WEBVTT - Will Donald Trump save TikTok from exiting the US?

0:00:03.130 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a CNA podcast.

0:00:11.659 --> 0:00:14.810
<v Speaker 1>You see how I do my makeup for work? Very demure,

0:00:15.090 --> 0:00:17.729
<v Speaker 1>very mindful. I don't come to work with a green

0:00:17.729 --> 0:00:18.559
<v Speaker 1>cut crease.

0:00:18.729 --> 0:00:21.530
<v Speaker 2>It's just this massive lion, and to have him charge

0:00:21.530 --> 0:00:23.020
<v Speaker 2>me on foot, it was.

0:00:23.500 --> 0:00:27.940
<v Speaker 2>Pretty terrifying. I'm opening it now. I can't look. Please

0:00:27.940 --> 0:00:31.899
<v Speaker 2>be the green one. Please be the green one. That's

0:00:31.899 --> 0:00:37.500
<v Speaker 2>just a taste of TikTok, viral trends, dramatic personal stories, unboxings.

0:00:37.580 --> 0:00:42.209
<v Speaker 2>It's entertaining and addictive. Some call it a vibrant online forum,

0:00:42.459 --> 0:00:46.138
<v Speaker 2>others call it a digital drug. Whatever the case, TikTok's

0:00:46.139 --> 0:00:48.380
<v Speaker 2>time in America may be running out.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:49.659
<v Speaker 1>This is why

0:00:49.659 --> 0:00:52.310
<v Speaker 1>the government is arguing that the protecting Americans from Foreign

0:00:52.310 --> 0:00:57.540
<v Speaker 1>adversary Controlled Applications Act is entirely consistent with the First Amendment,

0:00:57.709 --> 0:01:00.549
<v Speaker 1>and Congress has every right to pass a law forcing

0:01:00.549 --> 0:01:03.709
<v Speaker 1>a sale or ban of T TickTok because the government

0:01:03.709 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>says the platform is a puppet of China.

0:01:06.750 --> 0:01:08.339
<v Speaker 2>Is the Chinese government really?

0:01:08.595 --> 0:01:12.044
<v Speaker 2>Controlling the platform and harvesting the data the app collects.

0:01:12.205 --> 0:01:17.044
<v Speaker 2>Parent company ByteDance denies that. Meantime, incoming US President Donald

0:01:17.044 --> 0:01:21.235
<v Speaker 2>Trump has gone from backing a TikTok ban to backing off,

0:01:21.404 --> 0:01:25.164
<v Speaker 2>asking the Supreme Court to press pause on restrictions so

0:01:25.165 --> 0:01:28.245
<v Speaker 2>his new administration can pursue a political resolution.

0:01:28.660 --> 0:01:31.289
<v Speaker 2>So lots of ground to cover. Let's bring in Washington

0:01:31.290 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 2>correspondent Benji Hier and Beijing correspondent Olivia Xiong. Happy New Year, guys.

0:01:36.769 --> 0:01:40.529
<v Speaker 2>Happy New Year. Theresa. You know, I remember when TikTok

0:01:40.529 --> 0:01:42.970
<v Speaker 2>was just emerging and people were trying it out for

0:01:42.970 --> 0:01:46.529
<v Speaker 2>the first time and I had friends tell me this algorithm,

0:01:46.569 --> 0:01:48.970
<v Speaker 2>it hits different, you know, this platform, it knows what

0:01:48.970 --> 0:01:51.650
<v Speaker 2>I want to watch before I even know I want

0:01:51.650 --> 0:01:52.250
<v Speaker 2>to watch it.

0:01:52.849 --> 0:01:58.089
<v Speaker 2>Benji, TikTok has 1 billion active monthly users, but 170

0:01:58.089 --> 0:02:01.569
<v Speaker 2>million of them are in America. Just how big is

0:02:01.569 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the app in the US?

0:02:03.330 --> 0:02:05.790
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm one of those users and like you, I feel,

0:02:05.889 --> 0:02:08.009
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the algorithm knows me better than I

0:02:08.008 --> 0:02:10.448
<v Speaker 2>know myself. And and the reason, I guess like any

0:02:10.449 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 2>social media application is that the more that we use it,

0:02:13.169 --> 0:02:16.250
<v Speaker 2>the more we scroll and scroll, the more the algorithm

0:02:16.250 --> 0:02:18.770
<v Speaker 2>learns about us, can, can give us content that we

0:02:18.770 --> 0:02:21.490
<v Speaker 2>think we're after. And that's an experience not only that

0:02:21.490 --> 0:02:24.330
<v Speaker 2>I have, but as you say, millions across the United States.

0:02:24.410 --> 0:02:27.369
<v Speaker 2>Just some stats on that. American adults spend an average

0:02:27.369 --> 0:02:29.130
<v Speaker 2>of almost 1 hour per day.

0:02:29.225 --> 0:02:32.175
<v Speaker 2>On TikTok, and that of course means that TikTok is

0:02:32.175 --> 0:02:35.654
<v Speaker 2>able to reach revenue in the many, many billions in

0:02:35.654 --> 0:02:38.895
<v Speaker 2>the US, 16 billion in 2023. Obviously we have to

0:02:38.895 --> 0:02:43.255
<v Speaker 2>wait for 2024 figures. And the thing about TikTok that

0:02:43.255 --> 0:02:47.323
<v Speaker 2>makes it so interesting for not just users but also

0:02:47.324 --> 0:02:49.413
<v Speaker 2>creators on it is that there is an opportunity for

0:02:49.413 --> 0:02:52.085
<v Speaker 2>them to make money too, right? So if you are

0:02:52.335 --> 0:02:55.184
<v Speaker 2>creating output as an influencer, you can earn.

0:02:55.699 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Tiny amounts per 1000 views, but if you're getting millions

0:02:59.679 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 2>of views, that adds up. The last thing I'd just

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.149
<v Speaker 2>say in terms of TikTok's influence, obviously there's the money,

0:03:05.258 --> 0:03:08.770
<v Speaker 2>obviously there's the influences. There is the political element as well,

0:03:08.839 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and we are gonna talk about Donald Trump, but you know,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 2>his presence on TikTok, both directly and indirectly, him posting

0:03:15.839 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 2>from his account or right wing influences putting up the

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.869
<v Speaker 2>sort of content that that can draw in a key audience.

0:03:22.449 --> 0:03:25.449
<v Speaker 2>That obviously was huge during the US election campaign here.

0:03:25.529 --> 0:03:27.770
<v Speaker 2>So the app is big on a number of fronts.

0:03:27.929 --> 0:03:31.210
<v Speaker 2>It would be really big, therefore, if it's banned. But hey,

0:03:31.250 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>it's happened before. It's happened in other places like India,

0:03:33.929 --> 0:03:36.610
<v Speaker 2>and it could, it could well happen in the US

0:03:36.610 --> 0:03:38.509
<v Speaker 2>as well. Yeah, we're going to dive deeper into that.

0:03:38.570 --> 0:03:42.479
<v Speaker 2>But first, Olivia, TikTok, not available in China, but there

0:03:42.479 --> 0:03:45.789
<v Speaker 2>is an equivalent called Douyin. Did I pronounce that correctly?

0:03:47.210 --> 0:03:51.089
<v Speaker 2>Doing Doyin, OK. ByteDance owns both of these apps. How

0:03:51.089 --> 0:03:51.850
<v Speaker 2>similar are they?

0:03:52.419 --> 0:03:55.929
<v Speaker 2>Well, we, we sometimes hear people refer to TikTok as

0:03:55.929 --> 0:03:59.699
<v Speaker 2>the international version of Douyin, which actually translates to a

0:03:59.699 --> 0:04:04.020
<v Speaker 2>shaking sound or Douyin as the Chinese version of TikTok,

0:04:04.059 --> 0:04:07.300
<v Speaker 2>that's quite understandable. They are very similar, both, you know,

0:04:07.380 --> 0:04:12.809
<v Speaker 2>originated as short video sharing platforms, they have very similar interfaces,

0:04:13.100 --> 0:04:16.269
<v Speaker 2>but instead of being the same product, I would actually

0:04:16.269 --> 0:04:17.149
<v Speaker 2>say they are more like

0:04:17.209 --> 0:04:20.269
<v Speaker 2>siblings, you know, with the same parent company, but they

0:04:20.269 --> 0:04:24.849
<v Speaker 2>have their own very distinct personalities and beings for that matter,

0:04:25.029 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 2>and I must admit, in the name of very good

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>rigorous research, I have spent quite a bit of time

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.750
<v Speaker 2>on these two apps more than usual, but I've had

0:04:33.750 --> 0:04:36.428
<v Speaker 2>to use two different devices because one of the biggest

0:04:36.428 --> 0:04:40.790
<v Speaker 2>differences is its availability. So Douyin can only be downloaded

0:04:40.790 --> 0:04:42.070
<v Speaker 2>when you're on the.

0:04:42.238 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Chinese app store, so I have to use my China

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.609
<v Speaker 2>mobile phone for that. Uh, while TikTok is only available

0:04:47.609 --> 0:04:51.079
<v Speaker 2>in uh app stores outside of China, in fact, has

0:04:51.079 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 2>never been made available on uh Mainland China. Audience wise

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.579
<v Speaker 2>as well, TikTok has more than 1 billion monthly active

0:04:59.579 --> 0:05:04.950
<v Speaker 2>users in 150 countries apart from China. Douyin has less,

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.070
<v Speaker 2>over 700 million users.

0:05:07.220 --> 0:05:10.488
<v Speaker 2>But all in China and it's the 2nd most popular

0:05:10.488 --> 0:05:14.649
<v Speaker 2>social media platform in China after WeChat, but it is

0:05:14.649 --> 0:05:18.079
<v Speaker 2>the most popular out of the video streaming apps in China.

0:05:18.410 --> 0:05:22.970
<v Speaker 2>Arguably Douyin has seen greater success with e-commerce, bringing it

0:05:22.970 --> 0:05:26.369
<v Speaker 2>huge amounts of revenue. There's also this other fun, you know,

0:05:26.570 --> 0:05:30.769
<v Speaker 2>little difference between Douyin and TikTok. The filter, actually if

0:05:30.769 --> 0:05:32.130
<v Speaker 2>you try to take a selfie of yourself.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.179
<v Speaker 2>is different. You should give it a go and see

0:05:35.178 --> 0:05:38.579
<v Speaker 2>how you look. But content-wise, they are two separate apps.

0:05:38.779 --> 0:05:42.099
<v Speaker 2>What you upload on one platform can't be automatically found

0:05:42.100 --> 0:05:46.140
<v Speaker 2>on the other. So it's perhaps what's happening behind the

0:05:46.140 --> 0:05:49.230
<v Speaker 2>scenes that has caused a bit more skepticism even though

0:05:49.230 --> 0:05:53.130
<v Speaker 2>for users, these are two different apps. Let's get into

0:05:53.130 --> 0:05:57.190
<v Speaker 2>the politics now. Benji, the argument from the Biden administration.

0:05:57.380 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>is that the app poses a serious national security threat

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.729
<v Speaker 2>that China's Communist Party can use it for its political ends.

0:06:04.928 --> 0:06:08.368
<v Speaker 2>What exactly is Washington afraid of? It's actually a really

0:06:08.369 --> 0:06:10.809
<v Speaker 2>difficult question to answer and the reason it's difficult to

0:06:10.809 --> 0:06:14.010
<v Speaker 2>answer is because from the US government's perspective, their argument,

0:06:14.089 --> 0:06:16.769
<v Speaker 2>as you say, is about data and national security and

0:06:16.769 --> 0:06:19.529
<v Speaker 2>therefore it's kind of tough to get down to the

0:06:19.529 --> 0:06:21.969
<v Speaker 2>details of what they're worried about because so much of

0:06:21.970 --> 0:06:23.250
<v Speaker 2>it is is redacted.

0:06:23.709 --> 0:06:25.349
<v Speaker 2>When they try and put their case forward and when

0:06:25.350 --> 0:06:27.589
<v Speaker 2>the White House presented their case and that case was

0:06:27.589 --> 0:06:30.670
<v Speaker 2>upheld by a court here in the US, it was

0:06:30.670 --> 0:06:33.750
<v Speaker 2>really thin on the ground on those specifics because, well,

0:06:33.829 --> 0:06:37.950
<v Speaker 2>naturally the government is wary about publicizing sensitive information, but

0:06:37.950 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 2>of course, how do you prove your case without actually

0:06:41.109 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 2>showing something. But here's kind of the overall idea that

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.589
<v Speaker 2>the Biden administration is putting forward, which is that TikTok collects.

0:06:48.187 --> 0:06:51.546
<v Speaker 2>data on Americans, which, OK, it happens with other social

0:06:51.546 --> 0:06:55.416
<v Speaker 2>media websites, Facebook or Instagram for example. But what's different

0:06:55.416 --> 0:06:59.786
<v Speaker 2>with TikTok is that the US government alleges that uh

0:06:59.786 --> 0:07:04.536
<v Speaker 2>that information can be used by China to influence politics

0:07:04.536 --> 0:07:07.346
<v Speaker 2>here in America, even to spy on people or inject

0:07:07.346 --> 0:07:11.707
<v Speaker 2>malicious software into people's devices or phones. Back in 20.

0:07:11.843 --> 0:07:15.493
<v Speaker 2>22, Christopher Wray, he's the outgoing director of the FBI.

0:07:15.783 --> 0:07:19.023
<v Speaker 2>He told Congress that, and I'm quoting here, the Chinese

0:07:19.023 --> 0:07:22.864
<v Speaker 2>government could control the algorithm, he says, which could use

0:07:22.864 --> 0:07:27.384
<v Speaker 2>to be influencing operations and that China angle, of course,

0:07:27.503 --> 0:07:30.824
<v Speaker 2>coming from the fact that TikTok's owner, Byte Dan is

0:07:30.824 --> 0:07:33.864
<v Speaker 2>based in Beijing. Now, look, it's important to stress that

0:07:33.864 --> 0:07:35.824
<v Speaker 2>China denies these sorts of theories.

0:07:36.460 --> 0:07:39.501
<v Speaker 2>And much of the risk is is theoretical. But if

0:07:39.501 --> 0:07:41.901
<v Speaker 2>you look at the rhetoric that has come from many

0:07:41.901 --> 0:07:45.300
<v Speaker 2>lawmakers in the US, they point to specific examples, one

0:07:45.300 --> 0:07:49.460
<v Speaker 2>of which is an incident back in 2022, in which

0:07:49.460 --> 0:07:53.300
<v Speaker 2>ByteDance admitted that some of its employees did access the

0:07:53.300 --> 0:07:56.571
<v Speaker 2>data of journalists in the West to try to check

0:07:56.571 --> 0:08:00.780
<v Speaker 2>their locations, see if they were meeting TikTok employees suspected

0:08:00.781 --> 0:08:02.890
<v Speaker 2>of leaking information to the media.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.130
<v Speaker 2>And the last thing on this is that yes, this

0:08:06.130 --> 0:08:08.250
<v Speaker 2>app is hugely popular. We were just talking about how

0:08:08.250 --> 0:08:10.529
<v Speaker 2>many users they are, but there is a notion in

0:08:10.529 --> 0:08:14.570
<v Speaker 2>the political world here in Washington that TikTok is a danger.

0:08:14.730 --> 0:08:18.209
<v Speaker 2>That is the political consensus. It is already banned on

0:08:18.209 --> 0:08:20.500
<v Speaker 2>government devices and even Donald Trump.

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.959
<v Speaker 2>endorsed a national ban when he was first in the

0:08:23.959 --> 0:08:27.519
<v Speaker 2>White House. So certainly there is a concern amongst the

0:08:27.519 --> 0:08:31.239
<v Speaker 2>government and all areas of US government about TikTok and

0:08:31.239 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 2>the risks that they see given its association potentially to

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.239
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese state. Yeah, and Washington saying, you know what,

0:08:37.479 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 2>shed that Chinese ownership or get out, right? I want

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.109
<v Speaker 2>to pick up on the point of national security, Olivia.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>What has been China's response to Washington's allegations and just

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>how Chinese is TikTok?

0:08:49.989 --> 0:08:52.359
<v Speaker 2>That is the big question, but there's also like what

0:08:52.359 --> 0:08:55.950
<v Speaker 2>Benji mentioned, right? There is the argument and then there's

0:08:55.950 --> 0:08:59.189
<v Speaker 2>perception as well, and then what do the US lawmakers

0:08:59.190 --> 0:09:00.789
<v Speaker 2>or the Supreme Court buy?

0:09:01.140 --> 0:09:04.689
<v Speaker 2>If you look at TikTok Inc which offers the TikTok app,

0:09:04.859 --> 0:09:08.619
<v Speaker 2>it is incorporated in California and Delaware. It has its

0:09:08.619 --> 0:09:12.890
<v Speaker 2>headquarters in Singapore and Los Angeles, and that's the argument

0:09:12.890 --> 0:09:15.459
<v Speaker 2>that TikTok has tried to use to prove its independence

0:09:15.460 --> 0:09:17.819
<v Speaker 2>from the Chinese government. It says that it is subject

0:09:17.820 --> 0:09:21.179
<v Speaker 2>to American laws and not Chinese ones, but perhaps the

0:09:21.179 --> 0:09:25.579
<v Speaker 2>bigger question here is with TikTok's parent company ByteDance, is

0:09:25.580 --> 0:09:29.348
<v Speaker 2>it Chinese? To give you some background, ByteDance was founded.

0:09:29.408 --> 0:09:33.317
<v Speaker 2>By Chinese entrepreneurs Jiang Yiming and Liang Bo Bo, who

0:09:33.317 --> 0:09:38.838
<v Speaker 2>went to Nankai University in China's North Tianjin. 43-year-old Zhang Yimming,

0:09:38.877 --> 0:09:41.918
<v Speaker 2>who hails from Fujian province in the south, has also

0:09:41.918 --> 0:09:46.317
<v Speaker 2>been named China's richest person in 2024 with a net

0:09:46.317 --> 0:09:50.947
<v Speaker 2>worth estimated at $49.3 billion. Now he stepped down from

0:09:50.947 --> 0:09:54.697
<v Speaker 2>his role as ByteDance CEO in 2021 and under that lens,

0:09:54.718 --> 0:09:57.227
<v Speaker 2>it would seem ByteDance is a Chinese company.

0:09:57.785 --> 0:10:00.204
<v Speaker 2>So if you were to look at the TikTok website,

0:10:00.255 --> 0:10:03.135
<v Speaker 2>it has been trying to distance itself from this. In

0:10:03.135 --> 0:10:06.856
<v Speaker 2>a section it has where it tries to debunk what

0:10:06.856 --> 0:10:10.135
<v Speaker 2>it says are myths about TikTok. It says one of

0:10:10.135 --> 0:10:14.056
<v Speaker 2>these myths is that ByteDance is Chinese owned. It claims

0:10:14.056 --> 0:10:17.966
<v Speaker 2>that about 60% of the company is owned by global

0:10:17.966 --> 0:10:22.765
<v Speaker 2>institutional investors and that co-founder Zhang Yiming holds a 20%

0:10:22.765 --> 0:10:25.856
<v Speaker 2>stake in the company and they say he is a

0:10:25.856 --> 0:10:26.116
<v Speaker 2>private

0:10:26.463 --> 0:10:30.393
<v Speaker 2>individual and not part of any state or government entity.

0:10:30.513 --> 0:10:34.114
<v Speaker 2>ByteDance is based in Beijing, it is incorporated in the

0:10:34.114 --> 0:10:37.073
<v Speaker 2>Cayman Islands. It also claims it does not have a

0:10:37.073 --> 0:10:40.823
<v Speaker 2>single global headquarters and that's where it gets tricky, right?

0:10:41.033 --> 0:10:45.213
<v Speaker 2>The US authorities say Chinese companies are required to do

0:10:45.213 --> 0:10:49.174
<v Speaker 2>whatever the Chinese government wants in terms of sharing information,

0:10:49.473 --> 0:10:52.624
<v Speaker 2>US members of Congress complain about the Chinese government having

0:10:52.624 --> 0:10:54.434
<v Speaker 2>a golden share.

0:10:54.541 --> 0:10:59.452
<v Speaker 2>In ByteDance, but TikTok has refuted this. Under Chinese law,

0:10:59.552 --> 0:11:03.692
<v Speaker 2>it says that because of media licensing requirements and entity

0:11:03.692 --> 0:11:08.881
<v Speaker 2>affiliated with the Chinese government owns 1% of a ByteDance subsidiary,

0:11:09.211 --> 0:11:12.011
<v Speaker 2>but it says that this arrangement is only for specific

0:11:12.011 --> 0:11:16.252
<v Speaker 2>services in the Chinese market and it has no bearing

0:11:16.252 --> 0:11:20.071
<v Speaker 2>on its global operations outside of China, including for TikTok.

0:11:20.331 --> 0:11:22.881
<v Speaker 2>The question though is whether this argument

0:11:23.289 --> 0:11:25.489
<v Speaker 2>Will be something that the US buys into.

0:11:26.989 --> 0:11:31.339
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say TikTok. Do you recognize that voice? Yes,

0:11:31.460 --> 0:11:35.539
<v Speaker 2>that's US President-elect Donald Trump, saying back in June that

0:11:35.539 --> 0:11:38.390
<v Speaker 2>he would save TikTok. Just before the new year, Mr.

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.380
<v Speaker 2>Trump filed a request with the Supreme Court to delay

0:11:41.380 --> 0:11:44.409
<v Speaker 2>the ban. He says he needs some time to find

0:11:44.409 --> 0:11:49.030
<v Speaker 2>a negotiated resolution and keep in mind Benji, you mentioned this. Mr.

0:11:49.099 --> 0:11:51.390
<v Speaker 2>Trump was the leader who first put a ban on

0:11:51.390 --> 0:11:52.780
<v Speaker 2>the table back in 2020.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.189
<v Speaker 2>So my question to you is, why is he now

0:11:56.190 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 2>so keen to keep it around? Yeah, he's gone through

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 2>quite a transformation here, and I, I've just come back

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.039
<v Speaker 2>off the end of covering the 2024 presidential campaign, which

0:12:05.039 --> 0:12:07.190
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump won, of course, and I saw a lot

0:12:07.190 --> 0:12:09.330
<v Speaker 2>of him and what I've realized is he is, he's

0:12:09.330 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>an unpredictable man. It can be complicated to work out

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>where he sits on a certain issue. For me though,

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.210
<v Speaker 2>I think on TikTok it's, it's actually pretty clear cut.

0:12:17.750 --> 0:12:20.739
<v Speaker 2>Because the app served him really well during the election,

0:12:20.770 --> 0:12:23.468
<v Speaker 2>you know, getting the sort of bro vote as it's known,

0:12:23.650 --> 0:12:26.750
<v Speaker 2>young men especially to engage in his campaign. There's a

0:12:26.750 --> 0:12:30.390
<v Speaker 2>bit of overlap between the campaign and the tech world.

0:12:30.429 --> 0:12:34.069
<v Speaker 2>One of his billionaire mega donors, someone called Jeff Yass,

0:12:34.109 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 2>he has an investment firm which owns a chunk of

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.950
<v Speaker 2>TikTok's parent company. We also saw the president-elect recently meet.

0:12:42.054 --> 0:12:46.364
<v Speaker 2>The Singaporean CEO of TikTok, and Trump has since argued

0:12:46.364 --> 0:12:49.515
<v Speaker 2>that the, the timing of this law that we're exploring

0:12:49.515 --> 0:12:52.564
<v Speaker 2>where TikTok has to be sold, you know, by ByteDance

0:12:52.565 --> 0:12:56.125
<v Speaker 2>or face a ban, he says that that law interferes

0:12:56.125 --> 0:12:59.885
<v Speaker 2>with his own ability to manage the United States' foreign

0:12:59.885 --> 0:13:03.655
<v Speaker 2>policy and national security, not to mention First Amendment rights.

0:13:04.044 --> 0:13:06.465
<v Speaker 2>I think overall though, this is my theory, which is,

0:13:07.090 --> 0:13:11.250
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump just likes being popular, right? He, he boasts

0:13:11.250 --> 0:13:13.890
<v Speaker 2>all the time about his biggest crowds, his winning the

0:13:13.890 --> 0:13:17.609
<v Speaker 2>popular vote, best this, biggest that, being a star on

0:13:17.609 --> 0:13:20.049
<v Speaker 2>the app, he says that he has a warm spot

0:13:20.049 --> 0:13:22.770
<v Speaker 2>in his heart for TikTok, and I think that the

0:13:22.770 --> 0:13:25.849
<v Speaker 2>bottom line is just like he just enjoys the positive

0:13:25.849 --> 0:13:29.049
<v Speaker 2>attention that TikTok has granted him. He has the unfettered ability.

0:13:29.419 --> 0:13:33.900
<v Speaker 2>To spread his message to 1415 million followers. So from

0:13:33.900 --> 0:13:39.700
<v Speaker 2>Trump's perspective, you know, never mind those pesky national security concerns, which, yeah,

0:13:39.820 --> 0:13:42.169
<v Speaker 2>he raised in the past, but those don't matter now.

0:13:42.340 --> 0:13:46.109
<v Speaker 2>TikTok is good for me. I like TikTok, let's keep TikTok. And,

0:13:46.119 --> 0:13:48.858
<v Speaker 2>and now that he's president again or or soon to

0:13:48.859 --> 0:13:49.869
<v Speaker 2>be president again.

0:13:50.169 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>He could try and prevent that ban for that reason, right,

0:13:53.650 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>casting himself as the platform savior, and I think really

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.289
<v Speaker 2>that that that's it, that's the reality. Yeah, and influencers

0:13:59.289 --> 0:14:03.020
<v Speaker 2>would love him for that, right? OK, so Mr. Trump's appeal,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.929
<v Speaker 2>could it work, you know, how likely is the Supreme

0:14:05.929 --> 0:14:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Court to overturn or pause the ban?

0:14:08.830 --> 0:14:11.239
<v Speaker 2>That is the million dollar question, and we're gonna find

0:14:11.239 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 2>out quite soon because the Supreme Court is holding its

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>hearing on TikTok on January 10th, and if, if it

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>decides to take up the case, first of all, President

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Biden would have to issue an extension on that deadline

0:14:24.159 --> 0:14:28.039
<v Speaker 2>for ByteDance to sell TikTok. Otherwise that expires on the 19th.

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.039
<v Speaker 2>That's the day before Trump's inauguration.

0:14:30.479 --> 0:14:33.159
<v Speaker 2>If you're asking to sort of predict what the Supreme

0:14:33.159 --> 0:14:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Court is gonna do, I think that's less actually to

0:14:36.359 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 2>do with the cases in which you're stronger on either side.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.150
<v Speaker 2>It's more to do with where the justices lie politically

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:46.169
<v Speaker 2>and ideologically. This is a conservative leaning court.

0:14:46.385 --> 0:14:50.775
<v Speaker 2>Who might agree with TikTok's argument about the constitutional right

0:14:50.775 --> 0:14:53.575
<v Speaker 2>to free speech, the First Amendment. It is also though

0:14:53.575 --> 0:14:56.934
<v Speaker 2>a Trump leaning court. It has ruled in the president

0:14:56.934 --> 0:15:00.424
<v Speaker 2>elect's favor on a number of matters of late, for instance,

0:15:00.455 --> 0:15:02.294
<v Speaker 2>granting him presidential immunity.

0:15:02.770 --> 0:15:04.609
<v Speaker 2>TikTok could also go in front of the court, right,

0:15:04.659 --> 0:15:09.169
<v Speaker 2>and it could argue that it is practically impossible to

0:15:09.169 --> 0:15:11.450
<v Speaker 2>ban this app. You know, there was a bill that

0:15:11.450 --> 0:15:13.770
<v Speaker 2>went through Congress and it suggested that the way that

0:15:13.770 --> 0:15:16.489
<v Speaker 2>they would do this is they would penalize app stores

0:15:16.489 --> 0:15:20.849
<v Speaker 2>or internet providers for hosting versions of the app. I mean, yeah,

0:15:20.890 --> 0:15:23.419
<v Speaker 2>the US government is, you know, big and important, but

0:15:23.419 --> 0:15:25.969
<v Speaker 2>good luck imposing that sort of rule on on Apple

0:15:25.969 --> 0:15:28.849
<v Speaker 2>or or Google, and there'd be huge uproar amongst the

0:15:28.849 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 2>public as well, not that that stopped the Supreme Court, so.

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I actually don't know which way this

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:36.679
<v Speaker 2>is going to go. We don't even know if the

0:15:36.679 --> 0:15:38.630
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court are going to take it up or when

0:15:38.630 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>they'd have this decision. And then of course Trump's in

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.349
<v Speaker 2>the White House and he may decide to intervene as well.

0:15:44.799 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 2>So it's going to be a really interesting couple of

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.479
<v Speaker 2>weeks ahead, I think for TikTok. Definitely, yeah, I want

0:15:50.479 --> 0:15:52.479
<v Speaker 2>to pick up on that thought in a moment, but Olivia,

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.669
<v Speaker 2>you know, since the law was passed last year.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:16:00.140
<v Speaker 2>TikTok said the ban violates First Amendment protections. It's unconstitutional

0:16:00.390 --> 0:16:03.109
<v Speaker 2>and the Chinese government has called Washington to respect the

0:16:03.109 --> 0:16:07.710
<v Speaker 2>market economy, respect fair competition. How much more reactive could

0:16:07.710 --> 0:16:09.059
<v Speaker 2>Beijing get over this?

0:16:09.859 --> 0:16:12.940
<v Speaker 2>Oh, with the latest developments, we have seen Chinese media

0:16:12.940 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 2>like the China Daily say that the potential reprieve is

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.739
<v Speaker 2>a positive development, but other than that, the Chinese response

0:16:20.739 --> 0:16:24.260
<v Speaker 2>has been relatively measured or muted for that fact. If

0:16:24.260 --> 0:16:27.219
<v Speaker 2>you would just think back to March last year, in

0:16:27.219 --> 0:16:30.020
<v Speaker 2>the lead up to and just after the US House

0:16:30.020 --> 0:16:32.900
<v Speaker 2>of Representatives passed the sell or ban bill paving the

0:16:32.900 --> 0:16:33.539
<v Speaker 2>way for it to be.

0:16:33.645 --> 0:16:38.245
<v Speaker 2>Eventually signed into law. In April, China's Foreign Ministry famously

0:16:38.245 --> 0:16:42.916
<v Speaker 2>called it quote sheer robbers' logic in which it accused

0:16:42.916 --> 0:16:46.356
<v Speaker 2>the US of trying to snatch from others all the

0:16:46.356 --> 0:16:49.466
<v Speaker 2>good things that they have, calling it an abuse of

0:16:49.695 --> 0:16:53.986
<v Speaker 2>national security to bring down competitive companies of other countries,

0:16:54.116 --> 0:16:57.616
<v Speaker 2>saying that there is no fairness or justice. But since

0:16:57.771 --> 0:17:00.851
<v Speaker 2>Then there's been a shift in the Chinese government's intensity

0:17:00.851 --> 0:17:03.811
<v Speaker 2>of response and we've seen that as this ban of

0:17:03.812 --> 0:17:08.482
<v Speaker 2>TikTok has become more of a reality. Reports suggest that,

0:17:08.491 --> 0:17:11.732
<v Speaker 2>you know, after proceedings got going, TikTok chose to take

0:17:11.732 --> 0:17:14.251
<v Speaker 2>the case to the courts and to let its team

0:17:14.251 --> 0:17:18.651
<v Speaker 2>in the US, which famously is led by its Singaporean

0:17:18.651 --> 0:17:21.620
<v Speaker 2>CEO Sho Chuu, he had famously highlighted.

0:17:21.677 --> 0:17:26.307
<v Speaker 2>his nationality, TikTok choosing to let that team handle the

0:17:26.307 --> 0:17:30.988
<v Speaker 2>political lobbying and the legal battle. Questions about ongoing developments

0:17:30.988 --> 0:17:34.147
<v Speaker 2>relating to the ban in Beijing have been met with

0:17:34.147 --> 0:17:38.338
<v Speaker 2>answers from Chinese spokespersons just deferring back to their past statements.

0:17:38.667 --> 0:17:40.748
<v Speaker 2>And again, it would seem that the Chinese government is

0:17:40.748 --> 0:17:44.547
<v Speaker 2>trying to show relative restraint now, trying to distance itself

0:17:44.547 --> 0:17:45.647
<v Speaker 2>or perhaps keep its

0:17:46.354 --> 0:17:49.042
<v Speaker 2>He quite close to its chest, as Benji mentioned, there's

0:17:49.042 --> 0:17:51.994
<v Speaker 2>still a lot of uncertainty with what's going to happen,

0:17:52.083 --> 0:17:55.614
<v Speaker 2>but analysts have also said that, you know, this shouldn't

0:17:55.614 --> 0:17:58.654
<v Speaker 2>be taken as an indication that China is going to

0:17:58.654 --> 0:18:02.833
<v Speaker 2>back off or take this lying down. So my question is,

0:18:03.374 --> 0:18:06.234
<v Speaker 2>do you even think China would allow the sale of

0:18:06.234 --> 0:18:08.322
<v Speaker 2>TikTok if it meant staying in America? That seems like

0:18:08.323 --> 0:18:09.552
<v Speaker 2>a really big ask.

0:18:09.979 --> 0:18:12.810
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we haven't really heard directly, you know, from China

0:18:12.810 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 2>on what it would do, perhaps because of all these uncertainties,

0:18:16.489 --> 0:18:19.609
<v Speaker 2>but there have been statements to show that China is

0:18:19.609 --> 0:18:22.209
<v Speaker 2>not going to let up on this and it is

0:18:22.209 --> 0:18:26.369
<v Speaker 2>quite unlikely to let a sale go through. In March 2023,

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 2>China's Commerce Ministry then outrightly said that it is firmly

0:18:30.719 --> 0:18:34.149
<v Speaker 2>opposed to a forced sale of TikTok and the tricky

0:18:34.150 --> 0:18:36.609
<v Speaker 2>part here is with TikTok's algorithm, the ministry.

0:18:36.984 --> 0:18:40.836
<v Speaker 2>said that the sale or divestiture of TikTok is subject

0:18:40.836 --> 0:18:45.515
<v Speaker 2>to Chinese laws because it involves technology export and therefore,

0:18:45.645 --> 0:18:50.245
<v Speaker 2>it is subject to administrative licensing procedures. It also said

0:18:50.244 --> 0:18:52.965
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese government will make a decision in accordance with

0:18:52.965 --> 0:18:55.806
<v Speaker 2>the law. Don't forget that this has been like we've

0:18:55.806 --> 0:18:59.275
<v Speaker 2>been talking about a long standing issue dating back to Mr.

0:18:59.286 --> 0:19:01.845
<v Speaker 2>Trump's first term in office where he pushed for a

0:19:01.845 --> 0:19:03.436
<v Speaker 2>ban on the app in 2020.

0:19:04.281 --> 0:19:08.321
<v Speaker 2>amid an escalating China-US tech war, China actually moved to

0:19:08.321 --> 0:19:12.482
<v Speaker 2>revise its catalog of technologies that are subject to export

0:19:12.482 --> 0:19:17.802
<v Speaker 2>bans or restrictions, all pointing to targeting TikTok's price data

0:19:17.802 --> 0:19:22.001
<v Speaker 2>mining algorithm that pushes that content to people that has

0:19:22.001 --> 0:19:25.802
<v Speaker 2>made it so successful and what all this means is

0:19:25.802 --> 0:19:28.811
<v Speaker 2>ByteDance may not be able to make a decision of

0:19:28.811 --> 0:19:30.161
<v Speaker 2>a sale on its own.

0:19:30.420 --> 0:19:33.510
<v Speaker 2>And that may also be where the conundrum lies for TikTok,

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 2>even as it tries to make the argument in case

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.750
<v Speaker 2>that it does not have ties with the Chinese government.

0:19:39.839 --> 0:19:43.179
<v Speaker 2>There are few possible scenarios here, right? We talked about

0:19:43.180 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>letting the sale go through, which would be most unlikely

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to have.

0:19:47.165 --> 0:19:50.655
<v Speaker 2>as it would make China look weak, especially as it

0:19:50.655 --> 0:19:55.165
<v Speaker 2>has framed this as an abuse of national security concerns

0:19:55.165 --> 0:19:58.604
<v Speaker 2>by the US. Don't forget that observers are also pointing

0:19:58.604 --> 0:20:01.675
<v Speaker 2>out that China is very mindful of this domestic audience

0:20:01.675 --> 0:20:03.275
<v Speaker 2>and how it's perceived as well.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.489
<v Speaker 2>Another option some say is for ByteDance to sell its

0:20:07.489 --> 0:20:12.728
<v Speaker 2>US business without including the platform's algorithm, but the Chinese

0:20:12.729 --> 0:20:16.958
<v Speaker 2>Commerce Ministry did not respond directly to a question on whether,

0:20:17.170 --> 0:20:19.688
<v Speaker 2>you know, this could be a possibility, and this was

0:20:19.689 --> 0:20:23.659
<v Speaker 2>just last month. Observers including uh Carnegie China say.

0:20:23.723 --> 0:20:26.672
<v Speaker 2>What's most likely to happen then is that China could

0:20:26.672 --> 0:20:30.192
<v Speaker 2>block the sale and that would have greater repercussions for

0:20:30.192 --> 0:20:34.713
<v Speaker 2>China-US ties and could escalate tensions. This would be at

0:20:34.713 --> 0:20:39.512
<v Speaker 2>the expense of ByteDance's business if it's left unable to

0:20:39.512 --> 0:20:42.032
<v Speaker 2>operate in the US, which is a key market, and

0:20:42.032 --> 0:20:43.642
<v Speaker 2>it will be a huge loss for.

0:20:43.855 --> 0:20:47.456
<v Speaker 2>Talk in terms of revenue as well. But experts asking

0:20:47.455 --> 0:20:51.666
<v Speaker 2>that this could possibly let China gain political leverage amid

0:20:51.666 --> 0:20:57.176
<v Speaker 2>this China-US rivalry. OK, then before we go, Benji, let's

0:20:57.176 --> 0:20:59.696
<v Speaker 2>fast forward a few days, you know, so say the

0:20:59.696 --> 0:21:03.936
<v Speaker 2>law is upheld. January 19th comes around, TikTok is banned,

0:21:04.296 --> 0:21:07.296
<v Speaker 2>but then the day after on January 20th, Donald Trump

0:21:07.296 --> 0:21:10.875
<v Speaker 2>is inaugurated as president. Could he still intervene at that

0:21:10.875 --> 0:21:12.086
<v Speaker 2>point and maybe save it?

0:21:12.819 --> 0:21:15.380
<v Speaker 2>So actually, yes, he could try and there's a couple

0:21:15.380 --> 0:21:18.250
<v Speaker 2>of things he could do, but they all have problems. If,

0:21:18.260 --> 0:21:21.579
<v Speaker 2>if we go one by one, firstly, he could ask

0:21:21.579 --> 0:21:25.050
<v Speaker 2>Congress to repeal the legislation. So Congress is the, the

0:21:25.050 --> 0:21:27.380
<v Speaker 2>body that passed this bill. He could go back to

0:21:27.380 --> 0:21:30.180
<v Speaker 2>them and say, reverse it. It's possible. I mean, he

0:21:30.180 --> 0:21:33.109
<v Speaker 2>holds both chambers of Congress narrowly, but there would be

0:21:33.109 --> 0:21:36.060
<v Speaker 2>a big backlash, I think, amongst some of the Sino

0:21:36.060 --> 0:21:39.979
<v Speaker 2>skeptic representatives on Capitol Hill, as well as arguably some

0:21:39.979 --> 0:21:41.849
<v Speaker 2>American social media companies.

0:21:42.151 --> 0:21:45.232
<v Speaker 2>OK, so that's option one. Option two would be to

0:21:45.232 --> 0:21:48.911
<v Speaker 2>take executive action. So don't go back to Congress, just

0:21:48.911 --> 0:21:52.781
<v Speaker 2>go down and ask his Justice Department to effectively abstain

0:21:52.991 --> 0:21:56.232
<v Speaker 2>from enforcing the law. The issue with that is that

0:21:56.232 --> 0:21:59.671
<v Speaker 2>the law still remains in effect. And so if you're

0:21:59.671 --> 0:22:02.952
<v Speaker 2>a company like Apple, even if Donald Trump said don't

0:22:02.952 --> 0:22:05.671
<v Speaker 2>worry about it, you're still in violation of it. So

0:22:05.671 --> 0:22:08.271
<v Speaker 2>if you're, if you're the general counsel of Apple, are

0:22:08.271 --> 0:22:11.192
<v Speaker 2>you really going to just bank on Trump.

0:22:11.523 --> 0:22:14.244
<v Speaker 2>Truth social post that, yeah, I'm not going to enforce

0:22:14.244 --> 0:22:17.163
<v Speaker 2>the law anymore. You're probably not because of the fact

0:22:17.163 --> 0:22:19.883
<v Speaker 2>that Trump has form of changing his mind, especially on

0:22:19.884 --> 0:22:24.043
<v Speaker 2>this topic of TikTok. Alternatively, there is this option where

0:22:24.042 --> 0:22:27.042
<v Speaker 2>he could try to push through that sale from ByteDance,

0:22:27.083 --> 0:22:31.072
<v Speaker 2>and Donald Trump would love that. He brands himself as Mr.

0:22:31.083 --> 0:22:33.833
<v Speaker 2>Deal Breaker, Art of the deal. That is Donald Trump.

0:22:34.163 --> 0:22:38.163
<v Speaker 2>Even if there are potentially buyers in the US, China

0:22:38.163 --> 0:22:40.523
<v Speaker 2>really reluctant to comply on that front. So.

0:22:40.666 --> 0:22:43.744
<v Speaker 2>The options are there, but they have their challenges. And

0:22:43.744 --> 0:22:47.014
<v Speaker 2>I think that the, the worry, even though there are opportunities,

0:22:47.095 --> 0:22:50.095
<v Speaker 2>the worry for the Trump administration is that this is

0:22:50.095 --> 0:22:53.494
<v Speaker 2>more than just an app where people do funny dances, right?

0:22:53.536 --> 0:22:56.446
<v Speaker 2>The stakes are really high here because whichever way this goes,

0:22:56.494 --> 0:23:00.576
<v Speaker 2>and there are multiple outcomes and implications, this is clearly

0:23:00.576 --> 0:23:05.455
<v Speaker 2>going to have consequences for US-China ties. That bilateral relationship

0:23:05.455 --> 0:23:07.975
<v Speaker 2>between the global superpowers is going to be tested if

0:23:07.975 --> 0:23:09.956
<v Speaker 2>a ban is put in place. Beijing could

0:23:10.239 --> 0:23:12.750
<v Speaker 2>Ma, you know, choose to respond, then this could spill

0:23:12.750 --> 0:23:16.150
<v Speaker 2>over more widely as part of this tit for tat

0:23:16.150 --> 0:23:19.290
<v Speaker 2>trade war that is going on between China and the

0:23:19.290 --> 0:23:22.208
<v Speaker 2>United States. I wouldn't say anything is set in stone.

0:23:22.270 --> 0:23:26.030
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's massively moving in terms of the parts,

0:23:26.060 --> 0:23:28.390
<v Speaker 2>and we might not know until, you know.

0:23:28.535 --> 0:23:31.284
<v Speaker 2>Trump, frankly, has had his last say on this. Yeah,

0:23:31.405 --> 0:23:34.765
<v Speaker 2>and all the while, some 170 million users in America

0:23:34.765 --> 0:23:38.125
<v Speaker 2>counting down the days as they watch things unfold. Things

0:23:38.125 --> 0:23:40.395
<v Speaker 2>really unclear, but you guys, thank you so much for

0:23:40.395 --> 0:23:43.194
<v Speaker 2>shedding some light on what could happen in the days ahead.

0:23:43.285 --> 0:23:46.685
<v Speaker 2>Benji and Olivia really appreciate this. Thank you. Thanks.

0:23:47.410 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 2>You can find all the reports from our correspondents on

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.599
<v Speaker 2>YouTube and on CNA. Asia, and don't forget there are

0:23:53.599 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 2>TV episodes of CNA Correspondent every Wednesday at 9:30 p.m. Singapore,

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kong time. I'm Teresa Tang. The team behind this

0:24:00.839 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 2>week's episode is Sai Yain, Clara Ong, Christina Robert, and

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.550
<v Speaker 2>Craig Dale. Join us again for more next week. Take care.