WEBVTT - Where will your fish come from in a climate stressed world? | EP 8

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:02.340
<v Speaker 1>This is a C. N. A podcast.

0:00:05.410 --> 0:00:05.850
<v Speaker 1>All right,

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.550
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the climate conversations with me julie you

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.150
<v Speaker 1>of late, we're seeing the twin terrors of supply chain

0:00:18.150 --> 0:00:22.980
<v Speaker 1>disruptions and climate change, affecting something very important to human

0:00:22.980 --> 0:00:28.110
<v Speaker 1>survival food. In this episode. We want to talk about seafood,

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:33.260
<v Speaker 1>specifically fish. Where do our supplies of fish come from?

0:00:33.270 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Especially since fish prices have risen from our traditional sources

0:00:37.250 --> 0:00:39.229
<v Speaker 1>in Malaysia and Indonesia.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.890
<v Speaker 1>And as waters get warmer and the weather gets more unpredictable,

0:00:43.900 --> 0:00:48.030
<v Speaker 1>how can the world better protected seafood supplies? What does

0:00:48.030 --> 0:00:52.210
<v Speaker 1>it mean when businesses talk about sustainable seafood and what

0:00:52.210 --> 0:00:54.890
<v Speaker 1>are the biggest problems we face? And how do we

0:00:54.890 --> 0:00:55.780
<v Speaker 1>do better

0:00:56.430 --> 0:00:59.990
<v Speaker 1>with me to dive deeper into the issues as Chester Gun?

0:01:00.250 --> 0:01:05.830
<v Speaker 1>The responsible seafood Program officer at WWF Singapore. Hi Chester

0:01:05.830 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>welcome hi judy. Thanks for having me.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.220
<v Speaker 1>So, was there a particular moment that inspired you to

0:01:12.220 --> 0:01:16.210
<v Speaker 1>get involved in tackling the issue of sustainability and seafood? Yeah,

0:01:16.209 --> 0:01:18.149
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question actually. I've always been interested in

0:01:18.150 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 1>marine conservation has always been my main interest in terms

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:24.150
<v Speaker 1>of my educational background. My background as a marine scientist.

0:01:24.150 --> 0:01:26.630
<v Speaker 1>I was trained in environmental science, I have a Master's

0:01:26.630 --> 0:01:30.750
<v Speaker 1>in oceanography, but specifically on seafood, I was taking opportunities

0:01:30.750 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>as it came

0:01:31.810 --> 0:01:34.230
<v Speaker 1>before I joined up W. F. I was doing research

0:01:34.230 --> 0:01:37.250
<v Speaker 1>for Shark and Ray supply chain looking at Singapore, trying

0:01:37.250 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>to figure out where it's coming from. But with that

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>particular study on shark and ray, there's actually one image

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.190
<v Speaker 1>that kept sticking in mind. A huge part of that

0:01:45.190 --> 0:01:48.590
<v Speaker 1>was having interviews with your web market stall owners of

0:01:48.590 --> 0:01:51.550
<v Speaker 1>your fishery merchants and the first few times I went

0:01:51.550 --> 0:01:53.750
<v Speaker 1>down to the porch. I remember very clearly, still in

0:01:53.750 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>my head right now, having this conversation with an old

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.330
<v Speaker 1>uncle about his stock and right next to me was

0:01:59.330 --> 0:02:00.700
<v Speaker 1>a massive power of

0:02:00.710 --> 0:02:04.690
<v Speaker 1>stingray carcasses up to my mid tie, maybe 203 100 portions.

0:02:04.700 --> 0:02:07.420
<v Speaker 1>And only then it really struck me the enormity of

0:02:07.420 --> 0:02:10.190
<v Speaker 1>what I'm working with. This is a small country we have, right,

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.450
<v Speaker 1>Our consumption is about 22 kg of seafood per capita.

0:02:13.460 --> 0:02:16.550
<v Speaker 1>It's not even compared to Korea like 70 plus kg

0:02:16.550 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>per capita.

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.419
<v Speaker 1>And just like on a daily basis, this amount from

0:02:20.419 --> 0:02:23.650
<v Speaker 1>one store for domestic consumption. So if you just multiply,

0:02:23.650 --> 0:02:27.690
<v Speaker 1>that just feels like the oceans are definitely trouble at

0:02:27.690 --> 0:02:30.010
<v Speaker 1>some point here. Exactly like you said, you know that

0:02:30.010 --> 0:02:33.820
<v Speaker 1>Singapore is a seafood loving nation. Yet over 90% of

0:02:33.820 --> 0:02:36.130
<v Speaker 1>the seafood are actually imported from overseas.

0:02:36.139 --> 0:02:39.389
<v Speaker 1>Could you perhaps walk us through how fish or seafood

0:02:39.389 --> 0:02:41.660
<v Speaker 1>get on their plates? Is it a lot different from

0:02:41.660 --> 0:02:45.030
<v Speaker 1>other forms of food supplies, like meat or vegetable? Well,

0:02:45.030 --> 0:02:48.620
<v Speaker 1>we do go through the same agrifood cultural systems. We

0:02:48.620 --> 0:02:51.690
<v Speaker 1>largely import from the region. I think about good, 60%

0:02:51.690 --> 0:02:54.709
<v Speaker 1>are coming from Thailand Vietnam Malaysia Indonesia.

0:02:54.889 --> 0:02:57.220
<v Speaker 1>It could be either wild caught or farm Indonesia is

0:02:57.220 --> 0:03:00.109
<v Speaker 1>the second largest exporter of seafood in the world. Singapore

0:03:00.110 --> 0:03:02.780
<v Speaker 1>is just getting that from these areas and going through

0:03:02.780 --> 0:03:05.850
<v Speaker 1>the fishery ports, going to the web markets or directly

0:03:05.850 --> 0:03:08.100
<v Speaker 1>imported to your retailers and restaurants and that's how it

0:03:08.100 --> 0:03:11.210
<v Speaker 1>gets to your plate. We do have a domestic sector

0:03:11.210 --> 0:03:13.670
<v Speaker 1>for agriculture, we don't really have a significant one for

0:03:13.669 --> 0:03:14.650
<v Speaker 1>wild caught fisheries.

0:03:14.830 --> 0:03:17.900
<v Speaker 1>So most of our domestic production is from the agriculture side.

0:03:17.900 --> 0:03:20.870
<v Speaker 1>About 110 c based farms adding land based farms will

0:03:20.870 --> 0:03:23.590
<v Speaker 1>be 100 and 30 140. But like you said, the

0:03:23.590 --> 0:03:27.250
<v Speaker 1>production volumes at this point in time are still very small.

0:03:27.260 --> 0:03:30.540
<v Speaker 1>Although with the Singapore Food Agency, 30 by 30 go,

0:03:30.550 --> 0:03:33.790
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more push to expand that to three,

0:03:35.385 --> 0:03:38.955
<v Speaker 1>More than five years ago. I think it's 2016 to

0:03:38.955 --> 0:03:44.445
<v Speaker 1>be exact report by WWF revealed that 75% of the

0:03:44.445 --> 0:03:49.495
<v Speaker 1>seafood consumed in Singapore is unsustainable and they're irresponsibly fished

0:03:49.495 --> 0:03:51.825
<v Speaker 1>or farmed. Can you tell me a little bit about

0:03:51.825 --> 0:03:56.045
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a sustainable farm and one that's not

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.150
<v Speaker 1>okay when it comes to sustainability, there's a common misconception

0:04:00.150 --> 0:04:03.110
<v Speaker 1>that we just look at species, it helps to really

0:04:03.110 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>boil it down to species is easier as a piece

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge for consumers. But unfortunate fact is that when

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.410
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at city of seafood, it includes the production methods.

0:04:11.410 --> 0:04:13.369
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of wild caught fisheries is how it's

0:04:13.370 --> 0:04:17.109
<v Speaker 1>being caught, whether it's using devices that increases bycatch or

0:04:17.110 --> 0:04:21.500
<v Speaker 1>decreases bycatch, which is catching non targeted species, which is

0:04:21.510 --> 0:04:22.500
<v Speaker 1>obviously not some

0:04:22.510 --> 0:04:25.370
<v Speaker 1>something that we want. The production method is important. But

0:04:25.380 --> 0:04:28.380
<v Speaker 1>also the location itself because fish stocks of the same

0:04:28.380 --> 0:04:31.900
<v Speaker 1>species could differ widely in the health three different areas.

0:04:31.900 --> 0:04:34.410
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at systemic or seafood is a

0:04:34.410 --> 0:04:38.529
<v Speaker 1>combination of these factors, how it's produced in farms, Whether

0:04:38.529 --> 0:04:41.849
<v Speaker 1>you are taking into account whether you're mitigating environmental impacts,

0:04:41.850 --> 0:04:44.529
<v Speaker 1>whether in mitigating social impacts and that could differ on

0:04:44.529 --> 0:04:47.060
<v Speaker 1>farm to farm level. So looking at species specifically is

0:04:47.060 --> 0:04:48.370
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too general.

0:04:48.740 --> 0:04:50.930
<v Speaker 1>That's the lens we need to look at even as

0:04:50.930 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a consumer when I'm looking for stable products, I need

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.550
<v Speaker 1>to consider these other factors. Okay, so has the situation

0:04:56.550 --> 0:04:59.380
<v Speaker 1>improved since then? It's hard to tell. There's one huge

0:04:59.380 --> 0:05:02.549
<v Speaker 1>challenge that we face in Singapore. That's data. So data

0:05:02.550 --> 0:05:05.570
<v Speaker 1>transparency with one problem, we need to know this metrics,

0:05:05.570 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>but unfortunately it is not just a Singapore based issue regionally,

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.740
<v Speaker 1>there is this opacity in the data supply chain. That

0:05:11.740 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>awareness is also missing because that data is missing.

0:05:14.540 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Singaporeans are born and raised in Singapore at seafood my

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>whole life. Unfortunately I'm one of those who wouldn't be

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:23.750
<v Speaker 1>able to tell, especially if it's in a fill a

0:05:23.750 --> 0:05:26.740
<v Speaker 1>form and I didn't buy it myself what species it is.

0:05:26.750 --> 0:05:29.510
<v Speaker 1>So that's the same kind of problem that consumers face.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.910
<v Speaker 1>You don't know what you're eating half the time.

0:05:32.070 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>No, it's fish and then you're just eating it. Our

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.690
<v Speaker 1>national food to spell curry fish head sambal stingray woven

0:05:38.690 --> 0:05:42.380
<v Speaker 1>into our identity. But unfortunately on the consumers and because

0:05:42.380 --> 0:05:44.790
<v Speaker 1>of the lack of data that we have awareness is

0:05:44.790 --> 0:05:46.460
<v Speaker 1>just a big issue. So if I just want to

0:05:46.460 --> 0:05:48.140
<v Speaker 1>know where is it from, If you look at the label,

0:05:48.150 --> 0:05:49.589
<v Speaker 1>you could say product of Malaysia,

0:05:49.870 --> 0:05:52.330
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't tell you whether it's well caught or farmed.

0:05:52.339 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't tell you whether it's just imported from Malaysia,

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>but it could possibly be landed in Indonesia and then

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>send that. So you don't actually know the particular fish

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>stock it's from or the farm that it's coming from.

0:06:03.250 --> 0:06:06.790
<v Speaker 1>When I was talking to wet markets, store owners was

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.610
<v Speaker 1>asked them why they don't have this information, Why maybe

0:06:09.610 --> 0:06:13.350
<v Speaker 1>they know the country. But even then it's a 50% chance.

0:06:13.350 --> 0:06:15.820
<v Speaker 1>They say, oh, I don't know India Malaysia likely that's

0:06:15.820 --> 0:06:17.540
<v Speaker 1>coming from, but they are not certain about it. There's

0:06:17.540 --> 0:06:19.779
<v Speaker 1>no credentials, there is no proof behind that

0:06:19.980 --> 0:06:21.710
<v Speaker 1>and ask them. Do you not ask these questions? Is

0:06:21.710 --> 0:06:24.260
<v Speaker 1>this is not your concern? And for them, most common

0:06:24.260 --> 0:06:26.549
<v Speaker 1>response I get, which really drove it home is that

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.430
<v Speaker 1>the customers don't ask if the customers don't ask, why

0:06:30.430 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>would I want to possibly jeopardize this business relationship, it

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.770
<v Speaker 1>doesn't give me any profit margin, there's nothing gained on

0:06:35.770 --> 0:06:37.679
<v Speaker 1>my part is extra. But what we

0:06:37.695 --> 0:06:40.464
<v Speaker 1>see is some optimistic signs that there is a push

0:06:40.464 --> 0:06:43.414
<v Speaker 1>from the business side from the consumer side in having

0:06:43.415 --> 0:06:47.775
<v Speaker 1>more interest. So customers asking and collectively if we do

0:06:47.775 --> 0:06:50.025
<v Speaker 1>have a consumer base that's asking these questions then it

0:06:50.025 --> 0:06:52.445
<v Speaker 1>starts sending that signal up the chain so the situation

0:06:52.445 --> 0:06:55.395
<v Speaker 1>will improve, interesting given Singapore

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.020
<v Speaker 1>is highly dependent on imports for its food requirements, but

0:07:00.020 --> 0:07:03.180
<v Speaker 1>you certainly have very vulnerable to fluctuations and food supply

0:07:03.180 --> 0:07:07.580
<v Speaker 1>prices and food safety. Tell us about what W W. F. S. G.

0:07:07.580 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Is doing to ensure sustainable supply and market demand for

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>responsible seafood.

0:07:12.140 --> 0:07:14.350
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a great question. What we're trying to do

0:07:14.350 --> 0:07:17.180
<v Speaker 1>to forge a more responsible seafood future for Singapore, we'll

0:07:17.180 --> 0:07:20.180
<v Speaker 1>tackle in the supply side, Seafood work is complex. You

0:07:20.180 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>need to look at different details. There's so many species,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.660
<v Speaker 1>there's so many products processing involved. Supply chains are very

0:07:25.660 --> 0:07:28.910
<v Speaker 1>fragmented and very different. As I mentioned, these sf. A

0:07:28.910 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>30 by 30 goal includes a huge planned expansion of

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.020
<v Speaker 1>the local agriculture sector so that we can get a 30%

0:07:35.020 --> 0:07:38.050
<v Speaker 1>of Singapore's nutritional needs on that front. We try to

0:07:38.050 --> 0:07:38.270
<v Speaker 1>work

0:07:38.290 --> 0:07:41.510
<v Speaker 1>with the local farms in order to expand their capacity

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.890
<v Speaker 1>and ensure that while they're expanding this sector is done

0:07:43.890 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>with sustainability principles in mind. So this could be, for example,

0:07:47.330 --> 0:07:50.590
<v Speaker 1>we facilitate that move through what we call agricultural improvement

0:07:50.590 --> 0:07:53.820
<v Speaker 1>projects or A I. P. S. For short A. I. P. S.

0:07:53.830 --> 0:07:58.940
<v Speaker 1>Not a new initiative network. Marine conservation organizations across the

0:07:58.940 --> 0:08:01.170
<v Speaker 1>world are working on A. I. P. S. Because they're

0:08:01.170 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>very general catchall phrase that look at how to improve

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the farm

0:08:04.650 --> 0:08:07.690
<v Speaker 1>and for WWF we use this project to work closely

0:08:07.690 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>with them to look at various aspects like fish feed,

0:08:10.890 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>fish health, energy use on the farm, what the impact

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is on surrounding ecosystems and to help them become more

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.340
<v Speaker 1>environmentally and socially responsible. And with the benchmark it uses

0:08:20.340 --> 0:08:23.260
<v Speaker 1>the aquaculture stewardship council standard which is the S. C.

0:08:23.260 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Certification itself. So we try to prepare them because this

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.030
<v Speaker 1>is a rigorous, globally recognized standard. It has very strong

0:08:30.284 --> 0:08:33.504
<v Speaker 1>and very detailed metrics on how to move towards responsibility

0:08:33.504 --> 0:08:36.664
<v Speaker 1>really producing. So we use that certification as a benchmark.

0:08:36.674 --> 0:08:39.604
<v Speaker 1>We develop a gap on where their current practices are

0:08:39.604 --> 0:08:42.534
<v Speaker 1>to those standards. We help them develop an improvement plan

0:08:42.534 --> 0:08:45.124
<v Speaker 1>that is specific to the farm itself. To bridge that gap.

0:08:45.134 --> 0:08:47.713
<v Speaker 1>And throughout this whole process is very collaborative effort, A

0:08:47.714 --> 0:08:51.714
<v Speaker 1>very close partnership where we provide expertise, we provide assistance,

0:08:51.724 --> 0:08:53.934
<v Speaker 1>we do progress monitoring so that we are sure as

0:08:53.934 --> 0:08:55.434
<v Speaker 1>well because we are an NGO when we

0:08:55.458 --> 0:08:57.658
<v Speaker 1>looking at conservation we are sure that the farm is

0:08:57.658 --> 0:09:00.198
<v Speaker 1>moving to a sustainability for those of us who are

0:09:00.198 --> 0:09:04.588
<v Speaker 1>not so familiar with aqua farming in Singapore perhaps. Can

0:09:04.588 --> 0:09:06.928
<v Speaker 1>you tell us how many are out there what kinds

0:09:06.928 --> 0:09:11.688
<v Speaker 1>of species are grown domestically and blood volumes. Yes, we

0:09:11.688 --> 0:09:14.338
<v Speaker 1>actually just completed a study. I will need to look

0:09:14.338 --> 0:09:17.788
<v Speaker 1>at it again, fully familiarized myself with the actual volumes

0:09:17.798 --> 0:09:20.838
<v Speaker 1>but we have around 100 and 10 C based farms.

0:09:20.862 --> 0:09:23.952
<v Speaker 1>We have also up and coming farms on land. They're

0:09:23.952 --> 0:09:27.031
<v Speaker 1>using RS systems recently spoke to a farm that is

0:09:27.032 --> 0:09:29.722
<v Speaker 1>trying to farm salmon cohort of species in the tropical

0:09:29.722 --> 0:09:32.142
<v Speaker 1>climate like Singapore and that's possible because of these closed

0:09:32.142 --> 0:09:36.342
<v Speaker 1>containment systems, it's actively growing is a very fluctuating ecosystem. So,

0:09:36.342 --> 0:09:40.382
<v Speaker 1>but we have largely in Singapore produced barramundi so that

0:09:40.381 --> 0:09:43.732
<v Speaker 1>your agency best we produce coral trout. We have shrimp

0:09:43.732 --> 0:09:46.242
<v Speaker 1>farms in Singapore, there are quite a few different species,

0:09:46.266 --> 0:09:49.335
<v Speaker 1>But they're mostly locally consumed. So part of our study

0:09:49.336 --> 0:09:51.516
<v Speaker 1>that we did recently was to look at how they

0:09:51.516 --> 0:09:55.036
<v Speaker 1>were selling their products and which sectors about 3%. We're

0:09:55.035 --> 0:09:58.066
<v Speaker 1>going to exports and a lot we're going to your retailers,

0:09:58.066 --> 0:10:00.926
<v Speaker 1>your restaurants, so that's the current state of fun. But

0:10:00.926 --> 0:10:04.195
<v Speaker 1>it's going to change drastically in the next 10 years

0:10:04.196 --> 0:10:06.546
<v Speaker 1>with the plans that the Singapore government has in the

0:10:06.546 --> 0:10:09.636
<v Speaker 1>way it's being restructured agriculture sector. So what I'm saying

0:10:09.636 --> 0:10:11.670
<v Speaker 1>might be completely obsolete in a couple of years.

0:10:11.970 --> 0:10:15.819
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but if we look at right now, rising inflation

0:10:15.820 --> 0:10:19.860
<v Speaker 1>from feed to fuel, is that having any impact on

0:10:19.860 --> 0:10:23.540
<v Speaker 1>local fish farms? Yes, definitely. The fish farms need input, right?

0:10:23.540 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>They need farm, they need seed stock to grow out

0:10:26.250 --> 0:10:29.870
<v Speaker 1>and be able to sell it as well. So rising inflation,

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.819
<v Speaker 1>all cost considerations for them, which is why to help

0:10:33.820 --> 0:10:37.410
<v Speaker 1>them move to sustainability, especially for smaller farms, they need

0:10:37.410 --> 0:10:40.190
<v Speaker 1>that support either from industry or from government to try

0:10:40.190 --> 0:10:41.929
<v Speaker 1>and transition to practices

0:10:41.945 --> 0:10:45.005
<v Speaker 1>more sustainable, but for them causes a huge factor. They

0:10:45.005 --> 0:10:48.694
<v Speaker 1>are competing not just locally, highly competitive market, competing with

0:10:48.695 --> 0:10:53.005
<v Speaker 1>agriculture farms that are obviously with cheaper inputs from Malaysia

0:10:53.005 --> 0:10:56.885
<v Speaker 1>from Indonesia. So it's a highly competitive environment because they

0:10:56.895 --> 0:10:59.305
<v Speaker 1>recognize the need for it. And recently we had a

0:10:59.304 --> 0:11:02.845
<v Speaker 1>workshop with agriculture farmers in Singapore. They talk about water quality,

0:11:02.855 --> 0:11:05.985
<v Speaker 1>how it's affecting you. They know environmentally they need to

0:11:05.985 --> 0:11:09.075
<v Speaker 1>consider these things. It's just that cost considerations is still

0:11:09.075 --> 0:11:11.015
<v Speaker 1>a key factor for them. Survival is still a key

0:11:11.015 --> 0:11:11.915
<v Speaker 1>factor for them.

0:11:19.220 --> 0:11:21.610
<v Speaker 2>Hi, my name is Sarah Khaldi and I'm the host

0:11:21.610 --> 0:11:24.709
<v Speaker 2>of a new podcast called Money talks. Yes, we will

0:11:24.710 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>be talking about money, but more than that, we'll also

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 2>be talking about life, personal choices, lucky breaks, and how

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.650
<v Speaker 2>money is the thread running through it all. So look

0:11:34.650 --> 0:11:37.370
<v Speaker 2>out for our episodes wherever you get your podcasts.

0:11:45.950 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember there was a controversial netflix documentary. See Spirit

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>C which had a single call to action for its viewers,

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.940
<v Speaker 1>which was stop eating fish. So where do you stand

0:11:55.940 --> 0:11:58.410
<v Speaker 1>on that for me? It's a personal opinion. I think

0:11:58.410 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that call for stop eating fish was a little misguided.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.949
<v Speaker 1>There are huge portions of the global population that depend

0:12:04.950 --> 0:12:08.450
<v Speaker 1>on fish as the active protein, that most essential protein

0:12:08.460 --> 0:12:11.530
<v Speaker 1>in Indonesia. It doesn't account for some underground realities and

0:12:11.530 --> 0:12:12.900
<v Speaker 1>we live in a region where a lot of those

0:12:12.900 --> 0:12:14.229
<v Speaker 1>communities are like that.

0:12:14.390 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So just saying stop eating fish and what's the alternative?

0:12:17.250 --> 0:12:20.780
<v Speaker 1>That's difficult to answer amongst most of the mainstream meat products,

0:12:20.780 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>fish in general, it is actually more resource efficient.

0:12:23.690 --> 0:12:26.250
<v Speaker 1>The feed conversion ratio and this term is used to

0:12:26.250 --> 0:12:28.290
<v Speaker 1>see like how much feed you have to put in

0:12:28.290 --> 0:12:31.140
<v Speaker 1>to gain like one kg of animal weight. Feed conversion

0:12:31.140 --> 0:12:34.930
<v Speaker 1>ratio is the lowest. So on some level actually, fish

0:12:34.929 --> 0:12:38.030
<v Speaker 1>is a better protein, but it needs to be consuming moderation.

0:12:38.030 --> 0:12:40.250
<v Speaker 1>It needs to have these considerations or whether it's impacting

0:12:40.250 --> 0:12:43.540
<v Speaker 1>the ocean health, whether it's impacting social communities need to

0:12:43.540 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>know the local context of where you are consuming

0:12:46.590 --> 0:12:48.699
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore. We do have a little bit more choice.

0:12:48.700 --> 0:12:51.340
<v Speaker 1>So we do look at moderation in diet, we also

0:12:51.340 --> 0:12:55.730
<v Speaker 1>look at plant based diets is something that pushes Yeah, moderation.

0:12:55.730 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That's hard to define. Right? Is there a limit to

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.700
<v Speaker 1>the amount of fish we should eat per week? Keep

0:13:00.700 --> 0:13:03.300
<v Speaker 1>the oceans replenished maybe once a week.

0:13:03.325 --> 0:13:05.045
<v Speaker 1>Does that sound about right? Yeah, It's hard to put

0:13:05.045 --> 0:13:06.855
<v Speaker 1>a number like you say, what I was looking at

0:13:06.855 --> 0:13:11.195
<v Speaker 1>is more less excessively eating, for example, your seafood buffets

0:13:11.205 --> 0:13:13.885
<v Speaker 1>or one of those where you're just basically getting more

0:13:13.885 --> 0:13:16.015
<v Speaker 1>and more lobster just for the sake of it and spending.

0:13:16.015 --> 0:13:17.645
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I was looking at. So not so

0:13:17.645 --> 0:13:20.059
<v Speaker 1>much quantity of how much you eat a week,

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.020
<v Speaker 1>but just knowing that are you consuming just for the

0:13:23.020 --> 0:13:24.939
<v Speaker 1>sake of consuming at some point. So that's what I

0:13:24.940 --> 0:13:29.689
<v Speaker 1>mean by moderation. Okay, so if we are to consume seafood,

0:13:29.700 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>are there some other species that are at risk of

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>becoming unsustainable? That we should think twice about before eating?

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.260
<v Speaker 1>What are the preferred sort of eating choice would you say?

0:13:39.510 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's why I said we focus on certified products

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.300
<v Speaker 1>because looking at species level is kind of problematic. I

0:13:45.300 --> 0:13:47.630
<v Speaker 1>could be telling you, yes, you can eat this particular muscle,

0:13:47.630 --> 0:13:50.740
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps if it's sourced from this different area, it

0:13:50.740 --> 0:13:53.500
<v Speaker 1>actually causes a lot more problems than some other areas.

0:13:53.500 --> 0:13:55.370
<v Speaker 1>So you need to know the other metrics before you

0:13:55.370 --> 0:13:58.420
<v Speaker 1>can make decisions based on what you can consume. But

0:13:58.420 --> 0:13:59.790
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple more broad

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.370
<v Speaker 1>based ones that are just threatened worldwide and obviously should

0:14:02.370 --> 0:14:05.970
<v Speaker 1>avoid one example being your shark and ray species. Ru

0:14:05.970 --> 0:14:09.260
<v Speaker 1>CN just last year released a huge reassessment of their

0:14:09.270 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>red list where they're looking at the assessment of the

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:14.929
<v Speaker 1>species at the global level how threatened it is basically.

0:14:14.929 --> 0:14:17.890
<v Speaker 1>So there are different categories to that being no concern

0:14:17.890 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to critically endangered or even extinct

0:14:20.090 --> 0:14:22.500
<v Speaker 1>and what they found was for sharks and rays, we

0:14:22.500 --> 0:14:25.010
<v Speaker 1>had roughly one third of the species of sharks and

0:14:25.010 --> 0:14:28.460
<v Speaker 1>rays currently in danger of extinction. And that's the second

0:14:28.460 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>highest animal group behind amphibians. And then the second thing

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is in the critically endangered portion. We had a tripling

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of the number of species and a lot of that

0:14:36.650 --> 0:14:40.370
<v Speaker 1>in race species. So shocked, scared a lot of attention generally.

0:14:40.790 --> 0:14:42.650
<v Speaker 1>And that's a good thing in some way, even though

0:14:42.650 --> 0:14:46.130
<v Speaker 1>we still see a decline but raised, especially in Singapore

0:14:46.130 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we do consume, but a bit of race, they get

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.830
<v Speaker 1>a lot less attention. They're not commonly consumed in other countries.

0:14:50.830 --> 0:14:53.930
<v Speaker 1>They also something that we don't know as much information about.

0:14:53.940 --> 0:14:56.590
<v Speaker 1>So these are species you should just avoid at all

0:14:56.590 --> 0:14:59.020
<v Speaker 1>costs at this point in time. So there are certain

0:14:59.020 --> 0:15:02.650
<v Speaker 1>things that you can avoid completely, but just looking at

0:15:02.650 --> 0:15:05.390
<v Speaker 1>species itself is not sufficient. You need to know how

0:15:05.390 --> 0:15:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it's called, how it's farmed. Okay Chester. So before I

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.250
<v Speaker 1>let you go, what do you think

0:15:10.390 --> 0:15:13.700
<v Speaker 1>the next 10 to 20 years of aquaculture production might

0:15:13.700 --> 0:15:17.260
<v Speaker 1>look like? Well the composition farmed species, do you think

0:15:17.260 --> 0:15:21.530
<v Speaker 1>it'll shift globally within the next two years it's going

0:15:21.530 --> 0:15:24.830
<v Speaker 1>to be aquaculture and the expansion because of fish stocks

0:15:24.830 --> 0:15:26.660
<v Speaker 1>that we have and how we're already almost at the

0:15:26.660 --> 0:15:29.250
<v Speaker 1>maximum limit of fishing that it's going to be aquaculture

0:15:29.250 --> 0:15:32.330
<v Speaker 1>producing at the global level in Singapore, it's still a

0:15:32.330 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit fluid. I can't really say for sure the

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>next 20 years it has a lot of focus on

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:37.660
<v Speaker 1>high tech farming

0:15:37.810 --> 0:15:42.180
<v Speaker 1>and also obviously on more profitable products for your luxury items.

0:15:42.190 --> 0:15:44.239
<v Speaker 1>But there are farms that I've spoken to. They want

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to cater to the local market as well. So your

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>wet markets, they want to funnel to the basic consumer

0:15:48.890 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>rather than your hotels and restaurants. Your bigger markets, it

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>could change quite a bit, there could be more fish

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that you see that you're buying for the wet markets

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.470
<v Speaker 1>for the farms in Singapore, but it really depends at

0:15:59.470 --> 0:16:00.570
<v Speaker 1>this point in time. I know the

0:16:00.583 --> 0:16:02.753
<v Speaker 1>the government also wants to push for domestic consumption, right?

0:16:02.753 --> 0:16:05.433
<v Speaker 1>So there is a factor that they also want more

0:16:05.433 --> 0:16:08.863
<v Speaker 1>species that are consumed locally right now that is the case,

0:16:08.863 --> 0:16:11.163
<v Speaker 1>but it's also more for the higher end markets. So

0:16:11.163 --> 0:16:13.783
<v Speaker 1>there could be a shift for consumers. One of the

0:16:13.783 --> 0:16:16.013
<v Speaker 1>key things we really can do is start to create

0:16:16.013 --> 0:16:19.443
<v Speaker 1>the bus collectively we have purchasing power, we vote with

0:16:19.443 --> 0:16:23.340
<v Speaker 1>our wallets, so not just supporting companies that are investing

0:16:23.356 --> 0:16:28.446
<v Speaker 1>sustainability, have robust activity policies, but also certified products, right?

0:16:28.446 --> 0:16:30.916
<v Speaker 1>Certified products, They have gone through the whole process, they

0:16:30.916 --> 0:16:33.896
<v Speaker 1>are being ordered that the certification scheme does everything for you.

0:16:33.896 --> 0:16:35.746
<v Speaker 1>It looks at the metrics, you don't even have to

0:16:35.746 --> 0:16:37.676
<v Speaker 1>bother about that if you need to know and they

0:16:37.686 --> 0:16:40.359
<v Speaker 1>ensure that the products with that label actually came from

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:45.370
<v Speaker 1>the fishery or the farm itself. So certified products. So M. S. C. S. C. Products,

0:16:45.370 --> 0:16:46.130
<v Speaker 1>you look at them

0:16:46.290 --> 0:16:48.710
<v Speaker 1>and you use that if you can afford it of

0:16:48.710 --> 0:16:51.980
<v Speaker 1>course support because there's sometimes there's a gap because the

0:16:51.980 --> 0:16:54.140
<v Speaker 1>lack of supply in the local sphere, so that's why

0:16:54.140 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>WWF wants to create more certified farms in our local

0:16:57.330 --> 0:16:59.850
<v Speaker 1>culture sector, because with the logistics change, it might also

0:16:59.850 --> 0:17:02.980
<v Speaker 1>be comparable in price and easier for them for consumers

0:17:02.980 --> 0:17:05.290
<v Speaker 1>to take it up by using our wallet to buy

0:17:05.290 --> 0:17:08.659
<v Speaker 1>like certified products in supporting that. But also asking questions,

0:17:08.670 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>sustain the information is key to us making smart purchasing

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.590
<v Speaker 1>decisions that we want to know that

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:15.470
<v Speaker 1>And why I say that as well as we did

0:17:15.470 --> 0:17:18.780
<v Speaker 1>a study in Singapore and essential last year, looking at

0:17:18.780 --> 0:17:22.820
<v Speaker 1>the consumer base in Singapore, looking at how they view sustainability.

0:17:22.830 --> 0:17:25.570
<v Speaker 1>It was not just on seafood is generally on sustainability

0:17:25.570 --> 0:17:28.310
<v Speaker 1>across a wide various sectors, but what we found was

0:17:28.310 --> 0:17:32.210
<v Speaker 1>that not only 41% of them identified themselves as devoted

0:17:32.210 --> 0:17:36.020
<v Speaker 1>to the environment and that's pretty strong term, but 75%

0:17:36.020 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>said

0:17:36.780 --> 0:17:39.510
<v Speaker 1>they want to behave more sustainably, they just like the

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.689
<v Speaker 1>avenues and options. So there is this gap between current

0:17:43.690 --> 0:17:47.490
<v Speaker 1>behavior and where they seem to the attitudes to sustainability

0:17:47.500 --> 0:17:50.250
<v Speaker 1>and so bridging that gap could really help to build

0:17:50.250 --> 0:17:54.330
<v Speaker 1>momentum to transforming the whole seafood industry. Alright Chester, thank

0:17:54.330 --> 0:17:56.410
<v Speaker 1>you very much for your time. It's been so insightful.

0:17:56.420 --> 0:17:58.510
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much julie as well. That's great chatting with

0:17:58.510 --> 0:17:59.060
<v Speaker 1>you

0:18:01.490 --> 0:18:03.949
<v Speaker 1>special. Thanks to my guest and thanks to all of

0:18:03.950 --> 0:18:07.460
<v Speaker 1>you for tuning in, we hope you enjoyed this episode.

0:18:07.470 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Do remember to subscribe and like this podcast so, you know,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.350
<v Speaker 1>when a new episode drops, you can find CNN's climate

0:18:14.350 --> 0:18:18.220
<v Speaker 1>and sustainability coverage online at CNN dot asia. The team

0:18:18.220 --> 0:18:22.830
<v Speaker 1>behind this podcast is Audrey one Jacqueline chan Danieli and

0:18:22.830 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Christina robert, and I'm julie you signing off.