WEBVTT - How do fluctuating interest rates affect our personal finances?

0:00:00.009 --> 0:00:02.288
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to AC N A podcast.

0:00:04.530 --> 0:00:08.488
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Money talks. We have a fresh slate

0:00:08.500 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of personal finance topics that will help you save and

0:00:12.609 --> 0:00:16.780
<v Speaker 1>invest your money properly. I'm your host Andrea Heng. And

0:00:16.790 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>before we introduce our guest, I want to talk about

0:00:19.690 --> 0:00:23.940
<v Speaker 1>some money related news that may affect you. So I

0:00:23.950 --> 0:00:27.250
<v Speaker 1>wrote in my editor Tiffany Ang to come chat with me.

0:00:27.260 --> 0:00:30.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a new segment. We call I on the money.

0:00:30.915 --> 0:00:35.604
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody. So let's get straight to the headlines are

0:00:35.615 --> 0:00:38.924
<v Speaker 1>obviously being the first week of January. Happy New Year.

0:00:38.935 --> 0:00:42.055
<v Speaker 1>Happy New Year. Happy New Year, everyone. Well, it's not

0:00:42.064 --> 0:00:45.025
<v Speaker 1>just a new year. Actually, we've got a new GST

0:00:45.034 --> 0:00:47.525
<v Speaker 1>we have. That's right. So in the New Year comes

0:00:47.534 --> 0:00:51.775
<v Speaker 1>a new year present. 9% GST. That's correct. So, 9%

0:00:51.784 --> 0:00:54.064
<v Speaker 1>GST if you don't already know that's our goods and

0:00:54.075 --> 0:00:57.455
<v Speaker 1>services tax, it increased from 8% to 9%.

0:00:57.970 --> 0:01:01.450
<v Speaker 1>It's been in every single conversation that I've had since

0:01:01.459 --> 0:01:04.550
<v Speaker 1>the start of this year and it's only been a week. Right. Yeah. Yeah. Actually,

0:01:04.559 --> 0:01:07.619
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious. Did you make any big purchases before the

0:01:07.629 --> 0:01:11.809
<v Speaker 1>clock struck? 12, you know, I actually did, I bought

0:01:11.819 --> 0:01:16.139
<v Speaker 1>a TV. Not bad. So we were like 1%. The

0:01:16.150 --> 0:01:19.410
<v Speaker 1>GST actually was the impetus for us to buy a TV.

0:01:19.419 --> 0:01:20.870
<v Speaker 1>So here's the story. We don't have,

0:01:20.955 --> 0:01:22.745
<v Speaker 1>we have a TV. We've lived in this house for

0:01:22.754 --> 0:01:25.134
<v Speaker 1>a year, not had a TV. So we decided, oh,

0:01:25.144 --> 0:01:26.785
<v Speaker 1>you know what if we want to buy a TV?

0:01:26.794 --> 0:01:29.014
<v Speaker 1>And we've been mulling it for some time, we better

0:01:29.025 --> 0:01:32.404
<v Speaker 1>do it before the extra 1%. GST kicks in. So

0:01:32.595 --> 0:01:34.785
<v Speaker 1>that's what I did. Did you buy anything big ticket

0:01:34.794 --> 0:01:37.304
<v Speaker 1>before the GST kicked in? No, I didn't actually because

0:01:37.315 --> 0:01:39.815
<v Speaker 1>I have everything that I need at the moment. So

0:01:39.824 --> 0:01:43.995
<v Speaker 1>that's GST big, big headline. We also got some

0:01:44.430 --> 0:01:49.059
<v Speaker 1>nicer news. It is to help cushion the increase in

0:01:49.069 --> 0:01:53.330
<v Speaker 1>GST and the rising cost of living everything is going up.

0:01:53.339 --> 0:01:56.790
<v Speaker 1>So did our CDC vouchers 500 up from 300. I

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:00.910
<v Speaker 1>think that's really generous and I can't wait to spend it.

0:02:00.919 --> 0:02:02.830
<v Speaker 1>But you know what? I had this conversation with my

0:02:02.839 --> 0:02:05.980
<v Speaker 1>co-host on the morning show at CN A 938, Joel Chua.

0:02:06.519 --> 0:02:08.570
<v Speaker 1>And you know what? We're going to donate ours. Oh,

0:02:08.580 --> 0:02:11.910
<v Speaker 1>that's nice. Yeah, because here's the thing. I forgot to

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:13.779
<v Speaker 1>spend the rest of mine. That's what I was gonna

0:02:13.788 --> 0:02:17.020
<v Speaker 1>ask you what happened, what happened to last year's Trench

0:02:17.029 --> 0:02:20.428
<v Speaker 1>for you. So I spent, strangely, people find it easier

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.820
<v Speaker 1>to spend the supermarket ones and the Hawker ones. And

0:02:23.830 --> 0:02:24.529
<v Speaker 1>that's what you did.

0:02:24.669 --> 0:02:26.948
<v Speaker 1>I, I like the supermarket ones. It was hard for

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.889
<v Speaker 1>me to finish spending the Hawker Center one. Right. So, strangely,

0:02:30.899 --> 0:02:33.929
<v Speaker 1>the opposite happened with me. I was, I was able

0:02:33.940 --> 0:02:37.199
<v Speaker 1>to finish the Hawker ones. First. I spent maybe about

0:02:37.210 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>half of the supermarket ones and then I left the

0:02:39.970 --> 0:02:42.570
<v Speaker 1>remaining 75 or whatever else that was left behind.

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.539
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't realize that I forgot, completely, forgot there

0:02:46.550 --> 0:02:50.229
<v Speaker 1>was an expiry date until I saw on Instagram three

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.148
<v Speaker 1>of my friends they said they spent New Year's Eve

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.559
<v Speaker 1>at the supermarket. Well, the good news this year is

0:02:55.570 --> 0:02:59.750
<v Speaker 1>that you can spend at more participating merchants. Yes, I

0:02:59.758 --> 0:03:03.279
<v Speaker 1>think the list is something like 23,000 merchants now. So

0:03:03.288 --> 0:03:06.500
<v Speaker 1>you can go to, you know, pretty much your Heartland shops,

0:03:06.508 --> 0:03:09.339
<v Speaker 1>have a check, see if they have that CDC voucher,

0:03:09.750 --> 0:03:12.209
<v Speaker 1>you know, poster, there was ac N A article that

0:03:12.220 --> 0:03:14.550
<v Speaker 1>said a lot of our uncles and aunties, they were,

0:03:14.740 --> 0:03:18.389
<v Speaker 1>you know, buying new phones, new phone cases just before

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>31st of December. Yeah. So I think a lot of

0:03:21.729 --> 0:03:23.788
<v Speaker 1>aunties will go get their perms, you know, their hair

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.250
<v Speaker 1>perms right before Chinese New Year. So, you know, you

0:03:26.258 --> 0:03:28.250
<v Speaker 1>don't actually only have to spend it on food. You

0:03:28.258 --> 0:03:30.850
<v Speaker 1>can support any of these Heartland shops, any of these

0:03:30.860 --> 0:03:34.008
<v Speaker 1>participating merchants. Well, it's not just about Singapore. We want

0:03:34.020 --> 0:03:38.020
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some international movements. That's right. So you know, ok,

0:03:38.126 --> 0:03:42.285
<v Speaker 1>which company beat Tesla as the top maker of electric vehicles.

0:03:42.296 --> 0:03:47.085
<v Speaker 1>It is Byd, the Chinese brand, I kind of saw

0:03:47.095 --> 0:03:50.955
<v Speaker 1>this coming because yeah, because Byd China has been really

0:03:50.966 --> 0:03:56.626
<v Speaker 1>ramping up their electric vehicle industry. A lot of national

0:03:56.636 --> 0:04:01.065
<v Speaker 1>efforts poured into this industry. At the same time, Tesla

0:04:01.076 --> 0:04:04.065
<v Speaker 1>has its own problems, just some stats, right? So Byd

0:04:04.076 --> 0:04:06.466
<v Speaker 1>took over the crown with almost 40,000

0:04:06.572 --> 0:04:10.261
<v Speaker 1>more cars in the fourth quarter of last year. In total,

0:04:10.272 --> 0:04:13.352
<v Speaker 1>it sold more than 3 million passenger vehicles last year.

0:04:13.501 --> 0:04:16.891
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is full and hybrid V combined. So

0:04:16.902 --> 0:04:20.261
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting whether it's time as an investor to take

0:04:20.272 --> 0:04:22.891
<v Speaker 1>a look at Byd in your stock portfolio. If you're

0:04:22.902 --> 0:04:27.291
<v Speaker 1>looking into the space to diversify your portfolio, there could

0:04:27.302 --> 0:04:30.291
<v Speaker 1>be potential for it, but of course, always do your homework.

0:04:30.302 --> 0:04:33.402
<v Speaker 1>You can always ask your financial advisor what he or

0:04:33.411 --> 0:04:34.872
<v Speaker 1>she thinks and off you go.

0:04:37.299 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Now before we get started, I want to check in

0:04:39.649 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on you. I want to know how has money talks

0:04:42.769 --> 0:04:46.380
<v Speaker 1>helped you in 2023? We would really love to know.

0:04:46.390 --> 0:04:48.529
<v Speaker 1>So drop us a note in the comments. I cannot

0:04:48.540 --> 0:04:52.269
<v Speaker 1>wait to see what you tell us. Well, personally, for me,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.959
<v Speaker 1>it's been a very educational year as host of money

0:04:56.049 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>talks. I've learned so much from our guests from spending

0:04:59.850 --> 0:05:04.230
<v Speaker 1>hacks on credit cards and groceries to investing in unusual

0:05:04.238 --> 0:05:08.309
<v Speaker 1>portfolios to learning tips from the pros on how to

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>optimize my CPF biggest lesson for me, how to get

0:05:12.049 --> 0:05:13.868
<v Speaker 1>out of an IP if I really wanted to get

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.238
<v Speaker 1>out of one, another, thing I learned was how to

0:05:17.250 --> 0:05:21.410
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of higher interest rates that we saw in 2023.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.349
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sure. It made things expensive. But I found out

0:05:25.359 --> 0:05:28.380
<v Speaker 1>that there were in fact ways that this could be

0:05:28.390 --> 0:05:31.738
<v Speaker 1>useful to me. But the verdict is out from the

0:05:31.750 --> 0:05:34.679
<v Speaker 1>US Federal Reserve, that's the American Central Bank in case

0:05:34.690 --> 0:05:38.709
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know they're very likely to stop hiking interest

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:43.390
<v Speaker 1>rates and 2024 is the year we will finally start

0:05:43.399 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing

0:05:43.845 --> 0:05:48.284
<v Speaker 1>rate cuts. Ok. So in the first place, what do

0:05:48.295 --> 0:05:51.424
<v Speaker 1>interest rates have to do with inflation? Does it mean

0:05:51.434 --> 0:05:54.994
<v Speaker 1>we'll see an easing of prices? Let's get some help

0:05:55.005 --> 0:05:57.695
<v Speaker 1>making sense of all of this. And that person is

0:05:57.704 --> 0:06:01.244
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Low chief investment officer at May Bank Singapore. He's

0:06:01.255 --> 0:06:04.885
<v Speaker 1>in the studio with me on the Money Talks podcast. Welcome, Eddie. Hi,

0:06:04.894 --> 0:06:05.105
<v Speaker 1>I'm

0:06:06.380 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so first of all give us a 101 on interest rates. Ok.

0:06:10.209 --> 0:06:13.529
<v Speaker 1>What happens when they move? Why are so many things

0:06:13.540 --> 0:06:15.459
<v Speaker 1>affected by them? I think

0:06:15.470 --> 0:06:18.950
<v Speaker 2>if you look at interest rates, it affects us at

0:06:18.959 --> 0:06:25.010
<v Speaker 2>different levels on the individual personal basis, right? Obviously, depositors

0:06:25.019 --> 0:06:28.238
<v Speaker 2>are happy when interest rates are higher because you get

0:06:28.250 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>actually more for your deposits, your time deposits, correct?

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:36.670
<v Speaker 2>Not so happy for those who are actually having mortgage loans, right?

0:06:36.678 --> 0:06:39.868
<v Speaker 2>Because you need to pay more interest. Then on the

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.899
<v Speaker 2>market side, obviously, it also has implications not necessarily that

0:06:44.910 --> 0:06:50.738
<v Speaker 2>good for bonds which tend to underperform in the era

0:06:50.750 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of rising interest rates, right? As for equities, it depends

0:06:54.359 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>really certain interest rate, sensitive sectors or markets will be

0:06:59.450 --> 0:07:00.209
<v Speaker 2>affected

0:07:00.630 --> 0:07:01.349
<v Speaker 2>others less

0:07:01.359 --> 0:07:04.380
<v Speaker 1>so, right. What are some examples of those sectors? I

0:07:04.390 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>think

0:07:04.609 --> 0:07:07.649
<v Speaker 2>in Singapore, what is very common is actually Singapore S yes,

0:07:07.670 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 2>we have actually seen how Singapore rates have actually been

0:07:10.929 --> 0:07:14.899
<v Speaker 2>negatively impacted when interest rates were rising

0:07:15.890 --> 0:07:19.070
<v Speaker 1>and which sectors benefited from the high interest rates.

0:07:19.519 --> 0:07:24.339
<v Speaker 2>I think in the normal economy where there's still growth, actually,

0:07:24.350 --> 0:07:28.220
<v Speaker 2>the banking sector tends to benefit from a rising interest

0:07:28.230 --> 0:07:32.119
<v Speaker 2>rate environment because you sort of like get the expansion

0:07:32.190 --> 0:07:35.649
<v Speaker 2>in interest margins while your loan growth, you know, is

0:07:35.660 --> 0:07:39.290
<v Speaker 2>still somewhat healthy because economy is still chugging along. Yeah.

0:07:39.529 --> 0:07:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's an interesting observation, right? The economy went on

0:07:42.529 --> 0:07:45.529
<v Speaker 1>even though things got more expensive. It was almost as

0:07:45.540 --> 0:07:47.179
<v Speaker 1>if the high interest rate

0:07:47.290 --> 0:07:48.549
<v Speaker 1>didn't scare.

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.670
<v Speaker 2>It depends on where you are looking at. Obviously what

0:07:51.679 --> 0:07:55.589
<v Speaker 2>really triggered this spike in interest rates over the 12

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.950
<v Speaker 2>to 18 months was really the very high inflation that

0:07:58.959 --> 0:08:01.970
<v Speaker 2>we have witnessed, not just in Singapore but in other

0:08:01.980 --> 0:08:05.609
<v Speaker 2>parts of the world US Europe, right? And the US

0:08:05.619 --> 0:08:10.589
<v Speaker 2>FED had to combat inflation by really hiking interest rates

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.980
<v Speaker 2>very rapidly and that actually negatively affected.

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Not so much on the economy, but actually the markets,

0:08:19.179 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>both equities and bonds because the pace of rate hikes

0:08:23.450 --> 0:08:24.100
<v Speaker 2>was very

0:08:24.109 --> 0:08:26.350
<v Speaker 1>fast. Yeah, it was quite aggressive, very, very

0:08:26.359 --> 0:08:29.230
<v Speaker 2>aggressive. And that is something that investors do not

0:08:29.239 --> 0:08:33.510
<v Speaker 1>like. Right. Ok. So high consumption, not necessarily a good

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:34.988
<v Speaker 1>thing for investors.

0:08:35.260 --> 0:08:38.419
<v Speaker 2>Well, it depends on what drove the inflation in the

0:08:38.429 --> 0:08:41.109
<v Speaker 2>first place. Right. Right. And I think we came out

0:08:41.119 --> 0:08:45.030
<v Speaker 2>from a very unprecedented time where we had COVID, right.

0:08:45.109 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So when the economy started to reopen, obviously there's this

0:08:49.650 --> 0:08:50.819
<v Speaker 2>pent up demand,

0:08:50.969 --> 0:08:53.109
<v Speaker 1>the revenge everything. Yes,

0:08:53.119 --> 0:08:56.030
<v Speaker 2>but at the same time, supply wasn't keeping up so

0:08:56.039 --> 0:08:58.299
<v Speaker 2>that it took time to come back online. Exactly. So

0:08:58.309 --> 0:09:02.799
<v Speaker 2>that actually drove higher inflation. But we did see inflation

0:09:02.809 --> 0:09:06.728
<v Speaker 2>coming down this year. Combination of high interest rates as

0:09:06.739 --> 0:09:09.228
<v Speaker 2>well as normalizing supply chain. How

0:09:09.239 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is it that interest rates have anything to do with inflation?

0:09:12.409 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>How is it that the US decided? Ok.

0:09:15.210 --> 0:09:19.130
<v Speaker 1>In order to curb inflation to dampen inflation, I'm gonna

0:09:19.140 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>aggressively hike interest rates. What's that link

0:09:21.849 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 2>there? Right. Right. So I think inflation can be supply

0:09:24.849 --> 0:09:25.390
<v Speaker 2>driven

0:09:25.940 --> 0:09:30.289
<v Speaker 2>all demand driven. So the inflation that witnessed over the past,

0:09:30.299 --> 0:09:32.690
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, 12 to 18 months is probably a combination,

0:09:32.700 --> 0:09:36.359
<v Speaker 2>a bit of both. So the interest rate part is

0:09:36.369 --> 0:09:39.900
<v Speaker 2>actually to tackle the demand. Right. So when you have

0:09:39.909 --> 0:09:44.309
<v Speaker 2>higher interest rates, cost of money becomes higher. Sure. So

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:49.380
<v Speaker 2>theoretically it's going to dampen demand, you know, where people

0:09:49.390 --> 0:09:52.349
<v Speaker 2>think twice about spending a little bit more.

0:09:52.570 --> 0:09:56.030
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes there's a lag effect. It is not like immediate,

0:09:56.039 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 2>the rate hikes do not have an immediate impact on

0:09:58.210 --> 0:10:01.830
<v Speaker 2>demand economy. That's why it took time actually for inflation

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:02.450
<v Speaker 2>to come

0:10:02.460 --> 0:10:07.479
<v Speaker 1>off. Right? Ok, I understand now. So let's fast forward

0:10:07.489 --> 0:10:10.580
<v Speaker 1>to what's happening now. The latest news is that the feds,

0:10:10.909 --> 0:10:15.468
<v Speaker 1>they signaled three cuts in 2024. So tell me this

0:10:15.479 --> 0:10:19.030
<v Speaker 1>is overall good news, right? What happens now?

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.330
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you look at the market reaction to the

0:10:22.340 --> 0:10:27.580
<v Speaker 2>very Dovish fed statements recently, definitely good news for investors. Yeah,

0:10:27.869 --> 0:10:32.130
<v Speaker 2>we are anticipating like the fed, there will be three

0:10:32.159 --> 0:10:35.409
<v Speaker 2>rate cuts starting sometime in second half. Ok?

0:10:35.770 --> 0:10:39.299
<v Speaker 2>But some of the market participants are even more aggressive

0:10:39.500 --> 0:10:42.530
<v Speaker 2>pricing in a rate cut in the first half and

0:10:42.539 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 2>maybe 100 basis points or even more. That means four

0:10:45.969 --> 0:10:49.130
<v Speaker 2>or five rate cuts. So in our view, that's maybe

0:10:49.140 --> 0:10:53.159
<v Speaker 2>a little bit too aggressive because, well, yes, indeed, we

0:10:53.169 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>saw inflation

0:10:55.299 --> 0:10:58.710
<v Speaker 2>moderating. It is still actually a bit higher. A tad

0:10:58.719 --> 0:10:59.250
<v Speaker 2>higher

0:10:59.260 --> 0:10:59.950
<v Speaker 1>things are still

0:10:59.960 --> 0:11:04.989
<v Speaker 2>expensive. Yeah. Yeah, and it's like 3% fat is targeting 2%.

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:09.479
<v Speaker 2>So is still not exactly back to normal yet. So

0:11:09.489 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 2>I think the timing of rate cuts is really uncertain

0:11:13.090 --> 0:11:17.020
<v Speaker 2>and the fed will really be very data dependent. So

0:11:17.030 --> 0:11:19.780
<v Speaker 2>it's a bit premature to say, ok, now I'm seeing

0:11:19.789 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 2>inflation moderating at 3.1% and therefore the,

0:11:23.283 --> 0:11:27.023
<v Speaker 2>that is going to cut rates in first quarter, too early.

0:11:27.033 --> 0:11:27.182
<v Speaker 2>It's

0:11:27.192 --> 0:11:29.322
<v Speaker 1>excitement. Right. I'm putting it down to just

0:11:29.333 --> 0:11:32.802
<v Speaker 2>markets can overreact to time. But I think I also

0:11:32.812 --> 0:11:37.171
<v Speaker 2>wanted to point out there are actually also factors to consider. Right.

0:11:37.182 --> 0:11:41.953
<v Speaker 2>That could keep inflation maybe a little bit higher for longer.

0:11:42.002 --> 0:11:44.252
<v Speaker 2>I think on a fundamental basis, if you look at

0:11:44.263 --> 0:11:47.102
<v Speaker 2>the US again because I think that's a key economy

0:11:47.112 --> 0:11:51.181
<v Speaker 2>that's driving global markets. US, unemployment is still very

0:11:51.265 --> 0:11:53.245
<v Speaker 2>low compared to historical levels

0:11:53.255 --> 0:11:55.314
<v Speaker 1>means more people have jobs, more

0:11:55.325 --> 0:11:58.145
<v Speaker 2>people have jobs and wages are still going higher, right?

0:11:58.155 --> 0:12:02.315
<v Speaker 2>So that's going to lend some upward pressure on inflation.

0:12:02.325 --> 0:12:04.786
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because when people have jobs, they have the means

0:12:04.796 --> 0:12:05.454
<v Speaker 1>to spend

0:12:05.466 --> 0:12:09.486
<v Speaker 2>exactly at the same time if you've noticed on the

0:12:09.495 --> 0:12:13.096
<v Speaker 2>geopolitical side, some of the trade, like for example, the

0:12:13.106 --> 0:12:16.515
<v Speaker 2>Red Sea, yes, some of the geopolitical tensions is causing

0:12:16.526 --> 0:12:19.145
<v Speaker 2>rerouting of trade routes that could actually lead

0:12:19.500 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 2>to higher shipping costs and therefore indirectly inflation, it's going

0:12:23.570 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 2>to lead to higher costs and then therefore higher inflation, right?

0:12:26.729 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's a more on the supply side. And therefore

0:12:29.289 --> 0:12:33.460
<v Speaker 2>these combination of factors could add to the uncertainty about

0:12:33.469 --> 0:12:34.780
<v Speaker 2>the inflation trajectory,

0:12:34.789 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>right? Why do the rate cuts need to be done

0:12:38.450 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in such a measured way? Because at the risk of

0:12:40.770 --> 0:12:44.989
<v Speaker 1>sounding naive, couldn't they just slash it one time and say, OK,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>one time go 25

0:12:46.309 --> 0:12:49.289
<v Speaker 1>basis points, 100 basis points and then bring it down

0:12:49.299 --> 0:12:51.799
<v Speaker 1>at least to a level that the feds think everyone

0:12:51.809 --> 0:12:52.809
<v Speaker 1>is agreeable to

0:12:53.190 --> 0:12:55.549
<v Speaker 2>good question. So I think to answer that question, I

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.359
<v Speaker 2>think two points here to make, I think one is

0:12:58.369 --> 0:13:02.809
<v Speaker 2>the fed has been accused of hiking rates too late.

0:13:03.130 --> 0:13:07.809
<v Speaker 2>So they do not want to be accused of repeating

0:13:07.820 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 2>the mistake again by cutting rates too early. Therefore, they

0:13:11.210 --> 0:13:12.848
<v Speaker 2>are very cautious

0:13:13.450 --> 0:13:16.729
<v Speaker 2>in making any rate cuts. And I think they will

0:13:16.739 --> 0:13:20.409
<v Speaker 2>maintain that very cautious stance. And also if you take

0:13:20.419 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>a step back for those who, who are a bit older,

0:13:24.599 --> 0:13:27.449
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the seventies, right? There was also

0:13:27.460 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a similar episode where inflation was very high and then

0:13:31.849 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 2>the FED had to hide interest rate to tame inflation.

0:13:36.119 --> 0:13:40.729
<v Speaker 2>But then they actually, once they saw inflation coming off,

0:13:40.739 --> 0:13:44.450
<v Speaker 2>they actually cut interest rates and that led to a

0:13:44.460 --> 0:13:46.450
<v Speaker 2>resurgence in inflation.

0:13:47.630 --> 0:13:50.349
<v Speaker 1>So it was a pendulum swing. Yes, exactly.

0:13:50.359 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>So, so I think the fed now if you look

0:13:52.090 --> 0:13:54.299
<v Speaker 2>at fair Chair Power, I don't think he was

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:55.469
<v Speaker 2>to go in.

0:13:55.609 --> 0:13:58.539
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned in an environment of higher interest rate

0:13:58.549 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>benefits one group and it doesn't benefit another group when

0:14:02.849 --> 0:14:06.330
<v Speaker 1>it comes to falling interest rates, which if all goes well.

0:14:06.340 --> 0:14:08.739
<v Speaker 1>And Jay Powell says, ok, we can start cutting rates

0:14:08.750 --> 0:14:11.718
<v Speaker 1>now and we do see those falling interest rates who

0:14:11.729 --> 0:14:12.729
<v Speaker 1>would it benefit?

0:14:13.710 --> 0:14:19.229
<v Speaker 2>Well, obviously those servicing their loans, their mortgage mortgages, I

0:14:19.239 --> 0:14:22.849
<v Speaker 2>think they will be happier because yeah, at least you

0:14:22.859 --> 0:14:25.890
<v Speaker 2>don't have to pay as much interest right from an

0:14:25.900 --> 0:14:30.330
<v Speaker 2>investor standpoint. I think it will benefit both equity and

0:14:30.340 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 2>bond investors because if you look at bonds, there is

0:14:33.409 --> 0:14:33.969
<v Speaker 2>this negative

0:14:34.065 --> 0:14:37.625
<v Speaker 2>correlation between bond prices and interest rates when interest rate

0:14:37.635 --> 0:14:42.044
<v Speaker 2>goes higher, bond prices go lower and vice versa. So

0:14:42.054 --> 0:14:44.465
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be a very conducive environment for

0:14:44.474 --> 0:14:47.804
<v Speaker 2>fixed income. Ok? But at the same time for equities,

0:14:47.815 --> 0:14:50.705
<v Speaker 2>as long as growth stays up, interest rate coming off

0:14:50.715 --> 0:14:54.455
<v Speaker 2>will also benefit equity investors. At the same time,

0:14:55.030 --> 0:14:58.630
<v Speaker 2>in particular, more interest rate sensitive sectors. For example, that

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.950
<v Speaker 2>Singapore reads that we mentioned earlier on some of the

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.489
<v Speaker 2>growth sectors which the valuation can also be sensitive to

0:15:05.500 --> 0:15:10.500
<v Speaker 2>interest rates, usually higher interest rates negatively impact the valuation

0:15:10.510 --> 0:15:12.369
<v Speaker 2>of these growth stocks. So if interest rate were to

0:15:12.380 --> 0:15:15.270
<v Speaker 2>come off, right, then it will be deemed as positive

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:15.619
<v Speaker 2>for these

0:15:15.630 --> 0:15:18.830
<v Speaker 1>growth stocks. Ok. That's excellent stuff. I'm glad you brought

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:20.479
<v Speaker 1>that up because this is the part of the

0:15:20.900 --> 0:15:25.429
<v Speaker 1>where I wanted to tackle how interest rate movements affect

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:30.599
<v Speaker 1>our portfolios. So what role did high interest rates play

0:15:30.609 --> 0:15:33.809
<v Speaker 1>for our investments? I remember investors were flocking to things

0:15:33.820 --> 0:15:38.340
<v Speaker 1>like your 10 year treasuries, your Singapore government bonds, high

0:15:38.349 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>yield instruments. Was this why everyone was flocking to these

0:15:43.450 --> 0:15:45.530
<v Speaker 1>high yield products? And then when the interest rates start

0:15:45.539 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to fall,

0:15:46.849 --> 0:15:51.570
<v Speaker 1>what do I do now? That I'm in these portfolio instruments, right?

0:15:51.580 --> 0:15:56.159
<v Speaker 2>I think definitely we saw very strong flow cash deposits,

0:15:56.169 --> 0:15:59.669
<v Speaker 2>fixed deposits because of the very high interest rate environment

0:16:00.409 --> 0:16:06.919
<v Speaker 2>and investors are flowing to these instruments because also partly

0:16:06.929 --> 0:16:10.710
<v Speaker 2>because of the macro uncertainty. So they are not so sure, right.

0:16:10.719 --> 0:16:12.869
<v Speaker 2>So the best way is to stay short term,

0:16:13.239 --> 0:16:16.039
<v Speaker 2>go to cash, go to deposits, go to money market

0:16:16.049 --> 0:16:21.340
<v Speaker 2>funds where the level of risk is low, right? But

0:16:21.469 --> 0:16:24.849
<v Speaker 2>if we get a falling interest rate, what happens is

0:16:24.859 --> 0:16:27.619
<v Speaker 2>these short term deposits when they mature,

0:16:28.309 --> 0:16:30.679
<v Speaker 2>you may not be able to get back into them

0:16:30.690 --> 0:16:32.590
<v Speaker 2>at the same level of rate. So that is actually

0:16:32.599 --> 0:16:36.909
<v Speaker 2>increasing a reinvestment risk, right? It's always good to have

0:16:36.919 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>some cash buffer, you know, downside protection for advice. But,

0:16:41.450 --> 0:16:43.900
<v Speaker 2>but I think given the fact that we, you know,

0:16:43.909 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 2>our base case is

0:16:44.844 --> 0:16:47.854
<v Speaker 2>really for a soft landing for inflation to moderate for

0:16:47.864 --> 0:16:51.385
<v Speaker 2>fed to start cutting rates. I think it's time to

0:16:51.395 --> 0:16:56.695
<v Speaker 2>really redeploy some of this cash into bonds and equities, right?

0:16:56.705 --> 0:16:59.784
<v Speaker 2>But obviously, I think on the bond side, we still

0:16:59.794 --> 0:17:01.304
<v Speaker 2>want to stay with quality,

0:17:01.659 --> 0:17:05.810
<v Speaker 2>right? So you want to have more exposure into investment

0:17:05.819 --> 0:17:09.939
<v Speaker 2>grade bonds where the default risk tends to be a

0:17:09.949 --> 0:17:13.050
<v Speaker 2>bit lower save versus high yield credit. So just don't

0:17:13.060 --> 0:17:14.790
<v Speaker 2>just go blindly chasing after

0:17:15.390 --> 0:17:16.750
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rate

0:17:17.189 --> 0:17:21.109
<v Speaker 2>or high high bonds because sometimes there's this risk with

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:22.329
<v Speaker 2>what trade off. And

0:17:22.339 --> 0:17:24.420
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that you brought that up. Also, it, it's

0:17:24.430 --> 0:17:29.250
<v Speaker 1>worth clarifying. So you're saying not necessarily stop looking at

0:17:29.260 --> 0:17:32.270
<v Speaker 1>your higher yield products, but it's time to start thinking

0:17:32.339 --> 0:17:36.729
<v Speaker 1>about moving into other refinancing, taking the extra cash and

0:17:36.819 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>pumping it into other safer bets like your bonds or

0:17:39.410 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>rather

0:17:39.890 --> 0:17:43.089
<v Speaker 2>actually not necessarily a safer bets because we are actually

0:17:43.099 --> 0:17:45.660
<v Speaker 2>advocating or suggesting clients to move out of the so

0:17:45.670 --> 0:17:49.579
<v Speaker 2>called very low risk cash deposits, which are high yielding

0:17:49.589 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 2>at this moment, but may not be as high yielding

0:17:51.770 --> 0:17:52.669
<v Speaker 2>12 months down the

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>road. That's the thing. So I'm glad you said that

0:17:55.050 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>my question was going to be, when do we start pivoting?

0:17:58.910 --> 0:18:01.089
<v Speaker 2>I think we could start actually looking at it right

0:18:01.099 --> 0:18:07.530
<v Speaker 2>now because investors will be looking ahead. So for while

0:18:07.540 --> 0:18:10.079
<v Speaker 2>you say you may decide to stay in cash for now,

0:18:10.239 --> 0:18:11.650
<v Speaker 2>12 months down the road,

0:18:11.969 --> 0:18:16.030
<v Speaker 2>the other investments like bonds and equities may become more expensive,

0:18:16.219 --> 0:18:18.030
<v Speaker 2>the prices may have actually.

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.599
<v Speaker 1>So buying in low when bonds are not looking great

0:18:21.609 --> 0:18:22.790
<v Speaker 1>now would be a good

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:26.020
<v Speaker 2>move, right? In the sense that bond prices, we think

0:18:26.030 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 2>that there are still pockets of value within the bonds

0:18:30.050 --> 0:18:31.349
<v Speaker 2>and as well as equity space.

0:18:31.444 --> 0:18:34.814
<v Speaker 2>Um So bonds, I mentioned investment grade bonds, I think

0:18:34.824 --> 0:18:38.104
<v Speaker 2>that is still the place to be in. And you know,

0:18:38.114 --> 0:18:41.324
<v Speaker 2>they are actually pretty defensive as well, especially if you

0:18:41.334 --> 0:18:45.114
<v Speaker 2>stick with the higher quality names, right where the default

0:18:45.125 --> 0:18:49.014
<v Speaker 2>risk is, you know, relatively low. Ok. Obviously not, not

0:18:49.025 --> 0:18:50.505
<v Speaker 2>as safe as cash,

0:18:52.170 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's worthwhile taking the additional bit of risk.

0:18:55.729 --> 0:18:55.939
<v Speaker 2>You

0:18:55.949 --> 0:18:58.849
<v Speaker 1>know how there's that adage right time in the market

0:18:58.859 --> 0:19:01.910
<v Speaker 1>and not timing the market. This sounds a little bit

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.780
<v Speaker 1>like the opposite, just a little bit. This is where

0:19:04.790 --> 0:19:06.540
<v Speaker 1>timing does matter

0:19:06.959 --> 0:19:09.260
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because if you stay too long with

0:19:09.270 --> 0:19:12.219
<v Speaker 1>your low risk products, you might actually lose out on

0:19:12.229 --> 0:19:14.619
<v Speaker 1>stuff that might be attractive later on or more expensive

0:19:14.630 --> 0:19:15.899
<v Speaker 1>later on down the road. Right.

0:19:15.910 --> 0:19:18.380
<v Speaker 2>Frankly, I would actually turn it around to say that timing,

0:19:18.390 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the market is always very difficult. Right. So, although we

0:19:22.050 --> 0:19:23.300
<v Speaker 2>try to be tactical

0:19:23.380 --> 0:19:26.390
<v Speaker 2>about things to move things, shift things around, but we, we,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.550
<v Speaker 2>we think that it's actually important to maintain a core portfolio,

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:34.270
<v Speaker 2>a mixture of cash bonds and equities because while we

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.569
<v Speaker 2>try our best, very best to predict where the economies

0:19:37.579 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 2>are going, where the markets are going. Nobody can really,

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.930
<v Speaker 1>nobody has, nobody has the real, not even Jay Powell,

0:19:45.660 --> 0:19:47.739
<v Speaker 2>but it just, just maybe a case in point, case

0:19:47.750 --> 0:19:49.919
<v Speaker 2>in point is if you look at the beginning of

0:19:49.930 --> 0:19:56.689
<v Speaker 2>2023 consensus are actually all predicting a US recession. Yeah. Right. Exactly.

0:19:56.739 --> 0:20:00.629
<v Speaker 2>A very bearish outlook and 12 months down the road,

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.369
<v Speaker 2>we did not get the US recession

0:20:03.250 --> 0:20:07.010
<v Speaker 2>and equity markets did very well for markets not too

0:20:07.020 --> 0:20:08.420
<v Speaker 2>badly as well.

0:20:08.579 --> 0:20:11.310
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they seem to have weathered, everything that was

0:20:11.319 --> 0:20:14.660
<v Speaker 1>thrown their way. I mean, I remember talking about the

0:20:14.670 --> 0:20:17.170
<v Speaker 1>big R word as if you know, oh, we need

0:20:17.180 --> 0:20:20.060
<v Speaker 1>to be scared of this. Now today you can mention

0:20:20.069 --> 0:20:22.188
<v Speaker 1>the R word and no one really bets an eyelid,

0:20:22.260 --> 0:20:23.180
<v Speaker 1>not so much,

0:20:23.189 --> 0:20:26.670
<v Speaker 2>which actually raises another concern as well because I think

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.349
<v Speaker 2>the economy is not exactly without this.

0:20:30.959 --> 0:20:33.649
<v Speaker 2>We still have to bear in mind that as we mentioned,

0:20:33.660 --> 0:20:37.430
<v Speaker 2>inflation may not come down one straight line. We are

0:20:37.439 --> 0:20:40.410
<v Speaker 2>actually anticipating global growth, including that of us

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.099
<v Speaker 2>to soften in 2024. And then coupled with the fact

0:20:44.109 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>that apart from geopolitics, we also have major elections coming

0:20:48.770 --> 0:20:49.349
<v Speaker 2>on in

0:20:49.670 --> 0:20:52.829
<v Speaker 1>changing of the Guard in so many places in

0:20:53.130 --> 0:20:59.030
<v Speaker 2>Asia, as well as in Indonesia, right. So you know,

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:03.859
<v Speaker 2>these political elections sometimes can create marker uncertainty. So we

0:21:03.869 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 2>need to be conscious of the fact that volatility could

0:21:07.050 --> 0:21:08.619
<v Speaker 2>still spike from time to time.

0:21:09.219 --> 0:21:12.369
<v Speaker 2>So the best approach again for us is really to

0:21:12.380 --> 0:21:17.869
<v Speaker 2>spread your bets, avoid over concentration in any pockets, then

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.329
<v Speaker 2>you probably will have a smoother ride as

0:21:21.339 --> 0:21:24.550
<v Speaker 1>smooth as can be as smooth as can be. Ok.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So the one part that I think really affects us

0:21:27.569 --> 0:21:32.099
<v Speaker 1>all one way or another in a very uncertain environment,

0:21:32.109 --> 0:21:35.290
<v Speaker 1>especially to do with the interest rates, we're not sure,

0:21:35.300 --> 0:21:36.819
<v Speaker 1>you know what kind of journey is going to be

0:21:36.829 --> 0:21:37.250
<v Speaker 1>like

0:21:38.079 --> 0:21:42.719
<v Speaker 1>our debts. So what would you advise in terms of

0:21:42.729 --> 0:21:47.209
<v Speaker 1>managing things like our mortgage loans, our car loans, all

0:21:47.219 --> 0:21:50.300
<v Speaker 1>our owings that are pegged to interest rates. Would you

0:21:50.310 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>advise refinancing? And there's also that question about whether to

0:21:54.650 --> 0:21:54.938
<v Speaker 1>go with

0:21:55.025 --> 0:21:56.935
<v Speaker 1>fixed or floating rates. Right. Well,

0:21:56.944 --> 0:22:00.744
<v Speaker 2>maybe before we go to whether to refinance, maybe I

0:22:00.755 --> 0:22:04.625
<v Speaker 2>could share some of our projections in terms of interest rates. Right.

0:22:04.635 --> 0:22:07.805
<v Speaker 2>We are expecting the US fed. Yeah, to cut rate

0:22:07.814 --> 0:22:11.925
<v Speaker 2>three times in 2024 starting some somewhere in the second half.

0:22:12.500 --> 0:22:16.170
<v Speaker 2>So Singapore benchmark rates, interest rates are likely to follow

0:22:16.180 --> 0:22:20.139
<v Speaker 2>in the same direction magnitude could differ slightly, right. So

0:22:20.150 --> 0:22:23.069
<v Speaker 2>for example, one of the key benchmark rates that we

0:22:23.079 --> 0:22:26.540
<v Speaker 2>track is the three months. So where I think a

0:22:26.550 --> 0:22:27.569
<v Speaker 2>lot of mortgage rates,

0:22:27.750 --> 0:22:30.689
<v Speaker 2>loans are packed to this new benchmark rate as well,

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.979
<v Speaker 2>we are actually projecting so a three months or to

0:22:33.989 --> 0:22:40.770
<v Speaker 2>decline from 3.8% to 3.25%. Ok. Right. So what this

0:22:40.780 --> 0:22:47.589
<v Speaker 2>means if you say refinance now and lock in for

0:22:47.599 --> 0:22:51.020
<v Speaker 2>say three year rate, depending on what the rate is,

0:22:51.030 --> 0:22:53.260
<v Speaker 2>you may potentially lose out

0:22:53.890 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 2>on the lower rates that's going to be coming in

0:22:55.890 --> 0:23:00.619
<v Speaker 2>in 12 months, right. So, so that's the trajectory. So theoretically,

0:23:01.010 --> 0:23:03.750
<v Speaker 2>I know friends around me that I talked to, they

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.770
<v Speaker 2>are also thinking about whether to refinance some of them

0:23:06.780 --> 0:23:08.939
<v Speaker 2>will refinance and keep it to a very shorter turn.

0:23:08.949 --> 0:23:12.699
<v Speaker 2>So they have the flexibility precisely to refinance at the

0:23:12.709 --> 0:23:15.650
<v Speaker 2>lower rate should you know this low interest rate thinking

0:23:15.660 --> 0:23:18.979
<v Speaker 2>expectation do materialize. Yeah. Correct. Right. So, so I think

0:23:18.989 --> 0:23:22.260
<v Speaker 2>that's one school of thought, right? But overall,

0:23:22.729 --> 0:23:25.500
<v Speaker 2>I would say that in terms of debt management is

0:23:25.510 --> 0:23:26.310
<v Speaker 2>still the same,

0:23:26.699 --> 0:23:30.010
<v Speaker 2>but the fundamental basis is also you need to apart

0:23:30.020 --> 0:23:32.540
<v Speaker 2>from just refinancing fixed rate and what not, but you

0:23:32.550 --> 0:23:35.688
<v Speaker 2>still need to watch your own debt levels, of course,

0:23:35.699 --> 0:23:39.229
<v Speaker 2>and manage it according to your income because what's comfortable

0:23:39.239 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 2>for you, what is comfortable for you? The last thing

0:23:40.930 --> 0:23:43.530
<v Speaker 2>you want is actually to have two high debt levels

0:23:43.540 --> 0:23:46.750
<v Speaker 2>that you will struggle to keep up with in terms

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:48.300
<v Speaker 2>of interest payments and loan

0:23:48.369 --> 0:23:52.650
<v Speaker 1>repayments. So that question then about fixed versus floating rates, right?

0:23:52.660 --> 0:23:53.410
<v Speaker 1>Moving forward.

0:23:53.500 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But what should we do? Especially when there's that uncertainty there,

0:23:57.010 --> 0:23:57.488
<v Speaker 1>if you

0:23:57.500 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 2>do have the expectation that rates are coming down, right?

0:24:01.930 --> 0:24:04.839
<v Speaker 2>I would say that you would probably want to stick

0:24:04.849 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>with shorter or floating interest rate. So you float down together,

0:24:08.780 --> 0:24:09.089
<v Speaker 2>so

0:24:09.599 --> 0:24:12.390
<v Speaker 1>yourself flexibility and the comfort to move around a

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.619
<v Speaker 2>little correct, the shorter tenure will give you the flexibility

0:24:14.630 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and then the floating will give you the benefit of

0:24:17.010 --> 0:24:20.089
<v Speaker 2>enjoying that lower rates. Should it materialize?

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.430
<v Speaker 1>Eddie? It's been a real pleasure to have you on

0:24:23.439 --> 0:24:25.939
<v Speaker 1>money talks, you've given us so much to think about.

0:24:25.949 --> 0:24:30.030
<v Speaker 1>And more importantly, you've clarified quite a number of snags

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.369
<v Speaker 1>for us when it comes to interest rates. So thank

0:24:32.380 --> 0:24:35.319
<v Speaker 1>you very much for clearing the fog around interest rates

0:24:35.329 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and giving us an idea of what to do this year.

0:24:37.650 --> 0:24:38.079
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.300
<v Speaker 1>and of course, a big thank you to you listener.

0:24:41.310 --> 0:24:43.770
<v Speaker 1>Do us a favor. Hey, after this, let us know

0:24:43.780 --> 0:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>what you think about this episode. You can find us

0:24:46.729 --> 0:24:50.050
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcast. We're also on Spotify and guess what?

0:24:50.060 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>We're also on youtube as well. The team behind Money

0:24:53.810 --> 0:24:58.430
<v Speaker 1>Talks is Joanne Chan Tiffany Ang Christina Robert Saint and

0:24:58.439 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Andrea Heng.