WEBVTT - Is There DOUBLE STANDARDS in Gender Equality?! 

0:00:06.809 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Men Explained where we really

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.728
<v Speaker 1>dig deep into the differences in the way that men

0:00:12.728 --> 0:00:13.609
<v Speaker 1>and women think.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:16.750
<v Speaker 2>Now today we've got a TikTok duo that is very

0:00:16.750 --> 0:00:20.879
<v Speaker 2>popular when they talk about things like gender, they talk

0:00:20.879 --> 0:00:24.950
<v Speaker 2>about opinions, preferences. Let's please welcome our guests today, Nick

0:00:24.950 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and Chow.

0:00:27.020 --> 0:00:29.420
<v Speaker 1>I think they were quite surprised when you said TikTok duo.

0:00:31.180 --> 0:00:32.819
<v Speaker 2>The reason why I say that is because people are

0:00:32.819 --> 0:00:35.580
<v Speaker 2>very much comfortable and they know you guys now as

0:00:35.580 --> 0:00:37.060
<v Speaker 2>the two of you guys who sit together and talk

0:00:37.060 --> 0:00:37.740
<v Speaker 2>about these kind of things,

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:40.659
<v Speaker 1>right? I suppose, yeah, but I don't know, I don't

0:00:40.659 --> 0:00:42.729
<v Speaker 1>attach myself so strongly to the platform that's just a

0:00:42.729 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>duo can be discussed on any platform. OK guys, we

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.778
<v Speaker 1>always see you, you know, online, but

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.330
<v Speaker 1>How did you guys even start doing this content together

0:00:55.590 --> 0:00:57.750
<v Speaker 1>and decide that this is what we're going to narrow

0:00:57.750 --> 0:00:59.869
<v Speaker 1>in on because we all know by now the type

0:00:59.869 --> 0:01:01.869
<v Speaker 1>of content that you guys do. So how did it

0:01:01.869 --> 0:01:03.009
<v Speaker 1>even start? We're

0:01:03.009 --> 0:01:03.189
<v Speaker 1>friends,

0:01:03.310 --> 0:01:05.500
<v Speaker 2>right? And then one day I was sending her home,

0:01:06.110 --> 0:01:08.830
<v Speaker 2>driving back, and then after that we were talking about

0:01:08.830 --> 0:01:10.419
<v Speaker 2>one of the topics that we were talking about.

0:01:10.830 --> 0:01:13.940
<v Speaker 1>So I like to say that the Genesis is really organic.

0:01:14.150 --> 0:01:16.830
<v Speaker 1>It came from a real conversation we were having. Do

0:01:16.830 --> 0:01:18.220
<v Speaker 1>you remember what this topic was.

0:01:19.589 --> 0:01:21.940
<v Speaker 1>So it was like, what does it mean if he

0:01:21.940 --> 0:01:27.139
<v Speaker 1>likes your IG stories? Can I, can I, what does

0:01:27.139 --> 0:01:29.289
<v Speaker 1>it mean if he likes IG stories? I think it's

0:01:29.290 --> 0:01:34.459
<v Speaker 1>a form of flirting. Yeah, I think it's a form of, like,

0:01:36.059 --> 0:01:38.769
<v Speaker 2>because I like people's stories, right, based on what they're doing.

0:01:38.940 --> 0:01:41.539
<v Speaker 2>I literally just like my friend's story because she was in.

0:01:41.875 --> 0:01:43.035
<v Speaker 2>and I liked it. I went, Oh my gosh, I

0:01:43.035 --> 0:01:44.044
<v Speaker 2>love Cebu. I see it.

0:01:45.514 --> 0:01:47.294
<v Speaker 1>You liked it for context and you messaged her,

0:01:48.264 --> 0:01:49.875
<v Speaker 2>so it's opener, yeah,

0:01:49.955 --> 0:01:50.635
<v Speaker 1>but, but it

0:01:50.635 --> 0:01:51.754
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean that I'm

0:01:51.754 --> 0:01:55.714
<v Speaker 1>interested. OK, for example, right, he's scared you a cute selfie, OK,

0:01:55.834 --> 0:01:59.245
<v Speaker 1>and someone likes it and like you guys just met

0:01:59.245 --> 0:02:00.764
<v Speaker 1>like he's kind of texting you a little bit, but

0:02:00.764 --> 0:02:03.785
<v Speaker 1>you don't really know what it meant. So I was like, Nick.

0:02:04.110 --> 0:02:09.109
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? I think that even if whoever

0:02:09.479 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>likes not just likes your story, but keeps viewing your

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>stories constantly. How do you tell? They always appear at

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the top.

0:02:17.199 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 2>OK, anyway, we're going to go into our topic today, OK,

0:02:19.679 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 2>which is misogyny and misan. Do you guys know what

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.758
<v Speaker 2>that is? Misogyny is the hate against females, and then

0:02:25.758 --> 0:02:27.220
<v Speaker 2>is the other one. Let's not use the word hate.

0:02:27.895 --> 0:02:33.576
<v Speaker 2>the word prejudiced, misogyny is prejudice against women and misany

0:02:33.576 --> 0:02:35.865
<v Speaker 2>is prejudiced against men. We're going to keep it at

0:02:35.865 --> 0:02:40.095
<v Speaker 2>that now. Do you think that there is misany and

0:02:40.095 --> 0:02:43.695
<v Speaker 2>misogyny very prevalent in the social media platforms? Yeah, of

0:02:43.695 --> 0:02:47.055
<v Speaker 1>course, Definitely, especially when people are anonymous and they are

0:02:47.055 --> 0:02:49.055
<v Speaker 1>allowed to add their thoughts a lot more freely and

0:02:49.055 --> 0:02:51.416
<v Speaker 1>they don't feel like there's consequences to things that they say.

0:02:51.561 --> 0:02:54.701
<v Speaker 1>They tend to be a lot more carefree with what

0:02:54.701 --> 0:02:58.022
<v Speaker 1>they say and they'll be rude, they'll be, I guess

0:02:58.022 --> 0:03:01.311
<v Speaker 1>like the way that I'm observing your facial expression, I

0:03:01.311 --> 0:03:04.001
<v Speaker 1>feel like you've experienced this quite a bit. I think, OK,

0:03:04.072 --> 0:03:08.031
<v Speaker 1>any any woman on social media will have comments saying

0:03:08.031 --> 0:03:09.772
<v Speaker 1>things like you should do OF. I before

0:03:15.171 --> 0:03:15.242
<v Speaker 1>for what people ask me to do.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.110
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, yo man, no thank you.

0:03:18.679 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.179
<v Speaker 1>have any examples that you remember? The OF one is

0:03:23.179 --> 0:03:24.630
<v Speaker 1>a really big one or things that go back to

0:03:24.630 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen, that sort of thing. Like it's very, very

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.279
<v Speaker 1>they still say that, yeah, but it's not extremely prevalent.

0:03:31.399 --> 0:03:34.350
<v Speaker 1>I feel like at least in my on my platforms thankfully,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.639
<v Speaker 1>but occasionally you get a couple, uh, most recently I think.

0:03:37.735 --> 0:03:41.035
<v Speaker 1>The very common ones are like OF or like stop yapping,

0:03:41.205 --> 0:03:42.964
<v Speaker 1>then they always say like, oh, women yap a lot

0:03:42.964 --> 0:03:43.585
<v Speaker 1>and stuff,

0:03:43.884 --> 0:03:46.684
<v Speaker 2>yeah. But do you think that's actually misogynistic

0:03:46.684 --> 0:03:48.884
<v Speaker 1>though if they tie it to gender, then yes,

0:03:49.565 --> 0:03:49.824
<v Speaker 2>fair

0:03:50.244 --> 0:03:50.714
<v Speaker 2>fair.

0:03:51.445 --> 0:03:51.705
<v Speaker 1>What about

0:03:51.705 --> 0:03:52.154
<v Speaker 1>you then?

0:03:52.205 --> 0:03:55.645
<v Speaker 2>I think against men there is a lot of uh

0:03:55.645 --> 0:03:58.725
<v Speaker 2>insults by your status in life, like your wealth, how

0:03:58.725 --> 0:04:01.645
<v Speaker 2>you treat women and stuff like that. Like people are

0:04:01.645 --> 0:04:04.044
<v Speaker 2>always tying you to a certain value.

0:04:04.419 --> 0:04:06.289
<v Speaker 2>That they want you to earn this much of money,

0:04:06.380 --> 0:04:08.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, pay for every meal and that kind of thing,

0:04:08.380 --> 0:04:11.100
<v Speaker 2>but I don't necessarily think it's like much of a problem.

0:04:11.610 --> 0:04:14.270
<v Speaker 2>Right, I don't think there's an argument of misogyny versus

0:04:14.270 --> 0:04:17.130
<v Speaker 2>misanry when the whole platform itself is on social media

0:04:17.130 --> 0:04:20.368
<v Speaker 2>is toxic. No, I agree with that. But personally wise,

0:04:20.850 --> 0:04:23.609
<v Speaker 2>have you ever received like comments which you said like, oh,

0:04:23.730 --> 0:04:25.970
<v Speaker 2>you know, this sounds like it's coming from a person

0:04:25.970 --> 0:04:28.350
<v Speaker 2>who just does not like men, not about like status generalizing.

0:04:29.928 --> 0:04:33.049
<v Speaker 2>I just men, not so much against you, yeah, against

0:04:33.049 --> 0:04:35.739
<v Speaker 2>me as a person more more often but they tie

0:04:35.738 --> 0:04:38.500
<v Speaker 2>it to gender? I rarely think it's about gender at least.

0:04:39.428 --> 0:04:41.686
<v Speaker 2>For men, I think women have it way worse. So

0:04:41.687 --> 0:04:43.178
<v Speaker 2>if it's not genuinely, what do you think it's about

0:04:43.178 --> 0:04:44.097
<v Speaker 2>or just as a personal individuals.

0:04:44.517 --> 0:04:48.976
<v Speaker 1>It's a personal attack. OK, no, but for you, you've

0:04:48.976 --> 0:04:52.817
<v Speaker 1>addressed these comments before, right? You you have no hesitation

0:04:52.817 --> 0:04:55.257
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to like just going there and replying

0:04:55.257 --> 0:04:55.377
<v Speaker 1>the

0:04:55.377 --> 0:04:55.697
<v Speaker 1>comments.

0:04:55.817 --> 0:04:58.227
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think at some point in time, people

0:04:58.226 --> 0:05:00.138
<v Speaker 2>always think that other people are not allowed an opinion

0:05:00.138 --> 0:05:02.697
<v Speaker 2>just because it's against yours, but like at the same

0:05:02.697 --> 0:05:05.738
<v Speaker 2>time all these platforms they give you a place to

0:05:05.738 --> 0:05:07.226
<v Speaker 2>voice your thoughts, right, and I.

0:05:07.395 --> 0:05:10.354
<v Speaker 2>That's my thoughts really often. I don't think I'm wrong

0:05:10.355 --> 0:05:12.825
<v Speaker 2>to have an opinion just because it's different from the

0:05:12.825 --> 0:05:15.145
<v Speaker 2>general public. But do you ever think that there's a

0:05:15.145 --> 0:05:18.425
<v Speaker 2>line where because you have a following and because people

0:05:18.425 --> 0:05:20.466
<v Speaker 2>see you as a certain kind of influencer and whatnot,

0:05:20.505 --> 0:05:23.545
<v Speaker 2>the way that you respond, people may take it as harmful,

0:05:23.585 --> 0:05:25.265
<v Speaker 2>or people may take it as, oh, he's also a

0:05:25.265 --> 0:05:27.075
<v Speaker 2>very offensive person, or he's also a very hateful person.

0:05:27.186 --> 0:05:27.325
<v Speaker 1>I

0:05:27.325 --> 0:05:29.425
<v Speaker 1>have that thought process. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, it

0:05:29.425 --> 0:05:31.135
<v Speaker 2>could be, it could be, it could be. So why

0:05:31.135 --> 0:05:33.735
<v Speaker 2>I don't tie myself to a legit agency.

0:05:34.226 --> 0:05:34.406
<v Speaker 1>OK,

0:05:34.545 --> 0:05:35.226
<v Speaker 1>no, you brought up a good point.

0:05:35.553 --> 0:05:38.753
<v Speaker 1>Because frankly speaking, I actually think 2 or 3 times

0:05:38.753 --> 0:05:42.074
<v Speaker 1>before I reply or leave a comment. I want so

0:05:42.074 --> 0:05:45.074
<v Speaker 1>badly to reply sometimes to these stupid comments or like

0:05:45.074 --> 0:05:48.113
<v Speaker 1>hate comments or comments about your appearance or whatever. I

0:05:48.113 --> 0:05:50.503
<v Speaker 1>really craft something out and I'm like, bam, this is

0:05:50.503 --> 0:05:53.313
<v Speaker 1>the best comment ever. And then two minutes later I'm

0:05:53.313 --> 0:05:57.074
<v Speaker 1>like delete. I just backspace. So like what sort of

0:05:57.074 --> 0:05:59.354
<v Speaker 1>comments are you replying to? Somebody basically called me very

0:05:59.354 --> 0:06:02.593
<v Speaker 1>flat chested on Instagram, OK, and it was just out there.

0:06:02.634 --> 0:06:03.234
<v Speaker 1>He kept commenting.

0:06:03.462 --> 0:06:05.721
<v Speaker 1>on like all these different pictures that I was posting.

0:06:05.802 --> 0:06:07.962
<v Speaker 1>I don't even remember what photos they were or why.

0:06:08.041 --> 0:06:09.971
<v Speaker 1>And then I think some of my followers started to

0:06:09.971 --> 0:06:13.082
<v Speaker 1>like defend me on my platform, right? They were like,

0:06:13.161 --> 0:06:15.082
<v Speaker 1>You're so rude, get off. And then it started this

0:06:15.082 --> 0:06:17.601
<v Speaker 1>whole argument in the comment section and I wanted so

0:06:17.601 --> 0:06:19.361
<v Speaker 1>bad to go in there and type something really like

0:06:19.361 --> 0:06:22.511
<v Speaker 1>witty and I just decided to delete the whole thread.

0:06:22.761 --> 0:06:26.022
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I don't know. I because I feel

0:06:26.022 --> 0:06:28.190
<v Speaker 1>that I need to put more thought process into it,

0:06:28.282 --> 0:06:30.242
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then if I'm so harmful then, what

0:06:30.242 --> 0:06:31.261
<v Speaker 1>if he gets

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Affected and why did you delete it then I just

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.950
<v Speaker 1>decided that I didn't want to get into it at

0:06:37.950 --> 0:06:39.869
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. I was like forget it. Yeah,

0:06:39.950 --> 0:06:42.308
<v Speaker 1>it's not worth my energy because if I reply, he's

0:06:42.309 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>going to reply. All these people are going to continue

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.109
<v Speaker 1>chiming in and it just will never be the end

0:06:46.109 --> 0:06:46.309
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:06:46.420 --> 0:06:46.789
<v Speaker 2>It's a

0:06:46.790 --> 0:06:48.868
<v Speaker 2>good thing that you said that because the next question

0:06:48.869 --> 0:06:50.820
<v Speaker 2>I want to say, right, just back on this, right.

0:06:51.109 --> 0:06:53.308
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that kind of fuels you? Uh, not really.

0:06:53.470 --> 0:06:55.429
<v Speaker 2>So you, you honestly just replied because you want to

0:06:55.428 --> 0:06:59.630
<v Speaker 2>just I just. So the question that I want to ask, right,

0:06:59.660 --> 0:07:00.070
<v Speaker 2>is that.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.299
<v Speaker 2>Obviously as a woman, when you say certain things, right,

0:07:03.690 --> 0:07:05.589
<v Speaker 2>sometimes people would say it's pretty bold statement when you

0:07:05.589 --> 0:07:09.619
<v Speaker 2>guys talk about certain opinions, certain preferences together, as pretty bold.

0:07:09.950 --> 0:07:12.829
<v Speaker 2>How do you deal with backlash when sometimes people disagree

0:07:12.829 --> 0:07:15.029
<v Speaker 2>with that and maybe even if it comes from a woman,

0:07:15.190 --> 0:07:16.989
<v Speaker 2>especially if it comes from another woman, how do you

0:07:16.989 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>deal with

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:17.630
<v Speaker 2>that backlash?

0:07:17.750 --> 0:07:19.269
<v Speaker 1>I think there was like a video that we talked

0:07:19.269 --> 0:07:20.149
<v Speaker 1>about cheating. The

0:07:20.149 --> 0:07:23.429
<v Speaker 2>context is if your friend cheats, do you help tell

0:07:23.429 --> 0:07:24.299
<v Speaker 2>their partner.

0:07:25.730 --> 0:07:28.359
<v Speaker 1>OK, and what did you say? I think I said

0:07:28.359 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that I would talk to the friend first before intervening

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.779
<v Speaker 1>because it's not my relationship. Yeah and then people were like,

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.239
<v Speaker 1>you're not a girl's girl because of that. Oh, OK,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.269
<v Speaker 1>I have a very different definition of a girl's girl

0:07:39.269 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes these things happen within our friend groups and

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.429
<v Speaker 1>if you truly are very good friends with each other,

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you also want to state your views, right, because I

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:50.750
<v Speaker 1>think it affects the friendship also.

0:07:51.369 --> 0:07:53.890
<v Speaker 1>So it's like I think my thought process was I

0:07:53.890 --> 0:07:56.170
<v Speaker 1>would talk to the friend and let them know my

0:07:56.170 --> 0:07:59.190
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about this and how my values are different and

0:07:59.410 --> 0:08:01.209
<v Speaker 1>they get to choose what they want to do next.

0:08:01.329 --> 0:08:03.609
<v Speaker 1>So eventually if it prolongs and they don't do anything

0:08:03.609 --> 0:08:05.380
<v Speaker 1>about it, they still continue cheating, then that affects my

0:08:05.380 --> 0:08:08.570
<v Speaker 1>friendship with them because of the different values. Yeah, but

0:08:08.570 --> 0:08:10.730
<v Speaker 1>it also takes a while to explain these sorts of

0:08:10.730 --> 0:08:14.410
<v Speaker 1>concepts sometimes and TikTok videos, Instagram reels, they're all very

0:08:14.410 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>short form and they might just watch like 10 seconds

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:16.609
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:08:18.179 --> 0:08:18.578
<v Speaker 1>and

0:08:18.579 --> 0:08:18.779
<v Speaker 2>we

0:08:18.779 --> 0:08:21.579
<v Speaker 2>probably like 20-30 minutes worth of stuff that we condense

0:08:21.579 --> 0:08:24.339
<v Speaker 2>into one minute and there's a lot of context that

0:08:24.339 --> 0:08:26.769
<v Speaker 2>gets taken out because of brevity and stuff like that.

0:08:27.059 --> 0:08:30.130
<v Speaker 1>But we only had maybe a few videos that got

0:08:30.130 --> 0:08:32.630
<v Speaker 1>really bad backlash. That was like the main one I think.

0:08:33.219 --> 0:08:36.059
<v Speaker 1>But how do you guys then prevent after something like

0:08:36.059 --> 0:08:38.218
<v Speaker 1>that happens? Do you guys think like, OK, the next

0:08:38.219 --> 0:08:40.020
<v Speaker 1>video that we put out, should we change the way

0:08:40.020 --> 0:08:42.270
<v Speaker 1>that we craft certain things or you're just like

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.419
<v Speaker 1>Whatever. These are our views. I don't care.

0:08:44.789 --> 0:08:46.289
<v Speaker 2>That's my stance lah. OK,

0:08:46.630 --> 0:08:48.750
<v Speaker 1>I will tweak it a little bit just to, yeah,

0:08:48.869 --> 0:08:50.549
<v Speaker 1>so I will just make sure that the tone and

0:08:50.549 --> 0:08:53.669
<v Speaker 1>the messaging is still positive overall, that there's still valuable

0:08:53.669 --> 0:08:56.489
<v Speaker 1>takeaways from it. If it's just a video to incite

0:08:56.489 --> 0:08:59.109
<v Speaker 1>more hate and to stir more conversation of like emotions

0:08:59.109 --> 0:09:01.229
<v Speaker 1>and anger into rage, then what's the point? Like I

0:09:01.229 --> 0:09:03.150
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do that. That's why this balance works out because

0:09:03.150 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Nick is a very, uh, I'll just say

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.669
<v Speaker 1>one kind of person and then I'll be like, hold up.

0:09:08.270 --> 0:09:11.830
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we need to. Has anyone ever approached you in

0:09:11.830 --> 0:09:14.059
<v Speaker 1>real life, like in person to be like, yeah, I

0:09:14.059 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>really hated what you said. I love a lot,

0:09:20.750 --> 0:09:21.030
<v Speaker 2>a lot,

0:09:23.789 --> 0:09:27.219
<v Speaker 1>a lot despite sometimes getting negative comments blown out of proportion,

0:09:27.549 --> 0:09:29.390
<v Speaker 1>in real life, people are like, oh, I love your

0:09:29.390 --> 0:09:31.780
<v Speaker 1>stuff and it's always the hate.

0:09:32.090 --> 0:09:34.849
<v Speaker 1>loudest online and they don't dare to even look at

0:09:34.849 --> 0:09:36.089
<v Speaker 1>us they're the same

0:09:36.090 --> 0:09:38.409
<v Speaker 2>people actually. I realized after a while I click that

0:09:38.409 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>it's the same person commenting video A, B, C, same person.

0:09:41.580 --> 0:09:43.530
<v Speaker 2>I go see other user account, right? There's a comment

0:09:43.530 --> 0:09:44.669
<v Speaker 2>on all my other friends.

0:09:44.929 --> 0:09:45.010
<v Speaker 1>I

0:09:45.010 --> 0:09:48.250
<v Speaker 1>guess we should thank them for interactions. I suppose one

0:09:48.250 --> 0:09:51.809
<v Speaker 1>of the comments that it's related to misogyny would be

0:09:51.809 --> 0:09:54.690
<v Speaker 1>about my relationship status. I think as someone that's in

0:09:54.690 --> 0:09:55.869
<v Speaker 1>my late twenties and

0:09:55.919 --> 0:09:59.190
<v Speaker 1>As a girl, people always put my value to my

0:09:59.190 --> 0:10:01.630
<v Speaker 1>relationship status, right? So that comes in the comments now

0:10:01.630 --> 0:10:04.070
<v Speaker 1>and then I think there was a video about like

0:10:04.070 --> 0:10:06.270
<v Speaker 1>what a child's weaknesses, for example, and then they're like

0:10:06.270 --> 0:10:08.390
<v Speaker 1>child is too picky, that's why she's single. Nobody wants

0:10:08.390 --> 0:10:10.429
<v Speaker 1>her and stuff, but I don't know if that's like

0:10:10.429 --> 0:10:14.270
<v Speaker 1>gender specific also because it can go both ways. So

0:10:14.270 --> 0:10:16.630
<v Speaker 1>on that note, I've got friends who are like 30 already,

0:10:16.710 --> 0:10:18.710
<v Speaker 1>they are still single or just broke up, you know.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's

0:10:22.770 --> 0:10:26.459
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but you're also single now, OK, and if you

0:10:26.460 --> 0:10:29.869
<v Speaker 1>also actually, so for my girlfriends who are like, let's

0:10:29.869 --> 0:10:33.239
<v Speaker 1>say in their 30s already who are not in a

0:10:33.239 --> 0:10:36.580
<v Speaker 1>relationship and they're still single, versus men who are in

0:10:36.580 --> 0:10:39.780
<v Speaker 1>their 30s and are single, the perception I feel is

0:10:39.780 --> 0:10:42.859
<v Speaker 1>very different for sure because it's like, oh man, are

0:10:42.859 --> 0:10:45.820
<v Speaker 1>you OK? Like you're still in your prime. Like 30s,

0:10:46.059 --> 0:10:47.380
<v Speaker 1>you only be in your prime when you're like close

0:10:47.380 --> 0:10:49.669
<v Speaker 1>to 40, you're good, but for girls it's like.

0:10:50.039 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I expired already I think yeah 30+ is over. But

0:10:53.719 --> 0:10:55.460
<v Speaker 1>I do want to say I feel that that's changing

0:10:55.460 --> 0:10:58.039
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I hope so over time and that

0:10:58.039 --> 0:11:00.669
<v Speaker 1>even if you're single in your 30s, it's totally fine.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like there's more representation of single women

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.780
<v Speaker 1>who are just killing it in life online and this

0:11:06.780 --> 0:11:10.109
<v Speaker 1>just makes it overall seem a lot more normal and acceptable.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the perceived value of single women in their

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.750
<v Speaker 1>thirties who are highly successful in their own right, right.

0:11:15.898 --> 0:11:18.387
<v Speaker 1>It's even higher now because we don't play games, yeah,

0:11:18.927 --> 0:11:21.977
<v Speaker 1>and honestly like I think at that age it's just

0:11:21.977 --> 0:11:23.888
<v Speaker 1>if you want to date you date properly already, you

0:11:23.888 --> 0:11:25.047
<v Speaker 1>just don't waste your time. That's why you're,

0:11:26.288 --> 0:11:27.687
<v Speaker 2>I get all the time because I'm all the time

0:11:27.687 --> 0:11:37.528
<v Speaker 2>that's why he's still it's like permanent one. But when

0:11:37.528 --> 0:11:39.127
<v Speaker 2>you say that, where do you think this is coming

0:11:39.127 --> 0:11:41.127
<v Speaker 2>from because bringing it back to.

0:11:42.096 --> 0:11:45.015
<v Speaker 2>And misogyny, right? Like you said, the girls nowadays is

0:11:45.015 --> 0:11:48.455
<v Speaker 2>a bit different. I guess misogyny is not that prevalent

0:11:48.455 --> 0:11:51.536
<v Speaker 2>as it was like 20-30 years ago, but it's mercenary

0:11:51.535 --> 0:11:55.255
<v Speaker 2>then now more prevalent, be it in online, in in

0:11:55.255 --> 0:11:57.335
<v Speaker 2>real life, that you feel that these people are saying

0:11:57.335 --> 0:11:58.795
<v Speaker 2>these things to you just because they don't like

0:11:58.796 --> 0:11:59.265
<v Speaker 2>you. I,

0:12:01.176 --> 0:12:04.015
<v Speaker 2>to analyze whether it's gender specific or not. So here's

0:12:04.015 --> 0:12:06.535
<v Speaker 2>something that I've seen online quite a bit is that

0:12:06.535 --> 0:12:07.695
<v Speaker 2>there are people commenting.

0:12:07.903 --> 0:12:11.573
<v Speaker 2>trends, they have little TikTok videos of women saying things like, oh,

0:12:11.674 --> 0:12:15.193
<v Speaker 2>men are trash, you know, or not all men, but men.

0:12:15.343 --> 0:12:18.143
<v Speaker 2>You know, some men but men, that kind of trend

0:12:18.143 --> 0:12:22.864
<v Speaker 2>is so prevalently misanderistic, right, that it's got nothing to

0:12:22.864 --> 0:12:25.414
<v Speaker 2>do with anything other than the fact that a guy

0:12:25.414 --> 0:12:29.263
<v Speaker 2>can't seem to do things right. Have you personally? I

0:12:29.263 --> 0:12:33.664
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's personally attacked, but I do feel like it's.

0:12:33.952 --> 0:12:39.671
<v Speaker 2>Fair, right, because TikTok, Instagram, like social media is so

0:12:39.671 --> 0:12:44.671
<v Speaker 2>influential that it has influenced relationships, it influences work, it

0:12:44.671 --> 0:12:48.271
<v Speaker 2>influences all these things exactly right. And when you have

0:12:48.271 --> 0:12:51.901
<v Speaker 2>people who have a certain status, a certain type of influence, right,

0:12:52.052 --> 0:12:54.431
<v Speaker 2>and they share things like this, you know, oh, my

0:12:54.432 --> 0:12:57.111
<v Speaker 2>boyfriend didn't buy me flowers on the second date, men

0:12:57.111 --> 0:12:59.671
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing, right? People are going to be like, oh, then.

0:13:00.010 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Should I be receiving flowers on my second day? And

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 2>if then this person doesn't do it, is he just

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:06.090
<v Speaker 2>like every other person?

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's so funny because I I I clearly

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an overthinker. I don't know, but I never

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:11.919
<v Speaker 1>thought in that.

0:13:12.450 --> 0:13:15.890
<v Speaker 1>Line of, I never had that line of thought like

0:13:15.890 --> 0:13:18.530
<v Speaker 1>he didn't buy me flowers. Yeah, like I never really

0:13:18.530 --> 0:13:19.108
<v Speaker 1>thought about it. I don't

0:13:19.109 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>know that as an example.

0:13:21.770 --> 0:13:23.689
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I guess it depends on how you

0:13:23.690 --> 0:13:25.539
<v Speaker 1>consume that also. So if you consume that and think

0:13:25.539 --> 0:13:27.450
<v Speaker 1>that oh this is applied to all men now as

0:13:27.450 --> 0:13:30.690
<v Speaker 1>compared to like, oh, she's very critical and she demands

0:13:30.690 --> 0:13:31.690
<v Speaker 1>flowers for her own date.

0:13:31.950 --> 0:13:34.130
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you see, the difference is that people don't

0:13:34.130 --> 0:13:37.689
<v Speaker 2>think the same way that you think and the majority

0:13:37.690 --> 0:13:42.340
<v Speaker 2>of the people online will take what people say as

0:13:42.340 --> 0:13:42.979
<v Speaker 2>is

0:13:42.979 --> 0:13:43.099
<v Speaker 1>kind

0:13:43.099 --> 0:13:43.219
<v Speaker 2>of

0:13:43.219 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>like group

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 2>mentality.

0:13:45.739 --> 0:13:45.940
<v Speaker 1>I mean,

0:13:45.979 --> 0:13:47.419
<v Speaker 2>it's the same thing right when you guys do content,

0:13:47.500 --> 0:13:48.969
<v Speaker 2>you would tell as well that a lot of people,

0:13:49.299 --> 0:13:50.900
<v Speaker 2>they have the same kind of opinions. They take it

0:13:50.900 --> 0:13:51.449
<v Speaker 2>as it is.

0:13:51.869 --> 0:13:54.020
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what algorithm you have, right, but my

0:13:54.020 --> 0:13:56.580
<v Speaker 1>algorithm doesn't really show me too much men hate, which

0:13:56.580 --> 0:13:59.059
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing I guess. But when I do

0:13:59.059 --> 0:14:01.059
<v Speaker 1>see these comments, they are always tagged to some sort

0:14:01.059 --> 0:14:04.219
<v Speaker 1>of violence, violent crimes, and I feel like that's where

0:14:04.219 --> 0:14:08.108
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a heavier discussion also and that's the reason

0:14:08.109 --> 0:14:09.940
<v Speaker 1>why people say, I think I saw a line once

0:14:09.940 --> 0:14:13.450
<v Speaker 1>that I felt strongly for it was not all men,

0:14:13.659 --> 0:14:18.460
<v Speaker 1>but it's always a men in relation to violent crimes.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.250
<v Speaker 1>And what about cheating? No, not so much because

0:14:21.570 --> 0:14:24.250
<v Speaker 1>it's like I was gonna say

0:14:24.250 --> 0:14:27.969
<v Speaker 2>it's a thing as well. I see a lot more.

0:14:28.289 --> 0:14:31.289
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen a TikTok that uh like girlies comment,

0:14:31.369 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 2>the worst thing a Singaporean guy has done to you

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:40.989
<v Speaker 2>that TikTok, he's like 1,000,000,000

0:14:40.989 --> 0:14:41.690
<v Speaker 1>comments, it's crazy. There's so many stories are insane.

0:14:43.049 --> 0:14:45.049
<v Speaker 2>Some of the stories are insane, but some of them

0:14:45.049 --> 0:14:49.119
<v Speaker 2>are also, like I said, very minuscule things like, oh,

0:14:49.130 --> 0:14:50.210
<v Speaker 2>he didn't want to pay for the first date.

0:14:50.729 --> 0:14:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's like

0:14:51.479 --> 0:14:54.549
<v Speaker 2>000. 0, he showed up to our first date in shorts.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:56.599
<v Speaker 2>I would wear shorts to a first date.

0:14:56.830 --> 0:14:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I think he would. I actually

0:14:58.719 --> 0:15:00.780
<v Speaker 2>would. I still wear shorts and slippers to go to town.

0:15:01.039 --> 0:15:03.820
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean? No, you see what I mean.

0:15:03.919 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's really two different spectrums, right? And like bringing

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.719
<v Speaker 2>it back to you guys. Is this something that you

0:15:09.719 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 2>guys understand and you see on social media? And if

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 2>you do, how do you as this duo, talk about it?

0:15:16.039 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Or do you guys address? Yeah, do you address it

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.039
<v Speaker 2>at all? Every time we come out with a.

0:15:20.270 --> 0:15:23.750
<v Speaker 2>We always discuss it a bit beforehand, like to see

0:15:23.750 --> 0:15:26.630
<v Speaker 2>what stands we are at and whether it's different for

0:15:26.630 --> 0:15:28.140
<v Speaker 2>both of us because it doesn't make sense if both

0:15:28.140 --> 0:15:29.909
<v Speaker 2>of us have the same thought. Then after that we

0:15:29.909 --> 0:15:32.309
<v Speaker 2>just sound like one robot, right? So we tend to

0:15:32.309 --> 0:15:35.299
<v Speaker 2>have opposing views on some things. Sometimes if I feel

0:15:35.299 --> 0:15:37.619
<v Speaker 2>lightly about this, but she feels heavier about the other thing,

0:15:37.789 --> 0:15:39.950
<v Speaker 2>then I would take on the other stance from another

0:15:39.950 --> 0:15:42.549
<v Speaker 2>point of view, not necessarily that I fully believe in it. Yeah,

0:15:42.630 --> 0:15:44.020
<v Speaker 2>so that's how we kind of balance it out.

0:15:44.510 --> 0:15:46.909
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys ever find yourselves getting caught in a

0:15:46.909 --> 0:15:49.549
<v Speaker 1>real argument, you know, you're doing and then it

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:56.969
<v Speaker 1>Develops into a real disagreement. We just chill. Yeah, actually

0:15:56.969 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really good balance that we have.

0:15:58.919 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>We are able to have really good open conversations with

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>each other. We have had arguments before as friends, but

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>not in the context of like, yeah, the content. I

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:09.940
<v Speaker 1>want to get your thoughts on this. What do you

0:16:09.940 --> 0:16:11.679
<v Speaker 1>think about the whole I hate men culture

0:16:11.679 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>then? Specifically in Singapore, when they say Singaporean men are trash, right,

0:16:15.599 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 2>then you'll be like, oh, but I'm a Singaporean man.

0:16:17.359 --> 0:16:18.179
<v Speaker 2>Are they really trash?

0:16:18.622 --> 0:16:20.773
<v Speaker 2>Actually what my favorite first date question is what is

0:16:20.773 --> 0:16:25.713
<v Speaker 2>your worst date? Wow, it's actually really quite treasure. I, I,

0:16:25.773 --> 0:16:28.413
<v Speaker 2>I say most guys really don't know how to behave

0:16:28.413 --> 0:16:31.572
<v Speaker 2>on a date. I think basic respect, uh, first off,

0:16:31.732 --> 0:16:34.893
<v Speaker 2>like dressing, uh, we do not wear shorts in when

0:16:34.893 --> 0:16:38.492
<v Speaker 2>the girl, I disagree when the girl puts in effort

0:16:38.492 --> 0:16:40.973
<v Speaker 2>to dress up and you don't at least match her

0:16:40.973 --> 0:16:44.523
<v Speaker 2>like that. Let me give context, right? If let's say

0:16:44.523 --> 0:16:46.603
<v Speaker 2>we go on a night date and I say that,

0:16:46.612 --> 0:16:47.333
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm going to bring you up.

0:16:47.476 --> 0:16:48.676
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm going to bring out for drinks. Of

0:16:48.676 --> 0:16:50.776
<v Speaker 2>course I will dress up nicely. If you say, oh,

0:16:50.986 --> 0:16:54.065
<v Speaker 2>let's go grab a coffee on a Sunday afternoon. I

0:16:54.065 --> 0:16:56.546
<v Speaker 2>said I said her, you heard the line. I said

0:16:56.546 --> 0:16:59.505
<v Speaker 2>match her. Yeah, imagine I show up like in jeans

0:16:59.505 --> 0:17:01.786
<v Speaker 2>and she shows up in an FBT and an oversized t-shirt. Yeah,

0:17:01.866 --> 0:17:04.296
<v Speaker 2>it's happened to me before and then I call her out, right?

0:17:04.306 --> 0:17:05.225
<v Speaker 2>So it depends. And

0:17:05.225 --> 0:17:06.546
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have a second date, yeah,

0:17:06.645 --> 0:17:09.586
<v Speaker 2>yeah, yeah, yeah. She wears sports shoes, jean yellow color t-shirt.

0:17:12.296 --> 0:17:13.786
<v Speaker 2>I remember exactly what she wear. I was like, Wow,

0:17:14.145 --> 0:17:15.545
<v Speaker 2>I took 1 hour to pick up my outfit,

0:17:15.556 --> 0:17:15.706
<v Speaker 1>bro.

0:17:16.939 --> 0:17:19.060
<v Speaker 1>OK, so since quite a number of us don't really

0:17:19.060 --> 0:17:20.859
<v Speaker 1>get this on our FYP very much, right, here are

0:17:20.859 --> 0:17:23.339
<v Speaker 1>some examples, and the first one being, why are you

0:17:23.339 --> 0:17:24.709
<v Speaker 1>such a man hater? Have you seen

0:17:24.709 --> 0:17:26.819
<v Speaker 2>anything like this? God forbid I have a hobby. I

0:17:26.819 --> 0:17:29.379
<v Speaker 1>know this trend. That's a terrible thing to say because

0:17:29.380 --> 0:17:32.379
<v Speaker 1>like this trend is supposed to make light of like

0:17:32.380 --> 0:17:36.180
<v Speaker 1>a habit that they have, right? And to say that

0:17:36.180 --> 0:17:39.329
<v Speaker 1>this is a hobby is wild. I don't know. I

0:17:39.329 --> 0:17:40.729
<v Speaker 1>actually really like men.

0:17:42.369 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I've been your friend for long enough though. I can confirm.

0:17:45.849 --> 0:17:46.839
<v Speaker 2>I can confirm

0:17:49.349 --> 0:17:51.410
<v Speaker 1>like same if hating men was a job. This is

0:17:51.410 --> 0:17:53.010
<v Speaker 1>me loving men was a job,

0:17:53.969 --> 0:17:58.890
<v Speaker 2>we get it. Jeez. I do think people jump on

0:17:58.890 --> 0:18:01.889
<v Speaker 2>the bandwagon quite a fair bit, right? And that obviously

0:18:01.890 --> 0:18:04.250
<v Speaker 2>not all men are trash, right, but honestly, most men

0:18:04.250 --> 0:18:05.050
<v Speaker 2>are pretty much trash.

0:18:05.500 --> 0:18:07.900
<v Speaker 1>Well, you said it's jumping on a,

0:18:08.569 --> 0:18:11.129
<v Speaker 2>let me ask you this then, Nick, do you consider yourself?

0:18:11.209 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 2>A girl's guy for saying that. Like, do you think

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.958
<v Speaker 2>you agree with the majority of women because you're saying,

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:17.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, oh yeah, I agree that most guys are trash.

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Based on the stories I've heard and the sample size,

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.609
<v Speaker 2>I can agree that most guys are trash. So would

0:18:23.609 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 2>you say that you believe yourself to be the upper percentile?

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.780
<v Speaker 2>I always tell people I thought 5% of so fucking arrogant.

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh my God. There's obviously going to be topics and

0:18:34.439 --> 0:18:37.479
<v Speaker 2>opinions from other people about everybody here because we're so

0:18:37.479 --> 0:18:40.900
<v Speaker 2>prevalent on social media and people's opinions sometimes don't matter.

0:18:41.390 --> 0:18:45.630
<v Speaker 2>100%. But has anybody ever called you a misogynist, you

0:18:45.630 --> 0:18:47.669
<v Speaker 2>a misanderist? Same for you. Has anybody ever said this

0:18:47.670 --> 0:18:48.030
<v Speaker 2>to your face?

0:18:48.989 --> 0:18:49.550
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:18:49.670 --> 0:18:51.550
<v Speaker 1>I do want to say that Miss Andre isn't really

0:18:51.550 --> 0:18:53.829
<v Speaker 1>a word used in Singapore social media. In fact, I

0:18:53.829 --> 0:18:56.069
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people don't really understand the context

0:18:56.069 --> 0:18:57.790
<v Speaker 1>of it or the meaning of it, yeah. Yeah, so

0:18:57.790 --> 0:18:59.510
<v Speaker 1>when I went to look it up, I saw so

0:18:59.510 --> 0:19:01.819
<v Speaker 1>many people talk about how Miss Andre isn't even real

0:19:01.819 --> 0:19:05.139
<v Speaker 1>and that a lot of it perpetuated because of patriarchy

0:19:05.140 --> 0:19:08.109
<v Speaker 1>and the expectations of patriarchy. So how patriarchy had pushed for.

0:19:08.256 --> 0:19:10.847
<v Speaker 1>Things like men having to be taller. That was something

0:19:10.847 --> 0:19:12.847
<v Speaker 1>that men wanted to be because if you are short,

0:19:12.886 --> 0:19:15.087
<v Speaker 1>then you are likened to having feminine traits and they

0:19:15.087 --> 0:19:18.366
<v Speaker 1>don't they frown upon feminine traits. Therefore, it is so

0:19:18.366 --> 0:19:20.727
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. So if a girl goes like, I

0:19:20.727 --> 0:19:24.045
<v Speaker 1>will only date a guy if he's like 180, where

0:19:24.046 --> 0:19:26.927
<v Speaker 1>did she get this thought from? Is it from her

0:19:26.927 --> 0:19:29.366
<v Speaker 1>own hate of men or is it because of the

0:19:29.366 --> 0:19:30.516
<v Speaker 1>expectations of patriarchy?

0:19:30.587 --> 0:19:32.807
<v Speaker 2>And I get that, but I still do think that

0:19:32.807 --> 0:19:35.126
<v Speaker 2>as time progresses, right, we see misogy.

0:19:35.463 --> 0:19:39.104
<v Speaker 2>back in like the 1950s as violent, right? It has

0:19:39.104 --> 0:19:41.244
<v Speaker 2>progressed to being a bit different in this day and age,

0:19:41.583 --> 0:19:44.543
<v Speaker 2>but Mendy has become such a big thing and it's

0:19:44.542 --> 0:19:47.744
<v Speaker 2>even unknown that it is misanderism. Wait, is it a

0:19:47.744 --> 0:19:49.984
<v Speaker 2>big thing? Why is it a big thing? So why

0:19:49.984 --> 0:19:52.973
<v Speaker 2>was misogyny a big thing back then? Because men have

0:19:52.973 --> 0:19:53.144
<v Speaker 2>more

0:19:53.144 --> 0:19:53.654
<v Speaker 2>power than women.

0:19:53.784 --> 0:19:55.663
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and people actually dying.

0:19:55.823 --> 0:19:56.303
<v Speaker 2>I

0:19:56.303 --> 0:19:58.734
<v Speaker 2>mean in the age of social media as well, right?

0:19:58.833 --> 0:20:01.744
<v Speaker 2>People don't talk about men's health and in this day

0:20:01.744 --> 0:20:02.103
<v Speaker 2>and age.

0:20:02.211 --> 0:20:04.730
<v Speaker 2>And women are such a big part of life in

0:20:04.730 --> 0:20:07.380
<v Speaker 2>every aspect. There's so much empowerment to them as well

0:20:07.671 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 2>that I do feel that there are certain times where

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>misanderism is such a real thing that men also realize,

0:20:11.801 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 2>oh shit, you know, I am not enough for. To

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 2>give a

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.801
<v Speaker 1>very simple example, I feel like men are not seen

0:20:18.801 --> 0:20:21.201
<v Speaker 1>as people who really like give up that much emotion

0:20:21.201 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>or show as much emotion, right? I think I've definitely

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.470
<v Speaker 1>witnessed this before like in groups when we hang out,

0:20:26.681 --> 0:20:29.041
<v Speaker 1>watch movies, maybe there's like a bit of a moving scene.

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.900
<v Speaker 1>And maybe one of my guy friends like like looks

0:20:31.900 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's tearing up or something. Then one of the

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.250
<v Speaker 1>girls goes like, don't cry, be a man la, you know,

0:20:37.260 --> 0:20:39.900
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Would that be considered?

0:20:40.180 --> 0:20:40.419
<v Speaker 2>I think

0:20:40.420 --> 0:20:44.170
<v Speaker 1>that's toxic, not necessarily a hate towards men.

0:20:44.500 --> 0:20:45.099
<v Speaker 1>You don't think so.

0:20:45.140 --> 0:20:48.260
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I think a meanderistic comment are

0:20:48.260 --> 0:20:51.429
<v Speaker 2>things like basically this whole trend of like, you know,

0:20:51.579 --> 0:20:53.540
<v Speaker 2>men are trash, like what is.

0:20:53.652 --> 0:20:57.123
<v Speaker 2>The reasoning for men are trash because we wear shorts

0:20:57.123 --> 0:21:00.883
<v Speaker 2>to dates because we don't pay for the meals, because

0:21:00.883 --> 0:21:03.162
<v Speaker 2>we don't earn enough money. Like all that to me

0:21:03.162 --> 0:21:07.032
<v Speaker 2>is a cultural stigma that has become a norm. I

0:21:07.032 --> 0:21:10.583
<v Speaker 2>don't believe in. It doesn't exist. You don't think that exists? No,

0:21:10.883 --> 0:21:13.552
<v Speaker 2>because men are in power. Patriarchal society.

0:21:13.875 --> 0:21:15.865
<v Speaker 2>You feel this way because suddenly a bit of power

0:21:15.865 --> 0:21:18.306
<v Speaker 2>is stripped away from the male person. No, I disagree.

0:21:18.385 --> 0:21:20.826
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's ever been a situation where power

0:21:20.826 --> 0:21:23.946
<v Speaker 2>has been stripped away. When you talk about insulting somebody

0:21:23.946 --> 0:21:26.946
<v Speaker 2>or you talk about, you know, being mean to a person,

0:21:27.026 --> 0:21:29.426
<v Speaker 2>there's no power being taken away, but it's never been

0:21:29.426 --> 0:21:31.515
<v Speaker 2>tied to our gender, you see. What do you mean?

0:21:31.786 --> 0:21:35.026
<v Speaker 2>insult me in a centristic way, but go ahead, go

0:21:35.026 --> 0:21:36.336
<v Speaker 2>for it. No, no, no, but the thing is that

0:21:36.345 --> 0:21:39.586
<v Speaker 2>that's not the point, right, because if, if a man

0:21:39.586 --> 0:21:40.426
<v Speaker 2>hits another man.

0:21:40.689 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 2>It is obviously just you're a woman now, you're a

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 2>woman now. You have long hair. Let it down, let

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.839
<v Speaker 2>it down. So, so we'll say it this way, right?

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 2>If let's say a person comes to you online or

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>whatever and they go, oh, you're just a typical man

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.718
<v Speaker 2>because you go out with girls and you know, you

0:21:57.719 --> 0:22:00.329
<v Speaker 2>just anyhow date them. Then, then.

0:22:00.849 --> 0:22:03.339
<v Speaker 2>There's no point in that. There's no insult, but you

0:22:03.339 --> 0:22:06.079
<v Speaker 2>don't feel it. Some people will, some people won't. So

0:22:06.079 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 2>it's always contextual. So meanderism will exist in a space

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 2>where people accept meanderism. So you as a person don't

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.079
<v Speaker 2>believe me I don't think any insult a man is

0:22:15.079 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 2>tied to because you're a man, you know.

0:22:18.739 --> 0:22:21.188
<v Speaker 2>I will give you an example, right? I hopefully she's

0:22:21.189 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 2>not watching this, but one of my sister's friends, right,

0:22:24.339 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to give too much context, right? But

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.949
<v Speaker 2>she was a full on mertenist for a period of time,

0:22:29.979 --> 0:22:33.500
<v Speaker 2>and I called her out on it. It's a situation

0:22:33.500 --> 0:22:36.319
<v Speaker 2>where she was dating a girl and she straight up

0:22:36.619 --> 0:22:40.218
<v Speaker 2>just anything that had to do with men. She was like, ah, typical,

0:22:41.300 --> 0:22:43.900
<v Speaker 1>OK, but is it based on her own bad experiences.

0:22:44.380 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 2>She's dating a guy.

0:22:45.900 --> 0:22:48.449
<v Speaker 1>That means previously she must have had dated guys that

0:22:48.449 --> 0:22:49.369
<v Speaker 1>gave her a bad experience,

0:22:49.459 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 2>right,

0:22:50.530 --> 0:22:54.989
<v Speaker 2>and I agree, right? But to generalize the whole problem, right,

0:22:55.229 --> 0:22:58.810
<v Speaker 2>that is where the problem lies because you can't generalize

0:22:58.810 --> 0:23:00.728
<v Speaker 2>a problem and that's what she did. She generalized the

0:23:00.729 --> 0:23:01.969
<v Speaker 2>problem and that's why I'm trying to get it, right?

0:23:02.150 --> 0:23:05.129
<v Speaker 2>You're saying that it doesn't exist because you don't acknowledge

0:23:05.130 --> 0:23:07.020
<v Speaker 2>the fact that it exists and that's fine, but to

0:23:07.020 --> 0:23:10.329
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge the fact that Msanderism is real is just as equally.

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.349
<v Speaker 2>Important to say that misogyny is real as well.

0:23:13.430 --> 0:23:13.669
<v Speaker 1>I see

0:23:13.670 --> 0:23:16.150
<v Speaker 1>your point. Yeah, I think that's OK. I suppose it

0:23:16.150 --> 0:23:18.790
<v Speaker 1>just depends on like the prevalence of each and you

0:23:18.790 --> 0:23:21.989
<v Speaker 1>just happen to have this very personal experience, yeah, experience

0:23:21.989 --> 0:23:24.109
<v Speaker 1>with it. I have heard this a couple of times,

0:23:24.349 --> 0:23:25.339
<v Speaker 1>especially in the

0:23:25.739 --> 0:23:28.780
<v Speaker 1>Uh, lesbian community, right? They always say this, they're always

0:23:28.780 --> 0:23:31.260
<v Speaker 1>like men are trash or like, oh, men are worse

0:23:31.260 --> 0:23:34.010
<v Speaker 1>than women and stuff, and I didn't realize this until

0:23:34.010 --> 0:23:36.899
<v Speaker 1>I heard what you said, but my response had always been,

0:23:37.180 --> 0:23:39.239
<v Speaker 1>why do you generalize? And why do you say this?

0:23:39.339 --> 0:23:42.339
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not all but some, but it doesn't mean all.

0:23:42.420 --> 0:23:44.579
<v Speaker 1>So I have actually encouraged like uh my friends who

0:23:44.579 --> 0:23:46.540
<v Speaker 1>have these views to go and make friends with more

0:23:46.540 --> 0:23:50.260
<v Speaker 1>straight men. I've literally said that and I go to

0:23:50.260 --> 0:23:51.180
<v Speaker 1>the people.

0:23:51.790 --> 0:23:53.698
<v Speaker 1>See them hanging out with a straight guy, literally I'm like,

0:23:53.739 --> 0:23:57.448
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, straight friends, straight men friends, you know,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.060
<v Speaker 1>like there are great straight men and I think I

0:24:01.060 --> 0:24:04.219
<v Speaker 1>understand your point about how if it is a bigger

0:24:04.219 --> 0:24:06.380
<v Speaker 1>scale problem, if this gets even more out of hand,

0:24:06.500 --> 0:24:09.099
<v Speaker 1>if more people adopt this mindset, then it could lead

0:24:09.099 --> 0:24:12.739
<v Speaker 1>to very negative sentiments of like very unnecessary negativity also.

0:24:12.849 --> 0:24:14.219
<v Speaker 1>But I guess at the end of the day, right,

0:24:14.339 --> 0:24:16.419
<v Speaker 1>like very broad thing to say, I know. At the

0:24:16.420 --> 0:24:17.938
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I think just don't generalize.

0:24:18.579 --> 0:24:21.780
<v Speaker 1>people for their gender, their race, whatever. Frankly, I mean,

0:24:21.819 --> 0:24:23.579
<v Speaker 1>if you are getting to know a person, get to

0:24:23.579 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>know the person. Yeah, based on your own personal experience,

0:24:27.030 --> 0:24:29.699
<v Speaker 1>that's it. For example, when one of my besties hates

0:24:29.699 --> 0:24:32.170
<v Speaker 1>on her ex, we hate on her ex, not men,

0:24:32.979 --> 0:24:35.300
<v Speaker 1>if you get what I mean, he is an MCP

0:24:35.300 --> 0:24:36.939
<v Speaker 1>but we're like, yeah, he's such an MCP.

0:24:37.099 --> 0:24:39.579
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, it becomes a situation where if you have this

0:24:39.579 --> 0:24:41.619
<v Speaker 2>thought process, right, and a new person comes into your life,

0:24:41.689 --> 0:24:44.180
<v Speaker 2>you're always going to have an initial idea.

0:24:44.339 --> 0:24:46.900
<v Speaker 2>Already, you know, or I've dated Singaporean men and these

0:24:46.900 --> 0:24:49.589
<v Speaker 2>are the situations. I'm going to be pretty much just

0:24:49.589 --> 0:24:52.260
<v Speaker 2>expect the same kind of treatment and whatnot and you

0:24:52.260 --> 0:24:54.619
<v Speaker 2>got to look past all that, right? And if you don't,

0:24:54.819 --> 0:24:57.900
<v Speaker 2>that's when this whole misogyny slash misanderism comes in because

0:24:57.900 --> 0:25:00.459
<v Speaker 2>you're like, OK, you know, I already have a generalized

0:25:00.459 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 2>idea and that's what I'm going to believe in. Yeah,

0:25:02.449 --> 0:25:04.579
<v Speaker 1>but you know people's reactions on social media are always

0:25:04.579 --> 0:25:06.849
<v Speaker 1>going to be like that because I still remember this

0:25:06.849 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>episode of Manic Explain we did before you came on board, right?

0:25:10.510 --> 0:25:13.939
<v Speaker 1>This is with Aiden actually, when he made a statement

0:25:13.939 --> 0:25:16.750
<v Speaker 1>about how Singaporean men don't make an effort to dress up.

0:25:16.979 --> 0:25:19.660
<v Speaker 1>We incited so much hate against us in the comment

0:25:19.660 --> 0:25:22.300
<v Speaker 1>section because all the Singaporean men who are active on

0:25:22.300 --> 0:25:25.139
<v Speaker 1>TikTok were like slamming us like mad and they seemed

0:25:25.140 --> 0:25:27.869
<v Speaker 1>quite hurt or butt hurt about this comment.

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:28.489
<v Speaker 2>I think

0:25:28.489 --> 0:25:32.989
<v Speaker 2>this argument of the Singaporean men dress up is very prevalent, right?

0:25:33.050 --> 0:25:35.489
<v Speaker 2>And it's true. You dress like trash.

0:25:37.810 --> 0:25:39.379
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I want to say that there's a reason

0:25:39.380 --> 0:25:43.069
<v Speaker 1>why Uniqlo literally calls their t-shirt the Singapore man outfit,

0:25:43.380 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>like the Singaporean uniform. There are reasons for why people

0:25:46.199 --> 0:25:49.780
<v Speaker 1>have these views, but it definitely isn't generalized. And when

0:25:49.780 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>you talk about these things online, you tend to just

0:25:52.439 --> 0:25:56.310
<v Speaker 1>like sweeping statements, right.

0:25:56.814 --> 0:25:59.724
<v Speaker 2>Majority just for comfort is true and practicality is true.

0:26:00.175 --> 0:26:03.454
<v Speaker 2>Is that a bad thing? No, but is it objectively fashionable?

0:26:03.494 --> 0:26:03.655
<v Speaker 2>It's

0:26:03.655 --> 0:26:03.854
<v Speaker 2>not.

0:26:04.094 --> 0:26:06.015
<v Speaker 1>Then the question is, who are these guys who are

0:26:06.015 --> 0:26:07.694
<v Speaker 1>like very angry and riled up?

0:26:07.814 --> 0:26:08.514
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's

0:26:08.515 --> 0:26:13.694
<v Speaker 2>not being angry or triggered by this. I think it's acknowledging, right?

0:26:13.805 --> 0:26:15.645
<v Speaker 2>It's acknowledging that there is.

0:26:16.199 --> 0:26:19.750
<v Speaker 2>Mercenary in the world, right? It really is. It doesn't

0:26:19.750 --> 0:26:21.649
<v Speaker 2>have to make me angry. It doesn't have to make

0:26:21.650 --> 0:26:23.409
<v Speaker 2>me want to hurt women. It doesn't make me want

0:26:23.410 --> 0:26:25.599
<v Speaker 2>to do anything. It just has to be an acknowledgement

0:26:25.599 --> 0:26:29.089
<v Speaker 2>that this is a problem. Why is it a problem? Again,

0:26:29.449 --> 0:26:33.530
<v Speaker 2>people get influenced easily online, 9,000+ people, sure, fraction of

0:26:33.530 --> 0:26:36.959
<v Speaker 2>the world, but if 9,000+ people are thinking this way, right,

0:26:37.089 --> 0:26:39.079
<v Speaker 2>that's going to spread and it's going to become a problem.

0:26:39.250 --> 0:26:41.140
<v Speaker 2>There are people who are not as confident as you, right?

0:26:41.209 --> 0:26:43.129
<v Speaker 2>The people who are a little bit less confident.

0:26:43.222 --> 0:26:44.761
<v Speaker 2>And when they see this, they're going to be like,

0:26:44.891 --> 0:26:46.771
<v Speaker 2>you see, I can't do anything, right? And then I'm

0:26:46.771 --> 0:26:48.852
<v Speaker 2>literally going to never find a girlfriend because they all

0:26:48.852 --> 0:26:51.131
<v Speaker 2>hate guys. Everything I do is wrong. It's it's a

0:26:51.131 --> 0:26:51.651
<v Speaker 2>slippery slope.

0:26:52.212 --> 0:26:52.452
<v Speaker 1>I've I've,

0:26:53.421 --> 0:26:53.491
<v Speaker 2>yeah,

0:26:54.011 --> 0:26:57.251
<v Speaker 1>yeah. I suppose as people who do stuff on social media,

0:26:57.332 --> 0:27:00.011
<v Speaker 1>we post things, we talk about things and we have communities, right?

0:27:00.171 --> 0:27:01.732
<v Speaker 1>We just have to be careful about the things that

0:27:01.732 --> 0:27:04.371
<v Speaker 1>we say and which is also why I go back

0:27:04.371 --> 0:27:06.171
<v Speaker 1>to if I had a chance to say that we

0:27:06.171 --> 0:27:08.851
<v Speaker 1>cannot generalize, that's where I always come in and put

0:27:08.852 --> 0:27:10.370
<v Speaker 1>in that thought. No, I love that you.

0:27:10.463 --> 0:27:13.412
<v Speaker 1>brought that up because I think as people who create content,

0:27:13.494 --> 0:27:15.613
<v Speaker 1>you guys post so much, you know, videos and content,

0:27:15.693 --> 0:27:18.673
<v Speaker 1>you think we got a duty as well to try

0:27:18.673 --> 0:27:22.072
<v Speaker 1>and keep the peace there or it's hard to say that.

0:27:22.134 --> 0:27:25.573
<v Speaker 1>I would love if all publishers, all creators, anyone with

0:27:25.573 --> 0:27:28.654
<v Speaker 1>a social media presence, right, thought about this, but most

0:27:28.654 --> 0:27:31.663
<v Speaker 1>people are just optimizing to get the most views you

0:27:31.663 --> 0:27:34.484
<v Speaker 1>want and then they say like controversial things.

0:27:35.333 --> 0:27:35.453
<v Speaker 2>I

0:27:35.453 --> 0:27:37.644
<v Speaker 2>think on TikTok or Instagram, a lot of people.

0:27:37.705 --> 0:27:40.166
<v Speaker 2>People do things for the views and I think when

0:27:40.166 --> 0:27:41.975
<v Speaker 2>they get a certain amount of validation when they are

0:27:41.975 --> 0:27:44.416
<v Speaker 2>hitting on a certain group of people, whether it's men

0:27:44.416 --> 0:27:48.456
<v Speaker 2>or women, they will continually do stuff because they seek validation, right,

0:27:48.526 --> 0:27:50.805
<v Speaker 2>which is why uh half of the people that post

0:27:50.806 --> 0:27:53.536
<v Speaker 2>on social media do post on social media. It's because

0:27:53.536 --> 0:27:56.004
<v Speaker 2>they get a like that they normally wouldn't get.

0:27:56.455 --> 0:27:56.696
<v Speaker 1>They just

0:27:56.696 --> 0:27:57.735
<v Speaker 1>want people to agree with them.

0:27:57.855 --> 0:28:00.056
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah. The same reason why someone posts a comment

0:28:00.056 --> 0:28:01.895
<v Speaker 2>and then when it gets likes, they get very filled

0:28:01.895 --> 0:28:03.895
<v Speaker 2>up and then they continue posting hate comments again and

0:28:03.895 --> 0:28:04.776
<v Speaker 2>again and again and again.

0:28:05.199 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 2>So does it really matter in the grand scheme of things,

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 2>not really, la, because they might not even feel that way,

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, you reply to them and then after it's

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.699
<v Speaker 2>only like change 180 and then like, oh yeah, I

0:28:14.930 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 2>completely misread your post, then I'm sorry, but are they

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.290
<v Speaker 2>going to delete the comment because he already has 1000 likes? No, yeah,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.079
<v Speaker 2>so let's say now I'm in a picnic and then

0:28:24.079 --> 0:28:25.718
<v Speaker 2>after that I'm hanging out with some guy friends and

0:28:25.719 --> 0:28:27.319
<v Speaker 2>then I have a bunch of girls over there and

0:28:27.319 --> 0:28:29.079
<v Speaker 2>then one girl just goes, I hate all men.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.069
<v Speaker 2>Then what are we going to do? I'll ask her why,

0:28:32.209 --> 0:28:34.438
<v Speaker 2>why you hate explain. Talk to me. If you want

0:28:34.439 --> 0:28:36.719
<v Speaker 2>to figure out where the source of hate come from, right?

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.079
<v Speaker 2>Is it your past experiences? But she never said she

0:28:39.079 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 2>hate you there, so why does it matter? No, but

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.050
<v Speaker 2>she's now openly we are in a social setting, right?

0:28:43.150 --> 0:28:45.689
<v Speaker 2>She's throwing out a topic. Yeah, we are here to

0:28:45.689 --> 0:28:47.699
<v Speaker 2>discuss and debate. That's what I love to do, right?

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:49.890
<v Speaker 2>If you ask me a question like I hate all apples,

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll ask you why. So contextual, it's contextual. OK, well,

0:28:53.839 --> 0:28:56.079
<v Speaker 2>let me bring it to this then, right, since we're

0:28:56.079 --> 0:28:58.310
<v Speaker 2>talking about receiving hate and

0:28:58.355 --> 0:29:01.065
<v Speaker 2>All these things. Social media is obviously a place where

0:29:01.066 --> 0:29:03.946
<v Speaker 2>we cannot control what people say about us. We can't

0:29:03.946 --> 0:29:06.536
<v Speaker 2>control comments, but what do you guys think the difference

0:29:06.536 --> 0:29:11.145
<v Speaker 2>between cancel culture and constructive criticism from people watching you

0:29:11.145 --> 0:29:13.826
<v Speaker 2>is when you say like, OK, this is actually a

0:29:13.826 --> 0:29:15.826
<v Speaker 2>good point, versus this person just doesn't like me and

0:29:15.826 --> 0:29:19.105
<v Speaker 2>it's damn obvious. I think people often hide behind constructive

0:29:19.105 --> 0:29:21.465
<v Speaker 2>criticism like, oh, I'm here to insult you to make

0:29:21.465 --> 0:29:23.836
<v Speaker 2>you better, but they just want to cancel you most

0:29:23.836 --> 0:29:26.265
<v Speaker 2>of the bullshit. But do you think cancel culture is

0:29:26.265 --> 0:29:27.105
<v Speaker 2>like a little bit higher.

0:29:27.291 --> 0:29:30.362
<v Speaker 2>constructive criticism in the sense that they would put in

0:29:30.362 --> 0:29:32.531
<v Speaker 2>more effort to make you look bad rather than just

0:29:32.531 --> 0:29:33.131
<v Speaker 2>dropping a comment.

0:29:33.291 --> 0:29:35.501
<v Speaker 1>I think it's baby steps, right? It's like the frequency,

0:29:35.602 --> 0:29:38.011
<v Speaker 1>the quantity of the comments that are coming through and

0:29:38.011 --> 0:29:39.781
<v Speaker 1>how many times they're commenting on all the other videos

0:29:39.781 --> 0:29:42.651
<v Speaker 1>that you have. Does it seem? Yeah, if it's really

0:29:42.651 --> 0:29:46.241
<v Speaker 1>just like you're ugly, it's a personal attack for no reason,

0:29:46.452 --> 0:29:49.401
<v Speaker 1>like not really about your views or your opinions, not

0:29:49.401 --> 0:29:51.281
<v Speaker 1>a discussion, not trying to engage with you at all,

0:29:51.291 --> 0:29:53.562
<v Speaker 1>but just to insult you, then I think that's very clear,

0:29:53.682 --> 0:29:56.052
<v Speaker 1>just canceling, just trying to

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Get you off the internet, I guess, or like to

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.839
<v Speaker 1>hurt your feelings. OK, so sometimes you do get, I

0:30:01.839 --> 0:30:03.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you guys have ever received DMs or

0:30:03.839 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>anything on constructive criticism, right? Do you feel like people

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mean it more from a good place when they like

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.439
<v Speaker 1>privately tell you like, hey, you know, like I like

0:30:11.439 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>your content, but maybe this post didn't sit too well.

0:30:13.479 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>We just want to let you know. I think that

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.339
<v Speaker 1>sounds reasonable versus like just directly putting it on a

0:30:18.339 --> 0:30:20.359
<v Speaker 1>public platform immediately that I feel has a bit of

0:30:20.359 --> 0:30:22.650
<v Speaker 1>intention already because you want other people to see it,

0:30:22.719 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:30:23.166 --> 0:30:25.136
<v Speaker 2>I know it doesn't matter whether it's private or public,

0:30:25.187 --> 0:30:28.237
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes it's like the tone and the whole messaging. Yeah,

0:30:28.437 --> 0:30:29.717
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you can see that people come with a bit

0:30:29.717 --> 0:30:32.496
<v Speaker 2>of heart and then you're like, OK, I'm sorry, let's

0:30:32.496 --> 0:30:34.136
<v Speaker 2>address this, then we'll talk about it for a while.

0:30:34.396 --> 0:30:36.317
<v Speaker 2>I mean, people can still DM you and be like, Hey,

0:30:36.357 --> 0:30:38.116
<v Speaker 2>go off yourself kind of thing, right? So it comes

0:30:38.116 --> 0:30:39.567
<v Speaker 2>off the same way. I think he's completely right. It's

0:30:39.567 --> 0:30:41.957
<v Speaker 2>the approach to the comment and approach to the

0:30:41.957 --> 0:30:43.866
<v Speaker 1>DM. So I guess at the end of the day,

0:30:44.237 --> 0:30:46.396
<v Speaker 1>it's not really about taking sides. I think for all

0:30:46.396 --> 0:30:48.996
<v Speaker 1>of us, we have a certain amount of responsibility on

0:30:48.996 --> 0:30:49.636
<v Speaker 1>the kind of content.

0:30:49.723 --> 0:30:50.784
<v Speaker 1>We want to put out. Yeah,

0:30:51.034 --> 0:30:52.894
<v Speaker 2>it really isn't about being right. It's an honest opinion.

0:30:53.553 --> 0:30:55.874
<v Speaker 2>There's no right. Honestly, it's an opinion, but also I

0:30:55.874 --> 0:30:57.984
<v Speaker 2>feel like it's having a very safe and you know,

0:30:58.154 --> 0:30:59.514
<v Speaker 2>an open opinion about that one.

0:30:59.634 --> 0:30:59.793
<v Speaker 1>I

0:30:59.793 --> 0:31:02.274
<v Speaker 1>think it is dangerous if people are really pushing for

0:31:02.274 --> 0:31:06.303
<v Speaker 1>very polarizing views and they're breeding this sort of like discussion,

0:31:06.473 --> 0:31:08.784
<v Speaker 1>but that's why Nick and I always choose to have

0:31:08.784 --> 0:31:12.943
<v Speaker 1>opposing views where we discuss and we show that, yeah,

0:31:12.953 --> 0:31:16.004
<v Speaker 1>it's balanced instead of just stirring the pot. If we

0:31:16.004 --> 0:31:16.234
<v Speaker 1>have

0:31:16.281 --> 0:31:18.171
<v Speaker 1>Same view about something we usually don't talk about it.

0:31:18.230 --> 0:31:20.671
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree. This is why Aves and I always

0:31:20.671 --> 0:31:21.941
<v Speaker 1>have opposing views.

0:31:22.301 --> 0:31:24.870
<v Speaker 2>That's why we're on. Thank you guys so much for

0:31:24.870 --> 0:31:27.671
<v Speaker 2>watching yet another episode and thank you, Chow and Nick

0:31:27.671 --> 0:31:30.071
<v Speaker 2>for joining us today. We really do hope that you've

0:31:30.071 --> 0:31:32.671
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed this and make sure that you follow us on

0:31:32.671 --> 0:31:35.071
<v Speaker 2>all our socials at its clarity.com.

0:31:35.270 --> 0:31:37.750
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if you're tuning into us and not watching this

0:31:37.750 --> 0:31:41.110
<v Speaker 1>YouTube video, you can log on to Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

0:31:41.191 --> 0:31:42.711
<v Speaker 1>or Meliten and we'll catch you next.

0:31:44.699 --> 0:31:45.229
<v Speaker 1>Good boy.