WEBVTT - China bubble tea chain Mixue surges over 40% on debut

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:03.990
<v Speaker 1>Now CNA 938 rewind.

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 2>M Xue, the Snow king has claimed the throne, the

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.828
<v Speaker 2>Snowing being the mascot of M Xue. Who and what

0:00:12.829 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 2>is M Xue. Mix Xue is a Chinese chain that

0:00:16.959 --> 0:00:19.559
<v Speaker 2>sells milk tea, fruit drinks, and ice.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.590
<v Speaker 2>mostly in China and Australia, although you might have seen

0:00:22.590 --> 0:00:28.670
<v Speaker 2>some shops here in Singapore too. China's Miue has surpassed

0:00:28.670 --> 0:00:33.310
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's to become the world's largest food and drink chain

0:00:33.310 --> 0:00:35.028
<v Speaker 2>by store count.

0:00:35.740 --> 0:00:38.700
<v Speaker 2>Uh, and over the past two years, M Xue has

0:00:38.700 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 2>doubled the number of store locations to get this 45,000.

0:00:45.619 --> 0:00:50.860
<v Speaker 2>And that's worldwide. So that's more McDonald's 40 McDonald's doesn't

0:00:50.860 --> 0:00:54.180
<v Speaker 2>have 45,000 outlets, but M does. OK, so what's the

0:00:54.180 --> 0:00:57.500
<v Speaker 2>big news now, right? So M went public in Hong

0:00:57.500 --> 0:01:03.380
<v Speaker 2>Kong on Monday, raising $444 million in an IPO.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 2>Following that, shares jumped over 40% on its market debut

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.790
<v Speaker 2>after it was heavily oversubscribed by more than 100 times

0:01:12.790 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 2>of the total number of offer shares initially available. So

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.599
<v Speaker 2>you want to get a better understanding of this IPOs.

0:01:19.705 --> 0:01:21.855
<v Speaker 2>So we have uh joining us right now Gary Eng,

0:01:21.934 --> 0:01:26.175
<v Speaker 2>he's senior economist for APEC at Texas. Uh, Gary, thank

0:01:26.175 --> 0:01:29.175
<v Speaker 2>you for joining us and welcome to Open for Business

0:01:29.175 --> 0:01:33.654
<v Speaker 2>on CNA 938. So the listing was heavily oversubscribed. Did

0:01:33.654 --> 0:01:35.614
<v Speaker 2>this come as a surprise to the markets?

0:01:36.510 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, um, first, thanks for having me today. And then

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.429
<v Speaker 2>I don't think this is too much surprise to the market,

0:01:42.470 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 2>and uh there are two reasons for that. And from

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 2>a general perspective, we do see there is this improvement

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>in the sentiment which we really haven't seen in the

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:58.339
<v Speaker 2>past 3 years in the China-related assets driven by all

0:01:58.339 --> 0:02:00.110
<v Speaker 2>this tech story.

0:02:00.554 --> 0:02:05.954
<v Speaker 2>Dipsy, which has been basically filled the China's growth story

0:02:05.954 --> 0:02:09.464
<v Speaker 2>again that people think that, OK, maybe actually a lot

0:02:09.464 --> 0:02:14.063
<v Speaker 2>of assets may be undervalued compared to what they think before.

0:02:14.313 --> 0:02:16.554
<v Speaker 2>And of course for the case of M, the second

0:02:16.554 --> 0:02:19.343
<v Speaker 2>reason is that it is at a sweet spot even

0:02:19.343 --> 0:02:24.673
<v Speaker 2>though the Chinese economy may be decelerating, but if you.

0:02:24.757 --> 0:02:30.447
<v Speaker 2>at this business model, it is actually targeting the residents

0:02:30.447 --> 0:02:35.027
<v Speaker 2>that may be experiencing a consumption downgrade, but it's offering

0:02:35.026 --> 0:02:40.218
<v Speaker 2>very affordable type of drink with the innovative solution in

0:02:40.218 --> 0:02:44.867
<v Speaker 2>the F&amp;B industry. So it's not really aiming at selling

0:02:44.867 --> 0:02:47.786
<v Speaker 2>something at a very high profit margin, but really about

0:02:47.787 --> 0:02:48.908
<v Speaker 2>the high quantity.

0:02:49.302 --> 0:02:54.261
<v Speaker 2>So quantity over quality in a manner of speaking. So

0:02:54.261 --> 0:02:56.462
<v Speaker 2>uh if we take a look at the timing of

0:02:56.462 --> 0:03:00.542
<v Speaker 2>this listing, Gary, what conclusion can we draw here? Is

0:03:00.542 --> 0:03:03.421
<v Speaker 2>there a link to the boom that we're seeing in

0:03:03.421 --> 0:03:06.572
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese tech sector as well? Well, yes, I think

0:03:06.572 --> 0:03:12.102
<v Speaker 2>that's definitely a very strong connection towards that because I mean,

0:03:12.181 --> 0:03:13.102
<v Speaker 2>of course Misha is not.

0:03:13.496 --> 0:03:17.416
<v Speaker 2>related to the tax story, but the tax rally in

0:03:17.416 --> 0:03:22.095
<v Speaker 2>China really boost the confidence of investors not only in

0:03:22.095 --> 0:03:25.615
<v Speaker 2>China but also globally that people really think and look

0:03:25.615 --> 0:03:28.815
<v Speaker 2>at China's growth story again. So yes, I would say

0:03:28.815 --> 0:03:32.285
<v Speaker 2>that it's not a tech company, but it's definitely related

0:03:32.285 --> 0:03:35.416
<v Speaker 2>to all this tech rally that we have been seeing

0:03:35.416 --> 0:03:37.326
<v Speaker 2>over the past 1 or 2 months.

0:03:37.889 --> 0:03:41.339
<v Speaker 2>And Gary, so we want to talk about Mish Xuan

0:03:41.339 --> 0:03:46.940
<v Speaker 2>now being an attractive investment, it seems, uh opportunity. What

0:03:46.940 --> 0:03:51.860
<v Speaker 2>makes it so attractive? Well, um, indeed, um, if you

0:03:51.860 --> 0:03:58.220
<v Speaker 2>look at the usual China's company growth model, it is

0:03:58.220 --> 0:04:02.300
<v Speaker 2>really about having the very big quantity in terms of

0:04:02.300 --> 0:04:03.350
<v Speaker 2>the size.

0:04:03.692 --> 0:04:08.182
<v Speaker 2>In the domestic market, so 1.4 billion people, if each

0:04:08.182 --> 0:04:12.162
<v Speaker 2>of the residents actually buy one milk tea from them,

0:04:12.253 --> 0:04:14.852
<v Speaker 2>that would be a very big market. But at the

0:04:14.852 --> 0:04:19.173
<v Speaker 2>same time, I think this sort of business in F&amp;B

0:04:19.173 --> 0:04:22.542
<v Speaker 2>is also trying to expand overseas because domestically, of course,

0:04:22.653 --> 0:04:26.572
<v Speaker 2>there's that's pressure on the deflation, but I think M

0:04:26.572 --> 0:04:29.002
<v Speaker 2>is also an example to show that it's

0:04:29.055 --> 0:04:32.446
<v Speaker 2>Able to use it or model not only in China

0:04:32.446 --> 0:04:35.355
<v Speaker 2>but look at what the other overseas market, which may

0:04:35.355 --> 0:04:40.205
<v Speaker 2>actually offer them a higher profit margin model that investors

0:04:40.205 --> 0:04:44.446
<v Speaker 2>may be actually thinking about the future as well. So

0:04:44.455 --> 0:04:46.845
<v Speaker 2>if you put it this way, it's really like a

0:04:46.846 --> 0:04:50.846
<v Speaker 2>story that it can repeat this model maybe towards the

0:04:50.846 --> 0:04:54.585
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world which can challenge, you know, other.

0:04:54.648 --> 0:04:59.998
<v Speaker 2>FNB giants. From the investor's perspective, what risks should we

0:04:59.998 --> 0:05:03.518
<v Speaker 2>be aware of in relation to M's IPO and perhaps

0:05:03.519 --> 0:05:07.079
<v Speaker 2>its future growth prospects as well? I think we should

0:05:07.079 --> 0:05:11.079
<v Speaker 2>also look at the risk of this company and I

0:05:11.079 --> 0:05:14.539
<v Speaker 2>think when we look at the milk tea industry, one

0:05:14.539 --> 0:05:18.678
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest problem that we see here is that

0:05:18.678 --> 0:05:20.188
<v Speaker 2>even though the growth prospects

0:05:20.242 --> 0:05:24.272
<v Speaker 2>seems to be very uh great, but we cannot forget

0:05:24.272 --> 0:05:26.992
<v Speaker 2>the fact that um it is also an industry that

0:05:26.992 --> 0:05:31.630
<v Speaker 2>is highly replaceable, which basically means that in uh like today,

0:05:31.791 --> 0:05:35.380
<v Speaker 2>maybe a consumer really like the product of M share,

0:05:35.712 --> 0:05:40.832
<v Speaker 2>but how Mha can actually distinguish itself versus um other

0:05:40.832 --> 0:05:44.111
<v Speaker 2>players in the future? Would there be any other competitors

0:05:44.111 --> 0:05:45.782
<v Speaker 2>which are able to sell uh

0:05:45.863 --> 0:05:50.505
<v Speaker 2>Cheaper products or basically other sort of products that would

0:05:50.505 --> 0:05:56.984
<v Speaker 2>attract consumer attention and then basically change the consumer spending

0:05:56.984 --> 0:05:59.584
<v Speaker 2>pattern again. I think that is also a very, very

0:05:59.584 --> 0:06:03.393
<v Speaker 2>good question that we should ask and then really depends on,

0:06:03.424 --> 0:06:06.534
<v Speaker 2>you know, how the management will manage this issue. But again,

0:06:06.605 --> 0:06:11.274
<v Speaker 2>compared to many other industry, um, this industry is highly replaceable.

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.238
<v Speaker 2>Gary, Michuan now has the most number of stores owned

0:06:15.238 --> 0:06:19.678
<v Speaker 2>by any food and drink chain. Is this rapid growth sustainable,

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:20.230
<v Speaker 2>do you think?

0:06:21.019 --> 0:06:25.260
<v Speaker 2>Well, um, I think the biggest difference of me share

0:06:25.260 --> 0:06:29.390
<v Speaker 2>versus some of the other fast food chain is that

0:06:29.390 --> 0:06:32.849
<v Speaker 2>the input costs may be a bit lower and of course,

0:06:32.970 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 2>um I mean we do talk about that it has

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.929
<v Speaker 2>already surpassed some of the very large American fast food

0:06:38.928 --> 0:06:41.950
<v Speaker 2>chains like McDonald, but let's not forget that for me

0:06:41.950 --> 0:06:45.289
<v Speaker 2>here the story is much smaller. The cost of really

0:06:45.290 --> 0:06:48.368
<v Speaker 2>setting up everything will be much smaller than McDonald because

0:06:48.369 --> 0:06:48.950
<v Speaker 2>of the

0:06:49.190 --> 0:06:53.670
<v Speaker 2>more limited choice of the products is really about limiting

0:06:53.670 --> 0:06:56.910
<v Speaker 2>or focusing on like a few, not a field, but

0:06:56.910 --> 0:06:59.540
<v Speaker 2>like there's many choices, but you know, on drinks itself.

0:06:59.790 --> 0:07:03.630
<v Speaker 2>So the setup basically come with a lower cost. Then

0:07:03.630 --> 0:07:07.570
<v Speaker 2>it is really about when it is expand, right, where the,

0:07:07.709 --> 0:07:09.510
<v Speaker 2>where does the money come from if it is really

0:07:09.510 --> 0:07:13.070
<v Speaker 2>from a very heavy leverage and if there's a certain

0:07:13.070 --> 0:07:15.589
<v Speaker 2>change in the consumer preference, I do think this can

0:07:15.589 --> 0:07:16.739
<v Speaker 2>pose a risk.

0:07:16.980 --> 0:07:20.450
<v Speaker 2>So it is really about whether it can actually keep

0:07:20.450 --> 0:07:24.850
<v Speaker 2>this hype on Mti continue, um, you know, towards other

0:07:24.850 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>market as well, but I I do think that domestically

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:32.269
<v Speaker 2>it's possible to see more companies trying to tap on

0:07:32.269 --> 0:07:35.529
<v Speaker 2>the same type of business business model because the competition

0:07:35.529 --> 0:07:39.570
<v Speaker 2>is simply quite high in China. Then the question is

0:07:39.570 --> 0:07:44.730
<v Speaker 2>really whether it can expand overseas at a moderately good pace.

0:07:45.089 --> 0:07:48.429
<v Speaker 2>Which at the reasonably OK average. Yes, so I agree

0:07:48.429 --> 0:07:51.940
<v Speaker 2>that it's possible to see, you know, certain over expansion,

0:07:51.989 --> 0:07:56.910
<v Speaker 2>especially in the case within China. So, uh, going back

0:07:56.910 --> 0:08:00.940
<v Speaker 2>to MXue's IPO, what would be the first sign of

0:08:00.940 --> 0:08:04.890
<v Speaker 2>M Xue's true stock value? Uh, if I were an

0:08:04.890 --> 0:08:07.730
<v Speaker 2>investor putting my money on Mue, how would I know

0:08:07.730 --> 0:08:10.750
<v Speaker 2>what exactly is the true value by the time all

0:08:10.750 --> 0:08:12.790
<v Speaker 2>of this hype dies down?

0:08:13.750 --> 0:08:17.369
<v Speaker 2>Well, um, I would say the revenue side will still

0:08:17.369 --> 0:08:21.890
<v Speaker 2>be something very important and of course Mish may have

0:08:21.890 --> 0:08:26.190
<v Speaker 2>a very high market share in China, you basically see

0:08:26.190 --> 0:08:30.410
<v Speaker 2>the stores everywhere and then it's also tapping on this

0:08:30.410 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 2>consumption kind of downgrade story that people choose to consume

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.489
<v Speaker 2>their products. But I think if we are like looking

0:08:39.489 --> 0:08:40.590
<v Speaker 2>at whether the

0:08:40.636 --> 0:08:44.586
<v Speaker 2>Business model or the profit may actually reach a limit

0:08:44.785 --> 0:08:49.146
<v Speaker 2>and look at some of the other periods FNB chains

0:08:49.146 --> 0:08:52.057
<v Speaker 2>in China which may have fallen into a similar trap.

0:08:52.106 --> 0:08:55.377
<v Speaker 2>For example, Haidao. I think we also have seen this

0:08:55.377 --> 0:08:59.696
<v Speaker 2>hotpot chain everywhere, including in in Singapore, and they have

0:08:59.697 --> 0:09:04.706
<v Speaker 2>adopted a very aggressive strategy and expansion before which at

0:09:04.706 --> 0:09:07.606
<v Speaker 2>the end they need to scale it back. So I

0:09:07.653 --> 0:09:11.273
<v Speaker 2>Don't be surprised that we may end up in the

0:09:11.273 --> 0:09:15.073
<v Speaker 2>same path eventually, but I guess in the short run, um,

0:09:15.083 --> 0:09:19.804
<v Speaker 2>as long as they can still feel their profit with

0:09:19.804 --> 0:09:24.083
<v Speaker 2>a reasonably OK leverage, maybe that business model at least

0:09:24.083 --> 0:09:27.883
<v Speaker 2>will still be sustainable. But I guess once we start

0:09:27.883 --> 0:09:31.403
<v Speaker 2>to see uh and and like expansion in stock at

0:09:31.403 --> 0:09:34.513
<v Speaker 2>the same time, a fall in the profit.

0:09:34.820 --> 0:09:37.101
<v Speaker 2>Per store, I think to me this is like a

0:09:37.101 --> 0:09:41.300
<v Speaker 2>warning signal that maybe there could be a certain stress

0:09:41.301 --> 0:09:44.940
<v Speaker 2>from the overexpansion. I'm not saying this will necessarily happen.

0:09:45.020 --> 0:09:47.901
<v Speaker 2>It really depends on the management, but it will be

0:09:47.901 --> 0:09:51.221
<v Speaker 2>a warning signal to me. Yeah, it will definitely be

0:09:51.221 --> 0:09:53.981
<v Speaker 2>one for the investors as well. In the meantime, we

0:09:53.981 --> 0:09:56.580
<v Speaker 2>probably will have to see more niches popping up around

0:09:56.580 --> 0:09:59.700
<v Speaker 2>the region and around the world before all of that happens. Gary,

0:09:59.780 --> 0:10:01.570
<v Speaker 2>thanks very much for joining us this morning.

0:10:02.890 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 2>That's Gary Ng, senior economist for APEC at Nitis.