WEBVTT - TalkBack: Why did the Dragon Year not boost Singapore's birth numbers?

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:04.130
<v Speaker 1>Talk back with Lance and Daniel from 6 p.m.

0:00:04.989 --> 0:00:09.859
<v Speaker 1>Hello everybody, welcome into Talk Bank where you lead the show.

0:00:10.069 --> 0:00:14.909
<v Speaker 1>We need to talk about why Singapore's fertility rate didn't

0:00:14.909 --> 0:00:17.389
<v Speaker 1>get a boost from the dragon year. The dragon year

0:00:17.389 --> 0:00:21.299
<v Speaker 1>did not boost Singapore's birth numbers. We're asking you.

0:00:21.569 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Why the fatal fertility rate has remained at its record

0:00:25.479 --> 0:00:30.049
<v Speaker 1>low of 0.97 in 2024, despite it being the year

0:00:30.049 --> 0:00:31.969
<v Speaker 1>of the dragon. So it didn't go up, didn't go down,

0:00:32.009 --> 0:00:35.168
<v Speaker 1>it's just 0.97. Yeah, because normally when you have dragon years,

0:00:35.250 --> 0:00:38.009
<v Speaker 1>it gives a bump up for birth rates here.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh, with the Chinese, especially the Chinese deeming it an

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:45.639
<v Speaker 1>auspicious time to have babies. Uh, yet, early data showed

0:00:45.639 --> 0:00:50.349
<v Speaker 1>that there were 30,800 resident births last year, just slightly

0:00:50.348 --> 0:00:54.189
<v Speaker 1>up from 30,500. So I jumped in 300, but still

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.159
<v Speaker 1>not enough to make a change to that 0.97.

0:00:58.569 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Uh, record low fertility rate in 2024. Nice. OK, so

0:01:03.279 --> 0:01:07.250
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, have people just given up the idea

0:01:07.250 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>of cultural reasons for choosing the year of the birth,

0:01:12.430 --> 0:01:13.430
<v Speaker 1>or is it

0:01:14.330 --> 0:01:18.238
<v Speaker 1>The trump card is still cast. And that has now

0:01:18.239 --> 0:01:21.010
<v Speaker 1>trumped the year of the dragon. I'm also going to

0:01:21.010 --> 0:01:25.110
<v Speaker 1>throw another thing in this, yeah, maybe couples don't wanna

0:01:25.110 --> 0:01:28.819
<v Speaker 1>have kids. Point blank blank 7 is the new norm. Yeah.

0:01:30.569 --> 0:01:32.410
<v Speaker 1>What do you do? Please join the discussion as we

0:01:32.410 --> 0:01:35.690
<v Speaker 1>ask the question, why do the dragon boost Singapore's numbers?

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Have your say. It's Talkback with Lance and Daniel. Call

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in 669-119-38 or WhatsApp 963-11-938. Doctor Tan, Paul Lin joining us,

0:01:52.470 --> 0:01:56.290
<v Speaker 1>senior research fellow Institute of Policy Studies. Doctor Tan, hello, welcome.

0:01:57.129 --> 0:01:57.889
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having

0:01:57.889 --> 0:02:00.849
<v Speaker 1>me. Have we usually some kind of boost from Dragon?

0:02:01.739 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that um usually we did uh for

0:02:06.019 --> 0:02:11.019
<v Speaker 2>the past few cycles, um we've observed a boost in

0:02:11.020 --> 0:02:13.809
<v Speaker 2>the fertility rate when it came to the dragon year.

0:02:14.110 --> 0:02:14.750
<v Speaker 1>OK, maybe

0:02:14.750 --> 0:02:17.309
<v Speaker 1>you can tell us, Dr. Tan, why are we seeing

0:02:17.309 --> 0:02:20.538
<v Speaker 1>this sort of drop when it comes to

0:02:21.199 --> 0:02:22.059
<v Speaker 1>The dragon, yeah.

0:02:23.119 --> 0:02:25.478
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have to tell you that, uh, you know,

0:02:25.580 --> 0:02:29.139
<v Speaker 2>it's impossible to see everything in advance. Uh, I myself

0:02:29.139 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 2>was a little surprised that there wasn't a boost, uh,

0:02:32.470 --> 0:02:34.779
<v Speaker 2>but what I will tell you is that, uh, and

0:02:34.779 --> 0:02:37.419
<v Speaker 2>what a lot of people don't take into account is

0:02:37.419 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 2>that the dragon year phenomenon is actually uh somewhat of

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:46.539
<v Speaker 2>a relatively new and recent thing. Um so previous, so

0:02:46.538 --> 0:02:49.539
<v Speaker 2>it started in the 70s, uh natural pre

0:02:49.990 --> 0:02:54.210
<v Speaker 2>Uh, previously before that, anybody who is, uh, deeply intimate

0:02:54.210 --> 0:02:58.899
<v Speaker 2>with the um idea of astrology, Chinese astrology would know

0:02:58.899 --> 0:03:01.668
<v Speaker 2>that the way that people will look into uh what

0:03:01.669 --> 0:03:04.429
<v Speaker 2>would be a good time to have a child is

0:03:04.429 --> 0:03:07.869
<v Speaker 2>actually based on your uh parts uh 8.

0:03:07.994 --> 0:03:10.875
<v Speaker 2>Characters, right? And that would not just be a year,

0:03:10.955 --> 0:03:14.524
<v Speaker 2>which is a fairly minor consideration. It also depended on

0:03:14.524 --> 0:03:17.955
<v Speaker 2>the month, the day, even the hour of birth. So

0:03:17.955 --> 0:03:21.793
<v Speaker 2>there'll be 84 different things determining your 8 characters, and

0:03:21.794 --> 0:03:24.684
<v Speaker 2>that actually is what is used to tell fate for

0:03:24.695 --> 0:03:25.675
<v Speaker 2>fortune telling.

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>So why did this dragon phenomenon come about? Um, I

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.038
<v Speaker 2>think it basically it was a reaction to a lot

0:03:33.038 --> 0:03:35.789
<v Speaker 2>of things that were going on in the, in that period.

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.350
<v Speaker 2>So you know that at that point we also had

0:03:38.350 --> 0:03:42.479
<v Speaker 2>a cultural revolution, um, in in in China, um, um.

0:03:42.585 --> 0:03:44.735
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean around that period, um, this was

0:03:44.735 --> 0:03:47.835
<v Speaker 2>a period where, um, there were a lot of cultural

0:03:47.835 --> 0:03:51.514
<v Speaker 2>changes and um including the way that people thought about

0:03:51.514 --> 0:03:54.445
<v Speaker 2>having kids. So in the past having kids was, uh,

0:03:54.675 --> 0:03:57.955
<v Speaker 2>was not something that people debated about and everybody wanted

0:03:57.955 --> 0:03:58.714
<v Speaker 2>to have children.

0:03:59.029 --> 0:04:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Um, but then came along all these cultural changes and

0:04:02.279 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>you know we actually invented new ways of um of

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>thinking about what what what are the what are the

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.509
<v Speaker 2>cultural factors that are relevant um to things like uh childbearing.

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>are not so relevant anymore and now cost is a

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger factor than cultural. That's one of the things that

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to talk about a little bit as to

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>why this dragon year didn't work. Let's go to the

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>phone lines first, Dr. Tan. Christina has called in one

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:29.119
<v Speaker 1>of our listeners, 669-11938. Christina, why do you think the

0:04:29.119 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>dragoner did not boost Singapore's birth numbers? Actually, if you

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.519
<v Speaker 1>are smart, you won't want to give birth to a

0:04:34.519 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>dragon year. To have to be too many kids and

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:40.428
<v Speaker 1>the competition is.

0:04:40.980 --> 0:04:44.409
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be so crazy. So I guess people

0:04:44.410 --> 0:04:47.500
<v Speaker 1>all know everybody is thinking are smarter now, you know that,

0:04:47.559 --> 0:04:49.518
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, you know, you have too many kids

0:04:49.519 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>during the dragon year, and you're fighting with, with so

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.769
<v Speaker 1>many kids for not only for primary school, you have

0:04:56.769 --> 0:04:58.959
<v Speaker 1>to fight with them for secondary school, you have to

0:04:58.959 --> 0:05:03.519
<v Speaker 1>fight with them till tertiary, you know. Army also. And yeah,

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.559
<v Speaker 1>army also. So why bother?

0:05:06.820 --> 0:05:09.540
<v Speaker 1>Is that really a factor? No, it is true. I've heard,

0:05:09.619 --> 0:05:12.659
<v Speaker 1>I've heard this many a time that because so many

0:05:12.660 --> 0:05:16.238
<v Speaker 1>people in the previous dragon years, all the kids' classroom

0:05:16.238 --> 0:05:19.019
<v Speaker 1>sizes were bigger, even for their matches. Is that what

0:05:19.019 --> 0:05:19.899
<v Speaker 1>you heard as well, Christina?

0:05:20.540 --> 0:05:23.808
<v Speaker 1>Yes, of course. And I have a relative who gave birth,

0:05:23.928 --> 0:05:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I think during 1988, there were 52,000 or 54,000 babies.

0:05:30.420 --> 0:05:34.850
<v Speaker 1>So that was crazy here. And every, every time when

0:05:34.850 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they come to a like a critical year, like primary 64,

0:05:39.730 --> 0:05:40.890
<v Speaker 1>they are so worried.

0:05:41.790 --> 0:05:44.390
<v Speaker 1>And, and they are so anxious because that's where they

0:05:44.390 --> 0:05:47.308
<v Speaker 1>are fighting with people. Even if you are good, you

0:05:47.309 --> 0:05:49.950
<v Speaker 1>have to be really, really very good to get into

0:05:49.950 --> 0:05:53.589
<v Speaker 1>a good school. Singapore small country have to worry about

0:05:53.589 --> 0:05:56.510
<v Speaker 1>HDB size, HDB price. Now also worry about what year

0:05:56.510 --> 0:06:02.390
<v Speaker 1>you're born in, putting, uh, Tiger is that the unpopular year?

0:06:02.470 --> 0:06:06.670
<v Speaker 1>Tiger is the unpopular in the calendar. I'm a monkey,

0:06:06.709 --> 0:06:08.230
<v Speaker 1>I'm a monkey. How monkey or not?

0:06:13.220 --> 0:06:14.450
<v Speaker 1>Rabbits also quite good. Christina, so nice to hear from you.

0:06:14.529 --> 0:06:17.459
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. OK bye. Dr. Tan, what do

0:06:17.459 --> 0:06:19.130
<v Speaker 1>you think about what Christina had to say that based

0:06:19.130 --> 0:06:21.808
<v Speaker 1>on previous experience, there were just too many kids born

0:06:21.809 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was competition for resources.

0:06:24.230 --> 0:06:26.809
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, I think Christina is absolutely right, but as

0:06:26.809 --> 0:06:28.488
<v Speaker 2>time went on because it's a recent.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Kind of a new thing. I think people start, it

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.170
<v Speaker 2>wasn't yet culturally stable and then, and the more, the

0:06:34.170 --> 0:06:36.670
<v Speaker 2>more time went on, the more people became more aware

0:06:36.670 --> 0:06:39.369
<v Speaker 2>of the problems of being part of a large cohort.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:44.630
<v Speaker 2>Um, and, uh, actually what you asked about the monkey, uh, zodiac,

0:06:45.049 --> 0:06:47.089
<v Speaker 2>and so, uh, I just wanted to point out that

0:06:47.089 --> 0:06:50.959
<v Speaker 2>in Singapore we have something quite interesting because you know how, uh,

0:06:50.970 --> 0:06:53.649
<v Speaker 2>men go to NS and they delay their entry into

0:06:53.649 --> 0:06:56.730
<v Speaker 2>the labor market. So when we did research, um, with

0:06:56.730 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>my colleagues at NUS, we found that, um, in fact,

0:06:59.450 --> 0:07:01.970
<v Speaker 2>it's not just dragon year, uh, children who tend to

0:07:01.970 --> 0:07:03.410
<v Speaker 2>have lower wages.

0:07:03.570 --> 0:07:06.510
<v Speaker 2>Uh, wages, when we looked at their wages, their labor

0:07:06.510 --> 0:07:09.750
<v Speaker 2>market wages, um, because they're in a large cohort, but

0:07:09.750 --> 0:07:13.790
<v Speaker 2>also people who are are paired with them in, um, the,

0:07:13.829 --> 0:07:16.910
<v Speaker 2>the year of the horse, because men come out of

0:07:16.910 --> 0:07:19.970
<v Speaker 2>NS a bit later, right, than women do. So they

0:07:19.970 --> 0:07:23.190
<v Speaker 2>actually match with women from born in the year of

0:07:23.190 --> 0:07:26.700
<v Speaker 2>the horse. And we also find that for that particular

0:07:26.989 --> 0:07:27.329
<v Speaker 2>set of

0:07:27.380 --> 0:07:30.690
<v Speaker 2>People, they also have lower wages. So definitely that may

0:07:30.690 --> 0:07:33.369
<v Speaker 2>be a very good rationale behind what Christina

0:07:33.369 --> 0:07:33.450
<v Speaker 1>is

0:07:33.450 --> 0:07:33.730
<v Speaker 2>saying.

0:07:33.809 --> 0:07:34.130
<v Speaker 1>Tiger.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.730
<v Speaker 1>But Dr. Tan, we still need a replacement rate of

0:07:40.730 --> 0:07:45.850
<v Speaker 1>2.1 to allow the population to replace itself. At the

0:07:45.850 --> 0:07:49.250
<v Speaker 1>rate we're going, we can have more older people and

0:07:49.250 --> 0:07:51.079
<v Speaker 1>not too many young people.

0:07:52.750 --> 0:07:56.850
<v Speaker 2>Um, that's right. Um, so it's, it's actually the case

0:07:56.850 --> 0:07:58.769
<v Speaker 2>that even though we are all very used to the

0:07:58.769 --> 0:08:00.929
<v Speaker 2>idea that Singapore is a low fertility country and we

0:08:00.929 --> 0:08:05.279
<v Speaker 2>have a sub replacement TFR, the fact is that demographic

0:08:05.489 --> 0:08:08.670
<v Speaker 2>changes in Singapore are not yet stabilized. There's still a

0:08:08.670 --> 0:08:12.529
<v Speaker 2>lot of changes ongoing. Um, the reasons for why people

0:08:12.529 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have children actually has changed from just

0:08:15.252 --> 0:08:19.833
<v Speaker 2>Uh, because it's too expensive, um, to other considerations as well.

0:08:20.083 --> 0:08:23.513
<v Speaker 2>You know, people these days also, for example, don't want

0:08:23.513 --> 0:08:28.173
<v Speaker 2>to have children in order to have, uh, old age insurance. Um,

0:08:28.322 --> 0:08:30.632
<v Speaker 2>and that's, that's something that's positive. Actually, it can be

0:08:30.632 --> 0:08:33.002
<v Speaker 2>a source of relief, right? Because you don't have to

0:08:33.002 --> 0:08:35.793
<v Speaker 2>depend on your children and your, your children don't have to, uh,

0:08:35.802 --> 0:08:37.713
<v Speaker 2>pay for you when you get old. But

0:08:37.765 --> 0:08:40.155
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, that reduces the reasons for

0:08:40.155 --> 0:08:42.695
<v Speaker 2>having children. There are a lot of um, so that

0:08:42.695 --> 0:08:45.664
<v Speaker 2>to to just uh make it sweet and short, um,

0:08:45.715 --> 0:08:49.824
<v Speaker 2>there are other ongoing reasons as to why um people

0:08:50.515 --> 0:08:53.434
<v Speaker 2>actually are changing the reasons for not having children. It's

0:08:53.434 --> 0:08:58.135
<v Speaker 2>not just about cost as anymore actually other um changes

0:08:58.135 --> 0:09:00.343
<v Speaker 2>happening we see um by cohort.

0:09:01.344 --> 0:09:02.224
<v Speaker 1>All of our listeners.

0:09:03.340 --> 0:09:06.739
<v Speaker 1>Made a punny comment. Apparently our low fertility rates will

0:09:06.739 --> 0:09:08.260
<v Speaker 1>continue to drag on.

0:09:10.070 --> 0:09:14.070
<v Speaker 1>Drag on, get it get it well done, Alvin, well done. Uh,

0:09:14.190 --> 0:09:16.989
<v Speaker 1>another listener says people are holding off because they, they're

0:09:16.989 --> 0:09:20.219
<v Speaker 1>in anticipation of the SG 60 gifts from the government.

0:09:21.429 --> 0:09:23.770
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that you can hold off the baby la,

0:09:23.890 --> 0:09:26.699
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, like, like, I don't think

0:09:26.700 --> 0:09:28.809
<v Speaker 1>somebody last year said, no, no, no, no, maybe wait

0:09:28.809 --> 0:09:30.830
<v Speaker 1>till 60, then have the baby at 60, but you've

0:09:30.830 --> 0:09:34.049
<v Speaker 1>got to start now because you know it's 9 months

0:09:34.049 --> 0:09:36.969
<v Speaker 1>and you're looking at December, November, December already, you know,

0:09:37.049 --> 0:09:39.010
<v Speaker 1>so if you want to get on to the year

0:09:39.010 --> 0:09:42.619
<v Speaker 1>of the dragon, it's too late for that, but this

0:09:42.619 --> 0:09:44.210
<v Speaker 1>year is the you have the snake.

0:09:45.059 --> 0:09:47.020
<v Speaker 1>So the year of the snake, what, what is it like?

0:09:47.260 --> 0:09:49.339
<v Speaker 1>You know, is it popular at all or have you

0:09:49.340 --> 0:09:53.500
<v Speaker 1>noticed sub uh substantial or significant folds, Doctor Tan?

0:09:54.309 --> 0:09:58.789
<v Speaker 2>No, we, uh, actually only see significant differences in how

0:09:58.789 --> 0:10:02.349
<v Speaker 2>many kids people have in tiger and dragon years in

0:10:02.349 --> 0:10:02.949
<v Speaker 2>the past in

0:10:02.950 --> 0:10:03.669
<v Speaker 1>Singapore. Oh, OK,

0:10:05.619 --> 0:10:09.218
<v Speaker 1>uh, bottom line, maybe people don't care anymore.

0:10:10.510 --> 0:10:13.950
<v Speaker 1>That these cultural reasons for having a baby in a

0:10:13.950 --> 0:10:17.309
<v Speaker 1>specific year doesn't matter anymore. Is there any evidence, has,

0:10:17.460 --> 0:10:19.449
<v Speaker 1>has any of your studies pointed towards that? I'm curious.

0:10:20.239 --> 0:10:23.450
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that um it is very, uh there

0:10:23.450 --> 0:10:27.968
<v Speaker 2>are very um that's very clear indication uh from various

0:10:27.969 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 2>different polls that different cohorts actually have different attitudes towards,

0:10:32.330 --> 0:10:33.449
<v Speaker 2>towards family formation.

0:10:33.700 --> 0:10:36.968
<v Speaker 2>And the younger generation in general, when they say they

0:10:36.969 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 2>don't want what the reason why they're not having children,

0:10:39.609 --> 0:10:42.010
<v Speaker 2>it's not just because they didn't have the chance to

0:10:42.010 --> 0:10:45.700
<v Speaker 2>get married, it's actually that they really do have either

0:10:45.700 --> 0:10:49.479
<v Speaker 2>less interest in family formation or they would cite something

0:10:49.479 --> 0:10:53.210
<v Speaker 2>like um they they feel that um it may not

0:10:53.210 --> 0:10:54.820
<v Speaker 2>be a good thing to have kids,

0:10:54.929 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>yeah,

0:10:55.450 --> 0:10:56.608
<v Speaker 2>so that's something that you know.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 2>is different from previous generations.

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.478
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess another thing is back then, if you

0:11:02.479 --> 0:11:04.919
<v Speaker 1>had a kid or about to plan for a kid,

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>you would also get a lot of pressure from your

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>parents or grandparents, relatives. So maybe today, would you say

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:16.070
<v Speaker 1>that kids don't, don't bother about that sort of pressure.

0:11:16.159 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>They say, I mean we're doing our own thing, so

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>leave us alone.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.469
<v Speaker 1>And uh and, and there'll be a forecast and what

0:11:22.469 --> 0:11:25.750
<v Speaker 1>year might be, you know, practices. Yeah, those were quite

0:11:25.750 --> 0:11:28.348
<v Speaker 1>popular as well. People would look at the stars or

0:11:28.349 --> 0:11:32.390
<v Speaker 1>certain alignments and then decide. Would you say as well, Dr. Tan,

0:11:32.950 --> 0:11:39.299
<v Speaker 1>we saw less marriages, I think 24,800 in 2024 compared

0:11:39.299 --> 0:11:45.750
<v Speaker 1>to 26,500 in 2023. Uh, was that a result of

0:11:45.750 --> 0:11:49.030
<v Speaker 1>delays due to COVID? So maybe people are marrying less

0:11:49.030 --> 0:11:49.358
<v Speaker 1>and

0:11:49.820 --> 0:11:54.650
<v Speaker 1>Uh, maybe planning to have kids 23 years after marriage

0:11:54.650 --> 0:11:55.609
<v Speaker 1>life. Well,

0:11:55.650 --> 0:11:59.349
<v Speaker 2>it could be actually the opposite. The baseline was higher, um,

0:11:59.369 --> 0:12:01.530
<v Speaker 2>in those years, right, so you have all these catch

0:12:01.530 --> 0:12:06.169
<v Speaker 2>up marriages happening, um, because they couldn't get married in 2020, 2021,

0:12:06.330 --> 0:12:09.450
<v Speaker 2>pushed it back to 22, 23, so when you compare

0:12:09.450 --> 0:12:12.969
<v Speaker 2>that 2024 to 23, it may be that uh part

0:12:12.969 --> 0:12:16.369
<v Speaker 2>of that is that the um that the baseline was

0:12:16.369 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 2>higher than 23.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.968
<v Speaker 2>Um, at the same time, I think that when we

0:12:19.969 --> 0:12:23.929
<v Speaker 2>talk about things like, uh, specifically, you know, I want

0:12:23.929 --> 0:12:27.919
<v Speaker 2>to have babies in the dragon year versus, uh, and, uh,

0:12:27.929 --> 0:12:30.179
<v Speaker 2>thinking about things like that, I think it's kind of

0:12:30.179 --> 0:12:34.209
<v Speaker 2>an interesting paradox because on the one hand, there's never

0:12:34.210 --> 0:12:37.359
<v Speaker 2>been more, it's never been more profitable to be an astrologer,

0:12:37.609 --> 0:12:37.849
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:12:37.942 --> 0:12:41.463
<v Speaker 2>Uh, that's big money now it's a huge industry, um,

0:12:41.523 --> 0:12:44.163
<v Speaker 2>so people are still ascribing or at least they're interested

0:12:44.163 --> 0:12:47.283
<v Speaker 2>in astrology, but on the other hand, I think people

0:12:47.283 --> 0:12:50.552
<v Speaker 2>just don't have the luxury anymore of, uh, trying to

0:12:50.552 --> 0:12:54.083
<v Speaker 2>time children exactly when they have it. One thing is

0:12:54.083 --> 0:12:57.442
<v Speaker 2>that we're all getting older, um, and when you get older,

0:12:57.482 --> 0:12:57.992
<v Speaker 2>you start to get

0:12:58.046 --> 0:13:00.556
<v Speaker 2>Anxious about when I can have a kid. I can't

0:13:00.556 --> 0:13:03.226
<v Speaker 2>wait till dragon year, right, uh, to have a child.

0:13:03.356 --> 0:13:06.116
<v Speaker 2>I can't delay, uh, if it's a it's a tiger

0:13:06.116 --> 0:13:10.455
<v Speaker 2>year because I'm hitting my fertility, um, you know, uh,

0:13:10.466 --> 0:13:12.875
<v Speaker 2>age kind of, uh, when I want to get all

0:13:12.875 --> 0:13:15.306
<v Speaker 2>my babies out, you know, and maybe for some people,

0:13:15.395 --> 0:13:17.035
<v Speaker 2>I want to have all my babies by the time

0:13:17.035 --> 0:13:19.755
<v Speaker 2>I'm 35. So for them, it, it would be a

0:13:19.755 --> 0:13:23.195
<v Speaker 2>matter of much more practical considerations, like, what can I

0:13:23.195 --> 0:13:25.416
<v Speaker 2>do it now? Will my boss be happy?

0:13:25.719 --> 0:13:28.598
<v Speaker 2>Um, is, is it OK if I have another baby

0:13:28.599 --> 0:13:30.890
<v Speaker 2>within 2 years? These are the kind of things I

0:13:30.890 --> 0:13:32.309
<v Speaker 2>think that are more on the minds of

0:13:32.309 --> 0:13:36.169
<v Speaker 1>people timing it to things like when the HDB will

0:13:36.169 --> 0:13:37.210
<v Speaker 1>be ready as well.

0:13:37.250 --> 0:13:41.570
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. Yeah, so there are other things that

0:13:41.570 --> 0:13:44.590
<v Speaker 2>make it so that the space is quite constrained actually

0:13:44.969 --> 0:13:45.690
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of us.

0:13:45.890 --> 0:13:50.478
<v Speaker 1>But we're also offering opportunities of flexi hours for people.

0:13:50.859 --> 0:13:53.859
<v Speaker 1>And some of the, the goodies is you could have

0:13:53.859 --> 0:13:57.819
<v Speaker 1>up to 9 months of parental leave, which is quite

0:13:57.820 --> 0:14:00.750
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Don't you want to take advantage of that?

0:14:02.750 --> 0:14:06.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that there are, uh, definitely, um, um,

0:14:06.820 --> 0:14:11.569
<v Speaker 2>incentives that, you know, and, um, I, I would say, uh, support, uh,

0:14:11.580 --> 0:14:15.429
<v Speaker 2>given to families that people can respond to. Um, I,

0:14:15.590 --> 0:14:17.820
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just a matter, uh, for a lot

0:14:17.820 --> 0:14:23.210
<v Speaker 2>of people of whether they perceive that they can, they can,

0:14:23.219 --> 0:14:26.119
<v Speaker 2>they are in a good place to have children. Um,

0:14:26.380 --> 0:14:28.599
<v Speaker 2>if you look at, if you look at what, when

0:14:28.599 --> 0:14:30.380
<v Speaker 2>you ask people, do you want to have, do you

0:14:30.380 --> 0:14:32.109
<v Speaker 2>want to get married? Do you want to have children?

0:14:32.539 --> 0:14:36.260
<v Speaker 2>Actually, most people would say yes, that would be ideal,

0:14:36.539 --> 0:14:39.250
<v Speaker 2>it's not that they're saying that it necessarily is a

0:14:39.250 --> 0:14:42.340
<v Speaker 2>bad it's something they don't want to have, but where

0:14:42.340 --> 0:14:44.690
<v Speaker 2>is it in the queue is the question. Is it

0:14:44.690 --> 0:14:45.820
<v Speaker 2>at the front of the queue?

0:14:46.090 --> 0:14:47.559
<v Speaker 2>Or is it in the back of the queue? Is

0:14:47.559 --> 0:14:50.719
<v Speaker 2>the front of the queue more like financial stability, and

0:14:50.719 --> 0:14:54.030
<v Speaker 2>if I can get financial stability, I can get, um, uh,

0:14:54.039 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>my family support, um, and other kinds of, uh, social support,

0:14:58.049 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 2>my networks are up. um, then at that point, at

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.159
<v Speaker 2>the back of the queue, the next item will be

0:15:03.159 --> 0:15:06.039
<v Speaker 2>having a child, right, getting married and so forth. Um,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the problem is that then you need everything to fall

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.979
<v Speaker 2>in place for a lot of people, and if that

0:15:10.979 --> 0:15:11.679
<v Speaker 2>doesn't happen.

0:15:12.099 --> 0:15:15.260
<v Speaker 2>Right, if it's pushed back too late, you know, or

0:15:15.260 --> 0:15:19.099
<v Speaker 2>there's some kind of setback, then you don't see um

0:15:19.099 --> 0:15:19.940
<v Speaker 2>the bus coming.

0:15:20.219 --> 0:15:23.619
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so much. Um, one of our listeners

0:15:23.619 --> 0:15:26.900
<v Speaker 1>whats up and says, I've got a dragon baby. I

0:15:26.900 --> 0:15:29.859
<v Speaker 1>was so happy when I heard the news. That being said,

0:15:29.940 --> 0:15:32.460
<v Speaker 1>I've never felt more time starved after having a child.

0:15:32.604 --> 0:15:34.635
<v Speaker 1>But it's still worth it, I think. We want to

0:15:34.635 --> 0:15:37.195
<v Speaker 1>have a 2nd kid, but there's just no time. Work

0:15:37.195 --> 0:15:40.155
<v Speaker 1>is too hectic, just like what you were just saying, Prof. Uh,

0:15:40.515 --> 0:15:43.965
<v Speaker 1>another person WhatsApping across and saying, Hi, Daniel and Lance,

0:15:44.275 --> 0:15:46.075
<v Speaker 1>I'm born in the dragon year and I gave birth

0:15:46.075 --> 0:15:48.025
<v Speaker 1>to my #2 in December last year.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So dragging you about the dragon, that's kind of cool. Uh,

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the cost is high, you need energy to take care

0:15:52.719 --> 0:15:55.039
<v Speaker 1>of the kids and it takes lots of me time

0:15:55.039 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple time. Basically, your kids, your life. Lots of

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>my friends in my age bracket are opting to be dinks,

0:16:00.650 --> 0:16:03.359
<v Speaker 1>dual income, no kids, because they have full control of

0:16:03.359 --> 0:16:06.349
<v Speaker 1>their life. They do what they want when they want. Yes,

0:16:06.450 --> 0:16:07.679
<v Speaker 1>but you've got #2.

0:16:08.140 --> 0:16:11.090
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we just need one more push for number 33,

0:16:11.109 --> 0:16:15.609
<v Speaker 1>we need one more. Hey, replacement rate is 2.7. Talk

0:16:15.609 --> 0:16:19.690
<v Speaker 1>back with Lance and Daniel from 6 p.m. OK, we're

0:16:19.690 --> 0:16:23.010
<v Speaker 1>looking at Singapore's fertility rate, which kind of held steady

0:16:23.010 --> 0:16:23.650
<v Speaker 1>last year.

0:16:24.650 --> 0:16:29.130
<v Speaker 1>At 0.97, even though it was a dragon year. Singapore's

0:16:29.130 --> 0:16:33.450
<v Speaker 1>fertility rate first fell below 1.0 in 2023.

0:16:34.179 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, according to some numbers that our

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:44.070
<v Speaker 1>team dug up, apparently, generally speaking, dragon your numbers are

0:16:44.070 --> 0:16:45.359
<v Speaker 1>diminishing over time.

0:16:46.450 --> 0:16:49.809
<v Speaker 1>Like, in general, it's just going down. Yeah, I mean

0:16:49.809 --> 0:16:51.330
<v Speaker 1>if you were to compare one dragon year to another

0:16:51.330 --> 0:16:54.130
<v Speaker 1>dragon year la, so in 1976 it was 2.11.

0:16:54.820 --> 0:16:59.460
<v Speaker 1>1988, it was 1.96%, then it goes down to 1.6, 1.29,

0:16:59.500 --> 0:17:03.380
<v Speaker 1>and now 0.97. So it's been declining. Whether or not

0:17:03.380 --> 0:17:05.819
<v Speaker 1>it's higher than the other years, whether it's higher than monkey,

0:17:06.260 --> 0:17:09.010
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Uh, we didn't compare that. We've got

0:17:09.010 --> 0:17:12.060
<v Speaker 1>many of your comments and your questions coming in being

0:17:12.060 --> 0:17:13.939
<v Speaker 1>a part of the show as we ask you why

0:17:13.939 --> 0:17:18.660
<v Speaker 1>didn't the dragon year boost Singapore's birth numbers.

0:17:19.239 --> 0:17:20.930
<v Speaker 1>Uh, Ariel Lim is also joining us in the segment.

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.079
<v Speaker 1>She's a mother of three. She'll be talking to us

0:17:23.079 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>in just a moment, but one of our comments I

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.218
<v Speaker 1>want to read out, our listener says you didn't leave

0:17:28.219 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>your name, uh, let me scroll back, see if you

0:17:30.199 --> 0:17:34.229
<v Speaker 1>left it before. No. OK, so your current comments states,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just 2 cycles is a change of a generation. How

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.389
<v Speaker 1>many of us still actually follow strong Chinese culture? We're

0:17:40.390 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>influenced by other ideologies. We have couples spending more on

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 1>pets than having a child at home.

0:17:45.979 --> 0:17:48.989
<v Speaker 1>And also, how about looking at childbirth with reference to

0:17:48.989 --> 0:17:51.469
<v Speaker 1>dragon parents. Not many of us became parents when we

0:17:51.469 --> 0:17:54.109
<v Speaker 1>were 24, maybe only when we were 36. So yeah,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.149
<v Speaker 1>the age that you become a parent directly impacts how

0:17:58.150 --> 0:18:00.109
<v Speaker 1>many kids you're going to have and whether you can

0:18:00.109 --> 0:18:04.619
<v Speaker 1>hit that total replacement rate, which I believe is 2.7. Uh,

0:18:04.750 --> 0:18:07.310
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Ariel Lim, mother of three, joining us

0:18:07.310 --> 0:18:08.430
<v Speaker 1>right now. Hello, Ariel.

0:18:09.369 --> 0:18:14.770
<v Speaker 1>Hello, hello. Hi. So, um, amongst your peer group, I'm

0:18:14.770 --> 0:18:18.639
<v Speaker 1>curious and yourself as well, did the choice of year,

0:18:18.750 --> 0:18:21.349
<v Speaker 1>for example, dragon year, impact your decision?

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.859
<v Speaker 1>I would say I echo what the the previous uh

0:18:24.859 --> 0:18:28.569
<v Speaker 1>comments said about how the zodiac doesn't really matter to, uh,

0:18:28.579 --> 0:18:31.020
<v Speaker 1>my friends and I very much now. So I don't

0:18:31.020 --> 0:18:33.060
<v Speaker 1>think we were like looking out for this year or

0:18:33.060 --> 0:18:34.780
<v Speaker 1>I must give birth to a baby. No need to

0:18:34.780 --> 0:18:40.339
<v Speaker 1>go and pick the definitely not, definitely not. Yeah, I

0:18:40.339 --> 0:18:42.300
<v Speaker 1>would say that's way more common and and I guess

0:18:42.300 --> 0:18:43.079
<v Speaker 1>my generation.

0:18:44.030 --> 0:18:48.050
<v Speaker 1>30s and yeah. Was it easy for you to conceive?

0:18:48.209 --> 0:18:50.300
<v Speaker 1>Did you struggle at all? Do you know of people

0:18:50.750 --> 0:18:53.109
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to have kids but are struggling? Could

0:18:53.109 --> 0:18:55.829
<v Speaker 1>that be another factor too? It's just more difficult to

0:18:55.829 --> 0:18:56.739
<v Speaker 1>conceive these days.

0:18:57.959 --> 0:19:00.060
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does seem like I do hear a lot

0:19:00.060 --> 0:19:03.270
<v Speaker 1>more stories of people having trouble conceiving, although it could

0:19:03.270 --> 0:19:06.109
<v Speaker 1>also be social media because, um, you know, these issues

0:19:06.109 --> 0:19:08.790
<v Speaker 1>are people needing to go for IVF or uh assisted

0:19:08.790 --> 0:19:12.790
<v Speaker 1>reproductive uh technologies. Uh, there's a lot more exposure and

0:19:12.790 --> 0:19:16.030
<v Speaker 1>coverage of these issues also in the media, but so

0:19:16.030 --> 0:19:19.030
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't, yeah, I wouldn't know, you know, actual numbers

0:19:19.030 --> 0:19:21.949
<v Speaker 1>in difficulty of conception, but, um.

0:19:22.270 --> 0:19:25.329
<v Speaker 1>I do hear of people, I guess my age, we

0:19:25.329 --> 0:19:27.239
<v Speaker 1>see a mix, a mixed group. I mean there are

0:19:27.239 --> 0:19:30.689
<v Speaker 1>people who, you know, didn't plan and and then conceived,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:32.410
<v Speaker 1>and then we have those people who plan and plan

0:19:32.410 --> 0:19:35.530
<v Speaker 1>and just really find a lot of trouble conceiving, yeah.

0:19:35.729 --> 0:19:39.930
<v Speaker 1>So you're soon to be pregnant now. Yes, yes. Was

0:19:39.930 --> 0:19:42.569
<v Speaker 1>there any hope that could have been a dragon?

0:19:43.670 --> 0:19:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh, no, not at all.

0:19:46.459 --> 0:19:46.550
<v Speaker 1>Yeah

0:19:48.380 --> 0:19:52.729
<v Speaker 1>Time is what time is. 9 months is 9 months. Yeah, yeah, exactly.

0:19:53.060 --> 0:19:54.979
<v Speaker 1>And are any of your other kids dragon babies by

0:19:54.979 --> 0:19:58.180
<v Speaker 1>any chance? No, no. No, I don't actually know what

0:19:58.180 --> 0:20:01.579
<v Speaker 1>I mean what they are, so yeah, it doesn't matter

0:20:01.579 --> 0:20:05.699
<v Speaker 1>to the younger generation. Yeah, I really think not many

0:20:05.699 --> 0:20:07.819
<v Speaker 1>people look at it. Did you have to convince mom

0:20:07.819 --> 0:20:08.978
<v Speaker 1>and dad about that?

0:20:09.729 --> 0:20:11.770
<v Speaker 1>Uh, no, my parents don't really look at it too,

0:20:11.849 --> 0:20:14.530
<v Speaker 1>so I guess it's just, uh, it's also cultural for

0:20:14.530 --> 0:20:18.409
<v Speaker 1>my family. And your thoughts as well, Ari, the Large

0:20:18.410 --> 0:20:22.130
<v Speaker 1>family life HG initiative, which was announced just a couple

0:20:22.130 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago by uh Prime Minister Lawrence Wong.

0:20:26.510 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh, so

0:20:28.540 --> 0:20:31.410
<v Speaker 1>Uh, to be really honest, because he hyped it up at, uh,

0:20:31.420 --> 0:20:34.659
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Edira last year, National Day rally. Uh,

0:20:34.739 --> 0:20:38.780
<v Speaker 1>I really looked forward to it. Yeah, so, um, I

0:20:38.780 --> 0:20:40.188
<v Speaker 1>mean when it came out, I was still very thankful,

0:20:40.260 --> 0:20:42.698
<v Speaker 1>but I was, I was like, oh, OK, it's, it's

0:20:42.699 --> 0:20:46.030
<v Speaker 1>more of in a handout scheme, which is good. I think, uh,

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the money really helps to cover delivery, etc.

0:20:48.660 --> 0:20:52.069
<v Speaker 1>Um, but you know, uh, I've like other friends with

0:20:52.069 --> 0:20:53.969
<v Speaker 1>big families as well, and we were kind of hoping

0:20:53.969 --> 0:20:58.339
<v Speaker 1>of a more schematic, like, you know, maybe COE different

0:20:59.150 --> 0:21:02.510
<v Speaker 1>larger houses built for larger families, you know, something that's

0:21:02.510 --> 0:21:04.869
<v Speaker 1>a bit more categorically different as opposed to like get

0:21:04.869 --> 0:21:11.909
<v Speaker 1>sorry I know, I know it's so interesting to hear

0:21:11.910 --> 0:21:13.790
<v Speaker 1>you use the phrase big family.

0:21:14.109 --> 0:21:17.810
<v Speaker 1>What would you describe as a big, I mean, congratulations,

0:21:17.859 --> 0:21:21.540
<v Speaker 1>well done with 3, you've hit total replacement rate, um,

0:21:21.660 --> 0:21:23.968
<v Speaker 1>which is 2.7%, so you had your 3 well done

0:21:24.380 --> 0:21:27.900
<v Speaker 1>replaced already sorted, um, but what is big family to

0:21:27.900 --> 0:21:31.420
<v Speaker 1>you and to your peers? Because my dad, for example,

0:21:31.500 --> 0:21:33.500
<v Speaker 1>my dad came from a family of 7.

0:21:34.109 --> 0:21:36.989
<v Speaker 1>My mom came from a family of 55 siblings on

0:21:36.989 --> 0:21:39.149
<v Speaker 1>my mom's side, 7 siblings on my dad's side. Yeah,

0:21:39.270 --> 0:21:43.189
<v Speaker 1>on my mom's side they were like 9 siblings. So

0:21:43.189 --> 0:21:46.469
<v Speaker 1>big family as well. Those days are gone, and I've

0:21:46.469 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>got 3 older. How about you? What is big to

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:51.670
<v Speaker 1>your generation, Ariel?

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.390
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think, I think 3 and more are definitely big.

0:21:55.469 --> 0:21:57.750
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether 2 will become big too, but anyway,

0:21:57.939 --> 0:22:01.429
<v Speaker 1>3 and more are definitely considered big in my generation. Uh, yes,

0:22:01.469 --> 0:22:03.630
<v Speaker 1>I do have friends with with 3 and more or

0:22:03.630 --> 0:22:05.229
<v Speaker 1>I do know of people who want 3 and more

0:22:05.229 --> 0:22:07.948
<v Speaker 1>but they're not really the majority and like, you know,

0:22:08.189 --> 0:22:09.270
<v Speaker 1>I guess my parents' generation.

0:22:09.415 --> 0:22:12.444
<v Speaker 1>So my mom has like 6 siblings. Uh, so when

0:22:12.444 --> 0:22:14.964
<v Speaker 1>we heard of this large family scheme now being 3

0:22:14.964 --> 0:22:18.484
<v Speaker 1>and more, uh, we were, I guess surprised and yet

0:22:18.484 --> 0:22:20.474
<v Speaker 1>not surprised at the same time because yeah, frankly when

0:22:20.474 --> 0:22:24.604
<v Speaker 1>you go around anecdotally or like, you know, our experience

0:22:24.604 --> 0:22:26.395
<v Speaker 1>shows that most people have have to.

0:22:26.810 --> 0:22:29.010
<v Speaker 1>Two or less and when you see like, you know,

0:22:29.130 --> 0:22:32.689
<v Speaker 1>families with like 4 or 3, it's like wow, you know, respect, man,

0:22:32.770 --> 0:22:38.129
<v Speaker 1>those two parents heroes, you think it's ebbs and flows

0:22:38.130 --> 0:22:41.170
<v Speaker 1>as well? Do you think currently Singapore is at a

0:22:41.170 --> 0:22:45.619
<v Speaker 1>record low of 0.97? Do you think it will change maybe,

0:22:46.329 --> 0:22:49.089
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure whether they're going to be even newer initiatives,

0:22:49.500 --> 0:22:51.930
<v Speaker 1>or do you reckon it's just going to continue to

0:22:51.930 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>decline A?

0:22:54.060 --> 0:22:56.550
<v Speaker 1>Are you the exception rather than the norm?

0:22:57.180 --> 0:23:00.670
<v Speaker 1>OK, it does feel like I'm the exception sometimes, um,

0:23:00.689 --> 0:23:02.739
<v Speaker 1>and also I think studies have been done on this,

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, uh, and one demographer, she actually said

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:09.069
<v Speaker 1>that while government policies have been effective in lowering, um, the,

0:23:09.079 --> 0:23:12.079
<v Speaker 1>the total fertility rates around the world, they have not

0:23:12.079 --> 0:23:14.438
<v Speaker 1>seen this kind of success with policies in the other

0:23:14.439 --> 0:23:18.479
<v Speaker 1>direction to raise fertility rates, um, despite, you know, huge

0:23:18.479 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>amounts of spending. So I mean, Singapore isn't an exception

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.239
<v Speaker 1>here and I think what we're seeing is a whole

0:23:23.239 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>like overhaul of like value systems, um.

0:23:25.819 --> 0:23:28.750
<v Speaker 1>You know, people focusing less on like the practicalities of

0:23:28.750 --> 0:23:32.030
<v Speaker 1>like roof over your head, food to eat, uh, you know, uh,

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>money and dollars and cents issues and going into more, uh,

0:23:36.030 --> 0:23:38.750
<v Speaker 1>you know, quality of life, uh, you know, do I

0:23:38.750 --> 0:23:41.829
<v Speaker 1>want to sacrifice my life for like kids whom I

0:23:41.829 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know will be grateful to me in the future.

0:23:43.709 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we hear a lot, um, on the

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.430
<v Speaker 1>streets at least, uh, and whether that's good or bad,

0:23:48.510 --> 0:23:48.899
<v Speaker 1>I mean,

0:23:49.890 --> 0:23:53.250
<v Speaker 1>We all have our personal opinions, right? Yeah. So it's

0:23:53.250 --> 0:23:55.649
<v Speaker 1>a little difficult to change, change minds on this. I

0:23:55.650 --> 0:24:00.729
<v Speaker 1>feel in our current uh generation, yeah. I'm 44 and

0:24:00.729 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I just remembered one of my classmates from junior college

0:24:04.130 --> 0:24:07.290
<v Speaker 1>who married his junior college sweetheart, by the way, they

0:24:07.290 --> 0:24:08.099
<v Speaker 1>have 6 kids.

0:24:08.500 --> 0:24:11.969
<v Speaker 1>Wow, yeah, every time we see them posting photos of

0:24:11.969 --> 0:24:14.319
<v Speaker 1>their children, we're like, which one is this one? Like,

0:24:14.930 --> 0:24:16.728
<v Speaker 1>his goal is to build his own soccer team. That's

0:24:16.729 --> 0:24:19.409
<v Speaker 1>what he says. He's getting close, half a team at

0:24:19.410 --> 0:24:23.729
<v Speaker 1>least his goal, right? If he and the mom joins in,

0:24:23.770 --> 0:24:26.729
<v Speaker 1>that's 8 of them right there. But that's, that's.

0:24:27.599 --> 0:24:31.010
<v Speaker 1>That's wild, right? To have a family today that has

0:24:31.010 --> 0:24:35.599
<v Speaker 1>6 kids. That's wild, very common in the past, not today,

0:24:35.839 --> 0:24:38.589
<v Speaker 1>not today. So what do you think is, I mean,

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously our fertility rates are low. And Ariel, like you said,

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it was wonderful to see some of those um support

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.079
<v Speaker 1>measures that were announced as well. What would you like

0:24:47.079 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to see just from a family point of view, I mean,

0:24:49.530 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 1>do you, I think 3 is the perfect number. I

0:24:51.199 --> 0:24:52.369
<v Speaker 1>come from a family of 3. I have an older

0:24:52.369 --> 0:24:54.319
<v Speaker 1>sister and a younger brother who's just right. I'm the

0:24:54.319 --> 0:24:55.630
<v Speaker 1>middle child, which is the best one.

0:24:57.459 --> 0:25:01.290
<v Speaker 1>Studies have proven it. OK, studies have proven it. Um,

0:25:01.300 --> 0:25:03.468
<v Speaker 1>do you think 3 is the ideal?

0:25:04.550 --> 0:25:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh, well, I mean, I'm definitely open to having more.

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.349
<v Speaker 1>I hope my husband's not listening in on this now.

0:25:11.130 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, yeah, uh, it's interesting because actually, um, one

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of the organizations I, I help out with, uh, we

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>did a survey of like parents, I mean, uh, I

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>mean families in Singapore, and we found that about 24%

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 1>of uh married couples do want to have 3 or

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.599
<v Speaker 1>more kids, just that, uh, whether they realize it or not.

0:25:29.795 --> 0:25:33.035
<v Speaker 1>Another issue I think what is the issue? The issue is,

0:25:33.114 --> 0:25:35.915
<v Speaker 1>is it because they're starting later, so fertility becomes a

0:25:35.915 --> 0:25:39.354
<v Speaker 1>medical issue? Is it because waiting for HDB? Is it

0:25:39.354 --> 0:25:42.594
<v Speaker 1>because too costly? Those are all the things that keep

0:25:42.594 --> 0:25:45.915
<v Speaker 1>getting mentioned on our show. What is the one for

0:25:45.915 --> 0:25:46.864
<v Speaker 1>you that stands out?

0:25:47.849 --> 0:25:52.729
<v Speaker 1>Uh, I mean, it definitely is costly, uh, and, and,

0:25:52.780 --> 0:25:54.699
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you really crunching the numbers, you do

0:25:54.699 --> 0:25:57.300
<v Speaker 1>see there's a lot of opportunity costs like the amount

0:25:57.300 --> 0:25:59.619
<v Speaker 1>of money that's going into little human beings, OK, which is,

0:25:59.660 --> 0:26:02.219
<v Speaker 1>you know, good, um, you know, it takes away from

0:26:02.219 --> 0:26:05.619
<v Speaker 1>everything else. Yeah, but, uh, I mean, in our interface

0:26:05.619 --> 0:26:07.859
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of larger families, we find that there's

0:26:07.859 --> 0:26:10.339
<v Speaker 1>a common threads that, that, you know, go into their their.

0:26:10.454 --> 0:26:13.125
<v Speaker 1>Thinking, which is that, you know, again, not the dollars

0:26:13.125 --> 0:26:16.074
<v Speaker 1>and cents considerations, but the value and meaning about, you know,

0:26:16.285 --> 0:26:19.954
<v Speaker 1>having children and building families, uh, plus the worth and

0:26:19.954 --> 0:26:22.685
<v Speaker 1>potential of these children. OK, I'm so sorry my kids

0:26:22.685 --> 0:26:28.555
<v Speaker 1>in the background. No, no, never apologize, yeah, you've got kids. Uh,

0:26:28.885 --> 0:26:31.044
<v Speaker 1>tell us about your ecosystem as well, you know, have

0:26:31.045 --> 0:26:35.004
<v Speaker 1>you got good parental support? Have you got um a

0:26:35.005 --> 0:26:38.555
<v Speaker 1>good uh uh friends and relatives who are there for you?

0:26:38.939 --> 0:26:41.659
<v Speaker 1>Have you got a, a boss that's also quite understanding,

0:26:41.739 --> 0:26:43.849
<v Speaker 1>so it all works out quite well because if you

0:26:43.849 --> 0:26:46.739
<v Speaker 1>need help, it's easy to get it, Ariel.

0:26:47.180 --> 0:26:50.050
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so the help, the ecosystem of help is definitely

0:26:50.050 --> 0:26:52.890
<v Speaker 1>essential for for large families, I find, um, and it's

0:26:52.890 --> 0:26:55.770
<v Speaker 1>not just about the direct ecosystem, also the indirect ecosystem

0:26:55.770 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of cheers you on, you know, is in

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.729
<v Speaker 1>the the deep with you, uh, you know, other families

0:27:00.729 --> 0:27:03.569
<v Speaker 1>with large, you know, as in with with X number

0:27:03.569 --> 0:27:06.780
<v Speaker 1>of kids and and counting. So friends who understand you,

0:27:06.810 --> 0:27:10.020
<v Speaker 1>that's important. Uh, another thing I was thinking of, um,

0:27:10.030 --> 0:27:12.770
<v Speaker 1>was also grandparent leave, you know, because we're we're seeing

0:27:13.010 --> 0:27:15.290
<v Speaker 1>a generation of like younger grandparents who are not, you know.

0:27:15.925 --> 0:27:18.885
<v Speaker 1>Ready to retire yet, and yet they're still kind of

0:27:18.885 --> 0:27:21.844
<v Speaker 1>willing to be quite hands-on with children. So I mean

0:27:21.844 --> 0:27:23.935
<v Speaker 1>my friends and I were talking about this and you

0:27:23.935 --> 0:27:26.925
<v Speaker 1>know there's also a push to to kind of involve

0:27:26.925 --> 0:27:31.244
<v Speaker 1>grandparents in this whole um ecosystem, right? So yeah, we

0:27:31.244 --> 0:27:34.083
<v Speaker 1>were thinking oh maybe grandparents leave for the working grandparents,

0:27:34.125 --> 0:27:36.675
<v Speaker 1>but I know that that's a quite a niche area.

0:27:37.324 --> 0:27:39.885
<v Speaker 1>Are you thinking about the future where you could be

0:27:39.885 --> 0:27:43.194
<v Speaker 1>caught up with your kids and looking after your aging?

0:27:44.719 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>That could happen, um, and I think that's a reality

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.719
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of uh families and it's also one

0:27:49.719 --> 0:27:51.959
<v Speaker 1>of the government's fears, I think the increase of sandwich

0:27:51.959 --> 0:27:56.479
<v Speaker 1>families uh where only a few children will be supporting, um, yeah,

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:01.790
<v Speaker 1>the aging and then the the the the young and vulnerable. So, uh,

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for me, I think, uh, we have, because I'm still,

0:28:05.839 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess, relatively young, we can still prepare for that.

0:28:08.250 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we're still thinking about that, putting some money aside.

0:28:11.479 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>So I guess there really are a lot of monetary

0:28:13.439 --> 0:28:16.599
<v Speaker 1>and financial considerations for all these things, uh, and they

0:28:16.599 --> 0:28:19.198
<v Speaker 1>are very real. Ariel Lim, who is a mother of three,

0:28:19.319 --> 0:28:23.599
<v Speaker 1>on Talkback, our question for today, why did the dragoner

0:28:23.599 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>not boost Singapore's birth numbers? Thank you for your calls

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.270
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for uh joining us on WhatsApp as well.