WEBVTT - How to write a standout resume

0:00:03.119 --> 0:00:05.329
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a CNA podcast.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.970
<v Speaker 1>Hi, it's Tiffany and Gerald on the Work It podcast. Now,

0:00:14.119 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>a little story here, about 6 years ago, I had

0:00:17.319 --> 0:00:19.718
<v Speaker 1>to clean up my resume because I was looking for

0:00:19.719 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a new job. At that time, I hadn't touched it

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>in 8 years. So what did I do? I turned

0:00:25.959 --> 0:00:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to Google for help. Now this is what Google said

0:00:28.719 --> 0:00:32.439
<v Speaker 1>to me, List your achievements from most recent and work

0:00:32.439 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>bad work.

0:00:33.549 --> 0:00:37.540
<v Speaker 1>Highlighting any recommendations or awards you have won along the way,

0:00:37.830 --> 0:00:41.659
<v Speaker 1>then put your education background and list some skills you have,

0:00:41.869 --> 0:00:44.540
<v Speaker 1>which may be suitable for the job you are applying for.

0:00:44.830 --> 0:00:47.830
<v Speaker 1>Now by the time I was done, it was almost

0:00:47.830 --> 0:00:52.830
<v Speaker 1>3 pages long because everything felt important to me. OK,

0:00:52.869 --> 0:00:54.630
<v Speaker 1>I know this is where you will be shaking your

0:00:54.630 --> 0:00:55.069
<v Speaker 1>head at me.

0:00:55.310 --> 0:00:58.830
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think firstly, you have GPT today. It's

0:00:58.830 --> 0:01:01.700
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier now it's a lot easier, but I

0:01:01.700 --> 0:01:05.179
<v Speaker 1>think when it comes to resume writing, right, I think

0:01:05.180 --> 0:01:08.099
<v Speaker 1>everyone can agree that they feel that their resume is

0:01:08.099 --> 0:01:09.819
<v Speaker 1>always a work in progress. They don't feel that they

0:01:09.819 --> 0:01:12.580
<v Speaker 1>have the perfect resume. There's always something to add, update,

0:01:12.660 --> 0:01:16.179
<v Speaker 1>enhance in our resume, where we want to apply for jobs, right?

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:17.779
<v Speaker 1>So I think

0:01:18.269 --> 0:01:21.099
<v Speaker 1>Most people want to put everything that they have inside,

0:01:21.309 --> 0:01:24.419
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you hit 3 pages or more very quickly.

0:01:24.589 --> 0:01:27.389
<v Speaker 1>There's an art actually and a bit of science or

0:01:27.830 --> 0:01:30.459
<v Speaker 1>as to how we should tailor our resumes a bit

0:01:30.459 --> 0:01:33.870
<v Speaker 1>better so that it appeals to the recruiters, hiring companies

0:01:34.230 --> 0:01:36.669
<v Speaker 1>to attract them to take a second look at what

0:01:36.669 --> 0:01:38.589
<v Speaker 1>you've written on your resume and then call you in

0:01:38.589 --> 0:01:41.349
<v Speaker 1>for an interview. I know this is something that's really

0:01:41.709 --> 0:01:44.389
<v Speaker 1>on the top of many people's minds, people who are

0:01:44.389 --> 0:01:46.989
<v Speaker 1>job-seeking or even maybe not job-seeking as well. How do

0:01:46.989 --> 0:01:47.309
<v Speaker 1>you write?

0:01:47.385 --> 0:01:49.855
<v Speaker 1>A good resume and what to look out for. So

0:01:49.855 --> 0:01:52.635
<v Speaker 1>I call in the big shot today, right? I'm really happy.

0:01:52.815 --> 0:01:56.735
<v Speaker 1>We have a Lim Zirong, master professionals at the Institute

0:01:56.735 --> 0:01:59.775
<v Speaker 1>of HR Professionals to walk us through this thing about

0:01:59.775 --> 0:02:04.415
<v Speaker 1>resumes and to give us some tips and hacks. Welcome, Zong. Hi,

0:02:04.574 --> 0:02:06.375
<v Speaker 2>thank you. Thanks for having me. So

0:02:06.375 --> 0:02:09.175
<v Speaker 1>Zong, give me a ballpark, right? How many resumes have

0:02:09.175 --> 0:02:12.404
<v Speaker 1>you seen so far in your career and in percentage terms,

0:02:12.735 --> 0:02:15.214
<v Speaker 1>how many do you think are well written? Wow,

0:02:15.304 --> 0:02:15.615
<v Speaker 2>how many?

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.889
<v Speaker 2>Over hundreds or close to 1000. I mean, because I've

0:02:19.889 --> 0:02:23.070
<v Speaker 2>worked in HR for close to 19 years by now,

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:24.369
<v Speaker 2>and I would say,

0:02:25.199 --> 0:02:26.649
<v Speaker 1>how many are actually well written?

0:02:26.788 --> 0:02:27.039
<v Speaker 2>I like

0:02:27.038 --> 0:02:30.038
<v Speaker 2>to be cautiously optimistic, so more than half would be

0:02:30.038 --> 0:02:30.739
<v Speaker 2>well written.

0:02:31.559 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>But these

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>good ones, are they already like they're fresh from the

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.929
<v Speaker 1>job portals or are they like already pre-screened? Oh, you

0:02:38.929 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a difference? Yeah, the ATS.

0:02:41.300 --> 0:02:43.990
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, OK, application software.

0:02:44.330 --> 0:02:46.008
<v Speaker 2>So I would say in the earlier part of my career,

0:02:46.089 --> 0:02:48.288
<v Speaker 2>I will screen every resume myself though now in the

0:02:48.288 --> 0:02:50.289
<v Speaker 2>second part, I do have a team that helps me

0:02:50.288 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>to pre-screen.

0:02:51.179 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Now

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.690
<v Speaker 1>that you have heard what I did in the introduction,

0:02:53.850 --> 0:02:55.889
<v Speaker 1>what's the good thing I did and what's the bad

0:02:55.889 --> 0:02:56.210
<v Speaker 1>thing I

0:02:56.210 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>did?

0:02:56.649 --> 0:02:58.330
<v Speaker 2>I think first of all I want to start by

0:02:58.330 --> 0:03:00.970
<v Speaker 2>saying a lot of people fall into the pitfall where, oh,

0:03:01.570 --> 0:03:03.029
<v Speaker 2>now I want to look for a job, I want

0:03:03.029 --> 0:03:05.449
<v Speaker 2>to update my resume and then they just build on.

0:03:05.589 --> 0:03:08.940
<v Speaker 2>What they have previously updated in the past. Like personally,

0:03:08.979 --> 0:03:11.220
<v Speaker 2>I was, I started my career in Temasek, then I

0:03:11.220 --> 0:03:13.418
<v Speaker 2>will have a resume that wrote Temasek, then I moved

0:03:13.419 --> 0:03:16.490
<v Speaker 2>on to Unilever. I put on my resume experience on Unilever,

0:03:16.860 --> 0:03:19.538
<v Speaker 2>and then then I keep building on and on. But

0:03:19.538 --> 0:03:22.020
<v Speaker 2>the truth is when we build on our resumes, we

0:03:22.020 --> 0:03:25.660
<v Speaker 2>should also revisit the old parts and maybe refine it

0:03:25.660 --> 0:03:28.970
<v Speaker 2>or even delete it or make it shorter rather than

0:03:28.970 --> 0:03:29.779
<v Speaker 2>to take a very lazy.

0:03:30.110 --> 0:03:32.830
<v Speaker 2>approach like a Lego where you stack, stack, stack and

0:03:32.839 --> 0:03:34.860
<v Speaker 2>and now you have your 3-page or your 4-page

0:03:34.860 --> 0:03:38.309
<v Speaker 1>resume. Yeah, yeah, OK, OK. So I should actually go

0:03:38.309 --> 0:03:41.470
<v Speaker 1>back and then relook at some parts and maybe shorten

0:03:41.470 --> 0:03:43.470
<v Speaker 1>shorten some things, maybe even delete some things,

0:03:43.589 --> 0:03:48.429
<v Speaker 2>right? Especially if some are highly operational and especially if

0:03:48.429 --> 0:03:51.350
<v Speaker 2>you're applying for a much more senior role already. Let's

0:03:51.350 --> 0:03:54.110
<v Speaker 2>say you're applying for a director role after 15 years.

0:03:54.190 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 2>South Korea. You don't need to use to do campus

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.559
<v Speaker 2>recruitment coordinating the logistics with the hotel. Yeah, you should

0:04:01.559 --> 0:04:02.100
<v Speaker 2>delete that

0:04:02.100 --> 0:04:03.990
<v Speaker 1>by now. OK, OK, that's a good tip.

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Can I give another tip too? You know sometimes people

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.649
<v Speaker 2>put their contact details under header and footer. So their name,

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>their email address, their mobile number, and unfortunately, when they

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 2>go through ATS, the application tracking system.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.140
<v Speaker 2>Their contact details may not be captured because it's in

0:04:22.140 --> 0:04:25.260
<v Speaker 2>the header field. So always put your contact details in

0:04:25.260 --> 0:04:28.859
<v Speaker 2>the body of your resume. In the header, it becomes

0:04:28.859 --> 0:04:31.500
<v Speaker 2>very small and tiny and that might not be captured.

0:04:31.619 --> 0:04:33.700
<v Speaker 2>Then if you got shortlisted, the ATS don't even have

0:04:33.700 --> 0:04:35.290
<v Speaker 2>the contact details to contact you.

0:04:35.790 --> 0:04:38.579
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, I didn't know that as your resume

0:04:38.579 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>is incomplete.

0:04:41.217 --> 0:04:43.087
<v Speaker 1>But why, why would people want to put their contact

0:04:43.087 --> 0:04:46.617
<v Speaker 1>details in the header is because they want to space

0:04:46.617 --> 0:04:48.087
<v Speaker 1>is one thing. They also want it to be repeated

0:04:48.087 --> 0:04:49.846
<v Speaker 1>on every page. They want it to be more visible,

0:04:49.886 --> 0:04:52.967
<v Speaker 1>but actually on the contrary, if software is involved, right,

0:04:53.046 --> 0:04:56.046
<v Speaker 1>it could be invisible. Wow, that's like, OK, my mind

0:04:56.046 --> 0:04:58.286
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit blown right now. I would probably

0:04:58.286 --> 0:04:59.886
<v Speaker 1>have done and put it in the header because I

0:04:59.886 --> 0:05:03.687
<v Speaker 1>want to maximize the page space, right, right? OK, so.

0:05:04.033 --> 0:05:07.753
<v Speaker 1>Walk us through very quickly the entire process of recruitment

0:05:07.753 --> 0:05:10.794
<v Speaker 1>from the time our resume is submitted into the job portal.

0:05:10.954 --> 0:05:13.873
<v Speaker 2>When it's in the job portal, then progressive company would

0:05:13.873 --> 0:05:17.563
<v Speaker 2>have certain form of screening by picking up keywords first. Hence,

0:05:17.634 --> 0:05:21.993
<v Speaker 2>that's why I advise job seekers to always include reasonable keywords.

0:05:22.273 --> 0:05:25.194
<v Speaker 2>Don't include very bombastic one where, you know, you inflate

0:05:25.194 --> 0:05:26.343
<v Speaker 2>your title so big that it's

0:05:26.390 --> 0:05:29.420
<v Speaker 2>not so common out there. Make sure it's relevant to

0:05:29.420 --> 0:05:32.180
<v Speaker 2>the job that you are applying. Another pro tip, look

0:05:32.180 --> 0:05:34.221
<v Speaker 2>at the job description and look at the keywords in

0:05:34.221 --> 0:05:36.859
<v Speaker 2>the JD and try to incorporate some of the keywords

0:05:36.860 --> 0:05:40.300
<v Speaker 2>in the JD into your resume. And this way, it

0:05:40.300 --> 0:05:42.299
<v Speaker 2>is more likely to be picked up by the system

0:05:42.300 --> 0:05:44.260
<v Speaker 2>in the first stage of automated

0:05:44.260 --> 0:05:44.621
<v Speaker 2>screening.

0:05:44.740 --> 0:05:47.940
<v Speaker 1>So should you copy and paste wholesale the keywords or

0:05:47.940 --> 0:05:48.940
<v Speaker 1>you should try and

0:05:49.149 --> 0:05:52.700
<v Speaker 1>I don't not plagiarize and use this copy and

0:05:52.700 --> 0:05:53.070
<v Speaker 1>paste,

0:05:53.220 --> 0:05:56.339
<v Speaker 2>you're missing something, you missed out the parts to write

0:05:56.339 --> 0:05:59.260
<v Speaker 2>down your impact at work because JD is usually listing

0:05:59.260 --> 0:06:03.220
<v Speaker 2>the responsibility to help execute this event, but you wouldn't

0:06:03.220 --> 0:06:06.579
<v Speaker 2>say execute this event and achieve a certain impact. And

0:06:06.579 --> 0:06:09.059
<v Speaker 2>the second part has to come from your experience. So

0:06:09.059 --> 0:06:12.238
<v Speaker 1>resumes are already used at the beginning of the process, right?

0:06:12.250 --> 0:06:15.019
<v Speaker 1>And the process starts with some form of screening and

0:06:15.019 --> 0:06:18.660
<v Speaker 1>if if it's customized well like what Zong was telling us, then.

0:06:18.736 --> 0:06:20.967
<v Speaker 1>Your resume has a higher chance of moving on to

0:06:20.967 --> 0:06:23.886
<v Speaker 1>the next stages. So what happens after the resume has

0:06:23.886 --> 0:06:24.516
<v Speaker 1>been picked up?

0:06:24.647 --> 0:06:27.366
<v Speaker 2>Let's say. Then usually the recruiter would do a phone

0:06:27.367 --> 0:06:30.006
<v Speaker 2>screening in today's age or maybe a video screening, which

0:06:30.005 --> 0:06:33.166
<v Speaker 2>is now so common after COVID-19. Now after some sort

0:06:33.166 --> 0:06:36.777
<v Speaker 2>of phone screening, usually we move into a physical interview

0:06:36.777 --> 0:06:40.766
<v Speaker 2>where possible, though unfortunately, I've still seen companies sticking to

0:06:40.766 --> 0:06:44.367
<v Speaker 2>just video interviews throughout the whole selection process. I think

0:06:44.367 --> 0:06:46.957
<v Speaker 2>that's the ease of convenience and they also thought, oh,

0:06:46.967 --> 0:06:48.207
<v Speaker 2>I don't want you to come all the way.

0:06:48.324 --> 0:06:50.473
<v Speaker 2>Now candidates love it, right? You don't have to take

0:06:50.473 --> 0:06:52.644
<v Speaker 2>a half day leave to go for an interview with

0:06:52.644 --> 0:06:55.944
<v Speaker 2>Goldman Sachs. Then call me old school, but I feel

0:06:55.944 --> 0:06:58.984
<v Speaker 2>when the candidate meet the interviewer in person, you get

0:06:58.984 --> 0:07:00.914
<v Speaker 2>the chance to size him or her up to, is

0:07:00.914 --> 0:07:03.152
<v Speaker 2>this someone that I want to work with or work

0:07:03.153 --> 0:07:05.834
<v Speaker 2>for that you might not be able to tell so

0:07:05.834 --> 0:07:10.704
<v Speaker 2>clearly over an interview, right? So 3 interviews, even physical

0:07:10.704 --> 0:07:14.704
<v Speaker 2>one as a two-way courtship where you're evaluating the company.

0:07:14.834 --> 0:07:17.194
<v Speaker 2>Don't just go to say I need this job badly,

0:07:17.234 --> 0:07:17.794
<v Speaker 2>I need Goldman.

0:07:18.191 --> 0:07:19.661
<v Speaker 2>to love me and hire me. I see.

0:07:19.860 --> 0:07:22.501
<v Speaker 1>So I read that it takes a hiring manager on

0:07:22.501 --> 0:07:26.730
<v Speaker 1>average 10 seconds to decide if the resume is in

0:07:26.730 --> 0:07:31.540
<v Speaker 1>the accept pile or the reject stash. OK, what do

0:07:31.540 --> 0:07:34.300
<v Speaker 1>you first look at? If I were to put eye

0:07:34.300 --> 0:07:38.489
<v Speaker 1>tracking software into your eyes, which content takes the most

0:07:38.490 --> 0:07:39.670
<v Speaker 1>of your eye time?

0:07:39.781 --> 0:07:39.901
<v Speaker 2>I

0:07:39.901 --> 0:07:43.941
<v Speaker 2>would say your last most two recent jobs and your

0:07:43.941 --> 0:07:46.580
<v Speaker 2>time roll, but I want to qualify that first of all,

0:07:46.631 --> 0:07:47.460
<v Speaker 2>it depends on

0:07:47.649 --> 0:07:50.339
<v Speaker 2>The hiring company and the nature of the industry first.

0:07:50.510 --> 0:07:53.750
<v Speaker 2>If you're a startup looking to hire, probably you wouldn't

0:07:53.750 --> 0:07:56.179
<v Speaker 2>be so obsessed about the staying power of an individual,

0:07:56.549 --> 0:07:59.100
<v Speaker 2>but rather you are more obsessed on has this person

0:07:59.100 --> 0:08:01.670
<v Speaker 2>done 0 to 1 work, the ability to do something

0:08:01.670 --> 0:08:04.750
<v Speaker 2>from scratch and to scale it up, versus if you

0:08:04.750 --> 0:08:07.549
<v Speaker 2>are applying for a more traditional company, then the recruiter

0:08:07.549 --> 0:08:09.989
<v Speaker 2>might value. Oh, did you spend 4 years in your

0:08:09.989 --> 0:08:12.828
<v Speaker 2>last most recent gig and your last second most recent

0:08:12.829 --> 0:08:13.769
<v Speaker 2>gig was it at least

0:08:13.842 --> 0:08:16.423
<v Speaker 2>3 years or so. So I wouldn't say this is

0:08:16.423 --> 0:08:18.653
<v Speaker 2>what I look for, but depending on the nature of

0:08:18.653 --> 0:08:21.852
<v Speaker 2>the industry, the recruiters may look at it this way.

0:08:22.013 --> 0:08:24.453
<v Speaker 1>So they will still look at the first two jobs.

0:08:24.532 --> 0:08:27.852
<v Speaker 1>It's just that maybe someone from a startup company might

0:08:27.852 --> 0:08:30.893
<v Speaker 1>look at what you have achieved, whereas somebody who is

0:08:30.893 --> 0:08:35.412
<v Speaker 1>in a bigger company, a legacy company value longevity. So

0:08:35.413 --> 0:08:36.572
<v Speaker 1>they might be looking at the

0:08:36.572 --> 0:08:39.293
<v Speaker 2>duration. the first page is usually your last gigs.

0:08:40.005 --> 0:08:42.075
<v Speaker 1>Correct, but there's always the top part where you can

0:08:42.075 --> 0:08:43.794
<v Speaker 1>write a short little bio of yourself.

0:08:43.994 --> 0:08:47.484
<v Speaker 2>Personally, I don't think it is necessary, but if you

0:08:47.484 --> 0:08:49.934
<v Speaker 2>still want to include, I recommend keeping it to 2

0:08:49.934 --> 0:08:53.594
<v Speaker 2>to 3 sentences. Yeah, I've seen resumes where the personal

0:08:53.594 --> 0:08:56.994
<v Speaker 2>bio was almost like 1/3 of the first page and

0:08:56.994 --> 0:09:00.593
<v Speaker 2>all this personal bio is self-description of an individual, not

0:09:00.594 --> 0:09:03.794
<v Speaker 2>substantiated by your achievement or impact at work, depending on

0:09:03.794 --> 0:09:06.074
<v Speaker 2>the interview or the screener who picked up your resume.

0:09:06.409 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>He or she may believe or may not believe in

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.669
<v Speaker 2>it rather than going into the qualitative details.

0:09:11.719 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Zong mentioned a very important principle which is

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.309
<v Speaker 1>you need to create a resume that is reader friendly,

0:09:17.359 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so you need to put yourself in the shoes of

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>the reader.

0:09:19.909 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>What are they looking for, what will appeal to them

0:09:22.369 --> 0:09:25.330
<v Speaker 1>in terms of keywords, in terms of what's important information

0:09:25.330 --> 0:09:27.690
<v Speaker 1>for them to see about you, so that it makes

0:09:27.690 --> 0:09:31.238
<v Speaker 1>the whole reading, the whole 10 seconds more worthwhile. Yeah, yeah.

0:09:31.409 --> 0:09:35.409
<v Speaker 1>Now you talked about putting your contact details in the body. Now,

0:09:35.450 --> 0:09:38.549
<v Speaker 1>what are the things are necessary to put inside the resume?

0:09:38.690 --> 0:09:38.809
<v Speaker 2>I

0:09:38.809 --> 0:09:41.489
<v Speaker 2>think one thing that I would personally recommend is start

0:09:41.489 --> 0:09:44.510
<v Speaker 2>with the achievement that you have achieved in that company.

0:09:44.770 --> 0:09:47.130
<v Speaker 2>When I was at Unilever, what was the top two.

0:09:47.215 --> 0:09:50.434
<v Speaker 2>Achievement that I've done. So start with the achievement first,

0:09:50.645 --> 0:09:53.164
<v Speaker 2>then followed by some of the tasks or the work

0:09:53.164 --> 0:09:56.395
<v Speaker 2>that you have done in that gig. Yeah. This way

0:09:56.645 --> 0:10:00.694
<v Speaker 2>your achievement steals the limelight and quickly seizes the attention

0:10:00.965 --> 0:10:02.164
<v Speaker 2>very quickly. It catches

0:10:02.164 --> 0:10:02.405
<v Speaker 2>your eye,

0:10:02.445 --> 0:10:04.804
<v Speaker 1>right, because you put numbers inside there, right? Yeah, you

0:10:04.804 --> 0:10:07.965
<v Speaker 1>qualify numbers and it's a very nice welcome distraction for

0:10:07.965 --> 0:10:10.885
<v Speaker 1>your eyes. It gives your eyes, there could be some

0:10:10.885 --> 0:10:13.324
<v Speaker 1>numbers peppered in there too if you just see a

0:10:13.325 --> 0:10:14.445
<v Speaker 1>long essay, you feel like I don't want to.

0:10:14.530 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so when you put some nice words with

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.450
<v Speaker 1>not proper formatting, I think it sends the signals to

0:10:19.450 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the reader. What I'm getting so far from both of

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you is that it's a bit like storytelling, right? Writing

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a resume is storytelling, so it depends on who your

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.919
<v Speaker 1>reader is. If I'm applying for a managerial position, then

0:10:32.919 --> 0:10:35.479
<v Speaker 1>you want to put straight up that you have led

0:10:35.479 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>teams of what sizes, you have led them to achieve

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>certain transformations

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.719
<v Speaker 2>that you can include in your 2 to 3.

0:10:41.965 --> 0:10:44.434
<v Speaker 2>This is a summary if that is the intent. OK,

0:10:44.515 --> 0:10:44.784
<v Speaker 1>what

0:10:44.784 --> 0:10:47.593
<v Speaker 1>if though I am applying for a specialist role, but

0:10:47.594 --> 0:10:49.955
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to put myself into a corner and

0:10:49.955 --> 0:10:51.994
<v Speaker 1>say that this is what I'm good for. I want

0:10:51.994 --> 0:10:55.734
<v Speaker 1>to open up the possibility of maybe down the road,

0:10:55.835 --> 0:10:58.314
<v Speaker 1>you might want to consider me for a more managerial

0:10:58.315 --> 0:11:02.275
<v Speaker 1>position because that means that I get promoted. What then

0:11:02.275 --> 0:11:03.554
<v Speaker 1>should I focus in this

0:11:03.554 --> 0:11:08.085
<v Speaker 2>resume? You must remember the three E's, your experience, your exposure,

0:11:08.135 --> 0:11:09.074
<v Speaker 2>and your education.

0:11:09.390 --> 0:11:12.619
<v Speaker 2>The experience part, keep it 1 to 2 pages at

0:11:12.619 --> 0:11:15.630
<v Speaker 2>max I would feel that exposure, what are the things

0:11:15.630 --> 0:11:19.429
<v Speaker 2>you do outside work, volunteering or even part of associations

0:11:19.429 --> 0:11:22.710
<v Speaker 2>that you'll be very, be very active in, and then lastly,

0:11:22.719 --> 0:11:25.609
<v Speaker 2>your education, keep it short, where did you graduate from, etc.

0:11:26.109 --> 0:11:29.500
<v Speaker 2>And I, I think back to your point on, on,

0:11:29.549 --> 0:11:32.309
<v Speaker 2>on that, your resume is supposed to land you an

0:11:32.309 --> 0:11:35.549
<v Speaker 2>interview where possible. And once you land, if you land

0:11:35.549 --> 0:11:39.700
<v Speaker 2>the interview, then use that conversation to highlight your career aspirations,

0:11:39.869 --> 0:11:41.469
<v Speaker 2>how you may or may not want to be only

0:11:41.469 --> 0:11:44.150
<v Speaker 2>a specialist, and then probe the company if they provide

0:11:44.150 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>that option and opportunity and pathway for you to pursue. OK,

0:11:48.030 --> 0:11:51.869
<v Speaker 1>but be very honest with me, how many recruiters actually

0:11:51.869 --> 0:11:53.390
<v Speaker 1>look at the volunteering part?

0:11:53.604 --> 0:11:56.204
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, I think that volunteering part is a nice to

0:11:56.205 --> 0:11:59.125
<v Speaker 1>have and possibly people will put it in maybe if

0:11:59.125 --> 0:12:02.205
<v Speaker 1>they are headed towards politics or they are headed towards,

0:12:02.255 --> 0:12:05.044
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like a director position or they want

0:12:05.044 --> 0:12:06.885
<v Speaker 1>to join some association, then they want to try to

0:12:06.885 --> 0:12:10.005
<v Speaker 1>put everything in, shore it up, right? But how many

0:12:10.005 --> 0:12:12.965
<v Speaker 1>recruiters or hiring managers actually look at the volunteering part,

0:12:13.005 --> 0:12:14.405
<v Speaker 1>the exposure part like you

0:12:14.405 --> 0:12:14.593
<v Speaker 1>said.

0:12:15.405 --> 0:12:17.044
<v Speaker 2>I think it has to go back to what are

0:12:17.044 --> 0:12:19.765
<v Speaker 2>the companies that you're applying for, right? You want to

0:12:19.765 --> 0:12:20.804
<v Speaker 2>work for a company.

0:12:21.150 --> 0:12:24.710
<v Speaker 2>That has a good purpose. I believe that companies with

0:12:24.710 --> 0:12:30.150
<v Speaker 2>purpose last, brands with purpose grow, and people with purpose strives.

0:12:30.429 --> 0:12:32.429
<v Speaker 2>And when you look at a good recruiter, when you

0:12:32.429 --> 0:12:34.949
<v Speaker 2>look at the resume and look at that volunteering part

0:12:34.950 --> 0:12:38.669
<v Speaker 2>or the exposure part, you get a sense of what

0:12:38.669 --> 0:12:42.219
<v Speaker 2>drives this individual, what is his purpose in life, and

0:12:42.549 --> 0:12:44.580
<v Speaker 2>then see if there's a marriage between.

0:12:45.020 --> 0:12:47.608
<v Speaker 2>His passion and what the company stands for,

0:12:48.140 --> 0:12:50.109
<v Speaker 1>you know, this thing about what should I focus on

0:12:50.109 --> 0:12:52.770
<v Speaker 1>in my resume, especially if today we have got a

0:12:52.770 --> 0:12:54.859
<v Speaker 1>lot of good experiences and everything feels like it should

0:12:54.859 --> 0:12:58.618
<v Speaker 1>be in there, right? I, I typically would advise us

0:12:58.619 --> 0:13:00.260
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at, are you aware of this

0:13:00.260 --> 0:13:01.500
<v Speaker 1>principle called the Gestalt?

0:13:02.059 --> 0:13:07.348
<v Speaker 1>Principles. Basically, it's a set of rules or laws, right,

0:13:07.390 --> 0:13:11.669
<v Speaker 1>principles that are developed to help people design better user experiences.

0:13:11.750 --> 0:13:17.270
<v Speaker 1>It's meant to allow people to quickly understand complexity and

0:13:17.270 --> 0:13:20.429
<v Speaker 1>make sense of complexity. So when I apply this the

0:13:20.429 --> 0:13:25.909
<v Speaker 1>principles into resume, I treat the resume as a complex document, right?

0:13:25.989 --> 0:13:28.030
<v Speaker 1>Just how our careers are actually very complex. We've got

0:13:28.030 --> 0:13:30.830
<v Speaker 1>many different experiences, we do many different things across many

0:13:30.830 --> 0:13:31.390
<v Speaker 1>different jobs.

0:13:32.330 --> 0:13:37.340
<v Speaker 1>And how do we quickly design our resume according to

0:13:37.340 --> 0:13:39.659
<v Speaker 1>this principles so that people can still see and make

0:13:39.659 --> 0:13:43.238
<v Speaker 1>sense very quickly? Who am I? across all of all

0:13:43.239 --> 0:13:46.140
<v Speaker 1>these experiences. So if I use a metaphor, right, like

0:13:46.140 --> 0:13:49.579
<v Speaker 1>fish bone and the meat around the bone, we can

0:13:49.580 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>look like that very fat fish with a lot of meat, right,

0:13:52.580 --> 0:13:53.979
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we want to look like. But at

0:13:53.979 --> 0:13:55.770
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, if we strip away the meat,

0:13:55.940 --> 0:13:59.059
<v Speaker 1>what's the bone that's there, the core, which is what Zhurong,

0:13:59.070 --> 0:14:01.510
<v Speaker 1>I guess was also bringing up, right, that that.

0:14:01.580 --> 0:14:03.599
<v Speaker 1>The essence of who you are, why are you doing

0:14:03.599 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>what you are doing, the purpose of your career, there's

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a narrative, a storytelling like you said, right, that needs

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to come across. So how do we bring across this

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.669
<v Speaker 1>storytelling in our resume? We can design it according to

0:14:14.669 --> 0:14:17.510
<v Speaker 1>Gor principles, and some of these people are like, for example,

0:14:17.799 --> 0:14:22.340
<v Speaker 1>putting in content, words, experiences at different places so that

0:14:22.599 --> 0:14:25.130
<v Speaker 1>it signals certain things about you. And also, of course,

0:14:25.159 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>things like less is more, right, you don't have to

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>put everything you put in the right thing so that

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>people send the right signal to their mind.

0:14:31.260 --> 0:14:33.150
<v Speaker 1>And of course, I think one of the things that

0:14:33.150 --> 0:14:35.349
<v Speaker 1>I would advise people to do is to test. So

0:14:35.349 --> 0:14:37.549
<v Speaker 1>take your resume, give it to 5 different people and

0:14:37.549 --> 0:14:39.380
<v Speaker 1>ask them what do they think you're trying to say

0:14:39.380 --> 0:14:41.109
<v Speaker 1>in your resume. So you want to give it to

0:14:41.109 --> 0:14:43.179
<v Speaker 1>a range of people so that you can see that

0:14:43.710 --> 0:14:44.549
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what

0:14:44.919 --> 0:14:49.349
<v Speaker 1>Experiences they're reading from, how are they perceiving you? OK.

0:14:49.599 --> 0:14:52.179
<v Speaker 1>What are some red flags in a resume that will

0:14:52.179 --> 0:14:55.380
<v Speaker 1>make a recruiter like you toss

0:14:55.380 --> 0:14:57.429
<v Speaker 2>it out? red flags. Maybe I will answer it not

0:14:57.429 --> 0:15:00.950
<v Speaker 2>from my perspective but from how I know some recruiters, they,

0:15:01.119 --> 0:15:04.559
<v Speaker 2>they have told me. I mean, I mean one of

0:15:04.559 --> 0:15:07.219
<v Speaker 2>the very common ones would be, oh, there's gap years

0:15:07.219 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>in between jobs and I'm really I'm really.

0:15:11.294 --> 0:15:14.984
<v Speaker 2>Agains that though, and I feel very deeply passionate about

0:15:14.984 --> 0:15:18.275
<v Speaker 2>this because in the 1980s, it is common for people

0:15:18.275 --> 0:15:21.184
<v Speaker 2>to find a job and stay for 20 or 30 years.

0:15:21.275 --> 0:15:24.075
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if you look at now, economic cycles are shorter,

0:15:24.195 --> 0:15:27.775
<v Speaker 2>ups and downs are faster, layoffs are increasingly common, and

0:15:27.775 --> 0:15:30.484
<v Speaker 2>I really believe layoffs may not be an issue with

0:15:30.484 --> 0:15:33.554
<v Speaker 2>the individual. It's just because of the business needs and

0:15:33.554 --> 0:15:36.835
<v Speaker 2>hence I urge recruiters do not see gap years as

0:15:36.835 --> 0:15:37.765
<v Speaker 2>a red flag, but

0:15:38.359 --> 0:15:41.830
<v Speaker 2>Normalize the gap periods, there could be people who took

0:15:41.830 --> 0:15:46.859
<v Speaker 2>a gap period for house giving, caretaking, or really unfortunately

0:15:46.859 --> 0:15:49.159
<v Speaker 2>went through a layoff, and I think it should be

0:15:49.159 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 2>normalized and treated as common.

0:15:51.559 --> 0:15:54.450
<v Speaker 2>And not using the same yardstick like the 1980s where

0:15:54.450 --> 0:15:58.929
<v Speaker 2>we want a continuous period of employment for 35 years.

0:15:59.299 --> 0:16:01.409
<v Speaker 2>I think those days is a little bit

0:16:01.409 --> 0:16:01.890
<v Speaker 2>over.

0:16:02.580 --> 0:16:05.219
<v Speaker 1>What about if you are reading the resume and you're

0:16:05.219 --> 0:16:08.650
<v Speaker 1>very confused because this person, everything is just like a

0:16:08.650 --> 0:16:10.500
<v Speaker 1>jumble jumble of

0:16:10.500 --> 0:16:10.900
<v Speaker 1>stuff.

0:16:11.340 --> 0:16:12.710
<v Speaker 2>If you're working in a startup.

0:16:13.190 --> 0:16:16.559
<v Speaker 2>In a very cutthroat or hardcore industry, then maybe such

0:16:16.559 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a profile will be fascinating because you want innovation, creativity,

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 2>and not be bounded by the traditional boundaries. So a

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>good recruiter knows the company well to know how to

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.150
<v Speaker 2>hunt or look at recipes that may be suitable. Now,

0:16:31.159 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>when recruiters read resumes, because we're all humans, right?

0:16:35.429 --> 0:16:39.299
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they're bound to be subjective biases. OK. So

0:16:39.299 --> 0:16:41.729
<v Speaker 1>it could be maybe if you put an address in there,

0:16:41.820 --> 0:16:44.659
<v Speaker 1>here in Singapore it's very obvious like which district you

0:16:44.659 --> 0:16:48.849
<v Speaker 1>live in. Yeah, you live in District 9, District 10 people,

0:16:48.859 --> 0:16:52.710
<v Speaker 1>people automatically like it or not infer certain things right

0:16:52.710 --> 0:16:56.219
<v Speaker 1>about you. So how can we work around them knowing

0:16:56.219 --> 0:16:58.710
<v Speaker 1>that the person who's going to be reading my resume.

0:16:59.140 --> 0:17:01.030
<v Speaker 1>Might already infer some things about me.

0:17:01.219 --> 0:17:03.890
<v Speaker 2>So first of all, some tips you as a candidate,

0:17:03.979 --> 0:17:08.260
<v Speaker 2>then we should not over include certain information like address,

0:17:08.420 --> 0:17:11.099
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it is necessary. So some people may

0:17:11.099 --> 0:17:13.699
<v Speaker 2>not realize you don't even really need to put the

0:17:13.699 --> 0:17:16.579
<v Speaker 2>year of when you graduate from your school. You can

0:17:16.579 --> 0:17:20.060
<v Speaker 2>graduate from the National University of Singapore or MIT, but

0:17:20.060 --> 0:17:22.089
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to say 2007.

0:17:22.420 --> 0:17:22.849
<v Speaker 1>OK.

0:17:25.329 --> 0:17:28.030
<v Speaker 1>But then do you put your secondary school, your junior college,

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.260
<v Speaker 1>your poly, that kind of stuff, because people can again

0:17:31.469 --> 0:17:34.939
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore infer the route that you took and then

0:17:35.150 --> 0:17:38.669
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate and say oh maybe you come from a certain SES,

0:17:39.310 --> 0:17:40.149
<v Speaker 1>social economic

0:17:40.150 --> 0:17:40.869
<v Speaker 1>strata,

0:17:40.910 --> 0:17:43.750
<v Speaker 2>and it's very true in resumes. I would see people

0:17:43.750 --> 0:17:46.469
<v Speaker 2>putting secondary school when they come from the usual, the

0:17:46.469 --> 0:17:47.550
<v Speaker 2>branded schools I mean.

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 2>At least not in the recruiters that I've met and

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.699
<v Speaker 2>also as a HR professional, I've never let a secondary school,

0:17:54.719 --> 0:17:58.369
<v Speaker 2>a branded one influence if I was shortlisted you or not.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:17:59.770
<v Speaker 2>I mean, not really.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it adds that little food for thought

0:18:03.079 --> 0:18:07.839
<v Speaker 1>signal that affirms certain perceptions, but when it comes to

0:18:07.839 --> 0:18:10.899
<v Speaker 1>really selecting, you're still going back to the experiences, the achievements,

0:18:10.959 --> 0:18:13.390
<v Speaker 1>what you have done, I think those are more tangible

0:18:13.390 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>things that recruiters would.

0:18:14.969 --> 0:18:17.890
<v Speaker 1>Look out for there was a situation where someone was

0:18:17.890 --> 0:18:20.488
<v Speaker 1>applying for a job in Jurong and they're staying in

0:18:20.489 --> 0:18:24.290
<v Speaker 1>Pasir Ris. and then I think the recruiter.

0:18:25.339 --> 0:18:29.300
<v Speaker 1>Just discounted the resume saying that this person might be

0:18:29.300 --> 0:18:31.300
<v Speaker 1>late for work or not.

0:18:32.739 --> 0:18:35.020
<v Speaker 2>But what if this person has BTO flat near Boon,

0:18:36.099 --> 0:18:39.420
<v Speaker 1>or drives like a BMW. I was taking a ride

0:18:39.420 --> 0:18:41.500
<v Speaker 1>with a family car every day towards the west side.

0:18:41.739 --> 0:18:43.020
<v Speaker 1>You cannot assume these things.

0:18:43.665 --> 0:18:47.535
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, exactly. And then the other one is, of course, photographs, photographs, right?

0:18:47.665 --> 0:18:50.035
<v Speaker 1>Some people say you must put, for example, if you're

0:18:50.035 --> 0:18:52.534
<v Speaker 1>applying for certain kinds of jobs, you should put a photograph,

0:18:52.814 --> 0:18:55.145
<v Speaker 1>but I think by and large, if there's no need to,

0:18:55.265 --> 0:18:58.344
<v Speaker 1>my own personal opinion is you shouldn't put because photographs

0:18:58.344 --> 0:19:01.024
<v Speaker 1>are highly subjective. You could be too good looking.

0:19:01.579 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 1>You could be not up to someone's expectations and then

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.599
<v Speaker 1>you wasted that 10 seconds because the person's mind is

0:19:07.599 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>on the photograph instead of reading the other things. But

0:19:10.199 --> 0:19:13.810
<v Speaker 1>at which point can I inject my own personality into

0:19:13.810 --> 0:19:17.430
<v Speaker 1>the resume? Because I've read resumes where I can sense

0:19:17.430 --> 0:19:20.069
<v Speaker 1>this person is fun, like there's a cheeky tone to it.

0:19:20.079 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's in the 1st 2 or 3 sentences, but

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:24.188
<v Speaker 1>how much is too much.

0:19:24.479 --> 0:19:27.709
<v Speaker 2>I've seen resumes in my career where they started putting

0:19:27.984 --> 0:19:31.015
<v Speaker 2>Each competency 4 out of 5 stars, and then they

0:19:31.015 --> 0:19:34.214
<v Speaker 2>color their stars. So it looks so visual and it's

0:19:34.214 --> 0:19:37.534
<v Speaker 2>very pretty, but the truth is, the ATS system is

0:19:37.535 --> 0:19:39.895
<v Speaker 2>not going to be able to capture the stars that

0:19:39.895 --> 0:19:43.415
<v Speaker 2>you colored in yellow, the 4 out of 5 for communication,

0:19:43.694 --> 0:19:46.334
<v Speaker 2>the 5 out of 5 for empathy, and the 3

0:19:46.334 --> 0:19:48.764
<v Speaker 2>out of 5 for investment intelligence.

0:19:48.895 --> 0:19:51.535
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with that. I always advise people don't

0:19:51.535 --> 0:19:54.415
<v Speaker 1>bother putting that because the reader cannot validate.

0:19:54.959 --> 0:19:58.630
<v Speaker 1>That rating that you give yourself, we always like, I

0:19:58.630 --> 0:20:01.708
<v Speaker 1>like to give myself 5 popcorn. 5 stars all the

0:20:01.709 --> 0:20:04.988
<v Speaker 1>way right? because we Asians, we tend to downplay, OK,

0:20:05.239 --> 0:20:08.270
<v Speaker 1>we give 1 or 25 and 3 and then some 4s,

0:20:08.310 --> 0:20:09.169
<v Speaker 1>it's very arbitrary,

0:20:09.390 --> 0:20:11.589
<v Speaker 2>but it looks very pretty though. I mean it is

0:20:11.589 --> 0:20:12.609
<v Speaker 2>very pretty, but

0:20:13.060 --> 0:20:15.619
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it is suitable for the advertising industry. I'm not sure.

0:20:15.780 --> 0:20:17.060
<v Speaker 2>I'm stereotyping here, but

0:20:17.339 --> 0:20:21.219
<v Speaker 1>yeah, but who knows, I think, I think those are charts, right,

0:20:21.300 --> 0:20:23.889
<v Speaker 1>and they usually come in one pages, one page resumes, right?

0:20:23.900 --> 0:20:25.379
<v Speaker 1>I think those are really good if today you are

0:20:25.380 --> 0:20:28.218
<v Speaker 1>out for networking. Yeah, if you're out for networking and

0:20:28.219 --> 0:20:30.060
<v Speaker 1>you're meeting somebody for the first time.

0:20:30.420 --> 0:20:32.109
<v Speaker 1>And maybe finding out a little bit about the job,

0:20:32.469 --> 0:20:34.069
<v Speaker 1>do you have something on hand to show me and

0:20:34.069 --> 0:20:37.030
<v Speaker 1>you straight away produce that out. And then very quickly

0:20:37.030 --> 0:20:38.790
<v Speaker 1>at a glance, you can see that and it doesn't

0:20:38.790 --> 0:20:41.030
<v Speaker 1>become that arbitrary anymore because they have had a conversation

0:20:41.030 --> 0:20:43.430
<v Speaker 1>with you. Well, I think today you really, really gave

0:20:43.430 --> 0:20:46.390
<v Speaker 1>us so many tips, so many hacks. I mean, I

0:20:46.390 --> 0:20:47.189
<v Speaker 1>for one will be

0:20:47.234 --> 0:20:50.574
<v Speaker 1>Looking through my resume, not because I am job hunting,

0:20:50.604 --> 0:20:53.385
<v Speaker 1>but I think it helps to consistently look at it

0:20:53.385 --> 0:20:55.425
<v Speaker 1>so that when you really need it, you don't have

0:20:55.425 --> 0:20:59.385
<v Speaker 1>to do this major overhaul. So thank you so much

0:20:59.385 --> 0:21:03.064
<v Speaker 1>for your time and your expert advice. Thank you for

0:21:03.064 --> 0:21:03.944
<v Speaker 1>having me. Thank you.

0:21:07.890 --> 0:21:11.150
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to our Ask Me Anything segment where Gerald

0:21:11.150 --> 0:21:14.449
<v Speaker 1>and I take on a work-related question that you have

0:21:14.449 --> 0:21:17.609
<v Speaker 1>sent to us. Now today's question was sent in by

0:21:17.609 --> 0:21:21.609
<v Speaker 1>a listener who I'll call Xavier. He says he's in

0:21:21.609 --> 0:21:25.239
<v Speaker 1>his twenties and has just resigned from a job. Now,

0:21:25.250 --> 0:21:28.050
<v Speaker 1>initially he thought he was not the right person for

0:21:28.050 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the job.

0:21:28.895 --> 0:21:32.115
<v Speaker 1>After stating his intention to leave, and he told his manager,

0:21:32.205 --> 0:21:35.906
<v Speaker 1>the interactions were a bit disappointing. Now, it sounded like

0:21:35.906 --> 0:21:38.365
<v Speaker 1>Xavier was not sure whether he was set up for

0:21:38.365 --> 0:21:40.725
<v Speaker 1>success in the first place. OK, let me give you

0:21:40.725 --> 0:21:43.086
<v Speaker 1>an example of what he said. I knew that I

0:21:43.086 --> 0:21:46.285
<v Speaker 1>was the first official hire for the position, but I

0:21:46.286 --> 0:21:48.566
<v Speaker 1>was also saddened to hear from my manager that they

0:21:48.566 --> 0:21:50.004
<v Speaker 1>knew from the start that

0:21:50.052 --> 0:21:53.561
<v Speaker 1>Having a less experienced individual like myself was not going

0:21:53.561 --> 0:21:56.682
<v Speaker 1>to work out and that the higher ups wanted someone

0:21:56.682 --> 0:21:59.962
<v Speaker 1>like myself on board because I was much less experienced

0:21:59.962 --> 0:22:03.802
<v Speaker 1>and therefore would not command as high a salary. Yeah,

0:22:03.921 --> 0:22:06.682
<v Speaker 1>so Xavier is now searching for jobs, OK, and he

0:22:06.682 --> 0:22:09.881
<v Speaker 1>wonders if he should disclose what he went through in

0:22:09.881 --> 0:22:11.112
<v Speaker 1>his next job interview.

0:22:11.540 --> 0:22:14.260
<v Speaker 1>If asked for his reasons for leaving, should he say

0:22:14.260 --> 0:22:16.739
<v Speaker 1>what he went through? Will it hurt his chances of

0:22:16.739 --> 0:22:20.420
<v Speaker 1>getting a job? Wow. So sounds like there's actually a

0:22:20.420 --> 0:22:22.780
<v Speaker 1>few things happening here, right? The first one is, of course,

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.829
<v Speaker 1>Xavier and his feelings about how he has departed from

0:22:26.829 --> 0:22:29.449
<v Speaker 1>the last job, and this has a lot to do

0:22:29.449 --> 0:22:30.849
<v Speaker 1>with how he feels that

0:22:31.199 --> 0:22:33.900
<v Speaker 1>He was set up for failure, right? I think it's

0:22:33.900 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>probably quite confusing for Xavier because when you get into

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.619
<v Speaker 1>a job first and then you thought that you're the

0:22:38.619 --> 0:22:42.660
<v Speaker 1>best person hired, and in Xavier's case, he probably thought

0:22:42.660 --> 0:22:44.369
<v Speaker 1>there was a case and then when things didn't work

0:22:44.369 --> 0:22:46.958
<v Speaker 1>out and he wanted to resign and the boss told him, uh,

0:22:47.020 --> 0:22:48.859
<v Speaker 1>actually we kind of know that you're going to fail. Yeah,

0:22:49.060 --> 0:22:49.659
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine.

0:22:49.770 --> 0:22:52.569
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and and then we only got you in because

0:22:52.569 --> 0:22:56.079
<v Speaker 1>you know you were cheaper. OK, OK, so I can

0:22:56.079 --> 0:22:58.939
<v Speaker 1>imagine Xavier and we can imagine how it's very confusing

0:22:58.939 --> 0:23:02.739
<v Speaker 1>for him, right? And this definitely would um dent his

0:23:02.739 --> 0:23:06.500
<v Speaker 1>confidence for the future job interviews, especially if he has

0:23:06.500 --> 0:23:08.900
<v Speaker 1>to ask, he has to tell people like why he

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.218
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to resign without a job. Yeah, yeah. So

0:23:12.219 --> 0:23:14.619
<v Speaker 1>I think this being a very confusing time for Xavier.

0:23:14.630 --> 0:23:16.030
<v Speaker 1>Xavier would probably need to

0:23:16.380 --> 0:23:19.140
<v Speaker 1>Find some closure or some way of thinking or reframing

0:23:19.140 --> 0:23:21.659
<v Speaker 1>this situation so that it doesn't get carried forward to

0:23:21.660 --> 0:23:23.900
<v Speaker 1>the future. I think there can be a lot of resentment,

0:23:23.939 --> 0:23:27.020
<v Speaker 1>a lot of disappointment, help with the previous job, and

0:23:27.020 --> 0:23:30.020
<v Speaker 1>this can actually easily show in the next job. During

0:23:30.020 --> 0:23:33.579
<v Speaker 1>the interview when employers, the HR, they are sniffing for

0:23:33.579 --> 0:23:34.429
<v Speaker 1>anything that is not.

0:23:34.829 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Proper, they were probe a little bit more, a little

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:38.709
<v Speaker 1>bit more, and then it gets out. So Xavier has

0:23:38.709 --> 0:23:41.698
<v Speaker 1>to really come to terms with this situation first. If

0:23:41.699 --> 0:23:43.270
<v Speaker 1>you were in Xavier's suit, what would you do? Yeah,

0:23:43.510 --> 0:23:45.869
<v Speaker 1>you know what, it's true, the psychological part is going

0:23:45.869 --> 0:23:48.149
<v Speaker 1>to be very difficult, but also at the same time, OK,

0:23:48.229 --> 0:23:50.390
<v Speaker 1>I'm a very half glass full kind of person.

0:23:50.650 --> 0:23:52.550
<v Speaker 1>So I think the first thing I would do after

0:23:52.619 --> 0:23:55.438
<v Speaker 1>I have licked my wounds and tell myself it's not me,

0:23:55.510 --> 0:23:58.989
<v Speaker 1>it's them. Yeah. I think that's not me, it's them.

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:00.989
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be to also see that actually,

0:24:01.239 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>even if I was the only person for that role,

0:24:04.199 --> 0:24:07.319
<v Speaker 1>even though less experienced, cheap, but you know what, there

0:24:07.319 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>must be something in me that the employer found that

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I was hireable. Otherwise they could have just kept the

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:13.719
<v Speaker 1>position open.

0:24:14.109 --> 0:24:16.569
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I will need to reflect back on all

0:24:16.569 --> 0:24:19.329
<v Speaker 1>the things that I've done and ask myself, what is

0:24:19.329 --> 0:24:21.619
<v Speaker 1>it that I can bring to the next job role?

0:24:22.250 --> 0:24:24.810
<v Speaker 1>Are there transferable skills? Are there things that I would

0:24:24.810 --> 0:24:27.448
<v Speaker 1>consider my strength? You brought up a really important point, right,

0:24:27.489 --> 0:24:29.839
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's them, not you.

0:24:30.099 --> 0:24:33.270
<v Speaker 1>And you were picked for the job as the best

0:24:33.270 --> 0:24:36.659
<v Speaker 1>possible hire at that price at that point of time.

0:24:36.910 --> 0:24:39.430
<v Speaker 1>So I think these are positives, the silver linings that

0:24:39.430 --> 0:24:42.228
<v Speaker 1>Xavier can take along with him. I think Xavier has

0:24:42.229 --> 0:24:44.790
<v Speaker 1>to remember that he was doing a job that was

0:24:44.790 --> 0:24:48.270
<v Speaker 1>scoped to a higher level, more experienced. He was trusted

0:24:48.270 --> 0:24:49.619
<v Speaker 1>with kind of responsibility.

0:24:49.939 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that Xaia can probably take forward

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.270
<v Speaker 1>to the next employer to share that, you know what,

0:24:54.479 --> 0:24:56.958
<v Speaker 1>I was doing a job that was for someone that

0:24:56.959 --> 0:24:59.429
<v Speaker 1>was a lot more experienced. I learned a lot from it.

0:24:59.630 --> 0:25:02.079
<v Speaker 1>I realized that I needed to find something else. Yeah

0:25:02.079 --> 0:25:04.079
<v Speaker 1>and I can take on more. I have proven that

0:25:04.079 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>I can take on more, so that's why I'm applying

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.579
<v Speaker 1>for this job. I also like to think that from

0:25:08.579 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Xavier's perspective, why would the boss tell Xavier, you know, this,

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:14.819
<v Speaker 1>that is such a low.

0:25:15.619 --> 0:25:16.930
<v Speaker 1>Whether is it low move or is it could it

0:25:16.930 --> 0:25:19.449
<v Speaker 1>be because they actually have quite an open relationship like

0:25:19.609 --> 0:25:22.650
<v Speaker 1>like good communication, they trust each other to say the

0:25:22.650 --> 0:25:28.489
<v Speaker 1>boss Xavier, could be that the supervisor really said that

0:25:28.489 --> 0:25:31.369
<v Speaker 1>to maybe make Xavier feel that it's not you, it's

0:25:31.369 --> 0:25:34.770
<v Speaker 1>actually us. We did a mistake, so I'm I'm trying

0:25:34.770 --> 0:25:36.430
<v Speaker 1>to do something good by telling you that, but of

0:25:36.430 --> 0:25:39.208
<v Speaker 1>course it has that the other unintended effect on Xavier,

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:41.069
<v Speaker 1>which is why why Xavier wrote in.

0:25:41.609 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that open communication could be something

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.569
<v Speaker 1>that's also of a silver lining to show that you

0:25:46.569 --> 0:25:49.369
<v Speaker 1>know what those things didn't work out, you still could

0:25:49.369 --> 0:25:52.569
<v Speaker 1>get along with the people in your company. Well, Xavier,

0:25:52.650 --> 0:25:55.050
<v Speaker 1>I I hope that your situation becomes better and both

0:25:55.050 --> 0:25:56.650
<v Speaker 1>of us are really sorry that you were put in

0:25:56.650 --> 0:25:59.579
<v Speaker 1>this position, but like we have been talking about here,

0:25:59.650 --> 0:26:02.208
<v Speaker 1>I think there are silver linings in this situation.

0:26:02.489 --> 0:26:05.020
<v Speaker 1>You can use some of these as you approach your

0:26:05.020 --> 0:26:08.938
<v Speaker 1>next job interview. Don't let this one setback affect you.

0:26:09.140 --> 0:26:12.180
<v Speaker 1>So if like Xavier, you have a work-related question, do

0:26:12.180 --> 0:26:16.750
<v Speaker 1>write into us. We are at CNA podcasts at Mediacorp.com.sg.

0:26:17.140 --> 0:26:21.060
<v Speaker 1>We're also on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, me, Listen, and YouTube

0:26:21.060 --> 0:26:21.810
<v Speaker 1>where a video

0:26:21.854 --> 0:26:24.805
<v Speaker 1>Version of this is at. The team behind the Work

0:26:24.805 --> 0:26:29.964
<v Speaker 1>It podcast is Janaini Johari, Joanne Chan, Saya Win, Alison Jenner,

0:26:30.244 --> 0:26:34.324
<v Speaker 1>Shahzad Dalilia and Christina Robert. Video by Hanida Amin. I'm

0:26:34.324 --> 0:26:37.875
<v Speaker 1>Gerald and I'm Tiffany. Have a great work week ahead

0:26:37.875 --> 0:26:41.074
<v Speaker 1>and don't let anybody tell you you are not good enough.