WEBVTT - 5 things you need to know about China’s 20th National Congress

0:00:05.710 --> 0:00:08.660
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the five things you need to know about.

0:00:08.660 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the most watched events on the chinese political calendar.

0:00:12.250 --> 0:00:15.830
<v Speaker 1>China's National congress is held every five years and it's

0:00:15.830 --> 0:00:18.950
<v Speaker 1>coming up mid october. I'm sonar a mess from the

0:00:18.950 --> 0:00:22.730
<v Speaker 1>money mine team. My guests victor Shiff, associate professor of

0:00:22.730 --> 0:00:26.530
<v Speaker 1>political science at the University of California san Diego

0:00:26.870 --> 0:00:30.980
<v Speaker 1>and Rory Green, head of china and Asia Research at T. S. Lombard.

0:00:30.990 --> 0:00:35.550
<v Speaker 1>That's a macroeconomic forecasting consultancy victor. Let's start off with,

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.699
<v Speaker 1>why is this year's meeting so important And what clues

0:00:38.700 --> 0:00:40.430
<v Speaker 1>should investors be looking out for

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:46.409
<v Speaker 2>Once every five years? The party congressional delegates who are

0:00:46.420 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>2200 of the most senior officials in China will convene

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to

0:00:52.774 --> 0:00:58.074
<v Speaker 2>and they elect a new slate of central committee members.

0:00:58.084 --> 0:01:00.304
<v Speaker 2>And the Central committee is a little bit like the

0:01:00.304 --> 0:01:04.344
<v Speaker 2>Congress of the Parliament. These are 200 of the most

0:01:04.354 --> 0:01:08.634
<v Speaker 2>senior officials in china. But then the Central committee in

0:01:08.634 --> 0:01:13.624
<v Speaker 2>turn will immediately elect the new politburo, the new politburo

0:01:13.624 --> 0:01:17.474
<v Speaker 2>standing committee as well as elect or re elect

0:01:17.498 --> 0:01:21.038
<v Speaker 2>in this case, the new secretary general of the Chinese

0:01:21.038 --> 0:01:25.967
<v Speaker 2>Communist Party, the most important officials in the Chinese Communist Party.

0:01:25.978 --> 0:01:30.238
<v Speaker 2>Therefore the most important officials in china will be elected

0:01:30.248 --> 0:01:34.428
<v Speaker 2>or is selected. Some would say at this Congress and

0:01:34.428 --> 0:01:37.607
<v Speaker 2>also a new set of agendas for the next five

0:01:37.608 --> 0:01:41.118
<v Speaker 2>years will be announced in the political work report, which

0:01:41.118 --> 0:01:42.697
<v Speaker 2>will be read out loud.

0:01:43.162 --> 0:01:45.162
<v Speaker 2>She Jinping himself.

0:01:45.172 --> 0:01:48.882
<v Speaker 1>Yes, a lot of important signals, particularly around the economy

0:01:48.882 --> 0:01:52.292
<v Speaker 1>that will come out at the 20th party Congress. More

0:01:52.292 --> 0:01:56.202
<v Speaker 1>important for the longer term. Less. So the short term.

0:01:56.212 --> 0:01:59.542
<v Speaker 1>And really, I think there's going to be strong signals

0:01:59.552 --> 0:02:02.972
<v Speaker 1>from the party Congress around changes to the constitution. Party

0:02:02.972 --> 0:02:08.102
<v Speaker 1>Congress work report and the personnel governing the economy particularly

0:02:08.126 --> 0:02:11.606
<v Speaker 1>And all these shifts will basically confirm the sides. We've

0:02:11.606 --> 0:02:16.516
<v Speaker 1>seen that common prosperity more status. Government intervention is going

0:02:16.516 --> 0:02:20.486
<v Speaker 1>to be the key for China's emerging growth model, particularly

0:02:20.486 --> 0:02:24.726
<v Speaker 1>around the personnel, li Keqiang, the premier lieu, the top

0:02:24.736 --> 0:02:28.326
<v Speaker 1>guy on the economy in china, both likely to step down.

0:02:28.326 --> 0:02:31.905
<v Speaker 1>So it is a real key change here around the

0:02:31.916 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>party constitution,

0:02:33.630 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the political economic framework and the people that are actually

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.620
<v Speaker 1>implementing these policies. It could be a very big shift here.

0:02:41.010 --> 0:02:45.530
<v Speaker 1>The main change in the party constitution is to, we think,

0:02:45.530 --> 0:02:48.860
<v Speaker 1>to have xi Jinping thought added to the constitution and

0:02:48.860 --> 0:02:51.889
<v Speaker 1>this would elevate she to the same level as Mao

0:02:51.889 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Zedong and the only other party leader to ever have

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that accolade and really move into almost an unassailable position.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>He's already in an incredibly strong, powerful position. But this

0:03:03.290 --> 0:03:06.750
<v Speaker 1>putting him level with Mao in his own lifetime, would

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be an extremely powerful move guarantee his

0:03:10.050 --> 0:03:16.290
<v Speaker 1>continued leadership and through that flows his continued input into

0:03:16.300 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>political economy and china's growth model.

0:03:18.770 --> 0:03:19.410
<v Speaker 2>Do you

0:03:19.410 --> 0:03:22.210
<v Speaker 1>think the Congress will be an inflection point if you

0:03:22.210 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>will

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:23.300
<v Speaker 2>for key

0:03:23.300 --> 0:03:26.350
<v Speaker 1>policies in china in particular for Covid zero

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.299
<v Speaker 2>until early this year. There has not been a lot

0:03:29.300 --> 0:03:34.419
<v Speaker 2>of economic pain in china. So china control Covid pretty successfully.

0:03:34.419 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 2>In 2020 2021 when the whole world had to speak

0:03:37.770 --> 0:03:39.090
<v Speaker 2>covid pandemic.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.770
<v Speaker 2>So the service sector did fairly well. But more importantly

0:03:42.770 --> 0:03:49.700
<v Speaker 2>in 2020, Chinese exports grew tremendously because Chinese factories were

0:03:49.700 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 2>still open and operating at a time when many factories

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.620
<v Speaker 2>around the world were shut down. So China became a

0:03:56.620 --> 0:04:02.310
<v Speaker 2>main exporter of PPE. S, but also consumer electronics, clothing, etc.

0:04:02.510 --> 0:04:07.270
<v Speaker 2>This year, the economic challenges is greater. But because export

0:04:07.270 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 2>is still doing very well, the leadership may feel that

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:15.580
<v Speaker 2>it can continue with pretty stringent zero covid policies and

0:04:15.580 --> 0:04:20.470
<v Speaker 2>not suffer too much economic repercussions. But of course if

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:25.620
<v Speaker 2>export were to worsen a lot more from today's level,

0:04:25.630 --> 0:04:27.940
<v Speaker 2>they may have to reassess their approach.

0:04:27.956 --> 0:04:32.635
<v Speaker 1>I think there are two. He breaks on removing zero

0:04:32.636 --> 0:04:35.726
<v Speaker 1>covid policy in china. The first is political and the

0:04:35.726 --> 0:04:39.746
<v Speaker 1>second healthcare. So after the Congress that does make it

0:04:39.746 --> 0:04:42.676
<v Speaker 1>easy on the political side, I think we will start

0:04:42.676 --> 0:04:46.726
<v Speaker 1>to see the propaganda and the state media messaging around

0:04:46.726 --> 0:04:49.966
<v Speaker 1>zero Covid start to change and become a little bit softer.

0:04:49.976 --> 0:04:53.195
<v Speaker 1>But the health care is the main barrier, the vaccination

0:04:53.196 --> 0:04:53.390
<v Speaker 1>rate

0:04:53.402 --> 0:04:56.612
<v Speaker 1>needs to come up much higher. This china CDC says

0:04:56.622 --> 0:04:59.241
<v Speaker 1>they need to get through a very difficult winter flu

0:04:59.242 --> 0:05:03.822
<v Speaker 1>season stocking up on medical equipment and supplies for us.

0:05:03.822 --> 0:05:06.962
<v Speaker 1>We think it takes until Q 2 2023 Q two

0:05:06.962 --> 0:05:10.772
<v Speaker 1>of next year for a more substantial easing of covid

0:05:10.772 --> 0:05:13.622
<v Speaker 1>19 policies and once the party congress is out of

0:05:13.622 --> 0:05:16.422
<v Speaker 1>the way, it'll be health care rather than politics, which

0:05:16.422 --> 0:05:18.842
<v Speaker 1>is the main block on opening up.

0:05:19.089 --> 0:05:21.150
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple of headwinds that we perhaps we

0:05:21.150 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>get onto. We call them the three Ds debt, demographics

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and de globalization and longer term these three structural headwinds

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.550
<v Speaker 1>will weigh on china's growth. But near time it's all

0:05:32.550 --> 0:05:33.380
<v Speaker 1>about Covid

0:05:33.660 --> 0:05:34.100
<v Speaker 2>looking

0:05:34.100 --> 0:05:37.010
<v Speaker 1>further ahead the first of those deeds, you talked about

0:05:37.010 --> 0:05:37.930
<v Speaker 2>debt. Do

0:05:37.930 --> 0:05:40.050
<v Speaker 1>We have any clues on how the country might tackle

0:05:40.050 --> 0:05:44.330
<v Speaker 1>the property crisis? It's a massive risk. It's 70% of

0:05:44.330 --> 0:05:49.370
<v Speaker 1>household wealth, key source of revenue for local governments. Banks,

0:05:49.385 --> 0:05:53.345
<v Speaker 1>collateral banks, assets are heavily weighted to property. So it

0:05:53.345 --> 0:05:58.705
<v Speaker 1>is a major risk. A global financial crisis. Lehman moment

0:05:58.714 --> 0:06:02.575
<v Speaker 1>is always very unlikely in china because the government controls

0:06:02.575 --> 0:06:07.045
<v Speaker 1>the banks, controls most of the Corporates and with capital controls,

0:06:07.055 --> 0:06:09.895
<v Speaker 1>keeps all the household savings in the economy so money

0:06:09.895 --> 0:06:12.755
<v Speaker 1>can be shifted around. But to actually get things around

0:06:12.755 --> 0:06:16.425
<v Speaker 1>to generate growth, we really need to see improvement in confidence,

0:06:16.425 --> 0:06:18.485
<v Speaker 1>particularly around presales

0:06:18.830 --> 0:06:22.950
<v Speaker 1>pre sales of this. This model where an uncompleted apartment

0:06:22.950 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can be sold for full value and that's the dominant

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sales model in china and it worked very well when

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>prices were rising and developers could sell more of these

0:06:33.490 --> 0:06:36.350
<v Speaker 1>to use the money to complete the older pre sold units,

0:06:36.350 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>but now prices are falling and no one trusts the

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.870
<v Speaker 1>developers and the model is breaking down

0:06:41.140 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and the only way you can restore that model is

0:06:43.410 --> 0:06:47.010
<v Speaker 1>greater confidence in the economy and the developers to deliver

0:06:47.010 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>these units. So Beijing could do a lot around this issue,

0:06:50.370 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It would need quite a bit of liquidity injected into

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>these developers the banks, but the money is certainly that

0:06:57.089 --> 0:07:00.060
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly doable. And it's a choice from Beijing that

0:07:00.060 --> 0:07:02.110
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to Baxter

0:07:02.214 --> 0:07:06.415
<v Speaker 1>The entire sector. They don't want to let moral hazard

0:07:06.425 --> 0:07:09.885
<v Speaker 1>creep back in and give the developers a free ride.

0:07:09.885 --> 0:07:13.205
<v Speaker 1>So they're trying to do enough to keep the sector alive,

0:07:13.215 --> 0:07:17.175
<v Speaker 1>but not too much to kick off another round of speculation,

0:07:17.225 --> 0:07:18.925
<v Speaker 1>but I think they will have to do more to

0:07:18.925 --> 0:07:23.185
<v Speaker 1>keep the sector going until they can remove the COVID-19 restrictions.

0:07:23.850 --> 0:07:26.210
<v Speaker 2>The real estate sector, some would say has been in

0:07:26.210 --> 0:07:30.030
<v Speaker 2>a bubble territory for the past 10 years. Uh And

0:07:30.030 --> 0:07:33.510
<v Speaker 2>I sort of feel that myself, but nonetheless, you know,

0:07:33.510 --> 0:07:36.500
<v Speaker 2>the real estate sector kept growing, kept being able to

0:07:36.500 --> 0:07:39.810
<v Speaker 2>refinance a lot of the debt from the banking sector

0:07:39.820 --> 0:07:44.090
<v Speaker 2>in 2020 very draconian de leveraging policies for the real

0:07:44.090 --> 0:07:48.030
<v Speaker 2>estate sector was implemented. The so called three red lines

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>that curtailed property developers ability to borrow

0:07:52.175 --> 0:07:56.795
<v Speaker 2>even more money from the banks to finance the next project.

0:07:56.805 --> 0:08:00.635
<v Speaker 2>Suddenly the whole bubble began to deflate very rapidly and

0:08:00.635 --> 0:08:04.995
<v Speaker 2>real estate investment was still down sort of 2030% compared

0:08:04.995 --> 0:08:08.585
<v Speaker 2>to last year. And that is a major headwind to

0:08:08.595 --> 0:08:12.315
<v Speaker 2>the economy. I think they're trying to turn that part around,

0:08:12.325 --> 0:08:15.255
<v Speaker 2>even if they don't turn around zero covid, they are

0:08:15.255 --> 0:08:19.475
<v Speaker 2>definitely turning around the de leveraging policy for the real

0:08:19.475 --> 0:08:20.495
<v Speaker 2>estate sector.

0:08:21.540 --> 0:08:24.530
<v Speaker 1>So this is what we can expect from China's 20th

0:08:24.530 --> 0:08:29.330
<v Speaker 1>National Congress, the election of the most important officials, President

0:08:29.330 --> 0:08:32.930
<v Speaker 1>Xi Jinping appears all set for an unprecedented third term

0:08:32.929 --> 0:08:37.420
<v Speaker 1>in power. But who else is staying and who's leaving? Secondly,

0:08:37.420 --> 0:08:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the meeting sets China's agenda for the next five years.

0:08:40.450 --> 0:08:44.210
<v Speaker 1>So will those stringent zero covid policies continue,

0:08:45.050 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>analysts are also looking for changes in the constitution and

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.780
<v Speaker 1>any signals that the common prosperity policy as well as

0:08:51.780 --> 0:08:55.179
<v Speaker 1>government intervention, are going to be key for China's new

0:08:55.179 --> 0:08:58.380
<v Speaker 1>emerging growth model. Now, that's in the face of longer

0:08:58.380 --> 0:09:02.940
<v Speaker 1>term challenges the so called three D's debt, demographics and

0:09:02.940 --> 0:09:04.210
<v Speaker 1>de globalization.

0:09:04.620 --> 0:09:07.689
<v Speaker 1>So victor tell us, what do all these headwinds mean

0:09:07.690 --> 0:09:11.090
<v Speaker 1>for China's economic growth target is at all feasible this

0:09:11.090 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>time around

0:09:11.890 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 2>In the short term. I think that the central government

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.250
<v Speaker 2>is gonna unleash a whole series of measures to try

0:09:18.250 --> 0:09:21.100
<v Speaker 2>to convince the world at least that it has reached

0:09:21.100 --> 0:09:25.980
<v Speaker 2>its growth target for 2022. Most independent analysts will say

0:09:25.980 --> 0:09:29.570
<v Speaker 2>that there's no way China can reach this 5.5% growth

0:09:29.570 --> 0:09:29.900
<v Speaker 2>rate

0:09:29.917 --> 0:09:32.156
<v Speaker 2>By the end of this year. But I think we

0:09:32.157 --> 0:09:35.016
<v Speaker 2>will see maybe a little bit more of this additional

0:09:35.017 --> 0:09:38.997
<v Speaker 2>stimulus after the party. Congress which plausibly can give them

0:09:38.997 --> 0:09:42.186
<v Speaker 2>some excuse to say no. Actually we still came very close,

0:09:42.187 --> 0:09:46.317
<v Speaker 2>you know, 5% growth, something like that, potentially the leadership

0:09:46.317 --> 0:09:50.727
<v Speaker 2>change is going to introduce new leaders, a new premier

0:09:50.727 --> 0:09:54.617
<v Speaker 2>of China, a new executive, vice premier of China who

0:09:54.617 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 2>maybe

0:09:55.214 --> 0:10:02.294
<v Speaker 2>A lot more friendly to dovish monetary policy, less prudential

0:10:02.294 --> 0:10:06.054
<v Speaker 2>regulations over the real estate sector. This in the short

0:10:06.054 --> 0:10:09.854
<v Speaker 2>term will be bullish for growth. But as an economy

0:10:09.854 --> 0:10:13.934
<v Speaker 2>that already is saddled with 300% of GDP worth of debt,

0:10:13.944 --> 0:10:16.974
<v Speaker 2>any short term stimulus is going to result in higher

0:10:16.974 --> 0:10:20.144
<v Speaker 2>debt level down the road. And again, the big

0:10:20.660 --> 0:10:23.981
<v Speaker 2>is that we now live in a high interest environment.

0:10:23.991 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>The interest payment could be quite onerous for all the

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>different entities in china. It will be quite challenging for growth,

0:10:32.051 --> 0:10:34.681
<v Speaker 2>maybe not in the next three or four months, but

0:10:34.691 --> 0:10:37.151
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these growth concern will come back. So

0:10:37.151 --> 0:10:39.731
<v Speaker 2>if there's a mini stimulus the next three or four months,

0:10:39.741 --> 0:10:42.691
<v Speaker 2>that's great. But then a year later there's still going

0:10:42.691 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 2>to be these growth concerns because of high debt

0:10:46.030 --> 0:10:49.230
<v Speaker 1>chinese leaders have talked about common prosperity as a key

0:10:49.230 --> 0:10:52.170
<v Speaker 1>strategic goal, Do you expect it to change the way

0:10:52.170 --> 0:10:53.170
<v Speaker 1>china is run

0:10:54.010 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>common prosperity is clearly very important and at the forefront

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.610
<v Speaker 1>of Xi's mind and the emerging ideology that will be

0:11:02.610 --> 0:11:05.610
<v Speaker 1>confirmed at the party congress, but it's not very well

0:11:05.610 --> 0:11:10.300
<v Speaker 1>defined at all. It's still very nebulous uncertain concept to

0:11:10.300 --> 0:11:13.189
<v Speaker 1>sort of try and characterize it very, very simply, it

0:11:13.190 --> 0:11:17.929
<v Speaker 1>is a focus on slower, more sustainable, more equitable growth

0:11:17.940 --> 0:11:21.750
<v Speaker 1>with a much greater role for the state in the economy.

0:11:22.260 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>So this could mean some quite positive structural reforms around

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.590
<v Speaker 1>the chinese welfare system. Labor mobility. On the flip side,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it will see more of the regulatory crackdown that we

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>have seen in the past, where areas that are unaligned

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.229
<v Speaker 1>with the common prosperity agenda like property sector, big rent

0:11:41.230 --> 0:11:44.930
<v Speaker 1>seeking tech companies will be hit very hard from from

0:11:44.929 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the state.

0:11:45.950 --> 0:11:49.500
<v Speaker 1>So it's slower, more sustainable growth, trying to boost the

0:11:49.500 --> 0:11:53.630
<v Speaker 1>middle class, trying to boost incomes and shift away from

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this kind of debt-driven property model that has dominated China

0:11:57.850 --> 0:11:59.870
<v Speaker 1>the past 5 to 10 years.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:05.510
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, potentially it can be formalized and common prosperity, the

0:12:05.510 --> 0:12:09.470
<v Speaker 2>manifestation of it has been kind of forced taxation from

0:12:09.470 --> 0:12:13.060
<v Speaker 2>the billionaires, but the problem with common prosperity is that

0:12:13.059 --> 0:12:16.510
<v Speaker 2>it's really not redistribution, right? So the money that has

0:12:16.510 --> 0:12:19.730
<v Speaker 2>been donated by billionaires by and large has gone to

0:12:19.730 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the chinese government and chinese government by and large has

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.810
<v Speaker 2>not redistributed to actually poor households, there was kind of

0:12:26.809 --> 0:12:30.070
<v Speaker 2>an anti poverty drive a few years ago which read

0:12:30.082 --> 0:12:34.042
<v Speaker 2>just read some resources to poor households in rural areas,

0:12:34.052 --> 0:12:37.432
<v Speaker 2>but the common prosperity mainly just resulted in more money

0:12:37.432 --> 0:12:42.011
<v Speaker 2>going to the chinese government coffer. So that doesn't stimulate

0:12:42.011 --> 0:12:45.691
<v Speaker 2>demand too much at the household level. What china needs

0:12:45.692 --> 0:12:48.612
<v Speaker 2>actually is, if it's going to get into more debt,

0:12:48.622 --> 0:12:52.072
<v Speaker 2>it has to be a demand side kind of stimulus program.

0:12:52.082 --> 0:12:54.802
<v Speaker 2>China is the second largest economy of the world, but

0:12:54.802 --> 0:12:57.782
<v Speaker 2>it can afford to give hundreds of dollars to ordinary people,

0:12:57.792 --> 0:12:59.872
<v Speaker 2>really stimulate demand and

0:12:59.884 --> 0:13:02.654
<v Speaker 2>that will be quite a boost to the economy and

0:13:02.654 --> 0:13:05.344
<v Speaker 2>we'll get some of these troubled sectors like the service

0:13:05.344 --> 0:13:09.874
<v Speaker 2>sector going again. But despite a lot of discussion among

0:13:09.874 --> 0:13:13.294
<v Speaker 2>the experts in china on this kind of policy, the

0:13:13.294 --> 0:13:18.624
<v Speaker 2>government continues to reject a demand side. Stimulus instead prefers

0:13:18.624 --> 0:13:23.714
<v Speaker 2>a supply size stimulus, more infrastructure, more subsidies to the

0:13:23.714 --> 0:13:28.194
<v Speaker 2>tech sector. But then that ends up exporting deflation the

0:13:28.194 --> 0:13:29.583
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world, which

0:13:29.686 --> 0:13:31.836
<v Speaker 2>of course the world needs it. We live in high

0:13:31.836 --> 0:13:35.695
<v Speaker 2>inflation era, we do need a deflation from china. But

0:13:35.696 --> 0:13:38.805
<v Speaker 2>in the medium term, that really doesn't help the world economy,

0:13:38.816 --> 0:13:41.776
<v Speaker 2>how the world can benefit even more from china is

0:13:41.785 --> 0:13:46.045
<v Speaker 2>if the 1.3 billion chinese consumers can become wealthy and

0:13:46.046 --> 0:13:50.026
<v Speaker 2>prosperous and they can spend on goods and services produced

0:13:50.035 --> 0:13:52.736
<v Speaker 2>in the rest of the world, we haven't seen hardly

0:13:52.736 --> 0:13:56.126
<v Speaker 2>any of it because of the covid lockdown and because

0:13:56.136 --> 0:13:59.476
<v Speaker 2>wages have not grown very much in china,

0:13:59.710 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think she didn't think actually recognizes that these are

0:14:03.050 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>really big problems for china and this is why in

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.380
<v Speaker 1>some respects we're getting this common prosperity policy coming through?

0:14:10.410 --> 0:14:12.790
<v Speaker 1>I think she didn't think knows that the growth model

0:14:12.790 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>has to change cannot keep relying on debt and exports

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.790
<v Speaker 1>to a lesser degree to drive growth. He has realized

0:14:19.790 --> 0:14:21.580
<v Speaker 1>that some of the external depend

0:14:21.820 --> 0:14:24.340
<v Speaker 1>is that china has and this is why we have

0:14:24.340 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the dual circulation policy and a shift to rely more

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on china internally. The realization that de globalization and certainly

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>demographics as well, that is a big part of common prosperity,

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.990
<v Speaker 1>so boosting the growth rate so that there is a

0:14:37.990 --> 0:14:42.190
<v Speaker 1>realization among the top leadership that china faces these very

0:14:42.190 --> 0:14:43.510
<v Speaker 1>difficult headwinds.

0:14:43.810 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think common prosperity is an attempt to shift

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.290
<v Speaker 1>the political economic model to shift the growth model and

0:14:50.290 --> 0:14:54.310
<v Speaker 1>also to change the source of the party's legitimacy for

0:14:54.310 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>rule for governance. You can no longer rely on high growth,

0:14:58.170 --> 0:15:02.350
<v Speaker 1>high debt, rising property prices. The model there also has

0:15:02.350 --> 0:15:05.100
<v Speaker 1>to change that china is going to be slower, more

0:15:05.100 --> 0:15:07.830
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable to certain areas. So there needs to be a

0:15:07.830 --> 0:15:11.130
<v Speaker 1>shift both in the growth model but also where the

0:15:11.130 --> 0:15:11.620
<v Speaker 1>party too.

0:15:11.985 --> 0:15:15.795
<v Speaker 1>Its legitimacy for rule. Common prosperity is an attempt to

0:15:15.795 --> 0:15:18.195
<v Speaker 1>do both of these things changed a bit the growth

0:15:18.195 --> 0:15:22.325
<v Speaker 1>model and change the source of part legitimacy as well.

0:15:22.365 --> 0:15:24.895
<v Speaker 1>There will be clues at the party congress of how

0:15:24.895 --> 0:15:27.885
<v Speaker 1>they're going to attempt to do this very difficult task.

0:15:27.895 --> 0:15:30.915
<v Speaker 1>But they are aware of the challenges. The rise of

0:15:30.915 --> 0:15:34.295
<v Speaker 1>china has been this big story of the past few decades.

0:15:34.305 --> 0:15:36.325
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean now if you're starting a new

0:15:36.325 --> 0:15:39.555
<v Speaker 1>chapter where slower growth is going to be the new normal,

0:15:39.930 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 2>the Congress party understands that growth naturally slows down as

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.430
<v Speaker 2>an economy gets wealthier and wealthier. But for Xi Jinping

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.310
<v Speaker 2>he needs growth to be at a certain pace because

0:15:52.310 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the ultimate objective is to catch up with the United

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.650
<v Speaker 2>States in terms of nominal GDP, which of course most

0:15:58.650 --> 0:16:01.820
<v Speaker 2>economists will tell you is kind of meaningless. Nonetheless, I

0:16:01.820 --> 0:16:04.420
<v Speaker 2>think for china this would be a very important milestone.

0:16:04.420 --> 0:16:06.430
<v Speaker 2>The leadership has talked about this

0:16:06.608 --> 0:16:09.538
<v Speaker 2>since the 19 fifties. It's like the great leap forward

0:16:09.548 --> 0:16:15.118
<v Speaker 2>in 1958 1959 was all about surpassing Britain and also

0:16:15.118 --> 0:16:18.228
<v Speaker 2>catching up with the United States and this has been

0:16:18.228 --> 0:16:22.278
<v Speaker 2>the policy objective of generations and generations of chinese leadership.

0:16:22.288 --> 0:16:24.358
<v Speaker 2>And for Xi Jinping this is no different. So this

0:16:24.358 --> 0:16:29.048
<v Speaker 2>is why I think by statistical manipulation china will have

0:16:29.048 --> 0:16:32.888
<v Speaker 2>a decent growth rate officially this year actually for almost

0:16:32.888 --> 0:16:33.270
<v Speaker 2>for certain

0:16:33.286 --> 0:16:35.506
<v Speaker 2>Only the US is going to pull ahead, China is

0:16:35.506 --> 0:16:37.896
<v Speaker 2>going to fall behind a little bit. But for the

0:16:37.896 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 2>next few years as China seeks to catch up with

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the United States in the next 10 years or so.

0:16:43.410 --> 0:16:46.890
<v Speaker 2>It has to maintain GDP growth. I think the numbers

0:16:46.900 --> 0:16:50.780
<v Speaker 2>at least 3.5% to have a hope of catching up

0:16:50.780 --> 0:16:54.380
<v Speaker 2>with the US despite all of these headwinds, the technocrats

0:16:54.380 --> 0:16:57.490
<v Speaker 2>have to come up with some way to achieve this growth.

0:16:57.510 --> 0:16:59.950
<v Speaker 1>We do normally in a couple of

0:16:59.960 --> 0:17:03.270
<v Speaker 1>areas and new normal in terms of the growth rate

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.810
<v Speaker 1>is going to be slower due to the three Ds.

0:17:05.810 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>I talked about debt, demographics, de globalization that is structural.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>There will be periods of high growth around that cyclically

0:17:13.450 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>but longer term china is slowing. The second factor, which

0:17:17.250 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>I think people are already adjusting quite quickly and partly

0:17:21.170 --> 0:17:25.150
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Washington, what was led by trump but has

0:17:25.150 --> 0:17:26.629
<v Speaker 1>been taken up by both

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>sides of politics in the US is a more assertive

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:35.750
<v Speaker 1>china and china that is looking to not cut ties

0:17:35.750 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of the world as such, but to

0:17:37.810 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>insulate the economy, the political system from outside levers of

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.470
<v Speaker 1>control and this is across finance, across tech across commodity

0:17:47.470 --> 0:17:51.109
<v Speaker 1>supply chains. So china would very much like to trade

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.310
<v Speaker 1>more with the rest of the world, wants to export more.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.810
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of the imports and particularly around key

0:17:56.810 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>choke points, there's a very strong push to to try

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:03.570
<v Speaker 1>and cut dependence with the rest of the world. That

0:18:03.570 --> 0:18:07.990
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be making headway across c suites around

0:18:07.990 --> 0:18:12.139
<v Speaker 1>the globe and in key capitals, that trend is just

0:18:12.140 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>getting started to be a long rumbling grind. People adjusting

0:18:16.930 --> 0:18:19.740
<v Speaker 1>to a newer model in china and a new model

0:18:19.740 --> 0:18:19.939
<v Speaker 1>in the

0:18:20.090 --> 0:18:23.010
<v Speaker 1>The world as well as globalization comes out of favor

0:18:23.020 --> 0:18:26.100
<v Speaker 1>to a certain degree. All of this isn't just important

0:18:26.109 --> 0:18:28.340
<v Speaker 1>inside China, it's going to have an impact on the

0:18:28.340 --> 0:18:30.830
<v Speaker 1>rest of Asia and the world. Do you think it

0:18:30.830 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>will change the way investors and businesses look at China?

0:18:34.410 --> 0:18:38.669
<v Speaker 1>That's a bit harder to gauge. China initially was the

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>clear winner from the pandemic from 2020 until probably October

0:18:44.450 --> 0:18:46.670
<v Speaker 1>November last year. China was boo

0:18:46.990 --> 0:18:51.290
<v Speaker 1>exports booming money flowing into its bond market flowing into

0:18:51.290 --> 0:18:55.350
<v Speaker 1>the equity market from foreigners. But now it shifted and

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.150
<v Speaker 1>in line with some of the common prosperity and then

0:18:58.150 --> 0:19:01.429
<v Speaker 1>the tech regulatory crackdown, there has been a change in

0:19:01.430 --> 0:19:05.669
<v Speaker 1>view on china and investors are certainly wary of putting

0:19:05.670 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>their money into china, both chinese financial assets and sort

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.850
<v Speaker 1>of longer term fixed asset investment F. D. I. I

0:19:12.850 --> 0:19:13.340
<v Speaker 1>do think

0:19:13.350 --> 0:19:16.930
<v Speaker 1>The flows into China will return after growth picks up

0:19:16.940 --> 0:19:21.710
<v Speaker 1>in COVID-19 fade away. But the caution that investors have

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:26.180
<v Speaker 1>gained around the tech crackdown around geopolitics of Ukraine and

0:19:26.180 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan and the more clearly authoritarian model that that is

0:19:30.490 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>becoming evident will remain so the flows will come back

0:19:33.690 --> 0:19:36.979
<v Speaker 1>but there will be caution and probably the level the

0:19:36.980 --> 0:19:39.150
<v Speaker 1>pace of inflows will be less than we've seen in

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the past.

0:19:40.750 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>So what will china due to meet its 5.5% growth

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.860
<v Speaker 1>target for the year. World zero Covid policies continue. And

0:19:47.859 --> 0:19:51.220
<v Speaker 1>how will china deal with longer term challenges, so called

0:19:51.230 --> 0:19:55.619
<v Speaker 1>three days of debt, demographics and de globalization. All eyes

0:19:55.630 --> 0:19:59.350
<v Speaker 1>on these possible inflection points. As china's top leaders meet

0:19:59.350 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for their milestone National Congress.

0:20:02.390 --> 0:20:05.189
<v Speaker 1>We'll be looking for more clarity on the common prosperity

0:20:05.190 --> 0:20:09.530
<v Speaker 1>policy and how this will change the economic direction of china.

0:20:09.540 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It's likely to mean slower but also most sustainable and

0:20:12.770 --> 0:20:14.050
<v Speaker 1>equitable growth.

0:20:14.780 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, how it's achieved will be closely linked to the

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>political legitimacy of the chinese Communist Party presidency appears all

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.630
<v Speaker 1>set for an unprecedented third term in power. But who

0:20:25.630 --> 0:20:27.470
<v Speaker 1>else is staying and who's leaving?

0:20:28.369 --> 0:20:31.370
<v Speaker 1>That's five things to look out for at china's 20th

0:20:31.380 --> 0:20:35.340
<v Speaker 1>National Congress. Thanks to my guests victor shih, associate professor

0:20:35.350 --> 0:20:39.210
<v Speaker 1>of political science at the University of California san Diego

0:20:39.220 --> 0:20:42.740
<v Speaker 1>and Rory Green head of china and asia research at T. S.

0:20:42.740 --> 0:20:46.340
<v Speaker 1>Lombard money Mind as every saturday at 10 30 PM

0:20:46.350 --> 0:20:49.570
<v Speaker 1>on mediacorp C N A. Can also catch us online

0:20:49.580 --> 0:20:52.190
<v Speaker 1>at CNN dot asia and on youtube.