WEBVTT - The Case for Modesty

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Life audio of today's episode of Timeless Wisdom.

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned that you would like to do an hour

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 2>on modesty. I am really looking forward to that one.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm so thankful you do this hour. But

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm very curious to know in light of what you

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>have said. You know, I'm a Christian woman, but I

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 3>have worked very hard on my figure. Used to be

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 3>a fitness instructor. It's very important to me to look good.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>So I'm curious in light of what you said, what

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 3>is in your mind appropriate dress for a Christian woman

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 3>who wants to look good.

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>That's coming up on Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Welcome

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Here thousands of hours

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of Dennis's lectures, courses in classic radio programs, and to

0:00:52.960 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles, go to Dennisprager dot com.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Old Fashion. I like two sexes.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I think all of a sudden, I don't.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 5>Like being married to what is known as a new woman.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I want a wife, not a competitor, competator. Competitor.

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Talk about a bit this crying in the morning things, depression,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's get that fixed.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 5>That's what men think, isn't it what Unless you've got

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 5>the answer, unless you can say, oh, I know this

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 5>bloke in the essex Radical fix that, and there's no

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 5>point bothering.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 6>How do you write women so well?

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 3>I think of a man and I take away reason

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 3>and accountability. I love him, I love him and I

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 3>don't care what you think.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 4>I love him for the for the man he wants

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 4>to be, and I love him for the man that

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 4>he almost is.

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>What do people have rows about him? Money? It's sex sex,

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 2>money he wants, she doesn't want, she wants, he doesn't want. Women.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 2>I've always been a big problem to me. Doctor fusspend

0:01:59.040 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>by listening.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Doctor, Yes, yes, yes, go, I'm gone.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I love it every week, Hi everybody, Dennis Prager the

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Male Female Hour. Sometimes the Male Female Hour is so honest,

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 2>and that's what it's about that I tell you it's

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 2>not a good idea for kids under ten to hear

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>it today. I think I think we're pretty free. Is

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>that is that fair to say? I think so. I

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 2>mean you'll make up your mind, but I think so. Hi, everybody.

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I talk about the real real issues of men and

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>women on the Male Female Hour, and I want to

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 2>read to you a letter I received after last week's show,

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and it came from a an Orthodox in fact Asidic woman,

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>in fact one I know who is the wife of

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 2>a prominent Habad rabbi. That's that's an ultra orthodox Asidics

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>group in Judaism, and she brought Usapachinsky is her name,

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and she's very, very bright and writes me periodically. This

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>is what she wrote last week, Thank you Duch for

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the great Men Women Hour yesterday, and it was about

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the visual, the effect of the visual on men and

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 2>how different it is from the effect of the visual

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>on women. In fact, she notes, I loved your line

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>about women being more interested in looking at photos of

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>table legs than men's legs, which is something I said

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>on the show, which is true. Whereas if you asked men,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>would you rather look at women's legs or table legs,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>they would think that you were nuts. It's like asking

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>would you rather breathe or suffocate? It's in that realm

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of the obvious. So thank you for the show. I

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>talked to as you mentioned her husband, because it is

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>something we discussed many times before. You said on the program,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>this is something your husband would not tell you, but

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>he does not fall into that category at all, and

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 2>which is a credit to both of you. By the way,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>now here is today's theme, She writes, Have you ever

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>asked men if they like to have women around them

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 2>dressed scantily or if they would prefer to have them

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 2>more modestly dressed? Of course, every man would instinctively say

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 2>the first, but I wonder if, after a little bit

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 2>of thought, they might just prefer the second choice. You

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that you would like to do an hour on modesty.

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 2>I am really looking forward to that one. Well, broh,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 2>here is your request is granted. I feel sort of

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 2>like a Laddin's lamp. Herebbed she rubbed on the lab

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and vola, which, by the way, shows I read your mail, folks.

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 2>I can't respond. I didn't even get the chance to

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>respond to her, but I do. And if you have

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>thoughts and reactions, they are absolutely invaluable to me. I

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 2>was asked this question a long time ago, and I'm

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>very open on these issues, and that's why people ask me, Well, Dennis,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 2>I sweat something like, so, as a man, do you

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 2>like when women wear very revealing clothing or scantily dressed?

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 2>As Brohasapachinski put it, and I said, and this is

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 2>this was a key answer. The male in me loves it.

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>The man in me doesn't see. Every man who thinks

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>forget the values issue. Even every man who thinks, just thinks,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 2>knows that the man and the male are in conflict.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 2>That's why I call this the male female hour. Incidentally,

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 2>it's deeper than the man woman hour. It's the male

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>female hour. See, women have to fight the female, but

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>different parts. The problem, and I've said this and we'll

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>do another show on this, is that girls are not

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 2>raised to fight the female in themselves. Because our society,

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 2>because of the age of stupidity in which we live,

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 2>has announced that everything female is naturally beautiful. It's the

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>males that have to have their aggression, their sexual predatory nature,

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>which is true. We do, we men do have to

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 2>fight those things. Do women have nothing to fight in

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 2>their minute nature? Okay, that's a separate subject obviously, But

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 2>so the answer is for a man who thinks this through.

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it's exciting when women show their bodies. That's

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the point of it. It literally is exciting. Yes, that's

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.119
<v Speaker 2>how you excite men, at least those who aren't blind,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not being facetious blind. Men are stimulated in

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 2>other ways, and I'm not saying it's the only way,

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 2>but is it is the first way? The visual we

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 2>talked about that previous show, and you're free to download it,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and you should, in fact and play it for one another.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Easier often for a wife to hear a stranger than

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>her husband, or and vice versa, for a woman to

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>hear a stranger, perhaps than his wife saying certain things.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>So es, yes, we men are excited by the visual,

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>no question. So do we like the micro skirt, Well,

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 2>we're excited by the micro skirt. Do we like it, Well,

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 2>that's a different story. That's why men love women in bikinis.

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Men love women in short skirts. Well, it's not precise.

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Men are excited by women showing more of their more

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 2>of their body. Do we like it? Well, it depends

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>what like means, and I'm not being Clintonian. It depends

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>what the definition of is is. It depends what like means. Yes,

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 2>if you like being excited, especially by someone that you

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>will be able to consummate that excitement with, preferably hopefully

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>ideally your wife, that's spectacular. But as a general rule, Well,

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 2>it depends how much a man wishes to be governed

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 2>by his libido, because every time, not even in just life,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>in picture, this happens, he's distracted. When I was much younger,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I remember, I remember a friend who was a real character,

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>who pointed out an attractive woman walking in the street

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 2>in a short skirt. And the truth is, I bumped

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>into the car in front of me at a red light,

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 2>which brought him so much joy that I couldn't I

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 2>couldn't even be angry. I was disgusted at myself. I mean,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 2>it was two miles per hour. I was already, you know,

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 2>basically stopped at the red light. But that gives you

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 2>an idea of the power of the visual and it

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>is distracting. It is entirely distracting. Absolutely. That is one

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons that men love to have all men's

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 2>groups much more than women like to have all women's groups.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>We like to have we like to have men's clubs

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and golf clubs. And when rotary clubs were all men

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 2>not to discuss business. I was a member of the

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 2>rotary club for three years. The guys weren't talking business,

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 2>they were just talking guy stuff. There was a piece

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 2>that reigned because there was no sexual tension. Now there

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 2>were times it's fantastic to be with women. My point

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>is that hardly that all. I'm a moderate on this,

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, so don't think that because I say X,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 2>therefore y is never good. But this notion is that

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>men like it. No, men are stimulated by it. And

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 2>young girls who were listening, high school college girls, please

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>know that what you often call attractive is to a

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>man just a sexual. Come on. He doesn't know the

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 2>word attractive. He knows the word turn on. If you

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>want to turn men on, and that's a high for you, fine,

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 2>know what you're doing. My point here is not moral judgment.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I make them all the time, moral judgments. But the

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>point here is clarity. You'll make the moral judgments. Now,

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 2>let me tell you a story that especially young women

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 2>should know. I was the director of an educational institute

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>in California for seven years, and in the summer, during

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the year, couples came, but during the summer college and

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>graduate age students, in other words, kids nineteen to twenty

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>five came. I was only in my late twenties and

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 2>early thirty, so I was very close in age to them.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>But I was the director of this institute, so boys

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 2>and girls, young men and young women ages nineteen to

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty five would come. It was the summer. And I

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 2>will tell you when we come back, the story of

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>a particularly attractive, particularly well endowed young woman and what

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>she said to me one day, because I met with

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>every one of the students privately, and she and they

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 2>opened up to me because for reasons i'll explain later,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>but she did. I'll tell you what she said about

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 2>the way the guys looked at her and my response

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 2>and her parents' response. One eighth Praguer seven seven six

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 2>The Male Female Hour on the Dennis Prager Show.

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's timeless wisdom.

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 2>Prager, it is hi, everybody. You're listening to the Dennis

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Prager Show, the Male Female Hour, and I've really explained today,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>perhaps better than ever before, why I call it the

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>male Female Hour or not the man woman Hour. You

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 2>might recall that before I began this hour, it's one

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 2>of three dedicated hours that I have on the Dennis

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Prager Show. One is to Happiness, one is to ultimate issues,

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and one is to male female and this is the

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>most recent of the three. And the debate was man

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 2>women or male female. But the male female is goes

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>more primal. And as I said, the man fights the

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>male and the woman has to fight the female nature

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 2>in them both. And so I'm talking to you today,

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 2>especially in conjunction with the show that I did, on

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 2>the power of the visual to stimulate men, far far, far,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>infinitely more powerful than the visual stimulates women. It's just

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>a fact. I mean, that's why that line I used

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 2>about would a woman rather look at a magazine of

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 2>men's legs or you know, furniture legs, there's no comparison,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>whereas a man, you know, men by journals of women's legs,

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 2>So there's no comparison. That's the way we're made. Now

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 2>in light of that, the issue arises of well, so

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 2>then what's the answer. Do men really like scantily clad women?

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>They say they do, but do they really? It's written

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to me by a what they call an ultra orthodox,

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 2>a woman, the wife of a rabbi, and they run

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful center. And in fact, in this case, I

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 2>know who it is. And she she raised the question

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's a very important question. And my answer, because

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 2>I've been asked this before, is the male in us,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll speak for me. The male in me loves scantily

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 2>clad women. The man in me doesn't except under circumstances

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 2>where it's it's desirable and important. Like with your wife.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>That's that's the ideal, and she should and she should

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 2>play that role. By the way, with her husband. That's

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 2>a very important thing that you can do for your husband,

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 2>which we've talked about and we'll talk about again. Now

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>let me tell you the story, and then I want

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to take your calls. One eight prager seven seven six

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>one eight p r A g Er seven seven six,

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>which is eight seven seven two four three triple seven

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 2>six eight seven seven two four to three triple seven six.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 2>So I was the director of an institute which had

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 2>summer sessions. We had ninety in July ninety in August

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 2>of college aged and older. Eight nineteen to twenty five

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 2>year old kids would come as was in southern California,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 2>and they'd spend entire month living there, and of course

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 2>they dressed as they would dress. You know, there was

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 2>no code as it were, of dress at the at

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the institute. I met with every one of the ninety privately.

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>That was one of my tasks. How are you doing,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, open up to me about how you're reacting

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>to the program, how do you feel about the other kids, etc. Etc. So, anyway,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 2>there was one young woman I remember, viv I think

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 2>she was on the younger side. I think she was nineteen.

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>She was very beautiful, and she was she had a

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 2>terrific figure and well endowed, and she let everybody know it.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 2>That's how she dressed. She let everybody know it by

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the way she dressed. And so she came into my

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>office and by the way, to my everlasting credit, if

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I go to heaven, it will be because even though

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I was a bachelor and I was only a few

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>years older, I was very, very non flirtatious, totally removed

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 2>and totally professional. I must say, I'm very proud of

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 2>myself or the way I acted then. But it would

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 2>have the institute would have killed any values that I

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 2>preached if in any way I were perceived as not

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 2>even forget doing anything, just coming on to any of

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the young women. So therefore, they felt that they could

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>open up to me, which was one of the important things,

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and they could. So I was talking to her in

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>my office and I said, oh, you know, I asked

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>her the same questions I generally asked the other kids.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>And I said, how are you getting along with the kids?

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 2>He said, all right? But I think, you know, for

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason, you know, the guys here, you know, they

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 2>treat me like I'm some sex object. And I don't

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 2>feel that I could ever really just have a conversation

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>with them. So I said to her, do you think

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that you might be doing anything that causes them to

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 2>regard you in that way? And she said what do

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 2>you mean? And of course I'm thinking. I was thinking,

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>what do you mean? What do I mean? We live

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 2>on the same planet. But I didn't say that. I said, well,

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 2>to be perfectly honest, it's the way you dress, You

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 2>reveal your body, you reveal your breasts wherever, pretty much,

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 2>whatever you wear, and so you are saying to all

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>these guys around here, look at me as a sex object.

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>That's what you're telling them to do. And I took

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a gamble, because she could have said, you know, who

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the hell are you to talk to me that way?

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Or I'm going to call my parents. And I thought

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>about that in advance, and I thought, well, if she

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:42.719
<v Speaker 2>wants to call her parents, there's a telephone, it is

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 2>go right ahead, there's a photo in the next room.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, as it turns out, she did call

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 2>her parents, and guess what, her parents called me and

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 2>thanked me. They were so great because the parent saying

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 2>this is so often less effective than somebody else saying this.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 2>And I will never forget when I finally met the parents,

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:16.239
<v Speaker 2>they just were so grateful to me. They said, we

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know how to get this point across to her.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 2>And she was a very sweet girl. This was you know,

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 2>she was. This was not, you know, some slutty type girl,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 2>not in the least. She was naive, as almost all

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 2>women are at the beginning, because how could they possibly know.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 2>They know the word attractive, they don't know the word exciting.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Turn on. Therefore, just looking, I'm just showing, and it's

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 2>an attractive dress, attractive haltertop right, it's an attractive short skirt.

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not telling you what to wear. I'm telling you

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 2>to be aware of what the effects are, and that

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 2>the notion of men liking this is a very complex question.

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 2>The male in us likes it, the man in us

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 2>if we want to be able to not be distracted continually,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 2>is not a big fan of it. That's the answer

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:32.719
<v Speaker 2>to the question as written by this religious woman who

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 2>wrote to me one eight Prager seven seven six. And

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 2>now I go to your calls, and I would like

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 2>you look, if I'm willing to be open, and you

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>know who I am, you should certainly be willing to

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 2>open because people don't know who you are, so this

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>should be very helpful. And you might want to play

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>this for your young daughters, your high school or college

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 2>daughters or nieces. You are listening to the Deni Prager Show,

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 2>The Male Female Hour.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Prager it is, and this is the Male Female Hour.

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Every week. This hour is devoted and very openly, as

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 2>you have obviously noticed by now, to men women male

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 2>female issues. Women's dress is the current issue based on

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 2>the show of course that we did, on the power

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 2>of the visual to arouse men and how do men

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 2>like women's dress? The question posed to me by a

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>religious woman. And let's go to your calls now. Because

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 2>of the importance. And by the way, I have to say,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 2>having said the importance of non provocative dress, I don't

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 2>cook to the I don't go to the other extreme. However,

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 2>the other extreme, of course is the chador, is the

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 2>burka is where a woman is entirely covered. I find

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.959
<v Speaker 2>that immoral, dehumanizing and degrading. Can I be more strong

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>if I could, I would say it, I just don't

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>know how to be stronger in my condemnation of that.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>In fact, frankly, between the two, I would take the

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 2>immodest extreme over over that as as as much as

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's a problem, And so what does

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>that mean? Then what does it mean? I mean? And

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>here people have to be I think there has to

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>be a common sense understanding, because I mean, the fact is,

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 2>why do they used to say a well turned ankle

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 2>when women only showed ankles? It was it was something.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Women's skin is women's skin to men, that's the way

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 2>it is. That's the way men are made. And I

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 2>am one of them. It's not abstract. I propos of this.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Denver, Colorado, and a vita. Hello Avita,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager.

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Hello Dennis Frager. I am I'm nervous, and this is

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 3>such an honor to talk to you.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.959
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so so much, and I understand being nervous.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh this is so great, you know. I'm so thankful

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 3>you do this hour. But I'm very curious to know

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 3>in light of what you have said. You know, I'm

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 3>a Christian woman, but I have worked very hard on

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 3>my figure. Used to be a fitness instructor. It's very

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 3>important to me to look good. So I'm curious in

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 3>light of what you said, what is in your mind

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 3>appropriate dress for a Christian woman who wants.

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 7>To look good?

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, having you know your question is of course,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 2>you were asking exactly what the Jewish woman in the

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 2>letter is asking your religious Christian religious Jewish woman, same

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>same question and appropriate. I just want to tell you

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>a funny thing is when I see pictures of some

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 2>some starlets or some athletes, very very low cut, half

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>their breast showing and a cross in the middle, and

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking, what exactly did they have in mind? How

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 2>do I attract men to Christ? I mean, what.

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 8>Is is?

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>What is on their mind? Anyway? It's just it's it's all.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>It's actually it's it's humorous. In its way, and I'm

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 2>not it's not even a condemnation, it's just I I

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 2>marvel at it. But anyway you're asking, First of all,

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I think you have every right to let the world

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 2>know that you take care of yourself and have a

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 2>fine figure. So I do not believe that that figure

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 2>eradicating clothing is necessary or even good. I think the

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 2>fact that you are a woman and have a different

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.120
<v Speaker 2>body than than men do, and that you have a

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 2>fine one because you've taken care of it, you have

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>every right and I think even even obligation to yourself

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>to to make that clear by not wearing particularly baggy

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>clothing for example. Okay, so the figure is the figure.

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about skin here, much more than we're talking

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 2>about revealing that this is a this is a woman

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 2>with a fine body. That's just fine. And by the way,

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 2>well one will of course, one could argue, well, Dennis,

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 2>that's a turn on too men too. Okay, that's that's

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 2>meant at that point that becomes my male problem. Okay,

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll handle that.

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 3>That is good to know because that was a question

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 3>that I had.

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Good.

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I know other Christian women who say, like I won't

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 3>even wear anything that's form fitting because it's showing your face.

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 2>No no, no, no no no. Well so then then

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>you know then what's the difference. But then why not

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 2>by that logic you should wear a chador or a burka.

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 7>Right, that is true?

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, what about your face? Why reveal

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 2>your face? Face? Face? Face is also arousing? Right? I

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 2>mean bye? By that thing, king, then you know one

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 2>ends up really wearing a burka. No, not at all.

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 2>So there is you you are continue to do so

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 2>the question comes with regard. By the way, there are

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 2>also other questions. A cocktail party versus going to church

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 2>venue is part of the answer to your question. I

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 2>will explain when we come back on the Dennis Prager Show.

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 9>Hi Dennis, my name is Nick in Westwood, New Jersey,

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 9>and I just want to wish you well. I know

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 9>you've had an ordeal to deal with the last year

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 9>year plus. Now what happened to you if you fall? I,

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 9>like many people have had their life chames by you,

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 9>so Collins and videos and your book. I've read everything

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 9>you've ever written, and Jesus, thanks my life. You convinced

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 9>me to get a PhD in American religion. I went

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 9>from atheist to back to Catholics. I went from a

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 9>little conservative. I have successfully converted god knows how many

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 9>people and my family over to our cause. And I

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 9>just really appreciate everything you've drunk from me. And there

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 9>are there are millions, if not tens of millions of

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 9>people like me. Most of them will not call, but

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 9>just know how much good you've done in this world.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 4>So I wish you well and I look.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 9>Forward to continuing to indulge in your getting your timeless system.

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 9>Thank you so much from the bottle of my heart.

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you enjoying timeless wisdom? We'd love to hear from you.

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Call eight seven seven two four three seventy seven seventy

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>six and leave a review, share your thoughts, or just

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>even an encouraging word for Dennis. Your voicemail might just

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>make it on the show. That's eight seven seven two

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>four three seventy seven seventy six. That's eight seven seven

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>two four three trip seven six. Thanks for listening and

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>for your support.

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Prager. It is Hi, everybody, Dennis Prager The Male Female

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Hour talking about women's dress and its effect on men,

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and I take a middle road here. On the one hand,

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 2>it is so clear that the the effect of showing

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>more skin is so arousing and distracting to men, period,

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 2>end of issue. And it is, it's almost immeasurable, and

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 2>it's in its power. We talked about the visual and

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 2>previous week on the on the show. On the other hand,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the movement toward the entire coverage like in the like

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 2>among some Muslim women is degrading and humiliating in terrible ways. Uh.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 2>And and is actually, in my opinion, some total is

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 2>actually worse. And I say that having been quite clear

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>about the adverse effects of provocative dress. There was a

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 2>woman who called. Unfortunly, she hung up, but I got

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 2>a chance to at least read her subject. Her husband

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 2>likes her to go brals in public and uh, and

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 2>she's uncomfortable with that. And I and it's too bad

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 2>that she. I think she's in Cleveland. Uh. And the

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you very quickly the fact that he wants

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 2>you to do that. And I don't want to cause

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 2>any troubles at all, God forbid. The point of this

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 2>hour is to make marriages better, not worse. But Uh,

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 2>there is a part of men that wants to say

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to the world, to other men in particular, Look at

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>how sexy my wife is, and that's that's natural, that's

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>part of that's part. That's why they they often speak

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of what is the word when when has a much

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 2>younger wife trophy trophy? Yeh, but but that is something

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 2>that it is one thing for man to be proud

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 2>of how his wife looks. It is quite another to

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>to have her wear clothing to to provoke, to announce, Look,

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm a sex object. That's that's that's not a good thing.

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Men should not do that. And it's just it's it's

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 2>bad for both of you. It's bad for everybody. And uh,

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Maybe there's a certain insecurity at the

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 2>root of it that you know, this is how men

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 2>will listen. Let me tell you something. If, as a man, men,

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>if the way you will get respect from other men

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 2>is by showing off your wife's body, then you don't

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 2>have much that you can gain respect from other men.

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>For if that's what you're relying on, you don't have

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 2>much going on in your life. Okay? Is that direct enough?

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>One?

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Eight Praguer seven seven six And in fact, on that

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>very issue in Hyan dot Whyan dot Michigan, it's Mark Hello, Mark,

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager. Did I pronounce your city? Right?

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes? You did?

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 5>You got it?

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Good?

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Dennis, you know what my opinion on the subject

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 4>is pretty much the opposite of that call you just

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 4>described before.

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>That, right.

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 4>I like my woman to look modest and attractive in public,

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 4>and when there's times of intimacy, that's when the male

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 4>gets to come out, and that's when I like my

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 4>woman to be more provocative and sexy looking.

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 2>You got it, my friend?

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes? And you know, although I when I see you

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 4>want to dress scantily on the street, I'll look, but

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm thinking I wouldn't want my woman looking that way

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 4>because other men.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Are or your daughter, or your mother, or your sister,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 2>or your or a female friend. There isn't a single

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 2>woman that you love that you would want dressed that way. Okay,

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's something to bear in mind. That's exactly right.

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I do believe that there are extremely I think, for example,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are those who say that a woman

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>should cover her arms to her wrists. I think that

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.479
<v Speaker 2>or her or must hit her ankle her skirt, And

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, I respect those who feel that way. I

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 2>think that that's more than I think is necessary. But people.

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>But there's no objective answer to this. Obviously there will

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 2>always be a subjective element. But nevertheless that at least

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 2>they have at least, I mean, to their credit, they

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>have the right idea of the importance of modesty and dress.

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 2>And I always thought in that way when I look

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 2>at films of the fifties, and I don't mean movies,

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean just documentaries of the way women dress. They

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 2>looked beautiful, just as beautiful as women do today, in fact,

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 2>some ways perhaps more. But they showed much less. But

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 2>are are they less sexy? Are they less adorable? Are

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 2>they less desirable? Of course not, of course not. Just

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>sexual tension wasn't wasn't around quite as much. That's the

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 2>point there, Give me, give me line five. I just

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>disconnected the plug for a second. Give me line five,

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 2>and let's see Katie and Bradenton, Florida.

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Hi, Danny, Hi. My husband is actually the one that

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 6>urged me to call.

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh how interesting? Go ahead?

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, we listened to your show all the time.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 6>Good And I'm a big plug person for the no

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 6>expectations SERI that you have.

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh good, because.

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 6>I think it works.

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Wonder it does.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 6>I called them because when I was younger, say, around

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 6>eighteen or so apparently, and I know now, but I

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 6>used to wear very short skirts, provocative skirts. Gods have

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 6>blessed me with long legs. And I remember even around

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 6>my parents when I would go out and I would

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 6>be wearing these, they would say how nice I looked.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 6>And I had no idea, that's right, what I was

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 6>doing at.

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 2>All, Just like that nineteen year old at my institute.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, exactly exactly. And it wasn't until that one of

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 6>my friends made some offhanded comment, not a mean comment

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 6>in any way, but remarked about how I always wear

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 6>these short skirts that and I asked them, you know,

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 6>what are you talking about? And they acted like, oh,

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 6>you know that you do and this and that, and

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 6>it really it blindsided me at how that I was

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 6>dressing and what kind.

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Of Well that it proves my theory as to why

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm writing my book on men and why I do

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 2>this show so many women are never told by men

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 2>what's going on? Right exactly, Well, you're twenty five, and

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 2>thank god you now know, and that's great. I appreciate

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 2>your call immensely. Man who takes a yoga class with

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 2>scantily clad women Calling Up from Texas. Next on The

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Male Female Hour.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager here, final segment of this edition of The

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Male Female Hour. I suspect a lot of you would

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 2>like a copy of this. I don't mean a transcription,

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 2>though we should transcribe all the stuff. Actually, I have

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 2>finally decided, and if you want to laugh at me,

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 2>you are perfectly right in doing so, since I've been

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.479
<v Speaker 2>so paralyzed between so many books or among so many

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 2>But my next book will in fact be the Truth

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 2>about Men. I don't know if that'll be the title,

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 2>but that's what it is about. It is about all

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 2>these issues. And in the meantime, if you want to

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 2>get this particular show and play it for your daughter,

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 2>niece or whomever, go to Dennis Prager dot com and

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 2>I'd love your male I want to tell Marian and Tampa.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 2>She said, what can I do to get my husband

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 2>to be attracted to me? Again? It seems like no

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 2>matter what I do, he's just not that interested. It

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 2>is such an important subject. That's one I would like

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 2>to talk about at length. We don't have the time now, Marian,

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 2>please either send me an email or call in in.

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe even next time, we will just have an open

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 2>line male female hour so that people can pose any

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 2>honest question, the tough stuff that may have not been

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 2>dealt with or has been dealt with and you want

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 2>to ask about all right, e and Oh Kim asked

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 2>the same thing in San Diego. Do husbands like to

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 2>look at their wives bodies even once they age? I

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 2>don't feel as attractive as I used to. Okay, look,

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 2>it's a very honest question here in a nutshell, men

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 2>are still attracted to their wives if their wives, generally speaking,

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 2>these are all generalizations if their wives take care of

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 2>themselves and they do a lot of things to keep

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 2>that tension alive. For example, don't appear undressed before him

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 2>when you are not about to do something. Let it

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 2>be very rare that he still sees you undressed. Where

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the type of sexy stuff for him that accentuates the

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 2>still provocative parts of you. They're obviously you don't look

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 2>like a twenty year old, but that's not what he's expecting.

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's why people do continue to enjoy one another

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 2>all ages. All right, let's quickly, David san Antonio, quickly, Hi.

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 5>Dennis, great talking to you again. I retired from the military,

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 5>went back to college, and my last semester I heard

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 5>about a yoga class who had been the teacher was

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 5>one of my high school teachers from my high school days.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 5>So I took the class. Showed up. About twenty people

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 5>in the class, three males, me and two others.

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 2>With all right, wait, all right, I think I know

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 2>the lie forgive me, and they're scantily clad, and part

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 2>of him likes it, and part is very he's very distracted,

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 2>no kidding. That was my theme, the man versus the male,

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the woman versus the female. This is the Dennis Prager.

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Show tomorrow on Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager.

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.760
<v Speaker 8>The west side of la has a lot more influence

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 8>over the country than the west side of Toledo. I mean,

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 8>that's and by the way, I don't I'm not saying

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 8>that's bad. I'm just saying, if you have more influence

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 8>over how other people live, you to consider yourself a

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 8>steward of the country and you want to make wise decisions.

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 8>Is that Gladiator the music behind you? Yes, you can

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 8>literally quote.

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 5>The whole movie.

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 8>Maximus, Well you not accept this great.

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 5>Honor, sire, with all my heart. No, that is why

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 5>it must be you, Maximus.

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 8>There you go. That's my that's my best limitation. I

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 8>love that movie.

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Every human being is sinned. And by the way, I

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.479
<v Speaker 5>probably have a much longer list than you in life.

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 2>I doubt it, but I know I we'll get together

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 2>and compare.

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 5>Are we going to get together over a cigar for

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 5>a big part of my life, which I guess made

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 5>me a talk job.

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, nobody stereotypes more based on race, ethnicity, religion than

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 7>people on the left. And so when they saw them,

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 7>my last name was Shapiro and then I went to

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 7>Harvard lost one of them. And really, you know, usually

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 7>that's like a ninety eight percent and betvenue bother googling.

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 2>I just need to tell you that is one of

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the funniest responses in twenty eight years of a radio

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 2>out of interviewing people.

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Join us tomorrow to hear more on Timeless Wisdom with

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Prager. Visit Dennispragger dot com for thousands of hours

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of Dennis's lectures, courses in classic radio programs, and to

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 1>purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles. We want to take just

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a second to thank the team at Life Audio for

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>their partnership with us on the podcast. Go to lifeaudio

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com to find dozens of other faith centered podcasts

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and their network, including shows about prayer, Bible study, parenting,

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and more.