Speaker 1: Hello everyone. Welcome to the big show. I am Trish
Speaker 1: Regan and we got a bunch of breaking news to
Speaker 1: get to on this Friday. Wow, I mean this is huge.
Speaker 1: This is huge. We can finally sort of say we're
Speaker 1: putting to bed.
Speaker 1: For now anyway, these legal cases against one Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: the newly elected President of the United States, who's going
Speaker 1: to be taking over in, well, you know, it's coming
Speaker 1: down to hours now, not just days but hours, so
Speaker 1: sort of kind of ending and yet not entirely with
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court kicking it back to Judge Maron, Judge
Speaker 1: Merchon making his ruling and then of course, uh, Trump
Speaker 1: speaking out to the courtroom suggesting here that yes it's
Speaker 1: over but not.
Speaker 1: Entirely I think he's getting the last word.
Speaker 1: It's been a political witch hunt. It was done to
Speaker 1: damage my reputation so that I'd lose the election, and
Speaker 1: obviously that didn't work, and the people of our country
Speaker 1: got to see this firsthand because they watched the case
Speaker 1: in your courtroom. They got to see this firsthand and
Speaker 1: then they voted and I won and got the largest
Speaker 1: number of votes by far of any Republican candidate in history.
Speaker 1: And won, as you know, all 7 swing states, one
Speaker 1: conclusively all 7 swing states, and won the popularity, the
Speaker 1: popular vote by millions and millions of votes, and they've
Speaker 1: been watching your trial and I think it's a disgrace
Speaker 1: to the system.
Speaker 1: I was under a gag order. I'm the first president
Speaker 1: in history that was under a gag order where I
Speaker 1: couldn't talk about aspects of the case that are very important.
Speaker 1: I guess I'm still under, so probably I won't do
Speaker 1: it now. I assume I'm still under a gag order.
Speaker 1: But the fact is that
Speaker 1: I'm totally innocent. I did nothing wrong. In the meantime,
Speaker 1: I won the election in a massive landslide, and the
Speaker 1: people of this country understand what's going on. This has
Speaker 1: been a weaponization of government. They call it lawfare. Never
Speaker 1: happened to any extent like this, but never happened in
Speaker 1: our country before.
Speaker 1: And I just like to explain that I was treated very,
Speaker 1: very unfairly, and I thank you very much. Wow, wow, quite,
Speaker 1: quite a summary there from the newly elected President of
Speaker 1: the United States. It was pretty crazy just everything that
Speaker 1: went on. It is it was lawfare and.
Speaker 1: I have an interesting take on this, so I know
Speaker 1: we're all mad at Amy Coney Barrett, right? I, I
Speaker 1: get it because it seems like the tactful thing to
Speaker 1: do would be to send the newly elected President of
Speaker 1: the United States into office without having the baggage of this,
Speaker 1: you know, tarnished brand in some way, shape or form.
Speaker 1: They wanted to be able to say he was a
Speaker 1: convicted felon, right? You know that I know that and
Speaker 1: yet and yet the one good thing about this.
Speaker 1: Glass half full here is that it's a it's an
Speaker 1: opportunity to actually fix things so that they don't happen
Speaker 1: like this again if for example the Supreme Court had decided, OK,
Speaker 1: Judge Mershon, you're crazy, blah blah blah blah and and
Speaker 1: they didn't allow any kind of sentencing to stand, then
Speaker 1: you would have been at risk of everybody saying oh
Speaker 1: this was just political it's because he's got the court
Speaker 1: stacked with his people and he put Amy in there
Speaker 1: and that's why she voted for him.
Speaker 1: Now it's actually gonna go back to the court of
Speaker 1: appeals and so it's going to go through the proper
Speaker 1: legal process and the reality is, and I mean this,
Speaker 1: this case never should have been brought. I'm not a
Speaker 1: legal scholar I just cover the economy and some politics
Speaker 1: and a few other things, right? I'm not a legal scholar,
Speaker 1: but I can tell you I know enough about a
Speaker 1: few things in the world to know that this case
Speaker 1: should not have been brought, you know why they didn't
Speaker 1: have the jurisdiction. You know who else knew that album Bragg,
Speaker 1: he knew he didn't have the jurisdiction and yet they
Speaker 1: did this anyway.
Speaker 1: They did it anyway, and that's just disgusting to me
Speaker 1: and it's threatening to the entire system and so what
Speaker 1: I like about this is that it's gonna go back
Speaker 1: through the process. Maybe it comes to the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: again eventually, but let's get it through the legal process
Speaker 1: and have it shot down by a lower court as
Speaker 1: it should be. More coming up on that, but first,
Speaker 1: a quick shout out to one of our great sponsors
Speaker 1: here on the Trish Regan show.
Speaker 1: Grand Canyon University, a private Christian university in beautiful Phoenix, Arizona.
Speaker 1: It is beautiful there. Believes that we are endowed by
Speaker 1: our Creator with certain unalienable rights to life, liberty, and
Speaker 1: the pursuit of happiness. GCU believes in equal opportunity, and
Speaker 1: the American dream starts with purpose. Mhm. Whether your pursuit,
Speaker 1: whether your pursuit involves a bachelor's, master's or a doctoral degree,
Speaker 1: GCU provides a path to help you fulfill your dream.
Speaker 1: offering over 340 academic programs as of September 2024. Find
Speaker 1: your purpose at Grand Canyon University, private Christian, affordable, visit GCU.com.
Speaker 1: So this is a big deal, ladies and gentlemen, Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump out speaking in the courtroom. Let's just listen
Speaker 1: in moments ago saying ha ha, you know what? I
Speaker 1: did win. I did win after all.
Speaker 1: It's been a political witch hunt. It was done to
Speaker 1: damage my reputation so that I'd lose the election, and
Speaker 1: obviously that didn't work, and the people of our country
Speaker 1: got to see this firsthand because they watched the case
Speaker 1: in your courtroom. They got to see this firsthand and
Speaker 1: then they voted and I won and got the largest
Speaker 1: number of votes by far of any Republican candidate in history.
Speaker 1: And won, as you know, all 7 swing states, one
Speaker 1: conclusively all 7 swing states, and won the popularity, the
Speaker 1: popular vote by millions and millions of votes, and they've
Speaker 1: been watching your trial and I think it's a disgrace
Speaker 1: to the system.
Speaker 1: I was under a gag order. I'm the first president
Speaker 1: in history that was under a gag order where I
Speaker 1: couldn't talk about aspects of the case that are very important.
Speaker 1: I guess I'm still under, so probably I won't do
Speaker 1: it now. I assume I'm still under a gag order.
Speaker 1: But the fact is that uh.
Speaker 1: I'm totally innocent. I did nothing wrong. In the meantime,
Speaker 1: I won the election in a massive landslide, and the
Speaker 1: people of this country understand what's going on. This has
Speaker 1: been a weaponization of government. They call it lawfare, never
Speaker 1: happened to any extent like this, but never happened in
Speaker 1: our country before. And I'd just like to explain that
Speaker 1: I was treated very, very unfairly, and I thank you
Speaker 1: very much.
Speaker 1: You know, he, he was, he was treated incredibly unfairly
Speaker 1: and the thing is, is we can't have anything like
Speaker 1: that ever happen again. Here's Meron Mershon reading his unconditional discharge.
Speaker 1: This court has determined that the only lawful sentence that
Speaker 1: permits entry of a judgment of conviction.
Speaker 1: Without encroaching upon the highest office in the land.
Speaker 1: is an unconditional discharge.
Speaker 1: Which the New York State Legislature has determined is a
Speaker 1: lawful and permissible sentence for the crime of falsifying business
Speaker 1: records in the first degree.
Speaker 1: Therefore, at this time, I impose that sentence to cover
Speaker 1: all 34 counts.
Speaker 1: Sir, I wish you Godspeed as you assume your second
Speaker 1: term in office. Thank you.
Speaker 1: You know what, I wanna go to Charlie. Well, first
Speaker 1: of all, I'll talk about.
Speaker 1: Trump's reaction to this, he put something out on True Social,
Speaker 1: saying the radical Democrats have lost another pathetic un-American witch
Speaker 1: hunt after spending tens of millions of dollars, wasting six
Speaker 1: years of obsessive work that should have been spent on
Speaker 1: protecting New Yorkers from violent rampant crime that is destroying
Speaker 1: the city and state, coordinating with the Biden Harris Department
Speaker 1: of Injustice and Lawless weaponization and bringing completely baseless.
Speaker 1: Legal and fake charges against your 45th and now 47th president, me,
Speaker 1: I was given an unconditional discharge. That result alone proves
Speaker 1: that as all legal scholars and experts have said, there
Speaker 1: is no case. There never was a case and the
Speaker 1: whole scam fully deserves to be dismissed. The real jury,
Speaker 1: the American people have spoken. Yeah, that's right, you know what?
Speaker 1: America elected him like overwhelmingly elected him no matter how
Speaker 1: they try and slice it over on CNN and MSNBC
Speaker 1: here's the reality, OK, he got the popular vote and
Speaker 1: he got the electoral college, so deal with that, OK guys,
Speaker 1: here's Jonathan Turley saying, you know what, this is not
Speaker 1: a criminal case. It never was a criminal case. It
Speaker 1: never should have been brought in the first place. I
Speaker 1: agree here he is on Fox, brilliant, by the way,
Speaker 1: legal scholar at American University.
Speaker 1: The fact is that this is not a criminal case
Speaker 1: in my view, because there's no underlying crime. Bragg took
Speaker 1: a dead misdemeanor, zapped it back into life as this
Speaker 1: pile of felonies. He essentially, essentially a series of federal
Speaker 1: crimes that the Department of Justice rejected, and he was
Speaker 1: only able to do that by this enabling judge, and
Speaker 1: I was not nearly as harsh on Juan Meron.
Speaker 1: Until I sat in his courtroom, I was quite shocked
Speaker 1: with his rulings. I thought that they were well outside
Speaker 1: the strike zone and showed a lot of bias, but
Speaker 1: now we can the good news is that this case
Speaker 1: can be appealed in whole and those decisions can be reviewed. Yes, exactly.
Speaker 1: And they need to be reviewed and that's my point.
Speaker 1: So you know, as much as and and believe me,
Speaker 1: my temper flared last night when I saw the news,
Speaker 1: Amy Coney Barrett, I'm like, what the heck, you know,
Speaker 1: what do we need her for, right? What, what, what's
Speaker 1: that about? And then I just took a step back
Speaker 1: and I thought, you know what, this does actually need
Speaker 1: to go through the court process because this should not
Speaker 1: happen to anyone. It should never happen to any person ever.
Speaker 1: And you're going to basically discourage people from being in politics.
Speaker 1: We were running some kind of crazy, crazy, crazy system
Speaker 1: and I think bottom line, yeah, I'm looking at your
Speaker 1: comments in real time. James Rourke, you're right, Letitia James
Speaker 1: is next. I'm gonna get to that because we're gonna
Speaker 1: figure out exactly what went down. Don't forget this judge,
Speaker 1: he was so out over his skis, remember him telling
Speaker 1: the jury?
Speaker 1: Just pick a, pick a crime, doesn't really matter what
Speaker 1: you think he's guilty of, just whether or not you
Speaker 1: think he's guilty. I mean, can you imagine that?
Speaker 1: The entire legal system, frankly, the entire bedrock of our
Speaker 1: country and our foundation, our capitalism and all these things
Speaker 1: that we value was just put on the line. Jonathan
Speaker 1: Turley said that back at that time as.
Speaker 1: What happened in that courtroom became superfluous because of those instructions.
Speaker 1: Some of us were hoping for a hung jury because
Speaker 1: we hoped that the jury might redeem the New York
Speaker 1: legal system, which is one of the greatest legal systems
Speaker 1: in the world, and these last few weeks have left
Speaker 1: many of us shocked as to what we saw in
Speaker 1: that courtroom, but that was not going to happen after
Speaker 1: the instructions were finalized.
Speaker 1: And I wrote a column after I saw the instructions
Speaker 1: saying it had the feel of a can't hunt, you know,
Speaker 1: where you can shoot game in a small space, the
Speaker 1: space was very small for the defense to maneuver. I mean,
Speaker 1: so here we are, ladies and gentlemen, and Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: going to the White House, the American people.
Speaker 1: Said we're not buying this. We don't like this we
Speaker 1: don't like what you have done and not only are
Speaker 1: we sending him to the White House, but we're sending
Speaker 1: him with his team, his team, including one Pam Bondi
Speaker 1: who has made it clear here she is almost 2
Speaker 1: years ago with my former colleague Sean Hannity and she's
Speaker 1: saying hey hey hey watch out because we're coming for
Speaker 1: you because you can't allow this kind of law fair.
Speaker 1: And this witch hunt to continue. Watch pan. Something else
Speaker 1: that's going to happen, Sean, is when Republicans take back
Speaker 1: the White House and we will be back in there
Speaker 1: in 18 months or less, you know what's going to happen?
Speaker 1: The Department of Justice, the prosecutors will be prosecuted, the
Speaker 1: bad ones, the investigators will be investigated because of the deep.
Speaker 1: Last term for President Trump they were hiding in the
Speaker 1: shadows but now they have a spotlight on them and
Speaker 1: they can all be investigated and the house needs to
Speaker 1: be cleaned out because now we know who most of
Speaker 1: them are. There's a record of it and we can
Speaker 1: clean house next term and that's what has to happen.
Speaker 1: You better believe it and it's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: OK, so he's not about retribution, but I think he
Speaker 1: is about fairness and we can't have a world in
Speaker 1: which people can't run for office because they're fearful that
Speaker 1: if they're on the wrong side of the political aisle
Speaker 1: they're gonna get shut down now this this stands for
Speaker 1: both parties, OK, this is a nonpartisan statement.
Speaker 1: What went down with Donald Trump was so outrageous and
Speaker 1: so out of control. Mark Zuckerberg's even talking about it.
Speaker 1: He just went on to Joe Rogan to say, hey,
Speaker 1: you know what, the Biden administration was on our tail.
Speaker 1: We've never seen anything like it, and there are records,
Speaker 1: and we can show you the records. Some of them
Speaker 1: are already out there, but they weren't allowed to say,
Speaker 1: you know, or allow people to express themselves freely about
Speaker 1: anything on Facebook because the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: Was just running everybody over. Think about that. Letitia James
Speaker 1: oh trying to talk a good game before the election.
Speaker 1: Uh, I will not fear Donald Trump. I have steel
Speaker 1: in my backbone, and the reality is, I will not
Speaker 1: allow this um person, Donald Trump, who unfortunately is a
Speaker 1: broken man, um, to get in the way of progress
Speaker 1: and to separate us.
Speaker 1: Oh, OK.
Speaker 1: So, Letitia James meets Pam Bondi. Something else that's gonna happen, Sean,
Speaker 1: is when Republicans take back the White House and we
Speaker 1: will be back in there in 18 months or less.
Speaker 1: You know what's going to happen? The Department of Justice,
Speaker 1: the prosecutors will be prosecuted, the bad ones. The investigators
Speaker 1: will be investigated. OK, so Leticia, you know what?
Speaker 1: If I were you I would be a little bit scared.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know you get steel in your backbones
Speaker 1: and all that good stuff, lady, but you know what?
Speaker 1: I do think that you're gonna be in a little
Speaker 1: bit of trouble. Remember what Trump attorney Mike Davis had
Speaker 1: to say about how your fat m could go straight
Speaker 1: into prison.
Speaker 1: Uh, let me just say this to Big Tish James,
Speaker 1: the New York attorney general, I, I, I dare you,
Speaker 1: I dare you to try to continue your lawfare against
Speaker 1: President Trump in his second term because listen here sweetheart,
Speaker 1: we're not messing around this time, and we will put
Speaker 1: your fat ass in prison for conspiracy against rights and OK,
Speaker 1: there he said it, so I didn't have to, right?
Speaker 1: But you get it. He's gonna put her fat into prison.
Speaker 1: As soon as.
Speaker 1: She tries to do something outrageous, which surely she's going
Speaker 1: to do. I mean she's proud of it. This is
Speaker 1: how she exists don't forget she's preparing for this, she
Speaker 1: didn't think Donald Trump would win, you know, not after.
Speaker 1: Trying to bankrupt the guy to the tune of half
Speaker 1: a billion dollars. I mean, it's so outrageous because she
Speaker 1: disagrees with the valuation of Mar a Lago. Letitia James, yeah,
Speaker 1: like I'm gonna trust you with anything financial. You're just
Speaker 1: wasting taxpayer dollars going after Trump, right? And she's gearing
Speaker 1: up for the next round, watch.
Speaker 1: And lastly, I congratulate the President-elect Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And if possible,
Speaker 1: We will work with his administration.
Speaker 1: But we will not compromise our values.
Speaker 1: Or our integrity
Speaker 1: Our principles
Speaker 1: We did not expect this result.
Speaker 1: But we are prepared to respond to this result.
Speaker 1: And my office has been preparing for several months.
Speaker 1: Because we've been here before.
Speaker 1: We faced this challenge before.
Speaker 1: And we use the rule of law to fight back.
Speaker 1: Oh my God, no, you don't use the rule of law.
Speaker 1: In any kind of helpful way for society, you use
Speaker 1: the rule of law as a weapon and that tells us,
Speaker 1: you know what the rule of law needs a little
Speaker 1: working around or a little investigation into in terms of
Speaker 1: the people that are trying to abuse and manipulate those laws,
Speaker 1: including one Letitia James, including Alvin Bragg, including this Judge
Speaker 1: Merson who had a clear political bias, his daughter makes
Speaker 1: her living off of sending emails saying, hey, won't you
Speaker 1: donate to help the legal fund.
Speaker 1: Against Donald Trump, unbelievable stuff. Quick shout out to one
Speaker 1: of our great sponsors, American Heart for Gold. You can
Speaker 1: get up to $15,000 in free silver. Just go to
Speaker 1: Trishlovesgold.com today. Trishloves Gold.com, you know, it's part of my portfolio.
Speaker 1: I'm a big believer in investing in gold to help
Speaker 1: iron out all my concerns about inflation, of which I still.
Speaker 1: Have plenty. I really do. You saw the jobs report today.
Speaker 1: It was actually pretty good. So this means, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe the Fed won't move on rates. It's good if
Speaker 1: they don't move on rates because if they do move
Speaker 1: on rates, then we're back in this inflation saga that we,
Speaker 1: we really need to end at some point. Anyway, inflation's
Speaker 1: been out of control, but the one way you can
Speaker 1: try and hedge it.
Speaker 1: is by looking at something like gold. You can get
Speaker 1: up to $15,000 in free silver, call them at 1-844495-1115
Speaker 1: or just text my name, Trish to 65532. Again, Trish
Speaker 1: to 65532.
Speaker 1: The reality is that Trump now has the ultimate victory.
Speaker 1: He's going back to the White House think of that,
Speaker 1: back to the White House in spite of everything, in
Speaker 1: spite of everything that they tried to throw at him,
Speaker 1: and they threw a lot, ladies and gentlemen, you know
Speaker 1: you've been here with me on the front lines of it.
Speaker 1: If you're just joining the show, thank you. Make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe, like, share, all that good stuff, but we've
Speaker 1: been covering this day in and day out and it's
Speaker 1: outrageous everything that has happened.
Speaker 1: And he won in spite of it all. He won
Speaker 1: and you know what that means? Not only is he
Speaker 1: going back to the White House with the opportunity to
Speaker 1: send in Pam Bondi.
Speaker 1: He's taking no prisoners to figure out just exactly what
Speaker 1: went down.
Speaker 1: He's actually gonna have the chance to appoint.
Speaker 1: 12, maybe 3 new justices to the Supreme Court of
Speaker 1: the United States of America, thereby cementing his legacy in
Speaker 1: ways that gosh darn it, the left.
Speaker 1: I terrified of. Here's a CBS News reporter who covers
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court predicting who's gonna be the next to
Speaker 1: go on the court.
Speaker 1: I'll go back to the court. I think that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump will probably get his 4th nomination to the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court either this year or maybe next year because someone retires.
Speaker 1: Justice Alito. Justice Alito, uh, he was nominated, uh, took
Speaker 1: the bench in 2006 after nearly two decades on the court.
Speaker 1: So she think it's thinks it's gonna be Sam Alito.
Speaker 1: What do you think? Curious in the comments. Let me know.
Speaker 1: I think it could be Sotomayor, you know, one or
Speaker 1: the other. I think he's gonna get both positions. So
Speaker 1: you're gonna get Sotomayor, you're gonna get Sam Alito, you're
Speaker 1: probably gonna get somebody else, 2 or 3 Supreme Court justices.
Speaker 1: Think of that in terms of the lasting effect. It
Speaker 1: is incredible. I mean it really, really, really is incredible,
Speaker 1: and I kind of love it.
Speaker 1: Lot's going on today. TikTok, ladies and gentlemen, TikTok may
Speaker 1: be up for sale or they gotta somehow divest all
Speaker 1: their Chinese assets if they want to stay in the US,
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court made this decision coming out today and
Speaker 1: so now everybody's gearing up for a chance to bite
Speaker 1: at the apple here. We'll see, we will see whether
Speaker 1: or not.
Speaker 1: It's gonna come to fruition. Donald Trump had been asking
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court to maybe take a step back and
Speaker 1: wait for them to come out to some kind of.
Speaker 1: Resolution that wouldn't involve uh them having to sell off
Speaker 1: all their assets but you know he wanted some kind
Speaker 1: of political solution but right now increasingly it looks like
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court really doesn't think that this is necessarily
Speaker 1: the best option for America, you know, I, I have
Speaker 1: mixed feelings on this because I don't think it's entirely
Speaker 1: free speech. I think a lot of these companies try
Speaker 1: and try and say that they are um.
Speaker 1: All about free speech, but I, I'm not really sure
Speaker 1: that that's entirely the case. This is Chinese owned don't forget,
Speaker 1: and I know I have a TikTok account what gets through,
Speaker 1: what doesn't get through, what gets banned, what doesn't get banned,
Speaker 1: and it always causes me to raise an eyebrow anyway,
Speaker 1: Kevin O'Leary.
Speaker 1: I think he's Canadian. I don't know if this will work, right?
Speaker 1: He's a foreigner too. He's stepping up to the plate
Speaker 1: and he'd love to buy it.
Speaker 1: And we want to, and then at midday 12:05, Trump
Speaker 1: will be who we have to work with to close
Speaker 1: the deal in the months ahead. So I wanted to
Speaker 1: let him know as well as others in his cabinet
Speaker 1: that we're doing this and we're going to need their help. Well,
Speaker 1: that's going to be a very interesting story to watch,
Speaker 1: you know, I want to go back to that, but
Speaker 1: I want to.
Speaker 1: So what really happened? Basically there were arguments that were
Speaker 1: heard for and against banning TikTok and the US government
Speaker 1: is expressing these concerns that China has control over TikTok
Speaker 1: and has for years and so they're saying look you
Speaker 1: know Beijing could really exploit this platform and use it
Speaker 1: to collect data on individuals so for an espionage function.
Speaker 1: As well as spread disinformation or propaganda against American interests
Speaker 1: and so that's kind of a an interesting thought I mean.
Speaker 1: You know, that that's, that's where it starts to get
Speaker 1: really tricky.
Speaker 1: I will tell you from personal experience, I think ByteDance,
Speaker 1: which is the company that runs TikTok, does do some
Speaker 1: massaging on its own.
Speaker 1: Right? I mean, I just know because apparently even if
Speaker 1: I just talk about tariffs.
Speaker 1: I'm in violation of some kind of hate speech there
Speaker 1: on TikTok, right? I boring talk about tariffs and somehow
Speaker 1: whe you'd think that was something else entirely. So I suspect.
Speaker 1: There's like some kind of mandate, right? And there and
Speaker 1: there's no appeal process. You can't do anything. I mean
Speaker 1: if you, you, you've probably seen it on me. I've
Speaker 1: seen it there too, right? So I, I feel good
Speaker 1: over here on YouTube. I feel good on places like
Speaker 1: Rumble and Twitter. I mean X, think of what Elon
Speaker 1: Musk has done for X.
Speaker 1: So yeah I mean if it's actually freedom of information
Speaker 1: it's freedom of information but if it's not really free
Speaker 1: if it's gonna be controlled by a state actor and
Speaker 1: you know China wants to control everything then where does
Speaker 1: that leave us? It leaves us at a disservice so
Speaker 1: I think ultimately what you're going to see here is that.
Speaker 1: TikTok is not gonna have the same rights to the
Speaker 1: First Amendment that an American owned company would have. This
Speaker 1: is why Donald Trump tried to arrange a deal with
Speaker 1: Larry Ellison, his buddy who started Oracle, multi multi billionaire
Speaker 1: Larry Ellison wanted to buy TikTok. That deal didn't happen,
Speaker 1: so Trump was very, very against TikTok until, well, you know,
Speaker 1: he thought it was helping him in the campaign and now.
Speaker 1: Given also that one of his buddies and campaign donors
Speaker 1: owns a large stake in it, I think he's trying
Speaker 1: to find some kind of solution that would work for everyone.
Speaker 1: We want a solution that would work for everyone, right? We,
Speaker 1: we don't wanna be in this standoff with China. We
Speaker 1: don't want the Chinese controlling one of our major social
Speaker 1: media companies. We do want freedom of expression. We do
Speaker 1: want all I say let's have X buy it, right?
Speaker 1: Because I trust Elon. We can have X by it.
Speaker 1: What do you guys think? um.
Speaker 1: It it's, it's, it's gonna be something I'll, I'll tell
Speaker 1: you that it's really, really, really something I would say
Speaker 1: that there's been such an indoctrination going on over the
Speaker 1: last several years, but really over the last couple of
Speaker 1: decades if you think about it really and truly this
Speaker 1: stuff just didn't come out out of the blue, um,
Speaker 1: and it's one of the reasons why I'm really proud
Speaker 1: to tell you about a partnership. I think I mentioned
Speaker 1: this yesterday, but I'm gonna tell you again about my
Speaker 1: partnership that I now have with Herzog Foundation.
Speaker 1: Uh, it's all about advancing Christian values and Christian education,
Speaker 1: you know, I've certainly been talking for years about how
Speaker 1: our nation's public schools are just a disaster and how
Speaker 1: they've been captured by these progressive, really destructive in my
Speaker 1: view ideologies teaching things to kids that really directly contradict
Speaker 1: the values of so many American Christian families. I mean,
Speaker 1: especially if you're Christian right.
Speaker 1: They don't like it. They don't like the Christians. They
Speaker 1: don't like the religion. That's just, you know, for, uh,
Speaker 1: small minded people, as they'd probably say. So for those
Speaker 1: of you that are worried right now about what is
Speaker 1: the best path for your children or maybe your grandchildren
Speaker 1: and for their education, I am thrilled to tell you
Speaker 1: about Hertzog Foundation and my partnership with.
Speaker 1: Them because these are just great folks, um, it, it's,
Speaker 1: it gives me really tremendous pleasure to talk about this.
Speaker 1: They are the trusted source really and truly on education
Speaker 1: K through 12 private education with a remarkable suite of
Speaker 1: resources for parents and for grandparents who are thinking about
Speaker 1: making the switch from public schools to a Christian education
Speaker 1: and for those that are already in Christian schools as well,
Speaker 1: they have the online publication The Lion.
Speaker 1: Uh, they have a new podcast Making the Leap. The
Speaker 1: Herzog Foundation is offering a wide range of advice and
Speaker 1: information for Christian parents who want to make the best
Speaker 1: decision for their children's education and for their family. So
Speaker 1: to learn more about how your family, faith and community
Speaker 1: can flourish through a quality Christian education, please go to
Speaker 1: Herzog Foundation.
Speaker 1: Dot com again that's Herzog Foundation.com. Herzog Foundation.com. You got it?
Speaker 1: You got it. I know you guys do. I know
Speaker 1: you guys do. Have you been following all of the horrible,
Speaker 1: horrible news out of the West Coast? It's just devastating
Speaker 1: what's happening there with the fires and the thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands of structures that are being destroyed. It's pretty darn incredible.
Speaker 1: And yet this caught my eye.
Speaker 1: Because you think about what's really needed in a time
Speaker 1: like this, you need personnel capable personnel you need water,
Speaker 1: you need the resources to be able to fight something
Speaker 1: like this and yet the state of California has been
Speaker 1: so obsessed with everything but.
Speaker 1: What they need to be obsessed with that they're facing
Speaker 1: a crisis unlike anything we've seen in modern times. So
Speaker 1: as Los Angeles burns, think about this.
Speaker 1: The fire chief, a woman who is gay and very
Speaker 1: proud of herself being a woman that is is gay
Speaker 1: running the fire department of LA, that's fine, you know what,
Speaker 1: you be a woman, you be gay. I don't care
Speaker 1: like enjoy it, right? What you know you do you,
Speaker 1: I do me, we're we're all good.
Speaker 1: But when that takes precedence over actually doing your job
Speaker 1: and actually keeping things under control, then we have a
Speaker 1: little bit of a problem, don't you think? Well, we
Speaker 1: have a similar problem with the assistant fire department chief
Speaker 1: there in Los Angeles, Christine Larson, she made this video
Speaker 1: and it's kind of coming back to haunt her in
Speaker 1: a really big way, you know, some people are calling
Speaker 1: it lesbians to the rescue.
Speaker 1: You want to see somebody that responds to your house,
Speaker 1: your emergency, whether it's a medical call or a fire call,
Speaker 1: that looks like you. It gives that person a little
Speaker 1: bit more ease knowing that somebody might understand their situation better.
Speaker 1: Is she strong enough to do this or you couldn't
Speaker 1: carry my husband out of a fire, which my response
Speaker 1: is he got himself in the wrong place if I
Speaker 1: have to carry him out of a fire.
Speaker 1: Oh, OK, uh, did we, did I, did I?
Speaker 1: Did I really hear that? Yeah, and you really heard
Speaker 1: that too. I believe the direct quote was, he got
Speaker 1: himself into the wrong place if I have to carry
Speaker 1: him out of a fire. So I'm like, is this
Speaker 1: a parody? Is this like an SNL skit?
Speaker 1: David, one of the producers on the show, sent this
Speaker 1: to me last night and I'm like, this is not real.
Speaker 1: This is a joke, right? It's real. OK, that's how
Speaker 1: insane these people have gotten. They don't think a firefighter
Speaker 1: would have to carry you out of a fire, for
Speaker 1: goodness sakes. Oh, and gosh, you know, when you're just
Speaker 1: there waiting for somebody to rescue you, you're concerned about
Speaker 1: the color of their skin.
Speaker 1: Their ethnicity
Speaker 1: Their sexual preference? No, I don't think so. You know
Speaker 1: what you're concerned about you're concerned about getting out alive, OK, alive.
Speaker 1: And so there's a reason why you got like 100
Speaker 1: and some odd firefighters that are female and thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands and thousands of men in Los Angeles that are
Speaker 1: firefighters that are male. A lot of that has to
Speaker 1: do with just sure physical capability, which I'm sorry if
Speaker 1: you're in a fire, kind of matters, don't you think?
Speaker 1: Here's the fire chief talking about everything but fires.
Speaker 1: I'm super inspired. She took time out of her already
Speaker 1: busy schedule to tell us about her vision for the
Speaker 1: department's future, one that includes a 3 year strategic plan
Speaker 1: to increase diversity. People ask me, Well, what number are
Speaker 1: you looking for? I said I'm not looking for a number.
Speaker 1: It's never enough. Out of 3300 city firefighters, only 115
Speaker 1: are women right now. She's already looking at ways to
Speaker 1: change that. She's quick to
Speaker 1: Point out that doing so has a greater purpose, attracting
Speaker 1: the best and brightest for the job. They feel included.
Speaker 1: They feel valued, and they feel part of a cohesive team.
Speaker 1: The chief also checks another box when it comes to
Speaker 1: inclusivity and diversity at this department. She's a proud member
Speaker 1: of the LGBTQ community. That just kind of opens the
Speaker 1: door of people that thought, wow, I didn't even know
Speaker 1: that that was an opportunity for me.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, you know what, we can't laugh. This is
Speaker 1: not funny. This is disgusting. This is what is so, so, so, so,
Speaker 1: so wrong with all the DEI garbage that we've had
Speaker 1: to deal with over the last 4 years, 8 years,
Speaker 1: this nonsense that you get a job because of the
Speaker 1: color of your skin or your sexual preference or your.
Speaker 1: Your your sex. That's why they're giving you the job
Speaker 1: as opposed to, well, maybe you're the best one for
Speaker 1: the job, which I'm sorry when it comes to just
Speaker 1: rescuing people out of a fire.
Speaker 1: You kind of want the big strong man with the
Speaker 1: big strong muscles, right? Like think of the brawny towel guy, right?
Speaker 1: Like you you big firefighter, they're in great shape.
Speaker 1: Because they have to be, not to mention carrying all
Speaker 1: the equipment around on their backs. I mean this is
Speaker 1: DEI stuff it has to end, OK? It has to
Speaker 1: end California you voted for this, you idiots, you stupid, stupid,
Speaker 1: stupid people you vote for a mayor who takes off for.
Speaker 1: Ghana on New Year's despite word that there's gonna be
Speaker 1: some disastrous fires in her city, she leaves because oh
Speaker 1: no she's gonna get to Africa to celebrate the new
Speaker 1: leader coming in. I mean, please, right? They care more
Speaker 1: about the smelt and the fish than they do about
Speaker 1: you as an individual living in California. I'm sorry like
Speaker 1: you know you make a packed right as a taxpayer
Speaker 1: that you pay taxes in.
Speaker 1: And that you're supposed to get certain services, right? Your
Speaker 1: safety is supposed to be somewhat assured and the firefighting
Speaker 1: service is supposed to have water when they go to
Speaker 1: put out the fire. I mean this is what the
Speaker 1: taxpayer dollars is supposed to be going for, but in
Speaker 1: California apparently it's like an optional. It's like it's like
Speaker 1: Judge Merchand you pick A, B, or C.
Speaker 1: You just think he's guilty. You just pick A, B,
Speaker 1: or C. In California they're like, uh, yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe we'll consider patrolling the streets. Maybe we'll consider arresting criminals.
Speaker 1: Maybe we'll put water in the hydrants, maybe we'll get
Speaker 1: around to getting you out of a fire, but uh
Speaker 1: if you're a guy.
Speaker 1: And it's lovely Karen coming to rescue you. Well, she's
Speaker 1: gonna remind you, sorry, it's Christine, Christine Larson coming to rest.
Speaker 1: She's gonna remind you.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't have gotten yourself in a fire in the
Speaker 1: first place, right? I mean, this is the attitude and
Speaker 1: this is what's so crazy. Hey, listen, it's a new year.
Speaker 1: Make sure you're taking care of yourself. Part of that
Speaker 1: includes your financial health and a lot of it just
Speaker 1: includes your plain old health, right?
Speaker 1: Go to the gym, drink water, go for walks, do
Speaker 1: what you can to prioritize yourself. For me that means
Speaker 1: doing all of those things, all of those things, and
Speaker 1: also taking my balance in nature, my fruits and veggies
Speaker 1: every single day I take them, I get all my
Speaker 1: vitamins this way. I know a lot of you love
Speaker 1: balance in nature. Leslie, I think you were saying that
Speaker 1: on the chat one day. I, I got a call.
Speaker 1: From my kid's music teacher last year saying, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: I love the Balance of nature is on your program
Speaker 1: because I've been taking this stuff for years and it's fantastic. Well,
Speaker 1: if you haven't had it and you want a chance
Speaker 1: to get it, you can get 35% off right now
Speaker 1: with my code, just use Trish T R I S
Speaker 1: H or call him at 1-800-246-8751, 1800-246-8751. Go to balance
Speaker 1: in Nature.com again.
Speaker 1: Use my code Trish, TR I S H, you get 35%
Speaker 1: off and you get free shipping. So you get this
Speaker 1: stuff every single month, you take it, it tastes great,
Speaker 1: it's gluten-free for those of you that have a gluten
Speaker 1: allergy and you feel better just like I do, plus
Speaker 1: you don't have to worry about your vitamin D levels anymore.
Speaker 1: By the way, there's all kinds of other stuff on there,
Speaker 1: so go check out the website. You get 35% off
Speaker 1: with my name on everything. So,
Speaker 1: It's not just the fire chief and the assistant fire
Speaker 1: chief that are all concerned about things that maybe they
Speaker 1: shouldn't be concerned about the, the, the reality is you
Speaker 1: have a mayor there in Los Angeles who kind of
Speaker 1: has her own set of challenges. This would be one
Speaker 1: Karen Bass and as I was saying.
Speaker 1: New Year's was coming up, so she figured why not
Speaker 1: head over to Ghana? Let me, let me go hang
Speaker 1: out in Africa because I got a big party over
Speaker 1: there despite the fact that there is a massive fire
Speaker 1: with huge winds possibly heading my way to my city.
Speaker 1: Now Karen Bass took off. She also, ladies and gentlemen,
Speaker 1: reduced the budget rather significantly. I think the latest total
Speaker 1: uh total was by 34 million. She was demanding all
Speaker 1: kinds of budget cuts because, you know.
Speaker 1: Firefighters apparently don't really matter in LA, at least not
Speaker 1: to one lovely Karen, um, here she is, Karen Bass.
Speaker 1: She was asked and, and you know I don't know
Speaker 1: what's going on here. She looked like she was having
Speaker 1: a unfortunately perhaps a a moment, a seizure. I don't
Speaker 1: know but watch how this reporter is asking her if
Speaker 1: she feels bad at all.
Speaker 2: Do you owe citizens an apology for being absent while
Speaker 2: their homes were burning?
Speaker 2: Do you regret cutting the fire department budget by millions
Speaker 2: of dollars, Madam Mayor?
Speaker 2: Have you nothing to say today? Have you absolutely nothing
Speaker 2: to say to the citizens today?
Speaker 2: Elon Musk says that you're utterly incompetent. Are you considering
Speaker 2: your position?
Speaker 2: Madam Mayor, have you absolutely nothing to say to the
Speaker 2: citizens today who are dealing with this disaster?
Speaker 2: No apology for them.
Speaker 2: Do you think you should have been visiting Ghana while
Speaker 2: this was unfolding back home?
Speaker 1: Wow, I mean that that that was weird, right?
Speaker 1: I it's like she just was shutting him out. I
Speaker 1: guess she was paralyzed. She was afraid to answer these questions,
Speaker 1: but you probably shouldn't be the mayor of Los Angeles
Speaker 1: if you're not putting the right priorities on the right
Speaker 1: things and believe me, she didn't.
Speaker 1: But this was symptomatic of everyone.
Speaker 1: I mean Gavin Newsom's under fire. A woman confronted him,
Speaker 1: a mom saying, oh my gosh, that's my children's school,
Speaker 1: and he was pretty embarrassed because he's like, Hang on,
Speaker 1: hang on, I'm just talking to the president about it
Speaker 1: except that wasn't true. He didn't have the president on
Speaker 1: the line and good luck getting Biden on the line
Speaker 1: these days, so he's making stuff up.
Speaker 1: And, and so it goes, right? You keep electing incompetent people.
Speaker 1: Who try to cover their tracks by lying, cheating, stealing, whatever, lawfare, extraordinaire,
Speaker 1: and you got problems. I mean, look what happened to Facebook.
Speaker 1: Facebook is coming out with a whole new thing that
Speaker 1: first of all, they're getting rid of DEI over at Facebook,
Speaker 1: so you know, good luck um to Karen and to
Speaker 1: Christine if you were trying to get a job over
Speaker 1: Facebook right now because they don't care about if you're
Speaker 1: a lesbian or if you're black or white or purple. No,
Speaker 1: they've made a decision that this is not the right
Speaker 1: thing for their company so they joined many other companies.
Speaker 1: This was like just a whole big kowtow thing.
Speaker 1: To Biden. Well, Mark Zuckerberg just went on to Joe
Speaker 1: Rogan's show today and he, he had quite nearful for Rogan.
Speaker 1: He basically said that they intimidated the heck out of
Speaker 1: his staff and they would yell and scream and threaten.
Speaker 1: And made Mehta's life a living hell.
Speaker 1: Because they would not allow information on the platform.
Speaker 1: That they believed was misinformation.
Speaker 1: That's kind of scary. I mean, like, you know, we're
Speaker 1: not a lot different than China or Russia when you
Speaker 1: think about it if that's really what's going on, the
Speaker 1: White House is gonna control everything they have. They've controlled
Speaker 1: it for years all through the mainstream media, and they
Speaker 1: don't know what to do because all of a sudden, hey,
Speaker 1: Trish Regan can come over here. I don't have to
Speaker 1: have scripts. I don't have to have anybody breathing over
Speaker 1: my shoulder, reading my scripts, making sure that I'm saying this,
Speaker 1: that and the other.
Speaker 1: I can say whatever I want.
Speaker 1: What do you know? I mean, except apparently on Meta
Speaker 1: you couldn't do it there. So, uh, Zuckerberg went on
Speaker 1: to to the show with Rogan and he had a
Speaker 1: few things to say, but you know this comes on
Speaker 1: the heels of him explaining his position just the other
Speaker 1: day on Meta itself to viewers.
Speaker 1: to make sure that we handle responsibly. So we built
Speaker 1: a lot of complex systems to moderate content. But the
Speaker 1: problem with complex systems is they make mistakes. Even if
Speaker 1: they accidentally censor just 1% of posts, that's millions of people,
Speaker 1: and we've reached a point where it's just too many
Speaker 1: mistakes and too much censorship. The recent elections also feel
Speaker 1: like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech.
Speaker 1: So we're gonna get back to our roots and focus
Speaker 1: on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression
Speaker 1: on our platforms. More specifically, here's what we're gonna do. First,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get rid of fact checkers and replace them
Speaker 1: with community notes similar to X starting in the US.
Speaker 1: After Trump first got elected in 2016.
Speaker 1: The legacy so he's taking a page out of Elon's book.
Speaker 1: He's putting in some community notes. He's getting rid of
Speaker 1: the fact checkers. He's getting rid of DEI. He goes
Speaker 1: on Rogan and says, oh my gosh, you wouldn't believe
Speaker 1: what the Biden administration was telling us what they were
Speaker 1: threatening with us. You know what? I believe it. I
Speaker 1: believe it. I don't know if it fully let you
Speaker 1: off the hook, Mark.
Speaker 1: You know, I, I don't really, I don't know as
Speaker 1: I buy everything from you, you know, I, I think
Speaker 1: you're doing what's good for Mark and what's good for Meta,
Speaker 1: but that's OK because a lot of us are invested
Speaker 1: in meta whether you like it or not, probably through
Speaker 1: your 401k you are because of the S&P 500, and
Speaker 1: you should be, you know what they look, this is
Speaker 1: a great company that still has tremendous potential. he's.
Speaker 1: He's doing what's good for Mark. He's doing what's good
Speaker 1: for men, OK, so don't get too carried away with it.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna get too carried away with it, but
Speaker 1: I will say it's the right thing for the country.
Speaker 1: We need to do the right thing for the country.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of different companies that you can
Speaker 1: be investing in right now that are going to see
Speaker 1: some upside. I realized the market fell out of bed today.
Speaker 1: I was actually buying today because when the market goes down,
Speaker 1: that's actually when I go in.
Speaker 1: Hey, Leticia, you got nothing on me. She said she's
Speaker 1: made of, she's got a backbone of steel. I got
Speaker 1: a backbone and nerves of steel. So anyway, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of opportunity in this market if you're in it
Speaker 1: for the long term. You can go to invest in MAGA.
Speaker 1: And get my free guide that I put together with
Speaker 1: long term investor, brilliant, brilliant, brilliant, smart guy Rob Horton,
Speaker 1: who's my partner there at 76 Research. So go to
Speaker 1: Invest in Maga.com. It's totally free. We put it together
Speaker 1: for you guys if you haven't done that. I'm offended
Speaker 1: because you need to. I put this together for you.
Speaker 1: It's really important. I want you to be investing in
Speaker 1: your future in America's future in the Trump future. There's
Speaker 1: a lot of opportunity there so invest.
Speaker 1: In MAA.com or go over to 76 Research again today 76research.com. 0,
Speaker 1: and before I forget again, American Heart for Gold, Trishloves Gold.com,
Speaker 1: our good friends over at American Heart for Gold, TrishlovesGold.com
Speaker 1: you can get up to $15,000 worth of free silver
Speaker 1: right now. I get a very special offer. So if
Speaker 1: you're worried about inflation, I get it. I am too.
Speaker 1: I still am even with Trump coming in. It's one
Speaker 1: of the reasons why I want to be invested in
Speaker 1: the market and another reason why.
Speaker 1: I want that diversification into gold, and this is not
Speaker 1: like an either or but you know, like some people,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, Bitcoin, Bitcoin, you know how can you
Speaker 1: like Bitcoin and you like gold, believe me, I like
Speaker 1: them all because I want that diversification. So gold is
Speaker 1: an important part of my portfolio. Text Trish right now
Speaker 1: to this number 65532, so you can get more information
Speaker 1: on that $15,000 in free gold, free silver rather free
Speaker 1: gold with a gold purchase silver gold, you got it, right? Anyway, uh.
Speaker 1: Again, it's Trishloves Gold.com, very easy to remember because I
Speaker 1: do love gold. Trishloves Gold.com 1844495-1115. Listen, I will say this,
Speaker 1: you know, Trump warned them, he did warn them back
Speaker 1: in 2018 about having a better use of fire management
Speaker 1: there on the West Coast. He did a sort of
Speaker 1: PR stint there with Gavin Newsom. Gavin Newsom who's going down.
Speaker 1: Cleaned out and protected. We got to take care of
Speaker 1: the floors, you know, the floors of the forests, very important.
Speaker 1: You look at other countries where they do it differently
Speaker 1: and it's a whole different story. I was with the
Speaker 1: president of Finland and he said we have a much different.
Speaker 1: We're a forest nation. He called it a forest nation.
Speaker 1: You know what?
Speaker 1: I would just say this California, word to the wise
Speaker 1: start focusing on what matters. Start focusing on taking care
Speaker 1: of yourself rather than this stupid, you know, let me
Speaker 1: sue Trump again. They sued him 100 times. Think about that,
Speaker 1: ladies and gentlemen, 100 times. It is so good to
Speaker 1: have you here. I really do encourage you to subscribe
Speaker 1: to the show. Have a wonderful weekend and I'll be
Speaker 1: back again on Monday.