WEBVTT - Moving the Midterm Needle

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Hammer, and this is the Josh Hammer Show

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you've all livin of national affairs. Will join us momentarily

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>for a deep policy wonker dive on healthcare, political economy,

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and much more. Be sure to stay tuned for that.

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>But for now, the big story continues to be Venezuela

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>protests and Iran and all sorts of global affairs that

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are really shaking up the geopolitical chess board in the

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>year twenty twenty six. Just earlier today, a Venezuelan tanker

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>putting on a false Russian flag trying to escape the

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>naval blockade They're off Venezuela, and the United States military,

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>not wasting any time, not mincing any words, they promptly

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>went ahead and boarded and apprehended the vessel. So tensions

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>continued to play out. When it comes to Venezuela. The

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>big question there in that particular country still is Delus Rodriguez,

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this socialist communist loombag who was Nicholas Muduro's former vice preser.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Is she going to be up for doing anything other

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>than just running this poor, grieving country into the ground,

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>much as her two predecessors, Hugo Chavez and Nicholas Muro

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have been doing for decades. So that is what is

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>going on in Venezuela. By the way, the polding on

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the Venezuela Operation Operation Absolute Resolve somewhat mixed at this time.

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't particularly buy much into that, but for what

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it's worth, Trump has very very strong Republican support within

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>his own flank when it comes to what the administration did. Again,

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>all this talk of all this foreign policy debate, there

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you have the hardcore Lindbergh Ron Paul isolationist wing that

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>is ready to cry anything whatsoever when it comes to intervention.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Even Megan Kelly, even Megan Kelly on her show on Monday,

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>was saying how she is lukewarm at best on this.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of actual Republicans, in terms of the

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>elected official class, they are very very, very very much

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>behind President Trump. For instance, here Senator Rick Scott of

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>my state of Florida on Fox Business.

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Proud of what the President did, and Marco Ruby and

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 2>Pete headsef than everybody, our military, Maria Corina Machago and

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 2>what they did in Venezuela is going to change Latin America.

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the start of changing Venezuela. Then we're going

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 2>to fix Cuba. Nicaragua will get fixed. Next year, We'll

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>get a new president in Columbia. We're going to start

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>the democracy is coming back to this hemisphere.

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>So your minds mad various to what exactly to make

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of that statement. Now, this rhetoric of democracy coming back,

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I think will probably give a lot of people the

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>hebgbs when it comes to the memories of the Middle

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>East boondoggles in Iraq and the mountains of Taliban ridden

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>overrun Afghanistan, things like that. I submit to you that

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the Western Hemisphere, when it comes

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to Latin America, things fundamentally actually are quite a bit

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>different because it is quite literally on our doorstep, and

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we do have a greater interest in a country like

0:02:55.919 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Venezuela and not being used as a launching pad literally

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.839
<v Speaker 1>and proverbially, as the case may be, for America's arch

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical enemies, for Russia, Iran, and for China. There were

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Hesbola money launching operations, Iranian military facilities. That was all

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>happening in Venezuela, in our own hemisphere backyard. During the

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>presidential tenures of Chavez and Nicholas Maduro. So is it

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the beginning of all these totalitarian dominoes falling

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Western hemisphere? Is the Castro regime in Cuba

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be next? Certainly Center Scott's of Florida would hope,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>so that'll be very popular here in Florida, where I

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>live as well. I'm not totally sure, but at a

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>bare minimum, what's happening in Venezuela augurs positively for these

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>United States. Meanwhile, I mentioned Iran, and the protests in

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Iran are really just frankly going to the next level.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Some of these images, some of these videos are utterly astonishing.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>They are taking over parts of cities, they are taking

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>over parts of town squares. At this point, this is

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>probably the largest scale uprising against the Iranian regime, probably

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>since the regime came to power in nineteen seventy nine,

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in the very tail end of the Jimmy Carter presidency.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>You could talk about the two thousand and nine Green Revolution,

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>which Barack Obama famously failed to support. But these images

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that were images and videos that we're seeing now from Iran,

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>which is very much part of this axis of totalitarian

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>thuggery along with their allies in North Korea, China, Russia

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and formerly Venezuela. I guess now we shall see. Look,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Iran is a complicated country. Persian culture goes back many millennia.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It's very proud country, very proud civilization. In fact, the

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>exiled Shah, the exiled crown Prince putting out a very

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>fascinating video in the Farsi language calling for exiled Persians

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to pray for what happens, and teasing that there might

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.679
<v Speaker 1>actually be some sort of special announcement actually coming sooner

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than later. So you take that, you combine it

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>with what the British newspaper The Times of London has

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>been reporting, which is that the Supreme Leader or the

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Ayatollah Khamene apparently allegedly has an escape patch planned to

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>grab his twenty person inner circle and then high tail

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it to Moscow to pull a Boscher alssade, and then

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately live out the rest of his probably fairly few

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and limited years there under the protective embrace of lamyr Putin.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>If you put two and two together, you're looking at

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a potentially potentially very serious situation in Iran. Now, it's

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not like the United States is going to be directly

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>involved in getting in sending in one hundred first airborne

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>or likely even getting to the point where they are

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to vet and select individual dissident individual protesters, things

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. But certainly, when you look at Venezuela, when

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at Iran, when you look at some of

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the other pieces of the geopolitical chessboard, the fact that

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Russia and China and America's various other foes seem to

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>be very much on the defensive. This has been nothing

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>short of his historic, a truly historic first year for

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.119
<v Speaker 1>his Secretary of States, Mark or Rubio. In fact, Chris

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>van Holland, one of the biggest adults of the generally

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>doult Field Senate Democratic Caucus, Chris van Holland was actually

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>just on CNN where he was talking about Marca Rubio

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as mister Maga. Go ahead and watch this.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I said, probably way back in March of last year,

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 3>that I regretted deeply voting for Mark Rubio as Secretary

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>of State, because as soon as he took that position,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 3>he became the dear leader man. He became mister Maga.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>And he used to give these speeches on the floor

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 3>of the Senate about an American foreign policy based on

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 3>our values, based on human rights, based on freedom, based

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 3>on democracy. But ever since he's gone into the Donald

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Trump orbit, he's thrown all of that out the window.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 3>And we saw the proof of that again in their

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 3>National Security Strategy document from a couple of weeks ago,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 3>where they essentially through American principles overboard, and in its

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 3>place they've put this gunboat, you know, New Monroe doctrine,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>where the United States, by you know, stint of its

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 3>military power can just go do what it wants throughout

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Latin America. That story doesn't end well for people in

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Latin America, nor for Americans.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the notion in that Chris van Holland

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>knows anything whatsoever about American principles is so utterly foolhardy

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>as to make you want to pinch yourself to make

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that you're still sitting there listening seriously. But also

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Chris van Holland is referring to Mark

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Rubio trying to belittle him as the dear leader as

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>mister Maga. Frankly, that just means that Marca Rubio is

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>over the target. But the twenty twenty six midterms this

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>fall are not necessarily going to be contested solely or

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even predominantly, on the terrain of foreign policy. Look,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy is definitely important. I care about it quite

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a bit. I think that many American voters care about

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it quite a bit, especially above all when it comes

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to situations and countries like Venezuela, given the fact that

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's in our hemisphere, given the fact that they are

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>complicit in shipping drugs right through our southern border, given

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the energy interests and other interests as well. But overall,

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty six mid terms of this November, which

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>now are getting really really close, they will be contested

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>primarily on domestic issues, on issues like immigration, on issues

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>like crime, on issues like healthcare, and on issues like

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Eve all in our guest will join us

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>just a few minutes here to break down some of

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the angles and some of the train on which this

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>midterm election will will be contested. But our working theory

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>here on the Josh Hammer Show is that Jimmy Carvill

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>did indeed have it right. Back in nine ninety two,

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>back when he was running the Bill Clinton presidential campaign,

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Carvill famously said that it's the economy stupid. Now, Carville

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>himself may ironically be quite stupid these days, and some

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of the things that he has said, but his quip

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>from thirty four ish years ago has largely held up.

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It indeed still is the economy stupid? What exactly are

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans going to do when it comes to healthcare, when

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to affordability, when it comes to inflation. Is

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there going to be another government shutdown coming at the

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>end of this month? Both sides are talking like there's

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a viable off ramp coming up here

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're not looking at another shutdown. Recalled that the

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>shutdown from just a few months ago ends up being

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the longest shutdown in the entire history of the United States.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>No one wants to repeat that debacle. How is that

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>going to unfold? There's a lot of questions. Meanwhile, there

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>was a tragic passing, a terrible, terrible passing at just

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the tender age of sixty five, just yesterday of Congressman

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Doug LaMalfa of California. Congressman Jim Baird, also in the

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Republican Caucus, is now recovering from a serious car accident.

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>There is a jungle primary special election coming up for

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Marjorie Taylor Green seat in northwest Georgia. Meanwhile, Thomas Massey

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is basically a vote for her King Jefferys and House Democrats.

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So Mike Johnson's margin in the House to do anything

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this year any of this is shockingly, shockingly small. And

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>by the way, don't think for a second, don't think

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for a second that if Democrats don't retake the House

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this November, that they will not move immediately, literally immediately

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to impeachment. For instance, here was Congressman Jason Crow talking

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>about this very topic on CNN.

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, impeachment is something that I haven't been to know

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot about because I was a prosecutor in Donald

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Trump's first impeachment trial, one of two. So that is

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 4>a tool that Congress can use. But there are other

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 4>tools that Congress can use. I am not holding my breath,

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 4>but a Democratic controlled Senate and I'm sorry, Republican controlled

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Senate and ablic Republican controlled House, Jim Jordan or others

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 4>are going to move and do anything on an initiated

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 4>impeachment proceeding right now, which is why the midterms are

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 4>so important.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>So the translation is very simple. If Democrats retake the

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>House of November, race yourself for more impeachment theater, raise

0:10:54.679 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>yourself for more manufactured jin Dove Fox controversies similar to

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that laughably, laughably insignificant Vladimir Zelenski phone call in two

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.599
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen. I had to think about the year was

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>for second year because it was so insignificant, I just

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>forgot about it. Do you all remember that this five

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to six page transcript of a nothing burger phone call,

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and that led to dontrmp's first impeachment. That's what will happen.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>The rest of Danton's presidency will be gone unless Republicans

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>keep the House. Now, look, you can have your equipmals

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with Republican party. Lord knows, I have many, many of

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 1>my own objections, many of my own quibbles. But for

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the midterms this fall, but again will be primarily contested

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>on domestic issues. The key point is this, who'se hands?

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Whose hands should the House remain in. On the one hand,

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a shot at reforming social Security, at helping healthcare,

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>helping affordability. On the other hand, all you're gonna get

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is impeachment theater. I know it's way, I'll be voting.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back after the break with Evan Levin

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of AI and National Affairs. Welcome back. So there's really

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>no one that we'd rather bring on to talk about

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all things midterm elections related, as well as the broader

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation that you may or may not have been paying

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>attention to as to what the heck is going on

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>on the American rite at this time. That man is

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you've All Levin. Y've all Levin is a very smart fellow.

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend that you check out all of his work,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>all of his writings, but for present purposes, you've all

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is a senior fellow as well as the director of Social,

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Cultural and Constitutional Studies at AEI, the American Enterprise Institute.

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>He's also the editor of National Affairs, one of the

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>most air udite journals on the American rights. I'm honored

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to have been published there a number of years ago.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Now probably overdue for another submission at some point, but

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in any event, you've all thanks so much for joining

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the Josh Hammer Show. We really do appreciate it.

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for having me, Josh. She took the words out

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 5>of my mouth. So yeah, anytime, look forward to it

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 5>very much.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So, Look, there's a lot to get to you've all,

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>and I want your thoughts in a few different topics,

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think the number one reason I really want

0:12:58.200 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to bring you on the show you You are one

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of the fairly rare people on the right of center

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>who I think of as being something of a healthcare

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>policy want. It's somewhat of an arcane topic, to be clear,

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>your wankery extends to a lot of different areas, but

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I definitely think of you, among other things, one of

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the foremost Obama era critics of Obamacare. You've done a

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of the intellectual legwork putting forth alternatives to Obamacare,

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're currently in the midst of this continued fight

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as to the extension of Obamacare subsidies. Potentially there's going

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to be even another brinksmanship shut down fight in Congress

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>later this month. I keep on hearing from sources on

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill, including unlimited to congressmen themselves, the Republicans are

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>working on a healthcare plan or some sort of alternative.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>What is that? Perhaps more accurately, you've all, what should

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it be?

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 5>Well, thank you, Yeah, I've suffered and labored for a

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 5>long time and the vineyards of Republican health care policy,

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 5>and it's a very, very challenging issue for the Republican Party.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 5>It has been for a long time. The basic challenges straightforward,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 5>it is that ideas that make sense economically and healthcare

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 5>tend not to make sense politically, and Republicans have never

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 5>gotten themselves out of that thicket. Democrats have solved it

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 5>by advancing ideas that don't make sense economically, and Obamacare

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 5>is one of those. It drove costs up and not down,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 5>exacerbated the problems rather than addressing them, and here we are,

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 5>so many years later, essentially still stuck with its consequences.

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 5>The ideas that Republicans advance on this front tend to

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 5>be ways of making the health system more market oriented,

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 5>allowing more of a consumer market to form around purchasing insurance,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 5>and so that means allowing people to have more choice,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 5>allowing people to exercise more consumer power to face real prices.

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 5>At the center of that for a long time have

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 5>been ideas like health savings accounts, and ways of enabling

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 5>people to enter consumer markets with some subsidies that they

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 5>can chew how to use, rather than have those markets

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 5>replaced by government systems like Obamacare or like Medicaid. In

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 5>a way, the debate we're having is very much a

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 5>traditional left right debate now. But I would say the

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 5>problem with it is that it's driven by a short

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 5>term problem, which is the temporary extension of the Obamacare subsidies,

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 5>which it's really important to stress was a COVID era

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 5>emergency measure. It was intended to last for one year

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 5>to begin with, and then ultimately extended for another three years.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Republicans the whole time, we're saying this is a trap,

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 5>We're going to end up having to renew this forever.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 5>The Democrats said, no, we're not, and here we are.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 5>We're going to have to renew it forever. That short

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 5>term problem is a significant political problem for Republicans because

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 5>really for two reasons. One, it drove up enormously the

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 5>number of people in the Obamacare exchanges from about eleven

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 5>million to almost twice that now at twenty one to

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 5>twenty two million people. And secondly, the changing electorate of

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 5>the Republican Party, the fact that Republicans really are more

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 5>of a working class coalition now means that a lot

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 5>more Republican voters depend on these subsidies than was the

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 5>case during the Obamacare debates, and so Republicans have to

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 5>take this seriously, have to have something to offer on

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 5>this front, and they've been stuck in a tough place,

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 5>getting dragged around by the Democrats in this debate.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of folks sympathize with the

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>need for the government to do something that the everprising question,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, is actly what that something is. And this

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>conversation is not limited to healthcare. I think back to

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the off off year elections a couple months ago and

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>now in New York City, in Virginia, New Jersey, and

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all of the exit pollsters that I saw

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>were unanimously reporting that the number one, two, three, four

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>issues for American people in those jurisdictions was inflation, cost

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of living, affordability. Healthcare is a big part of this.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Housing certainly is a big part of this as well.

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>What should the administry and their allies in Congress, and

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think also crucially their allies in the States. What

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>are some concrete things that you think that they should

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be working on and addressing in these next few months

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>as we start to get ready for the midterms this fall.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 5>I think this is the right way to think about it,

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 5>which is part of a larger cost of living challenge.

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 5>And the way that the way that I'd least have

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 5>been talking about this for fifteen years since the kind

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 5>of reformicondas is that it's worth Republicans thinking about this

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 5>problem in terms of the three ahs, healthcare, housing, higher education.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 5>Those are three areas where a lot of middle class

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 5>families face costs that are exorbitant, unreasonable, and unconnected to

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 5>the quality of what they're buying in ways that it

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 5>is possible for public policy to help with. And the

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 5>way in which it could help, first of all is

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 5>by recognizing the ways in which public policy is causing

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 5>the problem. And I think that's fundamentally about the Democrats'

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 5>basic approach to social policy, which is to restrict supply

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 5>subsidizing demand, and so you set strict rules about what's

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 5>allowed to be sold, and then you give people the

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 5>money to buy the things they're being allowed to buy,

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 5>and the incentives that kind of system creates as an

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 5>incentive for higher and higher costs and lower and lower quality.

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 5>That's what's happening in every regulated sector, and it's very

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 5>much the case in healthcare, and so the solutions look

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 5>like deregulating supply while allowing consumer pressures to drive demand,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 5>so giving people more options and the real power to

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 5>make choices. This is a problem in healthcare. It's not

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 5>a simple matter. Healthcare is a complicated market. What you're

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 5>buying is something you need in an emergency, when your

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 5>kid is sick, when your elderly parents need care. This

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:49.959
<v Speaker 5>is not a simple choice, and we shouldn't pretend it is.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 5>But that's why what's sold in that market is insurance

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 5>more than care in the moment, and it's important to

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 5>give people real options, to let them make choices among

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 5>genuinely distinct and different options in healthcare we've really seen.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this is this is essentially what Obamacare is.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 5>It restricts supply, It says you're only allowed to sell

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 5>these three kinds of products, and then it subsidizes demand.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 5>It says, whatever this cost, the government will pay for it. Well,

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 5>what's going to happen in that kind of market is

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 5>insurers have a reason to increase prices rather than reduce costs,

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 5>and so over and over, that's what we've seen, and

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 5>Republicans know in the abstract what the solution looks like,

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 5>but they've never really had the nerve to propose a

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 5>major reform along these lines. John McCain did it to

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 5>his great credit in two thousand and eight, and it

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 5>was used to undermine his presidential campaign. Republicans have been

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 5>afraid of it ever since, and so when they have to,

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 5>when they're pressed, like right now, you hear them talking about,

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, various kinds of consumer measures. It's not their priority.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 5>It's not what they do most of the time, and

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 5>I think we're seeing the effects of that.

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You've all. Levin is a senior fellow at AI in

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the editor of National Affairs, highly recommend that you check

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>out all the National Affairs publishes on a quarterly basis.

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>You've all just a couple of minutes left here before

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.959
<v Speaker 1>our first break. We'll hold you over until the next segment,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but for now, on a related topic, speaking of affordability,

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that our seemingly annual trillion dollar

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>plus deficits are not necessarily helping the matter when it

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>comes to the pinch that the federal government find itself in,

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and all then the secondary tertiary effects when it comes

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>to inflation, federal Reserve Monetary policy twenty twenty six, this

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is the first year that a US Senator could be

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>elected that will then face reelection twenty thirty two, which

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is the year that some say Social Security actually is

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>looking to go bankrupt. So it's kind of a long

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>winded way of teeing up this question for you, which

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is is there any chance that we see something when

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to entitlements here or is that just ever

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a pipe dream?

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, I think it would take a broad bipartisan coalition,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 5>which is probably in this moment another way of saying

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 5>that it feels like a pipe dream. I think the again,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 5>the political pressure all push in the opposite direction, and frankly,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Republicans have become much less interested in advancing solutions on

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 5>the entitlement front than they used to be. Democrats have

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 5>never been interested in advancing them, and so if there's

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 5>a bipartisan coalition, it's in the other direction. There's now

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 5>very broad agreement that we should basically do nothing about

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 5>this enormous oncoming train. I do think it's connected to

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 5>the healthcare debate. The biggest entitlement challenge is Medicare, much

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 5>more than Social Security. It's growing more quickly, and you

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 5>know that's an area where the kinds of reforms you

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 5>need are again to allow people to use some consumer

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 5>power to reduce costs. Republicans have had these ideas. They

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 5>know really how to solve this problem. Paul Ryan was

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 5>advancing this fourteen years ago, and he was right. The

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 5>fact is if we had done that, then we would

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 5>be in a much better place on this front.

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>He no doubts right about that. You've also sorry, we're

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>going to take a quick break here. Stage tuned. Folks

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are much more with evolven and AI on the other

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back, So we're continuing our conversation with you've all

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>events senior fellow at AEI and editor of National Affairs.

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You've all may just take us just a minut or

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>two just to finish up what you were saying before

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the break about Social security Medicare, which frankly is an

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>issue for me that I think that the ECONI populists

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>are totally out to lunch on. I myself have some

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>national's populous instincts on some of these economic topics, but frankly,

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the notion of intilent reform, it

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to me to be pretty pretty black and white.

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>These things are going bankrupt, and they're going to go

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt probably in our lifetimes.

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 5>I think there's actually an argument for reform that is

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 5>fundamentally a populist argument, which is the way these programs

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 5>are structured now is as a wealth transfer from the

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 5>young to the old, and in America, that also means

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 5>it's a wealth transfer from the less wealthy to the

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 5>more wealthy, and that doesn't make sense, and so there

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 5>is room for public programs that may make sure that

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 5>Americans are not in poverty when they are older. That

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 5>makes sense, But the way these programs now work creates

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 5>an enormous burden on younger generations. And they can be

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 5>means tested, they can be reconceived in ways that would

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 5>even better address the problem of poverty in old age,

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 5>which has not been solved by sober security, but do

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 5>so in a way that poses less of a burden. Look,

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 5>we're a wealthy society. We can afford to help older

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Americans stay out of poverty, but we're doing it in

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 5>a very profoundly foolish way. And the idea that politics

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 5>means you can never change that, I think is just

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 5>something that we have to get beyond. It's not true.

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>That's very well said. It's certainly not true. And this

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>moment calls for a statesmanship, as many moments do, and we'll,

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll find out sooner rather later whether we

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to get So you've all among the things

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that you are. You're not just a policy walk. I

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>think of you also as being a genuine conservative intellectual.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So I imagine at times that you've found yourself as

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I've found myself as well, sometimes kind of wanting to

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>pull your hair out when it comes to some of

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the extreme rhetoric that we hear in certain parts of

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>what is typically the very online parts of the so

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>called right, but increasingly it seems is starting to seep

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>out into the moment as well. I kind of want

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to just turn over to you a pretty broad question.

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Much to your great credit, you're actually not on social media,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and to be clear that that is much to your benefit,

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and those of us who are on social media are

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>suffering on a daily basis. But you've been in this

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>game for some time now. You're really quite formidable during

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the Tea party days, the Obama era and so forth. There,

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you assess the current state of the right.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, maybe for those of us who

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>are so online, is easy to kind of get lost

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in the weeds a little bit. But do you think

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that there is is ultimately sufficient intellectual heft and policy

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>seriousness that can get us through this very difficult moment

0:24:58.680 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're often in.

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, I think the right today is certainly not

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 5>focused enough on governing, which is a particular problem when

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 5>the right is in power and is not focused enough

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 5>on policy. But what that really means is that we're

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 5>not focused enough on how to make the lives of

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 5>the American people better. For a political movement to succeed,

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 5>you have to offer a vision, fundamentally, a vision of

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 5>peace and prosperity. You have to offer people a sense

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 5>of what you propose to do to make their lives better.

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 5>And there's no hope to win. However much we might

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 5>be worried about the terrible things the left wants to do,

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 5>we can't hope to succeed unless we offer that kind

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 5>of vision. And for conservatives in particular, that vision begins

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 5>from what we love in American life, not what we hate.

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 5>It has to start by what we're trying to defend,

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 5>but what we're trying to conserve, and that's always a

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 5>powerful way to speak to people, because what we mean

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 5>by that is we want to conserve the preconditions for

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 5>flourishing life, for family, for religion, for community, for real education,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 5>for meaningful work. That's what conservatives are for. That's what

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 5>we want to conserve. When we become too obsessed with

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 5>what's dangerous about the left, and it is dangerous, but

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 5>when all we have to say to the public is

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 5>what we're against, what we're opposed to, and especially when

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 5>in doing that we fall into these kinds of dangerous

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 5>internal squabbles where frankly, we just take the margins much

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 5>too seriously and we imagine that the fringes of the

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 5>left and the right are really what matter in political life.

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 5>We lose sight of what we're trying to achieve and

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 5>of how we might be able to achieve it. And

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 5>so I think conservatives need to reconnect with the purpose

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 5>of a conservative movement in a free society, which is

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 5>to sustain the preconditions for that free society, to preserve

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 5>what's necessary for us to be able to be a

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 5>free people. Right now, frankly, we're not doing a good

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 5>enough job of that, and that means that we do

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 5>have to reconnect with those core objectives, with those core principles,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 5>remind ourselves of them, as you have to do in

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 5>every generation, and we can't expect the younger generation on

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 5>the right to do this on its own. There has

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 5>to be a reconnection with those foundations that reach us

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 5>to everybody.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've all, if I'm mistaken, you reread the

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Federalist papers in their entirety every year. I think, right,

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It's true.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 5>It's a strange, it's a strange hobby, but yes, I do.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm probably one of the rare folks out there

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 1>who genuinely deeply appreciates that about you. Actually, in fact,

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I've long admired about you so very much.

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Staying on this note of trying to reimbue and reconnect

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>those who are somewhat lost from the great titans of

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>this American experiment, there, what are one or two nuggets

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of wisdom from the Federals papers, or perhaps if you

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>would like, from other sources as well, whether it's Lincoln

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or elsewhere, But a couple of nuggets of wisdom, perhaps

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>above all, on prudence and statesmanship for a moment like

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the current American rights pass.

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's a wonderful question, thank you. I think that

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 5>a lot of what is most wise in our political

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 5>tradition begins from the premise that politics is hard, that

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 5>in a free and therefore also divided society, it is

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 5>difficult to bring people together and to act on the

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 5>problems that we confront together, and therefore that what's required

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 5>is politics, which is to say, engagement across lines of difference,

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 5>actually directly confronting people you disagree with, exercising whatever leverage

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 5>you have, and fighting over what needs to be the

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 5>direction of our society. That does start by seeing our

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 5>fellow Americans as part of one society, and they can

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 5>be hard when we're divided as we are, but it

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 5>has to begin from that sense that when we talk

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 5>about America, we're talking about us. The constitution. The first

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 5>ward of the Constitution is we, not they, and that

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 5>means that our politics requires us to be in constant

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 5>engagement with people we don't agree with. And the way

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 5>in which that engagement can become practical for us is

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 5>by letting the structures, the systems we've got in place

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 5>work and force us into negotiation. Ultimately, politics in a

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 5>free society is negotiation. The reason for that is the

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 5>basic principle of the Declaration of Independence. Because we're all

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 5>created equal, we can't have a politics of coercion in

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 5>this country. We can only have a politics of negotiation.

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 5>And that's a demanding kind of politics. That means you've

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 5>got to be willing to engage with people you don't

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 5>agree with. It means you've got to be willing to

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 5>build coalitions, to make some concessions in order to make

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 5>some gains. I think not enough of us approach politics,

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 5>but that practical prudential mindset. Now we think it's more

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 5>pure to say, well, only accept everything we want. But

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 5>that's not more pure. That's stupid. That's a way to lose.

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 5>That's not a way to engage in a stronger kind

0:29:56.960 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 5>of politics. And ultimately, I think to cover the knack

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 5>for coalition building, the sense that I could win this

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.479
<v Speaker 5>guy over, I do need to offer him something, but

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 5>in return for that, I can get something that matters

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 5>to me. That's what it takes for the politics of

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 5>a free society to function. And I think over and

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 5>over that's the core insight that we can draw out

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 5>of the American political tradition. It's not a failure to

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 5>engage in a politics of bargaining. That's actually what politics

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 5>is all about. And that doesn't mean compromising your principles.

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 5>It means achieving something practical in the world in the

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 5>name of those principles. I think seeing that we have

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 5>in a sense confused strength and weakness. We think strong

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 5>as weak and weak as strong. We think it's strong

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 5>to stand outside and say these people are all failing.

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't want any part of it, when in fact

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 5>it's strong to stand inside and drive the process in

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 5>a direction that achieved something for what you care about.

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>That's extraordinarily well saided. Look, I think it was Aristotle's

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>politics who refers to prudence as being the queen of

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the virtues. And in my mind, there's really no statesment

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in American history who most exudes the virtue of prudence.

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Then Abraham Lincoln, my son of those, favorite leader in

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>American history, and I think that at times to this

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve Republican presidential primary debate where they ask hypothetical,

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>if there's every ten dollars a spending card for one

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars of taxes raised. I think I think it was

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>only John Huntsman of Utah raise his hands. I mean

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not prudential. That is ideology, and frankly, our

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>current politics, as you correctly note, could use a lot

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>less zealous ideology and a lot more prudence and statesmanship.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So one final time, folks, you've all live in as

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow at AEI and the editor of National Affairs.

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Check them out at National Affairs dot com. All you

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>are a wonderful, wonderful scholar on the right. I thank

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you mosted by the Josh Hammers Show. We really do

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it.

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 5>Thanks very much, Shosh. It was a.

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Wonderful conversation and there's a lot to chew on there,

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of chew on there, folks, when it comes

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to prudence, when it comes to what the rest of

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this legislative year is going to look like, Republicans are

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>down on the account. There lots to unpack for the

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>months ahead. Stay with us, we'll be right back after break.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back, great stuff there from Yevlovin. Always appreciate him

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>stopping by. In related news, this we'll tie back to

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>our conversation with Yvlllevin here momentarily in related news. Today,

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>January seventh is the one year anniversary of the Pacific

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Palisades Fire. You might have forgotten about the Pacific palis

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Ads Fire. You might have forgotten about the fact that

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>much of the initial reporting and the internal investigations and

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the assessments as to what the heck went so egregiously

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>catastrophically wrong much those conclusions seemingly have been memory hold,

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>they've actually gone away. You might have forgotten about all

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of the DEI controversy there in the Los Angeles County

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Fire Department, in terms of who the fire chief was,

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>where the protocol was fired, and this and that. Frankly,

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I think back as well to the Maui, Hawaii fire.

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That fire was in twenty twenty three. It was two

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half years ago. Now have we got accountability

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for either of these horrific conflagrations that burned up countless

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>homes and killed tragically thousands, yes, thousands, of innocent Americans.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>This is now part of a long, long and very

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>sad trail of unfortunate events. When it comes to lack

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of political accountability for lack of justice, I personally start

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this trail at least as far back as the Russia

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Gates hoax, the Russia collusion delusion, the hoax back in

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen, this notion that Donald Trump was a Manchurian

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>candid running on behalf of Lammer Putin. Let's not forget

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Steele dossier, This bought and paid for dossier

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>by the Hillary Clinton campaign, laundered through the shady political

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>consulting firm Fusion GPS with the hoity toity white shoe

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>law firm Perkins Koolie. They're paying for it all long,

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and how that dossier did make its way into the

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>infamous January twenty seventeen presidential Transition era Intelligence Community assessment,

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.360
<v Speaker 1>therefore justifying the spying on the campaign leading to the

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Crossfire Hurricane investigation, the Molar probe, and all and all

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that ended up engulfing half of the first Trump term.

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot as well about the infamous year

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty COVID nineteen. Are you kidding me? There's

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>been no accountability whatsoever for all that this nation, frankly

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the world endured when it came to the lockdowns of

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the COVID nineteen era. We will not know the full

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>cost of many of these children who went an entire

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>year or more of their lives not going to school,

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>whose social skills, whose elementary education was retarded, was set backwards.

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to know the full cause of this.

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>For years, perhaps even decades. Have we faced any accountability

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever when it comes to that. Have we faced any

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>accountability whatsoever when it comes to to the Hunter Biden laptop,

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI and the Deep States, all of them

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>working in collusion with big Tech. The laptop comes out

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>there a month before the election, in October of twenty twenty.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>The very next day, you have this infamous letter the

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty one Deep State spooks. You have Brandon Clapper and

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the whole clown brigade linking arms with

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorsey formerly of Twitter, and Zuckerberg and all the

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of them, and saying that this is Russian misinformation. Therefore,

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't even share the link on social media. I

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>am are trying to DM that link to send a

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>direct mess on Twitter. You could even DM it. How

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we face any accountability whatsoever for that? How we face

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>any accountability whatsoever for the myriad, the myriad scandals of

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the horrific presidency known as the Joe Biden tenure, arguably

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the worst four presidential years in history, at least in

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>my book. In my ranking of this, the Biden presidency

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>ranks below even the Jimmy Carter presidency. How about the facts,

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>most obviously, that the Democrats had a mental patient running

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the country, someone who was not even aware of the

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.399
<v Speaker 1>executive orders, of the clemencies, of the pardons, of the commutations,

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the bills, of anything that he was doing. Dude

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't even know what day of the week it was.

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You could ask him on a Wednesday, what day the

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>weekn is? Oh, I don't know some day Indian Why

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't there? This is not an ageous thing. People

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>get old. I have old grandparents. We all do. But

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in no world whatsoever was that man fit to run

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the nation in that particular state. Have we gotten any accountability?

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Do we even know who for large swaths of those

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>four years was actually running the country on an effective

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>data basis? I have my own thoughts on that. I'm

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not sure we know the answer. In fact, I'm pretty

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:57.240
<v Speaker 1>sure we don't know. How about the lawfair Attorney General

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Merrior Garland and by the way, Thank god, Raric Garland

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>did not end up on the United States Supreme Court.

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Recall that that was who Barack Obama nominated after Anthony

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Scalia passed away in February twenty sixteen. In one of

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the great all time Senate procedural maneuvers, Mitch McConnell and

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Shuck Grassley linking arms to block Merrick Garland from even

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>getting a hearing on the Santurtiary Committee. Thank goodness that

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that wildly, wildly zealous partisan did not end up on

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States Supreme Court, but as Attorney General and

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, Merrick Garlands presided over the most egregious use

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of lawfair in this nation's history. So called Special Counsel

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Jack Smith, so called because he's actually not a legitimate

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>special council as Clarence Thomas correctly deduced, and is concurring

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>opinion to the Trump versus the United States Presidential Communiy

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>case a year and a half ago at the High Court.

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But regardless, so called special Council Jack Smith attempting with

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Garland. They are cheering him along, as was the

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>President himself, Joe Biden, when he actually was able to

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>pay attention and be convenident of what was happening before him.

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>They were all cheering on the prosecution and attempted bankruptcy

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and incarceration of the then former and also as a

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>casement be then future President of the United States Donald J. Trump. Folks,

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we have never seen this level of vindictiveness, of petty

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>vindictedness in our nation's history. How Jacksmith has not already

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 1>had charges filed against him, as my colleague got the

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Article three project Mike Davis has been clamoring for for years. Correctly, so,

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>there's at least one charge that stands out eighteen US

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Code Chapter two forty one for a conspiracy to deprive

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>your fellow American citizen of his or her constitutional rights.

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>That is exactly but Jack Smith working hands in glove

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>with Fannie Wills in Fulton County, Georgia, with Alvin Bragg

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in Manhattan, and with Tis James in Albany, New York.

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what all of them did together. I wait patiently

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen US Code Chapter two forty one to be

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 1>invoked and ideally for Jacksmith to be prosecuted on those grounds. Folks.

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Zooming off for a second here, whether it's the one

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>year anniversary of this horrific confagation in the Pacific Palisades

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles County. Whether it's the Maui fire, whether

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Russia Gates, whether it's COVID nineteen, whether it's the

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty election in general, but especially the whole Hunter

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden laptop and the Deep State spook letter dismissing its

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>rush disinformation. We don't have accountability. We don't. A free

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>republic can only long endure to take us back to

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>where conversation is a promise due with evol evant. A

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>free republic can only endure when there is some notion

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of understanding your fellow Americans, as indeed your fellow Americans,

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>that we have more in common with them than we

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>do not in common with them. That means that at

0:39:57.480 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 1>least to some extent, we have to consume and process

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the same information. We cannot be incredibly deeply euremically siloed

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>in our own silos where we consume different information we

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>process information, then we deduce wildly differing, perhaps even irreconcilable

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>conclusions as to what to do for the country. In

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>other words, we have to have some level of baseline

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 1>trust in institutions, in narratives, and so forth. The corporate

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>press has done more work than we could possibly elaborate

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on this show to discrete itself and the ability of

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>American people to take the core press at their word.

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 1>But this is our very difficult, arduous task, is to

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>try to get some justice for the great gas lightings

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of the American people that we have endured now for

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>years and years. Only with some kind of juice, only

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>with some kind of accountability, can we begin to trust

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the ruling class again, to trust media elites, to trust

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>elites in both the public and the private sector. And

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:07.319
<v Speaker 1>only then by it once again having some baseline level

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of trust in elites and some baseline level of acceptance,

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>can we work together in this quid pro quo style

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>negotiation or the deal style negotiation that you've all lived

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>in was so correctly describing as being one of the

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>great inherited inheritances of the American political tradition. There is

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>really really a lot of work to go to get

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>us back to that there. But we need accountability. The

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>American people are thirsting, they are thirsting for accountability. I

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>don't pretend that's going to happen tomorrow. I don't pretend

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen after that. But you want to

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>shut up the conspiracist kooks. You want to get this

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>nation back to work in a meaningful, earnest sense. Accountability

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and justice, folks, that's what we need. I was always

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>hoping you enjoyed today's episode of The Josh Hammers Show.

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Make sure to subscribe to our show everywhere to get

0:41:57.719 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts, and watch it every evening on the Sale

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>New Channel until tomorrow. I'm Josh him

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 3>M hm