Speaker 1: Welcome to the program. No thictocrats allowed, because we've got
Speaker 1: a country to say, so let's get her teed up.
Speaker 2: Lost that Subdego triple eight ninety seven one s a
Speaker 2: ge triple eight ninety seven one seven two four three.
Speaker 1: I am Larry Elder. We are Salem News Channel. President
Speaker 1: Trump has given Iran a deadline of five pm Pacific
Speaker 1: eight pm Eastern today to do a deal or faced
Speaker 1: military bombardment. Iran is mobilizing its people to form human shields,
Speaker 1: including women and children, around likely bombing targets. President Trump
Speaker 1: said he sent an Iranian group guns, but they took
Speaker 1: the guns and did not give them to civilian resistors.
Speaker 1: President Trump teas off on South Korea, Japan, and Australia
Speaker 1: for not helping us in the war against Iran. A
Speaker 1: CNN pundit says America is quote not a Christian nation.
Speaker 1: Close quote. That's true, It's a Judeo Christian nation. James
Speaker 1: Carville says Donald Trump is quote deteriorating at a really
Speaker 1: rapid rate end of quote. Supreme Court is considering whether
Speaker 1: the Fourteenth Amendment gives birthright citizenship the children born in
Speaker 1: America of parents here illegally six years ago, CBS New
Speaker 1: York did a report on women from Turkey who flew
Speaker 1: here to have babies and then signed them up for medicaid.
Speaker 1: New York City mayor Mom Dommy announces a quote racial
Speaker 1: equity plan close quote to tackle affordability. The Trump DOJ
Speaker 1: says it sounds fishy and will be reviewed. All of
Speaker 1: this and more. The number again triple eight ninety seven,
Speaker 1: one seven two four three, triple eight nine seventy one
Speaker 1: sage descent. Of course, it's welcome. I want to say
Speaker 1: something about the number of Trump supporters who are angry
Speaker 1: over the Iranian war and they say, President Trump promise
Speaker 1: no more forever wars, no more new wars. Now. I
Speaker 1: support what President Trump is doing in Iran. I think
Speaker 1: it's just horrific that the can was kicked down the
Speaker 1: road by so many other presidents, and President Trump is
Speaker 1: stomped on that can. It's about time. If you truly believe,
Speaker 1: as I do, that Iran was on the brink of
Speaker 1: developing a nuclear weapon, and we now know that they
Speaker 1: had the missile technology to reach virtually every capital in
Speaker 1: Europe and pretty soon America. If you believe that, it
Speaker 1: seems to me You have a couple of choices. One
Speaker 1: is to do nothing, because, after all, President Trump is
Speaker 1: being criticized for engaging in a quote war of choice,
Speaker 1: close quote, It is a war of choice. You're the
Speaker 1: choice is to do nothing and to perhaps someday face
Speaker 1: the prospect of having to deal with a nuclear armed
Speaker 1: Iran in a regime that has been chanting for forty
Speaker 1: seven years, death to America, death to Israel, a regime
Speaker 1: that believes martyrdom is an advancement to heaven. This is
Speaker 1: a sick, brutal regime. And you have a choice to
Speaker 1: do something or to kick the can down the road
Speaker 1: for some other president to ultimately have to face this
Speaker 1: awful decision. But as to the promise he made about
Speaker 1: no forever wars, I thought it was an ill advised
Speaker 1: thing to say. It didn't bother me that he said
Speaker 1: it because I knew that circumstances would dictate what any
Speaker 1: president would do. Woodrow Wilson ran in nineteen fourteen to
Speaker 1: keep us out of World War One. We went into
Speaker 1: World War One in nineteen seventeen. There was a large
Speaker 1: America First, that's what it was called, an America First
Speaker 1: movement before Pearl Harbor and Gerald Ford, who was then
Speaker 1: a student at Yale, was involved in that movement. John Kennedy,
Speaker 1: who was a student at Harvard, donated money to that movement.
Speaker 1: There was a huge, huge number of people that felt
Speaker 1: it would be ill advised for US to get into
Speaker 1: the war in Europe until Pearl Harbor, and then that
Speaker 1: attitude immediately melted away. My point is circumstances dictate what
Speaker 1: presidents do. I've told you this story before I campaigned
Speaker 1: with President Trump in twenty sixteen. We were at a
Speaker 1: church in Cleveland, and he wasn't president then, of course,
Speaker 1: he was a private citizen, and we had about a
Speaker 1: fifteen twenty minute private conversation and I said, there's one
Speaker 1: thing you should apologize for. He said, I know what
Speaker 1: you're going to say. You're going to say I should
Speaker 1: apologize for what I said about John McCain. I said,
Speaker 1: couldn't care less. You should apologize for what she said
Speaker 1: about George W. Bush quote lying us close quote into
Speaker 1: the Iraq War. He didn't say anything. I said, I
Speaker 1: understand you oppose the war. Frankly, if you listened to
Speaker 1: the Howard Stern interview with President within private citizen, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump he said, yeah, I support the Iraq War. Later
Speaker 1: on now he says he never never supported well. In fact,
Speaker 1: during the interview he said he did, but put that aside.
Speaker 1: I said, you said that George W. Bush lied us
Speaker 1: into the Iraq war. I say, didn't lie. The intail
Speaker 1: about the assumption that he had stockpower to WND was wrong,
Speaker 1: no question about that. I've spoken to Colin Powell. I
Speaker 1: told him, I've spoken to Connolleica Rice as successor as
Speaker 1: Secretary of State, and they both admitted that the intel
Speaker 1: was wrong. They both also said that nobody lied that
Speaker 1: when Colin Powell gave that presentation for the United Nations,
Speaker 1: he was doing it based upon information he thought was credible.
Speaker 1: And I said President Bush got resolutions from the Senate
Speaker 1: and from the Congress, from the House, and the resolute
Speaker 1: was quite lengthy. It mentioned the assumption that he had
Speaker 1: Saddam was saying had stockpile of WMD, but that was
Speaker 1: just one reason. It also talked about he was shooting
Speaker 1: at the southern and Northern American and British plane patrolling
Speaker 1: the no fly zones, that he was stealing from the
Speaker 1: American from the Oil for Food program, billions of dollars
Speaker 1: doing lord knows what with the money. He tried to
Speaker 1: assassinate the first President Bush. We know he had chemical
Speaker 1: weapons at one point because he used him on the Courge,
Speaker 1: he used him on the Iranians, and I said, the
Speaker 1: president went to the United Nations got a unanimous resolution
Speaker 1: fourteen forty one telling Saddam was saying to thoroughly declare
Speaker 1: what he's done with his WMD or face consequences. And
Speaker 1: everybody knew what that was. Moreover, roughly seventy three percent
Speaker 1: according to a CNN poll of Americans, supported the war.
Speaker 1: Later on that support went away, but at that time
Speaker 1: he did what Colin Powell said, is the power doctrine,
Speaker 1: used overwhelming force and make sure you have overwhelming domestic approval.
Speaker 1: And we were assisted by what was then called a
Speaker 1: Coalition of the Willing, something like forty nine forty eight,
Speaker 1: forty nine states that participated in one way, shape or form,
Speaker 1: including Britain and Australia and Poland committing ground troops. It
Speaker 1: wasn't a lie. I said. You can make an argument,
Speaker 1: and many people have it was a mistake. By the way,
Speaker 1: I don't support that argument. If you weren't going to
Speaker 1: see it through as a mistake. But the NY idea
Speaker 1: that we were faced with a pow possible threat of
Speaker 1: somebody with WMD was a decision that the commander in
Speaker 1: chief had to make in terms of dealing with it,
Speaker 1: and he just listened and kind of grunted. But he's
Speaker 1: never referred to the President as having lied us into
Speaker 1: the war since the end of my knowledge. President Trump
Speaker 1: never apologizes. You know, what he does is not say
Speaker 1: the same wrongheaded thing twice. And I believe that I've
Speaker 1: had something to do with the fact that he hasn't
Speaker 1: said it again. Now, why am I saying all of
Speaker 1: this Because this is a very unpopular war, as opposed
Speaker 1: to the Iraq War, which is very popular at one point.
Speaker 1: This has been unpopular out of the gate. And President
Speaker 1: Trump did not advise our allies. He was going into
Speaker 1: it the way George W. Bush did about a rack
Speaker 1: to recruit their assistance. So, given what the President Trump
Speaker 1: didn't say about the Iraq War, I'm sure he can
Speaker 1: imagine a whole bunch of people are saying that you
Speaker 1: led us into this war. You said that Iran was
Speaker 1: on the verge of getting a nuke, when in fact,
Speaker 1: a lot of people don't think that they were. You
Speaker 1: said that you weren't going to get us involved in
Speaker 1: any new wars, and now you are. This is what
Speaker 1: makes the job of commander in chief one that gives
Speaker 1: people gray hair after a few years. You have to
Speaker 1: manage risks in President Trump has incurred the wrath of
Speaker 1: a lot of his supporters for quote, getting us into
Speaker 1: a new war, a forever war, even though it's only
Speaker 1: been about a month, because circumstances dictate how a president
Speaker 1: is going to govern. But when to compare contrast this,
Speaker 1: you could argue that the Iraq War had broad American approval,
Speaker 1: had congressional support. President Trump did not go to Congress,
Speaker 1: did not get a resolution, let alone both the Senate
Speaker 1: and the House the way George W. Bush did, did
Speaker 1: not go to the UN the way George W. Bush did,
Speaker 1: and again did not enjoy the popular support at least
Speaker 1: at one time, the way George W. Bush did. Yet,
Speaker 1: the President Trump is doing the right thing for the
Speaker 1: right reasons. This is a determined, sick enemy, and I
Speaker 1: believe that it's in the best interest of the rest
Speaker 1: of the world, the civilized world, to assist. I'm larry
Speaker 1: yolder parents The biggest question in education today is how
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence is shaping the way your student learns. Artificial
Speaker 1: intelligence is changing education faster than most schools are willing
Speaker 1: to admit, and many families are rightly concerned. At Patrick
Speaker 1: Henry College, the goal isn't to outsource thinking to machine,
Speaker 1: is to train students to think for themselves. PHC emphasizes
Speaker 1: a Christian liberal arts education that develops reasoning, writing, speaking,
Speaker 1: and discernment skills no algorithm can replace. Students learn to
Speaker 1: engage technology wisely understanding its capabilities, but also its danger
Speaker 1: and limitations, rather than becoming dependent on it. In a
Speaker 1: world increasingly shaped by AI, Patrick Henry College prepares students
Speaker 1: to lead with wisdom, conviction, and moral clarity. If you
Speaker 1: want a college that prepares your child to lead in
Speaker 1: an AI driven world without losing his or her faith
Speaker 1: and values, I encourage you to learn more about Patrick
Speaker 1: Henry College. Visit PHC dot edu slash elder. That's PHC
Speaker 1: dot edu slash Elder Triple eight nine seven one sage
Speaker 1: triple eight nine seven one seven two four three. I
Speaker 1: am Larry Elder. We are Salem News Channel. Mark is
Speaker 1: in La Mark, so nice to hear from you.
Speaker 3: E two, Larry, So what do you think the most
Speaker 3: at least sand Trump is right about something and not
Speaker 3: many things. He is the most unhingged president in the
Speaker 3: history of the United States.
Speaker 1: But what's he Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait,
Speaker 1: you said he was right about something, and then you
Speaker 1: said he's the most unhinged president in the history of
Speaker 1: the United States.
Speaker 3: Well, because he's the best at everything, So of course
Speaker 3: he's the best, being the most in the hinged president
Speaker 3: in the history of the United States.
Speaker 1: Mark, Mark, don't you think, Mark, Mark, Mark, You're a
Speaker 1: very intelligent guy. Don't you think that's a little silly
Speaker 1: saying he's the best at everything?
Speaker 3: That's what he says.
Speaker 1: Do you think do you do you think he's Do
Speaker 1: you think he's the best at everything?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 1: He neither needed neither need to do I and need
Speaker 1: to do most sensible people, So you know, honestly, that's
Speaker 1: his personality.
Speaker 3: Okay, he's definitely the most unhinged president of the United States,
Speaker 3: based on.
Speaker 1: Based based based on what that's a fact, based on what,
Speaker 1: based on his psychiatric examination, based on his cognitive test, based.
Speaker 4: On what.
Speaker 3: Uh, just just to tweets, what what President and the
Speaker 3: most most powerful country in the world would send out
Speaker 3: tweets like that, Larry swearing F bombs, saying well, we
Speaker 3: are you?
Speaker 1: Are you as? Are you as just Mark Marcus? You
Speaker 1: as disturbed about people on your side referring to him
Speaker 1: as a fascist and the Nazi and Hitler and as
Speaker 1: Stalin and the Mussolini. Does that bother you?
Speaker 3: I don't like that neither, But Larry is that one
Speaker 3: doesn't have nothing to do with another. They're not the
Speaker 3: president of the United States, are they?
Speaker 1: If you're disturbed, if you're if you're disturbed about f bombs,
Speaker 1: you ought to be disturbed about the way this man
Speaker 1: has been treated, what he's been called. If you said,
Speaker 1: I'm just as disturbed by my side referring to him
Speaker 1: as he's as a fascists, a Hitler, as a Nazi,
Speaker 1: I would respect that. But you don't seem to be
Speaker 1: disturbed by that. Are you disturbed about the law there?
Speaker 1: You're disturbed about the the way that the uh Biden
Speaker 1: administrats DJ has gone after him for having documents when
Speaker 1: Joe Biden had more documents and more places and did
Speaker 1: not have the authority to declassify them. Are you disturbed
Speaker 1: Are you disturbed about Alvin Alvin Bragg running to get
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and Letitia James the Age of New York
Speaker 1: running to get Donald Trump? Are you sturbed by Fannie
Speaker 1: Lewis going after him because of alleged campaign interference, all
Speaker 1: this stuff that he's endured, and you're upset because he
Speaker 1: sends out tweets using F bombs?
Speaker 5: Are you serious, Larry? Larry?
Speaker 3: To disappoints you. But I thought all the things you
Speaker 3: just said were all politically motivated. I am a Democrat.
Speaker 1: I'm happy. I'm happy. I'm happy to hear that. I'm
Speaker 1: happy to hear that.
Speaker 3: I'm to ask you the question again because you diverted
Speaker 3: and didn't answer the question what president says? If I
Speaker 3: have to, I'll blow up the whole country.
Speaker 1: Oh, by the way, by the way, it's it's it's
Speaker 1: it's it's rhetoric. Rhetoric is not a war crime. Let
Speaker 1: me let me give you, let me give you a
Speaker 1: story to answer your question, Mark, And I'm serious.
Speaker 3: About this, but hold hold on, hold on, Mark, Mark, Mark.
Speaker 1: I will answer your question, not the way you want
Speaker 1: me to, but I will answer it during the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty election. I'm in the airport. You might have heard
Speaker 1: me tell this story before. And I meet this military
Speaker 1: chaplain who did not vote for Donald Trump in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: pretty much for the same reason that you don't like
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Thought he was a radic, thought he was
Speaker 1: a rational, didn't like his tweets. He has a son,
Speaker 1: he told me, who's in special ops. And his son
Speaker 1: told his father that Donald Trump is keeping us safe.
Speaker 1: And the father said how and why? He said, because
Speaker 1: our enemies are scared blankness of him, and our allies
Speaker 1: respect him. So if he's keeping my son safe, I'm
Speaker 1: voting for him this time. That's what he said. My
Speaker 1: point is Donald Trump says a lot of things that
Speaker 1: are that are contradictory up, down, hot, cold. It keeps
Speaker 1: our enemies off balance. They don't know what he's going
Speaker 1: to do, and I think there's an effective tool for
Speaker 1: both diplomacy and for national security.
Speaker 3: You don't, I do, Hey, Sir Crumb said, what when
Speaker 3: we just started bombing them again a month ago? He said,
Speaker 3: his biggest reason, which should have been to overturn the regime,
Speaker 3: but his biggest reason was to be sure or Ron
Speaker 3: never gets a nuclear weapons and to just.
Speaker 1: Do something about their about their missile program, and to
Speaker 1: make sure that they stopped supporting terrorists like the hu
Speaker 1: Thies and like comas and like Hesbalah. Those are the
Speaker 1: three big, biggest reasons. And he said, ideally it will
Speaker 1: result in a regime change. That's what he said.
Speaker 5: Okay, okay, So.
Speaker 3: Supposedly when we bombed them six months ago, they were
Speaker 3: so many hundreds of years, fifty years away from getting
Speaker 3: a nuclear weapon, and so because but now he wanted
Speaker 3: to use.
Speaker 1: This you know, you know what, you know what Mark, Mark,
Speaker 1: That to me is the strongest argument you've made so far.
Speaker 1: President Trump six months ago bomb these three nuclear sites
Speaker 1: and then said that he set back this program. I
Speaker 1: forget what he said. Sometimes he said for decades, generations whatever,
Speaker 1: he was wrong, he was wrong. So now that he
Speaker 1: was wrong, he's not supposed to do anything about it
Speaker 1: because he was wrong. Well, I said I sent back
Speaker 1: their program for generations. It turns out I was wrong.
Speaker 1: Since I said that, I can't do anything about it.
Speaker 1: Did that make sense?
Speaker 6: Okay?
Speaker 3: And Larry also, Donald Trump three weeks ago said Roan
Speaker 3: has like ninety percent less missos, ninety percent drones. Just
Speaker 3: last week the Pentagon Larry said no, they have at
Speaker 3: least fifty percent of their missos and at least fifty
Speaker 3: percent of their drones. And when I was on with
Speaker 3: you a few weeks ago, I mentioned to you that
Speaker 3: do you think that they will never have missos because
Speaker 3: Russia and China will continue to send them to them,
Speaker 3: which apparently China. I don't know Rushia is, but China
Speaker 3: is sending the missiles. And he literally one other.
Speaker 1: Wait, wait, wait a second second, is it or is
Speaker 1: it not true that the numbers of missiles has dropped
Speaker 1: almost ninety five percent. That's either true or false. It
Speaker 1: turns out that's true. So their passy has been sufficiently degraded.
Speaker 1: Whether it's been degraded by fifty, seventy percent, eighty or ninety,
Speaker 1: we don't know. But certainly the percentage of missiles they've
Speaker 1: shot up has declined by almost ninety percent. Their navy
Speaker 1: is at the bottom of the ocean. Their air force
Speaker 1: is pretty much destroyed. Do they still have some drones?
Speaker 1: Do they still have some missiles? Obviously, otherwise wouldn't have
Speaker 1: lost those two planes we lost a few days ago. Okay, Larry,
Speaker 1: you know Mark, Mark, there are sick, determined enemy They're
Speaker 1: very determined. They don't care. They don't care that twenty
Speaker 1: five thousand of their own people have been killed. They
Speaker 1: don't care that they used children to walk on foot
Speaker 1: declare minefields for their soldiers and for their tanks during
Speaker 1: the Iran Iraq War. They don't care to put women
Speaker 1: and children around sights that they believe are going to
Speaker 1: be bombed. They don't care. That's why they cannot be
Speaker 1: allowed to get a nuclear bomb. That's why we need
Speaker 1: to do something about their missile program. That's why we
Speaker 1: need to do something about their support for terrorists around
Speaker 1: the world. That's why they are an enemy, and that
Speaker 1: is why, in my opinion, our allies should be joining
Speaker 1: the fight, because if you're part of the of the
Speaker 1: civilized world, uhould recognize that these people are dangerous. These
Speaker 1: people control the strace of Hermus Twenty percent of our
Speaker 1: oil goes through there, which means the world is going
Speaker 1: to be held hostage if they stay in power. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is doing something about that, and our allies need
Speaker 1: to join the fight.
Speaker 3: Okay, Larry you, sir, that's all that's true, which we
Speaker 3: could argue for hours on that. Let me ask you
Speaker 3: another quick question. Why hey, has he taken sanctions is
Speaker 3: off of the Russian oil and sanctions off more importantly
Speaker 3: the Iranian oil. So is making money so they can
Speaker 3: blow up Ukraine.
Speaker 1: And in your way you want, Okay, Okay, Mark, Mark, Mark,
Speaker 1: I have to go ask for why he's done that.
Speaker 1: There are various different reasons that have been given. I
Speaker 1: trust him as commander in chief. I'm Larry Older Oh no,
Speaker 1: oh no, no, no no no. Triple eight nine seven
Speaker 1: one s A g E. Triple eight nine seven one
Speaker 1: seven two four three. I am Larry Elderly or Salem
Speaker 1: News Channel. We start out by talking about the people
Speaker 1: that are angry at President Trump, who voted for him
Speaker 1: because and one of the reasons they voted for him
Speaker 1: is because he said no more new wars and he
Speaker 1: condemned so called endless wars. At the time, I did
Speaker 1: not think it was prickly why for him to say
Speaker 1: that didn't bother me that he said it, because, as
Speaker 1: I said, I knew that circumstances would dictate what he
Speaker 1: was going to do anyway. But this whole rhetoric about
Speaker 1: endless wars, as if we were just nothing to do.
Speaker 1: George W. Bush wanted to just kind of wear combat
Speaker 1: camouflage and decided to go to war in Iraq in
Speaker 1: two thousand and three, Ah, nothing to do. We decided
Speaker 1: to go to war in Afghanistan. There are reasons for this.
Speaker 1: We have endless enemies and they have a vote. This
Speaker 1: is a regime, as I was saying to Mark, that
Speaker 1: used children during the Iraq Iran war to walk on
Speaker 1: foot ahead of troops and a head of tanks, wearing necklaces,
Speaker 1: plastic necklaces that would give them the key to paradise
Speaker 1: in the event that they died. Hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: children were used, and tens of thousands of children lost
Speaker 1: their lives. There's a word for that, or two words
Speaker 1: for that. It's called war crime. And again and that
Speaker 1: Iraq Iran wore both of them used chemical weapons on
Speaker 1: each other. You know what that's called. It's called a
Speaker 1: war crime. And right now they are mobilizing boys as
Speaker 1: young as twelve years old to fight the United States,
Speaker 1: and to fight is real. That's called a war crime.
Speaker 1: This is the value that this regime places on its
Speaker 1: own people. Imagine the value they place on its perceived enemies,
Speaker 1: and imagine what a regime like that would do with
Speaker 1: a nuclear bomb. How the rest of the civilized world
Speaker 1: does not understand this is their fight as well. It's
Speaker 1: beyond me. I would have thought after it was clear
Speaker 1: that Iran had the technology to reach Diego Garcia, which
Speaker 1: is twenty five hundred miles away, which means it's capable
Speaker 1: of hitting the European capitals. I would have thought that
Speaker 1: that would have opened the nostrils of our reluctant allies.
Speaker 1: But it hasn't. After they blocked the strait of our moose,
Speaker 1: through which twenty percent twenty five percent of the world's
Speaker 1: oil goes, I would have thought that would have opened
Speaker 1: up the nostrils. So everybody, Okay, don't like the idea
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump did this without advising us, but we
Speaker 1: cannot allow this regime to hold the world hostage and
Speaker 1: to jack up the prize of oil and to plunge
Speaker 1: our economies into recession. So we're going to assist in
Speaker 1: the fight. I would have thought that would have happened,
Speaker 1: particularly after we assisted in so many wars we had
Speaker 1: nothing to do with Ukraine. Russia threatens Europe, not US.
Speaker 1: And what do we give for four three hundred billion
Speaker 1: dollar something like that? We have tens of thousands of troops,
Speaker 1: and Germany tens of thousands of troops in South Korea,
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of troops in Japan. We assisted Britain
Speaker 1: when they wanted to make sure that Argentina did not
Speaker 1: take the Falcon Islands or the Maldives, as Argentina calls
Speaker 1: it wasn't our war. We assisted Kosovo Bosnia, not our wars.
Speaker 1: We assisted. This is in the best interests of the
Speaker 1: entire civilized world. And where are they? Where's the UK,
Speaker 1: Where's Australia, France?
Speaker 7: Eh?
Speaker 1: And when Donald Trump called out NATO and said, you
Speaker 1: guys are supposed to do two percent of your GDPIT,
Speaker 1: you're not even come close to doing many of you.
Speaker 1: I want five percent, and got them to do it.
Speaker 4: And the.
Speaker 1: NATO Secretary General Mark Ruda said, you know, President Trump's right,
Speaker 1: We should have been pointing up that we've gotten away
Speaker 1: with it. This is not climate change, the existential threat
Speaker 1: that European nations think we have, which has screwed up
Speaker 1: their economies picarly that of Spain. This is a true
Speaker 1: existential threat. And where are they? Forty seven years these
Speaker 1: people have been chanting death to America. Remember that whole
Speaker 1: city underneath the ground and gaza that AMAS built with
Speaker 1: the financial assistance and technical assistance from Iran, and even
Speaker 1: the Israeli were unaware that was there. This is who
Speaker 1: we're dealing with here.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: As Operation Epic Fury intensifies, the world braces for what
Speaker 1: comes next. In the Holy Land, red alert sirens fill
Speaker 1: the air, sirens that give you fifteen seconds to reach
Speaker 1: the nearest bomb shoulder. The situation is serious, the threat
Speaker 1: is real. In times like this, freedom and faith aren't
Speaker 1: just abstract ideas. They are what we depend upon, and
Speaker 1: in times like this, the International Fellowship of Christians and
Speaker 1: Jews is on the ground, preparing large scale distributions of
Speaker 1: life saving food, first aid, and emergency essentials for security personnel,
Speaker 1: while helping ensure hospitals, emergency rooms, and shelters are stocked
Speaker 1: with critical medical supplies. Israel's most vulnerable, the sick, the elderly,
Speaker 1: children and families depend upon the Fellowship, and the people
Speaker 1: of the Holy Land depend upon your prayerful support. Join
Speaker 1: Christians and Jews around the world and praying for the
Speaker 1: protection of israel hurt people and the brave American and
Speaker 1: Israeli troops putting their lives in the line in this
Speaker 1: fight for freedom. Support IFCJ dot org. Support IFCJ dot.
Speaker 8: Org when it comes to love of album.
Speaker 1: Triple eight ninety seven one s A G E. Triple
Speaker 1: eight ninety seven one seven two four three Larry Elder,
Speaker 1: Sailing News Channel, coming to you from the Relief Factor Studio.
Speaker 1: Don't forget your Relief Factor eight hundred four Relief eight
Speaker 1: hundred the number four relief and Relief Factor dot com,
Speaker 1: Reliefactor dot com. Next hour, we're gonna talk about California
Speaker 1: fraud Cindia Lauper. The singer says that voter ID will
Speaker 1: mean the suppression of millions of women and their right
Speaker 1: to vote. We're also going to talk about citizenship, birthright citizenship,
Speaker 1: a case the Supreme Courty is considering. Then we're going
Speaker 1: to go back to the war in Iran, speaking of which,
Speaker 1: quoting the New York Times quote, the United States and
Speaker 1: ran reached an eleventh hour ceasefire deal Tuesday evening hours
Speaker 1: that President Trump threatened to start wiping out a whole
Speaker 1: civilization if the Ranians did not allow commercial shipping to
Speaker 1: pass through the straight of her moves safely. The agreement
Speaker 1: was announced by mister Trump on a post on social
Speaker 1: media hours after Pakistan, a mediator in the dispute, urged
Speaker 1: mister Trump to stand down from the eight pm Eastern
Speaker 1: time deadline he set for Iran to accede to his demands.
Speaker 1: Pakistan proposed at each side observe a two weeks cease fire,
Speaker 1: and that during that time Iran allow oil and gas
Speaker 1: and other vessels to proceed unmolested, it unmolested through the
Speaker 1: economically vital waterway end of quote. So to get back
Speaker 1: to our friend Mark, I guess his erratic rhetoric at
Speaker 1: least got the Iranians two for two weeks allowed boats
Speaker 1: to go through the strait of her world. You know
Speaker 1: how many boats go through there every day? Over one hundred,
Speaker 1: and in recent times been a handful. Here's what President
Speaker 1: Trump said yesterday, Number thirty.
Speaker 9: Mister President, how would it not be a work run
Speaker 9: to strike Iran's bridges and power plants.
Speaker 10: They killed forty five thousand people in the last month.
Speaker 11: More than that the good news much for sixty.
Speaker 10: They killed protesters. They're animals and we have to stop them,
Speaker 10: and we can't.
Speaker 12: Let them have a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 13: Very simple.
Speaker 14: They want a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 11: They've been trying for a long time.
Speaker 10: I stopped them with the Obama It's a horrible rand
Speaker 10: nuclear deal.
Speaker 11: I stopped them, and.
Speaker 12: I did it in a lot of different ways.
Speaker 1: And before he agreed to this two week cease fire,
Speaker 1: here's what he said about bombing them back of the
Speaker 1: Stone Age number thirty one.
Speaker 11: Go ahead, please.
Speaker 15: Your messaging on the war has moved from the wars
Speaker 15: coming to an end, to war going to be bombing
Speaker 15: around to the stone Ages.
Speaker 4: And we've heard a range of those short of messages.
Speaker 4: So are you so? Which is it? Are you winding
Speaker 4: this down?
Speaker 9: Are you as chating you?
Speaker 11: I don't know.
Speaker 4: I can't.
Speaker 13: It depends what they do. This is a critical period.
Speaker 13: They have a period of well till tomorrow. At eight
Speaker 13: o'clock I gave them an extension. They asked for an
Speaker 13: extension of seven days, right, I said, Steve, give them
Speaker 13: ten days.
Speaker 4: Ten days is up actually today?
Speaker 1: So I gave them a leven.
Speaker 13: I guess indirectly, I thought it was inappropriate the day
Speaker 13: after Easter.
Speaker 1: I want to be a nice person.
Speaker 4: They have till tomorrow.
Speaker 11: Now we'll see what happens.
Speaker 13: I can tell you they're negotiating we think in good faith,
Speaker 13: we're going to find out.
Speaker 4: We're getting the.
Speaker 13: Help of some incredible countries that want this to be
Speaker 13: ended because it affects them.
Speaker 11: Also, a lot of people are affected by this.
Speaker 13: But we're giving them. We're giving them till tomorrow eight
Speaker 13: o'clock Eastern time, and after that they're gonna have no bridges,
Speaker 13: they're gonna have no power plants, stone ages.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and regarding the enemies being scared blankless, this is
Speaker 1: part of the way this man operates. Again, here's what
Speaker 1: he said yesterday, number thirty two.
Speaker 11: Had money.
Speaker 10: In fact, they asked the seven days. I said, I'm
Speaker 10: going to give you ten. But at the end of
Speaker 10: ten all hell's going to break out if you don't
Speaker 10: get there.
Speaker 1: Hid Now there's a two week cessation and Ryan apparently
Speaker 1: has agreed to open up the straight up our moved
Speaker 1: so that vessels could go unmolested again. This is President
Speaker 1: Trump yesterday, number thirty three, So hopefully.
Speaker 16: It could be over with quickly.
Speaker 10: Again, there are lots of different alternatives. We have many alternatives.
Speaker 10: We could leave right now and it would take them
Speaker 10: fifteen years to rebuild what they we could leave right now.
Speaker 11: But I want to finish it up.
Speaker 10: Iran ready cannot have a nuclear weapon. They are lunatics
Speaker 10: and you can't put nuclear weapons in the hands of
Speaker 10: a lunatic.
Speaker 1: Thank you very and again this is yesterday. He said
Speaker 1: that they have made a significant step. Number thirty four, Sir,
Speaker 1: is tuesday.
Speaker 15: Your final deadline?
Speaker 11: Are you prepared.
Speaker 9: Fire?
Speaker 8: Proposing Tuesday?
Speaker 3: Fire?
Speaker 17: Proposal from this morning?
Speaker 4: Every proposal you can imagine what.
Speaker 9: Your final deadline is Tuesday?
Speaker 18: And am your final deadline?
Speaker 1: Nature demands mister president, Are you willing to continue the war?
Speaker 4: You have to watch.
Speaker 10: It's an easy idea answers.
Speaker 11: Yes, but you have what do you think is the proposal?
Speaker 10: They've made a proposal, and it's a significant proposal.
Speaker 11: It's a significant step.
Speaker 10: It's not good enough, but it's a very significant step.
Speaker 10: They have made the negotiating now and they made a
Speaker 10: very significant step.
Speaker 4: We'll see what happens.
Speaker 1: He also said he did send guns to Iran, to
Speaker 1: a group with the group to whom he sent the
Speaker 1: guns apparently kept them and did not give them to
Speaker 1: the protesters. Number twelve.
Speaker 10: If you can hear you want people, if you're plot
Speaker 10: who you is, yes, well, that's a radical group of
Speaker 10: lunatics that you're with.
Speaker 11: Let me just tell you.
Speaker 10: Let me just tell you very fair question. The Iranian people,
Speaker 10: when they don't hear bombs go up, they're upset. They
Speaker 10: want to hear bombs because they want to be free.
Speaker 10: And the only reason they're not out protesting, you know that,
Speaker 10: is because they were informed that if they protest, like
Speaker 10: the wrestler and his friends, if they protest, they.
Speaker 4: Will be shot immediately. And that's an edict that's in writing.
Speaker 10: If they protest, if they go out in the streets,
Speaker 10: they will be immediately shot. They don't have guns.
Speaker 19: You know.
Speaker 10: We sent some guns, but the group that was supposed
Speaker 10: to give which I said, what happened to my people?
Speaker 1: I said it.
Speaker 10: I called it exactly. We sent guns, a lot of guns.
Speaker 10: They were supposed to go to. The people said they
Speaker 10: could fight back against these ducks.
Speaker 11: You know what happened.
Speaker 10: The people that they sent them through kept them because
Speaker 10: they said, what a beautiful gun.
Speaker 4: I think I'll keep it.
Speaker 10: So I'm very upset with a certain group of people,
Speaker 10: and they're gonna pay a big price for that.
Speaker 1: Coming up. Ice was involved in a shooting that sent
Speaker 1: one person to a hospital while conducting a traffic stop
Speaker 1: in California's Central Valley. We're gonna have that for you
Speaker 1: coming up now. Our founders believe that freedom wasn't just
Speaker 1: a word, it was a way of life. The freedom
Speaker 1: to move forward, the freedom to pursue what matters most,
Speaker 1: the freedom to live fully. But pain is a way
Speaker 1: of taking those freedoms away. That's why our Relief Factor exists.
Speaker 1: I've told you about my buddy Tom Avid Golfer Scratch
Speaker 1: Golfer use Believe Factor every day. Otherwise he wouldn't be
Speaker 1: able to swing freely without shoulder and back pain. Relief
Speaker 1: Factors one hundred percent drug free research base supplement designed
Speaker 1: to help support a healthy inflammatory response, addressing painted its source,
Speaker 1: not covering it up. Over a million Americans have found
Speaker 1: relief and reclaim parts of life they thought were behind them.
Speaker 1: So this year, as we celebrate two hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: years of freedom, ask yourself a simple question, are you
Speaker 1: living with the freedom you deserve? Relief Factor gives you
Speaker 1: the opportunity to live pain free and get back of
Speaker 1: the life you love. Try Relief Factor today for nineteen
Speaker 1: dollars and ninety five cents, less than a dollar a day.
Speaker 1: Three week Quick Start if ready for you, Relief Factor
Speaker 1: dot Com, Relief Factor dot Com eight hundred four Relief
Speaker 1: eight hundred the number four Relief Trible Late nine seventy one,
Speaker 1: Sage Triple eight nine seventy one seven two four to three.
Speaker 1: I am Larry Elder. We are sailing the news channel.
Speaker 1: Next hour. We're going to talk about California fraud. It
Speaker 1: is far far worse than the fraud. And Minnesota. We're
Speaker 1: going to talk about Cindi Lauper, the well known political
Speaker 1: analyst who claims that the Save Act would suppress millions
Speaker 1: of women and deny them the right to vote. We're
Speaker 1: also going to talk about the Supreme Court case dealing
Speaker 1: with whether the fourteenth Amendment allows someone to come to
Speaker 1: the country illegally, have a child on American soil and
Speaker 1: have that child automatically be an American citizen. In the
Speaker 1: later on, we're going to get back to the Iran War,
Speaker 1: speaking of which President Trump just posted this untruth social
Speaker 1: based on conversations with Prime Minister Shabbaz Sharif and Field
Speaker 1: Marshal Assim Manure of Pakistan and wherein they requested that
Speaker 1: I hold off the destructive force being sent to night
Speaker 1: to Iran and subject to the Islamic Republic of Iran
Speaker 1: agreeing to the complete, immediate and safe opening of the
Speaker 1: Strait of Harmouse. I agree to suspend the bombing an
Speaker 1: attack of Iran for a period of two weeks. This
Speaker 1: will be a double sided ceasefire. The reason for doing
Speaker 1: so is that we have already met and exceeded all
Speaker 1: military objectives and are very far along with a definitive
Speaker 1: agreement concerning a long term peace with Iran and peace
Speaker 1: in the Middle East. We receive a ten point proposal
Speaker 1: from Iran and believe it is a workable basis on
Speaker 1: which to negotiate. Almost all of the various points of
Speaker 1: past contention have been agreed to between the United States
Speaker 1: and Iran, but a two week period will allow the
Speaker 1: agreement to be finalized and consummated. On behalf of the
Speaker 1: United States of America. As President and also representing the
Speaker 1: countries of the Middle East, it is an honor to
Speaker 1: have this long term problem close to resolution. Thank you
Speaker 1: for your attention to this matter, President Donald J.
Speaker 14: Trump.
Speaker 1: I am struck by him saying on behalf of the
Speaker 1: USA and also representing the countries of the Middle East,
Speaker 1: which shows you how many countries in the Middle East
Speaker 1: are on our side, particularly the Gulf States. UAE has
Speaker 1: been bombed by a more than any other country, and
Speaker 1: at one point they were neutral, and UAE said would
Speaker 1: even send troops. So apparently there's at least two week
Speaker 1: period of time where the strait will be open. Let's
Speaker 1: find out if it gets back to over one hundred
Speaker 1: ships going through that strait, which will benefit Japan, benefit Europe,
Speaker 1: cause the price of oil to go down. And we'll
Speaker 1: find out. But so far, assuming he says, all the
Speaker 1: major points of past contention have been agreed to, which
Speaker 1: means Iran agrees not to acquire a nuclear weapon, which
Speaker 1: means Iran agrees not to continue its ballistic missile program,
Speaker 1: which means Iran has agreed not to continue to fund
Speaker 1: their terror proxies, the who Thies, the Hamas, and Hezbollah.
Speaker 1: If all these things have been agreed to, do you
Speaker 1: think maybe, just maybe, President Trump might get some credit
Speaker 1: for diffusing a country on the brink of acquiring a
Speaker 1: nuclear weapon. Triple eight nine seven one S eight g
Speaker 1: E triple eight nine seven one seven two four three.
Speaker 1: I am narrow elder, Do not leave town.
Speaker 20: One let's get her teed up.
Speaker 2: Do you want to lost to my resudgo Triple eight
Speaker 2: ninety seven one s A g E.
Speaker 1: Triple eight ninety seven one seven two four to three.
Speaker 1: I am Larry Elder. We are Salem News Channel. We're
Speaker 1: going to get back to the war in Iran. Later on,
Speaker 1: President says that by five pm Pacific time eight pm
Speaker 1: New York time, if Iran has not reached a deal, well,
Speaker 1: there'll be massive, massive consequences. We'll get back to that.
Speaker 1: Cindy Lauper, the great political pundit, claims that voter ID
Speaker 1: will disenfranchise millions of women. We'll talk about that. The
Speaker 1: Supreme Court is deliberating a case about citizen birthright, whether
Speaker 1: the fourteenth Amendment confers automatic citizenship to a child born
Speaker 1: on American soil even if his mother is an illegal alien.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about that this hour. The number is Triple
Speaker 1: eight nine seven one sage Triple eight nine seven one
Speaker 1: seven two four three. When Nick Shirley did his expos
Speaker 1: on fraud in Minnesota, I said, then please come to California.
Speaker 1: The media out here in California is not doing their job.
Speaker 1: The Early Time's not doing its job. The fraud in
Speaker 1: California will make the fraud in Minnesota look like couch
Speaker 1: cushion money. Well, Nick Shirley did come out here, as
Speaker 1: did doctor Oz nine.
Speaker 21: I've never been on this, but dozens of young just
Speaker 21: hyper prepared individuals.
Speaker 4: There were drones and planes and.
Speaker 21: These trucks that could drive through gates that they were
Speaker 21: able to blast through and no one got hurt. And
Speaker 21: they stunned these folks in pre dawn hours. And they
Speaker 21: were one of seven hospice owners that were shut down yesterday.
Speaker 21: To put that in perspective, in the prior four years,
Speaker 21: the governor of California had shut down four hospices. We
Speaker 21: shut down seven in one night. And I've got news
Speaker 21: for you today, Brett. Let's announce and make it clear everybody.
Speaker 21: We've shut down already, just in the last ten weeks,
Speaker 21: two hundred and twenty one hospices in California in the.
Speaker 11: State of California, two hundred and twenty in.
Speaker 21: Los Angeles, not have been the state in Los Angeles.
Speaker 21: So we're able to dramatically accelerate a process that had
Speaker 21: been meandering along in California.
Speaker 4: And we believe that.
Speaker 21: There are eighteen hundred hospices in California. That's by way,
Speaker 21: about a third of the entire nation's hospice life is
Speaker 21: just in Los Angeles. We're going to be able to
Speaker 21: shut down, we hope appropriately half of them.
Speaker 16: We saw what happened in Minnesota. Now we're seeing the
Speaker 16: tip of the iceberg in California. Every time we see
Speaker 16: a fraud bus like this, it's framed as kind of
Speaker 16: bad actors and that it's happening on such.
Speaker 11: A large scale because the system allows for it.
Speaker 16: What incentives inside Medicare and medicator are actually enabling this
Speaker 16: kind of systemic issue.
Speaker 11: It's obviously been going on for years, right.
Speaker 21: Well, part of it is that government had been fragmented
Speaker 21: in its approach. So yesterday the US Attorney Billy Aseli
Speaker 21: led the charge. He got the Office ins back to
Speaker 21: General the Department of Justice. You got to have them
Speaker 21: working together. We're bringing in Scott Best in Treasury because
Speaker 21: guess what, bank fraud is a big part of this,
Speaker 21: and we've also got a problem that's been larger, I think,
Speaker 21: and that we had told people in the federal government
Speaker 21: for the last four years under the Biden administration, don't
Speaker 21: do your job.
Speaker 4: Literally, we told people who are in.
Speaker 21: Charge of fraud that they should just sort of calm down.
Speaker 21: We don't want to have a big problem with this.
Speaker 21: This is not a legitimate issue. Just enroll people. We
Speaker 21: kept score in Medicare and Medicaid by looking at how
Speaker 21: many people were in the program as opposed to we're
Speaker 21: the right people in the program. Let's extend that now
Speaker 21: to autism. So what happened in Minnesota is they would
Speaker 21: pay moms to this honestly say their children had autism.
Speaker 4: Brett.
Speaker 21: If you have a child in a neighborhood that's autistic
Speaker 21: and need support, it's expensive and it's worth the investment.
Speaker 4: We should do it. It's the right thing.
Speaker 21: But if every child in the neighborhood is autistic, then
Speaker 21: no one really is getting those services. So you take
Speaker 21: scarce resources and funding and you now stretch it out.
Speaker 4: But here's the biggest message I can deliver tonight. This
Speaker 4: is critical.
Speaker 21: If these corrupt fraudsters are willing to steal your money,
Speaker 21: they will steal your health.
Speaker 4: They'll steal your life.
Speaker 21: I've seen it firsthand, hospice owners who are willing to
Speaker 21: throw away the benefits that these older folks should have,
Speaker 21: and they die because they don't realize they've been tricked
Speaker 21: in the signing up on hospice they never wanted. We
Speaker 21: have the same thing happened with durable medical equipment right
Speaker 21: now in the epicenter of this durable medical equipment suppliers
Speaker 21: in South Florida outnumber the number of McDonald's by twofold.
Speaker 4: There's twice as many people.
Speaker 21: Selling wheelchairs and canes and braces in South Florida then
Speaker 21: there are McDonald's.
Speaker 4: How is that possible?
Speaker 11: All right? So do you have enough people? Does this
Speaker 11: task force have enough stuff?
Speaker 16: Are you going to be able to get after this
Speaker 16: to the point where the American people.
Speaker 11: Can go, Okay, this is moving the needle, This is
Speaker 11: making a difference.
Speaker 21: Yes, because the President and the Vice President the task
Speaker 21: Force says yes. So I spent yesterday when we weren't
Speaker 21: doing the bust, talking to collaborators and talking about how
Speaker 21: we're going to be able to recruit the right people
Speaker 21: back into government because we need people. And by way, please,
Speaker 21: I came on the show in part the recruit folks.
Speaker 21: There is a generational opportunity to serve your nation. If
Speaker 21: you're interested in the space of fraud, come on, give
Speaker 21: us a call, we want to hear your tips. I
Speaker 21: found out that of the referrals we were getting in
Speaker 21: my agency from the Office of Inspector General, these are
Speaker 21: like detectives finding fraud, we were only acting on about
Speaker 21: a third. Well, if you only acting a third of
Speaker 21: what the the factors are telling you is fraud, you're
Speaker 21: throwing away a lot of good intel.
Speaker 4: But also the.
Speaker 21: Detectives stopped referring cases because they don't think you're serious.
Speaker 21: I told my team, I want one hundred percent of
Speaker 21: their referrals acted on, and.
Speaker 4: I want to hear about it.
Speaker 21: If we don't do this, and that's what everyone across
Speaker 21: the government is doing, because the Vice President has made
Speaker 21: it really clear he doesn't want the gaming anymore. He
Speaker 21: doesn't want one arm of government holding back another arm.
Speaker 21: We are all laser focused on dealing with the crisis
Speaker 21: the American public is furious about.
Speaker 16: Can AI and data processing help you with the fraud
Speaker 16: detection real time to be.
Speaker 11: Able to deal with it on the front end.
Speaker 4: You're so smart, Come work with us.
Speaker 6: You got it.
Speaker 21: What you just said is profoundly important. One of the
Speaker 21: beauties of AI is that we could use it to
Speaker 21: catch fraud.
Speaker 4: Earlier and more accurately. But we could also use it
Speaker 4: to defend.
Speaker 21: Ourselves because guests who's using AI, the fraudsters. They're corrupting
Speaker 21: the system with sophisticated tools to hide their ill gotten
Speaker 21: games from us. So by us using technology AI in particular,
Speaker 21: we're going to copy what's already happening in banking. You
Speaker 21: don't think bank managers are good at fraud. If they were,
Speaker 21: they wouldn't be bank managers. AI is being used to
Speaker 21: help them think like a fraudster.
Speaker 4: We're doing the same thing.
Speaker 21: For the first time. We've stopped billions of dollars from
Speaker 21: leaving the door of CMS. The goal for us is
Speaker 21: the money never leaves the building, and AI has helped
Speaker 21: us do that again billions of dollars already, because we
Speaker 21: can identify fraud as soon as the frousters starts corupting
Speaker 21: the system.
Speaker 16: And then the big picture in the background is insolvency
Speaker 16: of Medicare, which is now what twenty thirty two.
Speaker 21: Twenty thirty two is when we predict the Medicare Trust
Speaker 21: Fund to go bankrupt, we can double that life expectancy,
Speaker 21: medicate a program that I love and adore.
Speaker 4: The President says he loves and cherishes these programs.
Speaker 21: Let me be crystal clear, if we don't protect these
Speaker 21: programs from fraud, they will be destroyed by the corrupt system.
Speaker 21: And we don't want our most vulnerable citizens, folks who
Speaker 21: have had in trouble, as Hubert Humphrey said.
Speaker 4: And it adorns the entry way to our building.
Speaker 21: You know, we want people at the dawn of their life,
Speaker 21: at the twilight of their life, the young and the old,
Speaker 21: and those living in the shadows.
Speaker 4: To be protected.
Speaker 21: If we don't take care of these beautiful programs, the
Speaker 21: crown jewels of our social set program they will implode
Speaker 21: under the weight of the corruption that's now being pushed
Speaker 21: on them.
Speaker 1: All right.
Speaker 16: You mentioned the president his approval overall, forty three percent disapprove,
Speaker 16: fifty seven On healthcare, it's thirty eight percent, sixty one
Speaker 16: percent disapprove. A lot of Republicans looking at these numbers
Speaker 16: going the midterms right around the corner.
Speaker 1: Do you look at approval?
Speaker 16: Are you looking at how the public is perceiving some
Speaker 16: of these actions?
Speaker 4: The President saved Medicaid.
Speaker 21: The President came into office with a proposed additional expenditure
Speaker 21: of five point four trillion dollars in Medicaid alone. We
Speaker 21: were becoming a big healthcare system with a small country attached.
Speaker 21: So the President said, don't cut Medicaid. In fact, put
Speaker 21: more money into Medicaid, and we did two hundred billion
Speaker 21: dollars more over the next decade. But we're not going
Speaker 21: to pay for legalized money laundering. And what we've been
Speaker 21: able to do is create a solvent program which will
Speaker 21: keep Medicaid alive for the rest of my life, allow
Speaker 21: Medicares trust fund to last longer as we deal with
Speaker 21: the trust fund crisis and with the fraud. And by
Speaker 21: doing those brave decisions in the Working Families Test cut legislation,
Speaker 21: we added a lot of other health benefits. For example,
Speaker 21: for the first time ever, the largest investment in rural
Speaker 21: health care ever in our country, doubling the amount of
Speaker 21: money we're putting for Medicaid into these programs that help
Speaker 21: sixty million Americans who don't live in urban areas. We
Speaker 21: have done the right things, so when people hear the stories,
Speaker 21: they nod the head up and down. They just want
Speaker 21: to know that we're doing the right thing. We're tightening
Speaker 21: our belt for.
Speaker 4: The right reasons.
Speaker 16: But when you are an environment with low approval ratings,
Speaker 16: you're getting ready for an election. You've had Secretary Nome
Speaker 16: let go of her position, the Attorney General let go
Speaker 16: of her position. Are people inside the administration looking over
Speaker 16: the shoulder.
Speaker 4: I'm not Secretary Kennedy's not.
Speaker 21: And the President calls me all the time with very precise,
Speaker 21: well targeted questions. Excellent executive, is superb leader. And all
Speaker 21: I need to know is that when I make a
Speaker 21: top decision that I know we'll get some blowback on,
Speaker 21: but it's the right decision. The President says, go ahead,
Speaker 21: and you know what he she says. I don't care
Speaker 21: what they say. Do what's right for the American.
Speaker 11: People, doth Mom and Oz. We appreciate the time.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you, man, Thank you when we come back.
Speaker 1: California bleeding people. Primary reason affordability crisis and Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: is going to run for president on the issue of
Speaker 1: wait for it, affordability. Also, a former San Francisco human
Speaker 1: rights official accused of diverting four point five million dollars
Speaker 1: for personal use to bankroll a VIP lifestyle and California
Speaker 1: Democrats are in a panic over the fact that the
Speaker 1: top two finishers in its Republican primary for governor might
Speaker 1: be Republicans. I'm Larry Elder Triple eight nine seven to
Speaker 1: one Sage Triple eight nine seven one seven two three.
Speaker 1: I am Larry Elder. We are a Salem news channel.
Speaker 1: Several years ago, I was on a station where Gloria
Speaker 1: Alred also had a show, and Gloria Alred was trying
Speaker 1: to encourage Sybil Shepherd to run for president. And I
Speaker 1: said to Gloria why and she said, well, because it's
Speaker 1: very important for us to make sure that the right
Speaker 1: to abortion is protected. And I said, what is Sybil
Speaker 1: Shepherd's position compared to that of al Gore any different
Speaker 1: on this issue? And she didn't have any real response.
Speaker 1: So I said, a pro choice woman is better than
Speaker 1: a pro choice man, because a pro choice woman is
Speaker 1: a woman. Which brings us to the debate that was
Speaker 1: can So a little while ago. They were supposed to
Speaker 1: be scheduled and held at USC. It was a gubernatorial debate,
Speaker 1: and they chose the six candidates that they deem based
Speaker 1: upon their metric the most viable, all of whom happened
Speaker 1: to be white. The two leading candidates on the Publican side,
Speaker 1: Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco, and four candidates on the
Speaker 1: Democratic side, all white males, and the three quote candidates
Speaker 1: of color on the Democratic side cried foul and accused
Speaker 1: the system of suppressing the minority voice, and usc scalded
Speaker 1: by the race card, canceled the debate. Now, were there
Speaker 1: any polity differences between the candidates on the Democrat side
Speaker 1: running for governor. They all believe in race based preferences.
Speaker 1: They all believe that rich people aren't paying enough in taxes.
Speaker 1: They're all climate change people. They all want to increase
Speaker 1: the minimum wage. They want to do nothing at all
Speaker 1: about our a lousy school system. Virtually no difference whatsoever. However,
Speaker 1: they were all white, so therefore therefore the debate was canceled.
Speaker 1: A left wing white person apparently is different from a
Speaker 1: left wing Hispanic, or a left wing Asian American person,
Speaker 1: or a left wing Latino, the three candidates that were
Speaker 1: not allowed to debate. And the thing about the obsession
Speaker 1: the Democrats have with race is that poll at the
Speaker 1: poll at the poll shows that most Americans couldn't care less.
Speaker 1: There's a think tank, probably the most prominent think tank
Speaker 1: on the left, called the Brookings Institution. They used a
Speaker 1: new report called Interracial Cooperation in the United States, and
Speaker 1: guess what they found. Ninety percent of respondents called race
Speaker 1: a non factor in their business decisions. Ninety one percent.
Speaker 1: That's virtually everybody. I say that because there's the Elvis factor.
Speaker 1: I mentioned that many times over the several years. Eight
Speaker 1: percent of Americans believe Elvis is still alive. Something like
Speaker 1: four to six percent believe if you send them a letter,
Speaker 1: he will get it. So you have to kind of
Speaker 1: write off eight percent. So if you add the eight
Speaker 1: percent on the ninety one percent that they don't care,
Speaker 1: you're at ninety nine percent. Eighty three percent. According to
Speaker 1: this Brookings Institution study, said that race was a non
Speaker 1: factor in choosing their friends. Overwhelmingly Americans had friends of
Speaker 1: a different race. Overwhelmingly Americans work with people of a
Speaker 1: different race. Many of them had bosses of a different race.
Speaker 1: It is a non factor. But as far as the
Speaker 1: California left is concerned, well, if you don't have candidates
Speaker 1: of color, somehow, some way, you are not advancing the
Speaker 1: interest of the people of California. Speaking of fraud, there
Speaker 1: is a former human rights commissioner of the City of
Speaker 1: San Francisco, where you know who was mayor for eight years.
Speaker 1: She's accused of stealing four point five million dollars from
Speaker 1: a fund that diverted money from law enforcement. So one
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty million dollar program that she oversaw that
Speaker 1: took money from law enforcement, and four point five million
Speaker 1: numbers she's accused of stealing. You wonder why people are
Speaker 1: leaving California. It is estimated that since Gavin Newsom has
Speaker 1: been governor, as much as perhaps three hundred billion dollars
Speaker 1: has been stolen from taxpayers, state and local and federal
Speaker 1: tax pay through the various programs that nobody cares about.
Speaker 1: Three hundred million dollars. As I said before, the governor
Speaker 1: of Minnesota, Tim Walls, had enough self respect to drop
Speaker 1: out of his campaign for re election when the nine
Speaker 1: billion dollars in fraud in Minnesota was exposed. Gavin Newsom
Speaker 1: still trucking, still wants to be president, never mind three
Speaker 1: hundred billion dollars in fraud, never mind the highest unemployment
Speaker 1: rate in the country, never mind the highest gas prices
Speaker 1: in the country. Largely because of the obsession with climate change.
Speaker 1: Heats very much a part of this is a guy who,
Speaker 1: until he rolled it back was banning the sale of
Speaker 1: gas powered cars. By the year twenty thirty five, he
Speaker 1: banned the sale of gas powered lawnmowers gas powered leafloords
Speaker 1: because after all, gas powered lawnmars and gas power leaf
Speaker 1: boards out of California is going to have a major
Speaker 1: impact on the climate. This is a guy, Gavin Newsom,
Speaker 1: who signed legislation forcing companies headquartered in California, publicly held
Speaker 1: companies headquartered in California to have at least one person
Speaker 1: from the quote disadvantage community close quote on his board
Speaker 1: of directors. A minority, Indigenous person, Native American LGBTQ. You
Speaker 1: know somebody who's been disadvantaged on the board. It's being
Speaker 1: challenged in court, will very likely be overturned as a
Speaker 1: violation of the fourteenth Amendment. That didn't stop him. He
Speaker 1: signed a bill setting up a panel for reparations for
Speaker 1: quote black descendants of slavery in California, even though California
Speaker 1: was not a slave state. We have the highest home
Speaker 1: prices in the nation, twice as high as the national average,
Speaker 1: largely because of the environmental policies that he had promoted
Speaker 1: for his entire career. We have the largest highest electricity
Speaker 1: prices in the lower forty eight same thing. There's a
Speaker 1: article the Daily Signal headlined while califor while leaving California
Speaker 1: is paying off for middle class families and talks about
Speaker 1: the loss of population LA County the largest loss of
Speaker 1: population of any county in the country. LA County population
Speaker 1: is dipped below ten million for the first time since
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, and the number one reason is cost of living,
Speaker 1: followed by crime, followed by followed by poor governance in
Speaker 1: general disorder, including highest homeless population. People are sick of
Speaker 1: the state highest gas prices higher than Hawaii that has
Speaker 1: to ship in its gas. Yes, and at one time
Speaker 1: California was headquartered to all ten of the largest oil
Speaker 1: and gas companies in America. It is now headquartered to
Speaker 1: none of them because they've regulated them out of the state.
Speaker 1: And it turns out, according to a UC Berkeley study,
Speaker 1: when people leave California, they're far more likely to be
Speaker 1: able to purchase a home, substantial decreases in rent about
Speaker 1: thirty to thirty five percent lower in their new neighborhood.
Speaker 1: And they're not leaving California for the weather, best weather
Speaker 1: probably in the country in the world close to it
Speaker 1: in the world. They're leaving because they cannot afford to
Speaker 1: live here because of the dominance of Democrats supermajorities in
Speaker 1: the Senate and the Assembly. Republican has not been elected
Speaker 1: statewide in twenty years. I'm Larry, Yolded Triple Eate ninet
Speaker 1: seven one Sage Triple eight ninety seven one seven two
Speaker 1: four to three. I am Larry that we are sale
Speaker 1: on News Channel. We'll be talking about the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: deliberating the case of whether or not the Fourteenth Amendment
Speaker 1: conference birthrights citizenship to a child born on American soil
Speaker 1: of an parent who is here illegally. But first, that
Speaker 1: great pundit, Cindy Lauper said this about the Save Act
Speaker 1: number sixteen.
Speaker 8: It's me, Cindy, don't be fooled.
Speaker 22: This Safe Act is not about protecting against voter fraud.
Speaker 8: It's about voter suppression. Congress is trying.
Speaker 22: To pass the Save Act to make it harder to vote,
Speaker 22: especially for millions of women. First they come after our
Speaker 22: right to control our bodies, and now they're.
Speaker 8: Coming after our right to vote. So we must stop them.
Speaker 8: We are half the population.
Speaker 22: You need to stand up now, join me and telling
Speaker 22: your senators to stand up against the Safe Act at
Speaker 22: LWV DOT or say that.
Speaker 1: Don't you love the way she pronounces the word fraud,
Speaker 1: voter fraud. We went in over fifty percent of population.
Speaker 19: This.
Speaker 1: Don't be fool the say that is all about not
Speaker 1: about voter fraud. Open up the door. Do we have
Speaker 1: to do this again? Apparently we do. I was having
Speaker 1: this discussion with John a Lot a few days ago.
Speaker 1: Those of you who were here remember this, so bear
Speaker 1: with me for those of you who weren't. Extremely eye opening.
Speaker 1: Do you know that every single country in Africa requires
Speaker 1: some form of government issued ID to vote? And get this,
Speaker 1: fifty one of fifty four African nations demand that would
Speaker 1: be voters submit proof of citizenship to register. Let me
Speaker 1: repeat this, Every country in Africa requires some form of
Speaker 1: government issued ID. Another fifty four countries in Africa fifty
Speaker 1: one require proof of citizenship to register. Sounds like the
Speaker 1: Save Act to me. But American women, as opposed to
Speaker 1: people in Africa, are clearly too stupid to figure out
Speaker 1: how to register to vote and how to produce voter ID.
Speaker 1: According to Sydney Lauper, and she didn't song about girls
Speaker 1: just want to have fun I guess they just want
Speaker 1: to have fun. They don't want to spend time trying
Speaker 1: to figure out how to register to vote, how to
Speaker 1: get voter ID. Mexico all twelve Southern American countries mandate
Speaker 1: government issued photo IDs to vote and to verify the
Speaker 1: citizenship of each registered voter. I repeat, Mexico and all
Speaker 1: twelve Southern American countries requires government issued photo ID to
Speaker 1: vote and to verify the citizenship of each registered voter,
Speaker 1: which sounds a lot like the Save Act All forty
Speaker 1: seven European countries. Are you noticing a pattern here? Required
Speaker 1: government issued photo ID at the polls, and virtually every
Speaker 1: single one of them checks voters citizenship against a national database.
Speaker 1: Now why did this happen? Well, as for Mexico nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety one huge problem with voter fraud. They do They
Speaker 1: required biometric photo voter IDs, They banned aptentee ballots, mandated
Speaker 1: in person registration in addition to proof of citizenship. And
Speaker 1: guess what happened. Same thing happened when Georgia tightened up
Speaker 1: its rules. Remember what Joe Biden called it? Worse than
Speaker 1: Jim Eagle. It was worse than Jim Crow. It was
Speaker 1: Jim Eagle, the percentage of Blacks who voted increased, percentage
Speaker 1: of eligible voters who were black increased, didn't decrease. It
Speaker 1: increased easier to vote, harder to cheat. So when Mexico
Speaker 1: did all those things prior to that, fifty nine percent
Speaker 1: of eligible voters voted, and because presumably people felt more
Speaker 1: confident about the integrity of their voting process, it went
Speaker 1: up to sixty eight percent of eligible voters. Just the
Speaker 1: opposite of what people like Cindi Lauperer predict would happen
Speaker 1: if the Save Act were to pass. Pretty insulting for
Speaker 1: somebody who's supposed to be this big pro woman person.
Speaker 1: You know, girls just want to have fun. Triple eight
Speaker 1: nine one s A G. When we come back, let's
Speaker 1: talk about the Supreme Court considering birthright citizenship. I'm Larry Elder.
Speaker 1: Do not leave town.
Speaker 8: Sindy. Don't be fooled.
Speaker 22: The Safe Act is not about protecting against voter fraud.
Speaker 8: It's about voter suppression. Congress is trying.
Speaker 22: To pass the Save Act to make it harder to vote,
Speaker 22: especially for million of women.
Speaker 8: First they come after our right to control our bodies,
Speaker 8: and now they come in after our right to vote,
Speaker 8: so we must stop them. We are half the population.
Speaker 8: You need to stand up.
Speaker 22: Now join me and telling your senators to stand up
Speaker 22: against the Safe.
Speaker 8: Act at LWV dot org say that.
Speaker 1: Dot org Triple eight nine seven one Sage Triple eight
Speaker 1: ninety seven one seven two VO three. I am Larry Elder.
Speaker 1: We are Salem News Channel. Does anybody anybody think that, maybe,
Speaker 1: just maybe we might have an issue with voter integrity?
Speaker 1: If you don't think we do, don't you think it
Speaker 1: would be better for people to feel that there isn't
Speaker 1: a problem. Supreme Court ruled years ago six three that
Speaker 1: an Indiana law that required photo voter ID advanced the
Speaker 1: integrity of the voting process. Person that wrote the majority
Speaker 1: of decision with was Justice John Paul Stevens, arguably the
Speaker 1: most left wing guy there. But now all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: it's racist. It's voter suppression, even though we're virtually the
Speaker 1: only industrialized country in some countries that are not industrialized
Speaker 1: on the face of the earth that does not require
Speaker 1: photo voter ID or proof of citizenship to register to vote.
Speaker 1: Mexico does, House America does, Europe does. We don't because
Speaker 1: we're so honest so upright, there is zero chance that
Speaker 1: fraud is taking place here in America.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 1: How often do the people on the left say we
Speaker 1: ought to be emulating European nations when it comes to
Speaker 1: their welfare state, when it comes to universal healthcare, when
Speaker 1: it comes to how they handle the voting integrity. All
Speaker 1: of a sudden, who cares what the Europeans to think?
Speaker 1: Right now, let's talk a little bit about birthright citizenship.
Speaker 1: Here again is Harry Reid back in nineteen ninety three,
Speaker 1: number twenty nine.
Speaker 19: If making it easy to be an the illegal alien
Speaker 19: isn't enough, how about offering a reward for being an
Speaker 19: illegal immigrant? No sane country would do that, right. Guess again,
Speaker 19: if you break our laws by entering this country without
Speaker 19: permission and give birth to a child, we reward that
Speaker 19: child with US citizenship and guarantee of full access to
Speaker 19: all public and social services this society provides. And that's
Speaker 19: a lot of services. Is it any wonder that two
Speaker 19: thirds of the babies born at taxpay expensive country county
Speaker 19: run hospitals and Los Angeles are born to illegal alien mothers.
Speaker 1: Yesterday we talked about how all these companies are set
Speaker 1: up in China to send pregnant mothers over here so
Speaker 1: they become they have children who become imre acansitizen and
Speaker 1: over the course of time that could be about a
Speaker 1: million people eligible to vote.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 1: This is six years ago CBS from New York talking
Speaker 1: about women in Turkey doing the same thing. Number twenty eight.
Speaker 15: Crackdown on an alleged anchor baby ring on Long Island.
Speaker 15: Prosecutors say more than one hundred pregnant women from Turkey
Speaker 15: came here to give birth so their children were instantly
Speaker 15: granted US citizenship.
Speaker 23: The investigators say the women then used benefits like Medicaid.
Speaker 23: CBS two's calend Gossof reports from Suffolk County.
Speaker 24: An alert Smithtown Town employee noticed a strange pattern of
Speaker 24: birth certificates, five babies from one house at one time.
Speaker 24: An investigation led to an international fraud scheme, an alleged
Speaker 24: birth tourism ring operating on Long Island.
Speaker 4: For three years.
Speaker 25: The defendants fraudulently facilitated the births in the United States
Speaker 25: of approximately one hundred and nineteen a Turkish chillildren, and
Speaker 25: those children now hold birthright US citizenship.
Speaker 24: It's the fourteenth Amendment that grants citizenship to any child
Speaker 24: born in the US. Officials say. In this case, ringleaders
Speaker 24: brazenly advertised in Turkey translation, if you believe your baby
Speaker 24: should be born in the USA and become an American citizen,
Speaker 24: you're in the right place. What's illegal alleged lies to
Speaker 24: obtain travel visas, Fraudulent Medicaid claims for babies and moms
Speaker 24: who stated seven birthhouses across Suffolk County women paid up
Speaker 24: to ten thousand dollars each for accommodations and free health
Speaker 24: care paid by US taxpayers.
Speaker 4: They're doing it on the backs of the taxpayers.
Speaker 1: They're milking the Medicaid system.
Speaker 24: Six people arrested charged with money laundering and two million
Speaker 24: dollars in Medicaid fraud. Birth tourism has gotten the president's attention,
Speaker 24: who recently closed some loopholes.
Speaker 23: It is estimated that over thirty thousand childbirths occurred in
Speaker 23: the United States last year alone in connection with this practice.
Speaker 24: Prosecutors say the arrests are not about stopping immigration, but.
Speaker 4: Those who game the system.
Speaker 25: Desire to have your child born in the United States
Speaker 25: is understandable, but the methods and means employed by these
Speaker 25: criminals were both unlawful, completely unacceptable.
Speaker 24: Medical care in the homes is questionable. Prosecutors say the
Speaker 24: defendants are selfish individuals who see dollar signs instead of children.
Speaker 24: In hotpog Long Island. Carolyn Gusoff's CBS two News.
Speaker 23: The defendants edited not guilty. Police today the mothers who
Speaker 23: participated were not charged. Investigators say many of them have
Speaker 23: returned to Turkey with their babies, who will remain US citizens.
Speaker 1: Wow, that was thirty thousand a year, it said, and
Speaker 1: that was six years ago, so I'm sure it's more now.
Speaker 1: By the way, we are brought to you from Relief
Speaker 1: Factor Studios. Don't forget your relief Factor eight hundred four
Speaker 1: Relief eight hundred to number four relief Reliefactor dot com.
Speaker 1: That's Relief Factor dot com. Now listen to this prigger
Speaker 1: you video on birthright citizenship number fourteen.
Speaker 18: The Constitution grant citizenship to anyone born in the United States,
Speaker 18: even the children of people who've entered the country illegally
Speaker 18: or the children of foreign tourists who owe our country
Speaker 18: no allegiance. That's the question underlying the controversial issue of
Speaker 18: birthright citizenship. Many people today take it for granted that
Speaker 18: the answer is yes if you're born on American soil,
Speaker 18: You're an American citizen, period, end of issue. But is
Speaker 18: that what the Constitution says. Let's first look at the
Speaker 18: text of that document, specifically the fourteenth Amendment. It reads,
Speaker 18: all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
Speaker 18: subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.
Speaker 18: Case closed, right, Not so fast. The key phrase here
Speaker 18: is subject to the jurisdiction thereof. It creates a second
Speaker 18: condition for birthright citizenship, beyond merely being born on American soil.
Speaker 18: But it also raises another question, who is born subject
Speaker 18: to US ruas urisdiction. To answer that question, we need
Speaker 18: some historical context. The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in eighteen
Speaker 18: sixty eight, just three years after the end of the
Speaker 18: Civil War. Its purpose was to rectify the infamous eighteen
Speaker 18: fifty seven Supreme Court decision dread Scott v. Sandford.
Speaker 1: We will get back to this ess in just a
Speaker 1: second now. For two hundred and fifty years, Americans have
Speaker 1: believed in one powerful idea that we were meant to
Speaker 1: live free, free to work hard, free to move, free
Speaker 1: to enjoy life without being held back. But if every
Speaker 1: day aches and pains are thlowing you down. It might
Speaker 1: be time to declare your independence from pain. I've told
Speaker 1: you about my brother Kirk. I had difficulty going up
Speaker 1: and down the stairs in the morning until he started
Speaker 1: taking relief Factor. Relief Factor is a one hundred percent
Speaker 1: drug free, research based formula designed to help your body
Speaker 1: fight inflammation, one of the root causes of pain. It's
Speaker 1: not a quick fix or a temporary mask. It worked
Speaker 1: from the inside out at the source. Relief Fact was
Speaker 1: created so people could get back to living their life
Speaker 1: on their turs, walking, working, exercising, and enjoying the moments
Speaker 1: that matter. This year, as we celebrate two hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty years of American independence, take a stand for your
Speaker 1: own freedom. Declare your independence from pain. Try relief Factor
Speaker 1: today for just nineteen dollars and ninety five cents relief
Speaker 1: Factor dot com, Reliefactor dot com, or call eight hundred
Speaker 1: four relief eight hundred the number four Relief Triple late
Speaker 1: nine seven one Sage triple eight nine seven one seven
Speaker 1: two four three. Im Lario that we are seven in
Speaker 1: the chapter. We're gonna get back to the Iran war
Speaker 1: next hour. But let's get back to the peger Yu
Speaker 1: video about birthright citizenship.
Speaker 18: This was to rectify the infamous eighteen fifty seven Supreme
Speaker 18: Court decision dread Scott v. Sandford, in which the Court
Speaker 18: declared that Black Americans were not and could never be citizens.
Speaker 18: Even after slavery was abolished in eighteen sixty five, dread
Speaker 18: Scott technically remained the law of the land. Black Americans
Speaker 18: were left in limbo. They were no longer slaves, but
Speaker 18: they still were not citizens. The Fourteenth Amendment resolved the
Speaker 18: issue once and for all. These newly freed slaves and
Speaker 18: their descendants were certainly born subject to the jurisdiction of
Speaker 18: the United States. This had been their home for generations.
Speaker 18: If they were not American citizens, to which other nation
Speaker 18: did they still belong? So while the Fourteenth Amendment resolved
Speaker 18: the issue as it related to race, its authors would
Speaker 18: have been shocked to learn that we now interpret these
Speaker 18: words to make citizens of virtually anyone born on US
Speaker 18: soil under all circumstances. As Yale law professor William C.
Speaker 18: Robinson explained in his eighteen seventy five Legal Treatise, the
Speaker 18: Fourteenth Amendment grants citizenship only to those born within the
Speaker 18: jurisdiction and allegiance of the United States, a condition that
Speaker 18: requires at minimum lawful p permanent residence in this country.
Speaker 18: This was also the original understanding of the federal government.
Speaker 18: In eighteen eighty five, for example, the State Department rejected
Speaker 18: the citizenship claim of a man named Richard Greiser. Yes,
Speaker 18: Greiser had been born in Ohio eighteen years earlier, but
Speaker 18: his German parents never intended to stay in the United
Speaker 18: States and returned with their son to Germany shortly after
Speaker 18: his birth. Because Greiser's parents did not owe the United
Speaker 18: States political allegiance, their son wasn't born subject to its jurisdiction,
Speaker 18: at least not within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendments
Speaker 18: citizenship clause. Similarly, in eighteen ninety, the Justice Department considered
Speaker 18: the citizenship claim of a child born to one married Devereaux,
Speaker 18: a pregnant irishwoman being held on a ship in New
Speaker 18: York Harbor while awaiting immigration approval. Devereaux left the ship
Speaker 18: for medical treatment and subsequently gave birth in a New
Speaker 18: York hospital. Authorities later denied her immigration application because Devereaux
Speaker 18: wasn't eligible for lawful admission to the US. Her US
Speaker 18: born daughter was not recognized as a US citizen. Both
Speaker 18: mother and child were sent back to Ireland. The Supreme
Speaker 18: Court addressed the question of birthright citizenship in the eighteen
Speaker 18: ninety eight case of United States be Wang Kim Mark.
Speaker 18: Wang was born and raised in San Francisco, the son
Speaker 18: of Chinese immigrants. In eighteen ninety five, after a short
Speaker 18: trip to China, Wang returned to the US, only to
Speaker 18: be detained by authorities and threatened with deportation. Wang sued,
Speaker 18: arguing that he was an American citizen by birth. The
Speaker 18: Supreme Court agreed. While this decision is often cited as
Speaker 18: proof that the Fourteenth Amendment mandates universal birthright citizens the.
Speaker 1: Bottom line is the reason Supreme Court agreed is because
Speaker 1: his parents were in the country lawfully. They weren't citizens,
Speaker 1: but they were in the country lawfully. That is not
Speaker 1: the case with the tens of thousands of people who
Speaker 1: come here every year and have children on American soil,
Speaker 1: automatic American citizens.
Speaker 20: I'm Larry Elder, so let's get her teed up your toys.
Speaker 1: That go triple eight nine seven one s age triple
Speaker 1: eight nine seven one seven two four to three. I
Speaker 1: am Larry yolda. We are a sailing news channel. According
Speaker 1: to Reuters, these Raeli military says Iran has launched new missiles.
Speaker 1: This is about an hour after Trump announced the ceasefire.
Speaker 1: Israeli military says it's identified a launch of missiles from
Speaker 1: Ran toward Israel, and Israel said he's working to intercept them.
Speaker 1: Rand says it will halt attacks it strikes against its stop. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: crude oil prices declined almost ten percent after the ceasefire
Speaker 1: was announced. Royders also says talks will begin April tenth.
Speaker 1: Iran says the talks do not necessarily mean that there
Speaker 1: will be a cessation of attacks. Iran has revealed a
Speaker 1: ten point proposal which includes lifting all primary and secondary sanctions,
Speaker 1: payment of full compensation to Iran in the release of
Speaker 1: frozen Iranian assets. Earlier, Israel City agreed to the two
Speaker 1: week cease fire, a cease fire that Iran apparently has
Speaker 1: already broken. Now Here is what Trump tweeted on Truth's
Speaker 1: social based on conversations with Prime Minister Shabbaz Sharif and
Speaker 1: Field Marshal Assim Munir of Pakistan and wherein they requested
Speaker 1: that I hold off the destructive force being sent tonight
Speaker 1: to Iran and subject to the Islamic Republic of Iran
Speaker 1: agreeing to the complete, immediate and safe opening of the
Speaker 1: Strait of Hormuz. I agree to suspend the bombing and
Speaker 1: attack of Iran for a period of two weeks. This
Speaker 1: will be double side ceasefire. The reason for doing so
Speaker 1: is that we have already met and exceeded all military
Speaker 1: objectives and are very far along with a definitive agreement
Speaker 1: concerning long term peace with Iran and peace in the
Speaker 1: Middle East. We've received a ten point proposal from Iran
Speaker 1: and believe it is a workable basis on which to negotiate.
Speaker 1: Almost all of the various points of past contention have
Speaker 1: been agreed to between the United States and Iran, but
Speaker 1: a two week period will allow the agreement to be
Speaker 1: finalized and consummated. On behalf of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: As President and also representing the countries of the Middle East,
Speaker 1: it is an honor to have this long term problem
Speaker 1: close to resolution. Thank you for your attention to this matter,
Speaker 1: President Donald J. Trump. Again, supposedly negotiatings are going to
Speaker 1: begin on April tenth. Now, this business about using civilians
Speaker 1: and placing them in front of the proposed or expected
Speaker 1: military sites is a common tactic used by Iran and
Speaker 1: by its proxies. This is why these people cannot be
Speaker 1: allowed to have a nuclear weapon. As I said earlier,
Speaker 1: they are recruiting boys as young as twelve to fight
Speaker 1: in the war against Iran and against Israel. And in
Speaker 1: the war between Iraq and Iran, Iran used boys to
Speaker 1: walk on mine fields to prepare troops and tanks by
Speaker 1: exploding IEDs and minds ahead of the troops and tanks.
Speaker 1: It is estimated that tens of thousands of Iraqi children
Speaker 1: died over and several hundreds of thousands of troops of
Speaker 1: children were mobilized in order to undertake this. As I
Speaker 1: said earlier, there's a term for this. The term is
Speaker 1: war crime. Putting civilians in front of proposed military sites.
Speaker 1: It's the term for that. It is war crimes. And
Speaker 1: recruiting children as young as twelve years old to fight
Speaker 1: in wars war crime. And this is what Coleman Hughes
Speaker 1: was attempting to explain to Joe Rogan, who's accusing Israel
Speaker 1: of engaging in genocide in its war against Amas. Number
Speaker 1: thirty six.
Speaker 26: Civilians and you're continuing to bomb an area into oblivion,
Speaker 26: which is what it looks like when you're looking at Gaza.
Speaker 26: There's many people that have made the argument that that
Speaker 26: is at least the steps of genocide or a form
Speaker 26: of genocide. You're destroying thousands and thousands of people's homes
Speaker 26: and killing them.
Speaker 9: So when you say thirty thousand civilians, it's not thirty
Speaker 9: seven and civilians that have been.
Speaker 26: Killed though, how many thousands have been killed?
Speaker 9: So according to Gaza Health Ministry, which is it is
Speaker 9: run by Hamas, the number they have is thirty two thousand,
Speaker 9: but they don't distinguish between Hamas and civilians. How many
Speaker 9: members of Hamas are there, forty thousand something like that.
Speaker 9: I don't think the number is known, but it's tens
Speaker 9: of thousands. So Hamas says thirty two thousand people have
Speaker 9: been killed, civilians and soldiers. Israel says thirteen thousand soldiers
Speaker 9: have been killed by Israel. So if you just being
Speaker 9: let's not doubt either number. They could both be elated.
Speaker 9: But if both of those numbers are accurate, which they
Speaker 9: may or may not be, that would be thirteen thousand
Speaker 9: soldiers killed, nineteen thousand civilians killed which for urban combat
Speaker 9: in the Middle East is of very normal ratio.
Speaker 26: I could see what you're saying if you wanted to
Speaker 26: look at it cold and objectively.
Speaker 4: Yeah, well I don't.
Speaker 9: Still I hope it doesn't come across cold.
Speaker 26: But it's mostly women and children that are dying, that
Speaker 26: are that are dying because they're in a place where
Speaker 26: these terrorists are, right, I mean, this is it's.
Speaker 9: Not because the terrorists on purpose embed themselves with the
Speaker 9: civilian population, which is a war crime.
Speaker 26: Which is a strategy that they have clearly employed when
Speaker 26: you see them and when when the IDEF went into
Speaker 26: that hospital and found the just recently. Yes, yeah, so
Speaker 26: it's real. It's not just a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 9: We know that that's real because and I know Kurt
Speaker 9: would probably say, I'm doing the tragedy of war thing,
Speaker 9: but it's actually a legitimate point. In every single war,
Speaker 9: even the just ones, there are war crimes by brazerk soldiers,
Speaker 9: by the good guys. That doesn't mean it's genocide, and
Speaker 9: that doesn't mean it's not a just war. And I
Speaker 9: think that the fundamental difference between Israel and Hamas is
Speaker 9: Israeli society, however imperfectly is not going to celebrate the
Speaker 9: monsters on their own side when they're really found to
Speaker 9: be monsters. They're not gonna they're not going to hand
Speaker 9: out candies to people who kill Palestinian civilians like Hamastas.
Speaker 1: In reverse.
Speaker 9: And so my feeling about it is still that, you know,
Speaker 9: any nation that suffered what Israel did on October seventh,
Speaker 9: everyone in the country would be saying, you have to
Speaker 9: go get these guys. You have to eliminate this organization
Speaker 9: that did this. And I there and they're eighty percent
Speaker 9: finished with that job. It would make no sense at
Speaker 9: this point to stop before you've cut out the last
Speaker 9: twenty percent of the cancer or before you've put out
Speaker 9: the last twenty percent of the fire, right even with
Speaker 9: all of the absolute suffering that is real on the Palestinian.
Speaker 1: Side, you know.
Speaker 9: So that's how I feel about it, and I think
Speaker 9: it's really it's very very distinct from genocide, because genocide
Speaker 9: is when you're trying to maximize civilian casualties. I think Israel, however,
Speaker 9: imperfectly is doing the opposite. They're trying to minimize civilian casualties.
Speaker 26: That's interesting.
Speaker 9: Hamas is the one that turns these civilian locations into
Speaker 9: military operation sites, which is a war crime.
Speaker 1: It's imp like.
Speaker 9: This is the way I would put it succinctly. If
Speaker 9: you ask the question what is unique about this war?
Speaker 9: What is different about this war than all of other wars?
Speaker 9: It's not the civilian death toll. The ratio of combatants
Speaker 9: to civilians is. I think it's better than the American
Speaker 9: armies was when we got Isis out of Mosul, that
Speaker 9: was like ten thousand civilians dead to kill four thousand Isis.
Speaker 9: This is nineteen thousand civilians dead to kill thirteen thousand.
Speaker 9: What's unique about this war unlike every other war that
Speaker 9: I could think of, is you have an army in
Speaker 9: Hamas that has perfected the art of embedding itself and
Speaker 9: meshing itself with civilians so that you cannot hit them
Speaker 9: without hitting the people around them. Other armies have done this,
Speaker 9: but none have perfected it to the extent that Hamas has.
Speaker 9: No army that I know of in military history has
Speaker 9: had fifteen years to build three hundred miles of tunnel
Speaker 9: underneath a city that they don't use to shelter the civilians,
Speaker 9: but they used to shelter themselves so that they can
Speaker 9: operate right under a kindergarten, right under a mosque. So
Speaker 9: this is a challenge no army has faced. And so
Speaker 9: that's what makes this war different. And yes, the I
Speaker 9: agree with all of the absolute tragedy and suffering of
Speaker 9: the Palestinian people, but it's what creates that is the
Speaker 9: way Hamas fights. Can we live in a world where
Speaker 9: we allow that to be an acceptable strategy? I don't
Speaker 9: think so.
Speaker 1: And it's very ugly to watch.
Speaker 9: It's heartbreaking, and I completely understand why people don't think
Speaker 9: the way I think when they see the videos. I
Speaker 9: completely get it, but I don't think we can actually
Speaker 9: live in a world where that's allowed to be a strategy.
Speaker 26: I appreciate your perspective. Yeah, I see what you're saying. Yeah,
Speaker 26: you clearly know more about it than I do.
Speaker 1: And what is the country for which Hamas is a proxy?
Speaker 1: The answer is Iran. Without a RAM support, October seventh
Speaker 1: could not have happened. This is the enemy that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has faced down when previous presidents have kicked the
Speaker 1: can down the road, and that our allies don't see
Speaker 1: that this is in their best interests as well, and
Speaker 1: don't join the fight. It's beyond me. Triple eight nine
Speaker 1: seven one S A G E. I'm Larry Older triple
Speaker 1: eight nine seven one s A G E. Triple eight
Speaker 1: nine seven one seven two fourty three. I am Larry Elder.
Speaker 1: We are Salem News Channel. Antoinette in Sunset Beach. Antoinette.
Speaker 1: Always nice to hear from you.
Speaker 5: How are you?
Speaker 12: I'm doing much better?
Speaker 19: Thank you?
Speaker 12: How is How are you doing? My brother? Or you're
Speaker 12: getting Aaron was thrown at you every which way.
Speaker 1: And that kuy Mark.
Speaker 12: You know, this is why I was calling Mark to me.
Speaker 12: He loses his man card, his US citizen card. What
Speaker 12: else card could we have taken away from that person?
Speaker 12: I don't understand, Larry. Why do they not understand what
Speaker 12: we're dealing with? They have no common sense?
Speaker 1: To the other side would just say, unfortunately. I think
Speaker 1: you're right. Part of it is Trump derangement syndrome. As
Speaker 1: I was explaining, Trump is now called a war criminal
Speaker 1: all these kinds of things, the same as George W.
Speaker 1: Bush was, and I think part of his hatred of Republicans.
Speaker 1: As I said earlier, George W. Bush goes to the
Speaker 1: House and the Senate gets a resolution, go to United Nations,
Speaker 1: gets a resolution, gets forty eight forty nine states to
Speaker 1: join with US. At one point that the war was
Speaker 1: supported overwhelming by the American people, it became unpopular all
Speaker 1: of a sudden. He was a war criminal and a fascist.
Speaker 1: So that's how they roll.
Speaker 12: And larry. So now that this one missile has been launched,
Speaker 12: I mean, you would think, now Mark gets it. Why
Speaker 12: we don't trust those people? And I'm sorry, I love
Speaker 12: I'm a woman and I am a minority just like yourself,
Speaker 12: but we're both born in la But I have to
Speaker 12: say I admire my president. There's a moment in time
Speaker 12: when you've got to be tough, and that is what
Speaker 12: he is. And he's decisive and he loves America. That
Speaker 12: guy Mark does not love America. He doesn't get it.
Speaker 12: And yes, there are times when you don't or you're
Speaker 12: able to be classy, but at this moment in time,
Speaker 12: he is the man, President Trump, and he has to
Speaker 12: say what he said because he's over it. He is
Speaker 12: here to protect us, that's his main duty. And is
Speaker 12: he doing his job? Tell yes, he's doing his job.
Speaker 12: And I am out of him.
Speaker 1: And Antoinette, Barack Obama was polite an air you died
Speaker 1: and spoken beautifully crafted sentences and did the Iran deal
Speaker 1: and they cheated. Everybody knows they cheated.
Speaker 12: Not only did they cheat, they continue to cheat. And
Speaker 12: what I'm shocked is the whole up here in California.
Speaker 12: Would you quit voting Democrats? My god, you would think
Speaker 12: they've grown up by now.
Speaker 1: Well, damn well, Antoinette. That is why when people ask
Speaker 1: me do I support term limits? I say yes. For voters, Antonette,
Speaker 1: we got to run. Thank you very much for the call.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. James is in Culver City. James, you're
Speaker 1: in the Larry of the show. Thank you so much
Speaker 1: for calling.
Speaker 5: Hello, Larry.
Speaker 26: I'm just wondering why we're going to give two more
Speaker 26: weeks of the Ranian guys to play their games and
Speaker 26: you know, more human shields and they're just wasting time.
Speaker 14: And how high is gas going to be in California.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I can't argue. I can't argue. I can't
Speaker 1: argue against it. Yeah, I can't argue against that, James.
Speaker 1: They gives them time to presumably make more drones. But
Speaker 1: I also think it gives the world a little bit
Speaker 1: of pause. Maybe, just maybe we can get our allies
Speaker 1: to join us. Now that Trump has agreed to hold
Speaker 1: off for a couple of weeks, I'm sure talks are
Speaker 1: going on between US and NATO about getting the UK
Speaker 1: and maybe Germany and some other people to help secure
Speaker 1: the Strait of Hormouse. So it seems to me Trump
Speaker 1: must have a reason for doing it.
Speaker 14: Yeah, well he can crush Gavin Newsom. I guess the
Speaker 14: gap prizes.
Speaker 5: People are finally realizing it's all his fault, so maybe
Speaker 5: he can kill two birds with one stone.
Speaker 1: But thankfu, Yeah, thanks for the call. Appreciate it. Dan
Speaker 1: is in Inver, Inver, invergrown in Invergrove Heights. Dan, you're
Speaker 1: in the Larry of the show.
Speaker 5: Yeah, Hi, Larrie, thank you so much for covering the war.
Speaker 5: You know, if people go, well, I don't know how
Speaker 5: credible do you feel Times of Israel dot com is
Speaker 5: for information?
Speaker 1: I think it's reasonably credible.
Speaker 5: So if you go to Times of Israel dot com
Speaker 5: and just periodically refresh the site every few minutes, you
Speaker 5: get up to date reporting, and it seems like this
Speaker 5: what do you call it, ceasefire is very tenuous because
Speaker 5: it's they're saying that there were cluster bomb warheads on
Speaker 5: missiles multiple missile attacks already after the ceasefire was announced, right.
Speaker 1: About about an hour hour after and Routers, for what
Speaker 1: it's worth, Dana is saying the same thing. Here's here's
Speaker 1: what I think. I'm not sure one side one hand
Speaker 1: note what the other is doing. It is unclear who's
Speaker 1: calling the shots. It might be that people negotiating with
Speaker 1: Pakistan are different from the people who are launching the
Speaker 1: missile attacks. We just don't know, right right, I hear you, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for.
Speaker 4: The call the.
Speaker 1: Rescue of the down pilots. This is what the CNN
Speaker 1: counter terrorism experts said before the successful rescue number eighteen.
Speaker 27: I mean, this will go down as probably one of
Speaker 27: the most historic rescue operations in US special operations history.
Speaker 27: Forty six years after Operation Eagle Cloth failed in the
Speaker 27: deserts of Iran trying to rescue the hostages, largely because
Speaker 27: there was no interoperability among Special operations forces, poor equipment,
Speaker 27: poor training, and at that point in poortner agency coordination.
Speaker 27: The command was built to solve those problems, and now
Speaker 27: give another opportunity for forty six years later, we see
Speaker 27: the success.
Speaker 1: Now, this is what Victor Davis Hanson, they're brilliant, Victor
Speaker 1: David Hanson said about the Allies not joining into the
Speaker 1: war because they say it is quote not their war
Speaker 1: number twenty one.
Speaker 17: The other countries that didn't let us, like the UK
Speaker 17: in Italy as well as those three, they were saying, well,
Speaker 17: this wasn't our war, but they don't realize that we
Speaker 17: got involved on a lot of their Union lateral events.
Speaker 11: Falklands was not our war.
Speaker 17: We helped the British. They would not have been able
Speaker 17: to retake the Falcons without US logistical and resupply. Chad
Speaker 17: wasn't our war. The Friends wanted to go in there
Speaker 17: to their postcolonial interest and get out the Islamisa. That
Speaker 17: wasn't our war. Serbia and Koso Kosovo was not a
Speaker 17: NATO member, was attacked by Serbia. They told us it
Speaker 17: was on the doorstep of Europe. You had to come
Speaker 17: in and lead the coalition of NATO power.
Speaker 1: We did.
Speaker 17: Then they told us that we have to bomb Kadaffi
Speaker 17: and restore the momentum of the Arab spring.
Speaker 11: That wasn't our war.
Speaker 1: John Bolton was President Trump's national security advisor. Trump fired him,
Speaker 1: and Bolton just excoriated Trump for the last several months,
Speaker 1: but he supports the war in Iran. Number twenty five.
Speaker 7: Well, first off, the regime has not changed. It's still
Speaker 7: the same regime for the reasons you stayed. It's the
Speaker 7: ideology that controls. Second, it took the iatola Is in
Speaker 7: the Revolutionary Guard forty seven years to build this state.
Speaker 7: We're six weeks in. People are in a hurry. It's
Speaker 7: like a bunch of kids in the backseat of a
Speaker 7: car saying, are we there yet?
Speaker 4: Are we there yet?
Speaker 25: No, We're not there yet.
Speaker 7: The people in Iran need to be able to have
Speaker 7: flexibility to help pull this regime apart at the top.
Speaker 7: And I think fractures at the top of the regime
Speaker 7: are already underway. And I think there are people even
Speaker 7: in the regime who are saying this ship is going down,
Speaker 7: and I don't want to go down with it. That
Speaker 7: doesn't mean the people go out into the streets to
Speaker 7: be indiscriminately machine gunned. But there's a lot going on.
Speaker 7: I thought the most important thing the president has said
Speaker 7: in the past past day is that we gave weapons
Speaker 7: to the Kurds in northwestern Iran to transmit to other
Speaker 7: opposition forces. Apparently they didn't get past the curds. I'd
Speaker 7: like to know more about that, but I say, if
Speaker 7: the opposition wants weapons, we should get in as many
Speaker 7: as we can.
Speaker 1: And keep in mind John Bolton apparently attempted to get
Speaker 1: President Trump one point zero to go to war against
Speaker 1: Iran and he was not successful. Triple eight nine seven
Speaker 1: one s A g E. Triple eight nine seven one
Speaker 1: seven two four to three. More of your calls when
Speaker 1: we come back. I'm Larry Elder, Late Night teven one
Speaker 1: Sage Triple eight nine seven one seven two four to three.
Speaker 1: I am Larry Elder. We are seldom NewsChannel coming to
Speaker 1: you from the Relief Factor studios. Don't forget your Relief
Speaker 1: Factor eight hundred four Relief eight hundred to number four
Speaker 1: relief or Reliefactor dot com Reliefactor dot com. Back to
Speaker 1: John Bolton, the former National security advisor who Pump fired,
Speaker 1: who tried to get Trump to attack Iran during Trump
Speaker 1: one point zero. Regarding this mowing the lawn business number
Speaker 1: twenty six, well, I.
Speaker 7: Think he's worried about the taco charge. Trump always checkings out.
Speaker 7: I think this is a result of poor planning on
Speaker 7: his part. I think it's important that he consult with
Speaker 7: the Gulf Arab country and if they don't like this
Speaker 7: approach going after energy infrastructure, in particular associated with oil
Speaker 7: and gas produced by Iran, then we should hear what
Speaker 7: their alternatives are. I don't know whether that consultation has
Speaker 7: gone forward or not, but the result, in my view,
Speaker 7: ought to be regime change. I don't know what Trump's
Speaker 7: objective is. I know what my objective would be. And
Speaker 7: all the talk about ending the nuclear program, ending the
Speaker 7: terrors threat, ending the blockade of the Straight of Horror
Speaker 7: moves all depends on getting a different regime. All we're
Speaker 7: doing right now, and we're doing it very effectively, is
Speaker 7: what the Israelis call mowing the lawn. I don't want
Speaker 7: to mow the lawn anymore. I want this threat removed.
Speaker 1: So he says it's poor planning that he should be
Speaker 1: consulting with the Gulf States, and he says, I don't
Speaker 1: know whether not Trump has been consulting with the Golf States.
Speaker 1: So how do you know what's poor planning? In any case?
Speaker 1: What about this idea of using the power plants as targets.
Speaker 1: Some people are calling that a war crime. Here's what
Speaker 1: John Bolton said number twenty seven.
Speaker 7: Well, let's take a look at the phrase civilian infrastructure.
Speaker 7: There's less there that meets the eye. First off, the
Speaker 7: Revolutionary Guard is typically thought to hold control over about
Speaker 7: forty percent of Iran's economy, from which they derive revenues.
Speaker 7: Their generals derive revenues, the Guard itself derive revenues. They're
Speaker 7: part of the war machine forty percent of the economy. Next,
Speaker 7: the prohibition is against attacking civilian targets, but for example,
Speaker 7: a power plan that provides energy to a military base,
Speaker 7: to a military facility, to a military manufacturing operation is
Speaker 7: a legitimate target. There's collateral civilian damage, that's true, but
Speaker 7: it's a legitimate target. And what we've seen is that Iran,
Speaker 7: like Hamas, has spent a lot of effort building a
Speaker 7: military machine underground, but it's left the power for that
Speaker 7: machine on top of the ground. And I think it's
Speaker 7: perfectly obvious that highways can be used us to move
Speaker 7: men in equipment for military purposes. So the words civilian
Speaker 7: infrastructure are not talismanic. You have to look at specifics,
Speaker 7: and presumably that's what the lawyers in the Pentagon are
Speaker 7: doing as they go down the target list. I think
Speaker 7: we have very high priority and not violating that prohibition
Speaker 7: against hitting civilian targets. And let's see what happens.
Speaker 1: Trump teed off on allies he says should be joining
Speaker 1: the fight, including Japan, Australia, and South Korea, and had
Speaker 1: a thing or two to say about former President Joe
Speaker 1: Biden number fifteen.
Speaker 4: Think of it.
Speaker 13: And it's not just NATO. You know who els didn't
Speaker 13: help us. South Korea didn't help us. You know who
Speaker 13: else didn't help us? Or Australia didn't help us. You
Speaker 13: know who else didn't help us? Japan. We've got fifty
Speaker 13: thousand soldiers in Japan to protect them from North Korea.
Speaker 13: We have forty five thousand soldiers in South Korea to
Speaker 13: protect us from Kim Jong Un, who I get along
Speaker 13: with very well, as you know. Do you notice he
Speaker 13: said very nice things about me. He used to call
Speaker 13: Joe Biden a mentally retarded person. Okay, so don't tell
Speaker 13: me about your stuff. Joe Biden said he's a mentally
Speaker 13: retarded person.
Speaker 11: He was so nasty to Joe Biden was terrible.
Speaker 4: But to me, he likes Trump. And do you notice
Speaker 4: how nice things are with it's very nice, but we.
Speaker 1: Are mentally retarded person. Not quite sure why that was
Speaker 1: brought up. Brian from Iran is in Sacramento. Brian, you're
Speaker 1: in the Lario the show. Thank you so much for calling.
Speaker 6: Thank you, Larry, thank you for your sure. This has
Speaker 6: not been talked about a lot of the small town
Speaker 6: that the Weapons a Specialist crash, the people there helped them,
Speaker 6: rescued him and they provided shelter for him, and they
Speaker 6: also took him to where he was and nobody talked
Speaker 6: but that. I've seen the videos where people came out
Speaker 6: in the street blocking the IRGC, basically making it difficult.
Speaker 6: People drove from different parts of the small towns with
Speaker 6: the trucks and occupied the road so the IRGC could
Speaker 6: not get to it. And I saw the bodies of
Speaker 6: the IRGC in plain clothing that we took care of
Speaker 6: in the area where CIA pretended to be where the
Speaker 6: Weapons a Specialist was. So Iranian people afterwards when he
Speaker 6: was rescued celebrated it. So they want this regime change.
Speaker 6: Ninety percent of them want this regime to go, and
Speaker 6: nine percent of Iranians outside of Iran want this regime
Speaker 6: to go. There has not been a regime change. I
Speaker 6: have to I have to agree with John Bolton, which
Speaker 6: I don't care for some of the stuff he did,
Speaker 6: but everything he said about moying the lawn and regime
Speaker 6: change absolutely on target.
Speaker 1: Brian, can you stay on?
Speaker 5: Can you?
Speaker 1: Can you stay on the line for a second. I
Speaker 1: want to air ask you about Trump saying that he
Speaker 1: gave weapons to the Koords and the weapons did not
Speaker 1: get to the Uranian people. So Brian, please don't go away. Okay, Life, liberty,
Speaker 1: and the pursuit of happiness. Those words weren't written for
Speaker 1: the history books. They're written for you. But it's hard
Speaker 1: to pursue happiness when pain is part of everyday life.
Speaker 1: Relief Factor was created to help people address inflammation, one
Speaker 1: of the most common causes of ongoing aches and pain
Speaker 1: from aging, over exertion, and daily living. It's one hundred
Speaker 1: percent drug free, research based formula that work through multiple
Speaker 1: metabolic pathways to support comfort and mobility. No prescription, no
Speaker 1: masking symptoms, just real relief so you can keep moving forward.
Speaker 1: I've told you about my buddy Tom Avid Golfer out
Speaker 1: in the course almost every day, says without relief, actor
Speaker 1: wouldn't be able to swing freely because of shoulder and
Speaker 1: back pain. Now he swings freely as America celebrates two
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty years of independence. Give yourself a chance
Speaker 1: to reclaim yours relieffactor dot com. Relieffactor dot com eight
Speaker 1: hundred four relief eight hundred The number four relief.
Speaker 8: Sir, is Tuesday.
Speaker 15: Your final deadline?
Speaker 9: Are you prepared for fire?
Speaker 8: Proposing fire proposal?
Speaker 19: From this morning?
Speaker 4: I've seen every proposal.
Speaker 9: You can imagine what your final deadline is.
Speaker 18: Today you have your final deadline.
Speaker 20: Giving a random.
Speaker 13: Nature demands mister President, are you willing to continue the war?
Speaker 4: You have to watch.
Speaker 10: It's an easy guy answers yes, But you have to.
Speaker 20: President, what do you think of it?
Speaker 11: As they've made.
Speaker 10: A proposal, and it's a significant proposal.
Speaker 11: It's a significant step.
Speaker 10: It's not good enough, but it's a very significant step.
Speaker 10: They have made the negotiating now and then made a
Speaker 10: very significant step.
Speaker 4: We'll see what happened.
Speaker 1: Triple Light ninety seven one Sage Triple eight ninety seven
Speaker 1: one seven two four three. I am Larry Elder. We
Speaker 1: are Salem News Channel. Brian, thank you so much for
Speaker 1: holding on. I appreciate it Brian. He said that he
Speaker 1: gave some weapons to a group, That's how he put it,
Speaker 1: and the group said, oh, these are very nice weapons
Speaker 1: and didn't give them to the Iranian resistance. What do
Speaker 1: you know about that?
Speaker 6: Well, I'm I'm Kurdish. I grew up near seven thousand
Speaker 6: feet and from what I know from the British Iranian
Speaker 6: TV show, we've been through CIA providing weapons through core
Speaker 6: Kurdish people to immoral forces. These are defected military and
Speaker 6: also defected IRGC people that are waiting for the last phase.
Speaker 6: So Kurdish people are being careful what they're saying, because
Speaker 6: Iran is doing the republic through. What is bombing them
Speaker 6: is then to bomb near the hospital, which is basically
Speaker 6: a thinky building. But it was almost hit that hospital,
Speaker 6: so they're careful. They want to stay out of it. However,
Speaker 6: since January they've been provided by weapons which they distributed
Speaker 6: to immortal forces which will step in at the final phase,
Speaker 6: which the people are going to decide who is going
Speaker 6: to go in, not president from not BB people have
Speaker 6: to decide. None of these actors that are actually in
Speaker 6: power now should be in charge. And there has not
Speaker 6: been a regime change there's been some elements destroyed, but
Speaker 6: you see, as you see, all their efforts have been
Speaker 6: to build tunnels and stuff. I'm an engineer. I just retired.
Speaker 6: I buil high voltage line and it's not a good
Speaker 6: idea to go take power lines relying on oxygen masks
Speaker 6: and whatnot. But we build things. These people have not
Speaker 6: built things. They build tunnels to terrorize and kill people.
Speaker 6: They're not normal human beings. And who was to President
Speaker 6: Thump and dB for taking action? He did not start
Speaker 6: the war. A vacuum was created by the Democrats Obama
Speaker 6: to make China stronger. And that's what this is. This
Speaker 6: is about the war was started by them, about President Thrumb.
Speaker 1: Well, Brian, I want I want you to hear what
Speaker 1: President Brian. I want you to hear what President Trump
Speaker 1: said yesterday. And I want to get your comment on
Speaker 1: the other end of it. This goes about a minute
Speaker 1: and eleven seconds, number twelve.
Speaker 11: If your bomb, who who you is?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 14: Well, let's a radical left group of lunatics that you with.
Speaker 1: Let me just tell you.
Speaker 11: Let me just tell you, very fair question.
Speaker 10: The Iranian people when they don't hear bombs go up,
Speaker 10: they're upset they want to hear bombs because they want
Speaker 10: to be free. And the only reason they're not out protesting,
Speaker 10: you know that is because they were informed that if
Speaker 10: they protest, like the wrestler and his friends, if they test.
Speaker 4: They will be shot immediately. And that's an edict that's
Speaker 4: in writing.
Speaker 10: If they protest, if they go out in the streets,
Speaker 10: they will be immediately shot. They don't have guns. You know,
Speaker 10: we sent some guns, but the group that was supposed
Speaker 10: to give which I said, what happened to my people?
Speaker 11: I said it.
Speaker 10: I called it exactly. We sent gun It's a lot
Speaker 10: of guns they were supposed to go to. The people
Speaker 10: said they could fight back against these ducks.
Speaker 11: You know what happened.
Speaker 10: The people that they sent them to kept them because
Speaker 10: they said, what a beautiful gun.
Speaker 4: I think I'll keep it.
Speaker 10: So I'm very upset with a certain group of people,
Speaker 10: and they're going to pay a big price for that.
Speaker 1: Ryan, the President says that the group he sent the
Speaker 1: guns to did not give them to the people.
Speaker 6: Like I said, I'm not sure he has better information.
Speaker 6: But also President Trump is not going to devolop and
Speaker 6: to curtish people the bus and if they're doing it,
Speaker 6: under the table. They're not going to tell you it's
Speaker 6: on the Republic because it's bomb Adams says. You know,
Speaker 6: President Trump, what he says is not what he does.
Speaker 1: Last question, Brian, before you go, who's running the country.
Speaker 1: Who's running Iran?
Speaker 6: To my knowledge is this IRGC people. I'm not that
Speaker 6: they have so much money, Larry, that they stole so
Speaker 6: much money and they're still spending all this money. And
Speaker 6: the IRGC people are still in power, and they're doing
Speaker 6: everything that they've been doing before. And none of them
Speaker 6: should be left in power, none of them. The people
Speaker 6: and like I said, the last phase are the ones
Speaker 6: that are going to stand up against these IRGC people.
Speaker 1: Brian, thank you so much for calling us, and please
Speaker 1: stay in touch. Douglas is in Omaha. Douglasho and the
Speaker 1: Larry O the show, thank you so much for calling.
Speaker 14: How are you doing, Larry, I'm doing well.
Speaker 28: I got a question for you man.
Speaker 14: Now we talk about all this, I don't believe it's
Speaker 14: about what it's all about oil.
Speaker 28: Let's go back to nineteen seventy two when Nixon was president,
Speaker 28: him and Kissingers, when they gave when they.
Speaker 1: Gave Douglas dougas we don't. We don't need the oil.
Speaker 1: We're oil sufficient.
Speaker 28: No, no, no, no, no, Larry, that is what I'm
Speaker 28: talking about.
Speaker 20: Man.
Speaker 14: It wasn't about for It was about the ships.
Speaker 28: It was the ships over there at the time when
Speaker 28: when they want a part of Nixon and them gave
Speaker 28: them so much money to get all them. They wanted
Speaker 28: their ships, the same ships that we're fighting with now,
Speaker 28: those were their ship, Nash when Obama read your hissy,
Speaker 28: go back look, I'm sending three years old.
Speaker 14: Go back and find out. You'll find out that when
Speaker 14: that Obama gave him that check.
Speaker 1: Okay, Douglas, Douglas, Douglas, we don't have about a minute
Speaker 1: left to go. Douglas. Do you believe that Iran was
Speaker 1: working on developing the nuclear bomb?
Speaker 19: No?
Speaker 4: I do not.
Speaker 14: That's all.
Speaker 28: It's all about oil, man.
Speaker 14: I'm bere when.
Speaker 1: So when the Ranian negotiators, so, when the Rainian negotiators
Speaker 1: told Trump negotiators, we have enough in rish uranium to
Speaker 1: make eleven bombs, they were lying.
Speaker 14: No, no, yes, they were lying. And the thing about it, Okay,
Speaker 14: what did Russian just Russian China is today to day've
Speaker 14: blocking hisself right now, It don't matter man.
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you, thank you, okay. I guess see society
Speaker 1: he wanted to take off, probably had Ubercar waiting for
Speaker 1: him downstairs. Triple eight nine seven one s A G
Speaker 1: triple eight nine seven one seven two four three. I
Speaker 1: am Larry Elder, Do not leave town.
Speaker 11: Larry will be right back.
Speaker 1: Stay tuned.
Speaker 4: M H.
Speaker 8: Well, I mean you can.
Speaker 10: Watch it, but you don't have to be at the
Speaker 10: the neuralagist, said doctor Jonathan Ryan for anything like that.
Speaker 1: With Ball had experience with people. Agent Ball had this experience,
Speaker 1: and you could just look at the guy as just
Speaker 1: an average person to say, this man is deteriorating at
Speaker 1: a at a really rapid rate.
Speaker 11: I don't know I mean it, but it's evident of man.
Speaker 28: Alan Jones sees it.
Speaker 13: You see, can see it all over to Rive, got Megan,
Speaker 13: Kelly and Tucker fighting.
Speaker 4: With Mark Levan. I can't even keep trapped. Well, all
Speaker 4: of them they hate each other. One they hate us.
Speaker 1: Triple eight nine seven one s A G E nine
Speaker 1: seven one seven two four three. That is James Carvin. Now,
Speaker 1: as between President Trump and James Carville, who do you
Speaker 1: think is more likely to be mentally deteriorating somebody who
Speaker 1: says I got Trump doing I don't want to get
Speaker 1: rid of it. In fact, I wanted to get Wes.
Speaker 1: Who do you think is more likely to be imbalanced?
Speaker 11: Trump?
Speaker 1: Or James Carville? And speaking of Trump derangement syndrome. This
Speaker 1: is a Billy Bush formerly with NBC, talking about how
Speaker 1: many people were assigned in twenty sixteen at ABC to
Speaker 1: get stories on Donald Trump, seventy five reporters, number eleven.
Speaker 18: Their determination to find something.
Speaker 4: Imagine going around asking that question, who has something? Who
Speaker 4: has like there's.
Speaker 18: Evil in that ABC, even if it's somebody that wasn't
Speaker 18: like they had a.
Speaker 29: Division dedicated with seventy five people in it because I
Speaker 29: know the guy who ran the division which was dedicated
Speaker 29: to basically getting him, Wow and all the big network
Speaker 29: news that I understand all of that, like what you
Speaker 29: can do with they have a voice, and different networks
Speaker 29: have different voices.
Speaker 1: A division of seventy five people at ABC because I
Speaker 1: know the guy who ran the division he said, dedicated
Speaker 1: getting Donald Trump. Now, as you know, the President has
Speaker 1: agreed to a two week cease fire. But here's Senator
Speaker 1: Graham last night, Number seventeen.
Speaker 30: Don't be fooled about who the hell you're dealing with,
Speaker 30: or you're dealing with people that would use a NICO weapon.
Speaker 4: They could get it, and they were trying to get it.
Speaker 30: They've been cheating for years, And God blessed Donald Trump
Speaker 30: for stopping them from having a breakout so they could
Speaker 30: build eight or ten nuclear bombs and one day.
Speaker 4: They would have used them.
Speaker 30: So God bless President Trump, God bless epic fury. But
Speaker 30: this is a defining moment this time tomorrow night, we're
Speaker 30: gonna have one of two scenarios, capitulation of their desire
Speaker 30: to reign terror on the world through diplomacy, or we're
Speaker 30: going to have a massive military attack destroying this regime's
Speaker 30: capability to ever wage war again.
Speaker 1: Well, we'll find out over the course of two weeks
Speaker 1: whether or not the regime is serious, and whether or
Speaker 1: not this is going to buy time for the Iranian
Speaker 1: people to rise up and to take back their country.
Speaker 1: All of this will be unrevealed in it probably just
Speaker 1: in a matter of a few days. Let's do this
Speaker 1: again tomorrow. I am Larry Elder, Do not leave town.
Speaker 1: God bless.
Speaker 14: What can I say?
Speaker 1: Mobiles Michael All.
Speaker 11: Across America that's enough.
Speaker 5: Put down the mic, the Larry Eldership.
Speaker 6: You got an