Speaker 1: Welcome to today's podcast sponsored by Hillsdale College, All Things
Speaker 1: Hillsdale at Hillsdale dot ed or. I encourage you to
Speaker 1: take advantage of the many free online courses there, and
Speaker 1: of course I listen to the Hillsdale Dialogues, all of
Speaker 1: them at q for Hillsdale dot com or just Google, Apple,
Speaker 1: iTunes and Hillsdale. Joined now by the United States Senator
Speaker 1: Tom Cotton from the great state of Arkansas. Senator Cotton,
Speaker 1: thank you for joining me. I hope you have a
Speaker 1: happy Easter week with your family. I appreciate you taking
Speaker 1: the time to talk to me. First question, I was
Speaker 1: on Fox earlier today and I cannot believe the Democrats
Speaker 1: have closed the Department of Homeland Security thirty days into
Speaker 1: a war. What are they thinking.
Speaker 2: You They're scared or they're in league with their radical
Speaker 2: left wing base. I can tell you last week that
Speaker 2: on more than one occasion, Chuck Schumer had agreed to
Speaker 2: a deal that would fund all of Homeland Security aside
Speaker 2: from ice and border patrol, which we pre funded last
Speaker 2: year in our big budget ill in which we plan
Speaker 2: to return and pass a new budget that will fund
Speaker 2: them even further into future. And they constantly moved the
Speaker 2: goalposts on those agreements and reneged on them. One key
Speaker 2: sticking point he is the issue of masks. I don't
Speaker 2: think ICE officers want to wear masks to you, but
Speaker 2: they have to because otherwise the radical left will dox
Speaker 2: them and then left wing street militias will prize their
Speaker 2: wives and their kids at their homes. And that's where
Speaker 2: Chuck Schumer and Democrats have drawn a line in the sand.
Speaker 2: We'll obviously, we're obviously never going to agree to that,
Speaker 2: So we'll continue with the plan we had in place,
Speaker 2: which is to use the budget reconciliation process to make
Speaker 2: sure that we fund ICE and border patrol well into
Speaker 2: the future, probably the TSA now that we know chruction
Speaker 2: where in the Democrats are willing to inflict long lines
Speaker 2: on the American flying public and no paychecks on TSA agents.
Speaker 2: And then at that point you assume that the Democrats
Speaker 2: would go into town, because why would they continue to
Speaker 2: stay hold the Coast Guard and the Secret Service hostage
Speaker 2: that they have nothing to show for their extremism and obstructionism.
Speaker 1: Senator, When I looked into DHS two hundred and forty
Speaker 1: thousand employees, and there is something called the Cyber and
Speaker 1: Infrastructure Security Agency, as well as the Coastguard, FEMA, Secret Service,
Speaker 1: a bunch of other things besides TSA in wartime, isn't
Speaker 1: everyone basically an essential employee at the Cyber and Infrastructure
Speaker 1: Security Agency and they're not getting paid.
Speaker 2: He It's an important agency, little known agency, but they
Speaker 2: do very critical work. And that's again another example of
Speaker 2: just how radical and ideological Democrats have become. We're fighting
Speaker 2: against the enemy that has well known cyber capabilities that
Speaker 2: have used them against US interests in the past, and
Speaker 2: they would rather keep the cyber Security Agency inside of
Speaker 2: DHS unfunded rather than allow the men and women of
Speaker 2: Ice and Border Patrol to do their jobs to protect
Speaker 2: our nation from dangerous illegal aliens.
Speaker 1: Now. I was on Fox earlier today and Sandra Smith
Speaker 1: asked me to make sense of this, and I really can't.
Speaker 1: Forty five days ago, we weren't in a battle, and
Speaker 1: so maybe there was a political argument. But if anything
Speaker 1: happens now, and these lines at airports are the softest
Speaker 1: target in the world, but anything happens anywhere by a
Speaker 1: Hezbollah or an Iranian proxy, that's on the Democrats. Don't
Speaker 1: they realize that?
Speaker 2: And you just again to stress again. Republicans in the
Speaker 2: Saria anticipated that the Democrats might full a stunt like this.
Speaker 2: That's why last summer we pre funded ice and boarder
Speaker 2: patrol for several years. So the Democrats are getting nothing
Speaker 2: out of this. Not only are ice and boarder patrol
Speaker 2: working because they're essential government employees, they are also being paid.
Speaker 2: But the Democrats are willing to inflict long lines on
Speaker 2: the flying public or withholding pay checks to SAAH answer
Speaker 2: Coast Guard officers or people who are working at the
Speaker 2: Cybersecurity Agency or at the Secret Service or at FEMA
Speaker 2: because their radical left hates our immigration police and wants
Speaker 2: to defund them even though it has no immediate effect
Speaker 2: on them.
Speaker 1: So SATA, how long will this? This is actually a
Speaker 1: vulnerability with Iran is down to two things, the straight
Speaker 1: and whatever they can do the terrorists, I guess three
Speaker 1: things and the internet cyber attacks that's all they've got.
Speaker 1: Less how long are the Democrats going to leave us
Speaker 1: naked on this?
Speaker 2: I think they're willing to do it in definitely think
Speaker 2: that's why we've said that we're done with Chuck Shimmer
Speaker 2: continuing to move the goalposts. We're going to move out
Speaker 2: on a republican budget reconciliation process that will allow us
Speaker 2: to fund these critical agencies. You can give the Democrats
Speaker 2: holding the bag with nothing in return.
Speaker 1: All right now, the last time we talked about reconciliation,
Speaker 1: the gone hat and sent over an official request. Have
Speaker 1: they done that yet for a supplemental I.
Speaker 2: Don't think so yet. To you, it takes some time
Speaker 2: to make sure all the eyes are dotted and the
Speaker 2: t'ser cross, not just at the Pentagon, but also with
Speaker 2: the budget reconciliation process, So we still have some time.
Speaker 2: I would remind all your listeners to you that we
Speaker 2: still have two more shots at the reconciliation process as well,
Speaker 2: so we don't have to include all the needed funds
Speaker 2: to protect this nation in one single bill. We might
Speaker 2: try to move out and do that. It's to be
Speaker 2: determined on whether or not the Pentagon will be in
Speaker 2: a position yet to provide us those numbers. But there
Speaker 2: is the possibility that we could pass two more bills,
Speaker 2: one for homeland security and one for our military.
Speaker 1: All right now, I want to switch to the actual battle. Senator,
Speaker 1: you're a soldier, you're a vet. You know the costs
Speaker 1: that's already been born by thirteen families and thirty additional
Speaker 1: seriously wounded people, and hundreds of people with injuries. And
Speaker 1: that's just the American side. How much can the United
Speaker 1: States put up with in terms of months of this
Speaker 1: kind of conflict? Do you think.
Speaker 2: I've set from the beginning that I expected this campaign
Speaker 2: with the last weeks, not months. Here, four weeks into it.
Speaker 2: I'll stick to that for now, because whenever I get updates,
Speaker 2: and I get updates, whether it's in briefings or fearings
Speaker 2: or phone calls or meetings with administration officials, almost every day,
Speaker 2: I hear the same consistent message. We are on time
Speaker 2: or head of schedule on every single line of effort,
Speaker 2: their missiles, their missile launchers, their drones, their navy, their
Speaker 2: manufacturing sites, their commanding control facilities. The military campaign is
Speaker 2: going exceptionally well. I agreeve, as do all our cantons
Speaker 2: for those soldiers who we lost and for their families,
Speaker 2: and for the injuries, for the losses of equipment at hardware.
Speaker 2: We may have more losses ahead, but in the long run,
Speaker 2: it is to our great, great national security advantage that
Speaker 2: we finally defame in New York, this terroriced revolution regime
Speaker 2: that has been spreading chaos and violence against the United
Speaker 2: States and the civilized world for forty seven years.
Speaker 1: So last question, Senator, It's crept into some of the
Speaker 1: discussion from analysts, and none of us know anything because
Speaker 1: we're not we don't have clearances that we don't we
Speaker 1: can't dislodge, we can't defeat the IRGC. They are veterans
Speaker 1: of the eighty three eighty eight long war with Iran
Speaker 1: in Iraq and that they will never ever surrender. Do
Speaker 1: you believe that.
Speaker 2: They may not ever surrender, Hugh, But we're defeating a
Speaker 2: lot of them every sale day as we continue to
Speaker 2: target and kill their leaders. And remember, the Revolutionary Guard
Speaker 2: boards very different today than it was forty seven years ago,
Speaker 2: or even thirty seven years ago against the Iran Iraq War,
Speaker 2: after they still in the flush of revolutionary fervor. It
Speaker 2: is now well documented. In fact, I think the Wall
Speaker 2: Street Journal has a story about to day that much
Speaker 2: of what holds the Revolutionary Guard core together is not
Speaker 2: ideology but corruption and get backs and payoffs and bribes.
Speaker 2: And that's something that once the regime is defamed militarily,
Speaker 2: once the security services have their wings clipped that the
Speaker 2: Iranian people, I would imagine, are not going to put
Speaker 2: up with.
Speaker 1: Senator Tom Cotton. Happy Easter to you and your family.
Speaker 1: Thank you for joining me, and I hope you can
Speaker 1: get the Democrats to wake up to the fact that
Speaker 1: we are playing politics at our peril. I appreciate your
Speaker 1: joining me to take care. Welcome back to Americay, Hugh
Speaker 1: Hewett inside the Beltwagh joined from Israel by doctor Michael
Speaker 1: Orn former is really ambassador to the United States Doctor Orran.
Speaker 1: I had a four hour drive this morning, so I
Speaker 1: listened to every podcast that matter, Dan Senor talking with
Speaker 1: Fred Kagan and Adobt a commentary to Jonathan Schanzer, and
Speaker 1: the one thing that stuck out, well a lot suck out,
Speaker 1: but Fred Kagan said, the Iranians have no idea how
Speaker 1: badly they've been hurt. You know, I got to thinking
Speaker 1: about that. They don't do they nobody's talking to each
Speaker 1: other in Iran.
Speaker 3: Well, it's possible they're going to wake up in the
Speaker 3: morning after, if there's a morning after, and.
Speaker 4: Find out that they don't have very much.
Speaker 5: Again, they have a different cut concept of victory.
Speaker 4: Than we have in the West. You know, we count
Speaker 4: boats sunk and.
Speaker 3: Factories destroyed or unfortunately reminds me of a lot of
Speaker 3: the Body Council of the Vietnam War. They have a different,
Speaker 3: different definition of victory is that they just want to survive.
Speaker 3: They're like Hamas and Gaza, and they don't think in
Speaker 3: terms of you know, days and weeks and months. They
Speaker 3: think in terms of years and decades. Oh, we'll be rebuilt,
Speaker 3: especially we can get sanctions relief, then we'll rebuild. We
Speaker 3: have to fight two wars that seeks victory by our terms,
Speaker 3: but also victory by their terms.
Speaker 1: So in terms of whether or not a regime is
Speaker 1: left in place that we can do a deal with,
Speaker 1: are you optimistic about that at all? In other words,
Speaker 1: here's our enriched uranium. Here, send your inspectors anywhere they want,
Speaker 1: and we'll blow up the missiles that you don't want.
Speaker 1: But we want to stay in power. Is that possible?
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's possible if you look at how the Iraq
Speaker 5: Iran War ended.
Speaker 3: When the leaders of the Iran regime said, we know
Speaker 3: we have to drink from the poison chalice kind of thing.
Speaker 3: You didn't have a poison chalice moment, but you're still
Speaker 3: gonna have to verify that poison.
Speaker 5: Chalice very compliance with it, very very closely. But it's unlikely.
Speaker 1: It's unlikely.
Speaker 4: That's all I can say.
Speaker 3: And there may be very well at tipping point, a
Speaker 3: breaking point, whether it's internal or external, people in the
Speaker 3: street as a breaking point. The major issue here is
Speaker 3: whether the United States and Israel can continue to stand strong,
Speaker 3: stand together and see this through to the end, because
Speaker 3: there is an end.
Speaker 4: There is an end of that, I'm certain.
Speaker 3: And you know, we've just had two missiles fired at
Speaker 3: us in the last hour, Hugh, We've got my daughter
Speaker 3: was under constant fire from his bulla in the north
Speaker 3: in the Galilee today.
Speaker 4: We're tough people, We're resilient. We're willing to see this
Speaker 4: through the end. Uh. And you know we're asking the
Speaker 4: United States.
Speaker 5: We understand the American people are paying more at their
Speaker 5: gas pumps.
Speaker 3: Through that the prices are going up in many fields
Speaker 3: that are related to petroleum. We understand that, but we
Speaker 3: ought to make the case that this is essential for
Speaker 3: the peace of the United States, the peace of the world,
Speaker 3: and to the presidents. If he sees this through, he
Speaker 3: will not go down as one of the great presidents,
Speaker 3: will go down to one of the great leaders in.
Speaker 1: History now, DoD Oran. There are at least thirteen American
Speaker 1: families who will not have someone coming home from this war,
Speaker 1: at least twenty in Israel. Our golf allies have twenty
Speaker 1: five plus. The cause in human loss is extraordinary. That said,
Speaker 1: how much more can the two countries take in terms
Speaker 1: of casualties before one of the other blinks?
Speaker 5: You mean Israel and the United States, or the two
Speaker 5: of us in Iran?
Speaker 1: No, two of the Israel in the United States. Never
Speaker 1: forget about Iran. They'll tell their people all day.
Speaker 3: I can't speak for the United States. I can speak
Speaker 3: for the Essays speak for the state of Israel. We
Speaker 3: know we have no choice. We know if we don't
Speaker 3: prevail against his bull and Lebanon, and basically his bull
Speaker 3: is just a branch of Iran, right then we lose
Speaker 3: the galley, lose part of the country.
Speaker 5: And this country's tiny, so it's an existential.
Speaker 4: Issue for us.
Speaker 3: We understand that it's really military has called up four
Speaker 3: hundred thousand reservers. That's proportionally significantly more Americans than fought
Speaker 3: in all of World War Two, and people are leaving
Speaker 3: their homes, leaving their families and their jobs to go
Speaker 3: out and fight, pick up a gun and go out
Speaker 3: and fight because.
Speaker 4: They know they have no choice.
Speaker 3: We do all do and it, believe me, it's unpleasant
Speaker 3: to run to this bomb shelter several times a night,
Speaker 3: but we know, we know that at the end of
Speaker 3: the day, this is our lives, these are our families,
Speaker 3: this is our country.
Speaker 5: And I don't want to believe the point, but it
Speaker 5: literally is no choice.
Speaker 1: Now, doctor, And you know everyone in the government and
Speaker 1: outside of the government to what extent is Hezbollah hanging
Speaker 1: by a thread or are they as resilient as Hamas
Speaker 1: in the tunnels? Do they have that kind of network
Speaker 1: to retreat into and hide.
Speaker 3: They actually have a deeper network, because Lebanon is signifally deeper,
Speaker 3: bigger than than Gaza.
Speaker 1: But not just that.
Speaker 3: They can hide in the cities, They can hide in villages.
Speaker 3: They can use the entire population of Lebanon as human shields.
Speaker 3: The major thing with his Bula is can we cut
Speaker 3: them off from their oxygen? And their oxygen is Iran.
Speaker 3: Now the Syrians have closed off their border.
Speaker 4: I don't know how.
Speaker 3: Poorous that border is even when it's closed. But if
Speaker 3: we can defeat Iran, we will defeat his bula. That
Speaker 3: is what we call here, cutting off the head of
Speaker 3: the snake or the head of the octopus, whatever you know,
Speaker 3: reptilian or.
Speaker 4: Marine metaphor you want to use.
Speaker 5: And so these fights are all interrelated.
Speaker 3: And again we're going to have to keep fighting his bula.
Speaker 4: We've made a new defense line along the Tani River.
Speaker 3: It's about about ten miles from our border, about ten
Speaker 3: miles north of our border.
Speaker 4: But the fighting there is very intense.
Speaker 5: It is very intense, and his Bulla is far from defeated.
Speaker 1: Right now, earlier today, maybe in the last hour, the
Speaker 1: ID they've completed another wave of attacks in Tehran and
Speaker 1: that they finished their primary target list and they're moving
Speaker 1: on to economic targets, meaning the industrial base of Iran.
Speaker 1: Is that consistent with what you've seen on the air.
Speaker 3: Yes, definitely, And it's a decision not taking lightly because
Speaker 3: the last thing you want to do is to hurt
Speaker 3: the people of Iran. And you heard Secretary of State
Speaker 3: Rubio said that these are our peace loving people.
Speaker 4: For the most part. We want peace with them.
Speaker 5: We had peace with them before nineteen seventy nine.
Speaker 4: We want to go back to there.
Speaker 3: And it is with a great regret that we would
Speaker 3: cause them any discomfort or worse, but we may have
Speaker 3: no choice. And again, if Iran keeps on pounding energy
Speaker 3: sources in the Middle East, and today they shot at
Speaker 3: both at the Haifa refinery, set one of them ablaze,
Speaker 3: and you know, we could be sitting in the darky also,
Speaker 3: so we may have no choice, all.
Speaker 1: Right, So closing our in here. When the American people
Speaker 1: look up and there's been gone for thirty day, I
Speaker 1: think it's going to go to June. To tell you,
Speaker 1: that's Hugh Ywittt's opinion based on not knowing anything except
Speaker 1: talking to smart people. And I'm an American, so I'm
Speaker 1: not paying anything other than a dollar a gallon of
Speaker 1: gas ken Israel lasts until June under these circumstances.
Speaker 4: Of course, of course we can listen.
Speaker 3: We've been in this war for three years with very
Speaker 3: little let up, by the way, and there have been
Speaker 3: times in this war where it's actually been much more
Speaker 3: difficult than it is now. Iran, during the twelve Day
Speaker 3: Battle last summer, was hitting us more intensely with more
Speaker 3: missiles every day. During the opening months of the Gaza
Speaker 3: war and with his bullet in the North October November
Speaker 3: December twenty twenty three, and then twenty twenty four, far
Speaker 3: more intense barrages from both the South and the North.
Speaker 4: We are a very resilient people.
Speaker 5: We will be celebrating Passover this week.
Speaker 4: We got through slavery in Egypt. We got through forty
Speaker 4: years of wandering in the desert. We're going to get
Speaker 4: through this too.
Speaker 1: Well. Get through a commercial break. I have one political
Speaker 1: question for you, but if you can't, don't worry about it.
Speaker 1: I know you're a great demand and I appreciate the time.
Speaker 1: Doctor Michael Lauren, former israily Ambassador of the United States
Speaker 1: may or may not be back after the break for
Speaker 1: politics here America. I'm Hugh Hewittt. Welcome. I am joined
Speaker 1: by John pod Hortz, editor of Commentary Magazine. He is
Speaker 1: also the host Monday through Friday, most Monday through Fridays
Speaker 1: of the Commentary Magazine podcast, John, I listened to you today.
Speaker 1: I listened to have Ready Go talk about Passover with
Speaker 1: a Rabbi. I listened to Dan Senor and talk with
Speaker 1: Fred Kagan and with Nadavi Y'all. I listened to Jonathan
Speaker 1: Sandser to the FDD. So I've had a four and
Speaker 1: a half hour drive this morning, so I might be
Speaker 1: a little bit mixed up on where I heard what,
Speaker 1: So give me a little grace here. I want to
Speaker 1: start with the most important question always, Have you seen
Speaker 1: Operation Mincemeat on Broadway?
Speaker 6: I have not, but my wife went to see it
Speaker 6: last week or the week before, so I consider that
Speaker 6: I've seen it.
Speaker 1: Okay, So the premise of it is the ally spend
Speaker 1: the w a lot of time cooking up elaborate ruses
Speaker 1: to fool the enemy. Why should we believe anyone saying anything?
Speaker 6: Now, that's very very important, and it is very important
Speaker 6: to note that one in the tactics of the Trump
Speaker 6: administration is to throw a lot of lines in the water.
Speaker 6: We're gonna take card, We're not going to take card.
Speaker 6: We're negotiating package. There's going to be negotiations in Pakistan.
Speaker 6: We are not doing regime change because we've already done
Speaker 6: regime change. Maybe we should go get the the nuclear
Speaker 6: materials out of the Ifsahon. Maybe we should not do anything.
Speaker 6: Maybe we are done. Maybe we're going to land ground troops.
Speaker 6: So it's not that you shouldn't believe anything. It's that
Speaker 6: everything is on the table, and therefore you should view
Speaker 6: this as the United States, having achieved military supremacy in
Speaker 6: this war, is using its military supremacy in the war
Speaker 6: to continue to signal to the Iranians that they kind
Speaker 6: of have one last chance to give up, and giving
Speaker 6: up would mean a lot of things, including telling us
Speaker 6: where the nuclear materials are and allowing us to go
Speaker 6: get them, among other things. And aside from that, there's
Speaker 6: nothing to believe or not believe. Nothing is said determtively.
Speaker 1: That is, by the way, exactly nodding through the commentary podcast,
Speaker 1: which is fabulous today. By the way, I'm watching. I
Speaker 1: sent my wife a tech about Kevin Klein and Laura Lenny,
Speaker 1: which are two of her favorite people, and said she's
Speaker 1: on the West coast. Watch this immediately. John doesn't get
Speaker 1: excited about much television, so watching to me, we'll come back.
Speaker 6: That's true. That's a show called American Classic that you
Speaker 6: were talking about. MGM plus. You have to subscribe through Amazon.
Speaker 6: Kevin Klin, Laura Lenny Betsico, I'm seen in years. Okay,
Speaker 6: let's go.
Speaker 1: Back to the series. Stuff is the US the United
Speaker 1: States as a whole better off today than we were
Speaker 1: thirty one days ago.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean, I don't think we were at any
Speaker 6: particular immediate risk thirty one days ago from Iran, and
Speaker 6: we're better off because now if we had been and
Speaker 6: we didn't know about it, Iran is obviously in no
Speaker 6: position to inflict any harm or damage on us. I
Speaker 6: do think we need to finish the job, and that
Speaker 6: what we've done is prepare the way for a huge
Speaker 6: geopolitical historical triumph if we can just you know, put
Speaker 6: our noses to the grindstone, and Trump can silence the
Speaker 6: voices in his ear that are telling him that maybe
Speaker 6: there's going to be there's a better off ramp and
Speaker 6: do end this thing with an unambiguous American victory that
Speaker 6: will reshape the geopolitics of the twenty first century.
Speaker 1: I think that could be where we're headed. And I'm
Speaker 1: glad to hear that you're at least in the realm
Speaker 1: of possibility with me. There is Israel our ally better
Speaker 1: off today than it was thirty one days ago.
Speaker 6: I mean, unambiguously, although you have to say less serial
Speaker 6: It hasn't been tough in the sense that you know,
Speaker 6: for Israeli normal Israeli life in this period has been canceled.
Speaker 6: You know, people at kids aren't going to school. People,
Speaker 6: it's very hard for people to go to work. People
Speaker 6: are going in and out of shelter six or seven
Speaker 6: times a day. There has been relatively minor damage inside
Speaker 6: Israel and relatively few deaths related to a gigantic number
Speaker 6: of barrage of ballistic missiles being fired at it, so
Speaker 6: life is harder immediately. The Israelis themselves seem to believe
Speaker 6: that what is going on is not only righteous but necessary.
Speaker 6: Support for the mission against Iran runs it around ninety percent.
Speaker 6: Israel Is also trying to clean up Hesbelah on its north,
Speaker 6: get rid of Hesbelah, and it's north, so it's no
Speaker 6: longer threatened there, and so they think that they're better
Speaker 6: off now.
Speaker 1: John, I'm all of you an optimists. So I think
Speaker 1: we're going to win this decisively. We are winning decisively,
Speaker 1: but we have not yet won decisively. I think this decisively.
Speaker 1: Will it be possible to say that ten to seven
Speaker 1: as awful as it was was Israel in the West
Speaker 1: Pearl Harbor two point zero?
Speaker 6: I think that's I think the analogy is exact. I
Speaker 6: mean as a surprise sneak attack that shocked the conscience alarmed,
Speaker 6: made it clear just how dangerous and threatening the world
Speaker 6: was to the United States, and that this irridentist actor
Speaker 6: was intending on throwing Israel under the bus, or you know,
Speaker 6: in the case of Pearl Harbor, of removing us as
Speaker 6: a player in the Pacific while the Japanese took over,
Speaker 6: you know, the entirety of the Pacific and even the
Speaker 6: South Pacific. Ten seven awakened Israel to the fact that
Speaker 6: its strategy over the previous ten years had been and
Speaker 6: had been naive, and that it did not understand the
Speaker 6: misdirection that Hamas was up to in planning the war
Speaker 6: that it eventually launched and the tunnel system that it
Speaker 6: built in order to fight that war. And just similarly,
Speaker 6: ten to seven then said to Israel, well, May and
Speaker 6: to Trump, I think, well, the status quo can no
Speaker 6: longer exist. We need to rewrite the rules for us
Speaker 6: to be safe for the next one hundred years. We're
Speaker 6: going to do that in Gaza. We're going to try
Speaker 6: to do it against Iran, which is the you know,
Speaker 6: which is the head of the beast. And then when
Speaker 6: Trump won, Trump came in as not only a full partner,
Speaker 6: but a senior partner in that effort. I think think
Speaker 6: understanding particularly this year, it's an interesting case about the
Speaker 6: opportunistic nature of what has gone on this year, which
Speaker 6: is that it was this war that started on February
Speaker 6: twenty eighth started on February tari eighth because something started
Speaker 6: in Iran on December twenty eighth, which is that the
Speaker 6: people of Iran rose up and revolted because the real
Speaker 6: had gone to have no value, and they were broke,
Speaker 6: and they had no money and they had nothing. And
Speaker 6: then the regime responded badly, and then they rose even further,
Speaker 6: and then the regime started showing them in the streets
Speaker 6: and the idea that the country itself was falling to
Speaker 6: pieces as a civil society, if it could ever be
Speaker 6: called that, and that this was a once in a
Speaker 6: lifetime opportunity with them weekend, with them having no air defenses,
Speaker 6: and with the with the populace restive and uncomfortable and
Speaker 6: clearly wanting something new, and Israel developing the entil diligence
Speaker 6: that said, if we go on this date, certain we
Speaker 6: can decapitate the leadership all of those things coming into play.
Speaker 6: Trump said, it's a gift on a silver platter, like
Speaker 6: history doesn't provide these very often. It's not like he
Speaker 6: came into office saying, let's develop the way in which
Speaker 6: we can take Iran out. Taking Iran out became something
Speaker 6: that developed over time in twenty twenty five, in early
Speaker 6: twenty twenty six, and was a response to real world
Speaker 6: dynamic changes that we are taking advantage of.
Speaker 1: Now I've already written the column, so it's already into Fox.
Speaker 1: I'mp here tomorrow that begins. If President Trump succeeds in
Speaker 1: overseeing the toppling of the Iranian regime, it will rank
Speaker 1: with the greatest achievements of presidents since World War Two
Speaker 1: if it happens. Do you agree with me on that? Oh?
Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean I can't. In fact, oddly enough, it's
Speaker 6: hard to think of another aside from winning the Cold
Speaker 6: War that will it will be as geo politically significant
Speaker 6: as this victory over Iran would be.
Speaker 1: No, it's nineteen eighty nine, That's what I keep telling people. Now.
Speaker 1: I am also on the record with at least Guy
Speaker 1: Benson saying this is going to take at least until
Speaker 1: June unless the conditions of regime collapse. We just can't
Speaker 1: seek because the Internet is down. Does the American public
Speaker 1: have the patience for a low casually though not no casually.
Speaker 1: There are thirteen breathing families this Easter passover who have
Speaker 1: washed it all, and there are others who are wounded.
Speaker 1: But do we have the capacity to go to June
Speaker 1: if it remains a low casualty situation?
Speaker 6: I think absolutely, Because the sad part is I don't
Speaker 6: think the American people care very much. They're very uninvested
Speaker 6: in this. Unless gas prices go to two hundred and
Speaker 6: fifty dollars a barrel and suddenly it's costs nine dollars
Speaker 6: the gallon at the pump, what cost is being inflicted
Speaker 6: on any individual America can buy this conflict? There is
Speaker 6: no cost. There is no cost. No one in this country.
Speaker 6: One out of every three hundred and thirty people has
Speaker 6: a relative in the military. If that and the military
Speaker 6: is a volunteer. And from what we now, the military
Speaker 6: and people in the military are overwhelmingly in support of
Speaker 6: the mission, so they're not opposed to it.
Speaker 1: Who's opposed to it.
Speaker 6: Are democrats and people who think that war doesn't work
Speaker 6: and We've had a terrible time over the last twenty
Speaker 6: five years and haven't won anything.
Speaker 1: But so I can't.
Speaker 6: I don't think Trump is going to get a lot
Speaker 6: of credit for what's going on. Clearly he isn't, But
Speaker 6: that doesn't mean that there is going to be overwhelming pressure.
Speaker 1: And we come back from break the hardest hit I've
Speaker 1: been doing this show for twenty five and a half year.
Speaker 1: The hardest hit are USS Liberty, conspiracy Terrorist. But we'll
Speaker 1: be back with John pod Howarts. Don't go anywhere in America.
Speaker 1: I'm uqit, welcome back in America. I'm hue you at
Speaker 1: John pod Howtz. I'm the editor in chief of Commentary
Speaker 1: Magazine to the Daily Commentary podcast. I really recommend today, Monday,
Speaker 1: March thirtieth, because I had a fascinating conversation. I listened
Speaker 1: to all of it today driving back from Southern Virginia
Speaker 1: about American public opinion and what works and what doesn't work.
Speaker 1: By the way, I think Ame and Eleanna are just wise,
Speaker 1: wise wise when they judge American public opinion. And I
Speaker 1: thought you and Christine had a very interesting exchange about
Speaker 1: what would he say? What would he do? Because in
Speaker 1: fact about Trump. There are very few people whose minds
Speaker 1: are going to change. Isn't that a fact? John? No
Speaker 1: matter he can win. I mean, we could have a
Speaker 1: patent movie made about it. It won't matter, and he
Speaker 1: might lose terribly and his supporters won't care. It's frozen.
Speaker 6: Look we're playing. He's playing for history here. This is
Speaker 6: not about the next six months. It's not even about
Speaker 6: the rest of his term. What happens here is a
Speaker 6: world historical moment if he wins, and what happens is
Speaker 6: the failure of this presidency if he appears to end
Speaker 6: this on an inconclusive result, which is why he should
Speaker 6: go for all the marbles and not worried about what
Speaker 6: the immediate politics say. Even if, even if we need
Speaker 6: Republicans in the Senate the House start complaining and saying
Speaker 6: things are terrible, it doesn't make sense for him not
Speaker 6: to complete what he started because this is too big too.
Speaker 6: If you're going to make if you're going to take
Speaker 6: the risk and reap the reward, you were going to
Speaker 6: have to play the risk out. So my final point
Speaker 6: on that podcast, and I'll say today, is we're seeing
Speaker 6: the poll numbers looking really bad, right, but this is
Speaker 6: a very complicated thing. First of all, people say yes
Speaker 6: or no about things that they don't really care that
Speaker 6: much about and aren't of that much importance to them.
Speaker 6: And if they don't like Trump, they don't like the war,
Speaker 6: and that that's it. That's fine, it's over with. Among
Speaker 6: people who support Trump and who are Republicans, support for
Speaker 6: this war has been rising, not falling, and support for
Speaker 6: the war is at eighty to ninety five depending on
Speaker 6: how you calculate it. And that should matter less because
Speaker 6: you say, oh, well, he only as Republican supporting him,
Speaker 6: So what Publican and Democratic parties are at parody? They're
Speaker 6: both around forty two percent. Of course with leaners. If
Speaker 6: you look at the gallop, the gallop calculations of support
Speaker 6: for each party made this year so forty two, forty three,
Speaker 6: forty four percent. So that's a lot of people. And
Speaker 6: if ninety percent of forty four percent of the public
Speaker 6: supports you, the bottom isn't going to fall.
Speaker 1: Out for Trump.
Speaker 6: And the people who aren't in that forty in that
Speaker 6: in that number don't like him anyway and hate him
Speaker 6: and think he's awful and everything he does is monstrous,
Speaker 6: So he's got no play with them. There's nothing he
Speaker 6: can do with them. As he once joked, you know
Speaker 6: if he brought them the risen Christ, they would they
Speaker 6: would reject it. So I think under those circumstances he
Speaker 6: just should hold firm because tactically speaking, he's got all
Speaker 6: the backing that he'll ever be able to get.
Speaker 1: And now the only thing that can go wrong John
Speaker 1: is an HMS Sheffield incident where Iran gets off a
Speaker 1: lucky ballistic and they hit or a Lincoln or the
Speaker 1: four that would change American a mass casually disaster, even
Speaker 1: though in the run up to Normandy, not on Normandy.
Speaker 1: The run up to Normandy, more than five thousand soldiers, sailors,
Speaker 1: herman and marine lost their lives practicing for Normandy. We
Speaker 1: don't have that capacity anymore. You raise something at the
Speaker 1: very end, two things actually, One was Ukraine has really
Speaker 1: stepped up, and I hope American's opinion that changing of
Speaker 1: Zelenski and it's certainly a changing in the Gulf. And
Speaker 1: then second, the reality of the Strait of Hormuz is
Speaker 1: now in front of us. Do you think it's possible
Speaker 1: that China takes a look at that and thinks, hmmm,
Speaker 1: we really don't want the Mulas in charge of the
Speaker 1: Strait of Hormuz. Maybe we don't want them to win.
Speaker 6: I don't know if they want them to win or not.
Speaker 6: I think that they this is their alliance, and it's
Speaker 6: an anti American or you know, counter American alliance, and
Speaker 6: it may not be much of an alliance, but it's
Speaker 6: their alliance. And they don't shift very quickly the Chinese.
Speaker 6: So I wouldn't count on the Chinese coming in with
Speaker 6: us or something like that. But the point about horrm
Speaker 6: Movez that is really important is this. If you hate
Speaker 6: this war, fine you. And if you're now using the
Speaker 6: fact that the Strait of Hormuz is being threatened by Iran, fine,
Speaker 6: But now that the threat has been raised and you're
Speaker 6: trying to use the threat to Hormuz as an example
Speaker 6: of why Trump screwed up by starting the war, also fine.
Speaker 6: It doesn't mean that you then get to say I'm
Speaker 6: out of this, because if the Straight of Removes is
Speaker 6: threatened and the Islamic Republic of Iran remains in power,
Speaker 6: the Strait of Hormuz will never not be threatened again
Speaker 6: until they're gone. They've opened the Pandora's box it's there,
Speaker 6: it's threatened. They can threaten it at a moment's notice,
Speaker 6: and as could the people on the other side of
Speaker 6: the street, who certainly don't want to threaten it, but
Speaker 6: you know, you know who's on the other side, Dubai like,
Speaker 6: they could threaten it also, they could They could set
Speaker 6: a drone to get They don't want to, right, but
Speaker 6: we know Iran has opened this up as a possibility
Speaker 6: as their attempt to blackmail the world. Once they've decided
Speaker 6: to try to blackle the world this way, they gotta go,
Speaker 6: what are you going to do if we don't take
Speaker 6: them out?
Speaker 1: You're gonna why what are you going to do?
Speaker 6: How do you not have them on August fifteenth to
Speaker 6: so fire a volley and blow up a tanker somewhere?
Speaker 6: Just just to make a point, you are a.
Speaker 1: Season you're a season Trump watcher, and you're a former
Speaker 1: White House speech writer. Is there because Christine was talking
Speaker 1: about making a speech to a sure Americans get the constancy?
Speaker 1: I don't think it's possible anymore in this media. But
Speaker 1: if you were going to write him the speech to
Speaker 1: do that, what would it say? Would it say? Do
Speaker 1: you know how bad the Iranians are let me tell
Speaker 1: you what, he's not really that kind of a rhetoricician.
Speaker 6: It would probably be in three parts. Okay, the first
Speaker 6: part would be since nineteen seventy nine. So many of
Speaker 6: you were not born, so you don't understand what happened
Speaker 6: in nineteen seventy nine and nineteen seventy nine.
Speaker 1: This regime came in.
Speaker 6: America weirdly abedded its creation, and then ten months later
Speaker 6: they took fifty two Americans hostage and held them for
Speaker 6: four hundred and forty four days until a president came
Speaker 6: into power who frightened them so much that they relented
Speaker 6: and let the hostages go. And since then, for forty
Speaker 6: six years, they have been the world's leading sponsor of terrorism.
Speaker 6: They have fomented three major terrorist actors in the world,
Speaker 6: hesbal Ajamas and the Huthis. They have they started a
Speaker 6: war that where two million people were killed from nineteen
Speaker 6: eighty one to nineteen eighty nine, and they are developing
Speaker 6: nuclear weapons which every president has had to deal with.
Speaker 6: They are bad and they shouldn't exist anymore. But their
Speaker 6: country's not bad. Their country is tw twenty five hundred
Speaker 6: years old. It's a great old civilization. This was a
Speaker 6: construct place there forty seven years ago. If it goes,
Speaker 6: we're not taking out the country. We are taking out
Speaker 6: a regime that is a modern, jury rigged, corrupt, radical,
Speaker 6: anti American force. And it's only to the good that
Speaker 6: they're gone and will only be to the good for
Speaker 6: those people and for the world. And we are showing
Speaker 6: the world what we are made of, what we can do,
Speaker 6: and what they should not think they can threaten us with.
Speaker 6: After this is over, and all for all those three reasons,
Speaker 6: we're going in and we're taking them out.
Speaker 1: I hope he does that, now, that's what I would
Speaker 1: thirty seconds.
Speaker 6: I don't think he's Yeah.
Speaker 1: He didn't have that game, but maybe he could get
Speaker 1: it thirty seconds on a scale of one to ten,
Speaker 1: with one being I don't know, smooth Holly and ten
Speaker 1: being Reagan walking on a recovic. What's the JCPOA.
Speaker 6: Well, nothing's bad as bad as s. Pauley, right, so
Speaker 6: the jcpoas well. The win JCPO is three. But if
Speaker 6: the JCPOA actually can be viewed as the start of
Speaker 6: the reconstruction the Middle East, as it awakened people to
Speaker 6: the fact that unless Iran was stopped after this agreement,
Speaker 6: everything was going to go to hell. Then the j
Speaker 6: CPOA will have been, inadvertently, like ten to seven, a
Speaker 6: world changing moment, although the person who was responsible for
Speaker 6: it thought it would change the world in an entirely
Speaker 6: different way.
Speaker 1: Best case scenario for President Obama. Right there, John pod Or,
Speaker 1: it's always good to talk to you. I fall him
Speaker 1: on action, Jay pot Orritz stay tuned, America. Welcome back
Speaker 1: in America. I'm Hugh Hewittt and meet Schagahal has been
Speaker 1: my guest before. He is the lead analyst on Channel
Speaker 1: twelve in Israel, the author of a fine, splendid book,
Speaker 1: The call at four am that will, if it's possible,
Speaker 1: explain is Raley pout to you. It's not really possible
Speaker 1: because it doesn't make a lot of sense to Americans.
Speaker 1: I may welcome back. My first question just ask you.
Speaker 1: I want to ask you. It's usual better up today
Speaker 1: than it was thirty one days.
Speaker 7: Ago, Absolutely no doubt.
Speaker 8: You know, there is you know, this term Sizifian ritual,
Speaker 8: something that you do all over again and again in vain.
Speaker 7: Now, because we're.
Speaker 8: In the news industry, we have the feeling that this
Speaker 8: is an ongoing futile effort. However, every night the Israeli
Speaker 8: Air Force and the US ell Force shave another layer
Speaker 8: of this monstrous fundamentalist machine that had been built by
Speaker 8: Iranians for the last forty seven years. Even if the
Speaker 8: war ends today, which I hope it won't, but even
Speaker 8: if it ends today, Iran will have to buy one
Speaker 8: hundred new ships, a brand new airport, a force, a
Speaker 8: brand new a ballistic MISSILEI industry, a brand new steal industry,
Speaker 8: and of course the diamond the nuclear project, which means
Speaker 8: that their ability to threaten the world.
Speaker 7: And especially Israel and.
Speaker 8: The United States has decreased dramatically. Now, I think, while
Speaker 8: I think it's not enough, I'm still grateful enough.
Speaker 7: For prison Trump and for these ready army for doing
Speaker 7: the deality work.
Speaker 1: All right, second question, which is much harder. I want
Speaker 1: to remind people as well, and Meat is an almost
Speaker 1: daily correspondent now for the Free Press because they take
Speaker 1: his It's new an Israel email which I get every
Speaker 1: morning because it's free, and a me Segal dot net.
Speaker 1: It shows up at the Free Press, which I subscribe to,
Speaker 1: so I get it twice. I met. This is much tougher.
Speaker 1: Is Israel better off today than it was on ten six,
Speaker 1: twenty three, even though the horror of that day was
Speaker 1: ahead of it.
Speaker 7: I think it's way better.
Speaker 8: And you know, it's very hard to say this because
Speaker 8: it came at a cost, at a monstrous cost, twelve
Speaker 8: hundred casualties, but it actually quest in while on October
Speaker 8: seventh actually revealed the plan, the Iranian plan to choke
Speaker 8: Israel from seven different fronts, all funded and trained by Iran,
Speaker 8: without Iranian have to spill their blood fighting Israel. And
Speaker 8: now it's exactly the other way around. We have a
Speaker 8: border with Iran and they don't have a bottle with us.
Speaker 7: I just want to give you what we call proportions.
Speaker 8: Prior to Rising Line Operation in June twenty twenty five,
Speaker 8: the scenario was that eight hundred to four thousand Israelis
Speaker 8: how to.
Speaker 7: Be killed during the war.
Speaker 8: It ended with thirty casualties in Israel in twelve days.
Speaker 8: Now we are involved in a three front war with Iran,
Speaker 8: Kriz Bala and the Hooties, and yet after a month
Speaker 8: there are only twenty casualties. Now, while this is tragic
Speaker 8: and we mourn every victim of the conflict, it's something
Speaker 8: like less than two.
Speaker 7: Percent of the early.
Speaker 8: Expectations, which signals you how damage was caused by Israel
Speaker 8: and the US to the Iranian wall machine.
Speaker 1: Now in America, I remind people there are thirteen families
Speaker 1: who at this Passover Easter will not have someone at
Speaker 1: their table or know even that they're coming back, because
Speaker 1: they're dead and they've been killed by the Iranians and
Speaker 1: or accidents related to the war where they're on. So
Speaker 1: it's never not extraordinarily costly. But knowing what you know now,
Speaker 1: are we glad that Sinemore actually jumped the gun because
Speaker 1: if it had been coordinated, I don't know if Israel
Speaker 1: could have stood up to that, do you.
Speaker 7: It would be way way harder.
Speaker 8: I think lead is not the termed because every really
Speaker 8: knowing person, some of the victims or the half the
Speaker 8: photo hostages from October seventh. However, having said that, absolutely
Speaker 8: the entire existence of Israel was hanging by a thread
Speaker 8: four years, or had been hanging by a thread four years,
Speaker 8: and we didn't know it. Now, while it was a
Speaker 8: dramatic strategic failure, it gave Israel the opportunity to take
Speaker 8: its enemies one enemy at a time, one tentical at
Speaker 8: the time, and then the head of the octopus and
Speaker 8: this is what we see today. This was the big
Speaker 8: plan to actually eliminate Israel by the twenty thirty and
Speaker 8: Israel was saved.
Speaker 7: From it thanks for this.
Speaker 8: Someone defined it in Israel a terrible miracle. I think
Speaker 8: it's it's it's right to the point.
Speaker 1: That is a very app description. I'll be right back
Speaker 1: with a Meid Chagall. Don't go anywhere, America. Chat over
Speaker 1: to his website during the break, Amid Chagal that sign
Speaker 1: up for a daily newsletter, subscribe to the Free Press.
Speaker 1: He's on it TV every now. I think the Israelians
Speaker 1: appetite for news is even more satiable than mine. And
Speaker 1: so he's working around the clock. Don't go anywhere. I'll
Speaker 1: be right back with the meat broking back America. You're
Speaker 1: here with a Meek Cigale Channel twelve and of the
Speaker 1: Free Press. I mean, we are one missile away from
Speaker 1: a mass casually event to an American ship or a base,
Speaker 1: or a dreaded mass casualty event in Israel. Could that
Speaker 1: change everything? One missile getting.
Speaker 7: Through in Israel.
Speaker 8: No, because the assumption is that Israel would be heat
Speaker 8: so hard that it would have to stop either by
Speaker 8: the pressure of the public opinion or by a decision
Speaker 8: made by taken by a private san Aitanao.
Speaker 7: I think either of the neither option is feasible.
Speaker 8: The vast majority of the really public is fully aware
Speaker 8: of the danger from Iran, the threat posed by this
Speaker 8: fundamentalist regime, and there is a widespread, rare consensus support
Speaker 8: consensus around the idea that they must be eliminated as
Speaker 8: a military threat. At the very same time, I have
Speaker 8: to say that as time passes, Israeli have find it
Speaker 8: hard to actually function under this annoying sound of sirens
Speaker 8: going off entirely around the country.
Speaker 7: I'll explain.
Speaker 8: Okay, there was a fascinating statistics in our whole last week.
Speaker 8: Those with safe room in their apartment, you know, you
Speaker 8: don't have to show your pajama to the neighbors. They
Speaker 8: support the world seventy seven twenty two.
Speaker 7: Those who have public shelters, you.
Speaker 8: Know they have to to, you know, climb the stir is.
Speaker 8: At three am, they supported sixty to forty Those without
Speaker 8: shelters fifty seven percent to twenty two percent against the war, which.
Speaker 7: Means that people are exhausted.
Speaker 8: But the vastal jority of his radies is still you know,
Speaker 8: as Britz call it, Steve upper Lip, all.
Speaker 1: Right, No, I mean this is a difficult thing in
Speaker 1: the middle of a war that could still have terrible
Speaker 1: events happen in it, and no doubt we'll have other
Speaker 1: lots of life. Prime Minister that yahoo. I can't imagine
Speaker 1: anyone other than him leading Israel through this. But I'm
Speaker 1: not in ISRAELI and I don't know that much. Could
Speaker 1: anyone else have done this? In your view? I mean,
Speaker 1: you're much younger than he is, but you know everyone
Speaker 1: in Israel could Could anyone else have done this this way?
Speaker 8: I think the the you know, the most important piece
Speaker 8: in this battle is talking President Trump into attacking Iran.
Speaker 8: This is Nataniell's main advantage over his rivals. This is
Speaker 8: his even his most bitter enemies Rifles admits that this.
Speaker 7: Is his main achievement and main advantage when it comes
Speaker 7: to attack you run.
Speaker 8: I think you I could think about a few prime
Speaker 8: ministers would have done it, Benguion, maybe Arian Scheon, perhaps
Speaker 8: even Idol.
Speaker 7: But yes, I mean, this.
Speaker 8: Is Nataniao's main achievement in his entire career, and it
Speaker 8: has been a very long career.
Speaker 6: As you know.
Speaker 1: Now the budget in Israel passion for the benefit of
Speaker 1: the American audience. That means the government can go on
Speaker 1: to at least until October if it wants to. It's
Speaker 1: got a hold an election in October by law, but
Speaker 1: it can be pulled forward. The Brits in nineteen hundred,
Speaker 1: the Tory Party had just thought they had won the
Speaker 1: Second World War, so they held the Khaki election and
Speaker 1: they won overwhelmingly, so they pulled it forward. Do you
Speaker 1: think that the could coalition might pull the election forward
Speaker 1: if this war ends soon?
Speaker 7: And well, I'm not sure.
Speaker 8: You know, the main difference between the Tories in forty
Speaker 8: five and recording twenty twenty six.
Speaker 7: Is that the war hell goes nowhere.
Speaker 8: It's still you know, the very complicated security situation.
Speaker 7: It's not Europe post World War two.
Speaker 8: However, this is a dramatic achievement for Nathaniao because it's
Speaker 8: going to be the first government to serve a full
Speaker 8: term since nineteen sixty nine.
Speaker 7: Sixty seven years.
Speaker 8: Has passed since the last government seld a full term. Now,
Speaker 8: while you know it shows the strengths, it shows weakness
Speaker 8: as well, because the reason coalitions usually fall apart is
Speaker 8: because some parties believe that they can gain ground in
Speaker 8: the election. The coalition parties are relatively we following October seventh,
Speaker 8: so they have had no incentive coding up an early election.
Speaker 7: Having all that said, I think that is.
Speaker 8: More than fifty percent chance of getting re elected.
Speaker 1: All right, last question I may in times of crisis,
Speaker 1: Americans turn on the television. They turn on radio shows
Speaker 1: like this and television shows like this. They can't, but
Speaker 1: then their attention dissipates quickly. Can the Israeli possibly watch
Speaker 1: more news than they have watched consistently for the last
Speaker 1: ten years? Our ratings up? And what I'm asking?
Speaker 8: Oh yes, I'll give you an example. The most popular
Speaker 8: news the most popular TV show in Israel on a
Speaker 8: daily basis since the sixties is the eight pm news broadcast.
Speaker 8: Usually it gets on Channel twelve, where podcast something like
Speaker 8: fourteen percent, fourteen percent footy points. Nowadays sometimes it yes,
Speaker 8: but this is doing in ordinary days today nowadays it's
Speaker 8: nineteen percent.
Speaker 7: Twenty percent.
Speaker 8: My mid the Press show on Saturday night reached sixteen
Speaker 8: point six percent.
Speaker 7: It's it's it's it's yeah.
Speaker 1: It's context. When I don't television. When we got a
Speaker 1: share at one point we were popping child. Yeah, we
Speaker 1: were happy as it can be. So nineteen share is remarkable.
Speaker 7: No, no, no, no, the share is higher than nineteen.
Speaker 8: Nineteen is out of Yes, the share is something like
Speaker 8: thirty seven percent.
Speaker 7: Okay, the point when I when.
Speaker 8: I yeah, when I talk about points, I talk about you.
Speaker 7: Know, the percentage of a TV is open.
Speaker 8: Out of the out of one hundred TV televisions in Israel,
Speaker 8: how many televisions have opened on channel twelve? Okay, so
Speaker 8: it's thirty seven percent share and nineteen twenty percent of
Speaker 8: the entire out number of television.
Speaker 1: Can you go in public anywhere or do people yell
Speaker 1: at you all the time?
Speaker 7: Okay?
Speaker 8: So now justin Midgin, how how it feels to go
Speaker 8: at three am with your pajama to a shte and
Speaker 8: meet all your neighbors.
Speaker 1: You need to get a false mustache. I meet Cigal.
Speaker 1: We're out of time. I appreciate the time. Go to
Speaker 1: a meet Sigal se g a l a me ami.
Speaker 1: She Sagal dot net and he works for the Free
Speaker 1: Press as well. So you can subscribe to the Free
Speaker 1: Press and get it there every day as well. Thank you,
Speaker 1: and meat don't go anywhere America. I'm You're right back
Speaker 1: to wrap up today's You hew A show as we
Speaker 1: continue to cover a remarkably fast moving or it could
Speaker 1: change by tomorrow morning. You never really know when this
Speaker 1: thing is going to take another dramatic turn. It's watching
Speaker 1: Carolyn Levitt this afternoon before I got on the show,
Speaker 1: and she said, based on the latest, we're talking to
Speaker 1: the real people in Iran, So who knows. By tomorrow
Speaker 1: could all be different. Stationed, you've heard me talk a
Speaker 1: lot about Consumer Cellular. Now you can switch your carrier,
Speaker 1: save money without the sacrifice. That's because Consumer Cellular uses
Speaker 1: the same towers as major carriers. Make the switch today
Speaker 1: and get twenty five dollars off at Consumer Cellular dot
Speaker 1: Com slash shoe. If you're over fifty, get one line
Speaker 1: of unlimited talk, text and data for thirty five dollars,
Speaker 1: plus an additional five dollars per month off for the
Speaker 1: first five months. When you visit Consumer Cellular dot Com
Speaker 1: slash shoe, use the promo code Q twenty five. Consumer
Speaker 1: Cellular ranks number one for network coverage and consumer satisfaction
Speaker 1: according to ACSL. You'll be working with an actual human
Speaker 1: being when you switch based right here in the US.
Speaker 1: So get one line of unlimited talk, text and data
Speaker 1: for only thirty five dollars per month, plus an additional
Speaker 1: five dollars off per month for the first five months.
Speaker 1: Think of all the money you will save. Go to
Speaker 1: Consumer Cellular dot Com slash shoe Promo qu twenty five
Speaker 1: or call one eight hundred and four to one one
Speaker 1: forty four fifty four Consumer Cellular dot Com slash shoe.
Speaker 1: Clean water is not complicated, but it is essential. Without it,
Speaker 1: public health suffer, education declines, economic stability well it weakens
Speaker 1: if it doesn't collapse. Across Latin America and the Caribbean,
Speaker 1: families are facing that reality of unclean water every day.
Speaker 1: Mothers walk miles for clean water. Children are exposed to
Speaker 1: preventable diseases because they haven't got it. Communities are held
Speaker 1: back by the absence of basic clean water access. But
Speaker 1: strategic compassion changes outcomes. Through food for the poor, your
Speaker 1: gift provides safe and living water, improving how strengthening communities,
Speaker 1: and supporting gospeled centered transformation through trusted local partnerships. This
Speaker 1: is a measurable impact with lasting results. Your gift to
Speaker 1: fifty dollars ensures two people have safe and living water,
Speaker 1: or four one hundred dollars a family of four will
Speaker 1: be transformed for a year. I hope you act. Text
Speaker 1: Hewitt Hgwitt. That's Hewitt, Hwitt to five to one five
Speaker 1: fifty five, that's Hewett to fifty one five five five,
Speaker 1: or visit Hewitt dot com right now and click on
Speaker 1: the blue giving living water banner at the top to
Speaker 1: provide living water today and thank you. Smoking back America. Well,
Speaker 1: Bill wasn't lyon die Henley Don Henley singing from the
Speaker 1: eighties about a king talking about Reagan. I'm joined by
Speaker 1: the originally insured, the people's pundit, Selena Zo from the
Speaker 1: Washington Post, the Washington Seminer, the New York Posts, the
Speaker 1: Pittsburgh Post, Caazette syndicated column, and the UUs OW regular
Speaker 1: Selena Happy Easter in advance to you. I hope you
Speaker 1: have been planning for a big festive meal at your house.
Speaker 9: Oh, yes, yes, yesterday we were making Sicilian doughnuts, which
Speaker 9: we always have on Palm Sunday, which ever caught in them,
Speaker 9: and you deep fry them and then you bury them
Speaker 9: in sugar. Yeah, it's going to be cooking all week.
Speaker 9: My grandchildren were cooking with me today.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm sorry I missed the Sicilian donuts. Do you
Speaker 1: have to be a made man to get one of those?
Speaker 10: I can make you some. I can help you up.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 1: I want you to know you were quoted today on
Speaker 1: the commentary podcast your famous line, Trump must be taken seriously,
Speaker 1: not literally, but people take him literally and not seriously
Speaker 1: and right, And someone who said that, and John Bodor said,
Speaker 1: Selina Zito said that, do you think that's the most
Speaker 1: famous line you've ever been.
Speaker 10: Probably? Yeah, But you know, don't you think? I don't know.
Speaker 10: Maybe it's very obvious to me because I straddle to
Speaker 10: different worlds.
Speaker 9: Right, If I go online and look at the political class,
Speaker 9: it's the latter. If I'm out with you know, normal humans,
Speaker 9: which is where I much prefer to be, it is
Speaker 9: the former. You know, this is Donald Trump is a
Speaker 9: guy that's been in the American cultural experience since the
Speaker 9: early eighties, in the late seventies, and he's always been
Speaker 9: this way. And people that consumed him on television, on
Speaker 9: the New York Post and New York Times, they understood
Speaker 9: that this is the way he talked, and they didn't
Speaker 9: take it all that.
Speaker 10: Literally, know, Alina.
Speaker 1: I got old and dear friends whom Trump has completely broken,
Speaker 1: and I have friends who have divorced me as a
Speaker 1: friend because you know, he's a president. He's not a
Speaker 1: preacher or a pastor. And he's doing a very good
Speaker 1: job of taking down an a consistential threat to Israel
Speaker 1: in the world and Iran. And I generally approved seventy
Speaker 1: five percent of what he does, and so I'm pretty
Speaker 1: happy with him as a president. I do not approve
Speaker 1: a lot about Donald Trump, but he doesn't approve about
Speaker 1: it a lot about me. We're not buddies. But really,
Speaker 1: what is wrong with the no kingspeople? That's just constitutionally illiterate.
Speaker 10: It's so I just look at it and think it's
Speaker 10: so dumb.
Speaker 9: But here's here's a point and a really important point
Speaker 9: that I want to make. As I looked at two
Speaker 9: events that happened, one in Pittsburgh and one in my
Speaker 9: where I used to live in Mount Lebanon, UH and
Speaker 9: Connor Lamb, who's making no bones about the fact that
Speaker 9: he wants to primary John Fetterman, is speaking at the
Speaker 9: one in Mount Lebanon, and I'm looking, I'm watching it
Speaker 9: live online, and I'm like, oh my god, I know
Speaker 9: almost everyone there nothing. These people voted the same. There's
Speaker 9: no one new in this crowd. They're the same crowd,
Speaker 9: regurgitated every time. Are the crowd sizeable, yes, but they're
Speaker 9: not new. Why is it important? It's important because when
Speaker 9: you want to build a coalition, you need to bring
Speaker 9: new people into your coalition. There's no one new there.
Speaker 9: These are the same voters they had in twenty twenty
Speaker 9: four and they lost with these voters. And so I
Speaker 9: think that aspect really needs to be driven home, because
Speaker 9: you have to build, you have to grow. They're white
Speaker 9: and my age right, and there's nothing. There's no one
Speaker 9: new and young. There no, there's no diversity, not just
Speaker 9: racial diversity, there's no cultural diversity. You don't see any
Speaker 9: working class people there. You see culture.
Speaker 1: Basically old, upper middle class to upper class people. Selena,
Speaker 1: I agree. But I got to go to the more
Speaker 1: important thing because you had insured the insur this week.
Speaker 1: You gave me the perfect insurer story.
Speaker 11: The Pittsburgh public schools are closing because of the NFL draft,
Speaker 11: and I really I had to look twice I couldn't
Speaker 11: believe it because the kids I am an exactly experienced
Speaker 11: learning abundance in the last five years.
Speaker 1: Right, learning loss is a real deal. And they closed
Speaker 1: for two days because of the draft.
Speaker 10: Oh oh, not two days, four four days?
Speaker 1: You know it's not worth the draft. It's even if
Speaker 1: that was all worth the draft. What's wrong with your
Speaker 1: school district?
Speaker 10: I attended that school district. I am shocked at this
Speaker 10: school district, but I've been shocked at it for the
Speaker 10: past thirty years. I had an excellent education there.
Speaker 9: David mccaullaugh always said that was a premier education that
Speaker 9: we received in those schools.
Speaker 10: There was nothing better.
Speaker 6: And first of football.
Speaker 1: Out of this. We're leaving football out of this. Right.
Speaker 1: But but yes, Pittsburgh got good schools. But yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: are they getting criticized by the parents? Are the parents mad?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 9: The parents are infuriated there. And the draft is at night.
Speaker 9: It doesn't impact the schools. And there's only one school
Speaker 9: that is anywhere near the proximity of where the draft
Speaker 9: will be held, and that's not even that close.
Speaker 1: Has any national network covered this yet, because this is
Speaker 1: a national scandal. These kids have had learning loss, that's
Speaker 1: appreciable that everyone is documented and they're taking four days off.
Speaker 1: I thought it was two four days off for the
Speaker 1: NFL Draft. Has any national network covered it yet?
Speaker 10: No, not at all.
Speaker 1: Well, then the Salem News channel is first. I really,
Speaker 1: have they responded to the criticism or they just hunted
Speaker 1: down and they're taking their four day vacation.
Speaker 9: Oh yeah, this is my favorite criticism. Hey, we gave
Speaker 9: the parents for a month advanced notice. They should be
Speaker 9: fine with this. This is my favorite line that the
Speaker 9: public affairs person said.
Speaker 1: You know, I just spent the weekend with my four grandkids.
Speaker 1: I just spent the weekend with my four grandkids. My
Speaker 1: son in law is deployed. I cannot believe that. There
Speaker 1: got to be a lot of people in Pittsburgh who
Speaker 1: are deployed. So they just said to all those single parents,
Speaker 1: score you for four days because we want to watch
Speaker 1: and enjoy the draft. That's really what it is, right,
Speaker 1: The teachers and the administrator want to go enjoy the draft.
Speaker 9: I mean the teachers are mad too. By the way,
Speaker 9: it's the union and it's the superintendent. It's not the teachers.
Speaker 9: I talked to plenty of teachers. They're really upset. Most
Speaker 9: teachers really care about this kid.
Speaker 1: Of course they do, but then they would quit the union,
Speaker 1: or they would or they would start firing the superintendent.
Speaker 1: Where's the school board? Has anyone returned your call from
Speaker 1: the school board? Because this is nuts? Nope, Nope, Selena.
Speaker 1: Happy Easter to you and yours. Follow Selena on ex
Speaker 1: Zito Selena