Speaker 1: Georgie by
Speaker 1: Georgie Pie reportedly out at ABC News. We're gonna get
Speaker 1: into all the details on that one. Bill Clinton's Golden
Speaker 1: Boy bye bye, apparently FEMA. Well, they're in a lot
Speaker 1: of trouble. 4 FEMA employees are being fired over that
Speaker 1: $59 million payment that was just made to some fancy
Speaker 1: fancy New York City hotels to house illegals, uh-huh, believe
Speaker 1: it or not.
Speaker 1: And then Trump is calling out Letitia James in a
Speaker 1: really strong way and he's joined by none other than
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon wait till you hear how Steve Bannon believes
Speaker 1: she must be investigated now I'm with him, Pam Bondi,
Speaker 1: it is time and then well we gotta get to
Speaker 1: this story. What is Fox doing?
Speaker 1: Fox News seems to to wanna be back together again
Speaker 1: with Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly and Bill O'Reilly, my gosh. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you see, they figured it out. Apparently the independents kinda
Speaker 1: have it going on and so there's this little deal
Speaker 1: they just made.
Speaker 1: Or somehow all of them are gonna wind up back
Speaker 1: together we'll discuss it is great to have all of
Speaker 1: you here reminder to subscribe, share, like it is really
Speaker 1: important right now. Independent media, that's what we are we
Speaker 1: are completely unfiltered, no scripts, no nothing, just me and you.
Speaker 1: Great to have you all.
Speaker 1: Here, make sure you subscribe, share, like, and hit the
Speaker 1: bell so you know when the show is happening. We're
Speaker 1: on a little different time today, so it's good to
Speaker 1: see some new faces and I see some familiar ones
Speaker 1: as well. Tina, you're one of the first in the room.
Speaker 1: Leticia James is in a whole lot of trouble. We're
Speaker 1: gonna get to that, but first, what happened to Georgie?
Speaker 1: Oh wow, I mean, I, I'm looking at George Stephanopoulos,
Speaker 1: and I do think it's over for the poor guy,
Speaker 1: George Stephanopoulos, you know, he, he, he's gonna have a
Speaker 1: hard time. Let's be honest, right? Like he's gonna have
Speaker 1: a really hard time reporting on Donald Trump for the
Speaker 1: next 4 years. So maybe this is all for the best.
Speaker 1: He's apparently totally miserable. He feels emasculated. Can you imagine
Speaker 1: he feels emasculated. Oh, poor little guy, poor little Georgie.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm being unkind, right?
Speaker 1: He is little, um, anyway, little George is upset because
Speaker 1: he had to issue an apology and it cost him
Speaker 1: $16 million well, not technically him but his network, because
Speaker 1: you see he went on air and said some things
Speaker 1: that weren't true about the president and you know what,
Speaker 1: the president's like, I don't have to deal with this.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna sue you for libel and you know what?
Speaker 1: He won or at least they settled. So yeah, Georgie
Speaker 1: feels emasculated.
Speaker 1: Spirit Phil, good to have you back in the house.
Speaker 1: Thank you for your generosity. I'm gonna get to all
Speaker 1: of your comments. Thank you for all the super chats
Speaker 1: you guys gave yesterday. Just I'm amazed by the generosity
Speaker 1: that's so, so, um, so extraordinary. So George apparently feels
Speaker 1: emasculated because his.
Speaker 1: Uh, need of his need to give this apology, you see,
Speaker 1: and well, he didn't like it according to this new report,
Speaker 1: and this is for the New York Post who talked
Speaker 1: to to several sources involved, you know, I reported on
Speaker 1: this a while back and what did I tell you?
Speaker 1: He's gonna be out. There's no way they're gonna keep him.
Speaker 1: There's just no way because it's like you don't need
Speaker 1: that if you're Disney, if you're Bob Iger, I mean
Speaker 1: things are bad enough you got Elon Musk on your trail.
Speaker 1: Elon doesn't like you very much, but then again you
Speaker 1: didn't like Elon, but guess who won that battle? Mhm. Elon.
Speaker 1: OK, and he's also got act. So Bob Baer was
Speaker 1: the first to pull the funding. He runs Disney, which runs,
Speaker 1: of course, ABC News. And so this is getting a
Speaker 1: little bit sticky. Donald Trump has no use for ABC
Speaker 1: News after a few debates, and then this guy.
Speaker 1: So he said some things that were untrue. We're gonna
Speaker 1: get to that in a second, but as a result
Speaker 1: of this, he's pretty miserable according to sources telling the
Speaker 1: Post that the network could wait to pull the plug
Speaker 1: on him until this summer when things are dead or
Speaker 1: later in the year. I mean, put the guy out
Speaker 1: of his misery, for goodness sakes, would you? You're really
Speaker 1: gonna make him report on.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, the guy he calls this, that and the other. Again,
Speaker 1: more on that in a second. Stephanopoulos, it says, has
Speaker 1: been rumored to be on his way out, according to
Speaker 1: multiple network sources. Again, you heard it here first. I
Speaker 1: said it was the only logical conclusion after he had
Speaker 1: to pay, or Disney ABC News had to pay $16 million.
Speaker 1: It was the only logical conclusion.
Speaker 1: It's because you see one George Stephanopoulos was so intent
Speaker 1: on saying over and over and over again that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump was somehow found liable for rape, which was not true.
Speaker 1: That is not what he was found liable for sexual
Speaker 1: abuse was actually what the judge had said, and Georgie
Speaker 1: was told this multiple times by his producer apparently they
Speaker 1: even have text messages of it. They're like, Don't say this,
Speaker 1: don't say this, don't say this. And what did Georgie do?
Speaker 1: He went on air and he said.
Speaker 1: You've endorsed Donald Trump for president. Judges and two separate
Speaker 1: juries have found him liable for rape and for defaming
Speaker 1: the victim of that rape. How do you square your
Speaker 1: endorsement of Donald Trump with the testimony we just saw? Well,
Speaker 1: I will tell you I was raped at the age
Speaker 1: of 16, and any rape victim will tell you I've
Speaker 1: lived for 30 years with an incredible amount of shame. OK,
Speaker 1: so just to point out, he didn't just say it once,
Speaker 1: he had to say it twice, and this is after
Speaker 1: his producers were like, no, no, no.
Speaker 1: Don't say this. Please don't say this. Well, it resulted
Speaker 1: in a lawsuit. It resulted in a fine or at
Speaker 1: least a settlement of some $16 million.15 million dollars going
Speaker 1: to the Trump presidential library, another a million dollars for
Speaker 1: the lawyers and Georgie feeling totally emasculated as a result,
Speaker 1: you know, he had to give an apology to, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm not kind of pretty for for George, so.
Speaker 1: The expectation and I'm just gonna call it here and
Speaker 1: now like he's not staying there's no way he's staying.
Speaker 1: They're not gonna continue to pay that salary given what
Speaker 1: he's cost them and the sort of capital loss or
Speaker 1: the equity loss that they're gonna have with the White
Speaker 1: House having this guy in the seat, which makes you wonder.
Speaker 1: 87% support deporting criminal undocumented. I don't know, I don't
Speaker 1: know anybody in the world who wants to keep the criminals.
Speaker 1: I don't know anybody. I say you see Whoopi Goldberg
Speaker 1: is also on thin ice. George Stephanopoulos is not the
Speaker 1: only one who's gonna be out. It's expected that, you know,
Speaker 1: Whoopi could be in kind of a tough spot too,
Speaker 1: which is one of the reasons you just heard her say,
Speaker 1: I don't know anybody who wants to keep the criminals
Speaker 1: in the United States.
Speaker 1: Well, except for Letitia James, more on that in a moment. So,
Speaker 1: so she's actually sounding as though she agrees with Donald
Speaker 1: Trump a little bit on this one. I think that
Speaker 1: is by design, shall we say, if you notice, the
Speaker 1: View is out with a whole brand new program. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's The View on weekends. I will spare you the promotion,
Speaker 1: but suffice it to say Whoopi's not in it nowhere
Speaker 1: to be found, so they're gonna be streaming now on weekends,
Speaker 1: but there's no Whoopie. Everybody else, the whole cast is
Speaker 1: there except for Whoopi.
Speaker 1: Which makes one sort of conclude that perhaps there's a
Speaker 1: little contract negotiation going on and maybe that was one
Speaker 1: of the things that they haven't been able to determine
Speaker 1: in the negotiation but then again maybe they're not even
Speaker 1: going to keep her at all. Maybe they're gonna say
Speaker 1: enough is enough, right? You've cost us dearly lady, we
Speaker 1: don't need any more of this. We don't need the threat.
Speaker 1: A Brendan Carr at the FCC taking away our affiliate
Speaker 1: licenses all over the country for all of these little OO,
Speaker 1: not just the O1O's owned and operated, but all the
Speaker 1: little stations that we try and milk so that they
Speaker 1: get the privilege of having the ABC branding and they
Speaker 1: have the privilege of carrying your show Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar,
Speaker 1: Sonny House and the rest of them.
Speaker 1: Disney doesn't need that headache. Bob Iger doesn't need that headache.
Speaker 1: Shareholders don't need that headache, so I would expect that
Speaker 1: George will be joined, shall we say, on his way
Speaker 1: out the door by one Whoopi Goldberg sometime in 2025,
Speaker 1: sooner rather than later for George. In fact, if you
Speaker 1: turn into this week with George Stephanopoulos, I actually haven't
Speaker 1: seen him. I've seen Martha Raddatz. They're all circling the wagons,
Speaker 1: you see, because everybody wants the gig. There's a Jonathan Karl.
Speaker 1: Again, you've probably never heard of these people, but they're
Speaker 1: sort of mainstays at the network and they want the job.
Speaker 1: David Muir apparently wants it, but you know, he probably
Speaker 1: He probably doesn't have much of a future after the
Speaker 1: uh incident with the very tight fitting little, you know,
Speaker 1: fire jacket, remember that one he was caught with a
Speaker 1: clothes pin pinning his jacket tight because you know you
Speaker 1: had to just look so great while you're out there
Speaker 1: covering those LA wildfires. Oh my goodness. So they, they
Speaker 1: get a bit of a mess going on and none
Speaker 1: of it is any surprise. I would just say mainstream
Speaker 1: media is kind of doomed.
Speaker 1: And I think they know it. I think they know it,
Speaker 1: which is why we'll talk about the story a little
Speaker 1: bit later on.
Speaker 1: You have suddenly Fox trying to get back in on
Speaker 1: its action back in on Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson
Speaker 1: and Bill O'Reilly, the people that they kicked to the curb.
Speaker 1: They want him back. Oh yeah, you better believe it,
Speaker 1: you know, they're like Kaching, k chk ching. We got
Speaker 1: more on that coming up. Make sure you subscribe, share, like,
Speaker 1: all that good stuff. I want to get to DEI
Speaker 1: and Disney because Disney is starting a whole new course
Speaker 1: for itself here. It's going solo as far as the DEI.
Speaker 1: I goes no more of that dumping various DEI programs.
Speaker 1: Here's the headline 2 DEI programs, not one, but two.
Speaker 1: I mean, how many did they have for goodness sakes.
Speaker 1: They're acts in the programs for diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
Speaker 1: It's just the latest company, of course, to walk back
Speaker 1: some of this wokeness. I mean you have Google, for example,
Speaker 1: getting rid of all its fancy schmancy holidays. I mean,
Speaker 1: what would I do without every single month being.
Speaker 1: Some other affinity groups holiday. What do you know Google's
Speaker 1: actually getting rid of all those. I couldn't believe it.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna be able to know when it's Black
Speaker 1: History Month. I'm not gonna be able to know when
Speaker 1: it's indigenous People's Day. No, no, no, they're getting rid
Speaker 1: of all that. Check it out. I want to show you. Yup,
Speaker 1: Google calendar has removed cultural events from their site, including
Speaker 1: Pride Month, Black History Month, Holocaust, remember to say Jewish heritage,
Speaker 1: Hispanic Heritage, indigenous People's Day. What about, you know.
Speaker 1: Women and all that, I mean, there's so many. I, I,
Speaker 1: it's exhausting, right, when you look at your calendar because
Speaker 1: you start to see things and you hear things that
Speaker 1: you've never even heard of before. It's always a day,
Speaker 1: it's always a month. So that's going bye bye along
Speaker 1: with Disney, of course, dumping its DEI programs. I don't
Speaker 1: know how that's gonna sit so well with the likes
Speaker 1: of say Whoopi Goldberg, who's, you know, all about those
Speaker 1: initiatives or even, what about this guy, Captain America?
Speaker 1: The Captain America that thinks Captain America doesn't represent America.
Speaker 1: Here he is, just a couple of weeks ago over
Speaker 1: in Rome, Italy, speaking on the international stage, kind of
Speaker 1: trashing Captain America, and America for that matter. For me,
Speaker 1: Captain America represents a lot of different things and I
Speaker 1: don't think the term, you know, America should be one
Speaker 1: of those representations like, uh, it's about uh
Speaker 1: A man who keeps his word, who has honored, dignity
Speaker 1: and integrity, uh, someone who is, uh, trustworthy and dependable. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, it's, uh, it's, it's kind of
Speaker 1: This is kind of like a uh an aspect of
Speaker 1: a dream coming true, you know, when I was a kid.
Speaker 1: You know, all of us as actors, I believe, want
Speaker 1: to get back to that day before someone told you no.
Speaker 1: When you look out your door and you see a
Speaker 1: 5 year old kid with a stick and he's slaying
Speaker 1: dragons to save the princess in the tower, that kid
Speaker 1: really believes there are dragons out there. That stick is
Speaker 1: really a sword and he's really trying to save that princess.
Speaker 1: And then one day somebody told him no, there are
Speaker 1: no dragons, that's not a sword, and that princess is
Speaker 1: not there. And all of his little dreams were dashed.
Speaker 1: So, you know, as an actor, I feel like our
Speaker 1: job is to get back to the day where we
Speaker 1: see that dragon and we slave that dragon to save
Speaker 1: that princess. And we must admit that somehow Captain America,
Speaker 1: who's about all this goodness.
Speaker 1: And you know, good triumphing over evil, that that's not America.
Speaker 1: I mean, wow, what a way to sell a movie, buddy.
Speaker 1: I think he knows he's on the skids. I mean
Speaker 1: now the DEI programs out he's got actually deliver like
Speaker 1: real box office delivery, and he was quoted recently, this
Speaker 1: is Anthony Mackie, the new Captain America in Esquire magazine
Speaker 1: saying he doesn't know if he has a 2nd or
Speaker 1: 3rd or 4th movie. He doesn't know if they'll continue
Speaker 1: to develop his character because the movie needs to perform and, well,
Speaker 1: you know, that's, that's the name of the game, right?
Speaker 1: We are a capitalist nation. You do work for a
Speaker 1: for-profit company, one Disney, that actually.
Speaker 1: Needs to make a profit on your stuff. Disney pulling
Speaker 1: back out of the DEI programs. It's reimagine tomorrow program,
Speaker 1: a big DEI push coming right out of the SEC
Speaker 1: filing the 10K that they just put forward. The program
Speaker 1: had been seen as quote, amplifying underrepresented voices and features,
Speaker 1: some of Disney's DE and I commitments and action. Well, they're,
Speaker 1: they're getting rid of it because, you know, apparently they
Speaker 1: were promising.
Speaker 1: 50% of regular and recurring characters around the Disney universe,
Speaker 1: they would all come from unrepresented, underrepresented groups. Here's the
Speaker 1: executive speaking on it in March of 2023, sort of saying, hey,
Speaker 1: you know, we gotta do this, we gotta do this, huh?
Speaker 1: Not anymore. And that was the thing that really got me,
Speaker 1: because I have heard so much from so many of
Speaker 1: my colleagues over the course of the last couple weeks, um,
Speaker 1: in open forums and through emails and phone conversations, and
Speaker 1: Um, I feel a responsibility to speak, um, not just
Speaker 1: for myself but for them.
Speaker 1: Um, to all of us, we, we had a, we
Speaker 1: had an open forum last week at 20th where, um, again,
Speaker 1: the home of, of really incredible groundbreaking LGBTQIA stories over
Speaker 1: the years where, um, one of our execs stood up
Speaker 1: and said, you know, we only have a handful of
Speaker 1: queer leads in our content. And I went, what?
Speaker 1: I that can't be true. And I, and I, and
Speaker 1: I realized, oh, it, it actually is true. We have many, many,
Speaker 1: many LGBTQIA characters in our stories, and, and, and yet
Speaker 1: we don't have enough leads, um, and narratives in which
Speaker 1: gay characters just just get to be characters, um, and,
Speaker 1: and not have to be about.
Speaker 1: Gay stories. And so, um, that's been very eye-opening for me. Um, and,
Speaker 1: and I, I can tell you, um, it's something that
Speaker 1: I feel perhaps had this moment not happened, um, I,
Speaker 1: as a leader and me as my colleagues would not
Speaker 1: have focused on. And, and going forward, um, I, I
Speaker 1: certainly will be more so. I know that we will be, and, um,
Speaker 1: And I hope this is a moment where
Speaker 1: Shoot, um, the 50% of the tears.
Speaker 1: Sorry, I'm coming. Um, uh, we don't, we just don't
Speaker 1: allow each other to go backwards. OK. Well, sorry, honey.
Speaker 1: Apparently you're going backwards as far as that is concerned.
Speaker 1: Because they're dumping, totally dumping the initiatives, which means that
Speaker 1: some of these characters, some of these storylines, some of
Speaker 1: these movies are gonna actually have to stand on their
Speaker 1: own 2 ft at the box office, which is how
Speaker 1: it should be, right? I mean just like George Stephanopoulos
Speaker 1: should not have that gig just because he's a Clinton
Speaker 1: crony as he is and was. Don't forget this is
Speaker 1: the guy that was like the Caroline Levitt, if you
Speaker 1: can imagine that. Good luck.
Speaker 1: The Caroline Lovett of the White House back in the
Speaker 1: day under Bill Clinton.
Speaker 1: So he was always spinning for the Democrats. That's all
Speaker 1: he's ever done, and then he went to work at
Speaker 1: ABC News where he's masquerading around as a quote unquote
Speaker 1: journalist with a capital J. I'm Mr. Stephanopoulos. Good luck
Speaker 1: with that one, OK.
Speaker 1: And
Speaker 1: People saw through it.
Speaker 1: Everyone saw through it. We've all seen through the mainstream
Speaker 1: media and we've come out on the other side.
Speaker 1: And you know what? there's gonna be hell to pay,
Speaker 1: hell to pay, including for people like.
Speaker 1: Letitia James.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh. Donald Trump calling her out. Steve Bannon calling her out.
Speaker 1: Tri Regan calling her out. But first, quick word from
Speaker 1: one of our sponsors, American Heart for Gold, and you
Speaker 1: can get up to $15,000 worth of free silver right
Speaker 1: now with qualifying purchases of gold. You know, I'm a
Speaker 1: big believer in diversification. It's a lot of what I
Speaker 1: talk about at 76 Research, my financial research company, and
Speaker 1: gold is something that we put into our income builder portfolio.
Speaker 1: It is something that we actually like a lot for
Speaker 1: a whole lot of reasons, including the inflation picture also
Speaker 1: including the.
Speaker 1: You know, the drive for emerging market countries all around
Speaker 1: the world to try and stockpile something other than US Treasuries,
Speaker 1: this is another reason why gold is so well, you know,
Speaker 1: seeing so much upside in this moment in time. So
Speaker 1: go check it out and if you're gonna invest in gold,
Speaker 1: go with my friends over at American Heart for Gold,
Speaker 1: go to Trishloves Gold.com. Trishlovesgold.com. You can text Trish to 6.
Speaker 1: 5532. You can call them at 1-844495-1115. Again, if you
Speaker 1: use that code word Trish, you can get up to
Speaker 1: $15,000 worth of free silver, not bad. And by the way,
Speaker 1: silver tends often to move alongside gold, so kind of
Speaker 1: a worthwhile thing to have. Again, up to $15,000 in
Speaker 1: free silver, text Trish to 65532 or go to trishlovesgold.com.
Speaker 1: So, Letitia James.
Speaker 1: Is being viewed at this moment in time and I
Speaker 1: think rightly so, as a real menace, a real problem,
Speaker 1: a real disaster and not shall we say very smart
Speaker 1: or very good lawyer, you see she based her entire
Speaker 1: case going after Donald Trump on this idea that somehow
Speaker 1: he was inflating the value of his property Mar a Lago.
Speaker 1: Letitia James thinks it's worth $18 million. Interestingly enough, the
Speaker 1: property right next door, I mean literally right next door
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump. This one right here, do you see
Speaker 1: parcel A right next door to Donald Trump? Well, what
Speaker 1: do you know? This one just went onto the market,
Speaker 1: just went on to the market for some $200 million.
Speaker 1: I mean, you don't have a lot of properties that
Speaker 1: go from the intercoastal to the oceanfront. Mar a Lago's one,
Speaker 1: and this parcella, well, there you go.
Speaker 1: $200 million. So Leticia takes out. I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: know how you're coming up with $18 million given that
Speaker 1: Mar a Lago.
Speaker 1: Mar a Lago yields somewhere around $56 million in income.
Speaker 1: I mean, hey, we should all buy it, right? Anybody
Speaker 1: should take that trade, but you know, this was never
Speaker 1: about anything real. It was always about politics with Leticia.
Speaker 1: She figured she could wedge herself in between Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Who was getting the loan from Deutsche Bank and the
Speaker 1: bank itself, right, she just wedged herself right in the
Speaker 1: middle of that transaction and somehow proved that he was
Speaker 1: fraudulently getting a lower mortgage rate because he was inflating
Speaker 1: the value of his Mar a Lago property which she
Speaker 1: deemed to be worth, as did the judge, only $18 million.
Speaker 1: It's nuts, OK, especially now that we know $200 million
Speaker 1: for the lot next door.
Speaker 1: So Leticia is not that smart. Leticia brought a stupid case,
Speaker 1: and we're still sitting here waiting for the Court of Appeals.
Speaker 1: My gosh, guys, you know what time is going on
Speaker 1: it's ticking. OK, it's ticking, and you guys should have
Speaker 1: thrown that out. We know you don't like the case.
Speaker 1: We've heard you tell us repeatedly that the case makes
Speaker 1: absolutely no sense because guess what? There are no victims.
Speaker 1: So how do you have a case where there are
Speaker 1: no victims anyway, Donald Trump weighing in on this, saying
Speaker 1: New York is the.
Speaker 1: Most corrupt state in the union. That is why so
Speaker 1: many businesses and people are fleeing. Yeah, everybody's fleeing New York.
Speaker 1: I even fled New York. We need great judges and
Speaker 1: politicians to help fix New York and to stop the
Speaker 1: kind of lawfare that was launched against me from falsely
Speaker 1: valuing Mar a Lago at $18 million when it is worth,
Speaker 1: perhaps 100 times that amount. The corrupt judge was replaced
Speaker 1: by another judge only to be immediately put back on
Speaker 1: the case when the Democrat political leaders found out that
Speaker 1: a change of the judges had happened. That is exactly
Speaker 1: what happened.
Speaker 1: And we reported on that. In fact, it was only
Speaker 1: for a couple of hours they took that judge, Arthur
Speaker 1: Erdoin off of the case and then somebody got wind
Speaker 1: of it and the next thing you know the guy's
Speaker 1: back on it. This is the guy that's trying to
Speaker 1: hit him with a nearly half a billion dollar fine,
Speaker 1: nearly $500 million. It's bonkers, but this woman is bonkers,
Speaker 1: you know she's bonkers. She wants to seize his assets,
Speaker 1: she told interestingly ABC News.
Speaker 1: Still, not for long, of George Stephanopoulos Four days after
Speaker 1: a judge ordered Donald Trump to pay $355 million for
Speaker 1: a decade of fraud, New York Attorney General Letitia James
Speaker 1: says she's prepared to do everything she can to make
Speaker 1: sure the former president pays his fine, including, she told us,
Speaker 1: seizing the buildings that bear his name. If he does
Speaker 1: not have funds to pay off the judgment.
Speaker 1: And then we will seek, uh, you know, judgment enforcement
Speaker 1: mechanisms in court, and we will ask the judge to
Speaker 1: seize his assets. Hm.
Speaker 1: So she's still on that right she's still on that
Speaker 1: even though she doesn't have a case, even though the
Speaker 1: Court of Appeals needs to throw it out they know
Speaker 1: she doesn't have a case either and yet she's really,
Speaker 1: you know, it's political. I, I won't bore you with
Speaker 1: this just a quick, quick second because you need to
Speaker 1: remember how.
Speaker 1: Awful, like really awful and politically charged this woman is.
Speaker 1: He's called me venomous. We will fight back to your
Speaker 1: attempt to bring Trumpism to New York City. He's called
Speaker 1: me disgraceful.
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Illegitimate president.
Speaker 1: Illegitimate member
Speaker 1: OK, I'm sorry, she's just gross. I mean, she's saying
Speaker 1: an illegitimate president, when you get that from Jimmy Carter
Speaker 1: by way of Hillary Clinton illegitimate, come on, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, they, they're like, oh, you know, Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: undermining democracy. Hello, who do you think started this? Did
Speaker 1: Donald Trump run around say illegitimate, illegitimate, illegitimate. This is her, OK,
Speaker 1: this is her. And now she's kind of mad, you see, because, well,
Speaker 1: they're doing a whole lot of stuff they're doing some
Speaker 1: stuff that she doesn't like.
Speaker 1: And it's affecting, it's affecting her state because they're basically saying, hey,
Speaker 1: you know what, if you don't play ball and she's
Speaker 1: not playing ball.
Speaker 1: She's not allowing ICE to do its job and if
Speaker 1: you don't allow for that, then you're standing in violation
Speaker 1: of the law, which means as Tom Holman says we're
Speaker 1: gonna put you in cuffs or as Mike Davis says
Speaker 1: sorry sweetheart.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I can't do it justice. He's good
Speaker 1: at this one, watch him here. Uh, let me just
Speaker 1: say this to Big Tish James, the New York attorney General, I, I,
Speaker 1: I dare you. I dare you to try to continue
Speaker 1: your lawfare against President Trump in his second term because
Speaker 1: listen here, sweetheart, we're not messing around this time, and
Speaker 1: we will put your fat ass in prison for conspiracy
Speaker 1: against rights, and I promise you that, so.
Speaker 1: Yeah, OK, like I said, he says it better than
Speaker 1: I could. Donald Trump is stripping her right now of clearances,
Speaker 1: as well as Alvin Bragg, you know, the guy who
Speaker 1: got those felony convictions against him, those things will be
Speaker 1: reversed in court too, but he's stripping her of these
Speaker 1: federal clearances and he's doing this, you know, alongside, by
Speaker 1: the way, the.
Speaker 1: Former Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, because Anthony Blinken is
Speaker 1: the one that orchestrated that big letter from the 51X spooks.
Speaker 1: So he's doing this. It's in part symbolic, but it's
Speaker 1: also important. In other words, if you've got enemies out
Speaker 1: there that are trying to take you down as she
Speaker 1: so clearly is, then you do need to do something.
Speaker 1: I want you to see what she's out there saying,
Speaker 1: trying to stand in the way of everything that Doge
Speaker 1: is doing because somehow Leticia just doesn't want anything getting exposed.
Speaker 1: I wonder how much more there is with her. I
Speaker 1: think if we do a deep dive investigation we're gonna
Speaker 1: find out, but.
Speaker 1: In the past week, Elon Musk and his so-called Department
Speaker 1: of government Efficiency have accessed the personal private information of
Speaker 1: tens of millions of Americans.
Speaker 1: And sensitive data about public and private entities.
Speaker 1: Social Security numbers, addresses, tax returns, and more.
Speaker 1: This unelected group led by the world's richest man is
Speaker 1: not authorized to have this information.
Speaker 1: And they explicitly sought this unauthorized access to illegally block
Speaker 1: payments that millions of Americans rely on.
Speaker 1: Payments for health care, child care, and other social programs,
Speaker 1: and we're not gonna have all our money, all those
Speaker 1: transfer payments that we need in the state of New
Speaker 1: York because it turns out we were doing some really
Speaker 1: bad things. In fact, so bad, so bad that 4
Speaker 1: people were just fired today at FEMA because of it.
Speaker 1: This was corruption at the highest level. Donald Trump calling
Speaker 1: out Letitia James again saying, you know what, she's corrupt
Speaker 1: and she is presiding over the most corrupt state in
Speaker 1: this entire country and it's why everybody's leaving New York.
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon, you know him, piling on. I want you
Speaker 1: to watch it. He's right, he's spot on. Let's watch.
Speaker 2: existential threat to President Trump's
Speaker 2: Administration and I mean Doge Elon Musk, Secretary Treasury Besant
Speaker 2: uh Russos, Stephen Miller, all of his people, the existential
Speaker 2: threat is right here in this city.
Speaker 2: Is the queen of lawfare. It's Letitia James. Right now
Speaker 2: Soros has a DA that's running unopposed. He can call
Speaker 2: a grand jury at any time.
Speaker 2: He can set up criminal charges on the most bogus efforts.
Speaker 2: Letitia James runs this deal. She's got a pliant media
Speaker 2: right here, pliant left wing media. She's got a jury
Speaker 2: pool of only left wing radicals in the upper west
Speaker 2: side of this city.
Speaker 2: And she's got the judges, she's got all of it,
Speaker 2: and I'm hang on, I'm calling, I'm calling on right
Speaker 2: now the Attorney General Pam Bonney to begin an immediate
Speaker 2: criminal investigation to Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, all of it
Speaker 2: for what they did to President Trump. President Trump on
Speaker 2: his true social day laid it out once again. The
Speaker 2: existential threat.
Speaker 2: To his administration is this queen of lawfare Letitia James
Speaker 2: and how she and how she and how she has
Speaker 2: and how she has absolutely total control and Doge and
Speaker 2: Elon Musk and Scott Besson and all of them ought
Speaker 2: to be worried about this out of control city. Thank
Speaker 2: you very much.
Speaker 1: I know we don't like to think about the challenges, right,
Speaker 1: that Trump may be facing. He's going in their guns
Speaker 1: blazing he's basically doing everything he was asked and charged
Speaker 1: to do and everything he said he was gonna do,
Speaker 1: but there is this one woman who wants to be
Speaker 1: in the way, who actually sees her political future as
Speaker 1: being in the way. This is what she is all about.
Speaker 1: This is how she gains stature. This is what she
Speaker 1: wants to do and so she's got a city.
Speaker 1: That tends to lean more left than they do right,
Speaker 1: even though you know you take a look at the mayor,
Speaker 1: say what you want about him. I mean nobody had
Speaker 1: a problem with the guy until he suddenly said, yeah,
Speaker 1: we can't handle all these migrants we can't handle all
Speaker 1: the illegals we can't pay for all this. Then suddenly
Speaker 1: he became a problem. Donald Trump wiping away those charges
Speaker 1: and the left going nuts.
Speaker 1: On that, so Leticia loses her security clearance along with
Speaker 1: a few others that are considered nemesis like Andrew Weissman
Speaker 1: or Mark Zade uh, you also have Jake Sullivan, Anthony
Speaker 1: Blinken losing their clearances as well all as Leticia prepares
Speaker 1: for what? For what? I mean, is this this quote
Speaker 1: unquote civil war that she was waiting for? Here's Leticia
Speaker 1: saying she's been preparing for this day.
Speaker 1: For some time. With other democratic AGs across this country
Speaker 1: to make sure that we would be ready to respond
Speaker 1: to any attempt to roll back our rights.
Speaker 1: So here we are.
Speaker 1: We studied their platforms.
Speaker 1: We've identified certain possibilities, fact patterns. We've created contingency plans.
Speaker 1: So no matter what the next administration throws at us.
Speaker 1: We're ready.
Speaker 2: We're ready to respond to their attacks.
Speaker 1: Oh, and she's already out in front of it, of course,
Speaker 1: but how much success does she have? I do actually
Speaker 1: think she's met her match. I think she's met her
Speaker 1: match with this team, including Pam Bondi, as you heard,
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon. Let me play this a little bit again.
Speaker 1: He is saying Pam Bondi, go for it, be unleashed.
Speaker 1: You gotta do what you gotta do.
Speaker 2: Existential threat to President Trump's.
Speaker 2: Administration and I mean Doge Elon Musk, Secretary Treasury Besant
Speaker 2: uh Russ Vogt, Stephen Miller, all of his people, the
Speaker 2: existential threat is right here in this city.
Speaker 2: Is the queen of lawfare. It's Letitia James. Right now
Speaker 2: Soros has a DA that's running unopposed. He can call
Speaker 2: a grand jury at any time.
Speaker 2: He can set up criminal charges on the most bogus efforts.
Speaker 2: Letitia James runs this deal. She's got a pliant media
Speaker 2: right here, pliant left wing media. She's got a jury
Speaker 2: pool of only left wing radicals in the upper west
Speaker 2: side of this city.
Speaker 2: And she's got the judges, she's got all of it
Speaker 2: and I'm hang on I'm calling I'm calling on right
Speaker 2: now the Attorney General Pam Bonney to begin an immediate
Speaker 2: criminal investigation to Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, all of what
Speaker 2: they did to President Trump,
Speaker 1: President Trump. You know what? And that's exactly what Pam
Speaker 1: is going to do and here's how she's gonna do it, OK?
Speaker 1: This is important. You need to know how is Pam
Speaker 1: going to get.
Speaker 1: Leticia, it's right here. Look, Leticia incriminated herself. She said
Speaker 1: New York has laws that protect immigrants and limit cooperation
Speaker 1: with federal immigration enforcement efforts. These laws should be followed
Speaker 1: by law enforcement and officials in our state. I'll always
Speaker 1: uphold our laws and protect immigrant New Yorkers. OK, so
Speaker 1: if you're upholding those laws, aren't you doing so?
Speaker 1: In the face of what the federal government is telling
Speaker 1: you to do and isn't that going to fundamentally cause
Speaker 1: a problem? This is why Pam Bondi already out pausing
Speaker 1: all the funding. Leticia's going crazy. You can't, can't, can't,
Speaker 1: can't take our funding. But then again, remember there's this
Speaker 1: little thing called the Constitution. I'm talking about Article 1
Speaker 1: Section 8 Clause 4. Guess what? The federal government has
Speaker 1: the power.
Speaker 1: To establish a rule of naturalization, the federal government has
Speaker 1: the power to control its borders, and it all comes
Speaker 1: through Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4, which is why
Speaker 1: if you get in the way of that honey bunny,
Speaker 1: you know what, there's gonna be trouble. There's trouble ahead
Speaker 1: and Pam Bondi's making it clear they're going after the
Speaker 1: people that are in the way and there are people
Speaker 1: in the way.
Speaker 1: Whether it be Letitia James, whether it be people at
Speaker 1: the FBI Tom Holman's accusing the FBI of being the
Speaker 1: leakers here. We're going to get to that, but Pam's
Speaker 1: coming for you. There may be a leak inside the
Speaker 1: house as it relates to DHS and some of the
Speaker 1: operations that they are attempting to carry out. What's your
Speaker 1: reaction to hearing about that and what, if anything, can
Speaker 1: be done to mitigate that?
Speaker 1: Well you know if anyone leaks anything, people don't understand
Speaker 1: that jeopardizes the lives of our great men and women
Speaker 1: in law enforcement, and if you leaked it, we will
Speaker 1: find out who you are and we will come after you,
Speaker 1: and it's not going to stop our mission. It's not
Speaker 1: going to stop the president's mission to make America safe again.
Speaker 1: We were very clear with the lawsuit that we filed
Speaker 1: in Chicago that if you don't follow the law, you
Speaker 1: will be prosecuted by the Department of Justice.
Speaker 1: And again I go back to the law. OK, so
Speaker 1: the law says the federal government has this power. It's
Speaker 1: one of the reasons that by the way, Texas had
Speaker 1: trouble when they wanted that border wall to go back
Speaker 1: up and you had Biden's team taking it down. Why
Speaker 1: were they doing that by the way? Why the heck,
Speaker 1: you know, ask yourself that.
Speaker 1: All these NGOs, etc. all this money going to fund
Speaker 1: illegals coming into the country. What was that about? Certainly
Speaker 1: not putting America or Americans first.
Speaker 1: So guess what?
Speaker 1: They were getting shot down in court because again, the
Speaker 1: federal government has the power to control the border.
Speaker 1: And Tom Holman's like, hey, hey, hey, you know what?
Speaker 1: If you're leaking stuff, if you're getting in the way
Speaker 1: of federal agents that are trying to do their jobs,
Speaker 1: you're gonna wind up in cuffs. You hear that, Leticia?
Speaker 1: When they cross the line of impediment, and that's why
Speaker 1: I'm working very closely starting this morning with the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice, and where do they cross that line of impediment.
Speaker 1: So they may find themselves in a pair of handcuffs
Speaker 1: very soon. So working with DOJ on that gets some
Speaker 1: legal guidance on that. I'm not an attorney. I know
Speaker 1: what that cops is about. I know what crossing that
Speaker 1: line is, but getting DOJ back up on that. So
Speaker 1: it's something we're looking at right now, Harris. We're not
Speaker 1: going to tolerate it anymore. This is not a game
Speaker 1: when we show up.
Speaker 1: sites. This is a dangerous job for the men and
Speaker 1: women of ICE and Border Patrol and all the DOJ
Speaker 1: agencies to have that type of interference puts our offices
Speaker 1: at great risk. Not only the officers, it puts the
Speaker 1: aliens at great risk because anything can happen when we
Speaker 1: take our eyes off the goal here. So we're addressing
Speaker 1: that immediately today. I'm addressing offsets today, operational security, how
Speaker 1: these leaks are happening. We've already identified how this operator
Speaker 1: got leaked. I'll deal with that today. Boom. And he's
Speaker 1: dealing with it.
Speaker 1: And Pam Bondi's dealing with it and they're all gonna
Speaker 1: be dealing with Letitia James.
Speaker 1: Breaking right now, we've learned that Tom Holman believes those leaks,
Speaker 1: those leaks are coming from none other than the FBI.
Speaker 1: Take a look at this. Holman speaking on Hannity. Tom Holman. Tom,
Speaker 1: where are these leaks coming from?
Speaker 1: Well, look, we're thinking it's come from inside, and uh
Speaker 1: we know the first leak of Aurora is under current investigation.
Speaker 1: We think we identified that person under investigation right now,
Speaker 1: uh the, the California League, uh Secretary Noam, you know,
Speaker 1: she's correct that some of the information we're receiving tends
Speaker 1: to lead toward the FBI, uh, but I talked to
Speaker 1: the Deputy Attorney General all this weekend. They've opened up
Speaker 1: a criminal investigation.
Speaker 1: And they have promised that not only this person lose
Speaker 1: their job and lose their pension, they won't go to jail.
Speaker 1: They're going to criminally prosecute, so we're all over it.
Speaker 1: We got
Speaker 1: Wow, again, you're gonna remember this, right? Article 1 Section
Speaker 1: 8 Clause 4, the federal government, not to mention the
Speaker 1: commerce clause, but it is very, very clearly laid out.
Speaker 1: So Homan saying the leaks are coming from the federal
Speaker 1: government itself. I'll tell you Cash Patel cannot get there
Speaker 1: soon enough.
Speaker 1: Because we've got some problems and these things need to
Speaker 1: get fixed and that's what Doge is doing and that's
Speaker 1: what Trump is doing and that's what Pam Bondi is
Speaker 1: gonna be doing and that's what Pete Hegseth is doing
Speaker 1: and that's what Cosh Patel's gonna be doing and Scott Besson,
Speaker 1: our Treasury secretary, amazingly there saying, OK, you know what, Doge,
Speaker 1: go do your thing and then as we find out
Speaker 1: where all these problems are like the FEMA people which
Speaker 1: we're gonna get to it all gets exposed.
Speaker 1: Leslie Leslie Grimble, thank you so much for your generosity.
Speaker 1: Leslie Kimbrel has been on this channel from the very,
Speaker 1: very beginning, and, uh, we always appreciate her generosity, her support,
Speaker 1: and her, um, faithfulness in the, in this program. She's
Speaker 1: making the point that wow, it's amazing, Mark Fogel coming
Speaker 1: back to the USA. This is the teacher that had
Speaker 1: been held in Russia and it's just incredible because what
Speaker 1: Biden couldn't do in 3 years, jumped at it in
Speaker 1: 3 weeks. Amazing, right?
Speaker 1: It is wonderful. He has been released. He is returning
Speaker 1: to the US in an exchange that the White House
Speaker 1: did announce today the deal to release Fogel, um, who
Speaker 1: had been designated as somebody who was wrongfully detained by
Speaker 1: the US State Department, um, being negotiated by one Donald
Speaker 1: Trump along with Steve Witkoff, who's a special envoy there
Speaker 1: to the Middle East, and this is all coming from
Speaker 1: Mike Waltz, who's the national security adviser to Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And it's just a tremendous bit of news. It's um
Speaker 1: a show of good faith, the White House says from
Speaker 1: the Russians in a sign that we're moving to the
Speaker 1: right direction. We want to end the brutal, the brutal
Speaker 1: and terrible war in Ukraine. So just wonderful, wonderful news
Speaker 1: that this teacher who was wrongfully detained is going to
Speaker 1: be coming home and thank you Leslie, for your support
Speaker 1: and the mentioning of that because it's an important story
Speaker 1: and I think you got to remember here what's going on.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is getting stuff done.
Speaker 1: I mean it's amazing. I mean you even look at
Speaker 1: just the people that are trying to stampede the border
Speaker 1: right now that's not happening. Nobody wants to come here
Speaker 1: because they know exactly what's gonna happen as soon as
Speaker 1: they get here they're gonna be not only sent out
Speaker 1: you could, you could wind up in, uh, Guantanamo Bay or,
Speaker 1: or worse, one of the El Salvador prisons. I mean
Speaker 1: they're not messing around. They're not messing around. Take a
Speaker 1: look at what's going on at USA.
Speaker 1: You see this video, this was tremendous. They're taking the
Speaker 1: letters right off the darn building USA that was giving
Speaker 1: out some 70 billion one year, 40 billion another year
Speaker 1: to journalists, journalists all around the world, including some very
Speaker 1: important groups right here at home like the New York
Speaker 1: Times and Politico.
Speaker 1: I, I keep saying like you knew NPR you knew
Speaker 1: PBS they were supported by taxpayer funds. You didn't know
Speaker 1: the New York Times and Politico was getting any, did you? Well,
Speaker 1: sure enough, I mean, I guess that's why they hate
Speaker 1: Trump so much because the money, the money spigot was
Speaker 1: gonna be closed, and sure enough it is closed, it's
Speaker 1: so closed that if you mess up and you try
Speaker 1: and do anything sly.
Speaker 1: You're gonna get fired. 4 FEMA employees, they have been
Speaker 1: fired because guess what was just discovered? They were trying
Speaker 1: to send money to New York City hotels. This is
Speaker 1: unbelievable to me.
Speaker 1: I mean the 5 star hotels getting $59 million.
Speaker 1: Because they need to house illegal people.
Speaker 1: I mean, what about the money for the hurricane victims
Speaker 1: in North Carolina or Florida, forget about them, you know,
Speaker 1: those fire victims, right? Out in California, forget about them. No, no,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get the money to the luxury hotels.
Speaker 1: In New York City to cover the migrants' luxury hotel bills.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump putting out on True Social FEMA spent tens
Speaker 1: of millions of dollars in Democrat areas disobeying orders but
Speaker 1: left the people of North Carolina high and dry. It
Speaker 1: is now under review and investigation. The Bidenru FEMA has
Speaker 1: been a disaster. FEMA should be terminated. It has been
Speaker 1: slow and totally ineffective. Individual states should handle storms, etc.
Speaker 1: as they come, big savings far more efficient, says the
Speaker 1: businessman says the.
Speaker 1: Developer who kind of knows the importance of using local
Speaker 1: resources and how the local people kind of have a
Speaker 1: better handle on things, you know, when you can make
Speaker 1: your government smaller not bigger for goodness sakes, it'll be
Speaker 1: more efficient that way he wants to get rid of.
Speaker 1: an executive order to begin the process of fundamentally reforming
Speaker 1: and overhauling FEMA or maybe getting rid of FEMA. I
Speaker 1: think frankly FEMA is not good.
Speaker 1: I think when you have a problem like this, I
Speaker 1: think you want to go and whether it's a Democrat
Speaker 1: or Republican governor, you want to use your state to
Speaker 1: fix it and not waste time calling FEMA, and then
Speaker 1: FEMA gets here and they don't know the area. They've
Speaker 1: never been to the area and they want to give
Speaker 1: you rules that you've never heard about. They want to
Speaker 1: bring people that aren't as good as the people you
Speaker 1: already have, and FEMA's turned out to be a disaster
Speaker 1: and you could go back a long way. You could
Speaker 1: go back to.
Speaker 1: Louisiana, you could go back to some of the things
Speaker 1: that took place in Texas. It turns out to be
Speaker 1: the state that ends up doing the work. It just
Speaker 1: complicates it. I think we're going to recommend that FEMA
Speaker 1: go away.
Speaker 1: And we pay directly, we pay a percentage to the state,
Speaker 1: but the state should fix this. If the state did
Speaker 1: this from the beginning, it would have been a lot
Speaker 1: better situation. I think you guys agree with that.
Speaker 1: Yeah
Speaker 1: 59 million just last week, so Donald Trump comes in
Speaker 1: the office and it's like the FEMA employees don't hear anything.
Speaker 1: They, they, they skedaddled to get $59 million to luxury hotels.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. Like it's crazy and you know what? This
Speaker 1: is what was going on. You saw the report New
Speaker 1: York City hotels. This is from 2024 over the summer.
Speaker 1: They apparently raked in over a billion dollars in taxpayer funds,
Speaker 1: including one in New York City, the Roosevelt Hotel, Roosevelt
Speaker 1: Hotel that was getting $200 million and guess what? The
Speaker 1: hotel is owned by Pakistan.
Speaker 1: I mean, you can't make this.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna say the word up, OK? You just
Speaker 1: can't make it up. You can't make it up.
Speaker 1: I, it's, it's worse than you could have ever possibly imagined,
Speaker 1: and this was all going down as there were these
Speaker 1: horrible storms in places like North Carolina in places like Florida,
Speaker 1: and guess what Majorcas had to say, Head of Homeland Security.
Speaker 1: He's like we're out of money. We got more storms coming.
Speaker 1: We're out of money, no money for these people.
Speaker 1: We are meeting the immediate needs with the money that
Speaker 1: we have. We are expecting another hurricane hitting. We do
Speaker 1: not have the funds. FEMA does not have the funds
Speaker 1: to make it through the season. Yeah, remember this, I
Speaker 1: showed you this at the time.
Speaker 1: FEMA was out there giving out all kinds of money
Speaker 1: to every Tom, Dick and Harry. New York City to
Speaker 1: get 10 and nearly $5 million from FEMA for asylum seekers.
Speaker 1: You had the Department of Homeland Security announcing $300 million
Speaker 1: in direct funding for communities retrieving migrants and $340 million
Speaker 1: for a new competitive awards process. FEMA awards $110 million
Speaker 1: to emergency food and shelter programs to assist migrants. So
Speaker 1: all this is going down while people are struggling and
Speaker 1: you know what?
Speaker 1: people started to ask, hey, why is there all this
Speaker 1: money that FEMA has $77 million in congressional funding for
Speaker 1: communities receiving migrants? Why is there all this money? Yet
Speaker 1: there's no money for the Americans that are actually here.
Speaker 1: And guess what we were told, ladies and gentlemen, fake news, disinformation,
Speaker 1: don't go there. Here's KJP at her finest. Great question.
Speaker 1: Combating misinformation and disinformation is always, always critically important.
Speaker 1: It is, uh, you, you heard the lay down that
Speaker 1: I gave at the top. The reason I did that
Speaker 1: at the top is because we wanted to make clear.
Speaker 1: Uh, that, uh, things are available to, uh, to the
Speaker 1: public folks who are impacted, and that misinformation, disinformation is
Speaker 1: indeed dangerous. It gets in the way and what we're
Speaker 1: trying to do here. It does, and there's been a
Speaker 1: lot of falsehoods, uh, and let me just fact check
Speaker 1: a couple of things because it's really important, uh, it
Speaker 1: is again, it is wrong, it is dangerous, and I
Speaker 1: also called out.
Speaker 1: The there are important people, people who have power privilege
Speaker 1: who are spreading these uh these falsehoods, and they need
Speaker 1: to stop, they need to stop doing that. So disaster relief,
Speaker 1: this is a falsehood disaster relief funds used on immigrants
Speaker 1: illegally in the US. The fact is no money is
Speaker 1: being diverted from response needs. That's the fact, another falsehood.
Speaker 1: OK, despite the fact that Macas did tell us this.
Speaker 1: We are meeting the immediate needs with the money that
Speaker 1: we have. We are expecting another hurricane hitting. We do
Speaker 1: not have the funds. FEMA does not have the funds
Speaker 1: to make it through the season.
Speaker 1: Yeah, OK, so like I'm sorry. You know what, Eric
Speaker 1: Trump put it really well back in the day. This
Speaker 1: is over the summer, he highlighted exactly the inequity of
Speaker 1: what was going on. Sean, right now there are 157
Speaker 1: hotels in New York City that are completely full of
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants. Let me, let me just repeat that number.
Speaker 1: 150 hotels in New York City that are completely full
Speaker 1: of illegal immigrants. New York City alone spends over a
Speaker 1: billion dollars a year.
Speaker 1: On illegal immigrants, and then you see these pictures of
Speaker 1: husbands and wives and children who have lost everything. Their
Speaker 1: homes have floated down rivers. Their homes have been taken
Speaker 1: out by mudslides. Their vehicles are gone. The picture albums
Speaker 1: are destroyed. Every sentimental value that they could ever possibly
Speaker 1: imagine is gone, you know, will never be brought back.
Speaker 1: And what does Kamala do? She comes out and offers
Speaker 1: $750 750 dollars. The TV in the person's house costs
Speaker 1: more than $750 and you see the absolute destruction.
Speaker 1: Sean, of all the political things that I've seen in
Speaker 1: the last decade, this is the one that bothers me
Speaker 1: the most. Hands down by far. We have spent $200
Speaker 1: billion sending money over to Ukraine and Russia to see young, innocent,
Speaker 1: 21-year-old kids in dirty trenches pop around corners and shoot
Speaker 1: each other in the face with AK-47s. You watch these
Speaker 1: videos on YouTube.
Speaker 1: The lives are expunged in a matter of seconds. $200
Speaker 1: billion America has sent over there, yet we can't take
Speaker 1: care of our own in Georgia and North Carolina and Virginia,
Speaker 1: and Florida, $750. We send billions to places like Pakistan,
Speaker 1: and they won't tell us that bin Laden is literally
Speaker 1: living next to their equivalent of West Point.
Speaker 1: Yet we offer devastated families, the very people you're showing
Speaker 1: on the screen right now. We offer devastated families $750. Sean,
Speaker 1: this is the worst administration in the history of the country.
Speaker 1: These aren't serious people and thank goodness they're not there anymore,
Speaker 1: but apparently the holdovers still think that we need to.
Speaker 1: Send money to New York City luxury hotels. Of the
Speaker 1: $59 million that Doge found, I want to share with
Speaker 1: you it was $59.3 million. $19 million was for direct
Speaker 1: hotel costs while the balance funded other services such as
Speaker 1: food and security. According to New York City Hall, the
Speaker 1: funds were not part of a disaster relief grant. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: Mike Johnson is saying, well, you know, let's clarify these
Speaker 1: emergency relief funding things are separate from FEMA funds allocated
Speaker 1: to immigration, but said that the agency should not have
Speaker 1: been funding any of this border crisis by effectively, you know,
Speaker 1: helping it along. I mean, of course you're gonna come
Speaker 1: to New York. Hey, you get a free hotel room
Speaker 1: and you get special food. You get special food vouchers,
Speaker 1: remember when.
Speaker 1: The mayor of New York said, I'm gonna get rid
Speaker 1: of these vouchers. They were giving him like cards for
Speaker 1: for a lot of money. It was like $350 a
Speaker 1: week so you could buy your own ethnically whatever food
Speaker 1: because apparently if you're a refugee from Mexico or Guatemala
Speaker 1: or wherever you need your special special food. You can't
Speaker 1: eat whatever they're giving out at the Roosevelt Hotel. Give
Speaker 1: me a break, so.
Speaker 1: Remember this, FEMA's kicking out survivors of temporary housing and
Speaker 1: snowstorm and freezing temperatures back two weeks ago on January 11th,
Speaker 1: that was a headline. All while these.
Speaker 1: Deep state bureaucrats are given out our hard earned taxpayer
Speaker 1: dollars $59 million so that they can have luxury hotels
Speaker 1: for illegals, you know who's not having any of it?
Speaker 1: The new FEMA interim director. This is when Cameron Hilton
Speaker 1: I have his picture on the screen. He's responded and say, saying,
Speaker 1: I want to thank the Doge team. Thank you for
Speaker 1: making me aware of this effective yesterday. Guess what? These
Speaker 1: have been suspended from FEMA personnel will be held accountable
Speaker 1: and again we have learned today personnel indeed being held.
Speaker 1: Accountable. Here's the headline from the New York Post about
Speaker 1: all the money that went there. Here is the woman
Speaker 1: that is uh being fired, well, one of the four employees,
Speaker 1: according to Daily Mail that is being fired. It is
Speaker 1: high time, you know what? We need some accountability, lots
Speaker 1: of accountability. Speaking of accountability, please make sure you are
Speaker 1: accountable for yourself, for your own retirement. Take advantage of
Speaker 1: this wonderful financial research company that I started with a
Speaker 1: very dear friend Rob Horton.
Speaker 1: 76 research. I want you to use code word dollar
Speaker 1: and you get the 76 report for just $1 a month,
Speaker 1: a dollar a month for the first two months, and
Speaker 1: it goes to $995. Lots of information in there, a
Speaker 1: wealth of information, including some stock picks. If you are
Speaker 1: serious about investing though, you want to look at the
Speaker 1: model portfolios. We have a resilience growth portfolio. We have
Speaker 1: a basic income provider portfolio. So the one day you
Speaker 1: retire with inflation protection portfolio. Take a look at all
Speaker 1: of these things. It's important to look after yourself because
Speaker 1: you know for certain that Uncle Sam's not gonna be there.
Speaker 1: You better not be there, right? We're getting more and
Speaker 1: more information about everything that's happening. Things are getting blown
Speaker 1: wide open and I'll tell you who's gonna lead the
Speaker 1: charge on this. She just got a very interesting new gig.
Speaker 1: The representative from Florida, Anna Polina Luna, listen to her here.
Speaker 1: It is with profound honor that I have been entrusted
Speaker 1: by Speaker Mike Johnson and Chairman James Comer to lead
Speaker 1: the House at the House Oversight Task Force on declassification
Speaker 1: of federal secrets.
Speaker 1: Together with the help of the White House, our intelligence allies,
Speaker 1: the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, we'll be
Speaker 1: conducting investigations into the following.
Speaker 1: The assassinations of JFK, RFK, and Doctor Martin Luther King,
Speaker 1: unidentified aerial phenomena also known as UAPs, unidentified submerged objects,
Speaker 1: also known as UFOs, the Epstein client list, the origins
Speaker 1: of COVID-19, and the 9/11 files.
Speaker 1: This task force will be a beacon of bipartisanship on
Speaker 1: the Republican side. Representatives Burchett, Bobert, Burleson, Crane, Gill, and
Speaker 1: Mace will be joining me, although I'd like to note
Speaker 1: that I'm expanding this to the entire governing body and
Speaker 1: we'll be allowing certain members to wave on. Our first
Speaker 1: hearing is set for March. The date will be announced soon,
Speaker 1: and we have, we've already initiated close to a do
Speaker 1: a dozen communications with various agencies to include Pam Bondi
Speaker 1: at the Department of Justice and the Secretary of State.
Speaker 1: This will no longer be a task force that makes
Speaker 1: bold promises only to fade into irrelevance or send strongly
Speaker 1: worded letters. This will be a relentless pursuit of truth
Speaker 1: and transparency, and we will not stop until the until
Speaker 1: the American people have the answers they deserve. We will
Speaker 1: cut through the bureaucracy, challenge the stonewalling, and ensure that
Speaker 1: the American people finally get the truth that they have
Speaker 1: been denied for too long.
Speaker 1: If we are to endure and thrive as a nation,
Speaker 1: we must restore trust, trust through transparency. The American people
Speaker 1: must be trusted to think for themselves, to form their
Speaker 1: own judgments from the truth that they are entitled to know.
Speaker 1: We've been treated like children for too long and kept
Speaker 1: in the dark by those we elected to serve us.
Speaker 1: It is my solemn duty to begin mending this trust
Speaker 1: to form a new relationship between the government and the governed. Yes, yes, yes, OK,
Speaker 1: we need that transparency we need that trust we have
Speaker 1: been so lacking that. I mean, how if you lose
Speaker 1: the the trust of the people, what do you guys have? right?
Speaker 1: and believe me, you lost it you lost it with
Speaker 1: your Russia Russia Russia stuff.
Speaker 1: Oh, and then that that laptop that was nothing but
Speaker 1: a bunch of disinformation fed you courtesy of Rudy Giuliani. hm,
Speaker 1: turns out the whole thing was true despite what the
Speaker 1: 51X Spooks told you, of course they placed it in Politico,
Speaker 1: their letter that said, oh that that Russian.
Speaker 1: Disinformation is gonna try and upend the election when they
Speaker 1: actually knew because the FBI was actually investigating since 2019
Speaker 1: that laptop, OK, so they lied to you and they
Speaker 1: did it in Politico, uh, a publication that they were
Speaker 1: paying on the side for those political pro subscriptions, $10,000
Speaker 1: a pop for goodness sakes, to the tune of some
Speaker 1: $8.4 million. Well, of course they put it with the publication.
Speaker 1: The trust.
Speaker 1: They pay.
Speaker 1: You see what's going on? Well, Elon Musk, he's there
Speaker 1: in the White House today, and he echoed exactly what
Speaker 1: Paullina Luna was saying. He echoed this importance of you
Speaker 1: gotta have faith, right? And if you don't have transparency,
Speaker 1: what do you got?
Speaker 1: You're gonna wind up like Russia pretty fast and I'll
Speaker 1: tell you all the Russians I know, they don't trust
Speaker 1: their government. We've basically become that. We can't trust our
Speaker 1: government because they lie over and over and over again
Speaker 1: about everything for whatever reason. If there's not a good
Speaker 1: feedback loop from the people to the to the government,
Speaker 1: and if, if you have rule of the, the bureaucrats.
Speaker 1: If the bureaucracy is in charge, and then what meaning
Speaker 1: does democracy actually have? If the people cannot vote, and
Speaker 1: they will be decided by their elected representatives in the
Speaker 1: form of the president and the Senate and the House,
Speaker 1: then we don't live in a democracy. We live in
Speaker 1: a bureaucracy. So it's incredibly important that we close that
Speaker 1: feedback loop, we fix that feedback loop, and that the public,
Speaker 1: the public's elected representatives, the president, the House and the Senate.
Speaker 1: Decide what happened. Yes, OK, it's really important. Quick shout
Speaker 1: out for in the interest of transparency, yes, we have
Speaker 1: advertisers on the show, so when you actually buy those products,
Speaker 1: it helps the show, it helps you because, well, if
Speaker 1: you take balance in nature like I do, I think
Speaker 1: you're gonna feel pretty good. I take my fruits and
Speaker 1: veggies every day. Those are my vitamins. I've told you guys,
Speaker 1: you know what? I, I.
Speaker 1: Stop taking vitamins for whatever reason, like as in, well,
Speaker 1: probably after the time I was like 12 because I
Speaker 1: used to take the Flintstones. My mom would put it
Speaker 1: out with my breakfast every morning, Flintstone vitamins and somehow
Speaker 1: along the way I just stopped taking vitamins and really
Speaker 1: didn't actually start taking them again. I mean, I try
Speaker 1: and eat well and everything, but I didn't start taking
Speaker 1: them again.
Speaker 1: Until over the course of the last year when Balance
Speaker 1: of Nature approached me about being one of the sponsors
Speaker 1: of the Shrigan show and so I tried it. I
Speaker 1: loved it so far so good, you know, I tell
Speaker 1: you all the time I get 3 kids and everybody's always,
Speaker 1: it's like a revolving carousel of somebody having a sniffles
Speaker 1: or a cold or, you know, the flu or whatever
Speaker 1: and so far so good. I'm still standing strong and
Speaker 1: I actually think it has something to do with how
Speaker 1: I take care of myself, which means drinking plenty of water.
Speaker 1: Getting regular exercise and taking my daily vitamins for goodness sakes,
Speaker 1: fruits and veggies you can get 35% off right now
Speaker 1: with my code word Trish. Go to Balance and Nature.com.
Speaker 1: Balanced Nature.com, use code word Trish, so you get 35%
Speaker 1: off plus the free shipping plus money back guarantee. So
Speaker 1: no harm, no foul. Check it out. Balance of nature.
Speaker 1: Dotcom speaking of no harm, no foul. I got another
Speaker 1: one for you. Don't forget 76 Research, OK. Code word dollar.
Speaker 1: If you don't like it, you're at a dollar. I
Speaker 1: think you can spare it. You're not even at a dollar.
Speaker 1: What am I saying? We'll refund your dollar if you
Speaker 1: don't like it. Go to 76research.com, sign up for the
Speaker 1: 76 report. If you're a serious investor, you actually need
Speaker 1: to be signing up for our model portfolios. We get
Speaker 1: 3 of them. Go check them all out.
Speaker 1: Out there today at 76search.com. I'll tell you that this
Speaker 1: is amazing. I love seeing this video. I could watch
Speaker 1: it all day long. USA, bye bye USAID by by
Speaker 1: by losing its letters on the building, 70 billion one year,
Speaker 1: 40 billion another year. This is a lot of money
Speaker 1: that was getting flushed through this thing and the amazing
Speaker 1: thing is it was going a lot of it anyway.
Speaker 1: To journalists, including journalists in the US, I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna excuse the journalists around the world now we
Speaker 1: know why.
Speaker 1: The folks over in Great Britain, right, are so liberal. 8%
Speaker 1: of their income comes from USAID, you could make an argument,
Speaker 1: and I'm not condoning this because I don't believe it,
Speaker 1: but I can understand somebody saying, you know, this is
Speaker 1: the CIA slush fund, and we have certain agendas that
Speaker 1: we want to promote, and we're gonna promote these overseas
Speaker 1: so that we have our view represented.
Speaker 1: Well, how do you justify Politico?
Speaker 1: If you watch this show, you know I've shown you
Speaker 1: this graphic before. I, this is my scribbling in red.
Speaker 1: I'm just amazed $8.2 million and you wanna talk about
Speaker 1: a subscription cost. My goodness, $10,000 a month for these suckers,
Speaker 1: $10,000 a month, and you can see how they started
Speaker 1: spending like there was no tomorrow in 2024. I want
Speaker 1: this money back. I really do. I want every single
Speaker 1: cent of it back from the BBC, from Politico, from
Speaker 1: the New York Times. Hey, don't forget Politico is a
Speaker 1: German company. That's Axel Springer.
Speaker 1: They can spare it. That's a big company. Let's get
Speaker 1: all of that back. What were they doing buying 10,000
Speaker 1: zombie subscriptions and apparently nobody even used? And then this
Speaker 1: is unbelievable to me. The New York Times, they should
Speaker 1: just tell us, you know what, we are taxpayer funded,
Speaker 1: we are government funded we are state media. We knew
Speaker 1: they were state media.
Speaker 1: But here's the proof. We got receipts $26.9 million coming
Speaker 1: from the US Department of Health and Human Services. This
Speaker 1: is thanks to Elon's group, followed by National Science Foundation
Speaker 1: $19.15 million. You wonder why Anthony Fauci was getting all
Speaker 1: the puff pieces in The New York Times. This is why, guys, OK,
Speaker 1: this is why you had all this money going to political.
Speaker 1: New York Times, Associated Press, Reuters, you name it, just
Speaker 1: disgusting amounts of money, and Chuck Schumer's.
Speaker 1: Out there saying we want to keep. I am going
Speaker 1: to stand with you in this fight and we will win. Chucky, Chucky, Chucky,
Speaker 1: what are you gonna win? Nobody wants you to spend
Speaker 1: their money like that. Just look at the approval ratings
Speaker 1: of the president. 53% approval rating, including from some unlikely groups,
Speaker 1: minority groups, women, they like him. They like what he's doing. 70%
Speaker 1: of Americans saying, you know what, he's getting the job done.
Speaker 1: He's doing exactly what he promised he would do. And
Speaker 1: so what are you fighting? I'd really like to know.
Speaker 1: Oh, you're fighting, OK, all this USAID money that goes
Speaker 1: for all your pet projects, you basically commandeered this thing
Speaker 1: and turned it to a Democrat Party slush fund. Why
Speaker 1: else would you have $2 million going for transgender operations
Speaker 1: in Guatemala, tens of thousands of dollars going to a
Speaker 1: trans comic book in Peru.
Speaker 1: Or how about the $30,000 going to a trans opera
Speaker 1: in Colombia or the DEI musical in Ireland?
Speaker 1: I mean this, this is odd to me. This is very,
Speaker 1: very odd. Why I mean trans stuff is odd enough,
Speaker 1: I didn't like that's ended, by the way, thank you.
Speaker 1: With this present a lot of the DEI stuff is ending.
Speaker 1: Take a look at Google, take a look at Disney.
Speaker 1: Everybody's ending it, right? They're over it.
Speaker 1: So, so why was USAID trying to push this narrative
Speaker 1: all over the world?
Speaker 1: I was talking to my 76 research colleague about this
Speaker 1: just the other day, Rob Horton. He had a theory
Speaker 1: which is kind of interesting. I'll share with you. His
Speaker 1: theory was that they need to employ all these people
Speaker 1: somehow some way and so what better way than to
Speaker 1: put them into NGOs and give them some job in Timbuktu.
Speaker 1: Perpetuating this, you know, gender studies nonsense because it's all
Speaker 1: part of that academic machine that has to turn out
Speaker 1: these PhD candidates and make sure that, you know, they
Speaker 1: aren't suffering under all those loans because how else are
Speaker 1: you gonna be employed as a gender studies PhD and then.
Speaker 1: You know, to rub a little salt in the wound.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump getting rid of the Department of Education, or
Speaker 1: at least right now getting rid of 85 contracts. Yes,
Speaker 1: the federal government is dumping 85 contracts that they have.
Speaker 1: Maxine Waters is ready to explode.
Speaker 1: Here she is on Friday trying to demand a meeting
Speaker 1: with Linda McMahon, who's the new head of the Department
Speaker 1: of Education, who's charged with trying to wind this whole
Speaker 1: thing down because it's just grown into a colossal mess
Speaker 1: since it was started in the 1970s by none other
Speaker 1: than Jimmy Carter. Kay Nelson Junior, thank you for your generosity.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get to your comment in just a second,
Speaker 1: but first.
Speaker 1: Look them in the eye. Come on, hold your face up.
Speaker 1: Look at him. Let him see you. This is him.
Speaker 1: Look at it. What's your name? Tell us your name.
Speaker 1: Give me that idea again. So what I showed you
Speaker 1: the idea.
Speaker 1: You do what? I showed you. Could you let me
Speaker 1: see the ID again, huh? No. Will someone else ask
Speaker 1: him for the ID? Will you ask him for it?
Speaker 1: He won't let me see it again. You see it.
Speaker 1: I didn't see it.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, Mad Max kind of living up to
Speaker 1: her name there, right? Oh, that's cruel of me. Reuters again,
Speaker 1: there was another one of those places that got all
Speaker 1: that money. Anyway, the Department of Education has announced again
Speaker 1: today that they are canceling 85 contracts, so people are
Speaker 1: flipping out and they're saying, oh, you know, like our
Speaker 1: kids are gonna be at such a disadvantage. You think
Speaker 1: they're at.
Speaker 1: Any more of a disadvantage than they already are? I mean,
Speaker 1: you guys were the ones shutting down the schools and
Speaker 1: you look at some of the poorest communities in America,
Speaker 1: some of the most urban communities in America, and those
Speaker 1: kids were the worst off because it took forever for Chicago,
Speaker 1: for example, to reopen its schools or Baltimore to reopen
Speaker 1: its schools. In fact, at one point, Lori Lightfoot, the
Speaker 1: Chicago mayor who, you know, somehow.
Speaker 1: Said nobody can be, you know, going to hair salons, this,
Speaker 1: that and the other, but she had her hairdresser coming
Speaker 1: to her house to do her hair because somehow she's
Speaker 1: the face of Chicago. She's gonna look good. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: you can, you can work with all the hairdressers you
Speaker 1: want Laurie, it's not happening.
Speaker 1: She, she couldn't even get those teachers back to work
Speaker 1: in Chicago. OK, so I'm sorry, you know what? The
Speaker 1: onus is on you guys. You try and blame the
Speaker 1: federal government. You gotta manage your own people and you
Speaker 1: know what, if Lori Lightfoot isn't getting the job done,
Speaker 1: you got.
Speaker 1: Voter out and sure enough they did but we need
Speaker 1: more of that all over the country right now we
Speaker 1: absolutely do bye bye Department of Education bring it to
Speaker 1: the people less government is better. Oh my gosh, K
Speaker 1: Nelson Junior sharing with me that this is related to
Speaker 1: the balance of nature.
Speaker 1: Vitamins that I take. I'm so sorry to hear this.
Speaker 1: You said you used to take the Flintstone vitamins and
Speaker 1: when he was 5, you ate the whole bottle, you
Speaker 1: had to get your stomach. Oh my gosh, like I'm
Speaker 1: so sorry. That is quite a story. So yeah, if,
Speaker 1: if you take balance of nature, please um.
Speaker 1: Do not eat them all, OK? They're really, really good.
Speaker 1: They're gummies.
Speaker 1: They're gluten free. They get that going, you know, if you're,
Speaker 1: if you have gluten intolerance anyway, they're really, really tasty,
Speaker 1: but um if you do that like don't do what
Speaker 1: Kay Nelson Jr. did, that's a cute story. Thank you
Speaker 1: for sharing it. Their number, by the way, Balance of
Speaker 1: Nature is 1-800-246-87511-800-246-8751. OK, here's a story.
Speaker 1: What do you think of this? Mainstream media somehow wants
Speaker 1: to get in on the action, the mainstream media.
Speaker 1: One Fox News kicked Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly and
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly to the curb.
Speaker 1: Me as well, by the way, but I'm not part
Speaker 1: of their group you see there's a company called Red
Speaker 1: Seed Ventures and Red Seat sells advertising on podcasts and
Speaker 1: you know like I just did an ad you gotta
Speaker 1: have ads right? that helps support the show. I'm able
Speaker 1: to bring you the content for free because we have
Speaker 1: advertisers and so they sell the ads that go into
Speaker 1: these various podcasts and they just announced a big deal.
Speaker 1: A very big deal. In fact, Fox is buying Red
Speaker 1: Seed Ventures, the company that sells all the ads for
Speaker 1: the Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Bill O'Reilly, Piers Morgan as well.
Speaker 1: Wasn't he with an entity of Fox like a Murdoch company?
Speaker 1: Then he made a big deal, wasn't he with Sky, right?
Speaker 1: And then he went on on his own. He's coming
Speaker 1: back home. They're all coming back home. What do you know?
Speaker 1: So Fox is gonna sell the advertising.
Speaker 1: Of these people that they discarded.
Speaker 1: There's kind of an irony to that, don't you think?
Speaker 1: You know, I think they tell you, hey, we own
Speaker 1: our shows, it's different than last time around, and sure,
Speaker 1: you know, of course it's different. You do own your show.
Speaker 1: I own my show. I have somebody that sells the ads,
Speaker 1: a media company that sells the ads, and you know what,
Speaker 1: if I don't like what the advertiser is or you
Speaker 1: know I've turned plenty of ads, believe me, I'm, I can,
Speaker 1: I can be a bit of a headache because if
Speaker 1: I don't like the ad, if I don't like the company,
Speaker 1: it's not gonna appear on the show.
Speaker 1: But they never say to me, hey, you know, we
Speaker 1: want you to cover this or that, or maybe you
Speaker 1: could have this kind of viewpoint on something that does
Speaker 1: not happen.
Speaker 1: Nor would I ever allow that to happen because you
Speaker 1: know what I've been there, done that.
Speaker 1: That's like the kind of games that they play at
Speaker 1: network TV, so these guys, to their credit, have gone
Speaker 1: out on their own and built real businesses, successful businesses,
Speaker 1: and now Fox is realizing, gosh darn it, you know,
Speaker 1: we left a lot of money on the table and
Speaker 1: what if we were to say I don't know sell
Speaker 1: Jesse Waters alongside Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, you know,
Speaker 1: maybe that would be a good way to synergize.
Speaker 1: And so while Megan and Tucker still on their shows,
Speaker 1: you know, somebody else is controlling the purse strings, I
Speaker 1: hope that whatever contracts they have with Red Seat Ventures
Speaker 1: enable them to get out. I'm a big believer in
Speaker 1: the 90 day out, you know, and if you don't
Speaker 1: sell my ads the way I want you to sell
Speaker 1: my ads or if I don't like the ads or
Speaker 1: if you are trying to impose some kind of editorial
Speaker 1: agenda on me.
Speaker 1: Then I walk right and as an independent you have
Speaker 1: the ability to do that. But how is this entirely different?
Speaker 1: The difference is, I guess they do own their content
Speaker 1: like I own the Trish Regan show of course I
Speaker 1: always owned the Trish Regan brand. Trish Regan is me
Speaker 1: when I was on Fox. Fox paid me a salary.
Speaker 1: And I went on and did the Trish Regan show
Speaker 1: on Fox, but hey, hey, the difference, I I'll have
Speaker 1: the library, they'll make money, you know, for however long
Speaker 1: on old Trish Regan videos, but
Speaker 1: I, I did own my brand.
Speaker 1: And while I was under contract.
Speaker 1: I did, you know, eventually have the ability to go
Speaker 1: out and do my own thing, which is what we're
Speaker 1: doing right here. Reminder to subscribe, share, like, all that
Speaker 1: good stuff, make a comment, all of it helps. So
Speaker 1: how is it really different?
Speaker 1: After all, if Fox doesn't like the narrative they're spewing,
Speaker 1: if they don't like if Tucker goes near J6 now
Speaker 1: that may not happen right now because we're in a
Speaker 1: whole different world and this whole new world has allowed
Speaker 1: for conservative opinion to thrive but but if Fox is
Speaker 1: like mm.
Speaker 1: We really don't like that. It's at odds with who
Speaker 1: we are as a business, etc. etc. Then you have
Speaker 1: to ask, are they going to perhaps reduce some of
Speaker 1: the ads and if they're controlling the money, how much
Speaker 1: are they controlling the product?
Speaker 1: I'm not saying that's the case, and I think that
Speaker 1: these people are smart enough to know that if that
Speaker 1: were to happen, they could make an exit to stage
Speaker 1: left pretty quickly, but there's an irony here.
Speaker 1: There's an irony given that these are the talents that
Speaker 1: Fox felt it couldn't monetize anymore. I don't know in
Speaker 1: Megan's case whether they were gonna keep her or whether
Speaker 1: she just had a better offer at NBC, but certainly
Speaker 1: Tucker got a kick in the stomach. Bill O'Reilly went
Speaker 1: out in flames.
Speaker 1: And now,
Speaker 1: They're all coming back. What do you know? They're all
Speaker 1: coming back and so it's.
Speaker 1: An interesting sort of twist of fate fate. What I
Speaker 1: would say is it proves what I've said all along,
Speaker 1: you know what the mainstream media wants in the mainstream
Speaker 1: media knows that we got it going on over here
Speaker 1: in the digital space and that this is the future.
Speaker 1: And they don't have that. I mean they have Fox Nation,
Speaker 1: but you know Fox Nation isn't really doing that well.
Speaker 1: I mean if you look at the subscription numbers, I
Speaker 1: don't think they're anything to write home about, so they're
Speaker 1: looking over there at Tucker and Megan and Pierce and
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly. Oh my gosh, like this guys, they've figured
Speaker 1: it out.
Speaker 1: So they now want a piece of the action.
Speaker 1: Of course they do.
Speaker 1: I mean,
Speaker 1: I, I'd be a little reticent to get back in
Speaker 1: bed frankly, if it were me with them, and I
Speaker 1: know you guys are gonna say you're independent, you're independent,
Speaker 1: you're independent, but you know they are now gonna be
Speaker 1: controlling your ad revenue so.
Speaker 1: I'd get the 90 day out. I really would. I
Speaker 1: get the 90 day out and make sure you have
Speaker 1: the ability to go wherever you want and make sure
Speaker 1: whoever can sell your show the best does.
Speaker 1: Because Fox is just in it to continue profiting off
Speaker 1: of you.
Speaker 1: I mean they're capitalists we're all capitalists here like you
Speaker 1: know like it's a business. Fox has not been able
Speaker 1: to figure this business out so now they're going to
Speaker 1: these independents and the concern I think.
Speaker 1: Dare I say is that you run the risk.
Speaker 1: That independence may not be so independent at some point.
Speaker 1: In other words, if you're working, if you're working for
Speaker 1: the man, right, if you're working for the big corporation,
Speaker 1: at what point do they start to infuse their agenda
Speaker 1: and viewpoint into your programming so as they are able
Speaker 1: to sell more ads and the beauty of what independent
Speaker 1: media really is is that we have this Chinese wall
Speaker 1: so to speak between us and say.
Speaker 1: That kind of editorial control and that's what people respond
Speaker 1: to and this is why you know Joe Rogan has
Speaker 1: been so successful this is why Tucker and Megan and
Speaker 1: and and all of them Piers Morgan who just went
Speaker 1: out on his own, they've all been successful. This is
Speaker 1: why I look at this channel. wow, I mean we
Speaker 1: haven't done any marketing.
Speaker 1: I'm working on a website. I promise like we haven't
Speaker 1: done anything and you guys are here every single day
Speaker 1: we've got 575,000 I think and still counting subs just
Speaker 1: because I show up with a camera and I talk
Speaker 1: to you like a real person because we don't have
Speaker 1: the teleprompters and we don't have the graphics and the
Speaker 1: whiz bang and all that stuff. One of my friends
Speaker 1: who does a podcast actually Dave Rubin, you, you may
Speaker 1: know him.
Speaker 1: He once said to me, don't, when I was starting out,
Speaker 1: don't worry about that stuff. Like the viewers actually don't
Speaker 1: want all the video and the whiz bang and the
Speaker 1: noisy graphics. That's very much a cable news thing.
Speaker 1: And they use those tricks to distract.
Speaker 1: From the actual content itself in part because sometimes they
Speaker 1: just don't have the personalities right on the air to
Speaker 1: be able to deliver the content in a meaningful enough
Speaker 1: way so they got a whole bunch of whiz bang
Speaker 1: to distract you with.
Speaker 1: And that in some ways feels very old fashioned. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, we don't have that here.
Speaker 1: Like I said, it's very raw. It's just you and me, and, um,
Speaker 1: and you know, I think it's a, it's a special
Speaker 1: kind of relationship. I, I've gotten to know you all,
Speaker 1: for goodness sakes like Leslie who's been here from the beginning,
Speaker 1: you know, and occasionally we run into, I'm laughing at
Speaker 1: Alfonse who also I've gotten to know because he's been
Speaker 1: here so much. Alfonse is like, yep, no chyrons, Trish,
Speaker 1: no lower thirds, you know, usually in cable you always,
Speaker 1: you always know what the story is that they're talking
Speaker 1: about because you see the chyron flash on the screen.
Speaker 1: We don't do that here. I mean I did it
Speaker 1: in the beginning. I've tried it out and it's like
Speaker 1: I don't really need it because you guys are actually here.
Speaker 1: Regardless of the whiz bang, and I think there's something
Speaker 1: extraordinary and special and really unique about that. So I
Speaker 1: don't know, you know, we'll see, we'll, you have to
Speaker 1: keep an eye on those guys and see if their
Speaker 1: content changes in any way, shape, or form. Um, I
Speaker 1: can tell you this Agan Gagnon, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for your generosity. It is so appreciated really and truly
Speaker 1: like you guys are just wonderful. I.
Speaker 1: I I think that this is a very unique and
Speaker 1: very new medium and I'm very protective of it.
Speaker 1: Because authenticity is really all I have. My brand is me.
Speaker 1: And no one can take that away.
Speaker 1: Corporate media in their case may try.
Speaker 1: And they're gonna have to stand up and be strong.
Speaker 1: Very, very interesting stuff.
Speaker 1: Um, 76 Research, you know, that's my company that I started.
Speaker 1: I want to just give a plug again for that
Speaker 1: use code word dollar, 76search.com. You can get a lot
Speaker 1: of market research there which is the 76 report, but
Speaker 1: for those of you that are really interested in investing,
Speaker 1: I cannot stress this enough. Go check out the model portfolios,
Speaker 1: 10 to 15 stocks in each and every single one
Speaker 1: of them.
Speaker 1: That are designed to be long term picks. We rarely
Speaker 1: make changes. We did, I should say, over the weekend,
Speaker 1: last weekend, we came up with one change in one
Speaker 1: of the portfolios.
Speaker 1: I think that you got some of that information if
Speaker 1: you're signed up on the email, you can go to
Speaker 1: invest in Maga.com, Invest in Maga.com. You can go to 70,
Speaker 1: that's the free stuff. You can go to 76search.com, get
Speaker 1: the 76 report for $1. Finally, I will remind you
Speaker 1: that one of our great show sponsors right here, you see,
Speaker 1: we're just talking about advertising shows. The other one is
Speaker 1: just all me, but this one is American Hartford Gulton.
Speaker 1: These guys are great. OK, they're really, really great.
Speaker 1: You know how picky I am about advertisers, and they
Speaker 1: are giving up to $15,000 worth of free silver with
Speaker 1: gold purchases right now. You can text Trish to 65532.ex
Speaker 1: Trish to 65532 or call him at 1-844-495-1115, or go
Speaker 1: to the best handle of all time, Trish loves Gold.com.
Speaker 1: Trish loves Gold.com. I do, I do. What can I say, right?
Speaker 1: I love markets. I love gold I love investing and
Speaker 1: I love what Donald Trump and Doge is doing. Like
Speaker 1: I love every single minute of this as somebody who's
Speaker 1: a fiscal conservative, how could you not? Donald Trump actually
Speaker 1: talking about creating a sovereign wealth fund. Imagine.
Speaker 2: This is an executive order discharges your secretary of the Treasury,
Speaker 2: uh Scott Bessant and your secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, uh,
Speaker 2: to begin a process that will hopefully result in the
Speaker 2: creation of an American sovereign wealth fund.
Speaker 1: It's a very exciting.
Speaker 1: Event, uh, we're gonna have a sovereign wealth fund which
Speaker 1: we've never had. We have a lot of things that
Speaker 1: create wealth and you've seen that over the last two weeks.
Speaker 1: I think we've created more wealth. Other people have created
Speaker 1: the wealth, the people, my predecessors, we're creating a lot
Speaker 1: of wealth. Uh, Scott, maybe you'd like to say something
Speaker 1: about it, and I'd ask also Howard to say something
Speaker 1: about it.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. This is a very exciting. We're gonna stand
Speaker 1: this thing up within the next 12 months. We're going
Speaker 1: to uh
Speaker 1: Monetize the asset side of the US balance sheet for
Speaker 1: the American people. We're going to put the assets to work,
Speaker 1: and I think it's going to be very exciting. We're
Speaker 1: going to study best practices that's done around the world.
Speaker 1: It'll be a combination of liquid assets, assets that we
Speaker 1: have in this country as we work to bring them
Speaker 1: out for the American people.
Speaker 1: The extraordinary size and scale of the US government and
Speaker 1: the business it does with companies.
Speaker 1: should create value for American citizens. If we are going
Speaker 1: to buy 2 billion COVID vaccines, maybe we should have
Speaker 1: some warrants and some equity in these companies and have
Speaker 1: that grow for the help of the American people. So
Speaker 1: bringing all these things together, I think we'll create Scott
Speaker 1: and I will create an amazing sovereign wealth fund for you, sir.
Speaker 1: So other countries have sovereign wealth funds, and they're much
Speaker 1: smaller countries, and they're not the United States. We have
Speaker 1: tremendous potential in this country, tremendous. You're seeing that's what's
Speaker 1: happened just in a short period of time.
Speaker 1: And as an example, TikTok, we're going to be doing
Speaker 1: something perhaps with TikTok and perhaps not if we make
Speaker 1: the right deal we'll do it, otherwise we won't, but
Speaker 1: I have the right to do that and we might
Speaker 1: put that in the sovereign wealth fund, whatever we make,
Speaker 1: or if we do a partnership with very wealthy people,
Speaker 1: a lot of.
Speaker 1: Options, but we could put that as an example in
Speaker 1: the fund, and we have a lot of other things
Speaker 1: that we could put in the fund, and I think
Speaker 1: in a short period of time we'd have one of
Speaker 1: the biggest funds and you know some of some of
Speaker 1: them are pretty large, I must tell you some of
Speaker 1: the like the Saudi Arabia fund is on the large side.
Speaker 1: But eventually we'll catch it, but we're going to create
Speaker 1: a lot of wealth for the fund, and I think
Speaker 1: it's about time that this country had a sovereign wealth fund,
Speaker 1: and these two gentlemen and some others are going to
Speaker 1: work with them very closely, and they'll be heading it
Speaker 1: up and they're going to do a great job, two
Speaker 1: highly respected people that have done unbelievably well in the world,
Speaker 1: in the real world, so that's a big deal, huh?
Speaker 1: Yes sir, I think I think it's going to create
Speaker 1: value and be of great strategic importance.
Speaker 1: Amazing. The US is creating a sovereign wealth fund.
Speaker 1: I, I mean, think about that. Like Donald Trump's coming
Speaker 1: in and he's like, wait a second, how do we
Speaker 1: make money? Let's stop losing money in needless places. I
Speaker 1: mean the penny thing, right? It costs, costs like 2.5
Speaker 1: cents just to make one penny. He's like, forget it,
Speaker 1: we're not making pennies anymore. I know I feel a
Speaker 1: little bit bad about it too because you know we're
Speaker 1: gonna get a little nostalgic here, but you gotta be
Speaker 1: a realist. The pennies cost too darn much to make,
Speaker 1: and he's like one penny at a time we're gonna
Speaker 1: save this country money.
Speaker 1: And not only we're gonna save the country money, we're
Speaker 1: gonna make money, we're gonna make money in our sovereign
Speaker 1: wealth fund. There's a lot we can talk about. There's
Speaker 1: a lot we can debate because you don't necessarily want
Speaker 1: the federal government in there running businesses. I'm only thinking
Speaker 1: about Maxine Waters and Kamala Harris and Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: these kinds of people that don't understand how corporations work.
Speaker 1: We're not always gonna have say a Scott Besant there
Speaker 1: who spent his entire career investing in things, but so
Speaker 1: long as we got them, right?
Speaker 1: Maybe, maybe we can make a little coaching for the
Speaker 1: US taxpayer. Maybe we can actually help bring our debt
Speaker 1: down because we actually start making money.
Speaker 1: That's the innovation. That's what's so amazing here. This is
Speaker 1: a whole new ball game and I'm telling you all
Speaker 1: these people on the left that wanna sit there and
Speaker 1: moan and whine and ah, you know, my gosh, but
Speaker 1: we need all that doge money. We need all that
Speaker 1: USAID money, we need all that this, that and the
Speaker 1: other going to all our pet projects. Your day is over, OK?
Speaker 1: New team is in charge and they're gonna make America
Speaker 1: great again. Thank you for watching. I'm back here live
Speaker 1: as always with you Tamara. Make sure you hit the bell.