WEBVTT - Timeless Wisdom: Ultimate Issues Hour - Freud w/Peter D. Kramer

0:00:21.500 --> 0:00:25.820
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Here thousands of

0:00:25.860 --> 0:00:29.460
<v Speaker 1>hours of Dennis's lectures courses in classic radio programs. Had

0:00:29.500 --> 0:00:41.220
<v Speaker 1>to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles. Go to Dennisprager dot com.

0:00:41.260 --> 0:00:44.060
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, welcome to the Ultimate Issues Hour, an

0:00:44.100 --> 0:00:48.300
<v Speaker 2>hour each week devoted to the great questions of life.

0:00:48.500 --> 0:00:51.300
<v Speaker 2>And I think I got a signal from Heaven as

0:00:51.300 --> 0:00:54.100
<v Speaker 2>it were, to move Peter Kramer over into the Ultimate

0:00:54.100 --> 0:00:57.660
<v Speaker 2>Issues Hour. So it's actually worked out better for you,

0:00:57.740 --> 0:01:00.300
<v Speaker 2>and it worked out better, I think, for the show,

0:01:01.100 --> 0:01:03.500
<v Speaker 2>So thank you for your patience. Peter Kramer is a

0:01:03.540 --> 0:01:06.740
<v Speaker 2>professor of psychiatry at Brown University, a well known psychiatrist.

0:01:07.380 --> 0:01:11.100
<v Speaker 2>And there is a there is a series of biographies,

0:01:11.260 --> 0:01:15.140
<v Speaker 2>short biographies that have been put out. They're eminent, called

0:01:15.180 --> 0:01:18.780
<v Speaker 2>Eminent Lives, and he was given the honor and it

0:01:18.860 --> 0:01:22.699
<v Speaker 2>is an honor to write the one on Freud, whom,

0:01:22.780 --> 0:01:26.180
<v Speaker 2>as I reminded you folks earlier in the show, I

0:01:26.380 --> 0:01:29.100
<v Speaker 2>was my nominee either he or Hitler, and I'm not

0:01:29.180 --> 0:01:33.500
<v Speaker 2>comparing them. Although it's amazing how people will pervert what

0:01:33.540 --> 0:01:37.140
<v Speaker 2>you say. I'm a veteran of having my words perverted

0:01:38.260 --> 0:01:41.020
<v Speaker 2>there in no way related, but those were my two

0:01:41.060 --> 0:01:45.740
<v Speaker 2>nominees for Person of the Century. Time eventually picked Albert Einstein,

0:01:46.620 --> 0:01:49.780
<v Speaker 2>which was just a safe pick. But the effects of

0:01:49.820 --> 0:01:53.420
<v Speaker 2>those two individuals, one for ill and one perhaps, I

0:01:53.460 --> 0:01:57.900
<v Speaker 2>guess I'm a mixed bag. I have been to the

0:01:58.180 --> 0:02:01.020
<v Speaker 2>great consternation of many of my listeners. I have been

0:02:01.060 --> 0:02:03.540
<v Speaker 2>a fan of a Freud. I thought the man was

0:02:03.580 --> 0:02:07.340
<v Speaker 2>the genius of the twentieth century, for good and for ill.

0:02:07.380 --> 0:02:09.740
<v Speaker 2>But I really believe he was a genius in opening

0:02:09.820 --> 0:02:15.740
<v Speaker 2>up the unconscious and all of the ideas that he had.

0:02:15.859 --> 0:02:18.380
<v Speaker 2>Do you agree, first of all, on the effect that

0:02:18.460 --> 0:02:19.980
<v Speaker 2>he has had on modern man?

0:02:20.660 --> 0:02:24.500
<v Speaker 3>Enormous effect, you know. I think you have to when

0:02:24.500 --> 0:02:27.460
<v Speaker 3>you write a short biography, choose one challenge or a

0:02:27.500 --> 0:02:29.340
<v Speaker 3>couple and say these are the ones I'm going to

0:02:29.420 --> 0:02:32.180
<v Speaker 3>look at. And I think what's happened to Freud over

0:02:32.220 --> 0:02:35.340
<v Speaker 3>the past twenty years or so is that his stock

0:02:35.500 --> 0:02:38.980
<v Speaker 3>really has gone down as a scientist and even as

0:02:39.060 --> 0:02:42.019
<v Speaker 3>a person of character. I think, as we know more

0:02:42.060 --> 0:02:45.940
<v Speaker 3>about what he's done through witnesses, you know, beyond himself,

0:02:45.980 --> 0:02:51.260
<v Speaker 3>he looks less good. But he has had this enormous

0:02:51.300 --> 0:02:55.300
<v Speaker 3>influence on how we experience ourselves, so that that contrast

0:02:55.420 --> 0:02:58.820
<v Speaker 3>that paradox, how you can be less and less respected

0:02:58.860 --> 0:03:01.940
<v Speaker 3>as a scientist and yet have this enormous influence on

0:03:02.860 --> 0:03:05.540
<v Speaker 3>how modern man lives with himself. You know, that seemed

0:03:05.540 --> 0:03:06.860
<v Speaker 3>to me my challenge.

0:03:07.300 --> 0:03:10.140
<v Speaker 2>Well, it is a challenge. So the question is, and

0:03:10.180 --> 0:03:14.460
<v Speaker 2>there are people who believe this, many people that psychoanalysis

0:03:14.500 --> 0:03:16.980
<v Speaker 2>and psychotherapy, at least in so far as they are

0:03:16.980 --> 0:03:22.700
<v Speaker 2>related to psychiatry, are not based on science and therefore

0:03:23.060 --> 0:03:24.500
<v Speaker 2>are more harmful than good.

0:03:25.220 --> 0:03:28.620
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think psychotherapy is done well. There was psychotherapy

0:03:28.700 --> 0:03:33.540
<v Speaker 3>before Freud. Most psychotherapy today doesn't have very direct links

0:03:33.580 --> 0:03:37.260
<v Speaker 3>to Freud, and psychotherapy is still one of the really

0:03:37.340 --> 0:03:41.380
<v Speaker 3>important treatments for mental illness, for minor mental illness, for growth,

0:03:41.380 --> 0:03:45.260
<v Speaker 3>for education. But the particular additions that Freud made about

0:03:45.300 --> 0:03:49.420
<v Speaker 3>infantile sexuality, some of the things he said about the

0:03:49.500 --> 0:03:52.820
<v Speaker 3>nature of the unconscious just have not nature of dreams

0:03:52.860 --> 0:03:56.700
<v Speaker 3>have not held up as well as probably everybody expected

0:03:56.740 --> 0:03:58.300
<v Speaker 3>fifty years ago they would hold up.

0:03:58.820 --> 0:04:01.500
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of psychoanalysis itself? And for those

0:04:01.540 --> 0:04:04.460
<v Speaker 2>who don't know the difference psychotherapy is if you go

0:04:04.500 --> 0:04:07.100
<v Speaker 2>to a psychologist or you go to any therapist and

0:04:07.140 --> 0:04:11.620
<v Speaker 2>you talk through your problems. Psychiatry is somebody who does

0:04:11.660 --> 0:04:15.300
<v Speaker 2>that and also has an MD and can prescribe prescription drugs.

0:04:15.700 --> 0:04:18.580
<v Speaker 2>And then there was psychoanalysis where you go about four

0:04:18.580 --> 0:04:21.140
<v Speaker 2>times a week and what is it for about two

0:04:21.219 --> 0:04:22.020
<v Speaker 2>hours of session?

0:04:22.420 --> 0:04:25.099
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, usually the same fifty minutes.

0:04:25.260 --> 0:04:28.460
<v Speaker 2>Fifty minutes, yeah, and you but it is about that

0:04:28.620 --> 0:04:29.900
<v Speaker 2>much a week, right.

0:04:29.820 --> 0:04:31.820
<v Speaker 3>It can be four or five times a week, and

0:04:31.900 --> 0:04:35.380
<v Speaker 3>of course doing that is a different experience. You really

0:04:35.700 --> 0:04:39.220
<v Speaker 3>come in touch with aspects of yourself. The psychiatrists psychoanalyst

0:04:39.260 --> 0:04:42.420
<v Speaker 3>becomes very important in your fantasies and imagination.

0:04:43.180 --> 0:04:44.979
<v Speaker 4>Have you undergone psychoanalysis?

0:04:45.020 --> 0:04:49.100
<v Speaker 3>I have? I have, and it was a Freudian psychoanalysis.

0:04:49.100 --> 0:04:52.780
<v Speaker 3>I was in London, where Freud had moved after he

0:04:52.860 --> 0:04:56.539
<v Speaker 3>left Vienna. Anna Freud was still in London, his daughter.

0:04:57.100 --> 0:05:01.500
<v Speaker 3>I was at that institute where you know, they presided,

0:05:02.100 --> 0:05:04.980
<v Speaker 3>and I was a patient and I thought it did

0:05:05.020 --> 0:05:07.700
<v Speaker 3>me a great deal of good. Although you have to

0:05:07.780 --> 0:05:10.820
<v Speaker 3>ask was it for the reasons that people imagined at

0:05:10.820 --> 0:05:13.180
<v Speaker 3>the time, you know, was it important to bring forth

0:05:13.540 --> 0:05:18.180
<v Speaker 3>the Oedipus complex, this notion of having a sexual incestuous

0:05:18.180 --> 0:05:22.980
<v Speaker 3>interest in your mother? And being willing to murder your

0:05:22.980 --> 0:05:25.580
<v Speaker 3>father in the interest of that, you know, that sort

0:05:25.580 --> 0:05:27.779
<v Speaker 3>of thing. Is that? Did that really hold? Or was

0:05:27.820 --> 0:05:29.500
<v Speaker 3>it just that I was in the hands of a

0:05:29.620 --> 0:05:32.820
<v Speaker 3>very good person and given some time and space to

0:05:32.860 --> 0:05:33.820
<v Speaker 3>think problems through.

0:05:34.220 --> 0:05:38.219
<v Speaker 2>I publicly admit that if I had the time, I

0:05:38.260 --> 0:05:40.940
<v Speaker 2>would love to undergo psychoanalysis.

0:05:41.020 --> 0:05:44.460
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, I say that, and my wife says, you know,

0:05:44.580 --> 0:05:45.900
<v Speaker 3>she'd leave me if I did.

0:05:46.740 --> 0:05:49.460
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but you did already, Yes, I did already.

0:05:49.700 --> 0:05:50.900
<v Speaker 3>I did already, I see.

0:05:50.940 --> 0:05:53.300
<v Speaker 4>But so you're lucky you did it before you marry.

0:05:53.500 --> 0:05:55.500
<v Speaker 3>Right, that's it, that's it. She doesn't want me to

0:05:55.540 --> 0:05:56.300
<v Speaker 3>know any more than I know.

0:05:56.460 --> 0:05:58.940
<v Speaker 2>Right. Oh yeah, No, I understand that I may and

0:05:58.980 --> 0:06:01.500
<v Speaker 2>it may may be better if both spouses do it

0:06:01.580 --> 0:06:02.700
<v Speaker 2>than if only one does.

0:06:02.900 --> 0:06:06.500
<v Speaker 3>I suppose so. But you know, it has changed very greatly.

0:06:06.620 --> 0:06:09.979
<v Speaker 3>Freud thought he was a great scientist. He thought that

0:06:10.140 --> 0:06:12.900
<v Speaker 3>analysis had to be scientific, so you should stand at

0:06:12.900 --> 0:06:16.020
<v Speaker 3>some distance from the patient, not be empathetic, not be

0:06:16.100 --> 0:06:20.220
<v Speaker 3>overly sympathetic, that the patient remain very anxious. And then

0:06:20.260 --> 0:06:23.180
<v Speaker 3>he had these notions of what it was you were

0:06:23.220 --> 0:06:27.620
<v Speaker 3>going to discover, and in particular, these repressed sexual desires

0:06:28.340 --> 0:06:30.700
<v Speaker 3>and as I say that particular line of thought has

0:06:30.780 --> 0:06:32.460
<v Speaker 3>just not.

0:06:32.020 --> 0:06:34.500
<v Speaker 4>Fair, that do you not believe in the complex?

0:06:35.060 --> 0:06:38.219
<v Speaker 3>I think the Oedipus complex is probably and many people

0:06:38.260 --> 0:06:41.060
<v Speaker 3>thought this when Freud was alive, including some of his

0:06:41.140 --> 0:06:44.260
<v Speaker 3>competitors like Jung. That's sort of a shorthand for an

0:06:44.300 --> 0:06:48.620
<v Speaker 3>awareness that there are conflicts even in the best regulated

0:06:48.660 --> 0:06:52.739
<v Speaker 3>of families. I just reviewed a book which is about

0:06:52.740 --> 0:06:56.620
<v Speaker 3>Freud's visit to America. He became friendly with a man

0:06:56.700 --> 0:07:00.460
<v Speaker 3>named James Jackson Putnam, who was an American neurologist helped

0:07:00.500 --> 0:07:04.500
<v Speaker 3>spread psychoanalysis in this country. And there's a funny correspondence

0:07:04.540 --> 0:07:08.020
<v Speaker 3>where Putnam writes a letter saying that he used to

0:07:08.060 --> 0:07:11.500
<v Speaker 3>have fantasies, dreams that when he grew up he would

0:07:12.420 --> 0:07:14.700
<v Speaker 3>sit in front of a fireplace and have a devoted

0:07:14.700 --> 0:07:17.980
<v Speaker 3>wife and children and so on. And Freud writes back

0:07:18.260 --> 0:07:21.180
<v Speaker 3>to the effect of, well, you're you know, you're Sadism

0:07:21.220 --> 0:07:26.460
<v Speaker 3>and masochism obviously are coming to the fore the man

0:07:26.460 --> 0:07:31.100
<v Speaker 3>who would not take yes for an answer, that.

0:07:31.460 --> 0:07:32.820
<v Speaker 4>What's wrong with that fantasy?

0:07:32.900 --> 0:07:35.420
<v Speaker 3>By the way, well it must be a repression of

0:07:35.460 --> 0:07:36.100
<v Speaker 3>the reverse.

0:07:36.180 --> 0:07:36.380
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:07:36.700 --> 0:07:40.540
<v Speaker 3>Freud could turn anything into the edifice complex.

0:07:40.820 --> 0:07:42.900
<v Speaker 4>All right, so do you or don't you believe in it?

0:07:43.420 --> 0:07:45.980
<v Speaker 3>I don't believe in it in that form. I mean,

0:07:45.980 --> 0:07:49.060
<v Speaker 3>I think that what was valuable about Freud, and I

0:07:49.060 --> 0:07:52.179
<v Speaker 3>think what its contemporaries admired, was that he was very

0:07:52.220 --> 0:07:55.900
<v Speaker 3>open and frank about sex and aggression in an era.

0:07:56.100 --> 0:07:59.780
<v Speaker 3>You know, this wasn't exactly Victorian England, but it was Habsburg, Austria,

0:08:00.180 --> 0:08:03.620
<v Speaker 3>where these matters, although they were widely spoken about by

0:08:03.620 --> 0:08:08.620
<v Speaker 3>the intelligencia, you know, we're still somewhat repressed. And I

0:08:08.660 --> 0:08:12.700
<v Speaker 3>think bringing the possibility of conflict and desire even in

0:08:12.980 --> 0:08:15.140
<v Speaker 3>ordinary intimate circumstances into the did.

0:08:15.060 --> 0:08:16.740
<v Speaker 4>He did he help patience?

0:08:17.740 --> 0:08:21.140
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's an interesting question. You know that his patients,

0:08:21.460 --> 0:08:24.660
<v Speaker 3>the ones he wrote about, almost uniformly did less well

0:08:24.660 --> 0:08:27.180
<v Speaker 3>than he said they did. He was working with very

0:08:27.220 --> 0:08:29.820
<v Speaker 3>sick people. You know, we think of neurosis as a

0:08:29.860 --> 0:08:33.140
<v Speaker 3>mild manner matter, but he was dealing with very disturbed people.

0:08:33.620 --> 0:08:36.340
<v Speaker 3>And researchers have gone and found these patients and they

0:08:36.380 --> 0:08:40.980
<v Speaker 3>went on to be rehospitalized and you know, have a

0:08:41.100 --> 0:08:43.780
<v Speaker 3>very spotty careers and so on, and some of them

0:08:43.819 --> 0:08:46.500
<v Speaker 3>lived long enough to be interviewed, and they were really

0:08:46.540 --> 0:08:49.260
<v Speaker 3>still mentally ill at the time of interview many years later,

0:08:49.380 --> 0:08:52.260
<v Speaker 3>so I don't think he had miraculous effects on his patients.

0:08:52.340 --> 0:08:54.980
<v Speaker 3>Let's say that there are patients he didn't write about

0:08:54.980 --> 0:08:58.260
<v Speaker 3>who have written memoirs and diaries, and some of them

0:08:58.580 --> 0:09:02.940
<v Speaker 3>say they did quite well with him. But those accounts

0:09:02.980 --> 0:09:04.980
<v Speaker 3>show some other problems, which is that he didn't really

0:09:05.020 --> 0:09:09.540
<v Speaker 3>do psycho analysis. He was somebody who had strong opinions.

0:09:09.580 --> 0:09:11.940
<v Speaker 3>He'd give people advice, he'd have them over for dinner,

0:09:12.420 --> 0:09:15.460
<v Speaker 3>he'd lend them money. You know, it didn't look the

0:09:15.460 --> 0:09:20.020
<v Speaker 3>way psychoanalysis he wrote about. It was a different, different thing.

0:09:21.179 --> 0:09:23.540
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to tell you in a nutshell why I

0:09:23.660 --> 0:09:28.059
<v Speaker 2>have always admired him because it often surprises people because

0:09:28.060 --> 0:09:32.260
<v Speaker 2>I'm also very religious, and usually people think there's a

0:09:32.340 --> 0:09:36.140
<v Speaker 2>conflict between Freud and religion. Freud himself was an atheist

0:09:36.140 --> 0:09:38.780
<v Speaker 2>and no use for religion. He thought it was essentially,

0:09:40.460 --> 0:09:43.500
<v Speaker 2>you know, some psychological construct or crutch that we needed,

0:09:43.500 --> 0:09:47.380
<v Speaker 2>and that basically God and our Father were interchangeable. How

0:09:47.380 --> 0:09:49.140
<v Speaker 2>we looked at God is how we looked at our father.

0:09:49.900 --> 0:09:53.140
<v Speaker 2>And many people think his worst work is Moses and

0:09:53.179 --> 0:09:56.740
<v Speaker 2>Monotheism anyway, So but I want to tell you in

0:09:56.780 --> 0:09:59.980
<v Speaker 2>a nutshell and have you react. I think that what

0:10:00.060 --> 0:10:04.380
<v Speaker 2>he said was, look, we are really messed up inside,

0:10:05.420 --> 0:10:08.820
<v Speaker 2>and don't walk around with this idealistic notion of the

0:10:08.900 --> 0:10:15.220
<v Speaker 2>Enlightenment that we are you know, basically wonderful beings who

0:10:15.260 --> 0:10:18.020
<v Speaker 2>have just been you know, just been you know, somehow

0:10:18.780 --> 0:10:22.500
<v Speaker 2>ruined by the the economics of our time or by

0:10:22.540 --> 0:10:25.900
<v Speaker 2>our parents. But we are really, we really are a

0:10:25.980 --> 0:10:29.420
<v Speaker 2>mess and that's a religious belief in my opinion as well.

0:10:30.100 --> 0:10:33.699
<v Speaker 2>Peter Kramer, the psychiatrist and professor of psychiatry, My guest

0:10:33.740 --> 0:10:34.900
<v Speaker 2>is book Sigmund Freud.

0:10:34.900 --> 0:10:36.180
<v Speaker 4>This is the Ultimate Issues hour.

0:10:36.220 --> 0:10:40.980
<v Speaker 1>We continue this episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right

0:10:41.020 --> 0:10:50.540
<v Speaker 1>after this. Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:10:50.780 --> 0:10:52.940
<v Speaker 2>Hi, everybody, this is the Ultimate Issues are on the

0:10:52.940 --> 0:10:55.620
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager Show. You can't get much more ultimate than

0:10:55.780 --> 0:10:59.820
<v Speaker 2>the father of psychiatry, psychoanalysis and all the like.

0:11:00.860 --> 0:11:01.579
<v Speaker 4>And there is a.

0:11:01.540 --> 0:11:04.780
<v Speaker 2>New excellent brief biography and you know how much I

0:11:04.900 --> 0:11:09.060
<v Speaker 2>adore brevity in writing by Peter Kramer, who is well

0:11:09.100 --> 0:11:12.020
<v Speaker 2>known for writing on psychiatry. He's a professor of psychiatry

0:11:12.620 --> 0:11:16.500
<v Speaker 2>at Brann University and in private practice in Providence. By

0:11:16.540 --> 0:11:18.380
<v Speaker 2>the way of the two things, can you say which

0:11:18.420 --> 0:11:21.980
<v Speaker 2>gives you more joy? The teaching of psychiatry or the

0:11:21.980 --> 0:11:22.660
<v Speaker 2>practice of it?

0:11:23.980 --> 0:11:26.620
<v Speaker 3>You know, I love working with patients, I'd say they

0:11:26.820 --> 0:11:29.340
<v Speaker 3>you know. Number two for me, probably even before teaching,

0:11:29.420 --> 0:11:32.380
<v Speaker 3>is writing. I love I write in the morning, I

0:11:32.380 --> 0:11:34.699
<v Speaker 3>see patients in the afternoon, and it's just what I've

0:11:34.820 --> 0:11:35.740
<v Speaker 3>what I wanted to do.

0:11:35.980 --> 0:11:38.420
<v Speaker 4>When do you teach in the evening? Uh? No?

0:11:38.460 --> 0:11:39.780
<v Speaker 3>I do you like tea during the day.

0:11:41.420 --> 0:11:43.980
<v Speaker 4>I was wondering for a while.

0:11:43.980 --> 0:11:46.060
<v Speaker 3>I try to cram at wedge a few things, and

0:11:46.140 --> 0:11:49.100
<v Speaker 3>I got kids. There's a lot going on, but basically

0:11:49.140 --> 0:11:51.180
<v Speaker 3>it's writing in the morning, seeing patients, all right.

0:11:51.179 --> 0:11:53.460
<v Speaker 2>I was saying to you that a lot of religious

0:11:53.500 --> 0:11:58.219
<v Speaker 2>people have a big problems with Freud and Freudian psychiatry

0:11:58.380 --> 0:12:01.260
<v Speaker 2>and and the whole, the whole arena of much of

0:12:01.260 --> 0:12:02.420
<v Speaker 2>that psychotherapy.

0:12:02.580 --> 0:12:05.660
<v Speaker 3>No, I think you captured something, which is that you know,

0:12:05.820 --> 0:12:11.339
<v Speaker 3>this is one of these figures who says rationality has

0:12:11.380 --> 0:12:14.740
<v Speaker 3>its limits in human beings, and that is a philosophical

0:12:14.780 --> 0:12:17.700
<v Speaker 3>and religious issue. And you know, science aside, whether you

0:12:17.700 --> 0:12:20.620
<v Speaker 3>get it exactly right about dreams or the Oedipus complet

0:12:21.260 --> 0:12:24.260
<v Speaker 3>that issue about our irrationality having a big part in

0:12:24.340 --> 0:12:27.380
<v Speaker 3>our makeup is at the center of Freud.

0:12:27.820 --> 0:12:30.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, I say to my you know, to my

0:12:30.620 --> 0:12:35.700
<v Speaker 2>religious audience, that he, you know, he understands how limited

0:12:35.780 --> 0:12:41.140
<v Speaker 2>we are. He is no romanticist about human nature. And

0:12:41.179 --> 0:12:43.780
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly what I got from religion.

0:12:44.500 --> 0:12:47.579
<v Speaker 3>And you know, Freud certainly was, in a certain manner

0:12:47.700 --> 0:12:50.700
<v Speaker 3>a good Jew. He never turned his back on Judaism.

0:12:50.780 --> 0:12:54.699
<v Speaker 3>He you know, played cards with his male friends. That

0:12:54.820 --> 0:12:58.339
<v Speaker 3>been a breath every week. He told Jewish jokes. He

0:12:58.460 --> 0:13:01.579
<v Speaker 3>wasn't pretending not to be Jewish just because he was

0:13:01.620 --> 0:13:04.380
<v Speaker 3>an atheist in the sense that all scientists at that

0:13:04.460 --> 0:13:07.620
<v Speaker 3>moment were atheists. That was the that was the stance

0:13:07.740 --> 0:13:11.059
<v Speaker 3>he had contempt for a belief in God. It's true.

0:13:11.420 --> 0:13:14.340
<v Speaker 3>But this wrestling with Moses is also an interesting issue.

0:13:14.340 --> 0:13:18.780
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he got the theological history wrong, he got

0:13:18.780 --> 0:13:21.220
<v Speaker 3>the anthropology wrong. But at least he is trying to

0:13:21.260 --> 0:13:24.380
<v Speaker 3>do something very brave in the face of the Nazis. Here,

0:13:24.540 --> 0:13:27.940
<v Speaker 3>you know, with this change in Austrian politics, the Nazis

0:13:27.940 --> 0:13:31.020
<v Speaker 3>were at the border, and here is Freud saying, we

0:13:31.060 --> 0:13:33.660
<v Speaker 3>as Jews have to be honest with ourselves. This is

0:13:33.700 --> 0:13:35.380
<v Speaker 3>a new way of looking at Moses. I mean there

0:13:35.420 --> 0:13:38.260
<v Speaker 3>was something very touching about doing this, and this was

0:13:38.300 --> 0:13:40.460
<v Speaker 3>really in his old age. I mean he was he

0:13:40.580 --> 0:13:45.780
<v Speaker 3>was one of these bold, outspoken types from you know,

0:13:45.860 --> 0:13:47.020
<v Speaker 3>adolescents till death.

0:13:48.420 --> 0:13:50.700
<v Speaker 2>Give a couple of examples when you and I both

0:13:50.780 --> 0:13:53.179
<v Speaker 2>believe he's been such a powerful force. I mean, you're

0:13:53.660 --> 0:13:56.540
<v Speaker 2>the subtitle is a great subtitle for your book, The

0:13:56.540 --> 0:13:58.260
<v Speaker 2>Making of the Modern Mind.

0:13:59.900 --> 0:14:02.740
<v Speaker 4>Inventor. Yeah, yeah, he he made the modern mind.

0:14:02.940 --> 0:14:05.059
<v Speaker 3>He did, and you know, as I say, he did

0:14:05.100 --> 0:14:08.140
<v Speaker 3>it without necessarily being right on the science. He thought

0:14:08.179 --> 0:14:11.180
<v Speaker 3>that these things like the Oedipus complex were discoveries, that

0:14:11.220 --> 0:14:14.940
<v Speaker 3>he discovered natural laws the way Copernicus did or Darwin.

0:14:15.300 --> 0:14:18.620
<v Speaker 3>He compared himself to those scientists and to Einstein repeatedly,

0:14:19.500 --> 0:14:21.780
<v Speaker 3>and I think that and to who he was. But

0:14:21.860 --> 0:14:24.940
<v Speaker 3>he captured that sense of there being a lot of

0:14:24.980 --> 0:14:30.260
<v Speaker 3>absurdity in life, of symbols being important, of you know,

0:14:30.820 --> 0:14:33.540
<v Speaker 3>what goes on in modern intellectual studies, you may like

0:14:33.580 --> 0:14:37.100
<v Speaker 3>it or not. Where tag team wrestling may be looked

0:14:37.100 --> 0:14:40.340
<v Speaker 3>at as a subject of serious inquiry. I mean, here

0:14:40.380 --> 0:14:43.060
<v Speaker 3>Freud was looking at jokes and slips of the tongue

0:14:43.300 --> 0:14:47.380
<v Speaker 3>and trying to find basic indicators about the culture and

0:14:47.460 --> 0:14:52.060
<v Speaker 3>about the human mind in these very trivial, trivial products

0:14:52.100 --> 0:14:55.260
<v Speaker 3>and trivial events. And that really just has shaped the

0:14:55.260 --> 0:14:58.340
<v Speaker 3>way we look at the objects around us and think

0:14:58.380 --> 0:15:00.940
<v Speaker 3>about I mean, to give the most humble example, say

0:15:00.940 --> 0:15:04.900
<v Speaker 3>you're on a date and the person doesn't show up

0:15:04.980 --> 0:15:08.300
<v Speaker 3>or shows up late and has some sort of quasi

0:15:08.340 --> 0:15:12.340
<v Speaker 3>reasonable explanation, you will think, you know, maybe he or

0:15:12.380 --> 0:15:15.820
<v Speaker 3>she is hostile, maybe there's something more going on that

0:15:15.940 --> 0:15:18.660
<v Speaker 3>even the person, as he speaks doesn't know about. Well,

0:15:18.700 --> 0:15:21.420
<v Speaker 3>that's freud, the notion of that of the un contract.

0:15:21.540 --> 0:15:22.860
<v Speaker 4>That's such a great example.

0:15:23.460 --> 0:15:26.980
<v Speaker 2>See, it's humbling that that's what I mean, or is

0:15:27.020 --> 0:15:29.100
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that I meant. It is humbling

0:15:29.180 --> 0:15:35.260
<v Speaker 2>to know how much of ourselves we don't know. Yeah,

0:15:35.380 --> 0:15:37.140
<v Speaker 2>that's why, by the way, I said to you, I

0:15:37.140 --> 0:15:40.580
<v Speaker 2>would love to undergo psychoanalysis. I want to know Dennis better.

0:15:41.220 --> 0:15:43.820
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's a project you Well, it is, But.

0:15:44.060 --> 0:15:47.020
<v Speaker 2>That's the that's it's not because I'm sick, it's because

0:15:47.060 --> 0:15:49.820
<v Speaker 2>I want It's it's like we like to we like

0:15:49.900 --> 0:15:54.100
<v Speaker 2>to explore outer space. To me, psychoanalysis is exploring inner space.

0:15:54.540 --> 0:15:57.500
<v Speaker 3>And I think that probably is why most people undertake

0:15:57.500 --> 0:16:01.740
<v Speaker 3>psychoanalysis as opposed to, say, you know, taking prozac or

0:16:02.300 --> 0:16:05.500
<v Speaker 3>undergoing a brief cognitive therapy. I think if you're going

0:16:05.540 --> 0:16:09.420
<v Speaker 3>four or five days a week, you're looking for some

0:16:10.300 --> 0:16:12.220
<v Speaker 3>real insight and transformation.

0:16:12.500 --> 0:16:14.380
<v Speaker 2>But I will tell you this, if I were to

0:16:14.460 --> 0:16:17.780
<v Speaker 2>choose a psychiatrist or psychoanalyst, that's what it would have

0:16:17.820 --> 0:16:18.100
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:16:18.180 --> 0:16:19.820
<v Speaker 4>I would want a Freudian.

0:16:19.340 --> 0:16:21.380
<v Speaker 3>One h And why is that?

0:16:21.780 --> 0:16:24.700
<v Speaker 2>Because I have I would want them to tap into.

0:16:24.940 --> 0:16:26.780
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's all nonsense.

0:16:26.860 --> 0:16:27.260
<v Speaker 4>I don't.

0:16:27.380 --> 0:16:31.020
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that all of these almost Kakamami things,

0:16:31.020 --> 0:16:33.980
<v Speaker 2>for example, obviously wouldn't be applicable to me. But I don't.

0:16:34.020 --> 0:16:36.540
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that penis envy is totally nonsense.

0:16:36.860 --> 0:16:37.380
<v Speaker 3>Uh huh.

0:16:37.420 --> 0:16:39.460
<v Speaker 4>Do you think it's not totally nonsense?

0:16:39.580 --> 0:16:42.580
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it is much too simple. If you

0:16:42.660 --> 0:16:45.100
<v Speaker 3>think of the You know, if you were a woman

0:16:45.340 --> 0:16:49.420
<v Speaker 3>in late nineteenth earliest twentieth century Vienna, and all the

0:16:49.500 --> 0:16:52.500
<v Speaker 3>power you know, were really in the hands of all

0:16:52.580 --> 0:16:55.860
<v Speaker 3>the explicit power were in the hands of men, you know,

0:16:55.940 --> 0:16:59.740
<v Speaker 3>of course, you might wish that you had some more

0:16:59.740 --> 0:17:03.380
<v Speaker 3>of the benefits that manhood brings, whether that is related

0:17:03.460 --> 0:17:07.179
<v Speaker 3>to thinking, you know that you're having the fantasy that

0:17:07.220 --> 0:17:09.139
<v Speaker 3>your penis was cut off, you know, which was what

0:17:09.220 --> 0:17:12.379
<v Speaker 3>he imagined, that women thought that they were they were

0:17:12.379 --> 0:17:14.700
<v Speaker 3>in a sense wounded or injured. You know that does

0:17:14.740 --> 0:17:15.820
<v Speaker 3>seem a little nonsense.

0:17:15.820 --> 0:17:19.659
<v Speaker 2>Agal, Yeah, I agree with that in the maturer woman.

0:17:19.899 --> 0:17:22.220
<v Speaker 2>I always thought of it more than any younger girl.

0:17:23.060 --> 0:17:25.659
<v Speaker 2>And I must tell you, and you know I'm not I

0:17:25.659 --> 0:17:27.859
<v Speaker 2>don't want to saddle you with this, so you can say, Dennis,

0:17:27.899 --> 0:17:30.340
<v Speaker 2>I completely disagree, and I will never talk to you again,

0:17:30.939 --> 0:17:33.859
<v Speaker 2>or at least not publicly. But but I have viewed

0:17:33.939 --> 0:17:37.139
<v Speaker 2>much of the feminist movement as a form of penis envy. Yeah,

0:17:37.580 --> 0:17:43.299
<v Speaker 2>in that whatever men do, that's what's really valuable, and

0:17:43.419 --> 0:17:47.499
<v Speaker 2>so let us women model ourselves on the male model

0:17:47.540 --> 0:17:48.219
<v Speaker 2>of achievement.

0:17:48.739 --> 0:17:50.979
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I do disagree with you, do you know? I

0:17:51.020 --> 0:17:53.259
<v Speaker 3>think that there's a lot to be said for power,

0:17:53.340 --> 0:17:55.819
<v Speaker 3>and if you're in a culture, and I think this

0:17:55.979 --> 0:17:58.260
<v Speaker 3>is less true now, and you know, you look at

0:17:58.300 --> 0:18:01.260
<v Speaker 3>Madeline all right, and kind of Lisa Rice and Magufacture

0:18:01.300 --> 0:18:03.419
<v Speaker 3>and so on, it certainly is less true now. But

0:18:03.459 --> 0:18:05.539
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the culture over the past one

0:18:05.619 --> 0:18:08.100
<v Speaker 3>hundred years, men have had so much more power. And

0:18:08.139 --> 0:18:10.619
<v Speaker 3>then if you go back to times when women really

0:18:10.619 --> 0:18:14.220
<v Speaker 3>couldn't own land or assume certain positions in the culture,

0:18:14.260 --> 0:18:18.259
<v Speaker 3>become professionals of certain sorts, have positions, you know, within religions.

0:18:19.459 --> 0:18:21.899
<v Speaker 3>I think there are lots of reasons women would be

0:18:22.060 --> 0:18:23.699
<v Speaker 3>envious of men without.

0:18:23.459 --> 0:18:28.100
<v Speaker 2>Having Yeah, but the feminist argument has not produced in

0:18:28.179 --> 0:18:30.899
<v Speaker 2>my opinion, the average woman, I don't think, I think

0:18:30.979 --> 0:18:34.020
<v Speaker 2>is less powerful today. She may have a bank account,

0:18:34.379 --> 0:18:37.820
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of her influence. Uh, I mean, I think,

0:18:37.899 --> 0:18:42.099
<v Speaker 2>for example, their women are far more sexualized in public

0:18:42.179 --> 0:18:48.019
<v Speaker 2>life today than they were in Freud's time, right, I mean,

0:18:48.060 --> 0:18:50.659
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look at look at look at what Miss

0:18:50.699 --> 0:18:55.659
<v Speaker 2>America contestant has to wear today compared to fifty years ago.

0:18:56.020 --> 0:18:57.979
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the skimpiness of the bikini.

0:18:58.300 --> 0:19:00.780
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, that can be degrading or that can

0:19:00.820 --> 0:19:03.579
<v Speaker 3>be liberating. I think that's you know, that's a close one.

0:19:04.139 --> 0:19:05.219
<v Speaker 4>Ah, that is interesting.

0:19:05.260 --> 0:19:08.100
<v Speaker 2>We'll continue in a moment the thoughtful Peter Kramer and

0:19:08.139 --> 0:19:12.340
<v Speaker 2>will take calls one eight Praguer seven seven six his latest.

0:19:11.979 --> 0:19:12.859
<v Speaker 4>Book on Freud.

0:19:16.139 --> 0:19:18.379
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Ultimate Issues Hora on the Dennis

0:19:18.419 --> 0:19:22.580
<v Speaker 2>Prager Show, talking about the I think correctly stated by

0:19:22.619 --> 0:19:27.140
<v Speaker 2>the author Peter Kramer, Professor of psychiatry at Brown University,

0:19:27.260 --> 0:19:31.139
<v Speaker 2>the inventor of the modern Mind, and our take on

0:19:31.300 --> 0:19:35.179
<v Speaker 2>Freud on psychiatry on all the insights here in a

0:19:35.179 --> 0:19:39.300
<v Speaker 2>free wheeling discussion. We were just talking about penis envy

0:19:39.419 --> 0:19:43.580
<v Speaker 2>and the silly or non silly notions that Freud had,

0:19:43.619 --> 0:19:47.220
<v Speaker 2>and I was saying that if I were to undergo psychoanalysis,

0:19:47.219 --> 0:19:50.379
<v Speaker 2>I would want a Freudian and that I don't fully

0:19:50.419 --> 0:19:53.819
<v Speaker 2>dismiss that notion, especially in light of my view of

0:19:53.859 --> 0:19:57.699
<v Speaker 2>the feminist movement, which I think exhibited it.

0:19:58.100 --> 0:20:00.379
<v Speaker 4>And you don't agree, and I didn't think you would.

0:20:00.939 --> 0:20:03.340
<v Speaker 2>And then I asked you, though you spoke about women

0:20:03.419 --> 0:20:05.659
<v Speaker 2>in power, and I said, I thought that the average woman,

0:20:05.939 --> 0:20:10.619
<v Speaker 2>not Madeline Albright, but the average woman Dr Kramer today,

0:20:11.260 --> 0:20:15.219
<v Speaker 2>in fact has less power. And the average girl in

0:20:15.300 --> 0:20:19.459
<v Speaker 2>high school and college feels that essentially her greatest power,

0:20:19.899 --> 0:20:22.899
<v Speaker 2>I say, the averag girl, not every girl, is.

0:20:22.859 --> 0:20:25.939
<v Speaker 4>In fact the flaunting of her body.

0:20:26.260 --> 0:20:29.979
<v Speaker 3>Well, let me ask this question. If you could just

0:20:30.219 --> 0:20:33.179
<v Speaker 3>drop down out of the you know, ozone and be

0:20:33.340 --> 0:20:37.179
<v Speaker 3>born at any moment in history as a woman. When

0:20:37.219 --> 0:20:40.259
<v Speaker 3>would that be? Because I think you wouldn't be in

0:20:40.300 --> 0:20:42.980
<v Speaker 3>college for most of history. This is you know, the

0:20:43.020 --> 0:20:45.820
<v Speaker 3>fact that a majority of people in college, I think

0:20:46.179 --> 0:20:50.539
<v Speaker 3>certainly in the selective colleges are are women is absolutely unique.

0:20:50.580 --> 0:20:56.820
<v Speaker 3>There's no moment like that in history. So, uh, you know, lawyers, doctors,

0:20:57.699 --> 0:21:00.660
<v Speaker 3>it's right, well, women have assumed more of the burdens

0:21:00.699 --> 0:21:03.059
<v Speaker 3>of men. But it's but I mean, I don't know

0:21:03.060 --> 0:21:04.980
<v Speaker 3>how you would how you would answer that. But would

0:21:05.020 --> 0:21:07.379
<v Speaker 3>you want to be in the fifties as a housewife

0:21:07.500 --> 0:21:08.660
<v Speaker 3>or or would.

0:21:08.500 --> 0:21:12.739
<v Speaker 2>You want to be you know, Well, the truth is

0:21:12.899 --> 0:21:15.779
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's a very fair question, and I

0:21:15.820 --> 0:21:16.859
<v Speaker 2>don't know the answer.

0:21:17.300 --> 0:21:21.100
<v Speaker 3>I agree with the downside, and Freud would have agreed. Also.

0:21:21.300 --> 0:21:23.659
<v Speaker 3>Freud was very interesting. He thought of as being one

0:21:23.699 --> 0:21:26.700
<v Speaker 3>of these sexual liberation people. I think he was very

0:21:26.699 --> 0:21:30.460
<v Speaker 3>aware of sexual repression, but he wasn't entirely against it.

0:21:30.899 --> 0:21:34.419
<v Speaker 3>He thought that sexual repression in Leonardo DaVinci yes great

0:21:34.979 --> 0:21:37.379
<v Speaker 3>art and science, and he was actually worried that he

0:21:37.419 --> 0:21:42.139
<v Speaker 3>would be misunderstood as being in favor of much more

0:21:42.139 --> 0:21:45.859
<v Speaker 3>sexual directors. He actually was very much of his time

0:21:45.899 --> 0:21:46.539
<v Speaker 3>in that regard.

0:21:46.939 --> 0:21:47.979
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:21:48.300 --> 0:21:52.300
<v Speaker 2>And to answer your question, I do an hour every

0:21:52.300 --> 0:21:54.179
<v Speaker 2>week on my radio show on happiness.

0:21:54.179 --> 0:21:55.100
<v Speaker 4>I wrote a book on it.

0:21:55.179 --> 0:21:58.219
<v Speaker 2>I am very very concerned with that subject. And I

0:21:58.260 --> 0:22:01.059
<v Speaker 2>don't know if the sum total of female happiness today

0:22:01.139 --> 0:22:04.859
<v Speaker 2>is greater than the sum total of female happiness fifty

0:22:04.899 --> 0:22:07.580
<v Speaker 2>years ago. I really when I say I don't know,

0:22:08.139 --> 0:22:10.659
<v Speaker 2>it's not a euphemistic way of saying it isn't.

0:22:10.739 --> 0:22:12.099
<v Speaker 4>I really don't know.

0:22:13.139 --> 0:22:15.379
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know if all of that I have

0:22:15.979 --> 0:22:19.619
<v Speaker 2>Peter Kramer, I talk to women all the time who did,

0:22:19.619 --> 0:22:22.540
<v Speaker 2>in fact go to did go to graduate school, did

0:22:22.580 --> 0:22:26.459
<v Speaker 2>become doctors, did become lawyers, did become business women, And

0:22:27.060 --> 0:22:31.100
<v Speaker 2>we're and bought the whole idea that profession and vocation

0:22:31.739 --> 0:22:35.780
<v Speaker 2>and professional achievement are roads to happiness, and now find

0:22:35.820 --> 0:22:41.019
<v Speaker 2>themselves at thirty eight years of age alone and not

0:22:41.139 --> 0:22:43.540
<v Speaker 2>quite as easy to find a husband as at twenty eight,

0:22:43.659 --> 0:22:47.859
<v Speaker 2>let alone at that twenty two. And they say to me,

0:22:47.939 --> 0:22:50.500
<v Speaker 2>you know, Dennis, I bought the whole feminist bill of goods,

0:22:50.500 --> 0:22:54.179
<v Speaker 2>and I can't say that my happiness level is terribly high.

0:22:54.219 --> 0:22:57.300
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, they are these scientists who say happiness

0:22:57.300 --> 0:23:00.939
<v Speaker 3>doesn't change much altogether, that it's somehow characteristic that we

0:23:01.100 --> 0:23:04.819
<v Speaker 3>have or don't have at a certain level. You know,

0:23:04.859 --> 0:23:07.980
<v Speaker 3>I think you're capturing what the upside and downside are.

0:23:08.020 --> 0:23:11.179
<v Speaker 3>I think there is less divorce, say in the fifties

0:23:11.179 --> 0:23:15.179
<v Speaker 3>and sixties, but when it happens, it's more catastrophic and

0:23:15.340 --> 0:23:18.179
<v Speaker 3>also harder to get out of abusive marriages, and they're

0:23:18.179 --> 0:23:21.340
<v Speaker 3>more probably more of them or is accepted.

0:23:21.540 --> 0:23:23.419
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was just yeah, that's true.

0:23:24.139 --> 0:23:27.420
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's it's a mixed The culture is very difficult.

0:23:27.500 --> 0:23:29.940
<v Speaker 3>We certainly do have problems in our culture, and one

0:23:29.939 --> 0:23:34.179
<v Speaker 3>of them is, you know, what happens to the to

0:23:34.260 --> 0:23:37.979
<v Speaker 3>the forty fifty sixty year old woman who's single and

0:23:37.979 --> 0:23:38.580
<v Speaker 3>doesn't want.

0:23:38.459 --> 0:23:41.819
<v Speaker 2>To be Why would somebody go to a psychiatrist in

0:23:41.859 --> 0:23:44.139
<v Speaker 2>your opinion, and not a psychologist.

0:23:45.020 --> 0:23:47.699
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think medication is one of the issues, you know.

0:23:47.780 --> 0:23:54.419
<v Speaker 3>That is to say, these medicines like prozac, zolof you know,

0:23:54.459 --> 0:23:58.019
<v Speaker 3>the other ones you're familiar with, are often very helpful

0:23:58.060 --> 0:24:01.499
<v Speaker 3>in helping people get out of dead ends or past roadblocks,

0:24:01.619 --> 0:24:05.219
<v Speaker 3>and certainly to treat major mental illness. Like you know,

0:24:05.260 --> 0:24:07.939
<v Speaker 3>my prior book before this was called Against Depression, and

0:24:07.979 --> 0:24:10.579
<v Speaker 3>it was about the notion that depression is an entirely

0:24:10.699 --> 0:24:13.739
<v Speaker 3>legitimate disease that affects us throughout the body, and so

0:24:13.859 --> 0:24:17.059
<v Speaker 3>medication is important there. And I think the quality control

0:24:17.100 --> 0:24:19.619
<v Speaker 3>on the training of psychiatrists is that they go through

0:24:19.659 --> 0:24:24.780
<v Speaker 3>medical school, which you know it is fairly stringent. Stringent barrier.

0:24:24.899 --> 0:24:27.300
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll continue in a moment. Take your calls

0:24:27.340 --> 0:24:30.259
<v Speaker 2>as well. Peter Kramer, his book is on Freud. This

0:24:30.340 --> 0:24:34.100
<v Speaker 2>is the Ultimate Issues Hour. Your challenge is to psychiatry.

0:24:34.100 --> 0:24:36.139
<v Speaker 2>Are welcome to on the Dennis Prager Show.

0:24:38.859 --> 0:24:42.219
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:24:46.699 --> 0:24:51.740
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:24:51.939 --> 0:24:54.459
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Dennis Prager Show, and this is

0:24:54.459 --> 0:24:59.139
<v Speaker 2>the Ultimate Issues Hour. It's forty four minutes past the hour.

0:25:00.139 --> 0:25:03.460
<v Speaker 2>My guest is Peter Kramer. We're talking about the whole

0:25:03.540 --> 0:25:08.219
<v Speaker 2>world of Sigmund Freud and how he changed life and

0:25:08.300 --> 0:25:10.459
<v Speaker 2>he is I think it's a great term inventor of

0:25:10.500 --> 0:25:12.979
<v Speaker 2>the modern mind. And that is the short biography that

0:25:13.020 --> 0:25:15.300
<v Speaker 2>he has in fact written about Freud, and I recommend

0:25:15.340 --> 0:25:18.899
<v Speaker 2>it to you. And it is certainly no hey geography,

0:25:19.020 --> 0:25:22.019
<v Speaker 2>which is a term for biography of the Saints. He

0:25:22.100 --> 0:25:25.699
<v Speaker 2>hardly regards a Freud as a saint. I have a

0:25:25.820 --> 0:25:28.139
<v Speaker 2>challenge I'd like to post to you as a psychiatrist,

0:25:28.219 --> 0:25:30.899
<v Speaker 2>because I am a big defender of psychiatry to many

0:25:30.939 --> 0:25:31.900
<v Speaker 2>of my callers.

0:25:31.619 --> 0:25:33.459
<v Speaker 4>Who have a lot of dubious views of it.

0:25:34.020 --> 0:25:40.499
<v Speaker 2>But I have an increasing worry about the entire psychotherapeutic world.

0:25:41.379 --> 0:25:45.779
<v Speaker 2>And that is two it's there. They're related. One is

0:25:47.659 --> 0:25:50.219
<v Speaker 2>I have met too many people who have who have

0:25:50.859 --> 0:25:55.260
<v Speaker 2>undergone some form of psychotherapy, who have had their victim

0:25:55.300 --> 0:26:02.100
<v Speaker 2>status reinforced. And I believe that they literally come out

0:26:02.139 --> 0:26:06.020
<v Speaker 2>worse from therapy than they went in because they now

0:26:06.060 --> 0:26:09.619
<v Speaker 2>blame their problems on everybody else, and they now have

0:26:09.780 --> 0:26:14.419
<v Speaker 2>confirmation from a doctor that everybody else is responsible for

0:26:14.500 --> 0:26:18.540
<v Speaker 2>their problems. And the other is the whole modus operandi

0:26:18.580 --> 0:26:22.859
<v Speaker 2>of a psychotherapist is the opposite of anybody trying to

0:26:22.899 --> 0:26:27.180
<v Speaker 2>get to the truth. Can you imagine a detective analyzing

0:26:27.219 --> 0:26:30.980
<v Speaker 2>a homicide and only questioning one witness?

0:26:31.300 --> 0:26:31.500
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:26:32.659 --> 0:26:36.659
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think psychotherapy, you know, is aware of those problems.

0:26:36.659 --> 0:26:40.739
<v Speaker 3>You probably know Paul mcew, the former head of psychiatry

0:26:40.739 --> 0:26:45.659
<v Speaker 3>at Johns Hopkins, who was very critical of this victimization tendency.

0:26:45.699 --> 0:26:49.060
<v Speaker 3>And I think most psychotherapists and by the way, I

0:26:49.100 --> 0:26:52.580
<v Speaker 3>should I said something about psychiatry versus psychology before. I

0:26:52.580 --> 0:26:57.980
<v Speaker 3>have great respect for psychotherapists of all stripes, psychologists, social workers,

0:26:58.500 --> 0:27:02.939
<v Speaker 3>clinical neuros specialists. They're terrific people up and down the line.

0:27:02.979 --> 0:27:05.939
<v Speaker 3>I think most of psychotherapy really is to get people

0:27:06.060 --> 0:27:09.819
<v Speaker 3>back functioning better. And the measure of psychotherapy is that

0:27:09.859 --> 0:27:12.139
<v Speaker 3>you're doing better, not that you feel sorry or for

0:27:12.219 --> 0:27:15.179
<v Speaker 3>yourself or have more people to blame, but you know

0:27:15.260 --> 0:27:19.259
<v Speaker 3>that you're out and about achieving your goals. So I

0:27:19.300 --> 0:27:22.580
<v Speaker 3>think that you know that is is that side of

0:27:22.619 --> 0:27:25.659
<v Speaker 3>the question, and when the second part is the.

0:27:26.219 --> 0:27:30.180
<v Speaker 2>Second part is the modus operandi where you're only interviewing

0:27:30.300 --> 0:27:32.500
<v Speaker 2>one witness to the reality, right.

0:27:32.619 --> 0:27:36.019
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's true, and I think that there's a

0:27:36.100 --> 0:27:38.060
<v Speaker 3>reason for it, which is a lot of what goes

0:27:38.100 --> 0:27:40.700
<v Speaker 3>on in psychotherapy has to do with empathy. It has

0:27:40.739 --> 0:27:44.739
<v Speaker 3>to do with not necessarily knowing the external truth, but

0:27:45.780 --> 0:27:48.819
<v Speaker 3>really sitting and seeing the world from the perspective of

0:27:48.859 --> 0:27:51.580
<v Speaker 3>the other person, and that turns out to be powerful

0:27:51.820 --> 0:27:54.379
<v Speaker 3>in ways that sometimes gets people to move off the dime.

0:27:55.219 --> 0:27:57.580
<v Speaker 3>But psychotherapists have thought a lot about this, and there

0:27:57.659 --> 0:28:01.019
<v Speaker 3>certainly are therapies where collateral, you know, people are brought

0:28:01.100 --> 0:28:05.780
<v Speaker 3>in either to be interviewed about what's gone on, or

0:28:05.859 --> 0:28:08.219
<v Speaker 3>where people are sent out sort of in fact finding

0:28:08.260 --> 0:28:11.379
<v Speaker 3>missions in their own lives to interview people and bring

0:28:11.419 --> 0:28:13.580
<v Speaker 3>back the results. And then there are couple therapies and

0:28:13.659 --> 0:28:17.179
<v Speaker 3>family therapies where you hear plenty from other people, and

0:28:17.260 --> 0:28:21.419
<v Speaker 3>group therapies where people get also plenty of back about,

0:28:21.939 --> 0:28:26.060
<v Speaker 3>you know, their characteristic ways of tripping themselves up. So

0:28:26.100 --> 0:28:29.020
<v Speaker 3>there's some variety there, but I think both those criticisms

0:28:29.060 --> 0:28:30.419
<v Speaker 3>also are are valid.

0:28:30.859 --> 0:28:34.139
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to some calls. Matt in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

0:28:34.179 --> 0:28:37.019
<v Speaker 2>You're on with doctor Peter Kramer and Dennis Prager High.

0:28:37.179 --> 0:28:39.860
<v Speaker 5>Hi, how are you both doing? I just I wanted

0:28:39.900 --> 0:28:41.940
<v Speaker 5>to comment. I thought it was fascinating when I was

0:28:41.979 --> 0:28:44.860
<v Speaker 5>in college learning about freyd that here's someone who I

0:28:44.979 --> 0:28:48.060
<v Speaker 5>absolutely think is disgusting when it comes to his comments

0:28:48.100 --> 0:28:51.820
<v Speaker 5>on society and different atheistic views. But at the same time,

0:28:52.180 --> 0:28:56.180
<v Speaker 5>in an age of increasing materialism, he was this person

0:28:56.219 --> 0:28:58.820
<v Speaker 5>coming up with this new notion that there's this huge

0:28:58.860 --> 0:29:03.660
<v Speaker 5>cauldron of unexplored ideas in a time when people wanted

0:29:03.700 --> 0:29:06.140
<v Speaker 5>to just say, oh, it's just the human animal, it's

0:29:06.219 --> 0:29:09.180
<v Speaker 5>just the mind, there's no spirit. He actually, I think,

0:29:09.180 --> 0:29:13.180
<v Speaker 5>without meaning to, did a better job of describing what

0:29:13.340 --> 0:29:15.900
<v Speaker 5>the Christian world or and even the Jewish world would

0:29:15.900 --> 0:29:18.700
<v Speaker 5>call the spirit and the soul and the mind and

0:29:18.820 --> 0:29:22.780
<v Speaker 5>the battle between the conscience and the and the flesh,

0:29:23.180 --> 0:29:25.900
<v Speaker 5>better than than almost anywhere outside of the Bible.

0:29:26.380 --> 0:29:29.020
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's interesting, you know, I don't start with your premises,

0:29:29.100 --> 0:29:32.499
<v Speaker 3>but the you know, the notion that people are well

0:29:32.540 --> 0:29:34.860
<v Speaker 3>worth exploring, that you're going to discover a lot of

0:29:34.900 --> 0:29:38.820
<v Speaker 3>complexity that the mind has layers. He certainly brought those

0:29:38.860 --> 0:29:41.900
<v Speaker 3>concepts to the four A lot of what Freud did

0:29:42.700 --> 0:29:46.700
<v Speaker 3>was not truly novel. Their philosophers have gone back and said, look,

0:29:46.739 --> 0:29:49.100
<v Speaker 3>the ego, the in the superrego look a lot like

0:29:49.500 --> 0:29:52.660
<v Speaker 3>categories that Socrates was said to have spoken about having

0:29:52.739 --> 0:29:56.739
<v Speaker 3>to do with reason and desire and you know, social awareness,

0:29:57.140 --> 0:30:00.940
<v Speaker 3>and that what he's doing is really ancient Greek philosophy

0:30:01.100 --> 0:30:05.979
<v Speaker 3>in this modern uh you know, vocabulary. So I think

0:30:06.340 --> 0:30:09.660
<v Speaker 3>he is one of these figures in a tradition, you know,

0:30:09.739 --> 0:30:12.459
<v Speaker 3>in a tradition of Western ways of looking at the self.

0:30:13.459 --> 0:30:17.620
<v Speaker 2>Okay, over to Minneapolis and Thomas. Hi, Thomas, you're all

0:30:17.660 --> 0:30:19.100
<v Speaker 2>with Peter Kramer and Dennis Praeger.

0:30:20.140 --> 0:30:22.660
<v Speaker 3>I'm a I added Christian, and I think that there's

0:30:22.739 --> 0:30:27.140
<v Speaker 3>way more toward what makes a person's mental makeup than.

0:30:27.020 --> 0:30:27.660
<v Speaker 4>The sex drive.

0:30:28.380 --> 0:30:28.499
<v Speaker 3>Mm.

0:30:29.180 --> 0:30:30.860
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think so did Freud.

0:30:30.940 --> 0:30:33.500
<v Speaker 3>And so and by the way, so does modern psychiatry

0:30:33.500 --> 0:30:36.140
<v Speaker 3>and psychology. I think the sex drive is important. There

0:30:36.180 --> 0:30:39.219
<v Speaker 3>seem to be, you know, drives for self preservation, all

0:30:39.340 --> 0:30:42.380
<v Speaker 3>kinds of hungers. And then there's curiosity. I think one

0:30:42.420 --> 0:30:44.780
<v Speaker 3>of the one of the big things that Freud tried

0:30:44.780 --> 0:30:48.459
<v Speaker 3>to eliminate that we very much recognize as sort of

0:30:48.500 --> 0:30:53.340
<v Speaker 3>striving for competence and mastery and understanding, which curiosity, which

0:30:53.380 --> 0:30:56.499
<v Speaker 3>really seems also to be innate in human beings, you know,

0:30:56.540 --> 0:30:58.620
<v Speaker 3>whatever their sexual state.

0:30:59.340 --> 0:31:03.219
<v Speaker 2>Among the patients that you see, why would you say

0:31:03.260 --> 0:31:08.739
<v Speaker 2>the greatest single problem in general is today.

0:31:09.340 --> 0:31:12.260
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've written a lot about depression and minor depression,

0:31:12.380 --> 0:31:14.340
<v Speaker 3>so it's a skewed sample. I see a lot of

0:31:14.380 --> 0:31:18.499
<v Speaker 3>people with mood disorders, and I think some of that

0:31:18.780 --> 0:31:22.140
<v Speaker 3>is related to their circumstances, which can have been quite bad,

0:31:22.300 --> 0:31:25.059
<v Speaker 3>you know, both growing up and currently and some of

0:31:25.100 --> 0:31:29.019
<v Speaker 3>it is probably genetics. So we're looking at you know,

0:31:29.020 --> 0:31:31.900
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at compex puts problems. There are people who

0:31:31.940 --> 0:31:35.460
<v Speaker 3>come in with what you're i think pointing toward, which

0:31:35.500 --> 0:31:38.740
<v Speaker 3>are these more existential problems. I think they're men who

0:31:38.780 --> 0:31:40.980
<v Speaker 3>are very successful in their career and say, but I'm

0:31:41.020 --> 0:31:44.059
<v Speaker 3>not satisfied what really is there in life? And you

0:31:44.100 --> 0:31:46.860
<v Speaker 3>point out women who find limitations in the life, and

0:31:47.660 --> 0:31:49.459
<v Speaker 3>you know you see a fair share of that.

0:31:49.540 --> 0:31:51.700
<v Speaker 2>All right, let me recommend your book again. It is

0:31:51.820 --> 0:31:56.220
<v Speaker 2>Freud in the Eminent Lives series by Harper Collins, Peter Kramer,

0:31:56.300 --> 0:31:58.540
<v Speaker 2>the author, and I look forward to our next meeting.

0:31:58.860 --> 0:32:00.500
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, You're very welcome.

0:32:00.860 --> 0:32:02.700
<v Speaker 2>I'll have some thoughts on this, and I'd like to

0:32:02.739 --> 0:32:06.100
<v Speaker 2>explain to you why I have incorporated Freud into my

0:32:06.219 --> 0:32:09.700
<v Speaker 2>own religious worldview when we come back on the Ultimate

0:32:09.700 --> 0:32:11.540
<v Speaker 2>Issues hour of the Dennis Praeger Show.

0:32:13.620 --> 0:32:16.940
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:32:21.459 --> 0:32:26.380
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:32:26.540 --> 0:32:31.380
<v Speaker 2>All right, ay, my friends, Dennis Prager here, I like

0:32:31.420 --> 0:32:33.380
<v Speaker 2>to explain to you, in light of this being the

0:32:33.500 --> 0:32:37.259
<v Speaker 2>Ultimate Issues hour and the interview, I just conducted with

0:32:37.340 --> 0:32:41.180
<v Speaker 2>Peter Kramer, the psychiatrist who just wrote this short, fine

0:32:41.219 --> 0:32:45.300
<v Speaker 2>book on Freud. A lot of religious people like myself,

0:32:45.459 --> 0:32:48.540
<v Speaker 2>who are like myself and their religiosity, are surprised at

0:32:48.580 --> 0:32:52.380
<v Speaker 2>my openness to Freud. And I'll tell you in a

0:32:52.459 --> 0:32:56.180
<v Speaker 2>nutshell why I explained it earlier, and I'll develop it

0:32:56.219 --> 0:33:02.299
<v Speaker 2>further now. Freud knocks one of the most destroys. Not knocks,

0:33:02.380 --> 0:33:06.019
<v Speaker 2>he destroys one of the most pernicious myths of the

0:33:06.100 --> 0:33:09.140
<v Speaker 2>secular humanistic age known as the Age of Enlightenment or

0:33:09.180 --> 0:33:11.020
<v Speaker 2>the Age of Reason, and that is that we are

0:33:11.060 --> 0:33:17.100
<v Speaker 2>basically good souls, we are basically good, and that we

0:33:17.180 --> 0:33:24.100
<v Speaker 2>are basically rational. And he shows how naive those views are.

0:33:24.380 --> 0:33:28.420
<v Speaker 2>He did not have a particularly optimistic view of human nature,

0:33:28.580 --> 0:33:32.780
<v Speaker 2>nor do I, nor does the Judeo Christian value system.

0:33:33.580 --> 0:33:36.940
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons for the need for religion and

0:33:37.020 --> 0:33:41.500
<v Speaker 2>for the need for God is in fact, because we

0:33:41.580 --> 0:33:47.060
<v Speaker 2>are so messy inside, and it gives us a way

0:33:47.060 --> 0:33:49.380
<v Speaker 2>to act independent.

0:33:48.739 --> 0:33:50.499
<v Speaker 4>Of our psychological state.

0:33:51.100 --> 0:33:53.420
<v Speaker 2>You may be morose, and you may be unhappy, and

0:33:53.500 --> 0:33:56.700
<v Speaker 2>you may be embittered, and you may have been wounded

0:33:56.739 --> 0:33:59.660
<v Speaker 2>by a mother or father, a spouse, a child, a brother,

0:33:59.780 --> 0:34:02.900
<v Speaker 2>a sister, or a friend. But you still have to

0:34:03.060 --> 0:34:06.100
<v Speaker 2>act in a certain way. And there still is a

0:34:06.140 --> 0:34:10.060
<v Speaker 2>good God who governs the universe. And so I take

0:34:10.219 --> 0:34:13.900
<v Speaker 2>all of his insights. I just don't end with his insights.

0:34:15.100 --> 0:34:18.140
<v Speaker 2>I take them all, and I realize that religion gives

0:34:18.140 --> 0:34:23.419
<v Speaker 2>me a behavioral way to live. It tells me how

0:34:23.500 --> 0:34:26.980
<v Speaker 2>to live, how to make a good life despite whatever

0:34:27.260 --> 0:34:31.380
<v Speaker 2>goes on in my psyche. It's not a clean place.

0:34:31.500 --> 0:34:34.339
<v Speaker 2>I can make peace with that. I make peace with

0:34:34.420 --> 0:34:37.339
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the human being is filled with a

0:34:37.380 --> 0:34:42.979
<v Speaker 2>lot of if you will, awful thoughts, sinful thoughts, whatever.

0:34:42.660 --> 0:34:43.140
<v Speaker 4>They may be.

0:34:44.060 --> 0:34:46.860
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right, and that is why there is religion

0:34:46.940 --> 0:34:50.500
<v Speaker 2>to help me act in a way that I don't

0:34:50.580 --> 0:34:55.620
<v Speaker 2>live in the world of those of those thoughts. That's

0:34:55.620 --> 0:34:59.060
<v Speaker 2>a great thing, But I'm not going to be one

0:34:59.060 --> 0:35:01.580
<v Speaker 2>of those religious people who live in denial or one

0:35:01.580 --> 0:35:04.020
<v Speaker 2>of those secular people who live in denial about what

0:35:04.100 --> 0:35:10.620
<v Speaker 2>our nature is. And so Freud helped. You just can't

0:35:10.819 --> 0:35:13.899
<v Speaker 2>end with it. He doesn't give you. He doesn't give

0:35:13.940 --> 0:35:18.379
<v Speaker 2>you answers nearly as much as he gives you the

0:35:18.380 --> 0:35:23.899
<v Speaker 2>pathology that make up the human being. Dennis Prager here

0:35:23.940 --> 0:35:27.180
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow night. I speak in in your Belinda, California and

0:35:27.219 --> 0:35:31.979
<v Speaker 2>Orange County, California. It's on the Prager Radio dot com

0:35:32.100 --> 0:35:35.380
<v Speaker 2>or call seven one four six nine three oh seven

0:35:35.500 --> 0:35:38.819
<v Speaker 2>seven O seven one four six nine three oh seven

0:35:38.940 --> 0:35:42.660
<v Speaker 2>seven O tomorrow night, Orange County. Thanks for listening, my friends.

0:35:42.940 --> 0:35:45.820
<v Speaker 2>I'm Dennis Prager.

0:35:55.299 --> 0:35:59.660
<v Speaker 1>This has been timeless wisdom with Dennis Prager. Visit Dennisprager

0:35:59.660 --> 0:36:03.219
<v Speaker 1>dot com for thousands of hours of Dennis's lectures, courses

0:36:03.259 --> 0:36:07.259
<v Speaker 1>in classic radio programs, and to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational

0:36:07.380 --> 0:36:07.900
<v Speaker 1>Bibles