WEBVTT - A Special Message From Mrs. Erika Kirk

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>My name is Charlie kirk I run the largest pro

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>American student organization in the country, fighting for the future

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of our republic.

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>My call is to fight evil and to proclaim truth.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>If the most important thing for you is just feeling good,

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to end up miserable. But if the most

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>important thing is doing good, you'll end up purposeful. College

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is a scam, everybody. You got to stop sending your

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>kids to college. You should get married as young as

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>possible and have as many kids as possible. Go start

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at turning point. You would say college chapter. Go start

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>aturning point, yould say high school chapter. Go find out

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>how your church can get involved. Sign up and become

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>an activist. I gave my life to the Lord in

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>fifth grade, most important decision I ever made in my life,

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and I encourage you to do the same.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Here I am Lord, Use me. Buckle up, everybody, Here

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>we go.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirkshaw, a company that specializes in gold I rays

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegold investments

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. That is Noblegoldinvestments dot Com. You guys are

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>welcome to ask anything, open mic, disagreement, most welcome. You disagree,

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>come to the front of the line. You disagree, come

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to the front of the line. If you disagree, go

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to the front of the line. You guys know how

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it works. You disagree, go to the line. We'll have

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a great conversation here. Who are you? My name is

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk, and I love America because I love talking

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>with people I disagree with?

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 2>What have you done for your country?

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Start an organization that's now in a thousand plus campuses

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>to save the greatest culture in country.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Every two exists.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I love talking for people I disagree, though, When people

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>stop talking, that's when you get violence. That's when civil

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>war happens.

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Seems to me that nothing will ever be enough for

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>the evil in this world. Our country has become unrecognizable.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>These people have perverted the truth to the point that

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>they motivated the murder of my husband. They have continuously

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 3>tried to assassinate the president, and anyone who stands in

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>their way is labeled hateful, racist, fascist, and every other

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 3>trigger word that is grossly dishonest. We want the best

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 3>for our country.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 2>They don't.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 4>This is why.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Charlie started turning Point USA in the first place. He

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 3>didn't trust the radicalized liberal teachers. And this past Saturday,

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:31.279
<v Speaker 3>it was a school.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 5>Teacher, of all people, a school teacher.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>That attempted to change our history for the worst with bullets.

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 3>And everyone is asking why I even went to the

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>White House Correspondent Center, and it was because many of

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 3>the journalists in that room have attempted to dehumanize me,

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 3>and I wanted to meet some of them face to face.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Quite frankly, why have a conversation about me when you

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 3>can have a conversation with me. So, for example, a

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 3>journalist from the Daily Mail came up to me. She

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 3>introduced herself and she was saying she.

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Was very gracious.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 3>She was saying, you look so beautiful. I'm so sorry

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 3>for your loss, to which I replied, it is so

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 3>nice to put a name to the face, especially with

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 3>all of the slander, the lies, accusations that are out

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.959
<v Speaker 3>there surrounding my husband's murder and myself. And I said

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 3>to her, you know what's so interesting, this is my

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 3>first time at the White House Correspondent Sinner, and I

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 3>find it so fascinating the dynamic that is going on

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 3>right now, because everyone is all dressed up, and you

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>guys are co mingling in and out of each other's

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 3>cocktail parties, and so for one night you are able

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 3>to put aside all of your differences for the sake

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 3>of freedom of speech, and then by Monday morning things

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>will go back to being an absolute bloodbath between all

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>of you. She replied, literally, she said, I know, isn't

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 3>it special?

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Isn't tonight so special? And following that conversation, it was

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 3>time to take our seats and we went into the

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 3>big ballroom where the dinner was. And one of the

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>first things I noticed when I walked into that room

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 3>was quite literally the proximity of the opposing outlets to

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>one another. So you have one table here that's Politico,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 3>and another table here that's Fox, and another table here

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>that's Wappo, and you're all cramped together, elbow to elbow.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 3>And to make the night even more of a spectacle,

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 3>every single ten person table had ten bottles of wine.

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 3>And the president of the White House Correspondence Association, she

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>did a great job of trying to make the evening

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 3>had that feeling of Americana. You know, we were in

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>a room celebrating freedom of speech despite our differences, and

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>the US Marine band performed the national anthems so beautifully,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 3>and then shortly thereafter, gunshots rang out and total chaos ensued.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 3>And you guys have all seen what happened next, because

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>there are a thousand videos of it. So let's discuss

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 3>that fact for a second. If you were in that room,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 3>you had no way of knowing what the status of

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 3>the shooter was, how many there were, or honestly, really anything.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 3>It was just utter chaos. And so during an active shooting,

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 3>these journalists are using their phones to find moments to

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 3>capture for clips. They were so concerned about getting a

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 3>video in a room with an active shooter that they

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 3>could have accidentally and quite literally filmed themselves being shot.

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 3>Many of those people have become so desensitized that fight

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 3>or flight became secondary to the opportunity of putting themselves

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 3>into the story, which ironically breaks the number one rule

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 3>of journals. And again, ironically enough, the shooter was a teacher.

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 3>You have these people who are supposed to be teaching

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 3>our children the future of this country, and he's so

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 3>unhinged that he is able to teach children by day

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 3>and then attempt to murder the President of the United

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 3>States by night. And in his manifesto he starts by

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 3>contextualizing himself by saying, I am a citizen of the

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 3>United States of America. And while we may have big

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>problems with the legal immigration in this country, I have

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 3>to tell you we have an even bigger problem when

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the systemic and doctrination and radicalization of

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 3>our own citizens. This is what got my husband killed,

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>This is what has led to three legitimate attempts on

0:06:55.040 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>President Trump's life. And I can speak firsthand to that

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 3>unbearable toll that this must take on our first lady.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>There has never been a president who has faced this

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>many assassination attempts in Americans' entire history, and after each one,

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 3>the reaction from the far left has been, at best

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 3>a shrug and in some cases, a sick disappointment that

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 3>the shooter was unsuccessful. We are all human beings, and

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>if you can, just if you can just pause and

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>just take a minute and ask yourself, how would you

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 3>feel if even just one person made cruel jokes about

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the attempted murder of your loved one. That is what

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Kimmel did to the first lady. He said that

0:07:51.920 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>she had the glow of an expected widow, of an

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 3>expected widow just forty eight hours before that nightmare almost

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 3>became a reality. And this culture we're living in absorbs

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 3>disagreement as a form of personal betrayal. It turns having

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 3>an opposing viewpoint into a moral crime worthy of punishment.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 3>And here's what I've realized through all of this, truly,

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 3>having lived through quite literal hell these past seven months,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 3>if you strip someone of their humanity long enough, you

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 3>will arrive at the chilling conclusion that they don't deserve

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 3>to exist at all. Every morning I wake up to

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 3>a new headline lying about me.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 4>I have.

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Comedians dressing up in whiteface. I have people saying I'm

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 3>not fit to be CEO, and I have canvass Owens

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 3>claiming I murdered my husband, and the list goes on

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 3>and on and on.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 4>There is a serious.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Epidemic of dehumanization plaguing this country. The most unthinkable tragedies

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 3>have now become commonplace in our daily headlines, and yet

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 3>the media finds a way to conveniently explain away violence

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>this is what we're up against. This is what we're

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 3>up against. What is happening right now is something none

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 3>of us can afford to ignore. The evil forces working

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>to divide us, to distract us, and to pull us

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 3>apart has never been stronger. This is a moment for

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Americans to come together and decide what kind of country

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 3>we are going to be before we lose our country altogether.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 3>In Romans, Chapter twelve, verse twenty one, it says, do

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 3>not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>And this is why my husband and created Turning Point USA,

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>so we could have civil discourse and debate and open dialogue,

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 3>because when we stopped talking to each other, bad things happen.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I am choosing to fight for America, for my children,

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.719
<v Speaker 3>for your children, and for our humanity because we all

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 3>need to do our part, and by the grace of God,

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 3>we will succeed and America will remain what she was

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 3>always called to be, a shining city on a hill,

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 3>a light to the world. So let me give you

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 3>a perfect example of how it's done. My husband did

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 3>it best and left us the blueprint on how to

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>have uncomfortable conversations with those who disagree, but.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 4>So my sense today is on immigration. I think that

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 4>immigration contributes a lot to America. So my parents did

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 4>come here legally, and they right now are in the

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 4>process again and it takes a long time. No, they

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 4>came here legally, like they came with the RISA and

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 4>now they're renewing it and then to different process right now.

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 4>But so I'm really religious. I'm Catholic. My parents grew

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 4>me up that way. And in Matthew two thirteen through fifteen,

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 4>it talks about how Jesus had to flee Nazareth or

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 4>no Bethlehem. Sorry, he had to flee because someone was

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 4>going to die and they were looking to kill him.

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 4>And he had to flee his own country and leave

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 4>everything behind because an angel spoke to Mary and Joseph

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 4>that they should leave. So a lot of people do that.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 4>That's why they immigrate to the United States. A lot

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 4>of people have to leave everything behind because not everyone

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 4>just wants to pack up all the things and leave

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:33.599
<v Speaker 4>right now, I personally would hate if I had to

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 4>sell my car, my house, leave my parents, leave my friends,

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>and leave everyone. So I just want to know what

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 4>your stantus on that, just because in the Bible, it

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 4>talks about.

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 2>That, right.

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, Jesus actually didn't emigrate. He stayed

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>within the confines of the Roman Empire because Egypt was

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>actually other under Roman jurisdiction. That's a separate point. But

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of verses that says you should welcome

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the stranger, and so I will grant you that. I

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>guess the first point, the first point I would have

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to ask is should immigration always benefit the home country?

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 4>I think so yes, And that is one thing that

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 4>I looked into. So there are immigrants right now working here, correct,

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 4>and they get some of their paycheck cut off right

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 4>because of Social Security and all those benefits. But they

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 4>don't get those benefits because they're illegal.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you mean legal or illegal immigrants? That distinction is

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>very important.

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Illegal you get those benefits.

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>So let's just be clear.

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>If they have a social Security number, how'd they get

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that the right way? They stole it, don't You don't

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>get a social Security number as any illegal period, It

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.319
<v Speaker 1>does not happen. They stole it. So that's an act

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of theft. And so they stole an American social Security

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>number to be able to work here, which drives down wages,

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>which drives down opportunity costs. But even beyond that, we

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>just have to look at their action. They were not

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>invited to come to this country. They broke in line,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they cut in line, and we should not reward line

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>cutters or border jumpers. We should reward people like your

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>parents that actually came here legally to this country.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I understand that point, I really do. But sometimes

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 4>people generally need to leave their country because in like

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 4>my mother's case, for instance, there was like a terrorist

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 4>attack on my family and that's the reason my mom

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 4>had to come. And thankfully she did get it immediately.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 4>But now I've heard of so many stories where people

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 4>have to wait like ten years, twenty years, even thirty years.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Like my grandma right now is trying to get the process,

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 4>and thankfully she is now, but it's taken her about

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 4>ten years now, and she makes enough money in her

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 4>country and she just wants to come here as a tourist.

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 4>That's the main reason. And I do understand that. I

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 4>think that My main point is at how we should

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 4>implement more money into the immigration system because Trump's zero

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 4>tolerance policy that just felt cruel because there's a lot

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 4>of people here that are doing well and zero tolerance,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 4>they just had to leave the country. I feel like

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 4>that was imfumente of him.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's not their country though, and that's the

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So let me just like, here's it. If I went

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to Mexico without being invited or allowed, and I took

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a job and the Mexican government found out, what would

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Mexican government do to me? I'm not sure they

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>would send me back to America.

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 4>And why was the reason you left the US first?

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Reason?

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting thing. Is there ever a legitimate reason,

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion to commit a crime?

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, then the reason doesn't matter because under that say, so,

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>can you rob a bank because you wish.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>You had more money?

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 4>You work harder.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Then why doesn't that moral standard applied immigration?

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Because the system is it isn't doing its job. That's

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 4>why I think we should implement more money because there

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 4>is some people like I do get it. You know,

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 4>some people come here and then I do admit some

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 4>of them commit crime, but not all of them.

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>No, No, but they're all criminals if they came illegally,

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the distinction. By definition, they're breaking federal law eight USC.

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen twelve. Just their presence here is against the law.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Would you be okay welcoming in five hundred million people

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>into America?

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 4>That's why we which you implement the system to undercent Emis.

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 2>No, you got to kake.

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think five hundred million people would be too

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>many people?

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Five hundred million? I don't even think that would fit

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 4>the United States?

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And that's the point is that if everyone,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden declared that their life was in danger,

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we'd have to let in like all of Nicaragua, all

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of Honduras, almost all of Venezuela, the standard all of

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a sudden starts falling apart. And we find that people

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>lie about this, they deceive it. Here's my perspective. Why

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>don't we try to empower those people to make the

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>countries they're coming from greater and strong or else this

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>problem will actually never be fixed at the root level.

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense?

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 4>It does make sense, and I wish it was that easy.

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 4>So for instance, I am part Peruvian and in Peru,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 4>so they were having a presidential election and the president

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 4>who was going to win was better for the country

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 4>and would help out a lot more. But since it's corrupt,

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 4>they made the other president win. They sent him death threats,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 4>nearly almost killed him. He had to fake his death

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 4>and leave, and they jailed her. They jailed her completely,

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 4>and they let the guy win. That is why it's corrupt.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 4>It's hard to fix a country when there's no help

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 4>towards it. So Peru was. They were rooting for the

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 4>good president. They were rooting to build their system back up,

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 4>but the other president it was rigged. It was completely rigged.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So does it make it better or worse if millions

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of people leave that country for Peru?

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Can you, like, what do you mean by three million.

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>People left Peru? Does Peru get greater or weaker? Stronger

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>or weaker?

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 8>Neither?

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's in a weak state right now.

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's pretty obvious. I'm trying to even say

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that mass immigration is.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Bad for everybody.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It's bad for America, and it's bad for the country

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that people are leaving from. The only difference is that

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.119
<v Speaker 1>they send back American money through remittances that actually subsidize

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this entire thing. Let me ask one final question. If

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody comes into America without invitation and they are illegal,

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the penalty should be?

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's humane to look at their case and

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 4>why they had to leave everything they've ever known.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>We believe that we should send them back to their

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>country origin.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.719
<v Speaker 4>I just want to make one more final point. So

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 4>I do understand that, But my final point is that

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 4>do you agree that we should implement more money to

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 4>the immigration so well?

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we should have no immigrants in the country

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for the next ten years. We have way too many

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>people in this country. And I'll prove it to you

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>here in California. Your hospitals are overrun, your schools are overrun.

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys agree that you have a crowded state

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>right now? We are a California is a cluttered state

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>with social services that are being strained, and we need

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a pause on all immigration in my opinion, to metaphorically

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>digest the major meal that we just ate, or else

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we are going to have a major, major assimilation problem,

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>cultural problem, cohesion problem, all sorts of issues. And I

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>know this is a provocative thing to say, but immigration

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is something that you use as a way to benefit

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the homeland.

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to have immigration.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 4>But just as an example, my parents came here, like

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 4>I said, legally zero dollars and they have benefited so

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 4>much of the country. They have made so much, like

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 4>one hundreds and thousand dollars.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Praise God. That's the American dream.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 4>It is and it's just like a hard thing.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And I want American booring young people from UC Riverside

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to also have that American dream and not have to

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>compete against foreigners for that.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for your time.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Can I say one point?

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 2>We have a long line?

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 4>Thank you really quick though.

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Okay again, what is it?

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, okay, I understand the American dream is hard. My

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 4>parents my mom was pregnant, working two jobs one day

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 4>and she sacrificed everything and now she has more money

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 4>than the average American.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Praise God. That is the American dream. Thank you very much,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 7>I want to talk about the debate of abortion, so

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 7>I know that it's something very controversial. Some people are

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 7>pro choice, some people are pro life. Before I start,

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 7>I want to make sure that I understand your opinion fully,

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 7>so I don't take you know what I've heard online?

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 7>What is your stance on abortion?

0:18:58.480 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Life begins at conception?

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so where do you so? Conception? So is that

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 8>when sperm enters the egg?

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Is that during six, when new DNA is formed.

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 7>Okay, when new DNA is formed. So the egg by

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 7>itself you don't think is anything? Sorry, the egg of

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 7>a woman by itself.

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's a it's something, but it's not

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a life correct?

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 8>Okay, that's okay.

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 7>So my question is when you talk about abortion, why

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 7>you think you so, Why you support it, Why you

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 7>don't support it? Sorry, why you don't support it? What

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 7>do you use as your evidence? You use scientific evidence?

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 7>Do you talk about the Bible?

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you use both mainly self scientific and self evident reason?

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 8>Okay? So are you someone who's a follower of the Bible.

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I am, but that's not relevant to this discussion.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 2>But we could talk about it if you like.

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 7>I find irrelevant because when I'm going to talk about abortion,

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 7>there's there's quotes in the Bible that I think support

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 7>pro choice in my opinion.

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 8>Bible Exodus.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.880
<v Speaker 7>Exodus twenty one one twenty two through twenty five, when

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 7>men strive together and hit a pregnant woman so that

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 7>her child come out so miscarriage. But there's no harm

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 7>to the woman. The one who hit her shall surely

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 7>be fined, as the woman's husband shall impose on him,

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 7>and he shall pay as the judgees determined. But if

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 7>there is harm to the woman, you shall pay life

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 7>for life, foot for foot, burned for burn, wound for wound,

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 7>stripe for stripe. So I know that that can be

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 7>interpreted different ways. The Bible is can interpret him anyways,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 7>different there's different types, different interpretations. But this says if

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 7>a person causes a miscarriage through a woman, that they

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 7>will pay for the abortion. So they they will pay,

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 7>another one will punish them.

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>That is not what this law says. But let me

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>us ask, are you a Christian?

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 8>Yes?

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Then continue, So so you believe word of God?

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, okay, good?

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 7>So it says that as the woman's husband, shal impose

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 7>on him and he shall pay as the judges determined.

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 7>So the judge is determined, and it's talking about the husband.

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 7>So therefore it's talking about a person, not God himself,

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 7>not his judgment. So it's saying, if someone has an abortion,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 7>we have the right to choose what to do to them.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, And you say it was a miscarriage, not an abortion.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 7>It says when man strive together and hit a pregnant woman,

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 7>so that's causing her to lose the baby. That's outside cause,

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 7>outside cause. Therefore, it could mean abortion, because some people

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 7>find that abbressive abortion is through violence such as hitting,

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 7>because not everyone has access.

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>To medical for them to kill the baby.

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 7>It's unclarified, so that I cannot tell you it's unclarified. However,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 7>what I will say is that it says that it's

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 7>the judges determine, the husband determines, So God's not making

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 7>the choice for us what to do with the person

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 7>who does that to someone's child does that to their

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 7>own child.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 8>But it does say that if the woman.

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 7>Is home arms her herself, not the child, then they

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 7>are liable by God their life for her life, their

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 7>foot for her foot. So what I'm saying is if

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 7>somebody needs an abortion for health care, Let's say a

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 7>woman baby is not gonna make it, and if the

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 7>baby stays in her womb, she will die, and they

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 7>refuse her an abortion, they refuse her that health care

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 7>and she dies.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 8>Should the doctor be liable under God?

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all this those instances don't happen, So let's

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just be clear. No, See, you guys are so propagandized

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>by this that only happens in a very rare case

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>of the breaking of the uteriation.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 8>It does happen.

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But no, but where the baby is already dead, And

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that's the point, is that the baby is already dead.

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>That's a removal of a carcass of the baby.

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 8>No, it's not.

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 2>That's incorrect. No it's not. No, it's not.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>A removal of a carcass of a baby. Is not

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>an abortion. Those are two technically different things. It is

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>not a DNA. It is not a DNA is something

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>completely different. But then, if you want to talk about scripture,

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think we are bound to all six hundred

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>thirteen levitical laws?

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 7>Yes, if you're a follower of the Bible, you cannot

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 7>pick and choose what you follow.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Oh so you eat kosher? You cannot you eat kosher? No? Well,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were bound to all six hundred thirteen laws.

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 8>I'm not perfect. I'm sinner. Everyone hears a sinner.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But are we bound to it? Do you think Christian

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 1>should eat kosher?

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 8>Choose to follow the Bible? You cannot pick and choose.

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>What you of course, but we do believe in a

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>New Covenant, Old Covenant. So there's three types of Old

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Testament laws, right, there's ceremonial, there's civil and moral. So

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>ceremonial laws we do not honor civil we consider moral.

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 8>We upstate it. Guys, do humans decide what to follow

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 8>in God?

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Because Christ is actual, It's not us, It's not humans.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So Paul actually authored in the Book of Colossians, that's

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a human right inspired by the Holy Spirit, which wrote

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bible. The ordinances of Moses are nailed to the cross. Secondly,

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Christ our Lord, repeated nine out of ten of the

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>nine out of ten of the ten commandments, and he said,

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>all the laws of the Prophet hang upon the two

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>teachings of Bus nineteen and Deuteronomy six. But now I

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>equally have to challenge you with scripture in Luke one,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>when Elizabeth came in contact with Mary and both were babies,

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>what did it say that John the Baptist did.

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 8>I cannot tell you that he leapt?

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, do non babies leap?

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 8>I don't understand the question I'm.

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Going to be honest with.

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it a baby then worthy of protection if they're leaping?

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 8>I suppose yes.

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>And it was the Greek word breafos, which literally means baby,

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>intentionally used throughout hold on and Jeremiah says, I knew

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you before you were in the womb in sa I

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think one thirty nine. It's one of the most intricate

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>verses about the detail of our formation process as human beings.

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And finally, because of science, because of biology, we know

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that human life begins at that spark of new DNA,

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and God says do not murder. And it's incumbent on

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Christians that therefore tech that life.

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 7>Okay, So my my biggest question is I'm not saying

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 7>that all abortion is valid. I feel like that's a

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 7>for everyone to decide. But in the most even if

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 7>it's very small percentage, in the very small percentage, that

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 7>a baby is alive, but it has to be aborted

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 7>for the sake of the mother.

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 2>What do you think see section? What is a C section?

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 8>A C section is when you cut them with mother's.

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Wait, why don't they do that instead of the abortion?

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 8>Because it could be equally as dangerous.

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Wrong, it's much safer than an abortion and quicker.

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 8>Do you have evidence?

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yes, it's it's it's self evident.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 8>Can you tell me?

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, I there's plenty of people, he has

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>plenty of people that are in medicine can tell you,

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but like to be very clear, think about it. Every

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>hospital is equipped to do sea sections. You have to

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>go to a specific place for an abortion and a

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>C section. One third out of everyone in this audience

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was born by C section. C sections save lives, they

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>do not terminate lives. And so when they say we

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>must abort the baby, thanks to modern technolog that's actually

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a false choice. You could take the baby out of

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the environment and try to save its life as a

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>cesarean section.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 7>What if when the sea section happens, the baby's not

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 7>able to survive on its own no matter what.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, then that's a separate circumstance. It's like saying,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>if the baby has a heart attack after the sea section,

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not a reason not to terminate it. What do

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you mean if you have to give everybody a chance

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>at life, you don't kill the baby in the womb

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just because you think that it's going to well, it

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>could hurt the mother. You take it out of that environment.

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 7>Okay, But what I'm saying is if they take the

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 7>baby out and they know it's not gonna survive regardless,

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 7>how they.

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Know that post twenty two weeks.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't know that there's miracles that happen every day

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in the neonatal live in the neonatal intensive care unit.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>There's miracles that happen every day in.

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 7>Niic u's And I agree, there's definitely they don't know

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 7>one hundred percent for sure, but there's definitely probability through science,

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 7>through biology that they know, hey, this is more.

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 8>Likely going to happen.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't do morals on probability.

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 7>We don't saying it's morality. I'm saying probability of a baby's.

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Going to survive or doesn't matter. You don't terminate a

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>life based on a probability of survival.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh you do. Interesting?

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>You guys murder people based on probability of survival.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Interesting.

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>So somebody on a ventilator should just be murdered. I mean,

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's such incredible morality, which we keep someone.

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 8>On a ventilator for the entirenent of everything else.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Then it depends. There's two different things. There's no more

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and not yet. Once you reach the level of no more,

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>human interventions can improve this person's life or bring them

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>back to a full life. That is a separate moral

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>decision than not yet. When a human being is that

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>not yet, which they are in the womb, you must

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>do everything you can to make sure they get life.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>When a human being is that no more, it's a

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 1>completely separate moral dimension and decision to make no more

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and not yet are the ways to look at pro

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>life DEAs.

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense.

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 7>Yes, that makes sense. Well, thank you for debating with me,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 7>Thank you very much. Agree to disagree.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 9>I have a friend named Thomas Sheety. He is the

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 9>founder of an organization called Atheist for Liberty. He is

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 9>openly conservative, but he's mostly interested in atheists activism and

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 9>normalizing atheism in all sex, including the conservative movement. He

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 9>seems to be under the impression that a lot of concernism,

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 9>including you, are more hesitant to work with atheist organizations.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 9>Is there any truth to that?

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 2>Yes and no.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're an atheist and you want to

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be part of the conservative movement, go ahead, but you

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>must be an honest atheist and acknowledge that morality is

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>definitionally subjective. Without a belief in God, you cannot be

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>an atheist and believe an objective morality. It is an impossibility,

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and true atheists will acknowledge us at some point, you

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have an ought claim, well, things ought to be a

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>certain way. We as Christians are we that believe in

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the divine We have is claims that there murder is wrong,

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas an atheist will say, well, murder ought to be wrong,

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>because you can't have an objective definition if there is

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>not a divine eternal power over you. So look, if

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>an atheist wants to fight alongside of us to end

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>abortion or to try and end the ma s occurring

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of our kids, that's called gender affirming care. And or

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>if an atheist wants to march alongside of us to

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.479
<v Speaker 1>say no men in female sports, they're more than welcome

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do that. But atheist for liberty

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is an interesting phrase because I don't believe you can

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>have liberty without God, because liberty is not man's idea,

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it is God's idea. That's just my own personal belief,

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's also the belief of everything that built this nation.

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But yes, I'm I know a lot of good atheists.

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>The question, though, is how do you know they're good.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>It's because you're appealing to a moral authority above just

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the secular material realm, one that is transcendent.

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>We would believe given by God.

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, I don't believe in objective morality. I do know

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 9>there are plenty of atheists who are moral objectivist or.

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you an atheist? Sorry interrupt, but oh yeah, yeah, okay, cool? Please,

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So let me just can I ask you a question?

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And I don't mean I know this is your first

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 1>time at the mic, so I'm just going to try

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to be tender.

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>In doing this.

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate So you don't believe an objective of morality, right,

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't. Okay, was the Holocaust objectively wrong?

0:29:58.040 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Objectively no?

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 9>Would have been better than how because most people won't

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 9>want that to happen.

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's where that's where we are on different planets,

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's okay. I'm not trying to make fun of you.

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to be graceful in the way that we're

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>going about this. Do you think Hitler was objectively evil?

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 2>No, because it's subjective.

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But I just hope all of you guys understand he's

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>being an honest atheist to your credit, because as an atheist,

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not allowed to say anything is objectively right or wrong.

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I come from a worldview that when you butcher six

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>million people that is objectively wrong, no matter what. And

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's very important. It's a very important truth claim because

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>when you do not have objective truth anchoring your society,

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>then it becomes a power struggle. If you do not

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have truth, then power will reign. Whether you get the

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>most amount of power then ends up having the most

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of say over society. We believe what is objectively right, true, good,

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and beautiful should be transcendent over society.

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 9>Your thoughts, So, do you believe objective moralesy specifically comes

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 9>from the Bible?

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes and no.

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>It's also it's in nature, and the Bible explains nature.

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So objective morality can be discovered in many different cultures

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and societies, pointing towards what we believe is the ultimate

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>objective truth.

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Jesus Christ C. S.

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Lewis explained this the best in his book Abolition of Man,

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.959
<v Speaker 1>which is that almost every religion talks about a certain

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>way to live, a dow or a path that we

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>should be on. And so more more simply than just

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bible, we believe in what the founders believed, which

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is an ethical monotheism, that there is one God, he

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>has a general way that he wants you to live.

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>For example, murdering is bad, kidnapping is wrong, defense of

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the innocent, and we should do our best to try

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to live alongside of that path.

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 9>Okay, well, I think those are very interesting examples. You

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 9>bring up the Founders, you bring up Hitler. But Hitler

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 9>was his help proclaim Catholic, and he called Nazism and

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 9>the Christian movements.

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would be careful saying that he was. He

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 2>was not. That's okay, you.

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 9>Call himself a Catholic, he said, he's as Ely said

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 9>in nineteen twenty seven, our movement as Christian.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 2>They had on the.

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 9>Belt buckles God on our side. Yet they then swear

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 9>to the Almighty God. Atheists were not trusted to be

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 9>in the SS.

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Even if I grant you that, despite the fact that

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he killed a lot of pastors and priests, and there

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of course you can pervert things in the name of God,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>no one denounces that. Just as a side note, though

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>far more people died under the banner of atheism than

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Christianity in the twentieth century. Mao was an atheist, Stalin

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>was an atheist. Paul Pott was an atheist. Believing in

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>no God actually led to the destruction, the murder of

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>well over one hundred million people.

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's fine.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>So again, if atheists want to come alongside us as

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>conservatives and fight for what is good, that is great.

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But I will never acknowledge that atheists can tell me

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>what is objectively good. They can only give me a preference.

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>They cannot tell me what is right, and preferences eventually

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>will lead you towards moral and societal decline.

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 9>Okay, So I think he just listed a bunch of communists,

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 9>and it's worth acknowledging the vast enjoy of atheists are

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:02.959
<v Speaker 9>not communists, just like the vast majority of Christians are

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 9>not theocrats who don't support the divine right. It's also

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 9>worth acknowledging that the founders who were actually inspired by

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 9>Enlightenment values, not by the Bible. America's found is a

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 9>second nation. We were the first quote unquote gallis constitution.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah again, I've done this so many times, so I

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we want to waste our time doing this.

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But fifty five out of fifty six of the signers

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of the declaration were Bible believing church attending Christians. Nine

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>out of thirteen of the states of the time and

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>ratification require a declaration of faith in order for you

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to serve in the states we were. Our birth certificate,

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>which is the Mayflower Compact, said explicitly we are here

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to spread Christianity throughout the land. It was the first

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Great Revival that led to the American Revolution of Jonathan

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Words and Jonathan Mayhew and George Whitfield that preached all

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>across the Eastern seaboard. John Adam seamlessly said, the Constitution

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is written solely for a moral and religious people. It's

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>wholly inadequate for the people of any other. We were

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a Christian nation that was able to embrace the idea

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of a free society. God has mentioned four times in

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the Declaration of Independence. Not only that, Jesus Christ is

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the Declaration Deependence where it says we appeal

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to the divine Judge of the Universe, which of course

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is a direct appeal to Jesus in the Book of Revelation. Yes,

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there were rationalist Enlightenment values that informed some of the founders,

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but it irrefutably was a Christian nation. Maryland was Catholic,

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania was Quaker. Almost every state had their own specific

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>type of Christian preference. The idea of an atheist or

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>not believing in any god, was an idea that was

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>so foreign to the founders. Even Thomas Jefferson, the great deist,

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>he revered the Bible, albeit with you know, some significant edits. However,

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea of believing in no cosmological or no axiological

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>or no teleological or no optological being would be a

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>concept that our founding fathers and not just find form,

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>They would find it extraordinarily dangerous. Why because the French

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Revolution was happening simultaneously as the American Revolution, which was

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:53.439
<v Speaker 1>explicitly atheist. They actually recreated their own gods and had

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they said, we are going to appeal to what the

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>God of reason. And this is my final contention, is

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that when I talked to atheists, the French rebel is

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a great example. They literally tried to change the Gregorian

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 1>calendar to a ten day week. They went and imprisoned

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>people of faith, they put priests in jail, all these

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>different sorts of things, and they said, we are going

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to the God of reason. Well, how did

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that work out? It worked out with the guillotine and

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the slaughter of tens of thousands of people. The French

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Revolution was one of the greatest disasters in human recorded history.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Contrast that with the American Revolution. Why did the American

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Revolution create the greatest nation ever to exist in the

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>history of the world and the French Revolution resulted in

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of blood and even the killing of their

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>own once leader, Maximilian Robespierre. It's because we were anchored

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>on Christian ideas. If you are not anchored on Christian ideas,

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>then don't be surprised and all of a sudden there

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is no fruit to the harvest that you're trying to create.

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 10>I'm an atheist, so I disagree with your religious claims.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you believe in absolute truth?

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure you can provide me this positive evidence

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 10>that there is absolute truth. So the answer would be,

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure.

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Are you absolutely not sure?

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure if I'm absolutely not sure. See, this

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 10>works if you say no, But it doesn't work if

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 10>you bought them out in I don't know question right, No, But.

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Saying you're not sure, you are not even sure if

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not shirt, So at some point you're just always

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>have to make a truth claim.

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 10>Yet, no, you can just be not sure about everything

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 10>all the way down. I don't see why you can't.

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 10>And my answer would be, I think truth is instrumentalist

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 10>in theory. I think it's the thing we choose pragmatically

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 10>for the purposes of discussion. I think you can say, yeah,

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 10>I think truth exists pragmatically. Regardless of that, I don't

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 10>see how you get to God.

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Are you alive?

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 10>Huh?

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Are you alive?

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 10>I think I'm alive.

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you're life.

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Is the sun? Is the sun shining?

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 10>I think it's shining.

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 10>From my frame of reference, it is shining. Notice Notice

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 10>how none of this I mean, so, notice how you've

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 10>gotten no steps closer to proving God.

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm asking questions. Man, okay, yeah, but are you

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 2>sure we did it?

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I'm sure.

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:47.359
<v Speaker 2>Are you sure?

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 10>I'm sure in the practice God, I'm I'm sure in

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 10>the pragmatic instrument Are you that we did it in

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 10>the pragmatic instrumental as sense, Absolutely sure. I see truth

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 10>as a utility.

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 2>So there is a truth that's absolute.

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 10>No, it's it's instrumentally you just it was absolutely No,

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 10>absolutely sure in the instrumentalist sense of the word truth.

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 10>This is a philosophical tradition that dates back hundreds of

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 10>years instrumentalism.

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which, of course we don't subscribe to obviously. So

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>do you believe that murder is objectively wrong.

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 10>Epistemologically objective or ontologically objective?

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Morally?

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 10>See you didn't answer the question.

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>But both both epistemologically and ontologically. But for the purpose

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of discussion from.

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so by what you mean? No, I don't think

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 10>it's objective.

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Was Hitler a bad person objectively?

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 8>No?

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 10>If you mean by by the way, by the way,

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 10>wait wait wait wait wait.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.399
<v Speaker 1>No, but he's being honest at its core, atheists cannot.

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 10>Say can I make the claim?

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 10>Notice who here is relying on feelings and knocked facts.

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 10>Your argument is I feel that Hitler was objective?

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 2>No I know?

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 10>No, no, you feel that way? Can you provide me

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 10>evidence of how you know? Can you provide me evidence

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 10>that morality is objective?

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>No? Of course I can, because well, first of all,

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>morality is both reason and revelation, and it's built within

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 1>to us that murder is wrong.

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, okay, where's your evidence of that? Is that a

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 10>that's a claim, not evidence. That's a claim.

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we could, we could spend multiple hours, but in

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the Western tradition.

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 10>So you notice how you're saying by tradition, by by

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 10>on the standards. But I just want all claims of

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 10>non truth value hold on.

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes they are.

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>We believe that truth was revealed to us.

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 10>We believe claim.

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>But by God, hold on, but let me let me

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we can get there. You can keep on interrupting us. Okay,

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but let me prove to you how silly your viewpoint

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is and how self evidently wrong? Is it objectively wrong

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to kids?

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 10>When you say objective? What I mean by objective? Once again?

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 10>Once again? Can I you and I just notice how

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 10>you still haven't given me dispositive evidence and reality's objective.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 10>You're merely saying my answer is I feel that way.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 10>I feel that way.

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 2>No, it's objective.

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It's objectively wrong to the laws of nature of nature,

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the self evident nature of existence.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 10>Where's your proof that itself? Show me the logical proof

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 10>that it'sself evidence?

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's it's in your reason that God gave you

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the consciousness.

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 10>To prove that God gave it to me.

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but again, your existence is proof of that. You're

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>again we can get back down to the first principles

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of this.

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 10>But again but you don't want to because you know

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 10>it doesn't look good. No, it looks actually really good

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.720
<v Speaker 10>because it's built within evidence, built within.

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Again, interrupting does not make you right.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 10>So you keep repeating your point.

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>No I don't, So let me ask you a question

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in closing. Since you can't objectively say that Hitler was

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>bad or that child is wrong, So how did the

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>universe come into an existence? I don't know, okay, but

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>science says that it was a big bang or a

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>beginning point, right, okay, So using logic, which you believe.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 10>This is the colomn cosmological home on.

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Again, you keep interrupting using using logic, If space, time,

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and matter, okay, at a starting point, then logically shouldn't

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 1>something outside of space, time, and matter have started those things?

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 10>How do you know that cause is personal? How do

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 10>you know that cause is worth praying to anything?

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 2>That's not the question?

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 10>Wait, okay, sure there is a cause? Oh that causes God?

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 10>Because it's outside of space. You believe in different things

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 10>about God. You think that God is personal.

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:20.280
<v Speaker 2>That's not what we're debating.

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 10>We're arguing about God religion.

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, no, no, we're not debating. We're debating whether or not

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a God or not.

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 10>No, the Christian God. I said religion that you're a

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 10>religious person. You said, Christian in nature, you follow religious tradition.

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Calm down, you said you're an atheist.

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 10>We know God, God historically a quitness, even defines it

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 10>this way, is a personal God. You still haven't gotten

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 10>to me to prove that it's personal. I'm happy to

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 10>get to that. Okay, then get to it.

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Look, here's here's what I find with atheists. They don't

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>want to worship or acknowledge God because many atheists think

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they are God. And you and body that really well.

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 10>I didn't know you were a mind reader, Charlie. This

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 10>is news to me.

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not a mind reader. I can tell by your behavior.

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I will say this.

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope that you give your life to Jesus Christ.

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 2>I hope you do.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 10>I hope you can. I hope you can find.

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's interesting, there is evidence, there is evidence

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that Jesus hold on last thing, do you believe Jesus

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Christ was a real historical figure?

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:08.439
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that the Gospels are historically accurate and

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we improve them with archaeological evidence?

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 10>Some parts are some parts are Some parts are metaphors,

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 10>some parts are allegory, some parts are literal. It depends.

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 10>Some parts are attempts at history. Which book or gospel?

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Using rational analysis? Why would the disciples lie about the

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:28.280
<v Speaker 1>resurrection of Christ?

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 10>Okay, we can talk about this people. They can be

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 10>mistaken mistakenly wrong about it.

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So they would be mistakenly wrong up to the point

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:35.359
<v Speaker 1>where they get marty.

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 10>The whole point, the whole point of being mistakingly wrong

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 10>about something.

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Is you believe it's true all the way up to

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the point of death.

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:43.439
<v Speaker 10>The whole point of being mistakenly wrong about something.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make sure I understand your position.

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Your position is that the twelve disciples who knew Christ best,

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>saw him die, and then they all believe the mistaken

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy for the rest of their life. Yes, all of

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>them together as a conspiracy.

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 10>Yes, yes, there is no first tund account from the

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 10>five hundred Gospels are all written by these people. People

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 10>have died for crazy claims in the past that we

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 10>know aren't true. These are all fast about this as

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 10>not correct.

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the Gospels was written by one of his

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>closest associates, Matthew.

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:11.320
<v Speaker 2>The next collector.

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Luke was a fact fighter that was hired.

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 10>I didn't say the Gospels were written by them. I

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 10>said there's no evidence from the five hundred that he

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 10>appeared to there's no first hand accounts.

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Again, that's not correct. Thank you for your time. We'll

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 2>get to next.

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:21.879
<v Speaker 10>Okay, you can, you can.

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.720
<v Speaker 2>We will pray for you. Thank you. Be respectful, guys,

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you can do what he wants. Oh can I start now.

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Nice to meet you, Charlie. I'm a big fan. I

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 2>think you're right beautiful man. I admire you physically. But

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 2>uh no, no homo, no homo, no homo. I did

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 2>have a question. Something I don't find very interesting about you.

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Something I find kind repulsive is that I believe you

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 2>said that the Civil Rights Act was bad and that

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 2>we shouldn't have that. Okay, well, thank you. I appreciate that.

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't like you as much as Charlie though. First,

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.879
<v Speaker 2>So what's your name? Oh? Oh, sorry, I don't want

0:42:59.880 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to be like filmed and stuff too. I'm anonymous number

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 2>one anonymous guy. Okay, well, hello, nice to meet you, anonymous,

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, thank you. Nice to meet you too.

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I believe in part of the essence of the

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Civil Rights Act went went too way too far, way

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>too wide.

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, how they go too far? Well?

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>For example, it created an entire civil rights leviathan that

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>gave us affirmative.

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Action civil rights leviathan. What do you mean? Yes?

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you can let me finish three words in sorry.

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>It allowed the Department of Justice to go after people

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that have different skin color aka white people, and prevent

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 1>them from getting jobs in college admissions.

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 2>You have a job. I'm sorry, you have a job. No,

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 2>you're you're right, I do right.

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But just until Trump came around, until these Supreme Court decisions,

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the Civil Rights Act, if you have white

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>skin color, it's much harder to get into a college

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>than if someone has black skin color, much harder. You

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have to have higher test scores. It's a much harder pool,

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 1>largely thanks to the precedent set by the Civil Rights Act.

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention all the trans stuff that we're seeing,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing men be able to win trophies and medals

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>from women across the country, and they use the Civil

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Rights Act to justify Okay.

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:02.359
<v Speaker 2>I think I see where you're coming from. So you

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 2>think that it's harder for white people because of black

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 2>people they have, they can have lower text scores. Again,

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's not what I think that's what you're saying. Okay,

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 2>all right, well, well I guess well I would say too.

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I think perhaps you're familiar with the term equity, right,

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:21.439
<v Speaker 2>where different people have different circumstances. It's I reject. Okay, Okay,

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:24.920
<v Speaker 2>whether you rejected or not, I think it's a prescient,

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 2>uh concept in this argument, because what you have to

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 2>understand is that when you're, for example, you're born in

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 2>like a black nambor, you're born like O block or

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 2>something like a very very like is oh well, if

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 2>you're if you're if you're born there, if you're born

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 2>in a very poor area like that, but like very

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 2>lot opportunity, very very poor schools of very low ratings

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 2>with average test scores much lower. When you're in that environment,

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 2>you have the whole system up against you, right. So

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 2>it so when you say in that cop circumstance, when

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 2>you're facing the whole I guess Leviathan of systemic racism

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 2>sold you say that. Sorry, let me discrudge it when

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 2>you say it's Fan two for example, lower at the

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 2>standard because knowing that their circumstances were like that perhaps

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 2>based on what they had was productive to them, they

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 2>had the correct amount of merit to get into a school. Okay,

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 2>so are you a student here? I'm guessing you oh yeah.

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying are you pretty good student?

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say a good student. I have a

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty high GP. Okay, can you give your GP to

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 2>her because she's a woman of color? Please? Oh you

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 2>wan to give you a? I mean what would you

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 2>be willing to do that? I'm not sure. Yeah, sure

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 2>you could be good? You cool with that? Yeah?

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I get what you mean. I want you tell her

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>or like by force, so swapping. Let me tell what

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do by force, white man. Okay, I'm gonna

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>take your g P A. I'm gonna give it to

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a woman of color. You're cool with that?

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 9>Uh?

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean yeah? I can just work back up like

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:43.319
<v Speaker 2>I No, there's no working back up. I can pull

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 2>myself up on my bootstown. No, there's no working back up.

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can't work back that low point of conservatism.

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna keep on taking it from you

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 1>because that's equity, and you're cool with that.

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 2>What does that? That's just equity in practice isn't taken.

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Equity is giving applying the equal standard.

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>If you give, how do you get you must take?

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you get wait, what do you mean that

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>which is given must first be taken?

0:46:01.960 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's being taken?

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>When this case grades from you to grades to her.

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 2>That no one's taking my grades? Though, that's not what

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 2>that's not what a firm of it's hold on someone

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 2>takes your grades. Hold on a second.

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 1>If you only have so many you only have so

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:16.359
<v Speaker 1>many positions at University of South Florida to come in, right,

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:18.919
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a there's a there's a set number. Let's

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>say it's twenty thousand people, okay, And we're gonna say

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna lower the test standards so that somebody that's

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a woman of color can come in, and therefore it's

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>harder for you. So it's a higher bar for you,

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:33.239
<v Speaker 1>lower bar for them. Definitionally, that's a redistribution of test

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>scores for somebody else, just by the definition.

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:37.800
<v Speaker 2>And you're okay with that? Uh, well, I guess I

0:46:37.840 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 2>guess I would ask then if we were to do

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.400
<v Speaker 2>what you're doing, I guess that's what's happening Onundre Trump right, Well, no,

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.439
<v Speaker 2>it's actually been happen the last forty years. Okay, actually, yeah, whatever. Okay,

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 2>So when you say that, if you do that, then

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 2>well black of people aren't again in the school, and

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 2>then they won't be able to uplift themselves. They won't

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 2>be to have prosperous families, they won't be able to

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, equalize the economic status because you need to

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 2>give them a little jump starck. You know you have

0:46:57.719 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 2>a car, right, how is that? How is that?

0:46:59.120 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 8>Well?

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Now yeah, no, no, no, no, no, it's good, but no,

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 2>how is that worth?

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>The last forty years we've had robuster firm in action. Oh,

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 1>we've got hiring practices. Has it made Black America more successful?

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I can answer that easily. It's because it Oh sorry,

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 2>it's because sorry what am I? What am I going forward?

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. You're a funny guy. So what happened

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 2>is even after the civil rights side, you're under you

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 2>know what I believe I mean the term is massive resistance.

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 2>It was a movement in UH after the Bridasus wth

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 2>education in Virginia were essentially the legislature which was still

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 2>white supremacist, which is still extremely racist. They decided that. No,

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna do everything that feasibly possible within our means

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to stop black people from going to white schools. You

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 2>even see this in uh was I believe it's a

0:47:44.640 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 2>little rock nine right. Even after it was legalized at

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 2>the state level, white supremacist mobs still mobilized to prevent it.

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.800
<v Speaker 2>So even if the facto it's God did it still exists.

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you a very simple question. Yeah from

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you keep on throwing around, got you? What is racism?

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Is racism? That's a very complicated question. But no, it's not.

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's a simple answer, and then there's the

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 2>highly theoretical answer.

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:09.280
<v Speaker 8>Me simple.

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 2>The simple answer, well, essentially be because because we have

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 2>like different skin colors, that he's treated a different way

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 2>than me, he has like a different bringing to me. No, no, no,

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 2>but what is different? Oh, it's discrimination based on the colors,

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 2>based on the car, the skin. You got it, thank you.

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:26.400
<v Speaker 2>So isn't it racist?

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Then to then penalize white people to come into college

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 1>or to get jobs based on the color of their skin,

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't that be racist? So you're arguing for a very

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>racist policy, which is that we should actively discriminate against

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 1>people based on the color of their skin, which is

0:48:40.560 --> 0:48:42.720
<v Speaker 1>affirmative action and DEI in practice.

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I just don't. I just disagree with the premise that

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 2>you can do like anti white racism because uh because wait,

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 2>can you be racist against white people? No? Bro, I'm

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 2>a cracker.

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:53.279
<v Speaker 8>Bro?

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 2>What now you can't be racist?

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 8>Brother?

0:48:55.480 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 6>There's subny crackers here right, there's their bright there's a clip.

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:08.720
<v Speaker 6>Well what do you get that you could do political

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 6>violence to be bro? Like, why you're saying that to me?

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 6>You're making me scared?

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 8>Uh?

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Ohky, So let me tell you what we believe.

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Because you tell us what you believe, your worldview is

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>indistinguishable from the KKK that you want. That you want

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to organize the world based on skin color.

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 2>We want to organize the world based.

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>On merit and character, based on how hard you work,

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what you bring to the table. I believe it's destructive

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and wrong to say that people are gonna be organized

0:49:37.280 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 1>or have their future set based on the color of

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>their skin. I think it's tribalistic. I think it is divisive,

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think it hurts the excellence of a country.

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:48.399
<v Speaker 1>You asked a question, well, how are we gonna help

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:50.720
<v Speaker 1>other communities? You know how you help other communities stop

0:49:50.800 --> 0:49:53.839
<v Speaker 1>pandering to them and start treating them like individuals made

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in the image of God, not tribes to be organized

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>for political purposes.

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So do you think like Trump is a now

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:03.759
<v Speaker 2>not as president, now that racism is gone now because

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Jump is back, we're no longer pandering, right, do you

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:08.800
<v Speaker 2>think that the conditions of a of black people of

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:10.479
<v Speaker 2>like do you think, oh, block, is it gonna become

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 2>like how much a nice place? Do you think that?

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that these very downturned sort of a

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 2>black neighborhoods that have been sort of left beyond do

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you think they're gonna become revitalized now? Is that what

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 2>you think is gonna happen? Yeah, they'll do better, for sure.

0:50:22.760 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 2>You think they do better now we've stopped helping them,

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 2>they could do better.

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 9>Well.

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 2>See, that's an interesting thing because it seems like contre

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 2>dictory that may just do basic logic.

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, Actually, Black Americans under Donald Trump in the first

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>term saw the greatest economic renaissance that they saw since

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties. Do you want to think Obama race is

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>lowest unemployment, revitalization, amazing investment in their communities, opportunity zones.

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's when we had the firm of action

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 2>and they went to be bad.

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Well again, we actually get rid of firm of action

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>now now, but I'm talking about before. Those are unrelated

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>things though, just you know.

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 2>You think that they don't see them. I'm related to me. Well,

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 2>firm action is addressing racism. Theyve action is looking so

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, I'm know you are. That's okay, I'm sorry.

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Affirmative action is largely federal government hiring practices and the

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>adjacent institutions. I think that all communities will do even

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:12.840
<v Speaker 1>better when we stop living under the soft bigotry of

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:17.239
<v Speaker 1>low expectations. Inherent in your argument is that we have

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to pander to certain communities based on the call of

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>their skin because they can't do as well as white people.

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:22.800
<v Speaker 2>I reject the premise.

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that we should try to say I don't

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>care about the call your skin, I care about what

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you bring to the table, and stop pandering the people

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>based on special criteria points and acceptance the college saying

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to make it easier for one group

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and harder for another group.

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's that, but it's understanding. Okay, but

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 2>do you think that based on that.

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that we should have black only dormitories

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in America? No?

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:45.319
<v Speaker 2>Why would I want that?

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, there's hundreds of schools that have those actually, and.

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Black only, like they're not white people are not allowed.

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You, white people are not allowed to white where not

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 1>allowedrect we have black only graduation ceremonies across the country.

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, those are from a well I believe those are

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 2>most likely like eight pc us right, like.

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 1>The University of Michigan has, Harvard has one. So we're

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 1>agreeing that that is wrong. That is the first's extension

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>of hype hyper race obsession. So you have to you

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 1>could you could choose one or the other. You can

0:52:12.120 --> 0:52:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be race obsessed or merit obsessed. We as conservatives, decide

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to be merit obsessed to build a country base on

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>how hard you work and what you're able to deliver.

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well the uh so wait here, just I wasn't

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 2>final point? Yeah, final point? I sure, Okay, sure, this

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 2>thing's a little close. Oh I'm sorry, I don't mean

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 2>to offend your wonderful set up here. Uh yeah, so

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.360
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'll just restate my point that, Uh, I

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 2>don't believe you mentioned like all black dormitories, right, Uh,

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I I don't really comment on that. I mean,

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's real. To me, that sounds fake.

0:52:46.640 --> 0:52:48.480
<v Speaker 2>But I'll give you the benefit of doubt here. It's

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:51.800
<v Speaker 2>very real, okay, But I just think it's very irrelevant,

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:54.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of like aesthetic focus. Think it doesn't really affect

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 2>the material conditions of like black if.

0:52:56.160 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You if you heard there were white only dormitories, there'd

0:52:58.120 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be marching in the streets.

0:52:58.920 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, because because okay, I can I get the difference.

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 2>The difference is like, for example, I'll go back to segregation,

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the all white dormitory was nicest and all black one was.

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:11.080
<v Speaker 2>So if that's the if that's if that was brought back, Okay,

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:13.280
<v Speaker 2>if we were doing all white dormitory and I'm.

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Not recommending I think actually segregation is wrong and evil,

0:53:15.360 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're heading until Donald Trump.

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 2>We were heading in that direction until But like, okay,

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll go back because I did, like I let slip by.

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 2>But you mentioned that like in the early years of

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the dollch On presidency, right, that the conditions, the employment

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 2>and stuff were going up for black people. What I

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:32.799
<v Speaker 2>would say is the economy works up slow works at

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:36.120
<v Speaker 2>like a time dilation for the policies initially enacted so well,

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 2>I would I would probably assume, based on what you

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 2>said to me, is that it was the Albama era

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 2>policies that that actually led to that, not the Trump policies,

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:45.680
<v Speaker 2>because stuff like tax cuts doesn't really help.

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:47.200
<v Speaker 1>In a year from now, we're gonna have the greatest

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 1>economy ever. They're gonna say.

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 2>It's all bid them, it's all bid them. Well, I mean,

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 2>if we I don't think that's gonna happen at person.

0:53:52.719 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the colomy is going this with what all

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk is doing. But if that, if that was

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:59.399
<v Speaker 2>to happen, I mean, I guess my whole world view.

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 2>But I'm pretty sorry about what about Elon? What Elon's doing? Bothers?

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 2>You do you do you not want to see the

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 2>government efficient? The government is efficient. He's just firing everybody. Looks,

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:09.840
<v Speaker 2>look he did the toilet bro y'all see what happened

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 2>towilet brats races us. Now it is the Nazi haven.

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 2>It went from like a pretty pretty accepting place to

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 2>like what like we're like the average blue check mark,

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I saying Hail Hilther Like Elon Musk himself has replied

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 2>to like, well, he did the Nazi salute, Like we're

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 2>not gonna forget about that, are we?

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:24.759
<v Speaker 7>No?

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:27.839
<v Speaker 2>He did? Yeah, y'all, y'all see that clip. Bro y'all

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 2>see when he did that? All right?

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 8>Oh?

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, thank And by the way, I just want to

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 2>thank you for something. You're welcome. Well, I want to

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:34.919
<v Speaker 2>thank you. Do I get do I get a part

0:54:35.080 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of like the TikTok revenue gonna get from this?

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I want I want to thank you. I want to

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 1>thank you for something. Oh yeah, you you are a

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.840
<v Speaker 1>perfect reminder why we want to November. So thank you

0:54:43.880 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for that.

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I really appreciate it. Thank you.

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So you would say I'm a misinformation machine. That's fine, Yeah, fine,

0:54:48.960 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a teacher.

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes. What is a woman? What is a woman?

0:54:54.640 --> 0:54:54.839
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Buddy?

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 8>All right?

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 11>So we define gender as a set of preferences that

0:54:59.520 --> 0:55:08.880
<v Speaker 11>you have, excuse me, gender. Gender is a set of

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 11>preference we have. Woh. Woman is a social construct that

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 11>we've agreed upon. Typically, we imagine womanhood as makeup or

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:25.720
<v Speaker 11>whatever it is. There is a difference between the word

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 11>woman and being a biological female. Woman is a social

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:34.480
<v Speaker 11>construct that we use. Listen for a second. I'm telling

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 11>you what it means. Woman is a social construct. We

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:41.319
<v Speaker 11>agree on these set of preferences. If I tell you

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 11>that I'm a man, is because I want you to

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:45.799
<v Speaker 11>know that I like these set of preferences. If I

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:47.320
<v Speaker 11>tell you I'm a woman, is because I want you

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 11>to know that I agree with these set of preferences.

0:55:49.200 --> 0:55:52.479
<v Speaker 11>Can men give birth? Can men?

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Or can males?

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 11>Because males can't these Listen for a second. If you listen,

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 11>it's your bio professors, you'd understand there's difference between biology

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:04.399
<v Speaker 11>and what we think.

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:06.839
<v Speaker 1>So I want to thank you for proving a great point. Well,

0:56:06.880 --> 0:56:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you are why we should eliminate the Department of Education.

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you love it.

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:14.719
<v Speaker 12>I love you are here making a Trumps and mind

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 12>the pro Trump speech for you.

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 2>This has nothing to do with genders. Well, it has

0:56:17.960 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of children. I'll talk about it here. Tell

0:56:20.280 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 2>me how much you love you. Have a great day,

0:56:22.280 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 2>God bless you. I'll pray for you.

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:26.960
<v Speaker 13>Oh my goodness, that will help a lot.

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:28.200
<v Speaker 9>Prayer.

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:30.319
<v Speaker 2>Prayer is a powerful thing, Yes it is.

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 10>It has done horrendous things to this plant.

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:34.399
<v Speaker 2>Prayer has done horrendous things, and this.

0:56:34.400 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 12>Plant has through Christianity and through a lot of other religions,

0:56:39.440 --> 0:56:43.280
<v Speaker 12>marrow minded religions have caused a lot of pain and suffering.

0:56:42.840 --> 0:56:44.919
<v Speaker 1>On this plend More people have died over the last

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years under the guise of Marxism and statism

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 1>than any other ideology, not even close.

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:50.879
<v Speaker 6>More people.

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:53.759
<v Speaker 1>One hundred million people died under communism in the last

0:56:53.840 --> 0:56:57.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. One hundred million, Yeah, sixty and moles China

0:56:58.200 --> 0:57:01.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty in Stalin's Russia to pol Pot's Cambodia, at least

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:03.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thousand in Cuba.

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I can keep doing.

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:06.640
<v Speaker 12>I'm not teaching communism here.

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 1>No, but I'm saying nothing about children.

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:12.799
<v Speaker 13>You're telling me how much you support Trump and how

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:14.120
<v Speaker 13>much I'll.

0:57:13.680 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Talk about whatever you want to talk about.

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 13>It's your conversation.

0:57:16.480 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 2>What do you believe?

0:57:19.320 --> 0:57:22.480
<v Speaker 12>I believe that there's a remedy for situations and not

0:57:22.560 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 12>a political battle. I believe that if we work together

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 12>and open our minds instead of militarizing ourselves, we could

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 12>come up with a solution.

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Isn't talking how we come to solutions, Sure.

0:57:33.240 --> 0:57:36.360
<v Speaker 12>But getting mad and making political stances on who you

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:38.720
<v Speaker 12>love and what the president's doing is so great and

0:57:38.720 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 12>what the PM is doing.

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 13>So that is not a conversation, it's a statement.

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll have a conversation.

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:46.840
<v Speaker 13>Maybe we could have a conversation in the history building

0:57:46.840 --> 0:57:49.720
<v Speaker 13>sometimes about what. Maybe we could have a conversation in

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:50.280
<v Speaker 13>the history.

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Building sometimes, Yes, history conversation.

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 1>History will tell us that when government grows too big, people.

0:57:56.440 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Suffer and die.

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's what the history building should tell you. History

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:03.480
<v Speaker 1>will also tell us we live in the greatest country

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 1>ever to exist. History will also tell you that Western

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:10.240
<v Speaker 1>civilization is the greatest miracle that humans ever got.

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:13.280
<v Speaker 2>History will tell you that. Any history will tell you

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 2>that Western history will tell you that. Tell me any

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 2>history is a fault. I have to be in class.

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 2>So I would really love to continue. God, bless you,

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 2>thank you. Do you say it's a lie? It was

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 2>just kind of talks. Yeah, similar, similar, it's similar. Similar.

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So America is the greatest country ever to exist, not

0:58:37.440 --> 0:58:43.400
<v Speaker 1>even close. What what country would you say is the greatest?

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Makes the country great, most productive, most accepting, most generous,

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>most benevolence. Yes, we take in half the world's immigrants

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:54.640
<v Speaker 1>every single year. How is this not accepted?

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 2>What does that have to do about not being accepted?

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>My name is Charlie Kirk, and I love America because

0:59:02.360 --> 0:59:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I love talking with people I disagree with the country.

0:59:05.800 --> 0:59:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Start an organization that's now in a thousand plus campuses

0:59:08.520 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to save the greatest culture and country ever to exist.

0:59:10.760 --> 0:59:17.000
<v Speaker 5>Hires vets and Higher's vets and.

0:59:14.920 --> 0:59:19.600
<v Speaker 1>And I've had thousands of hours of conversation about these ideas.

0:59:19.680 --> 0:59:22.200
<v Speaker 8>The cameras, is it necessary?

0:59:22.800 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, considering I've been assaulted, followed, stocked, and had things

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>thrown at me, the greatest protection I have is cameras.

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a public space, all.

0:59:39.320 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, once one second?

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 1>One you have this seens it's all good. But what

0:59:44.440 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>country would you say is greater than this one? It's fine,

0:59:49.160 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I just said, I mean we taken.

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:52.920
<v Speaker 8>Hat your your definition of three.

0:59:54.240 --> 0:59:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean we are the you say that the.

0:59:56.240 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 4>United States of America has always done the has always

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 4>made the greatest decision because it's perfect.

1:00:03.080 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 7>Right.

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I never said America was a perfect country every nor

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>have we. We've made a lot of mistakes.

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:09.640
<v Speaker 13>Anything great?

1:00:09.720 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, no, That's not what I've said.

1:00:13.040 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Extra because from an objective analysis, pective correct of world history. Hello,

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>how are you? We are the most creative, the most accepting,

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the most benevolent, the most generous, most forward thinking and

1:00:28.880 --> 1:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>productive country ever to exist. We are a country that

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sent thirty seven thousand of our own citizens to die

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Korean peninsula so South Korea could exist, and

1:00:38.520 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we asked for nothing in return. No country's ever done

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>anything close to that. We sent them milkication reading history.

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>What did I do? How is that not true? What

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I just said? No? But what am I saying? That's untrue?

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Americans gave away five hundred billion dollars to charity last

1:00:57.960 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>year voluntarily. We've taken half of the world's immigrants half work.

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:07.000
<v Speaker 2>You know that only five percent of the money that

1:01:07.040 --> 1:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>you've put into a non promitary charity.

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:10.880
<v Speaker 8>Even has to be you.

1:01:12.560 --> 1:01:13.200
<v Speaker 2>So most.

1:01:15.400 --> 1:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Most charities and most foundations will use ninety plus percent

1:01:18.800 --> 1:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of the net assets they get.

1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Every single year. What now, you can look at the

1:01:24.720 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you can look at the IRS website.

1:01:26.120 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I understand what I'm saying might bother you, But we're

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>also the most accepting, least racist, most diverse, multiracial country

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in the world by far. We've been okay, How look

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>at the United accepted. We've taken half the world's immigrants

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>every single year, so.

1:01:44.040 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 8>Other countries to.

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 10>Poverty.

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Most America is not living in poverty. Yes, really educated.

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>We're the richest country in the world by far. We

1:01:54.400 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have an American middle class is a uniquely American concept.

1:01:58.160 --> 1:02:01.480
<v Speaker 13>You ever walk down the streets, Excuse me, I grew

1:02:01.560 --> 1:02:04.760
<v Speaker 13>up in a gang gang infested neighborhood. So you want

1:02:04.760 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 13>to talk to poor people, I'm talking, and we're talking

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 13>to you from a perspective.

1:02:09.000 --> 1:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>You know that America is poor actually and the richest

1:02:11.360 --> 1:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>one percent in the world a remarkable amount.

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Of people in the world.

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:20.240
<v Speaker 13>Persons.

1:02:20.960 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Know what I'm saying is that a very poor person

1:02:23.160 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in America is relatively extraordinarily rich by world standards.

1:02:26.920 --> 1:02:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, hello you. I don't want to tell you.

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 8>How to speak.

1:02:34.720 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I go around universities and have challenging conversations and because

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what is so important to our country is to

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>find our disagreements respectfully, because when people stop.

1:02:46.960 --> 1:02:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Talking, that's when violence happens. You could see that happen

1:02:50.480 --> 1:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>all across the world.

1:02:51.680 --> 1:02:53.880
<v Speaker 13>So I don't and I'm not really interested in being

1:02:53.920 --> 1:02:56.920
<v Speaker 13>a field. So that's I understand americastries.

1:02:58.120 --> 1:02:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Where are you from Australia?

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:04.600
<v Speaker 5>It okay, and I just again, don't send in Tennessee.

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 5>I've never seen someone dubiously.

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Well, it's a growing trend because people like me

1:03:10.680 --> 1:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are facing violence assault the left. Yes, the campus Antifa.

1:03:17.200 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been stormed out of restaurants. I've been assaulted publicly,

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>multiple death threats. Well, the campus left has been incited

1:03:28.520 --> 1:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>by Democratic leadership and trained to go after people like me.

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 13>Okay, so at that part of this asign.

1:03:35.280 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 8>What might have cheated from that year?

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, because I love talking to people I disagree with,

1:03:41.120 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Because in America we have a tradition for public discourse

1:03:46.000 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and dialogue. Going back into the Lincoln Douglas debates, going

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>back to Teddy Roosevelt screaming at political opponents, going back

1:03:52.560 --> 1:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to how the US Congress should exist.

1:03:54.120 --> 1:03:57.040
<v Speaker 13>Okay, so what's you golling on this to.

1:03:59.000 --> 1:04:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm freezing, We're we're in the shade. Is this is

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>where that we have to be? My goal is to

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>do you have to be them well, because you have

1:04:07.880 --> 1:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>to have permits and stuff to do this. Yeah, this

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:09.920
<v Speaker 2>is it.

1:04:10.520 --> 1:04:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Despite the First Amendment, they relegate me to a certain area.

1:04:13.640 --> 1:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>But so, but also number two, there's more people that

1:04:16.600 --> 1:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>agree with me than some people would actually believe, and

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they come out of the woodwork when I.

1:04:21.160 --> 1:04:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Do stuff like this. And finally we record all of.

1:04:23.840 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It so that we put on the internet so people

1:04:25.720 --> 1:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can see. These ideas collide when people stop talking, and

1:04:28.720 --> 1:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's when you get violence. That's when civil war happens

1:04:31.520 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>because you start to think the other side is so

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>evil and they lose their humanity. Marriages break apart when

1:04:36.000 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you stop talking, Churches fall apart, businesses, companies, friendships, relationships.

1:04:41.040 --> 1:04:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sure, so I have to go yes from the university.

1:04:45.160 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, there's just one thing that I've seen as your

1:04:47.480 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 13>big city can as you bring in the phone, is

1:04:49.920 --> 1:04:52.840
<v Speaker 13>it you really probably have some really good ones to say.

1:04:53.040 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 13>And that's fine. I'm trying and least it on the

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:56.640
<v Speaker 13>statinism bea So I'm gonna go apartment step.

1:04:56.480 --> 1:04:57.800
<v Speaker 8>And I'm wait from some pace.

1:04:58.280 --> 1:05:01.360
<v Speaker 2>But you're really like sleeping towar in a way into

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what that word means.

1:05:03.400 --> 1:05:03.680
<v Speaker 13>Rhetoric.

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, rhetoric. I didn't hear it.

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:07.680
<v Speaker 13>Okay, it makes you you kind of start to tip

1:05:07.680 --> 1:05:09.800
<v Speaker 13>off things and the points that you're trying to make

1:05:09.800 --> 1:05:11.960
<v Speaker 13>because I'm sure you know your arguments really well. But

1:05:12.080 --> 1:05:14.560
<v Speaker 13>from the people I watched, standing, the kind of the

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:15.120
<v Speaker 13>party is.

1:05:15.120 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 4>To fix your tourism.

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they hear that stuff commonly thought?

1:05:18.240 --> 1:05:21.120
<v Speaker 13>Well, I don't know what you present, that's all I

1:05:21.160 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 13>think you point. Let sure, and it's not a pretty sis.

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:29.400
<v Speaker 13>Sure you're comfortable with the session that you want. I

1:05:29.440 --> 1:05:30.800
<v Speaker 13>think you're approached on your hearing.

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but at least ten or twelve things I told that,

1:05:33.800 --> 1:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I said that word factual.

1:05:35.280 --> 1:05:36.640
<v Speaker 13>That's your point that you've told.

1:05:36.880 --> 1:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, telling is not a conversation, but they have They

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>can walk away at any time.

1:05:40.680 --> 1:05:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Conversation takes two people.

1:05:42.000 --> 1:05:43.680
<v Speaker 13>He told me there's something you want you two.

1:05:43.800 --> 1:05:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, But they didn't hear it some of it.

1:05:45.240 --> 1:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, I said ninety plus percent of border patrol

1:05:48.160 --> 1:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>agents support building the wall.

1:05:49.320 --> 1:05:51.960
<v Speaker 2>They immediately dismissed it. They never heard that before. So

1:05:52.000 --> 1:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying things that are not commonly discussed at a university.

1:05:54.760 --> 1:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>And all I'm saying is that way you say sometimes Okay,

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that, Thank you, I appreciate it.

1:06:00.760 --> 1:06:00.960
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:06.439
<v Speaker 14>I'm technically a Democrat, but I have very conservative views

1:06:06.560 --> 1:06:10.760
<v Speaker 14>because I'm faith based all the way. So I have

1:06:10.880 --> 1:06:13.960
<v Speaker 14>a question which is also kind of a disagreement, but

1:06:14.080 --> 1:06:16.880
<v Speaker 14>I want to build it up. Okay, So, of course

1:06:16.960 --> 1:06:19.320
<v Speaker 14>you just said Jesus is the most important thing for

1:06:19.440 --> 1:06:22.800
<v Speaker 14>everyone out here, and so can you please explain to

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:26.440
<v Speaker 14>everyone out here what Jesus stood for, and especially the

1:06:26.560 --> 1:06:29.880
<v Speaker 14>qualities of love, how to love your neighbor even if

1:06:29.920 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 14>they don't agree with you.

1:06:31.200 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>So what is your name? Again? To Lisa, that's a

1:06:33.640 --> 1:06:34.240
<v Speaker 2>beautiful question.

1:06:34.320 --> 1:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you came up to ask it, But I

1:06:36.200 --> 1:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>want to also just add something, because you're right, Jesus

1:06:39.280 --> 1:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>fully embodied to thinks simultaneously that showed his divine and

1:06:44.320 --> 1:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>his godly nature, because not that Jesus said good things.

1:06:47.520 --> 1:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Jesus is Lord, Christ is King, and Jesus is God

1:06:51.000 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on top of just being a guy with a lot

1:06:53.000 --> 1:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of good ideas. So John eight, if I'm drawing from

1:06:56.080 --> 1:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>memory correctly, best embodies both Christ's mercy and love, but

1:07:00.680 --> 1:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>also his commitment to truth. And sometimes in the modern Gospel,

1:07:06.200 --> 1:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we overemphasize the grace and we underemphasize the truth, and

1:07:11.240 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so we are far too willing to say, hey, Jesus

1:07:14.280 --> 1:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>loves everybody, but we don't get to the second part

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation. It says, Jesus doesn't want you to

1:07:18.800 --> 1:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>live in sin.

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>So this is in John A. It's best embodied.

1:07:21.920 --> 1:07:22.040
<v Speaker 7>Right.

1:07:22.240 --> 1:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Almost every Christian in this audience will be able to

1:07:24.280 --> 1:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you the first part of this, which is a

1:07:26.000 --> 1:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Sadducees and Pharisees are sitting around, standing around

1:07:28.840 --> 1:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with rocks, and they're about to stone the prostitute woman,

1:07:31.800 --> 1:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and Jesus comes up and says, let the first among

1:07:34.000 --> 1:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you without sin cast the first stone, and everyone starts

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>dropping the rocks. But what comes next shows that Christ

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is not just grace focused, he's simultaneously truth focused. He

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>goes up to the woman who had a career in

1:07:47.960 --> 1:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>selling herself for sex and said, sin no more. Now,

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine today how much trouble you would get in if

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you would go up to somebody and say, stop sinning.

1:08:00.000 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>You are being too judgmental. No, no, you're actually being

1:08:02.640 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>christ Like. So Jesus stood, he was one hundred percent

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>grace and truth. And that tension is very hard in

1:08:08.520 --> 1:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a modern world because we want to overemphasize grace, when

1:08:12.160 --> 1:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in reality Christ loves us too much to have us

1:08:15.400 --> 1:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to live in sin. He wants us to try

1:08:17.880 --> 1:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to elevate our actions to glorify God and all that

1:08:20.479 --> 1:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we do.

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:22.240
<v Speaker 4>I agree one hundred percent.

1:08:23.400 --> 1:08:25.680
<v Speaker 14>And so to go on my question, I really want

1:08:25.720 --> 1:08:28.920
<v Speaker 14>to talk about DEI and so with our Christian I

1:08:29.000 --> 1:08:31.760
<v Speaker 14>will agree with you a lot of I read the

1:08:31.800 --> 1:08:34.360
<v Speaker 14>Bible for myself, so I knew what that scripture said.

1:08:34.680 --> 1:08:37.879
<v Speaker 14>But my question is how can Christian teachings on love, equity,

1:08:38.000 --> 1:08:41.759
<v Speaker 14>and justice in form and shape discussions on diversity, equity,

1:08:41.800 --> 1:08:45.960
<v Speaker 14>and inclusion in today's society. And so to also, Jesus

1:08:46.080 --> 1:08:46.960
<v Speaker 14>hung out with sinners.

1:08:47.040 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 5>He did not judge. He told the truth.

1:08:49.200 --> 1:08:51.720
<v Speaker 14>And so I think that a lot of people in

1:08:51.840 --> 1:08:55.360
<v Speaker 14>society today when we talk about political views that our opposition,

1:08:55.560 --> 1:08:58.559
<v Speaker 14>we judge them because we think, oh, because you voted

1:08:58.640 --> 1:09:02.240
<v Speaker 14>for Trump, you agree on everything, when that's not the case, right,

1:09:02.680 --> 1:09:04.560
<v Speaker 14>And I want you to talk about that.

1:09:04.880 --> 1:09:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Are you good?

1:09:05.560 --> 1:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So, and then I'll connect with the DEI and I'm

1:09:07.760 --> 1:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going to make a case and I don't know if

1:09:09.080 --> 1:09:11.479
<v Speaker 1>it will be persuasive to you why I think DEI

1:09:11.600 --> 1:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>is unbiblical. And I'm gonna try to make that case. Okay,

1:09:14.479 --> 1:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But first let me talk about let me comment on

1:09:16.720 --> 1:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>your astute point, which is that Christ wants us to

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be around people that are not like us. This is

1:09:22.920 --> 1:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>why I go to college campuses. But more and more

1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I go to college campuses, I'm getting a lot of

1:09:26.400 --> 1:09:28.519
<v Speaker 1>big crowds. So it's kind of unusually. I used to

1:09:28.560 --> 1:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>go here and you know, get heckled and have very

1:09:30.200 --> 1:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>small crowds. But let me demonstrate this in an unusual way.

1:09:33.400 --> 1:09:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Almost every person that's audience would say Christ wants us

1:09:36.520 --> 1:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to be salt and light. Now what are the two

1:09:38.920 --> 1:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>characteristics of salt and light? They change the environments that

1:09:42.160 --> 1:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they come in contact with. They do not affirm, they

1:09:45.400 --> 1:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>do not conform, They change for the better. It's very

1:09:48.960 --> 1:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>important everybody, We as Christians are called to change the

1:09:52.040 --> 1:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>environment that we come in touch with.

1:09:53.920 --> 1:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>How's it going. So I'm a born gain believer in Jesus, and.

1:10:01.920 --> 1:10:04.280
<v Speaker 15>But I want to hear your thoughts, Charlie, because sometimes

1:10:04.360 --> 1:10:08.479
<v Speaker 15>I really struggle to align myself with the conservative side

1:10:08.680 --> 1:10:13.040
<v Speaker 15>of the issues in our country. And multiple experiences in

1:10:13.080 --> 1:10:16.439
<v Speaker 15>my life, whether it be it was just conversation that

1:10:16.520 --> 1:10:19.400
<v Speaker 15>somebody picked up or whatever how I look, whatever it

1:10:19.479 --> 1:10:23.799
<v Speaker 15>may be, assumptions my political views or where I'm leaning

1:10:24.040 --> 1:10:26.800
<v Speaker 15>have blocked and gotten in front of what I really

1:10:26.880 --> 1:10:30.280
<v Speaker 15>believe in, which is advancing the Gospel. And so my

1:10:30.479 --> 1:10:34.200
<v Speaker 15>issue sometimes is that I want to be patriotic, I

1:10:34.360 --> 1:10:38.519
<v Speaker 15>want to vote for and be public about that which

1:10:38.680 --> 1:10:40.760
<v Speaker 15>I think is best for my country, but I don't

1:10:40.800 --> 1:10:43.519
<v Speaker 15>want it to get in front of my main goal,

1:10:43.680 --> 1:10:45.240
<v Speaker 15>what I feel like I've been placed here on this

1:10:45.360 --> 1:10:48.000
<v Speaker 15>earth for, which is advancing the Gospel to all people,

1:10:48.240 --> 1:10:50.679
<v Speaker 15>not just conservatives, not just people who are comfortable walking

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:53.280
<v Speaker 15>in the church, but the far left of the left

1:10:53.360 --> 1:10:56.320
<v Speaker 15>who are in their season of life for reasons I

1:10:56.400 --> 1:10:59.560
<v Speaker 15>don't know, and I don't want what I believe to

1:10:59.640 --> 1:11:02.600
<v Speaker 15>be for this country to get in the way of

1:11:02.720 --> 1:11:04.880
<v Speaker 15>what's gonna ultimately grow the Kingdom of God.

1:11:05.200 --> 1:11:06.559
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question. What's your name?

1:11:06.720 --> 1:11:06.840
<v Speaker 11>Matt?

1:11:07.080 --> 1:11:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Matt? Thank you.

1:11:08.680 --> 1:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's repeat what you said, because it's correct. The most

1:11:10.720 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>important thing in the world is to know Christ then

1:11:12.880 --> 1:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>make him known. The second most important thing, though, is

1:11:18.240 --> 1:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you can do the first thing. That's

1:11:20.880 --> 1:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>where I come in. You're focusing your life the number one.

1:11:23.840 --> 1:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm focusing a majority of my life of number two.

1:11:25.600 --> 1:11:27.519
<v Speaker 1>What I mean by that during COVID. They called the

1:11:27.600 --> 1:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>church non essential. Yet they left strip clubs, open, marijuana dispensaries,

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>home depot and lows. But they said the Bride of

1:11:33.640 --> 1:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Christ non essential. They always say separation church and state.

1:11:37.400 --> 1:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Why is it then that the state could come in

1:11:38.840 --> 1:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and shut down the church? You see, what we see

1:11:41.080 --> 1:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is that when we stop caring about politics, is the

1:11:43.400 --> 1:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>government's so big it starts persecuting our religious liberty and

1:11:47.080 --> 1:11:50.479
<v Speaker 1>our freedom. And it's not a contradiction. In fact, if

1:11:50.520 --> 1:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at the conservative agenda, it is it is far.

1:11:54.400 --> 1:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a far greater fit with a biblical worldview than

1:11:57.080 --> 1:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>anything on the left. And I'm sure you agree with that.

1:11:58.920 --> 1:11:59.040
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:11:59.280 --> 1:12:02.519
<v Speaker 1>God created man and woman. When does life begin? Strong borders?

1:12:02.760 --> 1:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It says in the scriptures Jeremiah twenty nine to seven.

1:12:05.320 --> 1:12:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Demand the welfare of the nation that you are in,

1:12:07.760 --> 1:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>because your welfare is tied to your nation's welfare. So

1:12:10.240 --> 1:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we should care about our nation. In fact, Daniel fastened

1:12:13.280 --> 1:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and prayed for his country Esther Mordecai Niemaiyah Jeremiah Joseph.

1:12:17.120 --> 1:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we are called to be counselors to the king.

1:12:20.400 --> 1:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We're called to be the moral conscious of a nation.

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And so if we want to know Christ and make

1:12:25.760 --> 1:12:29.639
<v Speaker 1>him known, we must have one ingredient of free society.

1:12:30.280 --> 1:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It is hard to know Christ than make him known

1:12:32.800 --> 1:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in countries where the Gospel is not ought to be

1:12:34.680 --> 1:12:36.479
<v Speaker 1>told on the side of the street, like China or

1:12:36.520 --> 1:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>North Korea. And that's not an exaggeration. When Christians fail

1:12:40.080 --> 1:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to care about politics, politics will start caring about Christian

1:12:44.200 --> 1:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And we must understand that we are the recipients and

1:12:46.680 --> 1:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the inheritors of a country that was founded by Christians.

1:12:50.400 --> 1:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So the Gospel can spread. And so I don't think

1:12:53.240 --> 1:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a contradiction at all. I don't think that it's

1:12:55.840 --> 1:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>what's best for the country. I think is actually best

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for the kingdom. And let's pretend America. Let's say America collapses.

1:13:02.479 --> 1:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you know that well over ninety percent of all

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>international mission funding comes from.

1:13:06.720 --> 1:13:07.439
<v Speaker 2>The United States.

1:13:07.760 --> 1:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can believe it that most missionaries come from

1:13:10.320 --> 1:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the world's population. Here we are populating

1:13:13.160 --> 1:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the earth in Africa and South America with people who

1:13:15.760 --> 1:13:17.919
<v Speaker 1>love the Lord, that come with money, that come with resources,

1:13:17.960 --> 1:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that come with clean water equipment. If America were to fall,

1:13:21.479 --> 1:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the gospel would not spread as far in fact, the

1:13:23.960 --> 1:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>world is becoming more Christian because of America's wealth, our generosity,

1:13:29.120 --> 1:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and our track record to say that we're going to

1:13:31.160 --> 1:13:33.599
<v Speaker 1>stand for our fellow men and love our neighbor as ourselves.

1:13:33.680 --> 1:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>So I don't see any contradiction. I just see a

1:13:36.320 --> 1:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>difference in the same mission. Your mission is first and

1:13:38.920 --> 1:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>foremost to win people of Christ. I try to do

1:13:40.640 --> 1:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that every day. But my mission is to make sure

1:13:42.800 --> 1:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can do that without being arrest that are

1:13:44.840 --> 1:13:45.599
<v Speaker 1>thrown in a gulag.

1:13:46.400 --> 1:13:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, God, bless you.

1:13:48.240 --> 1:13:49.640
<v Speaker 16>And I just wanted to ask you, because I'm a

1:13:49.640 --> 1:13:51.560
<v Speaker 16>big Catholic, I wanted to ask you how important do

1:13:51.600 --> 1:13:53.679
<v Speaker 16>you think religion is in this in this day and age?

1:13:53.880 --> 1:13:54.439
<v Speaker 2>Very important?

1:13:54.520 --> 1:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean as America becomes more secular, and as

1:13:57.360 --> 1:14:01.599
<v Speaker 1>the country becomes less godly, we become less free, more miserable,

1:14:01.640 --> 1:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>more depressed, more suicidal, more anxious, et cetera.

1:14:03.840 --> 1:14:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:14:04.240 --> 1:14:07.240
<v Speaker 16>So is this so I see that you that you

1:14:07.320 --> 1:14:10.160
<v Speaker 16>really do try to push religion. Are you're a Christian?

1:14:10.320 --> 1:14:10.519
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

1:14:10.720 --> 1:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I am a Christian. When did you grow up that way? Yes?

1:14:13.880 --> 1:14:14.679
<v Speaker 2>Did you just recently?

1:14:15.080 --> 1:14:15.120
<v Speaker 5>No?

1:14:15.240 --> 1:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I grew up in a passive Christian home,

1:14:17.200 --> 1:14:18.479
<v Speaker 1>gave my life to the Lord when I was in

1:14:18.520 --> 1:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>fifth grade.

1:14:19.120 --> 1:14:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, Hi, I'm wondering what your intentions are. So

1:14:24.200 --> 1:14:25.960
<v Speaker 5>I am new to you and this, and I was

1:14:26.080 --> 1:14:26.720
<v Speaker 5>just intrigued.

1:14:27.160 --> 1:14:30.559
<v Speaker 1>Sure, hear from different ideas and see where we agree

1:14:30.560 --> 1:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and disagree.

1:14:31.439 --> 1:14:35.800
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, what's like your purpose though? Like communication? Yes,

1:14:35.920 --> 1:14:38.320
<v Speaker 5>but like what are what ideas are you trying to bring?

1:14:38.479 --> 1:14:39.479
<v Speaker 5>Or like help people.

1:14:39.360 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Understand conservative ones traditional American ones?

1:14:43.400 --> 1:14:47.200
<v Speaker 5>Okay, like traditional conservatism or like modern conservative right wing

1:14:47.280 --> 1:14:48.360
<v Speaker 5>because they like switched.

1:14:48.520 --> 1:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't like labels, so you can ask me about

1:14:50.360 --> 1:14:50.719
<v Speaker 1>a topic.

1:14:50.840 --> 1:14:53.559
<v Speaker 5>Cool, So yeah, okay, I.

1:14:53.560 --> 1:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Think there's only two sexes. No, gender's infinite personalities. Life

1:14:57.000 --> 1:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>begins at conception. We should deport all the illegals, right.

1:15:00.600 --> 1:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>The m RNA gen altering shot called the vaccine killed

1:15:02.880 --> 1:15:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people and it's currently poisoning a lot

1:15:04.439 --> 1:15:06.879
<v Speaker 1>of people. Yeah, so these are just some of my opinions.

1:15:07.080 --> 1:15:10.080
<v Speaker 5>So you think it'll like make the country better?

1:15:10.360 --> 1:15:10.880
<v Speaker 8>Like what are you?

1:15:11.200 --> 1:15:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:15:11.400 --> 1:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I hope that number the number one. I

1:15:12.920 --> 1:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>want to support our amazing turning point USA chapter here

1:15:15.439 --> 1:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>where they feel out numbered and isolated. Number two we're

1:15:17.840 --> 1:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>promoting our event tonight. So I hope you guys show up.

1:15:20.160 --> 1:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Where's our event. It's like in the Montazuma Hall or something. Yeah,

1:15:23.400 --> 1:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that's great, Monta Zooma Hall, Montazuoma whatever. And number three

1:15:27.439 --> 1:15:29.599
<v Speaker 1>is I want to see where I might be wrong,

1:15:29.680 --> 1:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>strengthen my arguments, and anybody can say anything to me.

1:15:32.360 --> 1:15:34.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that free speech is the last best hope

1:15:34.560 --> 1:15:35.639
<v Speaker 1>we have in Western society.

1:15:35.840 --> 1:15:39.080
<v Speaker 5>Nice. Okay, Then I have a question about like women's

1:15:39.160 --> 1:15:42.800
<v Speaker 5>rights in America. I just want to hear what you think,

1:15:43.160 --> 1:15:44.920
<v Speaker 5>like where you think we're at, how you think we

1:15:45.000 --> 1:15:45.720
<v Speaker 5>could better? Yeah?

1:15:46.040 --> 1:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Can you just so I know where you're coming from.

1:15:47.760 --> 1:15:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Can you tell me what is a woman?

1:15:51.320 --> 1:15:54.719
<v Speaker 5>Oh, that's a great question. I would classify a woman

1:15:55.040 --> 1:16:00.000
<v Speaker 5>as somebody with a womb and or a vagina. Sometimes

1:16:00.240 --> 1:16:02.720
<v Speaker 5>people are born with either one or the other.

1:16:03.479 --> 1:16:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Good we agree, yes, So as far as women's rights,

1:16:06.840 --> 1:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't separate rights based on sex. So you have

1:16:11.200 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to tell me what you mean based on that.

1:16:14.240 --> 1:16:17.720
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Oh that's interesting. So do you believe that there's

1:16:17.800 --> 1:16:21.559
<v Speaker 5>a difference right now in like people's rights and no.

1:16:21.960 --> 1:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean there's male female differences, but there are

1:16:24.240 --> 1:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>no male rights. Or can you give me an.

1:16:25.760 --> 1:16:28.360
<v Speaker 5>Example Okay, like patriarchy, That's what I'm getting at. Do

1:16:28.439 --> 1:16:30.120
<v Speaker 5>you believe that we live in a patriarchy and it

1:16:30.240 --> 1:16:31.280
<v Speaker 5>negatively affects women?

1:16:31.760 --> 1:16:31.800
<v Speaker 4>No?

1:16:32.400 --> 1:16:32.439
<v Speaker 9>No?

1:16:33.040 --> 1:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, for example, men are more likely to commit suicide, yeah,

1:16:36.640 --> 1:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>more likely to die at work, more likely to declare bankruptcy.

1:16:40.160 --> 1:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Women are far less likely to be in credit card debt,

1:16:43.040 --> 1:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>far more likely to graduate from college, far more likely

1:16:46.200 --> 1:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to get a high paying job.

1:16:47.920 --> 1:16:50.960
<v Speaker 5>Do you think that that's a really good point. Do

1:16:51.080 --> 1:16:54.479
<v Speaker 5>you think that the suicide rates, or the depression rates,

1:16:54.520 --> 1:16:57.479
<v Speaker 5>and the bankruptcy rates that you just mentioned regarding men

1:16:57.680 --> 1:16:59.960
<v Speaker 5>have to do with the fact that men are pushed

1:17:00.200 --> 1:17:04.439
<v Speaker 5>to be less open about their emotions. There they're less

1:17:04.560 --> 1:17:08.439
<v Speaker 5>available to being able to communicate how they feel with others.

1:17:08.479 --> 1:17:11.960
<v Speaker 5>They're taught to be more violent and be more physically

1:17:12.000 --> 1:17:14.200
<v Speaker 5>harmful to themselves and others. And do you think that

1:17:14.280 --> 1:17:17.400
<v Speaker 5>pushes them towards suicide, depression, and bankruptcy.

1:17:17.560 --> 1:17:19.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the opposite. I think that we're teaching

1:17:19.680 --> 1:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>men to be metrosexual versions of their former selves.

1:17:22.200 --> 1:17:23.479
<v Speaker 5>What does metrosexual mean to you?

1:17:24.000 --> 1:17:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Indecipherable between a man and woman.

1:17:26.240 --> 1:17:28.920
<v Speaker 5>So it's a man and women to you. What's the

1:17:28.960 --> 1:17:29.880
<v Speaker 5>difference between them.

1:17:29.840 --> 1:17:31.519
<v Speaker 1>Well, a man is in you're looking at a man,

1:17:31.600 --> 1:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think I'm looking at a woman if I'm not.

1:17:33.120 --> 1:17:35.519
<v Speaker 5>Mistaken nice Yeah, yeah, that's funny.

1:17:35.760 --> 1:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's yeah, thank you, there's there's characteristics, archetypes. But

1:17:40.640 --> 1:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we have we have differences. There are significant male female differences.

1:17:45.200 --> 1:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think what, well, men tend to be more assertive,

1:17:48.320 --> 1:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>women tend to be more agreeable innately or taught innately,

1:17:51.240 --> 1:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And I wouldn't sayinly based on what science Well, just

1:17:54.800 --> 1:17:58.559
<v Speaker 1>for example, if we look at artificial intelligence, scanned over

1:17:58.800 --> 1:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand brains using a spec scan and was able

1:18:02.400 --> 1:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to determine male female differences ninety five percent of the

1:18:05.040 --> 1:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>time of different brain functions based on basic ganlia, amigdal

1:18:08.760 --> 1:18:09.680
<v Speaker 1>age cerebella.

1:18:09.760 --> 1:18:12.880
<v Speaker 5>Because interestingly enough you read twenty two, okay, fourteen to

1:18:12.960 --> 1:18:17.000
<v Speaker 5>twenty two. I read a study recently that before the

1:18:17.120 --> 1:18:21.680
<v Speaker 5>age of ten, brains are Neuroscientists are unable to be

1:18:21.720 --> 1:18:23.840
<v Speaker 5>able to tell the difference in gender based on the brain.

1:18:24.160 --> 1:18:26.799
<v Speaker 5>But at a certain point the social implications that children

1:18:26.880 --> 1:18:30.000
<v Speaker 5>are taught start making them act differently. But it's been

1:18:30.280 --> 1:18:33.439
<v Speaker 5>it's been shown that if a man or a woman

1:18:33.600 --> 1:18:35.680
<v Speaker 5>were given the same. Okay, have you heard that men

1:18:35.760 --> 1:18:38.240
<v Speaker 5>are they have more spatial awareness, like in their brain.

1:18:39.120 --> 1:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably true.

1:18:40.120 --> 1:18:42.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, So we learned that if women are given

1:18:43.000 --> 1:18:46.040
<v Speaker 5>a month of the same practices as children that men

1:18:46.120 --> 1:18:48.800
<v Speaker 5>are given or allowed to do, whether whether it comes

1:18:48.840 --> 1:18:51.920
<v Speaker 5>to what they're playing the media they're intaking, like what

1:18:52.000 --> 1:18:54.040
<v Speaker 5>they're told and how they're told to act, that women

1:18:54.160 --> 1:18:58.320
<v Speaker 5>have the same spatial awareness ability as men. So we're

1:18:58.360 --> 1:19:01.240
<v Speaker 5>finding that innately the brain is the same, but because

1:19:01.320 --> 1:19:03.760
<v Speaker 5>of the social constructs that we're taught on men and

1:19:03.800 --> 1:19:06.920
<v Speaker 5>women and how they're supposed to act, their brain ability

1:19:07.080 --> 1:19:10.719
<v Speaker 5>to activate certain parts changes. So by fourteen, the brain

1:19:10.880 --> 1:19:11.759
<v Speaker 5>does seem different.

1:19:11.960 --> 1:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>You're raised kids. Tell me, have you ever raised kids?

1:19:15.040 --> 1:19:15.160
<v Speaker 8>Now?

1:19:15.200 --> 1:19:16.599
<v Speaker 5>I have six nieces and nephews.

1:19:16.640 --> 1:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Though men and women, you couldn't be more wrong. If

1:19:19.280 --> 1:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you're even around a two year old boy and two

1:19:20.880 --> 1:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>year old girl, it's not a matter of what they're taught.

1:19:22.920 --> 1:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>The girls are running too the dresses. The boys are

1:19:24.680 --> 1:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>running to the guns. You know who agrees with me.

1:19:26.840 --> 1:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the leading feminists of the sixties and seventies,

1:19:29.040 --> 1:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Gloria Steinmann, who wrote Feminist mystique.

1:19:31.280 --> 1:19:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and I read that even she who was.

1:19:34.280 --> 1:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Like a hardcore gender is taught when she raised her kids.

1:19:38.520 --> 1:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>She was like, oh my goodness, there is a fundamental,

1:19:41.080 --> 1:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>innate difference between men and women. And it's not just

1:19:43.200 --> 1:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>brain structure. It's testosterone, it's estradial, it's estrogen production, it

1:19:48.520 --> 1:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is hormone levels, it is all And I could just

1:19:51.840 --> 1:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>prove it. If you sit down to a young with

1:19:53.960 --> 1:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a young lady, they're far more likely to talk about

1:19:55.880 --> 1:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>micro topics, and men are more likely to talk about

1:19:58.400 --> 1:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>macro topics.

1:19:59.280 --> 1:19:59.880
<v Speaker 5>What's the difference?

1:20:00.560 --> 1:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Great question.

1:20:01.120 --> 1:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So if I sat down with a young lady, she'd

1:20:03.040 --> 1:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>mean much more likely to talk about friends, relationships, and

1:20:05.880 --> 1:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>things that are very intimate to her. A young man,

1:20:07.880 --> 1:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we more likely to talk about the weather, sports, or

1:20:09.960 --> 1:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the stock market or politics. Yeah, and that's not taught.

1:20:13.600 --> 1:20:14.439
<v Speaker 2>That is innate.

1:20:14.560 --> 1:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>That is innate into our bioprogramming.

1:20:17.080 --> 1:20:18.320
<v Speaker 5>What is bioprogramming?

1:20:18.880 --> 1:20:19.639
<v Speaker 2>How we were designed?

1:20:20.320 --> 1:20:21.559
<v Speaker 5>What do you mean how we were designed?

1:20:21.560 --> 1:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean I believe that there's a creator that designed

1:20:24.960 --> 1:20:27.479
<v Speaker 1>us and that we're fearfully and wonderfully made. And you

1:20:27.600 --> 1:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>might not agree. I was just say how you were born.

1:20:29.200 --> 1:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I would even say, just to come to common ground

1:20:31.080 --> 1:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on that.

1:20:31.479 --> 1:20:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So the Creator chose that men and women have

1:20:34.320 --> 1:20:36.280
<v Speaker 5>separate roles and it's innate, well.

1:20:36.200 --> 1:20:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Not just separate roles, but made differently, and out of

1:20:38.640 --> 1:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>being made differently, you get different roles.

1:20:40.520 --> 1:20:42.840
<v Speaker 5>Right, So if science proves that the other way do

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:45.360
<v Speaker 5>you just do you rely on creator over science.

1:20:46.000 --> 1:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But science has done the opposite. So for example, in

1:20:48.320 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a Harvard study, they put fifty women in a room alone,

1:20:51.320 --> 1:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and they put fifty men in the room alone. H

1:20:54.680 --> 1:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>not relevant, but around twenty five right relevant?

1:20:57.640 --> 1:20:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So no, sorry, I'm actually having so much.

1:21:00.320 --> 1:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So if you really I'm fascinated you think that

1:21:04.680 --> 1:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>eight year old's brains are infinitely neuroplastic, but we'll.

1:21:07.560 --> 1:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Get to the back to them.

1:21:08.360 --> 1:21:10.960
<v Speaker 5>No, no, when they're like babies by eight years old,

1:21:11.040 --> 1:21:13.680
<v Speaker 5>you're already going through school and you've had so many relationships,

1:21:13.720 --> 1:21:14.639
<v Speaker 5>they're definitely affected.

1:21:14.760 --> 1:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>But again, if you were right, John Money would have

1:21:16.439 --> 1:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>been proven right, but we'll get that later. So which

1:21:19.600 --> 1:21:22.519
<v Speaker 1>that test isn't replicated so many times, and even the Dutch,

1:21:22.840 --> 1:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>who are like the most progressive on this, have gotten

1:21:24.840 --> 1:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>away from the idea of tabila ross. So that boys

1:21:27.320 --> 1:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and girls are are boring similarly with brain differences, but

1:21:30.800 --> 1:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll agree to discrain that. But the anyway, twenty five

1:21:32.800 --> 1:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>year olds were put into a room, okay, and they said, men,

1:21:34.960 --> 1:21:36.519
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about when they're alone? No surprise,

1:21:36.600 --> 1:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>sports and sex? Right, young ladies, what do you think

1:21:39.160 --> 1:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>about in the room alone? For thirty minutes, just by themselves,

1:21:41.880 --> 1:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>they replayed prior conversations that they had. For the record,

1:21:45.960 --> 1:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>no man in the history of the species has replayed

1:21:48.360 --> 1:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>conversations that we had and thought about them when we

1:21:51.080 --> 1:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>were alone in a room, Like, what conversation?

1:21:53.080 --> 1:21:53.280
<v Speaker 9>What was?

1:21:53.360 --> 1:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>This person said?

1:21:54.240 --> 1:21:58.599
<v Speaker 1>Women are far more relational micro than men, and that's

1:21:58.720 --> 1:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>just based on how our design is.

1:22:01.760 --> 1:22:04.960
<v Speaker 5>WHOA, I think that you just lied that. All men

1:22:06.080 --> 1:22:08.880
<v Speaker 5>don't think that's such a It's called a joke.

1:22:08.960 --> 1:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's a man somewhere that recollected on a conversation.

1:22:13.280 --> 1:22:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, I didn't know that in a dialect that's a

1:22:15.120 --> 1:22:17.400
<v Speaker 5>debate based on science, and you're talking about a study

1:22:17.439 --> 1:22:19.280
<v Speaker 5>that would you implement a joke that's based on it.

1:22:19.439 --> 1:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Humor is a tool of a rhdetorician to try

1:22:22.479 --> 1:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to get people, you know, to chuckle a little levity.

1:22:25.600 --> 1:22:27.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, thank you, I appreciate it. Thank you.

1:22:28.160 --> 1:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you a question. Do you think testosterone

1:22:30.360 --> 1:22:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and estrogen play into people's ability to have drive, ambition, feelings,

1:22:35.960 --> 1:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and do you think testosterone estern are important?

1:22:38.479 --> 1:22:38.679
<v Speaker 5>Yes?

1:22:39.160 --> 1:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So then if women are lower in testosterone and

1:22:42.120 --> 1:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>higher and estrogen and men are lower in estrogen higher

1:22:44.760 --> 1:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in testosterone, wouldn't that, independent of society's framing, play into

1:22:49.800 --> 1:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there are natural differences between the two.

1:22:52.120 --> 1:22:54.960
<v Speaker 5>I think that it definitely plays into the idea that

1:22:55.000 --> 1:22:57.439
<v Speaker 5>they're in natural differences, and I think there are natural differences.

1:22:57.479 --> 1:22:59.960
<v Speaker 5>I just think to an extent that as a society,

1:23:00.200 --> 1:23:02.840
<v Speaker 5>we've decided that men because they have more testosterone, and

1:23:02.880 --> 1:23:08.280
<v Speaker 5>we've known testosterone makes people more aggravated, that or what's aggravated.

1:23:08.320 --> 1:23:11.800
<v Speaker 5>I'll just leave it aggressive aggressive, Yes, sure, I take aggressive. Yeah,

1:23:11.840 --> 1:23:14.879
<v Speaker 5>thank you. That it makes people are men more aggressive,

1:23:15.120 --> 1:23:18.960
<v Speaker 5>that we've decided that that means that men are not

1:23:19.240 --> 1:23:22.880
<v Speaker 5>in control of their moral ability or their ability to

1:23:23.560 --> 1:23:26.200
<v Speaker 5>to choose what they're going to do. So it becomes

1:23:26.320 --> 1:23:29.600
<v Speaker 5>like men have more testosterone, but they still have the

1:23:29.680 --> 1:23:33.720
<v Speaker 5>ability to choose to treat people so better or with

1:23:33.960 --> 1:23:37.160
<v Speaker 5>less aggression like it's not it's like, oh, men don't

1:23:37.280 --> 1:23:39.920
<v Speaker 5>have the ability to make those choices. That's almost like

1:23:40.040 --> 1:23:42.439
<v Speaker 5>downplaying men's ability by saying that they just have to

1:23:42.520 --> 1:23:43.559
<v Speaker 5>give into their aggression.

1:23:43.560 --> 1:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not contesting that the mark of a true man

1:23:45.880 --> 1:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>is one who who can control himself. Do you think

1:23:48.479 --> 1:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that you could do you think there's a problem of

1:23:50.240 --> 1:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to turn women too masculine.

1:23:53.960 --> 1:23:55.800
<v Speaker 5>Turning women to masculine.

1:23:56.920 --> 1:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>What's masculine for you, Well, let's just say not agreeable, forceful, aggressive,

1:24:07.520 --> 1:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>aggressive in the best possible term, forward thinking, more macro,

1:24:10.520 --> 1:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>more visionary, less feeling based, more rational, more yearning towards

1:24:15.080 --> 1:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>reason and dialogue, and less towards compassion or the ethos

1:24:18.400 --> 1:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And what's feminine to you the inverse of that, So

1:24:21.920 --> 1:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>more on the emotion side, less macro, more micro much.

1:24:25.840 --> 1:24:27.840
<v Speaker 5>So women aren't just what men are, not.

1:24:28.920 --> 1:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>No, they're different sides of a species coin, right, So

1:24:32.479 --> 1:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you have human species, you have male and female, and

1:24:34.960 --> 1:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there's differences. So I could also posit it separately. A

1:24:38.960 --> 1:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>woman is more compassionate, a man is less compassionate, So

1:24:42.040 --> 1:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I could there's two ways to word it. But do

1:24:44.200 --> 1:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you think that there's a problem about trying to force

1:24:46.200 --> 1:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>women to be too masculine.

1:24:48.000 --> 1:24:49.360
<v Speaker 5>No, I don't think there's a problem.

1:24:49.720 --> 1:24:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well I disagree. We have a crisis in this country.

1:24:53.640 --> 1:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Why do you I'm curious, why do you think that

1:24:55.040 --> 1:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we have so many unmarried young thirty something women. It's

1:24:59.040 --> 1:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the most in the history you have recorded data.

1:25:01.200 --> 1:25:02.960
<v Speaker 5>That's a good question. I don't know if I've ever

1:25:03.360 --> 1:25:05.240
<v Speaker 5>pondered why we have unmarried.

1:25:05.000 --> 1:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that it's the young women are

1:25:07.479 --> 1:25:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the most depressed, alcohol addicted and psychiatric drug addicted in history?

1:25:12.120 --> 1:25:12.639
<v Speaker 5>Is that true?

1:25:13.080 --> 1:25:13.200
<v Speaker 8>Oh?

1:25:13.280 --> 1:25:15.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the most miserable they've ever been. I'm just curious.

1:25:15.560 --> 1:25:16.439
<v Speaker 2>What why do you think that is?

1:25:16.640 --> 1:25:18.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I guess I would. I would say that I

1:25:18.479 --> 1:25:22.360
<v Speaker 5>think it's because like the society that we live in, right,

1:25:22.479 --> 1:25:27.000
<v Speaker 5>like capitalistic, consumeristic where there's like constant processing and overconsumption

1:25:27.479 --> 1:25:30.320
<v Speaker 5>that includes like drugs, alcohol.

1:25:31.800 --> 1:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Over so women going into the workforce a lot could

1:25:35.000 --> 1:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>create a lot of depression for them.

1:25:36.800 --> 1:25:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, same with men.

1:25:38.080 --> 1:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but then shouldn't women, like I don't know, stay

1:25:40.479 --> 1:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>at home and have children and do what they're designed

1:25:42.439 --> 1:25:44.479
<v Speaker 1>to do that make them happier.

1:25:44.479 --> 1:25:46.559
<v Speaker 5>You have the more most depression that they have right

1:25:46.600 --> 1:25:50.160
<v Speaker 5>now in this country could make the same just made

1:25:50.160 --> 1:25:50.479
<v Speaker 5>for women.

1:25:50.960 --> 1:25:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm asking questions.

1:25:51.920 --> 1:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, maybe the men are upset because the women

1:25:55.040 --> 1:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're trying to date are more interested in taking

1:25:57.439 --> 1:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>care of cats and trying to become partner at the

1:25:59.479 --> 1:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>local law firm. Yeah, and they say, I don't want

1:26:01.439 --> 1:26:03.799
<v Speaker 1>to get married till I'm thirty, And maybe that creates

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense of despondency when a young male being raised

1:26:07.080 --> 1:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in this country sees everything rigged against them.

1:26:10.000 --> 1:26:12.120
<v Speaker 5>So do you not believe that women should be working?

1:26:12.320 --> 1:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I think I believe in liberty. I'm just asking,

1:26:15.000 --> 1:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>has there been an unintended tragedy where we have the

1:26:19.160 --> 1:26:22.559
<v Speaker 1>most financially successful thirty to thirty five year old cohort

1:26:22.600 --> 1:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of young women in history?

1:26:24.320 --> 1:26:24.439
<v Speaker 7>Men?

1:26:25.479 --> 1:26:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, again, the women's history.

1:26:27.400 --> 1:26:29.479
<v Speaker 5>Like men and women are and depressed.

1:26:29.640 --> 1:26:31.479
<v Speaker 1>The women are far more depressed than men. The men

1:26:31.479 --> 1:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>are depressed.

1:26:32.000 --> 1:26:33.719
<v Speaker 5>But you just said that the men were more depressed

1:26:33.720 --> 1:26:34.439
<v Speaker 5>and that's why they're.

1:26:34.640 --> 1:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>They're more suicidal, and they're largely more suicidal.

1:26:37.160 --> 1:26:40.040
<v Speaker 5>They're more suicidal, but they're less No, they're.

1:26:39.880 --> 1:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>More successful at committing suicide than women.

1:26:42.240 --> 1:26:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Oh, that's a big difference.

1:26:43.400 --> 1:26:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, women commit su women.

1:26:46.080 --> 1:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>No, it's true women try to commit suicide more, and

1:26:48.560 --> 1:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>yet women will go through three or four attempted suicide attempts.

1:26:51.400 --> 1:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Men usual in the one.

1:26:52.439 --> 1:26:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You can look it up. It's just the way it is.

1:26:54.160 --> 1:26:57.719
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just curious, what is it about the thirty

1:26:57.760 --> 1:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to thirty five year old female. Do you think there

1:27:00.280 --> 1:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>might be something missing? Do you think that there's like

1:27:02.200 --> 1:27:04.519
<v Speaker 1>this biological urge to get married and procreate that we

1:27:04.600 --> 1:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>might have been suppressing because it is the least child

1:27:07.280 --> 1:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the childless, least married cohort in the history of

1:27:10.479 --> 1:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the country.

1:27:11.479 --> 1:27:15.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I believe that marriage and reproduction are beautiful things.

1:27:15.920 --> 1:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I do.

1:27:16.520 --> 1:27:18.559
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we should encourage it more for young women?

1:27:20.439 --> 1:27:23.960
<v Speaker 5>I think we could encourage like a deeper understanding of

1:27:24.000 --> 1:27:27.920
<v Speaker 5>people's individual sense of self and then through that, if

1:27:27.960 --> 1:27:31.400
<v Speaker 5>people can better understand their wants and needs and become

1:27:31.479 --> 1:27:33.680
<v Speaker 5>more self aware about who they are and what they need,

1:27:33.760 --> 1:27:36.640
<v Speaker 5>that ultimately they would lead them to like better and

1:27:36.760 --> 1:27:41.040
<v Speaker 5>more efficient decision making for themselves. Okay, whether or not

1:27:41.120 --> 1:27:41.719
<v Speaker 5>that means marriage.

1:27:41.800 --> 1:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Last question you posited this, how would you define the patriarchy?

1:27:45.360 --> 1:27:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Oh, the patriarchy so patriarchy like the epistemology of the.

1:27:50.000 --> 1:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Word, or just like if do you believe it exists

1:27:52.280 --> 1:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in the country today, or yeah, I.

1:27:54.200 --> 1:27:58.720
<v Speaker 5>Believe patriarchy exists. Patriarchy comes from poter, right. Potter means

1:27:58.800 --> 1:28:03.800
<v Speaker 5>father in Latin, so patriarchy is father over or men over,

1:28:04.000 --> 1:28:06.840
<v Speaker 5>so it's like a men ruling, right. So we see

1:28:06.880 --> 1:28:09.320
<v Speaker 5>it in the fact that God or the divinity is

1:28:09.360 --> 1:28:13.320
<v Speaker 5>represented as men, which was only happened like halfway through

1:28:13.360 --> 1:28:16.080
<v Speaker 5>the history of humans, so it was like a matrilineal

1:28:16.200 --> 1:28:20.040
<v Speaker 5>matriarchy society for a while. We see it in the

1:28:20.120 --> 1:28:24.240
<v Speaker 5>fact that women take men's last name. We see it

1:28:25.000 --> 1:28:29.679
<v Speaker 5>in the way that in the way that men are viewed,

1:28:30.200 --> 1:28:33.280
<v Speaker 5>or like men view women, and how women kind of

1:28:33.360 --> 1:28:36.800
<v Speaker 5>have to adhere to the way that men want them

1:28:36.920 --> 1:28:38.960
<v Speaker 5>to be portrayed. And I agree with you that porn

1:28:39.120 --> 1:28:42.120
<v Speaker 5>is what would you say, toxic? Toxic? Yeah, And I

1:28:42.160 --> 1:28:45.160
<v Speaker 5>think that's an aspect of the patriarchy, right, Like if

1:28:45.200 --> 1:28:47.680
<v Speaker 5>you go on a porn website, which I'm sure you

1:28:47.800 --> 1:28:48.920
<v Speaker 5>haven't in a while, but.

1:28:49.840 --> 1:28:52.599
<v Speaker 1>To be addicted though, yeah, woll could I encourage everyone

1:28:52.680 --> 1:28:53.679
<v Speaker 1>to break free of that addiction?

1:28:53.840 --> 1:28:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1:28:54.200 --> 1:28:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Me too, Yeah, me too. That's great, proud of you

1:28:57.439 --> 1:29:00.840
<v Speaker 5>for that one. Yeah, but if you go on a

1:29:00.960 --> 1:29:03.880
<v Speaker 5>porn website, you can see that, like the view of

1:29:03.960 --> 1:29:06.200
<v Speaker 5>all of the porn is from the perspective of a man,

1:29:06.360 --> 1:29:08.639
<v Speaker 5>and it's of a woman, and these kinds of aspects

1:29:08.720 --> 1:29:11.479
<v Speaker 5>show that right now we live in a society where

1:29:11.520 --> 1:29:14.880
<v Speaker 5>it's it's a man's view, it's men over, so like

1:29:15.000 --> 1:29:16.040
<v Speaker 5>we're all taking on.

1:29:16.680 --> 1:29:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thank you for that first.

1:29:19.960 --> 1:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>On the porn thing, eighty five percent of people that

1:29:21.640 --> 1:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>consume porn or men, so they're obviously going to shoot

1:29:24.000 --> 1:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that is more attuned to men.

1:29:26.080 --> 1:29:27.479
<v Speaker 1>For example, what if women?

1:29:27.600 --> 1:29:29.920
<v Speaker 5>What if it was shooted for women, and then.

1:29:30.520 --> 1:29:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Then they would change, they would change the perspective because

1:29:32.720 --> 1:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they're they're in it to make money. The same reason

1:29:34.920 --> 1:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>why lifetime movies don't have rock and roll music and

1:29:37.800 --> 1:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they tend to be very like uplifting, flowery, emotional based,

1:29:41.040 --> 1:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and hyper feminine in the writing because most people that

1:29:43.960 --> 1:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>watch lifetime movies are women.

1:29:45.520 --> 1:29:46.519
<v Speaker 5>What's lifetime movie?

1:29:46.840 --> 1:29:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

1:29:47.120 --> 1:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>A lifetime movie is like a field good movie on

1:29:49.240 --> 1:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>cable TV that has like a very poorly written narrative

1:29:52.320 --> 1:29:53.799
<v Speaker 1>and usually ends in some sort.

1:29:53.640 --> 1:29:54.760
<v Speaker 5>Of like re mark.

1:29:54.960 --> 1:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah like homek Yeah, yeah, that's that's the best way

1:29:57.120 --> 1:29:58.519
<v Speaker 1>I could I could got it. But thank you for

1:29:58.560 --> 1:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue. I appreciate it.

1:29:59.720 --> 1:30:01.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thanks, thanks you too.

1:30:01.360 --> 1:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, good luck.

1:30:02.280 --> 1:30:02.559
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

1:30:05.479 --> 1:30:05.759
<v Speaker 4>Sorry.

1:30:05.880 --> 1:30:08.000
<v Speaker 17>Just to clarify, I'm not a very big fan. I'm

1:30:08.000 --> 1:30:10.200
<v Speaker 17>aware of Turning Point in USA, but I don't watch

1:30:10.200 --> 1:30:13.600
<v Speaker 17>a lot of stuff. I don't really have like a

1:30:13.640 --> 1:30:16.400
<v Speaker 17>theological or political question. I have more of a question

1:30:16.479 --> 1:30:19.920
<v Speaker 17>about like dialogue and like the purpose of kind of

1:30:20.000 --> 1:30:23.840
<v Speaker 17>these meetings, because looking into Turning Point us say, it's

1:30:23.840 --> 1:30:26.400
<v Speaker 17>really just an organization that's meant to like spread awareness

1:30:26.439 --> 1:30:30.640
<v Speaker 17>of like your political beliefs, being like pro Christian, pro

1:30:33.000 --> 1:30:36.840
<v Speaker 17>Republican Party, more Trump, I guess. But my question is,

1:30:37.040 --> 1:30:40.000
<v Speaker 17>do you think that this platform or like this discussion

1:30:40.120 --> 1:30:43.479
<v Speaker 17>of like politics in this way is useful because, like,

1:30:43.680 --> 1:30:45.679
<v Speaker 17>for example, the guy that you talked to a little

1:30:45.680 --> 1:30:49.000
<v Speaker 17>bit ago about vaccines, you had a lot of stuff

1:30:49.040 --> 1:30:51.200
<v Speaker 17>to say to him that he couldn't really counteract in

1:30:51.240 --> 1:30:53.680
<v Speaker 17>that moment, because just coming from it, you are a

1:30:53.760 --> 1:30:56.120
<v Speaker 17>professional that this is your job, you walk around doing this,

1:30:56.640 --> 1:30:58.880
<v Speaker 17>and so you just have more facts readily available that

1:30:58.920 --> 1:31:02.800
<v Speaker 17>aren't necessarily very fiable. So it's kind of hard to

1:31:02.920 --> 1:31:06.519
<v Speaker 17>argue a point, whether it's right or wrong, and whether

1:31:06.600 --> 1:31:10.439
<v Speaker 17>or not you have the equipment to do so. If

1:31:10.479 --> 1:31:13.719
<v Speaker 17>you just automatically have points that we can't really verify.

1:31:13.840 --> 1:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You guys are welcome to bring phones or notes or

1:31:15.720 --> 1:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>phone a friend. Well, yeah, but then you bring a professor. Toot,

1:31:19.640 --> 1:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Go bring a professor, bring to bring the whole. I'll

1:31:21.720 --> 1:31:26.519
<v Speaker 1>debate them all. No, go find a professor, bring them down,

1:31:26.560 --> 1:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and let's debate whatever you want. I mean, I meaning

1:31:29.160 --> 1:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like yes, to answer your question. You're coming this in

1:31:30.720 --> 1:31:32.439
<v Speaker 1>a good way. I do think this is effective. Look

1:31:32.439 --> 1:31:35.479
<v Speaker 1>at the crowd you've already assembled. And I think that

1:31:35.600 --> 1:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>free speech is a bedrock of American society. And to

1:31:38.400 --> 1:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to pursue truth and find out we agree

1:31:41.200 --> 1:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or disagree, or have my assumptions challenged. And I do

1:31:44.400 --> 1:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this all from memory. I don't have any notes here.

1:31:46.200 --> 1:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>You guys are welcome. You're not professionals. You're able to

1:31:48.439 --> 1:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>bring whatever you want. But yeah, look, I think that

1:31:51.560 --> 1:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on this campus, especially it is a predominantly homogeneous left

1:31:56.320 --> 1:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>wing campus, especially amongst the professors, And to have a

1:31:59.080 --> 1:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>conservative be able to sit here and take adversarial questions.

1:32:02.720 --> 1:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it also gives confidence to other conservatives here

1:32:05.040 --> 1:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on campus to speak up when they might hear something

1:32:07.080 --> 1:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they disagree about, or give them conviction to maybe say hey,

1:32:10.400 --> 1:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree with that, and so I think that

1:32:12.120 --> 1:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of value.

1:32:13.280 --> 1:32:18.000
<v Speaker 17>Okay, just one more question on the meeting itself, because

1:32:18.000 --> 1:32:20.600
<v Speaker 17>I understand the point of like kind of validating conservatives

1:32:20.880 --> 1:32:23.439
<v Speaker 17>ability to talk. Obviously, we don't want to just kind

1:32:23.439 --> 1:32:25.800
<v Speaker 17>of shut them up. That's not a very good course

1:32:25.840 --> 1:32:29.479
<v Speaker 17>for dialoguee Yeah, But I think at the same time

1:32:29.960 --> 1:32:32.920
<v Speaker 17>it's also these are all posted on the internet, right.

1:32:33.240 --> 1:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, they're posted in its entirety. Yes, yeah, correct, But

1:32:37.040 --> 1:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as long as unless somebody says you know something that

1:32:39.840 --> 1:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you're insane.

1:32:40.800 --> 1:32:43.880
<v Speaker 17>But usually for again, as someone who doesn't watch Turning

1:32:43.920 --> 1:32:46.400
<v Speaker 17>point us say, the only thing I see from talks

1:32:46.479 --> 1:32:48.240
<v Speaker 17>like this and similar to like I don't know if

1:32:48.280 --> 1:32:52.040
<v Speaker 17>you associate with like Steven Crowder or but he has

1:32:52.240 --> 1:32:54.760
<v Speaker 17>very similar like come and talk talk about these things.

1:32:55.000 --> 1:32:56.920
<v Speaker 17>The only thing I ever really see from that is

1:32:57.680 --> 1:33:01.000
<v Speaker 17>more sensationalized conversations like shutting down.

1:33:01.320 --> 1:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes I feel like this dialogue can become Yeah,

1:33:04.160 --> 1:33:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, you could look at my YouTube channel.

1:33:05.720 --> 1:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>We post hour long clips of these deals, so you

1:33:08.439 --> 1:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>see the clips because they lead to the longer form,

1:33:10.800 --> 1:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but both are posted for sure.

1:33:12.479 --> 1:33:13.920
<v Speaker 17>Do you think it's because it leads to the longer

1:33:14.000 --> 1:33:16.759
<v Speaker 17>form or it's it's easier to watch and more entertaining.

1:33:17.280 --> 1:33:21.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you're competing for eyeballs against literal pornography, Hulu, Netflix,

1:33:21.680 --> 1:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and sports. So when people are wont to engage with

1:33:24.200 --> 1:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>content around politics, you're trying to win people over, right,

1:33:27.520 --> 1:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But also we want to have integrity for the conversations

1:33:30.320 --> 1:33:31.599
<v Speaker 1>that we have, which is what we do with our

1:33:31.600 --> 1:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our YouTube videos and our longer form content.

1:33:33.960 --> 1:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So okay, thank you very much, appreciate it, keep watching, man,

1:33:37.040 --> 1:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Are you a Satanist?

1:33:40.120 --> 1:33:41.760
<v Speaker 18>No, it's I know, I know, Satan's not real.

1:33:41.800 --> 1:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that Oh okay, yeah, no, Satan is very real.

1:33:44.320 --> 1:33:45.439
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you can put the mic up.

1:33:46.560 --> 1:33:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Satan is very It.

1:33:47.400 --> 1:33:49.000
<v Speaker 18>Does relate to I wanted to ask. I wanted to

1:33:49.040 --> 1:33:50.679
<v Speaker 18>ask like, well, first, are you a Christian?

1:33:51.800 --> 1:33:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Very very much so?

1:33:52.520 --> 1:33:54.479
<v Speaker 18>And I wanted to ask like, like, why is that exactly?

1:33:54.680 --> 1:33:56.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Jesus saved my life. I'm a sinner.

1:33:56.720 --> 1:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Fall short of the glory of God, gave my life

1:33:58.360 --> 1:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to Christ's most important decision I ever made.

1:34:00.120 --> 1:34:01.479
<v Speaker 18>So you believe the Bible is real?

1:34:01.640 --> 1:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I believe the Bible is true and real.

1:34:03.520 --> 1:34:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Why is that?

1:34:05.360 --> 1:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I could give you the technical answer. There's never

1:34:07.240 --> 1:34:09.519
<v Speaker 1>been an archaeological discovery that has contradicted the truth of

1:34:09.560 --> 1:34:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the Bible. We know everything the Bible, as far as

1:34:12.560 --> 1:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the kings, as far as the succession of Israeli rulers,

1:34:15.320 --> 1:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Jewish people being put in exile to be

1:34:17.479 --> 1:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>put back into the land of Jerusalem, to the destruction

1:34:20.040 --> 1:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Temple in eighty seventy.

1:34:21.120 --> 1:34:21.800
<v Speaker 2>All that checks out.

1:34:22.080 --> 1:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>There's never been a discovery that's contradicted it. From King

1:34:24.720 --> 1:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Hezekiah to King Cyrus, to Nehemayah to Zuribebel, to this

1:34:28.200 --> 1:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>destruction of the creation of the Second Temple, and then

1:34:30.920 --> 1:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of course the wisdom. There's not a truth of the

1:34:32.720 --> 1:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Bible that if you apply to your life, your life

1:34:34.280 --> 1:34:37.240
<v Speaker 1>does not improved dramatically. And then finally we have the

1:34:37.320 --> 1:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>most accurate and transparent, the most historically robust account. I

1:34:42.560 --> 1:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>should say that one can have of the most important

1:34:46.080 --> 1:34:47.599
<v Speaker 1>figure ever to live in the history of the world,

1:34:47.680 --> 1:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Jesus of Nazareth and Jesus of Nazareth, who was born

1:34:50.439 --> 1:34:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in virgin birth, we believe is the incarnation perform miracles

1:34:54.320 --> 1:34:58.240
<v Speaker 1>all throughout Juday and Samaria eventually confronted Pharisees, led to

1:34:58.320 --> 1:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a death that he did not deserve, was in the

1:35:00.400 --> 1:35:02.479
<v Speaker 1>grave for three days, and then rose from the dead.

1:35:02.520 --> 1:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And the resurrection is the is the pinpoint of my

1:35:05.800 --> 1:35:08.320
<v Speaker 1>belief that Jesus did rise from the grave so that

1:35:08.439 --> 1:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we may live.

1:35:10.240 --> 1:35:12.479
<v Speaker 18>So what about like the stories of Greek and Roman mythology,

1:35:12.520 --> 1:35:14.120
<v Speaker 18>do you think any of that is real? So then

1:35:14.160 --> 1:35:15.599
<v Speaker 18>what makes Christian mythology real?

1:35:15.960 --> 1:35:18.519
<v Speaker 1>Well, give me an example of Christian mythology that I

1:35:18.600 --> 1:35:20.559
<v Speaker 1>can do, like creation, so.

1:35:20.640 --> 1:35:23.400
<v Speaker 18>Like Genesis story of like David and Glive for example.

1:35:23.400 --> 1:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what's actually pretty easy to deconstruct. A sling is

1:35:28.720 --> 1:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>actually a rather lethal weapon, especially for someone in a

1:35:31.920 --> 1:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Judaian tribe that's trained to use a sling of a

1:35:34.080 --> 1:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>young age. And Goliath was a rather clumsy individual. And

1:35:38.200 --> 1:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're able to pinpoint a rock right between the

1:35:40.439 --> 1:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>temple lobe, you can effectively kill or lobotomize an individual.

1:35:44.640 --> 1:35:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's hardly mythology, all.

1:35:46.200 --> 1:35:48.120
<v Speaker 18>Right, So what about what about the story of Satan's fall?

1:35:48.200 --> 1:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Then what about in Ezekiel. Yeah, so that's not mythology,

1:35:52.560 --> 1:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>but that is theology. So in the story of Satan's fall,

1:35:56.400 --> 1:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in the later books of Ezekiel, we are told that

1:35:59.560 --> 1:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>God the heavens and the earth. God created the angels,

1:36:02.000 --> 1:36:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and there was a rebellious angel, Lucifer, who led a

1:36:04.520 --> 1:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>rebellion against God and brought one third of the angels

1:36:07.120 --> 1:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>with him and then created what is now is the underworld.

1:36:09.600 --> 1:36:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Is the best Hebraic interpretation of that which we now

1:36:12.360 --> 1:36:14.559
<v Speaker 1>know as hell. I could go through every single story

1:36:14.640 --> 1:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Jonah and the whale parting of the Red Sea, right

1:36:16.920 --> 1:36:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Ahab on Mount Karma with Elijah. Here's my answer. If

1:36:20.520 --> 1:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Genesis won one and the Resurrection is true, anything in

1:36:24.040 --> 1:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bible is possible. You're looking at the greatest miracle.

1:36:27.400 --> 1:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>The greatest miracle is creation. The fact that we have

1:36:30.400 --> 1:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>an ordered, intelligible world where we can exist and that

1:36:35.600 --> 1:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>human beings are able to flourish.

1:36:37.760 --> 1:36:38.599
<v Speaker 2>That is a miracle.

1:36:38.680 --> 1:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>In the beginning, God created the heavens of the earth

1:36:40.400 --> 1:36:42.439
<v Speaker 1>and Hebrew. That is better sheet in the beginning. And

1:36:42.479 --> 1:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>then the fact that Jesus rose from the dead and

1:36:44.400 --> 1:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I say, how do you know that Jesus rose from

1:36:45.880 --> 1:36:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the dead. Well, show me another historical piece of a

1:36:49.600 --> 1:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>story where so many people willingly died a brutal death

1:36:53.640 --> 1:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>for a lie. Every single person around him had everything

1:36:57.000 --> 1:36:59.519
<v Speaker 1>to lose, and yet they went to the absolute death,

1:36:59.560 --> 1:37:01.639
<v Speaker 1>from Paul to Peter to the half brother of James,

1:37:02.000 --> 1:37:04.639
<v Speaker 1>saying that Jesus is Lord. Jesus rose from the dead.

1:37:04.720 --> 1:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention, if you were going to fake a story,

1:37:06.560 --> 1:37:08.599
<v Speaker 1>you would not use female witnesses. In the ancient world.

1:37:08.840 --> 1:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>In the scriptures it said that the women were the

1:37:11.080 --> 1:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>first one to see Jesus Christ. If you're trying to

1:37:13.240 --> 1:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>fake a story, you would never do that. Not to

1:37:15.120 --> 1:37:16.720
<v Speaker 1>mention the five hundred people that I saw Jesus after

1:37:16.760 --> 1:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he rose from the dead, doubting Thomas, and then the

1:37:18.640 --> 1:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>later church that lived under persecution under the belief that

1:37:22.240 --> 1:37:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ was the son of God.

1:37:24.720 --> 1:37:26.360
<v Speaker 18>Our one loss goes. So do you think do you

1:37:26.400 --> 1:37:28.320
<v Speaker 18>think Christiania should be forced onto everybody?

1:37:28.439 --> 1:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>No? No, I don't believe Christiania should be forced. Then

1:37:31.080 --> 1:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not love, it's rape. So we believe that God

1:37:33.880 --> 1:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>loves you, so he will not force you. And so

1:37:36.000 --> 1:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>if you reject God, you will go to Hell. I

1:37:38.240 --> 1:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>hope that's not the case for you, guys, because you

1:37:39.920 --> 1:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>can give Jesus Christ so you can live life eternal.

1:37:42.120 --> 1:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's a love story, not a forced story. And

1:37:44.439 --> 1:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's this option in front of you. Will you

1:37:46.200 --> 1:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>surrender in front of the cross? The cross is this

1:37:48.320 --> 1:37:51.080
<v Speaker 1>idea that the perfect, the divine, came down and took

1:37:51.080 --> 1:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a human form and died the most brutal death the

1:37:54.120 --> 1:37:56.679
<v Speaker 1>ancient world knew the most tortuous, brutal death that someone

1:37:56.720 --> 1:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>could possibly know, and then rose in the dead the

1:37:58.720 --> 1:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>defeat deaths that you could live forever.

1:38:00.280 --> 1:38:00.880
<v Speaker 2>And so it's a gift.

1:38:00.880 --> 1:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>They're right in front of you. If you take that gift,

1:38:02.439 --> 1:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it transforms you from within, changes your life. You have

1:38:05.479 --> 1:38:08.280
<v Speaker 1>joy and happiness that you otherwise would not have. But

1:38:08.400 --> 1:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a conscious choice to reject that, and I

1:38:11.760 --> 1:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>hope you don't. And if you reject that, then you

1:38:14.439 --> 1:38:17.240
<v Speaker 1>will go where you want to go, which is in

1:38:17.400 --> 1:38:20.240
<v Speaker 1>absence and the furthest distance one can be from the Divine.

1:38:21.280 --> 1:38:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I go to college.

1:38:22.040 --> 1:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Campuses, and there's a lot of error. We're all sinners,

1:38:24.280 --> 1:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we are all live in error. We as Christians are

1:38:26.960 --> 1:38:30.599
<v Speaker 1>called to go into the public arena to correct error

1:38:31.080 --> 1:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>with truth. What is God's Planmen, I go on to

1:38:32.960 --> 1:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>college campus. I just believe I will only tell truth,

1:38:35.640 --> 1:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I will not compromise, and I'll love on the loss.

1:38:38.680 --> 1:38:41.519
<v Speaker 1>Purpose will give you happiness. You see, we live in

1:38:41.600 --> 1:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a country where they think that happiness is pleasure. We

1:38:44.760 --> 1:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>know that purpose is above all of this, serving God,

1:38:47.960 --> 1:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that we are made in this image, that there is

1:38:49.680 --> 1:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a struggle of good versus evil. Every day you get

1:38:52.080 --> 1:38:53.479
<v Speaker 1>to fight for what is good and what is true

1:38:53.479 --> 1:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and beautiful. God should be the most important thing in

1:38:55.920 --> 1:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>your life. Jesus Christ is your lord and says your

1:38:58.040 --> 1:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>most important pot Beyond that, it's getting married, having children,

1:39:03.240 --> 1:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>building families, leaving a legacy, doing.

1:39:05.840 --> 1:39:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Big and great things.

1:39:11.400 --> 1:39:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Taking the deep, but sometimes the difficult road is the

1:39:15.400 --> 1:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>way that you should configure your life. Getting married and

1:39:18.560 --> 1:39:22.720
<v Speaker 1>having children is a difficult but deep decision that I

1:39:22.800 --> 1:39:25.639
<v Speaker 1>hope every single of you make, because for every single

1:39:25.680 --> 1:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>one of you, there are a couple thousand students that

1:39:28.439 --> 1:39:31.400
<v Speaker 1>wish they could speak out like you do. Encourages a choice.

1:39:31.600 --> 1:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>We are no longer going to accept comfortable losing. We

1:39:36.000 --> 1:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>are no longer going to accept excuses from our elected officials.

1:39:41.400 --> 1:39:44.639
<v Speaker 1>We have more combined political power than they have ever

1:39:45.080 --> 1:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed us to believe. We are the party of people

1:39:48.040 --> 1:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that shower before work and shower after work, the people

1:39:51.720 --> 1:39:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that get their hands dirty, the people that protect our streets,

1:39:55.920 --> 1:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the people that built this country.

1:39:59.000 --> 1:40:00.800
<v Speaker 2>What can I do to say the country? Do you

1:40:00.960 --> 1:40:02.640
<v Speaker 2>answer that question every single day?

1:40:02.720 --> 1:40:06.479
<v Speaker 1>If you are doing the work to save this beautiful republic,

1:40:06.720 --> 1:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you are doing something that is bigger than you. America

1:40:14.800 --> 1:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is the greatest country ever to exist, period, bar none,

1:40:17.200 --> 1:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>is the greatest country ever to exist.

1:40:18.840 --> 1:40:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Right I'm

1:40:31.840 --> 1:40:33.880
<v Speaker 10>For more on many of these stories and news you

1:40:33.960 --> 1:40:35.760
<v Speaker 10>can trust, go to Charliekirk dot com.