WEBVTT - The Truth About Political Correctness | Ultimate Issues Hour 

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Life Audio. In today's episode of Timeless Wisdom.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I am going to discuss today political correctness. What is

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>it and why does it exist? To me?

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 3>The ultimate definition of it is tyranny with manners.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Tyranny tyranny with manners. What does that mean?

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, what I mean by that is people really don't

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 3>believe in the niceties of political correctness. They're basically forced

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 3>to be politically correct out of fear of lawsuits and

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 3>being fired or.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Being called a bad name.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 3>That's right, yes, right, or even prolin a president like

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 3>in Europe.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>That's coming up on Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Welcome

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Here thousands of hours

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of Dennis's lectures, courses in classic radio programs, and to

0:00:53.600 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles, go to Dennisprager dot com.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Or not to be.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 4>That is the question, where was God?

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Isn't God supposed to be good to love us?

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Does God want us to suffer?

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Ten years?

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 6>You're not yet?

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Why did you go there? Who are you?

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Rus?

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm God bingo yazi?

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Is that your final answer?

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 7>Our service has God bing ding ding ding ding ding

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 7>ding ding.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was nice to meet you God, thank you

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 2>for the Grand Canyon, and good luck.

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:42.199
<v Speaker 1>With the apocalypse.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Hi, everybody, this is Tennis Prager and this is the

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Ultimate Issues Hour. Every week this hour is devoted to

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>some great issue of life. I hope we have gathered

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>them up into some CD or downloadable thing, because it's

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>a it's a real course in life, and whether you

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>agree with me or not on any given subject is

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 2>truly secondary. These are great issues, whatever arena you come from,

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I am going to discuss today political correctness. What is

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 2>it and why does it exist? The term is used

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 2>regularly and it is an extremely important subject. Hence it

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 2>qualifies for the Ultimate Issues Hour. So what is it?

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Political correctness is and I'm giving my own my own

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 2>understanding of it. If you have a different one, you

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 2>are certainly welcome to offer it. But it is essentially

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the inability to state certain things, certain truths. See that's

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the key thing here, certain truths because they may offend

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>certain people or certain groups. Or There are two elements

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>to political correctness. It might be deemed offensive by some

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>members of some groups. And the other definition is it

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 2>might be painful for some people to recognize. There are

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 2>two separate categories. They may be related. One is hurtful,

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>the other is or offensive if you will, and the

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 2>other is just painful. And I will give you examples.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Please understand that political correctness must entirely be a matter

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 2>of truth. That can't be said lies that are offensive,

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>lies that are painful, can't be said not because they're offensive,

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 2>not because they're painful, but because they're lies. All right.

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 2>That's the issue here, and that is instrumental to the

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>whole discussion. It's going to be a difficult hour to

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 2>do because by definition I am going to offend certain sensibilities.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 2>My intent, let me say, at the outset is zero

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 2>to offend. Why would I want to do that? It's pointless,

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 2>it is, it just increases tension. I have no desire

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 2>for it. It is not the way I conduct my

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>life or my show. But it is inevitable to talk

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 2>about political correctness that if you give examples, somebody who

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 2>is politically correct will be offended. So let me tell

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 2>you in advance, that is the last thing I wished

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 2>to do. I gave an example. We talked about this

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 2>once when I spoke about stereotypes. So the issue about

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>there are two issues about stereotypes, not whether they're offensive,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 2>whether they are true, and whether you apply it to

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 2>every member of that group. All right, that's that's the question.

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 2>And number one is it true? And number two is

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the general Is the generalization true? But number two, do

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 2>you apply it to every member of the group. That's

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 2>totally wrong. That's totally wrong. That's the that's the reason

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 2>you can live with stereotypes and not be a bigot.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 2>You can say in general X or Y about a group,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 2>but that doesn't mean that every time I meet a

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>member of that group that applies. That's everyone is an individual,

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know if that applies, all right, So again,

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 2>let me let me make something clear. Political correctness. The

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>reason it is damaging is that it fights truth. It

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>is meant or designed to stop people from being offended.

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 2>And that's good. I don't there is no good in

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 2>needlessly offending people, of course not. But on the other hand,

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>it is a world built on lies if you can't

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>say certain things just because somebody or someone will be offended.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, So again there were two. Let me begin

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 2>with not the offensive part, but the hurt, the painful part,

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>all right. As an example, The best example of painful

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>truths that cannot be said and therefore become politically incorrect.

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 2>Has to do with the differences between men and women.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>In the nineteen sixties nineteen seventies, a lid was put

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 2>on truth telling about the sexes. The only thing you

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>could say about the sexes you could say really two things.

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>One you could criticize men all you like, patriarchy, sexism,

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera, machismo, anything you like. The other

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>is that you can say that there are that you

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 2>had to say. Essentially, there are no differences inherent between

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the sexes. The moment you spoke about inherent differences, then

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 2>you were then entering a painful truth. When the president

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>of Harvard, Lawrence Summers is now a major economic advisor

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 2>to President Barack Obama, when Laurence Summers at Harvard as

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>president spoke about the question, which he did interestingly enough,

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>as one who wanted to advance women, why are there

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 2>so many fewer women in the sciences and in math,

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 2>and he offered as a theory, said, well, it is

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 2>is we need to study whether or not there are

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>certain inherent factors in the way the brains of a

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 2>man and the brain, the brain of a man in

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 2>the brain of a woman function. That may be a

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>part of the reason that accounts for a fewer women

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 2>in the sciences, and especially in math and engineering. And

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm paraphrasing here. For that, he was essentially removed for that.

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.359
<v Speaker 2>Essentially he was removed from the presidency of Harvard University.

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 2>The politically correct professors could not tolerate what he said

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a woman. I'll never forget the MIT professor who was

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 2>present in the room, who said she felt nauseous, she

0:08:56.080 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 2>wanted to throw up. An MIT professor, she wanted to

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 2>throw up when she heard that. Why is this political correctness?

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Because he was talking about a truth that was painful

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>to hear that perhaps the brain of women militated against

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:24.479
<v Speaker 2>their pursuing math and engineering or some of the sciences.

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't find it painful. It doesn't mean a thing

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to me. The question that I have is only is

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>it true or false? It has nothing to do with inferiority.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 2>It has nothing to do with superiority. I'm awful at math,

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm awful at science and engineering. I don't feel inferior

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 2>My brain is not registered in that arena. So what

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 2>so I didn't pursue it, but the idea that it

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 2>might be. We know that men's brains and women's brains

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 2>are different. We know it. I mean, it's it's a

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 2>physical fact. So why would it be odd if somebody

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 2>had said, if a Harvard president had gotten up and said,

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>women are inherently more intuitive than men, would anybody have demanded?

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Would men have demanded that he resigned? Would a man

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>say and wanted to throw up? He'd either say, well,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>he's either right or he's wrong. Fine. Now, of course

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>that's not provable because intuitive is a subjective term, and

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 2>therefore it's not provable. Like the question about math science engineering,

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>it's not as empirically establishable. But there are many, many truths,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>and there were many opinions that can't be cited because

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 2>they are things that people don't want to hear. They're painful,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 2>not offensive, painful. For example, if I were to go

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 2>on a college campus and say, ley, young women, women here,

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I just want to tell you that I strongly advise

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>that if you find a wonderful guy while you're in

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 2>your twenties, get married, even if you're not ready with

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 2>your career, that you anticipate having because it is easier

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>to attract a man at twenty five than at fifty five.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I would be booted out of the college auditorium, even

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 2>though what I said was demonstrably true. Okay, because it's

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 2>painful to hear. So one aspect of political correctness is

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:35.479
<v Speaker 2>is it painful? The other aspect is is it offensive?

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll talk about that when we come back on the

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Ultimate Issues Hour on the Dennis Prager Show.

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:11:51.520 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Dennis Prager Show, the Ultimate Issues Hour.

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 2>The ultimate issue today is what is political correctness? And

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>it is so difficult because by nature, if I'm going

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, some people will be offended. It is

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the last thing I want to do. But it has

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to be grappled with. We have to try to understand it.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>If you differ with my understanding of it, then please

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 2>do call one eight Prager seven seven six. There are

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 2>two aspects to review here. One is that it is

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 2>a politically incorrect statement. Is a something true that is painful?

0:12:55.920 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 2>True that is painful is especially especially within a male

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 2>female context, about the differences between men and women, and

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it drives a lot of people crazy who have a

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>vested interest, for whatever reason, and I don't know what

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 2>that reason is, to believe that men and women are

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>essentially the same. And so when you speak about certain

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>truths that men are far more likely to see women

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 2>as sex objects than men to see than women to

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 2>see men as sex objects. As an example, not amen,

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>but men. It's so obviously true, yet it's for whatever reason,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 2>it is painful for some people to hear. I would

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 2>think it would be painful for men to hear, because

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't speak so well about men. And yet it

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 2>is women who have been taught to find that objectionable.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 2>And so any mention of differences that girls play with

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 2>tea sets and and dolls more readily than boys do,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>that is politically incorrect statement. Is it true? Of course

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 2>it's true, but it runs against it runs against what

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>is called political correctness, a way of seeing the world

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 2>that people wish were true. It's wishful thinking. It's political

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 2>correctness is a form of immaturity. It is wishful thinking

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that a childlike person would have, and adults should grow

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>up and realize that these differences, These truths are there.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's almost politically incorrect to say that people

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 2>are not basically good because it shatters a child like

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and childish view of humanity. Is basically good. So again,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 2>though I have to emphasize it, it has to be true.

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 2>If something is not true, then of course it's going

0:14:55.880 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 2>to be offensive. Of course, and even if it's true,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 2>some people may do it to offend and' but that's

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 2>a separate issue. The other is is so one is

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>painful and the other is hurtful. It shouldn't be hurtful,

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 2>but or and maybe the distinction between painful and hurtful

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 2>is a subtle one. Maybe you can just combine them

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>and that's fine. I'll give an example there, if one

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:29.359
<v Speaker 2>speaks about the greater rates of criminal violence among African Americans.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, now, the issue there becomes really whether or

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>not it is offensive. It is it should be clear

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>within context. If the purpose of a person is racist,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 2>meaning that somebody wants to make a charge that blacks

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 2>are inherently more violent, that is offensive. And it's a lie.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's got a double whammy. So it's and it's

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 2>offensive because it is a lie. It means you just

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 2>want to say something bad about blacks. But if one

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>wants to make a better society for both black and

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>white Americans or any other any other national group that

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 2>has blacks and whites in it, and where you have

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 2>this particular problem, then acknowledging the greater rates of violence

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 2>among among black males, and of course it's black males,

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 2>not black females, then that that's not it shouldn't be offensive. Rather,

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 2>a serious black says it's true, and we got to

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 2>work on it, instead of calling such a person names

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 2>like Uncle Tom. Look, it is to say truths that

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>are painful is very hard because you get you get

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 2>mulled for it. But nevertheless, my deepest belief is society

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 2>crumbles under lies more than any other single bad thing.

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Lies make society disappear, and so we have to fight

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 2>political correctness with all of our weapons. And our weapons

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 2>are truth. But truths that are stated with a noble purpose,

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 2>not to offend. Get that truth stated with a noble purpose.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>The only purpose of pointing out the greater rates of

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 2>violence among black males than among non black males is

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 2>to help society and to help blacks. That should be

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 2>the only reason you pointed out. If you point out

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 2>because you are just angry or you want to hurt blacks,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>well then that is offensive. There is such a thing

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 2>as offensive. The fact that I find political correctness to

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 2>be a lie and dangerous doesn't mean that there aren't

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 2>offensive statements you could make. Even within jokes. There are

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 2>ethnic jokes that are just funny, and there are ethnic

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 2>jokes that are cruel. It is not possible to tell,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, you cannot tell a joke that's funny

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 2>about lynching. Lynching is beyond the pale. There is no

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 2>funny joke. There is no funny Holocaust joke. You can

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 2>tell funny jokes about Jews, and by golly I have

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>in private. That's that's a separate issue. That's why you

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 2>have to know does the person wish to offend? And

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 2>there were certain things that are gratuitously cruel? You don't

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 2>you don't. You don't mock suffering, human suffering. You can

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>mock traits, but you can't mock suffering with me. That's

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a big deal. That's where there is ethnic humor I

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 2>can laugh at, and there is ethnic humor I cannot

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 2>laugh at the fact that there I mean the political correctness.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the most obvious one right now is you

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>can't tell the truths about Islamic terror. You can't even

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 2>use the word Islamic ad terror. You can't yet yet.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Are are you more likely if you are hit by

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 2>a terrorist in the West world today, or for that matter,

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 2>outside of Sri Lanka essentially, or outside of Columbia. I

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 2>mean there are there are non Muslim terrorist groups, obviously,

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 2>but internationally, the the the only international terror organizations are

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 2>are Muslim. I'm not saying their mainstream. I'm not saying

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 2>it's inherent to Islam. Those are separate issues entirely. But

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 2>you can't even say that even though it's true. That's

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the it's the war on truth about political correctness that

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>is dangerous, all right. I will take your calls when

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>we come back. This is a rather significant subject. Remember

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 2>the war against political incorrectness, the war on behalf of

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>political correctness, is really a war against truth. And you

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>can't you can't make a good and decent society based

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 2>on Lawes's an it advocates lying, that's what political correctness

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 2>in its essence is about. One eighth Prager seven seven six.

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 2>The ultimate Issues hour on the Dennis Prager Show.

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, Dennis Prager here, and I hope you

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 2>have been listening carefully. And is that right for a

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>talk show host to say, even because it's such an

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 2>important subject and so rarely clearly defined, And that is

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 2>political correctness. And the issue, remember, is ultimately not offense

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 2>or painful. The ultimate issue is truth. It's a war

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 2>against truths in the guise of not wanting to offend anybody.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 2>And even if the person really is politically correct, as

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 2>they're afraid of offending anybody, it's still a war against truth.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Lies about groups are lies, and they are defamatory in

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 2>their libels. That's a separate issue that's truly bad. Lakewood,

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey and Mark Kello, Mark, Dennis.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 8>Prager, Hi, Dennis, Hi. What I wanted to say was,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 8>I think that one element besides the blocking out of truth,

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 8>I think there's an element that's very negative for the

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 8>victims because they tend to what happens is is that

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 8>they tend to start defunding themselves in the terms of

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 8>the people who offend them, and they don't get a

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 8>chance to develop their own self positive self definition.

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 2>That's a very intelligent point, very intelligent point. That's such

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 2>an important point, as if the person's truth about the

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 2>group means it's about me, right, right, yes, very good.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Back to the example that I gave, and please forgive

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 2>me if you don't like this example. But if you

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 2>want me to use a different one, I'll use a

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>different one. But if one is talking about making a

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 2>better America and about crime, and one mentions that there

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 2>is a disproportionate amount of violence committed by blackmails, then

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 2>why would a black be offended? Now, if the person,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 2>as I said, if the person intends to hurt blacks,

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 2>then it's offensive. If the person intends to help blacks

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>and help America, it's not offensive. It's just a sad truth.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>But my caller makes a very interesting point. He said,

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's because the person hearing it internalizes it as

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>if you're saying it about all of us. But of

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 2>course not, of course not. And by the way, I

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>know he's right because so often I am misquoted as saying, oh,

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Prager said, all as for example, the men, women thing. Uh,

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, all women can't be good engineers. I happen

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to know a young woman who will probably be a

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 2>brilliant engineer. She's brilliant and uh, and she probably will

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>make a spectacular engineer. But it doesn't negate the truism

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 2>that most women don't don't for whatever reasons, and I

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 2>don't believe they're cultural want to win to engineering. Why

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 2>did so many women enter enter medicine? It was cultural

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 2>to be only only men went into medicine two generations ago.

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 2>All right one eight Prager seven seven six, Tampa, Florida, David, Hello, David,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager, Okay, thanks.

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah. What is political correctness to mean? The ultimate

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>definition of it is tyranny with.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Manners, tyranny, tyranny with manners. What does that mean?

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, what I mean by that is people really don't

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 3>believe in the niceties of political correctness. They're basically forced

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 3>to be politically correct out of fear of lawsuits and

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 3>being fired or.

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Being called a bad name that's right, yes.

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, or even thrown in prison like in Europe.

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 2>So is what of the manners the manners are among

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the tyrants or what is that? What you're saying right.

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 3>They use these niceties as manners, as good manners, pass

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 3>it off as good manners, when actually it's, like you said,

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 3>a war against truth. But it's more than that, because

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the only victims of political correctness are the white males.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 3>It's basically a war against the white male.

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's an interesting subject, and I think there's a

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of truth to that, since you can say anything

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 2>about the white male, and for whatever reason, there are

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 2>no politically correct problems with regard to him. That is correct.

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 2>You can say he's racist, you could say he's imperialist,

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>you could say he's macho, you could say he loves violence,

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 2>you could say he's patriarchal, and you're fine, that's right,

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 2>that is true. So there is a political correctness the very.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The very doctrine has an agenda, of course it is,

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>But my biggest anger is not its agenda. My biggest

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 2>anger is the war on truth that you are held

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 2>back from it. A reminder, by the way, that you

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 2>can get all of my shows in Pristine Clarity through

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 2>prager Topia back in a.

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Moment Dennis Jenny, Dennis Prager, do you have a question

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you've always wanted to ask? Dennis Prager. Well, now's your

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>opperity for upcoming Ask Me Anything episodes of Timeless Wisdom

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>with Dennis Praguer. We're inviting you to leave Dennis a voicemail.

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>He'll personally answer selected questions, and your question could be

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>featured on a future episode. Whether it's about faith, morality, politics, history, relationships, happiness,

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.719
<v Speaker 1>for simply navigating life, Dennis would love to hear from you.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Just call eight seven seven two four three seven seven

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>seven six and leave your question. Oh and be sure

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to include your first name and where you're calling from.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>That's eight seven seven two four three seventy seven seventy six.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>While we can't feature every question, Dennis will listen to

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>every voicemail. So call today you may hear Dennis Prager

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 1>answering your question on an upcoming episode of Timeless Wisdom

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>with Dennis Prager. And thanks for listening and supporting Dennis Prager.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 2>Love. You're listening to the Dennis Prager Show. This is

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the Ultimate Issues Hour. Every week at this time I

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 2>discuss some great issue of life. I wish I had

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 2>the list in front of me. Give you examples of

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 2>what we've done, and they're all available. By the way,

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>if you subscribe to Pregotopia, you get all my shows

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>downloaded a beautifully commercial, free, highest fidelity. Just go to

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager dot com, pregertopia dot com, or Prager Radio

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 2>dot com. That's pretty easy. Now, all right, let me

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 2>take some more of your calls. I'm talking about political

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 2>correctness and this is so important. It is truths that

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 2>cannot be said, that is in a nutshell what it is.

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 2>If it's a lie, then of course it shouldn't be said,

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>whether it's offensive or not. Lie shouldn't be said. But

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 2>if it's offensive, first of all, we should really do

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 2>a show on when people take offense. Maybe that's a

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 2>happiness hour. I don't know, but maybe it's a just

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 2>any hour, but we should put that down. People take

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 2>offense too easily, and it is It is a real problem,

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.479
<v Speaker 2>and it depends on what your what you want to

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 2>do with what you're saying. Do you want to hurt

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the group or do you want to help the group,

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 2>or do you want to just make a truth? These

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 2>are all factors in what we say. Let me take

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>some examples here from your calls in Ocean excuse me,

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 2>in Long Island, New York, it's Rachel. Hi, Rachel, Dennis Prager.

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 9>Hi, how are you.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm well, thank you.

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 9>I just wanted to say that I agree one hundred

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 9>percent with everything that you say about politically correct and

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 9>it's being the truth and people being afraid to hear it.

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 9>My question is when I have intellectual friends who are

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 9>on the left, and they would say, when when you

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 9>say that you have to ennoble, you have to when

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 9>you say something, it has to be for a noble reason.

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 9>How could you know that? I think that's what they

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 9>would counter. They would say, how do you know if

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 9>someone is being noble? And I'm wondering how you would

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 9>suggest answering.

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 2>That, well, you know it the same way you would

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:16.479
<v Speaker 2>know it. First of all, you don't always know it,

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>but you know it. A lot of the time, you

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 2>ask the person, why are you making the point? I'll

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 2>give you an example. There are people who have called

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 2>up my show knowing I'm Jewish, and they have said,

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, Jews are disproportionately represented in the media, to

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 2>which I immediately answer, you're right, what is the point?

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 2>And they they then they they have no answer because

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>in most cases, though the people who make that point

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 2>are angry at Jews for whatever reason. So that's not

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 2>a point to a noble that's because I'm just angry

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and I want to lash out. Of course, it means nothing,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 2>It has no effect. Do any of them use it

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 2>to further Jewish causes? I wish you know. It's the

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>last thing that they care about is to promote Judaism

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>or or or help Israel. That's that's the last thing

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>that most Jews in the media care about. So that's

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 2>an example, or or a whole host of example. But

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 2>if somebody says, uh, but by the way, it remains

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a truth. Jews are disproportionately represented in the media. The

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 2>question is why, why is the point being made? Just

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 2>as if somebody would call up and say, you know, Dennis,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 2>blacks are disproportionately represented black males and violent crime, I'll

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 2>say that is true. What is your point? Now, if

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 2>they have no point, they're just lashing out. But if

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 2>they have a point, therefore, what we need to do

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 2>is X, Y and Z to work within the black community. Uh,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to to uh, I don't know, to further fatherhood there,

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.719
<v Speaker 2>uh to to bring good values into the inner city.

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Then that's a good reason. So that's so you you

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>know the answer, Rachel. To answer your friends by asking

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the question why are you making the point?

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, they would say, why is the person who's politically

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 9>incorrect making them?

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right. So if the person making the politically

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 2>incorrect point needs an answer, here is why I'm making

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 2>the point. If they're just doing it to lash out

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.479
<v Speaker 2>at some group, then it is just anger.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 9>But if if there's an ulterior, a positive ulternation.

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's exactly right.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 9>Yes, that's right, okay, because that's that's always Their claim

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 9>is that there's no.

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 7>Way of nothing.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, but so ask that's all. There is a

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 2>way of knowing. Ask why do you make the point?

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 2>It's as simple as the great question. And I hope

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>it was a great answer. Let's go to uh, let's

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 2>go to Ron in Oceanside, New York. Hello Ron, Dennis Praeger.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Dennis, this is Oceanside, California. But uh, but uh right, idea, Listen,

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 7>I'm the Ocean Side Gangbuster. I run a side on YouTube,

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 7>and I have been involved in Neighborhood Watch reducing the

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 7>ethnic gang terrorism we're subjected to. And for many years,

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 7>the police would show up and if the person calling

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.959
<v Speaker 7>them was a white person, the police would shrug it off, like,

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, you need to be more reasonable and cooperative.

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 7>You need to stay inside or you might get hurt,

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 7>and then they would leave as well. I had confronted

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 7>the chief of police about that. He had me give

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 7>a presentation. I said, look, you don't give a break

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 7>to people because of their skin color. And I said,

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 7>what you do is you deal with the people causing

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 7>the problems regardless of their skin color. And crime is

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 7>down forty two percent in the last four years because

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 7>people are prepared to be more honest. Well, I go

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 7>to the city hall meetings. I raised my hands up.

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 7>I said, raise your hand if you've been terrorized because

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 7>you're white, and a lot of people look at me.

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 7>Some people raise their hands. People come up to me

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 7>later go look, I'm glad someone's bringing this up because

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 7>I can't. I got kids in the school. My wife

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 7>works for the city.

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, Well that's what I'm saying. You're saying

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 2>because people have been able to say people need to

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 2>be free to shay things without at the same time

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 2>wanting to hurt. If your point is to hurt, then yes,

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's not worth making. But if your point

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 2>is to say what appears to you to be true

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 2>and may not be true, let's find out. When Jesse

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Jackson said that if somebody is walking behind him in

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 2>certain parts of big cities, he hears footsteps and he

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 2>turns around, he sees it's a white man, He's relieved.

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Was he being anti black? Was he being? Was he being?

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 2>What was he being? He's being honest. It's a it's

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 2>a sad honesty. But it's not anti black. It's anti black.

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>If somebody ridiculously infers that to that black means violent,

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 2>that is idiocy. Not to mention bigotry and everything else,

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 2>but to say that there is that specific problem, it's

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 2>a good thing. It's a good thing. If Muslim leaders said, yes,

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>we do have a problem, God, the world would reach

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>out to them with and embrace them with respect and love.

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back at a moment.

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>You have a friend on whom you think you can't lie.

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 2>You are lucky man. If you found the reason to

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 2>live on and not to die you war lucky.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Man, mysel Bisconas, don't toss ten using step.

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, you're listening to the Dennis Prager Show.

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 2>This has been the ultimate issues hour defining political correctness,

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and the whole notion is a war against truth in

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the guise of a war against offending anybody. We shouldn't

0:34:56.080 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 2>defend gratuitously and people should not take offense easily, although

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 2>of course there are offensive comments that can be made

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 2>that are made Elgin, Texas, Tommy, Hello Tommy, Dennis Prager.

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 4>Hello, Dennis, how you doing.

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Hi?

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 4>They I want to tell you a little story before

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 4>I do. I want a preface by asking you to

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 4>go to chick dot com and you get a chance.

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 4>It's like a baby chicken chick dot com, and they'll

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 4>tell you the truth about the Roman Catholic Institution and

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 4>how the Muslim religion actually is a offshoot of it.

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, all right, right, don't sneak in other points

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>when you had another one to make.

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead, Hey man, hey, listen, I'm out from the north.

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm from the Chicago area and I moved to the

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 4>south here and I noticed the people down here don't

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 4>have a good sense of humor, they get offended, really

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 4>easy Northerners that kind of like to cut up and

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 4>crack jokes and stuff. And I had a guy at work,

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Puerto Rican from New York, and we hit it off,

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 4>I thought, and we would tell we'd tease each other

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 4>when we came on duty, and you know, he would

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 4>tease me and I tease him right back, and I,

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, I mean a fake was a lighthearted joke

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 4>about Puerto Ricans being clouset homosexuals, which I was just

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 4>didn't mean it.

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, it was just a joke, it's all it was, okay,

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and he got offended. Let me just quickly because of

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the time factor. We just have one minute to go

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 2>here on these jokes. Here is my view, generally speaking,

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 2>it is not worth telling people of other groups jokes

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 2>about their group. Okay, we can tell a in private,

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 2>that's fine. It's like, you know, it's my view of

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>like using swear words, I'm against it in public. I'm

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 2>also against it primarily generally in private. However, you talk

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>to your wife, you know, pillow talk, and you use

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 2>an expeltive, I don't think it's a pardicularly big big

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 2>deal when you're just emoting about something likewise, with these jokes,

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't make you a bigot if you confine it

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 2>to your home table. All right, where I remember there

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 2>was a time when they told school children report the

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 2>class if you're paying and told an ethnic joke, that

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make anybody a bigot. It is, but it is

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 2>not a wise thing to tell people at the workplace

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 2>jokes about their own group. Okay, if they invite it,

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 2>it's one thing. If you swap jokes, it's quite another.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 2>But you know, look, there's wisdom to in life, but

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 2>political correctness and jokes are separate issues. I'm talking about

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 2>truths about male female differences as an example, where it's

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 2>a very bad thing for kids to grow up thinking

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 2>it's the same thing to be a male and to

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 2>be a female. This has been the Ultimate Issues Hour.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for.

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Listening tomorrow on Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prieger.

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, here goes, my friends. The topic is when

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 2>one spouse has an affair. Those of you who have

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 2>listened to me over the years have heard in different

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 2>context when we've discussed micro subjects, and this is one

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 2>program that discuss discusses both the micro and the macro

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the personal and the social, global, philosophical, political, et cetera.

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 2>I have said on many occasions that I think it's

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 2>a very big mistake for a marriage to automatically end

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 2>because one of the spouses had an affair.

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm coming in, Dennis, because just yesterday I found out

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 5>my wife was having an affair for three weeks, so

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 5>I know that was that was that long. I found

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 5>out she met him through some kind of activity that

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:38.280
<v Speaker 5>she had a work, and.

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 6>The way she met him through through what at work, well,

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 6>they had they had like a small employed party and stuff,

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 6>and she met him and they went into a bowling

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 6>place and she met somebody around there, and you know,

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 6>she actually ended up kissing the person and she I

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 6>found out that she went out a couple other times.

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 2>You were told this by colleagues of hers. Is that it?

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 5>No? She told me herself.

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Join us tomorrow to hear more on Timeless Wisdom with

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Prager. Visit Dennispragger dot com for thousands of hours

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of Dennis's lectures, courses in classic radio programs, and to

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:23.719
<v Speaker 1>purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles. We want to take just

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a second to thank the team at Life Audio for

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>their partnership with us on the podcast. Go to lifeaudio

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com to find dozens of other faith centered podcasts

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and their network, including shows about prayer, Bible study, parenting,

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and more.