WEBVTT - Reclaiming Western Civilization

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>My book earlier this year is Real and Civilization, The

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Fate of the Jewish Nation, The Destiny of the West

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is a book, not, as the title would necessarily imply,

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just about foreign policy or anything like that. Rather, it

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is a book about the foundations the origins of Western civilization. Well,

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, there was at least one other

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>author out there who had something of a mind melt

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>with me, and that woman is Melanie Phillips. Melani Philips

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>is a long standing British conservative commentator, newspaper columnist, TV presenter,

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and also the author of the book that I currently

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>hold in my hands, in which I recently read myself,

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>The Builders Stone, How Jews and Christians built the West

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and why only they can save it now The Builderstone

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and my book is on civilization. There are some things

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that are a little different, I think Melani and I

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily agree on everything. We'll see if there are

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>any areas where we disagree over the course of our

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>conversation here in just a few moments. But certainly broadly speaking,

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we agree on the big questions. And the big question

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is essentially as follows in the aftermath of the Hamas

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>program of October seven, twenty twenty three, And not just

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the pagram, but the world's reaction to the Pagram, And

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>boy was that a horrific reaction. In the aftermath of that,

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>can the West recover? Can the West one understand what

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it is that which built it, which above all is

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a biblical inheritance. Can the West understand that? Can it

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>come to appreciate that? And can it come to fight

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>for that and take a stand for that? That is

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing, because the reaction to the program

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just quote unquote anti Israel or anti Semitic, it

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>was anti Western. When you are failing to distinguish between

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a culture that loves life and a culture that loves death,

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for a culture that flourishes and a culture that seeks

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>destruction subjugation. When you can't distinguish, when you are incapable

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of logical you are morally discerning between these two dichotomous,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>completely opposing forces, then you have lost the plot. And

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 1>if the West is to be saved, it must re

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>understand the plot at its most basic, rudimentary level. Because

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it was the Bible that gave us Western civilization. Sure,

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>there is absolutely a role to be played for some

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>no Biblical sources, namely ancient Greek and Roman Greco Roman thought.

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a role for that, certainly, no doubt about that, Aristotle, Cicero,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>any of the greats. But the West would not be

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the West where not for the Bible. It's not necessarily

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just free speech or the marketplace of ideas or the

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>economic market places in general. These things are important. There

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>are key features of moderny is something that Melani Phillips

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>emphasized in her book. But the core, the absolute bedrock

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of that which has made us great, and that which

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>alone can actually still make us great. The core is

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bible. That is these shared inheritance of Jews and Christians.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>That is, these shared inheritance of the original people of

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the book, the original folks led by Moses who stood

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>there at the base of Mount Sinai during the Revelation,

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the shared inheritance of the children of Issiel, the Jews

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and Christiendom, the great gentile offshoot that spread the message

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and civilized what today is known as the West. Jews

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and Christians should both be proud of the role that

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>their religions have played in the development of the West.

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>But if the West is going to stand up today

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>against the forces that seek to subjugate it, against intersectional wokeism, Islamism,

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and global neoliberalism. It's going to have to regain some

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>confidence and appreciation of what it once was and what

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>God willing will once again be in short order. Well,

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the end of the holiday season and it's the

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>time of the year where we are all having those

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>deep questions as to what should we believe, should we

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>believe in anything at all? What is the basis of

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>our civilization? All the fun things that we discuss not

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>just this on of the year, but oftentimes on a

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>day day basis here on the Josh Hammer Show. And

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>it's really a thrill to bring on a long standing writer,

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>thinker and commentator who's been saying and writing about these

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>very topics for many many years now, including most recently

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in the form of the book that I Hold in

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>my hands, The Builder's Stone. Melanie Phillips is the author

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of The Builderstone. She's also a columnist at Times of London,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>long standing British conservative commentator. I recently finished this book

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and thoroughly enjoyed it. So Melanie Phillips, thank you for

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>joining the Josh Hammer Show.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much, Josh, very good to be with you.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's really a delight. So I did recently finish

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this book, as I said, and I was struck by

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>reading it. Melanie, I think you and I had something

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of a mind meld for your book. In my book,

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Israel and civilization have a lot in common. There are

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>some differences, to be clear that they're not exactly verbatim

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>carbon copy, but very broadly speaking similar books written in

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a in a post October seventh milieu in this world,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the world where the world has been morally confused as

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>as to who to side with, not just between Israel

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and Hamas, but more broadly speaking, between civilization and barbarism.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>More generally speaking, Melli, I think I think one thing

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that I would like to kind of start in and

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to get our conversation started here. For a while, right

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of center partisans such as myself, perhaps yourself as well.

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how you would self described, but conservatives,

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think felt pretty reassured that we were unanimously on

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>the side of team civilization and not team barbarism. But

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately here in the United States there have been some

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>signs that not everyone who thinks of him or herself

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>as being conservative or on the right is necessarily part

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of teams civilization. I was told me that maybe you

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>could kind of just dive in unpack some of these strands. Here,

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>what is Western civilization as you can see and define it?

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>And then perhaps by extension, why do you think that

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>some folks who think of themselves as being on the

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>right seem to have lost the plot a little?

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Well, to me, western civilization is more than just

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a geographical area. Obviously, it consists very largely of the

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 2>geographical West. But to me, it's an idea, and the

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 2>idea is modernity. To me, the West became the West,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 2>as it were, in the way that we think of it,

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 2>when the modern world really emerged after the eighteenth century Enlightenment,

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 2>when we had the division of church and state, the

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 2>arrival of toleration of minorities, the development of what became

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 2>democracy and the democratic nation state, and that powered what

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>we now think of as the world, which was to

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 2>be the cutting edge of technology, of science, of reason.

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what I mean when I that's what I mean

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>when I talk about the West. Now, your second question

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 2>was what happened to the West and was that your question?

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 2>What was your question?

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's let's start there. I want to get into

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>also some internest sine fights happening on the right of center.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's let's start with why did conservatives?

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Why do conservatives lose the plot? Okay, so perhaps undlike yourself,

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I never thought conservatives had the plot. Ever, to me,

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 2>conservatives had lost the plot a long time ago. And

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>it's really the failure of conservatism, I would say, over

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 2>several decades, which has caused this situation to occur. Because

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>for sure, what has driven what we are now seeing,

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the eclipse of reason, the replacement of truth by power,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>ideologies based on power relations, and all those things which

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>from which I think in large measure the animus against

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Israel has developed. It was the left that powered all

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>that through their ideological preconceptions and obsessions. But we should

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>have been able to rely on conservatives to conserve, to

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 2>understand what was at stake, what was at risk, and

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 2>from where I was sitting, and I'm going back now

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 2>to you may be shocked to hear this, but even

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 2>in the time of Margaret Thatcher, when I was a

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>young journalist and I was working for The Guardian, and

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 2>it was considered by everybody on the left that she was,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, totally dreadful and so right wing and so on.

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 2>And it was around that time that I began to

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 2>realize something was going terribly wrong with the West, and

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 2>I decide did I realized that she didn't understand what

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>was going on at all, and that the right, the

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 2>forces of conservativesm And I'm really speaking from Britain because

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 2>from the perspective of Britain, because that's the country I

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 2>know best. But I think this kind of crosses over

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>to a large extent to what happened in America as well.

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not quite the same time, but what happened was

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 2>that this that when the Soviet Union collapsed, when the

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Berlin Wall fell, I remember conservatives in Britain saying, what

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 2>do we do now for an encore? We've shot our fox,

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>we don't have an enemy anymore. What banner are we

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 2>now going to march behind? And I remember the answer

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the answer was, we will march behind the banner of liberty.

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 2>And at that time, at that point, I thought, oh, no,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 2>they don't get it, because if they are adopting liberty

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 2>as their light motif, they are going to occupy exactly

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the same patch of ideological ground as the left. The

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 2>left did liberty in the social sphere, lifestyle choice. Everybody

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>makes up their own lifestyle. Nobody can tell anybody that

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 2>their lifestyle or culture is better than anyone else, all

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 2>that sort of stuff. It's basically to do with the self. Me,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I am an individual whose own subjective perspective trumps facts

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 2>and evidence and reason. That was what the left was saying,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 2>and it was busily collapsing Western education as a result,

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>because it decided that the nation's state, the Western nation state,

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>was born in the original sins of colonialism and imperialism

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and exploitation and whiteness and all the rest of it. Now,

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>faced with this, the conservatives didn't really it didn't realize

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>this because the conservatives only saw the Soviet Union. The

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Soviet Union disappeared, therefore there was no problem anymore. So

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 2>what we they're going to do? They were going to

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>have liberty as their load star. So they adopted liberty.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>From the point of view of economics. They decided that

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the free market was the solution to everything that was

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>wrong in the world. I remember missus Thatcher thinking saying,

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>in fact that if everything in Britain was run like

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Marks and Spencer iconic store, which was at that time

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 2>very well run, then everything will be fine. And I

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 2>remember thinking, none of these conservatives understands that what has

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>gone wrong is a denial of the world springs of

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Western culture and Western civilization, which is rooted in biblical values,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>which consists of upholding a set of traditions rooted in

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 2>history going back, in the case of Britain and the West,

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 2>many hundreds of years. And if you get rid of that,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 2>if you get rid of that scuffolding, the society and

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the culture will implode. It will just disintegrate. It will

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 2>no longer know what it is, it will no longer

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>love what it is, it will no longer want to

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 2>defend itself. And that's exactly what happened. Scroll on down

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 2>all these decades and we arrive at now, and there

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 2>are elements on the on on, on what's called the right,

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>which do understand this. They understand that in order for

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>the Wester survive, it has to reconnect to its core

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 2>values rooted in its historic traditions, in its religion. It's

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>it's its religious basis, uh, and in the institutions that

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 2>have kept it going, but they understand that. But at

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the same time, in America we have seen this faction

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 2>or this this this, this this element in in conservatism

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>which kind of got that I think correctly, has itself

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>now splintered, and we've seen the emergence of I think

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>you were alluding to this the Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentez,

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 2>canda own tendency, which has gone down a conspiracy theory

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>rabbit hole, which is deeply, deeply anti Semitic and has

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>an entirely false idea of what America is and what

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the West is and how they should behave And so

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 2>America is in a state of confusion. Britain is not

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>in that state of confusion yet he doesn't have an

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>equivalent to Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes. It has a

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>few fringe actors on the extreme white supremacist right, but

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>they really are tiny. But Britain has a different trajectory

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 2>that Britain has. Kind of if you can imagine America

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 2>as being I see it in a sort of pictorial form.

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 2>America is kind of divided down the middle. You have

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the people who want to preserve America and Western civilization

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 2>on one side, you have the people who want to

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 2>destroy it and replace it by something else. On the

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 2>other among the people who want to preserve it, they

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>have shaded off into this lunatic tendency. But basically it's

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a line down the middle Republicans Democrats. In Britain, we

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 2>don't have that line. It's not a line down the middle.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 2>It's more a kind of diagonal line. The entire system

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>has slid, nobody has got it, and so we see

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the arrival the emergence of a populist party reform led

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 2>by a extremely charismatic politician called Nigel Farage, who at

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the moment is leading the polls amazingly in a two

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 2>party a very very strong two party system. According to

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the polls, he become Prime minister. There's an election today.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's going to happen, But anyway, that's

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>not the point. The point is that he's come from

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>nowhere because basically the British public has lost faith in

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the entire political system. Now in America, I don't think

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 2>you have that. I think you have a division, a

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 2>very sharp division. So it's a different kind of situation.

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>But basically, can servatism has lost the plot for many,

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>many years, and that's why we are where we are.

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>The Pen Dragon Cycle Rise to the Merlin is the

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>newest original series from The Daily Wire, an epic seven

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>part adaptation of Stephen R. Lawhead's acclaimed novels. I've watched

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the trailers and they are truly breathtaking. This isn't just

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>another fantasy show. It's a sweeping story of belief, redemption,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and the origins of Western civilization, told through a bold

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>retelling of the Arthurian legend. The Pen Dragon Cycle Rise

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Merlin premieres January twenty second, exclusively on Daily

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Wire Plus, watch the new trailer and out at Pendragon

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Series dot com. Well, I really appreciate the deeply false manser.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And again, folks, Melani Phillips, you fought Melanie on X

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>at Melanie Latest. She also has a substack crent new

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>book which I hold in my hand, The Builder Stone,

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>How Jews and Christians built the West and why only

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they can save it. I very strongly do recommend it.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I spend the number of Shabots Jewish shabbitz reading it myself.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So Melanie, I there's lots of compact there. To be clear,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure we have time for all of it.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that you said that deeply resonate with

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>me was this quip about Margaret Thatcher during the nineteen eighties,

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about this well run department store and how that

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>could or could not solve solve all of our problems.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that I've been very critical of

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>on this side of the pond as well in my

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>own capacity. Is this notion that that conservatism is really

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just interchangeable with classical liberalism, and that that that that

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>free markets could solve each and every one of our

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>problems the world over, that there is no solution for

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>which simply deregulating and cutting taxes is not merely necessary,

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but is actually sufficient. I've been extraordinarily critical of of

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this myself because it seems to me and I don't

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>need to I certainly don't need to describe this to

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a well known British conservative commentator. But going back to

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to and Burk himself in so many great conservative statesmen,

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes from your side the pond, it seems to be

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that the that the that the essence of conservatism is

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this notion that we exist to conserve, as its name

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>would imply, and to therefore culturally preserve, as Burke would

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>have described it, in this social compact between the dead,

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the living, and the yet unborn. And that raises then

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the obvious question as to what exactly are we conserving there.

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of ways to answer this question,

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think you and I would both agree that

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>it really does ultimately start with the Bible. And this

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is itself something of a contentious point, because you do

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have some folks here, at least on this side of

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the pond. Do you name some of them, folks like

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Carlson and so forth, who are trying to essentially

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>write the original people of the book, that is to say,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jewish people out of the story, out of the

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>story of the United States of America, and by extension,

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the story of Western civilization. There's essentially an

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>attempt in information operation to get rid of the Judeo

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>from the Judeo Christian in the popular term has been

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>used in the United States for many decades now. Now

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you and I both push back on this very strongly

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in our in our respective books. There I'm wondering if

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>if you could just present that argument in very forthright

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Fams what is the unique contribute To be clear, we

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>could speak for hours about this, but perhaps in more

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>succinct fashion, what is the most forthright to the point

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>case for the unique contributions of the original people of

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the book, the break tradition where generally the Torah and

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>all that that entails.

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, it's a tremendously important point, not least because so

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 2>few people really understand it, even people who are sympathetic

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to the Jewish people really don't understand it. The point

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>being the absolutely key importance and significance of Judaism to

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the development of the West and to the values that

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>everybody holds deer or people who are civilized hold deer.

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's such a thing in the West that

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, in one compartment is religion, and that stands

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 2>for all bad things, you know, people who don't have education,

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 2>people who are irrational, they're superstitious, authoritarian, And in the

0:18:57.440 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 2>other box is all good things. And that is set.

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 2>It's rationality, it's reason, it's science, its progress. And this

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 2>couldn't be more wrong because it wasn't the Greeks and

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't imprinted in our DNA as universal values, the

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 2>values that everybody who is civilized in the West holds dear,

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 2>whether they're secular or religious, are Jewish values. Okay, Christianity

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>is the foundational creed of the West, but Christianity doesn't

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 2>come from nowhere, and the principles that animate the West,

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 2>which were brought into the West through Christian Church, are

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 2>basically Jewish values. What do I mean by that? They're

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 2>moral values. They are the values that people take for granted.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 2>The idea that we all have should have respect for

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 2>every human life. Well, that's only because we believe, or

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 2>the Bible tells us that every human being was made

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>in the image of God. If you don't believe that,

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>you don't respect every human being. The idea of personal

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 2>freedom and political freedom, this is something that's not fully understood.

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean people understand if they think about it, that

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, from the Mosaic Code in the Hebrew Bible,

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 2>mediated through Christianity, we have things like compassion and putting

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 2>other people first and stuff like that, and moral taking,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 2>moral responsibility. These are vital to the West. Without that,

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 2>the West wouldn't have been the moral and therefore the

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>civilizational force that it became. But what people don't fully

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>understand is that there was something else that was terribly important,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 2>which was that the principles of that animated the people

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 2>in the eighteenth century Christian evangelicals, the Puritans, who were

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the people who are political thinkers in Britain, and they

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>basically laid down the template for what became in due

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 2>course Britain's constitutional monarchy. It was where the power of

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 2>the monarch and the church were constrained by the democratic

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 2>institution of parliament. Now that arose in Britain because those thinkers,

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>those eighteenth century evangelicals, drew explicitly on the Hebrew Bible

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and on the example of the Davidic monarchy in ancient Israel,

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 2>which had certain key principles, of which perhaps the most

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 2>important were two. First of all was the idea that

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 2>law which governs everybody was not something to be handed

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>down by a ruler and imposed against everyone's will to

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 2>make everyone do what the ruler wanted. Law. In the

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 2>example of the Hebrew Bible and the ancient Kingdom of Israel,

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>law was founded in the consent of the people. Going

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 2>back right to the point where Moses came down the

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>mountain and said to the people, here's the law. What

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 2>do you think, will you do it? And they said,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 2>we will do and we will hear. And this idea

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 2>that law had to have the consent of all the

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 2>people is absolutely fundamental to modern democratic representative democracy, and

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>it was revolutionary at the time it was given to

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the West by the Jews. That was the first really

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 2>important point. The second equally important point was the idea

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>of limited government. Okay, there were plenty of monarchs kings

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 2>in ancient Israel who were dreadful tyrants and you know, ghastly,

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>but the template was limited government that the kings of

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 2>ancient Israel understood, or should have understood, that above them

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 2>was the Almighty. They were not the supreme ruler. I mean,

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 2>in ancient civilizations, the ruler was supreme. Nobody was above

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 2>the ruler. The ancient kings of Israel believed that above

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 2>them was the Almighty, and they were in turn surrounded

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 2>at their level by people who constrained their power, people

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 2>called prophets, people called judges, and people call priests. Now

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 2>that principle also was understood by the framers of British

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 2>parliamentary democracy. This idea of limited government, and the idea

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>that again in the King David did this. You basically

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 2>unite what would otherwise be warring tribes into a united kingdom.

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>These were revolutionary concepts, and those people in Britain who

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 2>produced the template for what became Britain's parliamentary democracy went

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 2>to America, founded America and founded your constitution. And you know,

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 2>American constitutional documents are absolutely studied with the explicit references

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>to the Hebrew Bible. So the importance of Judaism to

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 2>the development of America and the development of the West

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 2>cannot be overestimated. That's ancient Israel and ancient Judaism or

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Judaism from ancient.

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Times extraordinarily, Will argued again. Melanie Phillips is the author,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>most recently of the book that I hold in my hand,

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>The Builderstone, How Jews and Christians built the West and

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 1>why only they can save it availble everywhere books are purchased. Melanie,

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna play Devil's advocate for just a moment's here,

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and then perhaps we'll move on to more contemporary political issues,

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of which I would love your opinion on some of

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>them as well. And the Devil's Adam. The question is

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially this, Let's say hypothetically that I am sympathetic to

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Carlson's arguments here. And one of the reasons that

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sympathetic is because, although, let's conceive the sake of

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>argument that Genesis one twenty seven, Deuteronomy seventeen, which you're

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of alluding to, this notion that the ancient kings

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>in Israel had to write Taurus roll because they are

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>bound to off, let's kind of stimulate, just for the

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sake of argument, that all of these things are really

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>important for Western civilization. You know, wink, wink, nudge, nudge,

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>They're really, really, really important. Okay, back to the hypothetical,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that I agree that they're important, but I

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think that the jew Which people themselves, are necessary

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>anymore because Christianity itself has existed for two millennia. Now,

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so what do we still need this Jewish Christian alliance?

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>What do we still need this alliance between the United

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 1>States and Israel and so forth there? How do you

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>respond to that particular, that particular objection, let's call it.

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>First of all, Jews are Judaism is still necessary as

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the underpinning the moral scaffolding of the West, even though

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the West doesn't realize this. It is if Judaism were

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 2>not to exist anymore, Christianity would quite quickly implode, and

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the West would follow suit. If you take away the scaffolding,

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>the whole structure collapses. But that's in the kind of realm,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 2>of kind of the abstract thinking. More pertinently, perhaps for

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the Tucker Carlsons of this world, the Jews are vital

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.719
<v Speaker 2>today in Israel, the very country which he thinks is

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 2>dragging America into pointless wars which are not in America's

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 2>interest and from which America gets nothing. It could not

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 2>be more the other way around. First of all, in

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>military terms, as successive American administrations have fully understood, Israel

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>is the It's what's it called, you know, the the

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the the aircraft carrier, America's aircraft carrier in the Middle East.

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>It is the forward salient. It's the forward troop carrier

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 2>of the defense of the West against the Islamic world.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 2>If Israel weren't there, the Islamic world would have no

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 2>barrier between it and the West. I e America. That's

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 2>the first thing. The second thing is that America, like Britain,

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 2>unlike other countries which currently disdain Israel and are hostile

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to it. America gains an enormous amount from Israel, far

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 2>more than it gives. Now that may see, aren't contentious.

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 2>But America relies, as does Britain, to a very great degree,

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 2>on Israeli intelligence, Israeli military intelligence about the region, and

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 2>not just about the region, but increasingly about Islamic extremism

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>and terrorism that has come already planted itself in America

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 2>to as a result of the negligence of successive American administrations.

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 2>And I would say British administrations too. But Israel has

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>the intelligence about this, or about a lot of this,

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 2>and America needs that. The next thing to say is that,

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you know the famous figure or the famous argument that

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 2>America basically funds through billions of dollars every year Israeli

0:27:54.160 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 2>military equipment and song and you know this is just,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, a drain on America's resources for what, well,

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 2>this is completely untrue. I forget now the precise figure,

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's something like America gains something like more than

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>one thousand times the value in terms of arms productions,

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and heaven knows what else that goes on in America

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 2>as a result of this relationship which in which America

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>pays whatever it is, thirteen billion, whatever it is I

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 2>can't remember, and gets back in effect a vast amount.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 2>More so, these things are tremendously important. And the last

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 2>thing to say is that far from dragging America into

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 2>fighting foreign wars, and you know, our boys are gonna

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>die for what for our cause in which we have

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 2>no skin in the game. This is obscene. It is

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 2>Israeli boys and girls who have been dying to protect America.

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>It is against you know, a Israel A has been

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 2>fighting a desperate existential war of defense against basically Iran

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 2>and its proxies. Iran. I mean, I don't know whether

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 2>people like Tucker Carlson even know about this, but Iran.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 2>When the Iranian regime came to power in whenever it was,

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 2>seventeen nine, was it, it declared war immediately on America

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and subsequently, in all the decades since then, it has

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 2>attacked American interests over and over again, American military basis

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 2>over and over again through its proxies. But it's basically

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Iran and has caused the deaths of countless numbers of

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 2>American and other coalition forces in Iraq. Through roadside bombs

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 2>they provided, and so on. Now it's a bit of

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>a mystery to me why over all this time America

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and the West did not respond as any normal, sane

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 2>society would have done to being under attack in this

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 2>way and basically fought back. But it didn't. Okay, But nevertheless,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 2>it's been under attack all this time America. Iran has

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 2>made no secret of its continuing ambition and aim to

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.239
<v Speaker 2>destroy America and the West. It has said over and

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 2>over again that it regards it as essential to destroy

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Israel first, to kill the Jews first, because then it

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 2>thinks that the way will be open to destroy, to

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 2>attack and destroy America and the West, not least because

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 2>the Iranian regime believes that behind that, like other Islamists,

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 2>people who wish to inflict or impose Islam upon the

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>rest of the world, they believe that there may foe

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 2>is Western modernity, and they believe that behind Western modernity

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 2>is the Jews. They're not entirely wrong, and they believe

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.959
<v Speaker 2>therefore that in order to defeat Western modernity, they first

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 2>have to defeat the Jews and the nation state of Israel,

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 2>the Jewish nation state of Israel, and then the way

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 2>will be open to attack and defeat America. So even

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 2>if the Tucker Carsons of this world really loathe them,

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 2>detest Jews, which clearly they do, and think they're of

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 2>no value to humanity, nevertheless they are demonstrably vital to

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 2>American interests. And in this war of the last two years,

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 2>it's been Israeli boys and girls in the Israeli Defense

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Forces who have been fighting Iran and its proxies and

0:31:55.240 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 2>dying and getting terribly injured, taking the heat in order

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 2>to enable Israel to survive, for sure, but also serving

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 2>as the essential defense for America. It's not American boys

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 2>who are dying for Israel. It's Israeli boys who've been

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 2>dying for America.

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, as is often said, Melanie, you go to

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the Saturday people first, and then and then to the

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Sunday people. This is kind of one of those axioms

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of history. One of my favorite examples to bear this

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>out is is Karl Marx himself, right, I mean Karl

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Marx in the Communist Manifesto he in angles. They lay

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>out this comprehensive assault on Kristin Doman and Western capitalism.

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Of you, if you go back a few years prior

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Communist Manifesto, there is a deeply anti Semitic

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>treatise that Karl Marx pens on the Jewish question, because

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>even he understood, you cut to the source, you cut

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to the scaffolding, as you say, before you actually get

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to the broader entity. And I couldn't agree with you

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>more strongly that a lot, that a lot of these provocateurs,

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>both left and right, because certainly do well to understand

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>this most rudimentary of concepts. But while while I have you, Melanie,

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to go on a related topic, kind of

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>going more into into contemporary discourse, even outside the realm

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of foreign policy, because we're talking here, among other things,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about the threat of radical Islam at jihad, about the

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>threat of jihadism and s Trea supremacism. And one of

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that becomes more obvious here by the day,

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it certainly becomes very obvious from a British perspective, by

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the day, by the month, by the year as well,

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is the the the ever thorny question, if we can

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>even call it an unresolved question at this point, as

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to whether or not Islam and Western civilization are are

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>broadly speaking compatible. This is something that my tragically assassinated

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>late friend Charlie Kirk was adamant about in the final

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>year or two of his life. He was arguing bothciferously

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that that Islam and Western civilization and the United States specifically,

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>where broadly speaking not compatible. And Melanie, have to be

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>honest with you. I know you're you're British. I studied

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and I did a college semester of studying it at

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>UCL University College London, right in the heart of London

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and nine. I have such fond memories.

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I've not been back to London since then. I'm frankly

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>terrified to go because I think I'll barely recognize the place.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>So whether but whether it's the images we see of

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the streets of London, Paris, Brussels, this horrific recent massacre

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on the beach, and Bandai Beach and Sydney, Australia, there

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>are all sorts of incidents here in the United States.

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get too dire, but you're kind

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of the right person to kind of turn this question to.

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the question is is as follows, speaking

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>here necessarily about hard jihad but about soft, surreptitious forms

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of jihad, about jihad via immigration, there's actually a whole

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of obscure Islamic doctrine on exactly that actually on

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a softer form of spreading the message. I

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>guess the question is this is is Western civilization salvageable

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>or are we so far down the rabbit hole not

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>just of the declining Church, not just of decline religiosity,

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but just from a purely kind of multiculturalist perspective. Can

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we actually undo Pandora's box this point.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a very a good question. I'm my own view,

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and call me hopelessly optimistic. It's never over till it's over.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 2>The West hasn't begun to fight this, It hasn't even

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 2>begun to acknowledge what it's up against. It refuses to

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 2>do so. So if it carries on in this way,

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the West is finished. And Islam will indeed colonize, finish

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 2>colonizing Britain and Europe. And I'm afraid America in due course,

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 2>more slowly, more difficultily, perhaps, but that's the way it's going.

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Can it do it? Yes? It can. The problem has

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 2>been too, has been has been a double headed problem.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 2>The Islamists, who are not stupid, and the Islamists, by

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 2>which I mean Muslims who wish to take over the

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 2>world for Islam. They understood a long time ago what

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the West never understood, which is that of a culture

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 2>of society, a civilization destroys its religious scaffolding. It's finished.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 2>It no longer will know what it is, it will

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 2>no longer even like what it is. It will no

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 2>longer be pare to defend what it is, it will

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 2>no longer even understand what's happening to it. And it

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 2>understood that Britain was very forefront of this. Britain is

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the most most advanced post religious nation, I would say,

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 2>in the West, and it honed in on Britain. Britain

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 2>was where al Qaeda was formed, because Britain was the

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 2>most hospitable to Jihadis who Britain said, let them all in,

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 2>let them all in. It's multiculturalism, they're fine. We cannot

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 2>possibly oppose them because that's racism and Islamophobia and all

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 2>the rest of it. But nevertheless, this process happened, has

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 2>happened across Europe, and it's happening more slowly but certainly

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 2>surely in America too. So it is salvagible because in

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 2>this sense that it's happened because there was never a

0:36:56.160 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 2>fight put up by the West. The West basically said,

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>we can't assert the superiority of our values and our

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 2>culture over Islam, or over any other society because any

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 2>other minority in our midst because that's racism. Now, every

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 2>single minority except for one, has understood that the bargain

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 2>from the eighteenth century, from when modernity started, from when

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 2>tolerance was invented, from when church and state were separated.

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 2>In the West, the understanding has been that the or

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Western civilization will tolerate minorities. It will say, you're welcome

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to form communities of faith and communities of culture, provided

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 2>you uphold the core values of our society. We can

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 2>all discuss what the core values are, but I would

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 2>say one core value is the equality of women. Another

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 2>core value, even more core than that, is the idea

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 2>that the entire society is governed by one law for all. Now,

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 2>the problem has been that there's a very very significant

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 2>number of Muslims who came into Britain and Europe who

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and now America, who do not accept that, who say

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 2>that there can be no superior authority to Sharia law,

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 2>Islamic law, because Islamic law, Sharia law is the word

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 2>of God, and consequently we do not accept any secular

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 2>authority above it. Now, I think it's very important to

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 2>say that in Britain and in the rest of the West,

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 2>there are many many Muslims who don't agree with that,

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 2>who have genuinely signed up to Western values, who live

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 2>in the West because they value equality and freedom and

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 2>all the good things that the West provides. But there

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 2>is a huge, let's say a minority, but it is

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 2>vast who don't sign up to those things and who

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 2>have set out to conquer the West. Now that you

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about ji Had, it is the jihad she Had

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 2>is simply Islamic holy war to take over the non

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Islamic world for Islam. But it takes different forms, and

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 2>they're not stupid. The Islamists. In some circumstances, they will

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 2>use force, they will use intimidation, they will use terrorism

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 2>in order to terrorize, in order to help subjugate people

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 2>through terror. But they will also use and they have used,

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 2>particularly through the Muslim Brotherhood, they will use the most

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 2>devastating weapon of all, which is, as you implied or

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 2>you suggested, a kind of soft g had which is

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 2>actually not soft at all. It is basically cultural takeover.

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 2>It is where they use the openness and the democratic

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 2>institutions of Western societies to infiltrate them and subvert them

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 2>from inside. And it's like the frog being boiled in

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the pot so slowly and so gently. The frog has

0:39:56.320 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 2>no idea that it's being boiled until it's dead. And

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 2>that is what has been happening. And so now you

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 2>have this process has advanced to a very great extent.

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 2>And even now, I mean you talk about the terrible

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 2>atrocity at Bondai Beach. I read just today was it

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 2>or yesterday various people in Australia. I think it was

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 2>a correspondent for the ABC News and I think it

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 2>was one of their ministers saying or possibly in the

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:32.719
<v Speaker 2>prime minister saying that what happened at Bondai Beach had

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with Islam, nothing to do with religion.

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what do they think it was? You know,

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 2>these people were murdered for veganism. I mean, what are

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 2>they talking about? And this has been the case in Britain.

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 2>They will not accept that it's founded in the religion

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 2>because they think that. And it comes back to the

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 2>very first question you are are asked. That would mean that,

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, we demonize all Muslims and we demonize Islam.

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Now this has to be picked aside a part very carefully.

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 2>One should not demonize all Muslims, as I've said, there

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 2>are many Muslims who are not signed up to this.

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 2>But to argue that what we are living through, that

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 2>she had both terrorism and democratic infiltration and subversion. To

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 2>say that that is not being done in the name

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:24.240
<v Speaker 2>of Islam, and to say that it's not being done

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 2>in accordance, in strict accordance with the precepts of every

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 2>jurisprudential authority in Islam is simply a lie, and it

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 2>is a suicidal lie from the point of view of

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the West. So you know the question you ask originally,

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 2>is Islam compatible with Western civilization? For sure? Radical Islam

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>is not compatible. By radical Islam, I mean the understanding

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the interpretation the religion which says it is a religious

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 2>duty on all Muslims to make the non Islamic world

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and the not Islamic enough world Islamic. Now that is clearly, demonstrably,

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 2>unarguably incompatible with Western civilization, and that is what we

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:26.399
<v Speaker 2>collectively in the West have harbored. So you know, yes,

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 2>there are Muslims who, you know, they get a spiritual

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:36.280
<v Speaker 2>and moral uplift from their Islamic faith. Fine, but an

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 2>awful lot understand Islam to be as much a political

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 2>ideology as it is what as it is a communion

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 2>with the divine, which is how the West thinks of religion.

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 2>The West has a very Western idea of religion. It

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 2>is a communication between the individual and the Almighty, and

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 2>that's fine. If Muslims wish to interpret it in that way,

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 2>that's great. And if they find you know, uplifting and

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:13.759
<v Speaker 2>positive and constructive moral principles from their faith, fine, no

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 2>one's going to object to that. The problem is the

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 2>understanding of Islam, which is rooted in the theology that

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 2>it is simultaneously a political ideology of conquest and domination

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and war, and that, I'm afraid is its history, and

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 2>that is unarguable.

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Very well said as always Melanie Phillips, So one fun time, folks.

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Melanie Phillips is a calmness for the times of London.

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 1>She's also the author of The Builderstone, How Jews and

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Christians built the West and why only they can save it.

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a wonderful book. I strongly encourage it to all

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of you out there. Melanie has been a real pleasure.

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for all you've been doing for a very

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>long time now which you may be lated. Happy Hannagh

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>and hope to chavel with you again sometime soon.

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Happy Hannakha to you, and thank you so much for

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 2>your time.

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You better thank you as always for watching the Dosh

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Hamershire