WEBVTT - Trump's Big Iran Decision

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Hammer and this is the Josh Hammer Show.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's transgender argument day at the United States Supreme Court.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of other massive news to get to. Some huge,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.760
<v Speaker 1>huge cultural decisions will be decided by the nine justices

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>based on how this or argument in today's hearing went.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But the big story that the international community and most

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Americans are really fixated that are paying attention to right

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>now and how can we not address it at the

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>top of the show, that is the roiling situation in Iran.

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So it is reaching rapidly something of a boiling point.

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Earlier today, Donald Trump getting in briefed with his latest

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>assessment as to what the possible options are as to

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what to do at this particular time when it comes

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to the horrific regime crackdown, regime crackdown on the innocent

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>civilians who are rising up, who are risking their lives,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>their fortune, and their sacred honor. Yes, that is the

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>analogy draw here. They are risking it much as the

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>patriots of seventeen seventy six risk it in order to

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>try to topple this terrible regime. As of yesterday, we

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>were discussing on the show that the inside the Inside

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Baseball scoop that I heard from various sources was potentially

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>upwards of two thousand Iranian civilians who have been slaughtered.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm still hearing it's in the thousands. For what it's worth,

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm now hearing from some folks over at CBS News.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It's very, very difficult to get precise numbers on this stuff,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and partially because of the Internet blackout parts, because the

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>foam blackout parts are because this part of the world

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is just infamously difficult to get accurate numbers, see for instance,

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the Gaza Ministry of Health, which is run by Hamas.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But for whatever it's worth, folks over at CBS and

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>least those who I've been in touch with are are

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>estimating potentially potentially as many as twenty thousand. Potentially take

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>take them with a grain of salt, Okay, a big

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>grin of sault, potentially, but we could be looking at

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>upwards of twenty thousand innocent to runians. Billions mowed down

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>by this regime. Again, all sorts of anecdotal stuff. Images

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>popping up over social media of just body bags upon

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>body bags upon body bags at the hospital, at the Morgue.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a horrible, horrible situation. Well over million millions now

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of Iranians who have been taken to the streets in

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>protests of this regime. This particular protest, as discussed previously

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>on this show, have happened because of the plumbing real

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Iranian currency, because of food scarcity, of the droughts.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>That people just want the regime to focus on themselves

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to funding all of their terrorist proxies and

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the sheited insuluments, propaganda overseas and so forth.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>By the way, as an aside, I have to say,

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>putting on my pop culture lens here just for a

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>secondifem I actually just started season three of Tehran, which

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is the show on Apple TV, strongly encouraged at the

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>timing really could not be more incredible. But we just

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>started that in season three is off to a good start.

0:02:58.560 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So I was watching that last night. It's like, oh

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>my god, this is really happening in real life. So

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that is million dollar question though, is is it happening

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in real life? Because we see now what's going on

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>over in Iran, and it's it's bad. But where's auth

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>these going to go from here? Moreover, is the Trump

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>administration speaking clearly and with one voice on this issue.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>This has been one of the most difficult, thorniest evergreen

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>topics whenever various issues for the Trump ministration come up,

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps especially those pertending to foreign policy. Does the

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>administration actually speak with one voice? Does Donald Trump speak

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of everyone? From Marc Rubio on the more

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>hawkish end of the spectrum, Pete Hegseth, who is perhaps

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the middle, all the way over to his

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>own Vice President Jade Vance and the d and I,

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Tulca Gabber and others who have more isolation sympathies. It's

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty well known that there's a lot disagreements within the

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>White House, within the administration when it comes to all

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of these issues. So it's been somewhat of the talk

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the town now for a few days that Trump's

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>instincts are indeed to dramatically escalate in in bombing military

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>fashion against the Iranian regime. And he is now the leading,

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the leading proponents, if you are paying attention

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to the tea leaves, he's one of the leading proponents

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of increasingly aggressive military action to try to topple this regime.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you have the Vice President JD. Vance,

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>who is leading the alternative caucus, who is leading the

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>caucus of those who are trying now to preach diplomacy

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and various other means for what it's worth, Donald Trump

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>not exactly interested in diplomacy. Donald Trump putting out on

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>truth social this morning quote Irode and patriots keep protesting,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>take over your institutions. Save the names of the killers

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>canceled all meetings with the Roddian officials until the senseless

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>killing of protesters stops. Help is on its way migas

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in make Iran great again. So he's canceled all meetings

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>with officials until the killing stops. So it seems to

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>me the Vance led push for diplomacy, whatever the merits

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of that of that may or may not be, simply

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>are at this point falling on deaf years for President Trump,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, that's his own entire can of worms.

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>Is what is the current nature of the president vice

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>president relationship. Recalled that Vice President Vance was actually not

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>there at mar Lago during the Maduro operation. We saw

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>all these images of Donald Trump flanked by people like

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubiel. Well, where is the vice president? Well, his

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>office put out a statement explaining why he was not there.

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>They said that it was a possible security concern and

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>op SEC concern, operational security. I'm not entirely sure that

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>makes a whole lot of sense to make, to be

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, there's a lot of problement people there.

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>They all had their own large motor cads. But is

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>this another issue from Venezuela and now to Iran where

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there is this emerging delta, there's this emerging gap between

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and Vice President Vance. I actually, you know,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>putting on our domestic politics had for a minute here,

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking at an article a pull from

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>rass Mussen ras Musen, which is one of the more

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>conservative Republican leading major poulters out there. Ras Muson had

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>a big piece just yesterday talking about how jad Vance's

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>favorability numbers have been plumbing recently. So is this going

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to help his recovery where he's yet again being seen,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps probably accurately, seen as being on the other side

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of President Tromp on a major foreign policy issue. I

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>have to suspect that is not going to help JD.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Vans when it comes to twenty twenty eight, when it

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>comes potentially to Donald Trump's endorsement. Frankly of Jdvan's come

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty eight, But we will cross that bridge when

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>it gets to it. For now, the possible escalation of

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>military activities from the United States there looks at this

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>point to be pretty much imminence. B fifty two bombers

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>moving all the way into the Eastern Mediterranean, a lot

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of assets moving into places like Turkey. It seems like

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>this thing is really going to potentially hit the fan asap. Now,

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to necessarily go in guns fully blazing.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>There are alternatives to There are things such as cyber

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>attacks and things of that nature. But even if this

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>thing does really militarily escalade and there start being lots

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of bombs and fireworks and all of that, it's important

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to note a couple of things. One is that no

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>one here is talking about boots on the ground. I mean,

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>how many times do we hear this slogan of boots

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. It's becomes something of a line that

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the Tucker Curlson Ron Paul types push

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to persuade people not to take any military

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>action whatsoever. But it's obviously a false choice because there's

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>approximately a million or two million different things that can

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>happen between boots on the ground and between it doing

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>absolutely nothing. Last I checked, there is virtually no one.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even sure if Lindsey Graham himself is pushing

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>for literal boots on the ground, the literal one hundred

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>first airborne parachuting into Tehran to topple the Iyatola. No,

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not what's happening. What is happening is that the

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Iranian people, who have been brutally, brutally repressed for four

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half decades from the world's number one state

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>sponsor of jihad, are risky at all to go to

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the streets to fight back against this regime. That's what's happening.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw some folks on social media earlier today who

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>were promoting this clip of Charlie Kirk before he was

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to be assassinated. This was back in June, during

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole debate over whether to Bambaran's nuclear sytes, and

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this clip that I saw being circulated was Charlie Kirk

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>saying beware of taking out the Ayatola, Well, guess what

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was not happening back then? The Iranian people were not uprising.

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Stance on this for what it's worth, Charlie Stance

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was very clear. He said that it's worth supporting the

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Iranian people if slash, when they rise up against this regime.

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>What's not necessarily worth doing is going in guns fully blazing,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>absent the running people's support. Totally separate conversation for what it's worth,

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>if Donald Trump does decide to significantly increase the military

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>threat in the United States visa vise the iotolin As

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>moll as they're in, or it looks like he can

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>count on at least some byparises a poorer at least some,

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>which is fascinating. For instance, here was John Fetterman and

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania speaking on CNN.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Sure, absolutely, and now if it continues to make more sense. Absolutely.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 3>I think I was the only Democrat that fully supported

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 3>our strike of their Irenian nuclear facilities last year, and

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 3>now by then, without those kinds of strikes, Iran could

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 3>have acquired a nuclear bomb. I think I hope we

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 3>can all agree that Iran should have never acquired a

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 3>nuclear bomb. And Iran is one of the world's top

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 3>terrorist unrid and now you have that poisonous regime now

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 3>in spiral. So why wouldn't we want to support that

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 3>and those brave protesters they've killed probably more than six

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred by now. So now why would we want to

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 3>have the kinds of targeted, kinds of action that could

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 3>break that regime?

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Dal Trump has a unique opportunity to go down here

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in the history books. Already, in one fell swoop, in

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>one astonishing breath taking operation in Caracas, he has extracted

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the illegitimate narco terrorist leader of Venezuela, Nicholas Maduro. Could

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>he also be the president who presides over the end

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>of four and a half plus decades of tyranny in

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Iran and by extension, frankly, for the whole world. Given

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>how much jihad across the entire world that regime has sewed,

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>how much American blood, how much European blood, how much

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Christian bloo Jewish blood, how much blood is on this

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>theocratic isthmus regime's hands. It's not necessarily the job of

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States to go in there, with the aircraft

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>carriers and the overwhelming ground, air and sea power. That's

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not what's being floated right now. What is being floated

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>is support of the Iranian people. The details that will

0:10:59.960 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be defined by the president. But make no mistake about it,

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>donald Trump's red line has been crossed. And yesterday's show

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we explained why we're not necessarily the biggest fans of

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>red lines. I prefer the more foreign policy be done

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in secretive, clandestine fashion. Why give the enemy and he

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>heads up, what's whatever, it's what your next move might

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>actually be. But he said a redline. He said, if

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the regime starts massacring dissidents, he will take action. Over

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. On Sunday, it was reported that Donald Trump

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>was emitting that perhaps his redline has been crossed. Here

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, we can now definitively say it has been crossed,

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>stomped on, and torn to shreds. It's in your court,

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>mister president, exactly where you take it from here. But

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a unique opportunity to go down history for

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>providing moral sooker. And yes, military support is necessary to

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the running people. We'll be right back. I'm Josh Hammer

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and welcome back very much. Monitoring situation in Iraan. But

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>as mentioned at the beginning, of our show. There's other

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on as well. One of the largest cases

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually technically two consolidated cases. One of the largest

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>oral argument days at the Usupreme Court occurred earlier today.

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I listened to large swaths of the oral argument. So

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>these are two technically combined cases. One is out of

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the states of Idaho. One is out of the state

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of West Virginia. The state out of Idaho is Little

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>versus Hcock's West Virginia, and is West Virginia versus BPJ.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>They are basically dealing with the same fat pattern, which

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is whether or not a statute a law in Idaho

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>or West Virginia that bans that bans biological males from

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>competing against biological females when it comes to high school

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>athletic competition, Whether or not these laws are constitutionally principal,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>perhaps if there's a fourteen mement angle, or perhaps whether

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>they run a foul of Title nine. Title nine being

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the amendments to the Civil Rights Act, which was passed

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy two that prohibits set discrimination in all

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>educational programs and for all those universities institutions that receive

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>federal funding. More generally. So, as I mentioned, I watched

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and listen to a lot of this or argument this morning.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>The first thing that ought to be said is there

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>actually was a lot of jarring language from some of

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the right of center justices. You know, those of you

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>who've known me for a long time, who are not

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>silly new to the show, you know that one of

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>my longest pet peeves I've mean being this drum basically

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>my entire adult life, is the utter and complete debacle

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the failure of Republican judicial nominations. Why in the world

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>can Republican presidents just not get their judges right? To

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>be clear, they do sometimes. Most of the Trump Lower

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>court judital picks, for the most part, are really good.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I know that firsthand. I actually clerked for one. I

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>was one of the very first four law clerks for

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the Honorable James C. Hoe of the US corp Appeals

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Fifth Circuit back in twenty eighteen. Judge Hoe

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is a phenomenal jurist, and god willing will be our

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>next Supreme Court justice. But all three of Donald Trump's

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>first term Supreme Court nominees performed, shall we say, in

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>less than stellar fashion at the oral argument earlier today,

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you had both Bret Cavanaugh, both Brett Cavanaugh and Amy

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Coney Barrett, literally both of them who at times referred

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to boys who subjectively identify as girls as so called

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>trans girls. Yes, Amy Coney Barrett, the one who's basically

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Supreme Court, because Dianne Feinstein, the late Diane Finestelin,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>said that the dogmall lives likely within you. Ye, Amy

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Cony Barrett couldn't even bring herself to describe biological males

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>as biological males. Brek Kavanaugh, for Wordsworth did essentially the

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Neil Gorsich for Wordsworth. Gorsich is a particularly

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>frustrating one. So Neil Gorsich asked about whether a prohibition

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on on cross sex dressing would amount to discrimination kind

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of this notion that transgenderism can entail subjective notions such

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>as changing the clothes that you wear there and he

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>actually even asked some of the lawyers for the transgender

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>athletes why they were not trying to press the issue

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>as to whether transgender's constitutes what in constitutional law are

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>known as discrete and insular minorities, which is really kind

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of legalize language. Goes back to a nineteen thirties opinion

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>from the New Deal called Caroline Products. An infamous footnote

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in that case called footnote for basically it's not worth

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>explaining the details. Basically what this means is gorse is

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to tee up for the transgender plaintiff layers a

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>possible way of trying to litigate this case in a

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>way that it would be seen as complete and utter

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>abominable discrimination. Gorstich is the justice who in twenty twenty

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>also gave us a case called Bostak was a case

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>not on Title nine but on Title seven, which involves

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>employment decisions whether you can, for instance, hire or fire

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of sex. And in the Bostock case,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the court held six to three where you had John

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Roberts annual, Gorstitch joined the liberals Gorsi's rule for the court.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>At that time, Gorsich held that discrimination on the base

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of sex essentially amounts to discrimination on the basis of

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>sex orientation and gender identity. And right now Gorsich today

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be again advanced the argument that transgenderism should

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>be seen as a protected class. And my reading the

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>tea les is that Grosich could potentially be a vote

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>here to extend his same logic and rationale in the

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Bostock case. That's a Title seven case to now this

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Title nine case when it comes to these two transgender

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>at the cases. For what it's worth, John Roberts, who

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is as squishy as of all of the Republican nomination

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>jurors on the court there, John Roberts actually came across

0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>probably as the most sober of all the centrists, which

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily the most encouraging thing. Having said that,

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not trying to overly blackpill you guys, I still, despite that,

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>find it really really hard to believe that Idaho and

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia and also the DOJ. The DOJ swooped in

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>here as an intervener, they had an oral advocate at

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the courts as well, argue in defense of the Idaho

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and West Virginia laws, or arguing defense of biological reality,

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>or arguing defense of sexual dimorphism, arguing defense of the

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>integrity of biological females not be subjected to athletic competition

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for biological males. So I have to think that there

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is enough that there is enough ammunition even if someone

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>like Neil Gorstich were to go wildly. Admittedly, though, you're

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to play with fire, because if Gorstich does indeed

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>vote to extend his principle from Bostock, and he tries

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to conceive of transgenderism as a so called protective class,

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and he ends up holding on these laws are illegal

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>under Title nine, then you're down to a one vote margin.

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't afford to lose capital Roberts or Barrett's. So

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just so frustrating. I mean, this is such an

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>easy case. This is so easy, or at least it

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>should be. You know, for all the legal leads we're

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>talking here about carolling products footnote four, We're talking about

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>discreet insummonorities, intermediate scrutiny, strict scrutiny, all these tears of scrutiny,

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>which by the way, are all made up. How about

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he cut to the chase. How about the law just

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>reflect the truth? Is that not The purpose of law

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in the first place is to be a reflection of

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the truth, to be a reflection of God's plan for mankind,

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of human anthropology, of human teleology. What we are here

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to do? What is our purpose? The law should express this,

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and when it doesn't, that's how you know that a

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>law is flawed or is unjust, and when there is

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>an ambiguous statue, not that any of these statues are

0:18:55.680 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>ambiguous is incumbent upon judges in this case us to

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>read these statutes when in doubt. When an ambiguous cases,

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>which again this is not, but you should read it

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to err on the side of things like biological truth

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and moral truth, substantive justice, things like this. I didn't

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot of that, frankly at the oral argument

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at the court earlier today. If this does go the

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>wrong way, if Idah, how West Virginia lose this, and

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>if the court says that biological males can compete against

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>biological females, that is something of a yet another five

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>alarm fire for the conservative legal movement. If God forbid,

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>two of the three of Kavanaugh Baron Gorsis go the

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong way, that is a really, really, really big deal. Again,

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>if I had to make a guess, it really seems

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>like Gorsis could go the wrong way. I still think

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>that you look in a five to four victory for

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Idaho and West Virginia, but it really really really should

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>not be this close, really really really should not be

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:06.359
<v Speaker 1>this close at all because when a legal regime is

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>not ultimately tethered to the truth, is appropriate to start

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>questioning the legitimacy of that regime in the first place.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just that Bostock is the only recent

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>pressant for this. Yes, Gorstitz wobbled and boss Stock and

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Roberts actually, for what it's worth, also had the wrong

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>opinion in this Title seven case. But just last year

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it was actually even more recent present. It was a

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>case at a Tennessee called Scrimetti. In the Scrimmetti case

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>out of Tennessee, the court said that is well within

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the police powers of the states in this case Tennessee

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the volunteer state to severely ban or outright proscribe the

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>use of hormones, of chemical castrain drugs, general mutilation, all

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this stuff when it comes to so called transgender adolescents prepubessence.

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>That was a sixth three decision that the more recent

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>case in the Bostock case, that should hold. That absolutely

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>should hold. But the fundamental point is this against about

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the truth. What is transgenderism. Transgenderism is a lie, of course,

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>gender dyspory is not a lie. It's a mental condition.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But the notion of a distinct class of transgenderism doesn't

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>make any more sense than a distinct class of drug

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>addicts or alcoholics. We should have immense compassion, but in

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>no way whatsoever should the law, ever, ever, ever deviate

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>from the truth in order to accommodate what is in

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>this case a mental illness. God willing, Idaho and West

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Virginia will prevail. We'll be right back. We're also still

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>tracking the ice situation in Minneapolis. It's pretty good for

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the most part. Notably my article three project. Colleague Will Chamberlain,

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>in an excellent incisive post yesterday, noted how this is

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at a lot different than the summer of twenty twenty.

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you see a generally emboldened US law enforcement presidents.

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to ice, when it comes to DHS,

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to National Guard, but even when it

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to the local police that are choosing to work

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>with defence, they're generally doing a pretty good job of

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>tamping down and putting down the incipient mayhem they are

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in Minneapolis, but more generally speaking, getting us outside of

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the Minneapolis Renee Good ice situation, there continues to be

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>a concerted effort on the left to paint illegal aliens

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>as the victims of unjust laws. We were talking before

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the break about these transgend or athlete cases and the

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>notion of trying to make sure that your law is

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>tethered to truth and to reality. Well, folks, one of

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the most real and truthful things we can ever say

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>about the law is that the law exists for a

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>particular nation state. There's also this thing as global law,

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>other than the law of God, God all My to himself,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bibles close as we come to global law. Other

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>than that, the entire notion of a body of law

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is implicitly dependent on there being an entity for whom

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that law combined. That means the nation state. And if

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.239
<v Speaker 1>you have a nation state, that means you have borders. Now,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we've had so many Democrats who are pulling their hair

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>on saying, oh my God, Ice is deporting a lot

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of these aliens who didn't even commit a crime. They

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't commit a homicide or a rape or this or that. There,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They're just undocumented workers, to which I say, the crime

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>they committed was when they walked here in the first place.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But don't just take it from me. I was watching

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this wonderful Cliff and a certain gentleman made a certain

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>radio address in the year nineteen ninety five on this

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>very topic, and he said this, He said, it does

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>not matter if they have committed crimes while here. They

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.479
<v Speaker 1>came here legally. That's a crime. They have to go.

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Who do I speak of? I speak of Bill Clinton?

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Where is that sentiment today? It was totally common sensible

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>back in the mid nineties. Let's go ahead, actually and

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>watch this clip of Bill Clinton speaking in his State

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of the union'sdress the very same year of nine ninety five.

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 2>In the budget I will present to you, we will

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 2>try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 2>aliens who a arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 2>aliens in the workface, as recommended by the commission headed

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 2>by a former.

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Congresswoman Barbara Jordan.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 2>We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 2>a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 2>defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 2>of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 2>recent years, and we must do more to stop.

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Now he's saying that we're a Nesian of immigrants. I

0:24:57.320 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>take issue with that particular framing America is not a

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>nation of immigrants. We are a nation of Americans. We

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>are a nation of those who are native born, and yes,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>those who came here who have subsumed to have been

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>subsumed into Americanism. So I don't agree with the framing

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that we are a nation of immigrants. I actually really

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>hate that phrase. Certainly, there are very few people here

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>who are direct a sentence of the Mayflower in sixteen twenty.

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>That's something of a tangential non starter point though, because

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at various points over our family histories, our genealogies, someone

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>came here and someone decided to assimilarly, to learn to

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>learn English, to subscribe to cultural Americanism, to subscribe to

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the broader Protestant work ethic, ethos that has defined this

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>country for hundreds of years, to do things like understand

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>American civics and constitutionalism and this and that. So we're

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a nation of Americans, both the native born and the umorents.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a better way to phrase it. But the point

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is that even slick Willy, even slick Willy Clinton in

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen nineties compelled to say that we are a

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>nation of laws. Of course, nowadays nowadays, if you support Ice,

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>if you support a Christy Noman DHS Tom Holman, the

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>borders are and all the Ice men and women, if

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you support them enforcing this nation's im immigration laws, then

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you will get invariably tarn feathered as a fascist. They'll

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>call it hate speech. They'll say, oh, man, what are

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they doing in rounding up and getting getting this guy?

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Who is he? He's just laying around here. He's not

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>committing any crimes. Yes he did. His crime was cries

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on the border illegally. His first act on our soil

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>was to be here illegally. When you don't enforce the

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>rule of law, respect for the rule of law dies.

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Without the rule of law, you are nothing. You are

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing whatsoever.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>We were talking a few minutes ago about these these cases,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Theupreme Corps, the Trenchender athlete case, and these distinctions between

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>biological male or biological female, or transgender or non transgender.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>The law is full of distinctions. It is replete with

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>attempts to draw lines and to try to say that

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>this is an attempt to devise a policy scheme or

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>legal scheme that work for this group or that group,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but not the other way around. The most important distinction

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>in all of the rule of law, at least for

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the United States of America, is that between Americans and

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>non Americans. It's deeply relevant when it comes to which

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>provisions of the Constitution apply and which provisions of all

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>many other statutes in our legal code apply as well.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats today have lost their everlasting minds when it

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>comes to the topic of immigration. They say that you

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are trying to go back to nineteen thirties era Germany,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that Ice is the gestape. How offensive, how utterly appallingly

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>offensive is this look. If you have an issue with

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>how this ministration is enforcing its immigration laws, maybe, just

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should have forced their hand by letting in

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 1>millions and millions millions of unvetted illegal aliens during the

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>four years of the Biden Harris regime. Maybe that was

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a good idea. Who would have thought of that. I'm

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>just so sick of this notion that we hear and

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>over over and over again that you have to have

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>committed a crime in order to justify Ice supporting you.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>First of all, Ike doesn't give a you know what

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about your own subjective approval or lack thereof. They couldn't

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>care less, But they don't need anything more than identifying

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>an illegal alien and saying, guess what you're out of here.

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 1>That's the way that it ought to work. Immigration abortion

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the two issues really more generally with Democrats have

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>more the leftist the quickest in the decades since the

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Clinton administration in the nineteen nineties, Bill Clinton was the

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>era of safe, legal and rare on the issue of abortion. Nowadays,

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>abortion is touted as the left's foremost pagan sacrament, as

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a moloch like altar to the pagan non god goddesses

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that they all too frequently worship in favor or in

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>lieu of the One True God. As for immigration, well,

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>their immigration priorities other than some occasional votes of relatives

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>any people like Eric Adams in New York City, people

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like John Fetterman in Pennsylvania, with very rare exceptions loan

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of voice and wilderness. Their take on immigration seems to

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>me that it is dictated by, on the one hand,

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>possibly corporate needs, that's the corporate chilling time Democrat, but

0:29:54.840 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>more generally and more often by multiculturalism and intersectionality. You know,

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they say that the so called great replacement theory is

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a conspiracy theory, it's not. There is a lot of

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>intentional attempts to dilute America's historical inheritance going on there

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. A lot of it also is just cynical

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>attempts to gain more voters. Really quite simple. But ultimately,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you are undermining and desecrating the rule of law. By

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>promoting a scheme of legal immigration, by encouraging those to

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>come here illegally, and by refusing to deport those who

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>are already here illegally, you are ruining support and respect

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>for the rule of law. You are ruining support for

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the only edifice that prevents us from descending into tyranny

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and anarchy. The rule of law is the bedrock of

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.239
<v Speaker 1>any society. Is one of Donald Trump's fortes. We are

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>blessed to have him in power right now. He's doing

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a bank up job at Frankly, when it comes to crime,

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to illegal immigration, keep it up, mister

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>President Bill Clinton. Ninth nineties, frankly would have agreed with you.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. Welcome back. Last we checked in

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on Megan Kelly, it wasn't pretty. Unfortunately, it's only gone

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>significantly worse since then trust me, I don't like to

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about the fact that Megan Kelly has ascended into

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>hyperconspiratorial lunacy. I would much prefer it to be the

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>case that Megan Kelly were still a voice for civilizational stunning.

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at Megan Kelly's career, it's really

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>only about meg Kelly feels in a given moment, is

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>better to boost herself or to better acculturate herself to

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>her audience or her cliqts more accurately at a given time.

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You see what's one time back on Fox News, me

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and Kelly really made her bones. She advanced up the

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>corporate ladder there at News Corp. As a no nonsense,

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>vaguely centrist ish kind of lawyerly proseput style interviewer who

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>can forget her every very very difficult grilling, probably over

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the top offensive grilling of Donald Trump back in that

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen President of primary debate. Fox News didn't like

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that very much. She ended up going to NBC News,

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>where she tried to appease her left wing bosses. At

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty Rock, she took a very hard left stance on issues,

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>where today she now ironically claims to be pretty hardcore

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>issues like transgenderism. There was this infamous segment on Making

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Kelly's Show, her very short lived show in NBC years ago,

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>where she brought on a group a group of teenagers

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and was lauding them for their courage for transitioning from

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>girls to boys or boys to girls. Now, Megan or

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Grandma Groper as we prefer to call her, Grandma Draper,

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>says that she's had something of a change of heart

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>on the issue of transgenderism for teenie, but really, does

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>any religious person, does any religious Jew or Christian have

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to evolve or have a change of heart on the

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>notion of male female sexual dimorphism. It's only right there

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty seventh verse of the entire Bible, in

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Genesis one twenty seven, the notion that God made man

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>his image male and female had created them. Eventually, after

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>being fired by NBC News, Main Kelly reservices with her

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>current show being and Kelly Show, and for a while

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it was going just fine. Indeed, after the horrific hamas

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Pegram the Simhatora massacre of October seven, twenty twenty three,

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Megan had yours truly on as I guessed fairly frequently,

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>including one appearance where I was on for an hour

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or more. It was a really deep dive and all

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the various angles and facets of the then all too

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>fresh slaughter and the war that was to come. Unfortunately,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>mein Kelly over the past we'll go back potentially as

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>far as year ish, but really really really accelerating over

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the past half year and going into hyperdrive after Charlie

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Kirks assassination. At this point Me and Kelly has made

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>her bed with the enemies of Western civilization. She has

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly made her loyalty to individuals like Candae Owens at

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Tuger Carlson. No, that would be Candace Owens, who is

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>a literal nineteen thirties Germany esque Jew hater, who is

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>an avowid enemy of Western civilization for that matter, who

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I know from people who attended her wedding. She had

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a drink called Pudence Punch because of her russophilia and

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>love for the Kremlin in Russia. Canis Owens, who implicated

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Erica Kirk, who Megan pretends to defend Kansas has implicated

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Erica Kirk in her own husband's assassination. Literally a conspiracy

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>theorist so dripping in utter madness that even Alex Jones

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>think felt compelled recently to say, stop, you're making us

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>look bad. Really he did that, check the record. And

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Megan also has made her undying loyalty known to Tucker Carlson,

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the single leading provocateur of the anti American, anti Semitic,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>anti Western quote unquote right, someone whose daily show is

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>filled with myriad apologia for Russia, China, Oran Venezuela. He

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>literally defended Maduro and Venezuela is a daily dose of

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 1>how to make the American people stupider. That's what Megan

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Kelly is what I signed up for. Well, just last week,

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>less than a mom that though she called me a

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>snake on her show, Megan who is the quintessential coward

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>because she refuses to actually go with the courage of

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>her admittedly kind of only half baits convictions. She refuses

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to do anything whatsoever to call out the lunacy from

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>her friends, refuses, categoric refuses to say, can't just stop, Tucker, stop,

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? It's pure cowardice. So she gratuitously

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>dunked on me about a month ago, for no reason,

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>called me a snake for having done it nothing whatsoever

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>ovent to retweet one or two vaguely critical tweets. And

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>now last week, Megan went on her best friend Tucker

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Carlson the Doha Shill, because Tucker is, if nothing, if

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.760
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, he is certainly a shill for the regime

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and Katar. So Megan Grandma grayper Kelly went on Tucker

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the Dohah Shill Carlson Show last week, and boy was

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it a doozy. They were celebrating who else but Tucker's

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>most controversial recent guest, otherwise known as the lifelong arch

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>foe of their purported friend Charlie Kirk. Nick Fuentes, our

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>dear friend Dave Ruben put together quite a montage of this.

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and watch. This is Joseph Stalin's birthday. I'm

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a family. You're a fan of Stalins as an admirer.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, but he actually has a lot of things

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 4>he talks about that you're like, huh, is it not

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 4>a bad point about our country? So we'll be going

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 4>out telling people vote for a protest candidate, vote for

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 4>the Democrat, vote for a third party, don't vote vote

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 4>for anyone else, Do not give the anchor baby your vote.

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 4>Disgusting and that's a message for Vance in twenty.

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Eight There is value to be derived from that guy's messaging.

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Why do we say Hitler's cool and make jokes about

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 4>this because we are destroying the secular religion of liberalism

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 4>and the Holocaust, which go hand in glove.

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 1>That's why he asked.

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:44.479
<v Speaker 4>Me about the six million. To tell you the truth.

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how many Jews died during the Holocaust.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Don't care.

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:53.959
<v Speaker 1>He's very interesting. Congratulations, Grandma, you officially made your bed. Look,

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we all see what's going on here. Nay Kelly, who

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly is not happy being consigned to the digit ghetto.

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>A woman who thinks she should be on cable news

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even daytime television as she used to be

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with NBC, now desperate to get in with the cool kids,

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to try to appeal to the youth in the twilight

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>years of her career. Ditto Tucker Carlson, by the way,

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>also formerly of cable News, also consigned to the digital

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 1>ghetto now. Tucker is a slightly different situation because he

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>really does seem to have some genuine animus and hatred,

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>not just for Jews, but also for many Christians, frankly,

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and also for Western civilization more generally. But Grandma Grouper

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 1>is making a purely cynical play here to fall over

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 1>hel to trip over herself, to apologize for the gutter, trash, filth,

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the utter verman, as Charlie Kirk called him of Nick Flentes.

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Is this how you treat your friend? I mean, these

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>two call Charlie Kirk their friend. Fuentess was the lifelong

0:38:55.000 --> 0:39:00.439
<v Speaker 1>arch foe of Charlie Curry. Disgusting, absolutely disgusting, And it's

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>all this desperate play for clicks. You know, when I

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 1>decided to leave my law firm trajectory, when I left

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the law firm years ago now and I finished my

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>clerkship for my federal judge, and I said, though I

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>was going to embark on a different kind of career,

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the kind of career that I'm doing right now speaking

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>into this microphone, producing audio video content, writing columns, writing books, essays.

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>When I said I was going to leave the legal

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.280
<v Speaker 1>career and do all of this, I made a promise

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>myself that I would never sell out. I'm in this

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for the truth. I'm in this because America matters, Because

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>ideas matter, because Western civilization matters, because the Biblical inheritance matters.

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm in this business. When you were deciding

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>who to get your information from, who to be a

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>consumer of, when it comes to the media, when it

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to information, you should ask yourself, is this person

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>in it because he or she cares about values and

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the truth or in it just to be a clickhore. Unfortunately,

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Grandma Grouper has established herself as the foremost clickhore of

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the current online zeitgeist. It's a really sad, entredded descent

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch, but unfortunately there's really no one to blame

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>for it other than Grandma Groper, Megan Kelly herself. She's

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>made her bed, she will lie with it. It's a

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>bold strategy, and frankly, I don't think it's going to

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>pay off for her. I'm Josh hammer having good EATA

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 2>The Josh Hamber Show is a member of the Trust Project.