1 00:00:06,080 --> 00:00:08,879 Speaker 1: I'm Josh Shammer, and this is Josh Shammer Show. Well 2 00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:12,440 Speaker 1: wish he might fellow use a happy passover, wishing our 3 00:00:12,520 --> 00:00:15,520 Speaker 1: Christian friends well, of course a blessed Holy Week. As 4 00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:18,720 Speaker 1: we gear up towards Good Friday and this Easter Sunday weekend, 5 00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: no shortage of things happening in the news before we 6 00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:23,319 Speaker 1: take some time off for the holidays. There is the 7 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 1: Artemis space launch. What is the symbolism of America going 8 00:00:26,920 --> 00:00:29,920 Speaker 1: back to the moon. There is the continued debate over 9 00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:33,320 Speaker 1: Operation Epic Firey. Donald Trump addressing the nation today as 10 00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:35,279 Speaker 1: to what is happening in the Middle East. We will 11 00:00:35,320 --> 00:00:37,839 Speaker 1: assess what is likely to be the outcome of this 12 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:40,479 Speaker 1: speech and the fallout of that speech over the next 13 00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:44,200 Speaker 1: few news cycles heading into this holiday weekend into next week. 14 00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:47,400 Speaker 1: Tiger Woods now admitting that he has a problem and 15 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:50,000 Speaker 1: will seek treatment. We will revisit that much later in 16 00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:51,760 Speaker 1: the show, but for now we are going to open 17 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:53,680 Speaker 1: with this the big topic of the day, which the 18 00:00:53,680 --> 00:00:57,560 Speaker 1: theme of today's show is a massive, massive arguments early 19 00:00:57,680 --> 00:01:00,920 Speaker 1: today at the United States Supreme Court. I listened to 20 00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:03,800 Speaker 1: much of this or argument, so you did not have to. 21 00:01:04,280 --> 00:01:07,280 Speaker 1: This is an argument that is styled as Trump versus Barbara. 22 00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:10,319 Speaker 1: I've been tracking it since it's very early days in 23 00:01:10,440 --> 00:01:13,560 Speaker 1: Federal disrect Court. It is a challenge to the constitutionality 24 00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:16,959 Speaker 1: of one of Donald Trump's most high profile, indeed contentious, 25 00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:20,959 Speaker 1: Day one executive orders, mainly his executive order attempting to 26 00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:27,240 Speaker 1: eliminate automatic constitutionally secured birthright citizenship for the children of 27 00:01:27,319 --> 00:01:30,640 Speaker 1: legal aliens and the children of those who are only 28 00:01:30,680 --> 00:01:33,680 Speaker 1: here on a temporary legal basis. In other words, those 29 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:36,520 Speaker 1: who are, to use the legal nomenclature are so journals, 30 00:01:36,760 --> 00:01:38,480 Speaker 1: not those who are here on a green card or 31 00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:40,680 Speaker 1: on a path to print residence, those who are on 32 00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 1: a Torus visa or something much of much lesser time 33 00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:48,800 Speaker 1: duration such as that. Now, I've been fascinated by this 34 00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:51,920 Speaker 1: issue for a very very long time, so I want 35 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: to start by just laying out some of the legal 36 00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 1: backgrounds of this issue, and I will give you my 37 00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:02,320 Speaker 1: own take on this issue, and to not to bury 38 00:02:02,360 --> 00:02:04,840 Speaker 1: the lead, I think Donald Trump is emphatically correct actually 39 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:07,200 Speaker 1: in this which is a minority opinion, or the historically 40 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:10,560 Speaker 1: has been a minority opinion, not just in legal world 41 00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:15,560 Speaker 1: more generally, but even within originalists right of center legal worlds. 42 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:18,040 Speaker 1: This is a minority opinion. I happen to think that 43 00:02:18,080 --> 00:02:20,280 Speaker 1: it is genuinely correct. I've been steying this issue since 44 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:22,160 Speaker 1: my earliest days of law school, have been arguing against 45 00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:24,640 Speaker 1: many classmates, frankly, for a very long time. I want 46 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:27,239 Speaker 1: to walk you through the actual arguments. Then we'll get 47 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:30,000 Speaker 1: back to today's oral argument at the Supreme Court. I will 48 00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:31,440 Speaker 1: unpack some of that for you, talk about some of 49 00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 1: the policy issues, and we will go from now. So 50 00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:37,160 Speaker 1: we start, as does any legal argument, we start with 51 00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:41,920 Speaker 1: the text of the actual clause. This debate hinges upon, 52 00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:46,120 Speaker 1: among other sources, the actual text of the Fourteenth Amendment itself. 53 00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:48,920 Speaker 1: The forty Amendment was ratified in eighteen sixty eight. It 54 00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:52,120 Speaker 1: was ratified three years after the surrender of General Lead 55 00:02:52,200 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 1: to General Grant at Aththmatics Courthouse in Virginia. And the 56 00:02:56,880 --> 00:03:00,320 Speaker 1: intent above all of the Fourteenth Amendment was twofold. 57 00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:01,000 Speaker 2: One. 58 00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 1: It was to make sure that blacks were treated the 59 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,800 Speaker 1: exact same as White's period, full stop, end of story. 60 00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:12,240 Speaker 1: And two, the goal was to constitutionalize was to constitutionalize 61 00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:15,560 Speaker 1: the statute that was passed by Congress two years prior. 62 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 1: These civil rights activating sixty six, a beneficial peace of 63 00:03:20,040 --> 00:03:24,960 Speaker 1: legislation that attempted to secure rights for freedmen for freed blacks, 64 00:03:25,240 --> 00:03:27,840 Speaker 1: but unfortunately met a lot of constitucial challenges. They were 65 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:32,080 Speaker 1: trying to constitutionalize this statute. Essentially after the fact, both 66 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:35,320 Speaker 1: of those reasons for the Amendment are going to come 67 00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:38,720 Speaker 1: here into play momentarily. So bear that in mind as 68 00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:40,840 Speaker 1: I read to you the actual text of the relevant 69 00:03:40,840 --> 00:03:43,480 Speaker 1: clause of the fourteen Amendment, which is fourty Amendments, Section one, 70 00:03:43,640 --> 00:03:46,760 Speaker 1: Clause one, otherwise known as the Citizenship Clause, which reads 71 00:03:46,760 --> 00:03:50,240 Speaker 1: as follows, quote, all persons born or naturalized in the 72 00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:53,640 Speaker 1: United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens 73 00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:57,120 Speaker 1: of the United States and of the state wherein they resign. 74 00:03:57,720 --> 00:03:59,720 Speaker 1: So a lot to impact there. But the very first 75 00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:02,440 Speaker 1: thing that you should know is that the reason that 76 00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:05,840 Speaker 1: the drafters led with this is because again, the goal 77 00:04:05,880 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 1: above all here was to make sure that black people 78 00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:11,720 Speaker 1: were treated the same way as white people. 79 00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:13,800 Speaker 2: They were going to be full fledged citizens of the 80 00:04:13,840 --> 00:04:14,320 Speaker 2: United States. 81 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:17,720 Speaker 1: Specifically, the purpose of the Decisiship clause was to overturn 82 00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:21,480 Speaker 1: the most wrongheaded, morally, im leegally monster decision in the 83 00:04:21,600 --> 00:04:23,920 Speaker 1: entire history of the Supreme Court the eighteen fifty eight 84 00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:28,400 Speaker 1: horrific case of Dread Scott. In the Scott case from 85 00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:31,559 Speaker 1: a decade prior, the Court infamously held that black people 86 00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:34,200 Speaker 1: were not and could never be citizens of the United States. 87 00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:37,159 Speaker 1: So the decisionship clause in the fort Amendment was intended 88 00:04:37,279 --> 00:04:42,240 Speaker 1: to overrule that. Now, the relevant debate here in terms 89 00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:46,799 Speaker 1: of constitutionally required birthright citizenship for children of legal aliens 90 00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 1: or children of sojourners legal aliens who are here in 91 00:04:49,920 --> 00:04:53,839 Speaker 1: a short term basis essentially hinges on the phrase subject 92 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:57,719 Speaker 1: to the jurisdiction thereof, because we recognize here that you 93 00:04:57,800 --> 00:05:00,640 Speaker 1: have to be born here in order to enter this conversation. 94 00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:03,039 Speaker 1: That is why we have so called anchor babies, people 95 00:05:03,040 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 1: that are here illegally. That's why we have birth tourism, 96 00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:08,800 Speaker 1: this cottage industry that is now to the tune of 97 00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:12,159 Speaker 1: billions of dollars there. So the relevant clause here is 98 00:05:12,279 --> 00:05:14,719 Speaker 1: not that a person has to be born or naturalized 99 00:05:15,279 --> 00:05:18,279 Speaker 1: in the United States, but actually subject to the jurisdiction. 100 00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:21,560 Speaker 1: And that raised the question then, as does subject to 101 00:05:21,560 --> 00:05:24,080 Speaker 1: the jurisdiction mean On the one hand, meinly that you 102 00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:26,360 Speaker 1: can be arrested and tried for a crime, that you're 103 00:05:26,440 --> 00:05:30,680 Speaker 1: subject to the civil and criminal jurisdiction of the geographic 104 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:33,200 Speaker 1: entity the sovereign city in which you find yourself, whether 105 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 1: legally or illegally, or is there something quite a bit 106 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:39,520 Speaker 1: more going on than that? Is there more, shall we say, 107 00:05:39,560 --> 00:05:43,240 Speaker 1: a more complete jurisdiction that entails things such as the 108 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:48,400 Speaker 1: sovereigns acceptance of your allegiance, a full complete political allegiance. Well, 109 00:05:48,440 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 1: we're gonna get to that, actually just a second year. 110 00:05:50,120 --> 00:05:51,279 Speaker 1: Before we do, I want to tell you a little 111 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:53,480 Speaker 1: bit about one responsors for today's show, which is a 112 00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:57,080 Speaker 1: wonderful organization called Angel Studios. Look, I recently joined the 113 00:05:57,080 --> 00:06:00,600 Speaker 1: Angel Guild myself, and I actually watched their excellent recent documentary, 114 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:02,920 Speaker 1: The Death of Recess. I was not necessarily spreading this, 115 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:05,760 Speaker 1: but it was just a truly fantastic documentary. And let 116 00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:08,159 Speaker 1: me tell you, folks, I come from a long line 117 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,960 Speaker 1: of teachers. My great grandmother, grandmother mother were all teachers, 118 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:15,520 Speaker 1: and I heard endlessly from my mother about the depravity 119 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:18,680 Speaker 1: of the teachers union and how they would prioritize themselves 120 00:06:18,760 --> 00:06:20,160 Speaker 1: over the needs of children. 121 00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:20,440 Speaker 2: There. 122 00:06:20,600 --> 00:06:23,200 Speaker 1: Parents, meanwhile, are being pushed out. Kids are being pulled 123 00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:25,279 Speaker 1: into all sorts of ideological battles, a lot of it 124 00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:28,560 Speaker 1: being pushed by teachers, unions like the NEA itself. It 125 00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:31,840 Speaker 1: means something as basic as recess, movement, freedom, childhood. It's 126 00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:36,000 Speaker 1: all disappearing, frankly from within our grasp, within our eyes, 127 00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:39,719 Speaker 1: and is outly Why platforms like Angel Studios matter because 128 00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:41,880 Speaker 1: they're willing to tell stories that others won't. So again, 129 00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:44,160 Speaker 1: I watched documentary. Folks, you should go ahead and check 130 00:06:44,160 --> 00:06:46,919 Speaker 1: out yourself. Go to Angel dot com slash hammer to 131 00:06:47,040 --> 00:06:50,080 Speaker 1: join the Angel Guild and watch Death of Recess right now, 132 00:06:50,560 --> 00:06:52,840 Speaker 1: you care about kids. This is essential of you. Again, 133 00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:56,359 Speaker 1: that is Angel dot com slash Hammer. So take us 134 00:06:56,400 --> 00:06:59,520 Speaker 1: back then to the debates. I mentioned earlier that is 135 00:06:59,520 --> 00:07:03,520 Speaker 1: impossible to understand the fourteen Man without understanding the statue 136 00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:06,679 Speaker 1: that was ratified two years prior. This actually was talked 137 00:07:06,680 --> 00:07:09,800 Speaker 1: a lot about during the argument Justice Morning. The statue 138 00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:13,520 Speaker 1: was the Civil Rights Act of eighteen sixty six, and 139 00:07:13,880 --> 00:07:16,880 Speaker 1: the intent, which normally disputes of the amendment, was simply 140 00:07:16,920 --> 00:07:20,800 Speaker 1: to constitutionalize this statue. Now, the inciszenship clause of the 141 00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:25,680 Speaker 1: Civil Rights Act, beating sixty six was using slightly different language, 142 00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:29,520 Speaker 1: but it is clearer language, I would argue, and gets 143 00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:33,000 Speaker 1: us to the exact same principle, and the Civil Rights 144 00:07:33,080 --> 00:07:35,840 Speaker 1: Act of being sixty six says that anyone who is 145 00:07:36,080 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 1: born in the United States and not subject to any 146 00:07:38,920 --> 00:07:43,480 Speaker 1: foreign power is a citizen of the jurisdiction wherein they preside. 147 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:47,920 Speaker 1: Now the reason that the language was changed slightly because 148 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:51,160 Speaker 1: they wanted to make absolutely sure that the children of 149 00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:54,800 Speaker 1: Indian tribes who had an allegiance to the Indian tribes 150 00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:59,400 Speaker 1: were not automatically, by sheer dint of constitutional force, granted 151 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:03,320 Speaker 1: United sis State's citizenship. Crucial to this understanding is the 152 00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:07,400 Speaker 1: fact that Indian children were not automatically granted citizenship, not 153 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 1: via the Constitution, by a statutes. In fact, Congress passed 154 00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:15,920 Speaker 1: the Indian Clizenship Act in nineteen twenty four. Nineteen twenty four, 155 00:08:16,320 --> 00:08:20,400 Speaker 1: fifty six years after the forty men was ratified, was 156 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:23,000 Speaker 1: passed during the Calvin Coolidge presidency. That was the first 157 00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:26,920 Speaker 1: time that the children of American Indians were automatically granted citizenship. 158 00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:29,520 Speaker 1: And indeed, that is the argument here. The armament is 159 00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:31,440 Speaker 1: that a lot of this actually is up to Congress 160 00:08:31,480 --> 00:08:33,720 Speaker 1: it's actually up to the political branches. Not all of 161 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:39,400 Speaker 1: this was constitutionalized by this language. Now, the drafters of 162 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:42,280 Speaker 1: the forty Amendment happened to be pretty clear on this 163 00:08:42,440 --> 00:08:46,040 Speaker 1: as well, so there's no shortage of supporting quotations on this. 164 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:48,000 Speaker 1: There's actually been a bevy of scholarship on this just 165 00:08:48,000 --> 00:08:49,959 Speaker 1: for the past year or so. After this executive order 166 00:08:49,960 --> 00:08:52,200 Speaker 1: was signed by President Trump in Dulaw, many of it 167 00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:55,320 Speaker 1: was cited this morning by the extremely capable Solicitor General 168 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:57,880 Speaker 1: of the United States, John Sower, who was just extraordinary, 169 00:08:57,920 --> 00:09:01,400 Speaker 1: I thought in his comments this morning. For instance, Congressman 170 00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 1: James Wilson, who was the House Judiciary Committee chairman back 171 00:09:04,960 --> 00:09:07,000 Speaker 1: during this time, was a leading drafter of the actual 172 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:09,480 Speaker 1: text of the Fourth Amendi. He famously said that the 173 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:13,080 Speaker 1: amendment was quote establishing no new right in declaring no 174 00:09:13,160 --> 00:09:14,719 Speaker 1: new principle. In other words, it was just trying to 175 00:09:14,760 --> 00:09:17,960 Speaker 1: constitutionalize the Civil Rights Act from two years prior, which 176 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:22,000 Speaker 1: said that you can't be subject to any foreign power. Similarly, 177 00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:25,320 Speaker 1: Senator Jacob Power, who was the lead, single lead author 178 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:28,000 Speaker 1: of the actual language that made it into the fourteen 179 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:32,080 Speaker 1: Amendments citizenship clause, Jacob Power described as quote simply declaratory 180 00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 1: of what I regard as the law of the land already. 181 00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:37,200 Speaker 1: In other words, I barely to say this, but rather 182 00:09:37,240 --> 00:09:40,000 Speaker 1: we're saying in the constitution, to make sure the statute 183 00:09:40,240 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 1: is constitutionalized. And there's just again, it goes on and 184 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:48,199 Speaker 1: on and on. The chairman of the us N Judiciary Committee, 185 00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:52,240 Speaker 1: Lineman Shrumble, similarly said that subject to the jurisdiction, in 186 00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:55,320 Speaker 1: the words of the fourteen memenent sists clause means subjects 187 00:09:55,320 --> 00:09:58,200 Speaker 1: to the United States is quote complete jurisdiction, which means 188 00:09:58,280 --> 00:10:01,560 Speaker 1: not owing allegiance to anybody else. And this was indeed 189 00:10:01,679 --> 00:10:05,079 Speaker 1: the understanding for the first few decades after the radification 190 00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:07,280 Speaker 1: of the fourty Amendment. So the very first time that 191 00:10:07,320 --> 00:10:09,360 Speaker 1: this ever came up in debate was in a case 192 00:10:09,400 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 1: just a few years later called the slaughter House Cases 193 00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:13,800 Speaker 1: in nineteen seventy three. It was not the crux of 194 00:10:13,840 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 1: the issues. It was what lawyers called dicta. It came 195 00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:19,560 Speaker 1: up in the background. It was not the actual holding, 196 00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:22,400 Speaker 1: or was not the question presented for the court to decide. 197 00:10:22,640 --> 00:10:25,720 Speaker 1: But it is nonetheless worth noting, albeit and non binding diicta, 198 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:28,360 Speaker 1: that the justice in question who wrote the opinion Justice 199 00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: samul Miller wrote that the decisionship clause in the Fourteenmendments 200 00:10:31,480 --> 00:10:36,400 Speaker 1: quote intended to exclude from its operation children of citizens 201 00:10:36,520 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 1: or subjects of foreign states born within the United States. 202 00:10:39,679 --> 00:10:42,440 Speaker 1: So the very first time this clause came up, the 203 00:10:42,559 --> 00:10:46,360 Speaker 1: justice in question says that subjects of foreign states born 204 00:10:46,400 --> 00:10:49,840 Speaker 1: in the US, this doesn't cover them. That clearly applies 205 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:52,800 Speaker 1: to legal aliens today, no question whatsoever about that. 206 00:10:53,520 --> 00:10:54,080 Speaker 2: Very clearly. 207 00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:56,440 Speaker 1: Also in eighteen eighty four, and in a case that 208 00:10:56,559 --> 00:10:59,040 Speaker 1: John Sowerb talked about this morning at the Supreme Court, 209 00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:02,160 Speaker 1: in this case called Elk versus Wilkins, at the time 210 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:06,040 Speaker 1: Justice Horace Gray held that quote subject to the jurisdiction 211 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:08,880 Speaker 1: in the meaning of the Fourth Amendments means quote, not 212 00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:11,840 Speaker 1: merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction 213 00:11:11,920 --> 00:11:15,800 Speaker 1: in the United States, but completely subject, completely subject to 214 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:19,959 Speaker 1: their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. 215 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:24,680 Speaker 1: That's crucial language there, direct and immediate allegiance. Again, the 216 00:11:24,800 --> 00:11:27,520 Speaker 1: children of legal aliens and the children of legal aliens 217 00:11:27,559 --> 00:11:31,440 Speaker 1: who are short term visitors here on temporary visa clearly 218 00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:34,320 Speaker 1: do not owe some sort of allegiance to the United states. 219 00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:38,640 Speaker 1: This stuff has been buried by much of legal academia. 220 00:11:38,679 --> 00:11:41,319 Speaker 1: They wanted to think that the Amendments is unambiguous, a 221 00:11:41,480 --> 00:11:44,840 Speaker 1: clearly grand relationship to children legals. But we're here to 222 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:49,120 Speaker 1: tell you that understanding is mistaken. Whether or not Trump's 223 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:52,439 Speaker 1: gonna win on this is another question, but he is right, frankly, 224 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:01,559 Speaker 1: So we're continuing our unpacking of the earth riselationship constitutional, 225 00:12:01,720 --> 00:12:05,679 Speaker 1: legal and political debate. Now, I was explaining in the 226 00:12:05,720 --> 00:12:08,199 Speaker 1: opening part of our show how the Amendments language was 227 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:11,400 Speaker 1: had something to constitutionalize a statute past two years prior 228 00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:13,560 Speaker 1: in the eighteen sixties, and how for the first few 229 00:12:13,600 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 1: decades it went uncontested that this clause in the Constitution 230 00:12:18,360 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 1: had nothing whatsoever to do with anyone who was here 231 00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:23,840 Speaker 1: illegally or frankly, anyone here who is here in any 232 00:12:23,840 --> 00:12:27,520 Speaker 1: capacity other than a permanent capacity. Now the rubber starts 233 00:12:27,520 --> 00:12:29,680 Speaker 1: to meet the road a little bit in a case 234 00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:32,400 Speaker 1: called wan kim Ark that the court decided in eighteen 235 00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:34,360 Speaker 1: ninety eight. So in the wankim Mark case of eight 236 00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:38,320 Speaker 1: ninety eight, the fat pattern here is very irrelevant. Horace Gray, 237 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:40,040 Speaker 1: who was the justice in question, who had just ridden 238 00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:42,679 Speaker 1: the elk v. Wilkins case fourteen years prior. That's where 239 00:12:42,720 --> 00:12:45,679 Speaker 1: he said that there's complete total allegiance there. He does 240 00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:48,840 Speaker 1: something of an inexplicable one to eighty where he does 241 00:12:48,880 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 1: holds here that the child in question, who was the 242 00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:56,240 Speaker 1: children of legal Chinese aliens, He said that this child 243 00:12:56,520 --> 00:13:00,480 Speaker 1: is automatically accorded us isnship. But first of all, it's 244 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:03,280 Speaker 1: inexplicable that he did this reversal in fourteen years. That's 245 00:13:03,280 --> 00:13:07,800 Speaker 1: no consistent and frankly, Justice John Marshall Harlan, who was 246 00:13:07,840 --> 00:13:10,600 Speaker 1: the sole dissenter in the separate but equal case Pleasy 247 00:13:10,640 --> 00:13:12,960 Speaker 1: versus Vercaus, he was actually the lead dissenter also in 248 00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:15,079 Speaker 1: Wan Kim Mark. He pointed out that Horace Gray was 249 00:13:15,080 --> 00:13:18,520 Speaker 1: acting in intellectually inconsistant fashion into his dessense hold that aside. 250 00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:22,280 Speaker 1: Even taking the Wan Kim Mark majority opinion at face value, 251 00:13:22,400 --> 00:13:25,280 Speaker 1: what the court emphasized over and over and over again 252 00:13:26,080 --> 00:13:28,080 Speaker 1: was that the reason that it held this way was 253 00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:32,800 Speaker 1: because Wang Kim Mark's parents, these Chinese nationals, had domicile. 254 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:36,720 Speaker 1: They were permanently domicile. If you control f on this opinion, 255 00:13:36,720 --> 00:13:38,720 Speaker 1: you'll see the word domatil come up over and over 256 00:13:38,760 --> 00:13:41,120 Speaker 1: and over again. So they were here on what was 257 00:13:41,160 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 1: the functional late nineteenth century equivalent of a green card. 258 00:13:44,200 --> 00:13:48,160 Speaker 1: They were here trying to establish full residence. Wan kim 259 00:13:48,200 --> 00:13:51,199 Speaker 1: Mark does not stand for the proposition that the acl used. 260 00:13:51,160 --> 00:13:53,920 Speaker 1: Attorney ce Cilia Wong unpersuasively said this morning that it 261 00:13:53,960 --> 00:13:56,439 Speaker 1: stands for. It does not stand for the notion that 262 00:13:56,520 --> 00:14:00,920 Speaker 1: the children of illegal ambliens are automatically afforded birth relationship. 263 00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:04,440 Speaker 1: That is a fundamental misunderstanding of this case in eighteen 264 00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:07,880 Speaker 1: ninety eight, Wan kim Ark, the Court has never, ever, ever, 265 00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:11,960 Speaker 1: clearly ruled ever as to whether or not the children 266 00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:14,480 Speaker 1: of illegal aliens, or the children of those here on 267 00:14:14,520 --> 00:14:19,760 Speaker 1: a short term sojourner basis, are automatically afforded citizenship. The 268 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:22,880 Speaker 1: liberals like to point to aid opinion of nineteen eighty 269 00:14:22,920 --> 00:14:25,800 Speaker 1: two called Pliler versus Dough, which deals with a totally 270 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:28,320 Speaker 1: different fact pattern. That's the case at Texas that was 271 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:32,440 Speaker 1: assessing whether or not the children of illegal aliens have 272 00:14:32,640 --> 00:14:36,720 Speaker 1: a right to go to public, taxpayer funded schools. Unfortunately, 273 00:14:36,720 --> 00:14:39,360 Speaker 1: they said the answer is yes. And in the course's opinion, 274 00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:42,400 Speaker 1: one of the court's iconic late twenty century liberals, man 275 00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:45,920 Speaker 1: by the name of justice. William Brennan drops a footnote 276 00:14:46,240 --> 00:14:49,040 Speaker 1: speaking of non binding law. This is just pure dicta 277 00:14:49,120 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 1: is pure just intellectual amusing here, and he regurgitates onto 278 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:55,920 Speaker 1: his paper that he says, oh, Wan Kim Mark selld 279 00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:58,080 Speaker 1: the question as to whether or not the children of 280 00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:02,960 Speaker 1: illegals here born here are entitled to citizenship. But no, dude, 281 00:15:02,960 --> 00:15:06,360 Speaker 1: it actually didn't. And you saying as much in a 282 00:15:06,400 --> 00:15:09,360 Speaker 1: non binding footnote eighty four years later doesn't change the 283 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:12,480 Speaker 1: fact that the horrors gray opinion Wan Kim Mark had 284 00:15:12,600 --> 00:15:15,640 Speaker 1: nothing to do nothing to do with the children of 285 00:15:15,720 --> 00:15:19,080 Speaker 1: legal aliens. So this is a case of first impression, 286 00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:22,560 Speaker 1: as lawyers call, because it is a bespoke constitutional issue 287 00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:26,000 Speaker 1: that the Court has actually never definitively ruled on. Now 288 00:15:26,320 --> 00:15:28,920 Speaker 1: they have touched on it in ancillary fashion, they have 289 00:15:28,960 --> 00:15:32,000 Speaker 1: never clearly definitively ruled on it. The Donald Trump executive 290 00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:33,720 Speaker 1: war in question, as I said at the outset, is 291 00:15:33,760 --> 00:15:38,080 Speaker 1: attempting to say that the Constitution does not require birthright 292 00:15:38,160 --> 00:15:43,080 Speaker 1: citizenship for children of legal aliens or children of temporary seajonors, 293 00:15:43,080 --> 00:15:45,720 Speaker 1: those who are here on a short term basis. Rather, 294 00:15:46,160 --> 00:15:49,000 Speaker 1: the implicit argument that the administration's making is that all 295 00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:52,120 Speaker 1: of this can and should be left up to we 296 00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:56,040 Speaker 1: the people, acting through our elect representatives, meaning in the Congress. 297 00:15:56,560 --> 00:15:59,040 Speaker 1: It's a pretty persuasive argument. Where the constitutional text is 298 00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:02,720 Speaker 1: not silent, the people make decisions. Where it is silence, 299 00:16:02,760 --> 00:16:05,000 Speaker 1: we make decisions. That's what happens. As I mentioned earlier, 300 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:07,800 Speaker 1: again in the Indian SISONSIB Act of nineteen twenty four, 301 00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:13,520 Speaker 1: we decided to statutorially codify Congress added additional layers of 302 00:16:13,600 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 1: guaranteed citizenship. 303 00:16:15,280 --> 00:16:16,280 Speaker 2: Congress can do that. 304 00:16:16,360 --> 00:16:19,280 Speaker 1: If Congress wanted to legislate tomorrow that the children of 305 00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:22,600 Speaker 1: people here on a tourist visa, student vis whatever are citizens, 306 00:16:22,720 --> 00:16:26,200 Speaker 1: they can do that. You can even argue that's good policy. 307 00:16:26,240 --> 00:16:27,960 Speaker 1: I'm not sure if it is. You can make the argument. 308 00:16:28,360 --> 00:16:29,840 Speaker 1: You can make the same argument for the children of 309 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:33,960 Speaker 1: legal aliens. Congress can legislate that too, but they haven't. 310 00:16:34,640 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 1: Instead the acl you know, all the liberal NGOs are 311 00:16:37,240 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 1: relying on the fourteen Meendment, and the fourteenth Amendment is 312 00:16:40,840 --> 00:16:44,560 Speaker 1: not a persuasive point to make this argument, whether or 313 00:16:44,560 --> 00:16:47,000 Speaker 1: not it's actually going to matter in terms of trying 314 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:48,760 Speaker 1: to prognosticate a vote and what it means for Donald 315 00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:50,800 Speaker 1: True's political fortunes. That's a whole noother conversation. We'll get 316 00:16:50,840 --> 00:16:52,520 Speaker 1: to the conversation moment terribly. If no not, folks to sick. 317 00:16:52,600 --> 00:16:54,880 Speaker 1: Quick word from our other sponsor for today's show, which 318 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:56,840 Speaker 1: is a balance of Nature. You know, we talk a 319 00:16:56,840 --> 00:16:58,840 Speaker 1: lot on the show about getting back to basics, faith, 320 00:16:58,960 --> 00:17:02,360 Speaker 1: family foundations that actually work. Nutrition should be the same way. 321 00:17:02,400 --> 00:17:05,760 Speaker 1: When you look at labels, say it's obvious we've overcomplicated. 322 00:17:05,920 --> 00:17:07,480 Speaker 1: If you want to be more mindful of what you 323 00:17:07,520 --> 00:17:09,679 Speaker 1: eat and how you supplement, look to nature. When you 324 00:17:09,720 --> 00:17:13,359 Speaker 1: eat whole foods, you're getting their phyto nutrients, natural compounds 325 00:17:13,359 --> 00:17:17,040 Speaker 1: your body uses to adjust, repair, and respond every single day. 326 00:17:17,440 --> 00:17:20,200 Speaker 1: Bounce of Nature takes real fruits and vegetables and puts 327 00:17:20,200 --> 00:17:23,399 Speaker 1: them through a tailored vacuum cold process that stabilizes that 328 00:17:23,480 --> 00:17:27,080 Speaker 1: phyto nutrition. Their whole health system bundles their fruits and 329 00:17:27,160 --> 00:17:30,160 Speaker 1: veggies with fiber and spice, giving you forty seven whole 330 00:17:30,160 --> 00:17:33,840 Speaker 1: food ingredients and their phytoonutrients in one simple routine, and 331 00:17:33,920 --> 00:17:36,879 Speaker 1: their brand new freeze dried snacks go through a similar process, 332 00:17:36,920 --> 00:17:39,600 Speaker 1: so even your snacks can actually support your body whole 333 00:17:39,600 --> 00:17:42,960 Speaker 1: food phyto nutrition. Plus Balance of Nature helps you fight 334 00:17:43,080 --> 00:17:45,480 Speaker 1: the good fight. Save over thirty percent when you subscribe 335 00:17:45,480 --> 00:17:48,639 Speaker 1: at balance of nature dot com. Join hundreds of thousand 336 00:17:48,680 --> 00:17:51,360 Speaker 1: customers in one simple routine that's changed in the world. 337 00:17:51,600 --> 00:17:55,199 Speaker 1: Check out folks at balanced nature dot com. Now, is 338 00:17:55,280 --> 00:17:58,240 Speaker 1: any of this actually going to matter? Well, that is 339 00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:02,119 Speaker 1: the million dollar question. There are precisely two justice on 340 00:18:02,200 --> 00:18:04,800 Speaker 1: the US Supreme Courts who I think I can pretty 341 00:18:04,840 --> 00:18:07,200 Speaker 1: reliably count on to rule in favor of the Trump 342 00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:11,400 Speaker 1: administration's argument. Those who justice are Clarence Thomas and Sam Malito. 343 00:18:11,520 --> 00:18:14,080 Speaker 1: If I meet Candan, I'm just trying to count votes. 344 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:18,840 Speaker 1: I think any vote beyond that is extremely dicey and 345 00:18:19,040 --> 00:18:23,000 Speaker 1: is just totally something that cannot be counted on. Neil 346 00:18:23,040 --> 00:18:27,520 Speaker 1: Gorsich has had some aggressively pro American Indian opinions. Let's 347 00:18:27,520 --> 00:18:30,359 Speaker 1: recall that the debate here at the origins of this 348 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:33,320 Speaker 1: amendment passed in eighteen sixty eight RATIFY back then had 349 00:18:33,359 --> 00:18:36,240 Speaker 1: to do with Indian tribes that might implicate some of 350 00:18:36,240 --> 00:18:41,000 Speaker 1: Gorcich's sha always say, idiosyncratic sensitivities. He had questions, frankly, 351 00:18:41,040 --> 00:18:42,600 Speaker 1: that were all over the place. He asked some very 352 00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:45,560 Speaker 1: challenging questions of John Soward also has some challenging questions 353 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:49,040 Speaker 1: of the somewhat dim witted ACLU attorney Cecily Wonk, but 354 00:18:49,040 --> 00:18:53,439 Speaker 1: I thought give a very unpersuasive performance. John Roberts, the 355 00:18:53,800 --> 00:18:58,320 Speaker 1: very mercurial swing Justice, asks some questions that could mulitate 356 00:18:58,320 --> 00:19:01,400 Speaker 1: potentially in vote directions. Here there is the intriguing possibility 357 00:19:01,480 --> 00:19:05,080 Speaker 1: of maybe maybe there's a compromise here of sorts. Roberts 358 00:19:05,160 --> 00:19:09,159 Speaker 1: loves these bizarre, bespoke compromises. Maybe he might try to 359 00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:12,600 Speaker 1: craft some sort of narrow five justice coalition that and 360 00:19:12,640 --> 00:19:14,639 Speaker 1: I'm just speculating here based on when I heard this morning, 361 00:19:14,680 --> 00:19:19,199 Speaker 1: that maybe maybe holds the Constitution protects birthwrse relationship for 362 00:19:19,320 --> 00:19:22,879 Speaker 1: the children of illegals because maybe they intend by coming 363 00:19:22,920 --> 00:19:26,480 Speaker 1: here illegally to establish domicility, but the children of people 364 00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:29,520 Speaker 1: hearing a student visa don't. It's an intellectually muddled argument, 365 00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:31,760 Speaker 1: but it's the kind of thing that I could see 366 00:19:31,800 --> 00:19:34,439 Speaker 1: a guy like John Roberts trying to gather together a 367 00:19:34,440 --> 00:19:37,760 Speaker 1: five coalition. And certainly none of the liberal justice, the 368 00:19:37,760 --> 00:19:40,280 Speaker 1: three liberal ladies Kagan So and we Are and Jackson, 369 00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:41,960 Speaker 1: they are not going to join the trum Trump majority 370 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:43,119 Speaker 1: at all, zero chance. 371 00:19:43,400 --> 00:19:44,040 Speaker 2: End of story. 372 00:19:44,560 --> 00:19:47,920 Speaker 1: I think Kavanaugh is probably the likeliest of the Republican 373 00:19:48,080 --> 00:19:52,240 Speaker 1: nominal justice to join Sam Alido and Clarence Thomas. I 374 00:19:52,280 --> 00:19:55,000 Speaker 1: hope that I am wrong in my pestimism here. I 375 00:19:55,359 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 1: genuinely hope that the votes are there. When I first 376 00:19:58,320 --> 00:20:01,040 Speaker 1: start looking into this issue, back in my first days 377 00:20:01,040 --> 00:20:04,800 Speaker 1: of law school, I also thought this was a close question. 378 00:20:05,440 --> 00:20:07,920 Speaker 1: And in fact, the man that I clerked for, Judge 379 00:20:07,960 --> 00:20:10,080 Speaker 1: James Hoe on the Fifth Circuit, one of, if not 380 00:20:10,119 --> 00:20:12,600 Speaker 1: the single greatest appellate court judge of the country, and 381 00:20:12,640 --> 00:20:15,399 Speaker 1: god willing a future spreen core justice, he. 382 00:20:15,480 --> 00:20:17,000 Speaker 2: Disagrees with what I've said here. 383 00:20:17,040 --> 00:20:19,320 Speaker 1: A Judge Shoe wrote a piece of legal scholarship years 384 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:22,600 Speaker 1: ago arguing essentially that if you're born here, you are 385 00:20:22,640 --> 00:20:25,520 Speaker 1: a citizen, and that means a lot to me that 386 00:20:25,560 --> 00:20:28,400 Speaker 1: a man this smart and this world researched what would 387 00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:30,720 Speaker 1: say and argue out there. But over the years I 388 00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:33,119 Speaker 1: looked into this more and more closely. I did become 389 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:37,119 Speaker 1: convinced that the drafters of this of this amendment, in 390 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:41,120 Speaker 1: no way what's so freaking ever, would have looked at 391 00:20:41,160 --> 00:20:45,320 Speaker 1: today's immigration morass, at our current quagmire and say that 392 00:20:45,359 --> 00:20:47,199 Speaker 1: if you were born here, if you are, if you 393 00:20:47,240 --> 00:20:49,280 Speaker 1: are you come in the ninth month of pregnancy. Is 394 00:20:49,320 --> 00:20:52,560 Speaker 1: a Chinese tourist on a visa and you pop out 395 00:20:52,560 --> 00:20:55,159 Speaker 1: a baby at a birthing ward, or if you're a 396 00:20:55,240 --> 00:20:57,879 Speaker 1: vulnerable woman in your eighth month and you're shipped across 397 00:20:57,880 --> 00:20:59,959 Speaker 1: the border by the Cineloa Cartel or some other car 398 00:21:00,119 --> 00:21:02,520 Speaker 1: tell there, and you pop out a baby on the 399 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:04,800 Speaker 1: other side of the Rio grand and you guys says, Yeah, 400 00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:10,560 Speaker 1: it's unfathomable to me, unfathomable that that is possibly possibly 401 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:14,439 Speaker 1: what was meant. And that understanding of what I just 402 00:21:14,480 --> 00:21:17,200 Speaker 1: said is it is bolstered, bolstered by much of the 403 00:21:17,600 --> 00:21:22,480 Speaker 1: originalist evidence in this particular case. I hope that it 404 00:21:22,520 --> 00:21:24,600 Speaker 1: goes the right way, but I would try to brace 405 00:21:24,600 --> 00:21:26,440 Speaker 1: ourselves with the possibility that it will not go the 406 00:21:26,520 --> 00:21:28,080 Speaker 1: right way. And it'll be very interesting to see how 407 00:21:28,119 --> 00:21:30,119 Speaker 1: Donald Trump reacts to that. Trump is actually at the 408 00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:32,720 Speaker 1: courthouse this morning. There very rare, frankly, for President to 409 00:21:32,760 --> 00:21:34,800 Speaker 1: show up at our argument there. He cares a lot 410 00:21:34,840 --> 00:21:37,720 Speaker 1: about this, as he should, because our sovereignty is implicated. 411 00:21:38,280 --> 00:21:39,720 Speaker 1: It is the most important thing we have in nation. 412 00:21:39,760 --> 00:21:43,320 Speaker 1: Is our sovereignty is implicated by this question? He just says, really, 413 00:21:43,359 --> 00:21:46,320 Speaker 1: really really ought to read their history, read John Sowers 414 00:21:46,359 --> 00:21:48,359 Speaker 1: brief again and do the right thing. The stakes are 415 00:21:48,400 --> 00:21:51,000 Speaker 1: really really high. Whether they will actually do so, of course, 416 00:21:51,080 --> 00:21:52,879 Speaker 1: is another question, and you'll have to forgive me for 417 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:55,280 Speaker 1: being someone pessimistic about them. Folks here with this to 418 00:21:55,320 --> 00:21:56,800 Speaker 1: another commercial way, we'll be bret back the more on 419 00:21:56,840 --> 00:22:05,040 Speaker 1: the other side. Welcome back. Final thoughts on the birth 420 00:22:05,080 --> 00:22:07,720 Speaker 1: lislationship matter. Even if Donald Trump loses at the Supreme Courts, 421 00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:10,280 Speaker 1: which again, unfortunately I predict he is likely to do, 422 00:22:10,359 --> 00:22:13,720 Speaker 1: although the justices are actually doing it intellectually honest inquiry, 423 00:22:13,800 --> 00:22:16,960 Speaker 1: he should not. He should emphatically win. But even if 424 00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:19,160 Speaker 1: he does lose, that does not mean that Donald Trump's 425 00:22:19,160 --> 00:22:23,560 Speaker 1: election year midterm election immigration agenda is derailed in the slightest. 426 00:22:23,600 --> 00:22:26,200 Speaker 1: On the contrary, American people, despite what you hear, the 427 00:22:26,200 --> 00:22:28,240 Speaker 1: American people, according to the polls that we see here 428 00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:32,480 Speaker 1: on the show, continue to broadly support Donald Trump's immigration agenda. Now, 429 00:22:32,520 --> 00:22:36,280 Speaker 1: these specific details of x y z ice stand off 430 00:22:36,320 --> 00:22:39,400 Speaker 1: against x y Z left wing lunatic who is there 431 00:22:39,440 --> 00:22:43,040 Speaker 1: trying to obstruct justice, Well, those headlines, and that media 432 00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:46,320 Speaker 1: fallout might change depending on the pacissitudes of a given 433 00:22:46,359 --> 00:22:48,800 Speaker 1: news cycle, but the overall polling when it comes to 434 00:22:48,840 --> 00:22:52,879 Speaker 1: trying to deport criminal aliens above all, is overwhelmingly on 435 00:22:52,960 --> 00:22:56,959 Speaker 1: the side of the Trumpdministration and Donald Trump, Tom Homan, 436 00:22:57,760 --> 00:23:01,760 Speaker 1: Mark Wayne Moullin. They really should plow speed ahead when 437 00:23:01,920 --> 00:23:05,040 Speaker 1: it comes to immigration heading into this election year, no 438 00:23:05,480 --> 00:23:08,879 Speaker 1: doubt about that. Speaking of issues that are slightly more 439 00:23:08,880 --> 00:23:11,800 Speaker 1: contentious with the American public at a large though, there 440 00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:15,600 Speaker 1: is the issue of the war against Iran. Donald Trump 441 00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:19,040 Speaker 1: giving a national address today really for the first time 442 00:23:19,119 --> 00:23:20,640 Speaker 1: offering what we have called for him to do here 443 00:23:20,680 --> 00:23:23,400 Speaker 1: on the show of offering one of these solemn national 444 00:23:23,400 --> 00:23:26,800 Speaker 1: addresses talking about what is happening with Iran. What we 445 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:32,240 Speaker 1: can expect with Iran. My prediction and my understanding is 446 00:23:32,280 --> 00:23:36,320 Speaker 1: that Donal Trump is announcing that we are in the 447 00:23:36,359 --> 00:23:40,000 Speaker 1: final stages and that this is the beginning of the end, 448 00:23:40,560 --> 00:23:43,840 Speaker 1: and that this war will potentially be wrapping up fairly soon. 449 00:23:44,119 --> 00:23:47,119 Speaker 1: That we are engaged in negotiations with the new regime 450 00:23:47,560 --> 00:23:50,720 Speaker 1: over in Iran, and this is this is a new 451 00:23:50,760 --> 00:23:54,679 Speaker 1: regime change of sorts, and I expect that basically just 452 00:23:54,720 --> 00:23:57,240 Speaker 1: to be a lot of happy talk, to be honest 453 00:23:57,240 --> 00:24:01,880 Speaker 1: with you, and my prediction as to what exactly this 454 00:24:02,520 --> 00:24:04,480 Speaker 1: is really getting at, if we're trying to be between 455 00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:06,879 Speaker 1: the lines, here is as follows. Donald Trump's a man 456 00:24:06,880 --> 00:24:09,240 Speaker 1: who cares a lot about the markets. He's a man 457 00:24:09,280 --> 00:24:10,800 Speaker 1: who's made a lot of money in the markets. He's 458 00:24:10,800 --> 00:24:13,080 Speaker 1: been very successful playing the markets, being very successful in 459 00:24:13,080 --> 00:24:16,120 Speaker 1: investing leading companies, et cetera, etc. He pays very very 460 00:24:16,160 --> 00:24:19,879 Speaker 1: close attention to the markets. As he says repeatedly, you 461 00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:23,840 Speaker 1: know that he has looked a skance at best and 462 00:24:23,880 --> 00:24:25,440 Speaker 1: in worried fashion and worst. 463 00:24:25,760 --> 00:24:27,119 Speaker 2: At the rise of oil. 464 00:24:27,359 --> 00:24:30,880 Speaker 1: Over the past month, according to Triple A, the average 465 00:24:30,960 --> 00:24:34,320 Speaker 1: national gas price of gasing at the pump has risen 466 00:24:34,400 --> 00:24:37,520 Speaker 1: by over a dollar per gallon from somewhere in the 467 00:24:37,800 --> 00:24:41,920 Speaker 1: to ninety ish range before operation etpic Ferry, and now, 468 00:24:41,920 --> 00:24:44,040 Speaker 1: according to at least a recent survey that I saw, 469 00:24:44,080 --> 00:24:46,040 Speaker 1: it is now just over four dollars. That is a 470 00:24:46,080 --> 00:24:49,760 Speaker 1: serious change. So Trump is all but a surely trying 471 00:24:49,800 --> 00:24:54,280 Speaker 1: to tamp down the skittishness of Wall Street and the 472 00:24:54,280 --> 00:24:57,520 Speaker 1: investor class more generally, perhaps trying to even stabilize the 473 00:24:57,520 --> 00:24:59,239 Speaker 1: price of oil, although adle of the United States has 474 00:24:59,280 --> 00:25:02,600 Speaker 1: something of of mixed incentives, shall we say, when it 475 00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:05,680 Speaker 1: comes to the price of oil. Certainly the regnan's party, 476 00:25:05,720 --> 00:25:08,840 Speaker 1: the majority party, that being the Republican Party, the party 477 00:25:08,880 --> 00:25:11,000 Speaker 1: of Donald Trump, they don't want to see prices get 478 00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:12,840 Speaker 1: out of hand in the election year, especially in an election 479 00:25:12,920 --> 00:25:16,240 Speaker 1: year where there are affordability concerns and inflation and costplaying, 480 00:25:16,240 --> 00:25:18,520 Speaker 1: where all these issues are very much rises to forefront, 481 00:25:18,720 --> 00:25:22,520 Speaker 1: so that militates certainly against rise and oil prices. Rather, 482 00:25:23,240 --> 00:25:26,679 Speaker 1: I just say that because there is an alternative competing 483 00:25:27,400 --> 00:25:30,240 Speaker 1: incentive an interest here, and the competing incentive is that 484 00:25:30,320 --> 00:25:33,800 Speaker 1: America is now the number one net exporter of oil 485 00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:37,840 Speaker 1: and natural gas in the entire world, and that does 486 00:25:37,880 --> 00:25:40,280 Speaker 1: potentially militate in favor of higher prices. I'm not saying 487 00:25:40,280 --> 00:25:42,760 Speaker 1: that is what Trump's trying to do or anything like 488 00:25:42,800 --> 00:25:44,720 Speaker 1: that there, but it's just interesting to think about how 489 00:25:44,760 --> 00:25:48,160 Speaker 1: these incentives tend tend to kind of work potentially actually 490 00:25:48,200 --> 00:25:51,639 Speaker 1: at loggerheads against one another. Nonetheless, my understanding of my 491 00:25:51,680 --> 00:25:54,600 Speaker 1: reading is that Donald Trump is trying to quell Wall 492 00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:57,280 Speaker 1: Street anxiety and generally trying to restore us to something 493 00:25:57,359 --> 00:26:01,160 Speaker 1: of an equilibrium or a short term stasis. My prediction 494 00:26:01,320 --> 00:26:04,919 Speaker 1: is as follows. This Friday is good Friday, and the 495 00:26:04,960 --> 00:26:08,560 Speaker 1: markets will be closed. Accordingly, I would think that Donald 496 00:26:08,560 --> 00:26:13,480 Speaker 1: Trump is trying to stabilize and tamp down market freakouts, 497 00:26:14,359 --> 00:26:17,520 Speaker 1: market fervor in the short term, meaning over the next 498 00:26:17,560 --> 00:26:20,280 Speaker 1: twenty four to thirty six hours, and now potentially as 499 00:26:20,280 --> 00:26:23,040 Speaker 1: early as Thursday night over night in Tehran or Friday 500 00:26:23,080 --> 00:26:26,760 Speaker 1: morning or some combination there on a Friday Saturday, whatever 501 00:26:26,760 --> 00:26:29,719 Speaker 1: will be there. I would actually anticipate the United States 502 00:26:30,320 --> 00:26:34,560 Speaker 1: at that point than trying to escalate in the short 503 00:26:34,640 --> 00:26:37,399 Speaker 1: term in the interest of a mid to long term 504 00:26:37,440 --> 00:26:41,040 Speaker 1: off ram. There's also data points that lead me to 505 00:26:41,040 --> 00:26:45,600 Speaker 1: predict this. On the one hand, most importantly, there is 506 00:26:45,640 --> 00:26:49,119 Speaker 1: a new aircraft carrier strike group that is now heading 507 00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:52,520 Speaker 1: towards the Middle East. It's the USS George HW. 508 00:26:52,600 --> 00:26:52,840 Speaker 2: Bush. 509 00:26:52,880 --> 00:26:55,480 Speaker 1: It literally just left Norfolk, Virginia, where there's a major 510 00:26:55,560 --> 00:26:58,520 Speaker 1: naval presence, just over the past couple of days. It's 511 00:26:58,520 --> 00:27:00,119 Speaker 1: now it's going to take weeks, These things to a 512 00:27:00,119 --> 00:27:03,480 Speaker 1: long time. This whole strike group, it's essentially a floating 513 00:27:03,480 --> 00:27:06,159 Speaker 1: military in one unit. Thank god, America kicks butt. We 514 00:27:06,240 --> 00:27:07,919 Speaker 1: have a bunch of these, and it didn take a 515 00:27:07,920 --> 00:27:10,960 Speaker 1: long time to get all the way to the Middle East. 516 00:27:11,480 --> 00:27:14,080 Speaker 1: Why would you send that if you were just trying 517 00:27:14,119 --> 00:27:16,200 Speaker 1: to wrap up hostilities in the. 518 00:27:16,160 --> 00:27:19,679 Speaker 2: Next few days. It just makes no sense. 519 00:27:20,480 --> 00:27:23,359 Speaker 1: And in fact, actually thousands more marines just arrived in the 520 00:27:23,359 --> 00:27:26,719 Speaker 1: Middle East over the past few days. And we know 521 00:27:26,880 --> 00:27:31,040 Speaker 1: from leaks inside the Pentagon elsewhere that the Pentagon the 522 00:27:31,080 --> 00:27:35,400 Speaker 1: war planners have been tasked with drawing up various options 523 00:27:35,440 --> 00:27:39,040 Speaker 1: and presenting them on a menu of options to Donald Trump, 524 00:27:39,520 --> 00:27:42,080 Speaker 1: many perhaps even most of which involve some sort of 525 00:27:42,280 --> 00:27:46,679 Speaker 1: short term escalatory measure. Now, for what it's worth, Donald 526 00:27:46,720 --> 00:27:51,960 Speaker 1: Trump went on truth Social earlier today and just obliterated, 527 00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:55,880 Speaker 1: just obliterated the RANI is essentially calling bs on those 528 00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:58,440 Speaker 1: of say that he is winding down this operation. He 529 00:27:58,520 --> 00:28:02,800 Speaker 1: said on True Social quote, Iran's new regime presidents, much 530 00:28:02,880 --> 00:28:05,880 Speaker 1: less radicalized and far more intelligent than his predecessors, has 531 00:28:06,040 --> 00:28:08,399 Speaker 1: just as the United States America, for a ceasefire, we 532 00:28:08,440 --> 00:28:11,080 Speaker 1: will consider when the three offform moves is open, free 533 00:28:11,160 --> 00:28:15,000 Speaker 1: and clear. Until then, we are blasting Iran into oblivion 534 00:28:15,160 --> 00:28:17,960 Speaker 1: or as they say, back to the Stone age. I mean, 535 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:19,840 Speaker 1: does that sound like the kind of guy who is 536 00:28:19,880 --> 00:28:24,320 Speaker 1: trying to wind down this operation, this operation that Donald 537 00:28:24,320 --> 00:28:26,800 Speaker 1: Trumpeuwisco said that he was just having so much fun 538 00:28:26,840 --> 00:28:28,600 Speaker 1: frankly doing I mean again, this is a guy who 539 00:28:29,160 --> 00:28:32,399 Speaker 1: has had the mulla's number for nearly five decades. Is 540 00:28:32,440 --> 00:28:35,520 Speaker 1: the guy who went on national TV during the hostage 541 00:28:35,520 --> 00:28:39,720 Speaker 1: crisis during the Jimmy Carter presidency and blasted Jimmy Carter, 542 00:28:40,000 --> 00:28:42,320 Speaker 1: tore him a new rear end over the fact that 543 00:28:42,360 --> 00:28:45,680 Speaker 1: there were American hostages, dozens of them, languishing for four 544 00:28:45,720 --> 00:28:48,440 Speaker 1: to forty more days at the American embassy in Tehran. 545 00:28:49,240 --> 00:28:52,560 Speaker 1: Trump has been so consistent on this issue, as I 546 00:28:52,560 --> 00:28:54,840 Speaker 1: said in my seapack speech in Texas last week, he 547 00:28:54,880 --> 00:28:57,600 Speaker 1: has been arguably more consistent on the issue of ron 548 00:28:58,480 --> 00:29:01,760 Speaker 1: than literally any issue over the decades other than tariffs themselves. 549 00:29:01,960 --> 00:29:05,479 Speaker 1: I actually think that is probably an accurate statement. So 550 00:29:05,880 --> 00:29:08,440 Speaker 1: it doesn't make a whole lot of sense that he 551 00:29:08,480 --> 00:29:11,840 Speaker 1: would take the opportunity and just take an off ramp 552 00:29:12,120 --> 00:29:14,760 Speaker 1: right now. I don't buy it. I do not buy it, 553 00:29:14,760 --> 00:29:17,160 Speaker 1: and I do not think it's gonna happen. You know, 554 00:29:17,200 --> 00:29:19,240 Speaker 1: we had Rebecca Himristuf Hudson's doy on the show earlier 555 00:29:19,280 --> 00:29:21,400 Speaker 1: this week as well, and I said to Rebecca, he said, 556 00:29:21,400 --> 00:29:24,560 Speaker 1: you know what, Rebecca, the messaging again. I support this 557 00:29:24,800 --> 00:29:28,480 Speaker 1: war for sure, but messaging hasn't been quite directly on point. 558 00:29:28,480 --> 00:29:30,640 Speaker 1: I would have liked to have a little more clarity. 559 00:29:31,600 --> 00:29:34,400 Speaker 1: And Rebecca, to to a credit, raise a very good point, 560 00:29:34,480 --> 00:29:39,080 Speaker 1: which was that Trump is a master of information operations himself. 561 00:29:39,640 --> 00:29:44,760 Speaker 1: He loves, loves loves throwing the enemy off. Indeed, he 562 00:29:44,800 --> 00:29:46,920 Speaker 1: did so here when it came to the fact that 563 00:29:46,960 --> 00:29:49,520 Speaker 1: Kamini that I told, apparently felt okay going on to 564 00:29:49,560 --> 00:29:53,560 Speaker 1: public prior to his fatal meeting there on February twenty eighth, 565 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:56,560 Speaker 1: among other reasons, because Trump had just met publicly and 566 00:29:56,560 --> 00:29:58,720 Speaker 1: smiled in Chokens with Tucker Carlston at the White House, 567 00:29:58,840 --> 00:30:01,360 Speaker 1: all of a sudden was an elaborate deploy in hindsight, 568 00:30:01,520 --> 00:30:04,520 Speaker 1: to throw off the malls. Frankly, as we predicted right 569 00:30:04,560 --> 00:30:07,840 Speaker 1: here on the show. So I do not think that 570 00:30:07,920 --> 00:30:10,760 Speaker 1: this is the end of hostilities. Clearly, at some point 571 00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:12,880 Speaker 1: those end of hostilities are going to have to come, 572 00:30:13,000 --> 00:30:16,320 Speaker 1: there is no doubt about that whatsoever. But I do 573 00:30:16,400 --> 00:30:20,880 Speaker 1: not think, frankly, that now is exactly that time the 574 00:30:20,920 --> 00:30:22,800 Speaker 1: goals simply have not quite. 575 00:30:22,520 --> 00:30:23,280 Speaker 2: Been achieved yet. 576 00:30:23,280 --> 00:30:26,080 Speaker 1: The goal of this operation, as he said, the said 577 00:30:26,120 --> 00:30:29,120 Speaker 1: repeatedly Dan Kane Trump was Saide lesser extent, but he 578 00:30:29,160 --> 00:30:31,760 Speaker 1: is nonetheless made this clear enough at least at this 579 00:30:31,800 --> 00:30:34,760 Speaker 1: point as well. Is he has said that the goal 580 00:30:34,800 --> 00:30:38,000 Speaker 1: of Operation Epic Fury, this military operation, is to neutralize 581 00:30:38,080 --> 00:30:40,640 Speaker 1: the islam Republic everron as a threat to the United 582 00:30:40,640 --> 00:30:44,480 Speaker 1: States and our interests. Now he has also indicating that 583 00:30:44,480 --> 00:30:47,880 Speaker 1: he wants the Europeans rightfully to start to take up 584 00:30:48,320 --> 00:30:51,640 Speaker 1: a greater share of the burden for doing exactly that, 585 00:30:52,320 --> 00:30:54,800 Speaker 1: more than that actually in just a few minutes. But 586 00:30:55,560 --> 00:30:58,640 Speaker 1: he is nonetheless making pretty clear that this thing's not 587 00:30:58,680 --> 00:31:02,560 Speaker 1: going to stop unless and until the Knight States feels 588 00:31:02,600 --> 00:31:04,160 Speaker 1: like we've achieved our objectives. 589 00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:05,920 Speaker 2: Pete heex eth Is said. 590 00:31:05,720 --> 00:31:08,960 Speaker 1: That meeting with the soldiers Petex a payday surprise visit 591 00:31:09,400 --> 00:31:12,040 Speaker 1: to the troops in the region over over the weekend. 592 00:31:12,480 --> 00:31:14,040 Speaker 1: It said what he heard over and over and over 593 00:31:14,080 --> 00:31:19,280 Speaker 1: again was mister secretary, our only request, Our only request 594 00:31:19,600 --> 00:31:22,479 Speaker 1: is to finish the job. You do not start an 595 00:31:22,480 --> 00:31:24,920 Speaker 1: operation like this unless you intend to finish it on 596 00:31:24,960 --> 00:31:29,080 Speaker 1: its own terms. Exactly what those terms consist of is 597 00:31:29,400 --> 00:31:31,720 Speaker 1: where statesmanship and prudence and judgment and all the things 598 00:31:31,720 --> 00:31:34,080 Speaker 1: that we elect commanders in chief to do. That's where 599 00:31:34,080 --> 00:31:36,400 Speaker 1: that factor's in. Personally, I feel pretty good by the 600 00:31:36,440 --> 00:31:38,880 Speaker 1: fact that Donald Trump nobody's doing when it comes to 601 00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:41,840 Speaker 1: this issue. And I do not think for a second 602 00:31:42,000 --> 00:31:44,800 Speaker 1: that we are now beginning the winding down of operations. 603 00:31:45,120 --> 00:31:47,160 Speaker 1: I think we're in the beginning of trying to wind 604 00:31:47,160 --> 00:31:49,600 Speaker 1: down Wall Street jitters. But if I had to guess 605 00:31:49,920 --> 00:31:51,960 Speaker 1: Thursday night Friday morning, things will start to look a 606 00:31:51,960 --> 00:31:54,480 Speaker 1: lot more fiery in Iran. We'll see, frankly, if firemright. 607 00:31:59,560 --> 00:32:01,960 Speaker 1: So Trump definitely indicating when it comes to Iran that 608 00:32:02,000 --> 00:32:05,280 Speaker 1: the Europeans to start to take up more of the burden. 609 00:32:06,080 --> 00:32:08,400 Speaker 1: He definitely wants Europeans to get more involved when it 610 00:32:08,400 --> 00:32:11,640 Speaker 1: comes to this operation to try to open the crucial 611 00:32:11,680 --> 00:32:14,240 Speaker 1: Strait of Hormuz, to have free passage for oil tankers, 612 00:32:14,280 --> 00:32:18,160 Speaker 1: commercial vessels, et cetera. There, and there definitely is this 613 00:32:18,360 --> 00:32:23,560 Speaker 1: rift that is becoming pretty wide, this yawning chasm between 614 00:32:23,560 --> 00:32:26,000 Speaker 1: the United States and our European allies when it comes 615 00:32:26,040 --> 00:32:29,960 Speaker 1: to the NATO alliance. Donald Trump essentially saying about NATO 616 00:32:29,960 --> 00:32:32,720 Speaker 1: could look a lot different when this is all said 617 00:32:32,760 --> 00:32:35,960 Speaker 1: and done, unless NATO steps up its freaking game here 618 00:32:36,040 --> 00:32:40,280 Speaker 1: in the short term. Marco Rubio actually went on the 619 00:32:40,280 --> 00:32:43,880 Speaker 1: Hannity program on Fox News said something very very similar 620 00:32:43,920 --> 00:32:45,640 Speaker 1: from his vandpoint to Secretary of Sake, go ahead and 621 00:32:45,640 --> 00:32:46,560 Speaker 1: watch this from Marco Rubio. 622 00:32:46,960 --> 00:32:50,000 Speaker 3: Hundreds of billions of dollars over the years, trillions of dollars, 623 00:32:50,120 --> 00:32:52,920 Speaker 3: and all these American forces stationed in the region, if 624 00:32:52,960 --> 00:32:55,520 Speaker 3: we can only use we can in our time of need, 625 00:32:55,680 --> 00:32:57,680 Speaker 3: We're not going to be allowed to use those bases. 626 00:32:57,960 --> 00:33:01,240 Speaker 3: So I think there's no doubt. Unfortunately, after this conflict 627 00:33:01,320 --> 00:33:04,080 Speaker 3: is concluded, we are going to have to re examine 628 00:33:04,200 --> 00:33:06,200 Speaker 3: that relationship. We're going to have to re examine the 629 00:33:06,280 --> 00:33:08,600 Speaker 3: value of NATO and that alliance for our country. Ultimately, 630 00:33:08,640 --> 00:33:11,080 Speaker 3: that's a decision for the president to make, and you'll 631 00:33:11,080 --> 00:33:13,200 Speaker 3: have to make it. We're going to finish the job here. 632 00:33:13,240 --> 00:33:15,160 Speaker 3: As I said, we're very very close to achieving our 633 00:33:15,200 --> 00:33:17,640 Speaker 3: objectives on all of these things that I've outlined. But 634 00:33:17,720 --> 00:33:20,000 Speaker 3: I do think, unfortunately we are going to have to 635 00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:23,760 Speaker 3: re examine whether or not this alliance that has served 636 00:33:23,760 --> 00:33:26,480 Speaker 3: this country well for a while is still serving that 637 00:33:26,520 --> 00:33:28,680 Speaker 3: purpose or is it now become a one way street 638 00:33:28,880 --> 00:33:31,720 Speaker 3: where America is simply in a position to defend Europe, 639 00:33:31,760 --> 00:33:34,280 Speaker 3: but when we need the help of our allies, they're 640 00:33:34,320 --> 00:33:36,040 Speaker 3: going to deny US basing rights and they're going to 641 00:33:36,040 --> 00:33:39,120 Speaker 3: deny us overflight. I think these are very legitimate questions 642 00:33:39,120 --> 00:33:40,920 Speaker 3: that we need to be asking, and this are going 643 00:33:40,960 --> 00:33:43,240 Speaker 3: to have to be very carefully examined after this conflict 644 00:33:43,320 --> 00:33:43,800 Speaker 3: is over. 645 00:33:43,960 --> 00:33:44,600 Speaker 2: As they should. 646 00:33:44,600 --> 00:33:44,719 Speaker 3: So. 647 00:33:44,760 --> 00:33:47,040 Speaker 1: The more specifics are that Spain, which is led by 648 00:33:47,320 --> 00:33:51,080 Speaker 1: a left wing kook. Spain has outright denied the United 649 00:33:51,120 --> 00:33:54,960 Speaker 1: States use of any airspace. France under Emmanuel Macron, who 650 00:33:55,040 --> 00:33:57,480 Speaker 1: at one point France seemed like maybe they were going 651 00:33:57,520 --> 00:34:00,200 Speaker 1: to help us, maybe open this rate for moves. Now 652 00:34:00,240 --> 00:34:03,560 Speaker 1: they're backing away from that. France now is saying that, oh, yeah, 653 00:34:03,640 --> 00:34:06,800 Speaker 1: the US, we totally use our airspace, but not when 654 00:34:06,800 --> 00:34:10,160 Speaker 1: it comes to planes flying to the region. So you 655 00:34:10,160 --> 00:34:12,080 Speaker 1: can you can use their airspace to fly to like 656 00:34:12,920 --> 00:34:15,920 Speaker 1: Germany or Africa or whatever, but you can't use it 657 00:34:15,920 --> 00:34:17,319 Speaker 1: to fly to Middle East. You can't use it to 658 00:34:17,320 --> 00:34:21,400 Speaker 1: actually assist Israel or the Sunni Arab states when it 659 00:34:21,440 --> 00:34:24,080 Speaker 1: comes to the prosecution of this war. Against the Irani regime. 660 00:34:24,520 --> 00:34:28,440 Speaker 1: I mean a fat lot that does. Again, this is 661 00:34:28,480 --> 00:34:31,400 Speaker 1: one of our longstanding issues here on the show is 662 00:34:31,480 --> 00:34:35,080 Speaker 1: what is an ally in the twenty first century NATO's 663 00:34:35,160 --> 00:34:41,960 Speaker 1: organization that quite literally outlived it's it's raison detra it's 664 00:34:42,080 --> 00:34:46,680 Speaker 1: reason for existing was the at least the containment, ideally 665 00:34:46,760 --> 00:34:49,560 Speaker 1: the defeat of the Soviet Union. That goal was achieved 666 00:34:49,840 --> 00:34:54,880 Speaker 1: decades ago when I was in diapers. So what exactly 667 00:34:55,080 --> 00:34:59,120 Speaker 1: is the goal of this organization today? And this is 668 00:34:59,120 --> 00:35:01,000 Speaker 1: how you get Mission creep. Is how you get things 669 00:35:01,040 --> 00:35:03,799 Speaker 1: like the Human Rights Campaign, which is a pro same 670 00:35:03,800 --> 00:35:06,719 Speaker 1: tis marriage organization than after they got that constutionalized in 671 00:35:06,760 --> 00:35:08,919 Speaker 1: the absolut atrocity of a sko's case called a Berger 672 00:35:08,960 --> 00:35:11,319 Speaker 1: fell in twenty teen. After that, then the HRC moves 673 00:35:11,360 --> 00:35:14,880 Speaker 1: on to the transgender issue. It's just Mission Creep, moving targets, 674 00:35:14,920 --> 00:35:17,680 Speaker 1: moving the goalpost. That's essentially when NATO's done. But ironically, 675 00:35:17,680 --> 00:35:19,520 Speaker 1: I couldn't even tell you what the targets. I literally 676 00:35:19,520 --> 00:35:21,680 Speaker 1: could not tell you at this point. All I see 677 00:35:21,920 --> 00:35:25,680 Speaker 1: when I look at NATO is US taxpayer dollars, frustration, 678 00:35:25,960 --> 00:35:29,080 Speaker 1: vexation from Donald Trump, and a bunch of freaking European 679 00:35:29,160 --> 00:35:33,239 Speaker 1: freeloaders and moochers. That's all I see. If there's more 680 00:35:33,280 --> 00:35:36,800 Speaker 1: to see, I'm totally game. But in this twenty first century, 681 00:35:37,200 --> 00:35:40,440 Speaker 1: in this century that is retrenching, it's pulling back from 682 00:35:40,600 --> 00:35:44,319 Speaker 1: the globalist era and is now returning to more of 683 00:35:44,360 --> 00:35:49,040 Speaker 1: a of a nationalist posture, America is better suited making bilateral, 684 00:35:49,120 --> 00:35:53,920 Speaker 1: trilateral security arrangements with crucial allies, allies that will go 685 00:35:54,080 --> 00:35:57,040 Speaker 1: into battle with US if need be, just like Israel 686 00:35:57,040 --> 00:35:58,960 Speaker 1: has over the past month. That is what an ally 687 00:35:59,000 --> 00:36:02,680 Speaker 1: looks like. France telling you you came to use our 688 00:36:02,760 --> 00:36:06,440 Speaker 1: airspace to go fight your war. How is that an ally? 689 00:36:07,120 --> 00:36:10,640 Speaker 1: And why are we subsidizing it? It's just total stinking garbage. 690 00:36:10,680 --> 00:36:13,600 Speaker 1: And frankly, I have just had enough that I really 691 00:36:13,640 --> 00:36:17,240 Speaker 1: hope that Rubios right, that America's NATO pasture will be thoroughly, 692 00:36:17,280 --> 00:36:20,799 Speaker 1: thoroughly re examined after this war. Frankly, all options, really, 693 00:36:20,840 --> 00:36:24,880 Speaker 1: all options, including the complete winding down NATO, should be 694 00:36:25,040 --> 00:36:28,640 Speaker 1: on the table. Speaking of things that should be wound down, 695 00:36:30,080 --> 00:36:34,000 Speaker 1: an absolute lunatic in Rhode Island, remember the name of 696 00:36:34,800 --> 00:36:39,600 Speaker 1: David Morales, who is some sort of lected official there 697 00:36:39,760 --> 00:36:43,640 Speaker 1: in the in the proxrt Rhode Islands area was going 698 00:36:43,719 --> 00:36:47,320 Speaker 1: viral on social media for an outrageous region, which is that. 699 00:36:47,200 --> 00:36:48,360 Speaker 2: There is a mural. 700 00:36:48,520 --> 00:36:53,480 Speaker 1: There is a mural for Irena Zrutska there in the 701 00:36:53,480 --> 00:36:56,279 Speaker 1: city of Providence, Rhode Islands, and he's not having it. 702 00:36:57,000 --> 00:37:00,040 Speaker 1: He wants the artists to paint over this mural and 703 00:37:00,080 --> 00:37:02,400 Speaker 1: saying this mural does not reflect our values. 704 00:37:02,480 --> 00:37:03,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, he actually really did say. It goes up. 705 00:37:03,719 --> 00:37:05,440 Speaker 1: Go ahead and watch this plot from David Morales there 706 00:37:05,440 --> 00:37:05,840 Speaker 1: in Providence. 707 00:37:05,920 --> 00:37:06,200 Speaker 2: Rudelan. 708 00:37:06,360 --> 00:37:09,040 Speaker 4: Ultimately, we want to make sure that every community member 709 00:37:09,080 --> 00:37:12,839 Speaker 4: that calls Providence home feels safe, and we can both 710 00:37:12,880 --> 00:37:16,360 Speaker 4: agree that this mural behind us does not reflect Providence's 711 00:37:16,480 --> 00:37:20,040 Speaker 4: values nor does it reflect the creativity that we want 712 00:37:20,080 --> 00:37:20,880 Speaker 4: to see in ours. 713 00:37:21,080 --> 00:37:23,680 Speaker 1: Okay, So he is the state representative, is what he 714 00:37:23,840 --> 00:37:27,040 Speaker 1: is there in Providence. In this past September, he announced 715 00:37:27,040 --> 00:37:29,080 Speaker 1: his intention to run for a mayor of Providence. So 716 00:37:29,080 --> 00:37:32,200 Speaker 1: he's an aspiring a mayor currently in the state legislature 717 00:37:32,239 --> 00:37:35,920 Speaker 1: there in Providence. Dude, what is athlete does not reflect 718 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:44,520 Speaker 1: your values. This woman was killed brutally, murdered brutally by 719 00:37:44,560 --> 00:37:48,399 Speaker 1: a man with a fifteen crime long rap sheet who 720 00:37:48,520 --> 00:37:52,120 Speaker 1: never in a million years should have been on the streets. 721 00:37:53,280 --> 00:37:57,560 Speaker 1: She was a Ukrainian refugee. The left, aren't they pro 722 00:37:57,640 --> 00:38:00,759 Speaker 1: refugee refugee in scare quotes? Usually most of the people 723 00:38:00,800 --> 00:38:03,120 Speaker 1: are not bone and fied refugees under American refugee and 724 00:38:03,160 --> 00:38:07,960 Speaker 1: asylum law under our statutes? Isn't left aggressively pro Ukraine 725 00:38:08,000 --> 00:38:10,480 Speaker 1: because orange man bad and orange Man is a Manchurian? 726 00:38:10,480 --> 00:38:11,799 Speaker 2: Can that a poodin puppet, et cetera. 727 00:38:12,120 --> 00:38:14,120 Speaker 1: Weren't there once who were all in for the Slava 728 00:38:14,239 --> 00:38:18,320 Speaker 1: Ukraine yellow and blue flag crowd is not your crowd? 729 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:19,320 Speaker 2: Dem morales? 730 00:38:19,800 --> 00:38:23,680 Speaker 1: So what why this is not reflector values? We can't 731 00:38:23,719 --> 00:38:28,960 Speaker 1: honor the victims of horrific crime? Why does it figure narrative? 732 00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:33,360 Speaker 1: How does not fag your narrative? Are we pro murder? 733 00:38:34,000 --> 00:38:37,680 Speaker 1: Are you pro stabbing people of death? Are you pro 734 00:38:37,840 --> 00:38:41,200 Speaker 1: letting up people with fifteen crime long violent of property 735 00:38:41,200 --> 00:38:45,600 Speaker 1: crime ridden rap sheets into America's streets from the kill 736 00:38:45,640 --> 00:38:52,120 Speaker 1: people like Arina Zaruska? Just despicable stuff. I mean, how 737 00:38:52,160 --> 00:38:54,440 Speaker 1: do you square that circles? Outly? How do you square 738 00:38:54,560 --> 00:38:57,840 Speaker 1: that circle when it comes to saying that you're a 739 00:38:57,880 --> 00:39:01,520 Speaker 1: pro quote unquote refugee, you're maybe even pro Ukraine, and 740 00:39:01,560 --> 00:39:06,200 Speaker 1: yet don't want a mural of Irena Zutska. Make it 741 00:39:06,239 --> 00:39:08,959 Speaker 1: make sense. As with so much of the modern left, 742 00:39:09,200 --> 00:39:11,440 Speaker 1: none of this ultimately adds up. All of it is 743 00:39:11,560 --> 00:39:17,480 Speaker 1: just one gigantic act of virtual signaling and performative outrage. 744 00:39:17,080 --> 00:39:18,600 Speaker 2: And it just really stinks. 745 00:39:19,480 --> 00:39:21,360 Speaker 1: Finally, I want to return us to the way he 746 00:39:21,440 --> 00:39:23,440 Speaker 1: ended yesterday's show for a bit of an update. We 747 00:39:23,480 --> 00:39:26,560 Speaker 1: talked a little bit about the tragic fall of Tiger Woods, 748 00:39:27,040 --> 00:39:29,480 Speaker 1: a man who was my absolute hero when it came 749 00:39:29,600 --> 00:39:32,040 Speaker 1: to professional sportsman, who was the reason that I took 750 00:39:32,120 --> 00:39:34,520 Speaker 1: up a golf club like so many others in my generation, 751 00:39:35,280 --> 00:39:38,239 Speaker 1: Tiger has had a checkered personal life now for two 752 00:39:38,280 --> 00:39:39,600 Speaker 1: decades or more. 753 00:39:40,600 --> 00:39:41,239 Speaker 2: It's been a lot. 754 00:39:41,200 --> 00:39:44,640 Speaker 1: Written and spoken on this subject. Among these are numerous 755 00:39:44,640 --> 00:39:46,799 Speaker 1: car crashes. Most recently was a car crash just as 756 00:39:46,800 --> 00:39:50,640 Speaker 1: past Friday here in South Florida and Jupiter Island in 757 00:39:50,800 --> 00:39:51,640 Speaker 1: Palm Beach County. 758 00:39:52,120 --> 00:39:53,640 Speaker 2: They called it a dui. 759 00:39:53,920 --> 00:39:56,600 Speaker 1: We are now learning that it wasn't necessarily that he 760 00:39:57,000 --> 00:40:00,960 Speaker 1: was drunk on alcohol, but rather he was on an 761 00:40:01,000 --> 00:40:05,080 Speaker 1: excessive amount of painkillers hydro codum he might have had 762 00:40:05,080 --> 00:40:08,279 Speaker 1: some alcohol too, to be clear, although his Breatha liveser 763 00:40:08,280 --> 00:40:10,400 Speaker 1: did show a zero points zero zero, so perhaps not 764 00:40:10,920 --> 00:40:13,080 Speaker 1: Tiger Woods. For Woodsworth has now said that he is 765 00:40:13,120 --> 00:40:16,239 Speaker 1: going to step away from golf to seek treatment, and 766 00:40:16,280 --> 00:40:18,279 Speaker 1: a statement post on social media, he said quote, I 767 00:40:18,400 --> 00:40:20,640 Speaker 1: know and understand these seriousness of the situation I find 768 00:40:20,680 --> 00:40:22,919 Speaker 1: myself in. Today. I am stepping away for a period 769 00:40:22,920 --> 00:40:24,880 Speaker 1: of time to seek treatment and focus on my health. 770 00:40:25,239 --> 00:40:27,160 Speaker 1: This is necessary in order for me to prioritize my 771 00:40:27,239 --> 00:40:31,120 Speaker 1: well being and work toward lasting recovery. I committed to 772 00:40:31,160 --> 00:40:33,759 Speaker 1: taking the time needed to return a healthier, stronger, and 773 00:40:33,760 --> 00:40:37,800 Speaker 1: more focused place, both personally and professionally. Et cetera, et cetera, 774 00:40:37,840 --> 00:40:42,040 Speaker 1: et cetera. Folks, Tonight is the beginning of the holiday 775 00:40:42,080 --> 00:40:46,319 Speaker 1: of Passover on the Jewish calendar. Therefore, I will be 776 00:40:46,840 --> 00:40:49,879 Speaker 1: offline tomorrow and Friday. We of course will have some 777 00:40:49,960 --> 00:40:52,560 Speaker 1: shows for you. We hope that you enjoy them. And 778 00:40:52,600 --> 00:40:56,280 Speaker 1: this Sunday marks Easter for all of our Christian friends 779 00:40:56,280 --> 00:40:58,439 Speaker 1: there as well. This Friday Good Friday, This Sunday is Easter. 780 00:40:58,880 --> 00:40:59,520 Speaker 2: There are lots of. 781 00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:02,040 Speaker 1: Common themes of these two holidays will elebate that a 782 00:41:02,040 --> 00:41:05,040 Speaker 1: little bit on this Friday show actually with guest judge 783 00:41:05,120 --> 00:41:09,239 Speaker 1: Roy Altman. But the theme really is redemption. That's the 784 00:41:09,239 --> 00:41:13,319 Speaker 1: theme that is the common denominator of Passover Easter. These 785 00:41:13,360 --> 00:41:19,960 Speaker 1: are redemption narratives, redemption stories, personal redemption, personal salvation, national redemption, 786 00:41:20,200 --> 00:41:26,280 Speaker 1: national salvation. It's a very very auspicious time for Tiger Woods, 787 00:41:26,280 --> 00:41:29,719 Speaker 1: I think to be announcing this. Tiger is an icon 788 00:41:29,880 --> 00:41:33,000 Speaker 1: to so many of us, and I really hope that 789 00:41:33,080 --> 00:41:35,399 Speaker 1: he takes account of his life and gets his life 790 00:41:35,440 --> 00:41:37,360 Speaker 1: in order. For all of you out there, this is 791 00:41:37,400 --> 00:41:39,000 Speaker 1: a really good time of the year to take account 792 00:41:39,000 --> 00:41:40,839 Speaker 1: of your life too. How can you improve? Where can 793 00:41:40,880 --> 00:41:45,880 Speaker 1: you make improvements? Above all, strive towards something greater and 794 00:41:45,920 --> 00:41:49,160 Speaker 1: something higher and more transcendental, because you too, like all 795 00:41:49,200 --> 00:41:53,080 Speaker 1: of us, can be redeemed folks. Wishing you a happy 796 00:41:53,120 --> 00:41:56,040 Speaker 1: Passover at hat semiach. Josh Hammer signing off for now. 797 00:41:56,120 --> 00:42:04,239 Speaker 1: We'll be right back, of course with another programm.