WEBVTT - Trump’s Big 2026 Foreign Policy Tests

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.639
<v Speaker 1>We spend most Monday show talking about the exploding Somali

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>fraud Scandali story that continues to utterly baffle him in

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>bamboozle and swindle and defraud and all the works, all

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the additives. I think our fair game when it comes

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to this terrible story out of Minnesota, the repercussions of

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>which we are only beginning to learn the extent of it.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>As Cash Hotel said over the weekend, this is very

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>much only the tip of the iceberg we have seen

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the independent YouTuber Nick Shirley on

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground and from various other sources at this point.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But the world keeps on spinning, and there's plenty of

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>other events going on as well. And we're going to

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>bring on shortly to the show, rebeccaheim Res. Rebecca is

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow at the Hudson Suit, one of my

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite thinkers when it comes to foreign affairs more generally,

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna kind of just hop scotch across the

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>globe because from my vantage points, Donald Trump is a

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>peace making president. Donald Trump is a pro peace statement,

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>someone who has presided over god knows how many peace deals, ceasefires,

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>military off rams, in this first year of his second term,

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Congo and Rwanda in Sub Saharan Africa, whether

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Armenia and Azerbaijan, a conflict that I saw up

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>close and personal when I was there two and a

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>half years ago. If you had told me that there

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>will be peace there in twenty twenty five, I literally

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>would not have believed that. He has seen peace deals

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>between two nuclear powers Indian Pakistan, Thailand and Cambodia, all

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>sorts of Middle East peacemaking. He's been a phenomenal pro

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>peace president. The big question and the question that we

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>will get into in a few minutes here just with

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>with Rebecca Himriz, is is this pro peace momentum going

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to continue into the year twenty twenty six? On Sunday,

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Zelenski of Ukraine was at mar A Lago visiting

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump, and on Monday Benjaminincinniak Whu was their

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>mini president Trump as well. Russia Ukraine continues to be

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the huge question that is still looming out there when

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the lack of a peace steal. If

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the were still raging this February, which unfortunately there is

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a very good chance it will be that will now

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>mark four years since the carnage first started in the

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Dombas region of eastern Ukraine and in the Crimean Peninsula.

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>It was in February twenty twenty two that Lamar Putin

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>first sent the tanks over the border into Ukraine. And

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>are we closer to a piece still now than we

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>were three to four years ago? Maybe it's kind of

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell sometimes, frankly, because both sides are not

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>quite budging on some of their terminal demands. Russia is

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly the more obstinate party. They are the aggressor. They're

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are refusing to compromise virtually on anything,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>as far as I can tell a Zelenski Foid's worth.

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>It's also not quite ready to compromise when it comes

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to territorial concessions in eastern Ukraine. What a mess, certainly

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for me personally. As the calendar gets ready to flip

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>from twenty twenty five into twenty twenty six, that is

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>something that I will be paying very very close attention to.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything, Is there anything that we can possibly

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>do to try to cajole these parties to try to

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>make mutual concessions again, Primarily from the Russian side. They

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>are the more opnits of the two. Certainly at this time.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into all that, certainly and more on the

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Russian crane conflict with Rebecca Heinrich speaking of Primus Nataniyahu

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and his visit to mar A Lago on Monday, both

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>men fully smiling. They seem to be very much in

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>lockstep on the same page. Trump's warm embrace of his

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>longtime compatriot and ally Netsniaho's certainly doing a lot, I

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think to simmer the boiling tensions in this particular Bilatter relationship,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>which has really been dragged through the mud by bad

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>faith actors, mostly on the left, but increasingly with some

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>ferocity on the quote unquote right. And I use those

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>scare quotes deliberately. But whatever's worth whatever the naysayers and

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the conspiracists may be saying, they're certainly not reaching sixteen

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred Pennsylvania Avenue. They're certainly not reaching Maro Lago. Because

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump doesn't give a crap what the conspiracists say.

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>He clearly believes strongly in this particular relationship. He clearly

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>believes strongly in Benjamintiak, who, as an individual leader most recently,

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>actually on this trip, the Israeli delegation announcing that they

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>will be giving their Israel Prize, which is what they

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>named their Great Annual National Prize. It's typically given to

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>an Israeli citizen. This is actually the first time they're

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>give it to Donald Trump. Apparently, this is the first

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>time they'll be giving it to a non Israeli citizen

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in seven and a half eight decades essentially in the

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>entire existence of the contemporary Jewish date. So that just

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>shows you how he is viewed, does to say how

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is viewed in the state of Israel. And

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that's for good reason, because Donal Trump has been an

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>amazing friend, an amazing friend to Israel where the rubber

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>could potentially meet the road come twenty twenty six, and

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>again we'll get Rebecca Himer's thoughts on this is when

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the reascendant threat of the Iranian regime.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Recall that it was now six and a half months

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>ago that the Israelis first took out a lot of

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Iranian air defenses inside of the country of Iran,

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the United States came in for the kude

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Grath for the death blow with those B two bombers

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>dropping those massive bombs at four Donatans and various other

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Iranian nuclear sites. The big question right now is what

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is the current state of the Iranian nuclear program. We

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>know that there is some level of enriched geranium that

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is currently around there, and certainly we know that there

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is still a ballistic missile program that is in place

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>there as well. So what is going to happen when

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the country of Iran in the year

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six.

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>We will go ahead and ask Rebecca. China, another huge

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>issue that we have to pay very close attention to

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was actually just on Monday that Hijianping sent his military

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to perform some of the largest live fire drills in

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>the entire history of the Chinese military. This time it

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was directed at you guessed it, at the island of Taiwan,

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>where they are really ramping up and ratcheting up the pressure. Clearly,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Shijinping wants to reabsorb Taiwan into China, much as Varim

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Putin wants to reabsorb Ukraine and probably other places like

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Georgia and Belaries as well into broader Russia. Will he

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>attempt something really crazy in the year twenty twenty six.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think probably not. What I do

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>know is that China remains the number one threat to

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the United States, to the American citizen, and to the

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>American way of life throughout this presidency and frankly throughout

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>this century as well. And finally, that takes us to

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>one of these foremost allies, one of the stalwart allies

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of Russia and China in our own hemisphere, and that

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 1>is Nicholas Maduro in Venezuela. This month's long pressure campaign

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>against Nicholas Maduro and his failed tinpot socialist communist state

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>seems to be reaching something of a boiling point and

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>something of a fever pitch. How much longer can this

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure campaign go on? I don't really know the answer

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to that. What I do know is that it can't

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>go on forever. At some point, there's gonna have to

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>be something that's gonna have to give. Maybe Madua will abdicate,

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he may pull a Baucher alasade and flee to

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the welcoming warm bosom of Lamyir Putin in Moscow. Maybe

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>he will stay in power. Maybe the US will actually

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>engage in tactical airstrikes.

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of open questions there at What

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I do know is that there are a lot of

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of unresolved conflicts around the world. As we

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.119
<v Speaker 1>turn from twenty twenty five into twenty twenty six, Donald

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump's first year in office, the reputation is very much

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that of a peacemaker and is a very very welldess

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of reputation. Frankly, Donald Trump should have won the Nobel

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Peace Prize for his efforts. If the Noble Peace Prize

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>was not catastrophically induced and afflicted with TDS Trump arrangement syndrome.

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>That didn't happen. There will twenty twenty six bring more

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of the blessings of fruits? Or on the contrary, will

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>there be multiple one or multiple of these geopolitical hotspots

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>around the world that could explode into a large scale,

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>large scale tinder box or two. I don't know the answer.

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>What I do know is that we have to be

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>prepared for the worst, hope for the best, but always always.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Prepare for the worst.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So, as we're saying there in our introductory monologue, there

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are no shortage of geopolitical hotspots right now, all around

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the globe, pretty much everywhere you look, whether it is

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>South America our own hemispheric backyard, whether it's the Middle East,

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in Europe, whether it's China ever encroaching on

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan in the Indo Pacific, and many other hotspots in between.

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to bring on the consummates expert to go

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on and break it down for us, and that of

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>course is Rebecca Heinritz. Becca Hinrich is a senior fellow

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Hudson Institute's one of our great thinkers when

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to foreign affairs, and generally you can follow

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>her on x at r L Heinrich. Rebecca Witching you

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a very merry belated and Christmas an early happy New Year.

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate you joined the Josh Ammers Show.

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much, Josh, and Happy Hanaka to you.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so Recca. It's hard to know where to

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>start to.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, I thought that we would kind of just do

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit a of a foreign policy Poe Pride is

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of hopscotch your way around all of the all

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>all of the geopolitical hotspots. I want to get to

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>rush to the Ukraine. When I get to to Israel

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>with Zelenski and Netsiahu with their recent visits to Trump

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and mar A Lago. I thought I would start, though,

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>with with Venezuela, which a situation that is rapidly escalating.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>It's been escalating seemingly for months now, but it seems

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's reaching something of a fever pitch, with Trump

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>recently acknowledging that the US did indeed strike this implementation area.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>He's calling it this dock where some of these drug

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>voats were being loaded for possible shipment into the United

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>States In North America, there is some sort of blockade

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>around Venezuela right now. What is your read on the

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>current situation? Frankly, Rebecca, I didn't have this one on

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>my bingo card. If if you had ask me what

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>was gonna happen or in our own hemisphere back on

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>January twentieth, I wouldn't have thought that there'd be this

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>month's long pressure campaign against Nicholas Maduro. He's a very

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>bad actor, obviously, I just didn't necessarily see this level

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of intense administration pressure coming.

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 2>What is your guests as to what happens.

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Here in let's call the next two to three months

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and in the foreseeable future and what should happen from

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>your perspective.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Great, So I don't think it was on anybody's BINGO card,

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 4>so it wasn't just your bad Bingo card. So one

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 4>thing I think is always notable as somebody who just

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.959
<v Speaker 4>like you do comments very regularly on events, is you know,

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump actually has a very very high.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Tolerance to keep people waiting.

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 4>So he allows these pressure campaigns to just continue to

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 4>build and we're all kind of waiting for the next

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 4>thing or trying to understand it better, or something to break.

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 4>But he's pretty impervious to this sort of just pressure

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 4>to do something. So I think we might we might

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 4>still be in this phase of just cranking up pressure

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 4>for some time, even though it feels like we're reaching

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 4>kind of a culminating point. I don't know if we're

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 4>there yet. It seems to me that that what President

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 4>Trump wants. He obviously he wants the drugs to stop flowing.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 4>And he keeps talking about the seaborne drugs or down eliminated,

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, ninety eight percent or whatever the percentages. But

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I think more than that, Maduro represents a regime that

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 4>is a drug regime. Has a symbiotic relationship. There's really

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 4>not a difference between the drug cartels and what they're

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 4>doing and Venezuelan government with Maduro in power, not only

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 4>that he has permitted these other adversaries into our own

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 4>hemisphere by backing him, the Chinese, the Russians. You know,

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Trump tried to push out Maduro during his first administration,

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 4>was unsuccessful in part because they backed off day of

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 4>United We the United States backed off because the Russians

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 4>sent in troops to back Maduro, and so we didn't

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 4>want to have a conflict obviously with the Russians in Venezuela.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 3>We're not seeing that.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 4>This time because Russia is busy creating other problems in

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 4>Eastern Europe. But I clearly I think that Trump administrations

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 4>wants Maduro to go with the least cost to the

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 4>American people, so preferably we do not want to have

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 4>troops in Venezuela. But I do think that the president

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 4>seems to have very willing to do conduct air strikes

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 4>on the ground in Venezuela. That's going to make members

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 4>of Congress very uncomfortable, clearly, if they're not consulted and

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 4>have some kind of way in here, which I know

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 4>that there are many Republicans talking to the Trump administration

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 4>pushing for that before any other, you know, increased escalation

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the United States directly launching strikes into Venezuela.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So a related question that follows directly off of that

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>about this question of strikes, the proverbial or literal use

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of boots.

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 2>On the ground.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, frankly, this term kind of gets bandoned about

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>as a talking point more often than the reality. But

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this broad discussion also the recent intervention to strike some

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>ISIS militants in the Sokota State of Nigeria to save

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the persecuted Belieguer Christians there. I think a lot of

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>folks Rebecka are looking at the Maduro pressure campaign and

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this humanitarian intervention in Nigeria. And to be clear, it's

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a completely righteous intervention, for sure, But I think a

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks are looking at this and they're trying

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, how does this fit into the Trump doctrine.

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, it wasn't that long ago that I think

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us were thinking about the Trump foreign

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>policy doctrine as being very sober and narrow minded, concrete

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>national interests, the notion of regime change for a lot

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of people was tanta amount to kind of throw back

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Bush era. Now, distinction that I've made many

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>times on this show is that it's very different. So

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you have us militarily imposed regime changed in the one

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>tan versus just doing other sorts of tools to try

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to implement a change regime. On the other hand,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but nonetheless, I kind of want to kick over to you,

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what is your attempt to kind of make sense from

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a Trump doctrine perspective of the Maduro situation in this

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>more over the humanitarian situation in Nigeria as well.

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think what the way, and I think

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 4>that Trump two is very different than Trump one and

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Trump one. I think had you had more Republicans in

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 4>the administration, longtime Republicans, people like Mike Pompeo, a Urma Master,

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 4>or you know, others who lean more sort of conservative

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 4>conservative internationalist types were in power and try to put

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 4>some coherency in a grand strategy on the way President

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Trump operates.

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 3>This time, we have much less of that, and.

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 4>So we have much more sort of raw Trumpian impulse

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 4>and the way President Trump oper rates. And I think

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 4>It can be best understood as President Trump wants to

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 4>do what is in the best interests of the United States,

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 4>that is doable, that is doable and doesn't drag the

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 4>United States.

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 3>Sounds so if you give me a problem.

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, if you come in to President Trump and

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 4>you say, there's Christians being slaughtered in Nigeria by ISIS

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 4>or a variant of ISIS, and the Nigerian government is

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 4>going to let us wipe them out. We should do that, sir,

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 4>He'll say, great, let's do it, and then and so

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 4>and we'll do it. And the American people support it generally,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 4>and it's not a long, dragged out campaign, military campaign.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 4>It makes that area a bit safer for Christians, at

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 4>least in the case of Venezuela. You know, it's like, look,

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 4>we want to take out drugs that are just pouring

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 4>into the American you know, into the United States. Fentanyl,

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 4>of course, is the number one killer of Americans between

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:56.720
<v Speaker 4>the ages of I think it's eighteen and thirty five

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 4>in the United States.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Fentanyl's not coming out of Venezuela. That's coc other things.

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 4>But there is this there is this sort of communist

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 4>operation with the drug cartels in our own hemisphere that

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 4>are sending in all kinds of drugs throughout the region.

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 4>And so I do think that there is now beginning

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 4>to be a bit of a theory here. Maybe it's

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Marco Rubio who's developing, and I'm not quite sure who

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 4>the mind behind it does.

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's Rubio, but that.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 4>If you can, maybe you can pressure these regimes to

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:31.479
<v Speaker 4>stop this, this this car the cartel regime kind of relationship,

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 4>that you might be able to affect all of them,

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 4>because now you've seen these other these other countries are

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 4>starting to get nervous, and President Trump has said, look,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Venezuela might.

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Not be the only country. We do this too.

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 4>And and so I think again, it's sort of it's

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 4>like whenever the Iran strikes whenever. When President Trump initiated

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Operation Midnight Hammer, that was something that was incredibly doable,

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 4>but he still waited until it was as little risk

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 4>as possible to the Americans who are going to conduct

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 4>those strikes. He waited until Israel, of course did most

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 4>of the work and taking out air defenses, et cetera

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 4>in Iran. So I think that that's what he's doing.

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 4>It's much less it's much less of a grand strategy

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 4>starting with which would be my preference. China is the

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 4>biggest threat to the American way of life, and so

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 4>you have to start there and then kind of see

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 4>all of the parts, you know, how Iran fits into that,

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 4>how Russia fits into that, and develop a coherent strategy

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 4>work from there.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 3>He's much more what.

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Can I do with the least amount of harm to

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 4>the United States that's possibly doable, so I can achieve

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 4>an outcome, and I think we're.

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Going to see some mixed results. Some of it's been.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Exceptionally good, and then you know, but we'll see what

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the effect is at the end of the second term.

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Heimrich, because a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>follow her on x at url Heimris, you mentioned China.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna get the China momentarily. I very much am.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I think I was talking about that.

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>You know a lot of folks say they're China first,

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of use that as a pejorative to say,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care about about other issues. Now I'm

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>China first, while still caring about other issues. I really

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>do think that China's most important foreign policy issue. I

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>also care about all the other issues as well. We'll

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>get the China just momentarily, but before then I thought

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>we would kind of just touch on a couple of

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>these very recent visits and mar Lago. You had Vladimir

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Zelenski coming in on Sunday and then Natanyahu coming in

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just yesterday on Monday. Let's let's take the one at

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a time. Let's start with the Zelenski visit. Trump followed

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>his Zelenski powwow with a phone call to Laimir Putin.

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you know, Trump says some shall we say,

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>funny things I guess black of better word at some

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of these prescal conferences. I mean, he said, he said

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>in front of Zelenski that Pudin wants Ukraine to be

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>made great. It's not entirely obvious what he means by that,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>other than maybe Putin just wants to gobble up Ukraine.

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's really Putin's vision of making Ukraine great.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>This situation, to me, right, Rebecca, is so frustrating because

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the rough contours of what a peace

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>deal looks like have been so screamingly obvious for the

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>past two to three years, and the parties just just

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just for for xyz reasons just just can't get there.

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the administration frankly deserves a lot of credit

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for working as hard as they.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Have trying to get this peace deal in place. CLA.

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not quite working though, So what has to happen

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>what is not currently happening that you think has to

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>happen primarily but perhaps not exclusively from an American perspective

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trying to get these two parties to

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>actually reach a deal.

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 4>So on the first thing, in terms of the comments

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 4>that President Trump says whenever he's in the middle of

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 4>negotiating things, and I try to remind people, you know,

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 4>go back and think about the first term too. He

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 4>said flattering things about Kim Jung un whenever he was

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 4>trying to respond to North Korea's you know, illicit missile

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 4>testing and was preparing for a nuclear test, et cetera.

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 3>And so we had this big push to have peace with.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 4>North Korea, and President Trump said all kinds of flattering

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 4>things about Kim jungun. It's almost like President Trump is

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 4>taking sort of how he operates in the business world,

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 4>and he almost tries to will things into being.

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 3>Reality when they're clearly not reality, and.

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 4>So it is odd, it can be off putting, But

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 4>once you realize that this is kind of how he

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 4>does it and doesn't necessarily mean anything materially about the

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 4>substance of the negotiations, then you know you can kind

0:18:58.440 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 4>of be.

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Put at ease at least a little bit.

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 4>No, clearly, Russia is still if vladivra Putin had his way,

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 4>he wants to subjugate all of you, all of Ukraine.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 4>He believes that Ukraine belongs to this greater Russia, and

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 4>so Putin is going to take whatever he can, whatever

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 4>he can get away with.

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think that Zelensky I don't like.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Zolensky has really he had a lot more

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 4>willingness to push back on President Trump to he was

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 4>was a little cock here in the beginning of this

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 4>of this administration. I think President Trump has sort of

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 4>put that to rest and now said, look, you're going

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 4>to have to listen to the way the United States

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 4>is going to negotiate this. So you know, Ukraine I

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 4>think has come a long way in Dolensky's willingness to

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 4>negotiate and to try to come up to a peaceful resolution,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 4>at least temporarily. It's Russia that remains completely unwilling to

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 4>bend at all. And so Zelenski even said, I thought

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Brettbahar had a great interview for Fox with Zelensky where

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Zalynsky said, look, if we if we've voted right now,

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 4>eighty five percent of Ukrainians like want this war to

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 4>be over. We want peace, but eighty five percent also

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 4>do not want to surrender territory that the Russians have

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 4>not already taken through force. So if the Russians can't

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 4>take this fortified area of dun Esque, they haven't been

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 4>able to take it since twenty fourteen. If Ukraine surrenders that,

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 4>and there's like there's men in there right now, I

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 4>mean they're defending it. They've been defending it now for years.

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 4>They don't want to give it up. There's people living

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 4>around that area, they don't they see themselves as Ukrainian

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 4>and they don't want to give it up. And so

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Zelenski says, look, I'd be willing to even put this

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 4>to a vote. Now, you want to have.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 3>A referendum, let's do that, something that he's been unwilling

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 3>to do. Until this point.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 4>But in order to do that, you have to have

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 4>a ceasefire. It has to be peaceful for people to

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 4>come out and vote. And now the Russians are like,

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 4>we're not going to do that though, And the Russians

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 4>were refused.

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 3>To have a ceasefire before there is a peace deal,

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 3>which makes no sense to me at all.

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 4>So and then now, of course you have a little

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 4>bit of it's being sorted out I think in the media,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 4>and we'll hear what our own intelligence community says. But

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 4>the Russians are claiming that during these high stakes negotiations

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 4>that the Ukrainians launched an attack, an attempted attack on

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Putin's own residents, which Ukrainians have disputed. They said, we

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 4>have not done that, but Putin told President Trump that

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 4>that's what the Ukrainians did as well. So there's a

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of just you know, wrong information I think coming

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 4>out of Moscow trying to really muddy the waters.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 3>And make this very difficult.

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 4>My last point, I would just say, Josh, I think

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 4>the way this is going to end. I appreciate President

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Trump pushing for these talks, I really do, and I

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 4>think it's going to get us in a better position.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 3>For what security guarantees.

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 4>Look like for Ukraine, rebuilding Ukraine, you know, bolstering Eastern Europe,

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.479
<v Speaker 4>which I think is necessary to prevent Russia from testing

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 4>the waters outside of Ukraine. All of that is very

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 4>overdue and necessary, and Europeans have to step up and

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 4>rearm and provide the bulk of that. So all of

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 4>this is going to move us towards that, which is great.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I do think we're going to have to increase pressure

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 4>on the Russians. The Russians simply are just they are

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 4>not feeling like they need to make any concessions. And

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 4>I do think that means we're going to have to

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 4>ramp up selling weapons to Ukraine or selling weapons to

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 4>the Europeans that they can send them to Ukraine.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 3>And I think it.

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 4>Means more crushing sanctions on Russia and getting back and

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 4>President Trump, I think was in a better place on this,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of clearly on the side of NATO and Ukraine

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 4>and pressuring Russia a few months ago, and I think

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 4>we need to get back to that if we are

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 4>going to have anything like even like a ceasefire temporarily.

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it does seem like Trump has shifted a little

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>bit so around October, giver take has Tona shifted in

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a notably more pro Zolensky anti pun direction. And you know,

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>now it's a little hard to tell, so it's entirely

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>clear exactly what's going on. But Rebecca, real quick, before

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we move on to the Middle East, I kind of

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>one your thumbs up thumbs down prediction here. Do you

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>think we have a peace deal or a ceasefire in

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Rushi Ukraine in twenty twenty six.

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 4>Or no, I don't, No, I don't, but I do

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 4>my I think sort of best case, best best case

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 4>scenario that is most likely is frozen along the lines

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 4>of contact right now between Ukraine and Russia, with a

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 4>bolstered Ukrain ability to defend itself, hold the line and

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 4>then hopefully rebuilding its own society. And then you know,

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 4>a stronger, stronger NATO, a stronger NATO so that the

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 4>United States is not providing the bulk of the conventional defense.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 4>But that's Europe, and that, to me is going to

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 4>be the best most realistic scenario.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, And I hope that you're wrong. I fear

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you probably are not wrong, whatever whatever it's worth. So

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to another troubled part of the world,

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a perennially perpetually troubled part of the world, as the

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>case may be. I speak of course, of the Middle East.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>There's all sorts of brand new developments actually in the

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>country of Yemen. When it comes to this somewhat bizarre

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>orchane dispute between Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 2>That's a little outside of.

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The confines of our conversations, very in the weed stuff,

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was just breaking this morning. I'm definitely starting

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to monitor it a little more closely. We'll see what

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>happens there when it comes to the ongoing decade longth

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>civil war in Yemen. But sticking right now with Nantia,

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>who's visit to Israel. So he was there on Monday,

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just yesterday, Rebecca. This seemed to me to be a

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>very warm meeting between these two men who clearly share

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a natural liking and sympathy for one another. Trump seems

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to genuinely like bibing Nantia Nyakhu as a human being

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>based on all that I can tell there, and they

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>seem to agree basically on what the Israelis came to present.

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So it seems that the Israelis brought their assessment of

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the current state of the Iranian ballistic missile program and

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear program. It's now been six and a half

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>months since the B two bombers, since Operation Midnight Hammer.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>We know that contrary to that classic trumpy and braggadocio,

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we know that the nuclear program is not obliterated. Rather,

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it was definitely dealt a very heavy blow set back

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>by Xyz years. We can kind of debate exactly what

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the assessment is there. What do you think is the

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>administration's mentality right now, Rebecca, when it comes not just

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to the bilateral US Israel relationship, but also to all

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the various Islamic radical organizations and state sponsors in the

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Middle East. Because it's a little hard to tell, right

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>because on the one hand, they're very sympathetic to this

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>new Islamist sympathetic if not just our Iselmust regime in Damascus, Syria.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>They're definitely playing very nice with the rest of type

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Ertawan's Turkey, which is a huge supporter of Hamas and

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the Muslim Brotherhood there. On the other hand, they're definitely

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>playing very very nice with Israel. They still seem to

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>take the Iranian threat very seriously. So it's somewhat hard

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to figure out exactly where they stand when it comes

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to radical Islam than the Middle East in general. Kind

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of curious just for your general take on all the above.

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 4>So I think that one I think you always be

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 4>and this is a consistent now consistent from the first

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration the second Trump administration, was that key to

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 4>any stability in the Middle East is going to be

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 4>complete and total solidarity with Israel. So that's like, you know,

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 4>starting that's President Trump clearly has that very clear in

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 4>his own mind. And despite some maybe pressure even from

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 4>the far right of the of the Trump base or

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 4>those who voted for President Trump, they wanted more distance

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 4>between the United States and Israel, and certainly Trump and

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 4>beating at in Yahoo and maybe from those advisors even

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 4>inside the administration. So there was some chatter about that

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 4>coming out in the in the media, reporting of people

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 4>trying to push President Trump to separate himself, and he

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 4>won't do it.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 3>He won't.

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 4>Not only will he not do it, but it's almost

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 4>like he's like doubly over the top. And his compliments

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 4>of beating it in Yahoo and his leadership of Israel.

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 3>So that I think is obvious.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 4>That's very very clear that he understands that US interests

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 4>are inextricably tied to the success of Israel and it

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 4>being secure in the region. And he President Trump was

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 4>very clear that if Iran does, you know, build its

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 4>ballistic missile program, rebuild it, which it is. It's been

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 4>getting help from China. China's providing some of these precursors

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 4>needed for the solid rocket fuel to that Iran desperately needs.

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 4>And so that has been ongoing for the last several months,

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 4>and so there Israel is obviously going to keep a

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 4>close eye on that. Remind people that one of the

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 4>big reasons I was not supportive of the Iran deal

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 4>during the Obama administration for many reasons, but one of

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 4>them was it didn't include the missile program, and you

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 4>need the missile program goes hand in glove with the

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 4>nuclear program, So why would you let it build out

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 4>its ballistic missile fleet and improve on its ICBM capability.

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 3>The Iranians are back to launching satellites again.

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Satellite launches are directly that technology is directly applicable to

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 4>an intercontinentiballistic missile, which means they could reach Americans.

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 3>So you can't let them have that.

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 4>And then, of course President Trump said, and if they

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 4>were to sort of reconstitute and sort of work begin

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 4>development again on their nuclear on the nuclear piece specifically,

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 4>that it would immediately that it should be destroyed. And

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 4>as you pointed out, Josh, you know, my nuclear deterrence

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 4>and counterproliferation is kind of my specialty, what I really

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 4>focus on. And for years what we have said is

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 4>that even if you blow up you know, four doh,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 4>these natans, these these nuclear facilities, nobody was under the

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 4>illusion that it would completely eliminate every single particle of

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 4>its nuclear program and.

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 3>That would be the end of it.

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 4>It would significantly degrade it make it very very difficult

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 4>to operate and to work in there, to get the

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 4>scientists back in there, and it sets back the program.

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 4>It buys us time, and then you have to keep

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 4>pressure on the regime to make sure that they don't reconstitute.

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 4>So everything is actually going according to from our side,

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 4>what we can manage and what the Israelis can manage

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 4>are according to plan. It's up to the Iran government

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 4>if they're going to be so foolish as to try

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 4>to get scientists back in there and rebuild it when

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 4>the Israelis in the United States is watching so closely.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 4>And then to your point about Islamism around the region,

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that that the Trump administration is just looking

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 4>at regimes that are just going to be generally cooperative

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 4>with the United States and not proxies of the Iran regime.

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 4>So Syria seems to fit into that category right now.

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 4>I agree with you, We've got some major problems with

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 4>the leadership in Syria right now, but at least it's

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 4>not you know, it's not it's not a sad and

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 4>so I think that that's kind of what we're doing

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 4>with what we're.

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Dealing with, and same with with Turkey. What can we

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 3>get out of them?

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 4>What can we get out with the Emordies, you know,

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>the Egyptians, et cetera.

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 3>And then you point it out Yemen. You know, Mmen

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 3>has been a proxy for Iran.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Iran has tried to make Yemen a proxy, and so

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 4>that's where the Huthis obviously have been operating out of

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 4>And so it's been the Amorandis and the Saudis who

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 4>have really been hammering to make sure that Yemen does

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 4>not become a totally you know, proxy state of the

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Iran regime. So that's basically I think how the Trump

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 4>administration sees it.

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Seems like sober analysis to me.

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Himris again is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute,

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly a woman who knows what she is talking about.

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Follow her on x at r Alheimris Rebecca as we

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>continue our tour eastward, I do want to touch on

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the aforementioned threats of the Chinese Communist Party. It actually

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>was just on Monday that the PLA, the People's Liberation Army,

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the military of the Chinese Communist Party engage in some

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of the largest live fire military drills that they've ever

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>done when it comes to Taiwan, up to and including

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>full simulated blockades of all of Taiwan's ports. There're certainly

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>ramping up the pressure. I feel like it's been going

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on for a long time. I mean part of me,

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca kind of looks at the and says, you know,

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>if you guys are going to act on this, you

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>really should have done it under the Bond administration, when

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>he had a president who was just totally asleep at

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the wheel, who didn't even know what the difference between

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>China and Russia and Iran. Was I mean, are you

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>really gonna test Donald Trump right now? I mean maybe,

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but clearly it's it's deeply concerning. And what

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I what I said to my show recently was I

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>encouraged the administration to not take the foot off the

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>gas pedal of China. There was a potentially troubling recent

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>phone call that Trump had with the brand new, precocious

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of Japan basically trying to kind of coax

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>her into maybe lowering down the decibel of her rhetoric

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to China Taiwan. Japan had previously threatened

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>military action if China had invaded Taiwan. There and my

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>stance is, basically, this is not the right time to

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>be telling our allies like Japan, Philippines, et cetera, to

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>take their foot off the gas pedal. Frankly, I think

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it should be all hands on deck when it comes

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to China and Taiwan. I assume you view it similarly,

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But what would what would your advice to foreign policy

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>makers at this time be when it comes to China

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>More broadly, I guess Taiwana particular.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 4>No, I totally agree with you. I mean that now

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 4>is the time to be backing our allies. I mean

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.239
<v Speaker 4>this is this is actually just a great reaganie, you know,

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 4>page out of his playbook in the Cold War, which

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 4>is you just you back the countries that are closer

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 4>to the problem, closer to our shared adversary, and who

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 4>are standing up to them. And that's what Japan is doing.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 4>We have an amazing new ally leader government in Japan,

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 4>and she's wildly popular among especially young Japanese. I don't

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 4>think that she's sort of one of these like picking

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 4>for a fight, you know, looking for a fight. She's

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 4>not that, she's not reckless, but she's tough. She's very

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 4>very pro Japan, she's very very careful, and she has

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 4>been I think very prudently and understandably pushing back on

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Chinese aggression against Japanese equities in the region.

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 3>And so I agree with you.

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that now's the time for President Trump to

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 4>be encouraging her and backing her and providing diplomatic cover

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 4>for her public even and this kind of goes back.

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 4>This is the corollary to the first point I said

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 4>about the Trump doctrine, where President Trump wants to.

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 3>He likes to get these wins in defense.

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 4>Policy and geopolitically at a low cost to the Americans

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 4>that are achievable. But of course a corollary to that

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 4>is he seems to be pretty risk averse when it

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 4>comes to contending with peer adversaries. And that's where it

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.719
<v Speaker 4>gets me a little bit uncomfortable because the president, you know,

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 4>his advisors should be encouraging him though that if you

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 4>if you look like you're in any way week or

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 4>backing down to our peer adversaries or near peer adversaries

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 4>China or Russia because of its nuclear program, if you

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of back away, they just take that. They just

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 4>you give an inch, they take a mile. And so

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, now is the time, I agree with you

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 4>to be bolstering our allies much closer to the threat,

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 4>who are doing a lot and this this blockade, this

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 4>new military you know, flexing their muscles, the Chinese flexing

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 4>their muscles around Taiwan. They're doing that in response to

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 4>the United States to prove the largest weapons sale of

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 4>military equipment and weapons to Taiwan, which I think is great.

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 4>We have a backlog. We haven't even delivered everything. They've

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 4>already purchased, so we need to get at that. But

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 4>that's what this is in response to. And so it's

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, now is not the time to.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Be you know, hitting the brakes.

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 4>You got it. You got to hit the gas so

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 4>that the Chinese know that they should not move on

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan and they should not test the United States.

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So I do I do have one final substance question

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for you before lego, but before the final question, just

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>very quick, you know, similar kind of thumbs of thumbs

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>down fallow up to those remarks. Did you think that

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that China actually does make a legitimate move for Taiwan

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>during this second Trump presidency?

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't. I don't.

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't as long as as long as we keep

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 4>doing things like this weapon sale to Taiwan, I think

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 4>we need a correct course and back the Japanese. I

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 4>think we need to make sure that we're not removing

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 4>US troops from South Korea or Japan, which Congress has

0:33:57.840 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 4>already kind of put the marker down saying we're not

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 4>going to approve that. I think that my assessment has

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 4>always been Hijin Ping will move on Taiwan as soon

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 4>as he believes that the United States will either not

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 4>come to the defense of Taiwan or is just simply

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 4>ill prepared that we might try and then back out

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 4>of it because we're not going to win, and because

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 4>he really, I mean that his political will to fight

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:25.919
<v Speaker 4>is going to be very, very high if he goes

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 4>against Taiwan, and he's gonna want to win. And so

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.439
<v Speaker 4>I'm very worried about the possibility of the highest levels

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 4>of violence with a country that is going gangbusters on

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 4>their own nuclear weapons program right now. And so I

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 4>think that as long as the United States demonstrates that

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan is still a core interest of the United States,

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 4>it does not want Taiwan to be subjugated by the

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:51.399
<v Speaker 4>Chinese Economist Party, and that we remain committed to making

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 4>sure that there's a free and open Indo Pacific, and

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 4>that means that China cannot push the United States out.

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 4>As long as we keep pushing that and then demonstrates

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 4>to get through building our own defense industrial base and

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 4>supporting our allies, I think we keep China deterred. And

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 4>so I agree with you, though I thought man did

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 4>the Biden administration when things were sort of falling apart.

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of wild to me that she's in pain,

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 4>didn't make a go for it.

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I agree with you for what I was

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>worth in this second Trump term. Now having said that,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>if Gavin Newsom er god forbid, Jasmine Crockett AOC is

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in the White House, god forbid come January twenty twenty nine,

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think all that's are off at that point, But

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for the next few years, I definitely tend to agree

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 1>with your analysis. Rebecca, You've been amazing, so real quick

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>before I let you go, just one final question for you.

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>This is really not really particularly to current events, but

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of just zooming out a little bit. You and

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I chat a lot, both publicly and offline about the

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>states of the rights more generally and all these current

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>wins that are blowing and cross blowing there, and I

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to just take your sense as to

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>how you feel about the future. I'm gonna call conservative

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy because that's self explanatory. I mean that doesn't

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>need to be kind of gained out, but kind of

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>going with like the more part is in part of this,

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I thinking about the Republican Party and a post Trump

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party. What are your current thoughts is the various

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>ways that that foreign policy could emerge after twenty twenty eight.

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, so, one of the.

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Things I tell people, I am a conservative, So I'm

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 4>dispositionally conservative. I believe in certain things that make me

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 4>a sort of a conservative internationalist. That doesn't mean that

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 4>everything that I prescribe in foreign policy I would expect

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 4>everybody who's also a conservative to agree with it. It takes

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 4>enormous amount of you know, just it's just study and thought,

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 4>and people are going to come away with different, different ideas.

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 4>What I am most concerned about, though, is there does

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 4>seem to be a part of the Republican Party they

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 4>code right wing, I think sort of philosophically may this

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 4>is for another longer podcast where we just talk about this.

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 4>They're not even philosophically conservative, and yet they are part

0:36:59.960 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 4>of the Republican coalition, or at least they say they

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 4>voted for Trump, you know, multiple times, et cetera.

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 3>But maybe they hadn't voted for Republicans before.

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 4>But I do believe that they are They're not conservative,

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 4>and they are they've manifest.

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 3>As anti Semitic.

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 4>They don't believe in the United States having a strong

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.479
<v Speaker 4>leadership role in the world. They you know, you see

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 4>some members of Congress, like Marjorie Taylor Green now who's

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 4>on the oules with President Trump, but she didn't used

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 4>to be, and she gets frustrated when she sees President

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Trump even talking with world leaders, like she thinks that

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 4>the president United States should just be sort of looking inward.

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 3>It's like, you know, the United States.

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 4>Regardless of what you think the United States should do

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 4>to end the war in Ukraine, or to back Israel,

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 4>or to you know, keep China at bay, all of

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 4>us should want the United States to have the capacity,

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 4>the strength, and the influence to move in the world

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 4>on terms that benefit the American people.

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 3>And we are a global superpower.

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 4>We are the global superpower, and we want to use

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 4>our power for good of the American people, the American

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 4>way of life, and that requires the President of the

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 4>United States to engage with foreign leaders. So I'm a

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 4>little bit concerned with this sort of far right flank

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 4>that's you know, like they pushed conspiracy theories, and I think,

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 4>and I've written about this, I think that the conspiracy

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 4>theories are really meant to confuse Americans about who we

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 4>even are and what our role is in the world,

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 4>what our relative power is to our adversaries. Who is

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 4>our adversaries and who are our adversaries and so but

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 4>my hope, my hope is that there will be Republican

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 4>leadership that will come up and will sort of put

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 4>put you know, put these people in their place, and

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 4>essentially say there is no Republican coalition, there's no conservative

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.439
<v Speaker 4>coalition with people who reject the idea that America is good,

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 4>it's good for the world, and that it's good for

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 4>us to be strong and to be the strongest superpower

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 4>and to back our allies and to you know, try

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 4>to deter major power conflicts so that we can live

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 4>at peace. That's my hope. But I think we really

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 4>are in a time for choosing right now, and it's

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 4>very dynamic, and so I always appreciate you, Josh, to

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 4>stay in the fight and pushing back on this really

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.359
<v Speaker 4>dangerous wing, I think, and it's going to just take

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.720
<v Speaker 4>ideas fighting ideas, and may the better ideas prevail.

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:23.879
<v Speaker 1>And likewise, Rebecca, and you know, one final thing I'll

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>say is that a lot of these folks, I mean,

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 1>in addition to being conspiracists, racist and de semites, again,

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not all of them but definitely some of them. In

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, they have a rather curious view of

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>history too, right, don't they? I mean a lot of them,

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>like to quote George Washington's Farewell address, this notion of

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>being aware of foreign entanglements, and to be clear that

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>that's a probatally fine and suitable sentiments actually, But at

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the same time, there was the X Y Z affair,

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 1>which is a total foreign affair kerfuffle in the later

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Washingt administration. They're also the Barbary Wars, so the first

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and second Barbary Wars in the Jefferson presidency when it

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to fighting these Muslim pirates there. I mean, it's

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>just a very very bizarre view of history, frankly, and

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a rewriting history many ways as well. But in any event, Rebecca,

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I share your sentiments made the best ideas when and

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>we're proud to I'm so only proud to count to

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you not only as a friend but of someone who

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is on the sober side of all these issues. One

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 1>fall on time, folks. Rebeccahim Risu is a senior fellow

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Hudson Institute. You can follow her on x

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>at rl HEIMERSUS Brekley been very generous for the time,

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>wishing you a very happy new year. May twenty twenty

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>six be a wonderful year for all of us and

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for these great United.

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 3>States you too, Thanks so much, Josh

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And thank you for watching day's episode of The Josh

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Hemmers