WEBVTT - The Big Weekend Pod

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to today's podcast sponsored by Hillsdale College, All Things

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>hillsdalet Hillsdale dot ed or I encourage you to take

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the many free online courses there, and of

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>course I'll listen to the Hillsdale dialogues, all of them

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>at Hugh for Hillsdale dot com or just Google, Apple

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>iTunes and Hillsdale Morning Glory and even Grace America. And

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>here's the Big Weekend pod. I'm Hugh Hewett. Thank you

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Big line up today, John ellis of course

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>with the news items of great import that you may

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have missed this week. Be following it up with Eli Lake.

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.599
<v Speaker 1>We'll be talking about Iron, as I will be with

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Matt Continei and Ben Dominicic as well. Look at a possible,

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as I said on America Reports yesterday John Roberts, possible

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>that Iron will capitulate and simply say, hey, we're going

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to open up the kimono, Come get our missiles, come

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>get our uranium. It's what Kadafi did in two thousand

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and three December two thousand and three through the spring

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and four, after the invasion of Rock

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>had marched up to Bagdad Kadafi saw what the United

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>States military could do, and he said, okay, out come

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>get all my bad stuff, and we did go and

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>get all of his bad stuff. Could the Iranians make

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>that deal.

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think actually a regime is capable of doing that.

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But could a new regime put a bullet in the

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>back of Himene's head and decide, no, we're not going

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to go down with this ship.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 2>These people are crazy. Yeah, that's possible, but it.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Would be a new regime, Like there's a new regime

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela that is cooperating with President Trump and the

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of the administration in the transition to something new

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>and something that doesn't threaten the United States or the

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>people of Venezuela. That transition undeterminate yet how long it

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>will go. But I'll talk with all my guests about

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that today. Plus Japan takes a Chinese shipping boat. We'll

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>start there with John Ellis on this big weekend pod.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening, Glory and even Graves in America.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I hope your Valentine's Day weekend is off to a

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>good start. I'm starting the program today with John Allis,

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>founder and editor in chief of News Items, your morning

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>newsletter on everything that's important in the world. Get rid

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of everything else. You can stick with news items and

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be well read. John, I had no idea until you

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>sent me the note that we got a little crisis

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>brewing in the South China Sea. I didn't know that

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Takaichi had won a thumping, big victory last Sunday,

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>did not know that Japan had seized a Chinese fishing

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>vessel within their exclusive economic zone and China is not happy.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>How goes that situation, Well.

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting.

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's the most important story of the day,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 4>and it may, you know, become more important as the

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 4>day's passed. But if you go back to November, Takeishi

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 4>was newly installed as the Prime minister. She was asked

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 4>what would happen if China invaded Taiwan, and she said,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 4>Japan could become involved if that were to occur. The

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Chinese completely flipped out about that. They said, mind your

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 4>own business, you know, you have no right to even

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 4>think that, and they and they put down, you know,

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 4>some market, you know, tourists from.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 3>China could go to Japan. Whatever.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 4>She then last weekend was elected her party got a

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 4>two thirds majority in the Diet, which is the Japanese Congress,

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 4>and you know, she won a landslide victory. And here

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 4>we are five days later and a Chinese fishing boat

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 4>is in Japanese water. The Japanese seized the fishing boat

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 4>and they arrest the captain. And so that's where we're

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 4>at right now. But the one thing that President g

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 4>has simply can't allow is for him to appear week

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 4>and at the moment he appears weak because the Chinese

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 4>haven't done anything yet.

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see what.

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I would also add to what into her newly elected status.

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 4>It's a fairly bold move and one I think that well.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 4>I surprised it wasn't on the front page of every

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 4>major news website.

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you brought to my attention and I immediately went

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to see what have we got there? The Lincoln was

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on patrol in the South China Sea. That George Washington

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is back in Yakuska in the homeport. We do have

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>a big deck Tripoli US Marine Corps carrying ship out there,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's a big deck. But we really don't need

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>another crisis in the world right now. With two carriers

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>on their way to off the coast of Iran. So

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>good heads up on that. Let's go to the good

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>news in your briefing that you sent me Alzheimer's A

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm covered on coffee. I'm not sure I'm covered on

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>language unless high school Latin counts. Let people know about

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>how to ward off Alzheimer's and dementia.

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 3>So there are two stories today.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 4>One is that caffeine reduces your risk of Alzheimer's, and

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 4>it's a huge study conducted over forty three years. Two

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 4>or three cups of coffee a day, two or three

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 4>cups of tea a day reduces your risk of inflation of.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 3>It reduces it reduces your risk.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Hope that might be why the number came in today.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Sorry about that reduces your risk of dementia and you know,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 4>as I said, it's a huge study. So that was

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 4>encouraging news, particularly for me because I get up very

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 4>early in the morning.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 3>And drink a fair amount of coffee.

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 4>The second is that if you if you keep engaged intellectually,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 4>if you read, if you write, if you do puzzles,

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you stay active, if you learn the language,

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 4>it reduces your risk of dementia by forty percent. So

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 4>the advice is to start reading, start writing, and start

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 4>doing puzzles.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And well, I work with Dwayne every day, so I'm

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>covered on the puzzles too. But yeah, one thing they

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>never tell you in these studies on caffeine is I

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know anyone who drinks three cups of coffee. He

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't drink five cups of coffee. So I'm the five

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>cup of copy a guy day. Does it decline? Did

0:05:58.600 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you get to the small print?

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get to the small print.

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 4>I was so excited about the first paragraph that I

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 4>didn't read it anymore.

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Now you have to explain to me the AI story

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you sent me, because the numbers are mind boggling on

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the speed with which AI can compute or likely to

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>compute in the next twenty years.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a research group called METR and they built

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 4>a simple model for forecasting when AI will automate AI development. Okay,

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 4>so essentially the AI will wrote write the code, and

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 4>at current rate I'm going to quote from the research article,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 4>at current rates of compute growth and algorithmic progress, this

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 4>model's median prediction is ninety nine percent automation of AI

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>R and D in late twenty thirty two, So six

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 4>years from today, all code, all AI code, will be

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 4>written by AI.

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 3>And that is.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 4>That it has enormously positive implications because if genetics is

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 4>code as well, there are four letters and three billion

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 4>base pairs, So if your AI is able to write

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 4>that code, then we'll have a much better understanding of

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 4>every disease. It will be astonishing. On the other hand,

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 4>there are no guardrails to code writing code. There's no structure,

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 4>there's no salt talk if you will, that that nations

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 4>all agree on and how it should develop. So it

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 4>could be that the machines win.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>In the absence of an agreement, everyone goes fast as

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you can, which may lead to why people are so gloomy.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>The poll that you brought from Pew about the percentage

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of US adults who anticipate living high quality lives in

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>five years down to under sixty percent. I find that astonishing.

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 4>John ellis, Yeah, it was actually a gallup pole. But

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 4>they've been, you know, they've been tracking this forever, and

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 4>it is truly discouraging because people in the US are

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, discouraged, and the younger they are, the more

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 4>discouraged they are. So it's something that needs to be

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 4>turned around or else we're in a lot more trouble

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 4>than we.

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Think we are.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Is exuberance always been lower among the younger than it

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>has been among the middle aged because they are uncertainty?

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Or is it something that is precipitously declining with gen alpha.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 4>It's declining. It's not that it's precipitously declining. It's that

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 4>the steady decline has full en off a couple of

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 4>stairs instead.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Of one stair at a time I got my books.

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Discouraging the Pew Pole does not surprise me. That's the

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>low confidence in journalism to act in the best interest

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in public Fifty seven percent express low confidence in journalism

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to acting in the public interest.

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I kind of actually surprised it's that high.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 4>John Well, I think you know this is not this

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 4>is not news, right, I mean, we've been watching this

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 4>trend for a long time, uh, and you know that

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 4>it's I think the reason that it's not higher is

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 4>it because people have found their own news sources, which

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 4>they quite like, right. I mean people who listen to

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 4>Hugh hewittt like the Hugh Hewitt Show. So from from

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 4>their point of view, you know, the news media isn't

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 4>a bad thing. But I think big news media organizations,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 4>the major broadcast networks, the major cable organizations measure what

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 4>we used to call newspapers, are suffering a crisis of confidence.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>But that's you know, that's not news.

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>That's yeah, you've got tens of thousands, You've got tens

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of subscribers to news items.

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I am among them.

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Do they ever do you ever get feedback from them

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>why they have confidence and news items? Because I think

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's because you cover the waterfront quickly, but I'm not sure.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 3>I think, I mean, I think the.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Key to our success, such as it is, is that

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 4>in eight minutes, you get a lot of information that

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 4>is you know, vetted, and that brings to your attention

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 4>stuff that you might not otherwise see. I mean, the

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 4>basic premises, We read it all so you don't have to,

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 4>and then we make the decisions as to what is

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:48.119
<v Speaker 4>most important.

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 3>And people like.

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 4>That because it's you know, they can get a pretty

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 4>broad picture in eight minutes and.

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Then they can get on with their day.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, last story you sent me, Switzerland is joining

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the anti immigrant maybe joining the anti immigrant wave. They're

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>going to hold a referendum. I'm not sure when it's

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be on whether or not to admit more people.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Details, yeah, details are that the current population is nine million.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 4>There's a strong conservative movement in Switzerland that has gathered

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 4>the signatures to put a petition, put a referendum essentially

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 4>on the ballot to say, look, we're going to cap

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 4>the population of Switzerland at ten millions so that we're

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 4>not overrun by immigration. And it's an important vote. Switzerland

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 4>is not part of the EU, but it is indicative

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 4>I think of a very strong reaction to immigration across Europe.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 4>And as the climate gets worse in the upper part

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 4>of Africa and stuff, and as the political climate deteriorates

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 4>in the Middle East, more and more people are going

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 4>to want you moved to Europe. And so Switzerland has

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 4>said nope, quartering to go ten millions the number and

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 4>that's it.

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And Italy deployed its navy today saying stop introduce all

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>shipping from Africa. So it is not just the Swist's everywhere.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>John Ellis from news Items, Thank you. If you want

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>news items, just go to Google news items. Sean Ellis

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>substack and you'll find it. Thank you, John, I'll be right.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to America.

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Hugh Hewett, joined now by Eli Lake of the

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Free Press, where he was writing about the Kurds inside

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>of Iran today. Eli, good to see you. Follow Eli

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at x on exit Eli Lake. Yesterday, the President said

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if negotiations don't work, there will be severe trauma for Iran,

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and that they have about a month or zo to

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>make them work. I note before we start that Kadaffi

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact capitulated in late two thousand and three, early

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand or opened up as Kaimano. Take my nuclear stuff,

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>take my chemical take my skates. That's really the only

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>choice that I think the Iranians have other than getting

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>hammered again.

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 5>What do you think, Well, I agree with you.

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 6>I think it's slightly different than what happened with Kadaffi.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 6>Kadaffi was responding to the invasion of Iraq and the

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 6>coalition that George W. Bush had put together, and this

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 6>was pursued discreetly. There was no announcement of it until

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:35.479
<v Speaker 6>there was a deal. It was done first through intelligence,

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 6>and it was done very quietly. This time it's a

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 6>little different. We we know that we had Midnight Hammer

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 6>last June and the Iranian people, which were we began

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 6>the year with that front and center. I think, you

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 6>know are we're We're in the beginning stages. My hope

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 6>is that we are in the beginning stages of a

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 6>revolution that will finally topple the Islamic Republic. In this respect,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Trump is basically offering a kind of lifeline, albeit a

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 6>godfather offer, sort of light fline. If you disarm and

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 6>you do all these things which are definitely in the

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 6>US national interest, we will let you survive. But the

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 6>problem is he began twenty twenty six by promising to

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 6>come to the aid of the Iranian people who've already

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 6>died in the tens of thousands at the hands of

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 6>this vicious regime. So I have mixed feelings about them.

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 6>Where we are at this moment, I have very.

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Clear feeling eli, which is, if the President follows through,

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he will have done what he promised to do, meaning

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>if he attacks Iran, or if they totally capitulate and

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Hamani is gone and his son is gone and there's

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a general in charge, it's.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Possible, it is not likely.

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And then I think it is very likely that he's

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>going to hammer Iran, but that as Admiral Montgomery explained

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on this program on Monday, he's going to do it

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>after making sure we're it's defended as we can be

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>wherever we are vulnerable. And I don't I don't know

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>if they'll be Serbia like or Libya like in terms

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of our pounding of him, but it's going to be big,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's going to be within a month

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to two months.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, this is again I want to What I want

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 6>to say though, is that what bought. What concerns me

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 6>is that he has it seems that he has dropped

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 6>the condition that you can't kill the Iranians who are

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 6>protesting the regime.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 6>They did kill in the tens of thousands, lots of

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 6>they defied his redline. And if there is a final deal,

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 6>I have not heard any I mean, it could be

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 6>that that's in the deal, but we haven't heard.

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 5>When Trump talks.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 6>About the deal, he talks about nuclear he talks about missiles.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 6>He meets with net and Yahoo, but we don't hear.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 6>And we talked about the terror proxies, but what about

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 6>the executions, what about you know, the Iranian people and Ultimately,

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 6>I think the end goal has to be the end

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 6>of the regime.

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I give you that.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna I agree, but el I've heard a

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people talking about this. We won't know how

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>well Trump has pulled this off until it's over.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 2>It's like Sophocle.

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>He will not know how good the day has been

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>until the sun is set, and we want the sun

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't set on this drama for a while. So I'm

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he can bring those people back to life.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame them that the regime killed them and

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they've been killing people for forty seven years. But I

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>do think we got to give him a chance to

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>do what he said he would do, and by by

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>upping the any with terror, with the missiles on the table,

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to give up their missiles, are they?

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 6>Agree that now you're getting into something else, which is

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 6>that can they accept the offer? Are they motivated by

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 6>a kind of regime death wish? I believe they are.

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 6>I think they're apocalyptic. And then the second thing is

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 6>is that it's absolutely prudent to want to make sure that.

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 2>You have the innerset.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 6>Actors in place and the military positioning in place to

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 6>absorb any kind of barrages that the Iranians will launch

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 6>after an attack. All of that's true, and I hope

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:07.959
<v Speaker 6>and that there's a lot of coordination I assume there

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 6>is between the Mosad and our military and the CIA

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 6>to find out exactly where them as the launchers are

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 6>and to make sure maybe we get them before they

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 6>can fire them off. All that's great, but I just

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 6>want to stress it's not a judgment, because I think

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 6>you're right, we have to judge this until we can't

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 6>judge until it's over. I'm throwing one red flag, though,

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 6>is that the regime was cratering. They had lost popular legitimacy.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 6>Even the Chancellor of Germany said they're in their final

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 6>months or days.

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 2>At this point.

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 6>Even the act of negotiations is reflected back to the

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 6>Iranian people, see America will abandon you. And that's the

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 6>part of it that doesn't sit well with me. I

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 6>understand that he's trying to do it without war. That's

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 6>always admirable, but then why make a promise that you

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 6>didn't deliver on When they did that, now you know

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 6>again it could be one of these things where he

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 6>said that that was where his heart was. And then

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 6>he's briefed, listen, we don't have the interceptors in place.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 6>We've got to move these assets into the Persian golf.

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 6>That's going to take some time. I understand that. And

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 6>in the end history will judge him by the final result,

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 6>not by what maybe happens in the interim. But just

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 6>right now, where is that original demand, stop killing your

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 6>own people?

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 5>Moas we hold all the cards, they have zero leverage.

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>They can't deliver that now. I mean, I think he

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>was actually trying to protect those people. I think he

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>was trying to tell their regime not to do that.

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>And the regime did it, and they did something I

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't think possible. They out Chinese the tannem and square thing.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>They went three times and square, and I didn't think

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we'd ever see that done in the daylight or at

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>nighttime or without the internet. So they have done the

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>worst that they could possibly And now it's made it

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>harder because the IRGC can't really lay down its arms,

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>can they are the people will? I asked the Crown

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Prince that this on Monday, how do you stop the

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>reprisals if the regime falls? And he says, they think

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they can. I don't think he can.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 7>Do you.

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I hope he can.

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 6>I think there was I think in I think reprisals

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 6>in the situation, and it's been building I'd say since

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 6>seventy nine, are inevitable. I mean, there reprisals. As we

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 6>know in Romania, it's very rare that you don't get

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 6>reprisals when you have a regime this violent, repressive finally topple.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 5>But they do have to go.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 6>And I'm just worried that even if we got a

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 6>great deal on all the things we wanted, the survival

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 6>of the regime is still in my view of failure.

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I agree, but I don't think. I don't think

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's possible.

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 5>Eli.

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because if that is, then trumps gerald in a

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>way it would be as it would be a historic failure.

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It would haunt his presidency if he collapses.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 6>Yes, And I think the good The difference between Trump

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 6>and Obama, there's been a lot of these comparisons, is

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 6>that Trump understands that you can never go into a

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 6>negotiation wanting the deal more than the other side. So

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 6>he's shown before he is willing to say to walk

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 6>away and say I'm not going to play games anymore.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 6>That was something that was Obama's big weakness. He at

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 6>the end of it, he just wanted any deal and

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 6>he got a very bad one. So I don't think

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 6>Trump will agree to a bad deal in terms of

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 6>our US interest. I just want him to understand that

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 6>even if what he thinks is a good dealer, the

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 6>AD either says a good deal, it can't be a

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 6>good deal until we see a new regime in Iran.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I agree. And if you ever played Jackson Open,

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>trust the Wynn poker. H the Iranians doing Jackson Open.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>They can't open. Yeah, I mean they can't write and

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, So I hope we're there. I never seen

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Well keep talking about it every week because Eli and

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I have gotten there's no other story that's important in

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the world. Maybe the Chinese fishing boat, the Japanese cities

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this morning, but all other story is this close. Stay

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>tuned in America. Thank you, Eli Lake, follow him at

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Eli Lake, and read them in the Free Press.

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Stay tune. Welcome back to America.

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Hugh Hewett, joined now by Wall Street Journal columnist

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Continetti. Matt also has domestic policy studies at the

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>American Enterprise Institute, and in his column this week for

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the Journal, he was talking domestic policy. He said, the

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Republicans need three things before November. Sustained economic growth. I

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think I'm going to give a check to that. Given

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the inflation number and job number this week, they need

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to have a put the Democrats on their feet with

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a pivotal moment towards the end. Don't know if that's

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, and they need presidential barnstorming, which I

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen. Matt Continetti, do you agree

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with me first on the fact that sustained economic growth

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>appears to be in the in the offering for as

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>long as we can.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 5>See, Absolutely, Hugh. I mean, this administration has a great

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 5>story to tell on the economy. The very simply, jobs

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 5>are above expectations and inflation is below expectations, and slowly

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 5>but surely, the American economy and the American worker is

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 5>gaining back the ground that we lost during the Biden era.

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 5>I think Biden doug about a three thousand dollars hole

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 5>in living standards, and with the latest data, I think

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 5>the administration is saying we're up to about fifteen hundred

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 5>dollars back into the filling it back up, so that

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 5>means we're halfway there to where we're starting to really

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 5>feel that we're making progress again on the economy. And

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 5>so it's very important for the administration to highlight all

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 5>of this good economic news. I think President Trump has

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 5>been trying to do that in recent weeks, trying to

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 5>get the story back onto the economy. You notice that

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 5>he's not holding as many press conferences with foreign leaders,

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 5>for example, and the travel he's done in recent weeks

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.200
<v Speaker 5>has emphasized affordability. He needs to keep that up through

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 5>the election.

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>He has also made the Secretary of the Treasury a

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>regular fixture on the Evening and News and the Sunday shows.

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think Scott Besson deserves headline billing because he's

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>very good at this better than you know. I mean,

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Williami Simon was pretty good, James Baker was very calm

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and poised. I'm sure Hamilton was witty. But he is

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>our new Secretary of the Treasury, is a very funny man,

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and he's got good news to tell. I think they

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>can't keep them out there enough.

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, this Secretary Beson's a great ambassador for the administration,

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 5>and he made the rounds today with the latest inflation numbers.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, this has been the story of the Trump

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 5>presidency so far, is that the tariffs aren't showing up

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 5>in the overall inflation data, and so the economic cost

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 5>of the tariffs and the tariffs are attacks, so there's

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 5>always a cost is showing itself in other ways. And

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 5>so Secretary of Besting can say, look, inflation is lower

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 5>than expected, and meanwhile GDP growth is above expectations, quite

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 5>considerable growth coming out of the last quarter. And the

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 5>job a situation, the job picture in January was really

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 5>out of left field in terms of the jobs created.

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 5>And so that's a great story any administration wants to have.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Now it's not enough, i think for the midterms, because

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 5>if you recall, the economy was going gangbusters in twenty

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 5>eighteen as well, and in fact, at that time, the

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 5>economy was President Trump's best issue. He had high ratings

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 5>on the economy, which he does not enjoy today. But

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 5>in twenty eighteen, you had a growing economy, you had

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 5>Trump being rated very highly on the economy. The Democrats

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 5>still won the House of Representatives, so that's where that

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 5>second item in my list comes in a dramatic event.

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Something that puts the Democrats on their heels and allows

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Trump and the rep Republicans to display leadership and vision

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 5>late in the election is critical, I think for Republican

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 5>performance in the campaign.

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt Contney, this will carry over into the break, So

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I encourage everyone to go and listen to the Big

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Weekend pod as well to hear the second part of this,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and then Matt will be buck on the other side.

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Would you think that either one.

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Or two retirements on the Supreme Court this June or

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>early July would or even announced earlier, would set the

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Republicans up for an enthusiasm burst. You can't get a

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>higher one hundred percent turnout and the Democrats are there.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think a Supreme Court vacancy or

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>two would do for the GOP?

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, I do think of vacancy and a fight over

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 5>the Supreme Court would be something that could mobilize Republican

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 5>voters in the fall and add to their enthusiasm. And

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 5>we have historical president for this. Again, I'll go back

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 5>to the twenty eighteen example, Hugh, the Kavanaugh hearings and

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 5>the way in which now Justice Kavanaugh was treated by

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 5>the mainstream media and buy the Democrats on the Senate

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 5>Judiciary Committee infuriated Republicans and to I think, really defend

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Trump and go out and support Republican Senate candidates in

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty eighteen, I think the Kavanar hearings are a reason

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 5>that Republicans held on to the Senate despite losing the

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 5>House in twenty eighteen. And so fight over the Constitution,

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 5>a fight over jurisprudence about what type of direction we

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 5>want the country to go in, that is something that

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 5>would galvanize Republican views. And it's a consideration I think politically, though,

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 5>I think the Justices make their decisions on different considerations.

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh they do, and yeah, we don't know. And I'm

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not saying they should go. It's up to two justices

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and their spouses. But I'll be back with Matt Continentty

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some sacred saws that can be added

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to that during the burk. I'm back with Matt Continety

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in the bridge segment between our two over the year segments. Matt,

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been peddling the idea that if you really want

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to make Democrats stand up and go crazy, President Trump

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>would nominate either for a retirement by Justice Thomas or

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>win by Justice Alito.

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Eileen Cannon, the.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Astute judge from South Florida who ruled correctly that Jack

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Smith had no constitutional warrant for the position he was in.

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you think Democrats would respond to Judge Cannon's nomination?

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 5>Well, they go gaga. There's no question about that. I mean,

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 5>let's not forget the Democrats will pose any Supreme Court

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 5>nominee that President Trump throws up. And that's why people

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 5>should be wondering about the prospect of potential retirement among

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 5>a Republican appointed justice at the end of this term.

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Because say that the election does go overwhelmingly in the Democrats'

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 5>direction and they win not just the House but also

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 5>the Senate. I happen to think Democratic victory in the

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 5>Senate is unlikely at the moment, but let's just say

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 5>it happens. Well, that means that President Trump will get

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 5>no Supreme Court appointments for the rest.

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 2>No judicial appointments, Matt, I don't.

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 5>Probably no cabinet appointments either, right right, it will stop.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 5>So so that's a you know, that's a consideration. And

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 5>again I'm not sure that justice is thinking those terms,

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 5>and so as a Canon nomination I think would galvanize Republicans,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 5>it would galvanize Democrats. Let's remember, you know, Judge Cannon

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 5>was also I think involved in striking down the Biden

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 5>vaccine mandate which was unconstitutional as well and the mask

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 5>the mask mandate on planes. So she has I think

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 5>of you, of freedom, individual liberty that many Conservatives would

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 5>support if she were nominated to the High Court.

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And there are lots about Judge Strauss up there in

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>minnesot Cold Land. There's Mulsa Bar in Kentucky. There's David Hoe,

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Judge Hoe down in Texas. There are a lot of

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>great first term Trump judges who have added six years

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to their resumes on the Appeals Court bench. I'm just

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>toying with the Eileen Cannon, but any of them would

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>ignite the Republicans, I think because Democrats could I guess

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a question, and I don't want to give you

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>an answer in the form of a question. Could the

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats resist the bait Matt and not trash a nominee.

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 5>No, no, you is the Democrats can't resist any bait

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 5>right now. I mean, look at what they're shutting down

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 5>the government again this weekend, even though ICE is already funded.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 5>So we're having a second government shutdown, partial affected the

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 5>Department of Homeland Security, which just happens to include besides ICE, FEMA,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 5>the Coast Guard, and the TEMP Transportation Security Authority TSA.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 5>And the Democrats are doing it why because of their

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 5>left wing base. It's demanding resistance to Trump at all costs,

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 5>and that means taking grabbing any date that they see

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 5>before it.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>We'd have code pink twenty four to seven throughout a

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>nomination process. And that's a promise, not a prediction. I'll

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be right back when Matt Connetty stay tuned. Clargan back

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>in America. I'm huit joined by Matt Connetti. He had

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>AEI in the Wall Street Journal. Matt, time to turn

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to Iran. I was talking with Eli Lake before you

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>joined us about how long the president has to settle debts,

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think he is indebted to the people of Iran.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I think he made promises.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>The Crown Prince of Iran was on this program Monday

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and said President Trump promised help is on the way.

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>So unless they capitulate like Kaddafi did in two thousand

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and three and four, and that would probably mean the

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>general's removing Hamini and someone something like that, which I

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine. Trump has to hit them very, very hard,

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>or it's a shadow over his entire presidency. Do you

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>agree with that assessment?

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, I do agree that if Trump fails to enforce

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 5>the red line that he drew, it will affect the

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 5>rest of his presidency, not just in the way that

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 5>we think about his presidential performance, but it will affect

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 5>the way that America's adversaries see President Trump see our

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 5>position in the world. You know, the deterrent is a

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 5>capability plus the will to use it. And if President

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Trump ends up not having the will to use our

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 5>capabilities to enforce the lines he drew, that is, don't

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 5>kill your own people, stop enriching uranium, and limit your

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 5>ballistic missiles, and no longer support these terrorist proxies, then

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 5>it won't just be the Mullahs that take notice. It

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 5>will also be Vladimir Putin. It will also be Shi

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Jimping in the People's Republic of China, Kim Jong Lunan

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 5>in North Korea. They'll all see an opportunity and they'll

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 5>begin to probe America's defenses. I think it's very important

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 5>that President Trump enforced the Redline, and I think what

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing now, Hugh, is America moving our assets into position.

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 5>Kind of Remember, it's capability plus will. So if the

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 5>will is there, that means we have to have the capability,

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 5>not just the capability to strike Iran, but also the

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 5>capability to defend against a raring and retaliation. That takes time.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 5>And we were having the second aircraft carrier now moving

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 5>to the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea. That will

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 5>take time. And in the meantime, of course, we're replenishing

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 5>our air defenses and putting other offensive platforms into the

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 5>region as well. So I think this will play out

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 5>over the coming weeks. President Trump this week said that,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, a month or so, that probably just around

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 5>the amount of time it takes for that second carrier,

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 5>which I believe is the Ford Carrier Group, the largest

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 5>carrier in the world, to get in place, and for

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 5>everyone there on board and in the affiliate vessels to

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 5>have operational readiness.

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Admiral Montgomery brought me up as a civilian this week.

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>He said, takes the two weeks after a carrier arrives

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 1>on station to get operationally ready to do what they

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>really want to do if they can, if they have

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the time to take. They want to take the time

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to get ready.

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 2>So he said a month or.

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So yesterday on Thursday, and I take that strategic confusion again.

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>He said everything, but he's also last question on I run.

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to go to Japan and China. I think

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>what he's created are the conditions for what Admiral Montgomery

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>called strategic confusion, not ambiguity, but confusion. And we really

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>can't we really can't judge what he's done here until

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's over. And I'm going to stick to that point.

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't really know if he's erased the redline or not,

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>or he's gone Obama or not until those ships are withdrawn.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 5>I agree that Trump always leaves his options open. Trump

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 5>would prefer a deal. He's asking things that this Iranian government,

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 5>this deacratic dictatorship that has waged war against the United

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 5>States since it came to power in nineteen seventy nine,

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 5>they're not going to agree to it. And so the

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 5>moment of decision will come, but it might not come

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 5>for a few more weeks.

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you play poker as a young man? Now, have

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you ever played jack? So open trips to win.

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 5>I've played a few hands of poker, but I'm not

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 5>going to Blackjack is more my game.

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Hugh, Well, Jackson opened, even though the odds.

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 5>Are against him blackjack, blackjack, I still prefer it poker

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:42.240
<v Speaker 5>for whatever reason.

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Well so do I, and that's the only thing I

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>know how to play, So that's why I prefer it.

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd lose at blackjack, but Jack's to open. The Iranians

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have jacks. They don't have anything they can give

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>or their regime will collapse. And so either the generals,

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really the generals do it, or we

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>do it now. Matt earlier today, John Ellis brought me

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>up to be on this. Japan sees a Chinese fishing

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>but within their exclusive economic zone. We do not have

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a carrier in the South China Sea. We do have

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a big deck. The Tripoli is there that George Washington

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is in Yokuska. They're homeport in Japan, but they're not

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>patrolling right now. They were patrolling until December. Do you think,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what do you think is the worst case

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>scenario for China Japan right now.

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, the worst case is always a conflict between these

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 5>two powers that would drag in the United States, obviously,

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 5>because of our very important alliance with Japan. You know,

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 5>the Chinese so called fishing fleets have been harassing our

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 5>allies for over a decade. What's interesting here is, you know,

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 5>the Japanese Prime Minister Hue Prime Minister Takeichi just had

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 5>a tremendous victory in the Japanese Parliament and has done

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 5>one of the largest majorities ever enjoyed by her party,

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 5>the ld which has been the ruling party of Japan

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 5>since the Second World War. And of course Takeichi is

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 5>disliked intensely by Beijing because she is a Japanese nationalist,

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 5>because she is a strong supporter of the Democratic governor

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 5>government in Taiwan, and because she believes that Japan needs

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 5>to re arm and expand its defenses. It already has defenses,

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 5>and we help with them. And so I wonder whether

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 5>this probing by the Chinese fishing vessel was a part

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 5>of a test of Takeiichi to kind of remind her. Interesting,

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 5>even though she has this tremendous political victory, that she

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 5>still has to watch out for the CCP.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she I think I'm not sure I

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>can call her Asia's Thatcher yet. But she is a

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>China Hawk, and I can't imagine that she's going to

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>go wildly do you imagine? I just don't see it happening.

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 5>No, she's not you know Thatcher as an Iron Lady.

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 5>Takiichi is the Iron Maiden because she used to play

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 5>drums in a metal band. Oh, she's a fascinating Yes,

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 5>she's a fascinating figure. She spent time in the United States,

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 5>and you know she was a protege of Shinzo Abbe,

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 5>who is very much in Shinzo Abbe's mold, someone who

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 5>believes in Japan's power, strength, wants to re energize the

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Japanese economy. And of course Abe had a tremendously important

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 5>relationship with Trump, and I think Takeiichi and Trump are

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 5>on the way to re establishing that type of personal

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 5>friendship that strengthens the alliance.

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>In the second watch that space. Wait the Iron Maiden

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>would be terrific. Wait the Iron Lady and the Iron Maiden.

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a good one. Matt Conteney, thank you. As always

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>follow Matt Tad continenty on Accent in the Wall Street

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Journal and over at AEI and come right back here on.

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 2>The Huge Show. Hiight you, Hewett. You've heard me talk

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>About consumer sailor how you can switch your carrier and

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>save money without sacrifice. That's because Consumer Cellular uses the

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>same towers as the major carrier. You'll save money every

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>month on your bill without having to sacrifice the quality

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of coverage. Right now, you get your second month free

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>plus Folks over fifty get two lines of unlimited talk,

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>text and data for sixty dollars a month. That's in

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>addition to the second month totally free using promo code

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Q And are you tired of your wireless company telling

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to talk to an AI robot, download an app,

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>or Horizon pay ten dollars to talk to someone when

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>paying your bill?

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? No thanks.

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Cellular ranks number one for network coverage and customer

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>satisfaction according to ACSI, whether you're switching online or over

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the phone, you'll be working with an actual human being

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>based right here in the US. So switch and get

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>your second month free plus two unlimited lines of sixty dollars.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 2>If you're over fifty go.

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>To consumersellular dot com, slash u promo HU or call

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred eight or call one eight hundred four one

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>one forty four fifty four one eight hundred four to

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>one one forty four to fifty four. That's one eight

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred four to one, one forty four to fifty four.

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget my code.

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 5>Is you.

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Morning loraining engrace in America? I'm to hear it?

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Joined by Ben dominic Is, the host of the Big

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Ben Pod. And you ought to be listening to Big

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben Pod this week you would have heard is America?

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Is Trump Losing America? And a long conversation about a

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>novel with a novelist, which I found very interesting, though

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't read novels very often. Ben Dominicic, welcome. I

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>have a completely unexpected turn. Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition.

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But Ben, when you show up, nobody but I know

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that I can ask you about sports?

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Right? Are you an NBA fan?

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.879
<v Speaker 7>I am, but I paid more attention to basically once

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 7>the playoffs start, especially at this particular moment. I mean,

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 7>I'll wait for your question, but especially at this time

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 7>of year when you see so many teams tanking well

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 7>this time of.

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Year is also when you see teams going all in.

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 1>And the Cavaliers, my club has been since they got

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>started in the seventies, they've only won once twenty sixteen,

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>been ten years, and they went all in, trading Darius

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Garland for the Beard James Harden, and Cleveland is on fire.

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Ben.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>He made his home debut against the Wizards, the hapless

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Wizards who are thanking, and he's lit up the first

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>three games. And I just want to know what you

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>think of the Beard because Cleveland and I am now

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in love with the guy and I've kind of all

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 1>he's been a West guy mostly. He was with Philadelphia

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and Brooklyn for a while, but mostly it was thunder

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and rockets and stuff like that. Now the Clippers, what

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>do you think of the Beard?

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, first of all, I have to say it's a

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 7>bold statement to say Cleveland is on fire. I'm giving

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 7>it some context. No, you went on fire. And the

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 7>truth is I am actually a longtime fan of James Harden.

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 7>Oh who is who I has gotten to see multiple times,

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, in person, and look, the truth is that

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 7>his limitation has always been a physical one and not

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 7>a mental one. He's a very smart player, and when

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 7>he wants to get going, he can get going. And

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 7>the real question is just whether you know he's able

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 7>to hold up once you get to the playoffs, because

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 7>I think that this is you know, look, this is

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 7>a moment where there's a lot of action in the

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 7>East and there's a lot of things that I think

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 7>that the you know, people frankly are disappointed in how

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 7>Orlando has turned out. They're disappointed, and you know a

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 7>number of different clubs that they thought would be doing better.

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 7>And I think that, you know, this could be a

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 7>year where you have a team surprise and breakthrough. And

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 7>as for the Wizards, yes, they are definitely tanking, though

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 7>the Anthony Davis and Trey Young acquisitions are ones that

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 7>make me hopeful if they are able to stay healthy,

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 7>and that is an incredible heavy.

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.720
<v Speaker 1>If so that's when they when Darius Garland got traded,

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone was saying, oh lucky, he's ten years younger than

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.359
<v Speaker 1>hard and maybe the young man doesn't play, he's hurt

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:54.760
<v Speaker 1>all the time because he's small.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 7>You can't yeah, no, he's not. And you can't evaluate

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 7>a player on hope. You know, I'm sure only had

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.760
<v Speaker 7>plenty of them come through in Washington who you evaluate

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 7>that way, and you just have to at a certain

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 7>point you have to say, are we serious about this

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 7>or not? And so I like the hard and move

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 7>and I think that there is an opportunity here, perhaps

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 7>in the East to really, you know, make make some

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 7>noise in the year when certain places have underperformed expectation.

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>So let me that's my first step on the diving

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 1>board is step number two about sports. Cleveland is very

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>excited about this. The Guardians have got said, you know,

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we have the Browns, and the Browns are disaster, but

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they got a new coach. But they're very excited. And

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it brings me back to the Washington Post's decision to

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>close their sports page. Now, if they really want to

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>reinvigorate the paper, they have to reverse that decision, don't they.

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I pay to Cleveland dot Com a ridiculous

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>am I remember about this for Fox News this week.

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:51.359
<v Speaker 2>I subscribe to them.

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I get their verticals on the calves of the Browns,

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State and the Guardians. The only way the Post

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>can actually turn it around is to go heavy into

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Washington DC sports.

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 2>There. They even have the University of Maryland in the

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Big Ten.

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Now they've got George, they got hoops, they got UVA

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 1>planning for maybe getting in James Madison looks like it's interesting.

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you think then do they change their mind?

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 7>I think that there's I think there are two things

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 7>that have to happen. One is I actually think they

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:23.399
<v Speaker 7>need to expand you mentioned James Madison. The Washington Post

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 7>is for years essentially treated anything that's outside of Northern

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 7>Virginia as if it's a foreign country. You know, they

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 7>didn't they didn't cover Virginia Tech as as much as

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 7>they should have.

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 5>They don't.

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 7>They'll cover what goes on with you know, when UVA

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 7>was something that was a little bit of an exception

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 7>because it's a basketball tem But the truth is that,

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, when the jam you run was happening, they

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 7>did almost nothing in terms of their coverage of it

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.760
<v Speaker 7>because they're more they were more addicted to these stories.

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 7>And and Andrew Styles over at the Free Beacon did

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:52.879
<v Speaker 7>a fantastic roundup of like of like twelve of them

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 7>that over the past couple of years that are just

0:43:56.160 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 7>ridiculous injections of politics into sports. So I think you

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 7>have to step one is you have to expand you

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 7>have to cover these different teams that are outside of

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.839
<v Speaker 7>the of the Beltway area. But you also, I think,

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 7>have to be serious about we are in the business

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 7>of sporting news. We are talking about the games, we

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 7>were talking about the trades, we were talking about what's

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 7>going on. We are not using sports as a lens

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 7>to look into the American psyche as it relates to

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 7>gender and sex and raise.

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 2>They're doing fan service. They need to do fan service.

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 7>That's and not the kind of fans who don't care

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 7>about sports, but they've basically been catering to for the

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 7>last several years. And it's why this decision was easy,

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 7>because essentially you're killing in an opinion section which is

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 7>expensive to run, and that's something that I think that

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 7>they need to understand in order to move forward and look,

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 7>I think that that would be an enormous benefit to

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 7>the Posts and to having the paper set on a

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 7>good role going forward. They need to appreciate how important

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 7>this is. And I will say one more thing, and

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:00.840
<v Speaker 7>I say this with all due respect our British friends,

0:45:01.520 --> 0:45:04.399
<v Speaker 7>there's been you know, a real importation from the UK,

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 7>including in the in the Post, you know, in terms

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.720
<v Speaker 7>of their in terms of their leading folks and across

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 7>media generally, a lot of folks have come over in

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 7>the last couple of years. One thing that they don't

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.320
<v Speaker 7>get American sports. And that's something that I think that

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 7>they don't quite rock as much as they ought to

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 7>as something that was a centerpiece of American discourse. But

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 7>they have to change the approach that has been used

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 7>by these lefties who just wanted to I mean, I

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 7>don't know if you've seen this today, even Sarah Spain,

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, going after jd Vance for you know, seeing him,

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 7>just seeing him carrying his kid at the Olympics, and she's, oh, no,

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 7>I didn't.

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not reading the paper. I don't I don't subscribe

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to that.

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 7>Well that's that's she's doing it on X. But the

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 7>but the point is just that like those are the

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 7>kind of people you've had covering sports. That doesn't make

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 7>sense anymore. You can't get away with that anymore. We're

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 7>not interested in it. The market has spoken, and you can't,

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, let them write a notpbed occasionally in the

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:02.799
<v Speaker 7>New York Times, which also is a lot of people

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 7>who don't really care about sports reading it and and

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 7>leave that leave the sports sections alone. When it comes

0:46:08.719 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 7>to Indian injecting this type of politics into literally every

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 7>story you can.

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't want them to go hire David Campbell,

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.720
<v Speaker 1>who's the Cleveland dot com sports editor and the genius.

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But there are there got to be people around who

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:22.879
<v Speaker 1>know how to do sports journalism and do it well,

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 1>because everybody I know in my world love sports, even

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:28.359
<v Speaker 1>if they're left.

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 7>You Lucas Tomlinson and my colleague and I text about

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:35.759
<v Speaker 7>sports on a daily basis, and when it comes to

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 7>the Washington decisions and everything related all to the leagues,

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 7>and you know, he's absolutely as die hard into this

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 7>as I am. And I'm sure that we would love

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 7>to have an actual local section that was paying attention

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 7>to things that mattered in terms of the franchisees as

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 7>opposed to, you know, again, injecting politics into every piece

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 7>of coverage that you possibly can. Leave them leave that

0:46:58.200 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 7>worldwide leader.

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 2>By the way, my triple.

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Jump off of the board now is to the Olympics

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and it will take us into the break and we'll.

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Talk about Iran afterwards. I have watched very.

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Little Olympics because of one reason. There's too much Olympics

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're everywhere broken into eight minute segments, and

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.839
<v Speaker 1>there's not NBC News primetime at seven pm you can

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>catch the most important events with.

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 2>All the glitz. Do you think they killed the Olympics.

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what their viewership is like, but it's

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:27.479
<v Speaker 1>it's like a buffet course that is never ending.

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that there's there's a bit. It's just

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 7>oversaturation and it's hard to cover all this, you know,

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.320
<v Speaker 7>to pay attention to all the storyline. I'll confess that

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 7>because of the kid, the love of the little now

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 7>almost six week old, you know, I've paid less attention

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 7>to this Olympics than I normally do. Because I like

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 7>the Olympics. I think it's great to see America go

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 7>up into the Olympics and kick ass. But the thing

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:55.400
<v Speaker 7>that is the thing that I think is really you know, difficult,

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 7>is you never really know what you're watching. It bounces

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 7>around quite a lot, and I really wish that they

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:02.320
<v Speaker 7>would give it to us in a bit more of

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 7>a package where we would have, you know, something more

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:07.800
<v Speaker 7>that we can that we can see and follow. I

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:11.760
<v Speaker 7>will say though, that the primary complaint against the Olympics

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 7>was lodged by the five year old in the house

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 7>who wanted to watch a movie or something, and my

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 7>wife informed her that, know, in this house, we root

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 7>for the United States of America. And so that's what

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 7>happened for Mecca.

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:26.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a shared experience.

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a shared experience that most Americans like, but it's

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not a shared experience anymore when it's fragmented. So the

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:37.760
<v Speaker 1>shared experience of watching an ice skater fall or America

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>win beat the Russians in nineteen eighty, that's not there.

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 7>So I think just they made a huge program and

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 7>if you have not seen it, you should watch this

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:49.839
<v Speaker 7>Netflix documentary on the on the nineteen eighty USA team

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 7>because and this I think that they did a poor

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 7>job of advertising it, because it has a ton of

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 7>new footage, of footage that has never been seen before

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 7>of the game. And it's really just something that I

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 7>think is is, you know, I recommend to everybody that

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.800
<v Speaker 7>I know to watch, even even just as a historical

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 7>document and you know, you get different shots of Herb Brooks,

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 7>you get different shots of you know, key plays that

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 7>we're in it, and you look at that was obviously

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 7>an incredibly shared experience in America, as you as you had,

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.279
<v Speaker 7>you know, people able you know who did not know

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 7>that it had happened learning about it, and so I

0:49:23.560 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 7>think this is also just one of these uh, this

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 7>is one of these eras where we have such an

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 7>oversaturation of some of these things, often motivated by just

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 7>being able to do ad sales during them, as NBC

0:49:34.640 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 7>has done quite successfully, and and that I think leads

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:40.440
<v Speaker 7>to some of that fragmentation that you're talking about.

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll be right back during the break with Ben Dominics.

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about the Big Ben podcast. The

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:47.399
<v Speaker 1>lead story, has Trump lost in America? I don't think

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>some that will have been talked about that. We'll be

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:51.399
<v Speaker 1>back on the other side and talk Aaron, So don't

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere they tuned to.

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 2>The k Huge Shots. I'm back with Ben Dominic s.

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Ben, I thought you were opening at the Big Ben podcast,

0:49:57.000 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>which was very provocative this week, where you asked as

0:49:59.680 --> 0:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>president and Trump lost the country and then I watched

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>him go down to Fort Bragg and get the enormous

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 1>reception that the commanders in chief got. I think he's

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>lost belue America, but I don't think he's lost right.

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>America is just a question he turns up in November.

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:18.879
<v Speaker 7>I think that the big question though Hugh is whether

0:50:19.000 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 7>he is losing, and this is something where he got

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 7>in good news today obviously on the inflation figures, whether

0:50:24.840 --> 0:50:27.839
<v Speaker 7>he has lost the key portion of his coalition, which,

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 7>as you know, is difficult to get to the polls

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to mid terms of working class Americans.

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 7>I know that you probably saw if you have, If

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 7>you haven't, who you will the AOC clip from Munich

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 7>where she's talking about so today, you know, she went

0:50:43.960 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 7>to Munich, which is interesting.

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 2>So she's running for president. She's running.

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:50.360
<v Speaker 7>It's another sign as I think she's running for president.

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 7>She's not running for Senate. She's running for president, and

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:54.800
<v Speaker 7>that I think is But one of the things that

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 7>she started leading with was about having a coalition that

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 7>they basically it sounds like half Hillary Clinton on one

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 7>hand when it comes to the Globe and then half

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:10.120
<v Speaker 7>at home mom Donnie and basically you know, affordability. We

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 7>need to be this working class coalition, warrying warrying about

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 7>oligarchs by the way to Munich, which is pretty funny,

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 7>and and then and saying that we needed She was

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 7>asked by one of the people there about whether we

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:24.880
<v Speaker 7>ought to have a wealth tax, and she said that

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 7>needs to be a priority. That kind of language is

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:34.319
<v Speaker 7>actually what upper crust sort of lefties think is an

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:37.799
<v Speaker 7>affordability message. It's not an actual affordability message. And if

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 7>you look consistently the kind of reports that were coming

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 7>out after November of last year from from the you know,

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 7>the different Democrat super packs, they all indicated that basically,

0:51:49.560 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 7>what people want to hear within that demo, which again

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 7>went for Donald Trump and went in mass and delivered

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 7>a big victory for him, what they want to hear

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.399
<v Speaker 7>about is affordability. They feel like things should have gotten

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 7>cheaper since he got back into office, and they and

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 7>they care about those things as a priority. They don't

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:09.280
<v Speaker 7>really care about hearing about the you know how insulting

0:52:09.320 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 7>it is. She she went after the Trump administration, for instance,

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:15.919
<v Speaker 7>for forgetting Maduro, describing it as kidnapping a head of state,

0:52:16.600 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 7>which I mean, actually quite the stretch. But I think

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 7>that this is the situation where again she's running for president.

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 7>Put that in your calci bet now.

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think let me ask you that have you

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:30.920
<v Speaker 1>ever heard her give a serious interview on national security?

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 7>I have never heard once, of course not and and

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 7>she's treated by kid gloves, you know, she in terms

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 7>of the way that the media acts towards her, and

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 7>I think we have to expect that that will continue.

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:44.400
<v Speaker 7>And so look, you are going to end up with

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 7>the situation here where the President could lose a significant

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 7>portion of his coalition that the Republican Party needs to

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:53.800
<v Speaker 7>show up in order to have a competitive November. Otherwise

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:56.720
<v Speaker 7>they get swamped. The Democrats take at least the House

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:59.320
<v Speaker 7>and they just turn the next two years into a

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:02.280
<v Speaker 7>complete craft show of investigations and impeachments.

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's going to happen. I think we're gonna lose

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the House. But I'll come back on the other side

0:53:05.960 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>with Ben, and we're going to talk about how did

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans chiefs turn out?

0:53:08.880 --> 0:53:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Standby Welcome Back in America.

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Hugh Hewitt, and I'm temporarily stunned because during the break,

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Ben Dominic's told me that AOC went to the Munich

0:53:20.960 --> 0:53:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Security Conference, which is with the Reagan Defense Conference and

0:53:25.320 --> 0:53:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the Halifax Conference, the big three national security conferences around

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the country. The Nixon Foundation does one as well in DC,

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but the one up in Halifax out west in Munich.

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:40.759
<v Speaker 1>They're the Big three and I can't imagine AOC at

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:44.959
<v Speaker 1>a security conference. Ben just explain to our Steelers fans

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what that means, because I agree.

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 3>With you what it means.

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 7>What it means is that AOC wants the attention of

0:53:52.120 --> 0:53:54.759
<v Speaker 7>the world. And the way that she framed herself by

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:59.360
<v Speaker 7>the way to this global audience was essentially as someone

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 7>not who didn't want to tear down the system, but

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 7>kind of restore an older system of of you know,

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 7>using using all the normal catchphrases of global order and

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 7>the like. She basically depicted the Trump administration as agents

0:54:16.200 --> 0:54:20.120
<v Speaker 7>of chaos when it came to the global affairs, particularly

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 7>in our own hemisphere, you know, citing the Greenland example,

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:27.120
<v Speaker 7>citing the Venezuela example, you know, citing you know, some

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 7>of this other you know, saber rattling and the like.

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 7>What what she really means, of course, when she says

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 7>something like that is she wants to China run global

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 7>order in my opinion, but that's just my opinion. The

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 7>thing is, I think that when she goes on to

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:42.560
<v Speaker 7>a stage like that, she knows she's going to be

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.520
<v Speaker 7>treated with kids loves, by the by the international folks,

0:54:45.520 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 7>they're not going to be judging her right off the bat,

0:54:47.800 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 7>and she can basically give this message as one where

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:54.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, again she is depending on which polling numbers

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 7>you look at, she's third currently in terms of the

0:54:58.120 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 7>ranking of the Democratic potential presidential candidate. You can debate

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:05.480
<v Speaker 7>about where she is, but she's definitely third, with Newsom

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:08.319
<v Speaker 7>and of course Kamala Harris hanging around as one and two,

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:11.359
<v Speaker 7>depending on the ployee that you're looking at. I think

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:13.240
<v Speaker 7>she is fully intend to run for president.

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 5>I think she wants to.

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:18.239
<v Speaker 7>Depict herself as being this future is female candidate, but

0:55:18.320 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 7>from a younger generation. And I think that she wants

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 7>to basically become someone who could go up against the vance.

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 7>I mean Rubio was there as well this year, of course,

0:55:27.600 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 7>go up against you know, potentially a Rubo and depict

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 7>them as being chaotic figures, where she's a return to

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:36.759
<v Speaker 7>normalcy on the international level. And that's a savvy political move.

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 7>I think it's the kind of.

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:41.399
<v Speaker 1>There's no downside to her running for president, there's none.

0:55:42.080 --> 0:55:43.879
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't she didn't get stuck in the Senate where

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 1>she's one hundred out of one hundred. She gets either

0:55:46.760 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 1>she gets it the brass ring, or she makes a

0:55:49.160 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 1>gazillion dollars and she becomes her own thing. So there's

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:55.279
<v Speaker 1>no downside to it. It's almost inevitable that she runs.

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think she's going to win because she got

0:55:57.200 --> 0:55:59.320
<v Speaker 1>chops on stage and the President has said to me

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 1>on the show, Oh, she's got a lot of sparkle.

0:56:01.719 --> 0:56:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But we'll have to see how she does in an interview.

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>She does not do interviews, Ben, and I don't know

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:07.760
<v Speaker 1>whether or not she can do the comments.

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 7>I don't think require her to do it. I think

0:56:10.520 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 7>she's going to skate. And this is the thing that's

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, happens so frequently with her. Again, she represents

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:19.280
<v Speaker 7>herself as being this candidate who appeals to the working class,

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.800
<v Speaker 7>and you can't think of a less working class friendly

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:25.359
<v Speaker 7>policy than something like the Green New Deal. I mean,

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 7>that's just it's a complete opposite. And yet she never

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 7>gets asked about that. The idea that she is going

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:33.400
<v Speaker 7>is going to skate into this role is something that

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 7>I certainly believe, and I would be scared if I

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:39.239
<v Speaker 7>was Gavin Newsome that she could have the kind of

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 7>of inspiring appeal that he is, This kind of slick California,

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 7>you know, Silicon Valley back, you know Reid Hoffman backed

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 7>candidate or something like that. You know, is going to

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 7>seem like She's going to make him seem like the corporatist,

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:57.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, billionaire friend much older, Yeah, much older. And

0:56:57.960 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 7>I think that that's something that has real resonance in

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:05.040
<v Speaker 7>in America, where you know, no offense view that the

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 7>millennials are in charge right now, you know we are.

0:57:08.080 --> 0:57:10.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're going to skip right past these Actually

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you cannot offend me because I'm seventy. I know what happens,

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking at Gavin, and Gavin's on my side

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of the divide.

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 2>He's not on your side of the divide.

0:57:20.360 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, but again, I maintain the most gen x thing

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 7>that ever happened is to not have a president like

0:57:26.120 --> 0:57:28.440
<v Speaker 7>we looked around and we decided, nah, I will not

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 7>do that. So it's the thing that I think is

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 7>going to be very interesting going forward. Look at the

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 7>way that she is covered versus the way that JD

0:57:38.240 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 7>dances covered, because they are essentially I think that they

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:43.760
<v Speaker 7>are headed on a collision course.

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think, now I've been talking about I got

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to get this in because I've been talking about Iran

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:49.920
<v Speaker 1>with Matt Contenenny and Eli Lake.

0:57:49.960 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to cover it with you, but I

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 2>do want to cover with you.

0:57:52.080 --> 0:57:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Takaichi the new prime minister who just went overwhelmingly a

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:58.360
<v Speaker 1>week ago huge majority in the DAT in Japan, and

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:02.120
<v Speaker 1>today her security forces went out and nabbed the Chinese

0:58:02.200 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 1>fishing vessel inside their exclusive economic zone. It's a Conney

0:58:06.480 --> 0:58:08.439
<v Speaker 1>says we should call her the Iron Maiden. I said,

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:12.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe she'll be Asia's Asia's Thatcher, and Kantene said, no,

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:14.320
<v Speaker 1>she's the Iron Maiden, not the Iron Lady, because I

0:58:14.360 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't know she was in a heavy metal band. What

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:18.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think of her and what do you think

0:58:18.440 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of this this crisis in the South China Sea.

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:23.320
<v Speaker 7>I think that this is going to be a real

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 7>test for us in terms of the alliances that we

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 7>have in the region, and it could be something that

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 7>could spawn I mean, it's very rare that something like

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:37.680
<v Speaker 7>this happens without after action, after effect Domino's falling. I'll

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 7>be curious to see how she handles it. I do

0:58:40.000 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 7>think that you know, she's someone to watch, but you know,

0:58:43.640 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 7>in an era when we have seen so much praise

0:58:46.520 --> 0:58:50.960
<v Speaker 7>directed at UH directed at North Korea of all places,

0:58:51.360 --> 0:58:53.520
<v Speaker 7>for having a female air name. That was a big

0:58:53.640 --> 0:58:56.400
<v Speaker 7>trend among a lefty twitter. Why can't we have a

0:58:56.520 --> 0:58:59.720
<v Speaker 7>female air named You know, here in the United States,

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 7>don't people look to you know, women politicians who are

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 7>actually good at what they're doing. You know, why don't

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 7>Why don't she serious?

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And we just talked about AOC not doing any national

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>security interviews. Ever, she that's what she made her bones on.

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 1>She's a China Hawk.

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 7>Yes, yeah, And I think that this is I mean,

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.680
<v Speaker 7>this is obviously a test case. But the truth is

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 7>that we we should be applauding this in the West

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 7>in terms of having someone in that job who understands

0:59:25.280 --> 0:59:27.920
<v Speaker 7>the real threat that China represents and is not too

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:30.520
<v Speaker 7>scared to confront it. But look, you know, these these

0:59:30.520 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 7>are the kind of questions I would like to see

0:59:32.120 --> 0:59:35.000
<v Speaker 7>AOC asking, as opposed to should we have a wealth tax?

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:37.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we asked AOC if we asked her what

0:59:37.840 --> 0:59:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the Hunan Island incident was, would she have a clue?

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think she'd have a clue?

0:59:43.680 --> 0:59:47.920
<v Speaker 7>You know, I don't. I'm not a big fan of,

0:59:48.080 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 7>like of basic tests in order to run for office

0:59:51.320 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 7>or to get that job. But I kind of wish

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.520
<v Speaker 7>that we made all of the all of the you know,

0:59:57.640 --> 1:00:00.640
<v Speaker 7>folks who did this do some form of political jeopardy

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 7>just for the sake of just, oh, you know, where

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:07.240
<v Speaker 7>do you you know? What part of the world do

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 7>you think? You know? Afghanistan is in? How about that?

1:00:10.440 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 7>To start with?

1:00:11.240 --> 1:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't believe in gotcha's, but I do

1:00:13.320 --> 1:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>believe that before you become president. And you know, famously,

1:00:16.840 --> 1:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump told me he know more about terrorists on

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>day one when he became president, and I didn't. Sure enough,

1:00:22.280 --> 1:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he took it out more. He's taken out more terrorists

1:00:24.200 --> 1:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>than any other president on one on one basis.

1:00:26.240 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't.

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>But I I just wonder if she doesn't really have

1:00:30.840 --> 1:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>any kind of evidence, any kind of grasp of the

1:00:33.440 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>complexity of what she aspires to speak on it.

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's some humility in its a real problem.

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a real problem. But I think that

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:44.920
<v Speaker 7>the other problem that we need to understand is she

1:00:45.000 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 7>has a political career that is built on vibes and

1:00:47.760 --> 1:00:51.240
<v Speaker 7>social media that works in this era. It's going to

1:00:51.320 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 7>raise a ton of money for She's going to have

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 7>a ton of energy, and I think that Republicans should

1:00:55.920 --> 1:00:58.640
<v Speaker 7>not underestimate her. And that's you know, something that we've

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 7>seen happened four where they thought that certain people could

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:04.800
<v Speaker 7>come up. I mean, I remember the talk about Barack Obama.

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 7>How are they gonna k oh, yeah.

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty, and well well but.

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 7>See, I think at the time you can defend yourself

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:15.640
<v Speaker 7>because that seemed like a very unlikely scenario. But sometimes

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:19.439
<v Speaker 7>the nation is a couple of rungs ahead I guess,

1:01:19.600 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 7>or a couple of months behind where you think they are,

1:01:23.520 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 7>and they are very vulnerable in an era like think

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 7>about it this way, in an era in which education

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:32.760
<v Speaker 7>scores have plummeted. Not everybody's Mississippi, Hugh, And I say,

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:34.800
<v Speaker 7>that's a proud a child with Mississippi.

1:01:35.520 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I agree.

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I was in the Qweight Center when Obama gave his

1:01:39.760 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>speech in two thousand and four, and I was impressed,

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but I wasn't thinking he could be president. So that

1:01:44.360 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>just tells you what four years can do. But he

1:01:46.960 --> 1:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>also is a Harvard log guy, and she has not

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>well Ben dominant. She's given us a lot to think about.

1:01:51.440 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Follow Ben a be dominant on X Listen to the

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben podcast you hear most Fridays when we are lucky.

1:01:56.720 --> 1:01:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Ben,