WEBVTT - The Big Weekend Pod

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to today's podcast sponsored by Hillsdale College, All Things

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Hillsdale at Hillsdale dot ed or I encourage you to

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the many free online courses there, and

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>of course I'll listen to the Hillsdale Dialogue all of

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>them at Hugh for Hillsdale dot com or just Google, Apple,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>iTunes and Hillsdale Morning. Glauria and Indian Grace. Welcome to

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the Big Weekend Pod America. I'm Hugh HEWITTT. Good pod today,

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>great pod, if I may say so myself, Prompted in

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>part by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's Bankers Address to

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bankers at Davos. I got a standing ovation, got

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a big standing ovation at Davos, Mark Karney did. I

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's happened in Canada, all right, Stephen Harper

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was a great prime minister, Brian mulroney, great partner with

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan and facing down the Soviet Union. They had

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the clown Trudeau for a long time. Now they've turned

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to mister Davos himself, Mark Carney. I want you to

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>make time to listen to it, so I'm going to

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>have Harley had the fifteen minute speech not the Q

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and A. It's only fifteen minutes. Mark Carney, the fifteen

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>minute speech. I talk about it with my guests today,

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>John Ellis, Well, I'll lead off with Matt Contnetty, than

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Ben Dominic, then Eli Lake, then John Ellis. But listening

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Carney thing, it's quite quietly but quite definitely

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>anti American turn trough. It's also very cowardly because Carney

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>avoids naming President Trump for the United States. You got

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>that big standing o though at the Banker's Annual PEP

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>rally and Davos. Of course he would. But as you listen,

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind some facts. First, CARNEI purports to speak

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>for the so called Middle Powers. That's a variant I

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>guess of the non aligned nations of the Cold War,

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>which is odd since Canada depends almost entirely on America

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for its national defense and for the freedom of the seas.

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>That allows it to sell its major asset, which is oil. Now,

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Canada. My in laws are Canadian, my daughter

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in law is Canadian. Love Canadians love maple syrup. There's

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>even a hockey joke in the introduction of Carney. Who

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't like Canadian Adam is Canadian man who's producing

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>this second. Canada has a population of forty two million

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>people and a GDP of two point four trillion, but

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't even spend two percent of that GDP on defense.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It promises that it's going to get to two percent

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>two percent by twenty thirty. Right, it just isn't really

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a middle power, if there's any kind of a definition

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of middle power, which would begin with consistent spending of

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>between three and five percent of your GDP. Carney says

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>he stands in the course of the speech with Greenland

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and Denmark. He didn't say he's standing against because it's

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a uniquely cowardly approach to Reddick, like I said that

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>named the president of the US, but when he's asking

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>question the answer if there's an off ramp on the subject.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Carney says he's hopeful that the quote discussions have been

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>catalyzed in an unusual way. In other words, Trump's getting

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it done because we need golden doll. Carney talks about

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the need for Europe and the transpecific partnership to get

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>together to expand trade and counterock the hedgemons. First of all,

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you should know there is no Transpacific partnership. It's a dream. Secondly, hedgemons,

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>China and the United States are the big superpowers. I

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>guess we're the same. He really did say the two hedgemons,

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Powers have to stand against the two hedgemons,

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>US stand against US. No difference at all between China

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and the United States. He doesn't mention the sixty two

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar trade surplus that Canada has with the US.

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, his speech is free of hard facts. He

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>does mention, I should say, he does mention that Canada

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>has submarines. It does. Four submarines, the newest of what

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was commissioned in twenty fifteen. The other three were commissioned

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and three, two of them, and in

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand I got a twenty six year old submarine

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like a Beatles song. Canada has a standing military of

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight thousand. Unlike Poland and Finland, they are frontlines

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>states with Russia. They do as much as they can

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with as much as they have. Canada doesn't really actually

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to repulse a conventional incursion from Russia

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>without the US to back it up quickly. You know,

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Finland's got reserve forces. They only have standing on me

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>at twenty three twenty four thousand, but they have reserve

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>forces of two hundred and eighty thousand that can mobilize

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>immediately if Putin gets pesky up North and Poland spends

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>close to five percent of their GDP on defense. Those

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>are middle powers. Now the big power, Israel punches so

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>far above them with ten million people. So it's not

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>like they can't do it. They're a free writer. Canada

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>is a free writer. They're a nice free writer. We

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>like hockey, we like maple syrup. We like to go

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to Toronto and Montreal. People like to visit there. But they

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>are a free rider. And when he compares us to

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>China and he just got back from China said he

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>had a good, great meeting there, and he has an

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>alliance with China. Twice in this speech. It's at the

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>end of this he mentions human rights. Just keep in

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>mind the genocide of the Wigers, the crushing of Hong

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Kong's freedoms, the ongoing threat to Taiwan, Jimmy Laive's imprisonment.

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 1>None of that distinguishes that Hedgemond from our being a Hegemont.

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>So the truth is hard truth. Canada lives under the

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>umbrella of the United States and has for eighty years.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>It has its excellent standard of living because of the

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>freedom of the seas guaranteed by the United States Navy

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and by our trade with them. When you hear Carney declared,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and you will Canada be an energy superpower, ask yourself

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>which countries doesn't sell its oil too? That would be

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>US mostly, And to which countries it could sell the

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>oil should freedom of the seas be contested? Justin Trudeau

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>was a clown right Mark Carney appears to be the

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>vain banker from the Bonfire of the Vanities by Tom

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Will the master of the universe in an imaginary world.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Of course, he got a standing ovation at Davos for

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>his middle power at chess thumping. What in the world

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>has happened in Canada since the days of Harper and Mulroney,

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but that's on my mind today when

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I talk with Kontinetti, with Ben Dominich, and we're going

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to cover Jack Smith, We're going to cover Greenland, We're

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>going to cover everything that happened during the week, especially

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>whether or not President Trump should and will strike Iran.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the most important issue in the world. That's, by

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the way, he doesn't mention that Karnee didn't mention the

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>fact that President Trump got rid of the nuclear program,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>obliterated it to the benefit of the entire world, something

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>that no other power, the other hedgemond wasn't going to

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>do because the other hedgemon buys all of its oil

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>from Iran, which allows Iron to mo down fifteen thousand people.

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Mark Corney doesn't know that you think I'm a little

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>bit upset with Mark carnieat he's a banker. It's like

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Frye had submarines and oil that he's just basically

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a blue state mayor, the blue state mayor of Canada.

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Mark Carney. What a smarmy speech. But that just leads

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>us in to the big weekend pod enjoy. Welcome back, America.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Hugh Hewett. I'm joined by Matt Contadenny, who is

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of course head of domestic Policy Studies at the Canadian

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Enterprise North the American Enterprise Institute. He's also the Canadian

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Journal Wall Street Journal columnist, and he's just back from Canada.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I was going to call him the Kim Philby of Canada,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think Don McLean or Guy Burgess sounds more Canadian.

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>What were you doing up north in the land of

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>hockey and lander?

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 2>That's Flanders on my character, comparing me to those Cambridge spies. No,

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I was in Canada engaged in high stakes diplomacy. Hugh

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>went to Toronto Wednesday evening, spent a whole twenty four

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 2>hours there with our northern neighbor.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Touchdown in Ottawa.

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Briefly on my back to DC, and I can report

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the following Canada is not happy with President Trump and

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>his rhetoric on Greenland or the fifty first state.

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>And so my job there was.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>To explain what Trump is up to in shaping the

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 2>world in order to create kind of the sinews, restore

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the sinews of Western civilization in preparation for the competition

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>with China. I'd like to think I convinced a few

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of my Canadian friends, but it was tough going.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You need to sit down with Mark Kearney. Have you

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>listened to the Mark Kearney address at Davos yet?

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you know that speech was the talk of the

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>chattering class here in d C almost as soon as

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 2>it was delivered. And so ever curious, I went and

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 2>I looked it up. I watched the speech, and I

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 2>have to say, I don't know what all the fuss

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 2>was about.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Oh, I think it's one of them. More we

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have anti American speeches because it's cowardly. He never mentioned

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>America or Donald Trump, but he talks about the Hedgemonds,

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>meaning that China and US are alike, and then he

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>runs through I'll just give you some of the highlights.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Cut number four.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 3>We placed the sign in the window, We participated in

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 3>the rituals, and we largely avoided calling out the gaps

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>between rhetoric and reality. This bargain no longer works. Let

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture.

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Not a transition, all right, Matt, A rupture. They are

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>not protected from the world without us. They depend upon

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>our nuclear umbrella, our military. They have four submarines, sixty

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand soldiers. They spend less than two percent of

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>their GDP on national defense, and the oil they send

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>abroad is only because we maintain freedom of the seas.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>If we didn't, they'd have to sell it all to us.

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It was the most arrogant, two faced thing I have

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 1>heard from a world leader who depends upon America to

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the extent that Canada does. It really enraged me, So

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>tell me why I'm wrong.

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think you're wrong.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I think there are two main problems with this speech

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that Prime Minister carneg gave. The first one is there

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 2>was no action item. It was all rhetoric. It's all

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 2>quotations from Thucydides and Bossil of Hovel. But he never

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>said what he was going to do except have this liberal,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 2>pluralistic society that he is oversees he governs in Canada.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>But that what does that mean? Is he actually going

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 2>to spend more more money on defense? Is he going

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 2>to correct the wreckage that Justin Trudeau caused Canada through

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 2>socialism and through the Green New Deal?

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Canadian economy.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>America has opened up a tremendous gap in per capita

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 2>GDP and productivity with Canada. Canada has real domestic issues

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>that the United States did not cause, Canada caused them,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 2>and he needs to address those. And the second thing

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 2>about the speech was I thought it was really really

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 2>rich because he delivered the speech obviously directed toward President Trump,

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 2>less than a week after he met with Sijinping, Yes,

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>who does not believe in freedom, wants to set the

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 2>rules of this new world order in a way that

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>would disadvantage any country not named China. And Carney there

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>was extremely solicitous, even slavish, towards Si Jinping. And so

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 2>if you're going to quote Vaslovhavel about speaking truth to power,

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>why don't you do it to the Chinese communist dictator?

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 2>And instead of going up to the applause of Eurocrats

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>in Davos, Switzerland.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Because at that meeting with Jijenping, he said,

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we're entering into an alliance. And I thought, oh, the

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Whiggers will love that. And I thought, Jimmy laies in

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a prison cell, and I thought, to what, Taiwan is

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>being threatened every day, and that Hong Kong has been crushed.

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And he talks in this speech about the hedgemon. It's

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>clearly China enough that I don't really really know how

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to absorb this other than he is of the It's

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like Jacob Fry with submarines. He's of the banking class,

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and the banking class likes China because they do a

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of business with China. Am I two hearts.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're right about the banking class and the financial elite.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 2>But I think there's another thing at work here, Hugh,

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>and that is domestic Canadian politics.

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Not true.

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, the thing about nationalism is every nation has it,

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>and so we have American nationalism through President Trump, but

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>sometime he's awaken nationalism in India and in China traditionally

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 2>allies of ours, and so Carney was playing through a

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 2>domestic audience as well, and I can report it's way

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>he liked it.

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, I'm talking with Matt during the

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>break about the new superstar of American of repartee, Scott Fassen.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>And then when we turn back on the other day,

0:12:54.200 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack Trump Wiltennet, I'm back with Matt Connetty to play

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>from at two pieces of Scott Bessant and Davos if

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you may have missed it. First of all, here's Scott

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Bessant talking about Gavin Newsom and Davos on Tuesday cut

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>number eleven. I think it's very, very.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Ironic that you know Governor Newsom, who strikes me as

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Patrick Bateman Sparkle beach Ken maybe the only California.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Enough good enough. And then cut number eight.

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 3>We've seen the.

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Lack of energy security from this manic push for net zero,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 4>which I think we've seen in some recent scientific journals,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 4>has been pushed back. Even Bill Gates is saying the

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 4>one degree, two degrees, three degrees.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure it matters.

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 4>If you look at what he's doing with his own money,

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 4>it looks like he believes we're going to innovate our

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 4>way out of any perceived climate problem.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's on one side. And then again

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 3>I think this.

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 4>I think we almost reached a Saturday Night Live moment

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 4>a few years ago when it was you're not going

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 4>to own anything, You're going to eat insects.

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was just the inmates were running the

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 3>asylum at that well.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 4>I can tell you, after a few days of Swiss

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 4>German food, I may switch to bugs.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Got Eddy who knew that gott Besson was going to

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>be up there with Marco Rubio for verbal dexterity?

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you know, Q.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>As soon as we finished last week's interview where we

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 2>were talking about some of the great communicators in Donald

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump's cabinet, I slapped my forehead and said I left

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>out Scott Besson and sure enough, he showed why he's

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 2>one of the more effective communicators in this The other

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 2>thing about Besson is he established a profile in financial

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>markets long before the Trump era began, and like Donald Trump,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>he was a politically independent character. Right, but he has

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I think seen the light through the Biden Harris years

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and the Obama years, but the dangers of government regulation,

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 2>high taxes, spending, all of the different energy regulations that

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 2>limit growth. And so he's become a warrior for markets

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and for the Trump agenda, and he's entertaining. I mean

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 2>that line about Newsom was extremely cutting, to the point

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>where I think it left Governor Newsom speechless for a moment,

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>which is a rare occurrence.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, it's going to leave on Mark sparkle Ken is

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>going to leave on Mark Matt Continey. We've talked about

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Epstein before, the soul of wit and written word.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you know when you when you have wit?

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Because obviously Scott Besson has wit. We got we got

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a minute. What is wit?

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a quickness, it's the comeback. It's being able to

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 2>turn a phrase on a dime in response to something

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 2>somebody has said or something that occurs. Joseph Epstein has,

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Scott Besen has it. Of course, in my view, the

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 2>founder of American Conservatism, William F. Buckley grow is the

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 2>exemplar of wit because he was able to come up

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 2>with a one liner really just at the drop of

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 2>a hat.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a superpower. Trump, by the way, recognizes wit, but

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't practice it very often. He can get off

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a good one liner once in a while, but he

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>recognizes it always as a good entertainer. Next Jack Smith,

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>after the break, stay tuned, Welcome back to and you

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>do it? Maat Cottonetty is with me, of course. Matt

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is with the Wall Street Journal, way right a column.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>He's also head of Domestic policy Studies at the American

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Enterprise Institute and our special envoy to Canada. Uh Matt

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>last night. You know, Britt Brett Behar is so good

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at what he does with the panel. He realizes when

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>he has to stretch the moment because smoke is coming

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>out of someone's ears. I had a Democrat on who

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 1>said Jack Smith did great yesterday and it was wonderful,

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and he showed him up. And then Brett turned to

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>me and said, Hugh cut number three. Hugh final word,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>oh oh he I think Jack Smith effectively killed the

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>appointment of special prosecutors. Today, I think Eileen Cannon's decision

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that she ruled his appointment on constitutional has been validated.

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>He did not give answers, he gave evasions, and I

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>believe that that will go down as one of the

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 1>worst appearances before Congressional history, the other that I can

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>actually remember in real time. So there was a differenceive

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>opinion on the panel. What did you think of Jack

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Smith before the House Judiciary or Oversight Committee.

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it showed that he was the wrong man

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 2>for the job. He wasn't prepared for these questions, and

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 2>there are real questions. I mean, there are questions about

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 2>his approach to the First Amendment and whether Trump's actions

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 2>surrounding January sixth are exercise as a free speech, which

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I think there were. He showed lack of judgment on immunity,

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 2>taking the case all the way to the Supreme Court

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 2>and losing it. There are questions about the speech and

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 2>debate clause, which I think representative guilt really got into

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 2>when describing the way in which they pursued under arctic frosts.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>The communications of senior congressional leaders, including describing former Speaker

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Kevin McCarthy.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 3>As a potential flight risk.

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Now there's one thing I know about Kevin McCarthy.

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 5>He's not a flight risk.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>No, he's not a flight risk.

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 2>And then you know, you think about you think about

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Smith's resume and his case against Bob McDonnell, which was

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>then thrown out by the Supreme Court. So you have

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 2>here a kind of a pattern on the part of

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Jack Smith. And he is a relentless prosecutor. But I

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>think one who is so determined to indict that he

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 2>is ready to kind of walk all over the Constitution

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>in the process.

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I keep referencing Javert from Lea Mease, and I wonder

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>my question is did Merrick Garland know that and want that,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>or did he make a mistake. I know that Eileen

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Cannon's opinion needs to be revisited by everyone. She held

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>his appointment is unconstitutional because he had never been confirmed

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as a prosecutor, for example, as the US Attorney would

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>be and the prosecutory power. Robert Jackson wrote a very

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>great I gave a great speech actually a Department of

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Justice to prosecutors about how dangerous it is to be

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a state prosecutor. He had to be careful. Do you

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>think Garland knew what he was getting or just screwed up?

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 2>He must have known. I mean, Merrick Garland has been

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 2>around Washington, d C. For a very long time. He

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 2>knows about Jack Smith, and he knows about his relationships

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>with Komee and Fitzgerald and that whole crew. So I

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>think he had a sense of what was going to happen,

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>and it backfired. And we know that primary reason Donald

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump as president today, not just the total collapse of

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 2>the Biden administration, not just Donald Trump's own extraordinary resilience

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and talent, But it's because of the Lawfair. It's because

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>of the Lawfair that was spearheaded by Jack Smith. So

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a moment where we need to

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>look in the mirror. But you know, Hugh, I was

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>hoping you'd ask me about the Oscar picks, well, like

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 2>you've been asking people about then Oscar nominee.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I asked, if there's my chance.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 6>To weigh in, Well, there are ten of them. Did

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 6>you see any of the ten out now? I've only

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 6>seen one of the ten, and that's f one me too.

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 6>I did not see in the theater and I thoroughly enjoyed.

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 2>So as soon as you said that earlier this week,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I said, Okay, I'm rooting for f one to win

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the Picture of the Year now.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But I want to ask you about the most important

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>question in the world, and it really is should Donald

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Trump hit Iran harder than it's ever been hit? As

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>he pledged in me, if they would kill people? And

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think he will?

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 3>He needs to take action. You know, he drew a

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 3>line there. He has called for new leadership.

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 2>He has sent this signal of force by sending the

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 2>aircraft carrier group back into the region, and he's told

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the Iranian people that help is on the way.

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 3>So action needs to be taken.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, they've stepped up sanctions, they've stepped up the

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 2>maximum pressure. But I do think that a strike directed

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 2>at kind of the pillars of the regime security state,

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 2>in particular the Basiji militias and the IRGC, which has

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 2>caused so much havoc in the region and killed Americans,

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 2>would be completely justified, and it would back up President

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Trump's credibility, and it would extend America's deterrence, and it

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 2>would help the Iranian people who clearly believe that this

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 2>government is illegitimate and should fall.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a question which requires a little bit of prophecy.

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama will never escape erasing the red Line. Joe

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden will never escape the collapse in Afghanistan. Donald Trump

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>has already done the world a great thing by obliterating

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear program and by grabbing Maduro. But we're walking

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>back from the threat of force. Here be a lasting

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>mark on his legacy. As the historians assessed the Trump presidency.

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I think Trump's goal should be that there are new

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 2>governments in Venezuela, Iran, and Cuba by the time he

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 2>leaves office. And what a blow for freedom it would

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 2>be if that was the case. He's removed Maduro from

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Venezuela and he is working with the regime now, but

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 2>clearly there will be pressure as there should be, to

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 2>transition to democracy in Venezuela. He has made this pledge

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to the people of Iran. He has done more to

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 2>weaken in Iran in working with of course Benjamin and

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Yahoo in Israel, than any other American president.

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 3>And now we have news that.

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 2>He's going to really ramp up the pressure on Cuba,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>which is you know, in kind of the final end

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>state the communist government there. So I think on all

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>three fronts, he should continue the strategy he's been pursuing,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>with the ultimate goal of visiting free capitals in all

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 2>three nations when he leaves office or shortly thereafter.

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And one minute Matt In March of twenty eighty three,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan gave an SDI speech which was mocked, I

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>mean really mocked, mercilessly mocked as Star Wars and Israel

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>had the Iron dram as a result. Do you think

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the Greenland gambit for Golden Dome will look forty years

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>from now like a very smart move or will not

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be remembered.

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 2>No, I will be a smart move. I mean, greenland

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 2>strategic importance is clear. It's obvious to everybody. It's obvious

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 2>to Russia and China. That's why Trump has made this

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>play for it now. I think he rattled a lot

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>of cages when he wouldn't rule out the use of force,

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 2>and that's why it was important this week that he

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>said he would not use force to take Greenland. But

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>it's certainly the case that America needs to increase our

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 2>presence there and we need to build missile defenses in

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 2>order to protect our nation from nuclear armed superpowers.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Always good to talk with you, Matt Continetty. Follow Matt

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Continetty read him in the Wall Street Journal on exit

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>just at Cottonady, and we'll get the latest update from

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>our special envoys from Canada next week. Don't go anywhere America.

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I stay tuned.

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 5>It is in Hewig show.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Ben Dominis did come just in time for me

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to announce Mark Kearney, Ben, how are you?

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 5>I I'm doing well. I apologize. Megan woke up, so

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 5>she now has the baby.

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's okay. Young fathers don't have to ever apologize

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>for any And.

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 5>There was no way I tried. I tried, I could not.

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>If you had better get to the store before the

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>snow comes, because I have.

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I have spent approximately seven thousand dollars good good, good

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 5>good orders in the last Yeah.

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't show, it doesn't matter. Don't hurt your back. You've

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>got the baby.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, no, I have two different kinds of ice

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 5>melting assault. So I'm good.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to focus on Mark Kearney. Did you listen

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to his speech at Davos?

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 5>Not only did I listen to it, I let off

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 5>with it on the Big Ben Show. I know it

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 5>and I found I found it refreshingly honest. I don't

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 5>know what your opinion of Oh.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I hated it. I think he's cowardly and hypocritical. So

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>well we have a difference of opinion.

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, that's okay. What I also thought, though, is

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 5>that this is not something that he's going to bye

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 5>by in any real way. It's not something that he

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 5>truly in on a on a Hypocritical is a good

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 5>word for him, because this is something that I think

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 5>a smart person recognizes, but then he takes the wrong

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 5>lesson from it, meaning that I think that this, this

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 5>whole you know, admission that like, oh we were actually

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 5>just depending on the Americans all along, is honest and

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 5>is refreshing. I think that the next step though, of

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 5>saying well, because of that, you know, I mean, the

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 5>implication is basically we need to expand the nuclear umbrellas.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 5>I mean it just if you take it to the

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 5>end game of this you know too, And I think

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 5>that that's something that is going to be terrible for

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 5>Europe and for global stability, and you're going to have well,

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 5>they're not going to.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Do it though, Ben, this was fact. This is fact

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>free posturing. I don't think so. Because they've got forty

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>two million people, their GDP is two point four trillion dollars.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>They're spending a grand total of eighty two million dollars

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>over the next five years to get to two percent.

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>He said in the course of this speak, I've got submarines.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>He got four submarines. Four Yes, one was built in

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen, the other three were built in two thousand

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and three, in two thousand. He's got no. Sixty eight

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand active duty troops, twenty seven thousand reserve. He's not Finland.

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 5>By the way. The funniest thing about the Greenland deployment

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 5>that I said to a friend of mine, and that

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 5>friend with Lucas Tomlinson, by the way, it was I

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 5>was like, oh, so that's what fifty percent of their force. Yeah,

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 5>they're venting the Greenland.

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But what really, what really gets my goat is when

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he talks about the Hedgemonds, like we're the same thing,

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>all right. He can sell oil to China because we

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>protect freedom of the seas. If there isn't freedom of

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the season, China's not buying. He can only sell his

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>oil to us, don't.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 5>You think, But don't you think it's useful to at

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 5>least have someone get up on that stage who isn't

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump and say we cannot continue this fiction that

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 5>we are all living in. This this the system of

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 5>a rules based international order where you know, we are all,

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, sort of existing underneath some type of inner

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 5>national law and agreement. We're all sort of in the

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 5>room together, kumbaya.

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>There are two ways to say it. The way you

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>just said it, or the way and by the way.

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>The reason we aren't is because China got into the

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>WTO and cheated. They steal intellectual property, they do dumping,

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't care about the environment, they use dirty coal,

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and they've imprisoned a million week.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Nineties China policy just like the worst things, like the

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 5>biggest mistake that we made and will and I will

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 5>say we because I was totally I mean, I mean

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 5>so is I. I was in favor of it, and

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 5>I thought I thought this was the way to go,

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 5>you know, bring them in. You know, have have have

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 5>most favorite nation status, have to have you know, trade

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 5>have that you know, be something that increases alliances with

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 5>the West, and instead it's about exporting their values and

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 5>not importing ours.

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And that just you know, you're going to read a

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>book to your little boy one day called Willie the Wimp,

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>because every little four year old loves it. Have you

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have you seen it? It's a gorilla analy and chimpanzee

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and and Willy the whimp, and the chimpanzee is his

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>giant chimpanzee, and the giant chimpanzee takes care of the

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.959
<v Speaker 1>little monkey. And that's what we are. We're the giant

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>gorilla and they are the little monkey. And I'm glad

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that they're a nice little monkey.

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I like them.

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But you don't go around with a bunch of bankers.

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he's the only guy that got a

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>standing ovation at Davos. He got a standing ovation.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think I think that one of the things

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 5>that is so funny about Davos is that it's it's

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 5>just everything is posturing and behind the scenes, they're all

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 5>going to the same you know, things together and they're

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 5>all i mean, Gavin Newsome met with Donald Trump apparently,

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, like it's it's one of these things where

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's just so deeply corrupt and one of

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 5>the things that I do appreciate about this particular moment

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 5>as it relates to the Greenland situation, is that the

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 5>President's approach of foreign policy, I think has been vindicated

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 5>so many times that now he thinks he can just

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 5>like he can hit that number on Roulette every single time,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 5>I can get it every single time, you know, And

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 5>and I'm not sure he's going to get it everything.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Wall You know, I followed Lucas on Special Report last night.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>He's on Greenland, and I think we had a breakthrough

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this week because now everyone agrees Greenland is necessary for

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Golden Dum and it's just the details.

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 5>That's the break's details. And the breakthrough too is that,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 5>as I have argued, as my friend Josh Raphino has

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 5>argued in multiple essays, including a Wall Street Journal, there

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 5>is a sovereignty solution here that is right in front

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 5>of you, and it just, you know, basically requires that

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 5>that type of movement in our direction. It does not

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 5>require an invasion, it does not require us to spend

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 5>an enormous amount of money buying it, but it requires

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 5>America to have a sovereign footprint there that is in

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 5>our security interest, both long term and right now. And

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 5>I think that that's something that everyone has come around

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 5>to because it's just impossible to deny. Yeah, and you

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 5>know that's that's something that to your point, Trump sort

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 5>of forces people into admitting the truth that they don't want.

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>To unless they can go to a place in posture

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like Carney did. I'm going to come right back with

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben during the break because we've got to talk about

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Big Ben podcast this week and about his expert

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>from UVA on cell phones. If you haven't listened to it,

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben Podcast on the Fox Podcast Network. He's editor

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>at Large at The Spectator. His sub stack is the Transom.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But this is a great podcast with Tricia McLachlan basically

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>doing what JD Vance did in Minneapolis yesterday. But the

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>expert from the University of Virginia. I'll talk with him

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and if he can stick around. After the break, we'll

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>kick around Jack Smith some more. Don't go anywhere. I'm

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Hewett. I'm back with Ben Dominic. Ben. I listened

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Big Ben podcast today and it was fabulous.

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Trician McLachlan, but that was I basically did

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>jd speech yesterday. So I want to focus on your

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>UVA professor and his guidance on phones because just simply

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>dumb phones still high school and no phones in the bedroom.

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>That's all parents need to know, isn't it.

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 5>I think this thing is really a lot more simple

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 5>than people seem to be making it. Like there's been,

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, this whole public conversation around it. You know,

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 5>the work that Jonathan Height has done, and everyone else

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 5>who's who's kind of you know, I don't know, they

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 5>just they've developed a whole conversation within the space. I

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 5>think it's that simple, isn't it, Hugh? I mean it's

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 5>And I realized I may sound like completely out of

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 5>touch on this or or as if I'm some you know,

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 5>throwback stoic, but you know, the question that I really

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 5>have for him is why can't you just delete the apps?

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Why can't you just get rid of him?

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, he went further when he said, no cell phones

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at night in the bedroom because they lose sleep, and

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of course the boys are looking for body pictures. And

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>number two in school, computers are overrated. That we learn

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>by doing things.

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 5>And I said, hallelujah that that point is actually the

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 5>more critical point from my perspective. So first off the

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 5>no phones in the in the in the room. To me,

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 5>that's the same as no TVs in the room. But

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 5>you don't, you don't, you don't. You shouldn't be allowing that.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 5>I mean, come on, it's a distraction. It's bad, it's

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 5>and it's bad for you, by the way, as an

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 5>adult too. It's not just bads so but my other,

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 5>my other, I actually think that TVs should be you

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 5>should have a central location or whatever for it. But

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 5>but it should be something that you intentionally do. It

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 5>should not be constant background or noise or what have you.

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 5>But when it comes to the school part of this, Hugh,

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 5>we are in constant fights about this. And and I

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 5>will say this as as someone who sends, uh, you know,

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 5>my kids to some pretty top slight expensive schools. Don't

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 5>be no offense to any listener, but like I mean,

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 5>I think they're a little too pricey because I was

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 5>home school all the way. But anyway, the point is

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 5>that is a point of contention among everyone. It's not

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 5>just the public schoolers, it's it's the private schoolers too.

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 5>And the schools are constant pushing you to do more screens,

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 5>to say like, oh no, you I mean just this

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 5>this snowstorm, you know coming up, you know here, the

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 5>school sends out something about, you know, make sure to

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, have your kid take the iPad home, and

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 5>they want to, they need, you know, we need to

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 5>be able to zoom in for class. And it's like, no,

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to do that.

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to do that.

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're just not going to do that because that's

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 5>not the way that people learn.

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>But I was glad to hear you say, is that

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it's become a source of a program. If you are

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in a restaurant and you give the kid the phone,

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.439
<v Speaker 1>because it is I always I cast an I cast

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a glance like that thirty seconds Ben. How often do

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you get that look?

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 5>Uh?

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 3>For? For me? Uh?

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 5>I have quite honestly, I have never opened my phone

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 5>and shown my kids of the restaurants. Never I will.

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 5>I will say that I've been at table where other

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 5>people have done that and my kids have watched, and

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 5>I have not objected. But I have never done that

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 5>with my phone, and I don't never intend to, because

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 5>I think that is an admission of failure.

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I do believe that they are permissible on

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>long car rides and airplanes.

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 5>Lights. That's fine, it's a long time rights and airplanes.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Maybe it's the same thing that everybody else is doing,

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 5>you know, so I don't have a problem with that.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 5>You can bring a certain amount of games and entertainment,

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 5>but eventually they're going to move from the plate out

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 5>to just need to watch those things.

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Coming back with Ben on Jack Smith, don't go anywhere.

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I am back with Ben Dominich, host of the Big

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben podcast on the Fox Podcast Network. You can read

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>him in the Spectator, you can read his substack at

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Transom, and you can follow him on x at

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>b Dominich. Ben, I want to give you four uninterrupted

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>moments for your comments on Jack Smith and what we

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.479
<v Speaker 1>take away from this, because I've already said my piece

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>three or four times.

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, first off, I'll just say I don't I'm not

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 5>sure that I have seen a person who has occupied

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 5>a role as important as Jack Smith be in a

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 5>position in front of a congressional hearing where he was

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 5>more where anyone that I know of, was more dismissive, disrespectful,

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 5>and you know, quite frankly full of hubris about everything

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 5>that he did in his role. Ever in front of

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 5>the Congress, and keep in mind, we've seen Anthony Fauci justified.

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this is this is this is quite you know,

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 5>as a sort of you know, one one to achieve.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 5>And so I think that jack Smith, you know, came

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 5>in and did himself no favors because there was no

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 5>humility on his part, especially when it came to the

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 5>issues related to grabbing the phone records of members of

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.959
<v Speaker 5>Congress and the records of all these different citizens across

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 5>the country. I hope that you have seen, maybe you

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 5>played it that the audio of Chip Roy talking to

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 5>him about this, But the idea that you could just

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 5>seize and go after all of these things years after

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 5>the fact, by the way, and not in four members

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 5>of Congress, that you're just going to be snarfing up

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 5>their phone records, it's I mean, that's subscene.

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 1>You can't just Jackson, when he was Attorney General, gave

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a very famous speech about the power of the prosecutor

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and why you've got to be very careful. He went rogue,

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>he went javert, and I think Eileen Cannon's ruling that

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>his appointment was unconstitutional bears up very well because he

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>had never you can appoint a US attorney to be

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a special counsel. And that's fine. They've got the right temperament,

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the right judgment. They've passed through Senate confirmation. This guy

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is a fanatic and.

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 5>Therefore it's obscene. I mean, it's you say, when Javert,

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 5>Javert had the honor to jump off the bridge.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want him doing that. I just wanted

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to go away, just to be clear.

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 5>But I'm just saying there was a moment of clarity

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 5>for him. This is this is a guy who just

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 5>really thinks that he did everything right that you know,

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 5>he just you know, helps one of Chips questions to

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 5>him and it was just you know, you you know,

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 5>there's just and Kevin KYLEI asked it in a slightly

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 5>different way, but it's one of these things where this

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 5>you you come in front of Congress after something as

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 5>botched as this, and you don't at least have a

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 5>humility to admit maybe we overreached in certain areas, maybe

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 5>we should have done some things differently. You know, we

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 5>were trying to do this in a responsible way, and

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 5>instead we gave a reflection of it as a partisan investigation.

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 5>There was none of that.

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>So the key question is did Merrick Garland get what

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he wanted or did he just get punked by someone

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 1>making a recommendation.

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 5>You know, that is a big question and I don't

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 5>know the answer to it. I would incline more towards

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 5>the latter, but that's only because I think I think

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Garland is not particularly bright, because he kind of half

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.280
<v Speaker 5>was right. Yeah, yeah, I just that is my impression

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 5>of him, based on limited interaction. But I think that

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 5>that is not I don't. I think he got jobbed

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 5>in this right.

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Last question, of the ten movies nominated for Best Picture,

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>how many of them have you seen?

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 5>I've seen about half of them.

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh you are You're the outlier.

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 5>You're the sixth person, Hugh, I have, Hugh, I have seen.

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 5>I saw twenty seven movies last year, and of the

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 5>nine were kids movies. Okay, And the best movie of

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 5>the that I saw last year in theaters was f

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 5>One whichever.

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well that's the only other one that anyone's seen,

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and I agree it was it was great. But you

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>actually saw Sinner?

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 5>Yes, No, I mean I liked it. It was good.

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You're the only one.

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, great movie.

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 1>We're not going here for movie recommendations anytime soon.

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 5>Well look, look, look, I will I will tell you

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.919
<v Speaker 5>the movie that I saw that I enjoyed the most

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 5>last year was Weapons, And I also really liked Eddington,

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 5>which everyone hated, but everyone me and John Fedortz.

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>At least you've seen them though.

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 5>At least Ben, I think it's good to go back

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 5>to movies.

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Be dominants.

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, my friend, Jonathan Williams, tax economist at alex

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>American Legislative Exchange Company. Welcome back in America. I'm Hugh

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Hewittt on the weekend broadcast. Eli Lake joins us. He is,

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of course the host of the Breaking History podcast, a

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>contributor to the Free Press, an expert on Iran. Eli

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Davos love in among bankers, did anyone have

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the guts to stand up and say, Iran just mowed

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>down fifteen thousand of their people and imprison the same

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 1>number and is the evilest regime on the planet.

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 8>It's a really good question. I don't think anybody kind

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 8>of put it like that, and I think that's exactly

0:40:55.600 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 8>how we should think about it. But that said, this

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 8>is the end of the Obama delusion. I have not

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 8>heard from European capitals that there is a sense or

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 8>an expectation that there will be new negotiations with Iran

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 8>over you know, whatever remains of its nuclear program, and

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 8>eventually we will knit Iran into the global order by

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 8>investing in that country as long as that regime stays

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 8>in power. I think at this point, I hope it

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 8>the regime collapses tomorrow, but even if it doesn't, I

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 8>just don't think that we're going to get back to

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 8>what we lived through ten years ago, which was the

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 8>idea that there would be major corporations investing in Iran.

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 8>The sanctions were lifted as Iran built up this proxy

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 8>network throughout the region and continued to have the nuclear option.

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.479
<v Speaker 1>They did not invite. They ended up disinviting the Foreign

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Ministry of Iran. That's but they have not designated the

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>IRGC is a terrorist organization at the EU, which is

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a bad move. The most important question in the world

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I think by a lot, I've been

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 1>on a Canada rant already today because the Mark Carney

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>disgusting address or so cowardly in two faced, But the

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>most important question remains, should Donald Trump hit Iran hard?

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 1>And Willie what do you think Eli like, I.

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:31.399
<v Speaker 8>Think he absolutely should. I don't see how I mean, listen,

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:33.439
<v Speaker 8>nobody can bring to what's going on with Donald Trump.

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 8>His messaging has been pretty consistent, and I think he

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 8>tried to kind of create his own way out by

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 8>saying that they had they had canceled the execution of

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 8>I think he has a very specific number eight hundred

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 8>and thirty seven people in the hangings, which he's talked about.

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 8>We saw today that one of the senior kind of

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:02.320
<v Speaker 8>judges in Iran said that is not true and that

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 8>they would be going forward with the executions. Of course,

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 8>the death toll is horrific. I think at the very

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 8>least it's four or five thousand, and it could be

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 8>upwards of twenty five thousand or more. They've turned off

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 8>the internet precisely for this reason, so you know, I

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 8>hope that this is the kind of final straw. And

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 8>then more importantly, the response from Iran's leaders up into

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 8>and including Ayatola Ali Khamene has been effectively to taunt Trump,

0:43:33.120 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 8>yes to question his resolve. That that didn't go very

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 8>well for Nicholas Medoro, it didn't go very well for

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 8>Costum Soulamani and I think that they in some ways

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 8>in that respect, they are sealing their fate.

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 3>My wary is though that.

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 8>I would have liked to have seen something, and I

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 8>understand military assets have to be in place. I also

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 8>understand that, according to a lot of reporting, and I've

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 8>heard this too in my reporting, that Trump really does

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 8>want a comprehensive military option and to go big. So

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 8>that maybe takes time, but it would have been good

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:15.680
<v Speaker 8>to have something two weeks ago, a week and a

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:17.439
<v Speaker 8>half ago, when he said help was on the way,

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:21.400
<v Speaker 8>because I think the perception is is that there was

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 8>at least a chance that Trump would back off and

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 8>would seek some kind of deal. I don't think that's

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 8>going to happen. Let me go all sophocles on you.

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 8>You cannot know how good the day has been until

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:35.919
<v Speaker 8>the night has come. And with Donald Trump, the whole

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 8>Greenland thing, even actor the whole Greenland thing might have

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:41.320
<v Speaker 8>been a way to divert attention away from this. But

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 8>I did have a very smart national security fellow of

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:49.239
<v Speaker 8>impeccable credential say we can't hit carg Island and the

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 8>oil terminals, which is what seems obvious to me to's

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 8>keeping the regime alive because that would possibly bring China

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 8>in to rebuild it and to embed within Iran.

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of that?

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of reasons maybe why you don't hit

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 8>carg Island. You could also cause an oil shock that

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.279
<v Speaker 8>would do terrible things to the price of energy, which

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 8>has been relatively stable and low, and that would have

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.320
<v Speaker 8>an effect in terms of inflation. So Trump's got to

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 8>consider that. I think he would have an enormous effect

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 8>if he just decided to hit the headquarters in regional

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 8>headquarters for the IRGC, that's the Revolutionary Guard core and

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:28.360
<v Speaker 8>the besieging militia and then target started similar to what

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 8>Israel did, start targeting senior regime officials up to and

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 8>including Io La Kamine. You have a number of voices

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 8>from Iran's opposition, not just on the outside, that are

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 8>begging the America to hit the supreme leader. What else

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 8>is there left to talk about at this point? So

0:45:51.160 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 8>there are a lot of targets in Iran short of

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 8>carg Island.

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Like carg Island is all that money goes to the IERGC.

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Canada is ramping up it's export of oil. It's at

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars a barrel. Seventy dollars a barrel is not

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that big of a deal, and it can be we

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>can overproduce. We are just about to hit full American production.

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But Eli, before I go, I got to ask you

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the Carnie speech and many of the other Europeans seem

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to take for granted that the United States will always

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>protect them no matter what they say about us. It's

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of what Israel must have to deal

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>with on a daily basis, that they are really the

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>lynchpin to security in the Middle East, but they get

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.360
<v Speaker 1>dumped on by everyone and it's not pleasant.

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 8>I would say this, it's empty rhetoric. Canada and Europe

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 8>do not have the military, do not have the means

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 8>to protect themselves. That is by our design, and there

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 8>are good reasons for that. So I wanted to say,

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to give Trump a total path. I

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 8>think that some of the things that he said were outrageous,

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 8>and the way that he went about the Greenland thing,

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 8>I think can have but it's not the end of

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 8>the world, because there is no alternative right now to

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 8>the alliance with America. I mean the meeting with g

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 8>and the I'm sorry not even g like the senior

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 8>Chinese official and the statement that you know things are

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 8>going in different direction is absurd and Carney ought to

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 8>know better. The idea that Canada is going to pursue

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 8>the kind of relationship it has with China over the

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 8>United States even under Trump, and I get you know

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 8>why he's nervous about things, but don't make threats. Don't

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 8>use that rhetoric because it's just not realistic. It's not

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 8>in the cards.

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But they're going to sell a lot of oil to China,

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which is fine because we have freedom of the seas

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.879
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed by the United States Navy YEP. And if that ends,

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>they can only sell it to US, and they only.

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't even spend two percent of their GDP on defense.

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Eli he talked about his submarine. I have four submarines,

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the most recent one which was built in twenty fifteen.

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 8>Listen, I agree, and that some of this is exposing things.

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 8>I mean, listen, some of what Trump is saying is

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 8>I disagree with a lot of it is true. When

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:07.919
<v Speaker 8>we were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yes, it's true

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 8>when they say the British did fight, especially on the

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 8>special operations side, absolutely valiance and.

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 1>The Canadians lost one hundred and fifty eight people and

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>also true.

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.000
<v Speaker 8>But I'm just saying the Italians and the Germans, we

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 8>couldn't trust them to secure areas. They didn't they There

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 8>are cultural issues there that are really deep. It's not

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:30.320
<v Speaker 8>just about spending more of your GDP. There's not the

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 8>kind of military culture that we have in America right now.

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 8>So those are deep things that our generations are going

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 8>to be playing out over a generation. But like, let's

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 8>let's be realistic. There is no alternative to American power. Europeans,

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:46.840
<v Speaker 8>Canada and they know that, no matter.

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 1>How many times ago to Davos. I'm in the Killed

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Davos Forever club. But what do you think they like?

0:48:51.560 --> 0:48:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Thirty seconds?

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.720
<v Speaker 8>I agree with Davos is a is a debating society

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 8>of the plutocratic.

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Self pleasuring of the banking class. And I'm sick of it.

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Eli Lake. Follow him on ex at Eli Lake.

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll be right back. America, stay tuned, Good morning, Glory

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and even grace America, Bones or High Canada. The weekend

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:16.280
<v Speaker 1>broadcast is underway, as it usually is, with John Ellis,

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 1>founder and editor in chief of News Items which you

0:49:20.200 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>can find by googling John Ellison news items. It's the

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>only newsletter you really need in the morning. And the

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.919
<v Speaker 1>way John and I usually work Fridays is that John

0:49:30.000 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>will send me a list of topics he thinks we

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>got to cover, and I'll get smart about them, and

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>then we'll talk about them only today great minds thinking.

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Like John's second item, which I bumped up to number one,

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 1>is Canada. Oh Canada, John, I'm so glad you brought

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this up because I listened to Mark Carney's speech at Davos,

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>which got a standing ovation. Moderator said, that's very rare

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 1>at Davos, and it's because he's a banker talking to bankers,

0:49:56.680 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was really quietly but thoroughly anti American. Have

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:03.319
<v Speaker 1>you had a chance to listen to that speech yet?

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I have, I have not I read it, but good night.

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Listen to him. What did you think about the Well,

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>let me let me give you the main clip, which

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is cut number five.

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Altilateral institutions on which the Middle powers have relied and

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 3>the question for middle powers like Canada argue the middle

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:26.360
<v Speaker 3>powers must act together because if we're not at the table,

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 3>we're on the menu. Middle powers do not. What does

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 3>it mean for middle powers to live the truth when

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:37.880
<v Speaker 3>middle powers criticize economic intimidation? For this is the task

0:50:38.120 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 3>of the middle power, all right, So.

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 1>You get it, John, He's a middle Canada's a middle

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 1>power between hegemons and I guess we're on the same

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>scale with China. He mentioned the hedgemons. I'm insulted by this.

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>He just got back from China, that genocide of the Wigers. Uh,

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Lyon in prison, Taiwan, threatened, Hong Kong crushed, and

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 1>he's lecturing us because of you don't like Donald Trump?

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean I think that he You know, Carney

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 9>came to power because of Donald Trump. The Conservative Party

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 9>in Canada was leading the elections, the national elections leading

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:25.319
<v Speaker 9>up to election day by twenty five points. And then

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:28.839
<v Speaker 9>Trump was inaugurated and there was talking of a next

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 9>in Canada, and the tariffs were announced on Canadian products

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 9>and Carney vaulted to victory as a result. And so

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:47.840
<v Speaker 9>he replayed this card at Dovos and made himself something

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 9>of a hero amongst what he calls the middle powers.

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, he made himself something of a paria to me.

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>A couple other things, he said, one of my favorites, absolutely,

0:51:58.680 --> 0:51:59.879
<v Speaker 1>my favorite cut number six.

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Our commitment to NATO's Article five is unwavering. So we're

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 3>working with our NATO allies, including the Nordic Vault Gate,

0:52:11.640 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 3>to further secure the Alliance's northern and western flanks, including

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 3>through Canada's unprecedented investments in over the horizon radar, in submarines,

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:23.400
<v Speaker 3>in aircraft.

0:52:23.440 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, boots on the John. I looked it up.

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 1>They have four submarines, the most recent one of which

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 1>was commissioned in twenty thirteen. The other three or two

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:35.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three and two thousand and one. They spend

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 1>less than two percent of their GDP on defense. They'll

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>get to two percent by twenty thirty. Compared with Poland

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and Finland, which are at three point seven and four

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.719
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent GDP. They do not carry their weight

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and the reason that their energy superpower, another claim is

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the freedom of the seas that we guarantee.

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Is it too much for Americans? I'm a multi later,

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm an Internet. I love NATO, but this is poking

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:05.520
<v Speaker 1>me in the eye, and I imagine it's got to

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>make Trump really crazy.

0:53:08.560 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think it makes Trump incredibly crazy, which of

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 9>course is to Carney's at least short term benefit.

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:18.760
<v Speaker 3>But all the points you make are certainly valid.

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 9>I mean, Canada, everybody, all of the so called Western

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 9>countries benefit from the US umbrella, if you want to

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 9>call it that. And so if you're going to be

0:53:29.239 --> 0:53:31.279
<v Speaker 9>critical of the US, I think you also have an

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:35.320
<v Speaker 9>obligation to be appreciative of all of the advantages that

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 9>you get from being aligned with US.

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's all I would The thing that gets me

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the most in life, and I guess in international affairs

0:53:42.160 --> 0:53:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is in gratitude. And Canada is not a middle power.

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It is an NX to the United States that's sovereign,

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 1>but depends upon it. Let's go to your other pieces,

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:56.320
<v Speaker 1>because they make me happier. Let's talk about will Go

0:53:56.480 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>VI and pilled form because this is a giant breakthrough

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>from Erica and the world's health.

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:03.239
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:54:03.800 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 9>I think everybody's familiar with the weight loss drug wigov

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 9>and the other ones. But the problem has been that

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:12.919
<v Speaker 9>you had to get will go BE as an injectable,

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 9>right so you and as a result, it's much more

0:54:15.960 --> 0:54:18.880
<v Speaker 9>expensive to manufacture. You have to put it in the

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 9>refrigerator when you get it, you know, all that stuff.

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:26.920
<v Speaker 9>It's now been approved in pill form. And although the

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:31.360
<v Speaker 9>price at the moment is the same, inevitably and invariably

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 9>the price of the pill will come down because the

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 9>cost of manufacturing the pill is much much less than

0:54:38.280 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 9>doing the injectable. So we're going to have much wider distribution,

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 9>much wider use of wagov And as a result, we're

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:53.040
<v Speaker 9>going to have different menus, you know, reduced calorie menus

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:57.640
<v Speaker 9>at restaurants, We're going to have reduced purchases at grocery stores.

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 9>And my favorite piece was that the major airlines now

0:55:01.520 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 9>projected because people will be weighing less, they'll save eight

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:10.800
<v Speaker 9>five hundred and eighty million dollars this year on fuel costs.

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 1>All right, I think about the number of passengers who

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 1>don't sit next to the plus sized passenger that's sort

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:21.399
<v Speaker 1>of in their seat. But do you think the United

0:55:21.440 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>States ought to be encouraging people who are morbidly obey certainly,

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>but even those they are packing fifty or more pounds

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 1>or thirty or more pounds to go investigate this, that

0:55:31.880 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it's good for them. I think I think it.

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:39.160
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you know, efficacy and safety obviously are the

0:55:39.239 --> 0:55:43.720
<v Speaker 9>big concerns, but those concerns have been at least gotten

0:55:43.760 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 9>the approval of the FDA. And you know, if you

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 9>have high blood pressure, if you have diabetes, and if

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 9>you're either obese or morbidly obese, this is a game changer.

0:55:56.760 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 9>And it means for the you know, for taxpayers, it

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:05.399
<v Speaker 9>means less cost of you know, on Medicare and all

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:12.800
<v Speaker 9>sorts of government sponsored medical medical programs, healthcare programs. So

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 9>it's it's a win in every which direction, except that

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 9>it will have a major impact on the food business

0:56:22.160 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 9>and worldwide, the food businesses employees fifty percent of the

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:34.320
<v Speaker 9>world's population. I'm not saying that fifty percent grow carrots

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:37.200
<v Speaker 9>or whatever, but if you think about food and the

0:56:37.320 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 9>growing of it, the fertilizing of it, the machinery to

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:43.399
<v Speaker 9>get it, you know, out of the ground and blah

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:45.759
<v Speaker 9>blah blah all the way to restaurants and waiters and

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 9>bus boys and so on and so forth, that is

0:56:48.400 --> 0:56:51.880
<v Speaker 9>fifty percent of the working the workforce of the world

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:55.200
<v Speaker 9>that remond So if you if you have an impact,

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 9>even a slight impact on all those restaurants and all

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 9>those grocery stores and all the farmers who have decided

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 9>to grow different crops. The impact is enormous and we're

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 9>just at the outset of it.

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, because of my rant about Canada, we're running a

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>little on time. And they're two very important pieces from

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>news items that you sent me. Gen xers and millennials

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 1>are set to inherit four point six trillion dollars from

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:27.919
<v Speaker 1>their elders, and open Ai maybe flaming out in either

0:57:28.080 --> 0:57:29.840
<v Speaker 1>order that you want to do. That last one was

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a sock in the eye for people who

0:57:32.520 --> 0:57:37.600
<v Speaker 1>are invested in AI. Yeah, I mean, the open Ai

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:38.720
<v Speaker 1>story is that.

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:45.120
<v Speaker 9>Open ai is spending vast amounts of money and taking

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 9>in not very much revenue, and the question is whether

0:57:49.360 --> 0:57:52.919
<v Speaker 9>that's sustainable. Where there will there be in twenty twenty seven,

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 9>twenty eight, twenty twenty nine enough revenue to justify the

0:57:57.800 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 9>investments that they're making now in data centers, so on

0:58:00.520 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 9>and so forth. There's a guy named Sebastian Mallaby wrote

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:07.880
<v Speaker 9>a book about venture capital and AI, and he wrote

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 9>an influential piece, I think in the Journal or The

0:58:10.120 --> 0:58:13.960
<v Speaker 9>Times that said, basically, I think open ay is going

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 9>to run out of money.

0:58:15.040 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 3>So that's a big question.

0:58:16.600 --> 0:58:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But the millennials are not going to run out of money. Well,

0:58:20.640 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing.

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:24.000
<v Speaker 9>Okay, we got the whole the I mean, there's nothing

0:58:24.080 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 9>more annoying than the affordability issue when it's raised by

0:58:28.320 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 9>gen xers and millennials. Okay, because they're coming into four

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:37.280
<v Speaker 9>point six trillion dollars, is that right? Four points six yea, yeah,

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 9>four point six trillion dollars, okay, inheriting the most any

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:45.320
<v Speaker 9>generation ever in the history of that kindness. And all

0:58:45.400 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 9>they're talking about is the price of, you know, going

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 9>out to dinner. I mean, come on, giving a lot

0:58:50.080 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 9>of money here.

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a massive wealth transfer over the next ten years,

0:58:56.080 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and two point or trillion of that is in property

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, so they'll get a stepped up basis.

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the amazing thing. The tax part to this that

0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>makes it an incredible windfall. But John ellis a great

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:13.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of news items today. I want to remind everyone

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Google news items and John Ellis it's the best newsletter.

0:59:18.600 --> 0:59:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I read it every morning. I usually post one or

0:59:20.720 --> 0:59:23.600
<v Speaker 1>two of the fifteen to thirty different bits of news

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that John finds by staying up all night and sleeping

0:59:26.600 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 1>during the day. And I'm so glad you found the

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Canada thing. Thank you, John Dom, Welcome back America. I'm

0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Hewett. Jonathan Williams is the chief executive officer of

0:59:38.760 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the American Legislative Exchange Council. He's also great economists. He

0:59:42.760 --> 0:59:45.520
<v Speaker 1>puts together the Rich States, Poor States book every year,

0:59:45.600 --> 0:59:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Rich Statespoorstates dot Com. And I got to tell you

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, I got the longer segment for John because

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we've got to talk about the good, the bad, and

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the ugly, and that means state taxes. John First, Happy

0:59:58.080 --> 0:59:59.400
<v Speaker 1>New Year to Jonathan Williams.

1:00:00.960 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 10>Well, likewise, my friend, it's good to see you again.

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Good to see you, and I hope you've got your

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>snowshovel out. Are you ready?

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 11>Oh yeah, you know DC they freak out here with

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 11>about an inch of snow. So this is going to

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:15.440
<v Speaker 11>be real this weekend. It's looking like now.

1:00:16.040 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>It's unfortunate that we've got a new governor. And now

1:00:18.240 --> 1:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Abagail Spanberger as well, and I want to go

1:00:21.320 --> 1:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>right to the fact and the first story I read

1:00:23.440 --> 1:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>about her, the very first story, is that there's a

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>bill to put a death tax in Virginia. Hasn't everyone

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>learned that people leave your state when you put a

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>death tax in place, well.

1:00:38.040 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 10>You would think, I mean, this is pretty common sense stuff, Hugh.

1:00:41.880 --> 1:00:44.240
<v Speaker 11>I mean, we've had states all across the country looking

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 11>at ways to get rid of their death taxes.

1:00:47.040 --> 1:00:50.240
<v Speaker 10>Even in places like New Jersey. When Chris Christie was governor.

1:00:50.800 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 11>As part of his deal he struck with the Democrat legislature,

1:00:54.720 --> 1:00:57.000
<v Speaker 11>they begin to repeal some of their death tax that's

1:00:57.080 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 11>on the book. So if even New Jersey is looking

1:00:59.680 --> 1:01:02.640
<v Speaker 11>to part of their death tax, it's really a head

1:01:02.640 --> 1:01:05.760
<v Speaker 11>scratcher that you have the left wing Democrats now in

1:01:05.880 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 11>charge in Richmond looking to put one into place.

1:01:08.080 --> 1:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's not it.

1:01:08.880 --> 1:01:11.520
<v Speaker 11>As you probably saw on there are long laundry list

1:01:11.600 --> 1:01:14.560
<v Speaker 11>of tax increases and bad ideas such as repealing right

1:01:14.640 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 11>to work, and you can go down the line.

1:01:17.360 --> 1:01:18.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean, but this is pretty concerning you.

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 11>And I watched that race very closely with Winston Sears

1:01:21.800 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 11>and Abigail Spamberger, and Abigail Spamberger ran all of her

1:01:26.200 --> 1:01:29.920
<v Speaker 11>ads anyways, came across as a moderate Democrat that I'm.

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 10>Going to do the sensible thing. I'm a common sense person,

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 10>and here we are. We'll see how long that lasts. Unfortunately,

1:01:36.720 --> 1:01:37.840
<v Speaker 10>I don't think it's going to be long.

1:01:38.040 --> 1:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Turns out, Mom, Donnie in address, let's talk about the

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>taxes there. There are a lot of states that are

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going to go off the good tax pass and there

1:01:45.080 --> 1:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>are a lot they're going to do good thing. Let's

1:01:47.160 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>run through them. What else do they want to raise

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>taxes on besides people dying in Virginia.

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:55.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean you name it, right, I mean, it's

1:01:55.360 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 10>the old Reagan line.

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:58.800
<v Speaker 11>If it moves tax, if it keeps moving regulated, if

1:01:58.840 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 11>it stops moving subs. That's unfortunately what we're going to

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:05.280
<v Speaker 11>see in Virginia this session. And that's a high income

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:08.800
<v Speaker 11>earners tax. I mean they're looking to rival California with

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 11>high income earner taxes. And so, whether that's that, it's

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:16.120
<v Speaker 11>hotel taxes, it's taxes on private clubs, you get on

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 11>the list, and it is literally any idea you have

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 11>on tax policy, on raising taxes, they're probably going to

1:02:22.360 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 11>pursue it this year.

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>In Richmond, Now, I saw taxes on firearms. Now I

1:02:26.800 --> 1:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>think if that's a standalone bill, it's going to be unconstitutional.

1:02:30.240 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it a standalone bill or is it a general

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>sales tax?

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:36.760
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think I've seen it as a as a standalone,

1:02:36.840 --> 1:02:39.320
<v Speaker 11>but I think it's very possible it gets looped together

1:02:39.400 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 11>and as part of a budget as well. And you know,

1:02:42.360 --> 1:02:44.560
<v Speaker 11>there's lots of ways that this can emerge as we

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:48.080
<v Speaker 11>go during session here. But what's really interesting here, Hugh,

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:50.600
<v Speaker 11>is that you know, if I'm in North Carolina right now,

1:02:50.760 --> 1:02:52.880
<v Speaker 11>or if I'm in Tennessee on the other side of

1:02:52.920 --> 1:02:56.040
<v Speaker 11>the Bristol line, and if I'm in West Virginia, I mean,

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 11>this is economic development opportunity one oh one to attract

1:02:59.640 --> 1:03:00.640
<v Speaker 11>Virginia of businesses.

1:03:00.680 --> 1:03:02.400
<v Speaker 10>And it's as painful as it is as.

1:03:02.280 --> 1:03:05.480
<v Speaker 11>A Virginia resident to say that these are huge opportunities

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:08.200
<v Speaker 11>for those states to continue to make gains. Their states

1:03:08.240 --> 1:03:10.360
<v Speaker 11>are already way ahead of Virginia in many cases in

1:03:10.400 --> 1:03:13.160
<v Speaker 11>our rich states poor states index. And you know, this

1:03:13.280 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 11>is dynamic competitive environment and we're going to see what

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 11>those states do to respond to it. Governor Patrick Morrissey,

1:03:19.440 --> 1:03:22.160
<v Speaker 11>for instance, one of our great friends in West Virginia

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:24.800
<v Speaker 11>is per already proposed as state of the State address

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 11>cutting income taxes across the board once again in that state.

1:03:28.840 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 11>So I mean, this is a game on I think

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:33.520
<v Speaker 11>in terms of the mid Atlantic region and.

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Capital and people are mobile. I will not live in

1:03:36.880 --> 1:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a state with a death tax. I just want that's

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>taxing your well twice, it's been taxed before, at least once.

1:03:42.360 --> 1:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I will not do it a second. I'll just leave,

1:03:45.080 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think other people will. Washington, like Virginia, want

1:03:48.880 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to do a millionaire's tex Don't they realize that people

1:03:52.320 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>can move? I mean not some, but many.

1:03:56.920 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, the irony there in Washington State is they've been

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:02.959
<v Speaker 11>the reppient if so many people coming to Washington because

1:04:02.960 --> 1:04:04.240
<v Speaker 11>they have been a no income.

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:05.000
<v Speaker 10>Tax state forever.

1:04:05.160 --> 1:04:08.840
<v Speaker 11>Hugh and all the refugees, the tax refugees escaping places

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:12.320
<v Speaker 11>like California and other high tax states and going to

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:14.960
<v Speaker 11>Washington to take advantage of the fact that they were

1:04:15.000 --> 1:04:17.439
<v Speaker 11>a no income tax state. As you know, we've talked

1:04:17.440 --> 1:04:20.520
<v Speaker 11>about their state Supreme Court invented the right in their

1:04:20.600 --> 1:04:23.480
<v Speaker 11>constitution to have a capital gains income tax and claimed

1:04:23.520 --> 1:04:26.000
<v Speaker 11>it wasn't an income tax, and here we are, many

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 11>of us warned that that would be the camel's nose

1:04:28.520 --> 1:04:31.120
<v Speaker 11>under the tent and then'd be proposing other broad based

1:04:31.160 --> 1:04:34.400
<v Speaker 11>income taxes. And here we go under Governor Ferguson in

1:04:34.480 --> 1:04:38.880
<v Speaker 11>the legislature proposing a millionaire's tax. So unfortunately, there's some

1:04:39.000 --> 1:04:40.920
<v Speaker 11>really bad ideas out there right now, Hugh.

1:04:41.120 --> 1:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's not all bad news. You sent me good

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>news as well. That will show up in rich Statespoorstates

1:04:46.120 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>dot Com come April one. But let's talk about who's

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing. South Carolina, by the way, sounds

1:04:52.360 --> 1:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>like a nice place to move to.

1:04:55.400 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 11>Well, they've been getting a lot of residents already, and

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:01.400
<v Speaker 11>the legislature has just put for a great plan to

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:04.800
<v Speaker 11>reduce income taxes. They've obviously had to compete with North

1:05:04.840 --> 1:05:07.680
<v Speaker 11>Carolina that's been doing very good things for years, kind

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 11>of see a no income tax state Florida, no income

1:05:10.200 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 11>tax state.

1:05:10.760 --> 1:05:13.640
<v Speaker 10>Georgia has been cutting taxes and so they're looking.

1:05:13.400 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 11>At ways to get down to a one point nine

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:19.240
<v Speaker 11>to nine percent income tax. So incredible progress there from

1:05:19.240 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 11>a state that has not cut taxes as aggressively in

1:05:22.200 --> 1:05:24.800
<v Speaker 11>recent years. But you know another one that I wanted

1:05:24.840 --> 1:05:29.080
<v Speaker 11>to mention, Hugh, I just got back from Jefferson City, Missouri, yesterday,

1:05:29.440 --> 1:05:31.919
<v Speaker 11>where I was on the ground with our Missouri legislators

1:05:31.920 --> 1:05:34.600
<v Speaker 11>are ALEC delegation, and I have to give a hat

1:05:34.680 --> 1:05:37.640
<v Speaker 11>tip to Governor Mike Keho, who has put it in

1:05:37.720 --> 1:05:40.160
<v Speaker 11>a state of state address just recently, but he has

1:05:40.240 --> 1:05:43.880
<v Speaker 11>a bold plan to completely repeal the Missouri income tax.

1:05:43.920 --> 1:05:46.920
<v Speaker 11>Seeing all this movement around him and seeing that region

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:50.280
<v Speaker 11>with Sarah Huckabee Sanders in Arkansas and Kim Reynolds in

1:05:50.360 --> 1:05:54.000
<v Speaker 11>Iowa and so many great movers, he realized that Missouri.

1:05:53.760 --> 1:05:56.120
<v Speaker 10>Is quickly being left behind. They're tired of being middle

1:05:56.120 --> 1:05:56.600
<v Speaker 10>of the pack.

1:05:56.920 --> 1:05:59.160
<v Speaker 11>And he's got an ambitious plan to go and repeal

1:05:59.360 --> 1:06:02.200
<v Speaker 11>the personal ends income taxa Missouri. So a kudos to

1:06:02.280 --> 1:06:05.160
<v Speaker 11>Governor Kehoe for really being a leader on that this session.

1:06:05.640 --> 1:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And ALEC keeps a great close side the American Legislative

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Exchange Council ALEC dot org SLASHU keeps an eye on

1:06:12.040 --> 1:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the U haul growth Index inbound states you bought you

1:06:15.720 --> 1:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>haul's headed there number one, Texas, number two, Florida, number three,

1:06:19.400 --> 1:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, number four, Tennessee outbound states California, Illinois, New Jersey,

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and New York. You know you think they would learn, Jonathan,

1:06:27.920 --> 1:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And what about we got like forty five seconds the

1:06:30.560 --> 1:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Index of State Education Report which you released this week.

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:38.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, brand new education freedom and economic freedom go hand

1:06:38.160 --> 1:06:41.400
<v Speaker 11>in hand. The Sunshine State, the Free State of Florida

1:06:41.760 --> 1:06:44.640
<v Speaker 11>number one once again this year in our index, Arizona

1:06:44.760 --> 1:06:49.080
<v Speaker 11>number two, Arkansas number three. Incredible progress for the lone

1:06:49.160 --> 1:06:51.760
<v Speaker 11>Star state, the biggest gainer this year after their major

1:06:51.800 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 11>school choice expansion that we've talked about a billion dollars

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:58.160
<v Speaker 11>going to families and kids across the state of Texas.

1:06:58.240 --> 1:06:59.800
<v Speaker 10>So lots of great stories there at ALEC.

1:07:00.680 --> 1:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see Ohio on this list, Jonathan, are you

1:07:04.160 --> 1:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>doing your Michigan things are? Because I don't think we'll

1:07:07.800 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>follow up well. Fuck Jarlen William, CEO of al ALC

1:07:12.600 --> 1:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>dot org. Thank you friend. I'll be right back on

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the u U show.

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, Larry. I'm going to start in

1:07:23.920 --> 1:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>French and then I'll switch back to English. Mercy, Larry,

1:07:27.960 --> 1:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Larry.

1:07:29.480 --> 1:07:33.560
<v Speaker 12>It is both the pleasure and the duty to be

1:07:33.680 --> 1:07:38.520
<v Speaker 12>with you tonight, in this pivotal moment that Canada and

1:07:38.600 --> 1:07:39.120
<v Speaker 12>the world.

1:07:39.040 --> 1:07:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Going through.

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:44.080
<v Speaker 12>Today, I will talk about a rupture in the world order,

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:50.960
<v Speaker 12>the end of a pleasant fiction and the beginning of

1:07:51.240 --> 1:07:57.760
<v Speaker 12>a harsh reality. What you politics were the large main power.

1:07:58.080 --> 1:08:03.920
<v Speaker 12>Politics is submitted to no limits, no constraints. On the

1:08:03.960 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 12>other end, I would like to tell you that the

1:08:06.640 --> 1:08:10.920
<v Speaker 12>other countries, especially intermediate powers like Canada, are not powerless.

1:08:13.200 --> 1:08:16.400
<v Speaker 7>They have the capacity to build a new order that

1:08:16.640 --> 1:08:25.760
<v Speaker 7>encompasses our values such as respect for human rights, sustainable development, solidarity, sovereignty.

1:08:26.960 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 12>And territorial integrity of the various states. The power of

1:08:33.479 --> 1:08:37.400
<v Speaker 12>the less power starts with honesty.

1:08:39.000 --> 1:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>It seems that every day we're reminded that we live

1:08:43.680 --> 1:08:48.040
<v Speaker 3>in an era of great power rivalry, that the rules

1:08:48.080 --> 1:08:51.680
<v Speaker 3>based order is fading, that the strong can do what

1:08:51.760 --> 1:08:55.080
<v Speaker 3>they can and the weak must suffer what they must.

1:08:56.320 --> 1:09:01.559
<v Speaker 3>And this aphorism of Thucidides is presented as inevitable as

1:09:01.640 --> 1:09:07.280
<v Speaker 3>the natural logic of international relations reasserting itself. And faced

1:09:07.320 --> 1:09:12.200
<v Speaker 3>with this logic, there is a strong tendency for countries

1:09:13.000 --> 1:09:18.439
<v Speaker 3>to go along, to get along, to accommodate, to avoid trouble,

1:09:19.240 --> 1:09:24.360
<v Speaker 3>to hope that compliance will buy safety. Well it won't,

1:09:26.600 --> 1:09:30.519
<v Speaker 3>so what are our options? In nineteen seventy eight, the

1:09:30.560 --> 1:09:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Czech dissident Vaslav Hovel, later president, wrote an essay called

1:09:36.360 --> 1:09:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the Power of the Powerless, and in it he asked

1:09:39.560 --> 1:09:43.639
<v Speaker 3>a simple question, how did the communist system sustain itself?

1:09:44.880 --> 1:09:48.800
<v Speaker 3>And his answer began with a greengrocer. Every morning, the

1:09:48.960 --> 1:09:52.800
<v Speaker 3>shopkeeper places a sign in his window. Workers of the

1:09:52.880 --> 1:09:57.880
<v Speaker 3>world unite. He doesn't believe it, no one does, but

1:09:58.000 --> 1:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>he places a sign anyway to avoid, to signal compliance,

1:10:02.680 --> 1:10:06.880
<v Speaker 3>to get along, and because every shopkeeper on every street

1:10:07.000 --> 1:10:11.240
<v Speaker 3>does the same. The system persists not through violence alone,

1:10:12.160 --> 1:10:16.040
<v Speaker 3>but through the participation of ordinary people in rituals they

1:10:16.120 --> 1:10:21.679
<v Speaker 3>privately know to be false. Havell called this living within

1:10:21.760 --> 1:10:25.599
<v Speaker 3>a lie. The system's power comes not from its truth,

1:10:25.720 --> 1:10:29.479
<v Speaker 3>but from everyone's willingness to perform as if it were true,

1:10:31.160 --> 1:10:35.080
<v Speaker 3>and its fragility comes from the same source. When even

1:10:35.200 --> 1:10:39.559
<v Speaker 3>one person stops performing, when the greengrocer removes his sign,

1:10:39.720 --> 1:10:46.240
<v Speaker 3>the illusion begins to crack. Friends, it is time for

1:10:46.400 --> 1:11:00.400
<v Speaker 3>companies and countries to take their signs down. For decadesades,

1:11:00.439 --> 1:11:03.439
<v Speaker 3>countries like Canada prospered under what we called the rules

1:11:03.479 --> 1:11:08.080
<v Speaker 3>based international order. We joined its institutions, we praised its principles,

1:11:08.120 --> 1:11:12.240
<v Speaker 3>We benefited from its predictability, and because of that we

1:11:12.320 --> 1:11:16.880
<v Speaker 3>could pursue values based foreign policies under its protection. We

1:11:17.000 --> 1:11:20.240
<v Speaker 3>knew the story of the international rules based order was

1:11:20.320 --> 1:11:24.959
<v Speaker 3>partially false, that the strongest would exempt themselves when convenient,

1:11:25.479 --> 1:11:31.439
<v Speaker 3>that trade rules were enforced asymmetrically, and we knew that

1:11:31.600 --> 1:11:34.919
<v Speaker 3>international law applied with varying rigor depending on the identity

1:11:35.000 --> 1:11:39.880
<v Speaker 3>of the accused or the victim. This fiction was useful,

1:11:40.640 --> 1:11:45.800
<v Speaker 3>and American hegemony in particular helped provide public goods, open

1:11:45.880 --> 1:11:50.280
<v Speaker 3>sea lanes, a stable financial system, collective security, and support

1:11:50.400 --> 1:11:55.080
<v Speaker 3>for frameworks for resolving disputes. So we placed the sign

1:11:55.280 --> 1:12:00.160
<v Speaker 3>in the window, We participated in the rituals, and we

1:12:00.320 --> 1:12:04.080
<v Speaker 3>largely avoided calling out the gaps between rhetoric and reality.

1:12:05.600 --> 1:12:10.519
<v Speaker 3>This bargain no longer works. Let me be direct. We

1:12:10.840 --> 1:12:13.400
<v Speaker 3>are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.

1:12:14.640 --> 1:12:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Over the past two decades, a series of crises in finance, health, energy,

1:12:18.880 --> 1:12:22.679
<v Speaker 3>and geopolitics have laid bare the risks of extreme global integration.

1:12:23.520 --> 1:12:27.879
<v Speaker 3>But more recently, great powers have begun using economic integration

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:33.719
<v Speaker 3>as weapons. Tariffs's leverage, financial infrastructure is coercion, supply chains

1:12:33.800 --> 1:12:39.000
<v Speaker 3>as vulnerabilities to be exploited. You cannot live within the

1:12:39.120 --> 1:12:43.840
<v Speaker 3>lie of mutual benefit through integration when integration becomes the

1:12:44.000 --> 1:12:50.960
<v Speaker 3>source of your subordination. The multilateral institutions on which the

1:12:51.040 --> 1:12:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Middle Powers have relied, the wto the UN, the COP

1:12:56.479 --> 1:13:01.960
<v Speaker 3>the architecture, the very architecture of collective problems solving, are

1:13:02.040 --> 1:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>under threat, and as a result, many countries are drawing

1:13:05.960 --> 1:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>the same conclusions that they must develop greater strategic autonomy

1:13:10.920 --> 1:13:14.719
<v Speaker 3>in energy, food, critical minerals, in finance and supply chains.

1:13:15.680 --> 1:13:20.000
<v Speaker 3>And this impulse is understandable. A country that can't feed itself,

1:13:20.080 --> 1:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>fuel itself, or defend itself has few options. When the

1:13:24.240 --> 1:13:28.680
<v Speaker 3>rules no longer protect you, you must protect yourself. But

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:32.559
<v Speaker 3>let's be clear eyed about where this leads. A world

1:13:32.640 --> 1:13:36.600
<v Speaker 3>of fortresses will be poorer, more fragile, and less sustainable.

1:13:37.760 --> 1:13:42.000
<v Speaker 3>And there's another truth. If great powers abandoned even the

1:13:42.080 --> 1:13:45.600
<v Speaker 3>pretense of rules and values for the unhindered pursuit of

1:13:45.720 --> 1:13:51.400
<v Speaker 3>their power and interests, the gains from transactionalism will become

1:13:51.560 --> 1:14:00.599
<v Speaker 3>harder to replicate. Hegemonds cannot continually monetize their relationships. Allies

1:14:00.640 --> 1:14:06.200
<v Speaker 3>will diversify to hedge against uncertainty. They'll buy insurance, increase

1:14:06.280 --> 1:14:11.360
<v Speaker 3>options in order to rebuild sovereignty. Sovereignty that was once

1:14:11.479 --> 1:14:14.840
<v Speaker 3>grounded in rules, but will increasingly be anchored in the

1:14:14.960 --> 1:14:22.000
<v Speaker 3>ability to withstand pressure. This room knows this is classic

1:14:22.280 --> 1:14:27.880
<v Speaker 3>risk management. Risk management comes at a price, but that

1:14:28.080 --> 1:14:32.080
<v Speaker 3>cost of strategic autonomy of sovereignty can also be shared.

1:14:33.400 --> 1:14:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Collective investments and resilience are cheaper than everyone building their

1:14:37.640 --> 1:14:44.479
<v Speaker 3>own fortresses. Shared standards reduce fragmentations. Complementarities are positive sum

1:14:45.800 --> 1:14:48.479
<v Speaker 3>and the question for middle powers like Canada is not

1:14:48.720 --> 1:14:52.960
<v Speaker 3>whether to adapt to the new reality we must. The

1:14:53.080 --> 1:14:56.519
<v Speaker 3>question is whether we adapt by simply building higher walls,

1:14:56.880 --> 1:14:59.519
<v Speaker 3>or whether we can do something more ambitious.

1:15:02.040 --> 1:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Now.

1:15:02.280 --> 1:15:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Canada was amongst the first to hear the wake up

1:15:05.360 --> 1:15:11.240
<v Speaker 3>call leading us to fundamentally shift our strategic posture. Canadians

1:15:11.320 --> 1:15:14.360
<v Speaker 3>know that our old comfortable assumptions that our geography and

1:15:14.400 --> 1:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>alliance memberships automatically conferred prosperity and security, that assumption is

1:15:20.680 --> 1:15:24.519
<v Speaker 3>no longer valid, and our new approach rests on what

1:15:24.680 --> 1:15:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Alexander Stubb, the President of Finland, has termed value based realism, or,

1:15:29.840 --> 1:15:33.320
<v Speaker 3>to put another way, we aim to be both principled

1:15:33.400 --> 1:15:39.320
<v Speaker 3>and pragmatic. Principled in our commitment to fundamental values sovereignty,

1:15:39.640 --> 1:15:43.160
<v Speaker 3>territorial integrity, the prohibition of the use of force except

1:15:43.240 --> 1:15:46.960
<v Speaker 3>when consistent with the UN Charter, in respect for human rights,

1:15:48.040 --> 1:15:52.200
<v Speaker 3>and pragmatic and recognizing the progress is often incremental, that

1:15:52.720 --> 1:15:56.680
<v Speaker 3>interests diverged, that not every partner will share all of

1:15:56.760 --> 1:16:02.160
<v Speaker 3>our values. So we're engaging broadlytrategically with open eyes. We

1:16:02.320 --> 1:16:05.960
<v Speaker 3>actively take on the world as it is not weight

1:16:06.040 --> 1:16:11.320
<v Speaker 3>around for world we wish to be. We are calibrating

1:16:11.360 --> 1:16:15.639
<v Speaker 3>our relationships so their depth reflects our values, and we're

1:16:15.720 --> 1:16:20.120
<v Speaker 3>prioritizing broad engagement to maximize our influence. And given the

1:16:20.160 --> 1:16:22.960
<v Speaker 3>fluidity of the world at the moment, the risks that

1:16:23.080 --> 1:16:27.680
<v Speaker 3>this poses and the stakes for what comes next, and

1:16:27.800 --> 1:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>we are no longer just relying on the strength of

1:16:30.000 --> 1:16:34.920
<v Speaker 3>our values, but also the value of our strength. We

1:16:35.000 --> 1:16:39.679
<v Speaker 3>are building that strength at home. Since my government took office,

1:16:39.720 --> 1:16:42.519
<v Speaker 3>we have cut taxes on incomes, on capital gains and

1:16:42.600 --> 1:16:47.160
<v Speaker 3>business investment. We have removed all federal barriers to interprovincial trade.

1:16:47.560 --> 1:16:51.639
<v Speaker 3>We are fast tracking eight trillion dollars of investments in energy, AI,

1:16:51.800 --> 1:16:55.360
<v Speaker 3>critical minerals, new trade corridors and beyond. We're doubling our

1:16:55.400 --> 1:16:58.360
<v Speaker 3>defense spending by the end of this decade, and we're

1:16:58.400 --> 1:17:02.080
<v Speaker 3>doing so in ways that build our domestic industries, and

1:17:02.240 --> 1:17:07.400
<v Speaker 3>we are rapidly diversifying abroad. We've agreed a comprehensive strategic

1:17:07.479 --> 1:17:12.559
<v Speaker 3>partnership with the EU, including joining safe the European Defense

1:17:12.640 --> 1:17:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Procurement Arrangements. We have signed twelve other trade and security

1:17:17.120 --> 1:17:20.719
<v Speaker 3>deals on four continents in six months. In the past

1:17:20.760 --> 1:17:24.880
<v Speaker 3>few days, we've concluded new strategic partnerships with China and

1:17:25.000 --> 1:17:29.519
<v Speaker 3>cutter We're negotiating free trade packs with India, assion Thailand,

1:17:29.560 --> 1:17:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Philippines and Marcasar. We're doing something else to help solve

1:17:35.520 --> 1:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>global problems. We're pursuing variable geometry. In other words, different

1:17:40.360 --> 1:17:44.320
<v Speaker 3>coalitions for different issues based on common values and interests.

1:17:45.320 --> 1:17:48.120
<v Speaker 3>So on Ukraine, we're a core member of the Coalition

1:17:48.240 --> 1:17:50.799
<v Speaker 3>of the Willing and one of the largest per capita

1:17:50.960 --> 1:17:56.519
<v Speaker 3>contributors to its defense and security. On Arctic's sovereignty, we

1:17:56.680 --> 1:18:01.400
<v Speaker 3>stand firmly with Greenland and Denmark and fully support their

1:18:01.520 --> 1:18:14.360
<v Speaker 3>unique right to determine Greenland's future. Our commitment to NATO's

1:18:14.439 --> 1:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Article five is unwavering, so we're working with our NATO allies,

1:18:20.360 --> 1:18:24.640
<v Speaker 3>including the Nordic Baltic Gate, to further secure the alliance's

1:18:24.760 --> 1:18:30.920
<v Speaker 3>northern and western flanks, including through Canada's unprecedented investments in

1:18:31.080 --> 1:18:35.040
<v Speaker 3>over the horizon, radar, in submarines, in aircraft, and boots

1:18:35.080 --> 1:18:40.759
<v Speaker 3>on the ground boots on the ice. Canada strongly opposes

1:18:40.840 --> 1:18:45.040
<v Speaker 3>tariffs over Greenland and calls for focused talks to achieve

1:18:46.000 --> 1:18:49.720
<v Speaker 3>our shared objectives of security and prosperity. In the art

1:18:51.840 --> 1:18:55.280
<v Speaker 3>on purilateral trade, we're championing efforts to build a bridge

1:18:55.320 --> 1:18:59.000
<v Speaker 3>between the Transpacific Partnership in the European Union, which would

1:18:59.040 --> 1:19:02.400
<v Speaker 3>create a new trade block of one point five billion people.

1:19:03.479 --> 1:19:06.240
<v Speaker 3>On critical minerals, we're forming buyers clubs anchored in the

1:19:06.320 --> 1:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>G seven so that the world can diverse fly away

1:19:09.200 --> 1:19:14.120
<v Speaker 3>from concentrated supply. And on AI we're cooperating with like

1:19:14.200 --> 1:19:18.559
<v Speaker 3>minded democracies to ensure that we won't ultimately be forced

1:19:18.760 --> 1:19:25.920
<v Speaker 3>to choose between hedgemons and hyperscalers. This is not naive multilateralism,

1:19:26.600 --> 1:19:32.400
<v Speaker 3>nor is it relying on their institutions. It's building coalitions

1:19:32.439 --> 1:19:36.479
<v Speaker 3>that work issues by issue with partners who share enough

1:19:36.760 --> 1:19:41.320
<v Speaker 3>common ground to act together. In some cases, this will

1:19:41.360 --> 1:19:45.439
<v Speaker 3>be the vast majority of nations. What it's doing is

1:19:45.560 --> 1:19:49.080
<v Speaker 3>creating a dense web of connections across trade, investment culture

1:19:49.520 --> 1:19:53.040
<v Speaker 3>on which we can draw for future challenges and opportunities.

1:19:55.920 --> 1:19:58.639
<v Speaker 3>Argue the Middle powers must act together because if we're

1:19:58.680 --> 1:20:04.439
<v Speaker 3>not at the table. We're on them menu. But I'd

1:20:04.479 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 3>also say that great powers. Great powers can afford for

1:20:08.600 --> 1:20:10.960
<v Speaker 3>now to go it alone. They have the market size,

1:20:11.000 --> 1:20:15.559
<v Speaker 3>the military capacity, and the leverage to dictate terms. Middle

1:20:15.640 --> 1:20:20.200
<v Speaker 3>powers do not. But when we only negotiate bilaterally with

1:20:20.360 --> 1:20:24.639
<v Speaker 3>a hedgemoont we negotiate from weakness. We accept what's offered.

1:20:25.439 --> 1:20:28.120
<v Speaker 3>We compete with each other to be the most accommodating.

1:20:29.479 --> 1:20:33.160
<v Speaker 3>This is not sovereignty, it's the performance of sovereignty while

1:20:33.200 --> 1:20:39.120
<v Speaker 3>accepting subordination. In a world of great power rivalry, the

1:20:39.200 --> 1:20:42.960
<v Speaker 3>countries in between have a choice compete with each other

1:20:43.120 --> 1:20:47.160
<v Speaker 3>for favor or to combine to create a third path

1:20:47.479 --> 1:20:53.160
<v Speaker 3>with impact. We shouldn't allow the rise of hard power

1:20:53.280 --> 1:20:58.000
<v Speaker 3>to blind us to the fact that the power of legitimacy, integrity,

1:20:58.120 --> 1:21:01.759
<v Speaker 3>and rules will remain strong if we choose to wield

1:21:01.840 --> 1:21:07.400
<v Speaker 3>them together. Which brings me back to hal what does

1:21:07.479 --> 1:21:11.880
<v Speaker 3>it mean for middle powers to live the truth first?

1:21:11.920 --> 1:21:16.599
<v Speaker 3>It means naming reality, stop invoking rules based international order

1:21:17.320 --> 1:21:20.560
<v Speaker 3>as though it still functions as advertised. Call it what

1:21:20.720 --> 1:21:25.240
<v Speaker 3>it is, a system of intensifying great power rivalry where

1:21:25.280 --> 1:21:29.439
<v Speaker 3>the most powerful pursue their interests using economic integration, as coercion.

1:21:31.120 --> 1:21:35.360
<v Speaker 3>It means acting consistently applying the same standards to allies

1:21:35.439 --> 1:21:40.479
<v Speaker 3>and rivals. When middle powers criticize economic intimidation from one

1:21:40.560 --> 1:21:43.680
<v Speaker 3>direction but stay silent when it comes from another, we

1:21:43.840 --> 1:21:48.920
<v Speaker 3>are keeping the sign in the window. It means building

1:21:49.160 --> 1:21:52.840
<v Speaker 3>what we claim to believe in, rather than waiting for

1:21:52.920 --> 1:21:56.320
<v Speaker 3>the old order to be restored. It means creating institutions

1:21:56.720 --> 1:22:01.320
<v Speaker 3>and agreements that function is described. It means reducing the

1:22:01.400 --> 1:22:05.879
<v Speaker 3>leverage that enables coercion. That's building a strong domestic economy.

1:22:05.920 --> 1:22:11.240
<v Speaker 3>It should be every government's immediate priority. And diversification internationally

1:22:11.400 --> 1:22:15.040
<v Speaker 3>is not just economic prudence, it's a material foundation for

1:22:15.160 --> 1:22:19.160
<v Speaker 3>honest foreign policy because countries earn the right to principled

1:22:19.240 --> 1:22:27.799
<v Speaker 3>stands by reducing their vulnerability to retaliation. So Canada, Canada

1:22:28.439 --> 1:22:32.160
<v Speaker 3>has what the world wants. We are an energy superpower.

1:22:32.520 --> 1:22:35.720
<v Speaker 3>We hold vast reserves of critical minerals. We have the

1:22:35.880 --> 1:22:39.840
<v Speaker 3>most educated population in the world. Our pension funds are

1:22:39.880 --> 1:22:43.920
<v Speaker 3>amongst the world's largest and most sophisticated investors. In other words,

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:47.160
<v Speaker 3>we have capital talent. We also have a government with

1:22:47.479 --> 1:22:53.760
<v Speaker 3>immense fiscal capacity to act decisively, and we have the

1:22:53.880 --> 1:22:58.840
<v Speaker 3>values to which many others aspire. Canada is a pluralistic

1:22:59.000 --> 1:23:02.799
<v Speaker 3>society that we're works. Our public square is loud, diverse,

1:23:02.880 --> 1:23:08.360
<v Speaker 3>and free. Canadians remain committed to sustainability. We are a

1:23:08.439 --> 1:23:12.080
<v Speaker 3>stable and reliable partner in a world that is anything

1:23:12.160 --> 1:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>but a partner that builds and values relationships for the

1:23:15.840 --> 1:23:19.960
<v Speaker 3>long term. And we have something else. We have a

1:23:20.040 --> 1:23:23.840
<v Speaker 3>recognition of what's happening and a determination to act accordingly.

1:23:24.760 --> 1:23:27.760
<v Speaker 3>We understand that this rupture calls for more than adaptation.

1:23:28.320 --> 1:23:30.479
<v Speaker 3>It calls for honesty about the world as it is.

1:23:31.560 --> 1:23:34.400
<v Speaker 3>We are taking a sign out of the window. We

1:23:34.600 --> 1:23:38.360
<v Speaker 3>know the old order is not coming back. We shouldn't

1:23:38.360 --> 1:23:43.479
<v Speaker 3>warn it. Nostalgia is not a strategy, but we believe

1:23:43.640 --> 1:23:47.479
<v Speaker 3>that from the fracture we can build something bigger, better, stronger,

1:23:47.720 --> 1:23:51.519
<v Speaker 3>more just. This is the task of the middle powers,

1:23:52.600 --> 1:23:54.920
<v Speaker 3>the countries that have the most to lose from a

1:23:55.000 --> 1:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>world of fortresses and a most to gain from genuine cooperation.

1:24:00.880 --> 1:24:06.160
<v Speaker 3>The powerful have their power. We have something to the

1:24:06.280 --> 1:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>capacity to stop pretending, to name reality, to build our

1:24:10.720 --> 1:24:16.200
<v Speaker 3>strength at home, and to act together. That is Canada's path.

1:24:17.200 --> 1:24:20.680
<v Speaker 3>We choose it openly and confidently, and it is a

1:24:20.800 --> 1:24:25.040
<v Speaker 3>path wide open to any country willing to take it

1:24:25.439 --> 1:24:25.800
<v Speaker 3>with us.

1:24:26.479 --> 1:24:27.200
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much.

1:24:49.320 --> 1:24:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you Prime Minister.

1:24:50.920 --> 1:24:52.920
<v Speaker 13>I don't think I've seen many standing ovations.

1:24:52.600 --> 1:24:56.479
<v Speaker 3>At devils, so that was interesting. You said.

1:24:56.520 --> 1:24:58.160
<v Speaker 13>There was a phrase in your speech where you said,

1:24:58.200 --> 1:25:03.519
<v Speaker 13>sovereignty now is the ability to withstand pressure. Isn't Canada

1:25:04.439 --> 1:25:07.519
<v Speaker 13>almost uniquely vulnerable to pressure because of the extent of

1:25:07.600 --> 1:25:09.439
<v Speaker 13>your trade dependence on the United States.

1:25:10.000 --> 1:25:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, the proof is that we have been able to

1:25:14.960 --> 1:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>withstand the pressure, and there has been considerable pressure. I'll

1:25:19.040 --> 1:25:21.240
<v Speaker 3>give you a couple of facts. We've actually created more

1:25:21.320 --> 1:25:24.160
<v Speaker 3>jobs since the tariffs were put on than the United

1:25:24.200 --> 1:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>States in absolute number, economies growing at the second fastest

1:25:28.280 --> 1:25:32.519
<v Speaker 3>rate within the G seven. There are pockets of extreme pressure,

1:25:32.560 --> 1:25:37.920
<v Speaker 3>without question in Canada. But headline, we're reacting. The second thing,

1:25:38.040 --> 1:25:40.800
<v Speaker 3>and it's a fundamental point, is the recognition that we

1:25:40.960 --> 1:25:45.479
<v Speaker 3>can give ourselves far more than any foreign country can

1:25:45.560 --> 1:25:49.240
<v Speaker 3>take away. There's lots of efficiencies in having one Canadian market,

1:25:49.520 --> 1:25:54.639
<v Speaker 3>the trillion dollars of domestic investment and building these partnerships abroad,

1:25:55.200 --> 1:25:59.519
<v Speaker 3>all of which are bigger returns than what's been lost.

1:26:00.040 --> 1:26:01.960
<v Speaker 3>That's not to say we would rather not lose it,

1:26:02.560 --> 1:26:04.479
<v Speaker 3>but we can withstand the pressure, and we are.

1:26:04.920 --> 1:26:07.280
<v Speaker 13>I was interested that you said basically, the old world's

1:26:07.360 --> 1:26:09.719
<v Speaker 13>not coming back, so you're not seeing this as a period.

1:26:09.800 --> 1:26:12.759
<v Speaker 3>We just have to get through a normalcy. We'll return.

1:26:13.280 --> 1:26:18.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that is what that is our view, and

1:26:18.400 --> 1:26:20.759
<v Speaker 3>we regret it, but we're not going to sit around

1:26:20.800 --> 1:26:26.439
<v Speaker 3>and mourn it. We're acting, and we're acting in a

1:26:26.520 --> 1:26:29.880
<v Speaker 3>way both it's in our interests, but we believe in

1:26:29.960 --> 1:26:34.880
<v Speaker 3>a way with others that's building imperfectly in steps a

1:26:34.920 --> 1:26:37.160
<v Speaker 3>new system. I'll give you one example on handback, which

1:26:37.240 --> 1:26:41.840
<v Speaker 3>is we're members of We are members of trade agreements

1:26:42.200 --> 1:26:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that comprise already one point four billion people around the world,

1:26:45.439 --> 1:26:48.679
<v Speaker 3>so we have the most extensive network. We are trying

1:26:49.000 --> 1:26:51.640
<v Speaker 3>with others to bring some of those networks together. The

1:26:51.720 --> 1:26:55.479
<v Speaker 3>most prominent example is the transpecific partnership in the EU

1:26:55.920 --> 1:26:59.080
<v Speaker 3>acting of a bridge. It's it's not a direct benefit

1:26:59.160 --> 1:27:01.680
<v Speaker 3>for Canada, but it is a benefit for Canada that

1:27:01.800 --> 1:27:06.200
<v Speaker 3>these groups come together, ANGOZI is here consistent with the

1:27:06.400 --> 1:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>WTO rules, both of which are and in that way

1:27:10.040 --> 1:27:12.599
<v Speaker 3>we're building back out amongst willing partners.

1:27:13.840 --> 1:27:17.920
<v Speaker 13>And you talked about the need not to put the

1:27:18.000 --> 1:27:20.720
<v Speaker 13>sign in the window anymore to pretend that things are

1:27:20.800 --> 1:27:25.040
<v Speaker 13>still the same. Do you think to put it directly

1:27:25.080 --> 1:27:27.599
<v Speaker 13>that the NATO Alliance is still doing that, still pretending

1:27:27.680 --> 1:27:30.280
<v Speaker 13>it's the old Transatlantic partnership when it's.

1:27:30.200 --> 1:27:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Really kind of going. I think clearly NATO is experiencing

1:27:36.479 --> 1:27:40.040
<v Speaker 3>a test right now, and the first response to that

1:27:40.240 --> 1:27:43.160
<v Speaker 3>test has to be to respond in a way that

1:27:43.479 --> 1:27:46.880
<v Speaker 3>ensures the security of the Arctic in a robust way

1:27:47.000 --> 1:27:53.080
<v Speaker 3>for all possibilities. This is actually a point that we

1:27:53.160 --> 1:27:55.560
<v Speaker 3>have been making in recent years. It's a point that

1:27:55.680 --> 1:27:58.840
<v Speaker 3>I made at the NATO summit back in June, which

1:27:58.880 --> 1:28:02.360
<v Speaker 3>seemed like a pledging some but also was a was

1:28:02.800 --> 1:28:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to get NATO policies in the right direction. So I

1:28:05.720 --> 1:28:10.680
<v Speaker 3>think in the immediate term one of the imperatives is

1:28:10.840 --> 1:28:14.519
<v Speaker 3>to reinforce things that Canada is doing, Nordic balter Kate

1:28:14.640 --> 1:28:18.040
<v Speaker 3>are doing, the UK are doing other NATO partners France

1:28:18.080 --> 1:28:23.040
<v Speaker 3>included in a comprehensive way that provides much greater security

1:28:23.439 --> 1:28:26.160
<v Speaker 3>in the Artic that this is the test, and so

1:28:26.320 --> 1:28:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say the sign, the NATO sign stays in

1:28:29.280 --> 1:28:32.400
<v Speaker 3>the window, but we've got to meet the moment of that.

1:28:33.200 --> 1:28:35.479
<v Speaker 13>You also a big theme of your speech was the

1:28:35.560 --> 1:28:38.200
<v Speaker 13>need for middle powers to work together. But you've just

1:28:38.320 --> 1:28:41.840
<v Speaker 13>been to the other great power, to China, and I

1:28:41.880 --> 1:28:45.600
<v Speaker 13>think people very intrigued by seeing that meeting. And some

1:28:45.760 --> 1:28:49.880
<v Speaker 13>people say, kind of that's a mistake, really because you

1:28:49.960 --> 1:28:52.559
<v Speaker 13>know you're going to make yourself more dependent on China.

1:28:52.760 --> 1:28:57.200
<v Speaker 13>They're not that benign either. The US will be very annoyed.

1:28:57.280 --> 1:28:59.000
<v Speaker 13>What's what's the defense of what you're doing and what

1:28:59.080 --> 1:28:59.840
<v Speaker 13>do you have to get out of it?

1:29:00.280 --> 1:29:02.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, the first thing is to say, it's not a defense.

1:29:02.720 --> 1:29:04.800
<v Speaker 3>It's an I know the way you frame the question,

1:29:04.960 --> 1:29:09.120
<v Speaker 3>but it's offense, it's building out, it's something positive as

1:29:09.120 --> 1:29:13.799
<v Speaker 3>opposed to against. We're for something as opposed to being against.

1:29:13.960 --> 1:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>The second is they're very clear guardrails in that relationship.

1:29:18.439 --> 1:29:21.639
<v Speaker 3>I spoke of calibration of relationships in my remarks, that's

1:29:21.680 --> 1:29:25.400
<v Speaker 3>what I mean by it. But within those clear guardrails

1:29:25.479 --> 1:29:29.320
<v Speaker 3>are huge opportunities in energy, both clean and conventional, obviously,

1:29:29.439 --> 1:29:33.000
<v Speaker 3>in motor vehicles, in agriculture, in financial services, all of

1:29:33.080 --> 1:29:37.360
<v Speaker 3>which is mutually beneficial. So it's additive. And look, it's

1:29:37.400 --> 1:29:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the second largest economy and it's our second largest trading partner.

1:29:40.520 --> 1:29:44.240
<v Speaker 3>We should have a strategic partnership with them in that

1:29:45.200 --> 1:29:47.120
<v Speaker 3>within those guardrails, and that's what we've achieved.

1:29:47.320 --> 1:29:49.439
<v Speaker 13>And it is an interest and reversal though because I

1:29:49.479 --> 1:29:52.639
<v Speaker 13>think certainly during the Biden administration, there was this sense

1:29:52.720 --> 1:29:55.960
<v Speaker 13>that the Western world was trying to decouple from China

1:29:56.120 --> 1:29:58.720
<v Speaker 13>or the risk at least, and is now in this

1:29:58.920 --> 1:30:01.280
<v Speaker 13>new world really going to go into reverse and de

1:30:01.439 --> 1:30:05.160
<v Speaker 13>risking from China because there are other risks is less

1:30:05.240 --> 1:30:05.680
<v Speaker 13>of a.

1:30:05.760 --> 1:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Thing you need. Again, many in this room, this is

1:30:09.160 --> 1:30:12.760
<v Speaker 3>there live. You need a web of connections and to

1:30:12.920 --> 1:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>miss out in that web some of the largest ones

1:30:16.280 --> 1:30:20.000
<v Speaker 3>United States, we already have that China, India, Mercers or

1:30:20.360 --> 1:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>European Union. That's a mistake. That's not managing your relationships properly.

1:30:25.160 --> 1:30:27.240
<v Speaker 3>That makes you stronger, it makes you more resilient. And

1:30:27.320 --> 1:30:29.840
<v Speaker 3>then on top of that, I'll give you again all

1:30:29.920 --> 1:30:33.599
<v Speaker 3>appeal since it's in the headlines to the Nordics, Nordix

1:30:33.600 --> 1:30:37.240
<v Speaker 3>plus Canada, it's twenty percent of global GDP. It's not

1:30:37.560 --> 1:30:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the first thing people would realize, but that relationship, which

1:30:40.360 --> 1:30:44.920
<v Speaker 3>is deepening for security reasons, because we're like minded. Those

1:30:45.040 --> 1:30:47.519
<v Speaker 3>are the types of partnerships that I think we'll see more.

1:30:48.040 --> 1:30:50.320
<v Speaker 13>And you've got a round of applause when you said

1:30:50.520 --> 1:30:53.800
<v Speaker 13>something strong about standing on principle on Greenland.

1:30:55.479 --> 1:30:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Do you think we can find an off ramp on that.

1:30:59.280 --> 1:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sure you'll speak of it.

1:31:01.280 --> 1:31:02.720
<v Speaker 3>But put it this way.

1:31:02.720 --> 1:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>If there isn't an off ramp, where does this cut.

1:31:05.200 --> 1:31:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I strongly believe that there is a bet there's a

1:31:08.880 --> 1:31:12.080
<v Speaker 3>better outcome that come from the discussions that have been

1:31:12.200 --> 1:31:17.480
<v Speaker 3>catalyzed in an unusual way. Mantley. But and we absolutely

1:31:17.560 --> 1:31:24.559
<v Speaker 3>stand by the principles that I referenced. That solution starts

1:31:25.080 --> 1:31:28.120
<v Speaker 3>with security, and a security yes of Greenland, but more

1:31:28.200 --> 1:31:33.479
<v Speaker 3>broadly of the Arctic. Canada is four square contributing to that.

1:31:34.240 --> 1:31:36.320
<v Speaker 3>We're at the start of a major ramp up above

1:31:36.360 --> 1:31:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and beyond, so we will be a major contributor to that.

1:31:39.520 --> 1:31:42.600
<v Speaker 3>NATO has to deliver on that. We're working intensively in

1:31:42.760 --> 1:31:47.000
<v Speaker 3>order to do it as well prosperity for the people

1:31:47.080 --> 1:31:51.320
<v Speaker 3>of Greenland. In the end, it comes back to the

1:31:51.360 --> 1:31:54.040
<v Speaker 3>people there, and there are opportunities to do that in

1:31:54.200 --> 1:31:56.759
<v Speaker 3>ways that would strengthen all of the alliance.

1:31:57.120 --> 1:31:59.600
<v Speaker 13>And when President Trump says, oh, you know, Greenland's on

1:31:59.640 --> 1:32:02.920
<v Speaker 13>the threat from Russia, even from China, is that for real.

1:32:06.000 --> 1:32:09.559
<v Speaker 3>I would say that there are threat. Russia is without

1:32:09.800 --> 1:32:13.680
<v Speaker 3>question a threat in the Arctic. Without question, Russia does

1:32:13.760 --> 1:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>lots of horrible things, and I'll take the opportunity to

1:32:19.520 --> 1:32:25.040
<v Speaker 3>condemn their unjustified and horrific assault on Ukraine almost at

1:32:25.080 --> 1:32:28.800
<v Speaker 3>its fourth year. They are a real threat in the Arctic,

1:32:29.320 --> 1:32:32.840
<v Speaker 3>one against we need to protect, which is why we

1:32:33.040 --> 1:32:36.680
<v Speaker 3>have two hundred sixty four five day air sea and

1:32:37.080 --> 1:32:40.400
<v Speaker 3>land presence. Is why we're adding to our submarine fleet,

1:32:40.560 --> 1:32:45.000
<v Speaker 3>adding to our air fighter fleet, why we're building out

1:32:45.120 --> 1:32:48.559
<v Speaker 3>over the horizon radar to protect from Russian missile threats

1:32:48.560 --> 1:32:51.799
<v Speaker 3>and others, and why we will work with our NATO partners.

1:32:53.640 --> 1:32:58.200
<v Speaker 3>The threat is more perspective than actual at this stage

1:32:58.240 --> 1:33:01.400
<v Speaker 3>in terms of actual actives in the Arctic, and we

1:33:01.479 --> 1:33:03.320
<v Speaker 3>intend to keep it that way.

1:33:04.400 --> 1:33:06.280
<v Speaker 13>Another big issue that's going to come up this week

1:33:07.120 --> 1:33:10.400
<v Speaker 13>is this Board of Peace that President Trump is keen on.

1:33:11.320 --> 1:33:13.200
<v Speaker 13>I'm not sure whether it's for Gaza or for the

1:33:13.400 --> 1:33:16.160
<v Speaker 13>entire world, but apparently Canada has been invited.

1:33:16.200 --> 1:33:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Are you going to join? We have been invited, and

1:33:19.880 --> 1:33:23.000
<v Speaker 3>let me start by I think we should recognize the

1:33:23.160 --> 1:33:29.000
<v Speaker 3>progress that has been made in at least getting to

1:33:29.120 --> 1:33:31.640
<v Speaker 3>the towards the end of the first phase of this

1:33:32.280 --> 1:33:35.360
<v Speaker 3>process and the activation if I can put it that way,

1:33:35.880 --> 1:33:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of the process. To set up the border piece is

1:33:37.920 --> 1:33:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the start of phase two. Our view is and that's

1:33:43.040 --> 1:33:47.120
<v Speaker 3>to be welcomed and this is a positive vehicle. Our

1:33:47.240 --> 1:33:50.000
<v Speaker 3>view is we need to work on the actual structure

1:33:50.160 --> 1:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>of the vehicle you just referenced. Is it for Gaza? Well,

1:33:53.920 --> 1:33:58.000
<v Speaker 3>the UN Resolution Security Council Resolution twenty eight oh three

1:33:58.720 --> 1:34:02.400
<v Speaker 3>references a boarder piece for Gaza. That's where we see

1:34:02.760 --> 1:34:05.840
<v Speaker 3>it becoming immediately operative and it needs to be. In

1:34:05.960 --> 1:34:08.559
<v Speaker 3>our view, it's better to be designed in that way

1:34:08.680 --> 1:34:11.679
<v Speaker 3>for the immediate needs there there are many other needs

1:34:11.680 --> 1:34:14.760
<v Speaker 3>around the world. First point. Second point, it needs to

1:34:14.960 --> 1:34:21.040
<v Speaker 3>coincide with the immediate full flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza.

1:34:21.120 --> 1:34:23.360
<v Speaker 3>We are still not where we need to be. Conditions

1:34:23.400 --> 1:34:27.200
<v Speaker 3>still are horrific, so that needs to come alongside. We

1:34:27.320 --> 1:34:30.760
<v Speaker 3>think there's aspects of the governance and the decision making

1:34:30.880 --> 1:34:34.679
<v Speaker 3>process that could be improved, but we will work with others,

1:34:35.000 --> 1:34:38.960
<v Speaker 3>obviously work with the United States, because we will do

1:34:39.280 --> 1:34:44.720
<v Speaker 3>anything that we can to improve the situation. Horrific situation there,

1:34:45.280 --> 1:34:48.920
<v Speaker 3>and to move onto a path to a true two

1:34:49.000 --> 1:34:49.639
<v Speaker 3>state solution.

1:34:49.920 --> 1:34:52.280
<v Speaker 13>There's a suggestion you can get permanent membership of the

1:34:52.320 --> 1:34:55.599
<v Speaker 13>border piece by polling up a billion dollars.

1:34:56.160 --> 1:34:58.719
<v Speaker 3>You're going to write a check for that. We would

1:34:58.800 --> 1:35:05.200
<v Speaker 3>write checks and deliver in kind to improve the welfare

1:35:05.240 --> 1:35:08.360
<v Speaker 3>of the people of Palestine, but we want to see

1:35:08.400 --> 1:35:12.439
<v Speaker 3>it delivered direct to those outcomes, those outcomes promoting peace

1:35:13.080 --> 1:35:15.960
<v Speaker 3>and sower the mechanics and how it works that way. Okay,

1:35:16.080 --> 1:35:16.759
<v Speaker 3>final question.

1:35:18.960 --> 1:35:21.680
<v Speaker 13>President Trump and a lot of people who agree with

1:35:21.800 --> 1:35:26.240
<v Speaker 13>him condemn globalism a lot, and I suspect you know

1:35:27.920 --> 1:35:30.240
<v Speaker 13>you would be the kind of epitome of a globalist.

1:35:30.280 --> 1:35:32.240
<v Speaker 13>You know you work for Goldman Sachs. I believe you

1:35:32.320 --> 1:35:36.360
<v Speaker 13>were at central banker. You know you're comfortable and lived

1:35:36.360 --> 1:35:39.320
<v Speaker 13>in several countries. Is globalism first of all?

1:35:39.560 --> 1:35:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Is it a thing?

1:35:40.720 --> 1:35:41.479
<v Speaker 5>And is it over?

1:35:44.560 --> 1:35:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I think, well, look, understanding how the world works, having

1:35:49.200 --> 1:35:53.720
<v Speaker 3>an appreciation for other cultures, understanding the connections, and being

1:35:53.800 --> 1:35:58.679
<v Speaker 3>able to or at least appreciating ways that how we connect,

1:35:58.760 --> 1:36:02.800
<v Speaker 3>whether it's through technology, trade, investment, culture can enrich our

1:36:02.880 --> 1:36:06.360
<v Speaker 3>lives and that's a good thing. And also help solve

1:36:06.400 --> 1:36:10.799
<v Speaker 3>problems being detached from where you live and the broader

1:36:10.920 --> 1:36:16.320
<v Speaker 3>needs of society. There is an epithet for that. I

1:36:16.439 --> 1:36:19.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know that the G word is the one, and

1:36:19.280 --> 1:36:23.000
<v Speaker 3>there's certainly what we're finding. And to go back to

1:36:23.840 --> 1:36:26.600
<v Speaker 3>the points that I was making is that there are

1:36:26.600 --> 1:36:31.160
<v Speaker 3>a number of like minded countries that want to work

1:36:32.160 --> 1:36:36.920
<v Speaker 3>through partnership to achieve those goals for their citizens and

1:36:37.040 --> 1:36:41.800
<v Speaker 3>for the world more broadly, the call is for more

1:36:42.000 --> 1:36:47.439
<v Speaker 3>to recognize what's really going on right now and to

1:36:47.560 --> 1:36:50.439
<v Speaker 3>pool their resources to the benefit of citizens. So it

1:36:50.479 --> 1:36:54.160
<v Speaker 3>won't be global, it won't cover the globe, but it

1:36:54.280 --> 1:36:56.160
<v Speaker 3>will be more powerful.

1:36:56.800 --> 1:36:58.960
<v Speaker 13>Okay, prominent, Thank you very much in day much

1:37:07.840 --> 1:37:07.880
<v Speaker 5>You