Speaker 1: Welcome to the program. No thictocrats allowed, because we've got
Speaker 1: a country to say, so let's get her teed up.
Speaker 1: That subdiggo.
Speaker 2: You can't succeed with lt.
Speaker 1: Triple eight ninet seven one Sage Triple eight ninety seven
Speaker 1: one seven two four three. I am Larry Elder. We
Speaker 1: are Salem News Channel. President Trump says the war against
Speaker 1: Iran will end soon. What would happen to New York
Speaker 1: City if Mayor mom Donni truly got his way? A
Speaker 1: New York based hedge fund manager who went from donating
Speaker 1: to Democrats to supporting Donald Trump offers his scenario. Senator
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer has endorsed Abdul l Said, who advocates cutting
Speaker 1: off all aid to Israel. Democrat Texas candidate James tallerco
Speaker 1: denounces the theory of trickle down economics. Here's a problem.
Speaker 1: There is and never was any such theory advocated by
Speaker 1: any economist. DSA leaders say it's a requirement now for
Speaker 1: their endorsed candidates to dismantle the US government. Former DNC
Speaker 1: chair David Hogg says there's no room for moderates in
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party. Ronald Reagan warned about Medicare for all.
Speaker 1: We will revisit my conversation with Dave Ruben, who at
Speaker 1: one time bought into the systemic systemic racism against blacks nonsense.
Speaker 1: The Senate Homeland Security voted eight to five down party
Speaker 1: lines to hold doctor Fauci in contempt of Congress for
Speaker 1: taking the fifth over one hundred times. Remember when Jimmy
Speaker 1: Carter in two thousand and five advocated photo voter ID
Speaker 1: we do all of this and more. Triple eight nine
Speaker 1: seven one shge triple eight nine seven one seven two
Speaker 1: four to three. I've read the platform of the DSA,
Speaker 1: especially the new one where they updated it, and now
Speaker 1: they want to get rid of the Senate, get rid
Speaker 1: of the electoral College, abolished ice in the carcerial state,
Speaker 1: incarcial state, meaning get rid of prisons. That well known
Speaker 1: political pundit Richard Pryor weighed in on the idea of
Speaker 1: getting rid of prisons number thirty eight.
Speaker 3: At least I don't have to look at them anymore.
Speaker 4: I went to penitentiary jan while I did a movie.
Speaker 4: I went to not me personally, I mean I went
Speaker 4: to do a film in penitentiary and it was I
Speaker 4: was up there six weeks Arizona State Penitentiary.
Speaker 1: It was something. Oh you're plaud that.
Speaker 5: Arizona State Penitentiary real popular.
Speaker 4: Oh man, it was strange because it's like eighty percent
Speaker 4: black people. And what's strange about that is that there
Speaker 4: are no black people in Arizona.
Speaker 6: I'm not lying.
Speaker 1: They both then, and I was up there.
Speaker 4: And I spoke at all the brothers, and it made
Speaker 4: my heart ate. You know, it's all the beautiful black
Speaker 4: men and the Joint Warriors should be out there helping
Speaker 4: the masses.
Speaker 1: And I felt that way.
Speaker 7: I was real naive.
Speaker 1: Right in six weeks, I was up there.
Speaker 5: I talked to the brothers, you know, and I talked
Speaker 5: to them and thank god we got penitents.
Speaker 4: I asked usaid, why did you kill everybody in the house.
Speaker 3: Because there was home.
Speaker 1: Now, this reminds me of what Tupac Secure said about
Speaker 1: the need for the police in black communities.
Speaker 8: Please, and the main thing for us to rem is
Speaker 8: that the same crime element that white people are scared of,
Speaker 8: Black people are scared of the same crime element that
Speaker 8: white people fear. We fear, so we defend ourselves from
Speaker 8: the same crime element that they scared of. You know
Speaker 8: what I'm saying while they waiting for the legislation to
Speaker 8: pass and everything, we next door to the killer. We
Speaker 8: next door to them, you know, because we up in
Speaker 8: the projects where it's eighty in the building. All them
Speaker 8: killers that they letting out, they right there in that building.
Speaker 8: But it's better just because we black, we get along
Speaker 8: with the killers or something. We get along with the
Speaker 8: rapist because we black and we from the same.
Speaker 1: What is that we need protection too? What is that?
Speaker 1: That's these DSA members primarily white, primarily extremely well educated,
Speaker 1: not living in black areas, telling you that we're gonna
Speaker 1: defund the police with the polls show that black people
Speaker 1: want the police to remain the same level, if not increased,
Speaker 1: And we're gonna let bad guys out of prison because
Speaker 1: they're not going to move to a morphat Vineyard, They're
Speaker 1: not going to move to the suburbs. They're going to
Speaker 1: move to the inner city where a lot of black
Speaker 1: and brown people live. This is what these people are doing.
Speaker 1: And ifjord Mombami got his way, what would happen to
Speaker 1: New York City. This is Bill Ackman. He is a
Speaker 1: billionaire hedge fund manager donated to Democrats for years until
Speaker 1: he switched and began donating to President Donald Trump number
Speaker 1: forty two.
Speaker 9: Let's talk about affordability. We start with rent or cost
Speaker 9: of housing. Why is the cost of housing so high
Speaker 9: in New York City Because unfortunately left wing mayors have
Speaker 9: made it very difficult for developers to build in New
Speaker 9: York City, and Mandami when he freezes rents, he's just
Speaker 9: going to make the problem worse. There are buildings in
Speaker 9: New York City, many, many buildings in New York City
Speaker 9: where half the tenants plus or minus are rent stabilized apartments,
Speaker 9: and so their rent is frozen and the other half
Speaker 9: a market. And so what does the landlord do in
Speaker 9: order to make generate enough cash flow to cover his
Speaker 9: interest expense is going to raise rents in the part
Speaker 9: of the because he can't raise them on half departments.
Speaker 10: You know.
Speaker 9: So there's there's bad policy that's led to a big
Speaker 9: part of the Fordabilla problem. Why is energy costs so
Speaker 9: high in New York State. It's because we've shut down
Speaker 9: nuclear power and we've you know, it takes fifteen years
Speaker 9: to get a uh you know, power line approved of pipeline.
Speaker 9: You know, you know, we shut down tracking in New
Speaker 9: York state, and the result is that we're importing you know,
Speaker 9: natural gas from Pennsylvania.
Speaker 11: Right.
Speaker 9: Just bad policy, and so you know, the we can
Speaker 9: fix a lot of these problems with much better policy.
Speaker 9: You look at Florida. Florida's an incredibly well managed state.
Speaker 9: They're talking about eliminating I think they voted recently eliminate
Speaker 9: real estate taxes. Right, How are they able to do that?
Speaker 9: Just good policy. Austin, Texas, you know, rents have come
Speaker 9: way down. Why because they made it really easy to build.
Speaker 9: You make it really hard to build in a city
Speaker 9: where people want to live or they're moving to. And
Speaker 9: then you don't allow landlords to recover the costs to
Speaker 9: renovate their units, they're going to pull them off the market.
Speaker 9: So what's happened in New York We had like some
Speaker 9: sixty thousand units that are off the market because the
Speaker 9: cost to renovate them cannot be recovered under the rent regulations.
Speaker 9: You want the Ken Griffins of the world to locate
Speaker 9: Citadel here, You want him to spend two hundred and
Speaker 9: fifty million dollars in apartment Why because that's two hundred
Speaker 9: fifty million dollar purchase made that building economically viable. Well
Speaker 9: that the construction that building created, how many jobs, how
Speaker 9: many rich people moved into that building? Who are going
Speaker 9: to pay taxes the system? A system can work very well.
Speaker 9: You want people at the very top, who are you know,
Speaker 9: very small percentage of the population is paying a big
Speaker 9: you know, it's something like the top ten percent January
Speaker 9: seventy percent of the revenues. That doesn't sound like a
Speaker 9: particularly unfair You know, you want to have the Elie
Speaker 9: must of the world, but you don't want to discourage
Speaker 9: Elon Musk from locating his business here. I mean, look
Speaker 9: at what's happening in California right now. The United States
Speaker 9: made it such that a five percent wealth tax in California,
Speaker 9: which they say is one time. It's first of all,
Speaker 9: it's never one time. Income taxes were deminimous and they
Speaker 9: only apply to a small percentage, say one time. But
Speaker 9: you're worried it'll come back for more. It's a certainty.
Speaker 9: It's a certainty. So we have two big problems. We
Speaker 9: have enormous waste and fraud and government, and we have
Speaker 9: bad policy that economic policy, bad tax policy. And by
Speaker 9: the way, there are many things that are unfair about
Speaker 9: what tax policy that can be fixed. But you know
Speaker 9: the this the answer is socialism.
Speaker 1: Socialism is a disaster.
Speaker 9: Okay, watch if Mondami is successful in implementing these plans,
Speaker 9: watch what happens to New York City.
Speaker 1: You know, this notion that these lefties have are just
Speaker 1: fringe guys in the Democratic Party. Keep in mind that
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders almost won the twenty sixteen primary against Hillary.
Speaker 1: He had won about twenty five primaries and caucuses, I believe,
Speaker 1: and then in twenty twenty he was a leader. He
Speaker 1: was front runner after won the Nevada caucuses, and that's
Speaker 1: when James Cliburn pulled Joe Biden, who, as David Axod said,
Speaker 1: was mister magooing his way through the primary season because
Speaker 1: they thought that Bernie Sanders was too radical. But he
Speaker 1: was the front runner. And when Biden became president, began
Speaker 1: passing all of his stuff. His inflation reduction actor, even
Speaker 1: he said, was a big green new deal, even Biden
Speaker 1: said it. What did Berndie Sanders say? He said he
Speaker 1: was very happy. He rarely criticized Biden because he felt
Speaker 1: he was getting pretty much all he wanted. He had
Speaker 1: a guy Joe Biden, who called climate change the biggest
Speaker 1: existential threat facing the country, not radical Islam, not around
Speaker 1: the number one sponsor of terrorism, attempting to acquire a
Speaker 1: nuclear bomb. No, the number one threat was climate change.
Speaker 1: And he cut back substantially on drilling. We had high
Speaker 1: gas prices, we had high inflation. And again here in California,
Speaker 1: every dumb idea that they're thinking about trying in DC
Speaker 1: has been tried twice out here already. And what's been
Speaker 1: the result, highest unemployment in the nation, massive gap between
Speaker 1: the rich and the poor. James Tallarico has criticized what
Speaker 1: he calls trickle down economics. Stick around for that now,
Speaker 1: whether you're preparing for exams, juggling family and career, or
Speaker 1: just looking to stay sharp as you age, think Factor
Speaker 1: is here to help. Created by the same company that
Speaker 1: makes Relief Factor, think Factor supports sharper focus, stronger recall,
Speaker 1: and clearer thinking. It's a natural way to give your
Speaker 1: brain the daily nutrients it needs for memory, attention, even
Speaker 1: vibrant vision. I take it every single morning and get this.
Speaker 1: Think Factor results get better the longer it's taken. So
Speaker 1: if you want to stay focused during demanding tasks, keep
Speaker 1: your memory strong and maintain mental energy for whatever's head.
Speaker 1: Think factor is for you eight hundred for relief eight
Speaker 1: hundred to number four relief or relief factor dot com.
Speaker 1: That's relief factor dot com. Parents. The biggest question in
Speaker 1: education today is how artificial intelligence is shaping the way
Speaker 1: your student learns. Artificial intelligence is changing education faster than
Speaker 1: most schools are willing to admit, and many families are
Speaker 1: rightly concerned. At Patrick Henry College, the goal isn't to
Speaker 1: outsource thinking to machine, means is to train students to
Speaker 1: think for themselves. PHC emphasizes a Christian liberal arts education
Speaker 1: that develops reasoning, writing, speaking, and discernment skills. No algorithm
Speaker 1: can replace student learn to engage technology wisely understanding its capabilities,
Speaker 1: but also its danger and limitations, rather than becoming dependent
Speaker 1: on it. In a world increasingly shaped by AI, Patrick
Speaker 1: Henry College prepares students to lead with wisdom, conviction, and
Speaker 1: moral clarity. If you want a college that prepares your
Speaker 1: child to lead in an AI driven world without losing
Speaker 1: his or her faith and values, I encourage you to
Speaker 1: learn more about Patrick Henry College. Visit PHC dot edu
Speaker 1: slash elder that's PHC dot edu slash Elder Triple late
Speaker 1: nine seven one Sage Triple eight nine seven one seven
Speaker 1: two four three. I am Larry Elder. We are Salem
Speaker 1: News Channel. Several years ago, Thomas Soule wrote a colum
Speaker 1: call the trickle down Lie, talked about how Mayor build
Speaker 1: de Blazzio, in his inaugural speech denounced quote people on
Speaker 1: the far right who continued to preach the virtue of
Speaker 1: trickle down economics. Close quote, and soul says, if there's
Speaker 1: ever a contest for the biggest lie in politics, this
Speaker 1: one should be a top contender. He said that many
Speaker 1: lies told in politics, most of them have some sort
Speaker 1: of tiny fractions of truth then to make them sort
Speaker 1: of plausible. But the trickle down lie is one hundred
Speaker 1: percent lie. Years ago, he wrote a column and challenged
Speaker 1: anybody to quote any economists outside of an assane asylum
Speaker 1: whoever ever advocated quote trickle down. He said, Mayor Deblasia
Speaker 1: was by no means the first politician to denounce this
Speaker 1: non existent theory, which no economists ever advocated. Two thousand
Speaker 1: and eight, Obama denounced trickle down again, despite no economists
Speaker 1: ever promoting such a theory. He said, let me ask
Speaker 1: you something Why would anybody advocate that we give a
Speaker 1: something and hopes that it would trickle down to b
Speaker 1: Why in the world would any sane person not just
Speaker 1: give it to be and cut out the middleman. And
Speaker 1: the basis for trickle down is the assumption that you
Speaker 1: can just keep taxing and taxing and taxing without altering
Speaker 1: the behavior of those who are taxed. And that really
Speaker 1: is what is meant by supply side economics, that when
Speaker 1: you tax productive people to the point where they cease
Speaker 1: being productive, everybody gets hurt. When JFK advocated cross the
Speaker 1: board tax cuts, he made the argument every dollar saved
Speaker 1: could be spent or invested, thus creating new jobs, and
Speaker 1: that everybody would benefit. Today he'd be called trickle down suspect.
Speaker 1: And take about take a look at what some of
Speaker 1: these Democrat presidents have said, like Woodrow Wilson. He said
Speaker 1: this in nineteen nineteen. At some point, high rates of
Speaker 1: income and profits, discourage energy, remove the incentive to new enterprise,
Speaker 1: encourage extravagant expenditures, and produced industrial stagnation with consequent unemployment
Speaker 1: and other attendant evils. Close Ford, that was a Democrat
Speaker 1: JFK nineteen sixty two. It is a paradoxical truth that
Speaker 1: tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are
Speaker 1: too low, and the soundest way to raise the revenues
Speaker 1: in the long run is to cut the rates now.
Speaker 1: End of quote. Yet these DNC people that say there
Speaker 1: ought not be billionaires, the DNC people that lie and
Speaker 1: say the rich don't pay their fair share, don't seem
Speaker 1: to understand this and trotting down the old trickle down
Speaker 1: lie is good, Old James Tallerico number thirty.
Speaker 3: Trickle down economics is not a theory. It is theft.
Speaker 3: For fifty years, For fifty years, billionaire mega donors and
Speaker 3: their puppet politicians have been stealing from the American people,
Speaker 3: stealing the wealth that we created.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, you get your bride, You get the point.
Speaker 1: When I was running for governor, someone pulled out an
Speaker 1: article I wrote where I said the minimum way should
Speaker 1: be zero? And she said, are you saying that people
Speaker 1: should work for nothing? I says that what the article says.
Speaker 1: I said, do you work for nothing? She said no,
Speaker 1: I said, neither do I. Why would anybody work for nothing?
Speaker 1: Is the term for that? It's called slavery? I said.
Speaker 1: All I said is that a third party ought not
Speaker 1: get in the middle of a willing seller of labor
Speaker 1: and a willing buyer of labor. And I said, even
Speaker 1: most left winging economists believe that the minimum wage will
Speaker 1: hurt people. I said, who's your favorite economist? Blank Stare.
Speaker 1: I said, well, name an economists, because all the major
Speaker 1: ones I know, and I would know pretty much how
Speaker 1: they feel about the minimum wage. Waiting for her to name,
Speaker 1: I said, well, just name one, blank Stare. I said,
Speaker 1: you can't think of a single economist. She said, well,
Speaker 1: the professor I studied in college. I said, what's his
Speaker 1: or her name? Blank Stare. I said, so here you
Speaker 1: are attacking me for saying there should not be a
Speaker 1: minimum wage, and you can't think of a single economist
Speaker 1: who disagrees with me, even Paul Krugman. He is economist
Speaker 1: who's written for years for the New York Times. Left
Speaker 1: wing guy despises Donald Trump said that when Donald Trump
Speaker 1: got elected in one point zero there would be a depression.
Speaker 1: He was just off a little bit, and by the way,
Speaker 1: now he'd come around to agreeing that Donald Trump might
Speaker 1: be right about some of the things he said about tariffs.
Speaker 1: Jonathan Gruber, one of the architects of Obamacare also wrote
Speaker 1: negatively about a living wage or a minimum wage. This
Speaker 1: is just economics. One oh One's probably the most studied
Speaker 1: aspect of economics. There have been a number of pages
Speaker 1: papers written about this over the years, and economists a
Speaker 1: few years ago looked at about one hundred pages papers
Speaker 1: that had been written in the last several years about this.
Speaker 1: Eighty five percent of them found harmful effects, some found
Speaker 1: extremely harmful effects, a handful of them found neutral effects.
Speaker 1: Only a couple of them said that the minimum wage
Speaker 1: had a positive act. One of those was the famous
Speaker 1: Card Kruger or Kruger Card study that has been thoroughly,
Speaker 1: thoroughly debunked by other people that tried to replicate their results.
Speaker 1: Now you remember when I told you that Ben Rhodes,
Speaker 1: who was the architect of the Iran deal during the
Speaker 1: Obama administration, gave an interview to the New York Times.
Speaker 1: Don't ask me why he did it. Very candidly said,
Speaker 1: you know, I sold this thing on a narrative that
Speaker 1: there were hardliner iotolus and moderate iotolus, and if he
Speaker 1: wanted to give the upper hand to the moderate iototes,
Speaker 1: we need to do this deal, and he admitted that
Speaker 1: there was no distinction between hard lighter Iotolus and moderate Iotolus,
Speaker 1: and said he was able to sell it because the
Speaker 1: average reporter covering foreign policy, because I got rid of
Speaker 1: a lot of the veterans as the newspapers began to
Speaker 1: contract for losing money. The average reporter covering foreign policy,
Speaker 1: he said, with twenty seven years old quote, and they
Speaker 1: literally know nothing close quote. How many of these reporters
Speaker 1: covering the economy, covering tax covering spending, covering monetary policy
Speaker 1: are clueless about economics? One O one. I suspect a
Speaker 1: great deal of them are. That's why you hear this
Speaker 1: lie over and over and over again that the Donald
Speaker 1: Trump tax cuts went to the top one percent. Bull
Speaker 1: everybody who paid taxes got a break. But they still
Speaker 1: say this over and over and over again, just like
Speaker 1: just as they say over and over and over again,
Speaker 1: the rich don't pay their fair share in taxes. We
Speaker 1: come back when I talk about what the great Thomas
Speaker 1: Soul said about people that are denouncing the non existent
Speaker 1: trickle down theory. And let's revisit what Ronald Reagan said
Speaker 1: about Medicare for all, which is exactly what these Democrats
Speaker 1: DSA people really want, and I don't know a single
Speaker 1: Democrat who has not also advocated medicare for all. So
Speaker 1: there's no big, wide gulf between DSA and Democrats on
Speaker 1: many issues on Lariod.
Speaker 12: Half a century later, Watergate still shapes how Americans view power,
Speaker 12: scandal and trust. This weekend, the America two fifty film
Speaker 12: series presents Watergates, Secrets and Betrayals, revisit the investigation through
Speaker 12: archival footage, interviews, and new arguments about what happened. Launched
Speaker 12: Saturday and Sunday at seven pm Eastern on Salem News Channel.
Speaker 3: Trickle down economics is not a theory. It is theft
Speaker 3: for fifty years. For fifty years, billionaire mega donors and
Speaker 3: their puppet politicians have been stealing from the American people,
Speaker 3: stealing the wealth that we created with their bribes, their bailouts,
Speaker 3: and their billionaire tax breaks. This affordability crisis isn't something
Speaker 3: that happened over the last five years. This affordability crisis
Speaker 3: has been fifty years in the making. Since the late
Speaker 3: nineteen seventies, mega donors and corporate special interests have been
Speaker 3: buying politicians in both political parties and then those politicians
Speaker 3: turned around and rigged the economy to benefit their wealthy
Speaker 3: donors at our expense. We have an affordability crisis because
Speaker 3: we have a corruption crisis.
Speaker 1: Triple late nine seven one sage Triple eight nine seven
Speaker 1: one seven two four to three. I am Larry Yelder.
Speaker 1: We are stealem News Channel. Last I checked something like
Speaker 1: forty some odd billionaires have donated to the candidacy of
Speaker 1: mister tallerco Here is Thomas soul on this business of
Speaker 1: trickle down, Ember thirty.
Speaker 13: One, Segment three, Trickle down and Millionaires. Now the attack
Speaker 13: on this theory which has been tested and shown to work.
Speaker 13: President Obama in December of last year. The market will
Speaker 13: take care of everything. They tell us, jobs and prosperity
Speaker 13: will eventually trickle down to everyone else. In April of
Speaker 13: this year. During the Bush years, the wealthy got wealthier,
Speaker 13: but prosperity sure didn't trickle down. In July this past
Speaker 13: summer for Barack Obama, We've tried it their way. It
Speaker 13: didn't work. We were told that prosperity would start at
Speaker 13: the top and then trickle down. Close quote where does
Speaker 13: this trickle Where does this phrase trickle down come from?
Speaker 14: Oh?
Speaker 7: I don't know it was as far back as as
Speaker 7: the first as the Rosevelt administration. There is absolutely it
Speaker 7: is an incredible thing. It's there is a non existent
Speaker 7: theory that is constantly being attacked. Some years ago, in
Speaker 7: my newspaper column, I challenged anybody to cite any economist
Speaker 7: outside of an insane asylum who had ever made that argument.
Speaker 7: Nobody ever ever came up with a single person.
Speaker 13: So when Barack Obama says in this past July quote,
Speaker 13: we were told that prosper who.
Speaker 7: Told him, nobody told him nobody.
Speaker 13: No economist has ever held that. No politician has ever
Speaker 13: said it.
Speaker 7: I don't know anybody who's ever said it. In fact,
Speaker 7: when I put this out and I went out nationally,
Speaker 7: something caated column. Various people wrote me and said, well,
Speaker 7: so and so said that, so and so said it.
Speaker 7: But find me the person who said it. I don't
Speaker 7: want to hear how A said that. B said, find
Speaker 7: me B and show me where he said it. And
Speaker 7: that was years ago. Not one example has been offered.
Speaker 13: All right, So trickle down economics is not a political theory.
Speaker 13: It is a political I beg your pardon. It's not
Speaker 13: an economic theory. It is a political hack phrase.
Speaker 1: Used as a caricature.
Speaker 7: Caricature in other words, the argument really is is not
Speaker 7: that they that you should put more more money in
Speaker 7: the hands of the wealthy. It's also part of a
Speaker 7: zero sum conception of the economy. There's the thought that
Speaker 7: if you cut the tax rates on the rich, why
Speaker 7: then there'll be less taxes for the government, or you'll
Speaker 7: have to raise the taxes on other people to make
Speaker 7: up the difference, or cut programs and so forth. So
Speaker 7: that that that I hear all the time. It drives
Speaker 7: me crazy.
Speaker 13: So what so what about this notion George Bush? It
Speaker 13: was a giveaway that George Bush cut taxes on the
Speaker 13: rich and if he had not done that, the budget
Speaker 13: would be much closer to balance. He was just giving it.
Speaker 7: Points. Yes, but in the in the in the in
Speaker 7: the paper, I point out where the New York Times
Speaker 7: itself says, you know, there's been an unexpectedly large increase
Speaker 7: uh in tax revenues from the wealthy and from corporations,
Speaker 7: which has reduced the projected budget deficit. And that question, Yes,
Speaker 7: expectations are in the eyes of.
Speaker 13: The beholders, unexpected by the New York Times.
Speaker 7: Unexpected by the New York Times exactly. But that's exactly
Speaker 7: what people have been expecting from more at that point
Speaker 7: three quarters of a century, and which had been happening
Speaker 7: in the New York Times, just chose not to understand it.
Speaker 13: President Obama once again at the Democratic National Convention, addressing
Speaker 13: he might as well he and his speechwriters might as
Speaker 13: well have composed this passage for you, Tom Soul. President
Speaker 13: Obama talking to Tom.
Speaker 7: Oh my goodess.
Speaker 15: Now I've cut taxes for those who need it, middle
Speaker 15: class families, small businesses. But I don't believe that another
Speaker 15: round of tax breaks for millionaires will bring good jobs
Speaker 15: to our shores or pay down our deficit.
Speaker 13: I don't believe tax cuts for millionaires will bring jobs
Speaker 13: to our shores or pay down our deficits. So there, Tom,
Speaker 13: there you are.
Speaker 7: Happens that both those things happened in the twenties after
Speaker 7: Melon finally out his tax cuts on the and they
Speaker 7: were across the board tax these were not tax cuts
Speaker 7: for millionaires. But it was precisely after the tax cuts
Speaker 7: that the government reight revenue increased, and they brought down
Speaker 7: the national debt by about one fourth. As a result
Speaker 7: of the money pouring into Washington Governor Romney at the Republican.
Speaker 1: JFK two. I'm going to remind you of what JFK
Speaker 1: said about his tax cut plan that went into a
Speaker 1: fact after his assassination. Stick around for that now, whether
Speaker 1: you're climbing the corporate ladder, launching a new project, or
Speaker 1: just looking for that extra edge, your brain is your
Speaker 1: most valuable asset, and now there's a way to support
Speaker 1: it every single day. Think Factor from the makers of
Speaker 1: relief Factor. Think Factor is built to help you stay sharp,
Speaker 1: nurture your memory, and boost your attention, and unlocks the middle,
Speaker 1: clarity and the precision you need to stay ahead of
Speaker 1: the game, no matter the challenge. For me, provides energy,
Speaker 1: focus and the ability to push through mentally demanding days,
Speaker 1: and think Factor results get better the longest taken. So
Speaker 1: if you're a go getter who refuses to settle, think
Speaker 1: Factor helps you perform at your best and keep your edge.
Speaker 1: First bottle just nineteen dollars and ninety five cents. Think Factor,
Speaker 1: Think Clearer, Perform Better Daily eight hundred four Relief eight
Speaker 1: hundred the number four relief or visit relieffactor dot com.
Speaker 1: That's relief factor dot com.
Speaker 16: The worst deficit comms from a recession, and if we
Speaker 16: can take the proper action and the proper time, this
Speaker 16: can be the most important step we could take to
Speaker 16: prevent another recession. That is, the right time of a
Speaker 16: tax fun both for your family budget and the national budget,
Speaker 16: resolving from a commina bit basic reform and reduction in
Speaker 16: our rate structure, a creative tax cut creating more jobs, income,
Speaker 16: and eventually more revenue. And the right time for that
Speaker 16: kind of bill It now appears in the absence of
Speaker 16: an economic crisis today, and if the job is to
Speaker 16: be done in a responsible way, is January nineteen sixty three.
Speaker 16: Such a bill will be presented to the Congress for
Speaker 16: action next year. It will include and across the board,
Speaker 16: top to bottom cut in both corporate and personal income taxes.
Speaker 16: It will include long needed tax reforms that logic and
Speaker 16: equity demand, and it will date that cut in taxes
Speaker 16: to take effect as of the start of next year
Speaker 16: January nineteen sixty three. The billions of dollars this bill
Speaker 16: will place in the hands of the consumer and our
Speaker 16: businessmen will have both immediate and permanent benefits to our economy.
Speaker 16: Every dollar released from taxation, that is span or invested
Speaker 16: will help create a new job and a new salary,
Speaker 16: and these new jobs and new salaries can create other
Speaker 16: jobs and other salaries and more customers and more growth
Speaker 16: for an expanding American economy. Instead of being permanently saddaged
Speaker 16: with excess planned capacity and the budgetary deficits that is
Speaker 16: created by this means, our goal must be fuller capacity
Speaker 16: and full employment and the budgetary surfaces that that kind
Speaker 16: of employment and capacity can produce.
Speaker 1: Triple eight ninety seven one sage triple eight ninety seven
Speaker 1: one seven two four three. I'm Larry Elder, Salem NewsChannel,
Speaker 1: coming to you from the Relief Factor studio. Don't forget
Speaker 1: your Relief Factor eight hundred four Relief eight hundred and
Speaker 1: number four relief Relieffaction dot com reliefactor dot com Democrats
Speaker 1: have a Democrat like that arrested nowadays. Cynthia is in Ventura, California. Cynthia,
Speaker 1: you're in the Lard Show.
Speaker 17: Thank you for calling, well, thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 2: Larry.
Speaker 17: I'm a little off of the JFK thing because I'm
Speaker 17: thinking about taxes from California, the billionaire tax as Prop forty.
Speaker 17: I'm concerned about the language where you can amend it.
Speaker 17: It could be amended and not brought before voter approval.
Speaker 17: I've been told that I'm misinformed that it just includes
Speaker 17: the real estate, and I'm saying, well, no, I think
Speaker 17: that it could include other things. And I think potentially
Speaker 17: it could go from a billionaire at tax to a
Speaker 17: millionaire at tax, and they could do the five percent
Speaker 17: tax more than once. I wanted to get your thoughts
Speaker 17: on it.
Speaker 1: Sure, right now it is a quote one time a
Speaker 1: five tax on a billionaire's net worth, which includes everything
Speaker 1: the billionaire has. Don't mean somebody had to value it.
Speaker 1: But if you're concerned about whether or not if it passes,
Speaker 1: and I believe it will pass, that's how brain dead
Speaker 1: people in California are. Will it then ultimately go down
Speaker 1: to people that are under a billionaire? Absolutely? Will it
Speaker 1: just be a one time tax, No, it won't be.
Speaker 1: Once they start getting used to it, they're going to
Speaker 1: be taxing and taxing and taxing. Now. You know it's
Speaker 1: bad when even Gavin Newsom opposes it, Although after that
Speaker 1: Tuesday when all these DSA candidates won, he then came
Speaker 1: out with a national billionaires tax theory, being that well, sure,
Speaker 1: billionaires may leave California, many of them have. But if
Speaker 1: there's a national tax, where they're going to go. That's
Speaker 1: his argument. But he didn't come out with that until
Speaker 1: after that Tuesday when all these DSA candidates won. Because
Speaker 1: billionaires didn't become billionaire a bit by being stupid. Did
Speaker 1: a lot of them inherit the money, Yes, but most
Speaker 1: of them did not. And they can move things out
Speaker 1: of the country, they can live out of the country,
Speaker 1: they can do all sorts of things to reduce their
Speaker 1: tax burden. But again, even Gavin Newsom opposed the billionaire's tax,
Speaker 1: arguing that billionaires would leave California because he knows how
Speaker 1: heavily dependent California is on the wealthy for revenues. The
Speaker 1: number one source of revenue in California is the state
Speaker 1: income tax, which is the highest state income tax in
Speaker 1: the nation already, and now you're going to do a
Speaker 1: five percent, supposedly one time a tax on the net
Speaker 1: worth of billionaires, meaning stuff they've already earned, already paid
Speaker 1: taxes on, they get paid taxes on. Again, it's asinine.
Speaker 1: By the way, a number of European countries have tried
Speaker 1: a so called wealth tax and virtually all of them
Speaker 1: have repealed it because it didn't raise the revenue that
Speaker 1: they thought it would raise, and then a lot of
Speaker 1: billionaires left the country and moved somewhere else. Again, every
Speaker 1: brain dead idea nationwide has been tried twice already here
Speaker 1: in California. Now, let's talk about the push for medicare
Speaker 1: for all. Reagan warned about socialized medicine in the sixties,
Speaker 1: before we had medicare, before we had medicaid, warned about
Speaker 1: it and said, here's what they're going to do. Everybody
Speaker 1: loves seniors. Who doesn't love seniors, who doesn't love their grandparents.
Speaker 1: So if there's a plan to reduce the healthcare burden
Speaker 1: on seniors, oh, how could anybody be against that? And
Speaker 1: then they'll move it to children. How could anybody be
Speaker 1: against that? And then eventually it'll be for everybody, which
Speaker 1: has always been their goal. Many of them have even
Speaker 1: publicly stated it. Barack Obama when he was a before
Speaker 1: he was a candidate for presidency, there's a speech where
Speaker 1: he said, if I had to start from scratch, I'd
Speaker 1: be in favor of single payer. I think he even
Speaker 1: said that after he started running. He said, but it's
Speaker 1: not very realistic. We can do that right now. And
Speaker 1: after Obamacare was passed, Harry Reid, the Democrat leader of
Speaker 1: the Senate, was asked whether it's just a step towards
Speaker 1: single He said, oh, yeah, it is. Was interviewed in
Speaker 1: a Las Vegas newspaper and said, yeah, it is. It is.
Speaker 1: It's just another step towards single payer, which is our
Speaker 1: goal ultimately. Bernie Sanders has been saying it for decades.
Speaker 1: Medicare for all. And I told you the polling in
Speaker 1: the UK about their essay National Health System long lines,
Speaker 1: people dissatisfied, people believing that the money's not going to
Speaker 1: be there, particularly younger people. We would not put up
Speaker 1: with that. When I say long line, some people are
Speaker 1: on more than one line because they have more than
Speaker 1: one condition. Something like over eighty percent of the healthcare
Speaker 1: dollar and the UK is paid by the government as
Speaker 1: opposed to fifty percent here. Now, I'm opposed to all
Speaker 1: of this government provided healthcare. But we're not as bad
Speaker 1: as the UK, We're not as bad as Canada. Now
Speaker 1: when it comes to supplements, two things matter most that
Speaker 1: it works and you can trust it. Rather than just
Speaker 1: tell you about relief factor. We'll let our customers do it.
Speaker 1: We hear from people every single day whose lives have change,
Speaker 1: and we'd like you to hear a few of their stories.
Speaker 1: Chris has spent years doing physical work, leaving his feet
Speaker 1: sore at the end of the day. After starting relief Factor,
Speaker 1: he felt so good. He did something he'd never done before.
Speaker 1: He ran a half marathon. Now he tells all its
Speaker 1: friends about relief Factor. I take it every single morning
Speaker 1: because my back issues. Now they make it easy to
Speaker 1: find out if you'll be the next person telling us
Speaker 1: relief Factor gave you your life back three weeks, just seventeen
Speaker 1: dollars and seventy six cents. Just go to Reliefactor dot com,
Speaker 1: relief Factor dot com or call eight hundred four Relief
Speaker 1: eight hundred the number four Relief. We'll connect you with
Speaker 1: our friendly local team and they'll do everything they can
Speaker 1: to help. Reliefactor dot com. Relief Factor dot com eight
Speaker 1: hundred four Relief eight hundred the number four Relief. That's
Speaker 1: triple eight nine seven one sage triple eight ninety seven
Speaker 1: one seven two four to three. I am Larry Yelder.
Speaker 1: Remember when Jimmy Carter back in two thousand and five,
Speaker 1: advocated for photo voter ID.
Speaker 18: We do.
Speaker 1: Senate Homeland Committee votes eight to five down party lines
Speaker 1: to hold doctor Fauci in contempt of Congress for taking
Speaker 1: the fifth over one hundred times. We're going to revisit
Speaker 1: my conversation with Dave Rubin, who at one time bought
Speaker 1: into the anti black police systemic racism nonsense. DSA leaders
Speaker 1: say it's now a requirement for their endorsed candidates to
Speaker 1: dismantle the US government, and former ds chair David Hoggs
Speaker 1: says there's no room for moderates in the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: Donal Reagan warned against socialized medicine for all. Had that
Speaker 1: for you at the top of the hour, Stick around
Speaker 1: for that triple eight ninety seven one Sage Phil is
Speaker 1: in Philadelphia, phil or It's nice to.
Speaker 10: Hear from you, Hey, Larry.
Speaker 11: I just had a suggestion for these candidates running up
Speaker 11: against the brick wall with Jesus Lamist candidates, Why don't
Speaker 11: the Republicans start touting what we believe in that America
Speaker 11: has got to, you know, write for everybody, including the
Speaker 11: lgbt Q plus community, and get them to come out
Speaker 11: and try to see if they can get some photo
Speaker 11: ops with Jesus loamist candidates and saying that they support
Speaker 11: them too, and maybe get those photos out to Al
Speaker 11: Jazeer and and uh, you know, the Brotherhood Tatar and
Speaker 11: Iran and Hamas and let them know that maybe the
Speaker 11: the Brotherhood's coming out of closet here in America, that
Speaker 11: they're supporting the LGBTQ community.
Speaker 1: So I think we got to send them to Gaza,
Speaker 1: send them to Qatar and have them hold up signs
Speaker 1: saying we're here, we're queer. And see what happens.
Speaker 11: That's Larry, you hit the nail on the head. Love
Speaker 11: you and Philly, love you.
Speaker 1: Thanks a lot. Now, DSA leaders say it is a
Speaker 1: requirement now for their endorsed candidates to not just endorse
Speaker 1: their overall agenda, but to endorse the dismantling of the
Speaker 1: US government. I kid you not, number thirty six.
Speaker 19: This is actually something that we committed to at convention,
Speaker 19: having our endorsed candidates supporting the program. It's it's a
Speaker 19: requirement now and so that'll be incorporated into our endorsement process.
Speaker 20: It sounds so radical, like abolished the Senate, abolished the
Speaker 20: Supreme Court, like et cetera, et cetera. But it's really
Speaker 20: it's not like that's those are the things that need
Speaker 20: to happen.
Speaker 19: So whenever people are like, oh my god, they want
Speaker 19: to get to the president, I was like, well, I
Speaker 19: don't know what we would call it in the future.
Speaker 19: We could call it the head haun Show of whatever.
Speaker 19: You know, Like it's like, might we might not have
Speaker 19: a president.
Speaker 1: People say that abolishing the Senate abolishing the president's radical,
Speaker 1: but it really, it really isn't all that radical when
Speaker 1: you think about it. This is twenty twenty five. Hassan
Speaker 1: Piker sitting at a table with an lgbt Q plus flag.
Speaker 1: He offers his overall favorite flag, number forty five.
Speaker 2: Here, let's talk about our favorite flags.
Speaker 1: Oh, like overall what my favorite flag?
Speaker 16: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Hiszbolah look it up.
Speaker 2: Oh, I'm not even kidding.
Speaker 1: He's actually a dope flag.
Speaker 21: I don't know flags.
Speaker 1: It's a this is a you know what, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: be brave.
Speaker 22: My favorite flag.
Speaker 3: It's got an a k on it and a hand
Speaker 3: holding it up.
Speaker 1: His BLA flag is a dope flag.
Speaker 23: I'm Larry older, So let's get her teed up.
Speaker 2: You can't succeed with LT.
Speaker 1: Triple eight nineteen one s eh THEE Triple eight nine
Speaker 1: seven one seven two four to three. I am Larry Elder,
Speaker 1: Salem News TenneT. Coming to you from the Relief Factor Studio.
Speaker 1: This is the Great Ronald Reagan Number thirty seven.
Speaker 24: Them about socialized medicine. Gave them a chance to choose
Speaker 24: would unhesitatingly vote against it. We had an example of
Speaker 24: this under the Truman administration. It was proposed that we
Speaker 24: have a compulsory health insurance program for all people in
Speaker 24: the United States, and of course, the American people unhesitatingly
Speaker 24: rejected this. So, with the American people on record as
Speaker 24: not wanting socialized medicine, Congressman Farrand introduced the Farande Bill.
Speaker 24: This was the idea that all people of Social Security
Speaker 24: age should be brought under a program of compulsory health insurance.
Speaker 24: This would not only be our senior citizens. This would
Speaker 24: be the dependents and those who are disabled. This would
Speaker 24: be young people if they are dependents of someone eligible
Speaker 24: for Social Security. Congressman for Rande brought the program out
Speaker 24: on that idea of just for that particular group of people.
Speaker 24: But Congressman Farrande was subscribing to this foot in the
Speaker 24: door philosophy, because he said, if we can only break
Speaker 24: through and get our foot inside the door, then we
Speaker 24: can expand the program. After that, Walter Ruther said, it's
Speaker 24: no secret that the United Automobile Workers is officially on
Speaker 24: record as backing a program of national Health insurance, and
Speaker 24: by national Health insurance, he meant, socialized medicine for every American. Well,
Speaker 24: let's see what the socialists themselves had to say about it.
Speaker 24: They say, once the Fan Bill is passed, this nation
Speaker 24: will be provided with a mechanism for socialized medicine capable
Speaker 24: of indefinite expansion in every direction until it includes the
Speaker 24: entire population. Well, we can't say we haven't been warned. Now,
Speaker 24: Congressman Forand is no longer a Congressman of the United
Speaker 24: States government. He has been replaced not in his particular assignment,
Speaker 24: but in his backing of such a bill by Congressman
Speaker 24: King of California. It is presented in the idea of
Speaker 24: a great emergency that millions of our senior citizens are
Speaker 24: unable to provide needed medical care. But this ignores the
Speaker 24: fact that in the last decade, one hundred and twenty
Speaker 24: seven million of our citizens in just ten years, have
Speaker 24: come under the protection of some form of privately owned
Speaker 24: medical or hospital insurance. Now, the advocates of this bill,
Speaker 24: when you try to oppose it, challenge you on an
Speaker 24: emotional basis. They say, what would you do throw these
Speaker 24: poor old people out to die with no medical attention.
Speaker 24: That's ridiculous, And of course no one has advocated. As
Speaker 24: a matter of fact, in the last session of Congress
Speaker 24: a bill was adopted known as the Kerr Mills Bill. Now,
Speaker 24: without even allowing this bill to be tried to see
Speaker 24: if it works, they have introduced this King bill, which
Speaker 24: is really the Fan bill. What is the Kerr Mills Bill.
Speaker 24: It is a frank recognition of the medical need or
Speaker 24: problem of our senior citizens that I have mentioned, and
Speaker 24: it is provided from the federal government money to the
Speaker 24: states and the local communities that can be used at
Speaker 24: the discretion of the state to help those people who
Speaker 24: need it. Now, what reason could the other people have
Speaker 24: for backing a bill which says we insist on compulsory
Speaker 24: health insurance for senior citizens on a basis of age alone,
Speaker 24: regardless of whether they are worth millions of dollars, whether
Speaker 24: they have an income, whether they're protected by their own insurance,
Speaker 24: whether they have savings. I think we could be excused
Speaker 24: for believing that. His ex Congressman for Ann said this
Speaker 24: was simply an excuse to bring about what they wanted
Speaker 24: all the time, socialized medicine. James Madison in seventeen eighty eight,
Speaker 24: speaking to the Virginia Convention said, since the general civilization
Speaker 24: of mankind, I believe there are more instances of the
Speaker 24: abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and
Speaker 24: silent encroachment of those in power than by violent and
Speaker 24: sudden usurpations. They want attached this bill to socialis security,
Speaker 24: and they say, here is a great insurance program now instituted,
Speaker 24: now working. Let's take a look at social security itself again.
Speaker 24: Very few of us disagree with the original premise that
Speaker 24: there should be some form of saving that would keep
Speaker 24: destitution from following unemployment by reason of death, disability, or
Speaker 24: old age. And to this end, social Security was adopted,
Speaker 24: but it was never intended to supplant private savings, private
Speaker 24: insurance pension programs of unions and industries. Now in our country,
Speaker 24: under our free enterprise system, we have seen medicine reach
Speaker 24: the greatest heights that it has in any country in
Speaker 24: the world. Today, the relationship between patient and doctor in
Speaker 24: this country is something to be envied any place. The privacy,
Speaker 24: the care that is given to a person, the right
Speaker 24: to choose a doctor, the right to go from one
Speaker 24: doctor to the other. But let's also look from the
Speaker 24: other side at the freedom the doctor loses. A doctor
Speaker 24: would be reluctant to say this, Well, like you, I'm
Speaker 24: only a patient, so I can say it in his behalf.
Speaker 24: The doctor begins to lose freedoms. It's like telling a
Speaker 24: lie and one leads to another. First, you decide that
Speaker 24: the doctor can have so many patients. They're equally divided
Speaker 24: among the various doctors by the government. But then the
Speaker 24: doctors aren't equally divided geographically. So a doctor decides he
Speaker 24: wants to practice in one town, and the government has
Speaker 24: to say to him, you can't live in that town.
Speaker 24: They already have enough doctors. You have to go someplace else.
Speaker 24: And from here it's only a short step to dictating
Speaker 24: where he will go. This is a freedom that I
Speaker 24: wonder whether any of us have the right to take
Speaker 24: from any human being. I know how I'd feel if you,
Speaker 24: my fellow citizens, decided that to be an actor. I
Speaker 24: had to become a government employee and work in a
Speaker 24: national theater. Take it into your own occupation or that
Speaker 24: of your husband. All of us can see what happens
Speaker 24: once you establish the president that the government can determine
Speaker 24: a man's working place and his working methods, determine his employment.
Speaker 24: From here, it's a short step to all the rest
Speaker 24: of socialism, to determining his pay, and pretty soon your
Speaker 24: son won't decide when he's in school where he will
Speaker 24: go or what he will do for a living. He
Speaker 24: will wait for the government to tell him where he
Speaker 24: will go to work and what he will do. In
Speaker 24: this country of ours took place the greatest revolution that
Speaker 24: has ever taken place in world's history, the only true revolution.
Speaker 24: Every other revolution simply exchanged one set of rulers for another.
Speaker 24: But here, for the first time, in all the thousands
Speaker 24: of years of man's relation to man, a little group
Speaker 24: of men, the founding Fathers, for the first time established
Speaker 24: the idea that you and I had within ourselves, the
Speaker 24: god given right and ability to determine our own destiny.
Speaker 24: This freedom was built into our government with safeguards. We
Speaker 24: talk democracy today, and strangely we let democracy, begin to
Speaker 24: assume the aspect of majority rule is all that is needed.
Speaker 24: Will majority rule is a fine aspect of democracy, provided
Speaker 24: there are guarantees written in to our government concerning the
Speaker 24: rights of the individual and of the minorities. What can
Speaker 24: we do about this? Well, you and I can do
Speaker 24: a great deal. We can write to our congressmen, to
Speaker 24: our senators. We can say right now that we want
Speaker 24: no further encroachment on these individual liberties and freedoms. And
Speaker 24: at the moment, the key issue is we do not
Speaker 24: want socialized medicine in Washington. Today, forty thousand letters, less
Speaker 24: than one hundred per congressman our evidence of a trend
Speaker 24: in public thinking. Representative Halleck of Indiana has said, when
Speaker 24: the American people wants something from Congress, regardless of its
Speaker 24: political complexion, if they make their wants known, Congress does
Speaker 24: what the people want. So right, and if this man
Speaker 24: writes back to you and tells you that he to
Speaker 24: us for free enterprise, but we have these great services
Speaker 24: and so forth, it must be performed by government, don't
Speaker 24: let him get away with it.
Speaker 1: Show that you have not been convinced.
Speaker 24: Write a letter right back and tell him that you
Speaker 24: believe in government economy and fiscal responsibility, that you know
Speaker 24: that governments don't tax to get the money they need,
Speaker 24: governments will always find a need for the money they get,
Speaker 24: and that you demand the continuation of our traditional free
Speaker 24: enterprise system.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine someone at that time proposing medicare for all,
Speaker 1: just as when the Constitution was amended for an income tax,
Speaker 1: for much of a nation's history there was no income
Speaker 1: tax because the founding fathers did not envision there would
Speaker 1: be this massive welfare state, social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, FEMA,
Speaker 1: and on and on and on. And during the debates
Speaker 1: for the amendment to place an income tax in the Constitution,
Speaker 1: there was some discussion that maybe there's should be a
Speaker 1: cap that couldn't go higher than say ten percent. Oh,
Speaker 1: we don't never get that highest three dedicatus. We don't
Speaker 1: need that. We know what it is now. And so
Speaker 1: Reagan was talking about the idea of what ultimately became
Speaker 1: Medicare and opposed it. No one was proposing medicare for all,
Speaker 1: and now it's just an article of faith. Democrats would
Speaker 1: tell you that healthcare is a right. I don't think
Speaker 1: there's a single one that I can think of that
Speaker 1: opposes Medicare for all today. When they were debating again Obamacare,
Speaker 1: they wanted it, but they knew it with one step
Speaker 1: two big for the American people. So they said it
Speaker 1: among themselves and they said it quietly. I mentioned Harry
Speaker 1: Reid was being interviewed in a IF that had a
Speaker 1: newspaper and was asked whether in Obamacare is a step
Speaker 1: towards single parent He because, yeah, Obama didn't say that
Speaker 1: xpth going to bend the cost curve down. What you
Speaker 1: didn't do save the average family twenty five hundred dollars
Speaker 1: a month a year in premiums, which it didn't do. Now,
Speaker 1: when it comes to supplements, two things matter most that
Speaker 1: it works, that you can trust it. Rather than just
Speaker 1: tell you about relief Factor, we let our customers do it.
Speaker 1: We hear from people every single day whose lives have changed,
Speaker 1: and we'd like you to hear a few of their stories.
Speaker 1: Jim ran out of relief Factor twice, and both times
Speaker 1: his ache, stiffness, and pain came back. Once he restarted it,
Speaker 1: he says he felt better again. As Jim puts it,
Speaker 1: you know something's not working as long as you're taking it.
Speaker 2: It works.
Speaker 1: When you stop taking it, it stops working. That's when
Speaker 1: you know it's working. He said, three weeks, just seventeen
Speaker 1: dollars and seventy six cents. They make it easy for
Speaker 1: you to tackle your aches and pain. Just go to
Speaker 1: relief Factor dot com. Relief Factor dot com or called
Speaker 1: eight hundred four Relief eight hundred, the number four relief
Speaker 1: Reliefactor dot com eight hundred, the number four Relief Triple
Speaker 1: eight nine seven one Sage Triple eight nine seven one
Speaker 1: seven two four to three. I am Lariyoda. We are
Speaker 1: seven news channels regarding sending gays to gaza and to
Speaker 1: places like a tar pulling up a sign saying we're here,
Speaker 1: we're queer. This was in two thousand and seven September.
Speaker 1: The then president of Iran, Machmoud Ahmadina Jod spoke at
Speaker 1: Columbia University. Very controversial. He was invited, he spoke and
Speaker 1: during the Q and A he was asked why Iran
Speaker 1: denies women human rights and executes people who are homosexual,
Speaker 1: to which he responded, quote, in Iran, we don't have
Speaker 1: homosexuals like in your country. In Iran, we do not
Speaker 1: have this phenomenon. I don't know who has told you
Speaker 1: that we have it? End of quote. Interestingly, in the
Speaker 1: official website of Iran, in their state news agency, they
Speaker 1: cut out any reference to gays. Some of the other
Speaker 1: outlets in Iran printed the full transcript of the Q
Speaker 1: and A, but that didn't quote. In Iran, we don't
Speaker 1: have homosexuals like in your country. Some people booed in Iran,
Speaker 1: we do not have this phenomenon. I don't know who
Speaker 1: has told you that we have it? End of quote.
Speaker 1: And is in Indianapolis And you're in the Larry O
Speaker 1: the show. Thank you for calling.
Speaker 25: Yes, Hi, Larry, I've been trying to get a hold
Speaker 25: of you. Look, I just finally got a Ruku TV
Speaker 25: to get all kinds of channels and and on my
Speaker 25: writer TV, I can get to say them channel but
Speaker 25: not harding that now and just bound out and Brooklyn
Speaker 25: and so as a Muslims and they're running Brooklyn and
Speaker 25: New York? Is that true?
Speaker 1: I don't, I don't.
Speaker 26: I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the composition of the city council,
Speaker 1: uh there is, but I do know that the mayor
Speaker 1: of course of New York is Muslims. R I'm mom Donnie,
Speaker 1: and I'm sure there are lots of there are other
Speaker 1: candidates politicians there who are Muslim, whether it's run by Muslims.
Speaker 1: I couldn't say thank you for the call. Mary Anne
Speaker 1: is in Tampa, Florida. Marianne, you're on the Larry of
Speaker 1: the show.
Speaker 6: Yes, hy, Larry Hi. I love your show. I think
Speaker 6: that you have the best coverage of any news, whether
Speaker 6: it's on the radio or TV. I listened to you faithfully.
Speaker 6: But I want to say something about Medicare. I have
Speaker 6: heard Bernie Sanders say Medicare for all, it covers everything,
Speaker 6: pays for everything. Well, it doesn't pay for everything, because
Speaker 6: every time you see a doctor or a provider of
Speaker 6: any sort, even physical therapy, you have to pay a copay,
Speaker 6: and those copays get rather pricey, especially for somebody that's
Speaker 6: on a fixed income.
Speaker 1: Where you're talking, Marianne about the system we have right now.
Speaker 1: What Bernie Sanders is talking about is a system that
Speaker 1: he wants, which is a government pays for everything, which means,
Speaker 1: of course taxpayers pay for it, so we're all going
Speaker 1: to pay for it. But that's what he's talking about.
Speaker 1: But you're right, we have copaid, we have deductibles. What
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders is envisioning is you literally walk into your
Speaker 1: doctor's office, whatever procedure, whatever treatment, it's done, quote unquote free.
Speaker 1: That's what he is envisioning. And since there's no such
Speaker 1: thing as a free lunch for anybody that has a brain,
Speaker 1: youet to pay for it. That's why in Europe they're
Speaker 1: paying sixty percent of their income in taxes as opposed
Speaker 1: to our substantially lower than that, depending upon the state
Speaker 1: that you're in. But no, what Bernie sand is is
Speaker 1: in envisioning is this utopia where you can just wave
Speaker 1: a magic wand have everything paid for and it has
Speaker 1: no disastrous consequences. The other day I was talking about
Speaker 1: the interview with that guy with the think tank and
Speaker 1: a host in Britain, and they were complaining about the
Speaker 1: high number of people who are dissatisfied with the British system,
Speaker 1: the large number of people who are on lines in lines,
Speaker 1: and eventually it leads to rationing and a lower quality
Speaker 1: of health care. And they also said in this pulled
Speaker 1: that young people were concerned that there wouldn't be enough
Speaker 1: money there for the system to work for them. There's
Speaker 1: no such thing as a free lunch, and the idea
Speaker 1: that the normal rules of competition don't apply to medicine
Speaker 1: is one of the reasons we're in this situation. If
Speaker 1: you believe the healthcare is a right and then it
Speaker 1: should be paid for by somebody else, all bets are
Speaker 1: out the window. If you believe that healthcare is a
Speaker 1: commodity and that the more competition there is, the cheaper
Speaker 1: it becomes, the more accessible it becomes, the better the
Speaker 1: quality becomes, then that leads you to a different place.
Speaker 1: I've often noted that things that are not covered by
Speaker 1: insurance that you have to pay for out of pocket,
Speaker 1: like laser surgery or plastic surgery, or hair graphs, plastic surgeries,
Speaker 1: things like that have gotten cheaper and cheaper and cheaper
Speaker 1: over the years. I recall when a movie star would
Speaker 1: have plastic surgery, my mother would rush to the TV
Speaker 1: and would because it was such a novel kind of thing.
Speaker 1: Now it's pretty routine, but much of it is not
Speaker 1: covered by your insurance. You have to pay out of pocket.
Speaker 1: Yet the quality has gotten better, It's gotten more and
Speaker 1: more accessible, and it's gotten cheaper. Same thing with lasik surgery,
Speaker 1: not covered generally by your insurance. Because of competition, the
Speaker 1: quality is improved and it's gotten cheaper. Yet for some reason,
Speaker 1: people believe that the same principle wouldn't apply to things
Speaker 1: that are not covered by your insurance. We ought to
Speaker 1: have in this system, like car insurance. You have car
Speaker 1: insurance with a high deductible. It takes care of major things.
Speaker 1: The rest of it either your own pocket or a
Speaker 1: health savings account where you can put away money tax
Speaker 1: free so that you can use that money for expenses
Speaker 1: that are short of the catastrophic kinds of things that
Speaker 1: you have insurance for. That's what we ought to be
Speaker 1: doing in this country, but we don't because of the
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders and the aocs and the Democratic Party as
Speaker 1: a whole that believes healthcare is a right. Somehow, some way,
Speaker 1: somebody else are to pay for it. The former DNC
Speaker 1: vice chair, his name is David Hogg. He became prominent
Speaker 1: because of the school shooting where he was a student.
Speaker 1: Then he became DC vice chair for a while, he
Speaker 1: fled out. Told the told CNN that will listen to
Speaker 1: him number forty seven.
Speaker 27: There's been an argument that they need to moderate or
Speaker 27: concern over what that's going to look like should they succeed,
Speaker 27: or that they may not succeed, that they might be
Speaker 27: defeated by Republicans despite them not doing well in the
Speaker 27: polling either. What would you say to the moderates in
Speaker 27: your party who feel that way?
Speaker 22: I listen to the moderates our party. You need to
Speaker 22: figure out how to actually offer something new to voters
Speaker 22: that isn't just the same message that you gave them
Speaker 22: in twenty twenty four. Increasingly, the reason why the establishment
Speaker 22: of our party is being defeated over and over and
Speaker 22: over again is it's because you don't have the right
Speaker 22: values that are aligned with not the Democratic base, but
Speaker 22: the American people, where people are sick and tired of
Speaker 22: listening to Democrats and tell them all the reasons why
Speaker 22: they can't solve their problems. If you can't solve our problems,
Speaker 22: you shouldn't be running for office. We need people who
Speaker 22: actually sound at a minimum and genuinely believe what they
Speaker 22: are saying.
Speaker 1: In short, there is no room for moderates, no room
Speaker 1: for people that are rational, no room for people that
Speaker 1: don't want to freeze your rents, free grocery store, free this,
Speaker 1: free that. Don't get me started on Israel.
Speaker 28: I'm Larry Older, too many jumping line, got your body
Speaker 28: in time, triple eight nine seven one s A G.
Speaker 1: Four to three. I am Larry Yelder. You're a Salem NewsChannel.
Speaker 1: President Trump has signed a couple of executive orders making
Speaker 1: a distinction between a tourist and a birth tourist regarding
Speaker 1: first citizenship number thirty five.
Speaker 20: Can you help us understand how you distinguish between a
Speaker 20: tourist and a birth tourist.
Speaker 29: Well, I'll let you discuss it, please, happy to And so,
Speaker 29: by the way, that's an excellent presentation with Stephen.
Speaker 11: Yes.
Speaker 30: For those of you who want to do your research
Speaker 30: on this, Section two fifteen A of the Immigration and
Speaker 30: Nationality Act gives the president this authority. Two fifteen A
Speaker 30: of the Immigration and Nationality Act, very rarely used, probably
Speaker 30: one of the strongest laws in the entire Federal Code,
Speaker 30: gives him this power. And that's not the only but
Speaker 30: it's the main statutory.
Speaker 1: Authority that's being used in this order.
Speaker 30: So birth tourism is by definition of fraud on the
Speaker 30: American system, on the American tax, on the American visa.
Speaker 30: If you're coming here and again in your state of purposes,
Speaker 30: that you're a tourist that by definition, you are here
Speaker 30: to come for a few weeks, look what we have,
Speaker 30: engage in commerce, and leave. So if you're telling a
Speaker 30: costler officer you're here as a tourist, but your true
Speaker 30: purpose and intent is to go to a baby mail
Speaker 30: give birth and try to mint an American citizen while
Speaker 30: you're here, then you're committing a fraud against the American government,
Speaker 30: and by definition that visa can and should and will
Speaker 30: be now denied.
Speaker 1: Now regarding the Save Act, John Thune does not believe
Speaker 1: the votes are there to override the filibuster to get
Speaker 1: rid of the filibuster, and doesn't believe that using what's
Speaker 1: called reconciliation would work because reconciliations for budgetary items. But
Speaker 1: Senator John Kennedy disagrees. Number forty three.
Speaker 31: Leader in the United States Senate can bring a bill
Speaker 31: to the full law. I can't do that. Only Senator
Speaker 31: Foon can, and he is I have great respect for
Speaker 31: Senator Thune. I don't mean to be critical, but I'm
Speaker 31: not part of his inner circle. I'm not part of
Speaker 31: Republican leadership. I play outside the pocket. I'll never fit
Speaker 31: in completely in any group. That's one of my best qualities.
Speaker 31: All I can tell you what I would do is,
Speaker 31: if I were a king for a day, I would
Speaker 31: put the recon the budget resolution which starts the reconciliation process.
Speaker 31: I would have put it on the floor a long
Speaker 31: time ago. I would have put it on the floor
Speaker 31: right after we finished the one big beautiful bill, well,
Speaker 31: actually after the last reconciliation when we had to get
Speaker 31: money for border patrol on ice, I.
Speaker 1: Would have put it on the floor.
Speaker 31: Then I would have taken plenty of time to talk
Speaker 31: about affordability, to talk to the past bills, about election
Speaker 31: integrity and the things you're talking about.
Speaker 2: But we didn't do that, and we still.
Speaker 31: Haven't done that, and I can't honestly look you or
Speaker 31: your folks in the eye and tell you when, if ever,
Speaker 31: we're going to do that. I'm prepared to stay here
Speaker 31: as long as it would take. I've been to I've
Speaker 31: been to a squillion meetings to talk about the stuff
Speaker 31: that could have been an email. I'd rather have a
Speaker 31: back alley colonoscopy than go to another meeting. It is
Speaker 31: time to vote. We're not going to reach agreement. It's
Speaker 31: time to vote. That's what God made votes. That's that's
Speaker 31: where I am.
Speaker 1: Anyway, Well, I think you're in the right spot. Cent Now.
Speaker 1: The primary provision, the one that Donald Trump was concerned about,
Speaker 1: is the voter voter ID and prove of citizenship to
Speaker 1: Rachel to vote. There was something called the Carter Baker Emission.
Speaker 1: It looked at various voting ways and they said mail
Speaker 1: in voting was the one that was the easiest to
Speaker 1: use to commit fraud. They didn't say they shouldn't be
Speaker 1: mail in, but they said there should be all sorts
Speaker 1: of provisions. And here is Jimmy Carter two thousand and
Speaker 1: five talking about photo voter ID.
Speaker 32: Number forty four also have some form of photo ID
Speaker 32: required voter ID, and eight other states are considering it.
Speaker 32: So the second reason is to make a uniform recommendation
Speaker 32: in our country through this record, through this report that
Speaker 32: we've issued, so there is not a highly discriminatory laws
Speaker 32: past by one party or another. And the third reason
Speaker 32: is that we put in some very careful constraints to
Speaker 32: prevent abuse. For instance, these photo ID cards will be free. Secondly,
Speaker 32: there will be a wide distribution obum. The states are
Speaker 32: be required to go around the state to issue these
Speaker 32: porto ID cards to as many people as possible, which
Speaker 32: will be a good system just for recruiting new voters.
Speaker 32: This will be very important, and so this will be
Speaker 32: I think I'll move forward and getting more people to vote.
Speaker 32: It will not restrict people from voting. It will be
Speaker 32: uniformly applied throughout the country, and it will not be
Speaker 32: not It will be non discriminatory.
Speaker 1: In other words, Jimmy Carter's advocating Jim Crow two point
Speaker 1: zero before two point zho was cool. I'm Larry Older
Speaker 1: Triple eight nineteenn one Sage Triple eight ninet seven one
Speaker 1: seven two forty three. I am Larry Older. We are
Speaker 1: Salem News Channel. In as Cantor, who used to play
Speaker 1: in the NBA, says that based on the rules he's
Speaker 1: read on the w NBA, he is now going to
Speaker 1: declare himself eligible for their April twenty twenty seven draft
Speaker 1: because he now believes he identifies as a woman. We're
Speaker 1: going to revisit my conversation with Dave Rubin, who at
Speaker 1: one time believed the nonsense that there was anti black
Speaker 1: police systemic racism. All of this in more Triple eight
Speaker 1: nine seventy one, Sage, Salem News Channel now you already
Speaker 1: know grosses aren't getting any cheaper, So let me help
Speaker 1: you save money somewhere else. Right now, when you switch
Speaker 1: to Sage Wireless, I pay your first month phone bill
Speaker 1: that's right, one hundred percent free with promo code Sage
Speaker 1: one hundred. Keep your phone, keep your number, get a
Speaker 1: new one, even add a second line. You'll get reliable
Speaker 1: coverage on AT and t's very same towers, just at
Speaker 1: a far more affordable price. And get this, a portion
Speaker 1: of every bill helps support food for the poor. It's
Speaker 1: on me. Go to Sage Wireless dot com. Use code
Speaker 1: Sage one hundred to check out. That's Sagewireless dot Com.
Speaker 1: Sage Wireless dot com. Michael is in Sam Matteo, California. Michael,
Speaker 1: you and the Larry ol the show, thank you so
Speaker 1: much for calling.
Speaker 33: Hey, good morning, evening, Larry.
Speaker 18: Two points.
Speaker 33: I'm driving down one on one here thinking if you
Speaker 33: would have ever got elected governor, how we wouldn't be
Speaker 33: ten times worse than the hell hole we're in now.
Speaker 33: But it is what it is. And my second point
Speaker 33: is why aren't there reparations for them men and women
Speaker 33: or whoever were killed during the Civil War to free
Speaker 33: the slaves. Why are we giving reparations the slaves that
Speaker 33: we freed and thousands of people died to free them.
Speaker 33: I think they should get reparations. And I think wealthy
Speaker 33: black people ought to make a fun so that we
Speaker 33: could use that for the reparations for all the people
Speaker 33: that died.
Speaker 16: What do you think?
Speaker 1: And Michael, why should anybody other than Democrats pay reparations?
Speaker 1: Republicans didn't own slaves.
Speaker 33: I don't know, but hey, if we're gonna do that,
Speaker 33: and think, man, if you gave your life up for that,
Speaker 33: you should be I mean, thousands of people.
Speaker 1: And you're just talking about death. What about people? What
Speaker 1: about people that were injured? Obviously, Look, the whole thing
Speaker 1: is absurd. And why stop here? What about the African countries,
Speaker 1: in the Arab countries that participated in the slave trade. Now,
Speaker 1: these European and Arab slavers, they couldn't go into the
Speaker 1: interior of Africa and uh and take people out. They
Speaker 1: worked with tribes that captured them in war, captured them
Speaker 1: and raids, and then sold them to European slavers and
Speaker 1: Arab slavers. That wasn't in the movie The one starring
Speaker 1: Viola Davis about the di Hoomee tribe, which showed the
Speaker 1: the Dahomee tribe, and there was a tribe of female
Speaker 1: warriors in Africa, but the movie depicts them as working
Speaker 1: against the European slavers, when in fact they were collaborators.
Speaker 1: Most of the slaves who came to the America came
Speaker 1: from Senegal and Gambia and Congo, and we called Nigeria
Speaker 1: the Woman King, thank you, and they were heroic the
Speaker 1: movie The Women King. They were heroic, but they were fierce,
Speaker 1: fierce warriors who took men, women and children from other
Speaker 1: rival tribes and then sold them to the European slavers
Speaker 1: and to the Arab slavers. And by the way, people
Speaker 1: don't talk a lot about the Arab role in the
Speaker 1: slave trade. They started engaging in it hundreds of year
Speaker 1: the Europeans did, and kept going long after the Europeans stopped,
Speaker 1: but no one talks about that. It's the whole thing
Speaker 1: is absurd. And name a people on the face of
Speaker 1: the earth who at one point was not enslaved. So
Speaker 1: everybody owes everybody the whole thing is insane. Now, the
Speaker 1: former NBA player name I nas Cantor he changed his
Speaker 1: name to a Ned's Freedom. He says, Look, I've read
Speaker 1: the WNBA Charter. There are rules and regulation for who's eligible,
Speaker 1: and I think I'm eligible number forty six.
Speaker 26: After careful concentration I reviewing the current eligibilitic guidelines, I
Speaker 26: am officially declaring myself at WNBA prospect. If simply declaring
Speaker 26: who you are is all that's required, that I meet
Speaker 26: every single requirement necessary to compete in the WNBA. My
Speaker 26: Tim and I have carefully examined the WNBA's eligibility criteria
Speaker 26: and governing framework surrounding self identification and inclusion. Based on
Speaker 26: the current guidelines, I can and am officially declaring my
Speaker 26: eligibility for the upcoming WNBA draft in May twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 26: I am definitely not here to mock, make fun of,
Speaker 26: or to suspect any community or personal choices. I am
Speaker 26: simply asking that the current rules be applied equally to everyone,
Speaker 26: the rules that represent the very values many WNBA players
Speaker 26: and coaches have publicly advocated for my team, and I
Speaker 26: are prepared to ensure these guidelines are applied equally, consistently,
Speaker 26: and without exception, and I look forward to the WNBA
Speaker 26: honoring its stated principles. See your training camp.
Speaker 1: Kevin is in upland Kevin, you and the Larry Yoda
Speaker 1: showy Wow.
Speaker 34: Okay, Larry, nice to talk to you this afternoon.
Speaker 1: You too.
Speaker 34: I was just listening to that previous colar talking about
Speaker 34: reparation for slavery. First of all, the same owners did
Speaker 34: receive reparations.
Speaker 1: And after that, no, no they didn't, No they didn't. Okay, okay,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you. I tell you who received. If you're
Speaker 1: talking about hold on, hold on, Kevin, if you're talking
Speaker 1: about American slave owners, they did not receive reparations. European
Speaker 1: slave owners did, but American slave owners did not. They
Speaker 1: quote they quote lost their property close quote.
Speaker 10: Okay.
Speaker 34: Now, after that, the government gave over twenty million acres
Speaker 34: of property to white people who came out to settle
Speaker 34: the West, not to black people, to white people.
Speaker 1: Look, Kevin, Kevin, if your if your argument is that
Speaker 1: America has discriminated against black people, no one's gonna differ
Speaker 1: with that. No one's gonna argue with you on that.
Speaker 1: There's nothing to do with whether or not reparations are
Speaker 1: old to people who were never slaved to be slave
Speaker 1: to be paid by to people who were never slave owners.
Speaker 10: Reparations are owed to black people who fought for this
Speaker 10: country in World War two and did not receive if
Speaker 10: it's from the GI Bill, Reparations are owed to black
Speaker 10: people who fought for this country and were redlined out
Speaker 10: of home loans, like my parents. They could not get
Speaker 10: a home loan for one reason they were black.
Speaker 1: And and and reparations are therefore and reparations are therefore
Speaker 1: owed to a lot of people who were discriminated against
Speaker 1: the group. And a lot of Italians were discriminated against,
Speaker 1: and a lot of Japanese were discriminated against, and a
Speaker 1: lot of Chinese were discriminated against. All a state can
Speaker 1: be what Kevin, I'm getting a headache. All a state
Speaker 1: can be, it's just in its own time. And if
Speaker 1: there are people walking around who were discriminated against, and
Speaker 1: you can tie it to that, that's one thing. That's
Speaker 1: why Japanese were given reparations, if you want to call
Speaker 1: it that, because of the being placed in relocation camps
Speaker 1: where people and their heirs were directly affected. But it
Speaker 1: was just too long ago to give people money when
Speaker 1: they're great. Eight ancestors were slaves to be paid by
Speaker 1: people who are never slave owner. It's the whole thing
Speaker 1: is completely and totally absurd. And once you're going to
Speaker 1: start there, why not go back to the original sin
Speaker 1: the African chieftains that captured and sold slaves to European
Speaker 1: slavers and to Arab slavers. And what about all the
Speaker 1: whites that were enslaved by Muslims in the Mediterranean Northern Africa?
Speaker 1: How far back do you want to go? Triple eight
Speaker 1: nine seven one eight, triple eight nine seven one seven
Speaker 1: two four to three. I'm Larry Elder. We are Salem
Speaker 1: News Talmant. Now, whether you're climbing the corporate ladder or
Speaker 1: launching a new project or looking for that extra edge,
Speaker 1: your brain is your most valuable asset. And now there's
Speaker 1: a way to support it every single day. It's called
Speaker 1: think Factor from the makers of Relief Factor. Think Factor
Speaker 1: is built to help you stay sharp, nurture your memory,
Speaker 1: and boost your attention and unlocks the mental clarity and
Speaker 1: the precision you need to stay ahead of the game
Speaker 1: no matter the challenge. I take it every single morning,
Speaker 1: health with energy and with focus and get this think
Speaker 1: Factor results get better. The longer it's taken. So if
Speaker 1: you're a go getter who refuses to settle, think Factor
Speaker 1: helps you perform at your best and keep your edge.
Speaker 1: Call eight hundred four Relief eight hundred the number four
Speaker 1: relief or visit relief Factor dot com. Relief Factor dot
Speaker 1: com to order Think Factor your first bottle just nineteen
Speaker 1: dollars and ninety five cents. Think Factor, Think Clearer, perform
Speaker 1: better daily Coming up when I revisit my conversation I
Speaker 1: have with Dave Reuben, who talked about anti black police
Speaker 1: systemic racism regarding my last caller. Just more broadly, all
Speaker 1: a state can be, as I said, it's just in
Speaker 1: its own time. Everybody has a grievance. How many women
Speaker 1: did not realize our potential because of the idea that
Speaker 1: for a long time you had pretty much three options.
Speaker 1: You could become a secretary, you come a teacher, you
Speaker 1: become a nurse. How much potential was lost? Women couldn't
Speaker 1: vote for a very long period of time. Should they
Speaker 1: be suing us for reparations for that? How far back
Speaker 1: do you want to go? There were lots of injustices,
Speaker 1: But this is the greatest country God ever created. There
Speaker 1: is a long time tenured professor sociologist at Harvard named
Speaker 1: Orlando Patterson. I believe he's from the Caribbean, and in
Speaker 1: the nineties he's had America, despite its flaws, is the
Speaker 1: least racist, majority white country in the world. Gives more
Speaker 1: opportunities to blacks than all of the countries on the
Speaker 1: face of the earth, including all of those of Africa. Now,
Speaker 1: what about Lennon Johnson so called Great Society, talked a
Speaker 1: lot about how it would disapportionately benefit black people. So
Speaker 1: should the reparations be offset by the aid that was
Speaker 1: given to blacks for housing and for welfare, and for
Speaker 1: vouchers and tremportation vouchers, and this, that and the other.
Speaker 1: What about race based preferences we've had ever since the
Speaker 1: late sixties early seventies where it was easier for a
Speaker 1: black person to get into a college or university than
Speaker 1: a white person or an Asian person. What's the value
Speaker 1: of all of that? You want to go through the
Speaker 1: entire history of America and put some monetary value on
Speaker 1: the wrongs, We're going to be here for a very
Speaker 1: long period of time. The largest group hanging in American
Speaker 1: history was a group of Italians that were hanged in
Speaker 1: New Orleans in eighteen ninety one, what about their reparations?
Speaker 1: Japanese people in California couldn't own farmland, Chinese people were
Speaker 1: discriminated against. We can keep claiming this game all day long.
Speaker 1: I'm Larry Older along with.
Speaker 23: Us, So let's get her teed up.
Speaker 22: That big.
Speaker 2: You can't succeed with LT.
Speaker 1: Triple eight nine seven one s A G E triple
Speaker 1: eight nine seven one seven two four to three. I
Speaker 1: am Larry Elder. We are Salem News Channel. So much
Speaker 1: to get to. Between now and the close of the program,
Speaker 1: we're going to revisit my conversation with Dave Ruben where
Speaker 1: I disabused him of the notion that the police were
Speaker 1: engaged in anti black systemic racism. But first the DSA
Speaker 1: co chair explain the plan and what they're going to
Speaker 1: do to millionaires number fifty four.
Speaker 20: But we do believe in taxing the hell out of millionaires?
Speaker 13: Yeah, absolutely, Well what is taxing the hell out of them?
Speaker 1: Meaning?
Speaker 10: Uh? Yeah, you know.
Speaker 1: I again, I don't have like a solid but should
Speaker 1: I think?
Speaker 29: But shouldn't you?
Speaker 18: I mean, if you're the co chair, if you're the
Speaker 18: co chair of the DSA, shouldn't you be more specific
Speaker 18: than just taxing the hell out of something?
Speaker 1: What exactly do you mean? So again, it's democracy, right,
Speaker 1: and we have to look at what we need to
Speaker 1: spend and what we need.
Speaker 35: We don't want to depend on the existence of.
Speaker 1: Millionaires because that means people are still getting exploited.
Speaker 2: So so, yeah, we need to look at what.
Speaker 36: We need to pay for in the interim, what sort.
Speaker 1: Of tax base we need for that to happen, and
Speaker 1: then and build from there. She said, that's a good question.
Speaker 1: You haven't thought about it. You could confiscate the wealth
Speaker 1: of the millionaire class and you wouldn't have enough money
Speaker 1: to fund your welfare state. You haven't thought about it.
Speaker 1: Let's hear that again fifty four.
Speaker 20: But we do believe in taxing the hell out of millionaires?
Speaker 13: Yeah, absolutely, Well what is taxing the hell out of
Speaker 13: them mean?
Speaker 37: Uh?
Speaker 35: Yeah, you know again, I don't have like a song, but.
Speaker 1: I think, shouldn't you? I don't have like a solid
Speaker 1: He should have then asked, what do you think the
Speaker 1: top one percent already pay at the percentage of the
Speaker 1: federal income taxes? I don't know, but whatever it is,
Speaker 1: it's not enough. Here is the governor of Arkansas, Sarah
Speaker 1: Huckaby Sanders on these Socialists number twenty nine.
Speaker 38: So a plurality of Americans say nothing is good about socialism. So, Governor,
Speaker 38: why is this catching fire like it is? And why
Speaker 38: are so many Democrats now owning socialism?
Speaker 36: You know I've said it before, I'll say it again.
Speaker 36: It's no longer about right versus left. It's about normal
Speaker 36: versus crazy, And right now we are seeing the crazy
Speaker 36: side take over the Democrat Party. As much as I
Speaker 36: hate to see these ideas gain steam, I think it
Speaker 36: is good for us us to draw the contrast as
Speaker 36: we head into the midterm elections. The other side wants
Speaker 36: to promote socialism while our side wants to promote and
Speaker 36: protect freedom. We want to see what this country was
Speaker 36: founded on.
Speaker 1: And speaking of crazy, listen to Jim Carvell number fifty two.
Speaker 18: He's going to lose in spite of the best effort
Speaker 18: of certain Democrats to not make it happen. He's all
Speaker 18: likelihood going to get a drub in like you've never
Speaker 18: seen in November. And he is going to be irrelevant.
Speaker 18: He's got two years ago. He's a lame, dark No
Speaker 18: one's gonna care. He's a fat, flatulent, flashy old man.
Speaker 18: He's not, and he's going to say I don't need this,
Speaker 18: and I will stick by my prediction that he quits
Speaker 18: before April fifteenth, twenty twenty seven.
Speaker 1: Now why do you say that, Because what do you
Speaker 1: see in the times?
Speaker 18: Like most people know what it's like to get crushed
Speaker 18: in the mid term election, mid term of a president,
Speaker 18: your whole world changes, you know, you say, Mike Tyson,
Speaker 18: he'd hits you so hard and change the way your taste,
Speaker 18: which I actually saw a neurologists say that's true. You
Speaker 18: actually can get hitten in a mile so hard that
Speaker 18: it affects your taste. Mind, he's gonna get hit that
Speaker 18: hard in November and he doesn't any by the way,
Speaker 18: he's eighty. He's eighty years old.
Speaker 1: He can't do it.
Speaker 18: He doesn't have it. He falls asleep, he's tired, he
Speaker 18: has no life. He's got that who gonna Natalie whatever
Speaker 18: her name is, sitting there running around bringing them diaed
Speaker 18: coach and tell them how great he is. That's all
Speaker 18: he's down to. It's all he's down to. It's gonna
Speaker 18: be worse than that, because after November nality ain't even
Speaker 18: gonna call you back.
Speaker 1: I believe that Carville made a prediction that Trump was
Speaker 1: going to quit a long time ago. This guy is
Speaker 1: the energizer, Bunny. I'm talking about Trump, not Carville. Gets
Speaker 1: about four or five hours of sleep, if that. The
Speaker 1: most accessible president in American history very likely just today
Speaker 1: on television roundtable discussion about mining. By the way, I've
Speaker 1: been following politics ever since I can remember, and generally speaking,
Speaker 1: the out party does very well in midterm elections. I
Speaker 1: don't recall a president ever quitting because his party lost
Speaker 1: in midterms. Do you.
Speaker 7: So?
Speaker 1: Carville was the campaign manager for Bill Clinton. Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: on Trump Number forty.
Speaker 39: Eight clean up fixings.
Speaker 24: You know there's going to be so much to fix.
Speaker 39: I mean, first, get rid of all of the holdovers.
Speaker 39: Do not let anybody hang around in some small office
Speaker 39: somewhere who can literally subvert your program and you don't
Speaker 39: even know that person's there. And I will predict that.
Speaker 39: You know, Trump and his minions are going to try.
Speaker 22: To, you know, put people.
Speaker 2: They're going to try to move.
Speaker 39: People from political appointments to so called civil service appointments,
Speaker 39: although they're trying to destroy the civil service so people
Speaker 39: are going to have to be really searching to make
Speaker 39: sure that they are not going to be literally subverted
Speaker 39: from within the government.
Speaker 20: That's a really good point.
Speaker 1: Same thing that Barack Obama did, move people in positions
Speaker 1: where his successor couldn't get rid of him. Have you
Speaker 1: noticed anything? Did Carville talk about the policy plan the
Speaker 1: Democrats are going to implement when they take other than
Speaker 1: calling Trump a bunch of names, have a bunch of
Speaker 1: investigations and a bunch of impeachments, more of the Democrats
Speaker 1: are successful and taking over the House. What's your plan?
Speaker 1: What's your plan for the number one thing that Americans
Speaker 1: are concerned about, which is affordability? Tax the rich. We've
Speaker 1: tried that in California. Highest state income taxes in the nation.
Speaker 1: The rich pay fifty percent of all the state income taxes.
Speaker 1: Highest unemployment in the nation, highest gas prices in the nation,
Speaker 1: highest electricity prices than any state in the lower forty eight,
Speaker 1: massive homelessness, more legal aliens than any other state, massive
Speaker 1: gap between the rich and the poor, schools ranking near
Speaker 1: the bottom. So your plan is to be like Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 1: Your plan is to do what the lawmakers have done
Speaker 1: here in California, where Democrats have super majority in both
Speaker 1: chambers of the legislature. That's your plan. Freeze rents, open
Speaker 1: a few government owned grocery stores to put you at
Speaker 1: a competitive advantage over private sector people. We have to
Speaker 1: pay their own rent, their own utilities, and can't get
Speaker 1: subfidized food at a discount. That's your plan. Abolish the Senate,
Speaker 1: Abolish the Electoral College, make Washington, DC and Puerto Rico states,
Speaker 1: expand the Supreme Court. Those are your plans? And how
Speaker 1: in the world is that going to lower the cost
Speaker 1: of living? Before the Iran War, gas prices at a five
Speaker 1: year low, lower than they were under Joe Biden, lower
Speaker 1: than they were ejected fron inflation, and under Barack Obama?
Speaker 1: What is your plan? President Trump says that a ran
Speaker 1: can't hold out much longer. Number thirty three.
Speaker 29: And we had oil down to less than to in
Speaker 29: many places like Iowa, oil was down to gasoline was
Speaker 29: down at numbers that people hadn't seen in years. One
Speaker 29: dollar in eighty five, one dollar ninety five cents, So
Speaker 29: it past tuesdays. I was in Iowa at a stop
Speaker 29: and we had one ninety five, another one one eighty
Speaker 29: five a gallon, and we'll see those days pretty soon. Again,
Speaker 29: based on everything I say, as soon as the war ends,
Speaker 29: and I think it's gonna end pretty soon. I don't
Speaker 29: think they can go much longer.
Speaker 1: Yeah, please, Gas prices five year low before the war
Speaker 1: started and again even now again average price lower than
Speaker 1: it was under Joe Biden and lower than it was
Speaker 1: under the high point a Justice foreig inflation under Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: Barack Obama was the first president ever to inherit a
Speaker 1: recovery where he didn't have at least three percent GDP
Speaker 1: in one full calendar year. Regarding the tariffs, at one point,
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party was more likely to support tariffs the Republicans.
Speaker 1: So please explain to me what it is this man
Speaker 1: has done that you would do differently, other than raise
Speaker 1: taxes on rich people. When Larry Older prip Late nine
Speaker 1: seven one Sage triple eight nine seven one seven two
Speaker 1: four to three, I am Larry Elder, we are Salem
Speaker 1: News challenge jd Vance reacted to Abdul l sayid Win
Speaker 1: in Minnesota number forty one. Well, I think it says
Speaker 1: a couple of things.
Speaker 40: First of all, the base of the Democratic Party just
Speaker 40: wants radicals, that wants these DSA types at once, people
Speaker 40: who hate even the idea of private property ownership.
Speaker 21: But it also, i think.
Speaker 41: Tells us that that particular set of ideas is very
Speaker 41: popular in places you wouldn't expect because outside he's this
Speaker 41: guy who holds himself out as a working class hero,
Speaker 41: is a guy who's going to fight for the working class.
Speaker 41: How does he fight for the working class by flooding
Speaker 41: his state in his country with low wage immigrants.
Speaker 40: Of course, those people will drive down the wages of
Speaker 40: the working class. And he also doesn't want to do
Speaker 40: anything to protect the Michigan auto industry, has fought against
Speaker 40: the Trump tariffs that have saved the Michigan auto industry.
Speaker 40: So interestingly, as much as the media will pull this
Speaker 40: guy out as a socialist, as a guy who's trying
Speaker 40: to stand up for the working man, where did they
Speaker 40: do the best. He did the best among wealthy white
Speaker 40: liberals and among new immigrants to the United States of America.
Speaker 40: He basically represents the modern democratic coalition, which is self
Speaker 40: hating white liberals united to people who just came to
Speaker 40: the country for the first time and don't actually have
Speaker 40: the sense of appreciation for it that they should. Those
Speaker 40: are the people who are voting for al Sayed. He
Speaker 40: doesn't have a constituency among the working class.
Speaker 39: He present.
Speaker 1: Don't tell that to left wing podcaster Jennifer Welch number
Speaker 1: fifty one.
Speaker 20: So what they're going to do is they're going to
Speaker 20: say Abdul al Sayed he must be a terrorist, he
Speaker 20: must be this insane person. Well, they've run against him
Speaker 20: and they can't dig up any dirt on him at all.
Speaker 20: They've tried. They say, oh, he campaigned with son Piker,
Speaker 20: who gives it tough. Get over it. All of you
Speaker 20: are campaigning with jd Vance, Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, etc.
Speaker 2: Go ourselves.
Speaker 20: I am so sick of this narrative that somehow who
Speaker 20: the Democrats campaign with is this horrible thing. Look at
Speaker 20: the monsters running this country into the ground.
Speaker 1: Wow. So campaigning with the guy Hassan Piker who says
Speaker 1: that Hamas is a thousand times better than Israel, that's
Speaker 1: not a problem. Who says that America deserve nine to eleven,
Speaker 1: that's not a problem. Refers to Israel as an apartheid
Speaker 1: state that commits genocide, that's not a problem. Who says
Speaker 1: we should kill capitalists. That's not a problem. We should
Speaker 1: kill Senator Scott from Florida, That's not a problem. Mike
Speaker 1: Pompeo on getting energy prices down Number twenty seven, Santra.
Speaker 35: My sense is the best way to get these energy
Speaker 35: prices down is to continue to put pressure on the
Speaker 35: Iranian regime. I don't see a negotiated solution where the
Speaker 35: IRGC says we're not going to go kill forty thousand
Speaker 35: more of our own people, We're not going to continue
Speaker 35: to threaten Israel. We're going to tell the Huthis who
Speaker 35: fired just in the last twenty four hours while these
Speaker 35: negotiations are going on with Iranian weapons, that Iranian money
Speaker 35: fired to close the other strait, the mobel bundem And
Speaker 35: so I think that the task to get energy prices
Speaker 35: low is to actually do what President Trump talked about
Speaker 35: at the very beginning, get the regime to a place
Speaker 35: where they ultimately capitulate in a way that delivers a
Speaker 35: long term low set of energy where product not just
Speaker 35: crude all natural gas, fertilizer, all the things that move
Speaker 35: through the straight up removes can do so without a
Speaker 35: regime that has the leverage to shut it down at
Speaker 35: any moment.
Speaker 1: General Keith Kellogg, former National Security Advisor to the Vice President,
Speaker 1: Number twenty six.
Speaker 14: It's going to get to the second deal, which is
Speaker 14: the nuclear deal, which to me is the most important one.
Speaker 14: And having a trust in the confidence in that ftail
Speaker 14: basically fulfill a deal. I don't buy it. I never
Speaker 14: have and I don't think ever will. Just who they
Speaker 14: are is through credit government now, you know, saying that
Speaker 14: where you look at WTI, the price oil today, it's
Speaker 14: kind of in the moderate range. When you get into
Speaker 14: the seventies is kind of modern. It's been as high
Speaker 14: as one hundred, it's been low as thirty. That's like
Speaker 14: in two thousand and four. But I think we just
Speaker 14: have to pay attention to what's going to happen. I
Speaker 14: think again the Omanis and the uraniums are going to
Speaker 14: come together with a deal. The question is what does
Speaker 14: it look like. I just want to get back to
Speaker 14: the original purpose, which is not letting them have enriched
Speaker 14: uranium and getting to a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: The Secretary Treasury's Gott Bessett talks about the economic pressure
Speaker 1: we're putting on Iran number fifty.
Speaker 21: Three royd most if not all of their capability to rebuild.
Speaker 21: And then we moved on to what we call economic theory,
Speaker 21: and that's a one to two punch. It's the blockade.
Speaker 21: And then what we're doing at Treasury, and we are
Speaker 21: tracking these accounts all over the world. We froze a
Speaker 21: crypto wallet lead to the IRGC the other day about
Speaker 21: one hundred and thirty million dollars. We have found the
Speaker 21: money man for or the Ayatola and we are tracking
Speaker 21: the Ayatolah's properties around the world. We hope to soon
Speaker 21: be able to print his one hundred million dollar plus
Speaker 21: properties and show the addresses. And we're preserving this money
Speaker 21: for the American people. But most of all, we are
Speaker 21: constricting the regime. Their currency has collapsed. It is at
Speaker 21: an all time low versus the dollar. It's in free fall,
Speaker 21: and we think the inflation rate is upwards of one
Speaker 21: hundred and eighty percent.
Speaker 7: Enter.
Speaker 1: Now, let's spend a little bit of time on doctor Fauci.
Speaker 1: A committee has now recommended that he be held in
Speaker 1: contempt of Congress. This is Senator ram Paul number twenty eight.
Speaker 38: It's breaking precedent here, and are you comfortable with that
Speaker 38: new president?
Speaker 37: Actually, no, decision has been made. The only decision that's
Speaker 37: been made so far is to bring it to the
Speaker 37: committee in it's past. The next decision we have decided
Speaker 37: is we will forward it. It's the committee's verdict that
Speaker 37: he should be held in contempt and it will be
Speaker 37: sent and said that. We won't bring it before the Senate.
Speaker 37: We'll see what happens over time. But this is outside
Speaker 37: of the ordinary bill making process, so it doesn't have
Speaker 37: to go to the House, doesn't have to be signed
Speaker 37: by the President, and really doesn't have to go before
Speaker 37: the Senate.
Speaker 1: There is some precedent you're.
Speaker 37: Doing it that way, and it's still may be done
Speaker 37: that way. But for now, we will hand carry this
Speaker 37: over to the Attorney General. We will hand carry this
Speaker 37: to the district court here in Columbia, and we will
Speaker 37: as a committee, we have voted the majority to refer this,
Speaker 37: so that will be accomplished today.
Speaker 24: But doctor Fauci has said that you aren't out to
Speaker 24: get him.
Speaker 37: If you're circumventing the normal Senate procedure, aren't you proving
Speaker 37: his point? A million Americans died, and I think they
Speaker 37: deserve to know the truth. Anthony Fauci has advocated for
Speaker 37: dangerous Gain and Function research for two decades now. The
Speaker 37: question why is not a question that he can have
Speaker 37: liability for.
Speaker 1: He was given a pardon.
Speaker 37: Interestingly, the pardon starts in twenty fourteen, and that's when
Speaker 37: the funding of the lab and Ruhan started. So I
Speaker 37: think he should answer questions as far as pleading the fifth.
Speaker 37: When you have a pardon, all if do is tell
Speaker 37: the truth, just not commit a new crome. But if
Speaker 37: we were to grant him immunity from telling the truth,
Speaker 37: of what value you know, would his testimony be? So
Speaker 37: I think the American people do deserve to know this.
Speaker 37: This is the same Anthony Fauci who said in a
Speaker 37: Washington Post op ed in twenty eleven said that even
Speaker 37: if a pandemic should start from a lab, if someone's
Speaker 37: bitten in a lab or the virus escapes the lab,
Speaker 37: that the knowledge would be worth the risks. I don't
Speaker 37: think many Americans believe that this deserves to be thoroughly
Speaker 37: exhaustively debated. So we don't do this again. Most of
Speaker 37: the scientists who came out in opposition to Anthony Fauci
Speaker 37: in twenty eleven when he funded and Gain A Function
Speaker 37: research in the Netherlands. Most of these scientists, I have
Speaker 37: no idea of their partisanship. They want to make it
Speaker 37: about being partisan or me being partisan or disliking Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 37: I had no opinion of Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 1: All of this and more when I come back Triple
Speaker 1: eight Night seven one Sage, do not leave Town, Triple
Speaker 1: Late nine seven one Sage Triple eight nine seven one
Speaker 1: seven two four three. I am Larry Older. We are
Speaker 1: Saling News Channel, coming to you from the Relief Factor Studio.
Speaker 1: Don't forget your Relief Factor eight hundred four Relief eight
Speaker 1: hundred to number four relief Theliefactor dot Com. That's Reliefactor
Speaker 1: dot Com. Back to Rand Paul on doctor Fauci.
Speaker 37: Partisan or me being partisan or disliking Anthony Fauci. I
Speaker 37: had no opinion of Anthony Fauci when he came with
Speaker 37: the American people.
Speaker 1: I didn't know who he was. For a year.
Speaker 37: I didn't realize what was going on until I began
Speaker 37: reading actually press reports. Nicholas Wade and others wrote incredible
Speaker 37: stories talking about the evidence that made us believe that
Speaker 37: this came from a lab. He's been evading this for
Speaker 37: a long time. The level of dishonesty is really unparalleled.
Speaker 37: In January twenty In January twenty twenty, he wrote, we
Speaker 37: know now that the earliest cases were not from the
Speaker 37: wet market. It'll take you thirty seconds to look at
Speaker 37: all the clips. Dozens and dozens of times he came
Speaker 37: on your networks and he said, it's just the wet markets,
Speaker 37: those crazy animals.
Speaker 1: We shut down the wet market, will do this.
Speaker 37: But he wasn't an objective observer and he wasn't out
Speaker 37: of questioned really by the media on did he have
Speaker 37: a conflict of interest? Did he have a self interest
Speaker 37: in it not being from the lab. Of course he
Speaker 37: did because he funded the lab.
Speaker 1: And about doctor Pawcie taking the Fifth Amendment after he's
Speaker 1: been given a pardon number twenty five.
Speaker 37: I'm doing everything I legally can, even before all of this,
Speaker 37: for the last four years, I've referred him twice criminally
Speaker 37: for charges to the EJ under Biden, twice under Trump. Tomorrow,
Speaker 37: what will happen is if the committee votes for it,
Speaker 37: we will then forward that from the Committee to the
Speaker 37: Department of Justice seeking the same This time, they'll contempt
Speaker 37: is different. You can be jailed for contempt or you
Speaker 37: can be told by judge that you have to testify.
Speaker 37: So if they can get this into the court, if
Speaker 37: they choose to pursue it, the judge, you'll have a
Speaker 37: couple of choices. The judge could say, well, he's allowed
Speaker 37: to plead the fifth or the judge could say, well,
Speaker 37: he's been pardoned, why would he need to plead the fifth?
Speaker 37: And of what value is testimony if he doesn't have
Speaker 37: to promise not to lie? I mean, why would you
Speaker 37: need the Fifth Amendment if all you have to do
Speaker 37: is come before a committee and not lie. I mean,
Speaker 37: he can say that he destroyed records, he can say
Speaker 37: that he lied previously to Congress. He's just not lying
Speaker 37: this time. But there still are remedies. But I can't
Speaker 37: do it by myself. I have to have the help
Speaker 37: of the Department of Justice decide that this is something
Speaker 37: they wish to pursue.
Speaker 1: Sanata Josh Hawley from Azura also about Fauci and total immunity,
Speaker 1: refusing to answer questions number twenty four say what we're
Speaker 1: going to vote tomorrow?
Speaker 42: Believe it is tomorrow morning to hold whom the contempt
Speaker 42: And my team is working right now on the memo
Speaker 42: of blame and explaining why we think that he can
Speaker 42: be prosecuted for contempt of Congress. He's not entitled to
Speaker 42: immunity taking the fifth when.
Speaker 1: He already has a partner. You can't. He's one or
Speaker 1: the other.
Speaker 42: Listen, if he would like to give up his pardon,
Speaker 42: then I will grant him. He can invoke the fifth.
Speaker 42: You know what, I'd even be willing to say to
Speaker 42: advocate that we have another hearing. If he'd like to
Speaker 42: give up his parton and renounce it, we'll have another
Speaker 42: hearing and he can come back in. But unless he
Speaker 42: does that, you can't do both. You can't say I
Speaker 42: got total immunity, but I will not answer your questions.
Speaker 42: He needs to answer the questions.
Speaker 1: He's the least thing he can do to the American public.
Speaker 1: A million people go out of COVID. You know this
Speaker 1: guy can't even answer a question. You can't say what
Speaker 1: color is high is?
Speaker 8: Come on?
Speaker 29: Come on?
Speaker 42: Plus he got rich off of it, as we.
Speaker 1: Know, it's terrible. As for whether the DOJ will prosecute
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci, here's what President Trump saying. Number thirty two.
Speaker 38: Do you think the DOJ should prosecute doctor Fauci.
Speaker 29: Well, you know, they prosecuted Peter Navarro, and they prosecuted
Speaker 29: Steve Bannon, to very decent people over something that essentially
Speaker 29: was never prosecuted before, and their sort of telltale signs
Speaker 29: of similarity, and they went to jail for a number
Speaker 29: of months over something that they saw. One of the
Speaker 29: analysts said, they used to laugh at it in the
Speaker 29: Justice department when something like that was referred. But Merrick
Speaker 29: Garland prosecuted two very decent people and sent them to jail.
Speaker 29: I wasn't president. I would have given a apartner in
Speaker 29: two seconds, but I wasn't. Was after I left. They
Speaker 29: waited till left I left, and then they prosecuted these
Speaker 29: two people, and they were to be ashamed of themselves.
Speaker 29: So when you see that happen, you sort of say,
Speaker 29: maybe he should. What he did is far more serious
Speaker 29: than a lot of crimes. Frankly, but they prosecuted two
Speaker 29: people when nothing like that has ever taken place before.
Speaker 1: So he was noncommittal, and he could have brought up
Speaker 1: the the law fair against him, whether it's the Fannie
Speaker 1: Lewis lawsuit claiming that he somehow violated election law by
Speaker 1: asking the secretary of State to find ten thousand more.
Speaker 1: Didn't say tent steal them, just make sure that we
Speaker 1: didn't overlook them. Prosecuted for keeping documents allegedly illegally when
Speaker 1: Biden had more documents and more places without the ability
Speaker 1: to declassify him because he wasn't president the January sixth,
Speaker 1: so called insurrection case. Has there been anybody prosecuted more
Speaker 1: than this man for less reason? Now when it comes
Speaker 1: to supplements, two things matter most that it works as
Speaker 1: you can trust it. Rather then just tell you about
Speaker 1: Relief Factor, we let our customers do it. We hear
Speaker 1: from people every single day whose lies have change, and
Speaker 1: we'd like you to hear a few of their stories.
Speaker 1: Joni shared that before Relief Factor, her husband couldn't open
Speaker 1: his hands in the morning and had to give up
Speaker 1: playing guitar. Now he wakes up with flexibility and he's
Speaker 1: back to playing music. They're both recommending Relief Factor to
Speaker 1: friends as a way to enjoy the things they love again.
Speaker 1: I take it every single morning for back issues. Now
Speaker 1: they make it easy to find out if you'll be
Speaker 1: the next person telling us Relief Factory help you enjoy
Speaker 1: what you love three weeks for just seventeen dollars and
Speaker 1: seventy six cents. Just go to Reliefactor dot com. Reliefactor
Speaker 1: dot com or call eight hundred four Relief. That's eight
Speaker 1: hundred the number four Relief. We'll connect you with our
Speaker 1: friendly local team and they'll do everything they can to help.
Speaker 1: Reliefactor dot com, Relief Factor dot com. Eight hundred four Relief,
Speaker 1: eight hundred the number four Relief.
Speaker 12: Dennis, I'd love to start with a very important question.
Speaker 12: Did you watch the Fauci hearings.
Speaker 9: Under the advice of my counsel, I take the constitutional
Speaker 9: like not to incriminate myself under the Fifth Amendment.
Speaker 1: Triple eight, I said, one fag Triple eight nine seventy one,
Speaker 1: seventy two forty three Larry Older's Salem News Channel ten
Speaker 1: years ago. I didn't know who Dave Rubin was. One
Speaker 1: of my friends recommended that I do his show, and
Speaker 1: I arrived there early. We started talking and I said,
Speaker 1: I hear that you're a liberal. He said yeah. I said,
Speaker 1: I also hear that you've got common sense, and he said, well,
Speaker 1: I like to think I do. I said, well, after
Speaker 1: we're done with our interview, you won't be a liberal anymore.
Speaker 1: Number thirty nine.
Speaker 43: So, but you wouldn't not acknowledge that there are some
Speaker 43: systemic issues.
Speaker 1: Give me an example. Tell me what you think the
Speaker 1: most systemic racist issue is. What is it? Well?
Speaker 43: I would say that because black people in most cases,
Speaker 43: in many cases were descendants of slaves, that racism as
Speaker 43: a as an institution, that it is two thousand, A
Speaker 43: certain amount of it just exists.
Speaker 1: A twenty and fifteen is here. Give me the most
Speaker 1: blatant racist example you can come up with right now.
Speaker 43: I think you could probably find evidence that in general,
Speaker 43: cops are that cops are more willing to shoot if
Speaker 43: the perpetrator is black.
Speaker 1: What's your data than white? What's your basis for saying that?
Speaker 1: Last year, Well, look, I.
Speaker 43: Know a lot of people would say, look, what's going on?
Speaker 1: I know what they would say, talking about what the
Speaker 1: facts are. Nine hundred and sixty five people were shot
Speaker 1: by cops last year and killed. Four percent of them
Speaker 1: were white cops shooting unarmed blacks in Chicago. In twenty eleven,
Speaker 1: twenty one people were shot and killed by cops. In
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen. There were seven in Chicago, which is a
Speaker 1: third black, a third white, and a third Hispanic seventy
Speaker 1: percent of the homicides are black on black, about forty
Speaker 1: per month, almost five hundred in the per year last
Speaker 1: year Chicago, and seventy five percent of them are unsolved.
Speaker 1: Where's a Black Lives matter on that? The idea that
Speaker 1: a racist white cop and shooting unarmed black people is
Speaker 1: apparel to black people is BS is complete and total BS.
Speaker 1: And the reason for these so called activists saying this
Speaker 1: is the assumption that racism remains a major problem in America.
Speaker 1: The media CNN, especially MSNBC runs down whenever a black
Speaker 1: cop shoots somebody and it's some march on Washington. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Black people. Half the homicides in this country are committed
Speaker 1: buying against black people. Last year, there were fourteen thousand homicides.
Speaker 1: Not talking about suicides, I'm talking about homicides. Half of
Speaker 1: them were black, ninety six percent of them black on black.
Speaker 1: Of that seven thousand, where's a Black Lives Matter people
Speaker 1: on that?
Speaker 43: So there's where you would say that this is purely
Speaker 43: because of social justice, purely because they want ultimately for
Speaker 43: people to be angry enough to just keep voting Democrats.
Speaker 1: That's right, And where's the evidence of the lack of
Speaker 1: social justice. When a black suspect is killed by a cop.
Speaker 1: Believe me, the media is on it, people are watching it,
Speaker 1: and justice will, for the most part occur. In Baltimore
Speaker 1: where Freddie Gray was killed. Freddie Gray died in a van.
Speaker 1: I shouldn't say it was killed, died in a van.
Speaker 1: You have a city that's forty five black. City council
Speaker 1: is one Democrat, The majority of city council is black.
Speaker 1: The top cop at the time was black, the number
Speaker 1: two cop with black, the majority of the command staff
Speaker 1: is black, the mayor is black, the AG is black.
Speaker 1: And yet here we are talking about racism. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's absurd, absurd. So it's funny.
Speaker 43: I find myself caught in between this a little bit
Speaker 43: as a liberal, where I want to always try to
Speaker 43: defend the others. So in this case, the other being
Speaker 43: black people, I'm always sympathetic to that. And then yeah, yeah,
Speaker 43: at the same time, I hear you laying out a
Speaker 43: pretty solid well just the fact.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you something else too. There was just a
Speaker 1: study University of Washington, and it turns out cops were
Speaker 1: more reluctant, more hesitant to pull the trigger against the
Speaker 1: black suspect than a white suspect, probably because of the
Speaker 1: fear of being accused of racially profiling and the fear
Speaker 1: that the civil rights established was going to come down
Speaker 1: on him. So, if anything, whites are more likely to
Speaker 1: be shot by a cop under under certain circumstances than
Speaker 1: a black person. And in last thirty or forty years,
Speaker 1: the number of percentage of suspects killed by cops who
Speaker 1: are black has declined seventy five percent. However, the percentage
Speaker 1: of whites killed by cops has flatlined. And so, if anything,
Speaker 1: people are more concerned about shooting black people for fear
Speaker 1: that they're going to be called racist. And almost all
Speaker 1: every one of these incidents, whether it's Eric Gardner in
Speaker 1: New York who died because he was selling Lucy's and
Speaker 1: resisted arrests, whether it's Tamir Rice in Cleveland who was
Speaker 1: twirling around the gun, whether it's Michael Brown and Ferguson
Speaker 1: who had just committed an strong arm robbery, almost every
Speaker 1: one of these incidents involved somebody resisting arrests. Why don't
Speaker 1: you just do what the police tell you? My dad said,
Speaker 1: when I get pulled over, have my hand at ten
Speaker 1: o'clock had my hand at two o'clock. Say yes, sir,
Speaker 1: Say no, sir. Make sure my paperwork is in order.
Speaker 1: And if I feel the cop is mistreating me, get
Speaker 1: a badge number and deal with it later on. If
Speaker 1: Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and Obama and the whole
Speaker 1: group of them told black people to do that, we'd
Speaker 1: have a lot fewer of these things to deal with
Speaker 1: in the first place.
Speaker 43: Yeah, all right, So I'm with you. I'm hearing a
Speaker 43: lot of what you're saying here. So as a black conservative,
Speaker 43: then who Now you've You've laid out your case.
Speaker 1: There, but you haven't laid out yours. I asked you
Speaker 1: to name the most important example of racism, and you
Speaker 1: gave white cops going after black people. And I told you,
Speaker 1: gave you the facts for that. So that's nonsense that
Speaker 1: you must have something else. What else is it? If
Speaker 1: you think racism remains a problem in America, give it
Speaker 1: to well.
Speaker 43: I think it remains a problem to me. It may
Speaker 43: not be systemic in that we have. It's not like
Speaker 43: you're not being hired because you're black. There's no systemic reason,
Speaker 43: you know, legal reason that that exists.
Speaker 1: That kind of thing.
Speaker 43: But I think that racism as a general.
Speaker 1: I need some theory, need I need some specifics. Right,
Speaker 1: you gave me the white cop thing. What else? Give
Speaker 1: me another example where you think is a problem.
Speaker 43: Well, well, as a black conservative, tell me how to
Speaker 43: know you? How do you get people to come around.
Speaker 1: You're You're the one who made the assertion that racism
Speaker 1: remains a major problem in America. I asked you to
Speaker 1: give me an example. You gave me white cops going
Speaker 1: after blacks. As far as I'm concerned, you didn't hold
Speaker 1: it up very well. What's the other argument you have?
Speaker 1: What's the other thing?
Speaker 43: Well, I don't know that it's systemic in that in
Speaker 43: the sort of macro set.
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not mad. I want to know what
Speaker 1: it is you're you're talking to. That's that's yeah, I
Speaker 1: believe me. That's one hundred percent of whites are not
Speaker 1: getting into school b s. We have a race, we
Speaker 1: have affirmative action. So a black person with a with
Speaker 1: an S A T and a g P a uh
Speaker 1: of x will we'll get into a school faster and
Speaker 1: easier than the white person with an S, A T
Speaker 1: or a GPA of X. And if going to going
Speaker 1: to school is a route to the middle class. You
Speaker 1: can make an argument that Blacks have an easier route
Speaker 1: to middle to the middle class. If you're talking about
Speaker 1: black about poverty. The poorer you are, the more accessible
Speaker 1: loans and grants are for you.
Speaker 32: Uh.
Speaker 1: The problem, the biggest burden that black people have, in
Speaker 1: my opinion again is the percentage of black seventy five
Speaker 1: percent of them that are raised without fathers, and that
Speaker 1: has every other social negative consequences connected to it, crime,
Speaker 1: not being able to compete economically in the country, being
Speaker 1: more likely to be arrested. That's the number one problem
Speaker 1: facing the black community. And when I hear people tell
Speaker 1: me about systemic racism or unconscious racism, I always say,
Speaker 1: give me an example, and almost nobody can do it.
Speaker 1: Triple eate nineteenn one s a ge do not meet
Speaker 1: town with be right down. I'm Larry Elite, Triple Eate
Speaker 1: nine seven one sage triple eight nine seventy one seven
Speaker 1: two four to three Larry Elder, Salem News Channel.
Speaker 43: So the family stuff, So I'll follow your logic there
Speaker 43: on family stuff. What can actually be done about that?
Speaker 27: Then?
Speaker 1: I mean, because that's that's a big reverse the welfare state.
Speaker 1: In eighteen ninety nineteen hundred, you look at census reports,
Speaker 1: a black kid, believe it or not, was slightly more
Speaker 1: likely to be born to a nuclear intact family than
Speaker 1: a white kid. Even during slavery, a black kid was
Speaker 1: more likely to be born under a roof with his
Speaker 1: biological mother and biological father than today. What's happened is
Speaker 1: we launched this so called war on poverty in the sixties,
Speaker 1: where literally Lynna and Johnson sent people knocking on doors.
Speaker 1: I lived in the sixties, and people knocked on doors
Speaker 1: apprising women of their availability to welfare provided there was
Speaker 1: no man in the house. And we went from twenty
Speaker 1: five percent of blacks being born outside of wedlock and
Speaker 1: sixty five to seventy five percent right now. And you
Speaker 1: look at how much money that we spent on welfare,
Speaker 1: and the lines are parallel. It was a neutron bomb
Speaker 1: dropped on this country, not just in the black community,
Speaker 1: but on people in general. At one time, only about
Speaker 1: five percent of whites were born outside of wedlock. Now
Speaker 1: twenty five percent of whites are born outside of wedlock.
Speaker 1: I was in college in nineteen seventy and there was
Speaker 1: a report called them on a hand report. The Negro Family,
Speaker 1: A Case for National Action, is written by a liberal,
Speaker 1: by a man who became a Democratic center from New York,
Speaker 1: and at the time, twenty five percent of black kids
Speaker 1: were born outside of wedlock. He said, my god, this
Speaker 1: number is horrific. If we don't do something about it, it
Speaker 1: could get even higher. Well fast forward, twenty five percent
Speaker 1: of white kids are now born outside of wedlock. It
Speaker 1: is the number one problem in this country. And what
Speaker 1: we've done, in my opinion, is we've economically incentivized women
Speaker 1: to marry the government, and we've allowed men to abandon
Speaker 1: their financial and more responsibility. And now we have that.
Speaker 1: Dave Rubin, to his credit, because this wasn't a live interview,
Speaker 1: could have taken that out, splighted it together, so he
Speaker 1: didn't look as if he was not able to respond
Speaker 1: to my challenge. But he didn't do that. Not only
Speaker 1: did he not do that, you can go on line
Speaker 1: and see it. I think the next day or so,
Speaker 1: he played the whole thing and he said, I've now
Speaker 1: changed my mind. I no longer buy into this narrative
Speaker 1: that the at least are engaging in systemic racism against
Speaker 1: black people. I now understand what the real problem is,
Speaker 1: the way the welfare state and liberals have destroyed the
Speaker 1: nuclear intact family, not just among blacks but in America.
Speaker 1: And he told me that I completely changed his way
Speaker 1: of looking at things, his view. If you look at
Speaker 1: that excerpt, which is I'll played for you, about two
Speaker 1: three million people have seen it on YouTube. And somebody
Speaker 1: told me after they saw this that I had red
Speaker 1: pilled him. I had never seen the movie The Matrix.
Speaker 1: I had no idea what they were talking about. I said,
Speaker 1: what do you mean, I read piled him. Well, it's
Speaker 1: a term, he said, meaning you dropped some conservative information
Speaker 1: on him and you changed his mind. I said, oh,
Speaker 1: so it's a verb. Red pilled. Dave and I are
Speaker 1: now very very good friends, by the way, and I've
Speaker 1: just interviewed him on his podcast Good Guy, Great guy,
Speaker 1: and he had enough character in class to change his
Speaker 1: mind and do so publicly. God bless everybody. Great weekend.
Speaker 7: What can I say, mabou, Well, Mikey has been fro
Speaker 7: all across America.
Speaker 1: That's enough. Put down the mic. The Larry Elder Show