Speaker 1: Today's show sponsored by Lear Capital, the precious metals leader
Speaker 1: since nineteen ninety seven and only company I trust and
Speaker 1: recommend to my family, friends and viewers. Visit Lear Alex
Speaker 1: dot com.
Speaker 2: Ready to break the narrative, get the real story with
Speaker 2: no filters and no apologies.
Speaker 3: Cut through the noise.
Speaker 1: With real conversation, real conviction, and real news.
Speaker 2: It's time for truth without spin.
Speaker 3: It's the Alex Marlow Show.
Speaker 1: This is the Alex Marlow Show. We got a great
Speaker 1: show lined up for you today. I've got more AOC
Speaker 1: needing geography lessons and world history lessons. In the Munich
Speaker 1: security conference, I've got more Mark or Rubio just stunting
Speaker 1: on everyone there, just emerging as one of the true superstars,
Speaker 1: if not the superstar of the Conservative bench at the moment.
Speaker 1: But before that, we get some fresh news and all.
Speaker 1: What's kind of fun and interesting to start off the
Speaker 1: day with. Well, well, I guess I won't put it
Speaker 1: in the fun category. But Jesse Jackson passed away a
Speaker 1: civil rights icon is how he's going to be described.
Speaker 1: We know how conservatives thought of him. More of a
Speaker 1: shakedown artist and extortionist is sort of the reputation that
Speaker 1: he built with us, someone who pushed forward a lot
Speaker 1: of the diversity policies that a lot of companies have,
Speaker 1: corporations have, and well before the woke era began, someone
Speaker 1: who did move the country away from I would say
Speaker 1: the vision of the Martin Luther Kings we're going to
Speaker 1: judge people by the content of their character back to
Speaker 1: we're going to judge them by the color.
Speaker 4: Of their skin.
Speaker 1: This is what would be called a race baiting, I
Speaker 1: think is the way to put it. He also had
Speaker 1: a history of trying to wrangle money from various corporations, causes, etc.
Speaker 1: To push some of this stuff, a lot of anti
Speaker 1: Semitism controversies. He famously called New York City high Metown
Speaker 1: to make fun of the Jews in nineteen eighty four.
Speaker 1: That one got a lot of mentions, as it should have,
Speaker 1: and was a vocal critic of the conservative movement, but
Speaker 1: also he criticized the Democrats for not being not going
Speaker 1: far enough in a lot of cases.
Speaker 4: But I will say none of that's news to you.
Speaker 1: I will say what was really sort of amusing and
Speaker 1: enjoyable this morning is I woke up to an oh
Speaker 1: bit from Donald Trump Junior. From Donald Trump's senior President
Speaker 1: Trump and President Trump was quick to note that Jesse
Speaker 1: Jackson could not stand former President Barack Obama, and I
Speaker 1: just thought that was so fun. How Trump is figuring
Speaker 1: out a way where a left wing icon dies and
Speaker 1: most of the media attention today will be positive for
Speaker 1: Jesse Jackson because of that purpose. And Trump is like, yeah,
Speaker 1: but just remember he hated Obama. So Trump remembered him
Speaker 1: as a family man who liked a lot of who
Speaker 1: is very loving and giving and kind. I don't know,
Speaker 1: he allegedly stepped out on women over and over again, repeatedly.
Speaker 1: I don't have a lot of nice stuff to say
Speaker 1: about him, but I will say this thing did happen.
Speaker 1: And Trump did find a way to make the single
Speaker 1: most amusing comment that I saw this morning, which is
Speaker 1: that he really didn't like Obama, which is great. It's
Speaker 1: really fun to point that out. Trump has a knack
Speaker 1: for doing such things, all right. The next one also
Speaker 1: not in the fun category. We got more Trantifa terror.
Speaker 1: Pretty wild stuff coming out of Canada where a two
Speaker 1: people were killed in a shooting in a high school
Speaker 1: hockey game in Rhode Island. But that's really not the story.
Speaker 1: The story was the shooter was a person who is
Speaker 1: believed to be Robert Dorgan, shot his wife and I
Speaker 1: guess three children. One of them died due to a
Speaker 1: quote unquote family dispute during a high school hockey tournament
Speaker 1: in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. And this is one of these
Speaker 1: things where you have to read the details to believe
Speaker 1: to believe it, because this is a person who had
Speaker 1: mental health issues, clearly one of the most male looking
Speaker 1: people on the planet aside from his gigantic breass So
Speaker 1: this is a person who had gone through quote gender
Speaker 1: reassignment surgery and his wife had recently filed for divorce
Speaker 1: from him because he is narcissistic traits and a personality disorder.
Speaker 1: Who would a thunk it but to publicly try to
Speaker 1: execute and successfully execute multiple family members. Let us just
Speaker 1: add this to the list of Trantifa terror that we've
Speaker 1: seen in recent years in this country, from Nashville, the
Speaker 1: Nashville shooting, to the suspected assassin of Charlie Kirk being
Speaker 1: love with the trans person, to the horrific shooting in
Speaker 1: the church mowing down the kindergarteners as they prayed. And
Speaker 1: I've made this point recently on the show, and I'll
Speaker 1: continue to make this point. We were told specifically, if
Speaker 1: we don't embrace the entirety of trans culture, then the
Speaker 1: trans are going to kill themselves. And that's why we
Speaker 1: need to watch them metilate their bodies. We need to
Speaker 1: chemically castrate them. We need to make it so that
Speaker 1: quote unquote trans children are able to transition without their parents' knowledge,
Speaker 1: even elementary school or school. And so what are we
Speaker 1: getting now? We're getting a fact that they are as
Speaker 1: all the studies have shown, They're not becoming significantly happier,
Speaker 1: they're not becoming healthier, they're not becoming wiser. What they
Speaker 1: are doing is they're apparently increasingly violent and willing to
Speaker 1: shoot people, including their own family members, in public. Three
Speaker 1: people are stilling critical condition at the hospital, and the media,
Speaker 1: as always, is just entirely irresponsible. The New York Times
Speaker 1: this is their lead story on their article on this.
Speaker 1: At a later news conference on Monday night, or this
Speaker 1: is a line from it. Chief Gonclaves of pot of
Speaker 1: let me make sure you get the exact location. Pawtucket
Speaker 1: said the shooter was born in nineteen sixty nine and
Speaker 1: went by two different names. Yeah, the two different names
Speaker 1: were Robert and ROBERTA because he this man thought by
Speaker 1: lopping off his penis and installing some fake brass made
Speaker 1: him a woman. So this is a who needed deep
Speaker 1: mental health checks and someone who should be away from
Speaker 1: polite society. But we indulge them and then they're not
Speaker 1: happy with the as far as we go, and then
Speaker 1: they end up becoming violent. This is very important that
Speaker 1: we note this and we take a moment to reflect
Speaker 1: on this. The more we normalize the transgender stuff, the
Speaker 1: harder it is to rain this stuff in. I saw
Speaker 1: a clip I kind of couldn't believe that took place again.
Speaker 1: This was I think, Yeah, this was the Munich Security Conference.
Speaker 1: This was Sarah McBride formerly known as Kim McBride, talking
Speaker 1: to another than Hillary Clinton. This is a congressman who
Speaker 1: acts as though he is a woman. This is the
Speaker 1: content that we're getting from Sarah McBride. Can we please
Speaker 1: play cut eight?
Speaker 5: And a strong man's greatest asset is scarcity. When there
Speaker 5: is scarcity in jobs, when there is scarcity of opportunity,
Speaker 5: they picked boogeymen or in this case, boogie people, and
Speaker 5: they blame them.
Speaker 1: Boogie people that's right, and we gotta forget, we gotta
Speaker 1: remember the exact way to define boogeymen could be boogie people.
Speaker 1: So this he's talking to Hillary Clinton, which is why
Speaker 1: the optics are unbelievable, is that he's suggesting that we're
Speaker 1: just demonizing the trans we keep what are the trands contributing,
Speaker 1: What are the great contributions that we're getting.
Speaker 4: We're getting division, we're.
Speaker 1: Getting chaos, and we're also getting quite a bit of
Speaker 1: murder at this point. All right, that's the next story,
Speaker 1: the next story that we got. This is a lead
Speaker 1: story right now as we're recording on Bright Part News,
Speaker 1: Conferent Randy finds big trouble now because Democrats are cone
Speaker 1: from to resign because he said Americans will choose pets
Speaker 1: over Muslim supremacy. Here's the context here. The Muslim advocate
Speaker 1: for New York City Now Nerdine Kiswani said that quote,
Speaker 1: dogs definitely have a place in society, just not as
Speaker 1: indoor pets. Like we said all along, we assume, meaning Muslims,
Speaker 1: they have unclean and I guess nails is that the quote. Anyway,
Speaker 1: The point is that this is a tweet that the
Speaker 1: Muslim advocate for New York could put out and then
Speaker 1: people are pousing on it millions of views. You say,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, We're not gonna have dogs as pets
Speaker 1: in New York City. And she responded lmao at the
Speaker 1: Zionists could blaming the juice frothing at the mouths of
Speaker 1: this thinking they're doing something. It's obviously a joke. I
Speaker 1: don't care if you have a dog. I do care
Speaker 1: if your dog is defecating. She did not use the
Speaker 1: word defecate everywhere, and you're not cleaning it, so it
Speaker 1: was not a joke. It was posted publicly to Twitter.
Speaker 1: She only said it was a joke after a lot
Speaker 1: of backlash, and Randy find the congressman, who is very
Speaker 1: good at getting attention, is provocatorism. He comes out and
Speaker 1: responds three days later and says, if they force us
Speaker 1: to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not
Speaker 1: a difficult one. This, of course, has the left topping
Speaker 1: mad Rocanna Democrat says, taking an alleged comment by one
Speaker 1: person and attributing it to everyone who shares that person's
Speaker 1: faith is the definition of bigotry. Well, it's not an
Speaker 1: alleged comment. You can see the tweet right now. Finally
Speaker 1: NYC is coming to is Lom. Dogs definitely have a
Speaker 1: place in society, just not as indoor pats like you
Speaker 1: said all along, they're unclean. That's the exactly I'm steering
Speaker 1: at it right now. Roquana is out like this is
Speaker 1: some sort of an alleged comment. So Randy find has
Speaker 1: done something year which is actually kind of compelling because
Speaker 1: he said something's very aggressive and it's not something that
Speaker 1: you know, would be easy to defend at a polite
Speaker 1: dinner party, but as a public exercise. When we come
Speaker 1: back from break next, what I'm gonna do and I'm
Speaker 1: gonna break down why I think this quote is so important,
Speaker 1: and then I'm gonna get into the other fun news
Speaker 1: everyone's hopping mad about. Stephen Colbert had a guest censored
Speaker 1: by the FCC and I totally get why they did it,
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna defend them for doing exactly what they
Speaker 1: did when we come back as well. So all of
Speaker 1: that and more aoc more Marco Rubio when we come back.
Speaker 1: Gold and silver recently soared to record highs then pulled back.
Speaker 1: So are a precious metals still a goodbye many Wall
Speaker 1: Street experts predict higher prices ahead. Why because we still
Speaker 1: have trillions in national debt, a declining dollar, and inflation
Speaker 1: that just keeps shrinking our savings. Even with corrections along
Speaker 1: the way, gold remains a historical hedge for wealth protection.
Speaker 1: That's why Morgan Stanley's chief investment officer ditched the sixty
Speaker 1: to forty stocks and bonds portfolio and recommended up to
Speaker 1: twenty percent in precious medals. They're getting educated, and you
Speaker 1: should too. Call Lear Capital at eight hundred nine nine
Speaker 1: to two two two five five for your free gold
Speaker 1: investment kit and learn how you could qualify for up
Speaker 1: to twenty thousand dollars in bonus gold. Lear Capital has
Speaker 1: over three billion dollars in transactions and thousands of five
Speaker 1: star reviews. Call eight hundred nine nine to two two
Speaker 1: two five five eight hundred nine nine to two two
Speaker 1: two five to five, or visit lear alex dot com.
Speaker 1: You know one of the guys in the booths apparently
Speaker 1: when they saw the shooting, the initial video that came
Speaker 1: out on social media, the Trantifa terrorist that is it
Speaker 1: a trance, Like that's the instant reaction. Now, It's kind
Speaker 1: of like how for so many years we thought we
Speaker 1: would see terror. Is it a Muslim? Now we're starting
Speaker 1: to think is it a transperson? And we've indulge all
Speaker 1: of this. It's a completely our fault, self inflicted wound.
Speaker 1: We've run so hard away from the science and towards insanity,
Speaker 1: and I feel proud that we have bright Bard.
Speaker 4: We didn't indulge.
Speaker 3: Any of this.
Speaker 1: We never did the pronoun stuff, We never indulged all
Speaker 1: the anti science hysteria. But it just as a society,
Speaker 1: it's just been so bad. It does feel like this
Speaker 1: is the issue that's made a lot of people wake
Speaker 1: up to how awful the left is and how they'll
Speaker 1: they'll never stop, they will never be done, they will
Speaker 1: always try to take more, they will always try to
Speaker 1: create more chaos. But really truly troubling that this is
Speaker 1: a truly it's an epidemic in our society, all right.
Speaker 4: So before the.
Speaker 1: Break, I brought up why I think what Randy Fine said,
Speaker 1: which is suggesting that basically there is a choice now
Speaker 1: between I guess Muslims and dogs as pets is such
Speaker 1: a compelling thing.
Speaker 4: And I don't agree with all Randy Fine's tactics.
Speaker 1: He does a lot of provocatorism, which I have a
Speaker 1: soft spot for a bright part news, but it's not
Speaker 1: something I engage in on a personal level. But I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what's interesting here is if you think about
Speaker 1: what is one of the issues in this country where
Speaker 1: there is seems to be unanimous agreement left and right,
Speaker 1: one the few things that's left is that we all
Speaker 1: seem to like dogs, pets in particular, but dogs. We
Speaker 1: like dogs as a society. We're a pro dog people.
Speaker 1: I say this as someone who did not like dogs
Speaker 1: growing up, was a cat person, and then got dogs
Speaker 1: and immediately understood, Oh yeah, I get what this is
Speaker 1: all about. Why everyone loved dogs. It teaches us to nurture,
Speaker 1: It teaches us to be selfless, teach us to care
Speaker 1: for innocent creatures. It teaches us love, teaches our children love.
Speaker 1: We a lot of us exercise and have a healthier
Speaker 1: lifestyle because of our dogs companionship. All of these things
Speaker 1: are so wonderful and it's universally agreed upon. And to
Speaker 1: have a person who is an official title in New
Speaker 1: York to suggest that dogs do not have a place
Speaker 1: as indoor pets, who suggests that are there any pets
Speaker 1: that are not indoor pets. How many outdoor pets are
Speaker 1: there if we're going to farm or something, maybe your horse.
Speaker 1: If you're in the top zero one percent and you
Speaker 1: have some sort of a equestrian hobby, all the pets
Speaker 1: are indoor pets. So this is so far away from
Speaker 1: Western values and American values. Then I think suggesting that
Speaker 1: if we're going to choose between Muslim people who are
Speaker 1: their value system as laid out by the Koran has
Speaker 1: deep incompatibilities with the not to say, just to make
Speaker 1: an obvious point that there aren't many wonderful Muslims who
Speaker 1: have adapted and been absorbed in the United States in
Speaker 1: a productive way.
Speaker 4: I'm not saying that those people don't exist.
Speaker 1: I'm saying overall, if you go by their doctrine, by
Speaker 1: the Qur'an, and you go by their value system, a
Speaker 1: lot of it is deeply incompatible with what we consider
Speaker 1: Western values, particularly of things like liberty, that they are
Speaker 1: not aligned with those things. And the fact that Randy
Speaker 1: Vine can lay out that, look, if that's the choice,
Speaker 1: if you're posing it that way, because remember the Urdane
Speaker 1: Kiswan's tweet starts. Finally, New York City is coming to Islam.
Speaker 1: We've been hearing these reports are calls to prayer in
Speaker 1: New York City, and the Muslim called prayer five am.
Speaker 4: We could people lap.
Speaker 1: So if we want New York City to get absorbed
Speaker 1: by Islam, or if the choice is between that and
Speaker 1: being able to have dogs inside, I do think most
Speaker 1: Americans would choose dogs inside.
Speaker 4: It's just true. So and he's got the entire.
Speaker 1: Media hopping mad, entire Democrat Party people calling for his resignation.
Speaker 1: But it's one of those ones where if you really
Speaker 1: think about it and you had to choose, if it
Speaker 1: was black and white, and it's not.
Speaker 4: There's a gray area here.
Speaker 1: But if it really was a black and white choice
Speaker 1: between dogs inside or New York goes Muslim, then we
Speaker 1: would choose dogs inside. So very interesting point, all right,
Speaker 1: Next up, next big One. Stephen Colbert has provoked the
Speaker 1: whole world by had doing an interview with a guy
Speaker 1: named James Tallerco who I featured on the show. He's
Speaker 1: running for Senate against Jasmine Crockett and the Democrat primary
Speaker 1: in Texas. Best known for being the guy who said
Speaker 1: that he uses his Christian faith justify abortions, which is
Speaker 1: crazy and blasphemous, I will say, and he's runn against
Speaker 1: Jasmine Crockett. He's just very dislikable as a person, just
Speaker 1: a deeply unlikable persona publicly. Colbert lets him on, as
Speaker 1: Colbert often does, because Colbert's show is basically a Democrat
Speaker 1: that has a basically a Democrat platform. And what he's
Speaker 1: done on the show is he's provoked the FCC to
Speaker 1: say you can't do that because it's a clear violation
Speaker 1: of FCC's equal time policy. These are free public airwaves
Speaker 1: and we've basically turned it over to Stephen Colbert and
Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel and The View and others to make it
Speaker 1: just a left wing Democrat play place for them to
Speaker 1: play politics. Now, there are exceptions for legitimate news interviews,
Speaker 1: but we know that this is just a partisan propaganda show.
Speaker 1: So the FCC has said to CBS, you can't hear
Speaker 1: this stuff. So this is something where his show loses
Speaker 1: forty million dollars per year, and Colbert's course trying to
Speaker 1: take advantage. He's blamed Trump. It's nothing to do with Trump.
Speaker 1: That's do the laws that if you're going to benefit
Speaker 1: from free public airwaves, do you have a show we
Speaker 1: lose forty million dollars a year, then you can't use
Speaker 1: it just to propagandais on behalf of the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: I'm going to play a clip from the interview anyway
Speaker 1: when we come back and break it down some more
Speaker 1: on the Alex Marlow Show. If a red light therapy
Speaker 1: device is cheap, there's a reason, and it's not a
Speaker 1: good one. Most red light devices on the market are
Speaker 1: built to hit a low price point, not to deliver
Speaker 1: real results. They use weaker components, inconsistent light output, and
Speaker 1: non medical grade standards. That's why so many of them
Speaker 1: feel underwhelming or stop working altogether. Flashy ads and big
Speaker 1: promises can't make up for poor performance. The super Palm
Speaker 1: is medical grade built for consistent, deep penetrating light that
Speaker 1: professionals trust. That means stronger results, better reliability, and real relief.
Speaker 1: You can feel, not guesswork. It's also easy to use,
Speaker 1: handheld and comfortable, making it simple to add your daily
Speaker 1: routine as I have. I try cheaper devices made in
Speaker 1: China and didn't feel anything with the super Palm. The
Speaker 1: pain in my knee and back finally eased after just
Speaker 1: a few weeks. It's the first one that actually worked.
Speaker 1: SunPower led backs it with a money back guarantee and
Speaker 1: a two year warranty, something most competitors just can't offer.
Speaker 1: And it's made in America. Use code Marlowe for ten
Speaker 1: percent off today. Stop settling for low quality devices, an
Speaker 1: upgrade to real medical grade relief.
Speaker 6: All right.
Speaker 1: Before the break, I mentioned that Stephen Colbert had on
Speaker 1: a guy named James taller Rico on his show. It
Speaker 1: clearly just designed to boost him with his billion dollar
Speaker 1: network CBS, and to use that signal to try to
Speaker 1: get free advertisements for a Democrat. And because of that,
Speaker 1: the FCC stepped in said you can't do that anymore,
Speaker 1: and of course you should not be allowed to do that.
Speaker 4: So he was.
Speaker 1: Talking about it and he blamed Trump managed to do that.
Speaker 1: I got a cut of that. Let's play cut two.
Speaker 4: Please.
Speaker 7: You know who is not one of my guests tonight.
Speaker 7: That's Texas State Representative James taller Rico.
Speaker 3: He was supposed to be here, but we were told.
Speaker 4: The photo is not him. So what is that about?
Speaker 1: Cause when you guys hunt this down for me to
Speaker 1: explain this to me, Lea, that's not him. He's not
Speaker 1: on the that's a different guy. He puts a foot
Speaker 1: of a guy who's not the guy. This guy's a
Speaker 1: little sharper looking than Talla Rico, so they got to
Speaker 1: use the AI Talerica.
Speaker 4: He just got this really off putting look.
Speaker 1: I don't want to put my finger on it, precisely
Speaker 1: because I don't want to get taken out of context
Speaker 1: by sores fund and freaks. But there's something off about
Speaker 1: there with that guy. His appearance is just not there
Speaker 1: for me. Go ahead terms by our network's lawyers who
Speaker 1: called us directly that we could not have him on
Speaker 1: the broadcast.
Speaker 5: Then then I was told in some uncertain terms that
Speaker 5: not only could I not have him on, I could not.
Speaker 3: Mention me not having him on.
Speaker 6: And because my network clearly doesn't want.
Speaker 7: Us to talk about this, let's talk about this.
Speaker 1: It's just so smug. He's so smarty. And that's the
Speaker 1: whole point of why the FCC is doing this and
Speaker 1: they have to is that, again, free public airwaves, the
Speaker 1: agreement is that you don't use it just to promote
Speaker 1: your own political agenda, and the exception of anything that
Speaker 1: could be political have got to be legitimately news interviews,
Speaker 1: and this is not that this is trying to boost
Speaker 1: someone because they know they don't want Jasmine Crockett to
Speaker 1: get nominated for that sentence, because they know they absolutely
Speaker 1: have no chance. This guy who is show is poorly rated,
Speaker 1: He loses tons of money, and all he wants to
Speaker 1: do is try to position himself against Trump for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: because it makes him feel good and it gets some
Speaker 1: a lot of congratulations with the people he cares about.
Speaker 1: I got a Crockett clip and I thought this was
Speaker 1: pretty fun to play. Let's play cut twelve.
Speaker 8: Please, guys, the Independence and Republicans prefer me. Now. They
Speaker 8: want to say that I can't win, but the reality
Speaker 8: is that the numbers don't suggest that, and no one
Speaker 8: is putting numbers behind this. All they're doing is thinking
Speaker 8: a lot of money into a candidate who has never
Speaker 8: been tested and never been hit.
Speaker 4: You guys here that.
Speaker 1: Republicans prefer Jasmine Crockett, and I will tell you for once,
Speaker 1: and maybe only once. She's exactly right right in the money,
Speaker 1: the Jasmine Crockett. Yes, we do prefer her. We prefer
Speaker 1: for a number of reasons. But these people are very
Speaker 1: unimpressive Democrats. And we got some more AOC who has
Speaker 1: just been on absolute fire. At the Miniaturity conference I
Speaker 1: mentioned earlier what a incredible gift it is that she's
Speaker 1: out the earth, that she's round, that she's continued to
Speaker 1: create content for us and to prove how unseious she
Speaker 1: is as a person. Let us play cut number six.
Speaker 9: London Venezuela for example.
Speaker 3: It is not a.
Speaker 9: Is It is not a remark on who Madudo was
Speaker 9: as a leader. He canceled elections. He was an anti
Speaker 9: democratic leader. That doesn't mean that we can kidnap ahead
Speaker 9: of state and engage in acts of war just because
Speaker 9: the nation is below the.
Speaker 1: Equator Venezuela Madudo, I like how it's this is the
Speaker 1: only language where we do the pronunciation of Spanish language
Speaker 1: words with the accent. We don't do this with friends.
Speaker 1: We don't do this with any sort of Russian, Japanese, Chinese.
Speaker 1: We never try to find the word and then put
Speaker 1: pronunciation on it any of the most popular languages. Could
Speaker 1: you imagine if we start doing German pronunciation through of
Speaker 1: her German work we're using, but Venezuela. And of course
Speaker 1: those of you who know basic geography, there is not
Speaker 1: one morsel of Venezuela that is below the equator. It
Speaker 1: is all above the equator, hundred percent of it, as
Speaker 1: all of you probably heard at this point by far,
Speaker 1: but she's got the accent down. But it is really
Speaker 1: noteworthy and not funny that the Democrats consistently and I
Speaker 1: played the avenue and doing the same thing yesterday, going
Speaker 1: to a far off land overseas and crapping upon our country.
Speaker 1: This is completely unacceptable. Obama normalize this, and there is
Speaker 1: not a single Democrat who refuses to do this. And
Speaker 1: until this stops, this is a sign that we're in
Speaker 1: a very bad spot as a nation.
Speaker 4: As a people.
Speaker 1: You cannot go overseas and trash our country. Our country
Speaker 1: is the best country, and whether or not we are
Speaker 1: perfect has never been in dispute. We are not perfect,
Speaker 1: we never have been, but we are still the best.
Speaker 1: We're still leaders, and we need to work together because
Speaker 1: we're all Americans. And when you go overseas and you
Speaker 1: trash us, especially when you prove that you're historically and
Speaker 1: geographically illiterate, then it just does make you feel like,
Speaker 1: who are these people and who put them in charge?
Speaker 4: And why? All right?
Speaker 1: I got more aoc sounding like a genius here let's
Speaker 1: play cut nine.
Speaker 2: So when you run for president, are you going to
Speaker 2: impose a wealth tax or a billionaires tax?
Speaker 1: I don't think that the list posit I want to
Speaker 1: start from the beginning.
Speaker 4: Who's this reporter?
Speaker 1: I know she is with this obviously a form reporter
Speaker 1: on this airing on Forbes, But you've got it. Let's
Speaker 1: play from the beginning. You have to those of you
Speaker 1: are watching the streams or on sale news channel, watch
Speaker 1: your face, watch the glee. It is almost this is
Speaker 1: an erotic face that she's making. She is that compelled
Speaker 1: by AOC.
Speaker 4: Play it again.
Speaker 2: So when you run for president, are you going to
Speaker 2: impose a wealth tax or a billionaires I don't think that.
Speaker 9: I don't think that anyone and that we don't have
Speaker 9: to wait for any one president to impose a wealth tax.
Speaker 9: I think that it needs to be done expeditiously.
Speaker 1: Oh boy, expeditiously. That what she really means is now,
Speaker 1: But it sounds smarter when you say expeditiously.
Speaker 4: I just I don't.
Speaker 1: The wealth tax is just trying to stifle growth, trying
Speaker 1: to stifle anything they'll keep America ahead. All they want
Speaker 1: to do is to penalize the most productive people in
Speaker 1: society and redistribute wealth to the people who are do
Speaker 1: the least.
Speaker 4: That's all their ideas.
Speaker 1: And she speaks much more confidently when she speaks about economics,
Speaker 1: and her ideas and economics are horrible. She doesn't speak
Speaker 1: as confidently on national security in foreign policy issues because
Speaker 1: she's never thought about that at all. Clearly given zero
Speaker 1: minutes of critical thought to key national security in foreign
Speaker 1: policy issues over lifetime. She doesn't know where Venezuela is,
Speaker 1: she doesn't know what Taiwan does and why it's important.
Speaker 1: She didn't care about those things. But she does speak
Speaker 1: very confidently about economics. She's a pure Marxist. So again,
Speaker 1: I just hope she keeps talking. I hope she keeps
Speaker 1: talking really important. I keep emphasizing how we can lame
Speaker 1: the Democrats benches. Gretchen Whitmer, who I often accidentally referred
Speaker 1: to as Megan Whitmar. So if I ever do that,
Speaker 1: please Sean take me the Chasteismond quarters that Dennis established
Speaker 1: for the host here of the show. But she was
Speaker 1: asked about Ukraine and cut seven. This is really important
Speaker 1: as well.
Speaker 4: Go ahead.
Speaker 7: Ukraine's independences just and I think that it is a
Speaker 7: strategic and it's in the strategic interest of the United States.
Speaker 3: On Ukraine, What does victory look like? You answer?
Speaker 4: It is.
Speaker 7: The two that I am on the panel with are
Speaker 7: much more steeped in foreign policy than a governor is.
Speaker 7: But you know, I do think that Ukraine's independents keeping
Speaker 7: their land mass and having the support of all the allies,
Speaker 7: I think is the goal from my bantage point. Go ahead, ambassador,
Speaker 7: do better.
Speaker 1: Jeff so very unimpressive, and just note that she's one
Speaker 1: of the people who again could emerge if Newsom gets
Speaker 1: wiped out because of this horrible record from the early
Speaker 1: stage of the MCRAT primary. She could be the Democrat nominee.
Speaker 1: She could easily be on the ticket, was obviously on
Speaker 1: the short list for Joe Biden's vice president, and she
Speaker 1: hasn't thought critically again about one of the main foreign
Speaker 1: policy and geopolitical discussions of modern times. She is no
Speaker 1: answer on She doesn't even want to answer. She can't
Speaker 1: even pivot to something where she's comfortable, which is really
Speaker 1: interesting basic media training. You would think she would be
Speaker 1: if she's going to a Munich security conference, would be
Speaker 1: at least able to move the conversation in a way,
Speaker 1: we're to a place where she's comfortable. She doesn't even try,
Speaker 1: she just punts the football right away. And again, this
Speaker 1: is one of the more reasonable Democrats who could have
Speaker 1: a potential path through the White House. It's frightening. It's
Speaker 1: also kind of good news in some ways, but it
Speaker 1: is frightening. All right, let me change gears and play
Speaker 1: some positive stuff. Marco Rubio again was on fire during
Speaker 1: this Munich security conference. During his time there, I got
Speaker 1: some more audio of him, and I'm going to play
Speaker 1: cut one place.
Speaker 4: Talk about Iran.
Speaker 6: We're dealing with radical shea clerics, okay, We're dealing with
Speaker 6: people who make political geopolitical decisions on the basis of
Speaker 6: pure theology. And it's a complicated thing. I mean, no
Speaker 6: one's ever been able to do a successful deal with Iran,
Speaker 6: but we're going to try. Steve Woodcoff and Jared Kushner
Speaker 6: will be traveling. I think they're traveling right now to
Speaker 6: have important and we'll see how that turns out. And
Speaker 6: we'll always comply with the applicable laws of the United
Speaker 6: States in terms of involving congress ating decisions. But right
Speaker 6: now we're not talking about any of that. But right
Speaker 6: now we're talking about negotiations. We are focused on negotiations.
Speaker 6: That's what we're forward. The President's made that clear. If
Speaker 6: that changes, it'll be obvious to everyone. And obviously whatever
Speaker 6: the law requires us to do will do.
Speaker 1: What he's so good about here and people are realizing,
Speaker 1: is that he understands how to be diplomatic when it's
Speaker 1: time to be diplomatic. He understands when it's time to
Speaker 1: be tough, when it's time to be tough. Let me
Speaker 1: give an example of that. Cut five.
Speaker 3: Visas are not a right. I've said this repeated that.
Speaker 6: I don't know why it's so hard for something to
Speaker 6: comprehend it. So let me repeat it again. A visa.
Speaker 6: No one's entitled to a visa. There is no constitutional
Speaker 6: right to a visa. A visa is a permission to
Speaker 6: enter our country as a visitor. If you enter our
Speaker 6: country as a visitor, and as a visitor in our country,
Speaker 6: be it a student, a tourist, and a journalist, whatever
Speaker 6: you want to be, and you undertake activity that are
Speaker 6: against the national interest in national security the United States,
Speaker 6: we will take away your visa. In fact, if we
Speaker 6: knew you were going to do it, and we probably
Speaker 6: wouldn't have given you your visa.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And what's so good here is that not only
Speaker 1: is he crystal clear, but if you pan out and
Speaker 1: we only got a kind of a small shot at this,
Speaker 1: Victor Orbon is right next to him at the other
Speaker 1: podium and he is just waiting for the dunk to
Speaker 1: come from Rubio, which is really highly enjoyable to watch.
Speaker 1: He sees it because he knows this is just such
Speaker 1: comfortable territory for Rubio. It is just so essential in
Speaker 1: terms of his guys, I'm getting us Scott's background. So
Speaker 1: if you guys want to throw him on youthe, that'd
Speaker 1: be nice, thank you. The one thing that is just
Speaker 1: really fascinating about Rubio is he knows exactly when to
Speaker 1: switch gears. He knows exactly when to put on the gas,
Speaker 1: exactly when to put on the brakes. He knows when
Speaker 1: he's going to play a cautious and he knows exactly
Speaker 1: when he's going to give this SmackDown. And we know
Speaker 1: for a fact that you're not entitled to come into
Speaker 1: this country and to send this signal to the rest
Speaker 1: of the world. It's just so productive. It is completely
Speaker 1: different than anything that we've seen from people who are
Speaker 1: formerly part of the Republican establishment. They're starting to understand
Speaker 1: this and they're starting to see where we can really
Speaker 1: make headway. And contrast that with the clip by play
Speaker 1: earlier of AOC who just speaks such wishy, washy tones
Speaker 1: that you know, Maduro merely canceled elections. He's not a dictator.
Speaker 1: He's an anti democratic leader. He's not someone who illegally
Speaker 1: has sees powers and has basically enslaved his people and
Speaker 1: has used the cartels to make whatever money and power
Speaker 1: that he's had come to light. And the US are
Speaker 1: kidnappers because we decided that we think it's in the
Speaker 1: best interests of our hemisphere if we don't have a
Speaker 1: dictator who is in league with the cartels to be
Speaker 1: running this country that's very oil rich and to be
Speaker 1: oppressing as people. And then we see things so much
Speaker 1: more clearly at this point, and that's why we need
Speaker 1: to continue to build the momentum, get excited, and to
Speaker 1: run up the score as best we can as we
Speaker 1: head into this midterm election cycle.
Speaker 4: We'll be right back.
Speaker 3: Aunch question.
Speaker 4: Our big shout out to the team here.
Speaker 1: I got to bring in a new guest here on
Speaker 1: the show, Jonathan Gilliam, who's an old friend of mine,
Speaker 1: former Navy seal, an FBI special agent, and author of
Speaker 1: Sheep No More, The Art of Awareness and a Tax Survival,
Speaker 1: which I ate up and all of you should read
Speaker 1: that as well. And Jonathan, I haven't done any content
Speaker 1: on Savannah Guthree because I feel like there's it's hard
Speaker 1: for us to come distinguish ourselves a conservative media on
Speaker 1: this one. But just an unbelievable story of her mom
Speaker 1: getting kidnapped, and we really don't have a lot of
Speaker 1: clear answers, and then this deep involvement from TMZ is
Speaker 1: very odd. I want to try to get as much
Speaker 1: as we can, just a brief segment. What do you
Speaker 1: think is really going on here?
Speaker 3: Well, I think the investigation is moving forward.
Speaker 10: There's a lot of talk in the media because the
Speaker 10: sheriff keeps, you know, terrible That's what chairs and police
Speaker 10: chiefs do now. I think they have terrible press conferences
Speaker 10: while the investigators out there crushing it on the ground.
Speaker 3: I think that's what's happening.
Speaker 10: But the delay of this DNA at a Florida lab
Speaker 10: now going to the FBI lab Things like that really
Speaker 10: pushed these investigations down the road a bit much in
Speaker 10: delay things. But I think that they're circulating photos of
Speaker 10: potential suspects at gun shops now they are. They're looking
Speaker 10: for any sign of her pacemaker through a device that
Speaker 10: the FBI has from a helicopter. They you know, you
Speaker 10: have the video and you have these mysterious emails going
Speaker 10: to Harvard Levin, which most people aren't putting any stock
Speaker 10: in that. But he said something when he read the
Speaker 10: last one that the guy who's written those is saying
Speaker 10: that he has a record for burglary. And I'm not
Speaker 10: one of the people who are casting away. Burglary is
Speaker 10: a probable motive because we don't know when he hurt
Speaker 10: her to make her bleed. He could have been in
Speaker 10: there immediately she woke up and he hurt her. But
Speaker 10: it could have been a burglary. And if that's the case,
Speaker 10: and this guy's writing, he may just be looking for money.
Speaker 10: It may not have been a kidnapping. It may have
Speaker 10: been a burglary gone bad or some other type of thing.
Speaker 10: But if it was a kidnapping, this is the worst
Speaker 10: kidnapping in the history of kidnappings.
Speaker 1: As far as ransoms go, well, flesh that out, because
Speaker 1: this is what I'm not understanding is that apparently, and
Speaker 1: again I don't know how much of this is true
Speaker 1: or not, there was a kidnapping, there's a ransom. Obviously
Speaker 1: a wealthy family. Feels like he could have been anyone
Speaker 1: that did that professional crux, could have been a family
Speaker 1: member who DOO wasn't happy with life. It could durn
Speaker 1: cartel to reasonably close to the border. Well, what of
Speaker 1: these are you eliminating? What do you think is still
Speaker 1: in the running.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't, Unlike other people, I don't eliminate any
Speaker 3: of it.
Speaker 10: I put it up on a dry race board and
Speaker 10: I say, okay, this is where the evidence is leading.
Speaker 10: But I haven't disproven this other thing until we know
Speaker 10: for sure. I would say that all possibilities are still
Speaker 10: upen because we don't know where she is, We don't
Speaker 10: know who did it. Their work with this DNA now,
Speaker 10: But if that comes back and there's no hit on
Speaker 10: the DNA, then we got to go down the road
Speaker 10: of familia DNA and if they can contact, you know,
Speaker 10: through private entities, somebody in the family who's done a
Speaker 10: DNA search. So we're still we're still moving forward, you know, Alex,
Speaker 10: I don't think this case is solved by any means,
Speaker 10: but I don't think it's like the sheriff said yesterday
Speaker 10: in an article with New York Times that it could
Speaker 10: take years. It could, but I don't think it will
Speaker 10: because I think there's enough evidence now to actually start
Speaker 10: moving forward and pinpoint somebody.
Speaker 3: Then we'll determine the intent.
Speaker 10: And I don't think it's I don't think it's early
Speaker 10: enough to rule out any family members, which he did
Speaker 10: today as well, and I think that's wrong.
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, let's talk about the TMZ of it all.
Speaker 1: Are are you what are we to make of the
Speaker 1: fact that TMZ seems to be, which is your celebrity
Speaker 1: gossip site. It seems to be almost like leading the
Speaker 1: whole investigation.
Speaker 10: Well, I think there's a possibility that TMZ came up
Speaker 10: on the radars one of these outlets that got an
Speaker 10: initial ransom email. And so it's hard to tell because
Speaker 10: this person could just be writing saying that. You know
Speaker 10: they're writing him, because that's where everybody else is written.
Speaker 10: And you know there were these people, I mean, Alex,
Speaker 10: you know, anybody that has a public figure is going
Speaker 10: to get weird emails from people, So there's weird people
Speaker 10: out there.
Speaker 3: And but twenty.
Speaker 10: Percent of the people who call in a murder or
Speaker 10: the people actually committed the murder. So this very well
Speaker 10: could be the person that is now was trying to
Speaker 10: attempt to do one thing, is now trying to get
Speaker 10: some money. I would be very suspicious this person, if
Speaker 10: I was FBI be tracking it down.
Speaker 1: So why not just pay a ransom and then get
Speaker 1: Nancy guff your back and move on. They just a
Speaker 1: it feels like, why has that happened?
Speaker 10: Because I don't think those I think when the Bureau
Speaker 10: looks at those ransom emails that those are similar to
Speaker 10: a scam that would come out of India or Nigeria.
Speaker 3: They just don't pass the smell tests.
Speaker 10: And all of the majority of the kidnappings that we've
Speaker 10: seen in recent history down in Mexico, for instance, where
Speaker 10: they asked for bitcoin, it is a two way communication
Speaker 10: and they want you to know that that person is
Speaker 10: in grave danger so that you'll pay, And that did
Speaker 10: not happen in this case.
Speaker 1: So we're not even convinced it's real ransom notes. So
Speaker 1: do you believe that Nanthy Guthrie is alive.
Speaker 10: I don't know, but based on her age and the
Speaker 10: fact that she was bleeding and the time that she's
Speaker 10: been gone, I would probably say no. But there's always
Speaker 10: you shouldn't investigate it as though she's dead. You should
Speaker 10: still be investigating as thoh she's alive.
Speaker 1: Ten seconds your next moved. Often, if you're in charge
Speaker 1: of the investigation.
Speaker 10: I would be using every tool in the toolbox, which
Speaker 10: the sheriff is not doing.
Speaker 1: Thank you, John mcgilliam, I really appreciate you, and come
Speaker 1: back soon. We'll do a big podcast soon. Thanks everyone
Speaker 1: in the audience, go in peace, to love and serve
Speaker 1: the Lord.