Speaker 1: It's been a very difficult last, uh, almost 24 hours
Speaker 1: at this point.
Speaker 1: My heart goes out to all the families who have
Speaker 1: lost their loved ones. We're gonna get into all of that,
Speaker 1: including some of the president's comments and uh his his
Speaker 1: dust up with the media surrounding that tragic event, but
Speaker 1: I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: This
Speaker 1: Is also um a time when you're gonna see a
Speaker 1: lot of reckoning in a lot of changes in how
Speaker 1: things are done.
Speaker 1: They're in government and it's gonna affect one Leticia James
Speaker 1: Kash Patel about to be confirmed there we heard from
Speaker 1: him earlier today and I just want to show you
Speaker 1: he's got what 94% chance, 94% chance he's up 36%.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you, Poly markets usually spot on on this.
Speaker 1: They called the election before anyone, and I think this
Speaker 1: does suggest we get ourselves a new head of the
Speaker 1: FBI and boy oh boy does Washington not like this
Speaker 1: conscious promising to investigate fully when and where needed.
Speaker 1: And you know what, he doesn't want to have what
Speaker 1: happened to Donald Trump happened to any other politician ever again.
Speaker 1: He's insisting that you know what, we do the right
Speaker 1: thing by everyone. I wanna go to an excerpt from
Speaker 1: him here on Capitol Hill today. I am telling you
Speaker 1: he means business and Letitia James watch out because he's
Speaker 1: coming for you.
Speaker 1: For sure, confirmed as the next FBI director, I will
Speaker 1: remain focused on the FBI's core mission.
Speaker 1: That is to investigate fully wherever there is a constitutional
Speaker 1: factual basis to do so and to never make a
Speaker 1: prosecutorial decision that is solely the providence of the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice and the Attorney General.
Speaker 1: For the 1st 8 years after law school, I served
Speaker 1: as a public defender, first for Miami-Dade County and later
Speaker 1: for the Southern District of Florida.
Speaker 1: During that time, I represented some pretty awful human beings
Speaker 1: charged with some pretty heinous crimes.
Speaker 1: But what I learned there was the core value that
Speaker 1: has been enshrined in me since that due process must
Speaker 1: be provided without bias to all Americans. And if we
Speaker 1: cannot provide due process to the worst, then there can
Speaker 1: be no due process for anyone, and our constitutional republic fails.
Speaker 1: But I battled on that hill for that due process.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And that means Tish James.
Speaker 1: I think that given where you went and everything you
Speaker 1: did and the enormous fees that you tried to impose
Speaker 1: on the president, we're gonna have some problems we're gonna
Speaker 1: have a lot of problems with other democratic AGs across
Speaker 1: this country to make sure that we would be ready
Speaker 1: to respond to any attempt to roll back our rights.
Speaker 1: So here we are.
Speaker 1: We studied their platforms.
Speaker 1: We've identified certain possibilities, fact patterns. We've created contingency plans.
Speaker 1: So no matter what the next administration throws at us.
Speaker 1: We're ready. Yeah, OK. Well, glad to hear that because
Speaker 1: you better be ready because I have a feeling, just
Speaker 1: a little feeling, just a little inkling judging from some
Speaker 1: of what I heard from Kash Patel today that he's
Speaker 1: actually gonna be coming for you.
Speaker 1: And you know what, I'll go back to Pollymarket. It's
Speaker 1: looking like this guy's gonna get confirmed, so this is
Speaker 1: gonna be the new head of the FBI, and I
Speaker 1: think you're gonna have to answer a few questions. I mean,
Speaker 1: Eric Trump was asking these questions back in 2023 when
Speaker 1: you were going after his dad. He laid it out
Speaker 1: pretty well here. Right?
Speaker 2: You have
Speaker 2: a corrupt attorney general who literally ran on the campaign
Speaker 2: promise of taking down my father. She goes, I'm gonna
Speaker 2: go after Donald. I'm gonna take down his family, I'm
Speaker 2: gonna go after his children. I'm gonna get her exact quote,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna get to the office of Attorney General every day.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna sue Donald Trump and then I'm going to
Speaker 2: go home. I mean, she fundraise off of this nonsense.
Speaker 2: Like this was her entire platform going after Donald, after
Speaker 2: my father.
Speaker 2: Then obviously she gets into office and she does exactly
Speaker 2: that and you've got a crooked court and everything else,
Speaker 2: but actually I think we're making a breakthrough with the judge.
Speaker 2: I think they're starting to realize there are no victims.
Speaker 2: First of all, my father's statements are undervalued, not overvalued.
Speaker 2: Second of all, she's going after banks. She's trying to
Speaker 2: protect banks that made hundreds of millions of dollars with Trump,
Speaker 2: meaning there were no aggrieved party. There were no defaults,
Speaker 2: there were no, well, you guys, you guys made money
Speaker 2: that's why we would borrow, we borrow money.
Speaker 2: No, go do a great project, you know, be very
Speaker 2: successful jobs and homes, pay a tremendous amount of interest,
Speaker 2: and then pay the banks back in full. Like we
Speaker 2: never had so much as a default. No one, so
Speaker 2: we're sitting there saying, is there a victim in this?
Speaker 2: I mean, you're suing us and there's no victim, but,
Speaker 2: but Carly, it's nonsense. The DOJ has told Letitia James
Speaker 2: to make my father's life hell, to keep him tied
Speaker 2: up in a courtroom, to cost him tens and tens
Speaker 2: of millions of dollars to distract him.
Speaker 1: Right? And that's exactly what she did, and this is
Speaker 1: what she campaigned on. He's absolutely right. I mean, what
Speaker 1: kind of world are we living in? When you campaign
Speaker 1: on one thing, you're just gonna get someone because he's
Speaker 1: your political enemy and you think it's actually gonna land
Speaker 1: you some campaign dollars. This is what she did, you
Speaker 1: know it. He's called me venomous. We will fight back
Speaker 1: to your attempt to bring Trumpism to New York City.
Speaker 1: He's called me disgraceful.
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: President
Speaker 1: Illegitimate member
Speaker 1: He's called me radical. We know he's crazy.
Speaker 1: No, he
Speaker 1: mind.
Speaker 1: He's out of control.
Speaker 1: losing it.
Speaker 1: He's called me a racist. We've got to stand up
Speaker 1: to an an administration which is too male, too pale,
Speaker 1: and too stale. OK. So, you know the drill. All right.
Speaker 1: You know who she is, you know what she did.
Speaker 1: But what Ko is gonna try and get at, and
Speaker 1: this is what's gonna unravel everything and this is what
Speaker 1: everybody's so freaked out about is just exactly what role
Speaker 1: Merrick Garland, the DOJ, Biden, etc. played in all of
Speaker 1: this because I have a feeling they played a pretty
Speaker 1: decent instrumental role. This is something that Matt Gates.
Speaker 1: Was trying to get at when he was in the
Speaker 1: House of Representatives. I wanna show you this exchange he
Speaker 1: has with Garland and he's pushing him and he's asking
Speaker 1: just exactly what kind of communications did you guys have?
Speaker 1: It has now come out that we know at least
Speaker 1: they were communicating with Fannie Willis' BF who was running
Speaker 1: the case down in Georgia that was all thrown out
Speaker 1: because of disqualification, of course, um.
Speaker 1: Really lousy attorneys right across the board that were involved
Speaker 1: in this. Anyway, you've got Merrick Garland, who can't answer
Speaker 1: Matt Gates's question. This is really important. We got to
Speaker 1: get back to this and I know Kosh will. I
Speaker 1: want to play it for you. Here we go. Communicating
Speaker 1: with these state and local prosecutions against Trump, you can
Speaker 1: clear it all up for us right now. Will the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice provide to the committee all documents, all
Speaker 1: correspondence between the Department and Alvin Bragg's office and Fonn
Speaker 1: Willis's office and Letitia James's office?
Speaker 1: The offices you're referring to are independent offices of state.
Speaker 1: I get that. I get that. The question is whether
Speaker 1: or not you will provide all of your documents and correspondence.
Speaker 1: That's the question. I don't need a history lesson.
Speaker 1: Well,
Speaker 1: I'm going to say again, we do not control those offices.
Speaker 1: They make you communicate with them, not whether you control them.
Speaker 1: Do you communicate with them and will you provide those
Speaker 1: a request. We'll refer it to our Office of Legislative,
Speaker 1: here's the thing, you come in here and you lodge
Speaker 1: this attack, that it's a conspiracy theory that there is
Speaker 1: coordinated lawfare against Trump. And then when we say fine,
Speaker 1: just give us the documents, give us the correspondence, and
Speaker 1: then if it's
Speaker 1: But they couldn't
Speaker 1: You see, or they wouldn't.
Speaker 1: And instead, they leveled in nearly $500 million that's half
Speaker 1: a billion dollars guys, like this is a lot of money, right?
Speaker 1: It makes no sense against Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: In the case of Letitia James.
Speaker 1: And Judge Erdo in there who Arthur, who somehow thought
Speaker 1: that Mar a Lago was worth only $18 million. I
Speaker 1: mean this was bonkers. Remember this is part of the
Speaker 1: case actually just after he won the presidency, his lawyers
Speaker 1: came out and they tried to get her to drop
Speaker 1: this in the interest of the country and they're like,
Speaker 1: you know, this doesn't really make any sense because Mar
Speaker 1: a Lago, you were trying to say was somewhere around
Speaker 1: $18 million.18 million dollars.
Speaker 1: It makes more than 56 a year. Like, why would
Speaker 1: it be worth usually things trade on a multiple, right?
Speaker 1: You might say it's gonna trade at 10 times earnings. Well,
Speaker 1: if the earnings are 56, how are you valuing it
Speaker 1: at 18? I'm sorry, Leticia.
Speaker 1: Like you're not even a good lawyer, but forget about
Speaker 1: forget about valuing any kind of assets, and yet they,
Speaker 1: they come up with this $500 nearly $500 million dollar
Speaker 1: fine and she's out ready to seize his assets just
Speaker 1: waiting so she can take over Trump Tower and take
Speaker 1: over his golf courses. It's nuts, you guys. 4 days
Speaker 1: after a
Speaker 1: Judge ordered Donald Trump to pay $355 million for a
Speaker 1: decade of fraud. New York Attorney General Letitia James says
Speaker 1: she's prepared to do everything she can to make sure
Speaker 1: the former president pays his fine, including, she told us,
Speaker 1: seizing the buildings that bear his name. If he does
Speaker 1: not have funds to pay off the judgment, then we
Speaker 1: will seek judgment enforcement mechanisms in court, and we will
Speaker 1: ask the judge to seize his assets.
Speaker 1: That's what she was waiting for. Oh, she just wanted
Speaker 1: to seize us as, I mean, it's bonkers. So now
Speaker 1: it's in the appellate court, right? And we're waiting on
Speaker 1: the court of appeals who really can't get off their,
Speaker 1: you know what is and they're sitting there and they
Speaker 1: haven't done a damn thing yet.
Speaker 1: Even though we know how they feel, I mean they
Speaker 1: wouldn't even let Judith Bale, who was representing New York
Speaker 1: and Leticia James, she's at the appellate court, right? So
Speaker 1: she's supposed to be a little bit smarter and the
Speaker 1: judges are supposed to be a little bit smarter at
Speaker 1: the appellate court. Here's the New York Court of Appeals
Speaker 1: they wouldn't let her get a word out.
Speaker 1: May it please the Court, Judith Bale for the New
Speaker 1: York Attorney General's office. All of the defendants repeatedly violated,
Speaker 1: can you identify any previous case which the Attorney General
Speaker 1: sued under executive Law 6312 to upset a private business transaction.
Speaker 1: That was between equally sophisticated partners with the supposed victim
Speaker 1: had the ability and legal obligation to discover the allegedly
Speaker 1: misrepresented matters by conducting its own due diligence where the
Speaker 1: supposed wrongdoer advised the supposed victim through written disclaimers to
Speaker 1: conduct its own due diligence and to draw its own conclusions.
Speaker 1: The alleged misrepresentation almost entirely concerned inherently subjective valuations of
Speaker 1: properties and businesses and where and where the victim never
Speaker 1: complained about any fraud of the transactional losses from it
Speaker 1: because I've gone through the cases which you've cited and
Speaker 1: all of them always involved the consumer protection aspect. It
Speaker 1: involved protection of the market.
Speaker 1: And I want to add to his question and little
Speaker 1: to no impact on the public marketplace. Boom, OK, so
Speaker 1: no impact on the public markets, you have no victim.
Speaker 1: It sounds, as the judge said, like a private case,
Speaker 1: and yet Leticia brought it anyway.
Speaker 1: And now we're in a situation where she's promising to
Speaker 1: double down. She's doubling down, but yet, you know, you
Speaker 1: got one Cosh Patel who's coming in as head of
Speaker 1: the FBI, and I think he's gonna be wanting to
Speaker 1: do some of his due diligence to figure out just
Speaker 1: exactly how this all came about, which is why people
Speaker 1: like Dick Durbin are so freaked out. He goes on
Speaker 1: CNN he's trying to talk down cash and say, oh,
Speaker 1: he's not qualified. Let me tell you, the guy's qualified.
Speaker 1: It is such a loss. Are, are you aware of
Speaker 1: the hearing is still going on as planned today in
Speaker 1: less than an hour, frankly.
Speaker 1: 9:30 we're going to start the hearing on the person
Speaker 1: the president has chosen to lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Speaker 1: I can tell you I have some serious questions about
Speaker 1: his competence for that responsibility. Remember we're talking about.
Speaker 1: 38,000 criminal and civil investigators and the premier law enforcement
Speaker 1: agency not just in the United States but in the world.
Speaker 1: We want a person there who is responsible, experienced, and
Speaker 1: can handle this awesome responsibility. Senator, have general questions, as
Speaker 1: you just said about his ability to handle an agency
Speaker 1: of that size, but you also have very specific questions
Speaker 1: about a specific moment during the end of the Trump administration. Explain.
Speaker 1: Well I can tell you that you don't have to
Speaker 1: go searching for a playbook when it comes to Mr.
Speaker 1: Cash Patel. He has published a book called Government Gangsters
Speaker 1: which goes into excruciating detail about his theories on political
Speaker 1: conspiracies and retribution against those who did not treat him
Speaker 1: properly over the years to give this man the authority
Speaker 1: of leading the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Speaker 1: I think it is questionable. We need someone with sound
Speaker 1: judgment who is not driven by politics and Mr. Patel
Speaker 1: does not fit that description. Understood, and I was referring
Speaker 1: to the hostage rescue and his like.
Speaker 1: Like Biden's people were not driven by politics. Are you
Speaker 1: kidding me? I mean, he says this right with a
Speaker 1: straight face. so they hate him because they're terrified of
Speaker 1: what he is going to find out. Alvin Bragg, Leticia James,
Speaker 1: Fannie Willis, and Jack Smith.
Speaker 1: Like they they're so freaked out about what is about
Speaker 1: to be uncovered if Cash gets the gig and Cash
Speaker 1: is gonna get the gig because, well, you know, I'm
Speaker 1: basing this on Polymarket which tends to have a pretty
Speaker 1: good instinct on these things, 94 94% chance at this
Speaker 1: point in time he's gonna get confirmed. Pete Hegseth got confirmed.
Speaker 1: RFK is gonna get confirmed. I'm telling you, the whole
Speaker 1: world is gonna change as you know it. Maybe Tulsi
Speaker 1: we'll talk about that in a little bit, but Joy Reid,
Speaker 1: you know, she's the one who was just oh thank goodness,
Speaker 1: you know, all these people like Leticia and Fannie and Alvin,
Speaker 1: they're bringing it home for me. In prison, but for me,
Speaker 1: there is something wonderfully poetic about the fact that despite
Speaker 1: the fact that even if convicted, he's not gonna go
Speaker 1: to prison.
Speaker 1: The first person to actually criminally prosecute Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: a black Harvard grad, the very kind of person that
Speaker 1: his former staff, the people who worked for him, Stephen Miller, etc.
Speaker 1: want to never be at Harvard Law School, but he was,
Speaker 1: and he came out and graduated and he's prosecuting you, Donald,
Speaker 1: and a black woman is doing the same exact thing
Speaker 1: in Georgia and a black woman forced you to pay
Speaker 1: $175 million.
Speaker 1: that's out now also in question because the people who
Speaker 1: put it up, that might not be legit. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is being held to account by the very multicultural, multiracial
Speaker 1: democracy that he's trying to dismantle and for me there's
Speaker 1: something poetic and actually wonderful about that. It says something
Speaker 1: good about our country that we're still capable of having
Speaker 1: that happen. Go DEI if my DEIs are bringing it
Speaker 1: home on Her DEIs are bringing it home.
Speaker 1: A bunch of lawsuits that by the way, you know
Speaker 1: I guess they got out and brag and they can
Speaker 1: brag that they got the felony conviction there but that
Speaker 1: it's eventually gonna get tossed out in the appellate court.
Speaker 1: Letitia James has got nothing. In fact, if anything, if
Speaker 1: you listen to what those appellate judges were saying, they
Speaker 1: were like, wait a second, we need to make sure
Speaker 1: that like this kind of stuff doesn't happen before because
Speaker 1: again because if it happened here it could happen again
Speaker 1: and we need to rein in these very politically motivated prosecutors.
Speaker 1: And the, the DEI's, I'm sorry but like been there
Speaker 1: done that like that's not working it's not working for
Speaker 1: this country, you know, we are a meritocracy and we
Speaker 1: were founded on that in the United States of America
Speaker 1: we don't care what color you are, we don't care
Speaker 1: what sex you are. We only care that you can
Speaker 1: get the job done. let me tell you that's all
Speaker 1: Donald Trump cares about for sure. I mean, for goodness sakes,
Speaker 1: we saw that today, did we not?
Speaker 1: We saw that on display, he said over and over
Speaker 1: and over again, we can't be relying on DEI. We're
Speaker 1: gonna get into that coming up. It's one of the
Speaker 1: reasons I started 76 Research, by the way, my financial firm,
Speaker 1: 76 Research.com, use code word dollar you can get the
Speaker 1: $76 report for just $1 a month. I encourage you
Speaker 1: to do that, but this was in part because I
Speaker 1: saw Wall Street doing this and.
Speaker 1: Like this makes no sense. I talked to my buddy
Speaker 1: Rob who run billions of dollars for decades on Wall Street,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, what is going on? We both have
Speaker 1: the same reaction. So that's partly why we started that.
Speaker 1: I'll get into more of that later, but I just
Speaker 1: wanna say like DEI is not like that is not,
Speaker 1: that is not a reason to be doing things really.
Speaker 1: I mean.
Speaker 1: If you want diversity because it actually gets you to
Speaker 1: a better place and you want other perspectives, great, but
Speaker 1: if you're just trying to check a box because you
Speaker 1: wanna make other people feel better about themselves, no, no, no, no, no, look,
Speaker 1: and I'm just gonna point this this out, you know,
Speaker 1: Leticia's going after him now because of, well.
Speaker 1: I'm also signing an executive order to instruct the Departments
Speaker 1: of Defense and Homeland Security to begin preparing the 30,000
Speaker 1: person migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay. Most people don't even
Speaker 1: know about it.
Speaker 1: We have 30,000 beds in Guantanamo to detain the worst
Speaker 1: criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people. Some of them
Speaker 1: are so bad we don't even trust the countries to
Speaker 1: hold them because we don't want them coming back, so
Speaker 1: we're gonna send them out to Guantanamo. This will double
Speaker 1: our capacity immediately, right? and tough. That's a tough, that's
Speaker 1: a tough place to get out of.
Speaker 1: Today's signings bring us one step closer to eradicating the
Speaker 1: scourge of migrant crime in our communities once and for all.
Speaker 1: And it was just a purely, it's just an unforced
Speaker 1: error that we even have to be doing this now
Speaker 1: we need Congress to provide full funding for the complete
Speaker 1: and total restoration of our sovereign borders as well as
Speaker 1: financial support to remove record numbers of illegal aliens.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: Leticia apparently doesn't like that very much. Steve Fris saying, uh, uh,
Speaker 1: this is Trump should sign an order, an executive order
Speaker 1: Operation Hummingbird against these people. Look, it's happening, Steve. It's happening,
Speaker 1: you guys. They are not, this is not the same
Speaker 1: Trump administration.
Speaker 1: They have been through hell, OK, for 4 years they
Speaker 1: were trying to bankrupt him. They were trying to put
Speaker 1: him and his family in jail. They know what the
Speaker 1: Democrats are capable of and they wanna make sure that
Speaker 1: that doesn't ever happen again. In the meantime, in.
Speaker 1: In the meantime, guess what? He also wants to make
Speaker 1: sure that the country's in a better position so that means, yeah,
Speaker 1: getting him ready the DEI stuff. It means, yeah, arresting
Speaker 1: criminals because by the way, Leticia, whether you like it
Speaker 1: or not, the federal government does have jurisdiction.
Speaker 1: Over things like who is in the country you don't
Speaker 1: have jurisdiction over that and for the most part, most
Speaker 1: people don't want criminals in the country. I mean, heck,
Speaker 1: even Whoopi Goldberg admitted so much on The View just
Speaker 1: yesterday this must have taken a lot out of her.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you the contracts on the line. She must
Speaker 1: be in like renegotiation right now because she's actually sounding normal.
Speaker 1: It's just for a couple. 87% support deporting criminal undocumented.
Speaker 1: I don't know anybody in the world, yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: know anybody in the world who wants to keep the criminals.
Speaker 1: I don't know anybody that can I say something because
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 1: No one in the world actually wants to keep the criminals.
Speaker 1: It's like 87%. The polls are overwhelming, showing no one
Speaker 1: actually wants criminals in the country, although ICE tells us
Speaker 1: we have 650,000 of them, 650,000, and the administration would say,
Speaker 1: you know what, you're a criminal if you're in this
Speaker 1: country illegally.
Speaker 1: period. Well, here's Leticia saying guess what we got laws
Speaker 1: we got laws that protect our immigrants and limit cooperation
Speaker 1: with federal immigration enforcement efforts. Those laws should be followed
Speaker 1: by law enforcement and officials in our state. I'll always
Speaker 1: uphold our laws and protect immigrant New Yorkers, so.
Speaker 1: She's like, you know, going AWOL like she's she's kind
Speaker 1: of like left the reservation here. Leticia thinks that New
Speaker 1: York is its own little country and can do its
Speaker 1: own little thing, and we hate to remind her, but
Speaker 1: she's a lawyer after all, maybe not a very good one,
Speaker 1: not a very bright one, just a very political one. Leticia,
Speaker 1: the federal government.
Speaker 1: Like if they have any power at all, it's the
Speaker 1: power over who is in our country, it is the
Speaker 1: power over our borders, lady understood? No, she doesn't understand.
Speaker 1: Here she is just this week talking about how she's
Speaker 1: gonna take on Trump. Not only does this administration's new
Speaker 1: policy put people at risk, but it is plainly unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: The president does not get to decide which laws to
Speaker 1: enforce and for whom.
Speaker 1: When Congress dedicates funding for a program, the president cannot
Speaker 1: pull that funding on a whim. Later today,
Speaker 1: I'm leading and joining with my colleagues, my fellow Democratic
Speaker 1: attorney generals and suing this administration to stop this illegal freeze. OK,
Speaker 1: so you know where she's going. You're hearing the same
Speaker 1: thing out of California and you're gonna have these little
Speaker 1: annexes of places that are all gonna try and do
Speaker 1: this and I'm just gonna remind you that there's a
Speaker 1: new team in charge. You got Pam Bondi coming in
Speaker 1: as attorney general. You're gonna have Cos Patel running the FBI.
Speaker 1: So I'm just gonna say, Leticia, you know what?
Speaker 1: He's he's got some.
Speaker 1: Some top people.
Speaker 1: Right now who are not gonna put up with your BS.
Speaker 1: And this is one fight. I'm sorry lady you're just
Speaker 1: not gonna win.
Speaker 1: She says she's ready though, she's been preparing for this
Speaker 1: day forever. With other democratic AGs across this country to
Speaker 1: make sure that we would be ready to respond to
Speaker 1: any attempt to roll back our rights.
Speaker 1: So here we are.
Speaker 1: We studied their platforms.
Speaker 1: We've identified certain possibilities, fact patterns. We've created contingency plans.
Speaker 1: So no matter what the next administration throws at us.
Speaker 1: We're ready.
Speaker 1: We're ready to respond to their attacks.
Speaker 1: OK, yeah, yeah, yeah, she's been fundraising for a while
Speaker 1: on this. She's all ready to throw a few more
Speaker 1: lawsuits out there. She's got one already. She brags about
Speaker 1: how she got 100 in during the last go around,
Speaker 1: so give her money because she'll sue Trump for it. Listen,
Speaker 1: this shouldn't be that controversial, OK?
Speaker 1: Getting rid of DEI should not be controversial. I mean,
Speaker 1: Martin Luther King is the one who didn't want to
Speaker 1: see people by color now, did he? And yet all
Speaker 1: they can see is color.
Speaker 1: Obama, he actually led the charge on getting illegals out
Speaker 1: of the country he was right out in front of
Speaker 1: this and by the way, Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton,
Speaker 1: they all said the same thing but it's funny how
Speaker 1: it changes when it's Trump, right? Like I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I played this for you guys I'm gonna play it again.
Speaker 1: We go. If you're a criminal, you'll be deported.
Speaker 1: If you plan to enter the US illegally, your chances
Speaker 1: of getting caught and sent back just went up.
Speaker 1: Oopsie, I didn't want to come home. You'll be deported.
Speaker 1: If you plan to enter the US illegally, your chances
Speaker 1: of getting caught and sent back just went up.
Speaker 1: The actions I'm taking are not only lawful, they're the
Speaker 1: kinds of actions taken by every single Republican president and
Speaker 1: every single Democratic president for the past half century.
Speaker 1: And to those members of Congress who question my authority
Speaker 1: to make our immigration system work better.
Speaker 1: Or question the wisdom of me acting where Congress has failed,
Speaker 1: I have one answer.
Speaker 1: Pass a bill.
Speaker 1: OK, so here's the upshot. Guess what? Mr. Obama, President
Speaker 1: Obama sent them all out. He sent out more illegals
Speaker 1: than any other president. So how does that quite work? Leticia,
Speaker 1: apparently New York was fine with it then, right? New
Speaker 1: York was totally fine with it then. It just changes
Speaker 1: once it's Trump. But you know Caroline Levitt made something
Speaker 1: pretty clear the other day in her press conference. She
Speaker 1: said this is how we view it. We realized Biden didn't.
Speaker 1: see it this way, but this is how we see it.
Speaker 1: 500 arrests ISIS has made so far since President Trump
Speaker 1: came back into office. Can you just tell us the numbers?
Speaker 1: How many have a criminal record versus those who are
Speaker 1: just in the country illegally? All of them, because they
Speaker 1: illegally broke our nation's laws and therefore they are criminals
Speaker 1: as far as this administration goes. I know the last
Speaker 1: administration didn't see it that way, so it's a big
Speaker 1: culture shift in our nation to view someone who breaks
Speaker 1: our immigration laws as a criminal, but that's exactly what
Speaker 1: they are.
Speaker 1: So there you go apparently it had to be said
Speaker 1: even though Obama was very out front about sending back
Speaker 1: people who were here illegally so this is what.
Speaker 1: You have to conclude this is about Trump. This is
Speaker 1: about hating Trump and they're continuing to make their political
Speaker 1: careers all about hating Trump. They just wanna get in
Speaker 1: the way and it's, it's the, it's as Joy said
Speaker 1: her favorite DEI is bringing it home. In prison, but
Speaker 1: for me there is something wonderfully poetic about the fact
Speaker 1: that despite the fact that even if convicted, he's not
Speaker 1: going to go to prison.
Speaker 1: The first person to actually criminally prosecute Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: a black Harvard grad, the very kind of person that
Speaker 1: his former staff, the people who worked for him, Stephen Miller, etc.
Speaker 1: want to never be at Harvard Law School, but he was,
Speaker 1: and he came out and graduated and he's prosecuting you, Donald.
Speaker 1: And a black woman is doing the same exact thing
Speaker 1: in Georgia and a black woman forced you to pay
Speaker 1: a $175 million fine that's out now also in question
Speaker 1: because the people who put it up, that might not
Speaker 1: be legit. Donald Trump is being held to account by
Speaker 1: the very multicultural, multiracial democracy that he's trying to dismantle
Speaker 1: and for me.
Speaker 1: There's something poetic and actually wonderful about that. It says
Speaker 1: something good about our country that we're still capable of
Speaker 1: having that happen. Go DEI if my DEIs are bringing
Speaker 1: bringing it home. I mean that is just sort of pathetic, right?
Speaker 1: She's saying that Steve Fishman, he's very much into um
Speaker 1: having some kind of operation, right? You, you gotta go
Speaker 1: after Leticia maybe she's gonna do time.
Speaker 1: I don't know like I, I think that I think
Speaker 1: that there's a lot of people that you have to
Speaker 1: go after. I think that this was a very, very
Speaker 1: sort of, um, wide spanning op. I think that Garland,
Speaker 1: you know, I, I wanna know like how much were
Speaker 1: they coordinating with all of these people also thank you
Speaker 1: Steve for your generosity um you did watch some of
Speaker 1: the Tulsi hearing that's good we're gonna get to the
Speaker 1: Tulsi hearing because.
Speaker 1: I saw some of that too, and I, there's some
Speaker 1: quotes that are really, really important and significant and it
Speaker 1: relates to what's going on like Cash needs to look
Speaker 1: into this. Tulsi needs to look into this and you know,
Speaker 1: for all those that are trying to say that Cash
Speaker 1: Patel doesn't have the qualifications, give me a break. Well educated,
Speaker 1: worked there as a public defender and Miami-Dade County believes
Speaker 1: in the justice of our system, right? and if you believe.
Speaker 1: Really in in what we are as a nation, everybody
Speaker 1: deserves due process and this was his point and this
Speaker 1: is not what they gave Donald Trump. They didn't offer
Speaker 1: that to him in any way. He was like automatically
Speaker 1: guilty just because he was Donald Trump and now you
Speaker 1: have to go appeal, appeal, appeal. Well, you know, he's
Speaker 1: lucky he has the ability to do that, but what
Speaker 1: about somebody who's just sort of starting out in politics
Speaker 1: and suddenly they're on the wrong side of things because
Speaker 1: they're on the wrong side of.
Speaker 1: aisle, it's really bad. Donald Trump meanwhile almost responding here
Speaker 1: like that, that, that bit from Joy Reid that I
Speaker 1: just played you talking about go DEIs, that's from a
Speaker 1: while back. I'll tell you, Donald Trump has no use
Speaker 1: for DEI. Donald Trump came out right away as soon
Speaker 1: as he took office, signed an executive order, we're getting
Speaker 1: rid of DEI. He is done with it and as
Speaker 1: it relates to this horrible tragedy.
Speaker 1: Horrible, um, just, just, just awful, right? Like in, in,
Speaker 1: in any time something like this happens, I, I just
Speaker 1: can't stop thinking about the families, and it was a
Speaker 1: tough night last night as I was watching this news
Speaker 1: come in and hearing everything, but I will say this
Speaker 1: it was very interesting. Donald Trump was all over. He
Speaker 1: was asking the right questions actually.
Speaker 1: Like at midnight saying why the heck was the helicopter
Speaker 1: flying so low? What was going on? Why didn't they
Speaker 1: maneuver and get out of the way and you had
Speaker 1: Sean Duffy right on the scene, went straight down there.
Speaker 1: This is our new transportation secretary. I mean he had
Speaker 1: just been sworn in. You think Pete Buttigieg would have
Speaker 1: done that? Heck, remember when the trains derailed? Where was Pete?
Speaker 1: didn't show up for for months and Biden didn't show
Speaker 1: up like nobody nobody gave any information instead last night
Speaker 1: you had this very transparent approach. You had Caroline Levitt
Speaker 1: go right on Fox News and as she was getting
Speaker 1: information in in real time, she had just.
Speaker 1: Learned that the president had been briefed on it. She
Speaker 1: was telling the viewers that it was, it was actually
Speaker 1: really remarkable to see. And then of course Donald Trump
Speaker 1: sending out a tooth last night asking the right questions
Speaker 1: like why would this helicopter be flying so low like
Speaker 1: that doesn't make sense and why didn't they try and
Speaker 1: get out of the way? What is going on? And,
Speaker 1: and he of course you had a situation where immediately
Speaker 1: CNN and others are trying to blame him.
Speaker 1: Which is crazy, but nonetheless he's, he's frustrated and part
Speaker 1: of what he wants to change is this diversity equity
Speaker 1: inclusion thing because in his view, and by the way
Speaker 1: I agree with this wholeheartedly, you know that um we
Speaker 1: need to get back to being American.
Speaker 1: where people are rewarded because they're actually good at the
Speaker 1: job and so today he came out swinging really hard
Speaker 1: against DEI in the military in the FAA and anywhere
Speaker 1: else in government. I want you to hear it. And
Speaker 1: then when I left office and Biden took over, he
Speaker 1: changed them back to lower.
Speaker 1: than ever before.
Speaker 1: I put safety first. Obama, Biden, and the Democrats put
Speaker 1: policy first, and they put politics at a level that nobody's.
Speaker 1: Ever seen because this was the lowest level. Their policy
Speaker 1: was horrible and their politics was even worse.
Speaker 1: So as you know last week long before the crash,
Speaker 1: I signed an executive order restoring our higher standards for
Speaker 1: air traffic controllers and other important jobs throughout the country.
Speaker 1: So it was very interesting. About a week ago.
Speaker 1: Almost upon.
Speaker 1: Entering office, I signed something last week that was an
Speaker 1: executive order, very powerful on restoring the highest standards of
Speaker 1: air traffic control.
Speaker 1: So he got heavily criticized for that.
Speaker 1: Today I was like, how dare you bring this up?
Speaker 1: How dare you suggest.
Speaker 1: That there was any issue with competency whatever it's too
Speaker 1: soon and like you know in a transparent environment, obviously
Speaker 1: we're all devastated, devastated.
Speaker 1: But you also want some answers, right? You wanna understand
Speaker 1: why this happened and so he did bring this issue up.
Speaker 1: He did criticize the last administration, specifically the former head
Speaker 1: of the Department of Transportation, the guy who couldn't show
Speaker 1: up when the train derailment happened, one Pete Buttigieg, he
Speaker 1: had some choice words for the former mayor out there
Speaker 1: in Indiana.
Speaker 1: The FAA website shows that the agency's guidance on diversity
Speaker 1: hiring were last updated on March 23rd of 22. They
Speaker 1: wanted to make it even more so, and then I
Speaker 1: came in and I assume maybe this is the reason
Speaker 1: the FAA.
Speaker 1: Which is overseen by Secretary Pete Buttigieg.
Speaker 1: A real winner. That's the guy's a real winner. Do
Speaker 1: you know how badly everything's run since he's run this
Speaker 1: Department of Transportation. He's a disaster.
Speaker 1: He was a disaster as a mayor. He ran his
Speaker 1: City into the ground and he's a disaster now. He's
Speaker 1: just got a good line of bull.
Speaker 1: The Department of Transportation, his government agency charged with regulating
Speaker 1: civil aviation. Well, he runs it, 45,000 people and he's
Speaker 1: run it right into the ground with his diversity.
Speaker 1: So he's changing that.
Speaker 1: Uh, he, he was fired up. I mean, you heard it,
Speaker 1: we had to bleep it out, you know, Pete Buttigieg
Speaker 1: and his BS, he, um, decided today he was gonna
Speaker 1: appoint a 22 year veteran of the FAA to run
Speaker 1: the place. Listen to this. They are working tirelessly to
Speaker 1: figure out exactly what happened. We, we will state certain opinions, however,
Speaker 1: I'm also immediately appointing an acting commissioner to the FAA,
Speaker 1: Christopher Rocheleu.
Speaker 1: A 22 year veteran of the agency, highly respected. Christopher,
Speaker 1: thank you very much appreciate it. So he's got a
Speaker 1: new head of the FAA or at least an interim
Speaker 1: head of the FAA. He says he's getting rid of DEI.
Speaker 1: The DEI is the problem, all caused by this wokeness.
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, don't tell whoopie that don't, don't, don't, right?
Speaker 1: Like she was just saying.
Speaker 1: Gosh, none of you guys, you, you wouldn't be anywhere
Speaker 1: if it wasn't for wokeness. Yeah, I would like this
Speaker 1: young lady who's this is her first job, I would
Speaker 1: like her to do a little homework because she said
Speaker 1: something yesterday that really pissed me off. This is Caroline Levitt,
Speaker 1: the wonderful Caroline Levitt, who happens to be from my
Speaker 1: home state of New Hampshire, young woman, young mother out
Speaker 1: there working tirelessly, by the way, giving information very transparently
Speaker 1: late last night.
Speaker 1: I mean wow blowing everybody away didn't even need a
Speaker 1: notebook when she did her first press conference just took
Speaker 1: questions and spoke directly to those reporters anyway here is
Speaker 1: Whoopi really just going on and on about how much
Speaker 1: she dislikes her because you know she doesn't respect wokeness
Speaker 1: and DEI enough.
Speaker 1: And that was, she said there will be no wokeness here.
Speaker 1: Let me explain something to you, because without that wokeness,
Speaker 1: you might not have that job because
Speaker 1: Because women were not invited to that table. Women were
Speaker 1: not invited to many tables in this nation. The reason
Speaker 1: we fought.
Speaker 1: And busted our behinds to make sure that you didn't
Speaker 1: have to worry about this. And now to hear you
Speaker 1: talk about it and to hear anybody talk about the wokeness,
Speaker 1: the wokeness was put in place for a reason, because
Speaker 1: black people couldn't get into colleges.
Speaker 1: Because women could not get into the colleges they wanted
Speaker 1: to go to. This is all women. See, this is
Speaker 1: not black, Asian women, this is all women. Women were
Speaker 1: not invited to this party. It was a man's world
Speaker 1: and we busted our asses to make sure that this
Speaker 1: was a person's world. So please, please stop using that
Speaker 1: phrase to talk about because you don't understand what you're saying.
Speaker 1: You're saying about yourself that, you know, hey.
Speaker 1: That's a terrible thing to be. It's not a terrible
Speaker 1: thing to be. That's why we fought. That's what we
Speaker 1: were fighting for so that you could stand in that
Speaker 1: podium so that Katherine Jean-Pierre could stand at that podium.
Speaker 1: So women of all kinds of colors and ilks wherever
Speaker 1: they came from, whatever their belief system was, they had
Speaker 1: the opportunity to bust down that door.
Speaker 1: The thing is, it's 2025. All right, so we're not
Speaker 1: living in that world anymore. Guess what? Women can do anything. Heck.
Speaker 1: they, they, they, they're doing it all. They're doing it all, Whoopi.
Speaker 1: All right, so you don't need to rely on DEI anymore.
Speaker 1: Don't you think that we ought to be actually thinking
Speaker 1: about getting back to actually having women.
Speaker 1: Or anyone else in positions because they deserve to be there.
Speaker 1: I mean, Pete Hegseth had something interesting to say.
Speaker 1: On this speaking on Fox News with Jessie Waters I
Speaker 1: wanna play you this clip because he's our new defense
Speaker 1: secretary by the way, talking about how we should think
Speaker 1: about diversity and how that actually really isn't the strength
Speaker 1: the strength is actually unity listen.
Speaker 1: What's happening with DEI? How's that going at the Defense Department? Well,
Speaker 1: DEI is not going well at the Defense Department because
Speaker 1: it's dead. Uh, we will, as the president said in
Speaker 1: his inaugural, we will be merit-based and color blind, and
Speaker 1: that is the case at the Defense Department.
Speaker 1: is going to be ripped out root and branch because
Speaker 1: we want everyone treated equally with high standards and held
Speaker 1: accountable with war fighting, lethality, and readiness front and center.
Speaker 1: We don't have time for emphasizing differences. Jesse, one of
Speaker 1: the dumbest phrases in military history.
Speaker 1: Is our diversity is our strength. Our diversity is not
Speaker 1: our strength. Our unity and our shared purpose is our strength,
Speaker 1: and the Pentagon is excited to get back to that
Speaker 1: core mission. It's happening rapidly. The services are responding, and
Speaker 1: those that don't want to respond can work somewhere else.
Speaker 1: So diversity, equity, inclusion will not be a part of
Speaker 1: the Defense Department, not a minute long. All right?
Speaker 1: So that's where we are. I mean think about it though.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you're an organization, if you're an organization
Speaker 1: and you say, all right, we need to follow this
Speaker 1: DEI prescription, so we're gonna go out and we're gonna
Speaker 1: get everybody with the last name that begins with the
Speaker 1: letter D, and we're gonna say we're gonna hire you
Speaker 1: and make you into something because your last name begins
Speaker 1: with the letter D. Well, obviously you're limiting your.
Speaker 1: A pool of the people that would really be talented
Speaker 1: in the job because you're only looking at the people
Speaker 1: with the last name that begins with the letter D
Speaker 1: and so because it's so important to get these special
Speaker 1: special people all of a sudden you start overlooking things
Speaker 1: like deficiencies and maybe you know the reality that they're
Speaker 1: not the best at that particular job you're pretending that
Speaker 1: they're better than they are. You're, you're doing all these
Speaker 1: things to bump them up within the organization.
Speaker 1: Instead of actually focusing on, wait a second, we just
Speaker 1: need the best person.
Speaker 1: Man, woman, black, white, purple, we just need the best
Speaker 1: person for the job and that's all we care about
Speaker 1: and isn't that truly what you wanna be as a society,
Speaker 1: isn't that what America is known for? Isn't that why
Speaker 1: people all over the world from all kinds of different
Speaker 1: backgrounds wanna come here for the American dream so that
Speaker 1: they have a shot at at achieving something in a.
Speaker 1: Society that believes in the power of the individual believes
Speaker 1: in the power of creativity and rewards hard work. This
Speaker 1: DEI stuff is actually the antithesis of all of that,
Speaker 1: but you can't say it. You just can't say it
Speaker 1: these days. I mean, the media is going after Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: How dare you say this? I mean, obviously, yes, we're
Speaker 1: dealing with the tragedy.
Speaker 1: He's looking for answers. He's asking questions, but no, you
Speaker 1: can't bring up DEI. Gosh darn it. How dare you?
Speaker 1: I mean, you can't bring up DEI, by the way,
Speaker 1: you get CNN blaming him literally last night saying, well,
Speaker 1: it's because he's been firing all these people and because
Speaker 1: he's been firing these people, that's why we have a problem.
Speaker 1: So this pundit.
Speaker 1: Over at CNN he put out this kind of nasty
Speaker 1: tweet talking about this effort that's being made to get
Speaker 1: rid of DEI and how they're just, you know, slicing
Speaker 1: the government down because of it and he had to
Speaker 1: almost immediately retract it because you know they, they were
Speaker 1: still unfortunately.
Speaker 1: You know, trying to figure out what was going on,
Speaker 1: we didn't know how many people were dead. It was
Speaker 1: just it was a terrible night, right, really, really terrible
Speaker 1: night and this guy's out there playing the blame game
Speaker 1: and then you get Jim Acosta who used to be
Speaker 1: over at CNN until he got fired. Oh, I should
Speaker 1: say till he got sort of pushed aside. They offered
Speaker 1: him the midnight shift, burning the midnight oil. I didn't
Speaker 1: want to work that hard, so Jim Acosta left and
Speaker 1: now he's doing something else, I guess he's got a
Speaker 1: newsletter or something. He's reigniting his war with Donald Trump
Speaker 1: in a desperate effort to try to stay relevant. I'm sorry, Jim.
Speaker 1: I just don't think that that many people are gonna
Speaker 1: look at your newsletter, but you know, the reality I
Speaker 1: should also point out in the New York Post had
Speaker 1: a story on this is that the actual hiring freeze
Speaker 1: didn't actually affect a lot of these people granted, you
Speaker 1: do have the FAA saying we didn't have enough people
Speaker 1: on like there was only one guy. Why wasn't there
Speaker 1: more people like, and, and again that's what's going on?
Speaker 1: How is government that messed up that they don't have
Speaker 1: the proper number of people.
Speaker 1: That are they're in charge of where the planes are flying.
Speaker 1: How could you not? I mean, that's pretty bad. And
Speaker 1: then how could you have a pilot who didn't have
Speaker 1: the ability to sort of respond and act quickly when
Speaker 1: you see the plane, right, the helicopter should be getting
Speaker 1: out of the plane's way.
Speaker 1: So there's a lot of questions that are being asked
Speaker 1: and that should be asked, but Donald Trump is in
Speaker 1: trouble and he's getting mad at the media again. So
Speaker 1: CNN is blaming him for having said that it was
Speaker 1: DEI that's responsible for the midair collision.
Speaker 1: And because he said that, they started this whole thing.
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer joining in on the act, Senator Schumer today, watch.
Speaker 1: Mr. President, this morning our hearts go out to everyone
Speaker 1: impacted by the horrible, heartbreaking incident at Reagan Washington National
Speaker 1: Airport last night. I've been briefed on the horrific incident
Speaker 1: at DCA and have continued to monitor the situation.
Speaker 1: My heart goes out to everyone who was impacted by
Speaker 1: this incident. I'm praying for the victims, their families, and
Speaker 1: our brave first responders as we monitor the situation.
Speaker 1: But I have to tell you, I just watched President
Speaker 1: Trump's news conference.
Speaker 1: Listen, it's one thing for Internet pundits to spew off conspiracies.
Speaker 1: It's another for the president of the United States to
Speaker 1: throw out idle speculation as bodies are still being recovered
Speaker 1: and families are still notified.
Speaker 1: It just turns your stomach.
Speaker 1: So that's the party line. Got it. Chuck Schumer said it.
Speaker 1: AOC followed it. I represent LaGuardia Airport as well as
Speaker 1: workers for JFK. She writes, Trump gutted the Aviation Safety
Speaker 1: Committee last week. Air traffic controllers already understaffed, got Trump's
Speaker 1: buyout this week, and within a week, uh, they have
Speaker 1: an ultimatum to decide. It's not DEI, it's him, it's
Speaker 1: Elon too. So this came up at the press conference.
Speaker 1: And uh Kaitlin Collins, who seems to be making a
Speaker 1: run for Jim Acosta's job there at CNN, got into
Speaker 1: it with the president.
Speaker 2: yet know the names of the 67 people who were
Speaker 2: killed and you are blaming Democrats and DEI policies and
Speaker 2: air traffic control and seemingly the member of the US
Speaker 2: military who was flying that Black Hawk helicopter, don't you
Speaker 2: think
Speaker 1: you're getting ahead of the investigation right
Speaker 1: now? I don't think so at all. I don't think
Speaker 1: were the names of the people, you mean the names
Speaker 1: of the people that are on the plane.
Speaker 1: You think that's going to make a difference. They are
Speaker 1: a group of people that have lost their lives. If
Speaker 1: you want a list of the names, we can give
Speaker 1: you that. We'll be giving that very soon. We're in
Speaker 1: coordination with American Airlines. We're in coordination very strongly, obviously
Speaker 1: with the military, but I think that's not a very
Speaker 1: smart question. I'm surprised coming from you.
Speaker 1: Uh, I'm surprised coming from you, so I think he
Speaker 1: has a soft spot for her, but that may not
Speaker 1: last long. That may not last long. Another reporter asking
Speaker 1: a similar question. DEI and the claims that you've made,
Speaker 1: are you saying this crash was somehow caused and the
Speaker 1: result of diversity hiring, and what evidence have you seen
Speaker 1: to support these claims? It could have been. We have
Speaker 1: a high standard. We've had a much higher standard than
Speaker 1: anybody else.
Speaker 1: And there are things where you have to go by
Speaker 1: brain power, you have to go by psychological, uh, quality,
Speaker 1: and psychological quality is a very important element of it.
Speaker 1: These are various very powerful tests that we put to use,
Speaker 1: and they were terminated by Biden and Biden went by
Speaker 1: a standard that's the exact opposite. So we don't know,
Speaker 1: but we do know that you had two planes at
Speaker 1: the same level. You had a helicopter and a plane.
Speaker 1: It shouldn't have happened.
Speaker 1: And we'll see, we're going to look into that and
Speaker 1: we're going to see, but certainly for an air traffic
Speaker 1: controller we want the brightest, the smartest, the sharpest. we
Speaker 1: want somebody that's psychologically superior and that's what we're going
Speaker 1: to have, yeah, please go ahead.
Speaker 1: So he wants the best.
Speaker 1: What's wrong with wanting the best? Apparently he can't say
Speaker 1: that right now because this came up yet again as
Speaker 1: he was signing a bill. They still were going back
Speaker 1: to this. Mr. President, if uh you know, 64 people
Speaker 1: lost their lives last night, um, if you aren't confident
Speaker 1: that DEI had any role, why bring it up? Well,
Speaker 1: all I'm talking about is confidence, and we want in
Speaker 1: the uh
Speaker 1: In that particular position, we have to have the most
Speaker 1: competent people in our country because we're talking about lives.
Speaker 1: Now it may or may not have had to do,
Speaker 1: but I don't like the fact that the helicopter was
Speaker 1: at the exact same level as the airplane.
Speaker 1: The helicopter should have been.
Speaker 1: 1000 ft or 500 ft above it or something below it.
Speaker 1: The plane was at 300 to 400 ft or the
Speaker 1: plane should have been stopped because the helicopter could have stopped.
Speaker 1: The plane can't be stopped, but the plane was on
Speaker 1: a schedule that was, you know, was along a track
Speaker 1: they call it a track, and it's the same track
Speaker 1: that every other planes used for many years. It was
Speaker 1: going down and landing.
Speaker 1: And the helicopter got in its way, and if the
Speaker 1: helicopter was higher or lower or stopped or turning left
Speaker 1: or turning right at a quicker time, I mean it turned,
Speaker 1: but it turned when it was too late, a tragic,
Speaker 1: a tragic story. So I don't know, do you blame
Speaker 1: it on the air traffic controller too, in addition to
Speaker 1: the pilots, maybe the pilot's fault, they should have seen it.
Speaker 1: I would have thought they should have seen it.
Speaker 1: Because it was a plane that was loaded up with
Speaker 1: lights and everybody, you can see it from Kennedy Center,
Speaker 1: you can see it very easily. So all I want
Speaker 1: is the most competent people in our country to be
Speaker 1: air traffic controllers. It's a very important position and other
Speaker 1: positions too, by the way, we're not only talking about that,
Speaker 1: we're talking about air traffic controllers maybe in particular. They
Speaker 1: have to be brilliant with computers, brilliant with graphics, they
Speaker 1: have to be uh psychologically really, really smart.
Speaker 1: And uh you know, there are a lot of people
Speaker 1: that wouldn't be able to do that.
Speaker 1: Really, really sad stuff, um, but he says he wants
Speaker 1: the best. He wants only the best people and you
Speaker 1: know maybe in, in determining who's the best, you should
Speaker 1: be focused on the qualities and the tests, right, that
Speaker 1: would make them the best as opposed to other things
Speaker 1: that might be serving as kind of a distraction. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's that controversial to say that, but clearly
Speaker 1: other people.
Speaker 1: really, really do. I wanna get to Tulsi Gabbard because
Speaker 1: she had her hearing today and we have a lot
Speaker 1: to talk about there, um, before I do, just wanted
Speaker 1: to give a quick shout out to our friends at
Speaker 1: Grand forgive me at uh at Herzog Foundation because this
Speaker 1: is a uh this is a a foundation we can
Speaker 1: talk about Grand Canyon University too because they do wonderful,
Speaker 1: wonderful things there but I did want to flag.
Speaker 1: That this year I developed a partnership with the Herzog
Speaker 1: Foundation which I'm really, really proud of because you know
Speaker 1: there's so much DEI that's been taught in our schools
Speaker 1: that's really crazy. I mean, and I agree with the
Speaker 1: president so wholeheartedly on this that we need to get
Speaker 1: back to our core values and be that meritocracy and
Speaker 1: what we're seeing in the public school system really doesn't
Speaker 1: embrace that.
Speaker 1: If anything it's all about the diversity, equity and inclusion
Speaker 1: and it's a a direct contradiction if you would with
Speaker 1: sort of our American value system and so I think
Speaker 1: a lot of people, especially Christians in this country, feel
Speaker 1: like they are very much at odds with the ideologue
Speaker 1: that's coming out of these schools and so for that
Speaker 1: reason I just wanted to to mention this to you
Speaker 1: guys if you have children or if you have grandchildren
Speaker 1: or if you have friends that have children and you're
Speaker 1: looking for a school and you're thinking about.
Speaker 1: Perhaps a Christian school. I myself went to a Catholic
Speaker 1: school when I was a little kid. I, it was great.
Speaker 1: I mean it really really was it was a firm
Speaker 1: foundation and, and I have just really fond memories of it.
Speaker 1: It's something that you should take a look at. It
Speaker 1: really is and the folks over at Herzog can help
Speaker 1: you do this. It's called Herzog Foundation.
Speaker 1: Dot com they have um all kinds of information. I
Speaker 1: mean they're really a trusted source if you would on
Speaker 1: American education K through 12 they can guide you through it.
Speaker 1: They've again just wealth of resources they have an online
Speaker 1: publication they've got the Lion, their new podcast they've got
Speaker 1: making the Leap the new podcast and it's basically just
Speaker 1: all of this advice and information for Christian parents who
Speaker 1: are looking to make the switch and so take a look,
Speaker 1: take a look. I'm very, very proud of this partnership.
Speaker 1: I mean you wanna think about how your family.
Speaker 1: can really flourish with its faith and its community and
Speaker 1: school's a big part of that. So in light of
Speaker 1: all the DEI stuff we're talking about, I thought it
Speaker 1: was worth mentioning this. Herzog Foundation.com. I'll try and put
Speaker 1: that in the show notes so that you can see it. Herzog,
Speaker 1: H E R Z O G Foundation dot com. Tulsi
Speaker 1: Gabbard in the hot seat, but you know what? She
Speaker 1: can handle it. This woman is tough.
Speaker 1: And again she's bad news for Leticia and anybody else
Speaker 1: who was doing some funny stuff. I'm thinking Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, who by the way, wants you to think
Speaker 1: she's a Russian spy. I mean this woman's been put
Speaker 1: through HELL and back as well. Here she is today
Speaker 1: on the weaponization of the FBI, the CIA, our intelligence
Speaker 1: community against so many individuals, primarily President Trump but also her.
Speaker 2: American people elected Donald Trump as their president not once
Speaker 2: but twice.
Speaker 2: And yet the FBI and intelligence agencies were politicized by
Speaker 2: his opponents to undermine his presidency and falsely portray him
Speaker 2: as a puppet of Putin.
Speaker 2: Title One of FISA was used illegally to obtain a
Speaker 2: warrant to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, using
Speaker 2: a Clinton campaign funded false dossier as their so-called evidence.
Speaker 2: Biden campaign advisor Tony Blinken was the impetus for the
Speaker 2: 51 former senior intelligence officials letter dismissing Hunter Biden's laptop
Speaker 2: as disinformation specifically to help Biden win the election.
Speaker 2: Former DNI James Clapper lied to this committee in 2013,
Speaker 2: denying the existence of programs that facilitated the mass collection
Speaker 2: of millions of Americans' phone and internet records, yet was
Speaker 2: never held accountable.
Speaker 2: Under John Brennan's leadership, the CIA abused its power to
Speaker 2: spy on Congress, to dodge oversight, lied about doing it
Speaker 2: until he was caught, and yet has never been held responsible.
Speaker 2: Under Biden, the FBI abused its power for political reasons
Speaker 2: to try to surveil Catholics who attend traditional Latin mass,
Speaker 2: labeling them as quote unquote radical traditionalist Catholics.
Speaker 2: Personally, just 24 hours after I criticized Kamala Harris and
Speaker 2: her nomination, I was placed on a secret domestic terror
Speaker 2: watch list called Quiet Skies. Sadly, there are more examples.
Speaker 2: The bottom line is this, this must end.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's got to end.
Speaker 1: But they're terrified of her.
Speaker 1: For some reason she is a trigger point for them.
Speaker 1: I mean, hey, she used to be on their team, right?
Speaker 1: She was a Democrat and now all of a sudden
Speaker 1: she's crossed to the other side and she dares to
Speaker 1: come out swinging as she should against the 51X spooks.
Speaker 1: Think about that who literally lied to you and caused
Speaker 1: by the way, so much chaos. I mean you could
Speaker 1: not say.
Speaker 1: Guys, like I told you I went through this. I mean,
Speaker 1: over on, over on Meta which just settled for $25 million.
Speaker 1: That's like a dinner, right from Mark Zuckerberg. They just settled.
Speaker 1: They gave Donald Trump $22 to put towards his library
Speaker 1: and another 3.
Speaker 1: To pay his legal bills, so that's a $25 million
Speaker 1: cost to hit for them, but think of what it
Speaker 1: cost Donald Trump to not have access to all of
Speaker 1: his people on Facebook. I mean, again, I went through
Speaker 1: this because I dared to share a story about Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: And then like it was game over. You, you're in
Speaker 1: jail for a whole year like I couldn't, I couldn't
Speaker 1: see you guys so but the good news is I
Speaker 1: came over here to YouTube, which is wonderful, wonderful, wonderful,
Speaker 1: and it's been great and we've been able to make
Speaker 1: sure you subscribe if you haven't by the way, it's
Speaker 1: really important because I wanna make sure that we do
Speaker 1: have this constant connection and um.
Speaker 1: It's really scary what went down. You could not share
Speaker 1: information and they, they blocked it all, literally blocked it
Speaker 1: all so I had, you know, a couple 100,000 people
Speaker 1: over there on Facebook. I couldn't actually access them, but
Speaker 1: the president went through this and it was because I, oh,
Speaker 1: I shared a story about 10 Biden's laptop.
Speaker 1: Well, Biden was president then, so like it didn't actually
Speaker 1: affect the outcome of the election, but you see he
Speaker 1: was president then and as soon as he was president,
Speaker 1: he put in a whole bunch of things. In fact,
Speaker 1: his biggest regret is that he didn't do more to
Speaker 1: control quote unquote misinformation. Guess what? It's not misinformation that
Speaker 1: Hunter button laptop belonged to Hunter. You just tried to
Speaker 1: tell us it was, you know.
Speaker 1: Russian misinformation disinformation fed to all of us courtesy of
Speaker 1: one Rudy Giuliani that's the narrative that they spun and
Speaker 1: that they put together and that they should be ashamed
Speaker 1: of and someone should be going after them and heads
Speaker 1: should roll and you know what this should never ever
Speaker 1: happen again. One of the things that I liked as
Speaker 1: hard as it is in light of what has happened.
Speaker 1: There at Reagan National I mean gosh, at least you
Speaker 1: had the administration coming out and asking the right question
Speaker 1: demanding answers you had Duffy on the scene immediately this
Speaker 1: is a whole different ball game, right? This is a
Speaker 1: team that actually is willing to tell you the truth,
Speaker 1: and that goes a long way because if you can't
Speaker 1: trust your government to tell you the truth, and what
Speaker 1: kind of government do you have? Our belief in our
Speaker 1: institutions has been rattled.
Speaker 1: And that's why Trump is changing things. He's firing all
Speaker 1: the people that were involved in the Jack Smith case.
Speaker 1: He's getting rid of DEI. He's making big changes. Tulsi,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you it's gonna be harder for her. I
Speaker 1: think she's great, you know, and I've said to some people,
Speaker 1: oh well, you know, she's, she's possibly, uh, she's a
Speaker 1: risk and I'm like, what do you got on her?
Speaker 1: Like the, the woman like is, is actually pretty darn
Speaker 1: incredible like what what exactly do you have on her? Well,
Speaker 1: you know.
Speaker 1: She wasn't with us on this, that and the other,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, well, we haven't always been right like
Speaker 1: what what makes you think that we're all, you can't
Speaker 1: have some diversity of opinion you people who are all
Speaker 1: into diversity suddenly don't want the diversity of opinion of
Speaker 1: somebody maybe who disagrees with you. Maybe it's valuable to
Speaker 1: have more people at the table with more perspectives. I
Speaker 1: mean they tell you they're into diversity. They're not really
Speaker 1: into diversity of thought. No, you gotta think just like them.
Speaker 1: Just physical diversity, that's all they care about. I'll tell you,
Speaker 1: I got no use for any of it, any of it.
Speaker 1: I do have use for my balance in nature fruits
Speaker 1: and gummies though I have 3 kids home sick from
Speaker 1: school today. I do. I'm like, guys, you know what,
Speaker 1: I gotta start feeding them balance in nature, fruits and veggies,
Speaker 1: because again, knock on wood, so far so good for
Speaker 1: Tricia Regan this winter. Again, you know, we're just going
Speaker 1: into February, so we'll see but I credit fruits and veggies.
Speaker 1: There's thousands of testimonials. I'm not the only one. Millions
Speaker 1: of people love this stuff, so, and, and like for
Speaker 1: over 20 years.
Speaker 1: So take a look at their website. Go to Bannature.com.
Speaker 1: I encourage you to do that today. Really, fruits and
Speaker 1: veggies is my thing, but they got lots of things
Speaker 1: on there. You can call them at 1-800-2468-751, 35% off
Speaker 1: with discount code Trish TR I S H, so you
Speaker 1: help the show and you help yourself. So take a look. 1-800-246-8751, 35%
Speaker 1: off plus plus free shipping and no harm no foul
Speaker 1: money back guarantee. Um, RFK.
Speaker 1: He's also up for his appointment and his chances are
Speaker 1: looking not bad. They're in Pollymarket, I think they get
Speaker 1: him pegged around 75% chance at confirmation, but woo, Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders sure doesn't want the guy having the gig. Did
Speaker 1: you see this? I gotta play it for you because
Speaker 1: this was some real fireworks there.
Speaker 1: On display there on Capitol Hill. I'm gonna make America
Speaker 1: healthier than other countries in the world right now. Will
Speaker 1: you guarantee do what every other major country does. It's
Speaker 1: a simple question and by the way, Bernie, the, you know, the,
Speaker 1: the problem of corruption is not just in the federal agents. It's,
Speaker 1: it's in Congress too. Almost all the members of this
Speaker 1: panel are accepting, including yourself, are accepting millions of dollars
Speaker 1: from the pharmaceutical industry. Oh no.
Speaker 1: Their interest. Oh, I thought that that would I ran
Speaker 1: for president like you. I got millions and millions of contributions.
Speaker 1: They did not come from the executives, not one nickel
Speaker 1: of PAC money from the pharmaceutical. They came from 2020.
Speaker 1: In 2020 you were the single largest because I had
Speaker 1: received pharmaceuticals from workers all over this country, workers were
Speaker 1: not a nickel from corporate the single largest pharmaceutical dollars
Speaker 1: from workers in the 5 million out of $200 million.
Speaker 1: All right, but
Speaker 1: You have not answered last question.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, but, huh, maybe you got me there.
Speaker 1: Maybe I took some money. Oh, and then there was
Speaker 1: this little dust up you see with Elizabeth Warren. Like it,
Speaker 1: it just didn't stop with Bernie. You had to have
Speaker 1: the whole socialist brigade, I guess, against him. Elizabeth Warren versus,
Speaker 1: forgive me, not Bernie, RFK. This is, this is something, guys.
Speaker 1: So, Mr. Kennedy, will you also agree that you won't
Speaker 1: take any compensation from any lawsuits against drug companies while
Speaker 1: you are secretary and for 4 years afterwards?
Speaker 1: Well, I'll certainly commit.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm secretary, but I do want to clarify something
Speaker 1: because you're making me sound like a shell. I, um,
Speaker 1: I put together that case. I did the Science day
Speaker 1: presentation to the judge on that case to get it
Speaker 1: into courting. Mr. Kennedy, it's just a really simple question.
Speaker 1: You've taken.
Speaker 1: $2.5 million. I want to know if you will commit
Speaker 1: right now that not only will you not go to
Speaker 1: work for drug companies, you won't go to work suing
Speaker 1: the drug companies and taking your rake out of that
Speaker 1: while you're a secretary and for four years after. It's
Speaker 1: just I'll commit to not taking any fees from drug
Speaker 1: companies while I'm secretary.
Speaker 1: I'm asking about fees from suing drug companies. Will you
Speaker 1: agree not to do that? You're asking me to not
Speaker 1: sue drug companies, and I'm not going to as much
Speaker 1: as you want.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to agree to not sue drug companies
Speaker 1: or anybody. So let's do a quick count here of
Speaker 1: how as Secretary of HHS, if you get confirmed, you
Speaker 1: can influence every one of those lawsuits. Well, let me
Speaker 1: start the list. You can publish your anti-vaccine conspiracies, but
Speaker 1: this time,
Speaker 1: On US government letterheads, something a jury might be impressed by,
Speaker 1: you could appoint vaccine panel who share your anti-vax views
Speaker 1: and let them do your dirty work. You could tell
Speaker 1: the CDC vaccine panel to remove a particular vaccine from
Speaker 1: the vaccine schedule. You could remove vaccines from special compensation.
Speaker 1: Programs which would open up manufacturers to mass torts. You
Speaker 1: could make more injuries eligible for compensation even if there
Speaker 1: is no causal evidence. You could change vaccine court processes
Speaker 1: to make it easier to bring junk lawsuits. You could
Speaker 1: turn over FDA data to your friends at the law firm,
Speaker 1: and they could use it however it benefited them.
Speaker 1: You could change vaccine labeling. You could change vaccine information.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say I think she's figured this all
Speaker 1: out because I think it's going through her head. Let's
Speaker 1: take a little look here. Nancy Mace, she put this
Speaker 1: one out. Speaking of Sill, Senator Warren raked in over 5.
Speaker 1: $5.2 million from Big Pharma and the medical industrial complex. Wow. OK.
Speaker 1: And then she brought receipts. Let me show you the receipts.
Speaker 1: This is great, you guys, because I'm telling you, Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren just kind of
Speaker 1: I mean Elizabeth Warren, uh, not so much. Me and
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders, uh, not so much. Anyway, look at this.
Speaker 1: Hospitals and nursing homes, she got $1.6 million. Miscellaneous health
Speaker 1: $600 is that right? $644,499. Pharmaceuticals health products, $625,580. This
Speaker 1: is all according to open secrets like it's all there.
Speaker 1: You know, you got to be careful, a little more careful. OK,
Speaker 1: here we get another one. Top industries federal election data
Speaker 1: for Elizabeth Warren 2020 cycle. She got from health professionals
Speaker 1: $2.366 million. I mean this is a lot of money, OK.
Speaker 1: And she sits there and says, well, I wanna, you know, unbelievable.
Speaker 1: So this was kind of a circus act, but they're
Speaker 1: threatened by him because you know what he's threatening? He's
Speaker 1: threatening transparency, something we kind of need. My approach to
Speaker 1: uh uh administration HHS will be radical transparency.
Speaker 1: If members of this committee or other members of Congress
Speaker 1: want information, the doors are open. I've spent radical transparency,
Speaker 1: part of what we've been seeing, right? But they don't
Speaker 1: want that. No, no, no, I mean, I, I, I'll
Speaker 1: tell you.
Speaker 1: There's, there's, there's stuff going on there's stuff going on
Speaker 1: that shouldn't be going on. I mean, we're here we
Speaker 1: are trying to make America great again, trying to make
Speaker 1: America healthy again. We're excited about all these big changes
Speaker 1: there's so much that can be done, but you look
Speaker 1: at those numbers, right? You look at how much money
Speaker 1: the farm.
Speaker 1: Pharmaceutical, the drug industry, the health industry is giving to
Speaker 1: all these politicians and it means that we are vulnerable.
Speaker 1: I wanna tell you about something and I want you
Speaker 1: to go to this website because Big Pharma is setting
Speaker 1: the prices of drugs. I mean this is part of
Speaker 1: what he's trying to get at. We can't have this anymore.
Speaker 1: already this year they, they've raised the price on more
Speaker 1: than 575 drugs. They've got all kinds of anti-competition practices.
Speaker 1: They're blocking any kind of competition that you could see
Speaker 1: so that they can keep their prices artificially high on
Speaker 1: all these drugs, and they spend billions of dollars on
Speaker 1: stupid ads. I mean, you want to talk stupid ads.
Speaker 1: I can't even watch the news with my family anymore,
Speaker 1: for goodness sakes, because of their dumb.
Speaker 1: I won't say it, ads, all right, they got really
Speaker 1: dumb ads, so billions of dollars marketing these high priced
Speaker 1: brand name drugs that are super, you know, they're, they're
Speaker 1: like regulating the price on this stuff, so you need competition, right?
Speaker 1: That's what we need, that's what we're about in America,
Speaker 1: meritocracy and competition, and now they're out there urging Congress
Speaker 1: to undermine the incentives if you would in the private
Speaker 1: health care.
Speaker 1: Market to help American workers and help American families get
Speaker 1: more money for savings on prescription drugs so there's a
Speaker 1: group called Conservative for Lower Healthcare Costs and they're out
Speaker 1: there and they're warning this and I think this is
Speaker 1: important so I want to tell you about it, especially
Speaker 1: in light of RFK they're warning that big pharmer is
Speaker 1: no friend to the Trump agenda or to the pocketbooks
Speaker 1: of the American people. Now I don't think that's like.
Speaker 1: It that's that shouldn't stun you. Like, I don't think
Speaker 1: that's a a news bulletin, but you should at least
Speaker 1: know where they're coming from, right? So they oppose solutions
Speaker 1: to lower drug prices in President Trump's first term, and
Speaker 1: what are they doing now? I mean, they're definitely not
Speaker 1: even they don't want this guy through. They get Bernie
Speaker 1: and Liz Warren in their back pocket trying to do
Speaker 1: everything they can to derail this so you can learn more.
Speaker 1: I mean, I, I think it's important like if you
Speaker 1: can let your congress member know that they need to
Speaker 1: be on the right side.
Speaker 1: to the American people for this, go check this out
Speaker 1: at pharmawindfall.com. Pharmawindfall.com. You can go check that out today
Speaker 1: and and learn more information, but you know, let's, uh,
Speaker 1: keep our fingers crossed for RFK because I think like
Speaker 1: this could be amazing. I told you guys I was
Speaker 1: just overseas and in Europe, they actually don't allow all
Speaker 1: these crazy things into the food. I'm like, why does
Speaker 1: everything taste so good? It's like everything is good no
Speaker 1: matter where you go. You can't have a bad.
Speaker 1: Item of food anywhere and it's because they don't have
Speaker 1: all the preservatives that we have here right? we they
Speaker 1: they they're much tougher on that stuff. So anyway, check
Speaker 1: it out, pharmainfall.com today. Meanwhile, quick note on the crypto front,
Speaker 1: did you see yesterday Federal Reserve actually coming out and saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: banks can own crypto.
Speaker 1: Don't tell Liz Warren that. Oh, she's just gonna really
Speaker 1: get mad. So everything's changing.
Speaker 1: Cryptos at banks.
Speaker 1: It's kind of incredible. I know that a lot of
Speaker 1: you all don't like it, but I've been a big
Speaker 1: fan of this for, for some time. I mean, going
Speaker 1: back to the days when Bitcoin was trading at 10%. I,
Speaker 1: I've been kind of into it, so we, we write
Speaker 1: about it quite a bit over at 76 Research, 76%
Speaker 1: Research and get the 76 report just a dollar a month,
Speaker 1: learn a little bit about crypto, learn about what's going
Speaker 1: on in the macro environment, learn about a couple of
Speaker 1: stocks that we like. If you really like stocks, guess what?
Speaker 1: You should get the model portfolios. We have 3 of them.
Speaker 1: And you get 10 to 15 names and we tell
Speaker 1: you exactly what we're investing, how we're investing, all that
Speaker 1: kind of intel for you. That's easy to understand, easy
Speaker 1: to digest, and so I encourage you to do that,
Speaker 1: but if you just want to get started and learn
Speaker 1: a few things, guess what? 76 Research code word dollar,
Speaker 1: it's my company that I started with Rob Horton, very
Speaker 1: dear friend from a very long time, who by the way,
Speaker 1: shares our views, shall we say, right? I it's, it's
Speaker 1: important to know, you know, where people are coming from.
Speaker 1: Um, anyway, it's great to have you here. We have
Speaker 1: a huge tune in today. Please make sure that you
Speaker 1: subscribe to the show. I'll see you back here tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Hit the bell because you know.
Speaker 1: 33 kids home sick today. We came on the air
Speaker 1: a little bit later than usual. So it's great if
Speaker 1: you hit the bell then you know when I'm here
Speaker 1: every single day, but I'm here everyday live and I'm
Speaker 1: gonna keep doing it because it's an exciting time.
Speaker 1: And there's gonna be a lot of change, and this
Speaker 1: is gonna have consequences that I believe are going to
Speaker 1: be significant and tremendous. I am so optimistic. I don't
Speaker 1: think I've ever been this optimistic. Lots of good stuff ahead.
Speaker 1: Kosh is getting in, fingers crossed on Tulsi. I think
Speaker 1: RK is gonna get it too. We have change on
Speaker 1: the way. I'll see you tomorrow.