WEBVTT - Timeless Wisdom: Male/Female Hour: Criticizing Your Spouse

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Here thousands of

0:00:24.240 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>hours of Dennis's lectures courses in classic radio programs. Had

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles, go to Dennisprager dot com.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I am old fashioned.

0:00:40.879 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I like two sexes.

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I think all of a sudden, I

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 2>don't like being married to what is known as a

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 2>new woman. I want a wife, not a competitor.

0:00:48.519 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Competitor, competitor, talk about a bit, this crying in the

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>morning thing. It's depression, you know, Let's get that fixed.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what men think, isn't it. What Unless you've got

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer, unless you can say, oh, I know this

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>bloke in the essex rodical fix that, and there's no

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>point bothering.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>How do you write women so well?

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 4>I think of a man and I take away reason

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 4>and accountability.

0:01:11.759 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 5>I love him, I love him, and I don't care

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 5>what you think.

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I love him for the for the man he wants

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 3>to be, and I love him for the man that

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 3>he almost is.

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 6>What do people have rouse about him?

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Money?

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Sex, sex, money he wants, she doesn't want.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>She wants, he doesn't want women.

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 5>I've always been a big problem to me, doctor fusbend.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 2>He listening.

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, yes, go on, gone.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Hi everybody, and welcome to the Male Female Hour on

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the Dennis Prager Show. Every week, the second hour of

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 2>my program on Wednesdays is devoted to men and women.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I call it the Male Female Hour because it's about

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the natures of us. It's not just about the man woman,

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 2>but even deeper, the male female about us. So here

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:09.439
<v Speaker 2>is today's topic. It is about criticizing your spouse or

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 2>your significant other. If you prefer that term, I can't

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>stand it. But if we'll include that group as well,

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I cite a I won't cite the man who gave

0:02:25.519 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 2>me this quote because I don't want to put him

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 2>on the spot when he's not here. But it was

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 2>a very witty, a witty line that a friend of

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 2>mine told me many years ago. He said, in the beginning,

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 2>God created men and critics. And whenever I have said

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>this a speeches, people have cracked up, especially the men.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 2>The men, They absolutely adore this line. And it's the

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>reason that people laugh at any such lines. People don't

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>laugh at a line that they can't relate to. If

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd have said in the beginning, God created men and poets.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anybody would laugh. They would say what

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 2>do you mean? But nobody ever says what do you

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>mean when I give the line God created in the beginning,

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>God created men and critics. Now, we recently had a

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>show about about certain of the things that men do

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>that drive women nuts, and I I often agreed with

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>them and added some thoughts of my own. This week,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>it's not so much about what women do that drive

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 2>men nuts, and I'm only talking about the criticism thing.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>It's about both sexes. There are men who criticize their

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 2>wives a great deal, so I want to talk to

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 2>you about the issue. And by the way, this also

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 2>applies to friends. Remember everything that applies to friends applies

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to marriages except for the sex part. And that's why

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I consider friendships to be so incredibly important. And I

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>think people should date for friends just like they date

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>for spouses. That's how important I consider friendships. But here

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 2>is the question on criticism. How do you do it?

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>When is it okay? And how much do you do it?

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Those are the questions, And oh wait, I'll tell you

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 2>there's an even more important one in some senses, why

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 2>do you do it? Are the criticisms coming from a

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>good place. And so this is the issue. And I'd

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 2>love to get your takes as much as I want

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>to give you my take on this subject, because if

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>you feel that there is this issue in your marriage

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>or your relationship, I would be very interested in hearing,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 2>because I want others to hear as well about this subject.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>And the subject is criticizing our spouse or our boyfriend, girlfriend,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 2>significant other partner, whatever the term may be. I happen

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 2>to like marriage, but that's not the specific issue here.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 2>It's the issue of men and critics, or indeed women

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and critics. So the uh, it's a tough line here

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to balance because on the one hand, if someone never

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 2>says anything about any way at all in which you

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 2>can do better, I mean, you know, is it a

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>criticism to say you have something between your teeth after

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 2>you've eaten? Is it a criticism to say you're you're

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 2>speaking too loud at the restaurant? Uh? You know what,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 2>It's unnatural to never have anything of a critical nature

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 2>to say to the person that you are involved with,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>and and loving criticism dispensed lovingly obviously coming from a

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 2>loving spot, can be one of the greatest services you

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 2>can you can perform in a marriage or in a friendship.

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, we all I think, either

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 2>experienced or have seen elsewhere where there is simply too

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 2>much of it where the relationship seems to be a

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 2>continuous stream of criticism one eight Praeger seven seven six

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 2>one eight p R A. G. E. R seven seven six.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 2>That's eight seven seven two four three triple seven six

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 2>eight seven seven two four three triple seven six Is

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 2>this an issue in your relationship? Have you given this thought? Here? Is?

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Here is a thought that you might want to consider.

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 2>How about for have some sort of even keep account

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>that for every criticism you offer, that it has been

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 2>couched in eight positive statements about the other, that you

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>have an eight to one ratio. I'm just throwing out

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>a number. Maybe it should be three to one, maybe

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 2>it should be fifty to one, But that you have

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 2>some sort of ratio of positive reinforcing good statements to

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 2>your spouse your partner as critical ones. And then you

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>have to figure out, too, what is it you want?

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 2>What is it that is coming Where is the criticism

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>coming from? Is it is it really disguised anger? See?

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 2>That's what and the recipient needs to figure out as well.

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Am I hypersensitive? Is this just a loving criticism or

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 2>is it really just disguised anger? And is the person

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>just hyper in what they want me to be? And

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 2>is the criticism an attempt to change me? Or is

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>it an attempt to improve me? And how much improvement?

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a very very complex issue. But the very fact

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>that that I'm raising it is helpful because a lot

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>of people don't even think about this. How much do

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I criticize? How much am I criticized? Where is it

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 2>coming from? How what tone am I am I giving it?

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 2>And what Let's put it this way, I think it's

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 2>fair to say that the most harmonious relationship will probably

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 2>have less criticism. Is that a fair statement? I mean,

0:08:44.839 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>you look, it's one thing to be criticized by your boss.

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, I wish you had done a better job

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>in X, Y or Z. Next time you submit this report,

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 2>next time you go on this sales pitch, do this.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 2>It's one thing to be criticized by your boss. That's

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>what a boss is there for. I mean, they hired

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you for a job. You've got to do the job

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 2>well or they get rid of you. But your spouse

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 2>isn't your boss. They didn't hire you while they did

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 2>hire you. I take that back. Actually, I have a

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 2>view of marriage as a form of hiring. We have

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 2>I have hired a partner for life. That that's that's

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>a fair statement. But putting that aside, uh, it is

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 2>much harder for most people to take criticism from a

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 2>loved one than from a boss, and it ought to be.

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I think you should take criticism from

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a boss very, very matter of factly. That's their job.

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if they're hyper, they're hyper. That's a separate issue.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>But you have to figure out how much. And my

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>bottom line is that the less criticism, generally speaking, the

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 2>more harmonious the relationship. A good A good relationship does

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>not thrive on a lot of criticism, all right, Let's

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 2>let's be honest. Maybe it does in work. Maybe two

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 2>business partners thrive critiquing each other all the time for

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the sake of the business. That's possible, but it doesn't

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 2>work in the micro. It does not work in a

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>family life. In a family situation, that's different. By the way,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 2>then from kids, I think you should criticize your kids

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 2>when necessary, But that's not an that's not a relationship

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 2>of peers, And you're not seeking You shouldn't be seeking

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to be loved all the time you by your kids.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 2>You should be seeking to be loved all the time

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 2>by your spouse. So the one of you that is

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot of criticizing might ask, am I am

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I rendering myself very lovable with all of this criticism.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Now that doesn't mean there should never be. Of course

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 2>there should be. But I do stick with this statement

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 2>that the less there is, generally speaking, the more harmonious

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the relationship will be. I'll take your calls when we

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 2>come back. This is the Male Female Hour on the

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager Show eight seven seven two four three triple

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>seven six or one eight Praguer seven seven six, And

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I also love to read your emails on these subjects.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Back momentarily this episode of Timeless Wisdom.

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll continue right after this.

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's timeless Wisdom.

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Hi, everybody, Dennis Prager. Here the Male Female Hour on

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 2>the Dennis Prager Show. Every week, this hour the second

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 2>of my three hours on Wednesdays devoted to men and women.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 2>And this is a very complex subject. The issue of

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 2>criticizing your spouse. My rule of thumb is the less

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 2>the better on many grounds. One the less you do,

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe because the more you love about the person and

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 2>therefore feel less necessary to do. Another reason is the

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>less you do the more When you do it it

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>can be heard. If you criticize so much, then eventually

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>what really matters won't be heard in the din of

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 2>all of the other critiques. And at a given point,

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 2>how much do you love somebody that you continually criticize?

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 2>What's to love? On the other hand, you know, we

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 2>can all stand improvement in various areas, and and if

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>you know the person loves you, you have to ask.

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 2>And this is very very significant. Here is a toughie

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of people. You have to ask when

0:12:52.200 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>you're criticized, is the person perhaps right. It's a fairly

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 2>uncommon reaction because the instinctive reaction is to defend oneself.

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know, let me give you a macro example,

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>because I get a fair share of very angry criticisms

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>of me. I mean, I wouldn't even say criticism, say

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>attacks on the internet and elsewhere. I mean, they're very public.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>You can you can easily find them if if you search,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and I will be honest with you, I have learned

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 2>to think that is there any legitimacy to the attack?

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the way they're saying it, I think very

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 2>low of the person doing the attacking. But there are

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>times that I will all say, well, is there any

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>is the is the attack completely invalid or overwhelmingly invalid?

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Or is there some truth to it? Now? But that's

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 2>easy for me to do because these are not the

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 2>people I love in my life. Out of these are

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 2>strangers writing, so I can easily do that. It's much

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>harder with the spouse. I fully acknowledge. But still, if

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 2>your spouse has credibility and you know that they love

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>you and think well of you, that's the critical thing. Here.

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Here is a critical thing that you need to know.

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 2>And then I'm going to take your calls. I think

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the man's name is John Gottman is in Seattle, considered

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 2>by many to be the greatest expert on marriage in

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the country, on the relate un marital relations. He is

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>so good at this, apparently that he can watch unobserved

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 2>through a one way mirror. He can watch a couple

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>for a few minutes and tell you in how long

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>they'll divorce. I mean, the man is amazing, and he

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>has said couples can recuperate from anything except one thing.

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>They can recuperate from an infidelity. They can recuperate from

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the death of a child. They can recuperate from from

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the loss of jobs. They can recuperate from a terrible accident.

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 2>They cannot recuperate if one has contempt for the other.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 2>It is the one thing you cannot A marriage cannot

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 2>survive contempt. So if the criticism is either delivered contemptuously

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 2>or is perceived as coming from contempt, then then it

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>dooms the marriage. If it comes from love and from

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the opposite of contempt. Respect. If you know your spouse

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 2>things highly of you. But just as you would tell

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 2>a great baseball player, you know, let me just show

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>you a little way you might you might hold the

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 2>bat even better and do even better. That's a big

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 2>difference from you know, you're a real loser, and and

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, and then then then there's no chance. All righty,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>And let's go to some of your calls here Atlanta,

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Georgia and Barbara, Hello, Barbara.

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 7>Dennis Prager, Hi, my husband gave the greatest answer to

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 7>my criticism. One day I was nitpicking at something and said,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 7>why did you do it that way? And he said,

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 7>because I live to irritate you.

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>That is See. I tell you, if men learn to

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>use humor when there when their wife is a little annoyed,

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 2>it is one of the great weapons at me disposal

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>that they do not know of.

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 7>Well that year, isn't It makes me think anytime I

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 7>might say something to him, why am I criticizing him?

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 2>You're a good wife. You're a good wife. But you

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 2>admit then I'm sorry, he's a Oh well, that's sorry.

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Tell him tell him what you told me. I hope.

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Just as long as you tell him what you told me,

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>that's that's great. So you basically agree with this comment.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>God created men and critics.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 7>In my case, yeah, I tend to be a little critical.

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Barbara, I love you. That was great. That was just great.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>See if she acknowledges it, I think there is Look,

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I think there's truth to the statement in this way.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 2>And God knows there were men who criticize their women

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.719
<v Speaker 2>to their they're women far too much, of course, but

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.039
<v Speaker 2>there is truth in this way. Did you ever notice

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 2>how much more women groom their men? You never did

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 2>you ever see once a guy flicking off little tiny

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 2>pieces of god knows what from a woman's dress, his

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 2>wife's dress. No, how often have you seen the wife

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 2>fixing the guy's collar, tie, lapel, shirt, suit, jacket. Right.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 2>It always reminds me of the monkeys, and it does.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 2>It reminds me of the monkeys in the zoo when

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>you're watching them groom each other. That's how I, for

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason, I always get that image in my mind.

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 2>And so because there is a part of a woman,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I do believe this, there is a part of female

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 2>nature that would like their man to be perfect. I'm

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 2>not saying it critically. I mean there are a whole

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 2>host of images that men have and so on. Anyway,

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>So let's go, let's continue to get more of the

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 2>calls here, and we go to Catherine in Ulis, Texas. Hi,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Catherine Dennis Prager, Hello, Hi.

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Rob married ten years this month. And I fully believe

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 5>that with criticism it should be far and few between.

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 5>My husband was part of the Christmas party and sing

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 5>in a trio and his he had a solo at

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 5>the beginning and he killed it. And he had all

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 5>these compliments from everyone and as we're going home, he

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 5>asked me how he did and I said, do you

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 5>want me to be nice or do you want me

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 5>to be honest? And he said, I want you to

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 5>be honest. And so I thought for a minute and

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 5>I said that was the best performance by Kermit the Frog.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.479
<v Speaker 5>And he was quiet for a minute and then he

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 5>just said, now you know my secret. I can't I

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 5>can't sing in public. And so he just took it

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 5>in stride.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I have a big smile. I wish you could

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 2>see me personally. I had a big smile on my

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>face this whole dialogue that that you were recounting you did.

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>You did a very job that that, and I'm on

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 2>your side. I look, I think the less the better.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 2>That's what I said for a harmonious relationship. You know. I,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 2>in fact, I've always used this was this was given

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 2>by Irving Crystal, the godfather of the neo Conservatism. Said,

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, there are folks in America always criticizing America.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>All they are constantly criticizing America. They say, well, we

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 2>criticized it because we love it. He said, yeah, but

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 2>what if a man criticized his wife as much? Would

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you say? He loved her, something to keep in mind.

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Stay tuned.

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Hi everybody, and welcome back the Dennis Prager Show, The

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Male Female Hour, second hour, Wednesday week. I love your

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>emails on this. It helps me writing my book Onto

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 2>Male a Sexual Nature. By the way, but whatever the

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 2>subject on male female, I keep them. I keep your

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 2>letters on it, and I learn a lot from them,

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and you open up to me, because well, frankly, I'm

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 2>pretty open. Subject today is the tough one of criticizing

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 2>your spouse on a very complex subject. My bottom line

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 2>is that generally speaking, the less the better. It doesn't

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 2>mean none. None is not a good idea either, but

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 2>the less the better. If your spouse is so worthy

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 2>of criticism as for it to be a constant, then

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 2>clearly you have chosen the wrong person to be married to.

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I mean, come on, let's be honest. If

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 2>if you really are married to someone who is deserving

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 2>of constant criticism, then you know, unless you have a philosophical, moral, religious,

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>or reason to oppose a divorce, then it seemed to

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>me that that would be the most logical thing. And

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 2>even if you say, well, we're staying together for the children,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a very difficult thing to answer. Is it better

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 2>for children to see a parent constantly criticizing the other

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 2>or to experience divorce? I don't know. I don't know

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 2>the answer most not at answer I could give you

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 2>is it depends on the child's nature. But it's hardly

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 2>a beneficent experience for a child to see a spouse

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 2>criticized all the time. The odds are that that's exactly

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 2>what the child will do with either his or her spouse,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 2>or have done to him or her when they choose

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a spouse. So it's it's a it's a pretty tough thing.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 2>And what you might want to do is count how

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 2>many how many criticisms have I offered my spouse this week?

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Make a list every time you do it, just write

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 2>a little number down one aight. Praguer seven seven six,

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 2>and let's go to Debbie Escandido, California. Hi, Debbie, Dennis Prager,

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Hi Dennis, thank.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 6>You for taking my call.

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah this I've been married about ten years to my

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 6>husband and he's a wonderful man, very capable I tell

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 6>people there's nothing he really can't take apart and put

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 6>back together. That he's very intelligent, but he tends to

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 6>kind of pick at things, especially in my speech. If

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 6>I've mispronounced a word or said something that he felt

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 6>was incorrect, and it it over the years. Now it

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 6>seems to have undermined my confidence in myself because he

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 6>looks at it as I'm just giving you a suggestion

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 6>on how to do that better. But you know, now

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 6>I'll stop and I'll hesitate before I do something because

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 6>I don't like the criticism.

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Now, now give me give me a specific example if

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>you can.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 6>Well, if I've mispronounced a word, and he'll stop me

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 6>like and say, no, you said that you should be

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 6>said this way.

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Now, now is he doing that in front of

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 2>others or just when you two were talking?

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Both?

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Well, I disagree about it being done in front

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of others, and I agree with it being done when

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 2>you're alone. So I'm in the I'm between the two

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 2>of you because in front of others is there's a

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>humiliating aspect which should never never take place.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 6>Sometimes I feel like you knew what I meant.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he does, but but and I'm just kind of

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 2>well the question all right, So the question that then

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 2>you have to say, Look, you could say to him, look, honey,

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the truth is, I don't care if I mispronounced words uh.

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 2>When when I'm speaking to people, it does not It

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 2>does not matter to me, and so he'll have to

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 2>make peace with that. But I think it should matter

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to you.

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, I of course I do want to be

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 6>speaking correctly, but you know, it's it's gotten to the

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 6>point where I'll stop. I don't know.

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I understand because you're so self conscious. I understand. Well,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 2>that's why I this is. It's a very I can't

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 2>I can't answer because I'm not present. That's why I

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 2>The one no no I had was with regard to

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 2>uh when you were in public, because in public uh,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and anything that even smacks of humiliation is just is

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 2>a no no. Uh. It's a it's a tough call there.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 2>I know I would want to be I would want

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to be like I speak for a living, so I

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 2>would particularly want to be corrected by my wife anytime

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 2>I mispronounced the word. Okay, anyway, I will continue. This

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 2>is the Male Female Hour on The Dennis Prager Show. Hello, everybody.

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 2>This is Dennis Prager the male female Hour, and the

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 2>subject is criticism of your spouse. While no relationship should

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 2>be criticism free, none, because it almost means you don't

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 2>care about the person and you're not their close friend.

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 2>A close friend does lovingly criticize. But it's how you

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 2>do it, how often you do it, why you do it,

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 2>those are the things that matter, and you have to

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 2>be prepared to accept it under under the circumstances you you,

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the recipient of it, have to be you have to

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>accept it under the circumstances that they are given with

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 2>love and respect and solely to better you and so on.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 2>So these are these are these are appropriate. I have

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 2>changed some of my driving habits, I will admit because

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 2>of my wife's loving way of noting some of my tendencies. Uh,

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 2>that's right, that's fine. All right, let's let's take more

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>of your calls here. This is it's it's huge, it's

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.959
<v Speaker 2>a huge subject. Peter in San Antonio, Texas. Dennis Prager,

0:26:56.000 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 2>thanks for calling behind. How are you okay? Thanks?

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Let me take you off speaker phone. Actually, yes, please

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 4>do can you hear me?

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I apologize. I appreciate your show, and I learned

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 4>so much from you. I appreciate it. I think God's

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 4>plan for marriage is oneness. So when you criticize your spouse,

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 4>you're basically criticizing yourself. One of our the pastor when

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 4>we first came to know the Lord, he used to

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 4>have a good comeback and said, whenever you criticize each other,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 4>you'd say to each other, you know, well, you're just

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 4>as this or that because you picked me, you married me,

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 4>you knew my faults before we got married, more or less.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 4>And that has settled quite a few criticism sessions in

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 4>our marriage. We've been married for twenty one years, right,

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 4>and I think I criticized. I think I criticized my

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 4>wife one than she criticizes me.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 2>So how did you How did you start reducing the

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 2>amount of criticism? What changed your mind?

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, you ask God to give you a love for

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 4>your wife, or or at least seeing things from her

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 4>point of view.

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 2>But but that's excellent. But even before that, what happened

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>was you you went for counseling based on the on

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 2>the amount of criticism.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 4>No, I think no, that this was a comment made

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 4>from the pulpit.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, how interesting. Oh so that worked, Oh, very good.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Bless that pastor see pastors and you know radio talk show.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>We never know what line will affect somebody. That's very important. Well,

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that's very good, and that's why I said earlier. Look,

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 2>if if you find that you know you are you

0:28:55.720 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>are being constantly criticized, or you are constantly criticizing, then

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 2>then either you have to reduce it dramatically or realize

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that you were married to the wrong person. I mean,

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 2>somebody worthy of fairly constant criticism is not terribly livable

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 2>with right. I mean, one has to be honest with

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 2>with one self, and the ratio of beautiful comments to

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 2>criticisms has to be a very high one. That's the

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>thing that you that that I want to leave that

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 2>with you is I want to embed that in your

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 2>mind that there be this very large ratio of compliment

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to critique. If it's you, you've made the person raw.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 2>It's like they have a broken bone and you keep

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>hitting it. If the if criticism is the primary mode

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of expression that you have toward your spouse, Okay, uh,

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 2>let's go to some more of your calls here and

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 2>uh oh, here's an important one. San Antonio Texas. Laura Hi, Laura.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:10.479
<v Speaker 3>Dennis Prager, Hi, Dennis Hi, I should get together with

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Peter in San Antonio. The laugh collor right, you should.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Contentous family growing up, and I never really could identify

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 3>who was the most offending, my mother or my father.

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 3>It just helped shape me as a married person to

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 3>determine to not be as argumentative as they were. And

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 3>something interesting happened. My father died suddenly in nineteen ninety two,

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 3>and within that next year, my mother said something to

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 3>me that really surprised me, and it was typically an

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 3>ownership type statement. She said, I was responsible for ninety

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 3>five percent of the arguments that we had.

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 3>She made me really sorry for her because of forty

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 3>three years. You know, it takes its toll. There's a cost,

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 3>there's a price every single.

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 7>Time, you know.

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Pick now. She found her repentance in it, and she's

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 3>totally whole and good and healed from it. But it

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 3>just showed me that I was right, you know myself.

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Thirty three years go to well, you were a very

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 2>wise young woman then, Because it is just as likely

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>to repeat parental errors as it is to learn from them,

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 2>to do.

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 3>The opposite, absolutely and it's frankly, it can just be habitual.

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't have to be very scientific. It can just

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 3>be thinking habitual.

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's exactly right, that's exactly right, well said. That's why. Look,

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>if there's a lot of it in your marriage, it's

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 2>not good, folks. I mean, it's something to know, it's

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 2>something to know. It needs to be reduced. The amount

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 2>of compliments has to be increased, it has to be cushioned.

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 2>You have to figure out what it is. And if

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the person is really worthy of such constant criticism, then

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't be with that person. Now, if if for philosophical, religious, familial, psychological,

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 2>financial reasons you can't divorce, then you don't divorce. Fine,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, I'm only mentioning the d word, the

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 2>divorce word, not to encourage, but to tell you how

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 2>serious constant criticism is. That a divorce may well be

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 2>preferable to that for all concerned, not just the spouses,

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 2>even perhaps for the children. So this is a very

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 2>big deal. It's not just a nuisance. It's it's it's

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 2>destructive after a while. And if you're and and even

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 2>if your criticisms are legitimate, then if your criticism is legitimate,

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 2>then it just reinforces the D word back in a moment.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's timeless wisdom. You

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>say hello.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Hello, alrighty hello, I say hello, Dennis Prager Here the

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Male female Hour, terrific calls on a very important subject.

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Your emails will always be appreciated and read, even if

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I can't, of course respond to all of them. The

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 2>issue of criticism and uh, let me let me summarize

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>some here. I know Paul in Minnesota has been on

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>since the beginning. I feel terrible more critical of he's

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 2>been more. It's about criticizing your spouse. This hour has been.

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 2>By the way, you can get a copy of this hour,

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 2>or of all my hours at a ridiculously nominal fee.

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Call eight hundred two two five eight five eight four.

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 2>This this hour alone might be able to save some

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 2>of your marriages. Eight hundred two two five eight five

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 2>eight four For all of my shows, and to just

0:34:08.319 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>get this hour or this show, or just get all

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:16.599
<v Speaker 2>of them downloadable again. It's at Dennis Prager dot com

0:34:16.720 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 2>or at eight hundred two two five eight five eight

0:34:19.319 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 2>for prager topia, as I subscribe, And here is one

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 2>where I think a spouse might be better able to

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 2>listen to a stranger quote unquote, in other words, a

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:35.479
<v Speaker 2>third party me than perhaps to you. But the rule

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 2>has to be that the fewer the better. In terms

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 2>of criticisms, doesn't mean none, though, does not mean none.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 2>So Paul's more critical of his wife, especially in regard

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 2>to organizing the house. Well, you just got to figure

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 2>out a way to I'm not saying you can. I'm

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 2>not a utopian, but figure out a way for you

0:34:56.600 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 2>to minimize your criticism and to for her or you

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 2>both to figure out how a better way to organize

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the house, or you figure out how to live with it.

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Something has to give because continuing this way is just

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be a bad marriage. You don't like the

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 2>wish you organized the house, and you keep criticizing, something

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 2>has to give. I mean, and there are a lot

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of variables there. If I am in Atlanta, Georgia, this

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 2>is one has to choose in marriage between peace and truth.

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Rarely can you have both. God, I'd love to talk

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 2>about that at greater length. That's why I say the

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 2>truth is the greatest macro value not necessarily the greatest

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 2>micro value. Interesting point there, and let's see here, Jim

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 2>in Texas, you learned to go to the lord with

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 2>the criticism first. I'm reading off his own words and

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 2>would realize that I was often wrong with my criticisms,

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 2>and my wife would do the same. I believe you,

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's a great idea. Now, I wish

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I could have taken Steve, if you could call on Friday, Steve,

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 2>what do I do if I have a criticism? That

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 2>is important? But I am afraid to hurt my wife.

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a very important subject. So let me just leave

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 2>you and yes, and in Denver, Michael, you criticize the action,

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 2>not the person agreed. Again the rules, the less the better,

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 2>but that doesn't mean none. And keep a little accounting

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 2>of compliments, number of compliments versus number of criticisms. It's

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.959
<v Speaker 2>been the Male Female Hour or the Dennis Prager Show.

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>This has been timeless wisdom with Dennis Prager. Visit Dennisprager

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com for thousands of hours of Dennis's lectures, courses,

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and classic radio programs, and to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles.