WEBVTT - The Complex Truth About Beauty and Self-Image

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Here thousands of

0:00:24.240 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>hours of Dennis's lectures, courses in classic radio programs, and

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:38.279
<v Speaker 1>to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles, go to Dennisprager dot com.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>On today's episode of Timeless Wisdom.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>You know that old joke about the three stages of

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 2>human life, youth, middle age, and you're looking great. And

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>by the way, ever since I heard that joke, isn't

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 2>it a great one? I mean, even the young whipper

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>snappers are laughing, and it is such a good line

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 2>that I tried to consciously not say to a person

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 2>beyond middle age, you're looking great. But then I think, well,

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.719
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute, they don't know the joke, so I can.

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's coming up on Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager, and

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it starts right now.

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>I like two sexes.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I think all of a sudden, I don't like being

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>married to one is known as a new woman.

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 2>I want a wife, not a competitor.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Competator, competitor talk about a bit, this crying in the

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>morning thing. It's depression, you know, let's get that fixed.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 3>That's what men think, isn't it what unless you've got

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the answer, unless you can say, oh no, this bloke

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>in the Essex roodical fix that, and there's no point bothering.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 3>How do you write women so well?

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I think of a man and I take away reason

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and accountability.

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 3>I love him, I love him, and I don't care

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>what you think.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 4>I love him for the for the man he wants

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 4>to be, and I love him for the man that

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 4>he almost is. What do people have rows about him?

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Money? It's sex sex, money he wants, she doesn't want.

0:02:09.079 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>She wants, he doesn't want.

0:02:10.920 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Women.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I've always been a big problem to me.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Doctor fuspender.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Listening, doctor, Yes, yes, yes, go on gone.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I live for that. I live for that. Doctor. Hello everybody,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 2>missus Dennis Prager. The Male Female Hour an hour each

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>week devoted to issues of men and women and between

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 2>men and women. It is very adult, It is very

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 2>real and hopefully indeed very helpful. And you can't be

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 2>helpful if you're not real, So the two go together. Hi, welcome,

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>and the subject today is again a difficult one. I

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>will be my usual transparent here. Of all fifteen hours

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>of my show each week, by and large, the Male

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Female Hour is the hardest hour in terms of sheer

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>effort because the subject matter is so sensitive to at

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 2>least half the audience that I have to choose every

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 2>word very carefully. I admit it. I admit, I mean

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 2>try to choose my words carefully every hour of my program.

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 2>I take this as a as a gift to this microphone,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 2>but especially this hour. And here is one more example

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>of where I should get overtime pay, not because it's

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>more than the usual time, but because of the care

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>with which I will deliberately choose each word. I'm laughing

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>because of this introduction I'm giving the topic, and the

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 2>topic is the women changing their natural look for their

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>husband or indeed to have a better social life if

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 2>they're single. And it goes from I mean the most

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 2>obvious is make up. Make Up changes your natural look,

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and there are women who don't wear makeup. It is

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 2>I will admit that when I meet them and they're married.

0:04:34.159 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 2>If they're not married, I have nothing to say. But

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 2>if they are married, I will admit I feel some

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 2>sympathy for the husband, unless he is of the same mind,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 2>in which case God bless them both and may they

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 2>live many many years together in happiness. And I mean

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 2>it from the bottom of my heart, but for most

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>men it's probably not appreciated. It's very hard to say

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 2>anything to one's wife about her looks. Most men, I think,

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 2>would rather enter a combat zone than say anything to

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>their wife about their looks her looks. It's a very,

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 2>very difficult area because of the issue of looks and

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 2>women and how important it is. Unfairly, I admit, but

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>it is. The issue is not whether it is fair.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 2>The issue is whether it is true. And that is

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the way God made the human universe, and you have

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 2>if you have an issue with it, it's not with me.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 2>The power of looks in women it is. The issue

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.679
<v Speaker 2>is with God, or if you don't believe in God,

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 2>with nature and or evolution. But in any event, your

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 2>issue is not with me. I am the deliverer of

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>facts here in this case, not the creator of them. Now,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>so makeup is the most obvious example of where a

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>woman is changing her natural looks, and the number of

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 2>areas in which this is done routinely and then semi

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 2>routinely is very large. Another example, of course, is the

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>vast number of women who will keep their original hair

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 2>color as they get older. You see what is the

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 2>ratio of seeing gray haired men or white haired men

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 2>to white haired or gray haired or silver haired women.

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 2>The ratio must be I don't know, fifty to one.

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>And is it unfair? I mean, should should men? You know,

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>in the name of equality? Should men dye their hair too?

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Or women not? The issue is not equality, The issue

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 2>is what works. In fact, men who do treat their

0:06:53.600 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 2>hair with coloring are often regarded with a little contempt

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to be perfectly honest. Oh, you know the guy just

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, yeah, he won't he won't grow old gracefully

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it is. Or he's you know, he's trying

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 2>to act like he's still thirty eight. But nobody says

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 2>that about a woman. They say, more power to her.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>She looks terrific. Anyway, you know that old joke about

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the three stages of human life, youth, middle age, and

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 2>you're looking great. And by the way, ever since I

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>heard that joke, isn't it a great one? I mean,

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>even the young whipper snappers are laughing, And it is

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 2>such a good line that I try to consciously not

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 2>say to a person beyond middle age, you're looking great.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 2>But then I think, well, wait a minute, they don't

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>know the joke, so I can. And by the way,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, women are looking great at older and

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 2>older ages, and that's terrific. It's it's a blessing for her,

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a blessing for her husband. And I am I

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>am a big proponent of it. I mean, why not.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I remember when I went to the Soviet Union, where

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Communist countries, women and men, but especially women a far

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 2>more readily. I mean, a forty year old woman in

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the Soviet Union looked like a seventy or sixty year

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>old woman in the United States or France, and so

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, that was a natural look there. But in

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 2>more affluent societies in the West now, and not just

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 2>the West, women are looking better and better, getting older

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:46.479
<v Speaker 2>and older. I think that's magnificent. People are getting are

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 2>living older. Why not? So anyway, the subject again is

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>women not looking as they are naturally. So makeup is

0:08:59.960 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the most obvious example dying here Now, most people have

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 2>no problem with makeup or dying of the hair, and

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>talking about women here, I think most people do have

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 2>problems with men in makeup and men dyeing their hair,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>and I am among them. I would have some problem

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>with that too, But what about and what about a facelift?

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 2>In other words, what about when you're getting into And

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>here's where feminist feminists do not generally rail against dyeing

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of the hair. I don't think or against makeup. But

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 2>once you go beyond that to surgery, for example, then

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>you have a very large body of feminist literature. Oh

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>look at the risks women will take just for their looks.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 2>And you know, so women will have a facelift, for example,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 2>or any form of cosmetic surgery or a nose job,

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>as they do. They still call it those jobs. Is

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that the term still used? I don't know. That's the way,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that's the way it was used, I guess. Now reconstruction,

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>what is it? Nasal reconstruction? Oh, give me a break.

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I never heard anybody getting nasal reconstruction unless they have

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a deviated septum. Young whipper snappers, what do you guys? Anyway?

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>That's uh so, that's an area I will discuss with you.

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 2>And then, of course breast implants, which have become to

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 2>use the Latin de rigueur almost expected now and I

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>have I have a number of thoughts on both of these.

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's begin with Oh, yes. And the other one, which

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>is also uh, not looking your natural self, is you know,

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 2>putting on something sexy in the bedroom with your with

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>your husband. And I have heard over the course of

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>time from women, because both both sexes happily have do

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 2>open up to me as as you well should. I'm

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty open and and happily take the your openness. But

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I have heard and some young women, some different different

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>age women, will say, you know what, if he loves me,

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>he will love me from my heart and my mind.

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, not for not for my not for my

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 2>plastic surgery, not for my cosmetic surgery, not for my

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 2>breast implant, not for wearing sexy clothing. You know, if

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>you know God, God made the woman's body enticing on

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 2>its own, why why wear you know, negligee or whatever

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 2>it's called, tibet or or in the in the bedroom.

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 2>I will deal with all of these and take your

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 2>calls when we come back A one eighth Prager seven

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 2>seven six. All of these tend to be much less

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 2>frightening when when dispassionately discussed.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>This episode of timeless wisdom will continue right after this.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's timeless wisdom.

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay, everybody, you're listening to the Dennis Prager Show, and

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the subject is a very It is, of course, the

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Male Female Hour every what is it? Second hour Wednesday

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>is devoted to very real discussions about men and women.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>And I'm discussing one that for many women is a

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 2>non issue, absolutely, but for a fair number of women

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is an issue. And that is it's one thing to

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge the importance of looking attractive to your husband. But please,

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, okay, make up. I can live with even

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 2>dyeing my hair, But you know what about what about

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 2>going under the knife? Which is what cosmetic surgery is

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 2>about a facelift? You know, something on the nose, breast, implants,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Why you know, why can't he love me

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.959
<v Speaker 2>for who I am? Why do I have to do this?

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 2>And it is I understand the question, and I but

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the reality is that it matters. We are not disembodied creatures.

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>In the afterlife, we will be perhaps only souls, but

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 2>on Earth were physical beings, and the physical matters. I

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>wish it didn't. I wish it didn't, do you know?

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 2>I remember I'd be very open with you as I

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 2>as I am regularly. I have a very rarely I mean,

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 2>and it's probably true for most men. Most men don't

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 2>cry very often, and I have. I remember one of

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the only times I think post the age of twelve

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that I cried was when and I've never told this

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 2>actually maybe even new to you Allan I was about

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty or my early twenties, and there was a woman

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>that I loved deeply. Well, let's put it this way.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I thought was a total kindred spirit, which is hard

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to find in life. But I just wasn't attracted to her.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 2>And I remember crying for her and for me that

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 2>something so not in front of her I didn't but privately,

0:14:55.600 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 2>but that something so quote unquote trivial could prevent two

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>people from from bonding. But what are you going to do? Life?

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Life is doing what we can with reality, not denying reality.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So the woman who says he should love me just

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 2>for my heart and mind is denying reality, just as

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>just as it would be to deny reality to say

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>that the heart and mind don't matter, that that only

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 2>looks matter. A man who marries only for looks is

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 2>doomed for misery, utter misery. He's an idiot. Just to

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 2>put it. To put it bluntly, I mean, they're a

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 2>married women who marry just for money, they probably have

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>a better chance. I would think it's some happiness than

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 2>a man who married only for looks. That's how And

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>I certainly don't advocate marrying only for money. And I'll

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>have more to say about the uh, about the facelifts

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and so on, but I want to take your your calls.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Denver, Colorado and Cindy. Hi, Cindy, Dennis Prager.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Dennis, thanks for taking my call.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you called.

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to say that my issue as a woman

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 3>with plastic surgery is actually kind of the same issue

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 3>that I have with pornography, and that it sort of

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 3>alters the perception of what is real. And so when

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>you start talking about having women as a age altering

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 3>their bodies so that when you're forty or fifty, you're

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 3>looking like you're twenty five or thirty, then it sort

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 3>of becomes this new standard of what beauty is. Versus

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>accepting what is beautiful for a forty year old or

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 3>a fifty year old. You're trying to say that here's

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 3>this box of what's beautiful.

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Why are you okay? If you're okay with makeup? Why

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 2>are you okay? Since that alters a woman's looks?

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think because it is so invasive and because.

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 2>It wait wait wait wait wait wait, hold on your objection,

0:17:14.360 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 2>and you know me, I'm not going to argue with you.

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to clarify if we differ, So your objection

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 2>is not altering looks. It's using a knife to alter looks.

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of almost, in a way, mutilating a woman.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 3>And I know it's such a feminist word use, but

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 3>it's mutilating a woman's body to say that you have

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 3>to completely change what is naturally physically who you are

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 3>versus I think the idea with makeup is sort of

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 3>enhancing what you are naturally you know, well, surgery is

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 3>completely altering what you are naturally.

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that makeup changes your look, or can

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 2>change your look, at least as dramatically. I mean, have

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 2>you ever seen at the supermarket. I notice these you

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 2>know people and us and these others. They will have pictures,

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess to make women feel better, which I totally understand.

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Of some of the most glamorous stars in Hollywood, where

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 2>they paparazzi have caught them without makeup and then show

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 2>them with makeup. They are almost not recognizable as the

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 2>same woman. So I would argue that makeup is as

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>dramatically a changing all all a facelift does is in fact,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 2>quite the contrary. It is restored the way you looked earlier.

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 3>But that's what I'm saying is you're restoring a woman

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 3>who is beautiful at as a fifty year old.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Look, yeah, but she's not as But she's not as

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 2>beautiful at fifty as she was at thirty in most cases.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just a fact. But you so why

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't Why shouldn't she? Why shouldn't she? What if you

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 2>could take a pill? It's not invasive. You take a

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 2>pill and some of the sagging on the face just

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 2>goes away. Would you be against the pill?

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 3>I just feel like changing the standard of beauty at

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 3>a certain age to say that it has to compare

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 3>to the beauty at you know that a woman who's forty.

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Has to do well?

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you, well, yes, but I would argue,

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's almost less compassionate to have your view.

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's compassionate to women. Let us say that there is

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 2>a fifty year old woman and a thirty five year

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 2>old woman, and they both want this fifty year old

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 2>man who has a better chance, all things being equal,

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 2>who has a better chance perhaps the thirty five year

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 2>old based on looks alone. Why should we give that

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 2>advantage that woman who has developed her brain and her

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 2>mind and her and her abilities, Why should she seed

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that advantage if she can do something about it?

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 3>But all other things aren't equal. When you're talking about

0:19:58.160 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 3>a fifty five year old woman, you're talking about the

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 3>wisdom and the life experience.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 2>You're right, You're right, it is, But he's not if

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 2>he only wants wisdom.

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 3>To what you're going to find in a thirty five

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 3>years right. See why we can't as women, we can't

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 3>own that and say that, yes, this you know because.

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Looks Because Cindy, with.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 3>The wisdom and the time and the life, you're right.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>They are a tremendous value. I am a big wisdom proponent,

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>as you know, Cindy. However, Cindy, you're twenty seven, and

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 2>I think that when you're fifty seven you might feel

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 2>more like I am. I am speaking now, we'll be

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>back in a moment.

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom. We'll continue right after this.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Dennis Prager Show funny about the

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 2>issue of natural looks versus enhanced looks, whether it's makeup

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>or dyeing one's hair. And I'm talking about women specifically.

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the male female of the Dennis Prager Show,

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 2>second hour every Wednesday. And it's very tempting. Look, it's

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>very tempting for anybody to say, you sound noble, you

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 2>sound great. But it doesn't help anybody to say, ah,

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter, just you know, just grow old. And

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 2>in some cases it works, it does absolutely. I mean,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 2>this is something for any given couple to work out

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 2>on their own. But it's not common for a woman

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>to get the truth from her husband because talking about

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 2>her looks is the hardest thing a man can do.

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 2>How do I look, honey? The answer is great, Men men,

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 2>or at least men believe that we ought to talk

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 2>about that. By the way, that would be a good subject.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 2>In other words, women can help men in this regard.

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>What should they lie? And maybe they should, but it

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 2>would be a very helpful thing to have that as

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>a subject on you know, do I look fat in

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>this dress? What is he supposed to say? And then

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 2>we'll go, well, you know, well what about the guy?

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 2>And you know, but looks in men are not as

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>critical to women as looks in women are to men.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 2>It's just that's the way the world works. It's not fair,

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 2>but there are many things not fair. It's not fair

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 2>that men are far more likely to die in war.

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 2>It's not fair that men commit far more suicide than women.

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not fair that men flunk out more. It's not

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 2>fair that men are more on drugs. It's not fair

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 2>that men are tortured far more than women are tortured.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not fair that men have to make a living

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of women don't have to make a living.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you can go through it. The question is

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 2>not what's fair, as one mature, as one doesn't ask

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 2>that question. One asks one asks what works, whether it's

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 2>healthcare or the life of a couple. What works, not

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 2>what's fair. What's fair is a theoretical, platonic question of

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 2>some ideal that one constructs in one's brain. And then

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>you know the because I read this stuff, I read

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the feminist arguments against this. Oh what you know, women

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 2>going under the knife for the just to look younger. Yeah,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 2>that's true, that's true. And by the way, can one

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 2>have too much plastic surgery? Of course one can have

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 2>too much. One can have too much vitamins. One can

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>have too much of anything on earth. The question is

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 2>is any too much? Not as too much? Too much?

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Of course? Too much? Is too much? Is any too much?

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 2>That's the question. Let's go to Birmingham, Michigan. I know Birmingham. Hello, Cassie,

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager.

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Hi Dennis. I am thrilled to be talking to you

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 4>and looking to you all the time.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 4>I had a face lift about a month ago. I

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 4>am fifty eight years old, and I didn't do it

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 4>for my husband. I did it for myself. I am

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 4>a firm believer that how you feel about yourself, which

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 4>obviously means how you think you look, affects every relationship

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 4>you have. And if I and I do believe it

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 4>says even in the Bible that you are to love yourself.

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 4>And if I love myself, meaning I like the way

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 4>I look, every relationship in my life is going to

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 4>be better. And I can tell you that I looked

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 4>at the way I was looking, at the way I

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 4>was feeling, and they didn't match up. And I wanted.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 2>To look more like how you said. You didn't do

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 2>it for your husband?

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Was he one percent of the decision or zero?

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 4>Oh? He's a he's a He supported me whatever I

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 4>wanted to do.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Well? Is he happy you did it?

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 2>So he said.

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't look, and I don't look. It's not like

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 4>I turned back the clock.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, I no, of course not, nor should

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 2>one turning back the clock twenty years looks a little

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 2>foolish back in a moment. That's a very important call.

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I thank you.

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>This episode of timeless wisdom. We'll continue right after this. No,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>back to more of Dennis Prager's time swizz T.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, you're listening to the Dennis Prager Show,

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the Male Female Hour. And it's a particularly difficult subject.

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 2>It's such a sensitive issue when I am aware of that,

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and frankly, I have a great deal of sympathy for

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>women on this particular issue. But the question is in

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 2>sympathy as much as it is again what works. And

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about this issue of women's natural looks versus

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 2>enhanced looks, whether it's well the earliest stages make up.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Then there's the dying of hair, and then there is

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 2>a facelift, and then there is you know, something done

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 2>to the nose perhaps, and then there is their breast implants,

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and god knows what else, and tummy tucks and so

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>she tucks and so on. By the way, if this

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 2>may come as some surprise, given that I have support

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 2>for moderate use of these things, uh, the and that

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 2>is I think that a lot of women today in

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 2>America get breast implants and totally it's totally unnecessary. It's

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 2>almost you know, keep up with the joneses in breast size.

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I totally understand it when gravity, birth, nursing

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 2>or nature has you know, done a job on your breasts.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 2>But where a young woman who's you know, perfectly fine

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 2>body just wants them super duper large, I think that

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 2>that's social That is far more to be socially. I

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know, feel that she is fitting in almost than

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 2>it is any any real necessity.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 2>But this is the way of life I have not discussed,

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and maybe we should save that for another time, because

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 2>there's another way in which a woman artificially if you will,

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 2>enhances her looks. And that's with clothing and clothing in

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the bedroom. And you know, I've heard this too. You know,

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 2>why would he ask me to put something on? Why

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 2>doesn't he, you know, just love me the way I am?

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Which is a very fair question, but again does it's

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the reality is that something putting on something sexy is

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 2>putting on something sexy. And if it enhances the relationship

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 2>between a husband and a wife, and everything has bounds obviously,

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 2>then why not do it? I mean, one needs to

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 2>be bottom line oriented here, and that is what enhances

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 2>our love and making love with one another, and they

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 2>are related in most marriages. Okay, let's go to Monterey,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 2>California and Gina Hygiena Dennis Prager.

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Dennis, Hi, thank you so much for your contribution

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 5>to the quality of life for all of that.

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 5>I want this is a subject that's near and dear

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 5>to my heart, and I'm so glad that you have

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 5>raised it. I've always thought that it would beful. I

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.719
<v Speaker 5>always wanted to write a book called aging Beauty. I

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 5>have always been pretty. I am fifty nine years old.

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 5>I have always been pretty. Very I was beautiful as

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 5>a young woman, and I think women who have had

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 5>that experience throughout life have a particularly tough time letting

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 5>go when they start to age. And I think there's

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 5>an art to aging gracefully. I started at age thirty

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 5>nine to have small procedures here and there according to

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 5>what was available. But basically I studied women who were

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 5>older who did seem to me to be aging gracefully,

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 5>like Catherine Hepburn, and what it was made up of,

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 5>it seemed to me was hair, skin and weight. And

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 5>I thought, whatever I can do to enhance my hair,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 5>my skin, and my weight, you know, managing my weight.

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 5>I have made significant investments in my skin, keeping my

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 5>skin healthy, my hair healthy, and it has worked. I

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 5>don't look twenty nine. I don't want to look twenty

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 5>that's right, But I do look great for my age.

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 5>There's not a day that goes by, just like when

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 5>I was younger. There's not a day that goes by

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 5>that somebody doesn't tell me that I look great. And

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 5>I didn't want to let that go, right.

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, No, no, no, I hear you. And I like

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the hair, skin weight. That's a good that's a good guide.

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 2>That is a good guide, and again for the woman

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 2>who hesitates on let's say a facelift, and there a

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 2>face lifts. I see where I wish the woman didn't

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>have it obviously. I mean it's they're painful to observe,

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 2>but when done judiciously, and I would even argue conservatively,

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 2>My argument is why let nature win these battles. I

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 2>just that's the question that I pose. I have never

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 2>bought the idea. Well, that's natural. So what body? Odour

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 2>is natural? Bad breath is natural? You know, flatulating is natural.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand this. The natural argument means nothing to me. Nothing.

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Houston, Texas and Roda, Hi, Roda, Hello,

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 2>how are you? I'm well, thank you for calling.

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 6>I've been listening to you for a while. I love

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 6>your show great, But I do have issue as far

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 6>as faceless versus makeup. Makeup is temporary. You can take

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 6>it off you and it does not actually change a

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 6>whole look unless you go dramatic because you still have wrinkles.

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 6>You can see that through the makeup. You can see everything.

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 6>Facebooks are so invasive and then you're also sitting.

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Well then, I so I asked, okay, well though, but

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 2>those are tactical questions, not philosophical opposition.

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.239
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so then we have if you can't afford it,

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and then that ends the issue. And as for the

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 2>other let us say, as I asked my first caller,

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>if you could take a pill instead of having a knife,

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 2>then then what would you.

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 6>That is? It all depends on what other things the

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 6>pill could do to you.

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess, all right, so your issue then, okay, fair enough,

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 2>So so wrote to your issue is health, and that's

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 2>a very fair question. And by the way, to the

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 2>extent that one doesn't get age in these types of

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>of cosmetic surgeries. I am always towards the conservative side, absolutely,

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and by the well, not by the way, just as

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 2>it happens, I guess I think the earlier done, I'm told,

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 2>the better. It is that you don't want to wait

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 2>till a very late age to do to get it done.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>You do moderate things in their time back in a moment.

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>You SEGM lie say hello?

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Why you Sam?

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I say hello? Why I say hi? You say hello?

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>You say why I say I don't.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager here, The Male Female Hour Male Female Hour

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 2>is one of the reasons people subscribe to this program

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 2>in the thousands. Seven dollars a month is all it costs,

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and you get every show you want. You download it,

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 2>you keep it, you share it with a friend, let

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 2>your husband hear it'll let your wife hear it. And

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 2>it also comes with all of the articles that Alan

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 2>sends to me personally prior to every show with his comments.

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, that's worthwhile more than the seven dollars

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>a month alone. But that is a rare compliment to

0:34:55.239 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Alan publicly made. I'm looking at Alan and he has

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 2>maintained his sphinx like demeanor. All right, I've been talking

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 2>about this question of well it's not natural or whatever

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 2>other objection, and I have great sympathy for the objections,

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 2>but not in the final analysis. I have sympathy for

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 2>where they come from. Life isn't fair given the looks issue,

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 2>But talking about everything from makeup to to facelifts, et cetera.

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 2>I see no reason not to unless there are compelling

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 2>reasons not to. Let me take another young caller here.

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Brian is twenty five in Philadelphia. Hello Brian Dennis Prager.

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 7>Hello mister Breger, thank you for taking my phone call.

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 7>I really enjoy your show and I'm glad that I

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 7>could get on here good. I just wanted to talk

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 7>about the lingerie in the bedroom.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and I.

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 7>Feel that that is a really great way to splice

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 7>up a relationship, and I don't have any kind of

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 7>problem with that, but I do have one little quarrel

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 7>with it about the seems like some my older couple

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 7>friends are in marriages they like to splice it up

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 7>by having their wives and girlfriends dress up in like

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 7>cheerleader outfits.

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 2>And wait, wait, you mean privately or publicly? Yes, privately,

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.240
<v Speaker 2>And why would you object because of their age?

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 3>No, the of the age.

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so let me quickly react to that. The music's

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 2>coming on, Brian, Brian at twenty five. The thought of

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 2>people past the age of I don't know, fifty sixty,

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 2>let alone seventy having spiced up sex seems so bizarre

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 2>to you. Totally understandably, but thank God, you don't know

0:36:56.160 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 2>what you're talking about, thank God. And what couples do

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 2>in their bedrooms to enhance their marriage and the sex

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 2>life of their marriage is their business, and if it works,

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 2>God bless them. This is Dennis.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Prager Tomorrow Untimeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager.

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So there's no way around it. You can't ignore jew hatred.

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Not because it's not moral to ignore it. It's just

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 2>in our self interest to worry about this hatred. The

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 2>greatest in history.

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Join us tomorrow to hear more on Timeless Wisdom with

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Prigger. This has been timeless wisdom with Dennis Prager.

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Visit Dennispragger dot com for thousands of hours of Dennis's lectures, courses,

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and classic radio programs, and to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles.