WEBVTT - Timeless Wisdom: Male/Female Hour- Short Term vs Long Term 

0:00:21.500 --> 0:00:25.820
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Here thousands of

0:00:25.860 --> 0:00:29.340
<v Speaker 1>hours of Dennis's lectures, courses in classic radio programs, and

0:00:29.500 --> 0:00:42.540
<v Speaker 1>to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles, go to Dennisprager dot com.

0:00:42.580 --> 0:00:44.940
<v Speaker 2>All right, me, my friends, you're listening to the Dennis

0:00:44.940 --> 0:00:48.099
<v Speaker 2>Prager Show show, where we truly talk about everything in

0:00:48.180 --> 0:00:53.180
<v Speaker 2>life and one of my favorite subjects male female differences.

0:00:53.220 --> 0:00:54.980
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk to you about. There's an article

0:00:54.980 --> 0:00:57.179
<v Speaker 2>and I want to thank those who sent this to me.

0:00:58.060 --> 0:01:01.140
<v Speaker 2>I would not have seen it otherwise. There is a study. Well,

0:01:01.180 --> 0:01:02.940
<v Speaker 2>first of all, a report that just came out in

0:01:03.060 --> 0:01:08.860
<v Speaker 2>New Scientists, which is a sophisticated journal, a popular but

0:01:08.980 --> 0:01:13.660
<v Speaker 2>sophisticated journal about science news. And I read to you

0:01:13.740 --> 0:01:19.780
<v Speaker 2>from Asian News International that has made this report from

0:01:19.820 --> 0:01:26.820
<v Speaker 2>New Scientist widely available on the internet. Psychologists in Canada

0:01:26.940 --> 0:01:31.020
<v Speaker 2>finally proved that men are actually irrational enough to risk

0:01:31.260 --> 0:01:36.820
<v Speaker 2>entire kingdoms to catch sight of a pretty face. All right,

0:01:36.900 --> 0:01:40.220
<v Speaker 2>According to a report in New Scientists dot com, biologists

0:01:40.300 --> 0:01:44.740
<v Speaker 2>have long known that men like animals, and I want

0:01:44.780 --> 0:01:46.460
<v Speaker 2>to I'm going to talk to you about this like

0:01:46.540 --> 0:01:50.620
<v Speaker 2>animals thing because a very important little throwaway line that

0:01:50.660 --> 0:01:54.820
<v Speaker 2>they did not develop here. Prefer immediate rewards to long

0:01:54.900 --> 0:01:58.900
<v Speaker 2>term benefits in the future. The process is known as

0:01:58.980 --> 0:02:05.700
<v Speaker 2>discounting the future. Immediately available cash is generally worth more

0:02:05.780 --> 0:02:08.859
<v Speaker 2>than the same amount that would be in the future,

0:02:09.660 --> 0:02:12.300
<v Speaker 2>but greater amounts of money in the future would be

0:02:12.380 --> 0:02:18.340
<v Speaker 2>worth waiting for under so called rational discounting. However, some people,

0:02:18.460 --> 0:02:23.660
<v Speaker 2>like drug addicts, exhibit irrational discounting when it comes to

0:02:23.740 --> 0:02:27.660
<v Speaker 2>choosing a small amount of heroin today rather than a

0:02:27.700 --> 0:02:31.860
<v Speaker 2>greater amount in the future. Margot Wilson and Martin Daly

0:02:31.940 --> 0:02:37.620
<v Speaker 2>of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario decided to investigate discounting

0:02:37.700 --> 0:02:41.780
<v Speaker 2>behavior and see if it varied with sexual mood. This

0:02:41.860 --> 0:02:45.100
<v Speaker 2>is a good study. Listen to this. Male students, when

0:02:45.140 --> 0:02:49.100
<v Speaker 2>shown pictures of pretty women, were more likely to opt

0:02:49.180 --> 0:02:53.419
<v Speaker 2>for short term economic gain than wait for a better

0:02:53.500 --> 0:02:57.580
<v Speaker 2>reward in the future. This is a remarkable test that

0:02:57.660 --> 0:03:02.180
<v Speaker 2>they did. It's almost funny to show how powerful how

0:03:02.220 --> 0:03:05.460
<v Speaker 2>it takes over a man's mind just seeing a pretty woman.

0:03:06.500 --> 0:03:10.100
<v Speaker 2>Both male and female students at McMaster University were shown

0:03:10.180 --> 0:03:14.579
<v Speaker 2>pictures of the opposite sex of a varying attractiveness taken

0:03:14.620 --> 0:03:18.540
<v Speaker 2>from the website hot or not. The two hundred and

0:03:18.580 --> 0:03:21.820
<v Speaker 2>nine students were then offered the chance to win a reward,

0:03:22.660 --> 0:03:25.820
<v Speaker 2>and they could either accept a check for between fifteen

0:03:25.900 --> 0:03:31.060
<v Speaker 2>dollars and thirty five dollars tomorrow or one fifty to

0:03:31.100 --> 0:03:34.580
<v Speaker 2>seventy five dollars at a variable point in the future.

0:03:35.700 --> 0:03:39.620
<v Speaker 2>The experts found that male students shown the pictures of

0:03:39.780 --> 0:03:45.340
<v Speaker 2>averagely attractive women showed exponential discounting of the future value

0:03:45.380 --> 0:03:49.060
<v Speaker 2>of the reward, indicating that they had made a rational decision.

0:03:49.340 --> 0:03:52.420
<v Speaker 2>Let me make that very clear in case you're missing it.

0:03:53.100 --> 0:03:55.340
<v Speaker 2>When the male students were shown a picture of an

0:03:55.340 --> 0:03:59.060
<v Speaker 2>averagely attractive woman and then afterwards offered do you want

0:03:59.060 --> 0:04:02.660
<v Speaker 2>to check for fifteen to thirty five dollars tomorrow or

0:04:02.700 --> 0:04:06.140
<v Speaker 2>fifty to seventy five at a later date, that they

0:04:06.140 --> 0:04:11.700
<v Speaker 2>would note then then they would say, oh, I'll take

0:04:11.740 --> 0:04:15.260
<v Speaker 2>the more money a little later. They were making a

0:04:15.420 --> 0:04:20.099
<v Speaker 2>rational decision. Now, let me continue. When male students were

0:04:20.140 --> 0:04:24.779
<v Speaker 2>shown picks of pretty women, they discounted the future value

0:04:24.820 --> 0:04:28.740
<v Speaker 2>of the reward, indicating that they had made an irrational decision.

0:04:29.940 --> 0:04:34.460
<v Speaker 2>Now critical to understanding male female difference. Women, by contrast,

0:04:35.099 --> 0:04:39.460
<v Speaker 2>made equally rational decisions whether they had been shown pictures

0:04:39.500 --> 0:04:45.620
<v Speaker 2>of handsome men or those of average attractiveness. Uh huh,

0:04:46.260 --> 0:04:48.940
<v Speaker 2>so much again, I tell you that that of all

0:04:48.980 --> 0:04:51.219
<v Speaker 2>the subjects, the one that has driven me the nuts

0:04:51.260 --> 0:04:54.740
<v Speaker 2>my entire adult life. I mean, since college, has been

0:04:55.100 --> 0:04:57.940
<v Speaker 2>the line that men and women are basically the same,

0:04:58.340 --> 0:05:01.020
<v Speaker 2>that men are taught to see women as sexual objects

0:05:01.060 --> 0:05:05.900
<v Speaker 2>by playboy and the like. But really it's a societally

0:05:06.060 --> 0:05:13.100
<v Speaker 2>induced thing. It drives me nuts. Ignoramuses people truly ignorant

0:05:13.180 --> 0:05:16.180
<v Speaker 2>of male and female say that, or women who say, oh,

0:05:16.180 --> 0:05:18.779
<v Speaker 2>come on, I'm not attracted to an attractive man. Of

0:05:18.820 --> 0:05:21.540
<v Speaker 2>course you are, of course, step but it's it's it.

0:05:21.540 --> 0:05:26.540
<v Speaker 2>There's no comparison in in what it does. Also, the

0:05:26.700 --> 0:05:30.260
<v Speaker 2>number of men who will turn a woman's head be

0:05:31.020 --> 0:05:33.580
<v Speaker 2>a stranger stranger men in other words, a man that

0:05:33.620 --> 0:05:37.620
<v Speaker 2>she doesn't know from Adam, who will just have her,

0:05:37.980 --> 0:05:43.180
<v Speaker 2>you know, turn her head and and and confound her

0:05:43.260 --> 0:05:46.140
<v Speaker 2>mind is tiny. Where the number of women who do

0:05:46.220 --> 0:05:48.659
<v Speaker 2>that to men, ask men, I mean, it's it's it's

0:05:48.700 --> 0:05:53.180
<v Speaker 2>it's legion. I mean that the number is huge. This

0:05:53.660 --> 0:05:56.540
<v Speaker 2>is a very good article because it is a good

0:05:56.580 --> 0:06:04.540
<v Speaker 2>study because it it once again provides scientific proof for

0:06:04.700 --> 0:06:08.460
<v Speaker 2>the for the obvious. And unfortunately, people who go to

0:06:08.500 --> 0:06:12.580
<v Speaker 2>college are taught not to believe wisdom, not to believe

0:06:12.700 --> 0:06:17.219
<v Speaker 2>common sense, not to believe their own life, but to ask,

0:06:17.620 --> 0:06:21.099
<v Speaker 2>what do studies show? Okay, so for those of you

0:06:21.140 --> 0:06:24.500
<v Speaker 2>who want to know what study show, studies show that

0:06:24.660 --> 0:06:28.900
<v Speaker 2>men's minds are easily confounded by the sight of a

0:06:28.900 --> 0:06:33.420
<v Speaker 2>pretty woman, not to mention the rest of the female anatomy.

0:06:33.860 --> 0:06:37.539
<v Speaker 2>And this is just the face that presumably when it

0:06:37.540 --> 0:06:42.980
<v Speaker 2>says a pretty woman, the power of sight is uniquely

0:06:43.260 --> 0:06:48.419
<v Speaker 2>male the woman. The eye doesn't do to the woman.

0:06:48.500 --> 0:06:51.580
<v Speaker 2>The ear does to the woman a lot of things.

0:06:51.980 --> 0:06:57.820
<v Speaker 2>How he talks, how how he smells those things, or

0:06:57.900 --> 0:07:01.820
<v Speaker 2>in looks is he clean? But a picture of a

0:07:01.860 --> 0:07:04.779
<v Speaker 2>good looking man. The woman is just going to continue

0:07:04.820 --> 0:07:08.460
<v Speaker 2>the work that she is doing. It doesn't whatever chemical

0:07:08.620 --> 0:07:11.300
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it is, reaction, it's not. It's not. It's

0:07:11.340 --> 0:07:16.420
<v Speaker 2>not in the same universe one eight Praeger seven seven

0:07:16.580 --> 0:07:19.340
<v Speaker 2>six one eight p R. A. G. E. R. Seven

0:07:19.420 --> 0:07:22.580
<v Speaker 2>seven six. I'm going to give you more conclusions here,

0:07:23.300 --> 0:07:26.180
<v Speaker 2>and you may want to react to them, because this

0:07:26.260 --> 0:07:28.620
<v Speaker 2>is a very you know, if you could make a

0:07:28.620 --> 0:07:30.860
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun out of this thing. You know, oh,

0:07:30.900 --> 0:07:33.180
<v Speaker 2>you know, as they do in the very first sentence,

0:07:33.180 --> 0:07:35.420
<v Speaker 2>which I didn't read to you, the men are going

0:07:35.460 --> 0:07:37.220
<v Speaker 2>to take a double turn on this is what has

0:07:37.260 --> 0:07:41.020
<v Speaker 2>been long suspected is finally established. In other words, it's

0:07:41.060 --> 0:07:42.900
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot of, it's a lot of. It's not

0:07:42.980 --> 0:07:46.180
<v Speaker 2>a light subject, believe it or not. It can be

0:07:46.260 --> 0:07:49.820
<v Speaker 2>made into it because we don't want to acknowledge its seriousness.

0:07:50.020 --> 0:07:54.820
<v Speaker 2>But the eye plays havoc with men and therefore with women.

0:07:55.740 --> 0:08:00.340
<v Speaker 2>Women women sense it, sometimes know it, act on it,

0:08:01.060 --> 0:08:06.180
<v Speaker 2>deny it whatever it is, but its power cannot be overstated.

0:08:07.100 --> 0:08:12.020
<v Speaker 2>That is why I'll give you two other, two other factors,

0:08:12.060 --> 0:08:15.540
<v Speaker 2>two other conclusions from this. That is why what women

0:08:15.660 --> 0:08:20.860
<v Speaker 2>wear is of such extraordinary importance because of the impact

0:08:20.860 --> 0:08:26.860
<v Speaker 2>that it has on men. Now, I'm not saying we

0:08:26.900 --> 0:08:30.739
<v Speaker 2>can't pass laws, and we shouldn't pass laws, and God knows,

0:08:30.820 --> 0:08:33.340
<v Speaker 2>I think that the veil and the chador, these are

0:08:33.420 --> 0:08:38.140
<v Speaker 2>dehumanizing things for women. But let us I'm not even

0:08:38.179 --> 0:08:40.660
<v Speaker 2>taking a position. Well, I have a position, as many

0:08:40.699 --> 0:08:45.660
<v Speaker 2>of you know. I think that that a sober understanding

0:08:45.699 --> 0:08:49.660
<v Speaker 2>of the effect of how I, as a woman appear

0:08:49.780 --> 0:08:54.699
<v Speaker 2>to men is critical. We need to soberly consider what

0:08:54.740 --> 0:08:58.699
<v Speaker 2>will I want to show. But there is also another factor,

0:08:59.300 --> 0:09:01.860
<v Speaker 2>and that is I'll never forget. I was listening once

0:09:01.980 --> 0:09:06.820
<v Speaker 2>to a talk show host. A woman had called in

0:09:08.420 --> 0:09:11.060
<v Speaker 2>said that she had found out that her husband was

0:09:11.060 --> 0:09:17.180
<v Speaker 2>looking at sexy images on the computer, and the talk

0:09:17.220 --> 0:09:24.620
<v Speaker 2>show host said, your husband is sick and needs help. Now, folks,

0:09:24.980 --> 0:09:28.180
<v Speaker 2>there are religious reasons, there are a whole host of

0:09:28.260 --> 0:09:34.060
<v Speaker 2>reasons not to involve oneself in those images. But it

0:09:34.140 --> 0:09:38.900
<v Speaker 2>is not sick men look because that is the way

0:09:39.020 --> 0:09:43.980
<v Speaker 2>we are programmed, and the power of it is not

0:09:44.660 --> 0:09:48.620
<v Speaker 2>is not understandable by the female. You can't any more

0:09:48.660 --> 0:09:53.380
<v Speaker 2>than than a male can understand. I don't know how

0:09:53.420 --> 0:09:56.260
<v Speaker 2>many things go on in a woman's mind at one time.

0:09:56.980 --> 0:10:00.340
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we can. It's it's not available to

0:10:00.420 --> 0:10:05.940
<v Speaker 2>us because we are basically uh una attentive. One thing

0:10:06.020 --> 0:10:09.620
<v Speaker 2>at a time is what we attend to. But the

0:10:09.740 --> 0:10:12.420
<v Speaker 2>power of the eye that that a man. I mean,

0:10:12.460 --> 0:10:19.140
<v Speaker 2>this is an unbelievable study, an unbelievably important study. Guys

0:10:19.140 --> 0:10:22.740
<v Speaker 2>will make irrational decision financially just because they saw a

0:10:22.740 --> 0:10:26.340
<v Speaker 2>pretty face. It wasn't even to get the woman. It

0:10:26.380 --> 0:10:29.940
<v Speaker 2>was they've already got confounded in their thinking just by

0:10:29.980 --> 0:10:33.500
<v Speaker 2>the look. Do you agree? Do you have any issue

0:10:33.540 --> 0:10:36.340
<v Speaker 2>with what I am saying or this study? Do you

0:10:36.540 --> 0:10:40.060
<v Speaker 2>the power of the eye in men? You as a woman?

0:10:40.140 --> 0:10:43.220
<v Speaker 2>Does it bother you? Do you act on it? Do

0:10:43.300 --> 0:10:46.660
<v Speaker 2>you understand it? Does this trouble you? Do you disagree?

0:10:46.980 --> 0:10:49.740
<v Speaker 2>Do you think women have it the same way? One

0:10:49.820 --> 0:10:53.420
<v Speaker 2>eighth Prager seven seven six. One eighth p R A

0:10:53.660 --> 0:10:56.820
<v Speaker 2>g e r seven seven six. A gay man in

0:10:56.860 --> 0:10:59.500
<v Speaker 2>Honolulu on the line, and I know what he's gonna say,

0:10:59.500 --> 0:11:01.220
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna let him say it because it will

0:11:01.260 --> 0:11:05.980
<v Speaker 2>prove my point even further. One eighth Praguer seven seven six.

0:11:06.260 --> 0:11:07.540
<v Speaker 2>The Dennis Prager Show.

0:11:08.780 --> 0:11:12.140
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:11:16.620 --> 0:11:28.380
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:11:28.660 --> 0:11:32.699
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Prager here, I love it. Take five one of

0:11:32.740 --> 0:11:35.180
<v Speaker 2>the great jazz things, one of the great gifts to

0:11:35.220 --> 0:11:38.300
<v Speaker 2>my life in the last five years. Appreciation of a

0:11:38.300 --> 0:11:44.100
<v Speaker 2>lot of jazz, happy, optimistic, free music. Just a lot

0:11:44.140 --> 0:11:45.459
<v Speaker 2>of it. I mean a lot of it's junk. A

0:11:45.460 --> 0:11:47.300
<v Speaker 2>lot of every music is drunk. A lot of classical

0:11:47.340 --> 0:11:50.339
<v Speaker 2>is junk. And that's my background. So you know that's

0:11:50.380 --> 0:11:53.780
<v Speaker 2>the way it goes. One eighth Prager seven seven six.

0:11:54.100 --> 0:11:56.500
<v Speaker 2>This study that came out of a Canadian university is

0:11:56.500 --> 0:12:01.380
<v Speaker 2>a good one. Showed guys and girls at the university,

0:12:01.660 --> 0:12:06.540
<v Speaker 2>men and women. They showed them attractive, very attractive, and

0:12:06.860 --> 0:12:10.699
<v Speaker 2>you know, average looking members of the opposite sex, and

0:12:10.740 --> 0:12:15.300
<v Speaker 2>then tested their rationality on a very simple question that

0:12:15.340 --> 0:12:18.140
<v Speaker 2>would determine how reasonable they were. The men lost a

0:12:18.140 --> 0:12:20.620
<v Speaker 2>lot of their rationality after seeing pictures of pretty women,

0:12:20.700 --> 0:12:24.220
<v Speaker 2>and the women were completely unaffected by seeing pictures of

0:12:24.220 --> 0:12:28.180
<v Speaker 2>attractive men. And an attractiveness was taken off a website

0:12:28.179 --> 0:12:32.460
<v Speaker 2>that judges attractiveness of people, the power of the male eye,

0:12:32.700 --> 0:12:35.740
<v Speaker 2>the female power, but not just female. And the proof

0:12:35.780 --> 0:12:39.100
<v Speaker 2>that this isn't societal, but this is innate comes from

0:12:39.140 --> 0:12:41.980
<v Speaker 2>a call that I am about to take from Tim

0:12:42.020 --> 0:12:45.740
<v Speaker 2>in Honolulu on k h n R. Tim Dennis Prager,

0:12:45.780 --> 0:12:46.580
<v Speaker 2>thank you for calling.

0:12:47.980 --> 0:12:50.300
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Hi, Hey, I love Take five.

0:12:50.340 --> 0:12:55.460
<v Speaker 2>Also, how can you not you just need ears?

0:12:56.140 --> 0:12:58.620
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just wanted to confirm what you said because

0:12:58.660 --> 0:13:02.460
<v Speaker 3>I'm a gay man and my head is turned when

0:13:02.500 --> 0:13:04.620
<v Speaker 3>I see an attractive guy, and I think it is

0:13:04.660 --> 0:13:06.620
<v Speaker 3>innate exactly.

0:13:07.220 --> 0:13:10.220
<v Speaker 2>Gay men are the proof that I always offer for

0:13:10.500 --> 0:13:14.300
<v Speaker 2>male female differences that there is only one difference between

0:13:14.340 --> 0:13:18.940
<v Speaker 2>you and me, is sexually speaking, only one the object

0:13:19.620 --> 0:13:22.740
<v Speaker 2>of our attention of ours, that which attracts us is

0:13:23.140 --> 0:13:25.940
<v Speaker 2>a different sex. But in every other way, the gay

0:13:25.980 --> 0:13:28.940
<v Speaker 2>man and the straight man are sexually the same. That

0:13:29.100 --> 0:13:30.820
<v Speaker 2>is why. By the way, and I don't say this,

0:13:30.820 --> 0:13:34.420
<v Speaker 2>This is not a negative comment, It is just a comment.

0:13:34.500 --> 0:13:38.300
<v Speaker 2>It is far harder I have to believe for gay

0:13:38.380 --> 0:13:41.939
<v Speaker 2>men to stay faithful to one another than for a

0:13:41.980 --> 0:13:43.660
<v Speaker 2>straight man and straight woman.

0:13:45.980 --> 0:13:48.300
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's an ethical thing. I think that's individual.

0:13:50.020 --> 0:13:53.620
<v Speaker 2>It's always individual. But I'm saying it's harder because the

0:13:53.660 --> 0:13:57.100
<v Speaker 2>male drive for variety, which you the gay man, and

0:13:57.140 --> 0:14:00.540
<v Speaker 2>I the straight man have. But I am curbed by

0:14:00.620 --> 0:14:05.060
<v Speaker 2>the fact that I am married to a female, whereas

0:14:05.220 --> 0:14:07.820
<v Speaker 2>you are. You would be bonded to the extent that

0:14:07.900 --> 0:14:09.699
<v Speaker 2>you would be to a man who has the same

0:14:09.820 --> 0:14:10.939
<v Speaker 2>drive for variety.

0:14:11.980 --> 0:14:14.620
<v Speaker 3>That's true, that's true, But it's also a good argument

0:14:14.660 --> 0:14:16.660
<v Speaker 3>for legalizing marriage to give the.

0:14:16.860 --> 0:14:19.900
<v Speaker 2>Well that yeah, that's Andrew Sullivan's argument. We debated that,

0:14:19.980 --> 0:14:22.140
<v Speaker 2>and I'm in his look in fact my essay, I

0:14:22.300 --> 0:14:25.700
<v Speaker 2>I don't it is a good argument if the only

0:14:25.780 --> 0:14:30.420
<v Speaker 2>purpose of marriage is to is to stop promiscuity. But

0:14:30.420 --> 0:14:33.100
<v Speaker 2>but it is not a good argument if if part

0:14:33.180 --> 0:14:36.620
<v Speaker 2>of the reason for marriage is to is to sanctify

0:14:36.700 --> 0:14:39.100
<v Speaker 2>male female relations. But I don't want to get into

0:14:39.140 --> 0:14:42.940
<v Speaker 2>that because your call is extremely valuable for what it says.

0:14:43.140 --> 0:14:46.500
<v Speaker 2>People need to understand the male, the gay male looks

0:14:46.540 --> 0:14:49.180
<v Speaker 2>at men the way the straight male looks at women.

0:14:50.740 --> 0:14:52.820
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I see you know, I I see, I

0:14:52.860 --> 0:14:56.460
<v Speaker 2>see your your journals. I have absolutely often perused them,

0:14:56.980 --> 0:14:59.420
<v Speaker 2>and it is the men. The pictures of the men

0:14:59.540 --> 0:15:02.380
<v Speaker 2>are sex objects. That's why women can't say that men.

0:15:02.860 --> 0:15:06.980
<v Speaker 2>They say that all all, all, you know, sex photos

0:15:07.020 --> 0:15:10.740
<v Speaker 2>of women. This is misogyny. It is no more anti

0:15:10.900 --> 0:15:14.580
<v Speaker 2>female those pictures of women than it is anti male

0:15:14.700 --> 0:15:15.980
<v Speaker 2>the pictures you like of men.

0:15:17.980 --> 0:15:20.140
<v Speaker 3>That's right, it can't be degrading. But I also I

0:15:20.180 --> 0:15:22.780
<v Speaker 3>also know a lot of women whose heads turned a

0:15:22.820 --> 0:15:26.700
<v Speaker 3>lot faster than we might think. And maybe women are

0:15:26.740 --> 0:15:29.140
<v Speaker 3>just less willing to admit it now.

0:15:29.180 --> 0:15:32.100
<v Speaker 2>But this test was not about head turning. This test

0:15:32.300 --> 0:15:36.140
<v Speaker 2>was the effects of seeing a particularly attractive member of

0:15:36.180 --> 0:15:39.700
<v Speaker 2>the other sex on straight men and straight women, and

0:15:39.740 --> 0:15:45.100
<v Speaker 2>the men's rationality ability declined, the women's were unaffected. So

0:15:45.180 --> 0:15:47.860
<v Speaker 2>the fact that a woman's head will turn, and also

0:15:48.020 --> 0:15:53.820
<v Speaker 2>it will turn because the male the what attracts or

0:15:53.860 --> 0:15:57.180
<v Speaker 2>how he walks, how he dresses. I mean, it is

0:15:57.220 --> 0:16:01.380
<v Speaker 2>a very complex constellation of factors. Whereas for the man

0:16:01.420 --> 0:16:05.020
<v Speaker 2>a picture is sufficient, whereas for a woman a picture

0:16:05.100 --> 0:16:05.900
<v Speaker 2>is not sufficient.

0:16:06.300 --> 0:16:06.940
<v Speaker 3>Totally agree.

0:16:07.140 --> 0:16:09.180
<v Speaker 2>All right, thank you for your call to him. I

0:16:09.260 --> 0:16:12.900
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it that. I'll tell you anybody who ever argues

0:16:12.940 --> 0:16:16.620
<v Speaker 2>with you about well, these generalizations about male sexual nature,

0:16:16.660 --> 0:16:19.700
<v Speaker 2>and they're just generalizations. And a lot of women are

0:16:19.780 --> 0:16:22.460
<v Speaker 2>like that. And and anyway, if men are like that,

0:16:22.540 --> 0:16:25.220
<v Speaker 2>it was because it's a sexist society that portrays women

0:16:25.300 --> 0:16:27.700
<v Speaker 2>as sex objects. How do you explain them? Gay men?

0:16:28.180 --> 0:16:31.900
<v Speaker 2>The way they look at men, which is identical? Identical?

0:16:32.900 --> 0:16:36.980
<v Speaker 2>Alrighty one eighth Prager seven seven six. Now let's go

0:16:37.060 --> 0:16:44.420
<v Speaker 2>to Cindy in Peoria, Arizona on KKNT. Hello Cindy, Dennis Prager, Hello.

0:16:44.540 --> 0:16:49.140
<v Speaker 4>Hi, this is such an interesting topic. I finally realized

0:16:49.380 --> 0:16:53.020
<v Speaker 4>how visually motivated men were about three years ago. And

0:16:53.060 --> 0:16:53.540
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you.

0:16:54.180 --> 0:16:56.540
<v Speaker 2>Wait, and how old are you? I'm thirty four, Okay,

0:16:56.660 --> 0:16:58.500
<v Speaker 2>So it took till thirty one.

0:16:58.740 --> 0:16:59.700
<v Speaker 4>Isn't that disgusting.

0:17:00.020 --> 0:17:01.700
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have a lot of comments on that, and

0:17:01.740 --> 0:17:04.940
<v Speaker 2>I'll make them afterwards. How did it happen at thirty one?

0:17:05.540 --> 0:17:09.940
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'll tell you. I think it had a lot

0:17:09.980 --> 0:17:11.699
<v Speaker 4>to do with the fact that I was taking my

0:17:12.220 --> 0:17:16.580
<v Speaker 4>faith more seriously. And now this sounds crazy about reading

0:17:16.619 --> 0:17:21.540
<v Speaker 4>the Bible and intensively and realize that God has a

0:17:21.580 --> 0:17:26.179
<v Speaker 4>lot to say about women and men and how women

0:17:26.300 --> 0:17:30.219
<v Speaker 4>dressed and I and just you know the story like

0:17:30.300 --> 0:17:33.779
<v Speaker 4>David and Bathsheba, things like that. And I guess I

0:17:33.859 --> 0:17:37.939
<v Speaker 4>took I gave God more credit than I gave the

0:17:37.979 --> 0:17:38.740
<v Speaker 4>other people in my life.

0:17:38.780 --> 0:17:41.219
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll put it in a slightly different way. I

0:17:42.419 --> 0:17:47.820
<v Speaker 2>absolutely believe that secular women are far more naive about

0:17:47.859 --> 0:17:51.540
<v Speaker 2>male nature than religious women are. Yes, I would bet,

0:17:51.619 --> 0:17:56.100
<v Speaker 2>I would bet everything on it that secular women understand

0:17:56.179 --> 0:17:58.179
<v Speaker 2>men less than religious women do.

0:17:58.459 --> 0:18:01.780
<v Speaker 4>Yes, in my experience, that is very much the case.

0:18:01.820 --> 0:18:05.019
<v Speaker 4>And I see that in my family that the women

0:18:05.060 --> 0:18:09.340
<v Speaker 4>in my family who do not have any religious conviction,

0:18:10.139 --> 0:18:13.499
<v Speaker 4>they dress no, no, I'm not listening, so I can

0:18:13.500 --> 0:18:16.659
<v Speaker 4>say they dress like horse. And the women in my

0:18:16.699 --> 0:18:21.340
<v Speaker 4>family who love God, they rest in a way that

0:18:21.379 --> 0:18:25.739
<v Speaker 4>shows that they also love men and respect their temptations.

0:18:25.580 --> 0:18:28.939
<v Speaker 2>Right, And it is because they are more willing to

0:18:29.020 --> 0:18:32.659
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge the effect of how they dress on men very much.

0:18:32.739 --> 0:18:35.300
<v Speaker 2>That's right, That's what I mean. They know men better.

0:18:35.580 --> 0:18:39.859
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I'll tell you this whole revelation has

0:18:39.899 --> 0:18:42.179
<v Speaker 4>affected me in two very profound ways, and the first

0:18:42.219 --> 0:18:46.219
<v Speaker 4>one is simply, my relationships with men are so much

0:18:46.540 --> 0:18:49.820
<v Speaker 4>better now. I dress modestly and I can have such

0:18:49.859 --> 0:18:53.300
<v Speaker 4>wonderful conversations with men and they're not just struggled.

0:18:53.619 --> 0:18:57.139
<v Speaker 2>I would ask a woman to do the following test. Obviously,

0:18:57.219 --> 0:19:01.619
<v Speaker 2>you know, a woman would from from basically attractive to

0:19:01.780 --> 0:19:05.539
<v Speaker 2>very attractive. Would I would ask her to do a test,

0:19:06.100 --> 0:19:10.780
<v Speaker 2>and that is at work or anywhere else, to dress provocatively,

0:19:11.419 --> 0:19:14.020
<v Speaker 2>and then to dress modestly. And by modestly, I don't

0:19:14.060 --> 0:19:16.419
<v Speaker 2>mean to the ankles, and I don't mean to the risks,

0:19:16.459 --> 0:19:18.659
<v Speaker 2>and I don't mean to the neck, and I don't

0:19:18.699 --> 0:19:22.619
<v Speaker 2>mean in a bag form fitting. Let the world know

0:19:22.699 --> 0:19:25.059
<v Speaker 2>you're a woman and be proud of that. That's not

0:19:25.139 --> 0:19:27.859
<v Speaker 2>an issue. But I would ask a woman to dress

0:19:27.939 --> 0:19:32.580
<v Speaker 2>both ways and see how the world reacts to her

0:19:33.459 --> 0:19:36.700
<v Speaker 2>under the same conditions, where only her clothing has changed.

0:19:37.219 --> 0:19:40.820
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Cindy. It's an extremely important call. You've got

0:19:40.859 --> 0:19:44.419
<v Speaker 2>to tell your daughters this. I will tell you why

0:19:44.500 --> 0:19:47.419
<v Speaker 2>girls don't understand this. This has been my puzzle in life,

0:19:47.419 --> 0:19:51.100
<v Speaker 2>and I have an answer. One eighth Prager seven seven six.

0:19:51.459 --> 0:19:53.060
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Dennis Prager Show.

0:19:54.179 --> 0:19:57.539
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:20:02.020 --> 0:20:08.580
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's timeless wisdom.

0:20:08.699 --> 0:20:11.179
<v Speaker 2>All right, my friends, this is the Dennis Prager Show.

0:20:13.780 --> 0:20:16.499
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things that is so important people

0:20:16.540 --> 0:20:18.899
<v Speaker 2>don't like to acknowledge it. It is the power of

0:20:18.979 --> 0:20:22.899
<v Speaker 2>the male eye, and it is it is incomparably more

0:20:24.100 --> 0:20:28.260
<v Speaker 2>affected than the female eye. The female is affected through

0:20:28.300 --> 0:20:35.060
<v Speaker 2>far more senses, and the male eye is. It is again,

0:20:35.139 --> 0:20:39.339
<v Speaker 2>incomparably more powerful in its effect on the male than

0:20:39.379 --> 0:20:42.619
<v Speaker 2>the female eye is on the female. This this study,

0:20:43.260 --> 0:20:46.379
<v Speaker 2>That's why I'm reporting to because you know, I'm always uh.

0:20:47.060 --> 0:20:51.699
<v Speaker 2>My view of most studies is either they're wrong or

0:20:52.260 --> 0:20:55.340
<v Speaker 2>they confirm what we already knew. This confirms what we

0:20:55.379 --> 0:20:57.259
<v Speaker 2>already knew, but it confirms it in a way that

0:20:57.379 --> 0:20:59.580
<v Speaker 2>is so powerful that I thought i'd bring it to

0:20:59.619 --> 0:21:02.739
<v Speaker 2>your attention. It's reported in The New Scientists. They showed

0:21:02.780 --> 0:21:05.619
<v Speaker 2>men and women in college pictures are pretty pretty members

0:21:05.619 --> 0:21:08.260
<v Speaker 2>of the opposite sex is judged on the internet as such,

0:21:09.020 --> 0:21:12.500
<v Speaker 2>and the if, the if, the male. The males, as

0:21:12.540 --> 0:21:16.100
<v Speaker 2>the pictures got prettier, made more and more irrational decisions

0:21:16.100 --> 0:21:19.340
<v Speaker 2>on a very simple monetary matter, whereas the women were

0:21:19.379 --> 0:21:23.859
<v Speaker 2>completely unaffected in the irrational capacity. Now, women's reason is

0:21:23.899 --> 0:21:27.899
<v Speaker 2>profoundly affected by when she is in love, when she

0:21:28.020 --> 0:21:31.179
<v Speaker 2>is emotionally caught up, or whatever it is in a

0:21:31.219 --> 0:21:35.139
<v Speaker 2>man for other reasons. But we're talking now just about

0:21:35.139 --> 0:21:38.139
<v Speaker 2>the power of looks. Here we have a thirty four

0:21:38.219 --> 0:21:40.419
<v Speaker 2>year old woman just called and said she didn't realize

0:21:40.459 --> 0:21:42.579
<v Speaker 2>this till thirty one, and she felt funny about it.

0:21:42.780 --> 0:21:44.579
<v Speaker 2>And there are a lot of women who don't realize

0:21:44.580 --> 0:21:50.019
<v Speaker 2>it at any age. And certainly girls don't understand this.

0:21:50.060 --> 0:21:53.419
<v Speaker 2>There's no way they could. We understand the world through

0:21:53.540 --> 0:21:57.139
<v Speaker 2>our own experience. But if you don't experience it that way,

0:21:57.500 --> 0:21:59.779
<v Speaker 2>I mean, do the boys' legs at high school have

0:21:59.859 --> 0:22:02.299
<v Speaker 2>the same effect on a girl in high school that

0:22:02.379 --> 0:22:05.419
<v Speaker 2>girl's legs have on boys? Of course not. The idea

0:22:05.500 --> 0:22:08.699
<v Speaker 2>is preposterous. Oh my my god. I gotta have him.

0:22:08.739 --> 0:22:11.579
<v Speaker 2>I saw his legs. I mean, the idea is idiotic.

0:22:12.340 --> 0:22:21.260
<v Speaker 2>There is no comparable issue of power between the male

0:22:21.340 --> 0:22:24.100
<v Speaker 2>and the female when I talk about male sexual nature,

0:22:24.100 --> 0:22:26.379
<v Speaker 2>and I do a great deal, and is important, so

0:22:26.419 --> 0:22:29.939
<v Speaker 2>important for women to understand this and to understand that

0:22:30.020 --> 0:22:33.019
<v Speaker 2>their husband is not is not sick if he sees,

0:22:33.100 --> 0:22:36.859
<v Speaker 2>if he's attracted to billboards and to pictures and so on.

0:22:37.459 --> 0:22:40.219
<v Speaker 2>The issue of whether one should keep looking is a

0:22:40.260 --> 0:22:44.739
<v Speaker 2>religious issue, is a psychological issue that's separate, but it

0:22:44.820 --> 0:22:50.019
<v Speaker 2>is not abnormal. Don't call a man sick who's not sick.

0:22:52.219 --> 0:22:55.260
<v Speaker 2>And I and I have I have a great piece

0:22:55.300 --> 0:22:57.739
<v Speaker 2>of advice. For example, for the guy who on a

0:22:57.859 --> 0:23:03.419
<v Speaker 2>date can't stop looking around, I tell him you should

0:23:03.419 --> 0:23:05.939
<v Speaker 2>sit in the restaurant and face the wall. Very simple.

0:23:06.060 --> 0:23:08.939
<v Speaker 2>You have a just if you can't stop it, because

0:23:08.939 --> 0:23:10.939
<v Speaker 2>there are guys who do it when they're out with guys.

0:23:11.020 --> 0:23:13.699
<v Speaker 2>Forget that. When I have been at lunches with guys

0:23:14.020 --> 0:23:15.739
<v Speaker 2>and I can't talk to him, I call him radar

0:23:15.859 --> 0:23:18.979
<v Speaker 2>run where the you know the the He's like a

0:23:19.100 --> 0:23:22.379
<v Speaker 2>radar tower, just moving from side to side. All right,

0:23:22.540 --> 0:23:25.460
<v Speaker 2>let's go to uh. By the way, do you agree.

0:23:25.500 --> 0:23:28.299
<v Speaker 2>I made a very bold statement that I believe that

0:23:30.300 --> 0:23:37.259
<v Speaker 2>in general, religious women understand men better than secular women do.

0:23:37.979 --> 0:23:40.660
<v Speaker 2>I have said frequently that my grandmother, who never went

0:23:40.699 --> 0:23:45.700
<v Speaker 2>to school ever had no schooling, understood men better than

0:23:45.739 --> 0:23:50.379
<v Speaker 2>the average woman who gets a PhD in sociology, and

0:23:50.419 --> 0:23:56.019
<v Speaker 2>not just sociology, maybe even psychology. That is how That

0:23:56.179 --> 0:23:58.459
<v Speaker 2>is a good example, by the way of why I

0:23:58.500 --> 0:24:00.859
<v Speaker 2>think that there was so little wisdom at the universities.

0:24:01.179 --> 0:24:04.419
<v Speaker 2>This is a classic example. You have all that studying

0:24:04.899 --> 0:24:09.820
<v Speaker 2>and you won't even acknowledge this basic difference between between

0:24:09.859 --> 0:24:15.060
<v Speaker 2>men and women. I Pepper Pike, Ohio and Dan Dan

0:24:15.619 --> 0:24:17.820
<v Speaker 2>on WCCD.

0:24:17.179 --> 0:24:19.659
<v Speaker 5>High Hie Dennis, thanks for taking a call.

0:24:19.820 --> 0:24:20.260
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:24:20.739 --> 0:24:23.060
<v Speaker 5>Wanted to note I wanted to make notice something. I

0:24:23.500 --> 0:24:26.939
<v Speaker 5>happened to work a lot with the some Orthodox Jews

0:24:26.979 --> 0:24:29.619
<v Speaker 5>and they noticed that one day that some of them

0:24:29.659 --> 0:24:33.139
<v Speaker 5>have strings hanging out off the corners of their of

0:24:33.179 --> 0:24:35.619
<v Speaker 5>their pants. That's correct, and I asked them about what

0:24:35.659 --> 0:24:38.019
<v Speaker 5>the why why is it? And they said one of

0:24:38.020 --> 0:24:41.060
<v Speaker 5>the reasons why is because there's a biblical command not

0:24:41.139 --> 0:24:43.459
<v Speaker 5>to run after your eyes, that you should see the

0:24:43.500 --> 0:24:46.580
<v Speaker 5>strings and to remember that is exactly right, and not

0:24:46.659 --> 0:24:49.139
<v Speaker 5>to chase after your eyes. But it's interesting to note

0:24:49.419 --> 0:24:52.980
<v Speaker 5>that Jewish women do not have the command. But you're

0:24:53.139 --> 0:24:57.580
<v Speaker 5>very that's right, you're very like you're saying that's.

0:24:57.459 --> 0:25:01.540
<v Speaker 2>Right because women, women's eyes get them in trouble with

0:25:01.659 --> 0:25:05.459
<v Speaker 2>more with objects than they do with men. Exactly, she

0:25:05.540 --> 0:25:09.500
<v Speaker 2>will see a jewelry, she will see a home, and

0:25:09.580 --> 0:25:13.179
<v Speaker 2>she will really or clothing and then she, uh, you know,

0:25:13.260 --> 0:25:16.580
<v Speaker 2>may make compromise your values in order to get that right.

0:25:16.659 --> 0:25:17.979
<v Speaker 5>But it all biblically based.

0:25:18.340 --> 0:25:22.979
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's the whole point. See, you're raised, many of

0:25:23.020 --> 0:25:25.619
<v Speaker 2>you were raised at secular college in high school to

0:25:25.659 --> 0:25:29.500
<v Speaker 2>think that the religious folks are out of it. Some are,

0:25:29.540 --> 0:25:32.259
<v Speaker 2>there's no question, But in this society it's more the

0:25:32.340 --> 0:25:34.300
<v Speaker 2>secular folks who are out of it. We'll be back

0:25:34.300 --> 0:25:38.379
<v Speaker 2>in a moment, all right, everybody talking about the power

0:25:38.659 --> 0:25:42.939
<v Speaker 2>of the eye in men. This is a study that

0:25:42.979 --> 0:25:47.139
<v Speaker 2>I reported to you, and we'll try to put alan.

0:25:47.179 --> 0:25:49.180
<v Speaker 2>We'll try to put this up at the website there.

0:25:49.219 --> 0:25:52.579
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a fascinating study. It's originally reported in New

0:25:52.699 --> 0:25:58.060
<v Speaker 2>Scientists dot com. It comes from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.

0:25:58.179 --> 0:26:02.340
<v Speaker 2>The men acting irrationally after just seeing pictures of pretty women.

0:26:02.379 --> 0:26:05.980
<v Speaker 2>The women and the watch seeing pictures of attractive men

0:26:06.020 --> 0:26:10.139
<v Speaker 2>having no effect on their rationality whatsoever. Let's go to

0:26:10.179 --> 0:26:14.580
<v Speaker 2>some of those who disagree or at least have different takes.

0:26:14.619 --> 0:26:17.819
<v Speaker 2>Some don't anyway, we'll go to all types. Got good

0:26:17.899 --> 0:26:22.939
<v Speaker 2>calls here. Let's go to JT in the Phoenix on

0:26:23.139 --> 0:26:23.939
<v Speaker 2>KKNT Hi.

0:26:24.060 --> 0:26:28.019
<v Speaker 6>JT, Hey, Dennis, Hi say, I just think it's an

0:26:28.100 --> 0:26:31.019
<v Speaker 6>interesting observation, simply that. And I don't know if this

0:26:31.139 --> 0:26:34.859
<v Speaker 6>is supported biblically at all. But I have, in all

0:26:34.939 --> 0:26:37.619
<v Speaker 6>the job interviews I've had in different jobs throughout my life,

0:26:37.820 --> 0:26:41.660
<v Speaker 6>then offered jobs based on phone interviews by women twice,

0:26:42.020 --> 0:26:44.139
<v Speaker 6>but never by a man. It was I always had

0:26:44.179 --> 0:26:46.100
<v Speaker 6>to be seen. They all had to be a face

0:26:46.139 --> 0:26:48.139
<v Speaker 6>to face, meaning an interview process in that.

0:26:48.179 --> 0:26:53.699
<v Speaker 2>Situation, whereas the men were hired on the phone. Is

0:26:53.780 --> 0:26:54.499
<v Speaker 2>that what you're saying?

0:26:54.820 --> 0:26:58.579
<v Speaker 6>No, I'm sorry. I have in all my years of interviewing,

0:26:58.739 --> 0:27:01.499
<v Speaker 6>I have on two occasions been hired based on a

0:27:01.540 --> 0:27:03.219
<v Speaker 6>phone interview by a woman.

0:27:03.300 --> 0:27:09.460
<v Speaker 2>But oh, I see, I see, Okay, Yeah that's interesting, Yeah,

0:27:09.540 --> 0:27:10.259
<v Speaker 2>that is interesting.

0:27:10.939 --> 0:27:13.939
<v Speaker 6>I've been hired by a man without a face to

0:27:14.020 --> 0:27:15.100
<v Speaker 6>face interview.

0:27:15.139 --> 0:27:17.100
<v Speaker 2>Never but twice by a woman.

0:27:17.419 --> 0:27:17.979
<v Speaker 3>But twice.

0:27:18.300 --> 0:27:22.539
<v Speaker 2>Well that that is interesting, because I I it is

0:27:22.580 --> 0:27:25.300
<v Speaker 2>absolutely I think it's a good example of a difference.

0:27:25.340 --> 0:27:28.060
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's ought to hire anybody without seeing them,

0:27:28.419 --> 0:27:29.659
<v Speaker 2>to be perfectly.

0:27:29.179 --> 0:27:31.819
<v Speaker 6>Honest, and yet two women have done it.

0:27:32.139 --> 0:27:34.459
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, and I believe you. But the question is

0:27:34.459 --> 0:27:38.059
<v Speaker 2>with the men who It would be interesting. Would the

0:27:38.139 --> 0:27:43.259
<v Speaker 2>men who insisted on seeing you also equally insist on

0:27:43.300 --> 0:27:47.020
<v Speaker 2>seeing a man before they hired him see? That would

0:27:47.060 --> 0:27:49.939
<v Speaker 2>be an interesting question. You know, maybe the visual even

0:27:49.979 --> 0:27:53.219
<v Speaker 2>in that case is important to men. But anyway, but

0:27:53.300 --> 0:27:55.340
<v Speaker 2>it's a very good it's a good example. I think

0:27:55.379 --> 0:27:57.540
<v Speaker 2>it's a fair one. Thank you very much for that call.

0:27:58.419 --> 0:28:02.260
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Leslian Manhattan Beach, California on KRLA. Hello

0:28:02.340 --> 0:28:03.299
<v Speaker 2>Leslie Dennis Prager.

0:28:03.419 --> 0:28:06.739
<v Speaker 7>Hi, Dennis. I was prompted to call because your conversation

0:28:06.899 --> 0:28:08.859
<v Speaker 7>with the woman in her thirties. First of all, I

0:28:08.899 --> 0:28:11.379
<v Speaker 7>wanted to say it took her till she was in

0:28:11.379 --> 0:28:14.899
<v Speaker 7>her thirties. I found out that men were visually affected

0:28:14.899 --> 0:28:17.740
<v Speaker 7>when I was thirteen and used to walk to school

0:28:17.859 --> 0:28:21.499
<v Speaker 7>in my Catholic schoolgirls outfit, and no just that grown

0:28:21.619 --> 0:28:24.660
<v Speaker 7>men would stop in traffic. So why it took her

0:28:24.699 --> 0:28:27.379
<v Speaker 7>that long to realize how men were visually affected. I

0:28:27.419 --> 0:28:28.659
<v Speaker 7>don't really understand.

0:28:30.619 --> 0:28:32.739
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, it's interesting that you went you went to

0:28:32.820 --> 0:28:35.139
<v Speaker 2>Catholic school. Well you went to Catholic school.

0:28:35.179 --> 0:28:35.980
<v Speaker 7>I went to Catholic.

0:28:36.020 --> 0:28:40.060
<v Speaker 2>Well that may but I believe that in in traditional

0:28:40.180 --> 0:28:44.059
<v Speaker 2>religious places, they teach about the concept of modesty and

0:28:44.060 --> 0:28:46.620
<v Speaker 2>the effect of clothing on men more readily than at

0:28:46.660 --> 0:28:49.500
<v Speaker 2>other places, and that that may have been you may

0:28:49.540 --> 0:28:53.779
<v Speaker 2>have had already a thought process that enabled you to

0:28:53.900 --> 0:28:56.940
<v Speaker 2>understand why they were stopping. I want to tell you something.

0:28:57.060 --> 0:29:00.860
<v Speaker 2>I ran an institute for college age kids for seven years.

0:29:01.140 --> 0:29:04.340
<v Speaker 2>They would spend the summers there in warm southern California,

0:29:04.620 --> 0:29:07.700
<v Speaker 2>and they could dress any way they wanted. And I

0:29:07.820 --> 0:29:12.380
<v Speaker 2>remember a conversation with an intelligent a girl of nineteen

0:29:12.820 --> 0:29:17.380
<v Speaker 2>or twenty who dressed very provocatively and had something to

0:29:17.459 --> 0:29:20.499
<v Speaker 2>provoke with. And when we had our one on one meeting,

0:29:20.820 --> 0:29:23.420
<v Speaker 2>I asked her, how's your summer going? And she opened

0:29:23.459 --> 0:29:26.340
<v Speaker 2>up to me because they knew they could, and she said, well,

0:29:26.380 --> 0:29:28.420
<v Speaker 2>you know, I really feel the men don't relate to me.

0:29:28.500 --> 0:29:30.019
<v Speaker 2>Is real. I think they relate to me as a

0:29:30.060 --> 0:29:32.420
<v Speaker 2>sex object. And I said to her, do you think

0:29:32.459 --> 0:29:35.020
<v Speaker 2>there might be any reason for that? And she said,

0:29:35.060 --> 0:29:38.180
<v Speaker 2>I can't think of any and I you know I

0:29:38.300 --> 0:29:40.620
<v Speaker 2>want I wanted to throw my chair at her.

0:29:40.660 --> 0:29:42.900
<v Speaker 7>Well, I got to tell you something. I got to

0:29:43.020 --> 0:29:47.300
<v Speaker 7>disagree because the reason I called is because I feel

0:29:47.700 --> 0:29:49.860
<v Speaker 7>what I want to say is when you when a

0:29:49.900 --> 0:29:53.940
<v Speaker 7>woman puts on a victorious secret push up bra, you

0:29:54.219 --> 0:29:56.860
<v Speaker 7>you act as if what what what you're saying? What

0:29:56.940 --> 0:29:59.380
<v Speaker 7>I infer from what you're saying is she has no idea?

0:29:59.459 --> 0:30:03.820
<v Speaker 2>What oll no? No? When a woman does that, You're right, obviously,

0:30:03.860 --> 0:30:07.100
<v Speaker 2>But I want to tell you something right now. I

0:30:07.260 --> 0:30:11.140
<v Speaker 2>tell you half the women in this country are likely

0:30:11.260 --> 0:30:15.539
<v Speaker 2>to say that they they dress a certain way, or

0:30:15.660 --> 0:30:20.860
<v Speaker 2>they have a a an enhanced breast operation or what

0:30:20.979 --> 0:30:23.820
<v Speaker 2>have you for, and has nothing to do with how

0:30:23.860 --> 0:30:24.940
<v Speaker 2>they will look to men.

0:30:25.340 --> 0:30:28.579
<v Speaker 7>Dennis, What we say and what we really mean are

0:30:28.620 --> 0:30:30.660
<v Speaker 7>two different things. No woman is going to come on

0:30:30.700 --> 0:30:32.259
<v Speaker 7>the radio and tell you the truth.

0:30:32.340 --> 0:30:32.660
<v Speaker 2>Why not?

0:30:33.580 --> 0:30:34.299
<v Speaker 7>Why should she?

0:30:34.620 --> 0:30:36.219
<v Speaker 2>Why should wait? Wait? Why shouldn't she?

0:30:36.420 --> 0:30:39.580
<v Speaker 7>Women have bad natures, Just like I could.

0:30:39.380 --> 0:30:40.900
<v Speaker 2>Agree with you, I both.

0:30:40.739 --> 0:30:44.340
<v Speaker 7>Sexist, and what our nature says is that's the man

0:30:44.620 --> 0:30:46.540
<v Speaker 7>I want him. I don't care what I have to

0:30:46.620 --> 0:30:47.059
<v Speaker 7>do together.

0:30:47.140 --> 0:30:50.780
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you entirely, I do. But I'm telling

0:30:50.820 --> 0:30:53.380
<v Speaker 2>you that there was a tremendous amount of self denial

0:30:53.420 --> 0:30:56.860
<v Speaker 2>on the conscious level. There is, you know, I just

0:30:57.860 --> 0:31:01.060
<v Speaker 2>the whole feminist the whole feminist thing is men, we

0:31:01.180 --> 0:31:03.580
<v Speaker 2>dress the way we want. You have nothing to say

0:31:03.620 --> 0:31:06.260
<v Speaker 2>about it. We dressed the way we want for our

0:31:06.340 --> 0:31:09.780
<v Speaker 2>own reasons, and you know, if it bothers you, that's

0:31:09.820 --> 0:31:10.540
<v Speaker 2>your problem.

0:31:11.100 --> 0:31:15.100
<v Speaker 7>But Dennis, I never met a hardcore feminist woman who

0:31:15.140 --> 0:31:17.180
<v Speaker 7>wore a push up bra in short short.

0:31:17.340 --> 0:31:20.100
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but they but women don't wear push up bras

0:31:20.459 --> 0:31:23.900
<v Speaker 2>is general outdoors as much as they will as lingerie

0:31:24.020 --> 0:31:27.140
<v Speaker 2>for their for their man. I mean, let's be honest.

0:31:27.540 --> 0:31:30.860
<v Speaker 2>I mean the push up bra you're taking an extreme

0:31:30.940 --> 0:31:35.300
<v Speaker 2>example just in the normally provocative clothing that is worn

0:31:35.380 --> 0:31:38.819
<v Speaker 2>today by young women. If you interviewed the women and

0:31:38.900 --> 0:31:42.020
<v Speaker 2>you and you gave them truth serum, and you ask

0:31:42.100 --> 0:31:45.140
<v Speaker 2>them why are you wearing this? And I bet you,

0:31:45.219 --> 0:31:47.900
<v Speaker 2>on a conscious level, half of it would be they

0:31:48.100 --> 0:31:51.219
<v Speaker 2>just want to look attractive. And they say, well, do

0:31:51.260 --> 0:31:54.580
<v Speaker 2>you want to sexually excite men? No, that's not it.

0:31:55.260 --> 0:31:58.180
<v Speaker 7>Well, Dennis, they may not answer yes to I want

0:31:58.219 --> 0:32:01.580
<v Speaker 7>to sexually excite men. But if you ask a fourteen

0:32:01.660 --> 0:32:03.580
<v Speaker 7>year old girl when you were hip huggers like that

0:32:03.700 --> 0:32:05.059
<v Speaker 7>to the boys pay attention to you?

0:32:05.219 --> 0:32:09.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they do, Yes, pay attention. Yes, that's right, pay attention.

0:32:09.700 --> 0:32:13.420
<v Speaker 2>But its effect on the mail is not something that

0:32:13.540 --> 0:32:16.819
<v Speaker 2>most girls. I would say ninety percent of girls do

0:32:16.900 --> 0:32:19.660
<v Speaker 2>not understand by the way they can't. I don't blame them.

0:32:19.900 --> 0:32:22.020
<v Speaker 2>I blame pair terrans for not teaching them.

0:32:22.300 --> 0:32:26.219
<v Speaker 7>Well, I gotta choose to disagree with you because I remember,

0:32:26.459 --> 0:32:27.420
<v Speaker 7>I know, but that was.

0:32:27.420 --> 0:32:29.580
<v Speaker 2>The I know, but as a Catholic school, and I

0:32:29.620 --> 0:32:33.019
<v Speaker 2>already addressed that fact. And uh, and I'll tell you

0:32:33.060 --> 0:32:35.660
<v Speaker 2>there is something special about the Catholic school uniforms. I

0:32:35.660 --> 0:32:39.260
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to tell you. Be that as it may.

0:32:39.380 --> 0:32:41.500
<v Speaker 2>I really believe that because it was a Catholic school

0:32:41.540 --> 0:32:43.979
<v Speaker 2>and they did teach these things, that that may have

0:32:44.020 --> 0:32:47.380
<v Speaker 2>been a factor in the way you understood why the

0:32:47.420 --> 0:32:50.420
<v Speaker 2>cars were slowing down. Final segment on this If you

0:32:50.459 --> 0:32:52.740
<v Speaker 2>want to get in one eight praguer is a great call.

0:32:52.820 --> 0:32:56.019
<v Speaker 2>One eight praguer seven seven six one eight p R

0:32:56.100 --> 0:32:58.739
<v Speaker 2>A G E R seven seven six Are women aware?

0:32:58.820 --> 0:33:01.820
<v Speaker 2>Are girls aware? Of what I'm talking about. You're listening

0:33:01.820 --> 0:33:02.940
<v Speaker 2>to the Dennis Prager Show.

0:33:04.540 --> 0:33:07.900
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:33:12.380 --> 0:33:13.700
<v Speaker 2>Now back to more.

0:33:13.660 --> 0:33:19.100
<v Speaker 1>Of Dennis Prager's timeless wisdom.

0:33:19.219 --> 0:33:22.060
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, let's get us my make calls as possible. Here.

0:33:22.820 --> 0:33:25.820
<v Speaker 2>Do women understand the power of man's eye and its

0:33:25.860 --> 0:33:29.660
<v Speaker 2>effect on them when they're seeing women in the way

0:33:29.700 --> 0:33:32.579
<v Speaker 2>they're dressed, et cetera. Christina in San Diego is going

0:33:32.620 --> 0:33:37.500
<v Speaker 2>to refute the last caller. I guess, Hi, Christina, Dennis Prager, Hi, Hi,

0:33:39.100 --> 0:33:40.860
<v Speaker 2>I just disagree.

0:33:40.459 --> 0:33:43.140
<v Speaker 8>With the woman that was left on. I just feel

0:33:43.219 --> 0:33:46.340
<v Speaker 8>like day. For example, this morning, I was in sweat

0:33:46.420 --> 0:33:49.300
<v Speaker 8>and a sweatshirt of ques play outfit. But now I'm

0:33:49.340 --> 0:33:51.380
<v Speaker 8>going out to lunch with my husband and we're just

0:33:51.380 --> 0:33:54.459
<v Speaker 8>gonna go to the mall. And I feel better about

0:33:54.459 --> 0:33:57.539
<v Speaker 8>myself when I feel like I have a pretty good figure.

0:33:58.260 --> 0:34:00.779
<v Speaker 8>I'm thirty four years old, I have two children. I

0:34:00.900 --> 0:34:03.500
<v Speaker 8>feel great about myself. I want to you know, I'm

0:34:03.620 --> 0:34:06.180
<v Speaker 8>proud of me. I'm gonna put something on that says

0:34:06.459 --> 0:34:10.340
<v Speaker 8>I'm proud of me. It's not to make guys tongues

0:34:10.420 --> 0:34:13.660
<v Speaker 8>wag or to make women go oh, God, do you

0:34:13.660 --> 0:34:17.020
<v Speaker 8>see what she's got on. I have on four footing jeans,

0:34:17.060 --> 0:34:20.259
<v Speaker 8>a nice fitted turtleneck. And you know what it's all

0:34:20.300 --> 0:34:23.180
<v Speaker 8>about how it makes you feel as a woman. If

0:34:23.219 --> 0:34:25.379
<v Speaker 8>that's what makes you feel good about you, and you're

0:34:25.380 --> 0:34:29.299
<v Speaker 8>gonna have a positive outlook on others in on life

0:34:29.660 --> 0:34:33.259
<v Speaker 8>just by how you dress. They're dressed like that, and

0:34:33.380 --> 0:34:36.380
<v Speaker 8>those fourteen your own girls that are wearing those hip hunters,

0:34:36.380 --> 0:34:40.100
<v Speaker 8>good for them. They feel good about themselves. I mean

0:34:40.219 --> 0:34:43.380
<v Speaker 8>more women are going to the gym now. They're feeling

0:34:43.420 --> 0:34:47.460
<v Speaker 8>better about themselves, you know they. I just think that

0:34:47.940 --> 0:34:53.219
<v Speaker 8>for other women or men to criticize women that wear

0:34:53.380 --> 0:34:57.020
<v Speaker 8>things form fitting and say they look like sless or whatever,

0:34:57.259 --> 0:34:59.580
<v Speaker 8>I think it's because that person doesn't feel good enough

0:34:59.580 --> 0:35:03.500
<v Speaker 8>about themselves to put something on. It says, look at me,

0:35:03.739 --> 0:35:06.060
<v Speaker 8>here I am, I've walked into the room. You can

0:35:06.060 --> 0:35:06.660
<v Speaker 8>come talk to me.

0:35:07.859 --> 0:35:10.779
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I thank you. I you know, I've spoken so much.

0:35:10.980 --> 0:35:13.460
<v Speaker 2>I just want to take calls there. But that that

0:35:13.980 --> 0:35:17.060
<v Speaker 2>is what exactly what I argued to the last call er.

0:35:17.180 --> 0:35:19.819
<v Speaker 2>That is what a lot of women will say. It

0:35:19.859 --> 0:35:22.939
<v Speaker 2>has nothing to do with its effect on men, and

0:35:23.859 --> 0:35:26.620
<v Speaker 2>they don't even know what the effect might be, and

0:35:26.660 --> 0:35:29.219
<v Speaker 2>it is not of interest to them now whether that

0:35:29.339 --> 0:35:31.660
<v Speaker 2>is correct or not, or good or not, or bad

0:35:31.739 --> 0:35:34.259
<v Speaker 2>or not. We have talked about good or bad. But

0:35:35.020 --> 0:35:37.380
<v Speaker 2>I am telling you that a lot of girls today

0:35:38.140 --> 0:35:40.499
<v Speaker 2>do not know the effect on men. I'm not saying

0:35:40.540 --> 0:35:43.499
<v Speaker 2>Christina doesn't. I don't know she does or doesn't, but

0:35:43.580 --> 0:35:46.499
<v Speaker 2>she is saying, on any conscious level, I am doing

0:35:46.540 --> 0:35:49.259
<v Speaker 2>it because this is the way I like the way

0:35:49.339 --> 0:35:53.459
<v Speaker 2>I look. And that is why I'm saying there is

0:35:53.540 --> 0:35:55.700
<v Speaker 2>in this As in so much of life, there's a

0:35:55.739 --> 0:36:00.060
<v Speaker 2>religious secular divide in understanding men and having a sense

0:36:00.140 --> 0:36:03.700
<v Speaker 2>of well, wait a minute, if it does have effect B.

0:36:04.500 --> 0:36:09.660
<v Speaker 2>If dressing in fashion A has effect A or effect

0:36:09.660 --> 0:36:14.299
<v Speaker 2>B on men, the religious female is more likely to say, well,

0:36:14.339 --> 0:36:17.779
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute, feeling good about myself can't be the

0:36:17.819 --> 0:36:21.939
<v Speaker 2>only criterion for the way I dress, Yes, given the

0:36:22.020 --> 0:36:26.259
<v Speaker 2>way it affects men. I'm not here to even advocate,

0:36:26.299 --> 0:36:29.859
<v Speaker 2>as much as I am to clarify there is in

0:36:29.900 --> 0:36:32.580
<v Speaker 2>this arena, and this is only a part of why

0:36:32.660 --> 0:36:35.339
<v Speaker 2>I even raised this. As in so much else, a

0:36:35.540 --> 0:36:39.219
<v Speaker 2>big division in this world between the secular outlook and

0:36:39.299 --> 0:36:42.899
<v Speaker 2>what's called Judaeo Christian you're listening to the Dennis Prager Show.

0:36:42.940 --> 0:36:45.940
<v Speaker 2>Love your email at Dennispraguer dot com. Thanks for listening.

0:36:51.259 --> 0:36:55.539
<v Speaker 1>This has been timeless wisdom with Dennis Prager. Visit dennispragger

0:36:55.620 --> 0:36:59.140
<v Speaker 1>dot com for thousands of hours of Dennis's lectures, courses,

0:36:59.180 --> 0:37:03.180
<v Speaker 1>and classic radio programs, and to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational

0:37:03.299 --> 0:37:03.819
<v Speaker 1>Bibles