WEBVTT - Marriage Counseling, Atheism, and Morality | Dennis AMA 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Life Audio of today's episode of Timeless Wisdom.

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you play chess? And do you enjoy science fiction,

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>either televised or written.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm one of those happy atheist long time listeners. My

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 3>question is, if you do believe in an eternity and

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 3>if you believe in retribution from God for evil people? A,

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 3>why bother punishing evil people? And B why be upset

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 3>when someone dies there?

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 4>If they're going right now, this is right?

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Think about our human life would be just a speck.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>In the ocean that's coming up on Timeless Wisdom with

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Prager. Welcome to Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Here

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>thousands of hours of Dennis's lectures, courses, and classic radio programs.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I had to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bible. Go to

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Prager dot com.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 4>I you know how much I've gone your calls and

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 4>your emails. But the nature of my show is that

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 4>I set the topic each hour of the fifteen hours

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 4>except this one. Whatever you want to talk about, from

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 4>my favorite cigar or pipe tobacco, to the meaning of life, religion, sex,

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 4>beauty and politics, the show anything. This is your chance

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 4>to call in one eight Prager seven seven six one

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 4>eight p R A g E R seven seven six,

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>which translates digitally to eight seven seven two four three

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>triple seven six. It's completely unhelpful what I just did.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 4>I have deep content to talk show hosts who give

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 4>the number fast. The self loathing I'm engaging in now

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 4>is difficult experience one eight seven seven two four three

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 4>triple seven six. Yes, indeed, what is on your mind?

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 4>And now let us find out what that might be.

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to Hopkins, Minnesota and Bud on the Patriot. Hello, Bud,

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 4>Dennis Prager.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Dennis, Hi. I recently read the fifth Commandment, Honor

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 5>your father and mother, and occurred to me that that

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 5>was teaching gratitude, which suggested to me that it was

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 5>implying that God is commanding us to be happy. And

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 5>I was wondering if you would come in.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 4>On that we are commanded to be happy very specifically.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 4>But and I will get to that in a moment,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 4>but that the example you gave isn't one of them.

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Honor your father and mother is not a commandment to

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 4>be happy, It isn't. It is a commandment to exactly

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 4>as it says, give honor to your father, and mother.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 4>And when I teach it, it is I explain that

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 4>we are we are never commanded to love our father

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 4>and mother because either we feel it or we don't.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 4>But we can't be commanded to because there may be

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 4>parents that are unlovable, right and so, but whether they're

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 4>unlovable or not, or lovable or not, we still have

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>to honor them, just as I stand up. I will

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 4>never forget when Jimmy Carter came into my studio once

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 4>for the show following mine, and I stood up because

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 4>he had been president. I think he was the worst

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 4>president of American history. I have no respect for him

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.359
<v Speaker 4>as a public figure, but he was president of the

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 4>United States and I stood up. And this was after

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 4>he was president. Even so, there is honor that you

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 4>give positions. Your father and mother have a position, and

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 4>that commandment is protecting. But that position of father and

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 4>mother that has to be honored. Now there is commandments.

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 4>There are commandments then you shall rejoice during your holidays.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 4>For example, is the Psalm said you should worship God

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>and happiness. There is a very deep element of that.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 4>In fact, I raised this issue last hour, which is

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 4>why you're calling right there. I guess you hung up, okay,

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 4>and I am. I am going to pursue that I

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 4>would like to know from you folks. Do you think

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 4>that your religion commands happiness? Because I don't want to

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to say it right now because it's

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 4>not it's not my task. But I know that there

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 4>were religious traditions that emphasize happiness over others. There's just

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 4>no question in my mind. Alrighty, Let's go to Ottawa,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 4>the capital of Canada, and Howard. Hello, Howard Dennis Prager.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 6>Okay, Now I called about a serious subject, the where

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 6>do you get your values right? And I'm genuinely seeking here.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 6>I don't have a strong point of view. I come

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 6>to this as I'm a Jew. I was raised without

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 6>too much religion. I've come to study it a bit

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 6>more as an adult. I'm particularly interested in the Mussar

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 6>tradition of ethics teachings in practice. But here's my here's

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 6>my issues with you know, I would I think I

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 6>would like to believe values derived from the Bible or

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 6>good values derived from the Bible. But here are my

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 6>two problems. One is many scholars. You know, you can

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 6>look at the Bible and say it unambiguously teaches that

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 6>murderers must be put to death, and other scholars and

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 6>clergy can look at the Bible and draw the opposite concludion.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 4>No, they can't. They can't that that. I fully acknowledge

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 4>that there are areas open to interpretation. But nobody reading

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the the first five books of the Bible, known as

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 4>the Torah, can say that they are that it is

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 4>opposed to capital punishment for murder. It's the only law

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 4>in all five books of the of the Torah. The

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 4>only law that is in all five books is that

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 4>murderers be put to death. It's stated by God. Whether

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 4>you believe in God or not, God is quoted as

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 4>saying that.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 6>How do you account for you know, clergymen, nuns and

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 6>so on that show up at these visions for murderers

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 6>on the night before.

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 4>I'll tell you exactly how I account for it. Because

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 4>I have said frequently that secular values have made more

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 4>inroads into religion than religious values have made into secular society.

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 4>These are very often people with secular values who wear

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 4>religious clothing. Yeah, and it is very sad to me.

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 4>The secular left is a very real problem to me.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 4>But the religious left is an oxymoron to me. It's

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 4>a self contradictory statement to take the Bible seriously and

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 4>be a leftist.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 6>Okay, but the fact remains that I guess it's very

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 6>dangerous in the sense that you one must study a manual.

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 6>The Bible is not as clear as say the instruction

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 6>manual for your flash.

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 4>Do it this, that's right. That's why it has to

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 4>be you do that's.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 6>Right, with danger to interpret it learning.

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 4>You're right. That's why I have devoted my adult life

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 4>to teaching the Torah. I teach it verse by verse.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 4>I have about one hundred and fifty tapes on it.

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 4>You are welcome to sample one through my website. But

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 4>it is very painful to me that those insights are

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 4>not made relevant to a lot of people, even by

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 4>much of the religious community. I'm Dennis Prager. This is

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 4>the yeah I started wrong. This is Dennis Prager. This

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 4>is the hour where you, in fact make the set

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 4>the agenda here and it is one A Praguer seven

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 4>seven six. I'll go back to Ottawa in a little while, Howard,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 4>I want to get some other calls. In the meantime,

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 4>let's go to anonymous we rarely do this, but she

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 4>doesn't want to say anything since her husband might in

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 4>fact hear her. So Anonymous, you're on the Dennis Prager Show.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 7>Hey, Dennis, Hi, how are you?

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>You don't even want to say your city?

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 7>No, I'd rather not. Okay, my husband listens to your.

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 4>Show, buddy might know your voice.

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm taking that chance.

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 7>What would be your suggestion for somebody who their husband

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 7>doesn't want to go to marriage counseling and you think

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.119
<v Speaker 7>that if you pressure or push even more that he's

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 7>going to leave, Well.

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 4>If your husband. If a husband will leave because the

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 4>wife wants to work on repairing the marriage, then he

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 4>has decided to leave. If I it's pretty self evident.

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 4>I have told men. It is not always men, but

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 4>it is more often men than I think. Wives who

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 4>resist going to marital counseling. That is, in every case

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 4>that I know of, the resistance of one for long

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 4>enough period of time led to the end of the marriage.

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 4>In every case that I know of, not know of

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 4>an exception of somebody resisting and over long time the

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 4>marriage just worked itself out.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 7>I'm going on my own right now. You don't think

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 7>that's sufficient, Well.

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 4>It's sufficient if you are the primary source of the problems,

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 4>and that that could be there are I don't believe

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 4>it's always fifty to fifty, but I believe.

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 7>That's what he thinks, is that it's mostly my fault.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, then let him hear that from then. Fine, then

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 4>let it be vindicated at the counseling session.

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 7>It has been. He did go one time with me,

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 7>and and he thinks that the counselor's on my side.

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 4>No, no, then he wasn't vindicated. I say, he thinks

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 4>it's primarily you're the problem, right, but when he went

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 4>it turned out that that's not what the counselor said.

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Then say, you know what, honey, let's find a counselor

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 4>that you trust. That's fine. That sometimes happens. I think

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 4>that there are I think that there are therapists who

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 4>are biased in favor of the wife more than there are.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 4>I think many many therapists are not biased. But when

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 4>there is bias, I think it is often in favor

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 4>of the wife because she is more. Generally, women are

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:16.719
<v Speaker 4>more explicit about their more eloquent, more verbal about their problems,

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 4>and the guy often sits there just with his arms folded.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 7>Okay, what do you do in that case? When he

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 7>sits there with his arms folded that.

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 4>You say, then let's go. We'll keep going till we

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 4>find one that works. And if he says no, then

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't want to repair it. I mean, it becomes

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 4>self evident. It's painful for me to say this to

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 4>you because I but what other conclusion can one draw

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 4>if if your toilet isn't working and you don't want

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 4>to call a plumber, it means that you're prepared to

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 4>live with a broken toilet.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 7>He thinks it's working, and I think it's.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 4>Not well that but marriages have to be thought of

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 4>as working for both. It's not. There's no objective truth

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 4>to the to that sort of thing. Both have to

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 4>think it's working for it to work. And and and

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 4>a session is a good place. It's a safe place

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 4>to let everything out because there's a there's a person

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 4>you both trust. If you don't both trust, you've got

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 4>to find somebody else.

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 7>And if he's petrified of the whole idea.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 4>In general, why is he?

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 7>Because feelings are very difficult.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 4>That's right, and it's very painful for me to hear.

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 4>But then then you know. That's why I'd love to

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 4>talk to him. I go often. It takes a guy

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 4>to convince a guy on these matters.

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, you're about the only one he'd probably listen.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would be happy to I'm not kidding. I

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 4>really would. And if you happen to uh, if you

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 4>can send me an email, I'll even write it out

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 4>to him.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 7>Would you really?

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I would?

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 7>All right, then I will.

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, thank you, You're welcome. God bless you to thank you.

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's timeless wisdom.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Alrighty, let's go to I believe it's Chris in the

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Cleveland on WCCD. Is that right, Chris? Yeah? Hi, Yeah.

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 6>You frequently mentioned that you've lectured on all seven continents,

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 6>including an Antarctica, and I had a picture of you

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 6>in front of the penguins, and I was wondering exactly

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 6>what it was you were lecturing.

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 4>To them about. That's a fine question. Was why it

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 4>took your call? There is an answer to that, and

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 4>it's a little embarrassing. I spoke to them primarily about monotheism.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 4>ID how did they take it?

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 4>If you look at the picture, you will notice maybe

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 4>there are a hundred penguins, only one is actually looking

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 4>at me. So I just it was a humbling experience.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 4>But Chris, it was the only way I could honestly

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 4>say I had lectured on all seven continents, because while

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 4>I did lecture on the ship off the coast of Antarctica,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 4>that's true. On Antarctic itself, there's nobody to lecture to,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 4>so I have to choose penguins. Okay, you're a good man,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 4>You're a good man. I really appreciate the question. Let's

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 4>go to Los Angeles, California, k r l A, Greg

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Dennis Prager.

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Dennis, Hi, honor to speak with you, long time listen.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm one of those happy atheist longtime listeners. I have

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to say, with all due respect to you and your listeners,

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I just I find religion completely irrational, akin to perhaps

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 3>telling a child that Santa Claus actually really does exist.

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 3>That's why we inculcate children so early. How are that?

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 3>That's really not my question. My question is if you

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 3>do believe in an eternity, and if you believe in

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 3>retribution from God for evil people, A why bother punishing

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 3>evil people? And b why be upset when someone dies

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 3>if they're if they're going right now, this is think

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 3>about our human life would be just a spec in

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the ocean.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 4>That's right, well and well. To the truly religious, it

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 4>probably is a speck in the ocean. But to the

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 4>atheist it's also a speck in the ocean. Either case,

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 4>it's a spec. It's just for the atheist it's the

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 4>only speck. But for both well, right, wait, for both

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 4>the religious believer and the atheist, life is a spec

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 4>in the ocean. The difference. The difference is the atheist

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 4>believes it's only a spec and it just dissolves into

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 4>the ocean, whereas the religious believer believes that there is

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 4>something beyond the spec. But all right, fair enough, but

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 4>so so the spec part is not relevant because we

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 4>both believe that. But your question is a powerful one,

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 4>and it is the reason I believe that when religions

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 4>over emphasize the afterlife, people do in fact not act

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 4>the way they ought to. I could not agree with

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 4>you more in your supposition. I have spoken about it,

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 4>I have written about it. I believe deeply there's an afterlife,

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 4>but I also believe that concentrating on that can have

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 4>a negative effect on the way people act, where you

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 4>become very fatalistic, and there is a certain fatalism for

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 4>example an Eastern religion. Look, I'm coming back in the

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 4>next life, and you know whatever I come back, I'll

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 4>come back now. Of course, they believe that you come

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 4>back depending on how you act in this life, So

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 4>there really is a reason to do good. I need

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 4>to be absolutely honest here, but look at the Islamic

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 4>militants and their belief. Oh my god, if you know

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 4>you blow up enough innocent people, by golly, you'll have

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 4>seventy two women service you when you arrive. I never

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 4>quite understood what the women get they when they blow

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 4>up themselves. But theological question will lead an answer to

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 4>I have asked my whole life, why is the Torah

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 4>silent on the afterlife? I'm a big believer in the Torah,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 4>and I have concluded that it wants us to be

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 4>preoccupied greg with this life, even though there's no doubt

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 4>in my mind that if there was a God, there

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 4>was something after this life. It's just it's axiomatic. But

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 4>you are right to pose that question, because I have

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 4>seen that happen where people get so preoccupied with the

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 4>next life they ignore a lot of what happens here

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 4>and go to Dallas, Texas on case Guy, it's Tom.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Hello Tom, Dennis.

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 8>Prager, Hi Dennis, how are you doing all right?

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Thank you?

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 8>The question I had was, in recalling your past radio shows,

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 8>you mentioned several different times I guess that you had

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 8>studied communism. You'd measured in Soviet studies.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 4>That's right, and I was real.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 8>Curious about actually three things. First of all, why you

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 8>chose that study in the first place, and how you

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 8>felt about it as you were going through the studying

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 8>process at the time, And how your own attitude and

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 8>thoughts have evolved toward what you studied, you know, by

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 8>the experiences that you had in your political thought.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a very good question, and I imagine some

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 4>others might have won the same thing. First, you need

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 4>to know I was never pro Soviet or pro communist.

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 4>I always thought that both were evil. Why I studied

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 4>it was because I thought it was incredibly important to

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 4>understand the greatest threat to liberty at the time, which

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 4>came from communism. I wanted to understand what made them

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 4>think and why were so many in the West, especially

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 4>among the intelligentsia, attracted to a doctrine Marxism that had

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 4>led to so much evil.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 8>Did I ask you what you concluded about why the

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 8>intelligency is so attracted to this insanity?

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? The fundamental the fundamental problem, I believe, and it

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 4>hit me then and it was life changing, was the

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 4>fact that they are radically secular and they want a religion,

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 4>but they don't want it to be based on God,

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 4>and so their religion became Marxism and that's that or

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 4>some Marxist offshoot. People don't like to live without a

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.479
<v Speaker 4>methodology for understanding life, and if it will not derive

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 4>from Christianity or Judaism, then it will derive from another

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 4>religion or from a secular religion, and Marxism is a

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 4>secular religion.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 8>Would it not also have to do with their sense

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 8>of metaphysical and moral egalitarianism to make everything all values equal.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but they don't really hold that, They hold that

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 4>their values are better. But yes, egalitarianism is also more

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 4>equality has trumped liberty for the left. That is correct.

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 4>That is one of the major differences between the Left

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 4>and others is that equality is the god of the

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 4>left right.

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 8>Okay, thank you so much, Thank you, Dennis.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 4>I appreciate it. By the way, my majoring in that,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 4>specifically at the Russian Institute at Columbia University at the

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 4>School of International Affairs, was in fact the whole all

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 4>the travels I did to communist countries. My study of

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 4>totalitarianism has awakened me to so much of what happens

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 4>on the left in non tootalitarian states. The efforts of

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 4>the left in California right now to remove a little

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 4>cross from the seal of the County of Los Angeles

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 4>is to me the classic leftist totalitarianism. We wish to

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 4>obliterate the Christian history of America. Whether your pro or

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 4>anti Christian shouldn't even matter. You should be afraid of

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 4>the fact that there are people who want to erase

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 4>our history. Now it frightens me because it's also an

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 4>erasure of values that I believe in. Even though I'm

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 4>not Christian, I'm Jewish, but I believe in the Judeo

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Christian values that permeate this country. And I am afraid

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 4>of anything that will substitute for anything.

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>This episode of timeless wisdom will continue right after this.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Dennis Jennis Jennis, Dennis Prager.

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a question you've always wanted to ask

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Prager. Well, now it's your opportunity for upcoming Ask

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Me Anything episodes of Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. We're

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>inviting you to leave Dennis a voicemail. He'll personally answer

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>selected questions, and your question could be featured on a

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>future episode. Whether it's about faith, morality, politics, history, relationships, happiness,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>for simply navigating life, Dennis would love to hear from you.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Just call eight seven seven two four three seven seven

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>seven six and leave your question. Oh and be sure

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to include your first name and where you're calling from.

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>That's eight seven seven two four three seventy seven seventy six.

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>While we can't feature every question, Dennis will listen every voicemail.

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So call today you may hear Dennis Prager answering your

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>question on an upcoming episode of Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager.

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for listening and supporting Dennis Prager. Now back

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's go to your calls. This is the

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 4>hour of the week where you set the agenda. I

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 4>said it fourteen hours of the fifteen a week. Now

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 4>you said it. Whatever is on your mind, anything that

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 4>you want to ask, anything, anything, think about it. You

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 4>ever curious about something about me or about life, from

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 4>the meaning of life to my shoe size. I will

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 4>take anything. If you think it's silly, you have a

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 4>better chance to get on. But we will alternate everything. Ahlrighty,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 4>ladies and gentlemen. We go over to Cleveland, Ohio and John.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 4>Hello John on WCCD. Dennis Prager, Welcome to the show.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>How are you doing to day, mister Preger?

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, sir, thank you.

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 2>I've always wondered two things. Do you play chess? And

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 2>do you enjoy science fiction? Either televised or written?

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 4>That's so interesting, because I don't particularly enjoy either.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 4>I feel terrible. It was painful for me to say

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.479
<v Speaker 4>I do play chess. Now let me explain why. For

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 4>the science fiction. There is no good reason, because science

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 4>fiction is great stuff. I am just here is Listen. John.

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I may I may be lowered in your esteem as

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 4>a result of this, but I'm going to take the risk.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm picking the phone.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 4>I know you are believe me, you think you know.

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 4>I was thinking, should I tell John, oh my god,

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 4>I love this stuff, or should I tell him the truth?

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 4>So John, hold on, wait, I think I'm going to

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 4>gather a little you'll be able to put some of

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 4>your face back up. Okay, okay, the problem is not

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 4>science fiction. The problem is fiction. I had to make

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 4>a decision earlier in life, given the fact that I

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 4>only have twenty four hours in a day, that where

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 4>will most of my reading take place? And by definition

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 4>it has to be in nonfiction.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're taking one for the team.

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm saying, what, You're taking one for the team.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 2>You're sacrificed.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 4>I am, I'm taking one for the team. That is correct.

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 4>That's very kind. That's correct. I good. Now, as regards chess,

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 4>it's a little more complex. When I was in high school,

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 4>I actually bought chess magazines. Yes, and I would play

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 4>some of the great matches. Really, but this is what

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 4>I concluded in high school. He's already not happy. I

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 4>concluded the following. The amount of brain effort it is

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 4>taking me to play this game. I could probably learn

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 4>Japanese and Chinese during that time, and somehow or other,

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that knowing Japanese or Chinese will bring me

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 4>greater use in the in the in the mission that

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 4>I have for my life than mastering the Sicilian in defense.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but one day we have to play, because I

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>must add you to my to my expensive, to.

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Your expansive list of those you've defeated. I assure you

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 4>that I will be on that list. Oh, there is

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 4>no question. However I do beat my eleven year old.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Well that's well, that's good, and I actually I use

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 2>a Reagan esque attack on people that tends to shake

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>him up.

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Is that a new move in chess, the reagan esque offense.

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually, it's something I came up with during his

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>deployment of the persing Nissiles in Europe.

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 4>I see, I like that John's Reagan pershing defense. I

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 4>like that. Well, if you want to write it up, John,

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 4>send it to me. I'll play it on my board. Ones.

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 4>All right, sounds like a woman. You're a great guy.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 4>Thanks a million.

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>You're welcome a million.

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Hye bye bye. No, that is I gave. I gave

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 4>it to totally level with him. I actually wanted a

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 4>master chess, and I am asked. I know I could

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 4>never master it, but I mean, really, you know, be

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 4>good at it. So I would play these games, and

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 4>then after I devoted all that energy to figuring out

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 4>why the bishop went to Kingsrook six or whatever it was,

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 4>and I think, well, what did I accomplish here? It's

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 4>a game now, it's good to do. It sharpens the

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 4>mind and all that, and I have nothing. Let me

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 4>say something to be clear, there are a lot of

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 4>things I don't do, but I deeply respect those who

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 4>do it. The fact that I don't do it is

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 4>not a reflection on my belief that it is not worthwhile.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I fully acknowledge that I don't get into poetry,

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 4>but I at the same time know it's my lack.

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 4>It's my fault. Poetry is great, Dennis isn't for not

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 4>loving it. I acknowledge that. So I don't walk around

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 4>thinking because I don't play chess, Chess is not worth playing.

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 4>For what I wanted to use my brain matter for.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 4>I preferred to learn and I didn't learn Japanese or Chinese,

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 4>but I learned Russian, and in high school I started

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 4>teaching it to myself. So the time that I would

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 4>have learned, as I said, you know, a greater defense

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 4>or some you know, was it the roy Blast tactics?

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, I used to know a lot of them.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 4>I could have learned a language. And as it turned

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 4>out in life, knowing the languages that I've learned has

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 4>has been a great, massive blessing in my life, not

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 4>to mention, in my single days, a great vehicle to

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 4>social success. Okay, we'll leave that point there for now,

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 4>But that was that was true.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>This episode of timeless Wisdom will continue.

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Right after this.

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's timeless wisdom.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's go to more of your calls, Walnut, California. Jerry,

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 4>Dennis Praguer, Hello, Jerry.

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 9>Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes, sir, yes, sir.

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 9>My question for years, why does a symphony need a conductor?

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 9>I understand the music's already written down, the musicians know

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 9>their parts. Why do we need the conductor up there?

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, as it happens, on certain pieces, you don't really

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 4>need a conductor. There are, in fact conductor less orchestras. Yeah,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 4>they do exist. But having conducted myself and lived a

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 4>lifetime with music, first of all, there's somebody needs somebody,

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 4>even if it's the first violinist has to set the tempo.

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how many how fast will we do the

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 4>beats to the measure? Will it be one, two, three

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 4>four or one and two and three and four? Somebody

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 4>has to keep the beat.

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 9>You're not saying that a conductor is a glorified.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 4>No, of course not. No, he's not a glorified metronome.

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 4>But well he is in one sense that there is

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.479
<v Speaker 4>a lot of glory. And now let me tell you

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 4>the glory part. The glory part, aside from the fame

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 4>and stuff, is that, for example, I remember, I mean,

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 4>and I'm hardly I'm I'm not even in the realm

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 4>of the great conductors, but I at least I know

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 4>some of the things that they have to do. For example,

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>when I conducted a local orchestra in southern California, I

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 4>would say, you know what, in this measure, can I

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 4>please hear the horns a little more loudly? I like

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 4>the theme in the horns, so violins, please please subdue

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 4>it a little bit, would you? Then there is the

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 4>emotion I want to extract out of the orchestra the

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 4>most passionate playing that they can have. And so that

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 4>is fifty percent or more. Of what a conductor really

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 4>does is bring out the best from the musicians that

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 4>they care about the piece, that they're not just going

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 4>through the motions. That's the biggest, single thing. That's why

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 4>some conductors are greater than others. They can all keep

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 4>the beat, but some I remember the greatest compliment I

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 4>ever received, because there's so much more that professional conductors

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 4>know that I do. But the orchestras that I worked

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 4>with said to me, you know what, you got the

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 4>folks to play their best because it was so clear

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 4>how much I loved the music and cared about it,

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 4>how it wasn't me as an egotist, but in service

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 4>of Heiden or Mozart or Tchaikowsky and whatever it was.

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 4>And that's what a leader does. You bring out the

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 4>best from those those that are following you. So there

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.959
<v Speaker 4>is a huge amount that a conductor does, and to

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 4>the extent that I could tell Jerry often within two

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 4>minutes of a piece, is this a great conductor or not?

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 4>In fact, that's my favorite thing to do, is to

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 4>hear a piece, not knowing the conductor and then say

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 4>whether I liked it or not, great question. That's exactly

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 4>what I like. Alrighty, let's go to some more of

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 4>your calls, whatever it might be. On Chris in Los

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Angeles on eight seventy Carol like Dennis Prager.

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 10>Hello, I love to hear your talk. Dennis.

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. It's a good thing because if you didn't,

0:29:57.920 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 4>I'd be out of a job.

0:29:59.520 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 7>True.

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 10>Before I ask my question, I wanted to tell you

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 10>months ago you talked to somebody by the name of

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 10>Sergei who is from Russia, and you said that Russian

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 10>was your favorite accent mine too.

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 4>It is the best. It is absolutely the best. There

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 4>is nothing that is not close to Russian.

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 10>They don't have a word for a and or the,

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 10>so I go to a store.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 4>That's right, they don't. That's correct. But you know what

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of languages don't. Hebrew doesn't either. Okay, no, No,

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Hebrew has the it doesn't have a. It has the,

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 4>but not a and. That's true. Russian doesn't have V

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 4>or A. That is an interesting point, right, Okay, go.

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 5>Ahead my question.

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 10>I have a friend who has a bought a Saint Bernard.

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 10>She named her Hannah said the name is built the

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 10>same forward r H A N N H right, and

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 10>what is the word that what your your vocabulary is

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 10>so good.

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. The word for a word that is the same

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 4>backwards and forwards is palindrome.

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 8>P A L I N D O M E palandrome.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 10>Yes, thank you, thank you very much.

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 4>Now wait before you hang up, I will give you

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 4>a whole sentence. That's a palindromes. Madam, I'm adam, all right, okay,

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 4>it's clearly boulder away it boulder over. It is clear.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 4>That was about as unexcited irresponse as I have ever received.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 4>With the build up that I gave, I have to

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 4>there was a humbling moment for me. I thank you

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 4>because I can use it as I guess a lot

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 4>of people can. Riverside, California is another great one. KR.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's see Caro LH Or is that k Ti? It's

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 4>k THI yeah, k Ti of course. Hi Terry, Hi.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 11>Dennis, just wondering what is what are your feelings? Or

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 11>better yet, have you studied the ancient practice of astrology?

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 4>This is gonna bother half my listeners. I do not

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 4>dump on astrology. I do not live by it. I

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 4>do not tend to consult it. But I have read

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 4>about it, and I do not utterly dismiss it, and

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 4>I do not believe that it takes away from God's

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 4>governance of the universe. To believe that it may be true.

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm agnostic on astrology. I am not a rejector of

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 4>its possibilities, and I believe that it is wrong to

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 4>say that it takes away from God's governance of the universe.

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 4>In fact, to me, if there really is an influence

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 4>of the constellations, because of what constellation I was born under,

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 4>that argues for there being a transcendent God to begin

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 4>with that, because not everything is then explainable just by

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, genes and environment. So I don't have a problem.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 4>I find the stuff. I find it interesting, but you know,

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 4>but it will not compel the way I live my life, right,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 4>and I.

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 11>Don't see it as evil as some people. You can

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 11>see anything as evil.

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 4>That's correct, and anything could be used for read's that's

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 4>well said. And did I surprise.

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 7>You you did?

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I thought so, I thought.

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, But I'm very happy with you with your opinion.

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 11>Your opinions, Well.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 4>That's very sweet, Terry. I'm delighted to hear from you.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 4>We are to do an hour on astrology. We really should,

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 4>because I'd like to answer some of the objections that

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 4>I think and that I respect, but I don't agree with.

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 4>We'll be back in a moment.

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Timeless Wisdom will continue right after this.

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Now back to more of Dennis Prager's Timeless Wisdom.

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, everybody, this is Dennis Prager, and this is

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 4>the hour that you set the agenda. Let's go to

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 4>as many calls as possible. We'll go back to Ottawa

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 4>now and Howard Dennis Prager.

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 6>High, Oh, I'm back. Yes, here's my other question. I'm

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm an agnostic Jew. I would like to I would

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 6>like to believe in God, but I can't help thinking

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 6>when I look at the tore laws, not the not

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 6>the sanctification laws about you know, don't mix wool and linen,

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean the laws of men to men, like don't murder,

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 6>don't steal, and so on, I can't help thinking. Look,

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 6>couldn't it have been that some wise sage or sages

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 6>of the past just looked at the world and said,

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, if I steal, even if I can get

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 6>away with it, what if everyone did that, society will

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 6>will decay? And they recognized from reason that that it

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 6>doesn't make sense to steal, and why.

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Didn't people recognize from reason that it was wrong to

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 4>sacrifice their children? It was universal till the Torah came along.

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.959
<v Speaker 6>Perhaps I don't know, Maybe maybe it was universal, Maybe

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 6>it wasn't it was.

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 4>It was it was trust me, I mean, if I'm

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 4>not going to lie to you, it was every in

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 4>every ancient society that we have throughout the world. There was.

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 4>So that's a good example of obviously reason didn't lead.

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 4>And I have a chapter in my first book, the

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:04.720
<v Speaker 4>book Got I wrote on Judaism, the nine questions people

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 4>ask about Judaism exactly on why reason is not sufficient?

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 4>And I'll give you one example, And since you're a Jew,

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 4>I think it'll strike you as particularly strong. There was

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 4>no rational reason for a non Jew to save a

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Jew during the Holocaust in Europe. Reason alone would have

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 4>suggested not to risk one's life for a total stranger.

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 4>And it took the risking of a life to save

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 4>a Jew in the Holocaust. If the Nazis found you

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 4>hiding a Jew, they killed you. Now, why is it rational?

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 4>And the people who did it? And I have studied,

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 4>I've read every book on survivors that I know exists,

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 4>not on survivors, on rescuers. Not one ever gave the

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 4>answer why did you do it? Well, that was the

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 4>rational thing to do. It was the right thing, It

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 4>was the good thing, it was the religious thing. I

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 4>thought I was doing what God wants, whatever it was,

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 4>but it wasn't reason. Reason doesn't tell a kid who

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:08.479
<v Speaker 4>is in a classroom where ninety percent of the kids

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 4>are cheating on tests not to cheat. There's no great

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 4>rational reason when everybody else is cheating for you not

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 4>to cheat. There are moral reasons, the reasons of character.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 4>They are a whole host of reasons. Oh God, I

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 4>would love to spend a lot of time talking about

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 4>this with you. Howard it is. But I'll tell you

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 4>I've written and I've given talks on exactly these issues,

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 4>and only because they're not free, I feel funny recommending

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 4>them to you. But God, I beg you to avail

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.280
<v Speaker 4>yourself with some of that stuff. Thank you for your.

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Call tomorrow on Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager.

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 4>This is the Ultimate Issues Hour. Every week, this hour

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 4>is devoted to some great issue of life. It is

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 4>an extremely important subject. Hence it qualifies for the Ultimate

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Issues Hour. So what is it? Political correctness is? And

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm giving my own understanding of it. If you have

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 4>a different one, you are certainly welcome to offer it.

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 4>But it is essentially the inability to state certain things,

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 4>certain truths. See, that's the key thing here, certain truths

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 4>because they may offend certain people or certain groups or

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 4>there are two elements to political correctness. It might be

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 4>deemed offensive by some members of some groups. And the

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 4>other definition is it might be painful for some people

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 4>to recognize. There are two separate categories. They may be related.

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 4>One is hurtful, the other is or offensive if you will,

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 4>and the other is just painful. And I will give

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 4>you examples. Please understand that political correctness must entirely be

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 4>a matter of truth that can't be said. Lies that

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 4>are offensive, lies that are painful, can't be said not

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 4>because they're offensive, not because they're painful, but because they're lies.

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 4>All right. That's the issue here, and that is instrumental

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 4>to the whole discussion. It's going to be a difficult

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 4>hour to do because by definition I am going to

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 4>offend certain sensibilities. My intent, let me say, at the

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 4>outset is zero to offend. Why would I want to

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 4>do that. It's pointless, it is, It just increases tension.

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 4>I have no desire for it, not the way I

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 4>conduct my life or my show. But it is inevitable

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 4>to talk about political correctness that if you give examples,

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 4>somebody who is politically correct will be offended. So let

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 4>me tell you in advance, that is the last thing

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 4>I wish to do. I gave an example. We talked

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 4>about this once when I spoke about stereotypes. So the

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 4>issue about there are two issues about stereotypes, not whether

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 4>they're offensive, whether they are true, and whether you apply

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:39.919
<v Speaker 4>it to every member of that group. All right, that's

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 4>the question. And number one is it true? And number

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 4>two is the general Is the generalization true? But number two,

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 4>do you apply it to every member of the group.

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 4>That's totally wrong. That's totally wrong. That's the reason you

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 4>can live with stereotypes and not be a bigot. You

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 4>can say in ja general X or Y about a group,

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 4>but that doesn't mean that every time I meet a

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 4>member of that group that applies. That's everyone is an individual.

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Join us tomorrow to hear more on Timeless Wisdom with

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Prager visit Dennispragger dot com for thousands of hours

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of Dennis's lecturers, courses, and classic radio programs, and to

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles. We want to take just

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a second to thank the team at Life Audio for

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>their partnership with us on the podcast. Go to lifeaudio

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com to find dozens of other faith centered podcasts

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and their network, including shows about prayer, Bible study, parenting,

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and more.