1 00:00:00,920 --> 00:00:03,000 Speaker 1: Hey, everyone, welcome to this episode of Thinking Christian. I'm 2 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:05,559 Speaker 1: doctor James Spencer. I'm joined by doctor Ashish Pharma, and 3 00:00:05,600 --> 00:00:07,720 Speaker 1: we're going to be talking a little bit today about 4 00:00:08,039 --> 00:00:13,360 Speaker 1: this idea of assimilation and how in the world the 5 00:00:13,520 --> 00:00:19,759 Speaker 1: church tends to lose its shape, let's say, as the 6 00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:22,799 Speaker 1: world sort of encroaches into it. There's an incorporation that 7 00:00:22,880 --> 00:00:26,119 Speaker 1: sort of happens where the Church and the world start 8 00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:29,480 Speaker 1: to look a lot more alike than we might want 9 00:00:29,720 --> 00:00:33,840 Speaker 1: or hope, and so it becomes a problem of identity, 10 00:00:33,960 --> 00:00:37,559 Speaker 1: it becomes a problem of thought process, it becomes a 11 00:00:37,680 --> 00:00:41,159 Speaker 1: problem of values, and so that's what we're going to 12 00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:41,720 Speaker 1: be talking. 13 00:00:41,520 --> 00:00:42,560 Speaker 2: A little bit about today. 14 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,839 Speaker 1: We'll do a few episodes on the different problems we 15 00:00:47,040 --> 00:00:49,519 Speaker 1: sort of see, our forces that we see pressuring in 16 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:51,760 Speaker 1: on the church and keeping the Church from developing that 17 00:00:51,880 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 1: sort of mature, uncompromising faith that says, hey, I'm going 18 00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:59,640 Speaker 1: to obey Christ even when the consequences are fairly negative. 19 00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:02,640 Speaker 2: And figuring this out. 20 00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:05,640 Speaker 1: So this first one is assimilation, but well we'll dive 21 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:09,000 Speaker 1: in in future episodes into what we call fragmentation and 22 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:13,559 Speaker 1: then transaction. So that's what's coming up. But today assimilation, 23 00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:17,360 Speaker 1: So I'll leave it there. But ah wan, don't you 24 00:01:17,400 --> 00:01:21,160 Speaker 1: start us off help us. Maybe you'd mentioned something before 25 00:01:21,200 --> 00:01:24,479 Speaker 1: the podcast about syncretism, and I think people have probably 26 00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:26,200 Speaker 1: heard that term and off a lot. I've used that 27 00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: term and off a lot. I'm interested to understand your 28 00:01:29,560 --> 00:01:31,640 Speaker 1: thoughts on syncretism. So why don't we just jump in 29 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:32,160 Speaker 1: right there? 30 00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:34,080 Speaker 2: Right? 31 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:36,880 Speaker 3: I love jumping right in, jump into the deep end, right, 32 00:01:36,920 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 3: and then might as well the shock of the cold, 33 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:44,160 Speaker 3: you get over it quicker, that's right. So the two 34 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:48,520 Speaker 3: are often welded together for me, and that when I've 35 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:53,240 Speaker 3: gotten into conversations with assimilation, often in the classroom, I 36 00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:58,400 Speaker 3: often hear students raise the concern of syncretism, and I 37 00:01:58,480 --> 00:02:04,280 Speaker 3: think the connection for them is, generally, if assimilation is 38 00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:09,920 Speaker 3: the problem of one group absorbing into itself another so 39 00:02:09,960 --> 00:02:13,520 Speaker 3: that there's a loss of itself. The fear, on the 40 00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:17,920 Speaker 3: other end is when that sort of assimilation is is 41 00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:25,240 Speaker 3: compared to a religious setting or setting in which you 42 00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 3: have people concerned that we're going to lose the basics 43 00:02:28,919 --> 00:02:30,800 Speaker 3: of our faith, We're going to lose the core of 44 00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:35,200 Speaker 3: what it means to be in our case Christian, because 45 00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 3: we've allowed ourselves to get too close to something else, 46 00:02:38,680 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 3: whether it be a culture, a way of thinking. 47 00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:42,960 Speaker 4: And often this is. 48 00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:46,880 Speaker 3: One directional right, it's a group of people that have, 49 00:02:47,720 --> 00:02:49,720 Speaker 3: whether they recognize it or not. Usually it's they don't 50 00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:55,079 Speaker 3: recognize it, a very culturally saturated understanding of their faith 51 00:02:56,639 --> 00:02:59,920 Speaker 3: and often very traditioned. Right that it's been deep rooted 52 00:03:00,080 --> 00:03:03,280 Speaker 3: for so long that these traditions just become the normativities 53 00:03:03,320 --> 00:03:05,959 Speaker 3: of what it means to express their faith. And that's 54 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:11,919 Speaker 3: now engaging with another culture that's beginning to do similar 55 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:16,760 Speaker 3: sorts of things, right, starting to gain roots or begin 56 00:03:16,840 --> 00:03:19,519 Speaker 3: to articulate the message of Jesus in light of its 57 00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:24,399 Speaker 3: own place, and the fear then enters in of whoa 58 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:28,200 Speaker 3: that sounds too much like fill in the blank, whatever 59 00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:31,959 Speaker 3: your culture is, right, right, So generally that conversation of 60 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:36,120 Speaker 3: syncretism that flows out of the assimilation conversation is a 61 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:40,120 Speaker 3: fear based conversation. I'm afraid of losing the essence of 62 00:03:40,160 --> 00:03:43,119 Speaker 3: what makes Christianity what it is. Yeah, Now, I put 63 00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:47,360 Speaker 3: it that way deliberately because I want to highlight my 64 00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:52,760 Speaker 3: use of the word essence. There is already philosophically and 65 00:03:52,760 --> 00:03:57,640 Speaker 3: culturally saturated sure, right, And what I want to get 66 00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:01,200 Speaker 3: at within that is that there's a way discussing things 67 00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:08,880 Speaker 3: that's irretrievably tied to locality. So we think about universals, 68 00:04:08,960 --> 00:04:11,760 Speaker 3: we think about generalities, we think about common sense, these 69 00:04:11,760 --> 00:04:15,320 Speaker 3: things that should be true here, there and everywhere, and 70 00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:18,599 Speaker 3: it makes sense that we think in those terms. But 71 00:04:18,880 --> 00:04:23,600 Speaker 3: my reaction, my initial reaction, is to say that we 72 00:04:23,680 --> 00:04:26,680 Speaker 3: take for granted in that moment, how we don't know 73 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:30,839 Speaker 3: anything as generalities, We don't know anything as universals. Everything 74 00:04:30,920 --> 00:04:33,360 Speaker 3: we know. And so my case in Boinde is one 75 00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:35,680 Speaker 3: of the other things we were talking about, completely unrelated, 76 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:39,160 Speaker 3: was teaching in Europe, right. 77 00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:40,160 Speaker 2: Yeah, so. 78 00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:44,359 Speaker 3: At a place I used to teach, one of the 79 00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:48,640 Speaker 3: perks was this opportunity regularly to go teach these these 80 00:04:48,680 --> 00:04:53,359 Speaker 3: programs abroad. And I might have mentioned it on this 81 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 3: podcast in some previous times, So forgive me if this 82 00:04:56,160 --> 00:04:59,560 Speaker 3: was repetition, but I will never forget this moment we're 83 00:04:59,560 --> 00:05:02,960 Speaker 3: teaching in. I'm teaching in Germany and the setting we're 84 00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:06,880 Speaker 3: living in this youth hostel for me for weeks, for 85 00:05:06,960 --> 00:05:10,560 Speaker 3: the students for months. Part of the deal is they 86 00:05:10,560 --> 00:05:16,839 Speaker 3: have this very German breakfast right, yep, these mini loaves 87 00:05:16,839 --> 00:05:22,400 Speaker 3: of bread that are fantastic, fresh fruit, cheese, cold cuts, 88 00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:30,120 Speaker 3: put out some dutella, and students initially think that's breakfast. 89 00:05:30,279 --> 00:05:31,200 Speaker 4: Maybe they're used to. 90 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:35,400 Speaker 3: Cereal and milk, or reanola and yogurt. 91 00:05:35,080 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 2: Or make stup scrambled eggs. 92 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:38,200 Speaker 4: Yeah, that's right, that's right. 93 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:41,240 Speaker 3: But by the time they get into this a couple 94 00:05:41,279 --> 00:05:43,080 Speaker 3: months in, it's like this is normal to them, and 95 00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:46,240 Speaker 3: they love it. I'll never forget the initial part though, 96 00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:51,520 Speaker 3: And the initial thing was having these students walk up 97 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:53,960 Speaker 3: to the to the little food bar where all this 98 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:56,159 Speaker 3: stuff is laid out, and there's the basket of fruit, 99 00:05:58,000 --> 00:05:59,640 Speaker 3: and they look at the apples and they know that 100 00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:02,960 Speaker 3: it's an apple. It's not a confusion as to what 101 00:06:03,040 --> 00:06:09,279 Speaker 3: it is, right, but there's still a level of huh. 102 00:06:09,320 --> 00:06:12,560 Speaker 3: And the reason is and and I have an inverse 103 00:06:12,640 --> 00:06:14,479 Speaker 3: example of this as well. So before I get to 104 00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:16,000 Speaker 3: the punch one of this, let me give the inverse. 105 00:06:16,640 --> 00:06:19,000 Speaker 3: I had a student in my philosophy class years ago 106 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:22,640 Speaker 3: who was from Germany, Okay, and I was telling this story, 107 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,680 Speaker 3: and her first reaction was to start laughing and say, 108 00:06:27,720 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 3: that's how I feel about American apples. All right, So 109 00:06:31,080 --> 00:06:35,440 Speaker 3: where's the juxtaposition. You go to a major American supermarket 110 00:06:36,440 --> 00:06:39,279 Speaker 3: and you go look at the apples and they are big, 111 00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:42,719 Speaker 3: and they are perfect spheres, and they have this mild 112 00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:45,840 Speaker 3: layer of wax on them so they're shiny, and they 113 00:06:45,880 --> 00:06:48,480 Speaker 3: work hard to make sure that you don't find one 114 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 3: with the dent or the bruise in it. Right, And 115 00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 3: it's this idyllic image of the apple, and not just 116 00:06:56,600 --> 00:06:58,239 Speaker 3: the students, all of us. We go to the store, 117 00:06:58,279 --> 00:07:00,160 Speaker 3: we have this image in mind. And now when I 118 00:07:00,200 --> 00:07:02,599 Speaker 3: say apple, the first image that pops into mind is 119 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:03,159 Speaker 3: that thing. 120 00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:04,520 Speaker 2: Yeah. 121 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:07,720 Speaker 3: And that's just not what you're gonna find in Germany. 122 00:07:08,480 --> 00:07:08,680 Speaker 2: Yeah. 123 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:13,160 Speaker 3: Right, So you go to Germany and you you have 124 00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 3: this thing that's not waxy, and it's not big, and 125 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:22,560 Speaker 3: it's often not a perfect sphere. Its color is kind 126 00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:24,760 Speaker 3: of dull. It's a dull red, right, because it hasn't 127 00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:25,360 Speaker 3: been polished. 128 00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:26,080 Speaker 2: Yep. 129 00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:29,160 Speaker 3: So my German student had that image in mind and 130 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:31,480 Speaker 3: she sees these American apples like, what in the world 131 00:07:31,560 --> 00:07:33,680 Speaker 3: is going on with this? I've never seen apples like this, 132 00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 3: even if there's enough similarity that she knows, right, Yeah, 133 00:07:36,960 --> 00:07:39,080 Speaker 3: And these American students in Germany are like, what in 134 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:40,720 Speaker 3: the world is going on with this? I could take 135 00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:43,960 Speaker 3: two bites and be done with this thing, right right. 136 00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:46,160 Speaker 4: My point in this is. 137 00:07:46,120 --> 00:07:49,440 Speaker 3: That whatever image we have in our head, it came 138 00:07:49,440 --> 00:07:52,880 Speaker 3: from somewhere. So even as we think in generalities, think 139 00:07:52,920 --> 00:07:56,240 Speaker 3: in universals, think about the perfect form of the apple. 140 00:07:56,320 --> 00:07:59,200 Speaker 4: If you want to think click a Titaness. 141 00:07:58,840 --> 00:08:04,040 Speaker 3: Philosopher, we never get the image in our head from nowhere. 142 00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:06,600 Speaker 3: I'd say the same thing what I do with my 143 00:08:06,680 --> 00:08:09,320 Speaker 3: students now with regard to the category of what is 144 00:08:09,360 --> 00:08:12,280 Speaker 3: a weed? Now, some of them are funny, and they 145 00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:15,600 Speaker 3: think immediately of marijuana, and I think, okay, cool. But 146 00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:17,400 Speaker 3: the ones who are thinking about a weed in terms 147 00:08:17,440 --> 00:08:24,080 Speaker 3: of the garden, a dandelion, creeping Charlie. You know, I 148 00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:26,480 Speaker 3: can't run all the weeds that we have out there, crabgrass, 149 00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:29,000 Speaker 3: These sorts of images pop into their head. 150 00:08:29,560 --> 00:08:31,520 Speaker 4: Flower, a. 151 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:38,720 Speaker 3: Zenia arose, a daffodil, right, a buttercup, something like this 152 00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:43,480 Speaker 3: pops into their head. Now, how come the wild violet, 153 00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:48,440 Speaker 3: the dandelion, these all have flowers on them. Why are 154 00:08:48,480 --> 00:08:50,839 Speaker 3: they in one category versus the other? Again, the point 155 00:08:50,840 --> 00:08:53,280 Speaker 3: here is that there is no universal This says more 156 00:08:53,320 --> 00:08:56,120 Speaker 3: about us in the way that our language has been 157 00:08:56,160 --> 00:09:02,440 Speaker 3: shaped by our place, by our expectations, by our desires, 158 00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:05,000 Speaker 3: and we begin to put other things into these categories. 159 00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:08,120 Speaker 3: And that's not inherently wrong, that's just how languages work. 160 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:11,520 Speaker 3: But the trouble creeps in, and this is where we 161 00:09:11,559 --> 00:09:13,640 Speaker 3: get back to synchronism. The trouble comes in when we 162 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:18,920 Speaker 3: fail to recognize how deeply shaped our way of seeing things, 163 00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:23,000 Speaker 3: hearing things, feeling things, imagining things is by our locality, 164 00:09:23,120 --> 00:09:27,480 Speaker 3: by our cultures, by our traditions, our histories. And now 165 00:09:27,520 --> 00:09:31,040 Speaker 3: we get to the Christian faith and we see a 166 00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:33,240 Speaker 3: Christian faith and that I wanted to flag the word 167 00:09:33,360 --> 00:09:37,760 Speaker 3: essence earlier because essence is a deeply philosophical term coming 168 00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:42,720 Speaker 3: out of a particular Greek philosophical tradition that has saturated 169 00:09:43,800 --> 00:09:47,840 Speaker 3: Western thought and its development in multiple cultures, and especially 170 00:09:47,840 --> 00:09:50,920 Speaker 3: saturated the formation of Christian theology as we know it. 171 00:09:52,880 --> 00:09:55,720 Speaker 3: You go to Scripture, the language of essence is just 172 00:09:55,760 --> 00:09:59,760 Speaker 3: not there, right, not because it's wrong to use that 173 00:09:59,800 --> 00:10:05,559 Speaker 3: as theological category, but because the form you break thinking. 174 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:08,520 Speaker 2: Right, right, they wouldn't have ever called it essence, right. 175 00:10:08,559 --> 00:10:09,000 Speaker 4: That's right. 176 00:10:09,320 --> 00:10:14,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, So we're very quick and easy to use, these 177 00:10:15,040 --> 00:10:19,040 Speaker 3: languages that are deeply shaped and cultured and local and traditioned, 178 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:22,000 Speaker 3: and so on and so forth. But in that process 179 00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 3: to miss that it is just that it's not some 180 00:10:26,400 --> 00:10:29,440 Speaker 3: sort of pure version of the faith. And now when 181 00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:34,000 Speaker 3: we see another culture that's newer to the faith trying 182 00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:37,840 Speaker 3: to wrestle with the same sorts of things, we call 183 00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:40,280 Speaker 3: it syncretism. 184 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:42,679 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's helpful. 185 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:49,360 Speaker 1: Actually, my framework for syncretism was a little different, but 186 00:10:49,400 --> 00:10:53,440 Speaker 1: I am with you on what you're saying. In Old 187 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:59,080 Speaker 1: Testament theology, syncretism is a very clear thing, right. We 188 00:10:59,080 --> 00:11:02,160 Speaker 1: can talk about scism in the Old Testament, for instance, 189 00:11:02,640 --> 00:11:08,199 Speaker 1: where we have Israelite practices, usually idolatrous, but not always, 190 00:11:08,960 --> 00:11:14,679 Speaker 1: there's a an intake of what is clearly stated to 191 00:11:14,679 --> 00:11:23,120 Speaker 1: be inappropriate adoption of foreign cultural practices into Israelite society, 192 00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:28,839 Speaker 1: which then creates these sort of mergers of incompatible notions 193 00:11:29,480 --> 00:11:34,080 Speaker 1: under what's broadly called Yahwism. And so I think the 194 00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:37,440 Speaker 1: difference so just as I'm hearing you talk, and we 195 00:11:37,520 --> 00:11:41,160 Speaker 1: might tease this out a little bit, when the Bible, 196 00:11:41,320 --> 00:11:44,600 Speaker 1: i mean the Bible is making it explicit, right, it's 197 00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:49,840 Speaker 1: not saying that any cultural appropriation would be problematic. Right, 198 00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:55,800 Speaker 1: it's saying that these particular ones are compromising Israelite faith 199 00:11:56,679 --> 00:11:59,480 Speaker 1: and creating a skewed understanding of who God is and 200 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:04,920 Speaker 1: how God operates within Israelite society. That's often referred to 201 00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:09,440 Speaker 1: as syncretism in Old Testament theology. But what you're talking 202 00:12:09,520 --> 00:12:11,560 Speaker 1: about I agree with. I think we have to be 203 00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:15,520 Speaker 1: very careful and recognized that we are culturally rooted and 204 00:12:15,559 --> 00:12:19,560 Speaker 1: that not every difference would count as syncretism, which is 205 00:12:19,600 --> 00:12:24,320 Speaker 1: going to have a negative and pejorative understanding of what 206 00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:28,760 Speaker 1: that actually is. Right, So when we say something is syncretistic, 207 00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:36,160 Speaker 1: we're essentially saying it's heretical. It's a soft form of heretical. Right, 208 00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:41,160 Speaker 1: You've accommodated to the culture, You've compromised, You've allowed something 209 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:45,160 Speaker 1: in that shouldn't have ever come in. As opposed to recognizing, no, 210 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:48,040 Speaker 1: that's not exactly what this is. We can't equate this 211 00:12:48,160 --> 00:12:51,440 Speaker 1: exactly to the sort of quote unquote syncretism that we 212 00:12:51,559 --> 00:12:54,600 Speaker 1: identify in scripture, which that word is never used in scripture, 213 00:12:54,640 --> 00:12:58,640 Speaker 1: by the way, either it's Old Testament theology, right, is 214 00:12:59,120 --> 00:13:04,040 Speaker 1: naming a dynamic within the Old Testament syncretism. So that's 215 00:13:04,080 --> 00:13:08,120 Speaker 1: not biblical terminology, it's Old Testament theology terminology. 216 00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:09,800 Speaker 2: But when we. 217 00:13:09,720 --> 00:13:12,240 Speaker 1: See that in the scripture, yeah, okay, we can name that. 218 00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:16,240 Speaker 1: We can see it. It's clearly an abruption, like these 219 00:13:16,280 --> 00:13:18,679 Speaker 1: are problematic things, but when we see it out in 220 00:13:18,760 --> 00:13:20,680 Speaker 1: the world, we have to be I think, more careful 221 00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:21,040 Speaker 1: with it. 222 00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:25,040 Speaker 2: You can almost argue that the fact. 223 00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:27,600 Speaker 1: That we are naming something syncretistic when we see it 224 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:31,800 Speaker 1: in another culture is a sign of our assimilation into 225 00:13:31,840 --> 00:13:37,359 Speaker 1: our own culture. In other words, the depth of ingrainment 226 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:40,280 Speaker 1: that we have in our own culture keeps us from 227 00:13:40,400 --> 00:13:45,840 Speaker 1: recognizing that this other expression by other Christians may actually 228 00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:53,720 Speaker 1: be helpful and appropriate and a necessary understanding for us 229 00:13:54,640 --> 00:13:57,480 Speaker 1: to recognize as part of what it means to have 230 00:13:57,520 --> 00:14:00,400 Speaker 1: a good Christian witness. At the very least, we should 231 00:14:00,440 --> 00:14:02,920 Speaker 1: recognize it as something that could be very good within 232 00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:07,240 Speaker 1: a given culture of that culture's witness. And so I 233 00:14:07,280 --> 00:14:11,320 Speaker 1: think that that what you're describing would point back to 234 00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:13,079 Speaker 1: an assimilation to our own. 235 00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:16,760 Speaker 2: Culture right where we've lost the script. 236 00:14:16,400 --> 00:14:19,920 Speaker 1: Of I like to think I'll give a really cultural 237 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:24,000 Speaker 1: example to illustrate this. I've kind of gotten into this 238 00:14:24,040 --> 00:14:30,120 Speaker 1: idea that it's like an operating system. There's firmware, right 239 00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:33,280 Speaker 1: that defines the logic of a given system. So any 240 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:36,720 Speaker 1: computer we purchase, or an iPad or a phone or 241 00:14:36,720 --> 00:14:40,400 Speaker 1: something like that has a basic logic to it, and 242 00:14:40,560 --> 00:14:43,760 Speaker 1: every app that we put on that, every piece of 243 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:46,280 Speaker 1: software we put on that has to be formatted to 244 00:14:46,320 --> 00:14:49,560 Speaker 1: fit that logic. So we could say that the firmware 245 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:53,080 Speaker 1: is the governing logic of this system, and everything we 246 00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:55,640 Speaker 1: put onto it has to conform to that governing logic. 247 00:14:56,840 --> 00:14:57,920 Speaker 2: And I think that part of. 248 00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:00,440 Speaker 1: What we struggle with when we're dealing with this emmolation 249 00:15:00,760 --> 00:15:04,320 Speaker 1: is recognizing that, yeah, well we may have to conform 250 00:15:04,360 --> 00:15:06,960 Speaker 1: our behavior to within a given culture. As Christians. We 251 00:15:06,960 --> 00:15:08,880 Speaker 1: see this all over the New Testament. We talked about 252 00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:13,240 Speaker 1: in other episodes, where Paul is arguing that, hey, we 253 00:15:13,320 --> 00:15:16,520 Speaker 1: can still fit within these structures, we just have to 254 00:15:16,760 --> 00:15:18,000 Speaker 1: think about them differently. 255 00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:20,560 Speaker 2: So there is that aspect. 256 00:15:20,600 --> 00:15:24,040 Speaker 1: But I think when the governing firm where starts to 257 00:15:24,080 --> 00:15:27,920 Speaker 1: skew the way we even think about things, that's where 258 00:15:28,600 --> 00:15:31,880 Speaker 1: there's a baseline assimilation that starts to happen. I don't 259 00:15:31,880 --> 00:15:34,520 Speaker 1: know if that makes sense, but throw it out there. 260 00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:38,920 Speaker 3: It does. And so it leads to I have I 261 00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:44,760 Speaker 3: should be clear and say my concern with the conversations 262 00:15:44,760 --> 00:15:47,200 Speaker 3: that I often hear on syncretism doesn't mean that I 263 00:15:47,240 --> 00:15:53,600 Speaker 3: don't that I think everything goes right, right. I want 264 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:55,160 Speaker 3: to tease out the Old Testament stuff. 265 00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:58,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, go for it, because I think that. 266 00:15:58,400 --> 00:16:03,360 Speaker 3: Actually helps us understand the sorts of dynamics we're working 267 00:16:03,400 --> 00:16:07,400 Speaker 3: with here. You're the Old Testament scholar, correct me where 268 00:16:07,440 --> 00:16:10,880 Speaker 3: I go wrong. But I want to put them in 269 00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:14,600 Speaker 3: tension with Acts chapter two, right where in Acts chapter two, 270 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:18,320 Speaker 3: the disciples receive the power of the Spirit coming into 271 00:16:18,360 --> 00:16:22,160 Speaker 3: them and they start to speak, and people marvel specifically 272 00:16:22,160 --> 00:16:26,800 Speaker 3: that at this point it's Jews from diaspora who've come 273 00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:31,480 Speaker 3: back to Jerusalem. Yes, and so they've come back. Now 274 00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:34,160 Speaker 3: they're hearing the message of Jesus being proclayed to them 275 00:16:34,160 --> 00:16:35,120 Speaker 3: in their own tongue. 276 00:16:35,840 --> 00:16:37,800 Speaker 2: Yeah. 277 00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:40,920 Speaker 3: And I think that that's a significant claim, right, especially 278 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 3: to the degree that languages contain the boundaries, the ways 279 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:49,720 Speaker 3: of thinking, the localities. Right, So some things are just 280 00:16:49,800 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 3: lost in translation. But I hear people say chai tea, 281 00:16:53,120 --> 00:16:56,160 Speaker 3: I get irritated because chai means tea. But I also 282 00:16:56,320 --> 00:17:00,600 Speaker 3: get it because what an Indian person means by is 283 00:17:00,640 --> 00:17:04,040 Speaker 3: not precisely what a British person would mean. 284 00:17:03,920 --> 00:17:05,480 Speaker 4: By tea right in America. 285 00:17:05,560 --> 00:17:07,879 Speaker 3: So that's such that I've been in a situation where 286 00:17:08,600 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 3: someone offered me chai and I said yes, and I 287 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:14,560 Speaker 3: got a little thing with a green tea tea bag 288 00:17:14,640 --> 00:17:17,360 Speaker 3: and hot water. Like, what the heck is this? 289 00:17:17,359 --> 00:17:18,520 Speaker 4: This isn't what I signed up. 290 00:17:18,440 --> 00:17:21,199 Speaker 2: For language for this, This isn't right. That's right. 291 00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:24,439 Speaker 3: So I get the tension in that moment, right that 292 00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:27,320 Speaker 3: to say chai tea is redundant. But I get also 293 00:17:27,359 --> 00:17:31,159 Speaker 3: that when people say chai tea there, yeah, you know, 294 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:34,399 Speaker 3: there's layers going on. Yeah, they're saying they're referring to 295 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:36,640 Speaker 3: something different than the bag of green tea and hot water. 296 00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 3: But I also get that when people say chai t 297 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:41,600 Speaker 3: they're probably referring to something from Starbucks. 298 00:17:41,080 --> 00:17:42,040 Speaker 4: That is not chai. 299 00:17:42,800 --> 00:17:46,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, so there's there's at least three things 300 00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:49,360 Speaker 3: going on. Yeah, languages do. 301 00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:50,720 Speaker 4: That to it this That's what I'm trying to say. 302 00:17:51,160 --> 00:17:53,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, And the fact that you have acted chapter two 303 00:17:54,080 --> 00:17:56,159 Speaker 3: making that distinct point about language, I take it to 304 00:17:56,240 --> 00:18:01,200 Speaker 3: mean that no one language gets to declare that central normativity, 305 00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:04,720 Speaker 3: which means no set of categories gets declare one set 306 00:18:04,760 --> 00:18:09,520 Speaker 3: of central normativity to accessing Jesus. And sure enough the 307 00:18:09,520 --> 00:18:12,160 Speaker 3: rest of Acts is about not just to the Jew 308 00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:14,480 Speaker 3: but to the gentile, and the gentile not a second 309 00:18:14,480 --> 00:18:16,919 Speaker 3: class citizen. But what was far drawing near right? So 310 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:21,879 Speaker 3: Acts fifteen in some ways the climax there. So I 311 00:18:21,920 --> 00:18:24,320 Speaker 3: say that to now put that intention with the Old Testament, 312 00:18:24,359 --> 00:18:26,880 Speaker 3: that it seems to me that when we have this 313 00:18:27,000 --> 00:18:29,600 Speaker 3: thing that Old Testament scholars will call syncretism. In the 314 00:18:29,640 --> 00:18:34,320 Speaker 3: Old Testament, what's at stake there is Yahweh worship. Yes, always, 315 00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:38,480 Speaker 3: so the syncretism of bringing Yeah, so the syncretism of 316 00:18:40,720 --> 00:18:46,080 Speaker 3: capitulating to Canaanite ways is not capitulating to some other groups' 317 00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:51,560 Speaker 3: ways of making chy or cooking rotti or bread or 318 00:18:51,560 --> 00:18:52,320 Speaker 3: something like that. 319 00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:53,240 Speaker 2: Right, correct. 320 00:18:54,040 --> 00:19:00,159 Speaker 3: The issue here is the centering of life around the 321 00:19:00,160 --> 00:19:02,120 Speaker 3: appeasing and worship of some. 322 00:19:02,200 --> 00:19:03,840 Speaker 4: God who is not Yahweh. 323 00:19:03,880 --> 00:19:04,360 Speaker 2: That's right. 324 00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:09,240 Speaker 4: That absolutely is a concern. 325 00:19:09,560 --> 00:19:13,560 Speaker 3: Right, And if the concern here is a detraction from 326 00:19:13,960 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 3: as we understand Yahweh as the triune God revealed in 327 00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:20,199 Speaker 3: the person of Jesus and administered to us by the 328 00:19:20,200 --> 00:19:22,160 Speaker 3: breathing out of his very own breath, as we see 329 00:19:22,160 --> 00:19:26,360 Speaker 3: at the end of John Yep, the Holy Spirit. Right, 330 00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:32,720 Speaker 3: if that is undermined in speaking in a different tongue, 331 00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:35,439 Speaker 3: then the issue here isn't that we've entered a different 332 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:37,520 Speaker 3: tongue with another set of categories. The issue here is 333 00:19:37,520 --> 00:19:41,160 Speaker 3: we're no longer talking about the God of Abraham, Isaac 334 00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:44,440 Speaker 3: and Jacob. That's right, the God revealed in the person 335 00:19:44,440 --> 00:19:45,240 Speaker 3: of Jesus Christ. 336 00:19:45,800 --> 00:19:49,080 Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, I agree, and that's a problem. Yeah. 337 00:19:49,119 --> 00:19:51,879 Speaker 3: But if the issue here is that you've begun to 338 00:19:52,000 --> 00:19:54,960 Speaker 3: use categories that don't align with the long tried and 339 00:19:55,040 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 3: true versions of speaking essentialism. 340 00:19:57,840 --> 00:20:01,840 Speaker 2: Right, totally dif, then we got there. Yeah. Right. 341 00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:04,959 Speaker 3: So one of the ways in which I've seen this 342 00:20:05,080 --> 00:20:10,000 Speaker 3: is as an Indian who is a Christian, I have 343 00:20:10,280 --> 00:20:16,600 Speaker 3: long felt that there's a challenge to be given, and 344 00:20:16,640 --> 00:20:20,760 Speaker 3: that challenge is that because of the way that modern Christianity. 345 00:20:20,840 --> 00:20:23,359 Speaker 3: So there's an older tradition of Christianity in India, there's a 346 00:20:23,400 --> 00:20:25,760 Speaker 3: modern tradition of Christianity. The way the modern Christianity came 347 00:20:25,800 --> 00:20:32,120 Speaker 3: to India was through British colonialism. Sure, merchant and soldier 348 00:20:32,160 --> 00:20:35,680 Speaker 3: and missionary were working in tandem in a shared sort 349 00:20:35,720 --> 00:20:40,159 Speaker 3: of project, such that those who embrace Jesus through the 350 00:20:40,200 --> 00:20:45,520 Speaker 3: modern missionaries to India, I can affirm in this Philippians, 351 00:20:45,520 --> 00:20:47,520 Speaker 3: one kind of way of the Gospel was preached, and 352 00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:51,160 Speaker 3: I take joy in that, but I also am saddened 353 00:20:51,160 --> 00:20:53,840 Speaker 3: by the fact that part of that project was we 354 00:20:53,920 --> 00:20:55,439 Speaker 3: need to break being. 355 00:20:55,359 --> 00:20:56,119 Speaker 4: Indian out of you. 356 00:20:57,000 --> 00:20:58,320 Speaker 2: Yes, right. 357 00:20:58,480 --> 00:21:01,840 Speaker 3: So unfortunately that that version of the Church that comes 358 00:21:01,840 --> 00:21:06,680 Speaker 3: from the modern missionary movement in India rightfully so gets accused, 359 00:21:06,720 --> 00:21:12,960 Speaker 3: I think by other Indians as rejecting being Indian. And 360 00:21:13,040 --> 00:21:14,840 Speaker 3: it seems to me that the logic of Acts two 361 00:21:14,960 --> 00:21:19,440 Speaker 3: and following is that no Indian is capable not only 362 00:21:19,440 --> 00:21:24,040 Speaker 3: of bearing the presence of Christ, but ritually embracing, rather 363 00:21:24,080 --> 00:21:26,920 Speaker 3: than being a secondary category. So with that in mind, 364 00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:29,320 Speaker 3: it's been very important to me over the years, and 365 00:21:29,359 --> 00:21:34,680 Speaker 3: I've written essays in the past on this, on how 366 00:21:34,720 --> 00:21:38,520 Speaker 3: the Valley, which is in some ways, especially in northern India, 367 00:21:39,560 --> 00:21:43,199 Speaker 3: but two larger Hindu India, kind of Christmas it is 368 00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:45,399 Speaker 3: the chief There's tons of holidays, but it's kind of 369 00:21:45,400 --> 00:21:47,800 Speaker 3: the chief holiday. 370 00:21:48,680 --> 00:21:53,320 Speaker 4: And the basic premise of the Valley is that. 371 00:21:55,280 --> 00:21:59,160 Speaker 3: The God ram entered into the kingdom of Rabin, who's 372 00:21:59,760 --> 00:22:04,560 Speaker 3: a a demon god, to rescue his bride who'd been kidnapped, 373 00:22:05,320 --> 00:22:08,760 Speaker 3: to liberate her, set her free. And the tagline of 374 00:22:08,760 --> 00:22:10,480 Speaker 3: it is light overcomes darkness. 375 00:22:11,720 --> 00:22:13,200 Speaker 4: Now, if we strip away and. 376 00:22:13,160 --> 00:22:16,080 Speaker 3: We strip away it ob and these names, right, it 377 00:22:16,160 --> 00:22:19,080 Speaker 3: sounds very very Christian, to be honest. 378 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:20,960 Speaker 2: You get a lot of resonances. Yeah, that's right. 379 00:22:21,040 --> 00:22:23,440 Speaker 3: Yeah, And so my writing has been to the effect of, 380 00:22:24,040 --> 00:22:28,800 Speaker 3: you know, can Indian Christians embrace the valley, which on 381 00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:31,840 Speaker 3: the surface might sound like how dare they? That sounds 382 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:33,760 Speaker 3: like the same secretism you just said in the Old 383 00:22:33,800 --> 00:22:36,879 Speaker 3: Testament is not allowed, right, the portrayal of yahweh worship 384 00:22:36,920 --> 00:22:40,000 Speaker 3: for someone else worship. But my parallel here is to 385 00:22:40,040 --> 00:22:45,480 Speaker 3: think about Christmas December twenty fifth. Yeah, how did we 386 00:22:45,520 --> 00:22:47,560 Speaker 3: get there? We didn't get there from the Bible, there's 387 00:22:47,560 --> 00:22:50,080 Speaker 3: no date. We didn't get there from the snow. I 388 00:22:50,240 --> 00:22:54,080 Speaker 3: don't get the sense in the Middle East that there's 389 00:22:54,200 --> 00:23:01,960 Speaker 3: very much snow. We got there because Christianity really seemed 390 00:23:01,960 --> 00:23:03,879 Speaker 3: to take root in the Greco Roman world, and in 391 00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:06,880 Speaker 3: that Greco Roman world, especially under the Latin influence of Rome, 392 00:23:07,359 --> 00:23:10,959 Speaker 3: had this holiday called Saturnalia. On December twenty fifth, then 393 00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:15,160 Speaker 3: among other things, Saturn, who's God, the father of the gods. Right, 394 00:23:15,280 --> 00:23:19,000 Speaker 3: Jupiter is the high god, Saturn is the father of him. Yep, oh, 395 00:23:19,040 --> 00:23:21,200 Speaker 3: that sounds like it has some resonance, right, the father 396 00:23:22,240 --> 00:23:28,440 Speaker 3: and Saturn. Parents would give their children gifts on Saturnalia 397 00:23:28,640 --> 00:23:33,080 Speaker 3: as a bestower of the parent, Saturn bestowing his gifts. 398 00:23:33,760 --> 00:23:33,960 Speaker 4: Right. 399 00:23:34,560 --> 00:23:37,159 Speaker 3: And Christians saw this and they said, hey, God, the 400 00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:39,800 Speaker 3: Father gave us the ultimate gift in the person of Jesus. Right, 401 00:23:39,840 --> 00:23:42,639 Speaker 3: I'm truncating this, right, but you can see within this 402 00:23:42,840 --> 00:23:46,760 Speaker 3: how Christmas became December twenty fifth. 403 00:23:48,359 --> 00:23:48,639 Speaker 2: Yeah. 404 00:23:48,680 --> 00:23:51,480 Speaker 3: And I, by the way, I think that's a beautiful 405 00:23:51,560 --> 00:23:57,200 Speaker 3: move that Greco Roman Christians, especially Roman Christians, made to say, hey, 406 00:23:57,240 --> 00:23:59,560 Speaker 3: we can celebrate on the same day and we can 407 00:23:59,600 --> 00:24:00,159 Speaker 3: testify to. 408 00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:00,800 Speaker 4: Jesus on it. 409 00:24:01,160 --> 00:24:02,680 Speaker 3: And I've tried to use that as a parallel to say, 410 00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:04,199 Speaker 3: can we do that same sort of thing with light 411 00:24:04,440 --> 00:24:10,760 Speaker 3: overcoming darkness in the voley? Yeah, to me, that's not syncretism. 412 00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:13,359 Speaker 3: That's an attempt to continue the mission of the Book 413 00:24:13,359 --> 00:24:14,640 Speaker 3: of Acts. 414 00:24:14,960 --> 00:24:18,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think so that would square with what's 415 00:24:18,600 --> 00:24:21,560 Speaker 1: often referred to as syncretism in Old Testament theology, because 416 00:24:21,600 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 1: what you end up having is not so we could 417 00:24:25,840 --> 00:24:29,240 Speaker 1: easily just call it idolatry in the Old Testament. But 418 00:24:29,320 --> 00:24:32,200 Speaker 1: the reason I think it gets the nuance of signatism 419 00:24:32,640 --> 00:24:35,840 Speaker 1: often in the literature is that it's not a straight 420 00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:41,879 Speaker 1: trading of Yahweh with another god. You don't just reject 421 00:24:41,960 --> 00:24:45,239 Speaker 1: Yahweh and then pull another god in. What ends up 422 00:24:45,280 --> 00:24:49,240 Speaker 1: happening is the sole allegiance that you're to have to 423 00:24:49,359 --> 00:24:52,480 Speaker 1: the Lord to give him all you are and have right. 424 00:24:52,520 --> 00:24:54,879 Speaker 1: This is Deuteronomy six four and five. Right, give the 425 00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:57,840 Speaker 1: Lord all you are and have right. The short way 426 00:24:57,880 --> 00:25:01,040 Speaker 1: of saying all that, and so happens in the Old 427 00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:07,480 Speaker 1: Testament is you say, well, Yahweh is great for agriculture, right, 428 00:25:07,560 --> 00:25:11,520 Speaker 1: but I need something for war, right, And so I'm 429 00:25:11,560 --> 00:25:14,679 Speaker 1: going to pull in bail for war, or I'm going 430 00:25:14,720 --> 00:25:15,200 Speaker 1: to pull. 431 00:25:15,040 --> 00:25:17,720 Speaker 2: In you know, some other god for war. And you know, 432 00:25:17,840 --> 00:25:19,480 Speaker 2: God is great for you know. 433 00:25:19,400 --> 00:25:23,600 Speaker 1: The big stuff, but these household gods they really handle 434 00:25:23,720 --> 00:25:26,560 Speaker 1: the tedium of the day, right, And so I'm going 435 00:25:26,600 --> 00:25:28,960 Speaker 1: to pull those in. And what ends up happening is 436 00:25:29,040 --> 00:25:33,359 Speaker 1: you have not a wholesale rejection of Yahweh, but a 437 00:25:33,440 --> 00:25:37,800 Speaker 1: limiting of him, And what I usually argue is it's 438 00:25:37,840 --> 00:25:44,840 Speaker 1: a distortion that ultimately results in a denial. So distorting 439 00:25:45,040 --> 00:25:49,760 Speaker 1: Yahweh and making it seem as though he is either 440 00:25:49,840 --> 00:25:56,600 Speaker 1: incapable of or irrelevant to certain aspects of society is 441 00:25:56,720 --> 00:26:00,639 Speaker 1: ultimately a denial of who he is. That to me 442 00:26:01,160 --> 00:26:06,600 Speaker 1: is the best way to shorthand explain what is usually 443 00:26:06,640 --> 00:26:11,640 Speaker 1: meant by syncretism. It's a practice that sort of brackets 444 00:26:11,720 --> 00:26:14,000 Speaker 1: Yahweh to the side. And so what we have then 445 00:26:14,640 --> 00:26:19,040 Speaker 1: in your example, what you're saying is no de vali Christmas. 446 00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:20,440 Speaker 2: These things are. 447 00:26:22,280 --> 00:26:26,640 Speaker 1: The term I've been using lately, relocated, so you move 448 00:26:26,720 --> 00:26:31,080 Speaker 1: them from one sacred social order into another. So now 449 00:26:31,240 --> 00:26:37,520 Speaker 1: Devali really falls under the story of Christ and his church. Well, 450 00:26:37,520 --> 00:26:42,840 Speaker 1: that's not syncretism, that's a wholesale move over, right, And 451 00:26:42,880 --> 00:26:46,880 Speaker 1: so now it's sitting under something different, it's sitting under 452 00:26:46,880 --> 00:26:49,639 Speaker 1: the authority of Christ. It's been reshaped. You can make 453 00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:51,920 Speaker 1: the same sake case. I think your example of Christmas 454 00:26:51,960 --> 00:26:54,840 Speaker 1: is right on, and so what we have is not 455 00:26:56,280 --> 00:27:02,240 Speaker 1: an assimilation to right different culture. I'm going to be 456 00:27:02,320 --> 00:27:04,919 Speaker 1: a Christian, but I'm going to continue to worship Devali 457 00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:07,239 Speaker 1: over here and that's going to be fine, because it's 458 00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:08,400 Speaker 1: really just part of my culture. 459 00:27:09,720 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 2: Right. 460 00:27:10,280 --> 00:27:12,639 Speaker 1: There's a difference in saying that, I think, than what 461 00:27:12,720 --> 00:27:15,959 Speaker 1: you're saying, which is, no, I'm not going to celebrate 462 00:27:16,000 --> 00:27:17,600 Speaker 1: d VALEI because it's part of my culture. I'm going 463 00:27:17,640 --> 00:27:20,399 Speaker 1: to celebrate it with a renewed understanding of it because 464 00:27:20,400 --> 00:27:23,399 Speaker 1: I've moved it over underneath the authority of Christ and 465 00:27:23,440 --> 00:27:26,760 Speaker 1: I'm rethinking the whole thing. I'm going to assimilate it 466 00:27:27,440 --> 00:27:31,040 Speaker 1: under my faith as opposed to allowing myself to be 467 00:27:31,080 --> 00:27:35,640 Speaker 1: assimilated to it. I think there's a subtle move there 468 00:27:35,760 --> 00:27:39,920 Speaker 1: that's really crucial. And that Old Testament, like I said, 469 00:27:39,960 --> 00:27:43,480 Speaker 1: what gets assimilated at or we gets understood as syncretism. 470 00:27:43,520 --> 00:27:44,520 Speaker 2: The Old Testament is. 471 00:27:44,480 --> 00:27:49,200 Speaker 1: Largely that it's Yahweh is not in charge of everything. 472 00:27:50,359 --> 00:27:53,920 Speaker 1: Yahweh is only in charge of certain things. And once 473 00:27:53,960 --> 00:27:58,400 Speaker 1: you make that move functionally, you have denied who Yahweh 474 00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:03,040 Speaker 1: actually is, and in a very important way, especially in 475 00:28:03,080 --> 00:28:03,800 Speaker 1: ancient Israel. 476 00:28:03,840 --> 00:28:05,399 Speaker 2: But I would argue for the Church as well. 477 00:28:06,840 --> 00:28:09,880 Speaker 1: And so there isn't a there is a cultural condition 478 00:28:10,040 --> 00:28:12,920 Speaker 1: that I think has to happen, But sometimes we get 479 00:28:12,920 --> 00:28:15,760 Speaker 1: the impression I think that like we read the Book 480 00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:18,240 Speaker 1: of Daniel and we say, well, if we eat the 481 00:28:18,359 --> 00:28:21,879 Speaker 1: king's food, we're going to defile ourselves, and so we 482 00:28:22,040 --> 00:28:28,520 Speaker 1: have to remain apart from whatever culture we're in. That 483 00:28:28,600 --> 00:28:34,480 Speaker 1: isn't exactly it, right, Daniel is not refusing the king's 484 00:28:34,480 --> 00:28:34,960 Speaker 1: food to. 485 00:28:34,960 --> 00:28:36,800 Speaker 2: Avoid cultural appropriation. 486 00:28:36,920 --> 00:28:39,760 Speaker 1: I mean, he becomes an expert in Babylonian culture and 487 00:28:39,840 --> 00:28:43,240 Speaker 1: learning and understanding. It's difficult to believe that doesn't leave 488 00:28:43,280 --> 00:28:46,080 Speaker 1: some sort of an imprint on him, right, But he's 489 00:28:46,120 --> 00:28:50,680 Speaker 1: also preserving a deeply rooted we would probably call it 490 00:28:50,720 --> 00:28:54,520 Speaker 1: identity of some sort and commitment to the Lord by 491 00:28:54,720 --> 00:28:58,800 Speaker 1: refusing the king's food, right, by not becoming overly dependent 492 00:28:58,840 --> 00:29:02,960 Speaker 1: on the king. I think the practice is largely intended 493 00:29:02,960 --> 00:29:06,560 Speaker 1: to remind he and his friends that God is still 494 00:29:06,600 --> 00:29:10,720 Speaker 1: caring for them, you know, And all the other episodes 495 00:29:10,720 --> 00:29:13,280 Speaker 1: in Daniel, I think take on a similar flavor. They're 496 00:29:13,320 --> 00:29:15,680 Speaker 1: going to learn these things about Babylon, They're going to 497 00:29:15,680 --> 00:29:17,520 Speaker 1: become experts in the culture. They're going to become the 498 00:29:17,560 --> 00:29:23,680 Speaker 1: wise people of Babylonian society, not because they've refused Babylonian understandings, 499 00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:33,120 Speaker 1: but because they've retained their yahism while learning the Babylonian culture, 500 00:29:33,160 --> 00:29:37,440 Speaker 1: the Babylonian whatever, and so this makes them very unique, 501 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:43,920 Speaker 1: powerful individuals in that culture because they can now be 502 00:29:44,040 --> 00:29:47,880 Speaker 1: bridges into it. They can learn the new language, but 503 00:29:47,920 --> 00:29:51,240 Speaker 1: they understand in a very different way. That's how I 504 00:29:51,320 --> 00:29:54,280 Speaker 1: kind of read that aspect of it. Does that sort 505 00:29:54,320 --> 00:29:56,600 Speaker 1: of give you a sense of does that align with 506 00:29:56,640 --> 00:29:58,640 Speaker 1: what you're saying it? 507 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:02,000 Speaker 3: Does the the language that I like to use is transfigured. 508 00:30:03,080 --> 00:30:04,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, you've used that before. I like that a lot. 509 00:30:05,080 --> 00:30:08,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, So the idea I mean, if you think about 510 00:30:09,320 --> 00:30:16,000 Speaker 3: the Hebrew scriptures, yep. The way in which Yahweh is 511 00:30:16,040 --> 00:30:20,440 Speaker 3: depicted in the Hebrew Scriptures is certainly distinct from the 512 00:30:20,480 --> 00:30:24,080 Speaker 3: way that say, bal would be by the Canaanites, right, 513 00:30:24,920 --> 00:30:26,840 Speaker 3: or the gods of Egypt or the gods of Babylon. 514 00:30:28,000 --> 00:30:30,720 Speaker 3: But there's something remarkably similar. And what I mean by 515 00:30:30,720 --> 00:30:35,640 Speaker 3: that is that the mannerisms, the customs, the traditions, the 516 00:30:35,720 --> 00:30:38,680 Speaker 3: sorts of things being addressed seem deliberate. 517 00:30:39,120 --> 00:30:39,280 Speaker 2: Right. 518 00:30:39,480 --> 00:30:41,800 Speaker 3: Yeah, It's set up in a and we could call 519 00:30:41,840 --> 00:30:46,200 Speaker 3: it a cultural key, so that those who are among 520 00:30:46,440 --> 00:30:49,040 Speaker 3: the Canaanites and those who are among the Babylonians and 521 00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:53,600 Speaker 3: the Persians and the Egyptians. They're not seeing in yahweh 522 00:30:53,720 --> 00:30:57,520 Speaker 3: something so utterly foreign and distinct that it's category problems. Right. 523 00:30:57,560 --> 00:30:59,280 Speaker 3: This isn't like the person who grows up at the 524 00:30:59,280 --> 00:31:03,040 Speaker 3: equator internet suddenly transported to the Arctic saying what is 525 00:31:03,080 --> 00:31:04,440 Speaker 3: this right? 526 00:31:04,800 --> 00:31:05,840 Speaker 2: Right? Right? 527 00:31:06,120 --> 00:31:09,280 Speaker 3: Or vice versa someone who grows up there and whatever 528 00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:16,080 Speaker 3: they encountered the equator. This is distinction through proximity. Is 529 00:31:16,720 --> 00:31:18,840 Speaker 3: there's something oddly similar. 530 00:31:18,400 --> 00:31:20,680 Speaker 4: And yet radically different. 531 00:31:21,240 --> 00:31:21,440 Speaker 2: Yep. 532 00:31:21,880 --> 00:31:26,520 Speaker 3: And that's how honestly, that's how difference makes the most sense. 533 00:31:26,640 --> 00:31:29,240 Speaker 3: If it's so radically different, it doesn't it's not threatening. 534 00:31:29,760 --> 00:31:30,920 Speaker 4: Right. 535 00:31:32,080 --> 00:31:35,480 Speaker 3: When the European colonizers came to what we thought we 536 00:31:35,640 --> 00:31:38,160 Speaker 3: began to think of as the Americas, a lot of 537 00:31:38,160 --> 00:31:42,360 Speaker 3: them were initially embraced by these First Nations peoples. And 538 00:31:42,400 --> 00:31:45,040 Speaker 3: I would argue that it's partially because they were so different. 539 00:31:45,920 --> 00:31:47,960 Speaker 3: A lot of the First Nations peoples would have greater 540 00:31:48,160 --> 00:31:52,080 Speaker 3: senses of trepidation towards other groups of First Nations peoples. Right, 541 00:31:52,160 --> 00:31:57,000 Speaker 3: you think about the dam and the Apache. Sure they 542 00:31:57,000 --> 00:31:59,120 Speaker 3: actually had a different name for themselves. It's escaping me 543 00:31:59,160 --> 00:32:03,720 Speaker 3: at the moment, But they were not friends in a 544 00:32:03,720 --> 00:32:05,760 Speaker 3: way in which they were both in different sorts of ways, 545 00:32:05,800 --> 00:32:09,760 Speaker 3: willing to make partnerships with the expanding Americans not coming west, 546 00:32:10,720 --> 00:32:12,800 Speaker 3: And part of that was because of such radical difference, 547 00:32:12,840 --> 00:32:14,080 Speaker 3: there was no sense of threat. 548 00:32:14,800 --> 00:32:16,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, but it's the. 549 00:32:16,160 --> 00:32:19,720 Speaker 3: Similarity in which you see, oh yahweh is not one 550 00:32:19,720 --> 00:32:23,000 Speaker 3: of these, right, that the distinction is made. And I 551 00:32:23,000 --> 00:32:25,200 Speaker 3: think part of that is just simply for human reasons. 552 00:32:25,720 --> 00:32:30,160 Speaker 3: What does it mean to eat the idea of an apple? 553 00:32:31,160 --> 00:32:32,880 Speaker 3: Not only do I even know what the idea of 554 00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:35,880 Speaker 3: an apple is apart from what I experience, right, either 555 00:32:35,920 --> 00:32:41,320 Speaker 3: as that big, juicy, round, perfectly perfectly round, waxy thing, 556 00:32:41,520 --> 00:32:44,440 Speaker 3: or as this small, not as juicy, not so symmetrical 557 00:32:44,560 --> 00:32:47,400 Speaker 3: or waxy thing. Not only do I not know a 558 00:32:47,440 --> 00:32:49,880 Speaker 3: apple apart from what I experience in day to day life. 559 00:32:49,920 --> 00:32:55,240 Speaker 3: And we could go about that with everything. I don't 560 00:32:55,240 --> 00:33:01,080 Speaker 3: even know within that environment what it would taste like. 561 00:33:02,840 --> 00:33:05,040 Speaker 3: It's one of those apples more ideal than the other. 562 00:33:05,080 --> 00:33:11,120 Speaker 3: I don't know, Like sure, I guess, yeah. Like My 563 00:33:11,200 --> 00:33:14,240 Speaker 3: point here is that the categories that the Revelation to 564 00:33:14,320 --> 00:33:18,080 Speaker 3: the Hebrews had to make sense, something so radically different 565 00:33:18,120 --> 00:33:20,400 Speaker 3: that it didn't make cultural sense would have been so 566 00:33:20,520 --> 00:33:25,200 Speaker 3: radically different, that there's no basis for understanding, which is 567 00:33:25,240 --> 00:33:28,479 Speaker 3: all to say again that the Hebrew texts are working 568 00:33:28,560 --> 00:33:32,760 Speaker 3: precisely within a cultural bubble, let's call it. And it's 569 00:33:32,760 --> 00:33:36,120 Speaker 3: a challenge because it's in that cultural bubble, not in 570 00:33:36,160 --> 00:33:39,120 Speaker 3: spite of it, so that when you now begin to 571 00:33:39,160 --> 00:33:42,280 Speaker 3: think about the moving of the text and the Gospel 572 00:33:42,360 --> 00:33:46,800 Speaker 3: into other spheres, it's got to make sense within that, 573 00:33:47,080 --> 00:33:49,480 Speaker 3: and to call one purer than the other just on 574 00:33:49,520 --> 00:33:52,600 Speaker 3: the basis of the culture, that's a part of I 575 00:33:52,640 --> 00:33:55,040 Speaker 3: think misses the thrust of the Book of Acts, and 576 00:33:55,080 --> 00:33:59,160 Speaker 3: I think it if forecloses on the richness of what 577 00:33:59,440 --> 00:34:02,960 Speaker 3: the old US narratives are trying to do within those environments. Right, 578 00:34:04,880 --> 00:34:07,640 Speaker 3: Why these rules that say you can't eat food that 579 00:34:07,760 --> 00:34:11,720 Speaker 3: comes from animals with cleft feet like in and of itself? 580 00:34:11,800 --> 00:34:14,120 Speaker 3: I think that the rest of the Old Testament and 581 00:34:14,160 --> 00:34:17,359 Speaker 3: the New Testament make it clear that doesn't really mean anything, right, 582 00:34:17,960 --> 00:34:20,200 Speaker 3: but it certainly meant something to them because they lived 583 00:34:20,200 --> 00:34:22,240 Speaker 3: in an environment where these were the sorts of rules 584 00:34:22,280 --> 00:34:26,879 Speaker 3: around them, and Yahweh worship was now distinguishing itself within that. 585 00:34:27,360 --> 00:34:28,160 Speaker 4: Does that make sense? 586 00:34:28,680 --> 00:34:29,080 Speaker 2: It does? 587 00:34:29,160 --> 00:34:33,080 Speaker 1: So let me try to rephrase a little bit, and 588 00:34:33,120 --> 00:34:35,880 Speaker 1: I'll use the Old Testament studies arena to do this. 589 00:34:36,080 --> 00:34:39,440 Speaker 1: But there's been this sort of myth for a really 590 00:34:39,480 --> 00:34:43,040 Speaker 1: long time now that Old Testament law is let's say, 591 00:34:43,080 --> 00:34:47,040 Speaker 1: more just than any other ancient Near Eastern law. That 592 00:34:47,600 --> 00:34:50,520 Speaker 1: you see more mercy in the Old Testament law than 593 00:34:50,560 --> 00:34:53,200 Speaker 1: you do in the ancient Near Eastern law. But as 594 00:34:53,239 --> 00:34:56,400 Speaker 1: we've studied ancient Eary Eastern law codes outside of Israel, 595 00:34:56,440 --> 00:34:58,719 Speaker 1: outside of what we find in the Old Testament, that 596 00:34:58,800 --> 00:35:03,120 Speaker 1: really doesn't bear itself out. It's arguable that ancient Your 597 00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:07,040 Speaker 1: Eastern law codes were in certain instances more merciful than 598 00:35:07,080 --> 00:35:10,040 Speaker 1: what we find in the Old Testament. So even when 599 00:35:10,080 --> 00:35:13,680 Speaker 1: we have analogs, let's say, of different laws like how 600 00:35:13,719 --> 00:35:17,120 Speaker 1: long you could keep a slave, or what a basic 601 00:35:17,200 --> 00:35:20,800 Speaker 1: punishment might be, or something like that, many times the 602 00:35:20,840 --> 00:35:24,560 Speaker 1: ancient Near Eastern law codes are more favorable. 603 00:35:25,800 --> 00:35:27,319 Speaker 2: Than the Old Testament is. 604 00:35:28,280 --> 00:35:32,319 Speaker 1: So what's the difference, Well, what I would say is 605 00:35:32,360 --> 00:35:35,560 Speaker 1: I go to Deuteronomy for I think we've we've leaned on, 606 00:35:35,719 --> 00:35:38,560 Speaker 1: we've wanted, we've wanted somehow the Old Testament to be 607 00:35:38,640 --> 00:35:41,799 Speaker 1: quote unquote better than the ancient Near Eastern law. 608 00:35:41,840 --> 00:35:42,560 Speaker 2: Codes right. 609 00:35:42,600 --> 00:35:45,400 Speaker 1: We want to we want to advance a narrative that says, look, 610 00:35:45,440 --> 00:35:49,640 Speaker 1: these people were immoral, right, they only caught the law 611 00:35:49,680 --> 00:35:53,960 Speaker 1: in partial ways, right, and so they're worse off than 612 00:35:53,960 --> 00:35:56,879 Speaker 1: the Israelites were. That's not exactly the way I think 613 00:35:57,000 --> 00:35:58,560 Speaker 1: that's appropriate to frame it. 614 00:36:00,080 --> 00:36:00,360 Speaker 2: Before. 615 00:36:00,440 --> 00:36:04,560 Speaker 1: What we see is the Israelites are practicing the law. 616 00:36:04,600 --> 00:36:07,120 Speaker 1: They're obeying the law that God has given them. And 617 00:36:07,160 --> 00:36:09,760 Speaker 1: the nations look in at the Israelites and they say, 618 00:36:10,160 --> 00:36:14,600 Speaker 1: what other nation has a God so near they that 619 00:36:14,680 --> 00:36:20,319 Speaker 1: he gave them this law? And the implicit answer is none. 620 00:36:20,440 --> 00:36:24,080 Speaker 1: And so for Israel, the distinctive feature was not that 621 00:36:24,120 --> 00:36:28,080 Speaker 1: their law was so different than everybody else's. The distinctive 622 00:36:28,120 --> 00:36:32,480 Speaker 1: feature was God in their midst. And so you have 623 00:36:32,600 --> 00:36:35,359 Speaker 1: this sort of to underscore your point, there's a deep 624 00:36:35,400 --> 00:36:40,640 Speaker 1: similarity that they can see, and the core difference was 625 00:36:41,040 --> 00:36:44,120 Speaker 1: God in their midst, that God had come near to 626 00:36:44,160 --> 00:36:47,600 Speaker 1: give them this law, and that the dynamics of obedience 627 00:36:47,640 --> 00:36:51,360 Speaker 1: and blessing that we see often in Deuteronomy, where you 628 00:36:51,360 --> 00:36:55,719 Speaker 1: know the if Israel will obey, they're going to experience 629 00:36:55,760 --> 00:36:58,759 Speaker 1: then the blessing of God that comes with living. 630 00:36:58,520 --> 00:37:01,120 Speaker 2: Along the grain of reality. Right. 631 00:37:01,600 --> 00:37:05,439 Speaker 1: It's not a quid pro quo, but it's a as 632 00:37:05,480 --> 00:37:09,480 Speaker 1: you live into reality, you're always you're going to experience prosperity. 633 00:37:10,400 --> 00:37:16,600 Speaker 2: And so that's all deeper topic. But just everybody trusts me. 634 00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:19,040 Speaker 1: I'm not saying that if you obey you get stuff right, 635 00:37:19,120 --> 00:37:22,160 Speaker 1: not prosperity gospel there, but so I deal with that 636 00:37:22,239 --> 00:37:25,040 Speaker 1: in other places you could look and find it. But 637 00:37:25,200 --> 00:37:28,320 Speaker 1: essentially what I'm saying is just to underscore your point 638 00:37:29,400 --> 00:37:32,200 Speaker 1: that deep similarity doesn't is actually there. 639 00:37:33,600 --> 00:37:33,920 Speaker 2: It's not. 640 00:37:35,560 --> 00:37:38,000 Speaker 1: You could tell the difference because we're familiar with the literature. 641 00:37:38,400 --> 00:37:40,960 Speaker 1: But somebody who wasn't familiar with the literature, if I 642 00:37:41,040 --> 00:37:45,120 Speaker 1: laid out ancient Near Eastern laws with like Egyptian laws 643 00:37:45,400 --> 00:37:48,960 Speaker 1: with Old Testament laws, it's not easy to tell the difference. 644 00:37:49,719 --> 00:37:52,640 Speaker 1: If you lay out an ancient, you know, Near Eastern 645 00:37:52,719 --> 00:37:57,440 Speaker 1: proverb against an Old Testament proverb, it's not necessarily that different. 646 00:37:58,880 --> 00:38:02,640 Speaker 1: Like these common cons were, just that they were common conceptions. 647 00:38:02,719 --> 00:38:07,240 Speaker 1: And the distinguishing feature was really that Israel had a god, 648 00:38:07,800 --> 00:38:11,000 Speaker 1: a known God, a God who had revealed himself to them, 649 00:38:11,480 --> 00:38:14,040 Speaker 1: that was in their presence, in their midst And this 650 00:38:14,160 --> 00:38:16,640 Speaker 1: is why syncretism becomes such a problem in the Old 651 00:38:16,719 --> 00:38:20,560 Speaker 1: Testament because once you start pulling in these other gods, 652 00:38:21,600 --> 00:38:22,840 Speaker 1: right now. 653 00:38:22,680 --> 00:38:24,040 Speaker 2: There really is no difference. 654 00:38:25,840 --> 00:38:28,680 Speaker 1: There's no difference between Israel and the rest of the people. 655 00:38:29,680 --> 00:38:32,560 Speaker 1: And so I think that that gives us an understanding 656 00:38:32,600 --> 00:38:35,520 Speaker 1: not only of what was normally called syncretism, but almost 657 00:38:35,520 --> 00:38:36,920 Speaker 1: what we're getting at with assimilation. 658 00:38:38,120 --> 00:38:41,600 Speaker 2: It isn't that Greek speaking Jews and the. 659 00:38:41,520 --> 00:38:44,480 Speaker 1: New Testament couldn't really understand God that they needed to 660 00:38:44,480 --> 00:38:48,160 Speaker 1: speak Aramaic or Hebrew or whatever, right, otherwise they're just 661 00:38:48,239 --> 00:38:52,319 Speaker 1: completely lost and without hope. That's sort of ridiculous, right. 662 00:38:52,360 --> 00:38:56,080 Speaker 1: I mean, Stephen's speech in Acts seven speaks against this 663 00:38:56,200 --> 00:39:00,600 Speaker 1: as well. Right, Whereas the Pharisees and Sadducees, the religious 664 00:39:00,680 --> 00:39:02,879 Speaker 1: leaders of the day, wanted to narrow God down into 665 00:39:02,920 --> 00:39:06,960 Speaker 1: the temple and the law, Stephen narrates this whole history 666 00:39:07,000 --> 00:39:09,760 Speaker 1: of Israel where God is acting outside of the land, 667 00:39:09,920 --> 00:39:14,279 Speaker 1: apart from the Temple, and saying you're missing it. God 668 00:39:14,360 --> 00:39:17,719 Speaker 1: is not confined to these areas. You're too narrow. And 669 00:39:17,760 --> 00:39:21,239 Speaker 1: I think the point you're making is when we get 670 00:39:21,280 --> 00:39:25,799 Speaker 1: to if we're not careful, we'll get so narrow, right 671 00:39:26,960 --> 00:39:34,319 Speaker 1: that we miss all the different expressions that can be 672 00:39:34,440 --> 00:39:39,560 Speaker 1: appropriate of watching God work in the world. And so 673 00:39:39,600 --> 00:39:43,680 Speaker 1: that Greek speaking Jew isn't a lesser Jew because he's 674 00:39:43,719 --> 00:39:48,120 Speaker 1: Greek speaking. That gentile is not a lesser Christian because 675 00:39:48,600 --> 00:39:53,880 Speaker 1: they're gentile. They're expressing that faith in Christ within their culture, 676 00:39:54,000 --> 00:39:57,239 Speaker 1: and arguably most of Paul's letters are helping people work 677 00:39:57,320 --> 00:39:59,279 Speaker 1: out what it looks like to do that in their 678 00:39:59,320 --> 00:40:03,600 Speaker 1: particular moment in situation. Maybe not culture one hundred percent, 679 00:40:03,640 --> 00:40:08,040 Speaker 1: but definitely within their situation most of the time. And 680 00:40:08,120 --> 00:40:13,600 Speaker 1: so I think, Yeah, this notion of assimilation really is 681 00:40:13,640 --> 00:40:16,440 Speaker 1: to me more akin to what we find in the 682 00:40:16,440 --> 00:40:19,680 Speaker 1: Old Testament, where they're drawing other things in and giving 683 00:40:19,680 --> 00:40:27,280 Speaker 1: allegiance to something different than Yahweh. They're sort of saying, 684 00:40:27,320 --> 00:40:30,960 Speaker 1: I'll give Yahweh ninety percent of my devotion and ten 685 00:40:31,000 --> 00:40:34,040 Speaker 1: percent I'm going to spare for whatever other God I 686 00:40:34,160 --> 00:40:36,200 Speaker 1: tend to that I want to worship. 687 00:40:37,120 --> 00:40:38,280 Speaker 2: To me, that gets. 688 00:40:38,040 --> 00:40:43,040 Speaker 1: Into assimilation because we've changed something fundamental about what God 689 00:40:43,120 --> 00:40:47,919 Speaker 1: is asking us for. In denying him any aspect of 690 00:40:48,320 --> 00:40:52,680 Speaker 1: his authority over our lives, we're functionally denying the whole thing. 691 00:40:54,400 --> 00:40:56,480 Speaker 1: And that may seem like a harder line. But I 692 00:40:56,560 --> 00:40:59,600 Speaker 1: think that's sort of where assimilation starts to come in. 693 00:41:01,080 --> 00:41:03,360 Speaker 1: We start to say no, even though this doesn't align 694 00:41:03,440 --> 00:41:08,440 Speaker 1: with Scripture, it seems okay to do. Or just because 695 00:41:08,680 --> 00:41:12,080 Speaker 1: I'm now allowing something else to drive the course of 696 00:41:12,120 --> 00:41:15,680 Speaker 1: my life, it doesn't mean I'm denying the Lord. I 697 00:41:15,680 --> 00:41:20,560 Speaker 1: would argue that biblically it kind of does, right, and 698 00:41:20,640 --> 00:41:23,680 Speaker 1: so that authority structure has to be in place. And 699 00:41:23,920 --> 00:41:28,160 Speaker 1: I do think your illustration of Devali in Christmas it 700 00:41:28,239 --> 00:41:32,960 Speaker 1: does describe that dynamic. It's not I'm going to do 701 00:41:33,040 --> 00:41:34,600 Speaker 1: both of these. I'm going to be a Christian and 702 00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:39,040 Speaker 1: I'm going to celebrate Davali as is it's I'm a Christian. 703 00:41:39,680 --> 00:41:41,960 Speaker 1: But that doesn't mean I can't celebrate Davali. It just 704 00:41:42,040 --> 00:41:44,799 Speaker 1: means that Devali has to conform to what I know 705 00:41:45,000 --> 00:41:49,399 Speaker 1: of in christ That's more what I hear you. 706 00:41:49,280 --> 00:41:53,759 Speaker 3: Saying, yeah, and more than conform. I would still go 707 00:41:53,840 --> 00:41:58,399 Speaker 3: back to the language of transfigure, right, because it's it's 708 00:41:58,400 --> 00:42:00,560 Speaker 3: not as if I'm forcing it into a to which, 709 00:42:00,600 --> 00:42:06,000 Speaker 3: as I'm seeing within it echoes of something yeah that 710 00:42:06,080 --> 00:42:08,359 Speaker 3: are deeper and rich, and so to me, this gets 711 00:42:08,400 --> 00:42:13,799 Speaker 3: to the assimilation discussion, maybe from a different angle. See 712 00:42:13,800 --> 00:42:15,920 Speaker 3: if it's saying similar something similar to you or not, 713 00:42:16,320 --> 00:42:18,960 Speaker 3: let me know what you think that. I think in 714 00:42:19,000 --> 00:42:25,359 Speaker 3: some ways if syncretism is often a fear discourse, right, 715 00:42:25,400 --> 00:42:28,319 Speaker 3: we're afraid of losing what makes this thing what it is, 716 00:42:29,440 --> 00:42:30,960 Speaker 3: what makes the faith what it is, what we say 717 00:42:30,960 --> 00:42:36,040 Speaker 3: about Jesus unique assimilation is the result of that fear discourse. 718 00:42:36,040 --> 00:42:38,760 Speaker 3: So it's still part of the fear discourse where it's 719 00:42:38,800 --> 00:42:43,440 Speaker 3: because I'm afraid of assimilating. The best practice is this 720 00:42:43,600 --> 00:42:46,120 Speaker 3: tried and true thing over here that we've forgotten, is 721 00:42:46,160 --> 00:42:52,480 Speaker 3: itself an incarnate expression let's call it, or a transfigured expression? 722 00:42:53,040 --> 00:42:55,640 Speaker 2: Yep, you must. 723 00:42:55,560 --> 00:42:59,560 Speaker 3: Become more like this. So it's a stripping away of 724 00:42:59,560 --> 00:43:02,200 Speaker 3: those things that we fear could be syncretistic elements in 725 00:43:02,280 --> 00:43:05,800 Speaker 3: order to make you like this. In its worst forms, 726 00:43:06,280 --> 00:43:09,840 Speaker 3: it really did carry the language killed the Indian to 727 00:43:09,880 --> 00:43:13,080 Speaker 3: save the person, right, And in that case, people weren't 728 00:43:13,080 --> 00:43:15,800 Speaker 3: talking about me Indian. They were talking about the Native 729 00:43:15,800 --> 00:43:23,400 Speaker 3: Americans who were not Indian. And that fear based discourse 730 00:43:23,440 --> 00:43:26,880 Speaker 3: means assimilate. I think it doesn't have to take that 731 00:43:26,960 --> 00:43:30,160 Speaker 3: sort of strong version, but there is a certain implicit 732 00:43:30,200 --> 00:43:34,359 Speaker 3: power structure involved. Right, It's that we want to make 733 00:43:34,400 --> 00:43:37,120 Speaker 3: sure we maintain control. And I think what's lost in 734 00:43:37,160 --> 00:43:41,279 Speaker 3: that process is possibility. So rather than the possibility of 735 00:43:41,320 --> 00:43:46,879 Speaker 3: saying interesting, there's this deeply embedded mythic reality of light 736 00:43:46,960 --> 00:43:49,480 Speaker 3: overcoming darkness in which God has to enter into the 737 00:43:49,520 --> 00:43:52,920 Speaker 3: depths of darkness to rescue his bride. Yeah, and seeing 738 00:43:52,920 --> 00:43:57,279 Speaker 3: a possibility within that we foreclose on that possibility out 739 00:43:57,320 --> 00:44:01,280 Speaker 3: of a degree of fear. Right, it's a fear based discourse, 740 00:44:01,560 --> 00:44:05,920 Speaker 3: and so control must be maintained, and what's lost is 741 00:44:06,000 --> 00:44:09,840 Speaker 3: ultimately a richer expression. If we're really serious about the 742 00:44:09,880 --> 00:44:16,520 Speaker 3: fact that God surpasses everything that we can imagine, he 743 00:44:16,600 --> 00:44:20,680 Speaker 3: surpasses the finitude that is tied to our creational setting, 744 00:44:20,840 --> 00:44:24,000 Speaker 3: not making creation bad, but God surpasses it can't be 745 00:44:24,080 --> 00:44:28,680 Speaker 3: contained within it. Then we really should be looking increasingly 746 00:44:28,840 --> 00:44:34,080 Speaker 3: for more ways to express the God that we say 747 00:44:34,120 --> 00:44:38,520 Speaker 3: is true and good and beautiful. Right, And so to 748 00:44:38,560 --> 00:44:42,560 Speaker 3: see something like the valley shouldn't be a reaction in fear. 749 00:44:42,640 --> 00:44:46,920 Speaker 3: It should be the wonder of possibility. Now, that doesn't 750 00:44:46,960 --> 00:44:51,600 Speaker 3: mean that we lose the sense of transfiguring. If we've 751 00:44:51,600 --> 00:44:54,040 Speaker 3: lost the sense of transfiguring. Then we've lost the sense 752 00:44:54,040 --> 00:44:56,120 Speaker 3: that this is ultimately about God. 753 00:44:56,360 --> 00:44:56,520 Speaker 2: Right. 754 00:44:56,640 --> 00:44:58,200 Speaker 3: But it seems to me like the Book of Acts 755 00:44:58,320 --> 00:45:03,879 Speaker 3: is saying, worry less about that fear and more about 756 00:45:03,920 --> 00:45:07,520 Speaker 3: the fear of the fear that leads you to assimilate. 757 00:45:07,800 --> 00:45:08,080 Speaker 2: Right. 758 00:45:08,239 --> 00:45:10,440 Speaker 3: So to that culmination in Acts fifteen, where you have 759 00:45:10,480 --> 00:45:16,200 Speaker 3: this great Jerusalem Council, the Jews wanted to say to 760 00:45:16,239 --> 00:45:18,880 Speaker 3: the Gentiles, you must become Jewish in order to embrace 761 00:45:19,520 --> 00:45:23,360 Speaker 3: the Messiah, who is Jewish. And the point of dispute 762 00:45:23,480 --> 00:45:26,239 Speaker 3: wasn't that Jesus was anything less than the Jewish Messiah. 763 00:45:26,680 --> 00:45:29,799 Speaker 3: The point of dispute was that one had that one 764 00:45:29,800 --> 00:45:33,719 Speaker 3: could only fully participate in the very life and flesh. 765 00:45:33,400 --> 00:45:35,520 Speaker 4: Of the Jewish Messiah by becoming Jewish. 766 00:45:36,239 --> 00:45:36,479 Speaker 2: Right. 767 00:45:37,400 --> 00:45:40,200 Speaker 3: Where the reality that comes out of that council is 768 00:45:40,280 --> 00:45:48,040 Speaker 3: a recognition that both existences can exist coequally, right, the 769 00:45:48,120 --> 00:45:51,040 Speaker 3: Jewish and the Gentiles. So the gentile is asked to 770 00:45:51,120 --> 00:45:55,320 Speaker 3: honor these certain things about becoming Jewish, about the Jewish Jesus, 771 00:45:56,560 --> 00:46:00,520 Speaker 3: but a rejection of you must become Jewish, right, Yeah, 772 00:46:00,760 --> 00:46:04,279 Speaker 3: honor these sorts of things and fellowship with us. You 773 00:46:04,320 --> 00:46:07,000 Speaker 3: don't have to be circumcised. That's a pretty powerful declaration, 774 00:46:07,160 --> 00:46:10,720 Speaker 3: right to say, put these things next to each other. Yeah, 775 00:46:10,960 --> 00:46:16,960 Speaker 3: And I think the fear of syncretism brings about the 776 00:46:17,080 --> 00:46:20,719 Speaker 3: active fear, which is assimilation, and the result is the 777 00:46:20,800 --> 00:46:25,759 Speaker 3: loss of the kind of beautiful mosaic that the Book 778 00:46:25,800 --> 00:46:29,560 Speaker 3: of Acts and Versus in chapters fifteen and following are 779 00:46:29,600 --> 00:46:30,879 Speaker 3: offering to us. 780 00:46:31,160 --> 00:46:31,920 Speaker 4: Yeah, what do you think? 781 00:46:32,360 --> 00:46:34,759 Speaker 2: No, I like that a lot. I think so. 782 00:46:34,800 --> 00:46:39,160 Speaker 1: I used to describe when I teach hermeneutics Bible study methods. 783 00:46:39,239 --> 00:46:42,680 Speaker 1: I would try to help the students understand how the 784 00:46:42,680 --> 00:46:46,399 Speaker 1: Bible work by describing my daughter's playing with glitter. They 785 00:46:46,400 --> 00:46:48,000 Speaker 1: were really young at the time, and they always had 786 00:46:48,040 --> 00:46:50,719 Speaker 1: glitter out, and so you clean this stuff us. 787 00:46:51,120 --> 00:46:53,040 Speaker 2: Yes, it's exactly it right. 788 00:46:53,120 --> 00:46:54,800 Speaker 1: You'd clean it up and you'd be like, okay, I 789 00:46:54,840 --> 00:46:56,920 Speaker 1: got all the glitter, and then you knew, like ten 790 00:46:57,000 --> 00:46:58,880 Speaker 1: days later, you're going to come back and you're always 791 00:46:58,880 --> 00:47:01,920 Speaker 1: going to find more glitter, Like the stuff multiplies somehow. 792 00:47:02,480 --> 00:47:03,640 Speaker 2: You just can't get clear. 793 00:47:04,360 --> 00:47:07,520 Speaker 3: I was quoting Dimitri Martin, so in case that I 794 00:47:07,560 --> 00:47:10,120 Speaker 3: stole his joke, I've cided him. 795 00:47:10,480 --> 00:47:11,360 Speaker 2: I recognized it. 796 00:47:11,440 --> 00:47:14,560 Speaker 1: But yes, but yeah, I mean that and so what 797 00:47:14,600 --> 00:47:16,279 Speaker 1: I'd explained to him is, you know, every time you 798 00:47:16,320 --> 00:47:18,040 Speaker 1: come back to God's words, you're just going to find 799 00:47:18,040 --> 00:47:21,480 Speaker 1: more glitter. Right, that's the idea, And I think I 800 00:47:21,480 --> 00:47:24,799 Speaker 1: would apply that same analogy to what you're suggesting. That 801 00:47:25,000 --> 00:47:30,359 Speaker 1: God's realm is full of goodness, truth, and beauty, much 802 00:47:30,400 --> 00:47:33,360 Speaker 1: of which we can't capture in our first run of 803 00:47:33,440 --> 00:47:37,000 Speaker 1: the story. And so every time we come back to 804 00:47:37,360 --> 00:47:40,319 Speaker 1: creation and look at what God has given us, we're 805 00:47:40,320 --> 00:47:43,480 Speaker 1: going to find different aspects of that good, truth and beauty. 806 00:47:44,000 --> 00:47:45,800 Speaker 2: It's just going to keep showing up like glitter. 807 00:47:47,120 --> 00:47:49,960 Speaker 1: Right, you can't get rid of this stuff, and so 808 00:47:50,960 --> 00:47:54,839 Speaker 1: and so we have to remain open to goodness, truth, 809 00:47:54,880 --> 00:47:59,400 Speaker 1: and beauty. I think we have to remain open to 810 00:48:00,200 --> 00:48:02,320 Speaker 1: people seeing aspects. 811 00:48:01,840 --> 00:48:03,920 Speaker 2: Of the goodness, the good, true, and the beautiful. 812 00:48:04,320 --> 00:48:08,399 Speaker 1: Right, even if they don't understand who God is, they're 813 00:48:08,440 --> 00:48:12,480 Speaker 1: going to understand and see the goodness of creation, and 814 00:48:12,520 --> 00:48:14,640 Speaker 1: they're going to recognize certain truths. 815 00:48:15,440 --> 00:48:17,920 Speaker 2: They're going to see certain things as beautiful, and we 816 00:48:18,000 --> 00:48:18,399 Speaker 2: need to. 817 00:48:18,320 --> 00:48:23,799 Speaker 1: Be affirming that like, yes, you're right, you've correctly recognized 818 00:48:23,800 --> 00:48:25,680 Speaker 1: an aspect of the goodness, truth and beauty. 819 00:48:26,760 --> 00:48:26,960 Speaker 2: Right. 820 00:48:28,239 --> 00:48:31,520 Speaker 1: Our role is then to sort of recognize that as 821 00:48:31,560 --> 00:48:34,400 Speaker 1: something that we've been given by the Creator, something that 822 00:48:34,440 --> 00:48:36,799 Speaker 1: we don't determine, but that has been given to us, 823 00:48:37,480 --> 00:48:42,400 Speaker 1: and so as Christians, in my mind, it's almost in 824 00:48:42,440 --> 00:48:46,960 Speaker 1: a way a resistance to a recognition of all the 825 00:48:47,000 --> 00:48:50,160 Speaker 1: God has given us when we're refusing to see these 826 00:48:50,200 --> 00:48:53,919 Speaker 1: other things, when we close ourselves off to the goodness, truth, 827 00:48:53,920 --> 00:48:56,600 Speaker 1: and beauty that we finding all over creation, when we 828 00:48:56,640 --> 00:48:59,120 Speaker 1: decide that we're never going to see another piece of glitter, 829 00:48:59,200 --> 00:49:02,200 Speaker 1: even when it's a parent to us, Right, we're just 830 00:49:02,280 --> 00:49:05,239 Speaker 1: going to leave it in the corner and ignore it, right, 831 00:49:05,880 --> 00:49:09,439 Speaker 1: It doesn't mean it's not still there. And so there's 832 00:49:09,480 --> 00:49:11,400 Speaker 1: this aspect of it that I think we've got to 833 00:49:11,440 --> 00:49:17,480 Speaker 1: be not maximally open to anything, but consistently open to 834 00:49:17,600 --> 00:49:22,719 Speaker 1: recognizing that what I thought was there wasn't all that 835 00:49:22,880 --> 00:49:26,279 Speaker 1: was there. Right, There has to be an opening up 836 00:49:26,400 --> 00:49:30,319 Speaker 1: to not to other viewpoints like it's it's not quite 837 00:49:30,400 --> 00:49:34,399 Speaker 1: as like we often hear the boogeyman of postmodernism. It's like, oh, 838 00:49:34,400 --> 00:49:37,040 Speaker 1: there is no truth, there is no whatever, and it's 839 00:49:37,040 --> 00:49:37,960 Speaker 1: just all perspective. 840 00:49:38,360 --> 00:49:39,320 Speaker 2: That's not what I'm saying. 841 00:49:39,360 --> 00:49:42,120 Speaker 1: What I'm saying is that God's creation that is given 842 00:49:42,280 --> 00:49:45,440 Speaker 1: to us has more than we're capable of seeing in 843 00:49:45,480 --> 00:49:49,040 Speaker 1: any one moment, and that we have to be continually 844 00:49:49,080 --> 00:49:53,760 Speaker 1: open to looking at it afresh, recognizing goodness, truth and beauty, 845 00:49:54,320 --> 00:49:57,160 Speaker 1: and that often I think we'll recognize that goodness, truth, 846 00:49:57,200 --> 00:50:01,080 Speaker 1: and beauty through other people we are seeing the world 847 00:50:01,120 --> 00:50:05,320 Speaker 1: differently than we are, And that means that it doesn't 848 00:50:05,360 --> 00:50:07,560 Speaker 1: mean that we have to agree with those people every time, 849 00:50:08,040 --> 00:50:10,000 Speaker 1: but it means we have to give them their due 850 00:50:10,680 --> 00:50:14,400 Speaker 1: that they're seeing something, they're recognizing something, some aspect of 851 00:50:14,440 --> 00:50:16,440 Speaker 1: God's world that's really. 852 00:50:16,120 --> 00:50:19,319 Speaker 2: Good, true and beautiful that we didn't see yep. 853 00:50:19,960 --> 00:50:22,560 Speaker 1: And I think if we're unwilling to do that, what 854 00:50:22,600 --> 00:50:25,040 Speaker 1: we end up with is we end up assimilating to 855 00:50:25,080 --> 00:50:28,919 Speaker 1: our own culture, which is going to offer a very 856 00:50:29,040 --> 00:50:37,359 Speaker 1: constrained understanding of God's creation, a limited story right in 857 00:50:37,400 --> 00:50:40,520 Speaker 1: which certain parts, you know, we just like I said, 858 00:50:40,560 --> 00:50:42,480 Speaker 1: we sweep the glitter to the corners and we leave 859 00:50:42,520 --> 00:50:44,080 Speaker 1: it there, and then we. 860 00:50:44,080 --> 00:50:46,160 Speaker 2: Just never look right right. 861 00:50:47,239 --> 00:50:49,920 Speaker 1: And that is an aspect of this assimilation that we 862 00:50:50,000 --> 00:50:50,680 Speaker 1: end up getting to. 863 00:50:51,200 --> 00:50:53,920 Speaker 2: We end up buying into a narrower story than we 864 00:50:54,040 --> 00:50:54,480 Speaker 2: need to. 865 00:50:55,920 --> 00:50:58,680 Speaker 1: And then refusing the other stories out there, the other 866 00:50:58,719 --> 00:51:01,680 Speaker 1: perspectives out there that could really widen our frame and 867 00:51:01,719 --> 00:51:03,880 Speaker 1: help us see God's reality as it actually is. 868 00:51:04,840 --> 00:51:07,600 Speaker 3: Yeah, and the loss is really our loss. 869 00:51:07,960 --> 00:51:09,080 Speaker 2: It's very much our loss. 870 00:51:09,120 --> 00:51:15,839 Speaker 3: Yeah, the loss of seeing beauty more fully realized, you know. 871 00:51:16,280 --> 00:51:18,680 Speaker 3: And of course there remains a litmus test. And the 872 00:51:18,719 --> 00:51:22,600 Speaker 3: litmus test I don't think is merely is Jesus the center. 873 00:51:22,880 --> 00:51:26,400 Speaker 3: I think it's more specific than that, is is Jesus 874 00:51:26,480 --> 00:51:30,319 Speaker 3: the Jewish Messiah center? I think that sure to really 875 00:51:30,400 --> 00:51:33,080 Speaker 3: lean into Acts fifteen, I think that's an important part 876 00:51:33,080 --> 00:51:37,440 Speaker 3: of the conversation. That the answer wasn't merely that gentiles 877 00:51:37,480 --> 00:51:41,160 Speaker 3: don't have to become circumcised Jewish people to follow the Messiah, right. 878 00:51:41,200 --> 00:51:47,239 Speaker 3: The answer was was that these gentiles could be gentiles 879 00:51:47,800 --> 00:51:51,400 Speaker 3: without losing sight. It's very specific though, that without losing 880 00:51:51,480 --> 00:51:55,480 Speaker 3: sight that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah. 881 00:51:55,680 --> 00:51:55,919 Speaker 4: Right. 882 00:51:56,000 --> 00:51:57,560 Speaker 3: You don't have to become Jewish, and that doesn't mean 883 00:51:57,600 --> 00:52:01,320 Speaker 3: you're less less Christian for it. This isn't a class 884 00:52:01,480 --> 00:52:06,840 Speaker 3: issue in Christianity, right, But this is recognizing that Jesus 885 00:52:06,920 --> 00:52:11,239 Speaker 3: was not a gentile. First, this was a covenant made 886 00:52:11,400 --> 00:52:17,480 Speaker 3: in which Jewishness comes out of that to expand to everyone. Yeah, right, 887 00:52:17,520 --> 00:52:20,960 Speaker 3: and so the way that some would you know, I'm 888 00:52:21,000 --> 00:52:23,320 Speaker 3: a member of a theological group called the Society for 889 00:52:23,400 --> 00:52:27,279 Speaker 3: Post Supercessionist Christian or Theology, excuse me, and that's kind 890 00:52:27,280 --> 00:52:29,000 Speaker 3: of one of the things to say that The goal 891 00:52:29,040 --> 00:52:33,280 Speaker 3: here is not to say all things have to pass 892 00:52:33,360 --> 00:52:36,920 Speaker 3: through some sort of approval process. The issue here is 893 00:52:36,960 --> 00:52:40,560 Speaker 3: to say we are second readers, and being second readers 894 00:52:40,640 --> 00:52:47,200 Speaker 3: means that we are approaching an existing medium of theological revelation, 895 00:52:48,560 --> 00:52:51,160 Speaker 3: and that revelation is culminating in the person of Jesus, 896 00:52:51,200 --> 00:52:55,080 Speaker 3: who is a real person in a real place, opening 897 00:52:55,160 --> 00:52:57,160 Speaker 3: up that real place so that you didn't have to 898 00:52:57,200 --> 00:52:59,280 Speaker 3: be in or of that place. 899 00:53:00,120 --> 00:53:00,440 Speaker 2: Yeah. 900 00:53:00,480 --> 00:53:03,560 Speaker 3: And so that kind of litmus test says not everything 901 00:53:03,600 --> 00:53:07,080 Speaker 3: will go right if something supersedes not just Jesus, but 902 00:53:07,520 --> 00:53:08,960 Speaker 3: the Jewish Messiah Jesus. 903 00:53:09,440 --> 00:53:10,160 Speaker 4: So we've got a. 904 00:53:10,080 --> 00:53:13,799 Speaker 3: Problem, right, But that doesn't that shouldn't foreclose out of 905 00:53:13,840 --> 00:53:16,839 Speaker 3: fear seeing the glitter everywhere? 906 00:53:17,360 --> 00:53:20,839 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think so we're getting toward the end here. 907 00:53:20,880 --> 00:53:23,719 Speaker 1: What I would say is maybe where we're landing, which 908 00:53:23,760 --> 00:53:25,279 Speaker 1: I think is a little different than when I would 909 00:53:25,320 --> 00:53:27,720 Speaker 1: have what I would have said assimilation is at the beginning. 910 00:53:29,440 --> 00:53:32,080 Speaker 1: But maybe what we what we mean by this is 911 00:53:32,080 --> 00:53:37,400 Speaker 1: something closer to we're so captured by an ideological story, 912 00:53:38,440 --> 00:53:41,520 Speaker 1: a story that is that claims to be more complete 913 00:53:41,560 --> 00:53:47,160 Speaker 1: than it actually is, that we close ourselves off from 914 00:53:47,560 --> 00:53:54,000 Speaker 1: God's broader creator creation, God's broader reality. We essentially put 915 00:53:54,040 --> 00:53:59,399 Speaker 1: blinders on, and this is an effect of assimilation. There's 916 00:53:59,400 --> 00:54:04,600 Speaker 1: a way of fusing God where we say I'm going 917 00:54:04,640 --> 00:54:07,320 Speaker 1: to see in this way and only in this way, 918 00:54:08,120 --> 00:54:10,560 Speaker 1: and it doesn't matter what else God puts before me. 919 00:54:11,080 --> 00:54:14,160 Speaker 1: I'm only going to see in this way. And that 920 00:54:14,200 --> 00:54:21,120 Speaker 1: creates an inappropriate closure that reflects our stronger commitment to 921 00:54:21,200 --> 00:54:27,920 Speaker 1: a particular way of seeing a particular story than it 922 00:54:27,960 --> 00:54:32,000 Speaker 1: does to our commitment to Jesus being the Jewish Messiah. 923 00:54:32,040 --> 00:54:36,680 Speaker 1: That's right, Yeah, I think that's actually a helpful way 924 00:54:36,680 --> 00:54:37,920 Speaker 1: of thinking about assimilation. 925 00:54:38,760 --> 00:54:40,279 Speaker 2: I don't know, would you agree with most of that 926 00:54:40,480 --> 00:54:41,640 Speaker 2: or yeah? 927 00:54:41,680 --> 00:54:46,640 Speaker 3: Absolutely, And I think it's a helpful way to walk forward. Right, 928 00:54:46,719 --> 00:54:49,040 Speaker 3: So instead of walking forward out of fear, it's walking 929 00:54:49,080 --> 00:54:51,600 Speaker 3: forward with a sense of wonder and imagination. 930 00:54:51,920 --> 00:54:54,239 Speaker 4: But it's not, it's not in. 931 00:54:54,280 --> 00:54:56,759 Speaker 3: All things go, because that's often the fear. Well then 932 00:54:56,800 --> 00:55:02,399 Speaker 3: anything will go no, no, no, are we are being 933 00:55:02,560 --> 00:55:05,760 Speaker 3: very deliberate to say all things must be encircled because 934 00:55:05,800 --> 00:55:09,279 Speaker 3: it's a life giving reality, the life giving reality of 935 00:55:09,320 --> 00:55:14,000 Speaker 3: the very body of Jesus Christ too. Wasn't just anybody, right, 936 00:55:15,120 --> 00:55:18,400 Speaker 3: It wasn't Warner Solomon's German Jesus. He was the Messiah 937 00:55:18,400 --> 00:55:22,200 Speaker 3: who walked, that's right, from Nazareth to Jerusalem and back again. 938 00:55:22,960 --> 00:55:25,440 Speaker 1: There's a constraint there that I think is really important 939 00:55:25,440 --> 00:55:28,239 Speaker 1: to recognize. We used to when I used to be 940 00:55:28,280 --> 00:55:30,520 Speaker 1: an administrator in higher ed if you remember, we used 941 00:55:30,520 --> 00:55:34,080 Speaker 1: to do curriculum and stuff like that, right, And one 942 00:55:34,160 --> 00:55:35,799 Speaker 1: of the things I always had in my mind, whether 943 00:55:35,880 --> 00:55:43,080 Speaker 1: articulated it or not, was your best creativity happens within constraints. 944 00:55:43,840 --> 00:55:48,239 Speaker 1: And so for us, there's no point in releasing all 945 00:55:48,280 --> 00:55:50,720 Speaker 1: the constraints and saying we'll see the world better without 946 00:55:50,760 --> 00:55:54,839 Speaker 1: any boundaries, because that's simply not true. What we need 947 00:55:54,840 --> 00:55:58,400 Speaker 1: are the appropriate constraints so that we can actually be 948 00:55:58,520 --> 00:56:02,120 Speaker 1: enabled to see the world that God has given us 949 00:56:02,200 --> 00:56:04,880 Speaker 1: in an appropriate and theologically fitting manner. 950 00:56:05,360 --> 00:56:06,200 Speaker 2: And I think that. 951 00:56:06,040 --> 00:56:09,680 Speaker 1: That's an ever expanding sort of understanding. We don't just 952 00:56:10,160 --> 00:56:11,920 Speaker 1: see it once and then close it off. It's not 953 00:56:11,960 --> 00:56:16,520 Speaker 1: a snapshot. It's a continuing conversation that we're having with 954 00:56:16,680 --> 00:56:20,560 Speaker 1: God and others as we interact within creation. And to 955 00:56:20,719 --> 00:56:23,640 Speaker 1: resist that sort of movement and that sort of dialogue 956 00:56:24,160 --> 00:56:27,279 Speaker 1: is really to close ourselves off, to narrow ourselves so 957 00:56:27,440 --> 00:56:31,120 Speaker 1: much that we're unwilling to see any more of God's 958 00:56:31,160 --> 00:56:35,000 Speaker 1: creation at all. So, yeah, the constraints have to be 959 00:56:35,040 --> 00:56:41,279 Speaker 1: there there. To use Alicia Jauaro's language, they're enabling, They're 960 00:56:41,320 --> 00:56:45,520 Speaker 1: not limiting. The constraints are actually enabling us to do 961 00:56:45,560 --> 00:56:47,520 Speaker 1: something that we wouldn't be able to do without them. 962 00:56:48,719 --> 00:56:54,720 Speaker 1: And so Jesus as the Jewish Messiah, is an enabling constraint. 963 00:56:54,840 --> 00:56:58,319 Speaker 1: With that in place, we're able to do things with 964 00:56:58,480 --> 00:57:01,080 Speaker 1: our minds. We're able to see things differently that we 965 00:57:01,120 --> 00:57:03,280 Speaker 1: wouldn't be able to see without that constraint. 966 00:57:05,280 --> 00:57:06,040 Speaker 4: So agreed. 967 00:57:07,360 --> 00:57:09,840 Speaker 1: Very cool man, Well, there has been a great discussion 968 00:57:09,840 --> 00:57:13,520 Speaker 1: on assimilation and looking forward to the one on fragmentation 969 00:57:13,719 --> 00:57:14,440 Speaker 1: and transaction. 970 00:57:14,600 --> 00:57:16,200 Speaker 2: We'll kind of dig into those as we go. 971 00:57:17,200 --> 00:57:19,720 Speaker 1: We're kind of playing around with the diagnosis of this 972 00:57:19,920 --> 00:57:24,080 Speaker 1: for Christianity, American Christianity particularly, but I think it would 973 00:57:24,120 --> 00:57:28,680 Speaker 1: apply more broadly than that, and so we'll walk through 974 00:57:28,720 --> 00:57:34,640 Speaker 1: these issues, these three forces, we're kind of calling them assimilation, fragmentation, 975 00:57:34,720 --> 00:57:37,840 Speaker 1: transaction as we go further on the podcast, but hopefully 976 00:57:37,880 --> 00:57:39,800 Speaker 1: you enjoyed this and. 977 00:57:39,480 --> 00:57:43,760 Speaker 2: We'll see on the next episode. Take care of everybody,