1 00:00:21,500 --> 00:00:25,820 Speaker 1: Welcome to Timeless Wisdom with Dennis Prager. Here thousands of 2 00:00:25,860 --> 00:00:29,500 Speaker 1: hours of Dennis's lectures, courses, and classic radio programs had 3 00:00:29,500 --> 00:00:41,620 Speaker 1: to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles. Go to Dennisprager dot com. 4 00:00:41,820 --> 00:00:45,659 Speaker 2: As promised, today is about thoughts on the elections. Unlike 5 00:00:45,740 --> 00:00:51,740 Speaker 2: other classes, this is the most personal by definition, and 6 00:00:51,940 --> 00:00:56,380 Speaker 2: I trust you will appreciate that fact and will not 7 00:00:56,420 --> 00:01:01,220 Speaker 2: take offense at some of the views that will be expressed. 8 00:01:01,780 --> 00:01:04,580 Speaker 2: I would hope to do so as objectively as possible, 9 00:01:05,340 --> 00:01:08,740 Speaker 2: but it is even more than religion. It is not 10 00:01:08,940 --> 00:01:13,140 Speaker 2: possible to discuss politics and be perceived by everyone as 11 00:01:13,180 --> 00:01:17,819 Speaker 2: being objective. I would like to be, because this is 12 00:01:17,860 --> 00:01:22,179 Speaker 2: a course, not a lecture series. But I appreciate the 13 00:01:22,220 --> 00:01:24,620 Speaker 2: fact that some will simply find some of these views 14 00:01:25,060 --> 00:01:27,380 Speaker 2: quite wrong. That is why I will leave more time 15 00:01:27,380 --> 00:01:32,300 Speaker 2: than usual only in this particular session for other thoughts. 16 00:01:32,460 --> 00:01:35,140 Speaker 2: But I am asked to it as one of the 17 00:01:35,220 --> 00:01:37,460 Speaker 2: subjects that was listed, and that many of you have 18 00:01:37,500 --> 00:01:41,020 Speaker 2: asked for us to offer some analysis of the presidential 19 00:01:41,020 --> 00:01:46,620 Speaker 2: election that will take place next week, And I was thinking, 20 00:01:46,660 --> 00:01:49,460 Speaker 2: what should I do? Because you hear analyzes all the time, 21 00:01:50,900 --> 00:01:53,340 Speaker 2: what can I offer to you that you would not 22 00:01:53,500 --> 00:01:58,100 Speaker 2: normally get tuning in radio or reading a columnist. And 23 00:01:58,180 --> 00:02:01,780 Speaker 2: I thought that I would like to deal most specifically 24 00:02:01,820 --> 00:02:08,540 Speaker 2: with the question of the L word. I think that 25 00:02:08,620 --> 00:02:12,140 Speaker 2: I could do the best for you. Whether you consider 26 00:02:12,180 --> 00:02:19,020 Speaker 2: yourself liberal, conservative, or as I consider myself centrist, you 27 00:02:19,060 --> 00:02:25,900 Speaker 2: could you could most profit by an analysis of someone 28 00:02:25,940 --> 00:02:28,860 Speaker 2: who does think it's become a dirty word about why 29 00:02:28,900 --> 00:02:32,460 Speaker 2: it has become that I think is the is the 30 00:02:32,460 --> 00:02:36,419 Speaker 2: most honest thing. Rather than claiming some absolute neutrality in 31 00:02:36,460 --> 00:02:40,340 Speaker 2: the middle. I will tell you why this person who 32 00:02:40,460 --> 00:02:44,420 Speaker 2: was raised liberal, as virtually every Jew in America was, 33 00:02:44,780 --> 00:02:50,580 Speaker 2: who was raised to perceive voting Republican as an active apostasy. 34 00:02:52,620 --> 00:02:56,500 Speaker 2: A Jew for Republican is someone on the level of 35 00:02:56,620 --> 00:03:01,060 Speaker 2: Jew for Jesus in in the in the world that 36 00:03:01,140 --> 00:03:03,060 Speaker 2: I grew up, and in much of the Jewish world 37 00:03:03,180 --> 00:03:06,340 Speaker 2: to this day. And I must tell you when I 38 00:03:06,380 --> 00:03:10,420 Speaker 2: first the first time I voted Republican, it was it 39 00:03:10,500 --> 00:03:14,260 Speaker 2: was very, very hard. I felt that I was going 40 00:03:14,300 --> 00:03:18,420 Speaker 2: to have to answer to God on young Kipper that 41 00:03:18,540 --> 00:03:26,940 Speaker 2: you know alchte there will be one Shebahati Republican. There is. 42 00:03:27,660 --> 00:03:30,620 Speaker 2: I'm saying this with some levity, but it is absolutely 43 00:03:30,860 --> 00:03:34,140 Speaker 2: true that it is. It was. It was semi dramatic, 44 00:03:34,700 --> 00:03:38,100 Speaker 2: deep sense of guilt. While I have voted Republican the 45 00:03:38,220 --> 00:03:42,460 Speaker 2: last two times, it is, it is not even it 46 00:03:42,500 --> 00:03:45,420 Speaker 2: is a little easier, but I'm still a Democrat. In 47 00:03:45,420 --> 00:03:49,020 Speaker 2: other words, it's very hard to get the democrat and 48 00:03:49,100 --> 00:03:52,420 Speaker 2: liberal out of the Jew who was raised with Adlai 49 00:03:52,500 --> 00:03:57,420 Speaker 2: Stevenson and all the beliefs about conservatives and Republicans that 50 00:03:57,460 --> 00:04:01,580 Speaker 2: I am, probably most of you were raised with. So 51 00:04:01,940 --> 00:04:05,540 Speaker 2: I am a good example of someone who can honestly, 52 00:04:05,740 --> 00:04:09,340 Speaker 2: maybe incorrectly in your view, but at least honestly tell 53 00:04:09,380 --> 00:04:14,740 Speaker 2: you why something so venerated as the word liberal and 54 00:04:14,860 --> 00:04:21,059 Speaker 2: liberalism has become such a dirty word that until yes yesterday, 55 00:04:21,900 --> 00:04:25,580 Speaker 2: the thirtieth of October of an election year, the liberal 56 00:04:25,620 --> 00:04:30,419 Speaker 2: candidate refused to say he was. I mean, in other words, 57 00:04:30,460 --> 00:04:33,099 Speaker 2: that's not debatable. It's not debatable that it's become a 58 00:04:33,099 --> 00:04:36,500 Speaker 2: dirty word. What's debatable is it should it have become 59 00:04:36,860 --> 00:04:40,260 Speaker 2: why it has become, But that it has become is 60 00:04:40,300 --> 00:04:45,140 Speaker 2: not debatable. Conservative is not a dirty word. Mister Bush 61 00:04:45,180 --> 00:04:48,220 Speaker 2: walks around all day long saying I'm conservative, and it's 62 00:04:48,500 --> 00:04:51,860 Speaker 2: not a problem. Twenty years ago, thirty years ago, that 63 00:04:52,060 --> 00:04:55,580 Speaker 2: was a dirty word. My thesis to you, therefore, is 64 00:04:56,780 --> 00:05:01,580 Speaker 2: that it is deserved. In other words, conservative deserved to 65 00:05:01,620 --> 00:05:05,339 Speaker 2: be a dirty word. In the fifties, conservative was linked 66 00:05:05,700 --> 00:05:13,660 Speaker 2: with racism, with social retardation, holding back legislation that was moral. 67 00:05:13,900 --> 00:05:18,460 Speaker 2: Who opposed civil rights legislations? Liberal liberals are conservatives? Conservatives 68 00:05:18,540 --> 00:05:26,740 Speaker 2: Obviously conservative were retrograde. The conservative view was perceived as 69 00:05:26,780 --> 00:05:30,460 Speaker 2: being what's good for general motors is good for America, 70 00:05:31,060 --> 00:05:34,860 Speaker 2: not what's good for general motors and workers, not what's 71 00:05:34,860 --> 00:05:40,659 Speaker 2: good for Americans, what's good for big business. Conservative had 72 00:05:40,820 --> 00:05:46,100 Speaker 2: a dirty name, a bad name, bad reputation. It was deserved. 73 00:05:46,420 --> 00:05:50,780 Speaker 2: I believe liberal today has a bad name and a 74 00:05:50,780 --> 00:05:55,260 Speaker 2: bad reputation. I think it's deserved. The argument that is 75 00:05:55,300 --> 00:05:58,659 Speaker 2: being made that look at what liberals did traditionally and 76 00:05:58,740 --> 00:06:01,779 Speaker 2: how beautiful it was is not an argument. The question 77 00:06:02,020 --> 00:06:07,260 Speaker 2: is is that liberal that was beautiful the same thing 78 00:06:07,300 --> 00:06:11,180 Speaker 2: as the liberal today? I argue it isn't that. The 79 00:06:11,220 --> 00:06:14,140 Speaker 2: reason liberal has become a bad name, a bad word 80 00:06:14,180 --> 00:06:17,460 Speaker 2: in America is not because Americans have all of a 81 00:06:17,460 --> 00:06:20,580 Speaker 2: sudden become an extremely selfish people, which is a typical 82 00:06:20,780 --> 00:06:25,380 Speaker 2: argument given to me by liberals Americans vote their pocketbook. 83 00:06:25,660 --> 00:06:28,300 Speaker 2: You've become a little wealthy, and all of a sudden, 84 00:06:28,660 --> 00:06:34,020 Speaker 2: you are selfish. We liberals are beautiful and compassionate, and 85 00:06:34,060 --> 00:06:38,460 Speaker 2: you conservatives are selfish. That is truly how most liberals 86 00:06:38,500 --> 00:06:42,380 Speaker 2: perceive America. That they are compassionate and kind and that 87 00:06:42,620 --> 00:06:47,580 Speaker 2: conservatives are stingy, cheap and selfish. That there are selfish 88 00:06:47,740 --> 00:06:51,180 Speaker 2: conservatives goes without saying likewise, it goes without saying that 89 00:06:51,220 --> 00:06:54,460 Speaker 2: there are selfish liberals. I don't know if that is 90 00:06:54,500 --> 00:06:56,980 Speaker 2: a dividing line, and I will prove to you why. 91 00:06:57,060 --> 00:07:00,300 Speaker 2: I don't think that there is such a dividing line. 92 00:07:00,380 --> 00:07:04,219 Speaker 2: But that is the way liberals perceive it, that Americans 93 00:07:04,220 --> 00:07:09,460 Speaker 2: have become selfish, not that liberalism has changed. I argue 94 00:07:09,540 --> 00:07:14,300 Speaker 2: liberalism has changed the Americans have become not selfish. Americans, 95 00:07:14,580 --> 00:07:17,220 Speaker 2: I think correctly, have the reputation of being among the 96 00:07:17,300 --> 00:07:21,739 Speaker 2: most unselfish nations as a nation in the world. Given 97 00:07:21,780 --> 00:07:27,460 Speaker 2: how much America does when there is need for help, 98 00:07:27,940 --> 00:07:32,580 Speaker 2: when they are a starvation, etc. It is America that 99 00:07:32,700 --> 00:07:36,020 Speaker 2: is called on an America that responds first and most generously, 100 00:07:36,300 --> 00:07:41,780 Speaker 2: so too, when people need to go somewhere with refugee status. 101 00:07:42,460 --> 00:07:46,820 Speaker 2: It is America. America has this massive immigration problem because 102 00:07:46,820 --> 00:07:49,940 Speaker 2: it's wonderful. People flee to a country that they want 103 00:07:49,940 --> 00:07:54,500 Speaker 2: to live in. It's not because America is richer incidentally, 104 00:07:54,660 --> 00:07:57,700 Speaker 2: that people so want to come to America first. Switzerland 105 00:07:57,780 --> 00:08:00,180 Speaker 2: is richer than the United States. They are not lining 106 00:08:00,300 --> 00:08:02,740 Speaker 2: up as Swiss embassies around the world like they do 107 00:08:02,780 --> 00:08:06,540 Speaker 2: in American embassies. And the reason is people are smart, 108 00:08:06,820 --> 00:08:09,260 Speaker 2: They are not stupid. They know that there are more 109 00:08:09,260 --> 00:08:13,540 Speaker 2: opportunities in every area in America than anywhere else, not 110 00:08:13,620 --> 00:08:18,260 Speaker 2: just economic, but social and religious. You see, you are 111 00:08:18,300 --> 00:08:21,180 Speaker 2: not out of it in America if you are a minority, 112 00:08:21,380 --> 00:08:24,860 Speaker 2: as everybody else's too, but you are out of it 113 00:08:24,860 --> 00:08:29,900 Speaker 2: if you're a minority in Switzerland. Here you're another minority. 114 00:08:30,540 --> 00:08:34,220 Speaker 2: We live in a city of minorities. I work in Hollywood. 115 00:08:34,260 --> 00:08:38,580 Speaker 2: Once a week I drive through Soul Korea. I have 116 00:08:38,660 --> 00:08:42,660 Speaker 2: been to Soul Korea twice. Western Avenue might as well 117 00:08:42,699 --> 00:08:48,260 Speaker 2: be Soul houng chung Wong Avenue. It is. It is 118 00:08:48,260 --> 00:08:51,540 Speaker 2: like the Lower East Side when Mizeta lived. Everything was 119 00:08:51,579 --> 00:08:54,459 Speaker 2: in Yiddish. You might as well have been in Jerusalem. 120 00:08:54,500 --> 00:08:58,819 Speaker 2: Here it is soul transported. But there is also there 121 00:08:58,860 --> 00:09:02,620 Speaker 2: is also Little Japan. There is also Chinatown. There is 122 00:09:02,700 --> 00:09:06,620 Speaker 2: also huge Filipino area. And one goes on and what 123 00:09:06,740 --> 00:09:09,940 Speaker 2: about all the Hebrew you hear in the valley? Right? 124 00:09:09,980 --> 00:09:11,540 Speaker 2: I mean there are parts of the valley where if 125 00:09:11,580 --> 00:09:15,300 Speaker 2: you don't know Hebrew you have to study. You should 126 00:09:15,300 --> 00:09:20,140 Speaker 2: start studying it. Only in America can that be said 127 00:09:20,140 --> 00:09:22,780 Speaker 2: at this time. It's a wonderful place in many ways, 128 00:09:22,820 --> 00:09:26,339 Speaker 2: and people know it. So I don't believe Americans have 129 00:09:26,420 --> 00:09:30,859 Speaker 2: become selfish and rejected liberalism. I think liberals have rejected liberalism. 130 00:09:31,140 --> 00:09:33,540 Speaker 2: My proof being if you would listen to the speeches 131 00:09:33,580 --> 00:09:34,500 Speaker 2: of John F. Kennedy. 132 00:09:35,420 --> 00:09:38,300 Speaker 3: My friend Bill Pearl, who does the Saturday night show 133 00:09:38,820 --> 00:09:43,860 Speaker 3: on KBC prior to My show, is a terrific talk 134 00:09:43,900 --> 00:09:44,340 Speaker 3: show host. 135 00:09:44,380 --> 00:09:47,980 Speaker 2: You should truly listen to his show. I admire him 136 00:09:48,060 --> 00:09:50,500 Speaker 2: as a colleague. I mean, it's not common that one 137 00:09:50,540 --> 00:09:51,540 Speaker 2: admires a colleague. 138 00:09:52,380 --> 00:09:55,380 Speaker 3: It's easy to admire people in another field, but in 139 00:09:55,420 --> 00:09:57,020 Speaker 3: your own I'm telling. 140 00:09:56,740 --> 00:09:59,579 Speaker 2: You he has a beautiful show. The amount of homework 141 00:09:59,620 --> 00:10:03,420 Speaker 2: he does is remarkable. And I speak about the homework 142 00:10:03,500 --> 00:10:10,260 Speaker 2: because two weeks ago he compiled a huge assortment of 143 00:10:10,340 --> 00:10:13,580 Speaker 2: John F. Kennedy's speeches, and what he did was he 144 00:10:13,700 --> 00:10:16,460 Speaker 2: began the show by saying, ladies and gentlemen, tonight, my 145 00:10:16,580 --> 00:10:20,220 Speaker 2: guest is John F. Kennedy. And he would ask questions 146 00:10:20,220 --> 00:10:22,540 Speaker 2: and then play tapes at Kennedy's speeches as if he 147 00:10:22,580 --> 00:10:25,380 Speaker 2: was answering in the studio. That took a lot of work. 148 00:10:27,460 --> 00:10:30,540 Speaker 2: If you would have heard those speeches and you would 149 00:10:30,580 --> 00:10:33,380 Speaker 2: not have known it was Kennedy's voice, had it been 150 00:10:33,460 --> 00:10:36,380 Speaker 2: a just a reader reading them, you would have said, 151 00:10:36,660 --> 00:10:42,500 Speaker 2: this is a conservative speaking. For example, constant reference by 152 00:10:42,540 --> 00:10:46,020 Speaker 2: John Kennedy to the fact that the world is Haff's 153 00:10:46,060 --> 00:10:52,380 Speaker 2: half free and half enslaved, and the half that's enslaved 154 00:10:52,420 --> 00:10:58,900 Speaker 2: is communist. No democrat says that today. No liberal says 155 00:10:59,540 --> 00:11:03,380 Speaker 2: that the communist world is enslaved. That's Cold War rhetoric. 156 00:11:03,460 --> 00:11:07,940 Speaker 2: To a liberal, it's not allowable. I have said often, 157 00:11:07,980 --> 00:11:11,060 Speaker 2: and I do believe this. A liberal who would say 158 00:11:11,100 --> 00:11:15,220 Speaker 2: that would be elected. You see, people don't vote for 159 00:11:15,340 --> 00:11:21,620 Speaker 2: their House of Representatives, congressmen, or their senator foreign affairs. 160 00:11:22,300 --> 00:11:26,699 Speaker 2: They only vote for their president on foreign policy. That's 161 00:11:26,740 --> 00:11:30,220 Speaker 2: a major part of the reason Republicans keep winning the 162 00:11:30,260 --> 00:11:33,900 Speaker 2: country keeps electing after all Democrats, as mayors, as congressmen 163 00:11:33,940 --> 00:11:37,540 Speaker 2: and senators. What happens all of a sudden they get 164 00:11:37,580 --> 00:11:40,380 Speaker 2: selfish when it comes to voting for president. Again, the 165 00:11:40,460 --> 00:11:43,900 Speaker 2: selfish argument just fails. If Americans is selfish and to 166 00:11:44,620 --> 00:11:47,700 Speaker 2: liberal is unselfish, how come there are so many liberals 167 00:11:47,780 --> 00:11:54,980 Speaker 2: in Congress in governor's mansions because on foreign affairs, liberals 168 00:11:55,020 --> 00:11:58,540 Speaker 2: are not trusted for good reason, in my opinion, And 169 00:11:58,580 --> 00:12:02,660 Speaker 2: I'm talking to someone who voted for Mayor Bradley. I've 170 00:12:02,740 --> 00:12:08,500 Speaker 2: been a supporter of Mayor Bradley, so I identify with that trend. 171 00:12:08,540 --> 00:12:11,820 Speaker 2: This is coming from someone who is not talking above it. 172 00:12:11,900 --> 00:12:15,819 Speaker 2: I am part of that trend. And the reason that 173 00:12:15,900 --> 00:12:19,740 Speaker 2: Republicans or conservatives, if you will, are more trusted is 174 00:12:19,780 --> 00:12:24,740 Speaker 2: because of the issue of perceptions of communism and perceptions 175 00:12:24,780 --> 00:12:28,860 Speaker 2: of force. So I will begin my analysis of why 176 00:12:29,300 --> 00:12:32,220 Speaker 2: the L word has become the L word with an 177 00:12:32,260 --> 00:12:39,179 Speaker 2: analysis of foreign affairs. George McGovern was asked the quintessential 178 00:12:39,220 --> 00:12:43,300 Speaker 2: democratic liberal was asked when he ran for president. It 179 00:12:43,340 --> 00:12:49,340 Speaker 2: was in nineteen seventy two in Playboy magazine, where it 180 00:12:49,340 --> 00:12:54,260 Speaker 2: seemed for a while it was imperative that democratic presidential 181 00:12:54,300 --> 00:12:59,460 Speaker 2: candidates appear. Mister Carter was next, and that's when he 182 00:12:59,980 --> 00:13:08,500 Speaker 2: spoke about lusting, which apparently drew great evoked great trauma 183 00:13:08,660 --> 00:13:15,340 Speaker 2: among many Christians and massive yawns among many Jews, which 184 00:13:15,420 --> 00:13:19,860 Speaker 2: goes to that issue of one of the big differences 185 00:13:19,900 --> 00:13:23,860 Speaker 2: between Christians and Jews about the place of thoughts and 186 00:13:23,940 --> 00:13:27,180 Speaker 2: the place of actions and so on. That's another subject 187 00:13:27,179 --> 00:13:30,620 Speaker 2: for the other class. At any rate, he was asked 188 00:13:30,660 --> 00:13:33,820 Speaker 2: about communism, and he said more or less as follows. 189 00:13:34,300 --> 00:13:38,380 Speaker 2: I have the direct quote, but trust me that this 190 00:13:38,500 --> 00:13:42,620 Speaker 2: is just about what he said. He said, I personally 191 00:13:42,980 --> 00:13:47,459 Speaker 2: don't like communism. However, who am I to tell the 192 00:13:47,540 --> 00:13:52,699 Speaker 2: Russian people what sort of government they should have if 193 00:13:52,740 --> 00:13:58,300 Speaker 2: they want communism, that's their business. That was essentially his response. 194 00:13:59,260 --> 00:14:01,780 Speaker 2: That is the response, incidentally, that you would get from 195 00:14:01,780 --> 00:14:07,620 Speaker 2: most liberal professors at UCLA. That is the classic liberal 196 00:14:07,660 --> 00:14:09,900 Speaker 2: response post. 197 00:14:09,860 --> 00:14:14,580 Speaker 3: Vietnam, not John Kennedy pre Vietnam, to the question of 198 00:14:14,580 --> 00:14:17,540 Speaker 3: communist Listen, I don't like it, which is. 199 00:14:17,500 --> 00:14:20,140 Speaker 2: True, you don't. You never find the liberal who likes communism. 200 00:14:20,820 --> 00:14:25,780 Speaker 2: Like communism its communist, you know that's so, And they're 201 00:14:25,820 --> 00:14:30,380 Speaker 2: not communists, so obviously they don't like communism, but they're 202 00:14:30,380 --> 00:14:35,500 Speaker 2: not prepared to say it's slavery point blank, like John 203 00:14:35,580 --> 00:14:39,860 Speaker 2: Kennedy said, which was essential to liberalism. Communism is the 204 00:14:39,900 --> 00:14:44,220 Speaker 2: inheritor from Nazism of the enslaving of peoples and the mission, 205 00:14:44,500 --> 00:14:48,100 Speaker 2: which is what I believe communism is. But you can't 206 00:14:48,180 --> 00:14:51,180 Speaker 2: drag that out of a liberal. I asked Author's Lessener 207 00:14:51,260 --> 00:14:54,780 Speaker 2: Junior personally in public. Some of you may have been 208 00:14:54,780 --> 00:14:57,300 Speaker 2: there at the Brandis Bardine forums that I used to do. 209 00:14:58,660 --> 00:15:04,460 Speaker 2: I asked author Schlessinger Junior, probably the leading liberal professor 210 00:15:04,660 --> 00:15:08,380 Speaker 2: from the Kennedy era, extremely well known as you know. 211 00:15:09,380 --> 00:15:12,820 Speaker 2: I said to him, would you say that the United 212 00:15:12,860 --> 00:15:17,540 Speaker 2: States is morally superior as a society to the Soviet Union? 213 00:15:18,980 --> 00:15:23,620 Speaker 2: He said no, and I said, I'd like to repeat 214 00:15:23,620 --> 00:15:24,100 Speaker 2: the question. 215 00:15:26,300 --> 00:15:29,340 Speaker 3: You are not willing to say that as a society, 216 00:15:29,380 --> 00:15:34,220 Speaker 3: the United States is morally superior to the communist society 217 00:15:34,220 --> 00:15:35,060 Speaker 3: of the Soviet Union. 218 00:15:35,460 --> 00:15:40,940 Speaker 2: He said no, that would be self righteous. Liberals cannot 219 00:15:40,980 --> 00:15:44,780 Speaker 2: say the United States is morally superior to communism if 220 00:15:45,340 --> 00:15:50,900 Speaker 2: that has been perceived by the American public as eliminating 221 00:15:50,940 --> 00:15:55,980 Speaker 2: them from dealing with those who most Americans, thank god, 222 00:15:56,060 --> 00:16:00,380 Speaker 2: still perceive as vile. Mister Reagan said the Soviet Union 223 00:16:00,500 --> 00:16:03,980 Speaker 2: was an evil empire, a statement that should have elicited yours. 224 00:16:05,020 --> 00:16:07,860 Speaker 2: If the Soviet Union is not an evil empire, there 225 00:16:07,900 --> 00:16:10,700 Speaker 2: is no such thing as an evil empire, then none 226 00:16:10,700 --> 00:16:13,820 Speaker 2: ever existed. It's certainly an empire. It's the only remaining 227 00:16:13,860 --> 00:16:19,540 Speaker 2: empire in the world. What else would one call owning Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, 228 00:16:19,620 --> 00:16:26,140 Speaker 2: azer By John, the Ukraine, Moldavia. Not to mention Afghanistan? 229 00:16:28,020 --> 00:16:33,260 Speaker 2: And how is it greeted that statement by the president 230 00:16:33,380 --> 00:16:38,940 Speaker 2: as if the man had knocked down Shirley Temple, I mean, 231 00:16:39,020 --> 00:16:45,980 Speaker 2: had said she exposes herself to children. He had said 232 00:16:46,060 --> 00:16:53,900 Speaker 2: something that the liberal press, the liberal politician found utterly offensive. Now, 233 00:16:54,140 --> 00:16:57,540 Speaker 2: there is an argument that the President of the United States, 234 00:16:57,580 --> 00:17:02,540 Speaker 2: having to deal with the Soviets, ought not politically call 235 00:17:02,620 --> 00:17:07,980 Speaker 2: them in their face evil. That's a valid argument of tactics. 236 00:17:08,700 --> 00:17:11,739 Speaker 2: But it wasn't the tactic that was attacked. It was 237 00:17:11,780 --> 00:17:17,180 Speaker 2: the statement, who are we to say they're evil? After all? 238 00:17:17,260 --> 00:17:20,939 Speaker 2: Don't we have homeless, don't we have an You go 239 00:17:20,980 --> 00:17:23,379 Speaker 2: through the litany of all the terrible things of America. 240 00:17:24,699 --> 00:17:29,259 Speaker 2: That's what is perceived as the liberal reaction to the 241 00:17:29,379 --> 00:17:34,179 Speaker 2: question of communism. That's why they won't win. There's a 242 00:17:34,219 --> 00:17:42,740 Speaker 2: proof to what I'm saying. The proof is this. It 243 00:17:42,820 --> 00:17:45,340 Speaker 2: was argued for the last eight years, the last two 244 00:17:45,379 --> 00:17:48,859 Speaker 2: presidential elections, that mister Reagan was winning because of the 245 00:17:48,899 --> 00:17:53,739 Speaker 2: force of his dynamic personality. He was called by liberals, 246 00:17:54,739 --> 00:17:59,459 Speaker 2: not by others, By liberals the great communicator, man with 247 00:17:59,859 --> 00:18:06,619 Speaker 2: extraordinary charisma and with a Teflon coding. Nothing sticks. So 248 00:18:06,659 --> 00:18:11,100 Speaker 2: why did he win in almost every state? Because he 249 00:18:11,219 --> 00:18:15,019 Speaker 2: has a Teflon coding and he's a great communicator, and 250 00:18:15,060 --> 00:18:21,299 Speaker 2: that was the liberal wisdom. Well, the liberals today are 251 00:18:21,379 --> 00:18:26,379 Speaker 2: running against a man who has no charisma, who has 252 00:18:26,580 --> 00:18:33,979 Speaker 2: no ability to communicate, who is basically a very nice nothing, 253 00:18:35,340 --> 00:18:43,060 Speaker 2: who appointed a very nice sub nothing. Liberals are losing 254 00:18:43,219 --> 00:18:46,539 Speaker 2: and may lose forty five states to a nothing and 255 00:18:46,580 --> 00:18:52,300 Speaker 2: a sub nothing. The sub nothing can't communicate to anybody. 256 00:18:52,419 --> 00:18:54,459 Speaker 2: Do you know where he was the last two months? 257 00:18:55,139 --> 00:18:58,979 Speaker 2: He showed up for the debate, was wound up appropriately, 258 00:18:59,899 --> 00:19:02,499 Speaker 2: and has been yanked off the national fail. You can't 259 00:19:02,540 --> 00:19:05,539 Speaker 2: find him. He is not to be seen. He's almost 260 00:19:05,580 --> 00:19:09,740 Speaker 2: as hidden as Jesse Jackson has been for very similar reasons. 261 00:19:11,459 --> 00:19:14,379 Speaker 2: Not that Jackson can't communicate. He communicates all too well 262 00:19:14,419 --> 00:19:19,060 Speaker 2: and will come to Jackson in a moment. Now, if 263 00:19:19,100 --> 00:19:24,500 Speaker 2: you lose against George Bush and Dan Quail, you can 264 00:19:24,580 --> 00:19:28,700 Speaker 2: no longer argue it is because of great communicative abilities, 265 00:19:29,820 --> 00:19:34,939 Speaker 2: powerful charisma and teflon coding. There must be a reason. 266 00:19:35,699 --> 00:19:39,780 Speaker 2: What is the latest reason they do better TV commercials 267 00:19:39,820 --> 00:19:46,660 Speaker 2: than do Coccus. That is every column mist repeats that. Now, 268 00:19:46,739 --> 00:19:52,579 Speaker 2: ladies and gentlemen, that is ridiculous, It is ridiculous. It 269 00:19:52,619 --> 00:19:55,779 Speaker 2: has nothing or little to do with the reason. The 270 00:19:55,899 --> 00:20:00,259 Speaker 2: reason is precisely given in the most famous line of 271 00:20:00,300 --> 00:20:09,139 Speaker 2: mister Ducoccus's acceptance speech in Atlanta. This is this campaign, 272 00:20:09,219 --> 00:20:15,619 Speaker 2: this election is not about ideology but competence. Now why 273 00:20:15,619 --> 00:20:18,979 Speaker 2: did he say that? Because he is so competent. No, 274 00:20:19,619 --> 00:20:22,740 Speaker 2: because he knows that if it's about ideology he will 275 00:20:22,780 --> 00:20:28,139 Speaker 2: lose fifty states. That was the giveaway. They know it. 276 00:20:28,540 --> 00:20:32,979 Speaker 2: He is a smart man, mister Ducoccus, probably considerably smarter 277 00:20:33,060 --> 00:20:37,100 Speaker 2: than mister Bush in pure brain matter. And if you 278 00:20:37,179 --> 00:20:39,379 Speaker 2: want to choose a man's wisdom on the basis of 279 00:20:39,419 --> 00:20:42,019 Speaker 2: whom he chooses as a running mate, the only decision 280 00:20:42,060 --> 00:20:44,739 Speaker 2: we could judge either of them by it's a genius 281 00:20:44,859 --> 00:20:55,580 Speaker 2: versus a jerk. Now, mister ducacis understood. If we debate ideology, 282 00:20:55,739 --> 00:20:59,939 Speaker 2: we don't have a chance. This country has rejected what 283 00:21:00,060 --> 00:21:04,540 Speaker 2: we stand for. Fellow Democrats, Let's not use our ideals 284 00:21:04,540 --> 00:21:07,379 Speaker 2: to win, because we don't have a snowballs chance in 285 00:21:07,459 --> 00:21:12,699 Speaker 2: hell to win on that. Let's debate competence. That was 286 00:21:12,739 --> 00:21:18,819 Speaker 2: the giveaway. But you can then lapse back to the 287 00:21:18,859 --> 00:21:23,459 Speaker 2: old refrain. America are selfish because they're doing well, and 288 00:21:23,540 --> 00:21:25,939 Speaker 2: when they do well, they don't care about the poor guy. 289 00:21:27,260 --> 00:21:30,059 Speaker 2: If you believe that, I can't convince you otherwise. It's 290 00:21:30,100 --> 00:21:33,059 Speaker 2: a depressing thing. I would imagine, though, to believe that 291 00:21:33,139 --> 00:21:35,859 Speaker 2: all of a sudden, in the last eight years, Americans, 292 00:21:36,500 --> 00:21:40,059 Speaker 2: who have been such believers in government helping people, in 293 00:21:40,179 --> 00:21:42,820 Speaker 2: caring for the poor, have all of a sudden become 294 00:21:42,899 --> 00:21:46,179 Speaker 2: so selfish. I feel for liberals. They must walk around 295 00:21:46,260 --> 00:21:50,379 Speaker 2: much more depressed than I do, and I think they do. Incidentally, 296 00:21:50,699 --> 00:21:53,220 Speaker 2: I think they do. It's a depressing thing to think 297 00:21:53,260 --> 00:21:58,219 Speaker 2: the rest of your civilization has metamorphosized into a selfish mass. 298 00:22:02,340 --> 00:22:06,900 Speaker 2: Now why has this happened is the subject of my session. 299 00:22:07,659 --> 00:22:13,059 Speaker 2: Why has liberal become associated in most Americans' mind with 300 00:22:13,219 --> 00:22:17,419 Speaker 2: someone unworthy of the White House. I began with foreign affairs. 301 00:22:19,300 --> 00:22:22,699 Speaker 2: Conservatives are prepared to say, say the following Communism is evil, 302 00:22:22,899 --> 00:22:27,619 Speaker 2: the Soviet Union is evil. We are prepared to fight 303 00:22:27,739 --> 00:22:30,340 Speaker 2: that evil, or at least help those who are fighting 304 00:22:30,340 --> 00:22:36,379 Speaker 2: that evil fighting. Liberals say, who are we to call 305 00:22:36,419 --> 00:22:39,579 Speaker 2: it evil? We have our own bad things going on 306 00:22:39,659 --> 00:22:42,939 Speaker 2: in our own society. We should only use force when 307 00:22:43,020 --> 00:22:48,139 Speaker 2: we are threatened personally, and let others choose their own systems, 308 00:22:48,139 --> 00:22:51,939 Speaker 2: even if it is communists. Those are very different views 309 00:22:51,939 --> 00:22:55,020 Speaker 2: of the world, and they both can't be right. One 310 00:22:55,100 --> 00:22:57,340 Speaker 2: is right and one is wrong, or they're both wrong, 311 00:22:57,780 --> 00:23:00,899 Speaker 2: but they certainly can't both be right. That's why the 312 00:23:00,939 --> 00:23:04,780 Speaker 2: Countrist is a perfect example. It's a very good litmus 313 00:23:04,820 --> 00:23:11,699 Speaker 2: test conservatives whole, or if you will, old time liberals, 314 00:23:11,979 --> 00:23:15,100 Speaker 2: which is what I think of me. As people in 315 00:23:15,179 --> 00:23:18,740 Speaker 2: Nicaragua wish to overthrow their communist regime that has robbed 316 00:23:18,780 --> 00:23:21,940 Speaker 2: their revolution from them, I support them and will give 317 00:23:21,979 --> 00:23:25,499 Speaker 2: them aid as long as I can. Why did I 318 00:23:25,540 --> 00:23:28,500 Speaker 2: learn from Vietnam? Speaking personally and the name of many 319 00:23:28,500 --> 00:23:31,379 Speaker 2: of those who want to support the constricts, I will 320 00:23:31,379 --> 00:23:35,699 Speaker 2: not send American Americans to die there, but I will 321 00:23:35,859 --> 00:23:40,020 Speaker 2: help Nikaraguans fight there. Does that mean they will die? Yes, 322 00:23:40,100 --> 00:23:44,179 Speaker 2: it's not possible to fight with machine guns and not die. 323 00:23:44,340 --> 00:23:47,219 Speaker 2: I am prepared to help people die and kill. 324 00:23:47,340 --> 00:23:52,379 Speaker 3: Yes, that sounds cruel. That's because you've turned liberal. It 325 00:23:52,419 --> 00:23:53,179 Speaker 3: is not cruel. 326 00:23:53,899 --> 00:23:56,820 Speaker 2: Why is that any more cruel than helping Frenchmen kill 327 00:23:57,100 --> 00:24:01,500 Speaker 2: when they were occupied by the Visci regime. The Vicisi 328 00:24:01,580 --> 00:24:04,300 Speaker 2: regime was a local fascist regime in World War Two? 329 00:24:04,699 --> 00:24:09,539 Speaker 2: Why should we have invaded France? Why should we have 330 00:24:09,580 --> 00:24:12,419 Speaker 2: given aid to Frenchmen who are gonna shoot other Frenchmen 331 00:24:12,459 --> 00:24:16,499 Speaker 2: to overthrow the despicable vic regime? Because it's okay to 332 00:24:16,899 --> 00:24:22,859 Speaker 2: fight fascism but not okay to fight communism. Why communism 333 00:24:22,899 --> 00:24:27,779 Speaker 2: is more moral? On what gradation of morality? Is communism 334 00:24:27,859 --> 00:24:31,659 Speaker 2: more moral than fascism other than it's rhetoric. That's true. 335 00:24:31,859 --> 00:24:35,779 Speaker 2: On rh rhetorical terms, communism is much better than fascism. 336 00:24:35,939 --> 00:24:40,459 Speaker 2: When Nazis killed you, they said you are subhuman scum 337 00:24:40,820 --> 00:24:46,020 Speaker 2: and we are exterminating you. When communists murder you, they 338 00:24:46,060 --> 00:24:49,019 Speaker 2: do it in the name of progress, freedom and do 339 00:24:49,100 --> 00:24:53,980 Speaker 2: it for your sake. That is correct. Liberals by rhetoric. 340 00:24:56,060 --> 00:25:00,939 Speaker 2: Communist rhetoric is noble. Fascist rhetoric isn't trouble is in 341 00:25:00,979 --> 00:25:03,260 Speaker 2: the world today. I much rather live under a right 342 00:25:03,300 --> 00:25:07,899 Speaker 2: wing regime than a communist regime for a very simple reason. 343 00:25:08,659 --> 00:25:12,219 Speaker 2: Many simple reasons, but one that's the simplest and clearest. 344 00:25:13,139 --> 00:25:15,619 Speaker 2: If I live under a right wing dictator, I have 345 00:25:15,699 --> 00:25:18,939 Speaker 2: a chance in my own lifetime of living in a 346 00:25:18,979 --> 00:25:22,659 Speaker 2: free country. If I live under a communist dictator, I 347 00:25:22,739 --> 00:25:28,139 Speaker 2: have no such chance. That's the difference. Chili vote a 348 00:25:28,340 --> 00:25:33,939 Speaker 2: chilly general hunta neo fascist man just got himself voted 349 00:25:33,979 --> 00:25:40,540 Speaker 2: out of bower. Think Fidel Castro will do that. When 350 00:25:40,540 --> 00:25:43,699 Speaker 2: I'm going debate with one of my radio listeners on 351 00:25:43,699 --> 00:25:50,179 Speaker 2: this very issue, he told me it's much better in 352 00:25:50,179 --> 00:25:51,139 Speaker 2: Cuba than in Chile. 353 00:25:51,739 --> 00:25:56,459 Speaker 3: I said, by no criterion of human rights and values 354 00:25:56,500 --> 00:25:57,379 Speaker 3: that I can think of. 355 00:25:58,219 --> 00:26:02,580 Speaker 2: Is that correct? That is absolutely false. I would infinitely 356 00:26:02,619 --> 00:26:04,979 Speaker 2: prefer to live in Chili than in Cuba, and I 357 00:26:05,020 --> 00:26:07,979 Speaker 2: would infinitely prefer to live here than in either. But 358 00:26:08,060 --> 00:26:10,899 Speaker 2: if those were my choices, there is no question. He 359 00:26:11,060 --> 00:26:12,979 Speaker 2: called up the following week and said, you know, I 360 00:26:12,979 --> 00:26:19,219 Speaker 2: think you're right. To his credit, Cuba is worse, but 361 00:26:19,340 --> 00:26:22,019 Speaker 2: it goes down the line is worth South Korea we 362 00:26:22,060 --> 00:26:27,859 Speaker 2: speak the riots and rigged elections and so on. South 363 00:26:27,939 --> 00:26:31,899 Speaker 2: Korea's paradise compared to North Korea. West Germany is paradise 364 00:26:31,939 --> 00:26:35,179 Speaker 2: compared to East Germany. Wherever there's a communist half and 365 00:26:35,219 --> 00:26:38,100 Speaker 2: another half the other half is better, even if it's 366 00:26:38,100 --> 00:26:44,539 Speaker 2: not fully democratic. Everything I have said, John F. Kennedy 367 00:26:44,580 --> 00:26:47,740 Speaker 2: would have sat in this audience and played Tic tac 368 00:26:47,820 --> 00:26:50,619 Speaker 2: toe with himself while I spoke, because I would be 369 00:26:50,659 --> 00:26:56,340 Speaker 2: speaking such batal truths. This was the given of the 370 00:26:56,379 --> 00:27:03,259 Speaker 2: Democrats and the liberals up to Vietnam. Vietnam burned them. 371 00:27:03,379 --> 00:27:07,019 Speaker 2: They got very badly burned fighting communism. So all of 372 00:27:07,060 --> 00:27:08,899 Speaker 2: a sudden, instead of saying we fought it in the 373 00:27:08,939 --> 00:27:13,220 Speaker 2: wrong way, they said we shouldn't fight it. And when 374 00:27:13,260 --> 00:27:16,819 Speaker 2: a person decides not to fight something, he has to 375 00:27:16,859 --> 00:27:21,740 Speaker 2: start believing it's not worth fighting. It is very hard 376 00:27:21,780 --> 00:27:24,779 Speaker 2: to say something is evil, but I refuse to fight it, 377 00:27:25,379 --> 00:27:28,299 Speaker 2: because then you have to confront your conscience. So what 378 00:27:28,419 --> 00:27:32,100 Speaker 2: the Democrat liberal has done is said it's not worth 379 00:27:32,139 --> 00:27:36,419 Speaker 2: fighting communism, look at what happened in Vietnam. And once 380 00:27:36,500 --> 00:27:40,499 Speaker 2: deciding that it's not worth fighting communism. The next thing was, 381 00:27:40,659 --> 00:27:44,699 Speaker 2: it's really not so bad communism, which is why the 382 00:27:44,780 --> 00:27:49,779 Speaker 2: reaction to mister Reagan saying it's an evil empire. I 383 00:27:49,859 --> 00:27:53,340 Speaker 2: speak at colleges, If I describe communism as evil, professors 384 00:27:53,379 --> 00:27:58,459 Speaker 2: will get up and they they will that they have 385 00:27:58,899 --> 00:28:04,659 Speaker 2: viscerally angry reactions, passion passionately angry. I spoke at a 386 00:28:05,100 --> 00:28:07,659 Speaker 2: human rights conference. I was sneaked in as a speaker. 387 00:28:08,859 --> 00:28:11,579 Speaker 2: That's really what it amounted to. It was a human 388 00:28:11,659 --> 00:28:18,540 Speaker 2: rights conference developed by psychoanalysts, with whom I have great 389 00:28:18,580 --> 00:28:22,300 Speaker 2: respect for, and it was a very major conference here 390 00:28:22,340 --> 00:28:26,059 Speaker 2: at some hotel in Los Angeles. Speaker after speaker at 391 00:28:26,060 --> 00:28:30,780 Speaker 2: a conference on world human rights spoke about abuses in Chile, 392 00:28:31,459 --> 00:28:35,659 Speaker 2: abuses in South Africa, abuses in Argentina, which was then 393 00:28:35,739 --> 00:28:38,620 Speaker 2: run by the generals, and all correct. I agree with 394 00:28:38,660 --> 00:28:42,539 Speaker 2: every one of those. There are terrible. There are terrible 395 00:28:42,540 --> 00:28:46,260 Speaker 2: abuses and are still in the case of South Africa, 396 00:28:47,620 --> 00:28:51,060 Speaker 2: and should be noted. Now. One speaker spoke, however, about 397 00:28:51,219 --> 00:28:55,059 Speaker 2: abuses under communism. So I was sneaked in by a 398 00:28:55,100 --> 00:28:57,140 Speaker 2: friend of mine who's a psychoanalyst and who was on 399 00:28:57,180 --> 00:29:01,340 Speaker 2: the steering committee. He will also speak on human rights 400 00:29:01,340 --> 00:29:07,340 Speaker 2: in communist countries. I was hissed, I was booed. The 401 00:29:07,380 --> 00:29:11,180 Speaker 2: reactions were remarkable, to the extent that when I said 402 00:29:11,219 --> 00:29:14,060 Speaker 2: that Stalin killed more people than Hickler, which is a 403 00:29:14,180 --> 00:29:15,780 Speaker 2: fact of life, and I say it is a Jew 404 00:29:16,300 --> 00:29:22,099 Speaker 2: obsessed with the Holocaust. I was yelling that to the 405 00:29:22,100 --> 00:29:25,499 Speaker 2: point where it was denied. I was called a liar 406 00:29:25,660 --> 00:29:30,059 Speaker 2: for saying that there was genocide in the Ukraine. And 407 00:29:30,140 --> 00:29:32,540 Speaker 2: I simply looked at them, most of them being Jewish. 408 00:29:33,459 --> 00:29:36,540 Speaker 2: And I will analyze, perhaps tonight or another night, why 409 00:29:36,620 --> 00:29:43,459 Speaker 2: Jews tend to flock towards liberalism. And I said, you are, morally, 410 00:29:43,500 --> 00:29:48,060 Speaker 2: to me identical to those anti Semites who deny the Holocaust. 411 00:29:49,500 --> 00:29:52,340 Speaker 2: Anyone who denies what the Soviets did in the Ukraine 412 00:29:52,340 --> 00:29:56,180 Speaker 2: in the thirties is morally equivalent to the anti Semite 413 00:29:56,219 --> 00:30:00,499 Speaker 2: who denies what the Nazis did to the Jews. It 414 00:30:01,219 --> 00:30:07,380 Speaker 2: was the saddest of sad experiences. That's the issue, my friends. 415 00:30:08,260 --> 00:30:12,820 Speaker 2: If liberals could say these things about communism, it would 416 00:30:12,820 --> 00:30:16,980 Speaker 2: no longer be a dirty word, or it would fifty 417 00:30:17,020 --> 00:30:21,819 Speaker 2: percent at least would have been cured. Along with that, 418 00:30:21,900 --> 00:30:23,979 Speaker 2: of course, comes the issue of the use of force. 419 00:30:24,700 --> 00:30:29,660 Speaker 2: Mister Reagan used force on Libya. He bombed Libya. He 420 00:30:29,820 --> 00:30:36,340 Speaker 2: was called rambo for bombing Libya. Sometimes the rambo response works. 421 00:30:37,380 --> 00:30:40,579 Speaker 2: I have no one better to quote than an archtypical 422 00:30:40,820 --> 00:30:44,940 Speaker 2: liberal Woody Allen, who, in one of his films is 423 00:30:45,020 --> 00:30:50,019 Speaker 2: standing in Manhattan with two Jewish liberal friends and they 424 00:30:50,060 --> 00:30:55,180 Speaker 2: are debating about what to do about neo Nazis in America. 425 00:30:55,420 --> 00:30:58,180 Speaker 2: One of the liberal Jewish friends says to Woody Allen, 426 00:30:58,739 --> 00:31:02,420 Speaker 2: we should take out an ad in the New York Times, 427 00:31:03,300 --> 00:31:06,940 Speaker 2: to which Woody Allen responded that he suspects that most 428 00:31:07,060 --> 00:31:13,779 Speaker 2: Nazis don't read the New York Times and that baseball 429 00:31:13,860 --> 00:31:19,499 Speaker 2: bats are far more persuasive and effective. Now's Woody Allen 430 00:31:19,660 --> 00:31:24,259 Speaker 2: a rambo? That, no, because Jewish liberals are at peace 431 00:31:24,340 --> 00:31:27,259 Speaker 2: with bashing Nazi heads in, they're not at peace with 432 00:31:27,380 --> 00:31:33,340 Speaker 2: bashing communist heads in. I don't understand quite why I 433 00:31:33,459 --> 00:31:36,819 Speaker 2: never meet Jewish pacifists when it comes to Nazism, but 434 00:31:36,940 --> 00:31:39,060 Speaker 2: all of a sudden, when it comes to Communism, they 435 00:31:39,060 --> 00:31:45,739 Speaker 2: embrace Gandhi and every other pacifist that to me is selfish. 436 00:31:46,180 --> 00:31:48,940 Speaker 2: Those who want to destroy us should be killed, But 437 00:31:49,100 --> 00:31:51,860 Speaker 2: those who wish to destroy other nations, like the Ukrainians, 438 00:31:51,900 --> 00:31:55,060 Speaker 2: they should live and be Well, that's how I read 439 00:31:56,020 --> 00:32:03,660 Speaker 2: liberal non selfishness on foreign affairs. So when it comes 440 00:32:03,739 --> 00:32:06,900 Speaker 2: to force, mister Dukakis thought that it was wrong to 441 00:32:07,420 --> 00:32:11,860 Speaker 2: invade Grenada. There is a very large group of people, 442 00:32:11,940 --> 00:32:17,140 Speaker 2: as we discussed last week, that disagrees with mister Dukakis's appraisal. Grenadans. 443 00:32:18,380 --> 00:32:23,340 Speaker 2: They found the invasion terrific. They celebrated as a national holiday. 444 00:32:24,780 --> 00:32:27,860 Speaker 2: It's victory over Communism Day, like there was Victory over 445 00:32:27,979 --> 00:32:33,060 Speaker 2: Nazism Day in Europe. But that's rambo to the liberal. 446 00:32:33,700 --> 00:32:38,060 Speaker 2: When do you use force only when American interests are threatened? 447 00:32:38,700 --> 00:32:43,299 Speaker 2: Why that's considered noble and unselfish? I have never quite understood. 448 00:32:43,820 --> 00:32:47,059 Speaker 2: Strikes me as the quintessence of selfishness. Only when you 449 00:32:47,100 --> 00:32:49,900 Speaker 2: bother me? Will I ever use force? Do whatever you 450 00:32:49,940 --> 00:32:52,380 Speaker 2: want to the world, rap them all you like. Only 451 00:32:52,420 --> 00:32:55,340 Speaker 2: if you touch me, will I use my weapons. I 452 00:32:55,820 --> 00:32:59,299 Speaker 2: don't share that view. So those are two parts of 453 00:32:59,340 --> 00:33:04,700 Speaker 2: foreign affairs, the use of force and the view of communism. 454 00:33:04,979 --> 00:33:09,820 Speaker 2: Why we have an l word now domestic here. You 455 00:33:09,860 --> 00:33:12,420 Speaker 2: would think that liberalism should have a much better name. 456 00:33:16,100 --> 00:33:20,900 Speaker 2: It should it should have retained it. But it is 457 00:33:20,940 --> 00:33:27,740 Speaker 2: associated by many Americans with the following. For one thing, 458 00:33:30,100 --> 00:33:37,180 Speaker 2: it is associated with the sixties. Liberalism is associated with 459 00:33:37,219 --> 00:33:40,900 Speaker 2: the sixties, and for most Americans, except for those my 460 00:33:41,060 --> 00:33:45,700 Speaker 2: age who nostalgically look back at the sixties, I am 461 00:33:45,700 --> 00:33:48,300 Speaker 2: not among them. I didn't like the sixties during the sixties. 462 00:33:48,620 --> 00:33:52,420 Speaker 2: I certainly don't like the sixties in the eighties. But 463 00:33:53,300 --> 00:33:56,980 Speaker 2: there is a number of Americans that look back at 464 00:33:56,979 --> 00:34:00,860 Speaker 2: the sixties is a wonderful time. Do your own thing, 465 00:34:01,300 --> 00:34:06,660 Speaker 2: make love, not war, etc. Etc. Most Americans see that 466 00:34:06,780 --> 00:34:11,900 Speaker 2: period which had one spectacular liberal greatness attached to it 467 00:34:12,100 --> 00:34:17,100 Speaker 2: civil rights legislation, which is absolutely correct and which is 468 00:34:17,180 --> 00:34:21,020 Speaker 2: absolutely due to liberals and absolutely due to their credit. 469 00:34:21,380 --> 00:34:25,379 Speaker 2: That's just not a question. Conservatives did not open up 470 00:34:26,700 --> 00:34:31,180 Speaker 2: Southern schools to blacks. Liberals did. That's not a question 471 00:34:33,420 --> 00:34:37,740 Speaker 2: on You can't, however, on one issue. Continue to live 472 00:34:38,540 --> 00:34:42,979 Speaker 2: forever to maintain your credibility. You get the credit where 473 00:34:42,980 --> 00:34:45,100 Speaker 2: you deserve it, and then you move on. What do 474 00:34:45,180 --> 00:34:47,219 Speaker 2: you have to say to America in nineteen eighty eight, 475 00:34:48,060 --> 00:34:49,700 Speaker 2: We know what you have to say to the South 476 00:34:49,900 --> 00:34:53,220 Speaker 2: in nineteen sixty eight. What do you have to say now? 477 00:34:53,940 --> 00:34:56,900 Speaker 2: The sixties are perceived by most Americans as an age, 478 00:34:57,259 --> 00:35:04,339 Speaker 2: as a time of anarchy and tremendous permissiveness, breakdown of 479 00:35:04,540 --> 00:35:11,020 Speaker 2: institutions educationally, religiously, and politically, and by the way, I 480 00:35:11,100 --> 00:35:15,100 Speaker 2: generally share that assessment. I think we are still recuperating 481 00:35:15,140 --> 00:35:20,739 Speaker 2: from the sixties. It was a great time for an orgy. 482 00:35:21,380 --> 00:35:25,739 Speaker 2: It was a great time for fun. It wasn't necessarily 483 00:35:25,819 --> 00:35:29,180 Speaker 2: a great time for building the institutions that keep a 484 00:35:29,259 --> 00:35:33,419 Speaker 2: society going. The sexual revolution has at least as many 485 00:35:33,540 --> 00:35:38,620 Speaker 2: victims as it has people it has health. I have 486 00:35:38,700 --> 00:35:41,779 Speaker 2: no answer to the bottom line on the sexual revolution. 487 00:35:41,940 --> 00:35:46,140 Speaker 2: It's a very tough issue. Are women my age because 488 00:35:46,140 --> 00:35:50,780 Speaker 2: I'm quintessential sixties I was at college sixty six to seventy, 489 00:35:51,380 --> 00:35:53,859 Speaker 2: I was right smack in the heart of the sixties. 490 00:35:56,100 --> 00:36:00,299 Speaker 2: Are women happier as a result? Not that they can 491 00:36:00,339 --> 00:36:04,140 Speaker 2: go to work, which by and large is a good thing. 492 00:36:04,219 --> 00:36:06,700 Speaker 2: Women should be free. If they want to be surgeons, 493 00:36:06,700 --> 00:36:10,219 Speaker 2: they should be surgeons. There is obviously good things that 494 00:36:10,299 --> 00:36:13,500 Speaker 2: came out of feminism, But what about the part that 495 00:36:13,540 --> 00:36:19,100 Speaker 2: it was considered ridiculous to ever hold back sexually? You 496 00:36:19,140 --> 00:36:21,939 Speaker 2: had a hang up? The term why do you hung 497 00:36:22,060 --> 00:36:25,180 Speaker 2: up on a first date? They just had a bagel 498 00:36:25,859 --> 00:36:29,219 Speaker 2: and he wants to be in bed. She doesn't want 499 00:36:29,259 --> 00:36:31,580 Speaker 2: to go to bed. She has a hang up? Are 500 00:36:31,620 --> 00:36:35,859 Speaker 2: you sick? What's wrong with you? Did women benefit from 501 00:36:35,859 --> 00:36:39,620 Speaker 2: this buy and large men benefited from it? I'll be 502 00:36:39,739 --> 00:36:42,939 Speaker 2: very honest. I remember vividly. I was the happiest man 503 00:36:42,980 --> 00:36:47,339 Speaker 2: in the world that women were walking around saying, we're 504 00:36:47,460 --> 00:36:50,900 Speaker 2: just like men, we too can have sex without commitment. 505 00:36:51,819 --> 00:36:55,339 Speaker 2: I knew it was the biggest lie since pre Copernican 506 00:36:55,420 --> 00:37:01,339 Speaker 2: views of the universe. I knew it. Men for all 507 00:37:01,420 --> 00:37:05,980 Speaker 2: of recorded history, from ancient Mesopotamia had been trying to 508 00:37:06,060 --> 00:37:10,940 Speaker 2: convince women to have sex without commitment. All of a sudden, 509 00:37:11,380 --> 00:37:16,020 Speaker 2: this little window of opportunity open for men in the 510 00:37:16,100 --> 00:37:22,220 Speaker 2: late sixties, during my greatest period of bachelorhood, I knew 511 00:37:22,259 --> 00:37:26,499 Speaker 2: God was on my side. Women agreed, Oh, we can 512 00:37:26,580 --> 00:37:30,540 Speaker 2: also have non meaningful sex, said of course. Of course, 513 00:37:30,980 --> 00:37:35,299 Speaker 2: who said no? And it was just incredible. It was 514 00:37:35,380 --> 00:37:38,899 Speaker 2: the time to be a single man, or at least 515 00:37:38,900 --> 00:37:42,579 Speaker 2: that's what a lot of married men thought. And many 516 00:37:42,779 --> 00:37:45,579 Speaker 2: men decided to become single men then and found that 517 00:37:45,700 --> 00:37:48,899 Speaker 2: you know, in the final analysis, there was more fun 518 00:37:48,940 --> 00:37:54,180 Speaker 2: than happiness involved, which is another subject that you have 519 00:37:54,299 --> 00:37:59,060 Speaker 2: become aware of. So it's a very mixed bag, even 520 00:37:59,100 --> 00:38:01,219 Speaker 2: on the good stuff. And there were good things to 521 00:38:01,259 --> 00:38:04,500 Speaker 2: come from feminism, but they were also not good things. 522 00:38:05,060 --> 00:38:07,700 Speaker 2: I remember some of you were at Brandeis Bardein when 523 00:38:07,700 --> 00:38:12,140 Speaker 2: I was director, and I remember weekends so vividly. We 524 00:38:12,140 --> 00:38:14,859 Speaker 2: would open up weekends at the institute and it was 525 00:38:15,060 --> 00:38:20,020 Speaker 2: almost always for couples, and the way it worked was 526 00:38:20,219 --> 00:38:22,419 Speaker 2: the cup. Both both the husband and wife would stand 527 00:38:22,420 --> 00:38:27,140 Speaker 2: and introduce themselves. This was in the seventies, which is 528 00:38:27,259 --> 00:38:31,700 Speaker 2: which is philosophically the sixties, it's chronologically the seventies. I 529 00:38:31,779 --> 00:38:33,819 Speaker 2: remember so well. It made such an impact on me. 530 00:38:33,859 --> 00:38:37,020 Speaker 2: I was I was a bachelor. I was thinking what 531 00:38:37,100 --> 00:38:39,180 Speaker 2: will it be when I'm married? And I was watching 532 00:38:39,219 --> 00:38:43,500 Speaker 2: couples interact, and I remember a couple after couple that 533 00:38:43,540 --> 00:38:46,379 Speaker 2: would be like this. He would say, you know, I 534 00:38:46,420 --> 00:38:53,820 Speaker 2: am or whatever, and she would would very sheepishly admit 535 00:38:55,060 --> 00:38:59,140 Speaker 2: embarrassedly that she was uh uh a wife and mother. 536 00:39:00,339 --> 00:39:04,899 Speaker 2: It was said as if I'm sorry, I I have 537 00:39:04,980 --> 00:39:07,700 Speaker 2: nothing else to claim for myself. It was it was 538 00:39:07,900 --> 00:39:11,779 Speaker 2: said to see this. The shrip, to use the term 539 00:39:11,779 --> 00:39:16,460 Speaker 2: from the sixties put on women if they weren't a doctor, lawyer, 540 00:39:16,540 --> 00:39:20,899 Speaker 2: indian chief, or selling at May company. It it was 541 00:39:20,940 --> 00:39:24,979 Speaker 2: more prestigious to say I sell at May companies than 542 00:39:25,060 --> 00:39:31,140 Speaker 2: to say I make a home. Because you made six 543 00:39:31,180 --> 00:39:35,379 Speaker 2: bucks an hour and you didn't make a living, you 544 00:39:35,420 --> 00:39:40,259 Speaker 2: are in pay for being mother and wife. That too, 545 00:39:40,580 --> 00:39:43,180 Speaker 2: was part of it. Sure, there are good things, let 546 00:39:43,219 --> 00:39:45,739 Speaker 2: women do what they want and be free to Absolutely, 547 00:39:45,779 --> 00:39:49,700 Speaker 2: I'm totally for it, But a lot of bad stuff 548 00:39:49,739 --> 00:39:52,499 Speaker 2: came with it that is also part of them. It's 549 00:39:52,540 --> 00:39:57,980 Speaker 2: worthy of another talking will happen outside of feminism and 550 00:39:58,020 --> 00:40:01,540 Speaker 2: civil rights, though. There are a lot of things that 551 00:40:01,580 --> 00:40:05,739 Speaker 2: are associated with the sixties that simply are regarded by 552 00:40:05,779 --> 00:40:09,700 Speaker 2: Americans as a rule as not good. For example, kids 553 00:40:09,739 --> 00:40:15,499 Speaker 2: demanding that they make their own curriculum at college. Most Americans, 554 00:40:15,700 --> 00:40:19,500 Speaker 2: including this one, believed that the deterioration in American education 555 00:40:19,660 --> 00:40:23,700 Speaker 2: began in the sixties, and the major reason for it 556 00:40:23,739 --> 00:40:29,140 Speaker 2: is standards declined. In the sixties, standards were considered bourgeois, reactionary, 557 00:40:29,739 --> 00:40:35,339 Speaker 2: neo fascistic. It was the age of progress, progressive thought. 558 00:40:35,420 --> 00:40:39,580 Speaker 2: First of all, the most progressive was don't have greats, right, 559 00:40:39,859 --> 00:40:42,700 Speaker 2: don't have great and no required courses. So it is 560 00:40:42,739 --> 00:40:50,180 Speaker 2: now possible to graduate Princeton having taken movies. And I'll 561 00:40:50,219 --> 00:40:54,339 Speaker 2: prove it to you. What is the name of that Brookshields. 562 00:40:54,420 --> 00:41:00,379 Speaker 2: Brookshields went to Princeton. When she graduated about a year ago, 563 00:41:00,779 --> 00:41:04,979 Speaker 2: there was an article describing the courses she took. Because 564 00:41:05,020 --> 00:41:08,700 Speaker 2: she's famous and people wanted to know. A writer for 565 00:41:08,739 --> 00:41:12,219 Speaker 2: The New York Times wrote an opinion piece say missus 566 00:41:12,219 --> 00:41:15,779 Speaker 2: Shields should demand the mother as if the mother paid, 567 00:41:15,819 --> 00:41:21,379 Speaker 2: I don't know, Brookshields should demand her money back. Got no, 568 00:41:22,140 --> 00:41:25,500 Speaker 2: and then he would list what she never studied to 569 00:41:25,580 --> 00:41:29,779 Speaker 2: get a BA from Princeton University. Half her courses were 570 00:41:29,819 --> 00:41:36,660 Speaker 2: on film. That's an education, that's preparing. We're gonna compete 571 00:41:36,700 --> 00:41:38,820 Speaker 2: in the world, say the liberals. We have to compete 572 00:41:38,859 --> 00:41:41,979 Speaker 2: in the world, and the conservatives yell the same thing. 573 00:41:42,020 --> 00:41:45,300 Speaker 2: How you comte compete If kids are studying movies in college, 574 00:41:45,779 --> 00:41:48,660 Speaker 2: what are we gonna compete in movies? We won in movies, 575 00:41:48,739 --> 00:42:02,620 Speaker 2: We dominate the world. Unfortunately they're played on Japanese projectors. 576 00:42:03,380 --> 00:42:09,859 Speaker 2: See sense of decline of standards. I remember at Columbia, 577 00:42:09,859 --> 00:42:13,180 Speaker 2: where I attended graduate school, kids demanded to make the 578 00:42:13,259 --> 00:42:16,899 Speaker 2: curriculum juge of twenty two. What the hell are these 579 00:42:16,900 --> 00:42:20,259 Speaker 2: people called educators for if they don't know what's better 580 00:42:20,259 --> 00:42:23,100 Speaker 2: for us to study. I am not putting words in 581 00:42:23,140 --> 00:42:25,899 Speaker 2: a twenty two year old's mind. Now, at forty, I 582 00:42:25,940 --> 00:42:29,420 Speaker 2: wrote it. I said it then. I had such contempt 583 00:42:29,420 --> 00:42:32,940 Speaker 2: for educators it has never left me. Not teachers, educators, 584 00:42:34,100 --> 00:42:38,020 Speaker 2: the professional educators I still think are the dumbest people 585 00:42:38,380 --> 00:42:41,459 Speaker 2: in America unless proven innocent. In other words, if I 586 00:42:41,500 --> 00:42:45,099 Speaker 2: meet one who is an official in education, I think 587 00:42:45,100 --> 00:42:47,500 Speaker 2: they're dumb until I speak to them, and then they 588 00:42:47,500 --> 00:42:53,500 Speaker 2: can reverse it. These are the people who said twenty 589 00:42:53,540 --> 00:42:57,859 Speaker 2: two year old pishers like me would say, we don't 590 00:42:57,940 --> 00:43:01,019 Speaker 2: want to study X, Y, and Z, and we want 591 00:43:01,060 --> 00:43:05,060 Speaker 2: to study relevant remember relevant the key word and relevant courses. 592 00:43:06,020 --> 00:43:12,460 Speaker 2: Who needs history? I wan relevant courses? So they said, 593 00:43:12,739 --> 00:43:17,739 Speaker 2: you're right. A fifty five year old man who got 594 00:43:17,779 --> 00:43:21,259 Speaker 2: a PhD in education, who will spent thirty years education 595 00:43:21,819 --> 00:43:25,060 Speaker 2: says to a twenty two year old you're right. It 596 00:43:25,140 --> 00:43:28,379 Speaker 2: means he was wrong. They can't both be right. He 597 00:43:28,420 --> 00:43:32,739 Speaker 2: has spent thirty years wrong, and you expect kids to 598 00:43:32,779 --> 00:43:35,340 Speaker 2: have respect. I wrote an article when I was writing 599 00:43:35,380 --> 00:43:38,100 Speaker 2: my column for the Herald Examiner. You want to know 600 00:43:38,140 --> 00:43:43,339 Speaker 2: where the contempt for old age began in the sixties 601 00:43:44,180 --> 00:43:47,180 Speaker 2: because the elderly said, we have nothing to teach you kids. 602 00:43:47,940 --> 00:43:53,779 Speaker 2: The elderly caused the age gap, not the young. As 603 00:43:53,819 --> 00:43:57,140 Speaker 2: soon as the older generation says to the next generation, 604 00:43:58,020 --> 00:44:02,019 Speaker 2: you're right, where wrong? We don't know better than you? 605 00:44:02,819 --> 00:44:06,420 Speaker 2: Why will they not breed contempt for them? Clearly, age 606 00:44:06,460 --> 00:44:11,460 Speaker 2: brings nothing but wrinkles. It used to bring wrinkles and wisdom. 607 00:44:11,660 --> 00:44:16,819 Speaker 2: What was said in the sixties was it only brings wrinkles. 608 00:44:18,259 --> 00:44:20,979 Speaker 2: No wonder you couldn't trust anyone over thirty. They had 609 00:44:20,980 --> 00:44:24,980 Speaker 2: all lived a lie. I trusted people over thirty. I 610 00:44:25,060 --> 00:44:28,339 Speaker 2: came from a religious world where they said to me, 611 00:44:28,819 --> 00:44:33,420 Speaker 2: we do know better. We've lived forty years more than you, Dennis, 612 00:44:33,859 --> 00:44:36,660 Speaker 2: And as brilliant as you might think you are, you 613 00:44:36,779 --> 00:44:41,100 Speaker 2: don't know nothing. Four thousand years of Judaism knows a 614 00:44:41,140 --> 00:44:45,739 Speaker 2: lot more than you do. Religious kids in religious environments 615 00:44:45,739 --> 00:44:51,419 Speaker 2: respected their elders more for good reason. The elders were 616 00:44:51,420 --> 00:44:54,420 Speaker 2: worthy of respect. They said to us, we know better. 617 00:44:55,779 --> 00:44:58,219 Speaker 2: The worst thing I could tell my child is, I 618 00:44:59,700 --> 00:45:07,419 Speaker 2: don't know. What do you think? That's why? That's what 619 00:45:07,500 --> 00:45:09,460 Speaker 2: a five year old or a ten year old or 620 00:45:09,500 --> 00:45:12,019 Speaker 2: a fifteen year old wants to know, right, I don't 621 00:45:12,060 --> 00:45:13,500 Speaker 2: know what do you? Of course, if I don't know, 622 00:45:13,540 --> 00:45:16,219 Speaker 2: I'll say I don't know. I'm not a fool. My 623 00:45:16,420 --> 00:45:18,379 Speaker 2: child asked me in a lie, does God do exer? 624 00:45:18,540 --> 00:45:21,379 Speaker 2: I don't know when I don't No, I don't know, 625 00:45:22,180 --> 00:45:25,140 Speaker 2: but there are things I do know. How many parents 626 00:45:25,140 --> 00:45:27,939 Speaker 2: would say to me my kid came home from college, 627 00:45:27,980 --> 00:45:30,140 Speaker 2: and I don't know how to answer them. They're learning 628 00:45:30,219 --> 00:45:33,739 Speaker 2: things that we didn't learn. What's the difference. What's the 629 00:45:33,779 --> 00:45:37,140 Speaker 2: difference Our twelve year old daughter is learning things in math? 630 00:45:37,219 --> 00:45:39,339 Speaker 2: She came she showed me a math book. I would 631 00:45:39,420 --> 00:45:42,620 Speaker 2: funk I'd get a zero. She's in seventh grade. If 632 00:45:42,660 --> 00:45:45,419 Speaker 2: I took her exam, I'd get a zero. I never 633 00:45:45,460 --> 00:45:49,060 Speaker 2: heard of sets. I know sets from tennis. That's the 634 00:45:49,140 --> 00:45:54,140 Speaker 2: only set I know. Okay, she's studying sets. I don't 635 00:45:54,140 --> 00:45:57,739 Speaker 2: know what a set is. I could not answer her questions. Well, 636 00:45:57,940 --> 00:46:00,419 Speaker 2: that's technical knowledge. I'm not embarrassed not to know that. 637 00:46:01,020 --> 00:46:05,779 Speaker 2: But I'm supposed to have wisdom answers about life so 638 00:46:05,940 --> 00:46:09,739 Speaker 2: much crumbled. What else is the sixties and liberalism associated 639 00:46:09,779 --> 00:46:15,939 Speaker 2: with antireligion, and how could it not be it is. 640 00:46:17,660 --> 00:46:21,939 Speaker 2: You've got to be very, very disingenuous to say the 641 00:46:22,020 --> 00:46:27,060 Speaker 2: ACLU was not proposed to religion. It is. It wants 642 00:46:27,100 --> 00:46:31,259 Speaker 2: religion removed from every single public sphere. It was the 643 00:46:31,299 --> 00:46:35,860 Speaker 2: backbone of the democracy that without it, the democracy was threatened. 644 00:46:36,339 --> 00:46:39,460 Speaker 2: That's not believed by liberals. Liberals believe you can have 645 00:46:39,500 --> 00:46:43,219 Speaker 2: a secular society and thrive. Most Americans don't believe that. 646 00:46:45,739 --> 00:46:51,140 Speaker 2: I'm one of them. That's a very big deal. Yes, 647 00:46:51,180 --> 00:46:54,259 Speaker 2: the homeless is a big deal, but so is whether 648 00:46:54,380 --> 00:46:58,100 Speaker 2: or not religion remains the bonding of America, the backbone 649 00:46:58,100 --> 00:47:03,340 Speaker 2: of the civilization. That's a big deal. That is why 650 00:47:03,380 --> 00:47:06,180 Speaker 2: it is not right to say that Bush has run 651 00:47:06,660 --> 00:47:09,940 Speaker 2: just a negative campaign. It's certainly been no more negative 652 00:47:10,779 --> 00:47:15,140 Speaker 2: than the way the Democrats opened their campaign. And Richards 653 00:47:15,219 --> 00:47:17,899 Speaker 2: was dirtier than anybody has been in this campaign. And 654 00:47:17,940 --> 00:47:20,859 Speaker 2: her descriptions of George Bush at the Democratic Convention, that's 655 00:47:20,859 --> 00:47:24,539 Speaker 2: always forgotten. That's what started the campaign. The conventions begin 656 00:47:24,660 --> 00:47:28,379 Speaker 2: the campaign. They've both been dirty, and by the way, 657 00:47:28,380 --> 00:47:30,419 Speaker 2: I don't think it's been particularly dirty. I think that 658 00:47:30,420 --> 00:47:32,740 Speaker 2: this has been a very bizarre issue. Why was so dirty? 659 00:47:32,980 --> 00:47:34,660 Speaker 2: They attacked the other guy? Why do they suppose to 660 00:47:34,660 --> 00:47:36,339 Speaker 2: say he's a wonderful man. I think he'd make a 661 00:47:36,380 --> 00:47:42,020 Speaker 2: fine president. But I'm nicer Nixon and Kennedy. You know 662 00:47:42,100 --> 00:47:44,660 Speaker 2: what Kennedy said, when I think that the only thing 663 00:47:44,739 --> 00:47:48,180 Speaker 2: between Richard Nixon and the White House is me, I 664 00:47:48,219 --> 00:47:55,379 Speaker 2: get a heart attack. That's clean. And by the way, 665 00:47:55,420 --> 00:47:58,580 Speaker 2: so did we. It was something that we liberals shared 666 00:47:58,620 --> 00:48:00,380 Speaker 2: with him, that view he was the only thing between 667 00:48:00,460 --> 00:48:04,700 Speaker 2: Nixon and the White House. I don't understand exactly what's 668 00:48:04,739 --> 00:48:06,939 Speaker 2: so dirty about it. They attack each other, what are 669 00:48:06,940 --> 00:48:10,940 Speaker 2: they supposed to do? They do come out with position papers. Incidentally, 670 00:48:10,940 --> 00:48:14,579 Speaker 2: the press doesn't report it. The media is at least 671 00:48:14,620 --> 00:48:18,980 Speaker 2: as responsible as anyone over the impression that this is 672 00:48:18,980 --> 00:48:22,180 Speaker 2: a dirty campaign, because ten seconds on TV, they'll give 673 00:48:22,180 --> 00:48:25,219 Speaker 2: you the dirtiest line the man came out with. That's why, 674 00:48:25,980 --> 00:48:28,019 Speaker 2: that's why I beg people not to watch TV news. 675 00:48:28,060 --> 00:48:29,859 Speaker 2: I don't watch TV news. I don't think it's a 676 00:48:29,900 --> 00:48:34,620 Speaker 2: dirty campaign. I read what they say in articles, long articles. 677 00:48:36,180 --> 00:48:38,900 Speaker 2: You watch TV, you'll think it's dirty. TV is dirty. 678 00:48:39,060 --> 00:48:44,460 Speaker 2: Not the campaign at any rate. That is what a 679 00:48:44,500 --> 00:48:48,860 Speaker 2: lot of Americans are perceived when they perceive these issues 680 00:48:49,380 --> 00:48:51,779 Speaker 2: about what liberal means. What is the pledge of allegiance? 681 00:48:51,819 --> 00:48:55,300 Speaker 2: Issue is Ducaca is technically right, very well might. 682 00:48:55,140 --> 00:48:59,979 Speaker 3: Be, but Americans perceive that liberals don't have a high 683 00:48:59,980 --> 00:49:04,539 Speaker 3: regard for patriotism. That is the perception that someone who 684 00:49:04,580 --> 00:49:07,180 Speaker 3: really does love the flag and want to salute. 685 00:49:06,779 --> 00:49:10,660 Speaker 2: It is really a crypto fascist. That's how they're depicted. 686 00:49:12,339 --> 00:49:16,540 Speaker 2: That's how they're depicted by a liberal Hollywood movies. You 687 00:49:16,580 --> 00:49:19,500 Speaker 2: don't imagine a liberal crying at the sight of a flag. 688 00:49:20,739 --> 00:49:23,140 Speaker 2: Do you imagine a conservative crying at the sight of 689 00:49:23,180 --> 00:49:28,180 Speaker 2: a flag. That's the issue with this pledge of allegiance, 690 00:49:28,460 --> 00:49:31,339 Speaker 2: not the technical legal details which liberals are so fond 691 00:49:31,380 --> 00:49:34,060 Speaker 2: of clothing. And the same with Horton. I don't know 692 00:49:34,100 --> 00:49:36,899 Speaker 2: Horton was black, incidentally, until it was mentioned, because I 693 00:49:37,020 --> 00:49:40,060 Speaker 2: only read the papers. It was amazing to me when 694 00:49:40,060 --> 00:49:42,060 Speaker 2: I first heard that it was a racist issue. I said, oh, 695 00:49:42,100 --> 00:49:44,819 Speaker 2: he must be black. I swear to you, I give 696 00:49:44,819 --> 00:49:46,819 Speaker 2: you my word. I did not know the man was 697 00:49:46,859 --> 00:49:50,500 Speaker 2: black because I read newspapers and don't watch TV, so 698 00:49:50,540 --> 00:49:52,299 Speaker 2: I never saw a picture of him. I didn't have 699 00:49:52,339 --> 00:49:56,020 Speaker 2: any Imagy was black. And incidentally, I am convinced, as 700 00:49:56,060 --> 00:49:58,459 Speaker 2: the day is long, if Horton were white, they would 701 00:49:58,500 --> 00:50:00,820 Speaker 2: have made just as big a deal about it. Because 702 00:50:00,859 --> 00:50:03,339 Speaker 2: you remember that guy who hacked off the girl's arms 703 00:50:03,380 --> 00:50:06,859 Speaker 2: here in LA. He was white. The guy couldn't move 704 00:50:06,859 --> 00:50:11,020 Speaker 2: anywhere in California. Most Americans care if the hacker is 705 00:50:11,060 --> 00:50:15,459 Speaker 2: white or black. I mean, that's racist. The charges are 706 00:50:15,460 --> 00:50:19,060 Speaker 2: more racist than the Horton issue was. If Horton were white, 707 00:50:19,100 --> 00:50:23,859 Speaker 2: Bush wouldn't have made a deal. It's demeaning to the 708 00:50:23,900 --> 00:50:32,979 Speaker 2: American people to make that argument. I said. It's permissiveness 709 00:50:32,980 --> 00:50:39,340 Speaker 2: that's associated with liberalism. Take abortion. Apparently, according to polling, 710 00:50:39,660 --> 00:50:47,580 Speaker 2: most Americans are pro choice. I'm pro choice, but I 711 00:50:47,660 --> 00:50:51,900 Speaker 2: have very little in common with the liberal position on abortion. 712 00:50:53,180 --> 00:50:56,660 Speaker 2: That's the irony. Now, how could that be? I'm pro choice, 713 00:50:56,859 --> 00:51:02,060 Speaker 2: conservatives are antipe choice, and I feel closer to conservatives 714 00:51:02,100 --> 00:51:06,580 Speaker 2: on abortion. How is that possible? That will help you 715 00:51:06,739 --> 00:51:13,380 Speaker 2: understand why l has become a dirty word. It's the rhetoric, 716 00:51:13,580 --> 00:51:18,620 Speaker 2: it's the thinking, it's the philosophy. Most Americans feel very 717 00:51:18,660 --> 00:51:25,259 Speaker 2: bad about abortion. They perceive that liberals don't. The perception 718 00:51:25,460 --> 00:51:27,700 Speaker 2: is I got a letter today from Ira Glasser, not 719 00:51:27,739 --> 00:51:31,100 Speaker 2: personally a form letter that I should send money to 720 00:51:31,140 --> 00:51:34,780 Speaker 2: the ACLU. They obviously don't check their lists very carefully. 721 00:51:38,739 --> 00:51:42,299 Speaker 2: And in the letter, what does he say said? Well, 722 00:51:42,299 --> 00:51:46,540 Speaker 2: you must support the ACLU because we don't want a 723 00:51:46,580 --> 00:51:55,660 Speaker 2: Bush administration to undo women's reproductive rights. The second you 724 00:51:55,700 --> 00:52:00,540 Speaker 2: say women's reproductive rights, I feel like marching with fundamentalist 725 00:52:00,580 --> 00:52:03,899 Speaker 2: Christians whom I don't share the view of abortion as 726 00:52:03,980 --> 00:52:10,459 Speaker 2: murder at all. It's not women's reproductive rights. It is 727 00:52:10,540 --> 00:52:14,499 Speaker 2: the taking of the life. If liberals would at least 728 00:52:14,540 --> 00:52:18,419 Speaker 2: admit that and cry over the decision, they would get 729 00:52:18,460 --> 00:52:22,140 Speaker 2: American support. What is perceived is they don't give a 730 00:52:22,140 --> 00:52:26,100 Speaker 2: good goddamn about that thing in a woman's womb, and 731 00:52:26,180 --> 00:52:28,779 Speaker 2: they don't I perceive that. I don't think they give 732 00:52:28,819 --> 00:52:35,100 Speaker 2: a goddamn about it. I screwed, I got pregnant, I kill. 733 00:52:35,259 --> 00:52:40,660 Speaker 2: That's the motto of most abortions. It is not the poor, 734 00:52:40,660 --> 00:52:45,420 Speaker 2: the result of incest or rape. That's phony. The vast 735 00:52:45,460 --> 00:52:49,499 Speaker 2: majority of abortions are done by people who didn't use 736 00:52:49,540 --> 00:52:55,060 Speaker 2: birth control and want to undo their mistake. Period. I 737 00:52:55,180 --> 00:53:00,739 Speaker 2: interviewed a gynecologist. The gynecologist obstatrician who delivered my son, 738 00:53:02,460 --> 00:53:08,060 Speaker 2: a Beverly Hills gynecologist. Okay, his clientele on not Watts girls. 739 00:53:09,580 --> 00:53:13,620 Speaker 2: I said to him, just out of curiosity, doctor, how 740 00:53:13,660 --> 00:53:17,140 Speaker 2: many of the of the women, what percentage of the 741 00:53:17,180 --> 00:53:22,260 Speaker 2: women who come in here and are pregnant wish an abortion? 742 00:53:23,940 --> 00:53:31,700 Speaker 2: He said about fifty percent. Beverly Hills obstetrician. Immediately, by 743 00:53:31,739 --> 00:53:33,620 Speaker 2: the way, just think of the sadness. The man has 744 00:53:33,620 --> 00:53:37,100 Speaker 2: spent his whole life learning how to deliver babies, spends 745 00:53:37,140 --> 00:53:40,180 Speaker 2: half of his time destroying them. Okay, you don't like 746 00:53:40,180 --> 00:53:43,859 Speaker 2: the word baby fetuses or make you feel better. Spent 747 00:53:43,980 --> 00:53:47,020 Speaker 2: his life learning how to deliver babies, spends half of 748 00:53:47,060 --> 00:53:53,940 Speaker 2: his patients want the babies undelivered. Of those fifty percent, 749 00:53:54,060 --> 00:53:57,660 Speaker 2: I said, how many are married? He said fifty percent? 750 00:53:58,980 --> 00:54:01,060 Speaker 2: So I said, in other words, one out of every 751 00:54:01,100 --> 00:54:04,580 Speaker 2: four women who walks into your office pregnant wants an 752 00:54:04,580 --> 00:54:11,500 Speaker 2: abortion is married and wealthy. Correct. Okay, why would a married, 753 00:54:11,779 --> 00:54:15,379 Speaker 2: wealthy woman want an abortion? So as well, I'll tell you, 754 00:54:15,620 --> 00:54:17,939 Speaker 2: mister Brager, to give you an example. Just last week, 755 00:54:17,940 --> 00:54:20,379 Speaker 2: the woman came in and she explained to me that 756 00:54:20,420 --> 00:54:22,379 Speaker 2: her she and her husband had been planning a trip 757 00:54:22,380 --> 00:54:24,779 Speaker 2: to Europe for quite some time, and this was a 758 00:54:24,859 --> 00:54:30,739 Speaker 2: very inconvenient time to get pregnant. It's a liberal position, 759 00:54:30,819 --> 00:54:36,059 Speaker 2: isn't it. Take a good liberal position, no judgment. Most 760 00:54:36,140 --> 00:54:40,140 Speaker 2: Americans do take a judgment on that. There's something very 761 00:54:40,219 --> 00:54:44,259 Speaker 2: hideously wrong about a borning in such a circumstance. I'll 762 00:54:44,339 --> 00:54:46,739 Speaker 2: let her do it. I am legally pro choice, but 763 00:54:46,779 --> 00:54:51,859 Speaker 2: I think the act is despicable. And he gave other 764 00:54:51,940 --> 00:54:54,100 Speaker 2: examples just like that. Others had just thought it a 765 00:54:54,140 --> 00:54:58,219 Speaker 2: new job, a new home, and so on, bad time 766 00:54:58,299 --> 00:55:04,660 Speaker 2: to get pregnant. That's what's perceived as liberal. And when 767 00:55:04,700 --> 00:55:09,859 Speaker 2: you talk about reproductive rights, that's exactly what it is. 768 00:55:11,180 --> 00:55:15,620 Speaker 2: It is removing any concept of moral vacillation, of moral 769 00:55:15,739 --> 00:55:19,700 Speaker 2: ambivalence over what is being done. It's like removing a 770 00:55:19,779 --> 00:55:27,300 Speaker 2: decay to gay rights. I think discriminating against gays is wrong. 771 00:55:27,980 --> 00:55:32,060 Speaker 2: I think gay bashing is despicable. On the other hand, 772 00:55:32,100 --> 00:55:35,620 Speaker 2: I do not have a liberal position that whether you're 773 00:55:35,660 --> 00:55:39,660 Speaker 2: gay or whether you're straight, it doesn't matter. Everybody should 774 00:55:39,660 --> 00:55:41,939 Speaker 2: do what he wants and it's all a happy go 775 00:55:42,020 --> 00:55:50,860 Speaker 2: lucky civilization. I don't legally I'm pro gay rights morally, socially, theologically, 776 00:55:51,900 --> 00:55:56,420 Speaker 2: I think it is sad to say the least, that 777 00:55:55,339 --> 00:56:00,420 Speaker 2: we are not creating a civilization to teach that heterosexual 778 00:56:00,460 --> 00:56:06,660 Speaker 2: marriage is the preferred state. And most Americans feel that way. 779 00:56:07,540 --> 00:56:11,739 Speaker 2: Maybe Beverly Hills Jews don't, but most Americans, thank God do. 780 00:56:12,259 --> 00:56:15,219 Speaker 2: It's pretty tragic that Jews don't, since Jews gave the 781 00:56:15,259 --> 00:56:23,739 Speaker 2: heterosexual religious ideal to the world through their Bible. And finally, 782 00:56:23,900 --> 00:56:31,259 Speaker 2: two final things, taxes. Here is the classic case of 783 00:56:31,299 --> 00:56:35,180 Speaker 2: why liberals think conservatives are selfish. Say they're against any 784 00:56:35,339 --> 00:56:39,379 Speaker 2: rise in taxes to protect the rich, as if it's 785 00:56:39,420 --> 00:56:43,740 Speaker 2: the rich who pay taxes. I mean, there is something 786 00:56:43,859 --> 00:56:48,660 Speaker 2: so bizarre here. When taxes are raised, it's the middle 787 00:56:48,660 --> 00:56:52,580 Speaker 2: class that gets screwed, not the wealthy who find nine 788 00:56:52,739 --> 00:56:56,779 Speaker 2: thousand tax loopholes. And even if they didn't, do you 789 00:56:56,819 --> 00:57:00,940 Speaker 2: think they really care the wealthy don't care? The wealthy 790 00:57:00,980 --> 00:57:05,859 Speaker 2: and not walking around frightened of tax hikes. Where do 791 00:57:05,940 --> 00:57:08,700 Speaker 2: liberals live? They live in a cocoon that who do 792 00:57:08,739 --> 00:57:12,620 Speaker 2: they think they're convincing nobody? The middle class is frightened 793 00:57:12,660 --> 00:57:15,340 Speaker 2: by tax hikes, and the middle class votes for Reagan 794 00:57:15,739 --> 00:57:23,820 Speaker 2: it's rich Jews who vote liberal. The middle class hates taxes. 795 00:57:24,300 --> 00:57:27,220 Speaker 2: The upper class either avoids them or couldn't care less. 796 00:57:27,380 --> 00:57:31,420 Speaker 2: The bobes four hundred that waking over a tax rise. Oh, 797 00:57:31,500 --> 00:57:35,539 Speaker 2: I'll be in a thirty nine percent bracket. Evague, I'll 798 00:57:35,580 --> 00:57:43,340 Speaker 2: have to get rid of one of my planes. There 799 00:57:43,380 --> 00:57:48,940 Speaker 2: is something disconnected to reality here. There isn't an American 800 00:57:49,020 --> 00:57:52,180 Speaker 2: I know, outside of radical libertarians, who wouldn't be willing 801 00:57:52,220 --> 00:57:54,900 Speaker 2: to pay more taxes if he believed it would help. 802 00:57:56,540 --> 00:58:00,620 Speaker 2: Nobody believes it'll help. They think it'll cause more inflation, 803 00:58:01,060 --> 00:58:04,420 Speaker 2: more recession, and more spending on things that don't work. 804 00:58:04,740 --> 00:58:08,019 Speaker 2: That's the real reason people are opposed. How otherwise, how 805 00:58:08,020 --> 00:58:10,300 Speaker 2: do you explain the fact that this is the most 806 00:58:10,380 --> 00:58:13,540 Speaker 2: charitable society on earth. The amount of Americans gift to 807 00:58:13,620 --> 00:58:20,019 Speaker 2: charity is enormous. If they're so cheap, how come that's 808 00:58:20,060 --> 00:58:24,780 Speaker 2: the issue with taxes, not selfishness. People don't believe it works. 809 00:58:24,940 --> 00:58:28,660 Speaker 2: I don't believe it works. I give charity that extra thing, 810 00:58:29,100 --> 00:58:32,380 Speaker 2: what does it go for. I'll give more charity or 811 00:58:32,460 --> 00:58:34,780 Speaker 2: I'll pay I pay my taxes. Honestly, if I had 812 00:58:34,820 --> 00:58:38,540 Speaker 2: another percent, I would be shattered That's why I have 813 00:58:38,660 --> 00:58:42,380 Speaker 2: left Liberals because of taxes. I spend my life talking 814 00:58:42,420 --> 00:58:49,340 Speaker 2: about ethics, about paying taxes. Honestly, it's nonsense. If you 815 00:58:49,380 --> 00:58:52,540 Speaker 2: want to believe it, believe it, but it's not true. 816 00:58:52,860 --> 00:58:55,660 Speaker 2: And believing it's true costs the Democrats the White House 817 00:58:55,660 --> 00:59:00,540 Speaker 2: every four years. America is selfish. Americans don't believe taxation 818 00:59:00,660 --> 00:59:07,900 Speaker 2: will work. Where people are not taxed greatly, they produce more. 819 00:59:08,660 --> 00:59:10,860 Speaker 2: Why shouldn't they. If you get more of your money 820 00:59:10,900 --> 00:59:16,100 Speaker 2: to keep, you'll try to produce more. I am, by 821 00:59:16,140 --> 00:59:18,220 Speaker 2: the way I said this last session, I am for 822 00:59:18,340 --> 00:59:22,700 Speaker 2: taxing the rich personally, suspect the great majority of Americans are. 823 00:59:22,780 --> 00:59:25,860 Speaker 2: The question is how do you do it? Not that 824 00:59:25,980 --> 00:59:29,180 Speaker 2: an income tax clearly doesn't work. It ends up on everybody. 825 00:59:30,300 --> 00:59:32,700 Speaker 2: What about a consumption tax? A gentleman said, there are 826 00:59:32,740 --> 00:59:35,979 Speaker 2: problems with that. They're problems with everything, but at least 827 00:59:36,020 --> 00:59:38,020 Speaker 2: you know the man who buys the Mercedes has to 828 00:59:38,060 --> 00:59:41,420 Speaker 2: pay more tax than the men who buys a I 829 00:59:41,460 --> 00:59:58,100 Speaker 2: don't know. Dai certainly right, that's certainly right. Korean camera. Finally, finally, 830 00:59:58,260 --> 01:00:02,380 Speaker 2: in this election, there is the unspoken but passionately felt 831 01:00:02,380 --> 01:00:06,620 Speaker 2: issue of Jesse Jackson who as a rule, is loathed 832 01:00:06,620 --> 01:00:10,260 Speaker 2: by most Americans. He is not loath because he's black. 833 01:00:10,900 --> 01:00:14,660 Speaker 2: If Jesse Jackson were Irving Bernstein, he would be just 834 01:00:14,700 --> 01:00:18,979 Speaker 2: as loath. Many blacks don't wish to believe that many 835 01:00:19,060 --> 01:00:22,660 Speaker 2: liberal whites in that it is not true. They can 836 01:00:22,740 --> 01:00:25,780 Speaker 2: believe that till the cows come home, the man is 837 01:00:25,820 --> 01:00:30,380 Speaker 2: hated because of what he stands for. I personally, I've 838 01:00:30,420 --> 01:00:32,979 Speaker 2: written this, I've said this on the radio, and I 839 01:00:33,140 --> 01:00:36,820 Speaker 2: swear to it. If two equally wealthy candidates ran for 840 01:00:36,860 --> 01:00:39,100 Speaker 2: an office and one were black, I would vote for 841 01:00:39,140 --> 01:00:43,500 Speaker 2: the blacks solely on that basis. I deeply, deeply, for 842 01:00:43,620 --> 01:00:47,260 Speaker 2: the most selfish and altruistic reasons, want blacks to thrive 843 01:00:47,300 --> 01:00:49,620 Speaker 2: in America. What the hell do I have to gain 844 01:00:49,900 --> 01:00:53,939 Speaker 2: by a whole racial group feeling out of it? Even 845 01:00:53,980 --> 01:00:56,540 Speaker 2: if I were a bigot, I wouldn't be a stupid bigot. 846 01:01:00,900 --> 01:01:03,019 Speaker 2: You have to not only be bigoted not to want 847 01:01:03,020 --> 01:01:04,900 Speaker 2: blacks to thrive in America. You have to be a 848 01:01:04,900 --> 01:01:10,940 Speaker 2: stupid bigot. And there aren't that many stupid and bigoted 849 01:01:10,980 --> 01:01:14,020 Speaker 2: people in America. Not that many. We and Los Angeles 850 01:01:14,060 --> 01:01:16,300 Speaker 2: who have a black mayor can certainly attest to that, 851 01:01:17,300 --> 01:01:21,620 Speaker 2: and he almost became governor. Now it is said that 852 01:01:21,700 --> 01:01:24,700 Speaker 2: the difference was in fact a handful of white racists. 853 01:01:24,740 --> 01:01:27,020 Speaker 2: It may very well be, but it gives you an 854 01:01:27,060 --> 01:01:30,460 Speaker 2: idea of how many people aren't racist. And I wouldn't 855 01:01:30,500 --> 01:01:32,700 Speaker 2: be surprised. Had he been Republican, he would have won. 856 01:01:34,020 --> 01:01:37,980 Speaker 2: Blacks who run for Republican seats would probably have magnificent chances. 857 01:01:37,980 --> 01:01:42,900 Speaker 2: In general, Jesse Jackson I believe to be the most 858 01:01:42,980 --> 01:01:51,180 Speaker 2: dangerous public person in the United States of America. Now, now, 859 01:01:52,340 --> 01:01:54,700 Speaker 2: if that's the case that I believe this and I 860 01:01:55,140 --> 01:01:59,620 Speaker 2: am not out of it, then apparently a lot of 861 01:01:59,660 --> 01:02:06,380 Speaker 2: Americans also believe this. I say it, most people don't 862 01:02:06,380 --> 01:02:09,780 Speaker 2: say it because to say it is to be greeted 863 01:02:09,780 --> 01:02:12,340 Speaker 2: by cause of racist to which I will just add 864 01:02:12,340 --> 01:02:15,780 Speaker 2: the following and then take your comments. I say all 865 01:02:15,820 --> 01:02:20,060 Speaker 2: these things on the radio about Jackson to the extent incidentally, 866 01:02:20,060 --> 01:02:23,260 Speaker 2: where I had a very hute experience in Marie Callender's 867 01:02:23,740 --> 01:02:33,939 Speaker 2: half a year ago. I eated only the classiest places. Well, 868 01:02:33,940 --> 01:02:37,780 Speaker 2: they have the best pie in the world. 869 01:02:37,060 --> 01:02:38,820 Speaker 4: The decor is. 870 01:02:38,780 --> 01:02:47,100 Speaker 2: Not exactly at any rate. I was seated one one 871 01:02:47,180 --> 01:02:49,939 Speaker 2: day and I was reading my paper and there were 872 01:02:49,980 --> 01:02:55,460 Speaker 2: two elderly women I suspect were Jewish at the table 873 01:02:55,500 --> 01:02:59,260 Speaker 2: next to me, and I overheard one saying to the other, 874 01:03:00,020 --> 01:03:01,820 Speaker 2: do you know what I heard last night on the 875 01:03:01,900 --> 01:03:07,700 Speaker 2: radio Dennis Crager? He called Jesse Jackson a bum. She 876 01:03:07,740 --> 01:03:11,140 Speaker 2: couldn't get over that somebody on the radio called Jesse 877 01:03:11,260 --> 01:03:17,700 Speaker 2: Jackson a bump. Incidentally, black holers will call me on 878 01:03:17,700 --> 01:03:20,060 Speaker 2: on occasion say I'm a racist on the air. If 879 01:03:20,100 --> 01:03:21,860 Speaker 2: I say that, why way. I just want you to 880 01:03:21,900 --> 01:03:25,180 Speaker 2: know I get a lot of black callers, fifty percent 881 01:03:25,380 --> 01:03:30,900 Speaker 2: agree with me. I obviously not part of the majority, 882 01:03:30,980 --> 01:03:34,460 Speaker 2: but I just want you to understand that there is 883 01:03:34,500 --> 01:03:37,140 Speaker 2: almost a relief on their part, at least those blacks 884 01:03:37,140 --> 01:03:39,979 Speaker 2: suits don't like Jesse Jackson. That somebody could actually say 885 01:03:39,980 --> 01:03:45,180 Speaker 2: it on the radio and come back next week. But 886 01:03:45,340 --> 01:03:48,340 Speaker 2: there are those who say you're racist, and to which 887 01:03:48,380 --> 01:03:52,700 Speaker 2: I answer, I'm not racist, and to which they say, 888 01:03:53,300 --> 01:03:55,700 Speaker 2: why aren't you racist? And now we have a discussion, 889 01:03:55,700 --> 01:03:57,700 Speaker 2: now am I racist or not? Most of the time 890 01:03:57,780 --> 01:04:01,260 Speaker 2: they leave thinking I'm wrong and not a racist. It's 891 01:04:01,300 --> 01:04:03,620 Speaker 2: so patronizing of blacks not to say what you think 892 01:04:03,660 --> 01:04:07,580 Speaker 2: about Jesse Jackson. So you'll get call a racist, and 893 01:04:07,660 --> 01:04:10,740 Speaker 2: then the issue ends. My father taught me that it 894 01:04:10,780 --> 01:04:13,220 Speaker 2: was a great thing. He used to have a thing. 895 01:04:13,340 --> 01:04:15,580 Speaker 2: It wasn't The issue wasn't racism, he said, So why 896 01:04:15,580 --> 01:04:19,900 Speaker 2: do they They'll call me pitcher and I've established that 897 01:04:19,980 --> 01:04:23,140 Speaker 2: in my life, So they call me a name. What 898 01:04:23,340 --> 01:04:26,980 Speaker 2: happens the next minute you have said what you believe 899 01:04:27,060 --> 01:04:30,260 Speaker 2: to be true. People know where you stand, and you 900 01:04:30,260 --> 01:04:33,939 Speaker 2: have much more credibility than on the next issue. I 901 01:04:34,060 --> 01:04:38,220 Speaker 2: said last fall, the Democrat who takes on Jesse Jackson 902 01:04:38,220 --> 01:04:41,060 Speaker 2: in the primaries can run for Emperor of the United 903 01:04:41,100 --> 01:04:44,820 Speaker 2: States and women. But none did and that made a 904 01:04:44,860 --> 01:04:50,260 Speaker 2: deep impact on Americans. Deep impact that too was considered liberal. 905 01:04:51,060 --> 01:04:56,220 Speaker 2: Not to confront the Jesse Jackson liberal as liberal, see 906 01:04:56,340 --> 01:05:02,860 Speaker 2: conservative as conservative slash rambo conservatives, and that is mainstream America, 907 01:05:02,860 --> 01:05:07,340 Speaker 2: I should say, not conservatives. Mainstream America sees liberal as 908 01:05:07,500 --> 01:05:15,180 Speaker 2: liberal slash will That's what's happened. Okay, I'll take your 909 01:05:15,220 --> 01:05:19,980 Speaker 2: comments and other thoughts. Yes, please, the one Democrat to. 910 01:05:20,060 --> 01:05:24,340 Speaker 4: Gense during the age of the campaign, what's dead potch 911 01:05:24,380 --> 01:05:26,340 Speaker 4: and look what happens to the one who told the truth, 912 01:05:26,540 --> 01:05:28,180 Speaker 4: and look what happened to him to he do he 913 01:05:28,260 --> 01:05:32,180 Speaker 4: finally happened back up a period. 914 01:05:29,900 --> 01:05:35,820 Speaker 2: Of yes, uh being pointed out, Uh, look what happened 915 01:05:36,220 --> 01:05:39,340 Speaker 2: the Democrat to take uh to take uh on uh 916 01:05:39,420 --> 01:05:42,459 Speaker 2: Jesse Jackson, Uh and that was Mayor Couch of New York, 917 01:05:42,700 --> 01:05:46,380 Speaker 2: right and uh, well that right, There is some truth 918 01:05:46,420 --> 01:05:48,660 Speaker 2: to that cause. The lady points out that he made 919 01:05:48,700 --> 01:05:50,260 Speaker 2: it a Jewish issue. He should have made it an 920 01:05:50,260 --> 01:05:54,660 Speaker 2: American issue, which is true. However, what one has to say, 921 01:05:54,780 --> 01:05:57,420 Speaker 2: why can blacks have black issues but Jews can't have 922 01:05:57,500 --> 01:06:00,780 Speaker 2: Jewish issues? See but jew If a Jew speaks about 923 01:06:00,860 --> 01:06:04,939 Speaker 2: Jewish concerns, he's he's provincial. If a c if a 924 01:06:05,100 --> 01:06:08,939 Speaker 2: Hispanic speaks about Hispanic concerns, that's beautiful. He's rooted in 925 01:06:08,980 --> 01:06:11,940 Speaker 2: his community. Right. In other words, he has a perfect 926 01:06:12,020 --> 01:06:14,059 Speaker 2: right touch to do what he did. 927 01:06:15,980 --> 01:06:19,260 Speaker 3: Well wait, hold on, is it is an American issue 928 01:06:19,260 --> 01:06:20,580 Speaker 3: but it's also a Jewish issue? 929 01:06:21,060 --> 01:06:24,460 Speaker 2: It's both. I agree it's primarily an American issue. I 930 01:06:24,500 --> 01:06:28,340 Speaker 2: agree with that. And my theory, which I wrote in 931 01:06:28,380 --> 01:06:30,900 Speaker 2: the very first issue in my newsletter, Jesse Jackson in 932 01:06:30,980 --> 01:06:37,300 Speaker 2: the meaning of antisemitism is that demagogues first. 933 01:06:36,660 --> 01:06:39,979 Speaker 3: Start up with the Jews, and when non Jews don't 934 01:06:40,020 --> 01:06:44,260 Speaker 3: recognize this, they will suffer, but the Jews suffer first. 935 01:06:45,100 --> 01:06:46,459 Speaker 2: It starts out that way. 936 01:06:46,500 --> 01:06:50,060 Speaker 3: It's almost like a divine role that the black pulls 937 01:06:50,100 --> 01:06:51,060 Speaker 3: first on the Jews. 938 01:06:52,660 --> 01:06:54,860 Speaker 2: It is for somebody to say he's a naked emperor. 939 01:06:55,780 --> 01:06:58,660 Speaker 2: Nobody does, and it's a dangerous thing, but it is 940 01:06:58,700 --> 01:07:01,740 Speaker 2: certainly part of the reason that they will not get 941 01:07:01,780 --> 01:07:06,419 Speaker 2: to the White House. Now ed Koch was a sacrificial land. 942 01:07:07,460 --> 01:07:10,140 Speaker 2: By the way, you should all know that black leaders 943 01:07:10,140 --> 01:07:15,380 Speaker 2: did not support Jackson in eighty four. Prescott King was 944 01:07:15,380 --> 01:07:18,420 Speaker 2: the most credibility of black leaders, being the widow of 945 01:07:19,420 --> 01:07:25,180 Speaker 2: Mantin Luther King. UH did not embrace him, though recently 946 01:07:25,700 --> 01:07:29,099 Speaker 2: though a few months ago, and she had good reason 947 01:07:29,180 --> 01:07:30,019 Speaker 2: not to have, given what. 948 01:07:30,020 --> 01:07:34,060 Speaker 3: He had done in the in UH portraying himself as 949 01:07:34,100 --> 01:07:37,300 Speaker 3: the man in him from his arms Martin Luther King died, 950 01:07:37,340 --> 01:07:38,180 Speaker 3: who was with him. 951 01:07:38,020 --> 01:07:40,900 Speaker 2: As his royal follower till the end? And so on? 952 01:07:42,020 --> 01:07:45,580 Speaker 2: But listen, how could a black leader be less black 953 01:07:45,700 --> 01:07:50,300 Speaker 2: than the white liberal press. In other words, it became untenable. 954 01:07:50,500 --> 01:07:52,580 Speaker 2: The same thing with the mayor of UH of Atlanta 955 01:07:52,660 --> 01:07:53,019 Speaker 2: what's his. 956 01:07:53,020 --> 01:07:56,700 Speaker 3: Name, and Andrew Young didn't support him. 957 01:07:56,740 --> 01:07:59,620 Speaker 2: A lot of black leaders didn't, but it became impossible. 958 01:07:59,980 --> 01:08:02,340 Speaker 2: If the white press says Jesse Jackson is the leader 959 01:08:02,380 --> 01:08:05,939 Speaker 2: of the blacks, how could a black leader disagree? He 960 01:08:06,060 --> 01:08:10,180 Speaker 2: was created by white liberals much more than by black support. 961 01:08:10,780 --> 01:08:14,979 Speaker 2: That is the irony of it. Yes, uh, well give 962 01:08:15,020 --> 01:08:18,660 Speaker 2: it yougether. I mean exactly that the most uh particular 963 01:08:18,660 --> 01:08:23,900 Speaker 2: around the world. Once ago the Uniteds are you from Switzerland? 964 01:08:24,340 --> 01:08:27,460 Speaker 2: And not I say, are you from Switzerland? Oh? Okay? Yeah? 965 01:08:30,460 --> 01:08:30,620 Speaker 5: Uh? 966 01:08:33,020 --> 01:08:34,620 Speaker 2: How'd you know they had to. 967 01:08:36,180 --> 01:08:36,620 Speaker 3: The people? 968 01:08:36,780 --> 01:08:40,620 Speaker 2: Wasn't as uh, very very good question. 969 01:08:40,740 --> 01:08:42,740 Speaker 3: What if Switzerland had as open a policy as the 970 01:08:42,780 --> 01:08:44,059 Speaker 3: United States, maybe they would. 971 01:08:43,860 --> 01:08:46,500 Speaker 2: Flock the Swiss embasies as much. I still don't think 972 01:08:46,540 --> 01:08:51,300 Speaker 2: they would. But my point about how moral America is 973 01:08:51,300 --> 01:08:54,979 Speaker 2: is is is uh simply reinforced by the fact that 974 01:08:55,019 --> 01:08:57,540 Speaker 2: we do let them in far more than anybody else. 975 01:08:58,180 --> 01:09:00,500 Speaker 2: In other words, if even if what you say were true, 976 01:09:00,660 --> 01:09:04,300 Speaker 2: it would just uh further reinforce my plane to the 977 01:09:04,340 --> 01:09:07,900 Speaker 2: singular moral role America plays in the world. Vietnamese boat 978 01:09:07,939 --> 01:09:11,900 Speaker 2: people were taken in by the United States. Japan, which 979 01:09:11,939 --> 01:09:23,660 Speaker 2: is at that sea, took in none. 980 01:09:24,500 --> 01:09:27,259 Speaker 3: The Dukakis campaign has tried to use the Dukakis cover 981 01:09:27,420 --> 01:09:30,980 Speaker 3: up the Dukakis governup has they tried to use the 982 01:09:30,979 --> 01:09:33,740 Speaker 3: the Iran contra affair the entire time. 983 01:09:33,979 --> 01:09:38,340 Speaker 2: It's not selling on main Street. It's it's because there's 984 01:09:38,380 --> 01:09:41,940 Speaker 2: no reason it should sell on main Street. The the 985 01:09:41,939 --> 01:09:45,900 Speaker 2: the issue. It was an attempt by Democrats which almost 986 01:09:45,939 --> 01:09:50,139 Speaker 2: succeeded to undo the Reagan and Republican control of the 987 01:09:50,140 --> 01:09:55,460 Speaker 2: White House. It didn't work. Uh, it didn't work. Ironically. 988 01:09:56,300 --> 01:09:58,460 Speaker 2: Part of the reason there were two reasons. One, there 989 01:09:58,500 --> 01:10:00,460 Speaker 2: was no reason it should work. It wasn't a big 990 01:10:00,580 --> 01:10:06,620 Speaker 2: enough scandal to unseat the president. Number Two, it didn't 991 01:10:06,660 --> 01:10:09,860 Speaker 2: work because of a man named Oliver North. The irony 992 01:10:09,939 --> 01:10:16,020 Speaker 2: there being that the the Democrats wanted the hearings televised, 993 01:10:16,019 --> 01:10:18,540 Speaker 2: which was a demagogic thing to do because it was 994 01:10:18,820 --> 01:10:21,660 Speaker 2: pandering to the to the public should have been closed, 995 01:10:21,979 --> 01:10:24,580 Speaker 2: and then yelled that North stole the zo because it 996 01:10:24,660 --> 01:10:30,300 Speaker 2: was televised. But North und the people suspected that it 997 01:10:30,380 --> 01:10:34,020 Speaker 2: was more political than a very deep sense of revulsion 998 01:10:34,019 --> 01:10:37,620 Speaker 2: that what had happened. They Democrats can't stand the countries, 999 01:10:38,059 --> 01:10:40,259 Speaker 2: so any funding of the countries, whether or not there 1000 01:10:40,260 --> 01:10:42,900 Speaker 2: had been a link up with Iran, would have been 1001 01:10:43,660 --> 01:10:48,260 Speaker 2: would have been detested, but Americans didn't proceed. This is 1002 01:10:48,260 --> 01:10:51,980 Speaker 2: not a Watergate. This was idealistic. It was not selfish. 1003 01:10:52,820 --> 01:10:56,940 Speaker 2: See it was ideals. It was not Watergate was selfish. 1004 01:10:57,140 --> 01:10:59,939 Speaker 2: I have a bunch of corrupt guys to rob from 1005 01:10:59,979 --> 01:11:04,820 Speaker 2: Watergate headquarters to win an election. That's despicable. Here it 1006 01:11:04,900 --> 01:11:12,259 Speaker 2: was I that the motive was not selfish. No, I said, 1007 01:11:12,260 --> 01:11:15,459 Speaker 2: the motive of the government was not of those involved, 1008 01:11:15,700 --> 01:11:18,740 Speaker 2: of an Oliver North, of anyone. You think that the 1009 01:11:18,900 --> 01:11:23,380 Speaker 2: funding of the countries was for profit, Okay, fine, thank 1010 01:11:23,420 --> 01:11:27,180 Speaker 2: god you're in the minority. The vast majority of Americans 1011 01:11:27,220 --> 01:11:30,420 Speaker 2: believe that an Oliver North is an idealistic man who 1012 01:11:30,420 --> 01:11:33,500 Speaker 2: didn't want to pocket a penny. Oliver North was more 1013 01:11:33,660 --> 01:11:36,540 Speaker 2: that there were little guys involved in the middle with chicanery. 1014 01:11:36,580 --> 01:11:39,019 Speaker 2: Everybody knows that that's not the issue. That's not what 1015 01:11:39,099 --> 01:11:44,060 Speaker 2: created the scandal. The scandal's purpose was to get hostages 1016 01:11:44,099 --> 01:11:48,019 Speaker 2: for arms, a stupid idea, but one intended for good 1017 01:11:48,220 --> 01:11:51,780 Speaker 2: ends to fund and then to use that later. They 1018 01:11:51,780 --> 01:11:54,740 Speaker 2: were not connected originally, to use that later to fund countries, 1019 01:11:55,500 --> 01:11:59,340 Speaker 2: which Americans are ambivalent over but neither ideal, even if 1020 01:11:59,380 --> 01:12:03,740 Speaker 2: you think they're both awful is self serving. That's my point. 1021 01:12:03,860 --> 01:12:07,380 Speaker 2: Watergate was entirely self serving. This is how we use 1022 01:12:07,460 --> 01:12:11,220 Speaker 2: corruption to get elected. That's why there was no comparable 1023 01:12:11,260 --> 01:12:14,499 Speaker 2: thing anymore than if there had been a democratic president 1024 01:12:14,900 --> 01:12:18,339 Speaker 2: who had used funds to fund the African National Congress. 1025 01:12:18,380 --> 01:12:22,460 Speaker 2: Let's say, to overthrow of the South African regime would 1026 01:12:22,500 --> 01:12:25,420 Speaker 2: have been illegal. But even conservatives would have admitted the 1027 01:12:25,460 --> 01:12:28,660 Speaker 2: issue was not selfish. It was it was wrong ideals, 1028 01:12:28,939 --> 01:12:31,820 Speaker 2: they would have said, but it was still idealism. That's 1029 01:12:31,820 --> 01:12:34,580 Speaker 2: why it's not a war game. Yes, if you. 1030 01:12:34,580 --> 01:12:39,780 Speaker 5: Were Michael bias Agains many months ago the testimal water 1031 01:12:40,540 --> 01:12:42,060 Speaker 5: you're gonnas the Jackson. 1032 01:12:42,059 --> 01:12:47,380 Speaker 2: Suggestion it might to be undertake se well, I thank 1033 01:12:47,460 --> 01:12:51,419 Speaker 2: you because I hope to have that opportunity one day. 1034 01:12:51,460 --> 01:12:55,420 Speaker 2: If I were Michael Dukakis, how would I have taken 1035 01:12:55,500 --> 01:13:00,219 Speaker 2: Jesse Jackson apart months ago? If I had the intestinal fortitude, Well, 1036 01:13:00,300 --> 01:13:02,340 Speaker 2: for one thing, I would have said, I would have 1037 01:13:02,420 --> 01:13:04,939 Speaker 2: taken on a lot of the terminology he used, which 1038 01:13:04,979 --> 01:13:09,420 Speaker 2: was demagogic h and not adopted it. The second he 1039 01:13:09,540 --> 01:13:13,339 Speaker 2: used economic violence in his acceptance speech. I said, Jesse 1040 01:13:13,460 --> 01:13:18,540 Speaker 2: Jackson won the convention. See insidious rhetoric starts seeping in 1041 01:13:18,580 --> 01:13:21,099 Speaker 2: when it's used enough, you've gotta be aware of that. 1042 01:13:21,220 --> 01:13:24,220 Speaker 2: I remember the first time I heard that Israel was pacistic, 1043 01:13:24,660 --> 01:13:29,219 Speaker 2: I went crazy. But enough time hearing Israel Zionism is racism, 1044 01:13:29,340 --> 01:13:32,860 Speaker 2: Israel is pacistic, you start to lose anger. You have 1045 01:13:32,939 --> 01:13:36,259 Speaker 2: to cultivate anger on certain things. I hate this term. 1046 01:13:36,340 --> 01:13:41,099 Speaker 2: America commits economic violence against its people. It does not 1047 01:13:41,140 --> 01:13:42,620 Speaker 2: commit economic First of all, I don't know what the 1048 01:13:42,700 --> 01:13:46,299 Speaker 2: term means. It's a loaded term. It's a despicable term. 1049 01:13:46,500 --> 01:13:49,219 Speaker 2: America may commit economic error as visa via its people. 1050 01:13:49,260 --> 01:13:52,259 Speaker 2: Economic violence means America sets out to hurt its own people. 1051 01:13:52,860 --> 01:13:54,820 Speaker 2: Anyone who believes that should not be running for the 1052 01:13:54,860 --> 01:13:58,220 Speaker 2: president of a country that's so despicable. That's what I 1053 01:13:58,260 --> 01:14:00,780 Speaker 2: would have set to Jesse Jackson, if you truly believe that. 1054 01:14:00,939 --> 01:14:03,820 Speaker 2: He said, I don't agree with the Reagan policies. I 1055 01:14:03,860 --> 01:14:06,460 Speaker 2: think they're hurting our farmers. I think they're hurting our 1056 01:14:06,500 --> 01:14:08,700 Speaker 2: inner cities. I think they're hurting us in trade, and 1057 01:14:08,700 --> 01:14:14,540 Speaker 2: I think the federal deficit is catastrophic. But Jesse, I 1058 01:14:14,580 --> 01:14:17,259 Speaker 2: would never use such a term. I think the guy 1059 01:14:17,340 --> 01:14:20,540 Speaker 2: would have been heralded as a savior of the American people, 1060 01:14:20,979 --> 01:14:23,420 Speaker 2: and then he would have said, And furthermore, I must 1061 01:14:23,500 --> 01:14:27,420 Speaker 2: tell you while uh we Democrats UH certainly would never 1062 01:14:27,540 --> 01:14:31,460 Speaker 2: salute uh mister Bota of South Africa and we wanna 1063 01:14:31,500 --> 01:14:34,939 Speaker 2: call his nation an outlaw nation. Uh, I don't quite 1064 01:14:34,939 --> 01:14:38,540 Speaker 2: see the moral difference between mister Bota and mister Castro Jesse, 1065 01:14:39,460 --> 01:14:42,339 Speaker 2: and you're going uh down there and and going viva 1066 01:14:42,380 --> 01:14:46,300 Speaker 2: fidel bothers me and other Democrats a great deal. I 1067 01:14:46,300 --> 01:14:53,179 Speaker 2: think you should apologize, Jesse. That's what I would have done. Yeah, 1068 01:14:53,380 --> 01:14:56,100 Speaker 2: ye that over things. 1069 01:14:56,740 --> 01:15:00,460 Speaker 4: I think I understand why uh push did not so 1070 01:15:01,220 --> 01:15:06,940 Speaker 4: uh Ken. 1071 01:15:07,059 --> 01:15:10,939 Speaker 2: In trying to figure out why, well you recur to 1072 01:15:10,979 --> 01:15:18,219 Speaker 2: the strictly political that he's nothing's advantage tell uh and 1073 01:15:18,500 --> 01:15:22,900 Speaker 2: uh I mistrust him that you know? You find both? 1074 01:15:23,660 --> 01:15:28,019 Speaker 3: Uh could you elaborate on good are you ever to 1075 01:15:28,099 --> 01:15:30,620 Speaker 3: pay dupidity or just. 1076 01:15:32,979 --> 01:15:35,780 Speaker 2: A question that you just asked? Was naive taste, stupidity 1077 01:15:36,019 --> 01:15:38,900 Speaker 2: or whatever that uh prompted mister Bush to choose mister 1078 01:15:38,979 --> 01:15:42,099 Speaker 2: Quayle as a question. I have asked some of mister 1079 01:15:42,140 --> 01:15:45,820 Speaker 2: Bush's aides. Uh it it is uh? It is the 1080 01:15:45,979 --> 01:15:48,660 Speaker 2: a great riddle to me and I I hope it 1081 01:15:48,700 --> 01:15:53,580 Speaker 2: is neither stupidity nor naive tay, just political miscalculation based 1082 01:15:53,580 --> 01:15:56,780 Speaker 2: on erroneous data or I I mean, I wanna I 1083 01:15:56,820 --> 01:15:59,579 Speaker 2: want to believe, since he will probably be the next president, 1084 01:16:00,300 --> 01:16:02,620 Speaker 2: that it is not as bad as it looks. I. 1085 01:16:03,059 --> 01:16:05,939 Speaker 2: I would even think that democratic liberals here for the 1086 01:16:05,979 --> 01:16:08,500 Speaker 2: sake of the country would hope, would hope that that's 1087 01:16:08,540 --> 01:16:12,740 Speaker 2: the case. Uh I I it is uh. It is remarkable, 1088 01:16:13,500 --> 01:16:15,860 Speaker 2: uh to to have to have done that. I think 1089 01:16:15,939 --> 01:16:19,780 Speaker 2: in that regard, UH, it's probably it's there ought to 1090 01:16:19,820 --> 01:16:21,939 Speaker 2: be something different and in the selection of a vice 1091 01:16:21,979 --> 01:16:26,500 Speaker 2: presidential UH candidate in uh I it may if there 1092 01:16:26,540 --> 01:16:29,260 Speaker 2: may be time to either have a separate election or 1093 01:16:29,300 --> 01:16:32,740 Speaker 2: just abolish the office. Uh it's uh. I think that 1094 01:16:32,820 --> 01:16:36,620 Speaker 2: this really should cause that sort of thinking. Yeah, okay, it's. 1095 01:16:36,660 --> 01:16:40,540 Speaker 4: Uh question hide the organ stood looks like with information. 1096 01:16:40,220 --> 01:16:44,260 Speaker 5: Hus well in uh uh Bradley's first crack of the 1097 01:16:44,340 --> 01:16:48,460 Speaker 5: does ship U post election study of the pig seas 1098 01:16:48,500 --> 01:16:50,380 Speaker 5: of the state showed that the. 1099 01:16:50,260 --> 01:16:51,540 Speaker 2: Black beginning did not. 1100 01:16:51,540 --> 01:16:53,620 Speaker 5: Turn out to read a number of what the grady 1101 01:16:54,059 --> 01:16:57,380 Speaker 5: at grand the end of these uh happy a. 1102 01:16:57,460 --> 01:17:00,500 Speaker 2: Ninety's foot they went, and that was considered the reason. 1103 01:17:00,260 --> 01:17:07,740 Speaker 3: Why maybe two. That's interesting, I have not heard that. Okay, 1104 01:17:08,019 --> 01:17:09,860 Speaker 3: let me go to the this side. They always feel 1105 01:17:09,900 --> 01:17:11,460 Speaker 3: like I am prejudiced. 1106 01:17:11,019 --> 01:17:17,580 Speaker 2: Against the right wing. Yes, sir, that basically what the 1107 01:17:19,860 --> 01:17:31,540 Speaker 2: uh are you? Yeah? Uh I I am not forgetting 1108 01:17:31,580 --> 01:17:34,979 Speaker 2: that at all. It's also unrelated to my claim. They 1109 01:17:35,019 --> 01:17:35,860 Speaker 2: are anti. 1110 01:17:35,580 --> 01:17:38,019 Speaker 3: Religious and they have defended people who otherwise would have 1111 01:17:38,059 --> 01:17:38,740 Speaker 3: no defenders. 1112 01:17:39,460 --> 01:17:42,059 Speaker 2: If they're both true, they're anti religious and they have 1113 01:17:42,099 --> 01:17:44,300 Speaker 2: defended undi indefensible people. 1114 01:17:45,580 --> 01:17:50,660 Speaker 3: Who all people by and large. Yeah, the ACLU is 1115 01:17:50,700 --> 01:17:52,860 Speaker 3: a political organization. It has as much to do with 1116 01:17:52,900 --> 01:17:56,419 Speaker 3: civil rights today as Hadasa does, okay. 1117 01:17:57,220 --> 01:17:59,900 Speaker 2: Uh. And that is the view of many. Alan Dershowitz, 1118 01:17:59,939 --> 01:18:03,420 Speaker 2: who is uh quite a liberal professor, uh as you 1119 01:18:03,500 --> 01:18:06,059 Speaker 2: know and a a a brilliant man uh has written 1120 01:18:06,059 --> 01:18:08,380 Speaker 2: that it has become a political organization as a left 1121 01:18:08,380 --> 01:18:11,139 Speaker 2: wing agenda. If you read the letter sent to me today, 1122 01:18:11,580 --> 01:18:16,019 Speaker 2: uh to to solicit funds, the entire agenda is against Reagan. Uh. 1123 01:18:16,059 --> 01:18:19,820 Speaker 2: It c it hides behind the cloak of civil liberties. Uh. 1124 01:18:19,820 --> 01:18:22,740 Speaker 2: But if it love civil liberty so much, explain to 1125 01:18:22,780 --> 01:18:26,460 Speaker 2: me why it defended the rights of deporting a child 1126 01:18:26,540 --> 01:18:29,059 Speaker 2: back to the Ukraine after he wanted to stay here. 1127 01:18:30,300 --> 01:18:34,219 Speaker 2: You remember that the polupchick story. They are left wing. 1128 01:18:34,380 --> 01:18:38,860 Speaker 2: They are not civil liberties. That is what has become 1129 01:18:38,900 --> 01:18:42,500 Speaker 2: their agenda. The reason for that, by the way, I think, 1130 01:18:42,620 --> 01:18:46,580 Speaker 2: is partially this. The ACLU confronts what I call the 1131 01:18:46,660 --> 01:18:51,139 Speaker 2: March of Dimes syndrome. The March of Dimes existed in 1132 01:18:51,260 --> 01:18:55,339 Speaker 2: order to raise funds to cure polio. Polio was cured. 1133 01:18:55,420 --> 01:18:57,420 Speaker 2: Did the March of Dimes go out of existence? Of 1134 01:18:57,460 --> 01:18:59,820 Speaker 2: course not. Nobody goes out of existence. Then you have 1135 01:18:59,860 --> 01:19:02,860 Speaker 2: to work for a living. What you then do that 1136 01:19:02,939 --> 01:19:06,179 Speaker 2: The ACLU is in existence to protect civil liberties. Civil 1137 01:19:06,220 --> 01:19:08,380 Speaker 2: liberties in the United States are more advanced than on 1138 01:19:08,420 --> 01:19:09,979 Speaker 2: any place on the planet of Earth. 1139 01:19:10,420 --> 01:19:13,019 Speaker 3: And since I don't believe his life elsewhere, they're more 1140 01:19:13,059 --> 01:19:16,380 Speaker 3: advanced here than in the universe. Did they go out 1141 01:19:16,380 --> 01:19:21,299 Speaker 3: of business, No, they invent new civil libertarian issues. Civil 1142 01:19:21,300 --> 01:19:25,460 Speaker 3: liberties here are staggeringly assured. A criminal has more rights 1143 01:19:25,500 --> 01:19:26,499 Speaker 3: in the United States. 1144 01:19:26,300 --> 01:19:30,019 Speaker 2: And excuse me, an accused criminal has more rights in 1145 01:19:30,019 --> 01:19:33,019 Speaker 2: the United States than anywhere in the world, including Britain 1146 01:19:33,059 --> 01:19:37,620 Speaker 2: from which we learned the democracy. But they but they 1147 01:19:37,660 --> 01:19:41,979 Speaker 2: still argue for more things became the Miranda thing so 1148 01:19:42,099 --> 01:19:45,340 Speaker 2: that you undo a rapist sentence if you somehow got 1149 01:19:45,340 --> 01:19:48,780 Speaker 2: the evidence or excuse me, did not read to the 1150 01:19:48,860 --> 01:19:54,059 Speaker 2: man his rights. Is Britain an authoritarian country. They don't 1151 01:19:54,059 --> 01:19:58,660 Speaker 2: have such a law as France, Scandinavia, the enlightened Scandinavians. 1152 01:19:58,700 --> 01:20:00,979 Speaker 2: You think Norwegian police a excuse me, I'd like to 1153 01:20:00,979 --> 01:20:05,019 Speaker 2: read you Norwegian law prior to arresting you only here 1154 01:20:05,059 --> 01:20:07,860 Speaker 2: and it's considered a civil right. They should be out 1155 01:20:07,860 --> 01:20:12,139 Speaker 2: of business, the ACLU, but the groups don't like to 1156 01:20:12,140 --> 01:20:18,580 Speaker 2: go out of business. I don't blame him. Yes, one 1157 01:20:18,620 --> 01:20:24,939 Speaker 2: aspect though, Let me think this, ye, why do I 1158 01:20:25,019 --> 01:20:28,219 Speaker 2: think American Jews have become so liberal? With three minutes 1159 01:20:28,260 --> 01:20:31,740 Speaker 2: to go as impossible, it will probably be a lecture. 1160 01:20:32,019 --> 01:20:34,939 Speaker 2: It will probably be one of the classes. However, I 1161 01:20:34,979 --> 01:20:37,220 Speaker 2: will give you a hint, since I never like you 1162 01:20:37,300 --> 01:20:40,620 Speaker 2: to throw out a question. The American Jews who are 1163 01:20:40,660 --> 01:20:44,820 Speaker 2: that liberal nine percent of the time are not religious. 1164 01:20:46,300 --> 01:20:51,860 Speaker 2: Jews are very religious people, and if they don't use Judaism. 1165 01:20:51,300 --> 01:20:54,299 Speaker 3: As their religion, they will have something else as their religion. 1166 01:20:54,780 --> 01:20:58,179 Speaker 3: In this case it is liberals. Jews don't do well 1167 01:20:58,260 --> 01:21:01,979 Speaker 3: without causes to change the world. So if it's not 1168 01:21:02,019 --> 01:21:05,019 Speaker 3: gonna be Judaism, It's going to be something else. That's 1169 01:21:05,019 --> 01:21:11,860 Speaker 3: why they develop Christianity, Marxism, liberalism, ethical humanism. Jews makeisms 1170 01:21:12,340 --> 01:21:18,660 Speaker 3: like Japanese make transistence. It is and this is, This 1171 01:21:18,740 --> 01:21:21,939 Speaker 3: is the passion that Jews. That is why secular Jews 1172 01:21:21,939 --> 01:21:24,900 Speaker 3: a liberal. They don't have a religion. This is their religion. 1173 01:21:25,939 --> 01:21:28,900 Speaker 3: They perfect the world, not under the rule of God, 1174 01:21:29,220 --> 01:21:32,179 Speaker 3: but under the rule of government. With that, I promise 1175 01:21:32,260 --> 01:21:34,500 Speaker 3: next time, only questions first twenty minutes. 1176 01:21:35,099 --> 01:21:39,420 Speaker 1: This has been timeless wisdom with Dennis Prager. Visit dennisprager 1177 01:21:39,460 --> 01:21:42,979 Speaker 1: dot com for thousands of hours of Dennis's lectures, courses, 1178 01:21:43,019 --> 01:21:47,660 Speaker 1: and classic radio programs, and to purchase Dennis Prager's Rational Bibles.