1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,840
Speaker 1: Eric Swalwell is in deep fegfang right now. It turns

2
00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:08,119
Speaker 1: out the FBI is gonna be well, very open and

3
00:00:08,160 --> 00:00:11,920
Speaker 1: transparent about that investigation into him and his liaison with

4
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:15,520
Speaker 1: a Chinese spy. Eric Swalwell, of course, is running second

5
00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:18,400
Speaker 1: place right now in most polls to be governor of California.

6
00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:22,640
Speaker 1: So not a good look if you're trying to win

7
00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:29,600
Speaker 1: your next election. Take a look at the announcement here

8
00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:32,839
Speaker 1: from Kyle Griffin. This guy is ms now, dude, right.

9
00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:35,920
Speaker 1: Ms NOW confirms Cash Pateel has ordered the FBI to

10
00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:38,279
Speaker 1: gather up the decade old case. I love that keep

11
00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:41,600
Speaker 1: saying it's decade it's a decade old. Who cares it's

12
00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:42,760
Speaker 1: ten years old?

13
00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:43,920
Speaker 2: You know?

14
00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:46,200
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, remember when they were all frothing at the mouth

15
00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:48,720
Speaker 1: to get you know, Donald Trump's tax returns from like

16
00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:52,479
Speaker 1: twenty years ago, or the Stormy Daniels thing, or you know,

17
00:00:52,960 --> 00:00:56,680
Speaker 1: with anything. But this is a decade old. You know,

18
00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:00,360
Speaker 1: you commit a little treason, it get compromised by a

19
00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:03,520
Speaker 1: Chinese spy while you're a member of the House Intelligence

20
00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:07,320
Speaker 1: Committee ten years ago, and you still have to answer

21
00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:09,959
Speaker 1: for it. Come on, what is this country coming to?

22
00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:14,039
Speaker 1: I just just make note of when the media does

23
00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:20,200
Speaker 1: stuff like that decade old, decade old filecase on Representative

24
00:01:20,280 --> 00:01:24,600
Speaker 1: Eric Swallow's interaction interactions with a suspected Chinese spy. By

25
00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:26,600
Speaker 1: the way, why is she just referred to Feng Fang,

26
00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:29,720
Speaker 1: Fang Fang, It's Fang Fang. Why is Fang Fang only

27
00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:32,759
Speaker 1: referred to here as a suspected Chinese spy? Well because

28
00:01:32,800 --> 00:01:36,280
Speaker 1: she was never able to be arrested and prosecuted for espionage.

29
00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:40,200
Speaker 1: Why because as soon as the word was out, she

30
00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:42,920
Speaker 1: got on a plane and flew to Beijing, which is

31
00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:50,880
Speaker 1: what all you know, completely innocent Chinese nationals do. There's

32
00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:54,240
Speaker 1: grave concern among career officials about a possible effort to

33
00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:59,720
Speaker 1: smear him. Yes, grave concern among career professionals at the FBI.

34
00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:02,040
Speaker 1: Of the career professionals the ones that were hired by

35
00:02:02,080 --> 00:02:06,480
Speaker 1: Robert Mueller and James Comy, they are they have grave

36
00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:10,600
Speaker 1: concerns about this sort of thing. They didn't have grave

37
00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:13,519
Speaker 1: concerns when there was a Russian collusion hoax being investigated

38
00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:16,160
Speaker 1: by that various a MFBI. They didn't have grave concerns

39
00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:18,120
Speaker 1: when the FBI was tracking you for going to a

40
00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:21,840
Speaker 1: Latin mass They didn't have grave concerns when the FBI

41
00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:25,000
Speaker 1: was arresting old ladies for praying the Rosary out in

42
00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:29,600
Speaker 1: front of an abortion factory. But here they've got grave concerns.

43
00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:32,000
Speaker 1: Do you know why they've got grave concerns. We've got

44
00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:33,840
Speaker 1: a lot of Eric Swalwell to play for you here,

45
00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:35,640
Speaker 1: and we're gonna get to it because he's a joke.

46
00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:37,640
Speaker 1: But let me just tell you a little bit of

47
00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:42,600
Speaker 1: insight here from DC based on my sources, former US attorneys,

48
00:02:42,639 --> 00:02:44,880
Speaker 1: people that I've interviewed about this, and this is all

49
00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:48,919
Speaker 1: I believe part of the public record. When the FBI

50
00:02:49,040 --> 00:02:52,760
Speaker 1: learned that Eric Swalwell's paramour was in fact a suspected

51
00:02:52,880 --> 00:02:56,600
Speaker 1: Chinese spy, they pulled Eric Swalwell in and they gave

52
00:02:56,639 --> 00:03:01,840
Speaker 1: him what's known as a defensive interview. What this means

53
00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:05,639
Speaker 1: is basically, the FBI says, hey, Congressman, we think you're

54
00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:07,880
Speaker 1: tangled up with a spy. This woman that you're with,

55
00:03:08,040 --> 00:03:12,280
Speaker 1: We've been tracking it. Jesus, spy heads up, protect your records,

56
00:03:12,400 --> 00:03:15,280
Speaker 1: protect your office, make sure that she doesn't have access

57
00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:18,520
Speaker 1: to anything, okay, because there's some major things going on here.

58
00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:22,519
Speaker 1: It's similar to what they did with Dianne Feinstein, longtime

59
00:03:22,680 --> 00:03:25,720
Speaker 1: US Senator from California, when it was discovered that her driver,

60
00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:30,840
Speaker 1: she had a driver because she's a Democrat, her driver

61
00:03:31,120 --> 00:03:33,800
Speaker 1: was also a Chinese spy. Remember that story. Yeah, And

62
00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:36,960
Speaker 1: what did they do. Did they arrest the guy? Did

63
00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:39,520
Speaker 1: they keep an eye on Diane Feinstein to make sure

64
00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:41,760
Speaker 1: that she wasn't actually part of a scheme to funnel

65
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:45,480
Speaker 1: secrets to her driver. No, they gave her a defensive interview.

66
00:03:45,560 --> 00:03:48,000
Speaker 1: They brought her in, gave her a heads up, you know,

67
00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:54,240
Speaker 1: as a respectful colleague and fellow federal government official, and said, hey,

68
00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:57,240
Speaker 1: this is a problem. Just so you know, why didn't

69
00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:00,880
Speaker 1: they tail Eric Swalwell. Why didn't they surveil Swollwell, Why

70
00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:03,600
Speaker 1: didn't they bug his phone to find out if he

71
00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:08,240
Speaker 1: was willingly sharing state secrets with Feng Fang, the Chinese spy.

72
00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:11,160
Speaker 1: They didn't do that. They did do that to Donald Trump.

73
00:04:11,920 --> 00:04:13,760
Speaker 1: They did do that to everybody who worked on the

74
00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:16,760
Speaker 1: Trump campaign. They did do that to people who came

75
00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:20,240
Speaker 1: from the campaign and worked in the Trump administration. Oh No,

76
00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:23,840
Speaker 1: nobody got a defensive interview there. Nobody got a heads

77
00:04:23,920 --> 00:04:29,080
Speaker 1: up there. They all got interviewed and entrapped by the FBI.

78
00:04:30,279 --> 00:04:34,880
Speaker 1: So why are career officials gravely concerned about cash Pattel

79
00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:40,840
Speaker 1: releasing these documents Because those career officials, I believe, will

80
00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:44,000
Speaker 1: be shown to have dropped the ball. Think about it.

81
00:04:44,440 --> 00:04:47,240
Speaker 1: You call Congressman Eric Swalwell and you say, hey, Feng Fang,

82
00:04:47,279 --> 00:04:50,480
Speaker 1: she's a hotty patati. There, nice little dim sum situation.

83
00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:53,600
Speaker 1: We think she's a spy. You might want to watch

84
00:04:53,640 --> 00:04:56,800
Speaker 1: yourself next thing. You know, where's Fang Fang on a

85
00:04:56,880 --> 00:05:03,800
Speaker 1: plane to Beijing? How did she know? Thank you very much.

86
00:05:04,800 --> 00:05:09,240
Speaker 1: That's what's going on here in this host's humble opinion.

87
00:05:09,560 --> 00:05:12,240
Speaker 1: And if you just watch Eric Swawell's behavior over the years,

88
00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:14,520
Speaker 1: you might see a pattern of behavior yourself.

89
00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:18,080
Speaker 3: The Washington Post reporting, as I believe you know that

90
00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:23,800
Speaker 3: he has now restarted an investigation of you, which the

91
00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:31,640
Speaker 3: FBI previously conducted and found no accusation or evidence of wrongdoing.

92
00:05:31,800 --> 00:05:34,120
Speaker 3: You suspect because this wouldn't be the first time that

93
00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:36,000
Speaker 3: this is politically motivated.

94
00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:40,640
Speaker 2: I suspect it's politically motivated. Jim, I have the only

95
00:05:40,720 --> 00:05:43,840
Speaker 2: lawsuit that has survived this presidency. It's me and the

96
00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:47,360
Speaker 2: January sixth Officers. I was an impeachment manager. I worked

97
00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:50,800
Speaker 2: with Adam Schiff on the Russia investigation, and I'm a

98
00:05:50,839 --> 00:05:54,200
Speaker 2: candidate for governor in California start voting in about thirty

99
00:05:54,200 --> 00:05:59,279
Speaker 2: five days. So these are dangerous individuals who have gone

100
00:05:59,320 --> 00:06:03,000
Speaker 2: after over five hundred political opponents and organizations Donald Trump

101
00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:06,160
Speaker 2: and the FBI, and we know that they want a

102
00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:08,960
Speaker 2: western White House. There's a threat right now that two

103
00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:11,919
Speaker 2: Republicans will get through in the top two primary in California.

104
00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:14,479
Speaker 2: This is an effort to knock out the person who's

105
00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:17,039
Speaker 2: been in the league. And Cash Pattel, by the way,

106
00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:21,000
Speaker 2: in his own book called Government Gangsters, has a list

107
00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:24,520
Speaker 2: of government gangsters. I'm not on the list. I'm above

108
00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:27,120
Speaker 2: the list. Adam Schiff and I are in the prelude

109
00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:31,040
Speaker 2: to that list. But Californians know better. They are going

110
00:06:31,080 --> 00:06:33,320
Speaker 2: to pick the next governor, not Donald Trump.

111
00:06:33,600 --> 00:06:36,880
Speaker 1: Okay, so just so you know, I have no doubt

112
00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:39,000
Speaker 1: that there is some politics involved here, but it's not

113
00:06:39,040 --> 00:06:44,760
Speaker 1: what Eric Swalwell thinks. I play this out for me,

114
00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:48,920
Speaker 1: and let's accept for the fact that Cash Pateel and

115
00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:53,240
Speaker 1: whoever else is involved with this is not stupid. Who

116
00:06:53,279 --> 00:07:00,200
Speaker 1: benefits from leaking this right now to the media. Eric

117
00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:03,040
Speaker 1: Swalwell does so he can go on the offensive like this,

118
00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:05,560
Speaker 1: Number one, But there's also another group of people who

119
00:07:05,560 --> 00:07:08,880
Speaker 1: will benefit. Let's just be clear if Donald Trump wanted

120
00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:12,720
Speaker 1: to prevent Eric Swalwell from being governor, or for that matter,

121
00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:15,400
Speaker 1: as you just heard it, any Democrat from being governor,

122
00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:17,080
Speaker 1: and really, you know, they're just they just want a

123
00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:20,600
Speaker 1: Republican in California. Let me just be clear. I would

124
00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:23,280
Speaker 1: love it if the two remaining candidates in the general

125
00:07:23,320 --> 00:07:25,880
Speaker 1: election we're both Republicans. But let's just be real here.

126
00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:29,960
Speaker 1: That Republican has sworn in as governor on day one,

127
00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:34,800
Speaker 1: about an hour later, the impeachment articles or the recall

128
00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:36,880
Speaker 1: articles will be fed. There will be a recall of

129
00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:40,960
Speaker 1: that Republican governor within a month. Okay, let's not be

130
00:07:41,040 --> 00:07:44,440
Speaker 1: fools here. That's the reality in California. So even if

131
00:07:44,480 --> 00:07:47,320
Speaker 1: they win the election, which would be hilarious, they'll get

132
00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:51,480
Speaker 1: recalled immediately, all right, So please don't don't be giving

133
00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:53,920
Speaker 1: us that crap. Eric, You'll you'll lead the charge in

134
00:07:53,960 --> 00:07:57,160
Speaker 1: the recall effort, all right. Number one, who benefits most

135
00:07:57,240 --> 00:08:01,560
Speaker 1: right now from smearing Eric Swalwell? Now you see, if

136
00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:03,880
Speaker 1: the plan is to keep a Democrat from winning the

137
00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:06,520
Speaker 1: governor's seat by putting out this story about how this

138
00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:11,200
Speaker 1: Democrat in particular is tied to a Chinese spy, wouldn't

139
00:08:11,240 --> 00:08:15,520
Speaker 1: you wait until after the primary when it's just down

140
00:08:15,600 --> 00:08:19,200
Speaker 1: to two candidates, Eric Swalwell and a Republican. Isn't that

141
00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:22,720
Speaker 1: when you would drop a story like this? Who benefits

142
00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:27,640
Speaker 1: now from this story coming out? All the other Democrats,

143
00:08:28,680 --> 00:08:34,520
Speaker 1: all the other Democrats that want Eric Swalwell gone? Is

144
00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:38,440
Speaker 1: think like that? Because you see, Democrats know just as

145
00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:40,840
Speaker 1: well as Republicans that this guy is a disaster and

146
00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:44,240
Speaker 1: a joke. They can't say it out loud, but they

147
00:08:44,280 --> 00:08:48,040
Speaker 1: know it, and so they're trying to kill him before

148
00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:50,880
Speaker 1: the primary. Republicans have no interest in killing Eric Swallwell

149
00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:54,960
Speaker 1: before the primary. Trust me, trust me all right? That

150
00:08:55,040 --> 00:08:57,960
Speaker 1: said won't stop Eric Swalwell from being the martyr.

151
00:08:57,720 --> 00:09:02,000
Speaker 2: The Bureau said over ten years ago was help. But

152
00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:07,360
Speaker 2: this effort to weaponize the FBI against the president's political

153
00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:09,800
Speaker 2: enemy at a time that we are at war shows

154
00:09:09,840 --> 00:09:13,120
Speaker 2: a distraction. It shows an obsession with going after the

155
00:09:13,640 --> 00:09:18,880
Speaker 2: president's political opponents, and it also shows anyone anywhere who

156
00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:21,720
Speaker 2: would ever be asked to help their government. Why would

157
00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:23,480
Speaker 2: you do this if it would be perverted in a

158
00:09:23,520 --> 00:09:26,560
Speaker 2: way to make you look like you did something wrong.

159
00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:28,640
Speaker 1: Dude, if I were you, I would not use the

160
00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:32,080
Speaker 1: word perverted in this context because it just raises even

161
00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:35,880
Speaker 1: more questions. Yeah, he helped, alright, How did Fang Fang

162
00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:40,400
Speaker 1: find out about the investigation? Eric? Why isn't she in

163
00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:44,760
Speaker 1: custody right now? How did she escape? Yeah? He helped,

164
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:47,360
Speaker 1: He absolutely helped. But did I just hear that this

165
00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:50,520
Speaker 1: is a habit of the Justice Department being used as

166
00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:53,839
Speaker 1: a political weapon against the president's political opponents? Did he

167
00:09:53,920 --> 00:09:56,320
Speaker 1: not just live through the Biden administration with all of

168
00:09:56,440 --> 00:10:02,120
Speaker 1: us lack of self awareness to say things like this,

169
00:10:02,360 --> 00:10:06,960
Speaker 1: knowing what we saw transpired before our eyes against Donald

170
00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:10,160
Speaker 1: Trump and anyone affiliated with him is a remarkable thing

171
00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:10,720
Speaker 1: to witness.

172
00:10:11,200 --> 00:10:14,559
Speaker 4: So as you heard the resomblegnize any wrongdoing in this case,

173
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:17,680
Speaker 4: But some of his supporters and other Democrats that we've

174
00:10:17,679 --> 00:10:21,520
Speaker 4: heard from are expressing some concern about this.

175
00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:26,920
Speaker 1: That's the key. Other Democrats are expressing concern. That's what's

176
00:10:26,960 --> 00:10:30,520
Speaker 1: going to happen. Katie Porter out in California. The other

177
00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:32,760
Speaker 1: who are the other candidates that Peter Theo, They're all

178
00:10:32,760 --> 00:10:35,239
Speaker 1: going to say, well, I can't believe Trump is doing that.

179
00:10:35,240 --> 00:10:40,320
Speaker 1: That said, I have grave concerns if these allegations are true.

180
00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:44,240
Speaker 1: I have grave concerns about Congressman Swalwell's ability to lead.

181
00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:49,600
Speaker 1: This is a Democrat op. My friends, trust me on this,

182
00:10:49,720 --> 00:10:53,200
Speaker 1: or at least the leak of it is. That said that,

183
00:10:53,400 --> 00:10:57,080
Speaker 1: Eric Swalwell has plenty to say here about the weaponization

184
00:10:57,240 --> 00:11:00,840
Speaker 1: of the Justice Department, as you just saw. Tell me

185
00:11:00,840 --> 00:11:04,720
Speaker 1: more about your concerns about weaponizing the Justice Department, Eric Swawell,

186
00:11:04,760 --> 00:11:05,679
Speaker 1: when you're the target.

187
00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:08,719
Speaker 2: Well, first, we are making it clear that we're going

188
00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:10,840
Speaker 2: into the majority a year from now. We have every

189
00:11:10,840 --> 00:11:15,400
Speaker 2: intention to do that, and so we will bring oversight, accountability.

190
00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:18,880
Speaker 2: We will subpoena the Department of Justice, but also private

191
00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:22,320
Speaker 2: actors who have done these drug deals with the administration's

192
00:11:22,840 --> 00:11:28,840
Speaker 2: college campuses, entertainment companies, law firms, and so accountability is

193
00:11:28,920 --> 00:11:32,440
Speaker 2: coming and so one it's all coming out too. I

194
00:11:32,480 --> 00:11:35,920
Speaker 2: hope that deters people from doing more of these deals,

195
00:11:36,160 --> 00:11:38,480
Speaker 2: these one offs with the president. One other point though, on.

196
00:11:38,800 --> 00:11:41,840
Speaker 1: Komi no no, no other points. Did you hear what

197
00:11:41,880 --> 00:11:44,480
Speaker 1: he just said, we're going to get the majority, and

198
00:11:44,520 --> 00:11:46,880
Speaker 1: when we do, we're going to have investigations not just

199
00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:49,240
Speaker 1: into people in the administration, not just people in the

200
00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:52,199
Speaker 1: Justice Department with subpoena all of them, but also people

201
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:56,120
Speaker 1: in private businesses that are doing business with the administration,

202
00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:59,520
Speaker 1: that have contracts with the administration, that have a friendly

203
00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:03,040
Speaker 1: relationship with the administration. There need to be repercussions. Know

204
00:12:03,160 --> 00:12:05,120
Speaker 1: that we are coming, and I hope it keeps you

205
00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:07,880
Speaker 1: from doing anything positive for the American people if it

206
00:12:07,960 --> 00:12:10,880
Speaker 1: means working with the Trump administration. That's the guy who

207
00:12:11,080 --> 00:12:12,560
Speaker 1: just said with the straight face.

208
00:12:12,480 --> 00:12:15,880
Speaker 2: Bureau said over ten years ago, all we did was help.

209
00:12:16,559 --> 00:12:21,600
Speaker 2: But this effort to weaponize the FBI against the president's

210
00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:23,560
Speaker 2: political enemy at a time that we are at war

211
00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:27,640
Speaker 2: shows a distraction. It shows an obsession with going after

212
00:12:27,679 --> 00:12:28,679
Speaker 2: the president.

213
00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:32,040
Speaker 1: Yeah. So he's literally bragging about how he's going to

214
00:12:32,160 --> 00:12:36,080
Speaker 1: use the majority in the House for investigations and as

215
00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:40,160
Speaker 1: a weapon against people who are friendly with the Trump administration,

216
00:12:40,480 --> 00:12:42,200
Speaker 1: and at the same time dares to say, oh, this

217
00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:45,200
Speaker 1: is terrible that they're weaponizing the Justice Department against the

218
00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:49,199
Speaker 1: president's political enemies. He can't make it up. It's incredible,

219
00:12:49,640 --> 00:12:54,120
Speaker 1: how effortlessly they can lie like this, and that the

220
00:12:54,160 --> 00:12:57,000
Speaker 1: media in this town takes him seriously. Here's the Washington Post.

221
00:12:57,320 --> 00:13:00,240
Speaker 1: Attorneys for Representative Eric Swallow demanded in a letter to

222
00:13:00,520 --> 00:13:03,400
Speaker 1: an FBI director Cash Betel, that the bureau has to

223
00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:06,480
Speaker 1: refrain from releasing decade old. It's all decade old. Do

224
00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:08,520
Speaker 1: you see it? Do you see it? I mean, once

225
00:13:08,559 --> 00:13:11,679
Speaker 1: you see it, you can't unsee it. The other guy

226
00:13:11,720 --> 00:13:14,360
Speaker 1: was ms now saying decade old. Now it's Washington Post

227
00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:17,520
Speaker 1: saying decade old. It's all. You cannot describe what Eric

228
00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:22,800
Speaker 1: Swalwell did with a Chinese spy that then became the

229
00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:25,680
Speaker 1: target of an FBI investigation, and then the spy high

230
00:13:25,720 --> 00:13:28,040
Speaker 1: tails it out of the country because somehow she got

231
00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:31,079
Speaker 1: wind of it. You cannot describe that story if you're

232
00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:34,800
Speaker 1: in the left wing, liberal, corporate owned legacy media without

233
00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:39,960
Speaker 1: saying it's a decade old. Just so you know, if

234
00:13:40,000 --> 00:13:43,280
Speaker 1: you make a mistake on your taxes and the IRS

235
00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:45,760
Speaker 1: calls you and says, yeah, dude, you got a problem here.

236
00:13:45,880 --> 00:13:49,160
Speaker 1: You owees big time. Whatever you do, don't say you

237
00:13:49,240 --> 00:13:52,120
Speaker 1: can't come after me for this. It's a decade old.

238
00:13:53,880 --> 00:13:58,040
Speaker 1: I assure you that will not work in your favor. Okay,

239
00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:02,880
Speaker 1: A decade old investorative files involving the congressman's purported ties

240
00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:08,200
Speaker 1: to a suspected Chinese intelligence operative, Fang Fang. It's all

241
00:14:08,240 --> 00:14:15,880
Speaker 1: about Fang Fang. Interestingly, though, Eric Swollwell quite recently, just

242
00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:21,800
Speaker 1: last year, when commenting on various issues with the President

243
00:14:21,960 --> 00:14:27,560
Speaker 1: and his administration and such, he posted this, the American

244
00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:31,000
Speaker 1: people deserve transparency, not reactions and cover ups that may

245
00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:35,200
Speaker 1: have had to do with Epstein files. Here's my question, Eric,

246
00:14:36,920 --> 00:14:40,760
Speaker 1: the American people in fact do deserve transparency and not

247
00:14:40,960 --> 00:14:45,280
Speaker 1: cover ups. So why are you so upset about letting

248
00:14:45,400 --> 00:14:47,880
Speaker 1: us all learn about what a wonderful job you did

249
00:14:47,920 --> 00:14:51,520
Speaker 1: cooperating with the FBI when you were entangled with a

250
00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:55,880
Speaker 1: Chinese spy. I mean, I would think you've heard him say,

251
00:14:55,960 --> 00:14:59,480
Speaker 1: we did nothing but help, We were cooperative, We actually

252
00:14:59,520 --> 00:15:02,320
Speaker 1: stepped up and did the right thing. We didn't do

253
00:15:02,360 --> 00:15:07,880
Speaker 1: anything wrong. So why aren't you the first person wanting

254
00:15:07,960 --> 00:15:09,560
Speaker 1: to get this out here? I would think this will

255
00:15:09,560 --> 00:15:12,520
Speaker 1: help you win the governorship in California. In flying colors.

256
00:15:13,280 --> 00:15:15,040
Speaker 1: Look at what a great American he is, the way

257
00:15:15,040 --> 00:15:17,960
Speaker 1: he cooperated with the FBI after he was hoodwinked by

258
00:15:18,000 --> 00:15:23,720
Speaker 1: Fang Fang. I'm king. Eric Swala also said this back

259
00:15:23,760 --> 00:15:29,320
Speaker 1: in twenty eighteen during the Ukrainian impeachment fiasco. Say it

260
00:15:29,320 --> 00:15:32,120
Speaker 1: with me America so that Rudy Giuliani and Donald Trump

261
00:15:32,120 --> 00:15:35,200
Speaker 1: can hear it. Witnesses and suspects don't get to dictate

262
00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:39,760
Speaker 1: the terms of the investigation. Yeah, Well, his lawyers are

263
00:15:39,760 --> 00:15:42,400
Speaker 1: trying to dictate the terms of the investigation right now,

264
00:15:42,440 --> 00:15:45,760
Speaker 1: aren't they, Eric Swawell, here's his problem. He has a

265
00:15:45,760 --> 00:15:48,720
Speaker 1: real track record of saying things, things that have caught

266
00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:51,640
Speaker 1: our attention over the years, and they seem to bite

267
00:15:51,720 --> 00:15:53,720
Speaker 1: him in the butt right now when he's in hot

268
00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:54,720
Speaker 1: water like this.

269
00:15:55,280 --> 00:16:00,520
Speaker 2: Donald Trump was so innocent and this prosecution was so rigged.

270
00:16:01,040 --> 00:16:05,680
Speaker 2: Wouldn't an innocent person subjected to a rigged prosecution crawl

271
00:16:05,760 --> 00:16:10,120
Speaker 2: through glass and walk over fire to exercise their speedy trial, right?

272
00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:13,960
Speaker 2: Someone who is as innocent as Donald Trump claims he

273
00:16:14,040 --> 00:16:16,800
Speaker 2: is would not want to delay justice. The whole point

274
00:16:16,800 --> 00:16:19,280
Speaker 2: of a speedy trial, right, which he could use and

275
00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:23,080
Speaker 2: go to trial pretty quickly, is to protect people who

276
00:16:23,080 --> 00:16:26,200
Speaker 2: are wrongfully accused. And so he's sure acting like a

277
00:16:26,200 --> 00:16:26,960
Speaker 2: guilty person.

278
00:16:27,320 --> 00:16:31,280
Speaker 1: Yeah, listen at fair point. I guess, So, Eric Swollwell,

279
00:16:32,440 --> 00:16:34,680
Speaker 1: how do you explain why you're trying to resist having

280
00:16:34,840 --> 00:16:37,600
Speaker 1: full transparency with regard to your dealings with the FBI

281
00:16:37,720 --> 00:16:42,120
Speaker 1: and Frank Fang, Right, I mean, an innocent person would

282
00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:47,200
Speaker 1: crawl over broken glass to make sure that everybody knows

283
00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:50,800
Speaker 1: just how innocent he is. So why isn't Eric Swallwell

284
00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:53,560
Speaker 1: doing that? Why is he lining up his lawyers to

285
00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:56,720
Speaker 1: try to bully and intimidate Cash Bettel to keep him

286
00:16:56,720 --> 00:16:59,600
Speaker 1: from releasing this information. By the way, if you think

287
00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:04,119
Speaker 1: that Cash Patel is in some way intimidated by that

288
00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:07,639
Speaker 1: or bullied by Eric Swalloyle in his lawyers, if you

289
00:17:07,640 --> 00:17:10,120
Speaker 1: think that he's going to hesitate to actually follow through

290
00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:15,320
Speaker 1: on this, you have to understand something. Cash Pateel was

291
00:17:15,359 --> 00:17:17,880
Speaker 1: one of the lead investigators and attorneys on the House

292
00:17:17,920 --> 00:17:21,320
Speaker 1: Intelligence Committee when Devin Nuna's was the chairman. It's when

293
00:17:21,359 --> 00:17:24,879
Speaker 1: the whole team there uncovered everything about the Russian collusion

294
00:17:24,920 --> 00:17:30,920
Speaker 1: hoax and the dossier and who paid for it, and

295
00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:34,080
Speaker 1: the FISA warrants that were pulled. Because you remember all

296
00:17:34,160 --> 00:17:35,960
Speaker 1: of this, I know I remember all of this. It

297
00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:39,879
Speaker 1: was only eight years ago. Cash Patel was there. He

298
00:17:40,119 --> 00:17:43,760
Speaker 1: knows exactly who Adam Schiff is, he knows exactly who

299
00:17:43,920 --> 00:17:46,520
Speaker 1: Eric Swalwell is. And now that he's the FBI director,

300
00:17:46,560 --> 00:17:50,720
Speaker 1: well he's had one or two interactions with the fine

301
00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:54,040
Speaker 1: congressman from California. So if you think that cash Ptel

302
00:17:54,160 --> 00:17:56,719
Speaker 1: is in some way going to be intimidated by Swalwell

303
00:17:56,760 --> 00:17:59,480
Speaker 1: and his people, well here's a reminder about how this

304
00:17:59,600 --> 00:18:03,639
Speaker 1: is going to go down on the visual capabilities.

305
00:18:03,640 --> 00:18:06,520
Speaker 4: I'm going to borrow your tremnology and call bullshit your

306
00:18:06,640 --> 00:18:09,919
Speaker 4: entire career in Congress disgrace to the American.

307
00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:12,359
Speaker 1: You can reclaim your time all.

308
00:18:12,240 --> 00:18:18,400
Speaker 2: You Wantness Chairman yours.

309
00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:19,960
Speaker 3: The gentleman has no to Chairman.

310
00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:22,560
Speaker 2: Would you monished the witness not to insult members?

311
00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:24,920
Speaker 1: Gentleman has no tub with mister Chairman. Just maady will

312
00:18:24,920 --> 00:18:26,080
Speaker 1: remember the point of order?

313
00:18:26,800 --> 00:18:29,159
Speaker 2: Could the gentleman be extended in additional twenty seconds to

314
00:18:29,240 --> 00:18:32,880
Speaker 2: complete his thoughts since the witness decided to interrupt.

315
00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:35,000
Speaker 1: Him, and the witness will be able to respond if

316
00:18:35,040 --> 00:18:35,800
Speaker 1: he wants, We'll make sure.

317
00:18:35,840 --> 00:18:39,840
Speaker 2: Thank you. My question is, will you Director recuse yourself,

318
00:18:39,960 --> 00:18:43,600
Speaker 2: yes or no from investigating or making decisions about the

319
00:18:43,680 --> 00:18:47,640
Speaker 2: sixty individuals, including myself, that you identified as government tangsters.

320
00:18:47,720 --> 00:18:49,800
Speaker 1: Yes or no time, and the gentleman has expired.

321
00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:51,639
Speaker 3: The witness may respond if he would like.

322
00:18:51,680 --> 00:18:53,120
Speaker 2: And the answer was no, as I heard.

323
00:18:54,960 --> 00:18:58,679
Speaker 1: Correct, Okay, the gentleman from Wisconsin. The gentleman yelds back

324
00:18:58,680 --> 00:19:01,800
Speaker 1: to the gentleman Wisconsin's recognistion minutes. Yeah, there you go.

325
00:19:01,920 --> 00:19:05,680
Speaker 1: And so Cash Pateel, he doesn't give a crap. Cash

326
00:19:05,680 --> 00:19:08,960
Speaker 1: Ptel is not. He's going to go right forward with this,

327
00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:11,639
Speaker 1: all right. And again, if Eric swall was innocent, based

328
00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:14,720
Speaker 1: on his own standard, he should be crawling over broken

329
00:19:14,760 --> 00:19:18,120
Speaker 1: glass to get all the information out. You know, here's

330
00:19:18,160 --> 00:19:20,679
Speaker 1: what I think might be the circumstance. First of all,

331
00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:23,920
Speaker 1: I think Eric Swawell is guilty of something. I think

332
00:19:23,960 --> 00:19:26,359
Speaker 1: that all of the evidence and everything suggests that he

333
00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:29,520
Speaker 1: definitely got in way too deep. And again I want

334
00:19:29,520 --> 00:19:32,119
Speaker 1: to point out that I think what the FBI is

335
00:19:32,160 --> 00:19:35,040
Speaker 1: worried about here the career people at the FBI, is

336
00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:37,359
Speaker 1: that when everything is out and transpired, it's going to

337
00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:40,080
Speaker 1: look like the FBI gave Eric Swalwell heads up instead

338
00:19:40,080 --> 00:19:42,600
Speaker 1: of going after Eric Swalwell for potential wrongdoing like they

339
00:19:42,600 --> 00:19:47,040
Speaker 1: would a Republican. They gave Eric Swawell heads up, they

340
00:19:47,040 --> 00:19:49,640
Speaker 1: gave him a get out of jail free card, and

341
00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:53,439
Speaker 1: ultimately I think what somehow Farm Firing learned about this

342
00:19:53,600 --> 00:19:56,840
Speaker 1: and she went back to Beijing. And if you really

343
00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:58,800
Speaker 1: pull on the threads a little bit further, if the

344
00:19:58,880 --> 00:20:02,639
Speaker 1: FBI wanted to, they probably could have discovered that Swawell

345
00:20:02,680 --> 00:20:04,760
Speaker 1: gave up the store and let Feng Fang know, get

346
00:20:04,760 --> 00:20:06,159
Speaker 1: out of here. Because I don't want this to go

347
00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:10,120
Speaker 1: any further. That's just a hunch of mine. There's one

348
00:20:10,160 --> 00:20:13,479
Speaker 1: more hunch, knowing the kind of person Eric Swalwell is

349
00:20:13,520 --> 00:20:17,959
Speaker 1: seeing him operate. My hunch is that behind closed doors,

350
00:20:18,160 --> 00:20:20,480
Speaker 1: when the committee was doing their business there in house

351
00:20:20,520 --> 00:20:24,360
Speaker 1: intel and this young staffer for Devin Nuna's Cash Patel,

352
00:20:24,560 --> 00:20:26,280
Speaker 1: was hanging out and trying to do a good job,

353
00:20:26,520 --> 00:20:31,800
Speaker 1: I'm thinking Swawell was an absolute ahole to him because

354
00:20:31,800 --> 00:20:35,840
Speaker 1: people like Eric Swalwell treat staff like that, they treat

355
00:20:35,840 --> 00:20:38,360
Speaker 1: the little people like that. That's how they are, that's

356
00:20:38,359 --> 00:20:40,800
Speaker 1: how they behave. I've seen it, you've seen it, We've

357
00:20:40,800 --> 00:20:46,000
Speaker 1: all seen it. And Cash Patel now is the FBI

358
00:20:46,160 --> 00:20:50,400
Speaker 1: director and I'm just saying that if there's evidence there

359
00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:53,919
Speaker 1: and Swawell committed a crime, or the American people deserve

360
00:20:54,040 --> 00:20:56,680
Speaker 1: to know some things about Eric Swawell before they vote

361
00:20:57,680 --> 00:21:01,720
Speaker 1: in the fall in California. Then you know what, Eric

362
00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:05,840
Speaker 1: buddy Payback's a betch

363
00:21:09,720 --> 00:21:09,960
Speaker 3: Yeah,