Speaker 1: Ready to break the narrative, get the real story with
Speaker 1: no filters and no apologies, cut through the noise with
Speaker 1: real conversation, real conviction, and real news. It's time for
Speaker 1: truth without spin. It's the Alex Marlow Show.
Speaker 2: Alex Marlow Show. I'm glad you're here. We got lots
Speaker 2: to do today. We're gonna start with some jobs news.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna give you some updates on the California elections
Speaker 2: they're taking place, plus a lot of audio of Democrats
Speaker 2: squirming around trying to figure out what to do about
Speaker 2: Graham Platner. And it is a blast. You'll enjoy that
Speaker 2: very much. Plus more, plus more variety for you. But
Speaker 2: we'll start with a blowout jobs report, the third straight
Speaker 2: blowout report. People have tried to act as though the
Speaker 2: economy is in bad shape, consumer sentiment is very bad.
Speaker 2: But a lot of this we're learning is fake news.
Speaker 2: Recall that given the current state of the economy, after
Speaker 2: the crackdown on illegal immigration and the advent of doge,
Speaker 2: where we're trying to cut not ad federal government jobs,
Speaker 2: really even a neutral jobs number, literally zero new jobs created,
Speaker 2: would be okay. We're in that type of environment. We're
Speaker 2: trying to get people not necessarily to get the new jobs.
Speaker 2: We're trying to get them just to get wait, to
Speaker 2: get raises. We're in the we're in the raise getting
Speaker 2: business now in this country, and the Trump administration is
Speaker 2: in the lead on this. But we got one hundred
Speaker 2: and seventy two thousand jobs, one hundred and seventy two
Speaker 2: thousand with prior months actually getting revised upwards. Public sector grew,
Speaker 2: but only at state government level, not at the federal
Speaker 2: government level. Durable goods, leisure and hospitality, it's amazing stuff.
Speaker 2: Let me give you some of the breakdown. The forecast
Speaker 2: was eighty five thousand new jobs. So this is twice
Speaker 2: as much, so twice as much what economists predicted with
Speaker 2: the forecast topping out at one hundred ten thousands. So
Speaker 2: people whose professional job is to figure out should how
Speaker 2: much hiring is going on. I thought the most we
Speaker 2: could have seen is one hundred and ten thousand. We
Speaker 2: get one hundred and seventy two thousand. Huge upward revisions
Speaker 2: make this number even better than it sounds on paper.
Speaker 2: April revised up by sixty four thousand to one hundred
Speaker 2: and seventy nine thousand in March by twenty nine thousand
Speaker 2: to two hundred and fourteen thousand. So we're seeing combined
Speaker 2: ninety three thousand jobs added to the historical record that
Speaker 2: weren't there before, and this administration the country, no one
Speaker 2: got credit for it in real time. And I always
Speaker 2: note this that the revisions always seem to go in
Speaker 2: a direction that helps the parties out of power, the Democrats,
Speaker 2: and it always hurts President Trump, who is trying to
Speaker 2: paint a picture that we have an accelerating economy that's
Speaker 2: not fading, that's accelerating, and that really is what the
Speaker 2: number suggests. I know gas prices are up, though, I
Speaker 2: got to admit, and it's just I don't want to
Speaker 2: be insensitive and especially insensive to myself because I have
Speaker 2: giant cars and I live in the state with the
Speaker 2: highest gas prices. But it's what it was under Biden.
Speaker 2: It's not higher, it's about it's exactly the same. And
Speaker 2: I do think Trump won partially to lower gas prices.
Speaker 2: That's a fact. Aware of this matters, but it does
Speaker 2: feel and I feel strained about I think about, you know,
Speaker 2: I got one small car, and I think about driving
Speaker 2: that car when I drive into work. Because it's a
Speaker 2: long drive into work. I admit it, it's a factor.
Speaker 2: But are we overblowing it when we're looking at numbers
Speaker 2: like this? Are we overblowing some of the things when
Speaker 2: you're seeing actually a lot of spending going on. Manufacturing
Speaker 2: is genuinely booming right now. Manufacturing payrolls jump seven thousand,
Speaker 2: beat every single economist estimate. Durabile goods employment spended seventeen thousand.
Speaker 2: Prior month reported loss of two thousand was revised away,
Speaker 2: so we had lost manufacturing jobs in I guess this
Speaker 2: is the April data now that is back to neutral.
Speaker 2: Other stuff that's in this the trend that we're accelerating.
Speaker 2: Conomists of underestimated job growth now three straight months is
Speaker 2: noted three months average, widely considered a more reliable gauge,
Speaker 2: moved up to over one hundred eighty eight thousand jobs,
Speaker 2: when really, again, zero jobs could conceivably be okay in
Speaker 2: this current economy. And the last note on this, workers
Speaker 2: are winning on wages. According to John Carney at Brightbart News,
Speaker 2: our economic and finance editor, average hourly earnings rows a
Speaker 2: third of a percent in May. They're up three point
Speaker 2: four percent over the past year, While the number of
Speaker 2: people reporting themselves as employed grew by one hundred and
Speaker 2: forty nine thousand, the number of unemployed shrank by sixty
Speaker 2: six thousand. Again versus zero is probably a quality number.
Speaker 2: So the biggest wage boom came in factory workers, and
Speaker 2: it's the biggest factory wageman we've seen in half a century.
Speaker 2: This adds up. Trump is prioritizing factory work. Trump is
Speaker 2: prioritizing bringing back American manufacturing. As his secretary besant, weekly
Speaker 2: real wages for durable goods worker are up three point
Speaker 2: five percent. So we've never seen a pace like this.
Speaker 2: Is a month to month increase of three point five percent.
Speaker 2: This is the post war post World War II boom.
Speaker 2: Is the last time we saw numbers like this. Real
Speaker 2: weekly gains average point two percent annually for decades, including
Speaker 2: the prior decade before the pandemic. So Trump is really
Speaker 2: resetting the global economy. Workers are taking home more money
Speaker 2: than the headline show. Weekly paychecks are up seven point
Speaker 2: four percent year over year, Hourly pays up five point
Speaker 2: three percent. Overtime work had to jumped from three point
Speaker 2: seven to four hours a week. Why is that no
Speaker 2: tax on overtime. On top of that, the BBB's overtime
Speaker 2: tax cuts means that people are taking home more money
Speaker 2: of the overtime that they're taking. So they're doing more
Speaker 2: overtime and they're getting paid more on the overtime that
Speaker 2: they're doing. It's just great, it's fantastic. I love to
Speaker 2: bring the positive stuff on the show because we are
Speaker 2: so off and talking about negative things. But factors are
Speaker 2: producing more with every hour worked. Real durable goods output
Speaker 2: grew five point eight percent in Key One. Productivity up
Speaker 2: five point five percent annually. Just one good piece of data. Again,
Speaker 2: that's another gauge that could go down. We could have
Speaker 2: less productivity, but we're seeing more American manufacturing. American are
Speaker 2: factory workers are generating not just more value per hour,
Speaker 2: this is dramatically more value per hour that they're working.
Speaker 2: So it's not just about this is what I've talked
Speaker 2: about in the shows, what I talked about with Secretary
Speaker 2: Vestment when I spent time with him, and we could
Speaker 2: go today, we're resetting the expectation of this economy is
Speaker 2: not just about consuming cheap goods made in China. We're
Speaker 2: going to judge this economy based off of what we're producing,
Speaker 2: and we are producing way more and people are getting
Speaker 2: paid way more to produce it, So this is a
Speaker 2: this is a real sign of strength. Pay is out
Speaker 2: running price growth. So inflation is i relative to Trump's
Speaker 2: first term, low relative to Biden's term, but it is
Speaker 2: not at the level of job growth, so we're seeing
Speaker 2: higher pay relative to inflation. So this is just great
Speaker 2: good stuff. It's high quality. It's great to see all
Speaker 2: this happening in our country, and I just hope that
Speaker 2: we can spend a little bit of time celebrating this.
Speaker 2: And that's why when you see guys like Scott Best
Speaker 2: when he's out there, he always looks confident. He never
Speaker 2: looked even if there's some negative information. He always looks
Speaker 2: like he's having a great time, enjoying himself and believes
Speaker 2: in what he's doing. And part of this is because
Speaker 2: he knows this stuff is happening, and it's just a
Speaker 2: matter before people catch on. So is the president or
Speaker 2: is his team doing it at fantastic job selling this stuff.
Speaker 2: I don't know if they are, and I know they
Speaker 2: can sell it better, but these are fantastic numbers, and
Speaker 2: they keep getting revised even better. I just recorded right
Speaker 2: before the show a podcast with them and Joe Morris
Speaker 2: that I will commend to you will put that out
Speaker 2: probably tomorrow or Sunday. And one of the things we
Speaker 2: do is we celebrate Pride Month on it and our
Speaker 2: celebration of Pride Month is to elevate our favorite gay,
Speaker 2: which is Scott Bessant. And I want to share this clip.
Speaker 2: This is him going after Senator Ron Wyden's son play
Speaker 2: cut twenty please.
Speaker 3: Naciously slender the Treasury Building in an attempt to cover
Speaker 3: up his son having an investment meeting with Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 3: to ask for funding.
Speaker 2: Thank you, thanks, Chairman.
Speaker 4: Yes, let's be clear here, nobody is interested in the
Speaker 4: ramblings of a capo in the most corrupt regime in
Speaker 4: American history. We want to get some facts about this deal.
Speaker 4: That's what we're here for.
Speaker 3: Thank you, well, thank you, And I will ask my
Speaker 3: questions first today and we would like to here what
Speaker 3: Adam Widen and Jeffery Epstein talked about. Your son's largest
Speaker 3: investment position was ri'x Cabaret. So did your son and
Speaker 3: Jeffery Epstein talk about pole dancing as he begged him
Speaker 3: for money using your limited credibility.
Speaker 2: Happy Pride from Scott Bessant. Just amazing stuff. That's how
Speaker 2: we celebrate the Marlow Show. We play our most based
Speaker 2: gays playing clips of that. That's how what a takedown.
Speaker 2: Adam Widen is Ron Wyden's son and seems like a
Speaker 2: total dirt bag. I'm committed to you, I'll do a
Speaker 2: deep dive on him, but just it's so trite calling
Speaker 2: him a coppo. It's just it's one of the smartest
Speaker 2: guys around period, and he just makes complete fools out
Speaker 2: of everyone in the Senate. And I'm sure he did
Speaker 2: the same thing to all the students at Yale. Great
Speaker 2: stuff fromvesting, great stuff from the Trump economy. But they
Speaker 2: are trying to steal the elections in California. I will
Speaker 2: report on that when we come back on the Alex
Speaker 2: Marlow Show. All right, I've been talking about this for
Speaker 2: a few months now. Why because it's important and it's
Speaker 2: helping me. It's a handheld red light therapy device for
Speaker 2: pain and inflammation called the super Palm ten fifty. I
Speaker 2: use it right at home, and what I really like
Speaker 2: about is it's actually working on my back and my
Speaker 2: knee and no drugs no invasion and wow, have I
Speaker 2: generally noticed a difference. Here's how it works. Some power
Speaker 2: LED makes devices that deliver red and near infrared light
Speaker 2: energy directly into your cells reduces pain and inflammation. The
Speaker 2: science is called photo biomodulation or PBM, also known as
Speaker 2: red light therapy. You guys have heard about that this
Speaker 2: isn't some trendy wellness fab though. PBM has been researched
Speaker 2: around the world for decades. In fact, according to the
Speaker 2: PBM Foundation, over one hundred million patient treatments have been
Speaker 2: performed without any documented side effects. The engineering is impressive too.
Speaker 2: Some power LED devices feature a patent pended cooling system
Speaker 2: that lets you hold it closer to your skin, allowing
Speaker 2: deeper light penetration to reach your pain and inflammation. You
Speaker 2: can treat arthritis, knee pain, back, even tonightas joints, and more.
Speaker 2: The handheld super Palm ten fifty also creates what's called
Speaker 2: a wall of light. The LEDs project at a ninety
Speaker 2: degree angle, which eliminates hot spots and spreads light evenly
Speaker 2: over a wider area, making it five to nine times
Speaker 2: more effective than many alternative technologies. These are medical grade
Speaker 2: PBM devices. You can use at home, and they're also
Speaker 2: used by dentists, chiropractors, physiotherapists, wellness centers, and even researchers
Speaker 2: studying PBM. If you want to learn more, check them
Speaker 2: out at SunPower led dot com. If you use the
Speaker 2: code Marlow, you get ten percent off. Feel better, be better,
Speaker 2: treat your pain and inflammation at home, just like I do.
Speaker 2: Sunpowerled dot com use the code Marlow. So if they're
Speaker 2: trying to do it, they're trying to steal the elections
Speaker 2: in California. We knew it would happen, but I don't
Speaker 2: know if we knew it'd be quite this brazen. Recall,
Speaker 2: the Democrats designed a system where you count votes for
Speaker 2: up to thirty days. It usually takes about a couple
Speaker 2: of weeks to get through all of It doesn't usually
Speaker 2: take the full thirty but we're accustomed in California to
Speaker 2: having it be two or three weeks. I have a
Speaker 2: podcast up with Senator Tubberville where I ask him why
Speaker 2: they designed the system this way, and his understanding is
Speaker 2: so that they can get the votes they need in
Speaker 2: order to rig elections. And he's not alone in that thinking.
Speaker 2: That's my thinking. So we added about five percent of
Speaker 2: the vote count in the LA mayoral race yesterday. And
Speaker 2: remember how I reported on Wednesday that Spencer Pratt was
Speaker 2: up by eight points over Niche Ramen. Five more percent
Speaker 2: are in and that lead has shrunk to six percent.
Speaker 2: So somehow, of all the mail in votes that came
Speaker 2: in in the last two days, which makes up five
Speaker 2: percent of the total, Spencer Pratt barely had a single vote.
Speaker 2: It appears because Nitche Ramen caught up two percent and
Speaker 2: is now within six points. I had circled that eight
Speaker 2: points was seven points. I had figured they could cheat
Speaker 2: up to seven points. He was eight points ahead of Ramen,
Speaker 2: so I figured maybe perhaps we get away with it,
Speaker 2: But that gap is already closed with thirty five percent
Speaker 2: not counted yet. It's just striking stuff. It. It just
Speaker 2: shows you how brazen the Democrats are, how really they're
Speaker 2: going to rig it right in our faces. We're all
Speaker 2: watching them, we all know they're going to do it,
Speaker 2: and somehow they're going to just keep counting mail in
Speaker 2: votes and then they're going to certify perhaps a fraudulent runoff.
Speaker 2: Though it's imperative that we investigate, we figure out if
Speaker 2: this is legal cheating or illegal cheating. It's certainly one
Speaker 2: or the other. Legal cheating would mean that you get
Speaker 2: people who would otherwise not turn in votes and then
Speaker 2: you get them to fill out a ballot and then
Speaker 2: you get it in a mailbox. Or is it legal
Speaker 2: cheating where they're literally just making up fake people to vote.
Speaker 2: We got to figure out what it is, but we
Speaker 2: do know that as of now, it's very hard to
Speaker 2: bet on Prat actually making the LA mayoral race. He's
Speaker 2: up six points with thirty five percent left account, so
Speaker 2: it's that level. It's that brazen. Steve Hilton dropped down
Speaker 2: four tenths of a percent in the latest crop of ballots.
Speaker 2: In the governor's race, Tom Steyer moved up four tenths
Speaker 2: of a percent, so he's still up seven percent over
Speaker 2: a third place Styer. He's up one percent over Xavier Bakaria,
Speaker 2: as Joe Biden calls him. But just it's really happening, guys.
Speaker 2: They're trying to steal it. I named the show yesterday
Speaker 2: yesterday show They're trying to steal the election in California,
Speaker 2: and then last night we see it flat out. We
Speaker 2: saw flat out that there are all of a sudden
Speaker 2: niche Robin catches up two percent over a five percent
Speaker 2: vote count, doesn't make any sense, aside from it actually
Speaker 2: makes perfect sense. This is what they do. They don't
Speaker 2: have any values the left, they don't have any charismatic people.
Speaker 2: All they stand for is that Donald Trump is a
Speaker 2: bad guy, you're all racist and fascists, and that they
Speaker 2: can win. They consider winning its own value. They figure
Speaker 2: out ways to win, regardless of whether or not it's ethical,
Speaker 2: because they think that allowing Donald Trump to be president,
Speaker 2: allowing for Spencer Pratt to be mayor allowing for Steve
Speaker 2: Hilton to be governor is the definition of evil. It's
Speaker 2: the definition of bad. In the meantime, they're willing to
Speaker 2: overlook Nazis, which is just a major thing that they're
Speaker 2: doing this. And on the other side of the break,
Speaker 2: I'll play cuts of the Democrats struggling with this concept
Speaker 2: that they are nominating a guy who's not only as
Speaker 2: a Nazi tattoo is praise Nazis as a bunch of
Speaker 2: other baggage as well. But this is very curious, and
Speaker 2: I tease that I would play this on the show today.
Speaker 2: Ram Emmanuel, who's one of a close confidant of Barack
Speaker 2: Obama and is a Democrat establishment terry, And if therever
Speaker 2: was one, he completely is nuking the party now in
Speaker 2: anticipation of no doubt he's going to run for president
Speaker 2: in sort of a lane of Democrats have gone too far.
Speaker 2: Let's play cut, eight guys.
Speaker 5: Why do you think people feel so negatively about the
Speaker 5: Democratic Party?
Speaker 6: Because we earned their disrespect the hard way. Look, when
Speaker 6: your back's against the wall, you can't make a mortgage payment,
Speaker 6: you can't make you can't go to the doctor's visit
Speaker 6: because you can't afford it, or you're stealing money out
Speaker 6: of your four oh one K that you know is
Speaker 6: for your retirement, but you're doing it to pay your bills. Today,
Speaker 6: you expect the Democratic Party to show up.
Speaker 7: We did things that were really ridiculous. We let a
Speaker 7: border get out of control. When it came to public safety,
Speaker 7: we talked about defunding the police. When it came to
Speaker 7: an ethnic group, we called in LATINX and nobody else
Speaker 7: in that group ever identified themselves that way. And then
Speaker 7: rather than worry about classroom excellence, we were worried about
Speaker 7: bathroom and locker room access.
Speaker 2: It is amazing it's a great cut and he's exactly
Speaker 2: right about this. But will this actually catch on Democrats?
Speaker 2: I don't think it is. I don't think it will,
Speaker 2: but it's just a it's noteworthy that I don't think
Speaker 2: that woke has died, and you still see this over
Speaker 2: and over again, where the examples of woke coming back
Speaker 2: in a major way if it ever left. But we're
Speaker 2: going to get one guy at lead's going to run
Speaker 2: for president, who's going to act like Democrats have gone
Speaker 2: too far woke. It's going to be entertaining. We'll be
Speaker 2: back with those platter clips from Focused Features and the
Speaker 2: producers of Darkest Hour comes the new movie Pressure, the
Speaker 2: untold true story of D Day. In the seventy two
Speaker 2: hours leading up to the largest Seaborn invasion in history,
Speaker 2: General Dwight D. Eisenhower face an impossible decision that would
Speaker 2: determine the fate of the war. As Allied forces prepare
Speaker 2: to land to massive storms converge over Normandy behind closed
Speaker 2: doors with the clock ticking, General Eisenhower must decide send
Speaker 2: three hundred thousand men into nature's unforgiving fury or delay
Speaker 2: and risk losing the war itself. There's no safe option
Speaker 2: only consequences. One decision would change the world forever. This
Speaker 2: Friday Experience a powerful, inspiring story of courage, sacrifice, and
Speaker 2: the mission that gave the free world hope. Starring Andrew Scott,
Speaker 2: Brendan Fraser, Kerrie Condon, and Damian Lewis. Pressure is filled
Speaker 2: with thrilling tension from beginning to end. Pressure the untold
Speaker 2: True story of d Day. Rate of PG. Thirteen. Maybe
Speaker 2: inappropriate for children under thirteen only in theaters this Friday,
Speaker 2: with special engagements in Dolby Cinema. All Right, I told you, guys,
Speaker 2: woke is not dead, right, I told you maybe it
Speaker 2: didn't even go away. Check out what they just did.
Speaker 2: In New York erasing mother and father from official documents
Speaker 2: play cut sixteen guys.
Speaker 8: The New York Democrats argue the words mother and father
Speaker 8: are outdated and need to be replaced with more inclusive terms.
Speaker 8: Under state law, all that's needed now is Governor Kathy
Speaker 8: Hochel's signature. So if Hokle approves, in New York's family
Speaker 8: court and in domestic education law, a mother would be
Speaker 8: labeled as a gest stating parent, a father as a
Speaker 8: nonjest stating parent, and paternity proceedings to determine the child's
Speaker 8: father would be called parentage proceedings. The bill passed the
Speaker 8: State Senate this week and the State Assembly back in March.
Speaker 8: Governor Hokele proudly calls herself New York's first mom governor.
Speaker 8: It's unclear if she'll support this change though.
Speaker 3: I'm not familiar with what was introduced late last night,
Speaker 3: so I'll take a look at it if I have
Speaker 3: until the end of the year to review them and
Speaker 3: make a decision, so I won't be commenty on penning legislation.
Speaker 2: We have serious problems in this country, and this is
Speaker 2: what the left is focused on. Is anti science. You
Speaker 2: can't say mother and father. I just saw a story
Speaker 2: about how gen Z is going to have the least
Speaker 2: marriage and the fewest children maybe in history, certainly in
Speaker 2: modern history. And you know, we'll have to go back centuries,
Speaker 2: maybe a millennia to see people who are coupling off
Speaker 2: and pro creating less than gen Z's go. And this
Speaker 2: is the message that's being sent. There's nothing special about
Speaker 2: being a mother, there's nothing special about being a father.
Speaker 2: Anyone will tell you who has children, It probably is
Speaker 2: your number one identifying factor. I get to do so
Speaker 2: many cool stuff in my life, but the thing that
Speaker 2: preoccupies my time is being a father. Also a husband
Speaker 2: as well, but my identity is so tied to being
Speaker 2: a father, not as a non gestating parent. There's a
Speaker 2: romanticism to it that is essential if we want the
Speaker 2: species to continue. But the Democrats are a culture of death.
Speaker 2: The Left is a culture of death. They don't love life,
Speaker 2: and that's where all this comes from. It's anti science,
Speaker 2: it's anti life. It is just so lame too. It's
Speaker 2: how could they spend time on this? So it's pretty
Speaker 2: scary stuff. This is where their priorities are, and I
Speaker 2: think that it is. I think it's noteworthy that this
Speaker 2: is what their focus is on when there's so many
Speaker 2: things threatening us around the world in this country that
Speaker 2: they're thinking, what do we need to do today? Oh,
Speaker 2: I know, let's erase mother and father from official documents. Also,
Speaker 2: what's the objection the words mother and father? I understand
Speaker 2: trying to make things more inclusive, to trans or to gaze,
Speaker 2: They've been doing that forever. But why is it bad
Speaker 2: to call someone who is I guess because it's the
Speaker 2: trade stuff. It's fathers can be mothers now. So it's
Speaker 2: that men can have babies because you can have a
Speaker 2: man with a uterus and you can have a female penis.
Speaker 2: I'm figuring this out in real time, guys. This is
Speaker 2: a celebration of the female penis today. That's how we're
Speaker 2: cebeting pride in the Marlow Show. Oh my goodness. All right,
Speaker 2: I promised you I would play democrats squirming about the
Speaker 2: Grand Platin nomination, which continues to move ahead, even though
Speaker 2: The New York Times published a story with a bunch
Speaker 2: of accusations of former girlfriends and stuff that he was
Speaker 2: rough with them and stories of him grabbing people, may
Speaker 2: or may not have locked some one in a room.
Speaker 2: Not we didn't get the R word. So no rape accusations,
Speaker 2: no violent sexual assault accusations. So again, I keep making
Speaker 2: this point. I made this point when I was hosting
Speaker 2: The Huge Show, and I shared with on podcasts feed,
Speaker 2: so those of you describe my podcast, you could check
Speaker 2: this out. But I have made the point that I
Speaker 2: do believe we will get a Grand platinor PIC in October.
Speaker 2: I think it's gonna happen, and it's going to be
Speaker 2: an October surprise. But who cares because he's ad Nazi tattoo,
Speaker 2: and not just any Nazi tattoo, a Nazi tattoo worn
Speaker 2: by SS guards who were professional slaughterers of the Jews.
Speaker 2: So that's what he represents on his chest. And he
Speaker 2: was on Chris Hayes's show. Chris Hayes is an ms
Speaker 2: NOW person. I got some cuts of that, and then
Speaker 2: I'll play some Democrats try to explain him away to
Speaker 2: play fourteen. Please you refer to the tattoo as my
Speaker 2: toutton kumf, which is the German word for this particular
Speaker 2: Nazi symbol. There is other reporting and Jewish Inside Are
Speaker 2: in October in which an anonymous acquaintance says he used
Speaker 2: that same phrase. Did you know what this tattoo was
Speaker 2: about before last October when you said you first became
Speaker 2: aware of it?
Speaker 9: No? I did not. And I also think it's important
Speaker 9: to note that it's very likely and I think that
Speaker 9: she is that same source. She's the person who's been
Speaker 9: telling people this from the beginning, and it's a so
Speaker 9: I feel like, you know, we're kind of rehashing the
Speaker 9: thing we've been through.
Speaker 2: So now he doesn't know it's a Nazi tattoo. Even
Speaker 2: though he is deleted posts that are very much understanding
Speaker 2: that he knew exactly what this was and now he's
Speaker 2: just going to try to lie to people he feel
Speaker 2: like that's the path. Obviously, this guy is totally dishonest.
Speaker 2: Remember his one client as an oyster farmer is his
Speaker 2: own mother. He's playing a populist even though he is
Speaker 2: a trust fund kid or I don't know if he's
Speaker 2: trust fund, but he's a he went to one of
Speaker 2: the most spensive private schools in the country. This is
Speaker 2: a guy who is impersonating a super masculine guy because
Speaker 2: Democrat consultants thought this is how to package our message.
Speaker 2: Now you find a guy who acts like he's super
Speaker 2: masculine and will run all our woke messaging through that.
Speaker 2: So that's what they're doing. And then now he's lying
Speaker 2: about his tattoo. Of course, he knew exactly what it
Speaker 2: was and he didn't delete it. For a long time,
Speaker 2: I was thinking about the hostage video of the wife
Speaker 2: where the wife came out and was trying to defend him,
Speaker 2: and into the think, first of all, you married a
Speaker 2: guy the Nazi tattoo, so I don't count your opinion,
Speaker 2: your your opinion doesn't count for me. And then they're
Speaker 2: just trying to explain away this as if it is
Speaker 2: not exactly what meets the eye it is. They're trying
Speaker 2: to say, no, the media is the problem. The wife
Speaker 2: is going after the media. She was saying the media
Speaker 2: was taking stuff out of context. But look at all
Speaker 2: the context. The context is the guy. It's got the
Speaker 2: Nazi tattoo, and he's been lied about everything else in
Speaker 2: this past, and what are his accomplishments. This guy's running
Speaker 2: for the Senate, the Senate. This isn't dogcatcher, this isn't PTA.
Speaker 2: Of course you shouldn't be on a PTA, by the way,
Speaker 2: or I got one more clip from the Hayes interview.
Speaker 10: Fifteen Times basically reported that they saw texts of hers,
Speaker 10: including a text in August I believe August third of
Speaker 10: last year. This would be before October of last year,
Speaker 10: in which she's basically said that you had a quote
Speaker 10: Nazi tattoo and she joked about how she's going to
Speaker 10: volunteer for Collins. Now again, this is a text that
Speaker 10: got sent, so like we can place the time right,
Speaker 10: this is in August. How does she know it's a
Speaker 10: Nazi tattoo in August of last year, and you don't
Speaker 10: know it's an Nazi tattoo in August of last year.
Speaker 9: Well, she certainly didn't send that text to me. So
Speaker 9: whoever she sent it to and was talking to, that's
Speaker 9: I can't say why, but I will say that I
Speaker 9: certainly didn't know. And the text messages she's sending to
Speaker 9: friends who may have recognized that that they didn't tell
Speaker 9: me that.
Speaker 2: One of my favorite points about the Nazi tattoo is
Speaker 2: that they're deleted posts of him saying that he was
Speaker 2: aware that the symbol the Totten CoV is connected to
Speaker 2: the Nazis. But then he also has said that he
Speaker 2: does not endorse white supremacy and he didn't see the
Speaker 2: connection of white supremacy in the Nazi tattoo. He will
Speaker 2: say anything to you, We should not say anything, he says, seriously,
Speaker 2: So even though girlfriends said that he knew is a
Speaker 2: Nazi tattoo. All right, so let's see how the Democrats
Speaker 2: do with this. First of all, let's do Chris Coons
Speaker 2: cut seventeen.
Speaker 11: Frankly, mister Plattner's a four term, excuse me, four tour,
Speaker 11: a combat veteran and someone whose conduct as he came
Speaker 11: home from war. Many have questioned, I don't know him
Speaker 11: and don't know him at all. Well, but I'm going
Speaker 11: to give him a measure of grace and wait until
Speaker 11: I get a chance to hear more about the details
Speaker 11: of all these different allegations.
Speaker 2: In my view, the folks who.
Speaker 11: We have here in the Senate and who we might
Speaker 11: have here in the Senate, we should hold a high standards.
Speaker 2: All right, He's gonna give him grace. Gonna give the
Speaker 2: guy the Nazi tattoo some grace. And we love our veterans.
Speaker 2: Now you can get away with anything, now if you
Speaker 2: are a veteran. Okay, let's see how that goes. Alexandria
Speaker 2: Ocassio Cortes, who I just got such kick out this.
Speaker 2: I was talking about her with Senator Tubberville because she
Speaker 2: went down to Alabama and he told her to go
Speaker 2: back to Brooklyn, which is just great because she's from Queens.
Speaker 2: I think let's play cut nineteen. If you're reported by
Speaker 2: grim Plaidner in this New York Times article traffic in
Speaker 2: the room of being visited.
Speaker 12: Yeah, I mean, as you all know, this all kind
Speaker 12: of just came out. I've been doing let's say, business
Speaker 12: on the floor. So I need to into everything further
Speaker 12: before commenting on it.
Speaker 2: Pause, Yeah, because I think he's cut This is from yesterday.
Speaker 2: She's talking yesterday. All this just came out. You don't
Speaker 2: think that she and her comms team haven't workshopped. What
Speaker 2: are we going to say when inevitably someone puts a
Speaker 2: microphone a camera on our face and says, what do
Speaker 2: you think of the Nazi who's running for Senate Maine?
Speaker 12: Keep going yeah, because I think this reporting just recently
Speaker 12: came out, So I just want to make sure that
Speaker 12: I kind of fully read a office before.
Speaker 2: Comments generally about Platter.
Speaker 7: Are you concerned by what you've seen so far?
Speaker 10: Does he offer voters morbid X or does he need
Speaker 10: to offer voters more of an explanation?
Speaker 12: I mean, again, I think I have to read up
Speaker 12: on honestlyst reporting. You know, I think everyone, when we
Speaker 12: run for office, our responsibilities to our constituents and to
Speaker 12: the people of vote for me New York fourteen. In
Speaker 12: this case, for the people of Maine.
Speaker 2: The answer is yes, that's the correct answer. He does
Speaker 2: need to explain it, But instead you say, well, the
Speaker 2: candidates have a responsibility of their constituents. It means nothing.
Speaker 2: These people are so good at moving their mouth and
Speaker 2: saying nothing. I've never seen anything like it. It just
Speaker 2: shows you they're really struggling. Here. Here's Seth Molten, the
Speaker 2: craze lunatic who fantasizes about murdering Republicans. Play cut twenty two.
Speaker 7: What if there is more? And that is a question,
Speaker 7: What if there is more? Is that?
Speaker 13: Do you think that would then be too much for
Speaker 13: Grand Planner to continue?
Speaker 7: I mean, we just don't know.
Speaker 13: We just don't know what more can come out. But
Speaker 13: I do know this that he's running against a senator
Speaker 13: who every single day rubber stamps Trump's agenda, a senator
Speaker 13: who just like.
Speaker 2: I just I just love the premise that maybe more
Speaker 2: can come out. He's got a Nazi tattoo, he's a
Speaker 2: serial liar, and fabulous women have said he doesn't treat them. Well, yeah,
Speaker 2: there could be more. Of course, there could be rapeer
Speaker 2: murder like yes, maybe he gets accused of that, maybe
Speaker 2: he doesn't. But we got enough right go.
Speaker 13: On of the Republican Party supports this war in Iran,
Speaker 13: that's raising everybody's gas prices, It's getting Americans killed, that's
Speaker 13: killing innocent people in the Middle East. It's hurting our allies.
Speaker 13: It's taking our eye off the ball when it comes
Speaker 13: to deterring and preventing a war with China in Asia.
Speaker 13: So all of these things that Susan Collins does every
Speaker 13: single day are bad. And I think voters in Mayne
Speaker 13: are going to have to make a decision that only
Speaker 13: they can make weighing those two alternatives.
Speaker 2: It's awesome. It's the Nazis acceptable because we're in a
Speaker 2: war in Iran and gas prices are high. All right,
Speaker 2: all right, last one. This is Van Jones on CNN
Speaker 2: play cut twenty three.
Speaker 14: He said that he got this stuff under control years ago,
Speaker 14: and some of this stuff is not years ago, and
Speaker 14: people are concerned that there's more to come. Look, I
Speaker 14: don't sit in judgment anybody. You know all the work
Speaker 14: I've done in prisons, and I'm a second chances, third chances,
Speaker 14: four chances.
Speaker 11: Guy.
Speaker 14: You're on a redemption arc for real, when you've taken
Speaker 14: real accountability, when you've actually owned up and you have
Speaker 14: a track record, or at least you're honest about where
Speaker 14: you are in your process. My concern is he tried
Speaker 14: to polish this thing up. I used to be one way.
Speaker 14: Now I'm not. Well, you better be telling the truth
Speaker 14: about that, and it seems like he's not.
Speaker 2: Yeah, amen to that. We'll be right back, all right.
Speaker 2: I love the team on the show. Greg Evans our
Speaker 2: executive producer, Sean McConnell, runs our board, Roger Wicker junior,
Speaker 2: Rick Locke here, Shollie Matt Sibil junior producer, Ricky mister Callahan,
Speaker 2: John Cassio, Daniel West. I'll make vital contributions to what
Speaker 2: we're doing. A lot of stuff going on over at
Speaker 2: brightbart dot com for all of you who care to
Speaker 2: go over there. The best news page I believe on earth.
Speaker 2: Madonna is on all fours in front of a toilet
Speaker 2: bearing her breast in a wild Pride Month video. I'm
Speaker 2: not telling you to watch it. I'm saying, though, that
Speaker 2: Oak is not totally dead. And we celebrate Pride a
Speaker 2: little differently around here at the Marlow Show by playing
Speaker 2: bass Scott Bessen clips. We also have for you a
Speaker 2: kind of an unbelievable story about what's going on over
Speaker 2: in Arizona. We had thought that the Arizona Attorney General,
Speaker 2: Chris Mays is now seeking new indictments in the twenty
Speaker 2: twenty election case. So I'm saying the Democrats only look backwards,
Speaker 2: and they only look how to destroy Republicans. They stand
Speaker 2: for nothing. But the Arizona Attorney's General is now a
Speaker 2: returning a case to a grand jury for new indictments
Speaker 2: pertaining to President Trump in twenty twenty, and the alternate
Speaker 2: electors that were assembled there, which was not unprecedented. I
Speaker 2: wrote about this a lot in Breaking the Law about
Speaker 2: how there's alternate electors have been This is not a
Speaker 2: new thing. It's not a new concept. It didn't originate
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty. I don't love a lot of the
Speaker 2: way the election challenges played out in the aftermath of
Speaker 2: the twenty twenty election, but overall, there's a lot of
Speaker 2: smoke there, and just the fact that Democrats relitigating that
Speaker 2: stuff now unbelievable. So that's offer you over app bright
Speaker 2: part news. A couple other items I want to point
Speaker 2: out the I didn't get to dwell a lot on
Speaker 2: Scott Pelly's firing from sixty minutes, but I did catch
Speaker 2: this clip of longtime CBS host Katie Kirk talking about it.
Speaker 2: I got to play cut twenty one, Please, gentlemen, go ahead.
Speaker 5: Scott Pelly's tirade and expressing expressions of anger and frustration,
Speaker 5: which I totally understand and relate to, were extremely impolitic.
Speaker 5: I think is also a massive understatement. And I don't
Speaker 5: think that Barry Weiss had any choice but to let
Speaker 5: Scott Pelly go. I mean, I think it's a classic
Speaker 5: definition of insubordination. And I'm not saying that I don't
Speaker 5: agree with Scott and that I don't think that I
Speaker 5: don't believe it was a bad thing to make a stand.
Speaker 5: I think that I admired that he stood up for
Speaker 5: his principles. I just think perhaps the way that he
Speaker 5: did it and the way he expressed himself might have been,
Speaker 5: I don't know, handled differently.
Speaker 2: Perfect. That's it. He got fire free subordination. You can't
Speaker 2: just say you're ruining the show to your boss and
Speaker 2: then have a come out in public and keep the job.
Speaker 2: And as I noted on I think it was yesterday's show,
Speaker 2: I was commenting on how the most vocal people defending
Speaker 2: Pelly are all far left radicals. Here's another thing the
Speaker 2: Democrats are standing for right now is now they're going
Speaker 2: off on Donald Trump apparently falling asleep sometimes during boring
Speaker 2: events he's got to do so. The White House apparently
Speaker 2: exploded over a viral video of Trump being sleepy. Okay,
Speaker 2: ladies and gentlemen, let me explain something to you. The
Speaker 2: President does not sleep well. He's not a good sleeper.
Speaker 2: He's talked about this. He doesn't get a lot of
Speaker 2: rest at night. He also is twenty four to seven
Speaker 2: trying to help this country. One thing that you can
Speaker 2: never say negative President Trump is that he isn't trying
Speaker 2: to enact his vision. You might not like his vision,
Speaker 2: but he's a twenty four to seven workhorse. As I've
Speaker 2: said before in the show, every single cabinet secretary I've
Speaker 2: talked to says he wakes them up in the middle
Speaker 2: of the night with ideas. And Steven Chung, the White
Speaker 2: Hosse communications director, he says he literally holds his phone
Speaker 2: in his hand while he sleeps, so he's ready for
Speaker 2: that call if he needs to be there. And so
Speaker 2: now they're going after for being sleepy. I'll tell you
Speaker 2: I'm sleepy. I'm forty years old and I've been this
Speaker 2: way for a long time. When once you have young kids,
Speaker 2: the year's always sleepy, like I always could use a nap.
Speaker 2: If you are looking at me, then I would rather
Speaker 2: be sleeping. If you're listening to me on the air,
Speaker 2: I would rather be dozing off for twenty minutes right now.
Speaker 2: It's constant. And when you go to Washington, sometimes you
Speaker 2: do find yourselves, even if you're the president. It means
Speaker 2: they're pro forma. They're really boring. That there is you know,
Speaker 2: five minutes of substance and something. It takes several hours.
Speaker 2: And yes, I'm not saying it's the greatest look ever.
Speaker 2: President's fading away for a little bit, but the guy's
Speaker 2: legitimately tired. And sometimes you know, you rest yourise for
Speaker 2: a few seconds and then you're back. So I got
Speaker 2: a cut of let's start this cut this is this
Speaker 2: is herey engine, I want to squeeze this in cut
Speaker 2: eighteen over in CNN.
Speaker 15: Four plus House Democrats in fact lose their primary in
Speaker 15: twenty twenty six.
Speaker 7: Look at this sixty eight percent.
Speaker 8: Sixty eight percent.
Speaker 2: I looked back.
Speaker 15: At every single cycle that I could find that was
Speaker 15: not a post census redistricting cycle, and the highest I
Speaker 15: could find in terms of Democrats losing, Get this was
Speaker 15: only three, so this would actually beat it. Democratic angs
Speaker 15: against the establishment and an all time high. I think
Speaker 15: in large part driven by the fact that Joe Biden
Speaker 15: is so unpopular and therefore you have just this great
Speaker 15: distrust of the dem establishment.
Speaker 2: So is that a fresh clipp or is that an
Speaker 2: old clip? Anyway, I meant to pull a fresh one
Speaker 2: of Democrats being the yeah, of Democrats being yeah, it's
Speaker 2: apparently a fresh clip. It's the Democrats brand is just
Speaker 2: saying Nazis are okay because gas price high, the presents
Speaker 2: falling asleep, all of your racist It's terrible. They stay
Speaker 2: for nothing and we're gonna beat them. Go peace, to love,
Speaker 2: and serve the Lord.