Speaker 1: We got a lot going down right now. Caroline Levitt
Speaker 1: bringing receipts. The media was like, where, where's the proof?
Speaker 1: Where's the proof? She's got the proof. Doge is serious.
Speaker 1: Caroline is serious, and this president is serious, so you know,
Speaker 1: don't mess with him. Here he is speaking moments ago
Speaker 1: on Terrace and a CNN reporter kind of got in
Speaker 1: the way.
Speaker 1: Mr. President, you won the White House in part because
Speaker 1: of high inflation. If your tariffs make prices go up,
Speaker 1: we haven't asked you to speak, please.
Speaker 1: That's good, right? We're gonna get to what he's saying
Speaker 1: on tariffs in a moment, but first we got to
Speaker 1: talk about Caroline. Welcome to the show, everyone. Good to
Speaker 1: have you here. What a news cycle, right? I mean,
Speaker 1: have you ever seen anything like it? The Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal saying that Donald Trump and Elon Musk's team there
Speaker 1: at those, they have done more in the last 3 weeks.
Speaker 1: Than Ronald Reagan did in an entire 8 years to
Speaker 1: cut government spending. It's absolutely, positively remarkable. I mean really
Speaker 1: and truly, this is history in the making. Caroline Levitt.
Speaker 1: She's bringing receipts, OK? She comes into the press conference
Speaker 1: now and you know she had been dealing with reporters saying, Well,
Speaker 1: how do we know? How do we know? How do
Speaker 1: we know after she said, oh, you know, you've got
Speaker 1: $2 million going to sex change operations in Guatemala and
Speaker 1: you've got tens of thousands of dollars going to trans
Speaker 1: comic books in Peru. You get a DEI musical in Ireland,
Speaker 1: a trans opera in Colombia, and they're like, well how
Speaker 1: do we know? How do we know, how do we really.
Speaker 1: Really, really, really know, and she, uh, she came forward
Speaker 1: with something, shall we say? She came forward with actual
Speaker 1: proof and I have a feeling there's gonna be a
Speaker 1: whole lot more of this. You know why? Doge is
Speaker 1: coming out with a brand new website. You can go
Speaker 1: and check it out right now at doge.gov. They're coming
Speaker 1: out with a brand new website. You know what that
Speaker 1: website's gonna have in it? All of the receipts, OK?
Speaker 1: So they're not messing around.
Speaker 1: They're very, very serious about getting all of this stuff
Speaker 1: in and you combine somebody like Donald Trump with the
Speaker 1: ability if you would from a technological perspective of one
Speaker 1: Elon Musk and I'm telling you we are in for
Speaker 1: it we are in for it they're talking about blowing
Speaker 1: open Medicare for example.
Speaker 1: They're talking about blowing open the IRS. That's another biggie,
Speaker 1: for example, Pete Hegsath ordering an audit there at the Pentagon.
Speaker 1: This is stuff that Democrats and Republicans, both parties have
Speaker 1: talked about forever. Nobody's actually done it. And then you
Speaker 1: get this team doing this. Here's Caroline with the prep. Well,
Speaker 1: I want to say that actually tariffs are good. Tariffs
Speaker 1: are great actually, and uh the problem is we didn't
Speaker 1: charge them and everyone else did. They charged us, but
Speaker 1: we didn't charge them because we were.
Speaker 1: Generous or foolish or stupid.
Speaker 1: All of the above. So this is one of the biggest,
Speaker 1: I think economic bills ever. I think it's probably the
Speaker 1: biggest in terms of what it represents. Now this doesn't
Speaker 1: include what we did a few days ago with steel
Speaker 1: and aluminum that's over and above this. Uh, cars will
Speaker 1: be over and above this. Look at what's coming shortly.
Speaker 1: If you take a look at the chips and the
Speaker 1: various things in that world, that universe that will be
Speaker 1: over and above it, also pharmaceuticals will be over and above.
Speaker 1: OK, again, just from the press conference moments ago just
Speaker 1: wrapping up there and he's talking about the importance of
Speaker 1: tariffs and having reciprocal tariffs because you know what, if
Speaker 1: you go around the world, everybody else is charging us tariffs,
Speaker 1: but we never charge anybody else tariffs we're gonna talk
Speaker 1: about that a little bit later, but first, as I said,
Speaker 1: you know what, this woman, this young woman, this young
Speaker 1: mother Caroline Levitt, she's coming to the party and you
Speaker 1: know what, she's got receipts, OK? She is serious like
Speaker 1: they're like, well how is it that you really know
Speaker 1: that there's $2 million going to.
Speaker 1: Sex change operations in Guatemala. How do you know that
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of dollars went to the Trans opera
Speaker 1: in Colombia or the DEI musical in Ireland? And she's like,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, yeah. Here's how I know.
Speaker 1: I've got it all. I've got copies for all of you.
Speaker 1: Here we go, Caroline Le. Before it was Elon Musk
Speaker 1: making our government efficient and accountable. It was some unnamed
Speaker 1: bureaucrat that none of you knew. Elon Musk is the
Speaker 1: richest man in the world. He's also now one of
Speaker 1: the most highly scrutinized men in the world alongside President
Speaker 1: Trump because of what he's doing and the access that
Speaker 1: he is allowing. So there's great transparency.
Speaker 1: As for the actual receipts, we are happy to provide them,
Speaker 1: and I actually brought some today because all of you
Speaker 1: know I love to bring the receipts. We have contracts
Speaker 1: upon contracts that we can send and provide this information
Speaker 1: to you. Let me be very clear, we are not
Speaker 1: trying to hide anything. We have been incredibly transparent and
Speaker 1: we will continue to be. These are screenshots of contracts
Speaker 1: that Doge found across.
Speaker 1: Our government. This is a DEI contract $36,000 for US
Speaker 1: citizenship and immigration services. That is against the president's policies
Speaker 1: and his America first agenda. This is a $3.4 million contract,
Speaker 1: a council for inclusive innovation at the US Patent and
Speaker 1: Trademark Office, Department of Commerce, another DEI contract that Doge identified.
Speaker 1: I can continue to go through these. Oh, I love
Speaker 1: this 1. $57,000 for climate change in Sri Lanka. What
Speaker 1: is this doing to continue the interests of the American people?
Speaker 1: Absolutely nothing. These are the line items across the federal
Speaker 1: government that Doge is identifying daily. They're moving very fast.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of paper that we can show you,
Speaker 1: but we're happy to do it. This administration has been
Speaker 1: more than transparent about what Doge is doing, and here's
Speaker 1: one of their tweets that they posted about the.
Speaker 1: I believe this is in Pennsylvania where the federal employee
Speaker 1: retirement system is being processed. Did anybody know this was
Speaker 1: even happening in our country before Elon Musk talked about
Speaker 1: it in the Oval Office yesterday? A lot of Americans didn't,
Speaker 1: so we are providing transparency and accessibility on a daily
Speaker 1: basis when it comes to Doge. And I also have
Speaker 1: a Doge daily report, if anybody would like it, on
Speaker 1: all of the things that they are identifying and finding.
Speaker 1: We're happy to provide this information to you. We're talking
Speaker 1: about it every single day.
Speaker 1: Amazing, right? Amazing. And now they're coming out with a
Speaker 1: brand new website, Doge Gov, and it, it's all gonna
Speaker 1: be there like we're getting real transparency, amazing, amazing, amazing
Speaker 1: like this is what they've talked about for years. I
Speaker 1: was looking at some old tape, old old tape earlier
Speaker 1: today of Al Gore.
Speaker 1: And Bill Clinton talking about oh they're gonna do all
Speaker 1: this good stuff. I looked at some with Obama too
Speaker 1: they're gonna get rid of all the fat and waste
Speaker 1: in the government, but you know what, nobody ever did it. Instead,
Speaker 1: we've just been ballooning bigger and bigger and bigger.
Speaker 1: Over the years, and I gotta tell you over the
Speaker 1: last 4 years, holy moly, my gosh, some of the
Speaker 1: things that are coming up $52 million going to Associated Press. What?
Speaker 1: I mean over $50 million going to the New York Times.
Speaker 1: Come on, $8.2 million going to Politico for all those
Speaker 1: political pros subscriptions, so all those bureaucrats could pay $10,000
Speaker 1: a year, your taxpayer money to go to those things
Speaker 1: and then this DEI nonsense.
Speaker 1: Or I could just call it crap, right?
Speaker 1: All over the world, all over the world like what
Speaker 1: is that about? Like why are they pushing this agenda?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's bad enough here at home. Why were
Speaker 1: they doing it all over the world? Why was it
Speaker 1: so important to have DEI initiatives in Serbia or transgender
Speaker 1: operations that we're paying for as taxpayers in Guatemala? Like
Speaker 1: why is that important? I ask you because you know
Speaker 1: what I really still don't know the answers to that.
Speaker 1: We've talked about maybe it's because you know they're gonna
Speaker 1: employ all their transgender PhD students that they're graduating from
Speaker 1: these mills, right, these factories of academia, and they're gonna
Speaker 1: find some place for them to work, but I still,
Speaker 1: I'm really troubled by this. I don't understand the point
Speaker 1: of trying to re-engineer society in such a really heinous
Speaker 1: way and let's face it, it's heinous when you're saying, OK,
Speaker 1: it's perfectly fine that a boy who was born a
Speaker 1: boy gets to run or swim.
Speaker 1: In the same race with someone who's never had, let's
Speaker 1: face it, the testosterone, you can't take the drugs, right?
Speaker 1: You can't take testosterone and compete in these in these races,
Speaker 1: so why would you allow somebody who obviously.
Speaker 1: Had had most of their life with a whole lot
Speaker 1: more testosterone than the young woman. I mean it's bonkers
Speaker 1: and more and more and more of this is coming out.
Speaker 1: It's why Trump wants to get rid of the Department
Speaker 1: of Education. What good is it doing us? What good
Speaker 1: is any of this doing us? I mean they have
Speaker 1: no explanation. She's got the receipts now they can't sit
Speaker 1: there and say, oh it's not really happening and when
Speaker 1: this comes up, what do they got?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Factually accurate. He's talking about luxury hotels. There you
Speaker 1: can I'm I'm not a big look, I was in
Speaker 1: a hurricane FEMA does I believe I think the issue
Speaker 1: too is these are congressionally appropriate funds. I think you
Speaker 1: and I as conservatives could look for a lot of
Speaker 1: things in the federal budget. We would be more than
Speaker 1: happy to see done away with, but I think that
Speaker 1: there have been things that have been presented as one
Speaker 1: thing and then turn out to be.
Speaker 1: Thinks that very different. The condoms to Gaza. The first
Speaker 1: time I heard that stated, I knew that wasn't true.
Speaker 1: It doesn't take an expert to know that we're not
Speaker 1: doing that. And then we've got this example of Politico
Speaker 1: allegedly spending $8 million that just simply wasn't true. So
Speaker 1: I think what people want is, yes, it's fine to
Speaker 1: tweet it out, but explain why we're cutting it, what
Speaker 1: it is, and if it's taking away a good or
Speaker 1: a service from the public, what is backfilling.
Speaker 1: I just got to jump in because the 8.2 million,
Speaker 1: she's wrong on that, that actually is true and we
Speaker 1: have the receipts on that. I've been showing you the
Speaker 1: receipts on this one. They were paying, they're saying, oh,
Speaker 1: it was no big deal because you know they were
Speaker 1: paying for political pro subscriptions. Well, it's fascinating how the
Speaker 1: 8.2 million all happened for those political pro subscriptions.
Speaker 1: What are you doing in 2024, man, oh man, I
Speaker 1: mean they, they jumped up their spending in 2020 if
Speaker 1: you look at that yellow line, and by 2024, wow
Speaker 1: boy they sure had an agenda, did they not? You
Speaker 1: know what this was, these were like zombie subscriptions basically
Speaker 1: you pay 10 grand, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 1: And you get a subscription to political pro and no
Speaker 1: nobody can complain about it because, oh, it's political pro
Speaker 1: and maybe you need that to do your job. Let
Speaker 1: me tell you, you don't, and everybody's come forward now
Speaker 1: well many people have come forward and said, you know,
Speaker 1: I never even knew that I had this subscription. I
Speaker 1: never even knew about it. So before the woman on
Speaker 1: CNN who actually happens to also be on The View
Speaker 1: starts telling you that.
Speaker 1: Garbage. I want you to remember that actually it really
Speaker 1: and truly is true, but let's pick up where we
Speaker 1: left off, shall we? We're going to pick up where
Speaker 1: we left off because when I tell you this is
Speaker 1: all they got, really and truly this is all they got,
Speaker 1: Anderson Cooper has to get down in the gutter. People
Speaker 1: aren't going to be losing something they need, and I'll
Speaker 1: just add, I give him credit for this. He said, Look,
Speaker 1: we're going to make mistakes. He said, we're going to
Speaker 1: make them he said we're not going to bet 1000 here.
Speaker 1: We're going to make mistakes and we
Speaker 1: Oh, OK. We gotta get the, we gotta get the
Speaker 1: best part. We gotta get the best part, right? Let's
Speaker 1: get the very, very best part because, uh, like I
Speaker 1: said that Americans and it gives them some. OK. It's,
Speaker 1: it's not transparency to say things that have no factual background.
Speaker 1: I mean to say we're cutting, you know, we've found
Speaker 1: a billion dollars or $1 trillion in waste with no specifics,
Speaker 1: that's just talk. That's not transparent. It's 23 days in
Speaker 1: here guys. 23 days. You're, you're, you're talking about $2.3
Speaker 1: billion that was saved last year.
Speaker 1: These guys are saving $2.3 billion a day, but it's incredible.
Speaker 1: That's what they're saying. But where's the you're you're not
Speaker 1: going to be satisfied until he shows up with 10,000 pages.
Speaker 1: He's giving very specific things, but he's not actually giving
Speaker 1: any evidence of that. It's all going to come because
Speaker 1: what they also said was if we have to go
Speaker 1: to Congress, we'll go to Congress, show some of the
Speaker 1: details that have come out like the, you know, $59
Speaker 1: million spent on luxury hotels, it's actually.
Speaker 1: Not about the FEMA money that was abused for migrants
Speaker 1: that was FEMA money for migrants, that's OK now? No,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's OK. I'm not saying it's OK.
Speaker 1: Don't you stop that? Would you stop that process? Don't
Speaker 1: be a dick. The portray what I'm saying is the portrayal.
Speaker 1: Like that's where he goes, Don't be a, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Like this is, this is what it has basically evolved
Speaker 1: into because they got nothing and they're so scared for
Speaker 1: some reason of everybody finding out just exactly where all
Speaker 1: this money went, they're so scared.
Speaker 1: That that's what they have to do, the name calling,
Speaker 1: the name calling. I mean there's tons of it. We've
Speaker 1: been watching all over the air for the last 48
Speaker 1: hours or even longer. They are flipping out, you guys,
Speaker 1: because it's all getting exposed.
Speaker 1: Isn't it great? I mean, like it's really, really, really great.
Speaker 1: The IRS is about to get exposed. Donald Trump just
Speaker 1: talking about this moments ago in a press conference. Yikes.
Speaker 1: Workers arrived today, Gavin Kleer and others arrived today at
Speaker 1: the IRS. Do you expect.
Speaker 1: Close the IRS or what? No, I don't expect it, but,
Speaker 1: but I think, I think that the Internal Revenue Service
Speaker 1: will be looked at like everybody else. Just about everybody's
Speaker 1: going to be looked at, so it's, uh, they're doing
Speaker 1: a hell of a job. It's an amazing job they're doing.
Speaker 1: And you know that force is building these I call
Speaker 1: it the force of super geniuses, but it's building and
Speaker 1: you know they go up and they talk to some
Speaker 1: of the people about certain deals and the people get
Speaker 1: all tongue tied, they can't talk because these people get it.
Speaker 1: They're very smart people. We need smart people, yes.
Speaker 1: So it's pretty good. Everybody's gonna get looked at. You know,
Speaker 1: the IRS has um some stuff that maybe should be
Speaker 1: looked at. I'm thinking about, you know, we can go
Speaker 1: back to the Lois Lerner days.
Speaker 1: And the fact that
Speaker 1: Conservative Tea Party groups were being targeted by Obama's IRS.
Speaker 1: We can go back to that. We can go back to, oh,
Speaker 1: just recently, right? Matt Taibbi, when he was going to
Speaker 1: testify as a reporter who sort of I used to
Speaker 1: work for Rolling Stone. I always assumed he was pretty left,
Speaker 1: but he's, he's, he's gotten increasingly right too, like everybody, right, because, uh,
Speaker 1: if you're just a normal person, I guess you're, you're
Speaker 1: on the right now. So Matt Taibbi.
Speaker 1: Had the IRS show up at his doorstep the day
Speaker 1: he was supposed to testify about the Twitter files. The
Speaker 1: Twitter files basically were exposing he got his hands on
Speaker 1: I guess Elon gave it to him all of the
Speaker 1: State Department's information, uh, vis a vis how they were
Speaker 1: trying to manipulate what was going on on Twitter, right?
Speaker 1: So they had their agenda and there was all this
Speaker 1: back and forth between the State Department and the Twitter
Speaker 1: employees now ex.
Speaker 1: Think about that, like it's amazing if we didn't have X.
Speaker 1: I don't think all this stuff would be coming out.
Speaker 1: I really don't because it was like a game of
Speaker 1: whack a mole they were shutting everything down over and
Speaker 1: over and over and over again and people were losing
Speaker 1: all trust and all faith in the government and I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you, when you lose that, you've lost it all.
Speaker 1: Elon articulating that this week so well. If there's not
Speaker 1: a good feedback loop from the people to to the government,
Speaker 1: and if, if you have rule of the, the bureaucrat.
Speaker 1: If the bureaucracy is in charge, and then what meaning
Speaker 1: does democracy actually have? If the people cannot vote, and
Speaker 1: they will be decided by their elected representatives in in
Speaker 1: the form of the president and, and the Senate and
Speaker 1: the House, then we don't live in a democracy, we
Speaker 1: live in a bureaucracy. So it's incredibly important that we
Speaker 1: close that feedback loop, we fix that feedback loop, and
Speaker 1: that the public, uh, the public's elected representatives, the president,
Speaker 1: the House and the Senate.
Speaker 1: Decide what happened.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean, for the people by the people, right? Like
Speaker 1: the people should have some say.
Speaker 1: Oh, they, they don't like that over there in Democrat land. I,
Speaker 1: I'm kind of wondering what is it that they're so
Speaker 1: afraid of that's gonna get exposed? You gotta wonder, right? Hey,
Speaker 1: you know what, if you're watching the markets, markets went
Speaker 1: up today. Markets actually really like Donald Trump, really, really
Speaker 1: like Donald Trump, so it's a good time to be
Speaker 1: investing in the markets if you would. Go check out
Speaker 1: our model portfolios at 76research.com. Model portfolios, we get 3
Speaker 1: of them. If you wanna just sort of, you know,
Speaker 1: go in lightly, you can use code word dollar.
Speaker 1: And get the $76 report. It's just $1 a month
Speaker 1: for the first two months. Code word dollar deal LLAR.
Speaker 1: This is my research company that I started with a
Speaker 1: very dear friend who spent decades on Wall Street running
Speaker 1: billions of dollars and listen, uh, you know, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of opportunity out there right now because this president
Speaker 1: is doing things that you just haven't seen before. I
Speaker 1: mean you just look at our portfolio, for example, all
Speaker 1: of these numbers showing that, you know, all of them
Speaker 1: American resilience, income builder and inflation protection, all.
Speaker 1: Doing extraordinarily well, um, and better of course than the
Speaker 1: S&P because that's the goal, right? You want to be
Speaker 1: beating the S&P, so go check those out, go look
Speaker 1: at those model portfolios on 76 Research. I would just
Speaker 1: say that you know what he's, he's talking about exposing
Speaker 1: a lot, a lot like there's a little bit of
Speaker 1: a threat here when he said he's gonna expose the
Speaker 1: billionaires that are like stealing money from the government. I
Speaker 1: want you to listen. That you can have that kind
Speaker 1: of fraud you're talking about like.
Speaker 1: Are you talking about what? Wait, wait, which are you talking?
Speaker 1: You're talking about with regard to all of the investigations
Speaker 1: that are going on about the stupidity. What we're gonna
Speaker 1: do is tomorrow I'm having a news conference. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: read to you some of the names that hundreds of
Speaker 1: millions and even billions of dollars have been given to.
Speaker 1: And if you tell me that we should be giving
Speaker 1: money to those things, those entities, uh, I think you'll
Speaker 1: probably have to leave as a reporter because you're not
Speaker 1: very talented. When you look at the kind of money,
Speaker 1: billions and billions of dollars being thrown away illegally and
Speaker 1: there's no, there's no chance. I mean I say it
Speaker 1: in front of our.
Speaker 1: Our attorney general, there's no chance that there's not kickbacks
Speaker 1: or something going on when you give millions and millions
Speaker 1: of dollars to somebody that stands to look at something
Speaker 1: for 15 minutes and walks away with millions of dollars,
Speaker 1: that money's coming back in some form.
Speaker 1: And that's only one form of corruption. The biggest thing
Speaker 1: is what they do to our country. They're taking massive
Speaker 1: amounts of money and spending it on items. I went
Speaker 1: through a list of 200 expenditures that were made, and
Speaker 1: I found 3 that looked like they were reasonable. OK, 3,
Speaker 1: and uh we'll be talking about that tomorrow. We have
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff, and I want to commend Elon
Speaker 1: because he's done a fan. He doesn't need this, you know,
Speaker 1: he's abused by you people every day.
Speaker 1: Uh, he's found more things than anybody could find. I
Speaker 1: think he's got the credibility to do it. I know
Speaker 1: he does, and, uh, it's his group of people, you know,
Speaker 1: they started off with 12.
Speaker 1: I call them 12 geniuses. They started off with 12
Speaker 1: and they went to 20 and 25, and now they're
Speaker 1: up to almost 100 people are joining to help them
Speaker 1: because there's a massive fraud that's taken place.
Speaker 1: And he's going to uncover all of it.
Speaker 1: They're talking about $2.7 trillion in Medicaid and Medicare fraud.
Speaker 1: I mean improper payments. This is unbelievable going overseas, you guys.
Speaker 1: I want you to hear it. I mean, it's like
Speaker 1: one thing after another. This is what you call a
Speaker 1: big news cycle. to do just for a second. Earlier,
Speaker 1: the subcommittee headed by Chairman Margha Taylor Greene, her and
Speaker 1: her staff discovered $2.7 trillion in improper.
Speaker 1: Payments to Medicare, Medicaid overseas, the people who should not
Speaker 1: have gotten it. Some of this room might have missed
Speaker 1: that press conference. Can you elaborate on what the president
Speaker 1: is thinking at this point? Well, again, that's another example.
Speaker 1: There's a very long list of the fraud, waste, and
Speaker 1: abuse that Doge is identifying on a daily basis. Elon
Speaker 1: Musk also talked about yesterday about Social Security payments that
Speaker 1: are going out the door for people who
Speaker 1: are no longer with us unfortunately I would say that
Speaker 1: is certainly fraud. There's also a lot of contracts they've
Speaker 1: identified that just as a hypothetical example are a million
Speaker 1: bucks but only 500,000 went out the door. So where's
Speaker 1: the rest of that cash? And so that's the thing,
Speaker 1: those are the things that Doge is working on every
Speaker 1: single day and I would just remind everybody in this
Speaker 1: room this is what President Trump campaigned on doing. He's
Speaker 1: delivering on a promise that 17.
Speaker 1: Imagine that the president's actually doing what he said he
Speaker 1: would do. I said to a few people for the
Speaker 1: last couple of weeks I'm like, you know they campaign
Speaker 1: on this, that and the other.
Speaker 1: But do they ever actually do it? No, OK, let,
Speaker 1: let's be like perfectly frank. I mean, I think he
Speaker 1: came closest to it. It's just that he was always
Speaker 1: on defense because Russia, Russia, Russia was how we began
Speaker 1: the last administration in 2016, whole bunch of lies, by
Speaker 1: the way, and now he's coming in and he's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: been there, done that. I'm getting what I want done.
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna blow it all wide open because you
Speaker 1: guys are wasting money and it's one big just system
Speaker 1: of graft so you got the IRS he wants to
Speaker 1: look at you've got the Pentagon that he wants to
Speaker 1: look at. You've got Medicare Medicaid that he wants to
Speaker 1: look at. Josh Hawley saying, hey, you know what?
Speaker 1: Just think about what we spent on Ukraine. I gotta
Speaker 1: tell you, if you think all this other stuff is bad,
Speaker 1: you ain't seen nothing yet. You know what else needs
Speaker 1: to happen is we need an accounting of every single
Speaker 1: tax dollar that's been spent over there because remember right
Speaker 1: now we have $0 because Congress never would vote for
Speaker 1: an audit of the money and the White House, the
Speaker 1: Biden White House never would do one. We need to
Speaker 1: know exactly how this money has been spent all these
Speaker 1: years and if you think USAID.
Speaker 1: is a corrupt thing. Just wait till we see how
Speaker 1: our money has been spent. We need to know it
Speaker 1: and I'm glad the president is going to bring this
Speaker 1: to a close. Um, OK, like, isn't this great? Don't
Speaker 1: you want to know where the money was spent? Well,
Speaker 1: most of us do. I mean, Chuck Schumer, Chucky boy,
Speaker 1: he's a whole lot. I am going to stand with
Speaker 1: you in this fight, and we will win.
Speaker 1: We will win. We will win. I'm sorry, what are
Speaker 1: you winning? The American people voted for him and the
Speaker 1: American people don't like waste, OK? They really don't, and
Speaker 1: this is pretty, pretty consistent, shall we say, across both parties.
Speaker 1: They really don't like it when you waste our money.
Speaker 1: So people are looking at this and they're going, this
Speaker 1: is good, this is healthy, we like it. Well, most people.
Speaker 1: I mean you look at 53% approval ratings and 70%
Speaker 1: of Americans saying, you know what he's doing what he
Speaker 1: promised he would do and then you go over to
Speaker 1: some publications like that little shop called CNN which I tell,
Speaker 1: you know what I think we're beating them on our
Speaker 1: live shows guys like we get better ratings over here
Speaker 1: on YouTube and it's like just me and you, right?
Speaker 1: Like we're beating CNN.
Speaker 1: On most given days. Here's Kaitlin Collins, who's been ridiculed
Speaker 1: for this, this very dramatic, oh my gosh, constitutional crisis comment.
Speaker 1: We are 3 weeks into the second Trump presidency, 3 weeks,
Speaker 1: and tonight there are warnings that the US is dangerously
Speaker 1: close to a constitutional crisis.
Speaker 1: You scared yet?
Speaker 1: We are dangerously dangerously close to a constitutional crisis. It
Speaker 1: sounds like she was watching Letitia James's speech. Not only
Speaker 1: does this administration's new policy put people at risk, but
Speaker 1: it is plainly unconstitutional.
Speaker 1: The president does not get to decide which laws to
Speaker 1: enforce and for whom. When Congress. Yeah. OK, or maybe,
Speaker 1: or maybe she just read the New York Times editorial
Speaker 1: that said everybody, come on, we're gonna round them up.
Speaker 1: If Trump triggers a constitutional crisis which Kaitlin Collins and
Speaker 1: CNN say we are very, very near, well then no
Speaker 1: part of society can remain silent. What exactly do they
Speaker 1: think is happening right now?
Speaker 1: Because he's going through and he's exposing the graft like
Speaker 1: that is somehow not constitutional. The Wall Street Journal had
Speaker 1: a good take on this one writing in an op ed,
Speaker 1: Is this a constitutional crisis? Trump's actions? Yeah, sure, they're aggressive,
Speaker 1: but they aren't an executive coup, OK, not the way
Speaker 1: the mainstream media, I mean.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's a coup to the mainstream media because they're
Speaker 1: gonna lose their millions of dollars. What was it? $52
Speaker 1: million that Associated Press was getting. That's the latest and
Speaker 1: greatest that has just been discovered by none other than Doge.
Speaker 1: I wonder how much CNN was getting. Maybe they're, maybe
Speaker 1: they're paying for Caitlin's salary. Well, the Wall Street Journal writes, look.
Speaker 1: The same people who predicted Donald Trump would be a
Speaker 1: dictator now say a constitutional crisis has already arrived barely
Speaker 1: 3 weeks into his presidency. They're over as usual, and
Speaker 1: readers may appreciate a less a breakdown about Mr. Trump's.
Speaker 1: Actions of whether they do or not breach the normal
Speaker 1: checks and balances. The conclusion from the Wall Street Journal
Speaker 1: is no. They absolutely don't. This is not one of
Speaker 1: those moments where you need to panic. And you know,
Speaker 1: after a while, if you keep telling everyone it's time
Speaker 1: to panic, it's time to panic, it's time to panic,
Speaker 1: don't you become
Speaker 1: The, the little boy who cried wolf spirit filled, thank
Speaker 1: you for your generosity, appreciate it, and I'm always here
Speaker 1: to report the truth. Listen, they wear out their welcome.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's what happened with all of the lawfare,
Speaker 1: for example, at some point we couldn't even keep them
Speaker 1: all straight, right? It was like, oh, they're going after
Speaker 1: Trump again for this, that and the other nonsense and
Speaker 1: nothing was sticking. Well, the Wall Street Journal.
Speaker 1: Rights the first category if you think about it in
Speaker 1: terms of spending includes the administration's decision to pause discretionary spending. Well,
Speaker 1: guess what? The president absolutely has every bit of authority
Speaker 1: to pause discretionary spending and in fact, many presidents have
Speaker 1: done it before. It's exactly what Biden did. Did everybody
Speaker 1: freak out like this? No, no, but you know, I
Speaker 1: guess Biden wasn't pausing the USAID spending that was going
Speaker 1: to the likes of AP.
Speaker 1: The BBC Politico, and the New York Times.
Speaker 1: So this article goes on and they sort of explain
Speaker 1: that this is just absolutely over the top. It is
Speaker 1: totally ridiculous to think that this is some kind of
Speaker 1: coup or constitutional crisis, but you know what, this is
Speaker 1: what the media does, right? Like we've been there, done that,
Speaker 1: and I think everybody is pretty darn sick and tired
Speaker 1: of it, frankly it's why you're over.
Speaker 1: Here reminder of course make sure that you subscribe, share, like,
Speaker 1: make a comment, all that stuff because I'll tell you
Speaker 1: every bit helps and it it's because of outlets like
Speaker 1: this because of say my podcast and other podcasts where
Speaker 1: you're seeking out the truth you're actually hearing it and
Speaker 1: you're able to make informed decisions.
Speaker 1: Again I go back to the the importance of leadership
Speaker 1: in terms of X allowing all this information to get
Speaker 1: out there and here, you know, I, I'm on YouTube
Speaker 1: and fortunately I'm able to connect with all of you guys.
Speaker 1: You see a lot of transition happening for example over
Speaker 1: at Meta because they're realizing this wasn't the really the
Speaker 1: way to do it they shouldn't do it like that
Speaker 1: because if you don't have free speech, what do you have? right? well.
Speaker 1: Constitutional crisis, this is the concern, OK? Letitia James says
Speaker 1: we're going towards a constitutional crisis in the New York
Speaker 1: Times and CNN they all agree with her, a constitutional
Speaker 1: crisis because what the federal government's actually gonna control its borders?
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Tishhi you know what? New York.
Speaker 1: Has to get with the program.
Speaker 1: She tweets out that it has laws that protect immigrants
Speaker 1: and limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement officials. Those laws
Speaker 1: should be followed by law enforcement and officials in our state,
Speaker 1: but you see the federal government has a little bit
Speaker 1: of a problem with that.
Speaker 1: Because these green light laws that allow for people who
Speaker 1: are here illegally in the country to go and get
Speaker 1: driver's license from the DMV, well, that kind of stands
Speaker 1: in the face or sort of flaunts the sort of
Speaker 1: uh challenge of what the federal government needing to actually
Speaker 1: know who's in the country and control its borders and
Speaker 1: by the way they have total jurisdiction over that you
Speaker 1: can take that way went all the way to the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court and by the way, I think they will.
Speaker 1: That's one where
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but the federal government all day long trumps
Speaker 1: New York and Letitia James and Pam Bondi, our new
Speaker 1: AG under Donald Trump, she knows it. And if you
Speaker 1: don't comply with federal law, we will hold you accountable.
Speaker 1: We did it to an Illinois, strike one, strike 2
Speaker 1: is New York. And if you are a state not
Speaker 1: complying with federal law, you're next, get ready.
Speaker 1: And the great men and women of law enforcement are
Speaker 1: standing behind me today. We have FBI, DEF DEA, ATF agents.
Speaker 1: They put their lives on the line every single day
Speaker 1: to protect us.
Speaker 1: And what New York has, they have green light laws,
Speaker 1: meaning they're giving a green light to any illegal alien
Speaker 1: in New York where law enforcement officers cannot check their
Speaker 1: identity if they pull them over. Law enforcement officers do
Speaker 1: not have access to their background, and if these great
Speaker 1: men and women pull over someone and don't have access
Speaker 1: to their background, they have.
Speaker 1: No idea who they're dealing with, and it puts their
Speaker 1: lives on the line every single day. Violent criminals, gang members,
Speaker 1: drug traffickers, human smugglers will no longer terrorize the American people,
Speaker 1: and that is why we are here today. You will
Speaker 1: be held accountable if you do not follow federal law.
Speaker 1: It's over, it ends, and we're coming after you.
Speaker 1: Mm. Did you hear that, Tish?
Speaker 1: She's coming after you. She's going after the governor of
Speaker 1: New York. She's going after the head of the DMV
Speaker 1: and she has every right to do so. Article 1,
Speaker 1: Section 8, clause 4. This is what enables the federal government. Well,
Speaker 1: you could argue that the commerce clause also.
Speaker 1: Gives them this ability but it's spelled right out. They
Speaker 1: control borders they control immigration that is all the federal
Speaker 1: government no matter what these idiots are trying to tell you.
Speaker 1: I mean the same idiots they want to spend billions
Speaker 1: of dollars all around the world for DEI and trans efforts.
Speaker 1: I'm like why? Like why? You got people in North Carolina,
Speaker 1: you got people in California with the fires and now
Speaker 1: the earthquakes and you got people in Florida right? that
Speaker 1: they lost everything.
Speaker 1: You don't think it's smart to maybe direct some of
Speaker 1: those resources to back here at home in the good
Speaker 1: old US of A? No, they, they don't. The real
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch where
Speaker 1: district court judges and liberal districts across the country are
Speaker 1: abusing their power to unilaterally block President Trump's basic executive authority.
Speaker 1: We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather
Speaker 1: than honest arbiters of the law.
Speaker 1: And they have issued at least 12 injunctions against this
Speaker 1: administration in the past 14 days, often without citing any
Speaker 1: evidence or grounds for their lawsuits. This is part of
Speaker 1: a larger concerted effort by Democrat activists and nothing more
Speaker 1: than the continuation of the weaponization of justice against President Trump.
Speaker 1: Quick news flash to these liberal judges who are supporting
Speaker 1: their obstructionist efforts. 77 million Americans voted to elect this president,
Speaker 1: and each injunction is an abuse of the rule of
Speaker 1: law and an attempt to thwart the will of the people.
Speaker 1: As the president clearly stated in the Oval Office yesterday,
Speaker 1: we will comply with the law in the courts, but
Speaker 1: we will also continue to seek every legal remedy to
Speaker 1: ultimately overturn these radical injunctions and ensure President Trump's policies
Speaker 1: can be enacted.
Speaker 1: Gosh, she's good.
Speaker 1: Like how refreshing after having to deal with KJP for
Speaker 1: the last 4 years, nearly I mean it was peppermint
Speaker 1: Patty before her, but wow, I mean she's really, really
Speaker 1: good and she's on her game and she's not messing
Speaker 1: around and so she's like, you wanna find a real
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis? I can show you a real constitutional crisis.
Speaker 1: I can show you a real constitutional crisis and that
Speaker 1: would be coming from the left right now who somehow
Speaker 1: has totally forgotten about some rather critical important things including
Speaker 1: the need.
Speaker 1: To protect our First Amendment, it's like the first one, OK?
Speaker 1: You're not gonna believe what this woman said. I'm like, does,
Speaker 1: does she not know what she's saying? Does she not
Speaker 1: understand English? This is Ayanna Presley who's out of Massachusetts.
Speaker 1: Listen to this representative.
Speaker 1: Look, let me tell you something. I'll take a bit
Speaker 1: of umbrage here. I'll speak on behalf of my colleagues.
Speaker 1: I think I can say we are all willing to
Speaker 1: work with anyone who's serious about doing the work of
Speaker 1: censoring the American people and advancing progress, but they are
Speaker 1: not serious.
Speaker 1: You heard her?
Speaker 1: She's willing to work with anybody who's serious about censoring.
Speaker 1: Censoring the American people.
Speaker 1: They want to censor you.
Speaker 1: You don't have a right to complain about all this
Speaker 1: money being spent here, there and everywhere. I mean if
Speaker 1: you do, Anderson Cooper's gonna say you're just a.
Speaker 1: Well, let's let him say it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, FEMA money for migrants, that's OK now. No, I'm
Speaker 1: not saying it's OK. I'm not saying it's OK. Don't
Speaker 1: put words you stop that? Would you stop that process?
Speaker 1: Don't be a dick. The portrayal, what I'm saying is
Speaker 1: the portrayal by him is just not factually accurate. You
Speaker 1: heard it. You heard it, and this is their new
Speaker 1: go to move like a bunch of name callings, so
Speaker 1: they want to get rid of your First Amendment.
Speaker 1: They do. I mean, should, should I put the First
Speaker 1: Amendment up? Let me, let me see if I have
Speaker 1: that because, you know, I, I think that Ayanna Presley
Speaker 1: needs to remember and maybe the CNN reporter one Anderson
Speaker 1: Cooper needs to remember just exactly what the First Amendment is. OK,
Speaker 1: here we go. Congress shall make no law respecting.
Speaker 1: And establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Speaker 1: or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press
Speaker 1: or of the right of the people to peacefully assembly
Speaker 1: and to petition the government for redress of its grievances.
Speaker 1: This is the.
Speaker 1: First Amendment, Lady Presley. Look, let me tell you something.
Speaker 1: I'll take a bit of umbrage here. I'll speak on
Speaker 1: behalf of my colleagues. I think I can say, we
Speaker 1: are all willing to work with anyone who's serious about
Speaker 1: doing the work of censoring the American people and advancing progress. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but they are not.
Speaker 1: So she's trying to say oh we'll work with you
Speaker 1: we'll work with you, Elon if you would just censor
Speaker 1: the American people.
Speaker 1: Again, is this like just somebody who's a total idiot
Speaker 1: and doesn't actually understand, I mean, I remember Kama like
Speaker 1: using total word salads and inappropriate words at odd times.
Speaker 1: I mean, is that this woman or or does she
Speaker 1: actually know what she's saying? I'm gonna go with it,
Speaker 1: she knows what she's saying.
Speaker 1: Knows what she's saying and she doesn't care because she
Speaker 1: wants to shut down your right to speak. She's the
Speaker 1: only one that can speak and anybody else is gonna
Speaker 1: get called the D word by CNN or oh maybe
Speaker 1: this representative, this is one representative Robert Garcia. Today you
Speaker 1: harken here, but
Speaker 1: I want to hear why, but do you think that
Speaker 1: calling Elon Musk a dick is effective messaging for confronting
Speaker 1: what is a potentially irreversible transformation of the US government?
Speaker 1: Well, he is a dick, and I think he's also
Speaker 1: harming the American public in an enormous way, and what
Speaker 1: I think is really important. OK, like, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: This is all they got, guys.
Speaker 1: All they have, so they've well, completely, completely lost the plot,
Speaker 1: so to speak, what are they doing? I mean, one
Speaker 1: Dean Phillips who actually tried to run against Biden, they
Speaker 1: spit him up and threw him out.
Speaker 1: Dean Phillips brought this up. He's like, my party, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: like they, they really, really don't get it. They just
Speaker 1: don't get
Speaker 1: it.
Speaker 2: Unfortunately, Democrats are only focused on one thing right now, Mr. Musk.
Speaker 2: The fact of the matter, he's quite popular. He has
Speaker 2: the largest platform in human history, which is of course
Speaker 2: Twitter slash X, and I think we're missing the boat
Speaker 2: as Democrats, and all I'm saying is that sometimes it's
Speaker 2: better to join them.
Speaker 2: And actually play a role in how the strategy works
Speaker 2: rather than so pathetically, frankly try to combat something that
Speaker 2: clearly is a steamroller and Democrats are being steamrolled.
Speaker 1: It is pathetic, isn't it? I mean, it's totally, utterly
Speaker 1: pathetic watching them try and tackle this. I mean, here's
Speaker 1: this representative from Texas, Jasmine Crockett.
Speaker 1: Who
Speaker 1: I was wondering why you have a tech guy doing this.
Speaker 1: She doesn't understand like why is it a tech guy? Oh,
Speaker 1: I don't know, Jasmine, maybe because that tech guy, Elon
Speaker 1: Musk is like probably one of the most brilliant entrepreneurs
Speaker 1: we've ever had and you. I understand that we want
Speaker 1: everything to be perfect and if we could get all ways,
Speaker 1: fraud and abuse out, that would be fantastic. But let
Speaker 1: me talk about the big numbers. The big numbers are
Speaker 1: on that side. When we look at, say, our entire workforce,
Speaker 1: our federal workforce, as we're trying to somehow
Speaker 1: Fire all of them, they don't even make up a
Speaker 1: total of 5%. It's even less than that when we
Speaker 1: look at our budget. But let's talk about defense. That
Speaker 1: just happens to be the same side of the ledger
Speaker 1: that Mr. Musk gets the vast majority of his money from.
Speaker 1: In fact, at the same time that they were unlawfully
Speaker 1: and we will stay in court because on this side,
Speaker 1: we believe in law and order.
Speaker 1: We believe in, I mean, a number of us are
Speaker 1: actually lawyers, but nevertheless, we understand the Constitution, we believe
Speaker 1: in that as well. And so there's things such as, um,
Speaker 1: you know, empowerment, right? Because as Mr. Whitson said, he said,
Speaker 1: we need to return the power of the purse to Congress.
Speaker 1: It never left. According to the Constitution, that's where it's at.
Speaker 1: Now I know that people are confused right now.
Speaker 1: because for whatever reason, we had a guy that went
Speaker 1: in and you talk about people invading our data. Listen,
Speaker 1: people said that they were upset about TikTok, but I'm
Speaker 1: upset about the guy that runs Twitter, who for sure
Speaker 1: is doing nefarious things because I don't understand if you
Speaker 1: are trying to conduct audits and figure out where the waste,
Speaker 1: fraud and abuse is, I don't know why you would
Speaker 1: go to some tech guy.
Speaker 1: Because you know, maybe that tech guy is actually gonna
Speaker 1: have the right algorithm to figure out all those funny
Speaker 1: things you've been spending money on, Ms. Crockett.
Speaker 1: Maybe that tech guy is gonna be able to go
Speaker 1: in there and just determine exactly how it is that
Speaker 1: some people in Congress, I'm looking at you, Elizabeth Warren.
Speaker 1: Making what a couple $10,000 a year somehow have millions
Speaker 1: of dollars in the bank.
Speaker 1: Maybe that tech guy in Congress is gonna go into
Speaker 1: Congress and actually be able to discover where all that
Speaker 1: money went and you see it scares the heck out
Speaker 1: of them because something's amiss.
Speaker 1: USAID spending who did that go up? I mean like way,
Speaker 1: way up Donald Trump talking about whether or not that
Speaker 1: played a role in 2020 in the election because you
Speaker 1: think about all the media that was getting paid off
Speaker 1: so were they refusing to actually look at things succinctly?
Speaker 1: Were they refusing to think about policy or when they
Speaker 1: just going on these character attacks because they were paid to?
Speaker 1: We knew NPR, we knew.
Speaker 1: We knew NPR and PBS were funded by taxpayers, but
Speaker 1: who knew that the New York Times, Politico, the BBC,
Speaker 1: the Associated Press, who knew that they were all getting
Speaker 1: paid off by USAID HHS who wonder why they didn't
Speaker 1: like RFK Junior, by the way, he just got confirmed
Speaker 1: we're gonna show you that video coming up, but this
Speaker 1: is the reality of the moment. These people got nothing.
Speaker 1: They're gonna name call or they're gonna sing.
Speaker 1: Badly which side are you on?
Speaker 1: On which side are you on? Tell me which side
Speaker 1: are you on?
Speaker 1: On which side are you on? We'll fight against Jo.
Speaker 1: We'll find Elon Musk. No. Oh, listen, you just play
Speaker 1: that song for him. He might actually call it a day. Unbelievable, really, really, really,
Speaker 1: really unbelievable. But you know what good stuff is happening.
Speaker 1: You look at the USAID, which is giving out billions
Speaker 1: of dollars every year, $70 billion.01 year. I mean this
Speaker 1: is a lot of money, right?
Speaker 1: Uh we're talking a whole, I mean, Caroline Levitt saying
Speaker 1: earlier that 2.7 billion trillion trillion trillion trillion.
Speaker 1: It was, was in, in, in Medicaid and Medicare going
Speaker 1: overseas fraudulently. I mean, guys, like that's a lot of money.
Speaker 1: What is the, the, the entire debt is somewhere around
Speaker 1: $36 trillion so you're talking about 10% of our entire
Speaker 1: national debt that they're just sending over and we don't
Speaker 1: even know what we do know. See, that's the thing
Speaker 1: we do know now Doge knows and this is what
Speaker 1: scares everyone.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump blocking the Associated Press from the White House
Speaker 1: press room after, well, a little bit of a scuffle,
Speaker 1: a little bit of a scuffle, um, apparently Associated Press
Speaker 1: doesn't want to recognize Gulf of America, Gulf of America,
Speaker 1: formerly known as the Gulf of Mexico it's a big deal, right?
Speaker 1: He came in and he's like, why are we calling
Speaker 1: it the Gulf of Mexico? No, I don't think.
Speaker 1: So this is the Gulf of America. We're kind of
Speaker 1: the most important player here. Let's actually remember that. Let's
Speaker 1: actually do something about that. And so he very proudly
Speaker 1: one of his first declarations said, OK, we're gonna be
Speaker 1: the Gulf of America. And guess what? Everybody understood it.
Speaker 1: In fact, you know, when you look at uh the,
Speaker 1: the Google, for example, Google Maps, what did they do?
Speaker 1: They immediately changed it and it's his right to do so.
Speaker 1: I mean, think about.
Speaker 1: Obama and changing Mount McKinley to uh another name in Alaska. Well, here,
Speaker 1: this was on my shorts feed the other day. I,
Speaker 1: I actually wanna show you this because it's sort of great.
Speaker 1: He basically, he basically just totally, totally, totally reveled in
Speaker 1: all of this, um, because he has signed a proclamation making.
Speaker 1: It's Gulf of America and he heard the words for
Speaker 1: the very first time. Let's take a listen.
Speaker 1: Air Force One is currently in international waters, for the
Speaker 1: first time in history flying over the recently renamed Gulf
Speaker 1: of America. Please enjoy the flight, and we are now
Speaker 1: about to head westbound to Super Bowl 59. Wow, he
Speaker 1: did that well.
Speaker 1: Get a good voice.
Speaker 1: Make America great again, right? That's what we care about, OK.
Speaker 1: So he loved that. Well, the Association Associated Press didn't
Speaker 1: love it. Associated Press, who, by the way, look at this,
Speaker 1: can you guys see this? I want you to see this.
Speaker 1: This is what Doge has discovered. They took $52 million.52
Speaker 1: million dollars from the US government, the majority coming from USAID,
Speaker 1: but this is just unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I it really is state media we didn't know that
Speaker 1: they never tell you they're taking all that money from.
Speaker 1: Federal taxpayers and so Donald Trump's like OK you know
Speaker 1: what you guys don't wanna recognize Gulf of America really
Speaker 1: you don't wanna Google does, right? It's now Gulf of
Speaker 1: America so if you don't wanna recognize it then maybe
Speaker 1: we shouldn't have you always here in the front of
Speaker 1: the room at the press conferences. This came up with
Speaker 1: a CNN reporter who's running to their defense. I don't
Speaker 1: think um which White House.
Speaker 1: Official made the decision to bar the AP reporter from
Speaker 1: the Oval Office and the diplomatic reception room last night. Well,
Speaker 1: first of all, let me just set the record straight.
Speaker 1: It is a privilege to cover this White House. It's
Speaker 1: a privilege to be the White House press secretary, and
Speaker 1: nobody has the right to go into the Oval Office
Speaker 1: and ask the President of the United States questions. That's
Speaker 1: an invitation that is given and there are hundreds of
Speaker 1: outlets on this campus. Many of you in this room
Speaker 1: who don't have the privilege.
Speaker 1: Of being part of that pool every single day and
Speaker 1: getting to ask the president questions, we reserve the right
Speaker 1: to decide who gets to go into the Oval Office,
Speaker 1: and you all have credentials to be here, including the
Speaker 1: Associated Press who is in this briefing room today. But
Speaker 1: in nature is the argument because the reason that the
Speaker 1: AP was barred, which they said was because they're not
Speaker 1: using the phrase Gulf of America, they're using Gulf of
Speaker 1: Mexico in line with their standards. And so the question
Speaker 1: here is
Speaker 1: The setting a precedent that this White House will retaliate
Speaker 1: against reporters who don't use the language that you guys
Speaker 1: believe reporters should use and how does that align with
Speaker 1: the First Amendment commitment that you were just talking about?
Speaker 1: I was very up front in my briefing on day
Speaker 1: one that if we feel that there are lies being
Speaker 1: pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to
Speaker 1: hold those lies accountable, and it is a fact that
Speaker 1: the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is
Speaker 1: called the Gulf of America.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure why news outlets don't want to call
Speaker 1: it that, but that is what it is. The Secretary
Speaker 1: of the Interior has made that the official designation in
Speaker 1: the geographical identification name server, and Apple has recognized that.
Speaker 1: Google has recognized that. Pretty much every other outlet in
Speaker 1: this room has recognized that body of water as the
Speaker 1: Gulf of America, and it's very important to this administration
Speaker 1: that we get that right, not just for people here
Speaker 1: at home, but also for the rest of the world. Sure.
Speaker 1: Simple, right?
Speaker 1: Well, it's still not over so moments ago the same
Speaker 1: reporter Kaitlin Collins, um, during the Gulf of America signing,
Speaker 1: you know, tried to commandeer the the conversation and take
Speaker 1: it to tariffs and, and we can talk about this
Speaker 1: because you know I have a lot to say on tariffs,
Speaker 1: but notice he's signing there he's got the Gulf of
Speaker 1: America behind him.
Speaker 1: Mr. President, you won the White House in part because
Speaker 1: of high inflation. If your tariffs make prices go up,
Speaker 1: to speak, please.
Speaker 1: You know, I will give her credit for this. If
Speaker 1: that had been Jim Acosta. Jim Acosta would have been like, right?
Speaker 1: He would have been firing off over and over, and
Speaker 1: then he would have like turned into near fist to cuffs.
Speaker 1: We've seen that. So at least she has a little
Speaker 1: bit more decorum. She did speak out of turn. She
Speaker 1: did just jump in with the question that, you know,
Speaker 1: had nothing to do with the Gulf of America like fine,
Speaker 1: she wanted to get straight to tariffs, but.
Speaker 1: At least when he said, you know what, you weren't
Speaker 1: asked to speak, she stopped. So, you know what, we, we,
Speaker 1: you know, she, she may not be all that, but
Speaker 1: at least she's not Jim Acosta. They got rid of him.
Speaker 1: They got rid of him over at CNN, yeah.
Speaker 1: I think he's got like a newsletter now, um, certainly
Speaker 1: not a newsletter like my newsletter because my newsletter will
Speaker 1: actually make you money. My newsletter will actually provide you
Speaker 1: with information that you need in order to be in
Speaker 1: these markets. My newsletter is 76 Research code word dollar use.
Speaker 1: Rode dollar 76search.com really just fantastic wealth of information there.
Speaker 1: We published regularly on that and you know if you
Speaker 1: look at our portfolios, the proof is in the pudding
Speaker 1: here because we understand Rob and I who started this
Speaker 1: with me, we understand markets. I've covered them.
Speaker 1: On the front lines as a news reporter he's invested
Speaker 1: billions of dollars in in markets and and I want
Speaker 1: you to have the opportunity to benefit from that knowledge.
Speaker 1: I really mean that and so it's the reason I
Speaker 1: created it so I encourage you to go over to
Speaker 1: 76 Research and take a look at that.
Speaker 1: Today, um, the other thing I'd encourage you to do,
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna give a little plug for one of
Speaker 1: our sponsors here on the show, and that's Balance of Nature.
Speaker 1: Balance of Nature.com, use code word 35% off, 35% off
Speaker 1: plus free shipping, plus money back guarantees, so no harm
Speaker 1: no foul if if it doesn't work for you, if
Speaker 1: you don't like it.
Speaker 1: No big deal. You can get your money back. Um,
Speaker 1: I take this every day. I take fruits and veggies.
Speaker 1: I take a couple of gummies. They're gluten-free for, for
Speaker 1: those of you that care, and it's actually the first
Speaker 1: time in my adult life that I've taken my vitamins.
Speaker 1: Really, um, and I actually am noticing for the first
Speaker 1: time in my adult life that I have made it
Speaker 1: all the way through mid February without having a cold,
Speaker 1: so I think there may be some kind of link
Speaker 1: to this. I do drink a lot of water. I
Speaker 1: do get exercise, but for the first time I'm taking
Speaker 1: my fruits and veggies every day, and I think it's
Speaker 1: a big deal. So I encourage you to take a
Speaker 1: look at this. You can call them as well, um,
Speaker 1: balance of nature.
Speaker 1: Dotcom. Go to the website if you would balance of
Speaker 1: Nature.com and use my code word you help the show,
Speaker 1: you're helping yourself. It's all good stuff. I know some
Speaker 1: of you guys already take it. Leslie, who's usually in
Speaker 1: the conversation here is like, oh yeah, I've been taking
Speaker 1: that for years. My kid's music teacher was like, oh yeah,
Speaker 1: I've been taking that for years. I love it. So
Speaker 1: if you haven't been taking it for years, this is
Speaker 1: your chance. 35% offal of Nature.com.
Speaker 1: Come with code word Trish, so you know you think
Speaker 1: about what's going on with AP and how they've been
Speaker 1: really raking it in. I mean, wow, maybe this is
Speaker 1: why they don't wanna talk about Gulf of Mexico because
Speaker 1: you know they're still beholden to all those people in
Speaker 1: the deep state that were giving them all kinds of money.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'll tell you who else is in
Speaker 1: trouble right now NBC NBC's in.
Speaker 1: A whole lot of trouble in so much trouble and
Speaker 1: of course they have to spin off their MSNBC network
Speaker 1: because having MSNBC while being an FCC controlled property that
Speaker 1: would be NBC itself, the network, it's a little bit
Speaker 1: of a problem, just a little bit of a problem
Speaker 1: by the way, this is becoming indeed more and more
Speaker 1: of an issue. I wanna show you this is one
Speaker 1: Brandon Carr and he's like.
Speaker 1: He he's out for blood. I mean he's not messing
Speaker 1: around either it's a whole different kind of administration and
Speaker 1: if you saw, oh you know he's gonna be great
Speaker 1: with media companies and he's all about business, yeah, he's
Speaker 1: all about business, but he's also all about truth because
Speaker 1: he's seen the power of the media he knows what
Speaker 1: they can do and have done.
Speaker 1: And so he's putting everyone on notice.
Speaker 1: Tomorrow we're gonna have more about what he's doing with ABC,
Speaker 1: but take a look at what he's doing right now
Speaker 1: with NBC this week he told Comcast, that's the parent
Speaker 1: company right of NBC that he had asked the FCC's
Speaker 1: enforcement bureau to investigate the company and NBC Universal specifically
Speaker 1: for what?
Speaker 1: Promoting DEI quote in a manner that does not comply
Speaker 1: with FCC regulations, they got rid of it. OK, so
Speaker 1: you can't just have a job on TV. Oops, you see,
Speaker 1: I'm getting excited right now hitting my microphone. You can't
Speaker 1: just have a job on TV just because you check
Speaker 1: a certain box. Those days are over now maybe you
Speaker 1: can get away with a little more over on MSNBC,
Speaker 1: which is why in part they're spinning out MSNBC.
Speaker 1: You know that network that Joy Reid is so angry,
Speaker 1: you know, she's telling, she's telling everybody not to see
Speaker 1: their family over the holidays because if they voted for Trump,
Speaker 1: then they can't be trusted, etc. yeah, that network, the
Speaker 1: one with Rachel Maddow that comes up with these really
Speaker 1: elaborate schemes, all kinds of rabbit holes she'll take you
Speaker 1: down with all those lies when you wanna talk about conspiracy.
Speaker 1: theory thank you very much. That would be one Rachel anyway,
Speaker 1: Comcast is responding saying, well, for decades our company has
Speaker 1: been built on the foundation of integrity and respect for
Speaker 1: all our employees and our customers and that it will
Speaker 1: cooperate with the investigation.
Speaker 1: Good luck. Really? Good luck.
Speaker 1: You know, comes on the heels of Disney saying we're
Speaker 1: getting rid of our DEI units.
Speaker 1: And they're even apparently gonna take off the trigger warnings
Speaker 1: on some of those.
Speaker 1: Wonderful storied movies like um.
Speaker 1: The Aristocrats? I didn't even know they had one on
Speaker 1: the Aristocrats. Remember the Aristocrats? I guess they have one
Speaker 1: on Lady and the Tramps. They've got one on Dumbo.
Speaker 1: They've got one on Peter Pan. They've got one on
Speaker 1: Swiss Family Robinson. Like what is so triggering about the
Speaker 1: Swiss Family Robinson? I mean.
Speaker 1: Come on. So anyway, like enough, OK, like it's over,
Speaker 1: it's done, we're moving forward and yet there are some,
Speaker 1: there are some like some of the people I've just
Speaker 1: showed you that just can't get with the program.
Speaker 1: But the trains left the station. I mean, for goodness sakes,
Speaker 1: RFK just got sworn in. Yeah, that would be RFK
Speaker 1: Junior coming in. He is, ladies and gentlemen, the new
Speaker 1: HHS secretary and I'm guessing that means that the New
Speaker 1: York Times isn't gonna get their $30 million this year.
Speaker 1: You wonder why Fox you got so many positive stories.
Speaker 1: Here is RFK Junior being sworn in. I'm Robert F.
Speaker 1: Kennedy Jr. I'm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who solemnly swear,
Speaker 1: do solemnly swear that I will support and defend, that
Speaker 1: I will support and defend the Constitution.
Speaker 1: the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, against
Speaker 1: all enemies, foreign and domestic, foreign and domestic.
Speaker 1: That I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same,
Speaker 1: that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same,
Speaker 1: that I take this obligation freely. I take this obligation
Speaker 1: freely without any, without any mental reservation, without any mental
Speaker 1: resignation or purpose of evasion or purpose evasion, and that
Speaker 1: I will well and faithfully discharge and I will well
Speaker 1: and faithfully discharge the duties of the office, the duties
Speaker 1: of the office. It's pretty great, right?
Speaker 1: He sure went through HLL and back.
Speaker 1: To get that gig they're really scared of him too.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, Trump is making massive strides here. RFK
Speaker 1: Junior is going to make massive strides. Think of all
Speaker 1: that's happened just in the last 3 weeks. It's really
Speaker 1: kind of amazing, but you know what, you still got
Speaker 1: problems out there whether it be the Democrats or big pharma.
Speaker 1: Don't forget the role that big pharma plays in all
Speaker 1: of this. I mean, I was looking at some information here.
Speaker 1: They've raised prices on over 575 brand name drugs in January,
Speaker 1: in the month of January alone, and this is despite
Speaker 1: Trump being there and the threat of RFK, maybe the
Speaker 1: threat of RFK had them run to raise prices every,
Speaker 1: every chance they could. They've blocked all kinds of competition.
Speaker 1: They've spent millions of dollars pushing overpriced medicines on hardworking Americans,
Speaker 1: and now they're pressuring Congress as we speak to implement
Speaker 1: mandates that will undermine the one real check that we
Speaker 1: have against these drug companies.
Speaker 1: And ban the very market-based incentives that help employers and
Speaker 1: families save on prescriptions, right, because you need those and
Speaker 1: help save them on their health care costs even worse,
Speaker 1: you know what you get big pharma out there right
Speaker 1: now wanting to strip American employers of their freedom to
Speaker 1: choose health benefits that work the best for them. The
Speaker 1: proposals could hand.
Speaker 1: Believe it or not, Big Pharma, $32 million.32 million billion
Speaker 1: for I'm getting my M's and my B's and my
Speaker 1: T's mixed up here today, $32 billion. I mean this
Speaker 1: is a lot of money we're talking about at the
Speaker 1: expense of American employers, American families. They fought against solutions
Speaker 1: to lower drug prices during Trump's first term, of course
Speaker 1: they did, and they opposed, they.
Speaker 1: that guy that you just saw his nomination, did they not?
Speaker 1: So that they could get more and more and more
Speaker 1: control over the private healthcare market. They want to interfere
Speaker 1: with Donald Trump's promise to slash those prices. So this
Speaker 1: is wrong. I'm telling you guys, you know what Big
Speaker 1: Pharma is not your friend. They are no friend to
Speaker 1: the American people. They are no friend to Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: You can find out.
Speaker 1: More information about this because you know you need to
Speaker 1: go to Congress to your individual Congress rep and demand
Speaker 1: just demand that this become a priority so you can
Speaker 1: make a difference today. I'm gonna put this up. They've, uh,
Speaker 1: this is just a wonderful group and they've they've organized
Speaker 1: an effort here to really try and pressure, if you would,
Speaker 1: pharma windfall.
Speaker 1: Dot com. Go there today, check that out. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: put it up there and what they're doing is it's
Speaker 1: just not OK and Congress can stop it.
Speaker 1: But they need the, the will of the people, if
Speaker 1: you would behind them, so it's a big deal.harmainfall.com.
Speaker 1: We got all kinds of stuff going on I think
Speaker 1: about war in Ukraine looking like that's gonna come to
Speaker 1: an end, my gosh, I mean, did you see what
Speaker 1: the diplomat from Russia actually had to say about this today?
Speaker 1: This is amazing.
Speaker 1: Like he actually said it's pretty amazing what's been going down.
Speaker 1: It's so sad. I, I keep looking back on everything
Speaker 1: that's happened there and I'm not sure why we had
Speaker 1: to engage that way um because let's not forget these
Speaker 1: are lives that were lost and it just seems wrong
Speaker 1: and it seems like it was a real.
Speaker 1: Failure of diplomacy in every which way and form. Well,
Speaker 1: you know what, Pete Hegseth, my former colleague at Fox
Speaker 1: had to say about this. He said, Listen, you know,
Speaker 1: Ukraine's gonna have to deal with the reality that it's
Speaker 1: probably not gonna become part of NATO because that's kind
Speaker 1: of a sticking point if you would from Russia for Russia.
Speaker 1: Anyway, here is, um, here is the ambassador. I want
Speaker 1: to show you the Russian Foreign Minister I should say
Speaker 1: saying that the entire world is in a state of
Speaker 1: shock over the phone conversation that Putin and Trump had
Speaker 1: because it looks like this thing might actually get resolved.
Speaker 1: Yesterday after the phone call between President Trump and um
Speaker 1: and the Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 1: Are you more hopeful now that there can be real
Speaker 1: and fundamental change and improvement in US-Russian relations?
Speaker 2: What struck
Speaker 2: me was that now the entire world is in a
Speaker 2: state of shock, viewing the phone conversation and the news
Speaker 2: about it is something extraordinary. This shows to what extent
Speaker 2: the staff of the
Speaker 2: The Biden administration led by their presidents and their European
Speaker 2: satellites have abandoned dialogue and diplomacy as a method of
Speaker 2: communication with the outside world, opting instead for threats, sanctions,
Speaker 2: and the arming of the regime in Kiev to wage
Speaker 2: war against the Russian Federation.
Speaker 1: I think it's interesting that he said that they're all
Speaker 1: in shock.
Speaker 1: Because maybe they just saw this thing going and going
Speaker 1: and going and going, but you know Donald Trump doesn't
Speaker 1: like those kind of conflicts and if he doesn't feel
Speaker 1: that those conflicts are advantageous for the United States, then
Speaker 1: he doesn't want to be in them no he'd much
Speaker 1: rather be talking about how he uses economic tools to
Speaker 1: help our country and to influence other countries, right? Well,
Speaker 1: I wanna say that actually tariffs are good tariffs are
Speaker 1: great actually.
Speaker 1: And uh the problem is we didn't charge them and
Speaker 1: everyone else did they charged us but we didn't charge
Speaker 1: them because we just didn't because somehow we're all about
Speaker 1: helping companies as opposed to helping American workers and listen
Speaker 1: this is all changing in real time. It is so
Speaker 1: good to have you here. Thank you for joining me today.
Speaker 1: Thank you for all your generosity. I'm seeing in some
Speaker 1: of the super chats there. I really do appreciate it.
Speaker 1: It is important.
Speaker 1: That we do have this independent media and that we
Speaker 1: uphold our First Amendment and you know I am so
Speaker 1: committed to doing that. I don't care what they think
Speaker 1: for goodness sakes, right? Nothing to lose. I am out
Speaker 1: here for you and I'll continue to do this live
Speaker 1: on the front lines of history every day. I will
Speaker 1: see you back here live on the show tomorrow. Make
Speaker 1: sure you subscribe.