1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,840 Speaker 1: On the Daily Maverick. They often publish articles taken from 2 00:00:03,880 --> 00:00:08,039 Speaker 1: the Conversation website, which contains some really interesting writing about 3 00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:10,920 Speaker 1: science and science related topics, a lot of health related 4 00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:15,160 Speaker 1: topics in health and science. And it was by somebody 5 00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:19,000 Speaker 1: at the University of Sydney, Bernard Stewart, who has a 6 00:00:19,040 --> 00:00:24,000 Speaker 1: lot of expertise in cancer, and he conducted a meta study, 7 00:00:24,600 --> 00:00:28,080 Speaker 1: had a look at all peer reviewed research published between 8 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:32,040 Speaker 1: twenty seventeen and twenty twenty five, and found growing evidence 9 00:00:32,080 --> 00:00:35,760 Speaker 1: that nicotine based e cigarettes are likely to cause oral 10 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:39,280 Speaker 1: and lung cancers. One thing that struck me about my 11 00:00:39,400 --> 00:00:42,080 Speaker 1: time in France is how little the vaping culture has 12 00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:45,519 Speaker 1: caught on there. French people smoke a less smoke, but 13 00:00:45,840 --> 00:00:48,800 Speaker 1: ornut they really do. They smoke a lot. And the 14 00:00:48,800 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: only nasty thing about France is that if you're as 15 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:56,880 Speaker 1: rabbit and anti smoker as I am, you can't really 16 00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:00,920 Speaker 1: indulge in the pavement culture because the pavement tables is 17 00:01:00,960 --> 00:01:03,120 Speaker 1: where the smokers are allowed to sit and smoke, and 18 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 1: it's very unpleasant sitting and trying to eat and drink 19 00:01:05,840 --> 00:01:09,560 Speaker 1: amongst them. So you go into the dark, dingy interior 20 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:15,400 Speaker 1: and probably of the people who are either smoking or vaping. 21 00:01:15,760 --> 00:01:18,959 Speaker 1: I wasn't doing research, but I would guess maybe ten 22 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:22,080 Speaker 1: percent were vaping, whereas in South Africa, I think it 23 00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:24,440 Speaker 1: would be the other way around. If you take a 24 00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:28,399 Speaker 1: population of one thousand and nine hundred of them would 25 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:31,600 Speaker 1: vape and the other hundred would smoke. But we can 26 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:35,559 Speaker 1: talk to pulmonologist that you see, TEA Professor Richard Vanzale Smith, 27 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:39,880 Speaker 1: who's done his own research into the dangers of vaping. Hello, Richard, 28 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,920 Speaker 1: Hi John, Thank you having me, Given what you've told 29 00:01:43,959 --> 00:01:46,240 Speaker 1: me and what you've told my colleagues on the radio station. 30 00:01:46,360 --> 00:01:49,400 Speaker 1: This meta study by Bernard Stewart won't have surprised you 31 00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:49,800 Speaker 1: at all. 32 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 2: No, not at all. It's a nicely put together study 33 00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:58,800 Speaker 2: where they looked at each of the components, looked at 34 00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:02,320 Speaker 2: human looked at animals, look at mechanisms, and so from 35 00:02:02,360 --> 00:02:04,520 Speaker 2: a scientific point of view, it's a it's a very 36 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:08,000 Speaker 2: nice review of all the reasons why we ever thought 37 00:02:08,240 --> 00:02:10,680 Speaker 2: that vapering wasn't going to be one hundred percent safe 38 00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:13,400 Speaker 2: and is what it is? 39 00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:16,800 Speaker 1: How risky is it? I mean, is it possible to 40 00:02:16,840 --> 00:02:20,960 Speaker 1: do a Grade three accessible answer to that? 41 00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:29,400 Speaker 2: No, So let's go back to some basics. Ninety percent 42 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:33,919 Speaker 2: of people who have lung cancer is because of smoking, 43 00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 2: so ten percent of lung cancers occur in non smoking people. 44 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:43,240 Speaker 2: If you smoke, you have a thirty times higher risk 45 00:02:43,320 --> 00:02:47,480 Speaker 2: of cancer, So that's the status. But to a grade three, 46 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:52,040 Speaker 2: I think what this paper is showing. 47 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:54,560 Speaker 1: Okay, well, then then ignore the request and just tell 48 00:02:54,639 --> 00:02:56,000 Speaker 1: us in your aurach. 49 00:02:56,160 --> 00:02:58,400 Speaker 2: So I think to a grade three I could answer 50 00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:02,520 Speaker 2: that to say, the pendulum which marketing was saying that 51 00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:06,520 Speaker 2: these things are so, so, so much safer than cigarettes, 52 00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:11,480 Speaker 2: is starting to move a whole lot closer to tobacco than 53 00:03:11,840 --> 00:03:17,200 Speaker 2: I think the marketers would like. These authors conclude, and 54 00:03:17,240 --> 00:03:19,160 Speaker 2: I quote them because I was quickly looking at the 55 00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:24,200 Speaker 2: article that say moreover cancer aside, the range of diseases 56 00:03:24,240 --> 00:03:27,760 Speaker 2: are tributable to vaping, which can no longer be caricatured 57 00:03:27,919 --> 00:03:30,680 Speaker 2: as safer than smoking, and their reference to twenty twenty 58 00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:33,800 Speaker 2: four New England Journal paper which comes to the same 59 00:03:33,919 --> 00:03:38,720 Speaker 2: conclusion that there's growing evidence that this ninety five percent 60 00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:42,360 Speaker 2: safer which we always said was rubbish, is complete rubbish, 61 00:03:42,800 --> 00:03:50,440 Speaker 2: and that the super safe vaping marketing is really mischaracterizing vaping, 62 00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 2: and that the risks are never going to be as 63 00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:58,680 Speaker 2: the same as tobacco, but are way closer to tobacco 64 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:02,200 Speaker 2: than fresh air than I think the industry would like. 65 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:07,360 Speaker 1: How much closer? How much less risky is it? I 66 00:04:07,400 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 1: do neither. I indulge in other risky behavior. So it's 67 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:13,600 Speaker 1: not as if I'm a health saint by any description. 68 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:20,320 Speaker 1: But so it's not safe. It's nowhere near as safe 69 00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:25,800 Speaker 1: as industry still claims. It's not as risky as traditional cigarettes. 70 00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:28,760 Speaker 1: Where in the gap between the two does it sit 71 00:04:29,080 --> 00:04:31,120 Speaker 1: with current knowledge? 72 00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:34,359 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think it's a very difficult question. And the 73 00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:37,280 Speaker 2: reason I say that is that you're certainly going to 74 00:04:37,360 --> 00:04:43,200 Speaker 2: have less chance of, for example, cancer or emphisema just 75 00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:46,719 Speaker 2: because of the constitutes. Some data says that the risk 76 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 2: for cardiovascular disease, heart attacks, stroke, diabetes problems are the same, 77 00:04:53,440 --> 00:04:56,520 Speaker 2: And then you get other weird things that vaping causes 78 00:04:56,560 --> 00:05:00,800 Speaker 2: that tobacco doesn't cause. So you are reducing some risks 79 00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:05,320 Speaker 2: on the one side, and you are increasing risks on 80 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:09,120 Speaker 2: the other side. And so it depends which risk you 81 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:12,719 Speaker 2: are wanting to avoid and which you are prepared to gain. 82 00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:16,719 Speaker 2: And I think that's where it becomes really tricky. When 83 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:21,920 Speaker 2: you're trying to counsel someone who's stopping smoking about switching 84 00:05:21,960 --> 00:05:26,560 Speaker 2: to vapor is a safer alternative? Is absolutely no in 85 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:30,240 Speaker 2: any way good reason to start vaping if you don't. 86 00:05:31,040 --> 00:05:33,840 Speaker 2: But it's the proportionate risk that if you're a smoker, 87 00:05:34,120 --> 00:05:37,800 Speaker 2: how much safer you would be if you vaped? And 88 00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:41,800 Speaker 2: that's a very difficult answer. But ninety five percent safer, 89 00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:46,720 Speaker 2: I think is way gone. My estimate maybe forty fifty 90 00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:50,840 Speaker 2: percent safer. But that's a complete thumb suck, and I 91 00:05:50,880 --> 00:05:53,120 Speaker 2: wouldn't stand next to a judge and swear on that 92 00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:56,279 Speaker 2: with any scientific rigor. 93 00:05:57,040 --> 00:05:59,640 Speaker 1: But if you think you're going to start vaping and 94 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:05,400 Speaker 1: at whatever emotional and psychological benefits vapors gain from performing 95 00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:08,120 Speaker 1: this action, and you think it's going to be safe, think. 96 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:12,359 Speaker 2: Again, Absolutely you're in big trouble from a whole variety 97 00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:16,440 Speaker 2: of other things that we don't know about. And I 98 00:06:16,440 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 2: think the other element. I mean, I say this because 99 00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:22,719 Speaker 2: this is the area that I've researched. The addictive nature 100 00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:29,760 Speaker 2: of these newer vaping products with different nicotines synthetic nicotines 101 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:33,000 Speaker 2: is much higher, and certainly for the young individuals, that 102 00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:42,160 Speaker 2: addictive risk probably trumps any long term cancer, lung disease issues, and. 103 00:06:42,080 --> 00:06:48,000 Speaker 1: The because I I it's it's it's no, it's it's not. 104 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:51,760 Speaker 1: It's not a temptation to become moralistic over this. If 105 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:53,800 Speaker 1: it is a temptation, then I must avoid it. And 106 00:06:53,839 --> 00:06:57,080 Speaker 1: I hope I don't sound moralistic over it. And it's 107 00:06:57,120 --> 00:06:59,159 Speaker 1: easy for me to say quit it, and why don't 108 00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:01,560 Speaker 1: you quit it? Because I know started it, and it's 109 00:07:01,640 --> 00:07:04,839 Speaker 1: very easy to stop something you never started. But I 110 00:07:04,880 --> 00:07:07,000 Speaker 1: hear a lot of people talking about the addictive nature 111 00:07:07,200 --> 00:07:11,160 Speaker 1: of vaping, and again, what does current research tell us 112 00:07:11,160 --> 00:07:15,840 Speaker 1: about how much or how much less or the same 113 00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 1: is the addiction risk physiological and psychological put together of 114 00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:23,040 Speaker 1: vaping versus traditional cigarettes. 115 00:07:24,080 --> 00:07:27,280 Speaker 2: I think the data, certainly in adolescence is very clear 116 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 2: it is significantly higher, and I think in adults as well. 117 00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:35,240 Speaker 2: So the nicotine in vaping products is a nicotine salt, 118 00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:38,480 Speaker 2: not a free base, which means it gets absorbed quickly, 119 00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:42,040 Speaker 2: and this is designed by the companies. They change the 120 00:07:42,080 --> 00:07:45,680 Speaker 2: formulation of nicotine that it's easier to absorb, it gets 121 00:07:45,720 --> 00:07:49,240 Speaker 2: in faster and gets into the brain quicker. They are 122 00:07:49,240 --> 00:07:53,040 Speaker 2: also synthetic nicotines that do the same, so the addictive 123 00:07:53,120 --> 00:07:59,840 Speaker 2: properties of vaping, I think are significantly higher than traditional 124 00:08:00,040 --> 00:08:04,040 Speaker 2: tobacco cigarettes. Again, not to say you can't. I mean 125 00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:06,840 Speaker 2: people get off cocaine, people get off heroin, people get 126 00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 2: off alcohol, people get off drugs. What we tend to 127 00:08:11,320 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 2: do is to kind of ignore nicotine tobacco as an 128 00:08:14,880 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 2: addiction because it doesn't cause any trouble. We throw our 129 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:22,120 Speaker 2: hands up when people are crashing cars or destroying families 130 00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:26,760 Speaker 2: because they're addicted to alcohol. But we tolerate nicotine addiction 131 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:29,640 Speaker 2: as it were as a society, and so I don't 132 00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:34,280 Speaker 2: think we've recognized that it's something that we really need 133 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:37,680 Speaker 2: to be dealing with, and it can be dealt with. 134 00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:40,920 Speaker 2: It's not impossible to get off tobacco. It's just not easy. 135 00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:42,600 Speaker 2: Doesn't mean you can't. 136 00:08:43,679 --> 00:08:47,880 Speaker 1: James is asking about terrea, not a word or concept 137 00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:51,520 Speaker 1: that's familiar to me. Heated tobacco. James has read that 138 00:08:51,520 --> 00:08:53,960 Speaker 1: that is a lot safer than normal cigarettes. Would that 139 00:08:54,000 --> 00:08:56,520 Speaker 1: fall under the umbrella that you've been talking about. 140 00:08:57,520 --> 00:09:01,240 Speaker 2: No, so that heated tobacco is tobacco. So all of 141 00:09:01,280 --> 00:09:05,640 Speaker 2: the cancer risks that occur with tobacco occur with heated tobacco. 142 00:09:05,720 --> 00:09:10,679 Speaker 2: It's just not burnt. It's just heated. So even farmers 143 00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:13,840 Speaker 2: who farm with tobacco have a risk of getting cancer 144 00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:17,760 Speaker 2: from exposed to tobacco leaves, so all the carcinogens are there. 145 00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:22,280 Speaker 2: It is probably slightly safer than burnt tobacco. But it's 146 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:26,040 Speaker 2: a different product from a vaping product because it is 147 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 2: actually tobacco product, whereas vaping is a nicotine product, not 148 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:32,760 Speaker 2: a tobacco product. 149 00:09:33,640 --> 00:09:36,440 Speaker 1: Thank you very much for that explanation and for the 150 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:39,559 Speaker 1: chat we've just had. Professor Richard Van Sale Smith is 151 00:09:39,559 --> 00:09:41,439 Speaker 1: a pomonologist at UCT