WEBVTT - Consumer Talk: Slip and falls in supermarket

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Lunch with Piper Hudson.

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 2>And now Consumer Talk featuring Wendy Nola.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, so moving away from car tires, Wendy is

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 3>actually with us today for Consumer Talk, and we're going

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 3>to be talking about your options and what you should

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 3>or shouldn't expect if you suffer an injury or a

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 3>damage of some kind to your property while you are

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 3>busy shopping in a store. If you've had experience with

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 3>this issue and you'd like to tell us how it

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 3>played out in your case, you are welcome to share

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 3>that experience with us with a WhatsApp to seven two

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 3>five six seven one five six seven. You're also welcome

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 3>to call in on two one four four six five

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 3>six seven.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Wendy.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>We use the term slip and fall for quite obvious reasons.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 3>That's what the industry calls them, because the two most

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 3>common types of accidents in store are somebody slipping either

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 3>on spilled produce or a wet floor, for example, or

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>the fall being a product falling off a high shelf

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 3>onto somebody. One of today's cases interestingly introduces a further

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 3>restoration of this and that is what happens to what

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>happens if it's not you, that's hurt, but some of

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.559
<v Speaker 3>your belongings that are damaged in an incident in a store,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and will reflect on that aspect in our second case

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>study today.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But you wanted to set the scene for us, Wendy. Sure.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 4>So the main question is, of course, when is the

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 4>store liable for a customer's injuries or damages and when

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 4>are they not so. Retailers and this is my first observation,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 4>it's understandable but also quite sad, they tend to hand

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 4>over such cases to the legal teams. That's what they've

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 4>been instructed to do, because you know, establishing liability in

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 4>these cases is quite is a specialist idea. But the

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 4>unfortunate downside of that is that you know that's happening

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 4>behind the scenes and the person and they're often elderly,

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, they just want a human response. They're looking

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 4>for compassion, they're looking for care, they're looking for we

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 4>see you, we hear you, We sorry, sorry this happened

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 4>to you, And in many cases they don't get it,

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 4>which is that exacerbates the hurt. They physically hurt, and

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 4>then they feel emotionally hurt by what they perceive to

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 4>be a lack of care in the response. So we're

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>going to be discussing, as you said, two cases with

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.839
<v Speaker 4>the help of friend of the show, Trity Brookman, who

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 4>is a Cape Ton based attorney and her firm specializes

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 4>in representing consumers in these types of disputes and with

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 4>dodgy cars.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>We've heard her speak to us.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Many manner and will bring two d in in a moment.

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 3>But let's start by taking a look at the first case.

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 3>And I have to say upfront that since we started

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>working on this story, it has indeed be handed over

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 3>to a legal team, so we're somewhat restricted in terms

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 3>of what detail we can include today.

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 4>With we'll have a case of you know, as our

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 4>listeners will know, and I'm terribly sorry about it, but

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 4>these cases pour into my inbox at a right far

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 4>beyond that which I could reasonably cope with. So I

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 4>don't often see an email unless I'm doing.

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>A specific search.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 4>So I didn't see the first case until about three

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 4>months after it was said sent. And in that time

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 4>between me the email being sent as a.

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Result of a previous show we did and how.

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 4>Do you listened to the previous show and me getting

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 4>in touch, there had been some developments which I wasn't

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 4>initially aware of. Okay, So first, the other thing to

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 4>say is we're going to have to be a bit

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 4>vague because now this is gone legal, it's it's core emotion,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 4>it's emotion, and it's a case spending. And so when

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 4>I took it up with the supermarket group involved, I

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 4>was told we are giving our full cooperation to ensure

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 4>that the matter is resolved as swiftly and fairly as possible. However,

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 4>as it is subject to court proceedings and therefore subjected

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 4>to say, we are not in a position to comment

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 4>or provide any further information at this stage. And then

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 4>our complainant, who are going to be calling DeBie, then

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 4>also said, oh, maybe you should name me. I don't

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 4>want there to be any.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>So we're not naming the supermarket evolved and we So

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 3>what happened, okay. So, and the reason we still sharing

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 3>this case is because what happened is a very good

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 3>demonstration of the kind of it's a very common should

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 3>be dealing with, and it raises some opportunities to question

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 3>the sort of the conditions that have to be in

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>place in order for compensation to happen.

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, So, this case.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Involves We're going to call her Debbie, who was shopping

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 3>in a local supermarket almost a year ago. Now I

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 3>think he's just over a year. I think it was

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 3>the first of July. And can you tell us what

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 3>happened to Debbie?

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so she of all awful things, silly things to happen.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 4>She had checked out, she had bought her her goodies

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 4>that had been packed, and she was heading for the exit.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 4>And when she got to the rear part of the

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 4>check encounter, where the packers generally stand, that's where she slipt.

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 4>And it was only after you know, these things happened

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 4>so fat that she saw what was left of the

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 4>errant strawberry mushed into the bottom of her.

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So she slipped on a single storwberry.

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 4>Slipped on one strawberry, unbelievable, so stood on it.

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it went squish, and then.

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>That she's on the environment and she was on the floor,

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 3>and on the floor with very serious injuries.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Wendy exactly.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>She says.

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 4>She was lying there on the cold floor.

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't the stores.

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 4>But they called an ambulance.

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>It took over an hour to come.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Her knee was swelling up she was in terrible pain.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Who husband was with her.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>She says.

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>The store management offered to pay for the ambulance as

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 4>well as emergency room treatment because they wouldn't have known anos.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 4>But by the time we got to Constancheberg Hospital they

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 4>had withdrawn their offer. And I would say that the

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 4>lawse had entered the picture by that stage.

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>And said, don't offer anything.

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, oh there's a problem, need you know, Let's let's

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 4>leave this to the lawyers. So x rays did later

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 4>reveal that she had shattered her right knee cap. She

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 4>gave me the medical term, but I think for our listeners,

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 4>she shattered her right knee cap. She's had two surgeries,

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 4>one to pin the bones together, the second to remove

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>those pins. She spent four days in hospital, two weeks

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 4>in a step down facility to get her walking again.

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 4>She went from a walker to crutches, two crutches, then

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 4>one crutch after two months of physios. This has been

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 4>quite an ordeal that from that one strawberry on the floor,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 4>she says, in all this time. Sorry, she says, even

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 4>after all of that, certain actions are still difficult for me.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 4>There is the possibility of yet another operation to remove

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 4>bits of bone that are now pushing through the front

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 4>of money, and all this time the Supermarket Group has

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 4>done nothing and paid no expenses, which have racked up

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 4>to more than five hundred thousand grand by now. Money

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 4>will never be the same.

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, oh, Debbie, I'm so sorry that you went through this.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 3>As Mendy has mentioned, Debbie did reach out to us

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 3>a couple of months ago. Her brother actually heard the

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 3>previous conversation about slip and fall accidents that happened. I

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 3>think I was away at the time, but it happened

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>on the show and said to her, why don't you

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 3>call captain and ask for help? And at the time

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 3>she had already consulted a lawyer, and that lawyer had

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 3>reached out to the Supermarket Group involved asking for compensation

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 3>on her behalf, but hadn't had any feedback at the

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 3>point of that initial engagement.

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And Wendy, what has happened since then?

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 4>So I went back to DEBI with what the Supermarket

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Group had told me, because I'd asked them a whole

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 4>lot of questions around you know, there's been no reach out,

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 4>and they said that gave me that statement I read

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 4>out earlier, basically saying it's now subject dequyt. We we

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 4>can't comment a legal process in motion, we can't comment,

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 4>And DeBie said, yeah, it seems you know, our lawyer

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 4>is pursuing a court case. That was never our intention

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 4>from the start. We just wanted them to be fair

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 4>and pay us what this ordeal has cost, you know,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 4>some financial compensation for medical expenses, and she's also had

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 4>some loss of income.

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's the context of what happened.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Listening into that description was consumer attorney Trudy Brookburn and Truty.

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>It's always lovely to have you join us on the show.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back, Thanks very much, but then specially to you, Wendy.

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, we can't speak to the merits of the individual

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 3>case here it is still before the courts. But broadly speaking,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure there are a couple of sort of common

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>threads in these kinds of cases that we need to

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 3>highlight here. I mean, for example, if this case goes

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to court, as it looks like it might do, what

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 3>would Debbie's lawyer have to prove in order for the

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 3>supermarket to be found legally liable for her fall and

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>for the attendant expenses that came with it is there

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 3>a difference, Are there any sort of mitigating factors a

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 3>court would look at, or key questions that would need

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 3>to be asked to determine whether it's the shop's problem

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 3>or not.

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 5>Great question for Bill. Let me launch in. The basic

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 5>principle is that if you own a building, or you

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 5>manage and operate a building which is open to the public,

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 5>you have a legal duty to ensure that the public

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 5>is safe when there's still onto your premises. So there

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 5>are a few other legal aspects that that impinge on this,

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 5>but that is the basic principle. So a business owner

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 5>must take reasonable steps to ensure that where the public

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 5>are allowed to or invited to walk, that they can

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 5>walk there with with safety. The second layer of law

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 5>that comes into that so that that is a basic

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 5>principle of whether the building was neglegend. So consumers and

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 5>individuals members of the public are not required by the

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 5>law to watch the every move. That's reasonable for them

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 5>to assume that they can that they can walk around

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 5>in their surroundings without always being watching their feet.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's really import So you don't be vigilant as

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 4>down at all times, because that could create other problems

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 4>I would imagine yes.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 5>And I think the relevant thing here is that Debbie

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 5>was She said that she was walking next to her

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 5>husband who was pushing his shopping trolley. So remember in

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 5>a supermarket environment usually have tard flaws which are fundamentally slippery,

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 5>and then you are often pushing a huge, big shopping

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 5>trolley which prevents you from being able to watch where

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 5>you put your feet down right, And that also applies

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 5>to a person walking next to the person pushing the

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 5>shopping trolley. So that's where we are going to. The

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 5>fundamental process here is that the court is going to

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 5>try and find out who was more negligend. Was Debbie

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 5>negligend by not watching her feet? As I've explained, I

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 5>think in the circumstances there's less of an expectation that

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 5>you would have done that. And was the defendant who

0:10:55.320 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 5>would be the shopping center or the and the supermarket chains,

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 5>and did they conduct sufficiently regular inspections to ensure that

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 5>their premises were staff So the timing of this thing

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 5>is often the determinative factor there. So, as you can

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 5>imagine you are the manager of a shopping center or

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 5>of a supermarket, there are many square meters of floor

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 5>that have to be checked from time to time to

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 5>see whether something has built, whether there's a weily subsistance,

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 5>a substance which is related to sap or whatever which

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 5>or just a puddle of water, all of which can

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 5>be and then a strawberry for crying in a bucket.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 5>So all of these things are the source of things

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 5>that can land on the floor in a supermarket. As

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 5>a supermarket manager, you have to be checking from time

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 5>to time, but that you are not required by the

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 5>law to check once a second, or once a minute

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 5>or once every five minutes. You must check with regular intervals,

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 5>and your system of checking needs to be reasonable and

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 5>manageable in the circumstances of your supermarket and of the

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 5>risk post to the consumers. So that's the evaluation that

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 5>the poor judge will have to make. It's actually quite

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 5>a tricky thing of weighing up the relative interests. The

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 5>other thing that I thought might be relevant here is

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 5>that a strawberry doesn't generally fall out of your shopping bag.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 5>So this occurred after the tools. This is as they

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 5>are leaving that already paid, So the person who purchased

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 5>that strawberry has lasted out of their shopping bag most likely.

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 5>So what happened there with the packaging? How is it

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 5>that the strawberry was able to escape so easily? Because

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 5>all the strawberry I generally buy in the supermarket quite firmly.

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>In the plastic packaging, inside.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 5>Their plastic packaging. So I have wondered whether the person

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 5>who applied the packaging, maybe there was floppy cling wrap

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 5>or some other type of loose packaging that was not

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 5>sufficiently sat and that could indicate neglegends by whoever the

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 5>person was that packed it, whether that's the supplier to

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 5>the supermarket or the supermarket itself, depending on who did

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 5>that packaging, So there might be a further ground for

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Debbie to demonstrate that there was neg legends, and that's

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 5>worth really checking out. I think the two main things

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 5>that I would be almost forensically investigating if I were

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 5>her attorney, would be how long was that strawberry on

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 5>the ground, and one can take that if there was

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 5>a camera and that direction, and their number two who

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 5>did the packaging? And why was it loose.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Or the I mean, for argument's sake, and I have

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 4>no clue. It's just occurred to me while you were talking,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 4>truly that the previous sharper who bought those strawberries may

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 4>well have opened that clamshell and helped themselves to a

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 4>strawberry or two, and one dropped out in the processitch game.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 4>But that's where the CTV footage is critical, and they

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 4>will always have footage at those tills.

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's one of the most watched areas.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 5>I think if when thinks about the who can be

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 5>the negligent party? If there was another shopper who dropped

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 5>a strawberry, that might be the person against whom you

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 5>aim your clam if that's what the CCTV footage.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, truly, just before we go to the news, a

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 3>quick follow up here. In your experience with cases like this,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 3>are stores generally inclined to be happy to say we'll

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 3>cover you for the ambulance of the emergency visit if

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 3>it looks like it's a sort of a modest expense

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 3>in line, and less likely to do so if they

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 3>can see that this is going to be a very

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 3>expensive process to remedy. Did do you think that impacts

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.119
<v Speaker 3>how they behave in the immediate optimize Pepper.

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it certainly changes the consumer's experience of the

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 5>whole thing. But the types of matters that arise on

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 5>my death, I've never encountered one where the supermarket or

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 5>the shopping center infected cover any medical expenses. I suppose

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 5>the more serious ones come to me where the medical

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 5>expenses are more substantial, although not necessarily, but I think

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 5>it would be definitely. I mean, if I'm advising the

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 5>shopping center, my advice is sort this thing out quickly

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 5>and early, and pay the initial amounts in the hope

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 5>that you can avoid much greater damage and harm and

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 5>legal expenses are going forward as well. Cases can costume

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 5>million rand. It's really worthwhile settling things early where you

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 5>know that there is a problem or was a potential

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 5>problem on your side.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Great advice.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 4>I just need to make a really born correction. I

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 4>just remember Debbie wrote us in April this year. This

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 4>slip happened in July twenty twenty four, so it has

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 4>dragged on for a year already. Okay, that's why you

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 4>know she came to us and things are probably not

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 4>progressing legally because there has been.

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>There has been no no, no for that. I could

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>come back. Okay, join the conversation.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Join the conversation.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You're with Kate Thalk.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 6>Hello, Mangie, I'm a Nancy. My name is Marion, and

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 6>I'm a nanty one year old and I fell in

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 6>the store yesterday. Was shopping at Checkers in the West

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 6>Coast More and I slipped and it happened so quickly.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 6>They were cleaning floors. But I don't know if that

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 6>was the reason for why I slipped, but I just

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 6>wanted to give book cares to the manager and the

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 6>customer care lady. He arranged to get a wheelchair for

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 6>me and for her to push me around to finish

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 6>my shopping. But anyway, the pain was too bad. I'd

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 6>fallen on my hip.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 4>Sorry.

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 6>Fortunately my daughters were shopping in the store as well,

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 6>so I was able to be driven home and straight

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 6>to the doctor. But I must say the stuff at

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 6>Checkers in West Coast More were absolutely fantastic.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 3>I hope you feel much much better soon, Marianne. And

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 3>that's really good feedback.

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 4>After I said sometimes it can come across as a

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 4>bit I'm caring because they've got to worry about the

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 4>legal implications and but there's the notion of liability and

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 4>everything else. So that's lovely to hear.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's another positive voice note that's come through

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 7>Let's take a listen, Hi is gooden? Here two things.

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 7>I was in another supermarket and there was a fruit

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 7>box on the floor at below knee level, and I

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 7>banged into it and it sort of thought, wow, that

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 7>was a bit hard and sharp. Didn't think much more

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 7>of it because I had to look at my genes

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 7>from the one side and didn't see anything, but the

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 7>jeans were actually torn. When I got back, store was

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 7>very good. They said, no, look, that's obviously happened. I

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 7>went to speak to them to get them to move

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 7>the boxes. They did move that box, but I haven't

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 7>seen the boxes fixed in the other stores. All of

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 7>them have got metal frames on the outside, which we've

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 7>got very sharp edges, which if somebody had cut themselves

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 7>on an older person cutting themselves would have not great.

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the store was very good about it, and.

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 2>They sort of dealt with it straight away and then

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 2>offered to buy me a new pair of genes, which

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 2>was really really well done from one of the bigger

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 2>change But another thought, what about liability insurance. Surely these

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 2>stores carry liability insurance, and surely that should be part

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 2>of the processes be insured against the sort of.

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 5>Just a thought.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I thought that several other people had as well,

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 3>including Chris. And there was another one from Henry saying,

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 3>surely shopping centers of public liability insurance for exactly this

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of scenario.

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 3>Let's ask Trudy to comment on that attorney truly public

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 3>liability insurance? Should that be sufficient to cover this kind

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 3>of incident?

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 5>I would have I would have certainly thought so. So unfortunately,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 5>from a consumer perspective, that doesn't necessarily mean that you're

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 5>not in for a big fight. So how it works

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 5>if you have insurance is that you would notify your

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 5>insurer of the claim. So let's say the manager has

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 5>been informed that Marion has slipped while they're cleaning the floors,

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 5>or about another incident, and you would immediately ring your broker.

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 5>The broker would speak to the insurer, and then the

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 5>legal department at the lib Letty insurance would tell you

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 5>what you allowed to do and say and whatnot and

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 5>if the thing becomes a court case. And here I

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 5>just want to remind the listeners that you need to

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 5>sue within three years of the incident, and if you

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 5>miss that deadline, you've lost your calm, and if it's

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 5>against the municipality, that summons has to go out within

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 5>six months or that for them needs to be a

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 5>notice within six months after it happened. So if it's

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 5>a municipality that caused your harm or you slipped on

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 5>municipal property, definitely see a lawyer very quickly. So sorry

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 5>to circle back. So if the thing then goes to court,

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 5>it's essentially the liability insurances lawyers who are fighting against

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 5>you all the same stuff that you need to prove,

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 5>et cetera. But unfortunately they have a lot of legal

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 5>clout and they have deep pockets, so you can expect. Unfortunately,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 5>even though there's liability insurance, unless it's a real opening shatcase,

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 5>you may actually have more oppossession if your acclaimant than

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 5>you would have had otherwise.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for that feedback, Trudy, And just

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 3>to recap for anybody who's come in midway, Wendy Nada

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 3>with us in studio. Consumer attorney Trudy Brookman with us

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 3>by phone as we talk about compensation in the case

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 3>of injuries or damages happening in a store environment. I mean,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 3>this just makes my blood Boil. Tracy's sharing what happened

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>to her mom, who was in her sixties at the time.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>To cut a long story short, she had an accident

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 3>in the parking lot outside the store after her trolley's

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 3>wheels got stuck and she was sent flying and broke

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 3>her wrist. And she said when they tried the parking

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 3>attendant came to her assistance and went and called the manager,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 3>but the store manager said, we can't help because it

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 3>happened outside the store and very painful recovery. Later, her

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 3>mom did phone the landlord of the property and they

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty much or so she gave up. But Tracy says

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 3>a week after the incident, the shopping center placed signage

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>at the very point my mom fell with a sign

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 3>had a falling person, a tumbling trolley and a warning

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 3>or hazard sign. I mean, really, I mean, obviously that's

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 3>rubbing salt into a very painful wound because it says

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 3>that they obviously knew that there was a hazard there,

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that that was a danger to shoppers.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and as far as I know, the if you're

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 5>renting the the shop inside the shopping center, you also

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 5>are often the tenant of the of the parking which

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 5>is directly adjacent if you're huge. But I'm speaking under

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 5>correction there, so I think that that may just have

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 5>been an excuse to not avalid one. But when we'd

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 5>have to check that out with with reference to the

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 5>relevant lease, what I do want to say is that

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 5>disclaimers is a whole nother layer, and the signage and

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 5>the warning signage that was put up that Tracy was

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 5>was speaking about is another relevant factor when trying to

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 5>work out with you you're going to succeed with the

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 5>claim if you've been the victim of a slip and

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 5>trip or slipping for accident. Sorry about the flippant sounding

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 5>uh called accident, but that unfortunately, that's that's what lawyers

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 5>call it. So these disclaimers are are what attorneys and

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 5>and we do recommend that if you have a shop

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 5>or anything you're just open to the public, that you

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 5>do have a disclaimer up and a warning notice up

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 5>at the at the entrance. And these disclaimers can sometimes

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 5>succeed in avoiding consumers being able to claim from you,

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 5>and other times not. And it's quite a complicated thing

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 5>whether they can or coun't. The reason that it's complicated

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 5>is that the consumer Protection Act says that if there's

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 5>a contract, and these disclaimers and warning signs are a

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 5>type of contract between the public and the shop, these

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 5>contracts have to only contain fair, reasonable and just contract terms,

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 5>and must be drafted in plain language and must be

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 5>drawn to your attention in a conspicuous manner before you

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 5>gain access to the premises. So that's one of the

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 5>reasons probably that the signage was out in the parking lot,

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 5>right out in the parking lots. So then, so as

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 5>I was saying, the poor judges have an invidious task

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 5>sometimes to try and balance the rights of consumers and retailers.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 5>That the basic principle is that you cannot you cannot

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 5>bypass a disclaimer as a as a as a business

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 5>or you cannot rely on your disclaimer to bypass your

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 5>response fundamental responsibility as a as a business owner or

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 5>operator to take the reasonable steps to ensure that where

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 5>the public is allowed to walk, that they can walk

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 5>there with safety. So if that's not in place, no

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 5>disclaimer is going to help you. It just provides a

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 5>little bit of further ground for argument in court if

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 5>there really is a situation where the consumer has a

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 5>vallet case thanks.

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>For that, truly. Please stay with us.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 3>We're going to take a very short break and then

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 3>when we come back from this, we're going to switch

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.479
<v Speaker 3>slight focus away from injury to what happens in the

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 3>case of damage in store. And we've had an interesting

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 3>case study there from was it Gordon who got his

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 3>genes replaced?

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's not what's happened. In the next case, we're

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>going to take a look at talk WhatsApp seven to

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>five six seven one five six seven.

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Right, Well, back to the subject of incidents in shopping stores,

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 3>and let's switch the focus away from incidents where shoppers

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 3>are injured to ones where damage to their belongings takes place.

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 3>And Wendy, won't you just tell us about this week's

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 3>second case, Stuffy?

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 4>Sure? So. Just over two months ago, eighty two year

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 4>old Margaret from Koumaki visited Micah Hardaway store in Fishok

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 4>to buy paint.

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And a few other things.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 4>A salesperson helped her choose one liter type of paint,

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 4>a little one, and offered to carry it to her

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 4>to the till point for her. So he was walking

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 4>in front of her when for some reason, the tub

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 4>slipped from his hand and as it hit the floor,

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 4>the lid popped off and white paint splattered onto Margaret's handbag.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Pants, and shoes.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Because she was right in the firing line an attempt

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 4>by a store staff to clean her bags. They literally said,

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 4>liver with us, will clean it. She couldn't take a

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 4>clothes off, obviously, yeah, but she put They have a

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 4>plastic bag and she put all the stuff in her

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 4>handbag in that and she went home and they said, well,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 4>we'll return it to you. They did return the bag

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 4>to her, but it was not an entirely successful clean

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 4>up job. The paint was white and there was you know,

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 4>still smudges visible. It wasn't ours. What kind of bag

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:11.479
<v Speaker 4>it was, We're not talking about a designer. She actually

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 4>I said what kind of bag? I really wanted to know.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Was it fabric?

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Was leat?

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 4>Then she said it's foley there. So it was not

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 4>a very expensive hand bag in the scheme of things.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 4>But so she was given you know, laterally it was like, yeah,

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 4>he has your compensation five hundred rand and not just

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 4>five hundred rand cash, five hundred grand voucher for the store.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 4>And then she said she's already bought what she needed, and.

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You can't buy replacement trainers, pants.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 4>Or bag of plica the brands that she had. I

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 4>think the shoes were sketches, but her.

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.479
<v Speaker 3>Estimate was that the damage is total to about two

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 3>and a half thousand rands in total by the time

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 3>you taggied up the shoes, the pants and the bag.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 3>So she wasn't happy with the offer of take your

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 3>store voucher for five hundred rand because she said to us,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't help her resolve the issue that she's sitting

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 3>with through no fault of her own. Where do you

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 3>reached out to the short store tell us about that engagement?

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so I called the store and I was put

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 4>through to the owner and he, you know, I wanted

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 4>to point out that the voucher was not under the

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 4>circumstances appropriate compensation. I said, Margaret had no part in

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 4>what happened. The staff member made a mistake, as we

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 4>all do from time to time. The cost of replacing

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 4>the items is about two and a half thousand rand

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 4>in total, which in the scheme of things these kinds

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 4>of incidents is modest, right for three items of clothing.

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 4>And I said, are you willing to cancel that voucher

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 4>and give Margaret a cash amount of two and a

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.719
<v Speaker 4>half thousand in order to settle this matter appropriately. I

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 4>added that Margaret did still have the ruined clothing and

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 4>question and you know if they wanted to verify any

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 4>replacement estimations. He responded, well, he initially said I had

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 4>to had to be in person. I said, that's a

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 4>rather long drive for me. It's not a reasonable request.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 4>We can do this on the phone, and we could

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 4>do it over email. He said he couldn't read verify

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 4>me over the phone, so could I send an email?

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Which I did right and then I got a response

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 4>saying my.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 4>He said he asked for photos of the clothing items,

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 4>the not the handbag, but the pants and the shoes.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 4>He said the tracksuit, pants and shoes were not reported

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 4>in the store only afterwards and that and only a

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 4>week later. My staff went out of their way to

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 4>assist and the customers more than happy at the time,

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 4>only to then later report a further issue. I prefer

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 4>face to face meetings. Then I know exactly who I'm

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 4>dealing with and it can be dressed immediately. As I

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 4>had the photos which Margaret had sent me, I fowarded

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 4>them on and I repeated my question about him, was

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 4>he willing to pay that fairly modest amount to Margaret?

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 4>And as we sit here, I did say it would

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 4>have to be before one o'clock. And I don't see

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 4>a response from him. So this is this case is ongoing.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's just bring Trudy back in at this point because

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 3>she's still with us listening in and Trudy, thank you.

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 3>There's the final few minutes we'll ask of you before

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 3>we let you get back to your real job. In

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 3>a case like this, and we've heard a couple of others.

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Now we had the case of the genes that were ripped.

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I've had Williams saying his puffer jacket was was damaged

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 3>by the edge of a sharp edge of a metal

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 3>strip in a store as well. In a case like this,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 3>is the store liable to compensate for the damage? And

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, are they how much are they liable to compensate?

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Do they need to if you're wearing an old pair

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 3>of jeans, do they need to buy you a new

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 3>pair of jeans to replace them, or your second ad

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 3>page to replace them?

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>How does it work?

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So the basic principle is that where you are negligent,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 5>and negligence can be a proactive action or it can

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 5>be an omission, and that can also be the way

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 5>in which your environment is set up. Like the sharp

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 5>piece of meat. All of those could indicate neglegends, and

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 5>negligence is where you fall short of the required standard

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 5>of care that one should have for especially if you're

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 5>a retailer and you allow members of the public into

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 5>your space, then there's a standard of care where you

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 5>need to be careful to look out for other safety. Okay,

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 5>so as soon as these negligence, and to my mind

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 5>it's Christal clear in all three cases the genes, the

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 5>plant paints, planters situation, and the sharp piece of metal

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 5>that there was neglegends. In that case, the law says

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 5>that you must pay money to correct the situation as

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:48.719
<v Speaker 5>though you were never negligend. So if the shop had

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 5>never been negligend, then Margaret would would still have her

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 5>sketches and paints and a handbag that were clean and usable.

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 5>That's not the case. The easy way to to to

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 5>rEFInd her is with a new equivalent. That's strictly speaking,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 5>I suppose if those were all the clothes, the shop

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 5>could require her to find an equivalent secondhand pair. Just

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 5>for practical purposes, we replas with new things because those

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 5>are easily accessible and and you can find them, and

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 5>it's very difficult to find a secondhand equivalent of what

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 5>you had. So and that's basically how how it plays out. Normally,

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 5>if it's possible to repair the goods that were that

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 5>were damaged as a result of the neck legends, the

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 5>shop is only liable for a repair if that repair

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 5>renders the goods as good as they were before the

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 5>neg legends kicked in. So one doesn't I mean, you're

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 5>not require to walk around with a stained handbag or

0:32:55.800 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, clear clothing or whatever. Yeah, in that case

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 5>they must replace it with a new equivalent.

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I should say that the the what I could see

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 4>in the photographs of the pants and the shoes is

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 4>that they're not It's not just a huge artistic sort of.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Splatter pollock these spots.

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, I wouldn't be happy to walk around

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 4>with spots of paint on my clothing. It would they

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't wouldn't feel the same to me. And do you

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 4>think it's a reasonable expectation that they get replaced because

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 4>they are stained.

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, truly, I want to say such a huge thank

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 3>you to you for giving such a big chunk of

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 3>your time to us the softernoon in bits and pieces

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>We so appreciate your.

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Patients in bearing with us and as always appreciate your

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 3>advice to our listeners.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for no problem at all. If I can say

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 5>to you to Margaret, go to the Small Claims Court

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 5>or report the matter to the Office of the Consumer Protector,

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 5>which you can find under the provincial government's website, you

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 5>can just drop an email to them and they'll start

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 5>investigating a free of charge for all of us taxpayers

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 5>in the Western cap make use of the service and

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 5>these a newly formed consumer Affairs Tribunal which will hear

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 5>the matter if it isn't resolved by the Office of

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 5>the Consumer Protector, and all of that should play out

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 5>with art you needing lawyers or anything like that.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for that helpful advice as well.

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 3>Consumer attorney Trudy Brookman Well, a huge thank you to

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Wendy Nola as always, and reminder that if you want

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 3>to lodge a case with her, the best thing to

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 3>do is go to her website Wendynola dot co dot

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>z spelt k nw l e er and fill out

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the contact form there, which really will prompt you for

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 3>all of the information that is needed. Wendy will chat

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 3>again next week Wednesday.

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, thanks,