WEBVTT - Consumer Talk: Sensodyne toothpaste changes

0:00:03.810 --> 0:00:06.190
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Wendy Nola, who is with us in studio and

0:00:06.230 --> 0:00:08.070
<v Speaker 1>standing by for today's Consumer Talk.

0:00:08.100 --> 0:00:09.070
<v Speaker 2>Always good to have you with us.

0:00:09.340 --> 0:00:11.340
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Pippa. I love being here. Good.

0:00:11.500 --> 0:00:14.180
<v Speaker 1>We have a follow-up from last week's fingerprint story, and

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.020
<v Speaker 1>then we're going to tackle a listener question about the

0:00:16.060 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>changes in Sensodyne toothpaste. Already had some listeners responding to

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that one. And you can do so if you've been

0:00:22.660 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>using the product for years and you've noticed the change

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:26.459
<v Speaker 1>and you want to tell us whether you like it,

0:00:26.900 --> 0:00:29.950
<v Speaker 1>can't stand it, merely tolerate it or what you think,

0:00:30.300 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>send a WhatsApp to 0725671567. Already an open line question

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.500
<v Speaker 1>in already around cat food. I hope we'll have time

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.100
<v Speaker 1>to get to that one a little bit later on too.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.780
<v Speaker 1>For now, though, let's start with the fingerprint follow-up. And

0:00:43.900 --> 0:00:46.020
<v Speaker 1>just for those who weren't listening last week or who

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>need a reminder, we shared with you a question raised

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:51.780
<v Speaker 1>by our listener, Thomas, who was having a real battle

0:00:52.330 --> 0:00:55.510
<v Speaker 1>over fingerprint verification. He had been a client of Standard

0:00:55.530 --> 0:00:58.340
<v Speaker 1>Bank for 30 years and more, but was suddenly having

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>difficulty accessing bank services both in branch and on the

0:01:02.380 --> 0:01:05.130
<v Speaker 1>app because he was being told his thumbprints couldn't be

0:01:05.190 --> 0:01:08.890
<v Speaker 1>verified against Home Affairs records. And the bank gave him

0:01:08.930 --> 0:01:12.690
<v Speaker 1>a form asking for verification of biometric info and told

0:01:12.750 --> 0:01:15.709
<v Speaker 1>him to take it to Home Affairs. And Thomas refused.

0:01:15.750 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>He said, you need to sort it out. I'm your customer.

0:01:18.660 --> 0:01:20.660
<v Speaker 2>This is a bank problem. You must fix it.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.580
<v Speaker 1>And actually, in the end, Home Affairs confirmed it wasn't

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>necessary for Thomas to go into them with that form.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>They said nothing wrong on this end. The prints on

0:01:29.300 --> 0:01:32.110
<v Speaker 1>record for him are just fine. This is an internal

0:01:32.170 --> 0:01:35.750
<v Speaker 1>banking issue. First thing, Wendy, we heard last week that

0:01:35.770 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>there was hope Thomas was getting sorted out.

0:01:37.620 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Did that happen?

0:01:38.500 --> 0:01:40.900
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed. I'm happy to report he went to the

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:46.270
<v Speaker 3>Kenilworth branch of Standard Bank to re-enroll, redo his fingerprints.

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.170
<v Speaker 3>It took him less than 15 minutes. He said, compare

0:01:49.210 --> 0:01:51.390
<v Speaker 3>the time and bother to go to the Department of

0:01:51.450 --> 0:01:51.910
<v Speaker 3>Home Affairs.

0:01:51.930 --> 0:01:52.010
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:52.910 --> 0:01:55.230
<v Speaker 3>He said it was our show and not his two

0:01:55.270 --> 0:02:00.230
<v Speaker 3>months worth of increasingly exasperated efforts that got the bank's attention.

0:02:00.390 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>In fact, a complaints manager phoned him while we were

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.340
<v Speaker 3>on air with this subject last week. So his verdict

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 3>is the fingerprint issue should.

0:02:07.700 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Never have happened.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 3>They realize it now. It was a management customer service

0:02:11.860 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 3>and IT failure. He says the Kenilworth branch and an

0:02:15.419 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 3>area manager indicated to him that they'd be updating fingerprints

0:02:18.700 --> 0:02:21.500
<v Speaker 3>for customers who have problems such as this. But he says,

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm staying with Standard Bank. They eventually did rectify the

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.260
<v Speaker 3>problems and they appeared to be very apologetic.

0:02:27.380 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so all's well that ends well for Thomas. That's

0:02:29.620 --> 0:02:32.150
<v Speaker 1>good news indeed. But Wendy, of course, during our chat

0:02:32.210 --> 0:02:34.990
<v Speaker 1>last week, our phone lines lit up with similar complaints,

0:02:35.050 --> 0:02:38.530
<v Speaker 1>not just other Standard Bank customers, but also from Nedbank

0:02:38.610 --> 0:02:42.250
<v Speaker 1>and Capitec and FNB, all having the same problem, being

0:02:42.310 --> 0:02:45.510
<v Speaker 1>told your prints can't be verified. So you've gone back

0:02:45.550 --> 0:02:49.550
<v Speaker 1>and had further engagement with Home Affairs after that trend emerged.

0:02:49.610 --> 0:02:50.669
<v Speaker 1>What did you have to say?

0:02:51.190 --> 0:02:54.530
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I sent an email to Carly van Wyk, who's

0:02:54.590 --> 0:02:59.510
<v Speaker 3>the spokesperson for Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber. And She

0:02:59.610 --> 0:03:02.130
<v Speaker 3>called me earlier in the week, Monday, I think it was,

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:08.220
<v Speaker 3>and said yes to the question of could this fingerprint issue,

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 3>in other words, we spoke about it, you don't have

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:14.170
<v Speaker 3>great fingerprints at your tender age. And a lot of

0:03:14.230 --> 0:03:19.130
<v Speaker 3>people through age and through manual labor, their fingerprints either

0:03:19.169 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 3>can't register anymore on the biometric scanners or They're very,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:28.510
<v Speaker 3>very different. And she said, yes, that is possible, meaning

0:03:28.750 --> 0:03:32.930
<v Speaker 3>that they then don't match what's at Home Affairs. And

0:03:32.950 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 3>I asked, what's the remedy? So she says, zip it.

0:03:38.490 --> 0:03:40.670
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, before we get to this, again, the puzzling thing

0:03:40.710 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>here is that is not what the issue was with Thomas.

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.339
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't, and this is not always the case.

0:03:46.380 --> 0:03:48.660
<v Speaker 3>She said to me actually at the beginning of our conversation,

0:03:48.940 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 3>opening words, I think we're conflating a few issues here.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:03:52.180 --> 0:03:56.470
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so hopefully we will leave people, listeners, with more

0:03:56.530 --> 0:03:59.150
<v Speaker 3>answers than questions by the end of this segment.

0:03:59.170 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Okay, so people can lose their fingerprints as they age,

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.260
<v Speaker 1>but that is not what is causing all of the

0:04:07.300 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>problems that people are having. There does seem to be

0:04:09.980 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>some kind of internal issue with the reading of prints.

0:04:12.940 --> 0:04:16.670
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and even if that's the case, there are two

0:04:17.170 --> 0:04:21.110
<v Speaker 3>easy fixes. Number one, the banks don't have to insist

0:04:21.190 --> 0:04:24.710
<v Speaker 3>on biometric verification anymore. somebody with a smart card or

0:04:24.790 --> 0:04:28.349
<v Speaker 3>even a green book ID, that should be verification enough.

0:04:28.430 --> 0:04:30.890
<v Speaker 3>It's not like Home Affairs is saying to the banks,

0:04:31.110 --> 0:04:31.370
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:04:31.650 --> 0:04:32.450
<v Speaker 2>You can't accept this.

0:04:32.470 --> 0:04:35.730
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a decision they're taking. And so that should

0:04:35.750 --> 0:04:39.690
<v Speaker 3>have been a quick fix for Thomas. And also, I

0:04:39.710 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 3>think those forms haven't kept up with what's actually happening.

0:04:42.660 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>I think at branch level, they're not with it because

0:04:45.740 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 3>now we have myhomeaffairsonline.dha.gov. which is a portal that you

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.140
<v Speaker 3>can go on to. You look for your bank, and

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 3>ideally it should be your bank. Do you remember when

0:05:00.420 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 3>one of our listeners says it can be any bank?

0:05:02.100 --> 0:05:04.430
<v Speaker 3>And Carly from Vag said, yes, some banks will do

0:05:04.470 --> 0:05:07.470
<v Speaker 3>it as a service for other banks' clients, but ideally

0:05:07.490 --> 0:05:10.870
<v Speaker 3>Home Affairs would like you to go to your bank.

0:05:11.050 --> 0:05:13.030
<v Speaker 3>So you choose. In Thomas' case, it would have been

0:05:13.070 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Standard Bank. And then all the participating banks that have

0:05:17.339 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 3>partnered with Home Affairs as an application center, basically.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:21.700
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:05:22.220 --> 0:05:24.339
<v Speaker 3>You choose one of those. You don't make an appointment,

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.340
<v Speaker 3>which is the most delicious part. You go in. And

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.820
<v Speaker 3>in this case of, well, Thomas, it was 15 minutes.

0:05:30.420 --> 0:05:34.470
<v Speaker 3>They basically act as agents for Home Affairs. So they

0:05:34.550 --> 0:05:39.110
<v Speaker 3>capture your fingerprints. They can do your face, the form

0:05:39.150 --> 0:05:42.330
<v Speaker 3>and everything. And that's if you're applying for an ID.

0:05:42.430 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 3>But in this case, if you're having problems with your fingerprints,

0:05:45.300 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 3>that biometric information is then shared with Home Affairs. It

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>goes to Home Affairs directly.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:51.980
<v Speaker 2>Right, okay.

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.210
<v Speaker 3>So giving you a form and telling you to go

0:05:54.250 --> 0:05:58.530
<v Speaker 3>and stay in Home Affairs is not required anymore at all. Okay.

0:05:58.589 --> 0:06:01.430
<v Speaker 3>So number one, they don't really need the biometrics. It's

0:06:01.490 --> 0:06:03.750
<v Speaker 3>their own thing. If someone's having a problem, they can

0:06:03.850 --> 0:06:06.930
<v Speaker 3>choose to say, as they have done for decades, okay,

0:06:06.970 --> 0:06:07.860
<v Speaker 3>your ID is enough.

0:06:07.890 --> 0:06:09.380
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how do we verify you another way?

0:06:09.420 --> 0:06:12.659
<v Speaker 3>But it is a good idea for Home Affairs. They

0:06:12.700 --> 0:06:17.060
<v Speaker 3>call it their biometric store, which I love. It's my

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.620
<v Speaker 3>term of the week. it's a good idea for your

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.420
<v Speaker 3>fingerprints to be up to date. So all you have

0:06:23.460 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 3>to do, as I say, go to myhomeaffairsonline.dha.gov. Did I

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:29.660
<v Speaker 3>leave something else? Here we go.

0:06:29.660 --> 0:06:33.659
<v Speaker 2>It's myhomeaffairsonline.dha.gov.za.

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:34.610
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I left out the.

0:06:34.540 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Za. Sorry.

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:41.710
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so myhomeaffairsonline.dha.gov.za. There you'll find the list of all

0:06:41.750 --> 0:06:45.409
<v Speaker 1>the participating banks which have been equipped with those biometric

0:06:45.450 --> 0:06:48.750
<v Speaker 1>capturing systems and are aligned with Home Affairs. And you

0:06:48.790 --> 0:06:51.790
<v Speaker 1>go into one of those, preferably... one that is aligned

0:06:51.810 --> 0:06:54.580
<v Speaker 1>with your own bank and you can re-scan your fingerprints.

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.180
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Mark writing in to say, I'm a rock climber.

0:06:57.260 --> 0:06:59.980
<v Speaker 1>I frequently have an issue with fingerprint biometrics because of

0:07:00.020 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>my worn fingertips.

0:07:01.460 --> 0:07:02.980
<v Speaker 2>We need other options.

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.850
<v Speaker 1>Can you use eyes or face? Well, Mark, the point

0:07:05.900 --> 0:07:08.089
<v Speaker 1>is that Home Affairs are saying there are other options.

0:07:08.130 --> 0:07:11.570
<v Speaker 1>There's your ID book, your smart ID card, and that

0:07:11.630 --> 0:07:14.570
<v Speaker 1>is good enough as verification that you are who you

0:07:14.630 --> 0:07:17.540
<v Speaker 1>say you are. So if your bank is saying to you, sorry,

0:07:17.940 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we can't verify you for the app because your fingerprints

0:07:20.220 --> 0:07:23.060
<v Speaker 1>aren't reading properly. You must push back because that's not

0:07:23.100 --> 0:07:23.860
<v Speaker 1>the only way.

0:07:23.740 --> 0:07:25.260
<v Speaker 2>To verify you are who you say you are.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. And one point that Carly van Veek of DHA made,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.500
<v Speaker 3>and I should repeat, is that actually because they've turned

0:07:33.570 --> 0:07:37.270
<v Speaker 3>so many bank branches into centres where you can apply

0:07:37.310 --> 0:07:43.790
<v Speaker 3>for your ID, the Department of Home Affairs branches are

0:07:44.250 --> 0:07:45.530
<v Speaker 3>less busy than they used to be.

0:07:45.870 --> 0:07:46.730
<v Speaker 2>Used to be, yeah.

0:07:46.790 --> 0:07:49.500
<v Speaker 3>In the last few months that has eased up. That's fantastic.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 3>But it's still easier to go to a bank branch

0:07:51.180 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 3>than to go to.

0:07:51.580 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>… Of course.

0:07:52.380 --> 0:07:55.180
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, this was the whole point, is take

0:07:55.260 --> 0:07:59.230
<v Speaker 1>off the pressure of this mundane … Yes. easy checkbox

0:07:59.270 --> 0:08:01.690
<v Speaker 1>affair that should be an in and out capture and go.

0:08:02.210 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Take that pressure off the home affairs branches which need

0:08:04.580 --> 0:08:08.700
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the more complex issues and let them

0:08:08.740 --> 0:08:11.340
<v Speaker 1>focus on that. So if you are having this issue

0:08:11.380 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with your bank and whether it is a case of

0:08:13.140 --> 0:08:16.170
<v Speaker 1>some weird bank internal IT glitch like Thomas had or

0:08:16.230 --> 0:08:18.810
<v Speaker 1>if it's a case of an actual worn fingerprint, either way,

0:08:19.230 --> 0:08:21.770
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to go to home affairs. First, ask

0:08:21.810 --> 0:08:25.150
<v Speaker 1>your bank to please use an alternative verification. That is

0:08:25.230 --> 0:08:29.950
<v Speaker 1>the phrasing to use is is use alternative verification processes.

0:08:30.390 --> 0:08:33.150
<v Speaker 1>And if they still tell you they can't verify you, well,

0:08:33.190 --> 0:08:36.410
<v Speaker 1>then you want to go and get your fingerprints recaptured

0:08:36.730 --> 0:08:45.910
<v Speaker 1>within the banking system. One more time, that website is myhomeaffairsonline.dha.gov.za. Yeah,

0:08:45.950 --> 0:08:50.310
<v Speaker 1>Di says, how often are the print scanners cleaned? I

0:08:50.330 --> 0:08:54.010
<v Speaker 1>suggested this to Standard Bank recently. Suddenly, my thumbprint was

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.660
<v Speaker 1>readable in that case. She told it wasn't readable, but

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.300
<v Speaker 1>the scanner itself was mucky.

0:08:59.420 --> 0:09:03.660
<v Speaker 3>In my experience, I mean, I recently had to apply

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:08.099
<v Speaker 3>for a visa earlier this year. And the woman capturing

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.790
<v Speaker 3>the fingerprints was wiping after every person scrupulously. And that's

0:09:12.850 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 3>obviously to prevent... some kind of minuscule amount of dirt

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 3>from messing with the capture.

0:09:18.460 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>It's very easy if you touched your face, you've got

0:09:20.980 --> 0:09:23.220
<v Speaker 1>a bit of makeup on your print. I mean, I

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.380
<v Speaker 1>struggle with it getting into our scanners to get access

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.370
<v Speaker 1>to the work building sometime if I put cream on

0:09:27.380 --> 0:09:30.310
<v Speaker 1>my hands, for example. So it's a fair point. Ask

0:09:30.330 --> 0:09:32.709
<v Speaker 1>them if it's not reading, check that they've actually cleaned

0:09:32.750 --> 0:09:33.250
<v Speaker 1>the screen.

0:09:33.270 --> 0:09:34.090
<v Speaker 3>So good practical tip.

0:09:34.110 --> 0:09:36.690
<v Speaker 1>That is scanning your fingerprint before you assume it's the

0:09:36.730 --> 0:09:37.530
<v Speaker 1>fingerprint itself.

0:09:37.590 --> 0:09:38.510
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate that one.

0:09:39.300 --> 0:09:39.620
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.060
<v Speaker 1>I think we can leave the fingerprints there and move

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on to toothpaste gate.

0:09:44.179 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say I'm actually grateful to Thomas

0:09:46.300 --> 0:09:51.140
<v Speaker 3>for raising that because I spoke about it on 702

0:09:51.140 --> 0:09:53.809
<v Speaker 3>last Thursday. Yes. I've just as a throwaway to say

0:09:53.850 --> 0:09:55.410
<v Speaker 3>this is, if this has happened to you, this is,

0:09:55.809 --> 0:09:58.970
<v Speaker 3>you know, my home affairs online. And I had another

0:09:59.010 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 3>topic lined up and the listeners just took the rest

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 3>of the show. Me too.

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:03.940
<v Speaker 2>With the same problem.

0:10:03.980 --> 0:10:06.900
<v Speaker 3>Same thing. So it's, it's raised a lot of things.

0:10:06.940 --> 0:10:09.900
<v Speaker 3>I think the banks, these forms don't need to exist anymore.

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.420
<v Speaker 3>They shouldn't be handing out these forms.

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:11.660
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:10:12.500 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's sort of a home affairs problem

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.140
<v Speaker 1>and get them off our hands, sort of knee jerk reaction.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.340
<v Speaker 1>But please push back if they try it on you.

0:10:20.420 --> 0:10:21.470
<v Speaker 2>OK, great.

0:10:21.500 --> 0:10:21.850
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:10:22.230 --> 0:10:22.530
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:10:22.550 --> 0:10:25.990
<v Speaker 1>So let's park the fingerprints and move on to toothpaste gate,

0:10:26.030 --> 0:10:28.689
<v Speaker 1>as I'm saying very sarcastically. I mean, I said at

0:10:28.710 --> 0:10:30.750
<v Speaker 1>the start of the show, Wendy, I hope Sensodyne isn't

0:10:30.809 --> 0:10:31.770
<v Speaker 1>the new ProNutro.

0:10:32.110 --> 0:10:34.150
<v Speaker 2>Not quite.

0:10:34.170 --> 0:10:36.910
<v Speaker 3>It's a reformulation stage.

0:10:37.050 --> 0:10:40.429
<v Speaker 1>It's another longstanding popular product that has suddenly had a

0:10:40.610 --> 0:10:43.860
<v Speaker 1>recipe update, shall we say, that has actually fundamentally changed

0:10:43.940 --> 0:10:46.699
<v Speaker 1>the experience of the product. And I hope it's not

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>going to meet the same fate as ProNutro did. Wendy,

0:10:50.020 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>set the scene for us. Tell us what happened and

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:53.460
<v Speaker 1>why we're talking about this today.

0:10:53.540 --> 0:10:55.860
<v Speaker 3>So our listener, Andrew Kandem, wrote to us a week

0:10:55.900 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>or so ago. He has sensitive teeth and calls himself

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.820
<v Speaker 3>a loyal Sensodyne customer. A few months ago, he.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.860
<v Speaker 2>Bought his usual variant.

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.090
<v Speaker 3>There are many of them called Sensodyne Repair and Protect.

0:11:10.610 --> 0:11:13.930
<v Speaker 3>He opened the sealed box and tube and he found

0:11:13.950 --> 0:11:17.010
<v Speaker 3>a gel, a blue one at that and not the

0:11:17.050 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 3>white paste that he was used to. So the wording

0:11:20.220 --> 0:11:22.449
<v Speaker 3>on the pack looked the same. He said apart from

0:11:22.490 --> 0:11:26.770
<v Speaker 3>a new deep repair label and a DNA strand printing,

0:11:27.309 --> 0:11:30.349
<v Speaker 3>he used the tube, but he felt that it, well,

0:11:30.550 --> 0:11:32.670
<v Speaker 3>entirely used all the contents, but he felt it didn't

0:11:32.690 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 3>quite give him the same protection as the paste. So

0:11:36.050 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 3>he bought another repair and protect, plus a Sensodyne sensitivity

0:11:40.700 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and gum, another variant, thinking the first one might have

0:11:43.420 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>been packed in error. Both were gels, blue gels. So

0:11:47.100 --> 0:11:49.339
<v Speaker 3>back at Clicks, the manager told him that the manufacturer

0:11:49.380 --> 0:11:51.579
<v Speaker 3>had changed the product and that he wasn't the only

0:11:51.620 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 3>customer to complain about that. She told him to email

0:11:54.380 --> 0:11:58.630
<v Speaker 3>the manufacturer, Hellion, as she told the others that had complained.

0:11:59.130 --> 0:12:02.410
<v Speaker 3>And Andrew's question to us was, which of the Sensadan

0:12:02.470 --> 0:12:05.810
<v Speaker 3>toothpaste products can I now rely on to give me

0:12:05.830 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 3>the protection I trusted previously with the paste? I think

0:12:09.980 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to a toothpaste that's catering for people

0:12:13.420 --> 0:12:15.689
<v Speaker 3>with sensitive teeth, in other words, they feel good. I

0:12:15.730 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 3>suppose they can reliably say, my teeth feel different after

0:12:22.940 --> 0:12:25.580
<v Speaker 3>using it. My teeth felt better than the other one

0:12:25.620 --> 0:12:28.020
<v Speaker 3>rather than the other claims, which you really, as consumers …

0:12:28.260 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Quite hard to … Quite hard.

0:12:30.140 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, are they?

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.219
<v Speaker 3>How do you tell? So, it's an interesting product. And

0:12:34.740 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 3>if you look at … The amount of space that

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.010
<v Speaker 3>Sensodyne and all its variants occupy and your average clicks

0:12:42.050 --> 0:12:45.670
<v Speaker 3>or discount or whatever, it's a very important and popular product.

0:12:45.870 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so interesting already. Some responses then from listeners. Before

0:12:49.030 --> 0:12:52.540
<v Speaker 1>we talk about your engagement with Halion, no lean writing

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in to say, I can't stand the new Sensodyne taste.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Please go back to the original. So there's a flavor

0:12:58.020 --> 0:12:58.590
<v Speaker 2>issue there.

0:12:59.490 --> 0:13:01.910
<v Speaker 1>We had another person, it was Lynn who wrote in

0:13:01.970 --> 0:13:05.630
<v Speaker 1>to say, I've used Sensodyne repair toothpaste for many years

0:13:05.690 --> 0:13:08.010
<v Speaker 1>now and I've always been very pleased with it. But

0:13:08.050 --> 0:13:10.230
<v Speaker 1>the last time I used it about six months ago,

0:13:10.710 --> 0:13:14.110
<v Speaker 1>obviously something has changed. It now causes the tissue inside

0:13:14.150 --> 0:13:17.150
<v Speaker 1>my mouth to come away and looks like a white

0:13:17.290 --> 0:13:20.510
<v Speaker 1>sticky goo is her comment. It's not painful, but it

0:13:20.590 --> 0:13:23.510
<v Speaker 1>looks awful. And I have found the most expensive one,

0:13:23.550 --> 0:13:27.670
<v Speaker 1>the Sensodyne clinical repair is fine. Some other brands do

0:13:27.710 --> 0:13:31.309
<v Speaker 1>this to me too. So that's a slightly different variation

0:13:31.330 --> 0:13:34.189
<v Speaker 1>because the white sticky goo is very different from the

0:13:34.230 --> 0:13:36.650
<v Speaker 1>blue gel that we've had described to us.

0:13:36.670 --> 0:13:38.940
<v Speaker 2>But maybe that's a different iteration of the product she's

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:39.180
<v Speaker 2>been using.

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:40.740
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as I said, there are many variants.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:47.220
<v Speaker 3>If she would like to email that to me with

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.550
<v Speaker 3>as much detail when she bought, she did six months ago.

0:13:50.730 --> 0:13:50.910
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 3>I would like to pose that to Helene as well. Okay.

0:13:55.020 --> 0:13:59.740
<v Speaker 1>So, Lynn, a follow-up email, please, to pippah at capetalk.co.za.

0:14:00.620 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You said it was the Sensodyne Repair Toothpaste. You said

0:14:04.820 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>about six months ago. Could you tell us exactly which

0:14:07.420 --> 0:14:10.010
<v Speaker 1>variant you bought at what store? A little bit more

0:14:10.050 --> 0:14:13.650
<v Speaker 1>information and Wendy will probe that. I mean, look, Andrew

0:14:13.690 --> 0:14:16.860
<v Speaker 1>sent us photographs. He had done his diligence, really. He

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>took photographs of the ingredient lists on the new tube

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>versus the old tube of the repair and protect one.

0:14:23.620 --> 0:14:25.970
<v Speaker 1>And Wendy, tell us a little bit about what you

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.370
<v Speaker 1>looked at and what you saw when comparing those photographs.

0:14:29.390 --> 0:14:34.670
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so titanium dioxide, which makes toothpaste white, is gone.

0:14:35.290 --> 0:14:36.050
<v Speaker 2>In the new version?

0:14:36.070 --> 0:14:40.150
<v Speaker 3>Yes. So Helen told me back when we were querying

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.180
<v Speaker 3>the new Aquafish, I said, is it a regulatory requirement

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 3>that you've taken it out? And they said no.

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:14:47.460 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 3>So the new version, I don't know if it's in

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.460
<v Speaker 3>every variant because I wasn't told that, but I think

0:14:53.500 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of the variants, it's a blue color

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:59.350
<v Speaker 3>and silica. And a number of flavor oils have been added,

0:14:59.390 --> 0:15:01.030
<v Speaker 3>which I think, was it Linda who said she can't

0:15:01.050 --> 0:15:01.750
<v Speaker 3>stand the new taste?

0:15:01.770 --> 0:15:02.030
<v Speaker 4>Nolene.

0:15:02.150 --> 0:15:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Nolene, sorry. So they've added menthol, peppermint oil, and eucalyptus oil,

0:15:08.380 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 3>which strike me as quite typical toothpaste flavors.

0:15:10.820 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but eucalyptus isn't a quiet taste. I know a

0:15:12.860 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't like it. So that might explain

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:15.470
<v Speaker 1>why there is.

0:15:16.950 --> 0:15:20.250
<v Speaker 1>An issue with the flavor there. Okay, so it's partly

0:15:20.290 --> 0:15:23.450
<v Speaker 1>a change of ingredients. So the titanium dioxide gone.

0:15:23.470 --> 0:15:23.750
<v Speaker 3>Gone.

0:15:24.170 --> 0:15:25.470
<v Speaker 2>Well, not in its place, but.

0:15:25.490 --> 0:15:27.290
<v Speaker 3>Flavorant added.

0:15:27.370 --> 0:15:28.670
<v Speaker 2>Flavorant added.

0:15:28.790 --> 0:15:33.370
<v Speaker 3>And then the same active ingredients remain, novamin and 1,450

0:15:33.370 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>parts per....

0:15:37.730 --> 0:15:39.610
<v Speaker 2>Millimeter. Okay, of fluoride.

0:15:39.670 --> 0:15:40.530
<v Speaker 3>Of fluoride, yeah.

0:15:40.630 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so the active ingredients are the same. They've added color,

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they've added flavor, they've taken away the titanium dioxide and

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>also a change in where it's being produced. Wendy, the

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.220
<v Speaker 1>new tube made in Slovakia where it used to be

0:15:51.260 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>made in the UK. Okay, so those are the changes

0:15:54.460 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on the boxes and we are going to talk a

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.540
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about Halion's response as to why and

0:16:00.110 --> 0:16:01.890
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about the reason for this change

0:16:02.030 --> 0:16:04.070
<v Speaker 1>after the news. Before we get to that, though, we've

0:16:04.110 --> 0:16:07.590
<v Speaker 1>immediately had a voice note in from Vera, who I

0:16:07.610 --> 0:16:11.050
<v Speaker 1>think following up on Lynn's comment about the change six

0:16:11.130 --> 0:16:13.630
<v Speaker 1>months ago and the problems in her mouth. Let's take

0:16:13.670 --> 0:16:15.770
<v Speaker 1>a quick listen to Vera's voice note before we got

0:16:15.790 --> 0:16:16.130
<v Speaker 1>her news.

0:16:17.340 --> 0:16:19.700
<v Speaker 5>I had the same issue with Sensodyne as Helen has

0:16:19.740 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 5>about six months ago. The variant that I used also

0:16:23.020 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 5>started creating issues inside of the lining of my mouth

0:16:26.060 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 5>and it didn't feel as great on my teeth anymore.

0:16:29.230 --> 0:16:32.430
<v Speaker 5>It had a texture change and a slight flavor change.

0:16:33.150 --> 0:16:36.710
<v Speaker 5>I have been on Oral-B ever since. And sorry, Sensodyne,

0:16:37.030 --> 0:16:37.730
<v Speaker 5>I'm not coming back.

0:16:38.430 --> 0:16:38.650
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:16:38.750 --> 0:16:40.710
<v Speaker 2>Okay, wow. So that's the second one saying.

0:16:40.990 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I must definitely take that.

0:16:41.740 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Definitely look into that one. Basil saying, I've stopped using

0:16:44.980 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Sensodyne toothpaste. The new formulation is terrible. And I would

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.390
<v Speaker 1>recommend another brand. Recommended to be by my dentist called Elmex,

0:16:52.510 --> 0:16:55.410
<v Speaker 1>which is better than the old Sensodyne in Basil's opinion.

0:16:56.350 --> 0:16:59.250
<v Speaker 1>Carol also saying she has switched to the Clix version

0:16:59.290 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>for sensitive teeth and finding that works for her. But

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>she says maybe my teeth aren't as sensitive as others.

0:17:06.300 --> 0:17:09.179
<v Speaker 1>Who else have we got here? Kenton saying, I've had

0:17:09.220 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the same experience. I've been using it for years. The

0:17:11.740 --> 0:17:13.990
<v Speaker 1>last time I bought it, it was the blue color,

0:17:14.030 --> 0:17:16.770
<v Speaker 1>which I'm not crazy about. I really would prefer white.

0:17:16.910 --> 0:17:17.170
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:17:17.510 --> 0:17:20.890
<v Speaker 1>So again, there are flavor complaints. There are texture complaints.

0:17:20.930 --> 0:17:23.510
<v Speaker 1>There are color complaints. And I think the most alarming

0:17:23.550 --> 0:17:26.420
<v Speaker 1>is the one about impacting the inner lining of the mouth.

0:17:28.580 --> 0:17:29.220
<v Speaker 2>Cape Talk.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:30.620
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Talk.

0:17:30.980 --> 0:17:32.220
<v Speaker 2>WhatsApp on 072-567-1567.

0:17:37.850 --> 0:17:40.190
<v Speaker 1>That is the number to use for a WhatsApp to

0:17:40.750 --> 0:17:43.109
<v Speaker 1>raise a consumer issue and lots of people commenting on

0:17:43.130 --> 0:17:44.909
<v Speaker 1>the Sensodyne issue. And let me share a few of

0:17:44.950 --> 0:17:48.420
<v Speaker 1>those messages, Wendy, before we talk about your engagement with

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Halion who make the product. Eileen writes, I have the

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.270
<v Speaker 1>same problem with the skin coming off in my mouth.

0:17:56.869 --> 0:18:00.379
<v Speaker 1>I've tried many different brands of toothpaste. And she has

0:18:00.420 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>found that the Sensodyne MultiCare doesn't do that, both the

0:18:04.060 --> 0:18:06.150
<v Speaker 1>old and the new version. So she's at least found

0:18:06.170 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a variation that is working for her. It's an issue

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:09.940
<v Speaker 1>she's encountered as well.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:11.540
<v Speaker 3>Can I just jump in and say to anyone who's

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 3>had the same problem, it's very important when I raise

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 3>this as a follow-up query with Helene that I can

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 3>specify a particular variant because I don't know if it's

0:18:20.090 --> 0:18:22.869
<v Speaker 3>all of them since the change or whether it's just some.

0:18:23.030 --> 0:18:24.570
<v Speaker 3>If you could help me out there, that would be

0:18:24.590 --> 0:18:25.050
<v Speaker 3>really appreciated.

0:18:25.070 --> 0:18:26.030
<v Speaker 2>With that level of detail, yeah.

0:18:26.430 --> 0:18:29.070
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's the one issue is the impact on

0:18:29.109 --> 0:18:32.429
<v Speaker 1>the skin lining inside the mouth. Annika's issue is one

0:18:32.450 --> 0:18:36.660
<v Speaker 1>of efficiency. She says the new Sensodyne no longer reduces sensitivity.

0:18:36.740 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind the color or flavor change, but the

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.899
<v Speaker 1>problem is it's no longer doing what it claims on

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.659
<v Speaker 1>the packaging, is her comment. Chantal has also had the

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.609
<v Speaker 1>same problem of peeling in the mouth. She says, I

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.530
<v Speaker 1>cannot use a fluoride toothpaste, but I've always used Sensodyne

0:18:51.570 --> 0:18:55.710
<v Speaker 1>Repair and Protect, which was fine until the change. Now

0:18:55.950 --> 0:18:59.450
<v Speaker 1>she's changed to the Oral-B instead. Colleen says, I too

0:18:59.490 --> 0:19:02.050
<v Speaker 1>was shocked at the blue gel. I don't like the taste.

0:19:02.450 --> 0:19:04.890
<v Speaker 1>My teeth are now more sensitive, which they haven't been

0:19:04.930 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>for many years. Soraya has also stopped using it and

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>switched to Elmex instead. Jill says, I've tried all of

0:19:11.859 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the new variations of Sensodyne and they are awful. The

0:19:14.900 --> 0:19:17.780
<v Speaker 1>white one was far better. I've wasted so much on

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.740
<v Speaker 1>turfing up the unused tubes. I've literally tried all the variants.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:26.100
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So a number of people coming through. Here's one more.

0:19:26.140 --> 0:19:29.770
<v Speaker 1>Lisa's saying, I have an almost furry feeling inside my

0:19:29.810 --> 0:19:31.950
<v Speaker 1>mouth and gums for the last six months. I've been

0:19:32.010 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Googling long-term effects of all my medicine, not even thinking

0:19:35.540 --> 0:19:38.379
<v Speaker 1>that my toothpaste might be causing this effect. But I'm

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>going to change my toothpaste away from Sensodyne and see

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.330
<v Speaker 1>whether the problem disappears. Thank you for raising awareness of this. Well,

0:19:45.350 --> 0:19:47.129
<v Speaker 1>thank you to the listeners who flagged it because it

0:19:47.150 --> 0:19:49.220
<v Speaker 1>was a part of the conversation we didn't know coming in.

0:19:49.230 --> 0:19:49.590
<v Speaker 2>We didn't know.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Again, the complaints that we've been aware of and which

0:19:52.340 --> 0:19:55.490
<v Speaker 1>Wendy has addressed with Hallion were the color change, the

0:19:55.609 --> 0:19:58.970
<v Speaker 1>flavor change, The addition of flavor rinse and then.

0:19:59.390 --> 0:20:01.890
<v Speaker 3>Thomas saying he didn't feel that his teeth were as protected.

0:20:01.910 --> 0:20:03.390
<v Speaker 2>The efficacy of the product. Okay.

0:20:03.770 --> 0:20:06.270
<v Speaker 1>So, Wendy, it's not just Andrew who complained to us.

0:20:06.369 --> 0:20:08.770
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, we can see that from our own WhatsApp line.

0:20:08.790 --> 0:20:10.430
<v Speaker 1>But you also, as you do, went and had a

0:20:10.430 --> 0:20:13.100
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the major consumer websites. And there's

0:20:13.140 --> 0:20:15.419
<v Speaker 1>quite a clear trend there of people complaining about the

0:20:15.460 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>same thing.

0:20:16.020 --> 0:20:16.220
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:20:16.380 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>So, you took all of those complaints and reached out

0:20:18.380 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to Halian for comment. Talk to us a little bit

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:21.459
<v Speaker 1>about that interaction.

0:20:21.740 --> 0:20:26.730
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Okay. So I dealt with Kwara Kakana, who is

0:20:26.790 --> 0:20:30.090
<v Speaker 3>Hellion's corporate affairs manager for the Middle East and Africa,

0:20:30.369 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 3>asking why they made that change. As I said earlier,

0:20:34.140 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 3>it seems like a case of don't fix what ain't broke.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 3>And she said, we make changes to our product formulations

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.940
<v Speaker 3>from time to time. This change was not driven by

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:48.260
<v Speaker 3>any regulatory requirement. Titanium dioxide, she said, is commonly used

0:20:48.340 --> 0:20:50.869
<v Speaker 3>as a white colorant or, I don't even know how

0:20:50.890 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 3>to say that, A pacifier. I think that's it.

0:20:53.619 --> 0:20:53.979
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>In a range of products, thus its removal changed the

0:20:56.859 --> 0:20:59.970
<v Speaker 3>appearance of the toothpaste. And then color was added to

0:21:00.030 --> 0:21:03.500
<v Speaker 3>give the new formulations a consistent and recognizable appearance.

0:21:04.010 --> 0:21:05.790
<v Speaker 2>This change is aesthetic only.

0:21:05.910 --> 0:21:09.370
<v Speaker 3>None of the active ingredients that provide sensitivity relief have

0:21:09.430 --> 0:21:10.170
<v Speaker 3>been changed.

0:21:10.190 --> 0:21:12.550
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's interesting because that doesn't seem to ring true

0:21:12.570 --> 0:21:13.730
<v Speaker 1>with what we heard from listeners.

0:21:13.770 --> 0:21:14.750
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't at all.

0:21:15.770 --> 0:21:18.830
<v Speaker 3>She didn't say why they took out the titanium dioxide

0:21:18.890 --> 0:21:21.250
<v Speaker 3>other than to say that there was no regulation requiring

0:21:21.290 --> 0:21:25.390
<v Speaker 3>them to do that. On its efficacy, she said, while

0:21:25.430 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 3>the changes have affected the product's aesthetic appearance, there has

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:34.590
<v Speaker 3>been no impact on its efficacy or sensitivity protection. I

0:21:34.690 --> 0:21:38.149
<v Speaker 3>asked what evidence they have for that. The response didn't say.

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:46.980
<v Speaker 3>Why a gel replacing a paste? Hellion spoke only about

0:21:47.060 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 3>color and appearance, and there was no mention of the

0:21:49.980 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 3>word texture. Its own packs and social media posts call

0:21:54.700 --> 0:21:58.060
<v Speaker 3>the new product a blue paste, whereas the complainants call

0:21:58.100 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 3>it a gel.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.060
<v Speaker 2>Okay, now … That's all well and good.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about how they've been communicating their product because

0:22:04.580 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you've just referenced their own social media posts. And Wendy,

0:22:07.820 --> 0:22:11.500
<v Speaker 1>it's quite interesting which social media platforms they used and

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.869
<v Speaker 1>how they communicated this change to their customers.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:16.030
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:16.460 --> 0:22:20.459
<v Speaker 3>So I specifically asked about communication because it was one

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.990
<v Speaker 3>of Thomas's gripes. He felt completely blindsided. He bought his

0:22:24.070 --> 0:22:26.389
<v Speaker 3>usual product and there was nothing on the pack screaming

0:22:26.430 --> 0:22:28.270
<v Speaker 3>at him about the changes.

0:22:28.290 --> 0:22:29.210
<v Speaker 2>Mm-hmm.

0:22:29.790 --> 0:22:33.590
<v Speaker 3>The answer to that was customer communication and in-store messaging

0:22:33.670 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 3>introduced towards the end of 2025 alongside coordinated social media

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:44.780
<v Speaker 3>and on-pack communication across variants, which included communication of the

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 3>formulation change on the back of the pack. Well, interestingly,

0:22:47.940 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Thomas's pack didn't have that communication change. So maybe, I

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:22:52.300 --> 0:22:53.619
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that was introduced later on.

0:22:53.660 --> 0:22:53.970
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:22:54.530 --> 0:22:57.409
<v Speaker 3>She sent me pictures. On the back of Repair and

0:22:57.430 --> 0:23:00.899
<v Speaker 3>Protect and Complete Protection boxes in a small panel, it

0:23:00.940 --> 0:23:06.180
<v Speaker 3>says our formulation with the same grade sensitivity protection, comma,

0:23:06.540 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 3>in a blue paste. And on Sensodyne's South African Instagram

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.810
<v Speaker 3>page back in March, there were posts that said a

0:23:14.850 --> 0:23:18.710
<v Speaker 3>new formulation for the Sensodyne range changed from white to blue,

0:23:18.850 --> 0:23:21.149
<v Speaker 3>changed from white to green. So there's obviously some variants

0:23:21.170 --> 0:23:24.570
<v Speaker 3>that are green. And Repair and Protect from white to

0:23:24.609 --> 0:23:28.770
<v Speaker 3>blue paste. They drew between 37 and 49 likes. Now,

0:23:29.210 --> 0:23:31.650
<v Speaker 3>that'll tell you something. A, that there are not a lot.

0:23:31.590 --> 0:23:34.669
<v Speaker 2>Of people paying attention to it. And B, Instagram, really?

0:23:34.770 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>If I was buying a product that had a major

0:23:36.630 --> 0:23:38.940
<v Speaker 1>formulation change, Wendy, the place I would want to see

0:23:38.980 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that advertised was either on the packaging itself or at

0:23:41.740 --> 0:23:44.620
<v Speaker 1>the very least on the shelf where it was being sold.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:44.900
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:23:45.180 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Not on a random social media site. Especially, I would.

0:23:48.180 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Hesitate to say that the target market for this product.

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Is probably not on Instagram. Probably not on Instagram.

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so unusual choice of how they communicated and where

0:23:58.100 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>they communicated it. And they've used posts with things like

0:24:01.500 --> 0:24:06.020
<v Speaker 1>more foam and better cleaning with very small prints, sort

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.940
<v Speaker 1>of comparing it to the old formulation.

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:09.980
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so, I.

0:24:09.980 --> 0:24:12.020
<v Speaker 1>Mean, the bottom line there, Wendy, is they're saying this

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.850
<v Speaker 1>is an aesthetic change only. They are adamant that none

0:24:15.869 --> 0:24:18.630
<v Speaker 1>of the active ingredients have been changed and the sensitivity

0:24:18.690 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>protection should be what it used to be. We're hearing

0:24:22.060 --> 0:24:23.830
<v Speaker 1>from an increasing number of people that it's not in

0:24:23.850 --> 0:24:24.490
<v Speaker 1>their experience.

0:24:24.510 --> 0:24:28.330
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, the users have the final vote

0:24:28.350 --> 0:24:29.930
<v Speaker 3>here because they're feeling it in their mouths.

0:24:30.210 --> 0:24:33.409
<v Speaker 1>Interesting email in from Amber says, I'm experiencing everything you

0:24:33.450 --> 0:24:36.630
<v Speaker 1>have mentioned with regards to Sensodyne. The white goo inside

0:24:36.670 --> 0:24:39.729
<v Speaker 1>the mouth is caused by the epithelial cells sloughing off

0:24:39.770 --> 0:24:42.780
<v Speaker 1>from the inner cheek. I believe that this is caused

0:24:42.859 --> 0:24:45.220
<v Speaker 1>by sodium lauryl sulfate.

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 2>In the toothpaste.

0:24:45.380 --> 0:24:47.860
<v Speaker 1>So maybe the people you've experienced that have a particular

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.419
<v Speaker 1>sensitivity to that ingredient.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:50.979
<v Speaker 2>So that white goo.

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:55.470
<v Speaker 1>Is actually your own inner lining of the skin. Amber, thanks.

0:24:55.510 --> 0:25:00.250
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's an addition we were not aware of at all. Yeah,

0:25:00.270 --> 0:25:00.910
<v Speaker 2>Vera's just.

0:25:00.810 --> 0:25:04.190
<v Speaker 1>Saying, no one follows social media for toothpaste. She says,

0:25:04.670 --> 0:25:06.850
<v Speaker 1>I was at the dentist two weeks ago. The receptionist

0:25:06.910 --> 0:25:08.950
<v Speaker 1>told me that the style of the paste was new,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but there was nothing on the packaging or display at

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the dentist. It was the receptionist who told me to

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.850
<v Speaker 1>take samples. And I said, no, thank you, because it

0:25:16.869 --> 0:25:20.890
<v Speaker 1>was Sensodyne. OK, so and then another one from Anne

0:25:21.630 --> 0:25:24.209
<v Speaker 1>saying she's also wondering now because she said, I've developed

0:25:24.250 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a sore on my gum and a funny feeling on

0:25:26.500 --> 0:25:29.500
<v Speaker 1>my teeth after brushing. I'd assumed that there was something

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like a fungal infection, but I'm wondering now if it

0:25:31.780 --> 0:25:34.859
<v Speaker 1>is the change in the toothpaste I have been using.

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.860
<v Speaker 2>All of this time. Okay. All right.

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So clearly, I mean, there's a disconnect between what Helen

0:25:41.140 --> 0:25:43.350
<v Speaker 1>is saying about the active ingredients and the efficacy of

0:25:43.380 --> 0:25:47.010
<v Speaker 1>the product and what people are telling us they're experiencing. Wendy,

0:25:47.270 --> 0:25:49.570
<v Speaker 1>for those who want the old product back, is that

0:25:49.650 --> 0:25:51.470
<v Speaker 1>even an option? Can one still get hold of the

0:25:51.830 --> 0:25:52.649
<v Speaker 1>previous version?

0:25:53.290 --> 0:25:55.970
<v Speaker 3>I can't say categorically no, but it does seem quite

0:25:56.210 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 3>unlikely because Helen … told us that most of its

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.060
<v Speaker 3>formulations had now been updated. The exact quote is, current

0:26:03.140 --> 0:26:06.750
<v Speaker 3>availability of the old formulation will vary by retailer based

0:26:06.810 --> 0:26:09.930
<v Speaker 3>on their stock ordering and replenishment. So if you find

0:26:09.970 --> 0:26:13.369
<v Speaker 3>some outlet that doesn't sell a lot of Saint-Sedan, you

0:26:13.410 --> 0:26:19.590
<v Speaker 3>might find the old formulation there. And I also asked, obviously,

0:26:19.770 --> 0:26:25.129
<v Speaker 3>about the volume of complaints they'd received. And as is

0:26:25.230 --> 0:26:27.550
<v Speaker 3>always the case, I didn't get an answer to that,

0:26:27.609 --> 0:26:32.619
<v Speaker 3>except for the generic, we value all customer feedback and

0:26:32.700 --> 0:26:35.780
<v Speaker 3>understand that changes to a familiar product can result in

0:26:35.820 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 3>different consumer experiences and preferences. This feedback is important to

0:26:40.100 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 3>us and is shared with our consumer listening team. So

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.050
<v Speaker 3>we still, this is, you know, corporates. We still don't

0:26:47.070 --> 0:26:50.450
<v Speaker 3>know why they did it. Were sales flagging? Was someone saying,

0:26:50.470 --> 0:26:55.130
<v Speaker 3>you know, white toothpaste is so last century, can't we

0:26:55.170 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 3>have blue? I mean, I don't think, excuse the pun,

0:27:00.220 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 3>that they've come clean on the full reasons why they

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:07.880
<v Speaker 3>did it. It's an expensive exercise involving reformulations, repackaging. It's

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 3>not a cheap exercise. Yeah. Based on what they've told

0:27:11.300 --> 0:27:13.170
<v Speaker 3>us on the record, it doesn't make a lot of sense.

0:27:13.310 --> 0:27:14.050
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Yeah.

0:27:14.250 --> 0:27:16.950
<v Speaker 1>And which makes you wonder, is there something else going

0:27:17.010 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>on in the background around an ingredient that had to

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.100
<v Speaker 1>be removed or what was it?

0:27:22.100 --> 0:27:22.660
<v Speaker 2>We just don't know.

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:23.060
<v Speaker 3>We just don't know.

0:27:23.619 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So, I mean, what to do, Wendy?

0:27:25.660 --> 0:27:27.179
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, as you've said, you can look and try and

0:27:27.260 --> 0:27:30.340
<v Speaker 1>find older variations in stores that haven't moved a lot

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.540
<v Speaker 1>of the product that might still have old stock on shelf.

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.620
<v Speaker 1>But I would say there's not a lot more than that.

0:27:35.700 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 3>If you're having a horrible reaction, if the lining of

0:27:38.420 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 3>your mouth is slowing off, if your teeth feel furry

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.110
<v Speaker 3>or funny, obviously ….

0:27:44.140 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Flag it with them.

0:27:44.820 --> 0:27:47.959
<v Speaker 3>Flag it with them. What Thomas was told by the

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 3>manager of the Clicks branch that he visited was to …

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Tell Halion directly. They have an email address, which is

0:27:56.180 --> 0:28:06.379
<v Speaker 3>mystory.za at Halion, which is H-A-L-E-O-N.com. mystory.za at halion.com. And

0:28:06.420 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 3>he was told this feedback goes to its consumer listening team.

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, that's quite the phrase. The consumer listening team.

0:28:15.580 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 3>It's probably the clicks manager's words.

0:28:17.859 --> 0:28:23.020
<v Speaker 2>Not the actual name of the team. So mystory.za at halion.com.

0:28:23.540 --> 0:28:28.470
<v Speaker 1>And, yeah, I mean, so, sorry, another point. Two, three

0:28:28.510 --> 0:28:31.290
<v Speaker 1>more people making the comment about how small the font

0:28:31.430 --> 0:28:33.850
<v Speaker 1>is regarding the changes on the box itself.

0:28:33.869 --> 0:28:34.210
<v Speaker 4>Okay. Okay.

0:28:34.740 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So advertising the changes in a place where your typical

0:28:37.340 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>customer base probably wasn't going to see them or certainly

0:28:39.980 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't looking for them and paying attention. If I'm on

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>social media, Wendy, I'm not reading those adverts.

0:28:44.180 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I've got to be honest. No, definitely not.

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:50.270
<v Speaker 3>And as Thomas said, you know, it's something small on

0:28:50.290 --> 0:28:51.740
<v Speaker 3>the back of the pack. When you've been buying the

0:28:51.770 --> 0:28:54.190
<v Speaker 3>product for ages, that's not enough to tell you, hey,

0:28:54.250 --> 0:28:57.150
<v Speaker 3>this might not be what you're expecting. And I certainly

0:28:57.230 --> 0:29:02.250
<v Speaker 3>think that if you change something quite substantially, a product

0:29:02.270 --> 0:29:05.310
<v Speaker 3>that people put into their mouths twice a day You

0:29:05.350 --> 0:29:07.350
<v Speaker 3>should be flagging that on the front of the pack.

0:29:07.410 --> 0:29:09.770
<v Speaker 3>Don't expect them to see something on social media. Don't

0:29:09.830 --> 0:29:13.070
<v Speaker 3>expect them to see a sign on the wall of

0:29:13.110 --> 0:29:16.730
<v Speaker 3>the whatever. Put it on the product that they're going

0:29:16.820 --> 0:29:20.540
<v Speaker 3>to be handling and opening to get the toothpaste out.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, a small print on the back of the

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 3>pack for me doesn't tick that disclosure box enough.

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:29:26.220 --> 0:29:26.540
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:30.020
<v Speaker 1>Okay. watch the space if we hear any further feedback

0:29:30.060 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>around the formulation itself and the active ingredients in particular

0:29:32.900 --> 0:29:35.780
<v Speaker 1>we will share it with you Luke's just saying if

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.310
<v Speaker 1>I wanted blue gel toothpaste I would have started using

0:29:38.350 --> 0:29:42.250
<v Speaker 1>Colgate again he says my dentist kindly gave me some samples.

0:29:41.870 --> 0:29:43.830
<v Speaker 2>Which still have the white paste inside it. So there's

0:29:43.870 --> 0:29:44.370
<v Speaker 2>a thought.

0:29:44.670 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>You can ask your dentist for samples if they've still

0:29:48.060 --> 0:29:50.380
<v Speaker 1>got the old stock in place.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:50.860
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:29:51.620 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to leave the toothpaste there for now unless

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.979
<v Speaker 1>we get a substantive addition to that conversation. I think

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we've clearly seen the trend here around The appearance, the flavor,

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the texture and the efficacy being the key ingredients as

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>well as that quite alarming one of how it's reacting

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:08.980
<v Speaker 1>to the inner skin lining. And we'll keep you posted

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.030
<v Speaker 1>on any updates on that one. With that, we will

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.410
<v Speaker 1>open the lines for other questions and we'll go straight

0:30:14.490 --> 0:30:16.270
<v Speaker 1>to the question that came in right at the beginning

0:30:16.290 --> 0:30:19.070
<v Speaker 1>of the show from Jay, who is wondering what has

0:30:19.110 --> 0:30:22.610
<v Speaker 1>happened to feline cuisine dry cat food. Do you have

0:30:22.670 --> 0:30:25.490
<v Speaker 1>any idea? She has heard that there was a problem

0:30:25.510 --> 0:30:27.930
<v Speaker 1>with contamination in the factory, but that should have been

0:30:27.970 --> 0:30:31.570
<v Speaker 1>resolved ages ago. Has me emailed the company and they

0:30:31.590 --> 0:30:34.390
<v Speaker 1>have a very nice website, but nobody has replied. It

0:30:34.450 --> 0:30:36.970
<v Speaker 1>is the only dry cat food that my fat cat

0:30:37.110 --> 0:30:39.709
<v Speaker 1>Elvis will eat and they've sent us the most divine picture.

0:30:40.170 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Of said fat cat.

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But Jay's comment is, it's costing me a fortune in

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.980
<v Speaker 1>wet cat food while we wait for the product to return.

0:30:46.460 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Any ideas on that?

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.460
<v Speaker 3>I don't, but I'm going to quickly look it up

0:30:49.500 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 3>while we take other questions.

0:30:50.740 --> 0:30:51.580
<v Speaker 2>If I can.

0:30:51.900 --> 0:30:55.820
<v Speaker 1>Feline cuisine, dry cat food is the question.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:56.300
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:30:57.380 --> 0:31:01.430
<v Speaker 1>We happily will take more general WhatsApps and emails on

0:31:01.450 --> 0:31:06.290
<v Speaker 1>that note. So pippa, H-P-I-P-P-A-H at capetalk.co.za. If you want

0:31:06.310 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to mail your question, you can call in on 021-446-0567

0:31:08.820 --> 0:31:17.690
<v Speaker 1>or send a WhatsApp to 0725671567. One in from Keith,

0:31:17.710 --> 0:31:20.690
<v Speaker 1>which I think is one we have tackled before in

0:31:20.710 --> 0:31:22.570
<v Speaker 1>a previous segment, but it's an important one that a

0:31:22.610 --> 0:31:24.630
<v Speaker 1>lot of people grapple with. Keith would like to know,

0:31:25.190 --> 0:31:28.310
<v Speaker 1>can a store really refuse a return on an appliance

0:31:28.390 --> 0:31:30.930
<v Speaker 1>if you have changed the plug from a two-point plug

0:31:31.390 --> 0:31:34.330
<v Speaker 1>to a three-point plug, even if the fault is not

0:31:34.390 --> 0:31:35.290
<v Speaker 1>caused by the plug?

0:31:35.850 --> 0:31:41.350
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, I've got a gremlin. Yes, I think if

0:31:41.370 --> 0:31:43.150
<v Speaker 3>I heard you correctly while I was struggling to.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.260
<v Speaker 1>Can they refuse a return because you changed the plug

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.420
<v Speaker 1>on their appliance, even if the issue wasn't with the plug?

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:49.740
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:50.500
<v Speaker 2>They can.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:55.810
<v Speaker 3>Okay. Well, it's a flat piece of advice that's given

0:31:55.870 --> 0:31:59.430
<v Speaker 3>out by the Consumer Goods and Services Ombud. That's because

0:31:59.450 --> 0:32:02.750
<v Speaker 3>there's under Section 56 of the Consumer Protection Act, which

0:32:02.810 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 3>allows us to return a defective product within six months

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:11.900
<v Speaker 3>for our choice of a repair, replacement or refund.

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 2>There's a little.

0:32:13.650 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 3>but there, and that is, it doesn't apply if you

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:19.780
<v Speaker 3>have modified the product in any way. And, um, the

0:32:19.980 --> 0:32:24.660
<v Speaker 3>consumer goods and services ombud is of the opinion that taking,

0:32:24.900 --> 0:32:27.460
<v Speaker 3>taking the plug off is a modification of the product.

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:29.900
<v Speaker 3>So my advice is always just buy an adapter. Don't

0:32:29.980 --> 0:32:32.750
<v Speaker 3>fiddle around with the plug that's come. I mean, it

0:32:32.770 --> 0:32:35.130
<v Speaker 3>would require quite an extensive, I mean, it is, you're

0:32:35.210 --> 0:32:38.010
<v Speaker 3>rewiring something. There is a possibility that you could affect

0:32:38.510 --> 0:32:42.700
<v Speaker 3>the product itself. Um, It would be a very hard fight.

0:32:42.980 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if it's a dramatic defect and the person

0:32:46.700 --> 0:32:49.010
<v Speaker 3>feels very strongly, there's no way that changing the plug

0:32:49.050 --> 0:32:51.270
<v Speaker 3>could have caused it. Then I would say push back,

0:32:51.570 --> 0:32:54.430
<v Speaker 3>maybe write to me. But as a general rule, please

0:32:54.470 --> 0:32:55.310
<v Speaker 3>don't change the plug.

0:32:55.330 --> 0:32:57.820
<v Speaker 2>It's not worth it. Rather just buy an adapter. Okay.

0:32:57.860 --> 0:32:58.260
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Andy, for resending your email, which came in

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier on in the show. I appreciate it. Andy's going

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the issue of product formulations changing. And she says, please,

0:33:08.340 --> 0:33:11.100
<v Speaker 1>will you ask Wendy, what's the deal with sunlight liquid?

0:33:11.900 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>It still washes fine, but it doesn't smell like it

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.860
<v Speaker 1>used to in my childhood. What have they changed and why?

0:33:18.300 --> 0:33:20.690
<v Speaker 1>And is it affecting sales, I wonder? She said, last

0:33:20.730 --> 0:33:23.030
<v Speaker 1>time I heard you speak about sunlight, I remember somebody

0:33:23.090 --> 0:33:25.510
<v Speaker 1>mentioning an alternative product that they had changed to.

0:33:25.890 --> 0:33:28.530
<v Speaker 2>Do you perhaps recall? I think it was MAC, M-A-Q. Yes,

0:33:28.650 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it was MAC. That people recommended. I haven't

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:32.180
<v Speaker 2>tried it.

0:33:32.300 --> 0:33:33.650
<v Speaker 3>I can vouch for it.

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:34.420
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:35.940
<v Speaker 3>That smell, yes.

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.100
<v Speaker 2>The sunlight smell, definitely the change in the smell. It's

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 2>definitely changed.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.620
<v Speaker 3>And they've got all these variants. I did take up

0:33:41.660 --> 0:33:44.350
<v Speaker 3>the case. We definitely spoke about it. Yes. Because this

0:33:44.470 --> 0:33:47.290
<v Speaker 3>one has degreased and that one hasn't. I'm like, so

0:33:47.350 --> 0:33:50.210
<v Speaker 3>you're saying if you buy that variant, the other plain

0:33:50.250 --> 0:33:53.780
<v Speaker 3>old green one that we all know, does that not decrease.

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 2>As well?

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.620
<v Speaker 3>Like, it just, for me, I just think they're undermining

0:33:57.740 --> 0:34:01.570
<v Speaker 3>the basic product. I'm not going to recommend an alternative.

0:34:01.590 --> 0:34:04.270
<v Speaker 3>I've switched to one, but I don't do endorsements, so

0:34:04.330 --> 0:34:07.970
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to say. But, yeah, I don't know. It's...

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:10.700
<v Speaker 3>Do you think they would have stopped messing with it

0:34:10.780 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 3>after they put it in that upside down total bottle,

0:34:13.140 --> 0:34:17.379
<v Speaker 3>which went down like a lead balloon about 20 years ago?

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:21.700
<v Speaker 3>But apparently not. So it's very confusing. All these variants

0:34:21.860 --> 0:34:25.910
<v Speaker 3>and the one I bought was blue and I was like.

0:34:26.340 --> 0:34:27.230
<v Speaker 3>And it's strong.

0:34:27.250 --> 0:34:29.430
<v Speaker 2>I was like, what is that smell in the kitchen?

0:34:29.650 --> 0:34:30.730
<v Speaker 3>Oh, gosh. Okay.

0:34:30.890 --> 0:34:31.810
<v Speaker 2>I haven't used it in years.

0:34:31.870 --> 0:34:34.190
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, Andy, look, I can tell you that the

0:34:34.230 --> 0:34:36.330
<v Speaker 1>last time we discussed this, I remember a few people

0:34:36.370 --> 0:34:37.170
<v Speaker 1>recommending Mac.

0:34:37.210 --> 0:34:39.730
<v Speaker 2>But that's from other listeners. No idea.

0:34:39.790 --> 0:34:41.970
<v Speaker 1>As I said, neither Wendy and I endorsing a particular

0:34:41.989 --> 0:34:46.299
<v Speaker 1>product here. But that's what we got. A second person, Mark, saying,

0:34:46.380 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm having the same problem with feline cuisine. No response

0:34:49.580 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>from them. I've got three cats that refuse to eat

0:34:51.780 --> 0:34:52.259
<v Speaker 1>anything else.

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:34:52.910 --> 0:34:55.710
<v Speaker 2>I'm checking my local weekly. The shelves are still empty.

0:34:55.770 --> 0:34:57.489
<v Speaker 3>Let me tell you what I found. It's made by

0:34:57.630 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 3>RCL Foods. So I'll definitely send them an email when

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.420
<v Speaker 3>I get off air. It has faced massive shortages and

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.950
<v Speaker 3>temporary disappearances due to product safely recalls. So our listener

0:35:07.130 --> 0:35:10.129
<v Speaker 3>was right on that. and machinery replacement. It is not

0:35:10.210 --> 0:35:15.110
<v Speaker 3>permanently discontinued. Stock has been returning to local stores. So Elvis'

0:35:15.150 --> 0:35:16.030
<v Speaker 3>dad will be happy.

0:35:15.850 --> 0:35:16.550
<v Speaker 2>To hear that.

0:35:18.950 --> 0:35:26.180
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the recalls were due to massive toxins or salmonella

0:35:26.219 --> 0:35:32.430
<v Speaker 3>contamination risks. So, yeah, the good news is that feline

0:35:32.550 --> 0:35:36.790
<v Speaker 3>cuisine is gradually reappearing at major retailers such as Checkers, ShopRite,

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.130
<v Speaker 3>and online via price check or take a lot, although

0:35:42.150 --> 0:35:44.590
<v Speaker 3>availability remains sporadic.

0:35:45.620 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we'll look into it and see if we

0:35:47.780 --> 0:35:50.540
<v Speaker 1>can get further feedback than that, but it's obviously an

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:51.790
<v Speaker 1>ongoing issue for now.

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Um okay colleen going back to our very.

0:35:55.180 --> 0:35:57.940
<v Speaker 1>First conversation around the home affairs offices at the banks

0:35:58.420 --> 0:36:00.620
<v Speaker 1>colleen is asking do the home affairs offices at banks

0:36:00.700 --> 0:36:03.989
<v Speaker 1>issue smart ids to dual citizenship holders there was a

0:36:04.050 --> 0:36:05.690
<v Speaker 1>time when they didn't.

0:36:05.450 --> 0:36:08.050
<v Speaker 3>But they do they do now right i know.

0:36:07.570 --> 0:36:10.950
<v Speaker 1>Permanent residents were also excluded up until quite recently but

0:36:10.969 --> 0:36:13.710
<v Speaker 1>they have vastly expanded the net of who can now

0:36:13.770 --> 0:36:15.969
<v Speaker 1>apply through the banks so colleen do go back to

0:36:16.010 --> 0:36:19.700
<v Speaker 1>your branch and check um I'm not 100% sure on

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the dual citizenship issue, but I know certainly the permanent

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:24.069
<v Speaker 1>residency issue they have sorted out.

0:36:24.110 --> 0:36:27.049
<v Speaker 2>So it could well be more broadly applied. I'm pretty sure.

0:36:27.110 --> 0:36:29.509
<v Speaker 3>I can't say categorically, but I'm pretty sure I have

0:36:29.550 --> 0:36:31.750
<v Speaker 3>read that they've relaxed that. Okay.

0:36:31.790 --> 0:36:32.330
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for that.

0:36:32.750 --> 0:36:34.470
<v Speaker 1>We've got a voice note in from Gareth who has

0:36:34.530 --> 0:36:37.740
<v Speaker 1>some help for the cats in need of their particular

0:36:37.780 --> 0:36:40.379
<v Speaker 1>favorite food. I guess he's managed to find some stock.

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen.

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Hi Pippa, strangely enough my cat also only fancies the

0:36:49.060 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 4>feline cuisine and I managed to find it at the

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:58.569
<v Speaker 4>Somerset West Checkers Hyper at the Somerset Mall. I haven't

0:36:58.590 --> 0:37:00.150
<v Speaker 4>been able to find it anywhere else and when I

0:37:00.170 --> 0:37:02.910
<v Speaker 4>find it I buy bags of it. So I was

0:37:02.969 --> 0:37:06.630
<v Speaker 4>there yesterday and it seems to be back. There's a

0:37:06.670 --> 0:37:10.180
<v Speaker 4>2kg and a 4kg cat. But, yeah, for some strange reason,

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.969
<v Speaker 4>my cat only eats that whatever he ate before. He

0:37:12.989 --> 0:37:16.970
<v Speaker 4>doesn't eat any more, and he only likes the feline cuisine. Gareth,

0:37:17.010 --> 0:37:18.590
<v Speaker 4>Somerset West, thanks for a lovely show.

0:37:18.730 --> 0:37:19.050
<v Speaker 3>Bye-bye.

0:37:19.070 --> 0:37:22.150
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Gareth. Thanks, Gareth. Appreciate it.

0:37:22.170 --> 0:37:24.129
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how far away from Somerset West

0:37:24.170 --> 0:37:28.190
<v Speaker 1>you are to Mark, and he was the first to complain,

0:37:28.230 --> 0:37:30.750
<v Speaker 1>and Jay. If you're close to Somerset West, that might

0:37:30.770 --> 0:37:32.150
<v Speaker 1>be one thing to do. Hop in the car and

0:37:32.170 --> 0:37:33.830
<v Speaker 1>drive to the checkers and see if you can find

0:37:33.870 --> 0:37:36.330
<v Speaker 1>it there. But if you are far away from them …

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps try your nearest checkers. If one branch has stock,

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:41.510
<v Speaker 1>perhaps others have as well.

0:37:41.820 --> 0:37:42.070
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:42.230 --> 0:37:42.450
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:37:42.830 --> 0:37:46.050
<v Speaker 3>That's a major– that's my neighborhood. That's a major, major store.

0:37:46.090 --> 0:37:46.810
<v Speaker 2>It's a big, big store.

0:37:46.850 --> 0:37:47.110
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah.

0:37:47.130 --> 0:37:47.250
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:37:47.370 --> 0:37:49.810
<v Speaker 3>They will have a lot more stock if they suddenly

0:37:49.830 --> 0:37:52.810
<v Speaker 3>feed it back. If Alistair hasn't cleaned them out by now.

0:37:52.830 --> 0:37:54.390
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, a little bit of stockpiling

0:37:54.410 --> 0:37:55.890
<v Speaker 1>going on by the sounds of that.

0:37:56.070 --> 0:37:56.210
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:37:56.230 --> 0:37:56.370
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.060
<v Speaker 1>Now, interestingly, Karin asks, is all of this conversation around

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.420
<v Speaker 1>Sensodyne the same reason Aquafresh has changed its formulation?

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.100
<v Speaker 3>We did an Aquafresh show earlier in the year, and

0:38:06.180 --> 0:38:11.790
<v Speaker 3>it was a similar issue. They removed that titanium what, what? Dioxide.

0:38:11.830 --> 0:38:15.710
<v Speaker 2>Dioxide. Is that product harmful, that ingredient harmful?

0:38:16.469 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 3>It's, I speak under correction because I don't have those

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:22.299
<v Speaker 3>notes in front of me, but there was, when I

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.630
<v Speaker 3>researched it, there was, Some question mark around it.

0:38:24.630 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Some red flags around it.

0:38:25.450 --> 0:38:29.270
<v Speaker 3>In terms of what product it's in. So there isn't

0:38:29.310 --> 0:38:32.650
<v Speaker 3>a problem, certainly not in this country, with there's no

0:38:32.750 --> 0:38:35.250
<v Speaker 3>regulatory limit.

0:38:35.350 --> 0:38:38.250
<v Speaker 2>Demand that it be capped. That you remove it from toothpaste, no.

0:38:38.590 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Thank you, Joseph, telling us that he, as an

0:38:43.340 --> 0:38:45.219
<v Speaker 1>immigrant to South Africa, was able to get his ID

0:38:45.260 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at Capitec last week. And it only took five minutes,

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.190
<v Speaker 1>he tells us. So that's great. So who was it

0:38:50.210 --> 0:38:52.730
<v Speaker 1>who was asking the question? Colleen, as a dual citizen,

0:38:52.750 --> 0:38:54.529
<v Speaker 1>you should now be able to go into your bank

0:38:55.190 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to access that service.

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.780
<v Speaker 2>That's great news. Thank you so much for that quick response.

0:38:59.260 --> 0:38:59.530
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:38:59.910 --> 0:39:01.489
<v Speaker 1>We're going to leave it there with just time to

0:39:01.570 --> 0:39:03.410
<v Speaker 1>recap a little bit about how to reach out to

0:39:03.469 --> 0:39:06.029
<v Speaker 1>us if you are sending a case study or would

0:39:06.070 --> 0:39:07.830
<v Speaker 1>like Wendy to investigate things.

0:39:08.550 --> 0:39:09.750
<v Speaker 2>Because we've had a couple of.

0:39:11.410 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Cases where people have sent us the start of a case,

0:39:13.910 --> 0:39:15.739
<v Speaker 1>but not enough information to act on it.

0:39:15.780 --> 0:39:16.800
<v Speaker 2>So I just want to recap.

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Wendy, your website is the easiest place to lodge a complaint,

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>which is wendynola.co.za. If somebody does choose to email, what

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.230
<v Speaker 1>are the absolute bare minimum that they need to share

0:39:28.270 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>with us?

0:39:28.530 --> 0:39:30.469
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I need their full name. I need their phone

0:39:30.510 --> 0:39:32.590
<v Speaker 3>number because some people aren't great on email. If I

0:39:32.610 --> 0:39:35.020
<v Speaker 3>need to check something when taking up a case, I

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:37.419
<v Speaker 3>can't drop it if I'm not getting a quick enough

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.660
<v Speaker 3>email response. So I do appreciate a phone number. I'm

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.420
<v Speaker 3>not going to share it anywhere. It's just for my use,

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 3>should I need it, location, and then just simple things

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.540
<v Speaker 3>like dates and branches. For example, I'll get a board

0:39:49.580 --> 0:39:53.259
<v Speaker 3>to sell phone from MTN. When did you buy it?

0:39:53.260 --> 0:39:55.890
<v Speaker 3>Because that affects whether it's still under CPA warranty or not.

0:39:56.180 --> 0:39:59.990
<v Speaker 3>Which branch? If I'm going to take it up with MTN,

0:40:01.370 --> 0:40:03.569
<v Speaker 3>the company, then I need to give them all this

0:40:03.630 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of detail. Yeah. I will write back and ask,

0:40:07.460 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 3>but sometimes there's a deluge that I can't handle at

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 3>the best of times. And so there's a chance that

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't see your attorney. I'm not ghosting you. It's

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 3>just I don't have the capacity.

0:40:16.060 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 2>So if you can give.

0:40:17.660 --> 0:40:22.490
<v Speaker 3>Me all the basic, as we journalists say, who, what, when, when, how, why.

0:40:22.510 --> 0:40:22.989
<v Speaker 2>Why and how.

0:40:23.130 --> 0:40:26.089
<v Speaker 3>All of that. Then your chances of me actually being

0:40:26.110 --> 0:40:29.290
<v Speaker 3>able to take up your case are much greater.

0:40:29.590 --> 0:40:30.469
<v Speaker 2>Okay. Thanks for that.

0:40:30.550 --> 0:40:38.470
<v Speaker 1>So wendynola.co.za, spelled K-N-O-W-L-E-R. or an email to consumer at nola.co.za.

0:40:38.590 --> 0:40:41.620
<v Speaker 1>And Wendy, we'll chat to you again at Commerce Makers

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:43.180
<v Speaker 1>next week. We're going to take a look in our

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.930
<v Speaker 1>consumer slot at the ins and outs and do's and

0:40:45.969 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>don'ts and rights and responsibilities of buying from markets.

0:40:48.820 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. So looking forward to that conversation next week.