WEBVTT - Open Line 

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:13.630
<v Speaker 1>10 minutes after 11 o'clock and we open the lines.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I take your calls now, 118830702. I suppose the big

0:00:19.100 --> 0:00:23.860
<v Speaker 1>story at the moment are the conversations around the constitutional

0:00:23.940 --> 0:00:34.210
<v Speaker 1>court ruling and the ensuing unfortunate, sad, activities that have

0:00:34.250 --> 0:00:36.940
<v Speaker 1>taken place in certain parts of our country, including Soweto

0:00:37.020 --> 0:00:42.340
<v Speaker 1>and Durban. Soweto, 10 or 11 cars that have been

0:00:42.700 --> 0:00:50.379
<v Speaker 1>burned in Durban, 14 cars that have been burned. And

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I suppose the condemnation of the violence has been roundly

0:00:54.940 --> 0:01:04.259
<v Speaker 1>condemned correctly. So I have also tried to say, understand

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.539
<v Speaker 1>that violence as much as it ought to be condemned

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that is also to be seen within the context of

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a greater violence that is being inflicted on poor communities

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:22.779
<v Speaker 1>here in South Africa by systemic and systematic governance failures

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>not only of our own government but governments outside our

0:01:27.580 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>country who have made their citizens have to leave their

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:41.460
<v Speaker 1>countries to come to South Africa in droves. And I

0:01:41.500 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>suppose it's time for us to really have a conversation

0:01:45.540 --> 0:01:50.180
<v Speaker 1>about this constitutional court ruling and understand it for what

0:01:50.220 --> 0:01:56.060
<v Speaker 1>it is. And then also understand the understanding that has

0:01:56.080 --> 0:02:02.290
<v Speaker 1>developed in South African communities, particularly black communities, about that

0:02:02.370 --> 0:02:12.380
<v Speaker 1>Concord ruling. I think that the constitutional court is trying

0:02:12.460 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to do right here by the constitution and their understanding

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:25.380
<v Speaker 1>of the constitution. They are calling out a government that

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:33.210
<v Speaker 1>has not applied the requisite rigor in their application of

0:02:33.270 --> 0:02:41.470
<v Speaker 1>the law and connected regulations in the application of that

0:02:41.570 --> 0:02:47.169
<v Speaker 1>law as it pertains to its alignment to the constitution.

0:02:49.030 --> 0:02:49.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:50.650 --> 0:02:53.460
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose that's the work of the constitutional court.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're supposed to do. If you're going to

0:02:55.060 --> 0:02:58.820
<v Speaker 1>bring a case to the constitutional court, as has been

0:02:58.860 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 1>brought by those who brought that case to the constitutional court,

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that is the expectation. Let's show who in fact was the,

0:03:07.669 --> 0:03:10.410
<v Speaker 1>commissioner of the case. I think somebody suggested it was

0:03:10.450 --> 0:03:12.550
<v Speaker 1>the EFF and the ANC, but I'm not really sure

0:03:12.610 --> 0:03:16.230
<v Speaker 1>if that is entirely true, but you will correct me

0:03:16.730 --> 0:03:20.590
<v Speaker 1>as far as that is concerned. So the constitutional court

0:03:20.770 --> 0:03:24.610
<v Speaker 1>makes a decision and brings out a ruling that says,

0:03:26.510 --> 0:03:31.609
<v Speaker 1>we have a set of laws in this country that

0:03:32.330 --> 0:03:39.010
<v Speaker 1>bind us to certain responsibilities, international responsibilities. as it pertains

0:03:39.050 --> 0:03:45.790
<v Speaker 1>to migrants, asylum seekers, and refugee applicants. We cannot ignore

0:03:46.390 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>our responsibilities with regards to that. And while there is

0:03:52.100 --> 0:03:56.660
<v Speaker 1>evidence of the abuse of the immigration process as far

0:03:56.740 --> 0:04:04.010
<v Speaker 1>as it pertains to asylum seekers and refugee statuses, and

0:04:04.050 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we understand perhaps that the Department of Home Affairs put

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in certain regulations in order to deal with those abuses,

0:04:11.780 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they did not align those regulations and that law to

0:04:17.420 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional mandate that this country has. And that means

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.650
<v Speaker 1>that you've got to give anybody who says that they

0:04:24.850 --> 0:04:30.370
<v Speaker 1>want to apply for asylum the opportunity to apply for asylum.

0:04:31.070 --> 0:04:37.270
<v Speaker 1>And you can't let You can't interrupt that process because

0:04:37.529 --> 0:04:44.130
<v Speaker 1>of our commitment to international law, human rights, and so

0:04:44.170 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>forth and so forth. So I suppose you can't fight

0:04:49.510 --> 0:04:55.300
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional court, folks. They have done their work, at

0:04:55.339 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>least according to what their mandate is. Happy to take

0:05:00.339 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>your calls as far as that is concerned. But that

0:05:05.700 --> 0:05:10.340
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Home Affairs did a half job here.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>And they got caught out by the Constitutional Court. At

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:19.180
<v Speaker 1>least those that called for this case to be investigated

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:26.870
<v Speaker 1>by the Constitutional Court. At a legal level, at the

0:05:27.050 --> 0:05:31.090
<v Speaker 1>cerebral level of all of this, all of this makes

0:05:31.290 --> 0:05:36.140
<v Speaker 1>absolute sense. But there is, of course, the reality of

0:05:37.670 --> 0:05:40.550
<v Speaker 1>the practical experience of all of these things. And that

0:05:40.589 --> 0:05:44.230
<v Speaker 1>happens amongst the human beings, the people on the ground.

0:05:44.350 --> 0:05:51.330
<v Speaker 1>Both the asylum seekers and refugees, applicants, and the citizens

0:05:51.370 --> 0:06:00.659
<v Speaker 1>of this country. Both of whom have been treated very badly.

0:06:03.620 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 1>The English is starting to run out. Can you see that?

0:06:11.170 --> 0:06:14.770
<v Speaker 1>And in both sides, the residents of this country and

0:06:15.190 --> 0:06:19.690
<v Speaker 1>the refugee sides or the foreign national sides, there are

0:06:19.730 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>people who are abusing the system. But there are both sides,

0:06:25.740 --> 0:06:37.339
<v Speaker 1>people that are looking for real solutions. that have real concerns.

0:06:44.250 --> 0:06:46.770
<v Speaker 1>But South Africans have been betrayed by their own government

0:06:46.950 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>because their own government has been cutting corners. As, of course,

0:06:52.890 --> 0:06:56.779
<v Speaker 1>it has been discovered by this ruling by the Constitutional Court.

0:06:59.140 --> 0:07:02.539
<v Speaker 1>It has been cutting corners even before the changing of

0:07:02.580 --> 0:07:09.890
<v Speaker 1>the laws in 2020. Because the real reasons why people

0:07:09.930 --> 0:07:17.580
<v Speaker 1>were here for asylum were no longer being properly interrogated by,

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they called them the RSOs at Home Affairs.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:28.700
<v Speaker 1>People were being given asylum status, right? Some of them

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.300
<v Speaker 1>graduated to refugee status. And we believe that some even

0:07:32.340 --> 0:07:37.660
<v Speaker 1>became permanent residents and some even became naturalized South Africans

0:07:38.100 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of the inability of South African officials

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>at home affairs to do their work properly. And yes,

0:07:51.660 --> 0:07:56.310
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, there were bribes. We know of

0:07:56.430 --> 0:07:59.250
<v Speaker 1>the story of the bribes and and all of the

0:07:59.330 --> 0:08:02.150
<v Speaker 1>other things that have taken place. But for that, I

0:08:02.210 --> 0:08:08.490
<v Speaker 1>put the blame squarely on the South African officials. The

0:08:08.530 --> 0:08:11.390
<v Speaker 1>fact of the matter is that the refugee space and

0:08:11.420 --> 0:08:16.540
<v Speaker 1>the asylum-seeking space became abused. Not only did that space

0:08:16.620 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>become abused, our borders were not being looked after properly,

0:08:23.940 --> 0:08:29.210
<v Speaker 1>so they became progressively more and more porous such that

0:08:29.620 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>people didn't see the reason why they need to go

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:36.260
<v Speaker 1>through a port of entry. And some of the people

0:08:36.300 --> 0:08:38.740
<v Speaker 1>that came into this country were people that came perhaps

0:08:38.780 --> 0:08:44.819
<v Speaker 1>for legitimate reasons and others not. Some perhaps understood that

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they were coming for economic reasons, but there was this

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity of becoming an asylum holder and then perhaps a

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.589
<v Speaker 1>refugee holder. And by the way, if you are asylum

0:08:58.650 --> 0:09:01.569
<v Speaker 1>seeker or a person who holds an asylum or a

0:09:01.950 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>refugee document, you have the same economic status, exactly the

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>same economic status as a South African. There's the problem.

0:09:16.540 --> 0:09:23.500
<v Speaker 1>There's the problem. Part of the conversation, folks, is we

0:09:23.540 --> 0:09:28.420
<v Speaker 1>need to talk about what that did to the struggle

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of South Africans for a decent wage, a struggle that

0:09:33.940 --> 0:09:38.530
<v Speaker 1>was largely won already, but was undermined by the willingness

0:09:38.630 --> 0:09:42.570
<v Speaker 1>of those who had entered the country illegally for economic reasons,

0:09:43.050 --> 0:09:47.590
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily for political or religious reasons, but for economic reasons,

0:09:47.929 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>who were willing to take the lesser wage. What did

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:59.949
<v Speaker 1>that do for the economic space? In fact, I was

0:10:00.100 --> 0:10:07.220
<v Speaker 1>listening to a preacher. I was preaching in a church.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:21.910
<v Speaker 1>Largely attended by Zimbabwean nationals. Who himself is a Zimbabwean national.

0:10:21.950 --> 0:10:28.190
<v Speaker 1>Who was explaining this situation. To say that we. Speaking

0:10:28.250 --> 0:10:35.070
<v Speaker 1>to his fellow Zimbabwean nationals. Have undermined. Through the fact

0:10:35.110 --> 0:10:38.630
<v Speaker 1>that we are willing to take the lower wage. The

0:10:38.690 --> 0:10:47.010
<v Speaker 1>struggle for a better wage by South African workers. That invariably.

0:10:48.660 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>causes a lot of tension. Because that takes food out

0:10:53.080 --> 0:11:12.110
<v Speaker 1>of somebody's mouth. And it makes people question our so-called brotherhood. So,

0:11:12.910 --> 0:11:15.890
<v Speaker 1>having listened to all of that, I'm saying that we

0:11:15.910 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as South Africans need to perhaps In our anger, watch

0:11:24.620 --> 0:11:32.510
<v Speaker 1>this process carefully. The minister in the presidency, Menchaven, he said, no, no, no,

0:11:32.590 --> 0:11:35.010
<v Speaker 1>let's give it a chance, you know. But I understand

0:11:35.070 --> 0:11:37.929
<v Speaker 1>South Africans who say we were betrayed by these very

0:11:37.990 --> 0:11:42.460
<v Speaker 1>officials themselves to begin with. Why should we trust that

0:11:42.500 --> 0:11:46.260
<v Speaker 1>they will do a proper job? When we are told, no, no, no,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.100
<v Speaker 1>this is going to reveal who should be here and

0:11:48.140 --> 0:11:50.180
<v Speaker 1>who should not be here. Well, they betrayed us by

0:11:50.220 --> 0:11:52.980
<v Speaker 1>not doing their job properly in the first place. Why

0:11:53.020 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>should we believe them? That is the big gripe from

0:11:58.220 --> 0:12:04.450
<v Speaker 1>South Africans with regards to this Concord Judgment. I disagree

0:12:04.490 --> 0:12:09.069
<v Speaker 1>slightly with my guest, Prince Mtombeni, who says that this

0:12:09.530 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Concord Judgment implies that the South African Department of Home

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.940
<v Speaker 1>Affairs must be capacitated. Well, the Department of Home Affairs

0:12:17.980 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>has said that we don't have capacity. Expressly so. It's

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>part of their defense in the Concord case. Surely part

0:12:29.970 --> 0:12:32.610
<v Speaker 1>of the remedy should have been in the same way

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:37.470
<v Speaker 1>that the Constitutional Court said, we give the South African

0:12:37.530 --> 0:12:40.730
<v Speaker 1>Parliament so many years to deal with the whole issue

0:12:40.790 --> 0:12:46.569
<v Speaker 1>around the election rules and the fact that you may

0:12:46.630 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>now elect an individual not necessarily a party to elect

0:12:49.980 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a president for you time was given for that whole

0:12:52.860 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>thing to be capacitated surely part of the concord ruling

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:02.620
<v Speaker 1>should have been the department of home affairs will have

0:13:02.660 --> 0:13:05.570
<v Speaker 1>to be capacitated in this way and this way and

0:13:05.610 --> 0:13:09.730
<v Speaker 1>this way in order to meet the challenge of having

0:13:09.790 --> 0:13:14.969
<v Speaker 1>to Deal with the documentation of People who are applying

0:13:15.070 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for For asylum and refugee status It should have been

0:13:24.030 --> 0:13:29.260
<v Speaker 1>part of the ruling Because you can't Make a ruling

0:13:29.300 --> 0:13:40.100
<v Speaker 1>that is practically Un You see the English is going

0:13:43.970 --> 0:13:49.350
<v Speaker 1>That is practically unimplementable because you're just setting that whole

0:13:49.390 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>system up for failure. The BMA is complaining to say, well,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.380
<v Speaker 1>if the people that are here illegally can continue to

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.580
<v Speaker 1>do so because the ruling says that whether you are

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.630
<v Speaker 1>illegal or not, you must be given a chance to

0:14:07.130 --> 0:14:11.089
<v Speaker 1>go and be heard by the Department of Home Affairs.

0:14:11.950 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I suppose it does become a little bit confusing for

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>people like the BMA? What is the police officer who

0:14:18.580 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>finds somebody who they suspect is holding documents that are

0:14:22.140 --> 0:14:26.020
<v Speaker 1>fraudulent due under these circumstances? I suppose that is what

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.010
<v Speaker 1>Judge Obrele Duaba is trying to get answers from with

0:14:30.070 --> 0:14:32.950
<v Speaker 1>regards to the efforts that they're putting in place to

0:14:32.990 --> 0:14:35.390
<v Speaker 1>try and understand how do we deal with people that

0:14:35.430 --> 0:14:39.070
<v Speaker 1>are in prison right now or at Lindela right now

0:14:39.170 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>because they have been found to be in the country

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>illegally or with fraudulent refugee or asylum documents, or that

0:14:47.700 --> 0:14:49.980
<v Speaker 1>their story just doesn't add up. What do we do

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>with them? And all of this is bound to create

0:14:53.820 --> 0:14:58.830
<v Speaker 1>a major, major moment of confusion. And again, I say

0:14:58.850 --> 0:15:01.750
<v Speaker 1>that that confusion is what is making South Africans angry.

0:15:07.730 --> 0:15:12.790
<v Speaker 1>So I close my little montage by saying, My South

0:15:12.830 --> 0:15:21.330
<v Speaker 1>African brothers and sisters Your anger is understandable Regardless of

0:15:21.370 --> 0:15:31.500
<v Speaker 1>what anybody says Your anger is understandable But it might

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:41.220
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily be permissible In all instances We must be

0:15:41.260 --> 0:15:51.420
<v Speaker 1>tactical We must be strategic. Our anger against the government

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:59.930
<v Speaker 1>that has betrayed us is justified. But we must be tactical.

0:16:02.510 --> 0:16:11.110
<v Speaker 1>We must be strategic. We must also remember that us

0:16:11.170 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>being pitted against other poor Africans is not innocent. There

0:16:19.740 --> 0:16:29.330
<v Speaker 1>is a destabilization motive behind it. And I'll add and

0:16:29.370 --> 0:16:36.310
<v Speaker 1>say that it's not always coming from the West. Neither

0:16:36.390 --> 0:16:41.860
<v Speaker 1>is it always coming from the East. Sometimes it comes

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>from our very own leaders who benefit from the confusion.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:59.710
<v Speaker 1>Leaders who run economies that benefit from the confusion. And they,

0:17:00.850 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>those leaders in the private sector and in the public

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.479
<v Speaker 1>sector are not enemies because they are making money off

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of our fighting. We need to understand that. South Africans

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:25.850
<v Speaker 1>will tonight, and henceforth, as it has always been, been labeled,

0:17:25.869 --> 0:17:36.010
<v Speaker 1>they'll be labeled, given names, which is sad and unacceptable.

0:17:41.450 --> 0:17:44.470
<v Speaker 1>But it does remind me of the song that was

0:17:44.530 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>sang in the struggle years by many generation of South Africans.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>A song that asks a very simple question. Senze. Senze nina.

0:18:14.270 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And in that song, there is a response and an answer,

0:18:16.700 --> 0:18:32.070
<v Speaker 1>a reply to that question. I add a South African.

0:18:34.500 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Take your call straight after this. 702.

0:18:38.010 --> 0:18:42.770
<v Speaker 3>Call Aubrey on 011-883-0702.

0:18:43.109 --> 0:18:46.210
<v Speaker 1>Joseph is in Orange Farm. Hi, Joseph.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:48.100
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Aubrey.

0:18:48.140 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 4>How are you?

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm very well, thank you, sir. What's the norm?

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Long time no speak.

0:18:51.140 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, sir.

0:18:53.460 --> 0:18:59.410
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't even know how to talk. Why

0:18:59.450 --> 0:19:03.090
<v Speaker 2>do you think, Aubrey, that it so much easier for

0:19:03.130 --> 0:19:07.030
<v Speaker 2>us as a country to be angry at the government

0:19:08.050 --> 0:19:11.990
<v Speaker 2>right like you've had two guests now come on your

0:19:12.030 --> 0:19:17.629
<v Speaker 2>show and even yourself you know like even the reason

0:19:17.670 --> 0:19:19.949
<v Speaker 2>I'm calling you is when you started you know you

0:19:19.990 --> 0:19:24.050
<v Speaker 2>had this very emotional sort of epilogue that you're making

0:19:24.109 --> 0:19:27.950
<v Speaker 2>and you know so I could feel.

0:19:27.790 --> 0:19:29.150
<v Speaker 1>That anger you know.

0:19:31.030 --> 0:19:38.780
<v Speaker 2>And my pushback or my comment, which has always been

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:40.660
<v Speaker 2>the comment that I make every time I'm called here,

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:46.570
<v Speaker 2>is that we as a country feel that the reason

0:19:46.609 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>the country isn't working is because the government... is corrupt

0:19:50.619 --> 0:19:53.220
<v Speaker 2>which is true the government is corrupt and the government

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>isn't doing their job this is just a fact right

0:19:56.619 --> 0:19:59.139
<v Speaker 2>but so let's assume for a moment let's take the

0:19:59.180 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 2>department the department of home affairs let's assume the department

0:20:02.940 --> 0:20:06.670
<v Speaker 2>of home affairs worked right and It was capacitated. It

0:20:07.010 --> 0:20:12.250
<v Speaker 2>did everything that was necessary for it to function correctly, right?

0:20:12.770 --> 0:20:16.969
<v Speaker 2>It processed the asylum. The person comes in, right? The

0:20:17.030 --> 0:20:20.730
<v Speaker 2>law says that a person can come into South Africa

0:20:21.150 --> 0:20:27.710
<v Speaker 2>without any documentation, without any nothing, right? And the Department

0:20:27.910 --> 0:20:32.139
<v Speaker 2>of Home Affairs has to judge that. the validity, the

0:20:32.180 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>veracity of the claim of asylum of this person, essentially

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:41.570
<v Speaker 2>based on what they're saying, right? The home affairs says, no,

0:20:41.710 --> 0:20:45.669
<v Speaker 2>you do not qualify, right? The person, what does the

0:20:45.690 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 2>person do? They appeal, right? And the expert you had said,

0:20:52.590 --> 0:20:55.850
<v Speaker 2>they can first appeal within the Department of Home Affairs.

0:20:56.150 --> 0:20:59.830
<v Speaker 2>They say that also fails, right? And then you push

0:20:59.850 --> 0:21:01.629
<v Speaker 2>them and say, and then what happens at the end

0:21:01.670 --> 0:21:03.189
<v Speaker 2>of it? And the expert says, no, no, no, they

0:21:03.210 --> 0:21:07.700
<v Speaker 2>can also have other avenues. They can go to our courts, right?

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:15.709
<v Speaker 2>So the asylum seeker goes to our courts. And when

0:21:15.730 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you think about it structurally, When an asylum seeker goes

0:21:20.180 --> 0:21:23.300
<v Speaker 2>and protests a decision made by the department, it is

0:21:23.340 --> 0:21:26.179
<v Speaker 2>the department that has to go defend itself. It has

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 2>to go defend its decisions, right? So imagine then that

0:21:33.460 --> 0:21:38.770
<v Speaker 2>the department is working correctly, right? And people understand that

0:21:41.350 --> 0:21:45.300
<v Speaker 2>when the department says, No, you do not qualify for

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 2>asylum seeking. You can always just go to court. And

0:21:50.140 --> 0:21:53.430
<v Speaker 2>when you fail in one court, you can always take

0:21:53.450 --> 0:21:54.970
<v Speaker 2>it up to a higher court and a higher court

0:21:55.030 --> 0:21:56.609
<v Speaker 2>and a higher court, all the way up to the

0:21:56.930 --> 0:22:04.650
<v Speaker 2>constitutional court, right? So how can we expect that... A department, right?

0:22:04.830 --> 0:22:08.870
<v Speaker 2>For the department to function, right, it has to have authority, right?

0:22:09.090 --> 0:22:11.429
<v Speaker 2>It has to have the latitude to do its job.

0:22:11.770 --> 0:22:14.810
<v Speaker 2>It has to have domain control over the job that

0:22:15.050 --> 0:22:20.129
<v Speaker 2>they're supposed to do. It has to have jurisdiction. The

0:22:20.150 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 2>jurisdiction of home affairs is citizenry. It is matters of citizenship.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 2>It is matters of asylum seeking, right?

0:22:28.420 --> 0:22:28.580
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:29.170 --> 0:22:32.350
<v Speaker 2>Yet, and for it to perform its job, it has

0:22:32.369 --> 0:22:36.090
<v Speaker 2>to have the latitude to perform that job. But when

0:22:36.190 --> 0:22:41.150
<v Speaker 2>it performs its job, its decisions that it makes, that

0:22:41.210 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 2>it has the authority to make, can be overturned by

0:22:43.980 --> 0:22:47.580
<v Speaker 2>a court. Do you see the problem there?

0:22:48.220 --> 0:22:50.180
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which is why I asked.

0:22:51.300 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>So, for instance, take the situation with Chidima, right?

0:22:54.619 --> 0:22:54.689
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Chidema, the department did its job and said, Chidema, because

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.619
<v Speaker 2>of whatever reason, is not declared a person or an

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.109
<v Speaker 2>undesirable person. She's not allowed to be in South Africa.

0:23:06.750 --> 0:23:09.370
<v Speaker 2>So what did Chidema do? She gets into the country illegally.

0:23:09.990 --> 0:23:13.190
<v Speaker 2>The department continues to do their job. They say, no, no, no,

0:23:13.530 --> 0:23:15.189
<v Speaker 2>you are not allowed in South Africa. We're going to

0:23:15.210 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 2>deport you. That's their job. That's the mandate that they're given.

0:23:19.900 --> 0:23:23.500
<v Speaker 2>That's their domain, right? So why is Chidema still in

0:23:23.540 --> 0:23:23.940
<v Speaker 2>the country?

0:23:25.270 --> 0:23:31.230
<v Speaker 1>Because, and this doesn't make it right, but because we

0:23:31.650 --> 0:23:38.620
<v Speaker 1>are a constitutional democracy. In other words, above all other laws,

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>above all other systems, above all other capabilities, the constitution

0:23:46.460 --> 0:23:49.780
<v Speaker 1>has the right or it trumps all of those things.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>And what that means is that even if the right

0:23:58.020 --> 0:24:02.670
<v Speaker 1>thing is done by a department, if it is not

0:24:02.830 --> 0:24:09.570
<v Speaker 1>done according and in line with the Constitution, if the

0:24:09.710 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>processes that it has followed in arriving at a particular conclusion,

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.580
<v Speaker 1>even if that conclusion is considered to be right, if

0:24:20.660 --> 0:24:27.730
<v Speaker 1>the process to getting there was unconstitutional, unconstitutional, the constitution

0:24:28.050 --> 0:24:32.060
<v Speaker 1>then trumps and can override that decision.

0:24:32.490 --> 0:24:37.740
<v Speaker 2>No, no, you see, that's where the distinction, for me,

0:24:37.859 --> 0:24:40.580
<v Speaker 2>I feel like people miss. That's not the point I

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:45.140
<v Speaker 2>was bringing up. We, as a country, are saying that

0:24:45.380 --> 0:24:47.409
<v Speaker 2>the department is supposed to do its job.

0:24:48.050 --> 0:24:48.430
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:24:49.490 --> 0:24:51.609
<v Speaker 2>And we expect them to do their job, but they

0:24:51.630 --> 0:24:55.010
<v Speaker 2>don't have the power to do their job. You are

0:24:55.030 --> 0:25:02.470
<v Speaker 2>saying that I'm not saying that.

0:25:02.369 --> 0:25:06.060
<v Speaker 1>That is right. I am saying that the rules of

0:25:06.100 --> 0:25:08.619
<v Speaker 1>the game at the moment, whether they are right or wrong,

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.540
<v Speaker 1>are that the constitution is the supreme law.

0:25:13.740 --> 0:25:13.900
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:25:16.180 --> 0:25:21.230
<v Speaker 2>But yet we expect departments that do not control the constitution.

0:25:21.290 --> 0:25:23.969
<v Speaker 2>In order for the country to work, the people who

0:25:24.030 --> 0:25:26.390
<v Speaker 2>are making it work need to have the authority. But

0:25:26.650 --> 0:25:28.889
<v Speaker 2>the people whose job it is to make the.

0:25:28.890 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Authority do not have the power.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 2>To do it. Yet we are angry at the government.

0:25:34.780 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 2>We are angry that the government is not doing their job.

0:25:36.700 --> 0:25:40.220
<v Speaker 2>We are angry that our country isn't working. They actually

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.900
<v Speaker 2>do not have the power. Even if they were working,

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 2>they do not have the power.

0:25:46.700 --> 0:25:50.210
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, Joseph, and by the way, I

0:25:51.450 --> 0:25:55.450
<v Speaker 1>am sentimentally with you. Here's the argument that is going

0:25:55.490 --> 0:26:00.610
<v Speaker 1>to be brought to bear in our protest. That the

0:26:01.790 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>process to arriving at a particular decision which you and

0:26:07.700 --> 0:26:12.700
<v Speaker 1>i would consider to be the department working must also

0:26:12.850 --> 0:26:16.630
<v Speaker 1>be according to the constitution i i usually say it's

0:26:16.670 --> 0:26:18.850
<v Speaker 1>like it's.

0:26:17.890 --> 0:26:20.530
<v Speaker 2>I understand no no i understand i understand what you're

0:26:20.570 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 2>saying but there has to be an assumption that it

0:26:23.300 --> 0:26:26.490
<v Speaker 2>wasn't There has to be an assumption that the decision

0:26:26.770 --> 0:26:29.310
<v Speaker 2>taken by the department is wrong.

0:26:29.550 --> 0:26:31.669
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what this is.

0:26:31.730 --> 0:26:33.350
<v Speaker 2>I hear you.

0:26:33.670 --> 0:26:38.030
<v Speaker 1>So the Concord is saying that. The Concord is saying

0:26:38.090 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that the amendments made in 2022 or in 2020 by

0:26:40.130 --> 0:26:47.449
<v Speaker 1>the government to try and curb The issue of the

0:26:47.490 --> 0:26:53.909
<v Speaker 1>misuse of the asylum and refugee issue are understandable, but

0:26:53.950 --> 0:26:55.270
<v Speaker 1>they were not constitutional.

0:26:56.470 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm

0:26:58.340 --> 0:27:03.780
<v Speaker 2>talking about Chidima, right? Chidima, the department did their job.

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 2>They said Chidima, because of reason one, two, three, four,

0:27:07.340 --> 0:27:10.540
<v Speaker 2>she cannot be in the country, right? They did their job,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.940
<v Speaker 2>yet she is still in the country. Because you went

0:27:13.980 --> 0:27:18.090
<v Speaker 2>to the court and the court had to assume that

0:27:18.150 --> 0:27:23.909
<v Speaker 2>the decision that was taken by people who have to

0:27:23.950 --> 0:27:27.730
<v Speaker 2>do their job, there has to be like this acceptance

0:27:28.109 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that if a department is tasked to do a job,

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 2>then that job can be understood to have been wrong.

0:27:35.260 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I hear you. Joseph, I hear you. And I don't

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.369
<v Speaker 1>know if you've been listening to other programs where I...

0:27:41.820 --> 0:27:46.180
<v Speaker 1>raise that very issue myself. But those are the rules

0:27:46.260 --> 0:27:48.460
<v Speaker 1>of the game that we find ourselves in. Now, I

0:27:48.500 --> 0:27:53.550
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily like those rules. And I hear you don't

0:27:53.590 --> 0:27:56.550
<v Speaker 1>like those rules. But those are the rules that we

0:27:56.730 --> 0:28:00.450
<v Speaker 1>are confined in at the moment.

0:28:00.869 --> 0:28:05.090
<v Speaker 2>And there's a belief that the rules were made by

0:28:05.109 --> 0:28:07.690
<v Speaker 2>the government and the government has the power to change

0:28:07.710 --> 0:28:09.010
<v Speaker 2>those rules.

0:28:09.030 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>No, that's not the belief. The belief is to say

0:28:12.500 --> 0:28:19.590
<v Speaker 1>that these rules are made by the constitutional order that

0:28:20.330 --> 0:28:23.630
<v Speaker 1>made the constitution become a real thing in 1996. It

0:28:27.710 --> 0:28:31.910
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the government that made it. It was a group

0:28:31.970 --> 0:28:36.490
<v Speaker 1>of elected leaders who put together a constitution with which

0:28:36.550 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they would then govern. No, no, no.

0:28:39.740 --> 0:28:45.740
<v Speaker 2>Princey Tombeni previously said that in one of the cases,

0:28:46.700 --> 0:28:49.590
<v Speaker 2>the way she put it was that our government signed

0:28:49.650 --> 0:28:51.510
<v Speaker 2>us into this international.

0:28:50.970 --> 0:28:51.530
<v Speaker 4>Law that.

0:28:53.090 --> 0:28:57.130
<v Speaker 2>Bear us with this obligation of taking in refugees.

0:28:57.250 --> 0:29:02.660
<v Speaker 1>Post the constitution. It was the constitution that gave our

0:29:02.740 --> 0:29:05.060
<v Speaker 1>government the power to sign those documents.

0:29:06.830 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 2>And then the argument then is that the government has

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the power now to withdraw us from those agreements.

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:15.140
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:29:16.270 --> 0:29:21.250
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. And somebody would challenge that and say,

0:29:21.550 --> 0:29:25.930
<v Speaker 1>but the Constitution says something else. I hear your frustration, Joseph.

0:29:26.310 --> 0:29:26.790
<v Speaker 1>I hear you.

0:29:27.570 --> 0:29:32.410
<v Speaker 2>Why is it that then we have this propensity to

0:29:32.510 --> 0:29:36.330
<v Speaker 2>obsess over the government? I understand the government isn't working, right?

0:29:36.390 --> 0:29:36.750
<v Speaker 3>I'm not.

0:29:38.500 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Like, not aware of that.

0:29:40.060 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 4>I see it.

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.780
<v Speaker 2>I live it, too, right? But we are angry at

0:29:43.820 --> 0:29:47.090
<v Speaker 2>the government, I feel, because it's just easier. It's just

0:29:47.290 --> 0:29:50.090
<v Speaker 2>easier for us to be angry at the things that

0:29:50.130 --> 0:29:52.450
<v Speaker 2>we see, right? You look at the Madlana Commission, you

0:29:52.490 --> 0:29:54.870
<v Speaker 2>look at all the corruption that is happening, but even

0:29:54.910 --> 0:29:58.070
<v Speaker 2>if our state... Even if the government did work, I

0:29:58.290 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 2>feel like the problem is that we love the romance

0:30:04.710 --> 0:30:07.780
<v Speaker 2>of our constitution, right? There's this word that is often

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 2>used every time people are angry about what is happening

0:30:10.540 --> 0:30:13.980
<v Speaker 2>in our country, that we are a constitutional democracy, right?

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.980
<v Speaker 2>It's very romantic. It fills you all up with this

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.670
<v Speaker 2>gooey emotions, but I feel like it's a manipulative term. I....

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.580
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to quibble with you with that. But one

0:30:26.620 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I said right at the beginning

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:35.770
<v Speaker 1>was that we can have these cerebral conversations about government

0:30:35.830 --> 0:30:44.070
<v Speaker 1>versus constitution versus the separation of powers debate versus the

0:30:44.890 --> 0:30:51.730
<v Speaker 1>judiciary versus the executive. We can have those conversations. The

0:30:51.750 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>man in the street experiences all of that as the government. Right?

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:03.780
<v Speaker 1>So I'm happy to have that distinction with you and

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.660
<v Speaker 1>say I agree with you that we need to really

0:31:06.740 --> 0:31:11.100
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation about constitutional reform. I'm happy to. But

0:31:11.380 --> 0:31:12.220
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter.

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.210
<v Speaker 2>Up until the men in the streets understand that it

0:31:15.250 --> 0:31:18.890
<v Speaker 2>is not the government that is the problem, right? Another,

0:31:19.010 --> 0:31:20.870
<v Speaker 2>my last point that I wanted to make was that

0:31:23.340 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that you and I have always

0:31:26.300 --> 0:31:28.500
<v Speaker 2>talked about was that we keep being told that we

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 2>have like this wonderful constitution. Oh my God, yet no

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.300
<v Speaker 2>other country follows it, right? And a couple of weeks ago,

0:31:36.420 --> 0:31:40.570
<v Speaker 2>I made like this revelation and I found some information

0:31:40.610 --> 0:31:44.770
<v Speaker 2>about how we got to the situation that we are in, right?

0:31:45.710 --> 0:31:48.930
<v Speaker 2>The apartheid government, when the apartheid government ran South Africa,

0:31:50.170 --> 0:31:53.670
<v Speaker 2>the power, you see the power that sits with the

0:31:53.710 --> 0:31:59.290
<v Speaker 2>Constitutional Court, right? People keep saying the Constitutional Court's job

0:31:59.330 --> 0:32:03.590
<v Speaker 2>is to interpret the law. The Constitutional Court doesn't just

0:32:03.650 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 2>interpret the law. They actually make the law. But the

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:10.780
<v Speaker 2>problem with the Constitution is that constitutions are incomplete. They

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 2>are vague. So at some point, someone has to use

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.580
<v Speaker 2>their own personal judgment to determine what the Constitution must be.

0:32:17.620 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 4>What the Constitution is, right?

0:32:19.780 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 2>When in Western countries and when the apartheid government run

0:32:23.420 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 2>this country, right, in countries that white people run, the power,

0:32:28.580 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the power that sits in the constitution, it's not, it

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:35.100
<v Speaker 2>sits in parliament. In the UK, decisions made in parliament.

0:32:35.140 --> 0:32:37.180
<v Speaker 1>Gotcha, gotcha. Joseph, I'm going to let you go. Joseph

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:42.310
<v Speaker 1>is an orange farm, understandably frustrated by this idea that

0:32:42.870 --> 0:32:46.710
<v Speaker 1>government doesn't make decisions ultimately. It has to defer to

0:32:46.850 --> 0:32:47.710
<v Speaker 1>a constitution.

0:32:47.730 --> 0:32:47.870
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:54.140
<v Speaker 1>Many of us have raised that issue. But it comes,

0:32:54.300 --> 0:32:59.050
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, from the idea as to who guards

0:32:59.090 --> 0:33:03.810
<v Speaker 1>the guardians. And I suppose the same question would be

0:33:03.830 --> 0:33:06.790
<v Speaker 1>true even about the constitutional court itself. Who guards them?

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:12.660
<v Speaker 1>So I imagine there is a real conversation to be had.

0:33:12.700 --> 0:33:15.660
<v Speaker 1>And that's why we had that whole thing about constitutionally speaking,

0:33:15.700 --> 0:33:22.060
<v Speaker 1>if you remember. To say, but... How come this wonderful constitution,

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the best constitution in the world, we are told, is

0:33:27.220 --> 0:33:32.410
<v Speaker 1>nowhere else but here? And those that benefit from this

0:33:32.470 --> 0:33:37.090
<v Speaker 1>constitution are not the people of here. We've raised that question.

0:33:37.710 --> 0:33:42.130
<v Speaker 1>But I hear Joseph's impassioned frustration. And I share it.

0:33:45.030 --> 0:33:47.410
<v Speaker 1>Let me speak to Rodney in Sochanguwe. Rodney, hi.

0:33:47.470 --> 0:33:47.540
<v Speaker 4>Hi.

0:33:50.930 --> 0:34:05.060
<v Speaker 3>After 1994, South Africans were still traumatized due to the

0:34:05.220 --> 0:34:15.020
<v Speaker 3>colonization and apartheid. We were never rehabilitated. Nobody developed, there

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 3>was no program that can help us heal from where

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 3>we come from and getting into democracy. And we are

0:34:22.860 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 3>wrongly introduced into democracy with a statement of saying, We would.

0:34:29.590 --> 0:34:31.150
<v Speaker 1>Live as well as white people.

0:34:31.510 --> 0:34:32.450
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:34:34.370 --> 0:34:40.049
<v Speaker 3>So, and then, you know, even way after democracy, you'll

0:34:40.130 --> 0:34:43.910
<v Speaker 3>hear your own political leaders who are in charge.

0:34:44.469 --> 0:34:44.609
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:34:47.219 --> 0:34:50.379
<v Speaker 3>You can see, those are the signs of colonization. These

0:34:50.420 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 3>guys are still colonized. They still see success as being,

0:34:55.900 --> 0:34:58.460
<v Speaker 3>once you're successful, you look like you're a white person.

0:34:59.860 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 3>That simply tells you that I'm being led by someone

0:35:02.420 --> 0:35:03.900
<v Speaker 3>who's never been rehabilitated.

0:35:05.940 --> 0:35:07.140
<v Speaker 2>And then fast.

0:35:06.739 --> 0:35:11.069
<v Speaker 3>Forward, we move forward, we came into democracy. By them

0:35:11.150 --> 0:35:14.529
<v Speaker 3>coming into democracy as our leaders, because they have never

0:35:14.570 --> 0:35:18.850
<v Speaker 3>been rehabilitated, They did a lot of mistakes, like someone

0:35:18.870 --> 0:35:26.740
<v Speaker 3>who's being traumatized, to make sure that... It's a trauma

0:35:26.860 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 3>of experiencing poverty for a very long time.

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:30.979
<v Speaker 1>Let me make sure that....

0:35:34.270 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 3>And when they took, when it moved into, it became Beghi,

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:44.259
<v Speaker 3>come Zuma, come Kalema, and then, so whoever comes in

0:35:44.540 --> 0:35:47.780
<v Speaker 3>at that moment, they make sure that they cover their,

0:35:47.820 --> 0:35:50.980
<v Speaker 3>they fill their pockets. So what I'm simply saying at

0:35:51.020 --> 0:35:53.900
<v Speaker 3>this moment, we are being led by people who have

0:35:54.020 --> 0:35:58.009
<v Speaker 3>never been rehabilitated. Hence, it's not easy for them to

0:35:58.110 --> 0:36:01.970
<v Speaker 3>see the loopholes in our constitution. For them to debate,

0:36:02.010 --> 0:36:05.130
<v Speaker 3>to say, how do I protect my community in general?

0:36:05.390 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>It's about how do I protect myself? So that makes

0:36:09.260 --> 0:36:12.739
<v Speaker 3>it easier for those who are outside to see, oh,

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:15.339
<v Speaker 3>these guys, they see there's a gap in their constitution.

0:36:15.900 --> 0:36:21.260
<v Speaker 3>Let's compromise them. Now we are in a stage whereby

0:36:21.739 --> 0:36:24.219
<v Speaker 3>we are compromised as South Africans, and they are also

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.339
<v Speaker 3>now being compromised. You know, one day I saw the

0:36:27.380 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 3>picture of Nando Balfour. I couldn't believe that this guy

0:36:34.060 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 3>was once in power. So, which is what's going to

0:36:37.060 --> 0:36:39.580
<v Speaker 3>happen with all these leaders that we have at this moment?

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.180
<v Speaker 3>And they will be complaining just like us. So, I'm

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.630
<v Speaker 3>just worried. It's a challenge. It is definitely a challenge. Rodney,

0:36:45.650 --> 0:36:48.290
<v Speaker 3>raising the issue that the understanding.

0:36:47.950 --> 0:37:01.770
<v Speaker 1>Of freedom by many a South African, including our leaders,

0:37:02.550 --> 0:37:08.049
<v Speaker 1>has been connected to white aspirationalism. That we as black

0:37:08.090 --> 0:37:15.500
<v Speaker 1>people have understood freedom only to mean when you reach

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the level of lifestyle that white people live. Some people

0:37:22.020 --> 0:37:26.739
<v Speaker 1>have called it whitism. And I think that there's a

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:28.700
<v Speaker 1>lot of truth in that. And I don't think that

0:37:28.739 --> 0:37:31.259
<v Speaker 1>it's only to be found in South Africa. It's to

0:37:31.300 --> 0:37:34.089
<v Speaker 1>be found in many other different places. And I think

0:37:34.130 --> 0:37:37.629
<v Speaker 1>it has something to do with the fact that there

0:37:37.710 --> 0:37:40.610
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people that are still mesmerized by whiteness.

0:37:44.790 --> 0:37:56.250
<v Speaker 1>It's like the ultimate aspiration. And so I think that

0:37:56.330 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the court is saying that until we aspire to humanness

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:09.460
<v Speaker 1>rather than whiteness, perhaps that's when things might begin to change.

0:38:12.180 --> 0:38:16.509
<v Speaker 1>Because as soon as people reach a particular lifestyle that

0:38:16.550 --> 0:38:23.050
<v Speaker 1>they consider to be white, whatever that is, then people

0:38:23.110 --> 0:38:29.219
<v Speaker 1>think that they've made it. I think that at the

0:38:29.580 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>heart of what the caller is saying is that maybe

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of aspiring to be white, we should rather aspire

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:46.190
<v Speaker 1>to be right. A lot of injury, folks, that we

0:38:46.250 --> 0:38:53.730
<v Speaker 1>must still be rehabilitated. Or we must still heal from.

0:38:55.670 --> 0:38:58.630
<v Speaker 1>Let me continue and take the call from Isaac in Orlando. Soweto,

0:38:58.650 --> 0:38:59.569
<v Speaker 1>good evening to you, Isaac.

0:39:00.989 --> 0:39:02.089
<v Speaker 4>Good day, Bob. How are you?

0:39:02.170 --> 0:39:04.130
<v Speaker 1>I'm very well. Thank you, Isaac. What's on your mind?

0:39:04.790 --> 0:39:08.150
<v Speaker 4>I'm good, I'm good. So just three points. Number one,

0:39:08.170 --> 0:39:14.149
<v Speaker 4>I just want to address what Puleng Dimbane said, the

0:39:14.210 --> 0:39:19.260
<v Speaker 4>acting police commissioner. To me, it sounds like whenever the

0:39:19.300 --> 0:39:22.100
<v Speaker 4>police come to the scene, it sounds like they're running

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.380
<v Speaker 4>from a script, you know? Instead of them looking at

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:29.350
<v Speaker 4>the context– excuse me, that's my baby in the background

0:39:29.969 --> 0:39:35.479
<v Speaker 4>Go back. Go back. It seems to me as if, like,

0:39:35.580 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, the first thing that they want to do

0:39:37.020 --> 0:39:39.580
<v Speaker 4>is say, they're writing from a script to say, hey,

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.219
<v Speaker 4>they want to send a message to the public to say,

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:45.460
<v Speaker 4>you know, ABC or South Africans will be published for

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.750
<v Speaker 4>addressing their rights. And it was just disappointing from my side.

0:39:51.469 --> 0:39:57.620
<v Speaker 4>And then number two, around the government and the act

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 4>that was laid out, it seems to me like the

0:40:00.860 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 4>layman or the South African citizens, number one, they would

0:40:05.340 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 4>tell you that the government is putting the foreigners first

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 4>before them. It seems like they're always prioritizing sovereignness before

0:40:13.300 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 4>South Africans, and that's quite disappointing. And my last point

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:21.580
<v Speaker 4>will be that the standard that we're setting with this

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:25.020
<v Speaker 4>act is, for example, if you enter this country illegally,

0:40:25.660 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 4>you will be granted an asylum. And we know that

0:40:31.260 --> 0:40:35.110
<v Speaker 4>there are chance takers who, even though their country is

0:40:35.170 --> 0:40:38.230
<v Speaker 4>on their wall and so forth, they will apply for

0:40:38.250 --> 0:40:38.910
<v Speaker 4>this asylum.

0:40:41.010 --> 0:40:43.690
<v Speaker 1>So that's perhaps where we need to quickly jump in, Ike,

0:40:44.630 --> 0:40:49.969
<v Speaker 1>to say that all of my guests, and I think

0:40:49.989 --> 0:40:52.830
<v Speaker 1>that that is the point that many experts have been

0:40:52.850 --> 0:40:56.989
<v Speaker 1>trying to make to all of us who are concerned,

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:07.750
<v Speaker 1>is that the application process does not guarantee acceptance. And

0:41:07.810 --> 0:41:12.109
<v Speaker 1>many of us may have been under the impression that

0:41:12.170 --> 0:41:17.850
<v Speaker 1>this Concord ruling, under the wrong impression, that this Concord

0:41:17.910 --> 0:41:24.100
<v Speaker 1>ruling means that whether you are here legally or not,

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:28.340
<v Speaker 1>you will get asylum or refugee status.

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.180
<v Speaker 4>But don't they get an exemption permit to say, okay,

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 4>although you're going to have the asylum seeker permit, there's

0:41:36.700 --> 0:41:38.930
<v Speaker 4>an exemption to say you're under review.

0:41:39.050 --> 0:41:44.649
<v Speaker 1>Yes, they do. And there you are correct. But that

0:41:44.710 --> 0:41:49.770
<v Speaker 1>does not necessarily mean that you've now received asylum or

0:41:49.830 --> 0:41:54.149
<v Speaker 1>refugee status. I understand your concern that says, oh, here's

0:41:54.190 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>a guy who is here illegally. Now he is sort

0:41:57.910 --> 0:42:02.900
<v Speaker 1>of legalized, right? By having a document, an official document

0:42:02.940 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that says that he is in a process. Whether in

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 1>that process he fails or succeeds, but this guy came

0:42:10.420 --> 0:42:13.580
<v Speaker 1>here illegally is the big question that many South Africans

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:17.420
<v Speaker 1>are asking. And they are asking the question, then what

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is the value of being able to say that somebody

0:42:21.580 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>has done something wrong or has done something unlawfully? And

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that is part of what a lot of South Africans

0:42:28.980 --> 0:42:33.620
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about to say, fine, how can we trust

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:37.020
<v Speaker 1>that even this process is going to be okay? Because

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>we've been betrayed by, I mean, the SIU report, not

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:45.630
<v Speaker 1>just a few months ago, told us that the Department

0:42:45.650 --> 0:42:52.030
<v Speaker 1>of Home Affairs has become a market for illegal documentation.

0:42:53.030 --> 0:42:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So if people have enough money, maybe people are going

0:42:57.780 --> 0:42:59.450
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get the documents. So there's a

0:42:59.489 --> 0:43:01.950
<v Speaker 1>lot of mistrust, Isaac, and I think that that is

0:43:02.450 --> 0:43:04.370
<v Speaker 1>where part of the frustration is coming from.

0:43:04.390 --> 0:43:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a free-for-all now.

0:43:07.390 --> 0:43:10.190
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I hear you.

0:43:10.350 --> 0:43:12.770
<v Speaker 4>For our generation, it's okay, but for our kids and

0:43:12.810 --> 0:43:20.180
<v Speaker 4>the next generation, it's a big concern. I hear you.

0:43:20.460 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Isaac is in Orlando, so we're too much appreciated. So

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Ben has been sending me a lot of messages recently

0:43:26.010 --> 0:43:29.529
<v Speaker 1>Lots of messages. Now I'm getting what he's saying. Anyway,

0:43:29.910 --> 0:43:33.979
<v Speaker 1>it appears that on the 5th of October, a lady

0:43:34.020 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>by the name of Hanneke van Zyl was murdered at

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>her farm. A 55-year-old woman is on the 5th of October, 2026.

0:44:01.489 --> 0:44:06.290
<v Speaker 1>I suppose the translation is that a 55-year-old lady was

0:44:06.450 --> 0:44:10.350
<v Speaker 1>attacked at a farm gate on the 5th of October

0:44:10.469 --> 0:44:15.690
<v Speaker 1>and she died as a result of her injury. Her

0:44:15.730 --> 0:44:21.370
<v Speaker 1>death had South Africa and new women about the diversity

0:44:21.469 --> 0:44:26.250
<v Speaker 1>of land and country Many questions have been raised around

0:44:26.270 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the issue of safety in the farms and so forth.

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Then there's a whole thing for justice for Hanaki and

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:37.980
<v Speaker 1>so forth. First, Ben, my absolute condolences for the Fonseil

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:44.070
<v Speaker 1>family for losing their loved one. Nobody should be killed

0:44:44.250 --> 0:44:48.370
<v Speaker 1>in the way that you describe. But you don't say

0:44:48.430 --> 0:44:55.180
<v Speaker 1>who killed her. You imply it. but you don't say

0:44:55.440 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>who killed her. And your implication is playing into a

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:13.930
<v Speaker 1>larger political narrative. And I would argue that political narrative

0:45:15.210 --> 0:45:22.490
<v Speaker 1>is there to push a particular agenda. Your message implies

0:45:23.730 --> 0:45:33.299
<v Speaker 1>who Killed. I am with. The family. In this difficult time.

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:39.060
<v Speaker 1>But I could give you. Ten pictures today.

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 4>Ben.

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:50.230
<v Speaker 1>Of women. Black women. Colored women. That have also been killed.

0:45:52.910 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm looking for justice for them too. Suppose what

0:45:57.380 --> 0:46:03.410
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying to you is that perhaps it is vulgar

0:46:03.570 --> 0:46:09.149
<v Speaker 1>to use the tragic death of Anaki Fanzel to push

0:46:09.170 --> 0:46:15.670
<v Speaker 1>a political agenda without being sure who is responsible for

0:46:15.730 --> 0:46:21.700
<v Speaker 1>Anaki's death. Just a thought from my side. Because I

0:46:21.739 --> 0:46:30.620
<v Speaker 1>can give you pictures too, Ben. Lots of pictures. of black, Indian, colored,

0:46:30.860 --> 0:46:38.910
<v Speaker 1>and white women that have died. And they too deserve justice,

0:46:39.070 --> 0:46:49.710
<v Speaker 1>just like Hanneke does. So I'm saying maybe this parading

0:46:49.750 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of Hanneke's picture a million times on my timeline so

0:46:54.219 --> 0:46:56.460
<v Speaker 1>that I can talk about her, I suppose, and that's fair,

0:46:57.530 --> 0:47:03.180
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. That we should want justice for Haneke van Zyl.

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Should be a South African priority and I agree with

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:12.060
<v Speaker 1>you and I'm behind you. But I could give you

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:19.930
<v Speaker 1>just 10 pictures, just today, of women that have been murdered. Today,

0:47:21.830 --> 0:47:22.830
<v Speaker 1>that are of other colors.