1 00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:03,960 Speaker 1: Donald Trump says, great talks are happening, great, great talks, 2 00:00:04,240 --> 00:00:07,760 Speaker 1: talks with great, great prospects. But if that don't work out, 3 00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: I'll obliterate Iran. Well, that's not exactly what he said, 4 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: but that's kind of what he said. And Iran says talks, 5 00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 1: no talks, none at all. Turkey says, there have been 6 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:22,560 Speaker 1: some approaches, and it is look either the talks are 7 00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:25,480 Speaker 1: happening or they're not, or they could be happening, but 8 00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:28,200 Speaker 1: not at a level that they can be described as talks. 9 00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:35,280 Speaker 1: It appears that there is some back channel contact through 10 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:40,920 Speaker 1: mediators like or would be mediators like Pakistan, which might 11 00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 1: lead if not to face to face meetings between and 12 00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:51,240 Speaker 1: a senior Iranian government official and a senior US government official, 13 00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:56,680 Speaker 1: maybe Jared Kushner, maybe Steve Vitkoff. But it talks about 14 00:00:56,760 --> 00:00:59,400 Speaker 1: talks about the possibility of talks, which might or might 15 00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:04,560 Speaker 1: not lead to talks. How would you agree or disagree 16 00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:09,720 Speaker 1: with that characterization? James ker Lindsay of Kingston University, Hello. 17 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:14,119 Speaker 2: Hello, John. I wish I could throw some clear picture 18 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:16,720 Speaker 2: on what's going on here, But like everyone else, I mean, 19 00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:20,000 Speaker 2: we're just hearing all sorts of different reports, and you know, 20 00:01:20,040 --> 00:01:22,479 Speaker 2: there's all sorts of theories going around. So I mean, 21 00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:26,039 Speaker 2: if you've been generous, you could say, perhaps the Trump 22 00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:30,400 Speaker 2: administration is in fact in talks with somebody from the 23 00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:33,560 Speaker 2: Iranian government hierarchy. The problem, of course, is that Iran 24 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:37,240 Speaker 2: has been heavily bombed at the moment. It seems by 25 00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:41,640 Speaker 2: all accounts that the central administration is in disarray. There 26 00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:44,720 Speaker 2: have been suggestions that the Trump administration has been speaking 27 00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:49,360 Speaker 2: with a senior member of the parliament, for example, but 28 00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:53,760 Speaker 2: that seems to maybe not have filtered through towards other 29 00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:55,720 Speaker 2: parts of the government who are now denying it. So 30 00:01:55,800 --> 00:02:00,520 Speaker 2: that's a charitable explanation. An uncharitable would be simply to 31 00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 2: say that Donald Trump is making this up. That could 32 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:05,800 Speaker 2: be for all sorts of reasons. One he realizes he's 33 00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:07,520 Speaker 2: in the mess and wants to you know, this is 34 00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:11,560 Speaker 2: wishful thinking. There is a lot of very very disturbing 35 00:02:11,600 --> 00:02:13,799 Speaker 2: rumors emerging, and quite a lot of evidence to back 36 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:17,119 Speaker 2: it up that all sorts of trades have been done 37 00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:20,680 Speaker 2: stock market trades on the back of this sort of information, 38 00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:24,440 Speaker 2: because obviously every time any new information comes out, oil 39 00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 2: prices rise or stock prices rise, and if you time 40 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:29,560 Speaker 2: it right, and it seems that a lot of money 41 00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:32,080 Speaker 2: has been put on a lot of trades fifteen minutes 42 00:02:32,120 --> 00:02:35,080 Speaker 2: before Trump makes his latest announcement. They're used stand to 43 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:37,520 Speaker 2: make a lot of money. And then, of course the 44 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:40,600 Speaker 2: third theory is that there are talks, but of course 45 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:44,400 Speaker 2: the Urnian government is denying it for whatever reason, maybe 46 00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:48,160 Speaker 2: just to embarrass Trump. They have been proving particularly adept 47 00:02:48,200 --> 00:02:51,440 Speaker 2: at that in putting Trump into a corner. So every 48 00:02:51,440 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 2: time Trump sort of says, yes, we want an off brand, 49 00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:55,200 Speaker 2: we can end this, the Ornian government say, well, no, 50 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:58,400 Speaker 2: we're not being interested in talks and we'll continue to 51 00:02:58,480 --> 00:03:02,440 Speaker 2: keep the straight up Horner's blocked. So look, there are 52 00:03:02,480 --> 00:03:04,560 Speaker 2: lots and lots of theories that are going around, but 53 00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:07,680 Speaker 2: it's just there's a shortage of any real clarity at 54 00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:08,120 Speaker 2: the moment. 55 00:03:08,320 --> 00:03:12,000 Speaker 1: Would it be fair to say, though, that it seems 56 00:03:12,400 --> 00:03:17,680 Speaker 1: probable that Trump was I don't know who he listens to, 57 00:03:18,040 --> 00:03:20,880 Speaker 1: but if there is anybody who listens to that person 58 00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:23,400 Speaker 1: dropped a word in his ear about he's forty eight 59 00:03:23,520 --> 00:03:27,680 Speaker 1: hour deadline to open the strait of war moves and 60 00:03:27,720 --> 00:03:31,960 Speaker 1: the response from Iran and said, this is one we're 61 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 1: not going to win. If we do it, we'll do 62 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:39,160 Speaker 1: it successfully, but the consequences will be extremely negative for 63 00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:44,560 Speaker 1: the world and for chances of reelection of your party 64 00:03:44,720 --> 00:03:48,800 Speaker 1: Faithful in the mid terms later this year. Because I 65 00:03:48,840 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 1: do think that this is a Taco moment. I do 66 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 1: think that maybe at the time that he made the thread, 67 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:56,600 Speaker 1: he thought it was a great idea. For the moment, 68 00:03:56,720 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 1: he doesn't think it's a great idea, And the fact 69 00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:00,760 Speaker 1: that he doesn't think it's a great idea is a 70 00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:02,520 Speaker 1: great idea. 71 00:04:01,880 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 2: Well, yes, absolutely. And also, I mean, the thing is 72 00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:06,840 Speaker 2: all right. You could say that the United States isn't 73 00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:11,320 Speaker 2: bothered by such things, but it had become very very clear, 74 00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:15,880 Speaker 2: very quickly, from pretty much across the legal spectrum that 75 00:04:15,960 --> 00:04:19,920 Speaker 2: if Trump carried through with his threat to bomb power stations, 76 00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:23,600 Speaker 2: that would be a war crime, and it would be 77 00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:26,320 Speaker 2: very very obviously, and he has signaled it as such. 78 00:04:26,400 --> 00:04:28,679 Speaker 2: And you know, I don't think Trump for one moment 79 00:04:28,720 --> 00:04:30,640 Speaker 2: thinks that he you know, he would stand a chance 80 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:33,440 Speaker 2: have been pulled up before the International Criminal Court or 81 00:04:33,440 --> 00:04:37,960 Speaker 2: anything like that. But nevertheless, it was just so obviously 82 00:04:39,320 --> 00:04:42,479 Speaker 2: condemned across the board that I think that maybe he felt, well, 83 00:04:43,000 --> 00:04:45,360 Speaker 2: you know this this is perhaps a step too far, 84 00:04:46,640 --> 00:04:50,400 Speaker 2: but again it becomes very very difficult to get a 85 00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:53,600 Speaker 2: proper sense of what exactly is going on here. And 86 00:04:53,640 --> 00:04:57,919 Speaker 2: it's again there seems to be all sorts of evidence 87 00:04:57,960 --> 00:05:01,080 Speaker 2: emerging of very significant trades on the back of each 88 00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:04,320 Speaker 2: of these different statements, and people making a lot of 89 00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:06,800 Speaker 2: money out of all of this. 90 00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:13,159 Speaker 1: And a divergence of strategy between Netanyahu and Trump, between 91 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:19,320 Speaker 1: the Israelis and the Americans, because it again we don't know, 92 00:05:19,400 --> 00:05:22,640 Speaker 1: we're speculating that it does seem that the Americans are 93 00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:25,240 Speaker 1: a little more interested in an ORF ramp than the 94 00:05:25,320 --> 00:05:26,080 Speaker 1: Israelis are. 95 00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:30,360 Speaker 2: Yes, I mean I think for Netanyahu, I mean, we 96 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:33,120 Speaker 2: know that he has severe political problems, or he has 97 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:36,960 Speaker 2: at least had severe political problems and legal problems, and 98 00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:40,080 Speaker 2: so there's you know, one could argue that there is 99 00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:42,640 Speaker 2: a lot for Netanya who to be gained by pummeling 100 00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 2: Iran as much as possible but not actually bringing the 101 00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:50,680 Speaker 2: regime down. Whereas for the United States, I think that 102 00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:54,279 Speaker 2: Trump now sees that he's confronted with a huge problem 103 00:05:54,839 --> 00:05:58,039 Speaker 2: of he sets all these ambitious goals at the start 104 00:05:58,080 --> 00:06:01,120 Speaker 2: about and we're now in a situation. But frankly, it 105 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:04,080 Speaker 2: seems that number one goal of the American government is 106 00:06:04,160 --> 00:06:06,240 Speaker 2: to keep the straight up one was open, which everyone 107 00:06:06,279 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 2: points out, well, that was the case before this wretched 108 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:13,640 Speaker 2: war started in the first place. So I think Netanyahu 109 00:06:13,760 --> 00:06:18,919 Speaker 2: sort of emerges even if the regime remains intact, he 110 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:21,200 Speaker 2: remains in a strong position he can say, listen, I 111 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:24,279 Speaker 2: had to stop because the American government eventually told me 112 00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:27,360 Speaker 2: that we had to stop. But make no mistake, We're 113 00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 2: still confronted with a very dangerous regime in Iran, and 114 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:34,520 Speaker 2: I still need to lead Israel to provide the security 115 00:06:34,600 --> 00:06:37,200 Speaker 2: that Israel needs. But of course the United States is 116 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:39,320 Speaker 2: based with a very very different set of problems. And 117 00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:42,440 Speaker 2: what will also be interesting in all of this is that, 118 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:46,480 Speaker 2: of course, before this kicked off, that Christy Noham, who 119 00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:49,920 Speaker 2: had held a senior position in the US government, had 120 00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:52,120 Speaker 2: been far from her job. I wonder if a lot 121 00:06:52,120 --> 00:06:54,680 Speaker 2: of people are now wondering if Pete Hegsett, who is 122 00:06:54,720 --> 00:06:57,599 Speaker 2: probably one of the more hawkish people constantly wanting to 123 00:06:57,640 --> 00:07:00,520 Speaker 2: have a war, and maybe persuaded Trump that this was 124 00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:02,760 Speaker 2: going to be a war that would be very very easily. 125 00:07:03,240 --> 00:07:05,479 Speaker 2: While it would be the most beautiful and quick war 126 00:07:05,520 --> 00:07:11,960 Speaker 2: of all time. Trump will seek his punishment for having 127 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:15,560 Speaker 2: been led into what has been so utterly disastrous for 128 00:07:15,640 --> 00:07:17,760 Speaker 2: the United States, but also for Trump personally. 129 00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:21,800 Speaker 1: Thank you, very very much, indeed for your time, much appreciated. 130 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 1: James Kerlindsey is a senior research Fellow at Kingston University