WEBVTT - How to Make AI Your Most Powerful Workplace Ally

0:00:06.570 --> 0:00:10.690
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to I'MM with Me podcast.

0:00:13.530 --> 0:00:17.970
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to biz your work life Sorted. I'm

0:00:18.050 --> 0:00:21.169
<v Speaker 2>m Venom and today we're diving into something that I

0:00:21.210 --> 0:00:25.250
<v Speaker 2>am personally obsessed with. We're using AI to make our

0:00:25.290 --> 0:00:29.610
<v Speaker 2>work lives easier, or as TikTok calls it, lazy girl jobs.

0:00:30.090 --> 0:00:34.130
<v Speaker 2>So I'll be honest, I use AI for literally everything

0:00:34.410 --> 0:00:37.330
<v Speaker 2>these days. I use it for therapy, although I'm not

0:00:37.330 --> 0:00:39.449
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about that today, but I also use

0:00:39.490 --> 0:00:42.610
<v Speaker 2>it to help me prep for interviews, to structure my thoughts,

0:00:42.930 --> 0:00:45.490
<v Speaker 2>even just to give me a little confidence booster before

0:00:45.530 --> 0:00:48.290
<v Speaker 2>big meetings. But I know a lot of people are

0:00:48.330 --> 0:00:50.650
<v Speaker 2>either scared of it, or confused by it, or worry

0:00:50.650 --> 0:00:51.170
<v Speaker 2>that it's going to.

0:00:51.210 --> 0:00:51.890
<v Speaker 1>Take your job.

0:00:52.250 --> 0:00:55.410
<v Speaker 2>So today, so sits down with AI expert Amantha Imba

0:00:55.530 --> 0:00:58.690
<v Speaker 2>from INVENTINGM to break down exactly how to use AI

0:00:58.770 --> 0:01:01.850
<v Speaker 2>tools properly. And when I say properly, I mean actually

0:01:01.970 --> 0:01:05.130
<v Speaker 2>making them work for you, not just throwing random prompts

0:01:05.130 --> 0:01:08.170
<v Speaker 2>at chat GBT and hoping for the best. Plus, they're

0:01:08.170 --> 0:01:10.809
<v Speaker 2>sharing the exact prompts and frameworks that will help you

0:01:10.929 --> 0:01:13.369
<v Speaker 2>use AI as your personal work assistant.

0:01:14.449 --> 0:01:16.449
<v Speaker 3>First, when it comes to AI. I think there's a

0:01:16.490 --> 0:01:19.450
<v Speaker 3>really big mix in terms of how people are using it.

0:01:19.449 --> 0:01:22.850
<v Speaker 3>It's also changing so quickly. So in a work context,

0:01:22.850 --> 0:01:25.330
<v Speaker 3>should we be just trying to use AI as the

0:01:25.369 --> 0:01:27.569
<v Speaker 3>first point of call for everything or is there a

0:01:27.569 --> 0:01:28.050
<v Speaker 3>better way?

0:01:28.330 --> 0:01:31.289
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely a better way. Do not just default to AI.

0:01:31.490 --> 0:01:35.330
<v Speaker 4>So there are three questions that we think about at

0:01:35.410 --> 0:01:38.530
<v Speaker 4>Inventium when we're training people on how to use AI.

0:01:38.649 --> 0:01:39.569
<v Speaker 1>So the first.

0:01:39.410 --> 0:01:43.609
<v Speaker 4>Question is what is the risk if AI gets it wrong.

0:01:44.089 --> 0:01:46.529
<v Speaker 4>If it's a low risk, great, go ahead and use AI.

0:01:46.610 --> 0:01:48.650
<v Speaker 4>But if it's a higher risk, like if the life

0:01:48.730 --> 0:01:53.330
<v Speaker 4>and death situation, maybe think twice. Secondly, and this is related,

0:01:53.770 --> 0:01:58.690
<v Speaker 4>can you easily verify and correct the AI's output? So

0:01:59.050 --> 0:02:02.210
<v Speaker 4>you know, if for example, you're getting it to help

0:02:02.250 --> 0:02:06.290
<v Speaker 4>you write an article on something or social media post,

0:02:06.370 --> 0:02:09.450
<v Speaker 4>it's probably going to be pretty easy to verify things.

0:02:09.530 --> 0:02:12.210
<v Speaker 4>Maybe there's some research that it's referenced, you can go

0:02:12.290 --> 0:02:14.730
<v Speaker 4>straight to the source and check that. But if you

0:02:15.210 --> 0:02:17.290
<v Speaker 4>can't verify it, let's just say you're getting it to

0:02:17.330 --> 0:02:20.490
<v Speaker 4>review a contract and you're not a lawyer and that

0:02:20.530 --> 0:02:23.410
<v Speaker 4>contract is high stakes, maybe don't use the AI. And

0:02:23.450 --> 0:02:28.610
<v Speaker 4>then finally, will the AI save you significant time or effort,

0:02:29.010 --> 0:02:31.610
<v Speaker 4>because if it would be quicker to just write that

0:02:31.690 --> 0:02:35.050
<v Speaker 4>quick little email back yourself rather than prompt the AI

0:02:35.170 --> 0:02:37.410
<v Speaker 4>to do it for you, then there's really no point

0:02:37.450 --> 0:02:38.210
<v Speaker 4>in using the AI.

0:02:38.290 --> 0:02:40.010
<v Speaker 1>So there are the three questions that we ask.

0:02:40.010 --> 0:02:42.170
<v Speaker 3>I've definitely made that mistake before where it's like, would

0:02:42.210 --> 0:02:43.889
<v Speaker 3>you like AI to write this for you? And I'm

0:02:43.930 --> 0:02:46.570
<v Speaker 3>like sure, and then you spend more time rewarding it. Okay,

0:02:46.610 --> 0:02:49.010
<v Speaker 3>I really like those. So one assess the risk to

0:02:49.290 --> 0:02:51.210
<v Speaker 3>can you verify the output? And then three is it

0:02:51.250 --> 0:02:53.170
<v Speaker 3>actually going to save you time? Just one number two

0:02:53.170 --> 0:02:55.810
<v Speaker 3>in terms of verifying the output? How do you actually

0:02:55.890 --> 0:02:57.210
<v Speaker 3>do that? Then? So can you give such just a

0:02:57.250 --> 0:02:59.650
<v Speaker 3>few more examples of how you would actually verify the output.

0:02:59.930 --> 0:03:03.130
<v Speaker 4>So, for example, if you're using the AI to research

0:03:03.170 --> 0:03:06.290
<v Speaker 4>something for you and it gives you all the sources,

0:03:06.850 --> 0:03:09.250
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of us now know that AI

0:03:09.650 --> 0:03:12.530
<v Speaker 4>is not a fact engine. It's a prediction engine that

0:03:12.610 --> 0:03:15.290
<v Speaker 4>is very important, So it doesn't produce facts and it

0:03:15.410 --> 0:03:18.690
<v Speaker 4>is very prone to HA hallucination. So if for example,

0:03:18.890 --> 0:03:22.090
<v Speaker 4>you've asked it to research I don't know some statistics

0:03:22.090 --> 0:03:25.250
<v Speaker 4>around mobile phone use, and it's spitting out some data.

0:03:25.690 --> 0:03:27.889
<v Speaker 4>You want to be clicking on those sources that it's

0:03:27.930 --> 0:03:30.770
<v Speaker 4>giving you to verify those answers yourself.

0:03:31.090 --> 0:03:33.610
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's so true, I guess as well. Another build

0:03:33.690 --> 0:03:36.010
<v Speaker 3>on that is if you're doing something for the first time,

0:03:36.050 --> 0:03:38.330
<v Speaker 3>So say your boss is like, can you write this

0:03:38.570 --> 0:03:41.090
<v Speaker 3>like twenty page strategy document. You've never done that before.

0:03:41.170 --> 0:03:43.090
<v Speaker 3>Using AI to give you that output, you're not really

0:03:43.130 --> 0:03:45.730
<v Speaker 3>going to know like is that output any good or not? Okay,

0:03:45.810 --> 0:03:49.250
<v Speaker 3>So that's understanding when you should use it and doesn't

0:03:49.250 --> 0:03:51.450
<v Speaker 3>necessarily mean you should be using it for every task.

0:03:51.970 --> 0:03:54.210
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about like this is kind of what we

0:03:54.250 --> 0:03:55.810
<v Speaker 3>really want to get into today, which is like the

0:03:55.890 --> 0:03:58.810
<v Speaker 3>detail around how you actually use it, you know, sort

0:03:58.850 --> 0:04:01.130
<v Speaker 3>of challenging a lazy girl energy here. We want to

0:04:01.170 --> 0:04:03.490
<v Speaker 3>be using it to save us time and to make

0:04:03.530 --> 0:04:06.450
<v Speaker 3>our jobs easier. But I think the problem a lot

0:04:06.450 --> 0:04:08.370
<v Speaker 3>of us get into is we just jump straight into

0:04:08.410 --> 0:04:10.610
<v Speaker 3>like trying to write those prompts in chat GPT, and

0:04:10.650 --> 0:04:12.490
<v Speaker 3>then we're not really happy with what we're getting out

0:04:12.490 --> 0:04:14.650
<v Speaker 3>of it. So there's something really important that you need

0:04:14.650 --> 0:04:17.370
<v Speaker 3>to understand first. So Amantha Savius, what do we need

0:04:17.450 --> 0:04:19.450
<v Speaker 3>to know before we just start prompting.

0:04:19.450 --> 0:04:21.450
<v Speaker 4>Well, what we need to do is we need to

0:04:21.450 --> 0:04:25.250
<v Speaker 4>think about what role can AI actually play to help us,

0:04:25.370 --> 0:04:28.010
<v Speaker 4>Because if you think about your work life, there are

0:04:28.050 --> 0:04:31.089
<v Speaker 4>three categories of people that you have in your work life.

0:04:31.130 --> 0:04:33.370
<v Speaker 4>There's people that you can delegate too that might be

0:04:33.410 --> 0:04:38.130
<v Speaker 4>say an administrative assistant. There's people that are teammates, so

0:04:38.490 --> 0:04:41.370
<v Speaker 4>our buddies that might give us feedback and you know,

0:04:41.610 --> 0:04:43.730
<v Speaker 4>just help us think about ideas on problems that we're

0:04:43.730 --> 0:04:46.570
<v Speaker 4>trying to solve. And then there's experts. So maybe your

0:04:46.570 --> 0:04:50.010
<v Speaker 4>boss is an expert. Hopefully maybe you've got a mentor,

0:04:50.450 --> 0:04:52.450
<v Speaker 4>or maybe there are other clever people that you draw on.

0:04:52.850 --> 0:04:55.410
<v Speaker 4>And too often where we get it wrong with AI

0:04:55.690 --> 0:04:57.770
<v Speaker 4>is we just think about the AI as something we

0:04:57.810 --> 0:05:02.570
<v Speaker 4>can delegate our low level admin monotonous tasks too, right

0:05:02.810 --> 0:05:06.450
<v Speaker 4>like can you take notes for this meeting and summarize

0:05:06.490 --> 0:05:08.969
<v Speaker 4>the actions so I can email that round? Pretty low

0:05:09.090 --> 0:05:11.409
<v Speaker 4>level kind of task. Can you write this email for me?

0:05:11.490 --> 0:05:15.810
<v Speaker 4>Pretty low level? But where AI also really shines is

0:05:15.890 --> 0:05:19.090
<v Speaker 4>as a buddy and also as an expert. So I

0:05:19.130 --> 0:05:20.730
<v Speaker 4>don't know if you're anything like me, but I feel

0:05:20.810 --> 0:05:23.570
<v Speaker 4>very guilty tapping teammates on the shoulder and going hey,

0:05:23.650 --> 0:05:25.650
<v Speaker 4>can I get your feedback on this presentation I've put

0:05:25.690 --> 0:05:29.050
<v Speaker 4>together or something like that, because you know, people's time

0:05:29.130 --> 0:05:32.810
<v Speaker 4>is precious, but with the AI, it's always there for you.

0:05:32.930 --> 0:05:35.370
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't care how many times you ask at things,

0:05:35.410 --> 0:05:37.210
<v Speaker 4>what time of day or night you're asking it.

0:05:37.290 --> 0:05:39.490
<v Speaker 1>So it is great as a buddy.

0:05:39.850 --> 0:05:42.130
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, if I want to get a second

0:05:42.130 --> 0:05:45.169
<v Speaker 4>set of eyes on, you know, like a post that I've.

0:05:44.970 --> 0:05:47.770
<v Speaker 1>Written, I can just ask the AI to give me

0:05:47.970 --> 0:05:49.570
<v Speaker 1>its views on that. And I can also use it

0:05:49.570 --> 0:05:50.690
<v Speaker 1>as an expert.

0:05:50.530 --> 0:05:54.170
<v Speaker 4>Like there are times I find where you might have

0:05:54.210 --> 0:05:56.850
<v Speaker 4>a contract to review. There might be pretty low stakes,

0:05:56.890 --> 0:05:58.650
<v Speaker 4>but you still need to look at it. Like let's

0:05:58.650 --> 0:06:01.530
<v Speaker 4>say a contract to use a photographer for an event,

0:06:02.050 --> 0:06:06.010
<v Speaker 4>and it's not worthwhile paying a lawyer to reve because

0:06:06.010 --> 0:06:08.290
<v Speaker 4>it's low stakes. And I must say, lawyers are great

0:06:08.370 --> 0:06:11.930
<v Speaker 4>and lawyers are important, but USEI as an expert. You

0:06:11.970 --> 0:06:14.490
<v Speaker 4>can prompt it to be in the persona of a

0:06:14.570 --> 0:06:16.530
<v Speaker 4>lawyer and just review the contracts so that you can

0:06:16.610 --> 0:06:18.089
<v Speaker 4>understand the causes that you're signing.

0:06:18.130 --> 0:06:21.170
<v Speaker 3>For example, Ah, this is so good, I've never thought

0:06:21.170 --> 0:06:24.250
<v Speaker 3>about it. In those three levels. Before I know we're

0:06:24.290 --> 0:06:26.570
<v Speaker 3>going to get into a live walkthrough of sort of

0:06:26.570 --> 0:06:28.330
<v Speaker 3>how you craft are prompt in a moment, but just

0:06:28.370 --> 0:06:30.010
<v Speaker 3>going back to because I just think like some of

0:06:30.010 --> 0:06:33.170
<v Speaker 3>those use cases you shared are just so helpful and

0:06:33.450 --> 0:06:35.690
<v Speaker 3>can be quite simple too. So back to it being

0:06:35.730 --> 0:06:37.730
<v Speaker 3>like your buddy or your coworker who you don't want

0:06:37.770 --> 0:06:40.250
<v Speaker 3>to bother if you like, can you just review this

0:06:40.530 --> 0:06:42.450
<v Speaker 3>doc and tell me how to make it better? What

0:06:42.450 --> 0:06:44.570
<v Speaker 3>would be just an example prompt that you would throw

0:06:44.570 --> 0:06:45.650
<v Speaker 3>in there to get it to do that?

0:06:46.130 --> 0:06:49.570
<v Speaker 4>I would firstly always talk about, well, what's my task,

0:06:49.650 --> 0:06:51.450
<v Speaker 4>what's my goal that I need at the end of

0:06:51.490 --> 0:06:54.930
<v Speaker 4>the day. Am I looking for a critique? Am I

0:06:55.010 --> 0:06:58.890
<v Speaker 4>looking for a grammar and spelling check? Am I looking

0:06:59.090 --> 0:07:01.970
<v Speaker 4>for someone to view it through the lens of one

0:07:02.010 --> 0:07:04.930
<v Speaker 4>of my customers, for example? So be really clear and

0:07:04.970 --> 0:07:08.330
<v Speaker 4>give it that context. I would also if something that

0:07:08.330 --> 0:07:11.370
<v Speaker 4>you've done before, like let's just say it's a report

0:07:11.370 --> 0:07:14.650
<v Speaker 4>that you have to produce every week for your manager,

0:07:15.250 --> 0:07:17.970
<v Speaker 4>I would give it examples of previous reports that I've

0:07:17.970 --> 0:07:20.530
<v Speaker 4>written that I know a really good quality, and I'd say,

0:07:20.650 --> 0:07:23.570
<v Speaker 4>can you compare it against these previous reports and suggest

0:07:23.650 --> 0:07:26.650
<v Speaker 4>how I might improve it? For example, or tell me

0:07:26.690 --> 0:07:28.010
<v Speaker 4>what I might be missing.

0:07:27.890 --> 0:07:29.530
<v Speaker 3>Now that you're talking about this. This is kind of

0:07:29.530 --> 0:07:31.610
<v Speaker 3>how I use it a lot in terms of that

0:07:31.730 --> 0:07:35.410
<v Speaker 3>sort of almost like thought partner or like peer. And

0:07:35.450 --> 0:07:37.610
<v Speaker 3>so I'll even use things like can you tell me

0:07:37.610 --> 0:07:39.730
<v Speaker 3>what the boring parts are of this and take them out?

0:07:39.810 --> 0:07:42.530
<v Speaker 3>Or can you rewrite this like you're explaining it to

0:07:42.570 --> 0:07:45.170
<v Speaker 3>a smart twelve year old. I find those really helpful

0:07:45.210 --> 0:07:47.130
<v Speaker 3>as well. But just like that kind of thought partner's

0:07:47.170 --> 0:07:50.170
<v Speaker 3>boring partner, I find really helpful too. So that's kind

0:07:50.170 --> 0:07:51.930
<v Speaker 3>of like how to use it as a buddy or

0:07:51.930 --> 0:07:54.690
<v Speaker 3>a peer. Let's talk about an expert. One talk me

0:07:54.730 --> 0:07:56.130
<v Speaker 3>through how you use it as an expert.

0:07:56.410 --> 0:07:58.610
<v Speaker 4>So when I'm using it as an expert, I will

0:07:58.610 --> 0:08:02.650
<v Speaker 4>often go into what I refer to as voice mode

0:08:02.770 --> 0:08:05.210
<v Speaker 4>and how I use it. I've got chat JPT as

0:08:05.210 --> 0:08:07.970
<v Speaker 4>an app on my phone, and you can go into

0:08:08.010 --> 0:08:11.610
<v Speaker 4>the app and there's a little symbol that looks like,

0:08:11.890 --> 0:08:15.050
<v Speaker 4>I guess, an audio icon, and if you press on that,

0:08:15.330 --> 0:08:17.090
<v Speaker 4>wait for it to connect to the internet and turn

0:08:17.090 --> 0:08:21.450
<v Speaker 4>into a colorful bubble. The AI becomes a voice companion

0:08:21.570 --> 0:08:24.850
<v Speaker 4>as opposed to a writing companion, and it will talk

0:08:24.890 --> 0:08:27.210
<v Speaker 4>to you and you can have a conversation with it

0:08:27.250 --> 0:08:30.090
<v Speaker 4>as if you are talking to a real person.

0:08:30.410 --> 0:08:33.130
<v Speaker 1>So that is voice mode. I use that heaps.

0:08:33.650 --> 0:08:37.170
<v Speaker 4>Where I find it's really useful is I will often

0:08:37.570 --> 0:08:40.250
<v Speaker 4>try to think through problems when I'm out walking, when

0:08:40.250 --> 0:08:44.330
<v Speaker 4>I'm out moving, and what I now do is, rather

0:08:44.370 --> 0:08:46.970
<v Speaker 4>than just being with my own thoughts, than having to

0:08:47.010 --> 0:08:50.250
<v Speaker 4>think through things on myself, I can now have an

0:08:50.290 --> 0:08:52.330
<v Speaker 4>expert that I'm having a chat with while I go

0:08:52.410 --> 0:08:55.010
<v Speaker 4>for a walk. Like the other morning, I went for

0:08:55.010 --> 0:08:57.130
<v Speaker 4>a pretty early morning walk and I was trying to

0:08:57.130 --> 0:09:00.810
<v Speaker 4>think through a pricing strategy for a new product that

0:09:00.810 --> 0:09:04.849
<v Speaker 4>we're launching at Inventium, and so I prompted the AI

0:09:04.930 --> 0:09:09.850
<v Speaker 4>to actors are pricing expert in my particular industry, which

0:09:09.890 --> 0:09:13.410
<v Speaker 4>is consulting, and then I just started having a chat

0:09:13.450 --> 0:09:16.970
<v Speaker 4>with it about, Hey, this is my context, this is

0:09:17.010 --> 0:09:19.090
<v Speaker 4>the task that I want you to help me think through.

0:09:19.370 --> 0:09:23.250
<v Speaker 4>And we basically had a thirty minute conversation where I

0:09:23.290 --> 0:09:27.050
<v Speaker 4>had managed to channel an expert in pricing strategy, and

0:09:27.130 --> 0:09:29.130
<v Speaker 4>by the end of that thirty minute walk, I had

0:09:29.130 --> 0:09:31.770
<v Speaker 4>some really great advice that I could put into practice.

0:09:31.930 --> 0:09:33.930
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, if you don't listen to the rest

0:09:33.970 --> 0:09:36.290
<v Speaker 3>of the episode, don't worry, because this is the most

0:09:36.290 --> 0:09:41.210
<v Speaker 3>important thing. This for me was completely game changing for

0:09:41.330 --> 0:09:44.090
<v Speaker 3>anyone who is not using voice mode. You can use

0:09:44.090 --> 0:09:46.010
<v Speaker 3>it on chat, GPT, you can use it on Gemini.

0:09:46.170 --> 0:09:49.010
<v Speaker 3>I think probably most AI assistants have it. Now I

0:09:49.050 --> 0:09:51.410
<v Speaker 3>want you to pause this episode. I want you to

0:09:51.490 --> 0:09:53.530
<v Speaker 3>get your phone out, I want you to download the

0:09:53.650 --> 0:09:57.050
<v Speaker 3>app for your AI have choice, and I want you

0:09:57.090 --> 0:10:00.170
<v Speaker 3>to actually test out using voice mode. So as Amantha said,

0:10:00.210 --> 0:10:02.490
<v Speaker 3>it's that little button on the right hand side, lower

0:10:02.570 --> 0:10:04.210
<v Speaker 3>right hand side, and it looks like a little sound

0:10:04.210 --> 0:10:10.090
<v Speaker 3>recorder it and just start talking. It's so conversational and natural. Yeah,

0:10:10.090 --> 0:10:13.090
<v Speaker 3>this has been game changing for me. The way I

0:10:13.170 --> 0:10:15.330
<v Speaker 3>use it that I really love is to help it

0:10:15.490 --> 0:10:18.730
<v Speaker 3>organize my thoughts. So obviously I'm a content creator, but

0:10:18.930 --> 0:10:20.410
<v Speaker 3>this could be for you. You know, you've got a

0:10:20.450 --> 0:10:22.450
<v Speaker 3>LinkedIn post that you maybe you want to write at work,

0:10:22.490 --> 0:10:24.370
<v Speaker 3>or you've got like a strategy document you're working on.

0:10:24.450 --> 0:10:26.370
<v Speaker 3>You have to give a talk to your team and

0:10:26.570 --> 0:10:29.210
<v Speaker 3>update in a team meeting. I just say to it,

0:10:29.290 --> 0:10:32.650
<v Speaker 3>I want you to act as a marketing manager or

0:10:32.690 --> 0:10:35.010
<v Speaker 3>a business leader, whatever it is. And I'm just going

0:10:35.050 --> 0:10:37.050
<v Speaker 3>to share with you some of my thoughts. Then I'm

0:10:37.050 --> 0:10:39.330
<v Speaker 3>going to get your help to craft that into something

0:10:39.330 --> 0:10:41.090
<v Speaker 3>that has structure and blood, and then you just share

0:10:41.090 --> 0:10:42.490
<v Speaker 3>your little thoughts with it, and then you just kind

0:10:42.490 --> 0:10:44.490
<v Speaker 3>of keep going back and forth like that. So I

0:10:44.570 --> 0:10:45.570
<v Speaker 3>use that all the time.

0:10:45.930 --> 0:10:46.490
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:10:46.730 --> 0:10:49.330
<v Speaker 3>I love that. I've also heard a lot of young

0:10:49.370 --> 0:10:52.890
<v Speaker 3>people using it like a therapist or like an executive coach.

0:10:52.890 --> 0:10:54.970
<v Speaker 3>For example, this is like putting me out of a

0:10:55.050 --> 0:10:56.650
<v Speaker 3>job right now, but basically you say to it, like

0:10:56.690 --> 0:10:59.010
<v Speaker 3>act as an executive coach at leading companies like Apple

0:10:59.090 --> 0:11:00.850
<v Speaker 3>or Google, and I want you to coach me on

0:11:00.850 --> 0:11:02.610
<v Speaker 3>this problem that I've got, and you literally just like

0:11:02.690 --> 0:11:04.930
<v Speaker 3>share your problem with it. But therapy as well. Lots

0:11:04.970 --> 0:11:16.490
<v Speaker 3>of gen z using chat jopt there a bit. Now

0:11:16.530 --> 0:11:19.890
<v Speaker 3>we're going to get into the really practical stuff for everyone.

0:11:20.010 --> 0:11:21.770
<v Speaker 3>So we're actually going to do a bit of a

0:11:21.810 --> 0:11:24.850
<v Speaker 3>walkthrough of what makes a good prompt, because I think

0:11:24.850 --> 0:11:27.010
<v Speaker 3>that's where a lot of us just kind of come undone.

0:11:27.010 --> 0:11:28.650
<v Speaker 3>We'll just like chuck a prompt in there, we don't

0:11:28.650 --> 0:11:30.250
<v Speaker 3>really get a good output, and we're like, that was

0:11:30.250 --> 0:11:33.810
<v Speaker 3>waste of time. I'm not doing it again. But sometimes

0:11:33.970 --> 0:11:37.170
<v Speaker 3>it's a you problem and we're going to fix our

0:11:37.250 --> 0:11:40.410
<v Speaker 3>prompting the anatomy of a prompt. Okay, so let's talk

0:11:40.450 --> 0:11:43.450
<v Speaker 3>about the use case amanth Of. Say you've got a

0:11:43.450 --> 0:11:46.690
<v Speaker 3>presentation that you have to give an internal presentation in

0:11:46.770 --> 0:11:50.010
<v Speaker 3>a just like normal weekly team meeting. Can you walk

0:11:50.010 --> 0:11:52.410
<v Speaker 3>me through how you would approach creating a prompt for that.

0:11:52.730 --> 0:11:53.010
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:11:53.130 --> 0:11:56.490
<v Speaker 4>So at a higher level, what we talk about at

0:11:56.530 --> 0:11:59.330
<v Speaker 4>Inventium in our training as we say that there's gun

0:11:59.370 --> 0:12:02.890
<v Speaker 4>slinging and there's architecting when it comes to prompting. So

0:12:03.130 --> 0:12:06.930
<v Speaker 4>gun slinging is where you just treat it as someone

0:12:06.970 --> 0:12:09.290
<v Speaker 4>you were chatting to and you're like, hey, help me

0:12:09.330 --> 0:12:12.050
<v Speaker 4>do this presentation, and then it does stuff and then

0:12:12.330 --> 0:12:15.010
<v Speaker 4>you're like, ah, no, you got that completely wrong.

0:12:15.130 --> 0:12:16.410
<v Speaker 1>Do more of this, do less of.

0:12:16.370 --> 0:12:20.650
<v Speaker 4>That, and it turns into this really long, arduous prompt

0:12:20.730 --> 0:12:23.090
<v Speaker 4>chain and at the end you're thinking, why did I

0:12:23.130 --> 0:12:26.210
<v Speaker 4>even try using AI in the first place. So gunsling

0:12:26.290 --> 0:12:28.850
<v Speaker 4>is very ad hoc, but we find that I would

0:12:28.890 --> 0:12:31.370
<v Speaker 4>say ninety five percent of people that we work with

0:12:31.410 --> 0:12:34.130
<v Speaker 4>and coach at invent Him use a gunslinging approach. What

0:12:34.210 --> 0:12:36.850
<v Speaker 4>will get you a far better result, particularly the more

0:12:37.210 --> 0:12:40.329
<v Speaker 4>complex project you're trying to work with AI. The more

0:12:40.330 --> 0:12:44.090
<v Speaker 4>important this is is what we call architecting, where how

0:12:44.130 --> 0:12:45.890
<v Speaker 4>we would do it. Let's take the example of a

0:12:45.890 --> 0:12:50.450
<v Speaker 4>work presentation project update. Let's say is that first we're

0:12:50.450 --> 0:12:53.730
<v Speaker 4>setting the task or the goal. So that might be

0:12:54.330 --> 0:12:57.330
<v Speaker 4>I need you to help create a presentation from scratch,

0:12:57.690 --> 0:12:59.410
<v Speaker 4>or it might be I need you to help you know,

0:12:59.490 --> 0:13:01.770
<v Speaker 4>review this existing presentation. It's probably going to be one

0:13:01.810 --> 0:13:04.610
<v Speaker 4>of those goals. Then we want to give it the context,

0:13:04.970 --> 0:13:06.850
<v Speaker 4>so we need to tell it who is the audience

0:13:07.090 --> 0:13:09.370
<v Speaker 4>and what are the outcomes that I am trying to

0:13:09.410 --> 0:13:10.970
<v Speaker 4>achieve with this presentation.

0:13:11.330 --> 0:13:14.370
<v Speaker 3>So that might be the audience is like my team

0:13:14.570 --> 0:13:18.250
<v Speaker 3>of mid level marketing managers, and the outcome might be.

0:13:18.450 --> 0:13:21.090
<v Speaker 4>The outcome might be just so they're feeling crystal clear

0:13:21.130 --> 0:13:23.610
<v Speaker 4>on where this project is at, or so that they

0:13:23.690 --> 0:13:26.970
<v Speaker 4>are going to approve a certain amount of funding for

0:13:27.050 --> 0:13:29.170
<v Speaker 4>this idea that I have, or you know, whatever it

0:13:29.370 --> 0:13:32.010
<v Speaker 4>might be. The more specific we can be, the better.

0:13:32.090 --> 0:13:35.210
<v Speaker 4>So definitely the audience tell it the industry that you're in,

0:13:36.050 --> 0:13:38.490
<v Speaker 4>what your job is. So the more context the better,

0:13:38.650 --> 0:13:41.370
<v Speaker 4>because it is not psychic yet.

0:13:41.930 --> 0:13:43.650
<v Speaker 1>Then instead of.

0:13:43.610 --> 0:13:46.650
<v Speaker 4>Just going okay, so go create that presentation for me

0:13:46.890 --> 0:13:49.410
<v Speaker 4>in which case you are going to end up with

0:13:49.490 --> 0:13:54.130
<v Speaker 4>a very very messy prompt thread. Instead, work on an

0:13:54.170 --> 0:13:57.410
<v Speaker 4>outline first, because something like a presentation has a lot

0:13:57.410 --> 0:13:59.890
<v Speaker 4>of different components and there's a way to structure it.

0:14:00.250 --> 0:14:02.450
<v Speaker 4>So if you think about it like a collaborative buddy,

0:14:02.850 --> 0:14:05.770
<v Speaker 4>and you prompt it first to say, help work with

0:14:05.850 --> 0:14:10.370
<v Speaker 4>me on an outline for this presentation, don't actually start

0:14:10.490 --> 0:14:12.490
<v Speaker 4>writing the presentation yet, so.

0:14:12.490 --> 0:14:13.570
<v Speaker 1>Be really clear with it.

0:14:14.090 --> 0:14:17.090
<v Speaker 4>What you can also do, and this would be my

0:14:17.290 --> 0:14:21.010
<v Speaker 4>favorite add on to any prompt is get it to

0:14:21.130 --> 0:14:25.050
<v Speaker 4>ask you questions. So say something like, please ask me

0:14:25.170 --> 0:14:28.530
<v Speaker 4>any questions you need to be ninety five percent confident

0:14:28.690 --> 0:14:32.930
<v Speaker 4>in doing a great job because it's going to have gaps,

0:14:33.330 --> 0:14:36.890
<v Speaker 4>and why not let it guide you in helping it

0:14:36.930 --> 0:14:38.290
<v Speaker 4>fill in its gaps.

0:14:38.610 --> 0:14:40.570
<v Speaker 3>I am going to pause you there because I agree

0:14:40.690 --> 0:14:42.610
<v Speaker 3>if you are still listening to this podcast, even though

0:14:42.610 --> 0:14:44.890
<v Speaker 3>I told you the most important point was before around

0:14:44.970 --> 0:14:48.170
<v Speaker 3>voice mode, I actually lie because this is another important point,

0:14:48.930 --> 0:14:52.130
<v Speaker 3>flipping it and saying you ask me the questions and

0:14:52.170 --> 0:14:55.010
<v Speaker 3>I'll feed you more information. So that line you had

0:14:55.650 --> 0:14:58.730
<v Speaker 3>ask me clarifying questions. Until you're ninety five percent confident,

0:14:58.770 --> 0:15:02.090
<v Speaker 3>you can you know complete the task successfully. That is

0:15:02.130 --> 0:15:05.130
<v Speaker 3>so important and that has helped me so much because

0:15:05.130 --> 0:15:07.770
<v Speaker 3>a lot of time, it's not just that you want

0:15:07.770 --> 0:15:10.130
<v Speaker 3>the AI to just produce this perfect thing for you.

0:15:10.130 --> 0:15:12.090
<v Speaker 3>You sort of just need it to help you organize

0:15:12.130 --> 0:15:14.130
<v Speaker 3>your thoughts and I think getting it to ask you

0:15:14.250 --> 0:15:16.690
<v Speaker 3>question is a really good way to do that. So

0:15:16.930 --> 0:15:19.210
<v Speaker 3>let me just replay this because this is I mean,

0:15:19.250 --> 0:15:21.930
<v Speaker 3>I thought I was pretty good, but this has already

0:15:21.930 --> 0:15:23.490
<v Speaker 3>helped me. So, you know, what is the goal of

0:15:23.530 --> 0:15:25.530
<v Speaker 3>the task you're trying to do, give it the context

0:15:25.610 --> 0:15:27.530
<v Speaker 3>who you're talking to, what you want them to know,

0:15:27.970 --> 0:15:29.290
<v Speaker 3>you know what they're going to get out of it

0:15:29.410 --> 0:15:31.170
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing. And would you even put in there

0:15:31.210 --> 0:15:34.970
<v Speaker 3>amount the context around like the format or is that

0:15:35.010 --> 0:15:36.570
<v Speaker 3>coming later, like in terms of the output, like I

0:15:36.610 --> 0:15:38.930
<v Speaker 3>want it to be ten minutes long, or when does

0:15:38.970 --> 0:15:39.450
<v Speaker 3>that come in?

0:15:39.890 --> 0:15:43.210
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So format is good to stay upfront because then

0:15:43.290 --> 0:15:46.090
<v Speaker 4>if you're working with it to create a structure, it

0:15:46.130 --> 0:15:49.170
<v Speaker 4>can know that like a ten minute update presentation is

0:15:49.210 --> 0:15:52.850
<v Speaker 4>going to be very different from a sixty minute in

0:15:53.090 --> 0:15:55.770
<v Speaker 4>depth educational presentation, for example.

0:15:55.810 --> 0:15:57.770
<v Speaker 3>You'd almost put that in the goal then maybe like

0:15:57.930 --> 0:16:01.530
<v Speaker 3>your goal is to presentation that's ten minutes long. Okay, cool, Yeah, exactly.

0:16:02.210 --> 0:16:05.170
<v Speaker 4>So once you've got to ask you questions and you

0:16:05.210 --> 0:16:07.410
<v Speaker 4>feel in the gaps for it, it's got context, it

0:16:07.450 --> 0:16:10.010
<v Speaker 4>knows the tasks that we're trying to achieve the goal.

0:16:10.730 --> 0:16:12.890
<v Speaker 4>Then what you're going to ask it to do is

0:16:13.130 --> 0:16:16.650
<v Speaker 4>essentially build out the structure so that you're happy with

0:16:16.690 --> 0:16:19.610
<v Speaker 4>the structure you know, and it might be you know, introduction,

0:16:19.970 --> 0:16:21.530
<v Speaker 4>and then it might be you know, point one point

0:16:21.570 --> 0:16:24.250
<v Speaker 4>two point three and then some sort of closing, like

0:16:24.290 --> 0:16:26.450
<v Speaker 4>a very basic structure. It probably won't be that, but

0:16:26.530 --> 0:16:29.690
<v Speaker 4>let's use that as an example. So once you're happy

0:16:29.770 --> 0:16:32.490
<v Speaker 4>and you've kind of got that scaffolding, if you like,

0:16:32.810 --> 0:16:36.330
<v Speaker 4>for the overall structure of the output, then you want

0:16:36.330 --> 0:16:39.570
<v Speaker 4>to prompt the AI to build out each section with you.

0:16:39.890 --> 0:16:43.010
<v Speaker 4>So once you're happy with the scaffolding, I would then

0:16:43.130 --> 0:16:46.730
<v Speaker 4>be saying, okay, let's work on the first section. Can

0:16:46.810 --> 0:16:50.290
<v Speaker 4>you help me build out this introduction, And you're potentially

0:16:50.290 --> 0:16:53.330
<v Speaker 4>feeding it with more details or more context around the

0:16:53.330 --> 0:16:56.250
<v Speaker 4>introduction and what it needs to contain, and then basically

0:16:56.290 --> 0:17:00.850
<v Speaker 4>repeating that for every section or every chunk of the task.

0:17:01.330 --> 0:17:02.690
<v Speaker 1>It will stop you.

0:17:02.450 --> 0:17:06.169
<v Speaker 4>Having to undo and redo and edit prompts and make

0:17:06.210 --> 0:17:08.890
<v Speaker 4>a big mess of things. This is exactly the process

0:17:08.889 --> 0:17:10.970
<v Speaker 4>that I use when I'm using THEAI to work on

0:17:11.010 --> 0:17:12.450
<v Speaker 4>something quite long or complex.

0:17:12.690 --> 0:17:14.490
<v Speaker 3>I love this, and for anyone listening, we're going to

0:17:14.530 --> 0:17:17.689
<v Speaker 3>put all of these prompts in the newsletter, so just

0:17:17.730 --> 0:17:19.410
<v Speaker 3>make sure you're signed up. Is in links in the

0:17:19.450 --> 0:17:22.090
<v Speaker 3>show notes. But this is so good because what you're

0:17:22.130 --> 0:17:24.850
<v Speaker 3>saying is to that gun slinger method that you mentioned earlier.

0:17:25.090 --> 0:17:28.450
<v Speaker 3>I'm just thinking about today. I was prompting AI to

0:17:28.650 --> 0:17:32.369
<v Speaker 3>help me. It was actually helping me prep a podcast episode,

0:17:32.530 --> 0:17:34.730
<v Speaker 3>and I asked it to give me three examples based

0:17:34.730 --> 0:17:36.369
<v Speaker 3>on these three points that I gave, and then I

0:17:36.410 --> 0:17:38.609
<v Speaker 3>said make it funnier, and then I said, now make

0:17:38.650 --> 0:17:40.490
<v Speaker 3>it shorter, and then I said, now give me an

0:17:40.490 --> 0:17:43.250
<v Speaker 3>example for a manager. And it just progressively got worse

0:17:43.290 --> 0:17:45.410
<v Speaker 3>and worse as I sort of went down. Not to

0:17:45.450 --> 0:17:47.250
<v Speaker 3>say you can't do that, because I think refining it

0:17:47.290 --> 0:17:49.810
<v Speaker 3>sometimes is helpful, so like, you know, rewrite this to

0:17:49.850 --> 0:17:52.530
<v Speaker 3>make it more concise or whatever. But sometimes you know,

0:17:52.609 --> 0:17:55.210
<v Speaker 3>in just messing with it, the output just gets worse

0:17:55.210 --> 0:17:57.409
<v Speaker 3>and worse. I've noticed that, so I think taking a

0:17:57.450 --> 0:18:01.050
<v Speaker 3>pause to really architect your prompt at the start is

0:18:01.130 --> 0:18:01.850
<v Speaker 3>really helpful.

0:18:02.010 --> 0:18:04.770
<v Speaker 4>You've brought up a really important point that I find

0:18:04.970 --> 0:18:08.330
<v Speaker 4>most people don't know about. If you have felt that

0:18:08.370 --> 0:18:11.010
<v Speaker 4>way like you felt today, where it just seemed like

0:18:11.010 --> 0:18:15.290
<v Speaker 4>the AI was getting stupider, which is really weird because hey,

0:18:15.370 --> 0:18:16.130
<v Speaker 4>it's software.

0:18:16.210 --> 0:18:20.290
<v Speaker 1>Software doesn't get stupider. It actually does. So the AI

0:18:20.930 --> 0:18:21.929
<v Speaker 1>can't learn.

0:18:22.090 --> 0:18:24.689
<v Speaker 4>And if you think of its memory and why and

0:18:24.770 --> 0:18:27.129
<v Speaker 4>when you need to start a new thread or like

0:18:27.330 --> 0:18:30.810
<v Speaker 4>a new chat if you like, it's because the AI

0:18:30.970 --> 0:18:34.010
<v Speaker 4>can only remember so much. If you think about, like

0:18:34.490 --> 0:18:39.010
<v Speaker 4>if say you were reading a multi page document, Let's

0:18:39.010 --> 0:18:42.010
<v Speaker 4>say it's a five page document, why the AI gets

0:18:42.090 --> 0:18:45.770
<v Speaker 4>dumber is because it can remember about a page or two,

0:18:45.890 --> 0:18:49.570
<v Speaker 4>but then it starts to forget. And so what's important there.

0:18:49.650 --> 0:18:52.490
<v Speaker 4>If you were like having that experience where the AI

0:18:52.810 --> 0:18:55.689
<v Speaker 4>seems to be getting dumber, you probably at the end

0:18:55.730 --> 0:18:57.689
<v Speaker 4>of a very long thread, in which case what I

0:18:57.730 --> 0:19:02.090
<v Speaker 4>recommend is prompting the AI to summarize this thread in

0:19:02.170 --> 0:19:04.890
<v Speaker 4>terms of what's being covered, and then start a new

0:19:04.930 --> 0:19:07.889
<v Speaker 4>thread with that summary, and you'll find that all of

0:19:07.930 --> 0:19:09.690
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, the AI's gotten smarter again.

0:19:09.850 --> 0:19:12.850
<v Speaker 3>That is an amazing tip. Oh, that's just one other

0:19:12.850 --> 0:19:14.810
<v Speaker 3>point that I think is really important. Someone just showed

0:19:14.850 --> 0:19:16.890
<v Speaker 3>me how to do this amount, which is you can

0:19:16.930 --> 0:19:20.010
<v Speaker 3>actually see the memory that chat GPT has about you,

0:19:20.050 --> 0:19:22.090
<v Speaker 3>and I think it can only save. This is when

0:19:22.130 --> 0:19:23.970
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you're using it quite regularly, it's starting

0:19:24.010 --> 0:19:25.929
<v Speaker 3>to learn where you work and all this kind of stuff.

0:19:26.450 --> 0:19:29.730
<v Speaker 3>It can only remember about fifty lines about you or something,

0:19:29.770 --> 0:19:32.290
<v Speaker 3>and you can actually go into the settings. We'll put

0:19:32.290 --> 0:19:34.810
<v Speaker 3>the details of this in the newsletter, and you can

0:19:34.850 --> 0:19:37.330
<v Speaker 3>actually see what it knows about you, and you can

0:19:37.370 --> 0:19:40.010
<v Speaker 3>delete some stuff. So if something's not relevant anymore, you

0:19:40.050 --> 0:19:41.450
<v Speaker 3>were getting it to help you on a certain task

0:19:41.490 --> 0:19:43.610
<v Speaker 3>and that time has passed, you can delete that whole

0:19:43.609 --> 0:19:45.250
<v Speaker 3>thing and then it can actually learn more about you.

0:19:45.290 --> 0:19:47.250
<v Speaker 3>This is on the free version. It probably remembers stuff

0:19:47.250 --> 0:19:50.210
<v Speaker 3>on the paid version. So the final kind of point

0:19:50.210 --> 0:19:51.530
<v Speaker 3>that I want to talk about with your mouth there

0:19:51.690 --> 0:19:54.130
<v Speaker 3>is making it stick. So I think with a lot

0:19:54.170 --> 0:19:56.169
<v Speaker 3>of us it's something that we're kind of dabbling in.

0:19:56.210 --> 0:19:58.369
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we're using it here and there, but it hasn't

0:19:58.370 --> 0:20:00.530
<v Speaker 3>been so life changing. But then other people, you know,

0:20:00.609 --> 0:20:03.729
<v Speaker 3>it literally is their go to for everything. How do

0:20:03.770 --> 0:20:05.170
<v Speaker 3>you make that change? How do you make it a

0:20:05.170 --> 0:20:07.850
<v Speaker 3>happit and how are we really going to channel that

0:20:07.930 --> 0:20:10.530
<v Speaker 3>lazy girl energy and to get this to do our jobs?

0:20:10.570 --> 0:20:10.890
<v Speaker 1>For us?

0:20:11.650 --> 0:20:15.930
<v Speaker 4>I think the simplest thing is to have a constant reminder.

0:20:16.050 --> 0:20:18.410
<v Speaker 4>So what we recommend to people that we are training

0:20:18.450 --> 0:20:21.369
<v Speaker 4>at inventim is we say, grab a post it note

0:20:21.530 --> 0:20:24.130
<v Speaker 4>and write on that post it note should I use

0:20:24.170 --> 0:20:27.010
<v Speaker 4>AI for this task? Put that post it note on

0:20:27.090 --> 0:20:30.530
<v Speaker 4>your computer monitor, and for the next few days, you

0:20:30.570 --> 0:20:33.050
<v Speaker 4>will not be desensitized to that message.

0:20:33.170 --> 0:20:34.210
<v Speaker 1>You will think about that.

0:20:34.170 --> 0:20:37.210
<v Speaker 4>With every task that you do until it starts to

0:20:37.210 --> 0:20:39.730
<v Speaker 4>become second nature. I mean, there's plenty of other things,

0:20:39.730 --> 0:20:42.210
<v Speaker 4>but I think that's a really simple hack. Post it

0:20:42.250 --> 0:20:45.369
<v Speaker 4>note on your computer should I use AI for this task?

0:20:45.810 --> 0:20:48.490
<v Speaker 4>And you will start to think about that whenever you

0:20:48.530 --> 0:20:49.409
<v Speaker 4>start a new task.

0:20:49.770 --> 0:20:52.210
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly. And then yeah, once you've made that change,

0:20:52.250 --> 0:20:55.290
<v Speaker 3>then it just starts to become second nature just very quickly.

0:20:55.330 --> 0:20:56.810
<v Speaker 3>In terms of you know, we've talked a lot about

0:20:56.810 --> 0:20:59.450
<v Speaker 3>sort of chat GPT, but there are other tools that

0:20:59.490 --> 0:21:01.409
<v Speaker 3>are AI that are super helpful. Can you just give us,

0:21:01.450 --> 0:21:04.370
<v Speaker 3>like your top three most favorite AI tools that aren't

0:21:04.410 --> 0:21:05.570
<v Speaker 3>chat JPTO.

0:21:05.730 --> 0:21:09.010
<v Speaker 4>I actually use claude more than chat GPT. I find

0:21:09.050 --> 0:21:11.129
<v Speaker 4>that it's not as popular. But if you want an

0:21:11.130 --> 0:21:14.770
<v Speaker 4>AI that sounds more human than more robot, Claude is

0:21:14.930 --> 0:21:18.090
<v Speaker 4>your best friend. I have in the last few weeks

0:21:18.130 --> 0:21:22.970
<v Speaker 4>become obsessed with Granola. Now, Granola is a great meeting

0:21:23.170 --> 0:21:26.169
<v Speaker 4>note taker. It only works on a Mac and you

0:21:26.250 --> 0:21:29.250
<v Speaker 4>need a Google Workspace address. It doesn't work with a

0:21:29.330 --> 0:21:31.530
<v Speaker 4>Gmail address sadly, so that's going to be a smaller

0:21:31.570 --> 0:21:34.369
<v Speaker 4>portion of listeners. But anyway, if that is you, Granola

0:21:34.570 --> 0:21:38.129
<v Speaker 4>is gold. I use Perplexity for search. I'm sure a

0:21:38.130 --> 0:21:41.010
<v Speaker 4>lot of listeners are doing that already, a couple of others.

0:21:41.170 --> 0:21:44.609
<v Speaker 4>I love consensus. I do a lot of research for

0:21:44.690 --> 0:21:48.050
<v Speaker 4>my work, a lot of academic research, and consensus it's

0:21:48.050 --> 0:21:50.330
<v Speaker 4>been around for years, but the AI that they've put

0:21:50.370 --> 0:21:53.770
<v Speaker 4>into it is amazing. It basically allows you to find

0:21:54.210 --> 0:21:59.129
<v Speaker 4>research driven answers to your questions. It's basically got millions

0:21:59.170 --> 0:22:01.690
<v Speaker 4>of academic papers eaten up.

0:22:01.609 --> 0:22:04.250
<v Speaker 1>By the AI, so it draws on all that knowledge.

0:22:04.290 --> 0:22:06.889
<v Speaker 4>And you know, if I have a question, like you

0:22:06.930 --> 0:22:09.969
<v Speaker 4>know it does hybrid work lead to greater productivity? It

0:22:10.010 --> 0:22:12.290
<v Speaker 4>will show me all the research that's been done on

0:22:12.330 --> 0:22:15.010
<v Speaker 4>that topic, which is brilliant, amazing.

0:22:15.290 --> 0:22:18.130
<v Speaker 3>Can confirm you actually got me onto granola last week,

0:22:18.210 --> 0:22:20.170
<v Speaker 3>because like people have told me about meeting note takers

0:22:20.210 --> 0:22:21.530
<v Speaker 3>and I'm like whatever, I'm kind of like a bit.

0:22:21.570 --> 0:22:24.090
<v Speaker 3>I've tried different air tools and if they annoy me,

0:22:24.210 --> 0:22:27.690
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm sort of like against them. Granola is unbelievable.

0:22:27.770 --> 0:22:31.810
<v Speaker 3>I just like, I wish I had this my whole life. Yes,

0:22:32.370 --> 0:22:34.050
<v Speaker 3>can confirm the culture.

0:22:40.210 --> 0:22:40.610
<v Speaker 5>Culture.

0:22:42.690 --> 0:22:42.930
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:22:43.050 --> 0:22:46.290
<v Speaker 5>So if I loved that conversation, there were so many

0:22:46.370 --> 0:22:50.290
<v Speaker 5>nuggets of goals in that and little things that were

0:22:50.290 --> 0:22:54.330
<v Speaker 5>said that just unlocked new ways of thinking about AI

0:22:54.530 --> 0:22:59.050
<v Speaker 5>For me. I loved the point on verifying your answers.

0:22:59.770 --> 0:23:04.370
<v Speaker 5>That is so important and something that I don't do.

0:23:04.970 --> 0:23:06.010
<v Speaker 5>I am very trusting.

0:23:06.730 --> 0:23:08.729
<v Speaker 3>It's gotten a lot better in terms of hallucination, but

0:23:08.810 --> 0:23:11.010
<v Speaker 3>I still like the other day I asked Perplexity for

0:23:11.050 --> 0:23:12.889
<v Speaker 3>some research and then I was like, Okay, can you

0:23:12.890 --> 0:23:14.530
<v Speaker 3>give me the source of this? And it's like, oh, actually,

0:23:14.530 --> 0:23:16.609
<v Speaker 3>I got that wrong. It literally said to me, I

0:23:16.690 --> 0:23:19.890
<v Speaker 3>got that wrong. That research doesn't exist because it sort

0:23:19.890 --> 0:23:22.010
<v Speaker 3>of wants to give you what you want to hear.

0:23:22.290 --> 0:23:24.490
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's such a good point. I think that's a

0:23:24.570 --> 0:23:28.850
<v Speaker 5>really important one. To drill home and also just thinking

0:23:28.890 --> 0:23:33.210
<v Speaker 5>about AI as a buddy. I think that's probably the

0:23:33.250 --> 0:23:36.930
<v Speaker 5>bucket that I use it most in. And I actually

0:23:36.970 --> 0:23:38.729
<v Speaker 5>said to my co founder the other day, like, I

0:23:38.770 --> 0:23:40.929
<v Speaker 5>think chut jpit is my best friend.

0:23:41.490 --> 0:23:44.850
<v Speaker 1>Like I just talk to it. That's really sad.

0:23:45.210 --> 0:23:50.770
<v Speaker 5>I talk to it all day long, all the time,

0:23:51.370 --> 0:23:53.930
<v Speaker 5>in a similar bucket to the buddy. The main way

0:23:54.090 --> 0:23:57.330
<v Speaker 5>I use AI that I wanted to call out for

0:23:57.370 --> 0:23:59.250
<v Speaker 5>other people that are maybe thinking about just giving it

0:23:59.290 --> 0:24:02.250
<v Speaker 5>a go. I use it to build confidence in my

0:24:02.450 --> 0:24:05.730
<v Speaker 5>own take on something, or if I've gotten a pinion

0:24:05.810 --> 0:24:08.730
<v Speaker 5>that I think is fresh or unique, but I might

0:24:08.850 --> 0:24:11.010
<v Speaker 5>feel a bit scared about saying that in front of

0:24:11.050 --> 0:24:12.969
<v Speaker 5>a room of people just yet, or maybe I'm going

0:24:13.010 --> 0:24:15.050
<v Speaker 5>to put it out in some content on social media.

0:24:15.490 --> 0:24:18.530
<v Speaker 5>I use chat JBT as like a sense checker, Am

0:24:18.570 --> 0:24:21.930
<v Speaker 5>I onto something here? Is this interesting? And it actually

0:24:22.010 --> 0:24:24.810
<v Speaker 5>really builds my confidence. Like sometimes it'll say things back

0:24:24.890 --> 0:24:27.970
<v Speaker 5>like that's a really sharp take, and I'm like, yes,

0:24:28.050 --> 0:24:30.370
<v Speaker 5>you know, maybe this is a good one.

0:24:30.490 --> 0:24:33.330
<v Speaker 3>I love that as an original thoughts thought partner. The

0:24:33.370 --> 0:24:35.530
<v Speaker 3>thing I like about that is that so much of

0:24:35.609 --> 0:24:37.530
<v Speaker 3>the time we think about AIS like doing the task

0:24:37.650 --> 0:24:40.210
<v Speaker 3>for us. But actually it's about making you better at

0:24:40.410 --> 0:24:42.810
<v Speaker 3>your own original thought, which I think is cool. On

0:24:42.890 --> 0:24:45.530
<v Speaker 3>the thought partner thing, there's a little phrase you can

0:24:45.650 --> 0:24:47.850
<v Speaker 3>use that I think really helps, where you can say, like,

0:24:48.490 --> 0:24:51.450
<v Speaker 3>let's do a thought experiment works really well, or the

0:24:51.450 --> 0:24:53.450
<v Speaker 3>one I've started using a lot is I'll share my

0:24:53.850 --> 0:24:55.810
<v Speaker 3>opinion with it and then I'll say, okay, play Devil's

0:24:55.810 --> 0:24:59.090
<v Speaker 3>advocate pick holes in this basically what's wrong with this argument?

0:24:59.490 --> 0:25:01.970
<v Speaker 5>It was also enlightening to me. I think it was

0:25:02.050 --> 0:25:05.930
<v Speaker 5>you who brought it up, like actually getting whatever AI

0:25:06.050 --> 0:25:09.290
<v Speaker 5>tool you're using to ask you the questions to refine

0:25:09.730 --> 0:25:12.970
<v Speaker 5>things before it just comes out with a response, because

0:25:13.290 --> 0:25:16.450
<v Speaker 5>you do need to train it. Like initially I thought,

0:25:16.850 --> 0:25:19.369
<v Speaker 5>if I start talking through a campaign I idea with AI,

0:25:20.090 --> 0:25:22.010
<v Speaker 5>its ideas are going to be too basic, they're not

0:25:22.010 --> 0:25:24.210
<v Speaker 5>going to be thoughtful enough, they're not going to be considerate,

0:25:24.250 --> 0:25:26.730
<v Speaker 5>they're not going to be edgy. But it's actually like

0:25:26.770 --> 0:25:29.170
<v Speaker 5>what feedback you're giving it as well, Like I'll say

0:25:29.170 --> 0:25:31.689
<v Speaker 5>things like that's too basic, that's not cool enough, and

0:25:31.810 --> 0:25:34.010
<v Speaker 5>like we'll kind of work on it.

0:25:33.290 --> 0:25:36.090
<v Speaker 3>It's so true, Yeah, don't just take the first answer

0:25:36.090 --> 0:25:38.129
<v Speaker 3>that it gives you. You know, it's so much like

0:25:38.490 --> 0:25:42.610
<v Speaker 3>working with like a really smart intern or as a manager,

0:25:42.770 --> 0:25:46.129
<v Speaker 3>if you brief someone on a task and you don't

0:25:46.170 --> 0:25:47.770
<v Speaker 3>give a very good brief, you don't put much thought

0:25:47.770 --> 0:25:49.890
<v Speaker 3>into it. When they bring that work back to you,

0:25:49.890 --> 0:25:51.490
<v Speaker 3>you're kind of like, oh, that's not really what I thought.

0:25:51.490 --> 0:25:53.130
<v Speaker 3>But it's kind of like you haven't put enough time

0:25:53.130 --> 0:25:55.050
<v Speaker 3>into the brief. And the other thing that I thought

0:25:55.050 --> 0:25:57.409
<v Speaker 3>it was like, have you ever Michelle worked with Say

0:25:57.410 --> 0:25:59.770
<v Speaker 3>you're working with a freelancer or a creative and you're like,

0:26:00.290 --> 0:26:02.530
<v Speaker 3>just like, make the logo bigger, and now make it blue,

0:26:02.570 --> 0:26:04.130
<v Speaker 3>and now move it to the left. Like the more

0:26:04.290 --> 0:26:07.290
<v Speaker 3>prescriptive you are sometimes trying to kind of give it

0:26:07.330 --> 0:26:10.490
<v Speaker 3>this like the wrong kind of feedback, the worse it gets.

0:26:10.530 --> 0:26:13.290
<v Speaker 3>And that happens sometimes if it gives you a result

0:26:13.490 --> 0:26:16.330
<v Speaker 3>and then you're like, no, change this change that you'll

0:26:16.330 --> 0:26:19.090
<v Speaker 3>often like make it worse. So I think it's about

0:26:19.090 --> 0:26:21.490
<v Speaker 3>like from the beginning, trying to sort of have the

0:26:21.609 --> 0:26:24.330
<v Speaker 3>ingredients that you need to give it a really good brief.

0:26:24.570 --> 0:26:27.010
<v Speaker 3>But then it is like an ongoing conversation for sure.

0:26:27.410 --> 0:26:31.850
<v Speaker 5>Also your point on younger people using it as a therapist.

0:26:32.210 --> 0:26:35.210
<v Speaker 5>I have totally done that. Like I had a therapist

0:26:35.290 --> 0:26:38.609
<v Speaker 5>that I was saying fortnightly, and therapy is quite expensive,

0:26:39.250 --> 0:26:41.850
<v Speaker 5>and once I became a mum, I probably was probably

0:26:41.930 --> 0:26:43.729
<v Speaker 5>the moment where I really needed to go back to

0:26:43.770 --> 0:26:46.570
<v Speaker 5>my therapist, but I was just too busy, and so

0:26:46.690 --> 0:26:51.090
<v Speaker 5>I just started chatting to chat GPT. And I haven't

0:26:51.170 --> 0:26:54.130
<v Speaker 5>reached the point yet where it doesn't remember things. But

0:26:54.250 --> 0:26:56.250
<v Speaker 5>I love it that I can kind of like pick

0:26:56.330 --> 0:26:58.649
<v Speaker 5>up where I left off, Like, Hey, remember I was

0:26:58.690 --> 0:27:01.650
<v Speaker 5>talking to you about this complex situation I've got at work,

0:27:01.850 --> 0:27:05.010
<v Speaker 5>or I'll talk to it sometimes about the complexities of

0:27:05.130 --> 0:27:08.290
<v Speaker 5>mother and like how society isn't really set up to

0:27:08.370 --> 0:27:11.330
<v Speaker 5>support us, and like get into these deep conversations with it.

0:27:11.370 --> 0:27:14.490
<v Speaker 5>And I honestly think it is on par with the

0:27:14.490 --> 0:27:16.730
<v Speaker 5>therapy I've received from professionals.

0:27:16.770 --> 0:27:17.570
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say it.

0:27:18.050 --> 0:27:21.610
<v Speaker 3>Wow, Okay, that's really interesting on that point. In terms

0:27:21.650 --> 0:27:24.410
<v Speaker 3>of memory, you can go in, say there's like something

0:27:24.410 --> 0:27:26.770
<v Speaker 3>that happened in your life that's not relevant anymore. You

0:27:26.810 --> 0:27:28.690
<v Speaker 3>can actually go in and delete that from the memory.

0:27:28.770 --> 0:27:31.130
<v Speaker 3>So it's got more space to save new memories, which

0:27:31.130 --> 0:27:33.090
<v Speaker 3>I think is really good. It's just in the settings.

0:27:33.130 --> 0:27:35.129
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we'll share in the newsletter how to do that.

0:27:35.250 --> 0:27:38.169
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it's pretty easy. So I thought i'd give

0:27:38.210 --> 0:27:40.929
<v Speaker 3>a really quick, rapid fire roundup of my most helpful

0:27:40.930 --> 0:27:42.450
<v Speaker 3>prompts that I use, and then when I'm talking to

0:27:42.450 --> 0:27:45.450
<v Speaker 3>people they tell me similar things quickly on the ingredients,

0:27:45.450 --> 0:27:48.130
<v Speaker 3>because it's not about having a perfect prompt, right, there's

0:27:48.170 --> 0:27:50.930
<v Speaker 3>no like one framework that's right, but just in terms

0:27:50.930 --> 0:27:53.570
<v Speaker 3>of like the ingredients that make a good prompt, just

0:27:53.570 --> 0:27:55.929
<v Speaker 3>to recap some of this upper cupboard. But it was task.

0:27:56.130 --> 0:27:58.130
<v Speaker 3>So like, I'm trying to write a presentation that's about

0:27:58.130 --> 0:28:00.370
<v Speaker 3>ten minutes long. What role you want it to play?

0:28:00.450 --> 0:28:02.530
<v Speaker 3>Like do you want it to play a you know,

0:28:02.570 --> 0:28:06.570
<v Speaker 3>world class copywriter, a expert strategy or you know, an

0:28:06.570 --> 0:28:08.330
<v Speaker 3>executive coach? Like what is the role you want it

0:28:08.370 --> 0:28:11.090
<v Speaker 3>to play? If that's relevant? Any kind of context you

0:28:11.090 --> 0:28:13.570
<v Speaker 3>can give it, like who is the audience? What kind

0:28:13.609 --> 0:28:15.410
<v Speaker 3>of tone do you want it to be? What kind

0:28:15.410 --> 0:28:17.290
<v Speaker 3>of output do you want? Is it an outline that

0:28:17.330 --> 0:28:19.370
<v Speaker 3>you're after or do you want like a complete thing,

0:28:19.930 --> 0:28:22.129
<v Speaker 3>the one that is really helpful if you've done that

0:28:22.170 --> 0:28:23.689
<v Speaker 3>thing before. So, say you want it to write a

0:28:23.730 --> 0:28:26.610
<v Speaker 3>LinkedIn post for you give it three examples of other

0:28:26.650 --> 0:28:28.330
<v Speaker 3>LinkedIn posts that you've written that are good, and just

0:28:28.370 --> 0:28:31.609
<v Speaker 3>say these are good examples, like analyze these and like

0:28:31.650 --> 0:28:34.290
<v Speaker 3>try to match that kind of thing. So that's really helpful. Now,

0:28:34.410 --> 0:28:37.209
<v Speaker 3>just very quickly, my favorite prompts that I use so

0:28:37.490 --> 0:28:40.930
<v Speaker 3>with writing, I use this every single day. Basically, here's

0:28:40.970 --> 0:28:44.290
<v Speaker 3>the text, and you just drop your text in, improve clarity,

0:28:44.410 --> 0:28:48.970
<v Speaker 3>fix the grammar, make it sound more conversational, human, assertive, professional,

0:28:49.050 --> 0:28:52.530
<v Speaker 3>whatever inso your thing. I use that daily. The one

0:28:52.530 --> 0:28:55.770
<v Speaker 3>that I also love using is summarize this and I'll

0:28:55.810 --> 0:28:59.410
<v Speaker 3>upload like this giant pdf, like summarize this into one page,

0:28:59.450 --> 0:29:02.690
<v Speaker 3>one paragraph, and one word, and then using that for

0:29:02.730 --> 0:29:06.610
<v Speaker 3>your own stuff as well. It basically tests like how clear,

0:29:06.650 --> 0:29:08.690
<v Speaker 3>how concise, like how punchy is the thing that I'm

0:29:08.690 --> 0:29:11.130
<v Speaker 3>trying to write. And then the other one is, say

0:29:11.170 --> 0:29:13.090
<v Speaker 3>you're doing a slide deck and you want like a

0:29:13.130 --> 0:29:16.290
<v Speaker 3>really good headline or title for that slide that actually

0:29:16.290 --> 0:29:19.290
<v Speaker 3>explains what's on the slide and isn't boring. I'll say, like,

0:29:19.410 --> 0:29:22.570
<v Speaker 3>rewrite this headline in the style of And I've just

0:29:22.650 --> 0:29:25.050
<v Speaker 3>got some of my favorite people that write really sharp copies,

0:29:25.090 --> 0:29:28.130
<v Speaker 3>So like Malcolm Gladwell or Seth Godin, or whoever it

0:29:28.210 --> 0:29:30.130
<v Speaker 3>is that you love their writing style. You can say,

0:29:30.170 --> 0:29:34.850
<v Speaker 3>rewrite this in their style. Love okay, very quickly onto meetings,

0:29:35.410 --> 0:29:39.330
<v Speaker 3>analyze this presentation and give me a topic or question.

0:29:39.410 --> 0:29:41.969
<v Speaker 3>I can ask the room that will spark conversation that

0:29:42.010 --> 0:29:45.170
<v Speaker 3>one is amazing, or give me the objections that people

0:29:45.250 --> 0:29:47.090
<v Speaker 3>might have to this, so you can be prepared for

0:29:47.130 --> 0:29:49.010
<v Speaker 3>the things that people are actually going to object to.

0:29:49.530 --> 0:29:53.170
<v Speaker 3>I love that learning. I want to learn about insert topic,

0:29:53.450 --> 0:29:56.010
<v Speaker 3>identify and explain the most crucial twenty percent of the

0:29:56.050 --> 0:29:58.650
<v Speaker 3>concepts that will help me grasp eighty percent of the

0:29:58.650 --> 0:30:02.130
<v Speaker 3>topic effectively. Use that all the time to teach me stuff. Oh,

0:30:02.210 --> 0:30:03.410
<v Speaker 3>you're blowing my mind.

0:30:03.530 --> 0:30:05.250
<v Speaker 5>I'm trying not to start madly typing.

0:30:06.090 --> 0:30:08.010
<v Speaker 3>We'll put them all into the newsletter and then it

0:30:08.090 --> 0:30:11.810
<v Speaker 3>just to close. This my favorite thing to do. Sometimes.

0:30:11.890 --> 0:30:13.090
<v Speaker 1>This is just like wild card.

0:30:13.890 --> 0:30:16.530
<v Speaker 3>I like it to help me be creative and get

0:30:16.570 --> 0:30:19.890
<v Speaker 3>out of my own thought patterns sometimes. So this is

0:30:19.930 --> 0:30:22.210
<v Speaker 3>the one I've been using so much lately, and I

0:30:22.290 --> 0:30:26.450
<v Speaker 3>love it. I say, give me one truly deep novel

0:30:26.810 --> 0:30:30.490
<v Speaker 3>out of distribution, mind blowing insight related to topic that

0:30:30.610 --> 0:30:32.729
<v Speaker 3>only a few or none of us are aware of.

0:30:33.210 --> 0:30:36.650
<v Speaker 3>It can't be generic, vague, flashy or slop corporate stuff.

0:30:37.130 --> 0:30:40.450
<v Speaker 3>And it just gives you like things you would have

0:30:40.570 --> 0:30:41.210
<v Speaker 3>never thought of.

0:30:41.610 --> 0:30:44.090
<v Speaker 5>Really like, it's impressive what you're getting back.

0:30:44.370 --> 0:30:48.490
<v Speaker 3>It's learned from all of human insight and intelligence. Yeah,

0:30:48.610 --> 0:30:51.650
<v Speaker 3>you've just lived in your own brain for however many years,

0:30:51.650 --> 0:30:54.210
<v Speaker 3>so like it just breaks you out of your own

0:30:54.850 --> 0:30:55.690
<v Speaker 3>mind chamber.

0:30:56.170 --> 0:30:58.570
<v Speaker 5>Oh okay, well I've got to go because I've got

0:30:58.610 --> 0:30:59.610
<v Speaker 5>to get on chat JBT.

0:31:01.450 --> 0:31:03.450
<v Speaker 3>With that, we will close out. I will just say,

0:31:03.490 --> 0:31:06.170
<v Speaker 3>if you want to learn more about AIM, this company

0:31:06.250 --> 0:31:08.170
<v Speaker 3>invent Him has a really good course. So she does

0:31:08.210 --> 0:31:11.130
<v Speaker 3>both in person and also self paced, and so we'll

0:31:11.170 --> 0:31:13.330
<v Speaker 3>put a link to that in the show notes. And

0:31:13.370 --> 0:31:16.050
<v Speaker 3>also just her podcast is my favorite podcast. It is

0:31:16.170 --> 0:31:19.050
<v Speaker 3>very worky, but obviously I'm obsessed with work. Her podcast

0:31:19.170 --> 0:31:21.210
<v Speaker 3>is called how We Work and I've listened to every

0:31:21.250 --> 0:31:22.570
<v Speaker 3>single episode. Love it.

0:31:22.570 --> 0:31:24.650
<v Speaker 5>Well, thanks so much for leading that conversation.

0:31:24.730 --> 0:31:26.530
<v Speaker 3>It was amazing. Oh thank you.

0:31:33.010 --> 0:31:36.290
<v Speaker 2>So I thought I was someone who used AI a lot,

0:31:36.730 --> 0:31:39.330
<v Speaker 2>but my mind is blown by how much I could

0:31:39.370 --> 0:31:42.010
<v Speaker 2>actually be getting out of it. The key takeaway from

0:31:42.010 --> 0:31:46.330
<v Speaker 2>today's episode is understanding AI's three distinct roles as a

0:31:46.370 --> 0:31:50.090
<v Speaker 2>delegate for basic tasks, as a collaborative partner for brainstorming

0:31:50.170 --> 0:31:53.969
<v Speaker 2>and feedback, and as an expert for specialized knowledge. Make

0:31:54.010 --> 0:31:56.450
<v Speaker 2>sure you check out this week's bus newsletter, where we'll

0:31:56.450 --> 0:31:59.730
<v Speaker 2>be sharing all those juicy prompts that Amantha mentioned, from

0:31:59.810 --> 0:32:03.610
<v Speaker 2>therapy ones to those presentation helpers, and yes, I'll be

0:32:03.650 --> 0:32:06.690
<v Speaker 2>trying that mind blowing insight prompt. And immediately after this,

0:32:07.530 --> 0:32:09.610
<v Speaker 2>you can also head to our Instagram at biz by

0:32:09.650 --> 0:32:12.130
<v Speaker 2>Mama Mia, where we'll be sharing more AI hacks and

0:32:12.170 --> 0:32:14.930
<v Speaker 2>tools throughout the week. I will see you in Thursday's

0:32:14.930 --> 0:32:19.970
<v Speaker 2>Inbox episode, where we'll be answering all of your career dilemmas. Bye,

0:32:27.650 --> 0:32:31.010
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:32:31.010 --> 0:32:32.570
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on