WEBVTT - EXTRA: The Blake Lively Smear Campaign Unpacked

0:00:11.424 --> 0:00:14.144
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Amma Mia podcast.

0:00:14.784 --> 0:00:18.624
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and Waders

0:00:18.744 --> 0:00:20.624
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:20.784 --> 0:00:23.904
<v Speaker 3>Hi everyone, it's me and Friedman in your ears from

0:00:23.984 --> 0:00:27.144
<v Speaker 3>our sister podcast out Loud, and today we are sharing

0:00:27.184 --> 0:00:30.064
<v Speaker 3>with spill listeners an emergency episode.

0:00:29.624 --> 0:00:31.784
<v Speaker 1>That we recorded on out Loud.

0:00:31.784 --> 0:00:34.624
<v Speaker 3>We're Holly Wayne Right, Jesse Stevens, and I unpack all

0:00:34.624 --> 0:00:38.424
<v Speaker 3>the allegations that Blake Lively has made against Justin Baldoni

0:00:38.704 --> 0:00:40.344
<v Speaker 3>her It Ends with Us co star.

0:00:41.024 --> 0:00:43.824
<v Speaker 1>Have a listen and enjoy your holidays.

0:00:49.424 --> 0:00:53.024
<v Speaker 4>Hello out louders. It's Monday, the twenty third of December,

0:00:53.064 --> 0:00:56.264
<v Speaker 4>and I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm Weir Friedman, and.

0:00:56.184 --> 0:00:57.224
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:57.224 --> 0:00:59.984
<v Speaker 5>And we were not meant to be here right now,

0:01:00.064 --> 0:01:01.384
<v Speaker 5>but alas.

0:01:01.464 --> 0:01:06.104
<v Speaker 4>We are here because we can bury anyone inside a

0:01:06.144 --> 0:01:09.984
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood smear machine. That is the New York Times headline

0:01:10.024 --> 0:01:13.824
<v Speaker 4>that we definitely had to be here right now, Jesse Stevens,

0:01:14.624 --> 0:01:17.784
<v Speaker 4>because you might remember you definitely remember bits of it.

0:01:17.784 --> 0:01:19.744
<v Speaker 4>It was one of the stories of the year that

0:01:19.824 --> 0:01:22.664
<v Speaker 4>one of the most watched movies of twenty twenty four,

0:01:22.904 --> 0:01:26.944
<v Speaker 4>It Ends with Us, came alongside the mass cancelation of

0:01:26.984 --> 0:01:31.104
<v Speaker 4>its star, Blake Lively. The pressure that accompanied that movie

0:01:31.144 --> 0:01:33.944
<v Speaker 4>was notable for the fact that the star and producer

0:01:34.064 --> 0:01:38.224
<v Speaker 4>Lively and its other star and director, Justin Baldoni, went

0:01:38.264 --> 0:01:41.504
<v Speaker 4>to great and unusual lengths not to be seen together,

0:01:41.864 --> 0:01:44.624
<v Speaker 4>to be interviewed together, to show any of the usual

0:01:44.664 --> 0:01:49.104
<v Speaker 4>camaraderie required of co creators of a big film. Lively,

0:01:49.384 --> 0:01:52.304
<v Speaker 4>the rumors went, wanted to promote the movie as if

0:01:52.304 --> 0:01:57.704
<v Speaker 4>it were a flowery rom com. Baldoni supposedly loudly insisted

0:01:57.704 --> 0:02:00.864
<v Speaker 4>that he wanted its serious subject matter, coercive control and

0:02:00.904 --> 0:02:05.344
<v Speaker 4>domestic violence, to be front and center. Lively was criticized

0:02:05.384 --> 0:02:08.584
<v Speaker 4>for trivializing a serious topic, for being a tone deaf

0:02:08.704 --> 0:02:13.464
<v Speaker 4>self promoter, for launching a haircare brand. The backlash was huge,

0:02:14.104 --> 0:02:17.464
<v Speaker 4>and then yesterday The New York Times reported that Lively

0:02:17.584 --> 0:02:21.424
<v Speaker 4>is taking legal action against Baldooni, accusing him of sexual

0:02:21.464 --> 0:02:25.184
<v Speaker 4>harassment and an effort to destroy her reputation. It's a

0:02:25.264 --> 0:02:29.624
<v Speaker 4>story that has massive implications for I'd say almost every

0:02:29.664 --> 0:02:33.104
<v Speaker 4>celebrity story you see on the internet. Mia, what did

0:02:33.144 --> 0:02:35.984
<v Speaker 4>the story the one with the we can bury anyone

0:02:36.064 --> 0:02:37.904
<v Speaker 4>headline allege I.

0:02:37.824 --> 0:02:40.024
<v Speaker 3>Think Jesse's going to take us through some of the

0:02:40.504 --> 0:02:42.144
<v Speaker 3>allegations in more detail, but.

0:02:42.224 --> 0:02:46.384
<v Speaker 1>Overall, it alleged serious misconduct on the set.

0:02:46.464 --> 0:02:49.584
<v Speaker 3>Now, what's important to understand is that Justin was not

0:02:49.664 --> 0:02:52.904
<v Speaker 3>only the director and the producer and the co star,

0:02:53.424 --> 0:02:55.744
<v Speaker 3>he also was a co owner of the studio that

0:02:55.864 --> 0:02:58.944
<v Speaker 3>was making the film, So even though Blake Lively was

0:02:58.984 --> 0:03:03.104
<v Speaker 3>more famous, he had huge power in the context of

0:03:03.144 --> 0:03:07.424
<v Speaker 3>making this film. So it alleged sexual harassment. And then

0:03:07.504 --> 0:03:11.464
<v Speaker 3>also it detailed that when Blake Lively complained about it

0:03:11.504 --> 0:03:14.864
<v Speaker 3>and insisted on a meeting with all the stakeholders before

0:03:14.904 --> 0:03:18.384
<v Speaker 3>she returned to filming in January this year, after the writers' strike,

0:03:19.464 --> 0:03:22.504
<v Speaker 3>Justin Baldoni hired a crisis pr to smear her, which

0:03:22.544 --> 0:03:24.504
<v Speaker 3>we're also going to get into in a moment. But

0:03:24.584 --> 0:03:27.064
<v Speaker 3>let's just rewind to August to remind ourselves what this

0:03:27.104 --> 0:03:29.504
<v Speaker 3>movie was about and why there was so much controversy

0:03:29.504 --> 0:03:32.184
<v Speaker 3>when it was released, because it was only released a

0:03:32.224 --> 0:03:35.384
<v Speaker 3>few months ago, and it's about to come onto streaming,

0:03:35.504 --> 0:03:37.984
<v Speaker 3>or I think it's just come on to streaming. The

0:03:38.024 --> 0:03:41.464
<v Speaker 3>movie is based on the Colleen Hoover book that was

0:03:41.504 --> 0:03:43.184
<v Speaker 3>also called It Ends with Us and It tells the

0:03:43.224 --> 0:03:47.464
<v Speaker 3>story of a florist called Lily Bloom played by Lively,

0:03:47.624 --> 0:03:52.464
<v Speaker 3>who navigates the romance with a neurosurgeon called Ryle Kincaid

0:03:53.104 --> 0:03:56.264
<v Speaker 3>that becomes abusive. That's the essence of the film. The

0:03:56.304 --> 0:03:58.824
<v Speaker 3>three of us went to see it, it was already

0:03:59.064 --> 0:04:02.664
<v Speaker 3>completely swamped in controversy. I really liked the film. I

0:04:02.664 --> 0:04:06.024
<v Speaker 3>thought Blake Lively was fantastic. Yeah, I thought it was

0:04:06.104 --> 0:04:07.464
<v Speaker 3>not the best film in the world, but I thought

0:04:07.464 --> 0:04:11.944
<v Speaker 3>it was really good. And I was surprised the controversy

0:04:11.984 --> 0:04:15.344
<v Speaker 3>that had completely engulfed this film. It seemed really out

0:04:15.384 --> 0:04:18.784
<v Speaker 3>of whack. So what was the controversy. Well, there's a

0:04:18.824 --> 0:04:22.024
<v Speaker 3>few different elements to it, but it was basically all

0:04:22.184 --> 0:04:27.904
<v Speaker 3>about Blake Lively being inappropriate during the promotional part of

0:04:27.944 --> 0:04:30.304
<v Speaker 3>the tour. So it wasn't about the actual movie itself.

0:04:30.344 --> 0:04:32.904
<v Speaker 3>It was about how it was promoted. There was an

0:04:32.904 --> 0:04:36.864
<v Speaker 3>interview where she encouraged fans to grab your friends, wear

0:04:36.864 --> 0:04:39.384
<v Speaker 3>your florals, and head out to see it, which kind

0:04:39.424 --> 0:04:43.144
<v Speaker 3>of suggested that it was a lighthearted viewing experience. There

0:04:43.144 --> 0:04:45.464
<v Speaker 3>was no trigger warning at the beginning of it, so

0:04:45.504 --> 0:04:48.504
<v Speaker 3>there was a whole big debate about trigger warnings, and

0:04:48.824 --> 0:04:53.184
<v Speaker 3>the whole marketing campaign was criticized as tone death given

0:04:53.384 --> 0:04:56.824
<v Speaker 3>how serious the themes were in the movie about domestic abuse,

0:04:57.144 --> 0:05:00.024
<v Speaker 3>and that all landed on Blake Lively. Now, there were

0:05:00.064 --> 0:05:03.104
<v Speaker 3>some things she did during the tour that particularly made

0:05:03.144 --> 0:05:05.584
<v Speaker 3>her a target of criticism, like she was launching a

0:05:05.624 --> 0:05:08.744
<v Speaker 3>hair care line at the time. She also promoted her

0:05:09.024 --> 0:05:13.184
<v Speaker 3>beverage brand, which was called Betty Booze, and many people

0:05:13.224 --> 0:05:15.984
<v Speaker 3>said that alcohol is often connected with domestic violence, so

0:05:16.064 --> 0:05:20.024
<v Speaker 3>that's insensitive, and so it was seen that she was

0:05:20.224 --> 0:05:23.664
<v Speaker 3>just not taking it seriously, which led to this big

0:05:23.744 --> 0:05:28.184
<v Speaker 3>backlash against her. And you'd have to say, one of

0:05:28.224 --> 0:05:32.824
<v Speaker 3>the worst cancelations that we've seen in a long time

0:05:32.904 --> 0:05:36.904
<v Speaker 3>for reasons that seemed really spurious.

0:05:37.384 --> 0:05:40.984
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I agree, because back at the time we talked

0:05:40.984 --> 0:05:43.864
<v Speaker 5>about it and it felt as though the facts we

0:05:43.904 --> 0:05:46.984
<v Speaker 5>had in front of us were not proportionate to the

0:05:47.344 --> 0:05:52.504
<v Speaker 5>avalanche of hate that Blake Lively was getting, particularly on TikTok.

0:05:52.584 --> 0:05:55.624
<v Speaker 5>Maybe that's because that's where I leave most of the time,

0:05:56.264 --> 0:05:59.144
<v Speaker 5>and we were getting these leaks. So the leaks that

0:05:59.144 --> 0:06:02.104
<v Speaker 5>we were getting were that there was something that said

0:06:02.144 --> 0:06:05.864
<v Speaker 5>justin Baldoni lingered too long on a kiss, he asked

0:06:05.904 --> 0:06:09.584
<v Speaker 5>how much she weighed because he had a former back

0:06:09.624 --> 0:06:12.064
<v Speaker 5>injury and was worried about picking her up, like weird,

0:06:12.624 --> 0:06:13.384
<v Speaker 5>weird stuff.

0:06:13.744 --> 0:06:15.624
<v Speaker 3>None of those took hold, so there were a few

0:06:15.704 --> 0:06:18.944
<v Speaker 3>rumors of was it uncomfortable on set. The other thing

0:06:18.984 --> 0:06:23.544
<v Speaker 3>that really came out was Blake had taken over and

0:06:23.864 --> 0:06:27.664
<v Speaker 3>she'd insisted on doing her own edit that somehow Ryan

0:06:27.704 --> 0:06:30.224
<v Speaker 3>Reynolds got involved and was rewriting a few scenes. So

0:06:30.264 --> 0:06:33.304
<v Speaker 3>the image that came across through the press tour was

0:06:33.344 --> 0:06:38.624
<v Speaker 3>that she was not taking it seriously, was dominating an

0:06:38.704 --> 0:06:42.784
<v Speaker 3>a diva on set, and that he was a victim

0:06:42.824 --> 0:06:44.984
<v Speaker 3>of all this. Because, in case you're not familiar with

0:06:45.064 --> 0:06:47.944
<v Speaker 3>Justin Baldoni, his most famous role as an actor was

0:06:47.984 --> 0:06:52.464
<v Speaker 3>in Jane the Virgin, and he's really fushioned himself over

0:06:52.464 --> 0:06:55.144
<v Speaker 3>the last few years as a feminist and as a

0:06:56.184 --> 0:07:00.024
<v Speaker 3>podcast called Man Enough, where he questions toxic masculinity.

0:07:00.504 --> 0:07:03.184
<v Speaker 4>He had a viral ted talk about it like he's

0:07:03.304 --> 0:07:04.744
<v Speaker 4>very much he's that.

0:07:04.704 --> 0:07:07.704
<v Speaker 3>Guy, a champion of women. That was his vibe.

0:07:07.824 --> 0:07:10.504
<v Speaker 4>And among all these rumors, what was very clear, the

0:07:10.504 --> 0:07:14.864
<v Speaker 4>whole like smoke fire thing is that they had definitely

0:07:14.944 --> 0:07:17.904
<v Speaker 4>fallen out. There was no question about that. You know,

0:07:17.984 --> 0:07:21.024
<v Speaker 4>the other cast members had stopped following him on Instagram

0:07:21.024 --> 0:07:23.464
<v Speaker 4>and seemed to very much be siding with her. As

0:07:23.504 --> 0:07:25.424
<v Speaker 4>I said at the beginning, they weren't photographed together, that

0:07:25.424 --> 0:07:27.384
<v Speaker 4>they didn't do any promo. It was kind of like

0:07:27.584 --> 0:07:30.384
<v Speaker 4>dueling press tours, which is very unusual.

0:07:30.504 --> 0:07:34.424
<v Speaker 5>And Baldoni at the time he spoke to Today and

0:07:34.544 --> 0:07:38.304
<v Speaker 5>obviously addressing some of the creative differences, and he said,

0:07:38.784 --> 0:07:41.704
<v Speaker 5>I'm a best idea wins person and I always have

0:07:41.824 --> 0:07:43.944
<v Speaker 5>been to a fault, sometimes to a point where at

0:07:43.984 --> 0:07:45.824
<v Speaker 5>times I think I've had people wonder if I know

0:07:45.904 --> 0:07:47.904
<v Speaker 5>what I'm doing or if I have a point of view,

0:07:48.064 --> 0:07:51.064
<v Speaker 5>because I'm so willing to have my vision changed. I

0:07:51.104 --> 0:07:54.824
<v Speaker 5>don't believe that inspiration or creativity comes through one person.

0:07:55.224 --> 0:07:57.384
<v Speaker 5>On the night of the premiere, he was saying, this

0:07:57.464 --> 0:08:00.384
<v Speaker 5>isn't about me, It's a night for Blake, It's for Colleen.

0:08:01.104 --> 0:08:04.224
<v Speaker 5>I'm so grateful we're here, and again it was clear

0:08:04.264 --> 0:08:07.024
<v Speaker 5>that neither of those women were speaking to him.

0:08:07.624 --> 0:08:09.944
<v Speaker 4>What happened on the weekend is that Blake Lively has

0:08:09.984 --> 0:08:12.704
<v Speaker 4>filed a legal complaint that presents her side of the

0:08:12.744 --> 0:08:15.544
<v Speaker 4>story to all of the things that we were just discussing,

0:08:15.624 --> 0:08:17.624
<v Speaker 4>and Jesse's going to tell us about them in a minute,

0:08:17.704 --> 0:08:18.864
<v Speaker 4>but first shortbreak.

0:08:26.904 --> 0:08:31.824
<v Speaker 5>So, the allegations of misconduct on set are pretty damning.

0:08:31.984 --> 0:08:37.024
<v Speaker 5>In terms of physical boundaries and violations. There are allegations

0:08:37.104 --> 0:08:41.304
<v Speaker 5>that he improvised unwanted kissing scenes. He would enter This

0:08:41.464 --> 0:08:44.624
<v Speaker 5>is Baldoni would enter her makeup trailer uninvited while she

0:08:44.664 --> 0:08:48.864
<v Speaker 5>was undressed, including while she was breastfeeding. In terms of

0:08:48.904 --> 0:08:53.864
<v Speaker 5>sexual harassment, Baldoni and Jamie Heath, he was a producer

0:08:53.864 --> 0:08:58.144
<v Speaker 5>and co owner, there are allegations that they would describe

0:08:58.184 --> 0:09:02.024
<v Speaker 5>their genitalia on set. Baldoni would frequently refer to his

0:09:02.184 --> 0:09:06.424
<v Speaker 5>past porn addiction and describe previous sexual encounters where he

0:09:06.544 --> 0:09:10.944
<v Speaker 5>said he may or may not have received consent. Now

0:09:10.984 --> 0:09:14.224
<v Speaker 5>we know that Lively made a series of requests part

0:09:14.264 --> 0:09:17.744
<v Speaker 5>way through filming. They actually had this all hands meeting

0:09:17.824 --> 0:09:21.824
<v Speaker 5>which included her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and it was held

0:09:21.864 --> 0:09:26.584
<v Speaker 5>to address Baldoni and Jamie Heaths alleged inappropriate conduct.

0:09:26.784 --> 0:09:29.904
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, this was interesting because this was like she

0:09:30.104 --> 0:09:33.744
<v Speaker 3>had Ryan there as her support person, and it was

0:09:33.784 --> 0:09:35.904
<v Speaker 3>after the writer's strike, so they'd only been filming for

0:09:35.984 --> 0:09:38.264
<v Speaker 3>six weeks. Then that was the writer's strike and she

0:09:38.384 --> 0:09:40.384
<v Speaker 3>had this meeting and she said, I'm not coming back

0:09:41.104 --> 0:09:44.264
<v Speaker 3>unless we have this meeting. She included Sony, who's the distributor,

0:09:44.264 --> 0:09:46.184
<v Speaker 3>and all these different people. So there are a lot

0:09:46.224 --> 0:09:48.264
<v Speaker 3>of people at that meeting, which means that there will

0:09:48.304 --> 0:09:49.624
<v Speaker 3>be a lot of you know.

0:09:49.784 --> 0:09:52.224
<v Speaker 1>And none of this was disputed at the time.

0:09:52.704 --> 0:09:56.344
<v Speaker 5>So there was a list of thirty things. They're quite

0:09:56.384 --> 0:10:00.104
<v Speaker 5>revealing some of Lively's requests, and these were, as you say,

0:10:00.144 --> 0:10:03.384
<v Speaker 5>they were confirmed because it's a document. Her request were

0:10:03.424 --> 0:10:07.144
<v Speaker 5>that Baldoni would stop asking her about religious beliefs, stop

0:10:07.224 --> 0:10:10.544
<v Speaker 5>asking her trainer about her weight, she was four months

0:10:10.544 --> 0:10:13.624
<v Speaker 5>pardon with her fourth baby, and stopped claiming to be

0:10:13.704 --> 0:10:17.864
<v Speaker 5>able to speak to her dead father. There are allegations

0:10:17.864 --> 0:10:21.544
<v Speaker 5>that Baldoni improvised while on set. So in one scene,

0:10:21.704 --> 0:10:24.264
<v Speaker 5>they weren't miked up. It was just to be filmed.

0:10:24.264 --> 0:10:27.224
<v Speaker 5>It was just a visual scene, and Lively claims that

0:10:27.304 --> 0:10:31.224
<v Speaker 5>as himself, Baldoni leaned in and slowly dragged his lips

0:10:31.264 --> 0:10:33.984
<v Speaker 5>from her ear to her neck and said it smells

0:10:34.024 --> 0:10:38.304
<v Speaker 5>so good. It says that when Lively objected to his actions,

0:10:38.664 --> 0:10:44.184
<v Speaker 5>Baldoni retorted, I'm not even attracted to you. Baldoni added,

0:10:44.264 --> 0:10:48.384
<v Speaker 5>this is an allegation improvised sexual content and nude scenes,

0:10:48.544 --> 0:10:51.024
<v Speaker 5>and he fought to have a scene where the characters

0:10:51.064 --> 0:10:53.664
<v Speaker 5>climaxed at the same time on their wedding night and

0:10:53.744 --> 0:10:57.064
<v Speaker 5>told Lively that he and his partner always did and

0:10:57.144 --> 0:11:00.064
<v Speaker 5>allegedly pressed her on whether that was the case with

0:11:00.184 --> 0:11:03.264
<v Speaker 5>her husband, and she says she was very uncomfortable by

0:11:03.264 --> 0:11:08.384
<v Speaker 5>that conversation. There's an allegation about the childbirth scene which

0:11:08.424 --> 0:11:11.864
<v Speaker 5>is particularly unsettling. It wasn't agreed that she would be

0:11:11.984 --> 0:11:13.784
<v Speaker 5>naked for it, but then when she got on set,

0:11:13.824 --> 0:11:17.744
<v Speaker 5>she says that he insisted she be naked. They compromised

0:11:18.144 --> 0:11:20.824
<v Speaker 5>that she would be naked from the waist down, but

0:11:21.384 --> 0:11:25.104
<v Speaker 5>the set wasn't closed and in the end his friend

0:11:25.264 --> 0:11:28.024
<v Speaker 5>came in to play the role of the obgyn.

0:11:28.424 --> 0:11:31.384
<v Speaker 3>I think this is possibly the most chilling thing because

0:11:31.424 --> 0:11:34.064
<v Speaker 3>what's so illuminating about reading will link to it if

0:11:34.104 --> 0:11:36.864
<v Speaker 3>anybody wants to look at it, which I think you should.

0:11:37.024 --> 0:11:40.064
<v Speaker 3>But you learn a lot about Hollywood and how sex

0:11:40.104 --> 0:11:42.824
<v Speaker 3>scenes work right, and there are things like nudity writers

0:11:42.864 --> 0:11:47.024
<v Speaker 3>where everybody agrees what the parameters before you go into

0:11:47.024 --> 0:11:50.064
<v Speaker 3>a scene, things like closed sex when there's nudity, so

0:11:50.144 --> 0:11:53.264
<v Speaker 3>only essential people are there. Monitors are turned off so

0:11:53.344 --> 0:11:56.264
<v Speaker 3>other people can't look from other rooms and even film you.

0:11:56.784 --> 0:11:58.904
<v Speaker 3>So she was in stirrups. She had a little bit

0:11:58.904 --> 0:12:02.784
<v Speaker 3>of fabric just literally covering her and the role of

0:12:02.864 --> 0:12:07.224
<v Speaker 3>the gynecologist. They were like between her legs. And also

0:12:07.544 --> 0:12:11.264
<v Speaker 3>another owner of his studio, Wayfarirer, had just flown in

0:12:11.304 --> 0:12:13.944
<v Speaker 3>to visit the set on that day for the first time.

0:12:14.424 --> 0:12:17.464
<v Speaker 1>Like it is so gross and creepy.

0:12:18.024 --> 0:12:21.384
<v Speaker 4>It also is clearly from this very long list of

0:12:21.824 --> 0:12:25.744
<v Speaker 4>requests clear that this set was a shit show, right

0:12:25.784 --> 0:12:29.504
<v Speaker 4>because one of them is also stop having hours long

0:12:29.624 --> 0:12:35.144
<v Speaker 4>meetings where Baldoni cries and no more pressing from Baldoni

0:12:35.224 --> 0:12:40.184
<v Speaker 4>to sage any of Blake Live's employees, Like this is

0:12:40.224 --> 0:12:42.824
<v Speaker 4>batshit what's going on on that set, And it seems

0:12:42.824 --> 0:12:44.864
<v Speaker 4>that she's very much trying to say, let's get back

0:12:44.864 --> 0:12:47.064
<v Speaker 4>to a professional set.

0:12:46.904 --> 0:12:48.904
<v Speaker 5>And they're at claims as well that when you know

0:12:48.944 --> 0:12:51.624
<v Speaker 5>there were certain moments where Lively was made to feel uncomfortable,

0:12:51.664 --> 0:12:54.344
<v Speaker 5>other women from the set came up and said, I've

0:12:54.344 --> 0:12:57.544
<v Speaker 5>also had that experience so the allegations are that it

0:12:57.704 --> 0:12:59.784
<v Speaker 5>was not just her, she was trying to protect the

0:12:59.824 --> 0:13:00.344
<v Speaker 5>whole set.

0:13:00.704 --> 0:13:02.664
<v Speaker 2>The last thing I'll say, and I could go on

0:13:02.744 --> 0:13:04.104
<v Speaker 2>and on about what's in this.

0:13:04.224 --> 0:13:08.264
<v Speaker 5>Complaint, but the last thing is she alleges that there

0:13:08.384 --> 0:13:13.224
<v Speaker 5>was a clear marketing place that was distributed to the

0:13:13.304 --> 0:13:16.864
<v Speaker 5>cast and everyone involved in marketing it about how to

0:13:16.904 --> 0:13:19.584
<v Speaker 5>promote the film. This was from Sony and they said

0:13:19.904 --> 0:13:22.584
<v Speaker 5>they wanted to focus on hope and resilience and not

0:13:22.744 --> 0:13:26.424
<v Speaker 5>position this as a domestic violence film. They say that

0:13:26.504 --> 0:13:31.104
<v Speaker 5>Baldoni went against this, and that's massive because at the

0:13:31.144 --> 0:13:35.024
<v Speaker 5>time everyone was going, why is she not acknowledging that

0:13:35.064 --> 0:13:38.144
<v Speaker 5>this is a film about domestic violence. Baldoni was over

0:13:38.184 --> 0:13:42.264
<v Speaker 5>here with a link in his Instagram bio to help victims.

0:13:42.664 --> 0:13:46.864
<v Speaker 5>Everything he said in his messaging was acknowledging victims, and

0:13:46.944 --> 0:13:50.064
<v Speaker 5>this made Lively look really bad.

0:13:50.464 --> 0:13:52.584
<v Speaker 4>Well, as it turns out, or at least what's alleged

0:13:52.624 --> 0:13:55.744
<v Speaker 4>he here is that that Pivot Jesse was a very

0:13:55.784 --> 0:14:00.544
<v Speaker 4>deliberate one to smear Blake Lively because Baldoni and his

0:14:00.624 --> 0:14:04.424
<v Speaker 4>team knew what was coming. So to the smear campaign,

0:14:04.464 --> 0:14:07.184
<v Speaker 4>and why I say that this is a story that's

0:14:07.224 --> 0:14:09.344
<v Speaker 4>not just about Blake Lively and just In Baldoni, but

0:14:09.464 --> 0:14:13.424
<v Speaker 4>gives an in into what is really behind a lot

0:14:13.464 --> 0:14:16.304
<v Speaker 4>of what we believe right on social media. So all

0:14:16.344 --> 0:14:18.304
<v Speaker 4>those tiktoks and stories that we talked about at the

0:14:18.304 --> 0:14:21.264
<v Speaker 4>beginning that were being shared and reshared as facts that

0:14:21.344 --> 0:14:24.144
<v Speaker 4>Lively was a mean girl, that Lively tried to hijack

0:14:24.224 --> 0:14:26.944
<v Speaker 4>the movie, that Lively just wanted to promote a hair

0:14:26.984 --> 0:14:30.264
<v Speaker 4>care brand. What's alleged in this document is there was

0:14:30.344 --> 0:14:34.024
<v Speaker 4>nothing organic about those stories, and that the PR firm

0:14:34.184 --> 0:14:37.824
<v Speaker 4>hired by Baldoni when he realized that Reynolds had blocked

0:14:37.904 --> 0:14:42.624
<v Speaker 4>him on Instagram, Baldonian, his producing partner, hired this firm

0:14:42.664 --> 0:14:46.464
<v Speaker 4>who were expert in the dark arts of smearing, starting rumors,

0:14:46.464 --> 0:14:49.864
<v Speaker 4>and fanning the flames of negativity. Some of the tactics

0:14:49.864 --> 0:14:53.144
<v Speaker 4>that are alleged to have happened are that the PR

0:14:53.184 --> 0:14:56.584
<v Speaker 4>team would boost negative stories about Lively, branding her as

0:14:56.624 --> 0:15:00.504
<v Speaker 4>difficult and tone death. That contractors were allegedly hired to

0:15:00.584 --> 0:15:05.424
<v Speaker 4>dominate social media with untraceable tactics like social manipulation and

0:15:05.504 --> 0:15:10.944
<v Speaker 4>proactive fan posting. A hired gun helped amplify negative narrative online,

0:15:10.984 --> 0:15:15.424
<v Speaker 4>including on platforms like TikTok and Reddit, and basically all

0:15:15.464 --> 0:15:19.584
<v Speaker 4>these threads of theories started being sown and then amplified.

0:15:19.624 --> 0:15:23.144
<v Speaker 4>Now it's actually impossible, even by the investigative journalists at

0:15:23.144 --> 0:15:26.064
<v Speaker 4>The New York Times and actually by the legal team

0:15:26.144 --> 0:15:30.864
<v Speaker 4>to be able to absolutely identify exactly what the amplification did.

0:15:30.904 --> 0:15:33.544
<v Speaker 4>As we know, the Internet is sprawling and enormous. But

0:15:33.584 --> 0:15:37.744
<v Speaker 4>the negative stories that were planted were planted very deliberately

0:15:38.184 --> 0:15:42.024
<v Speaker 4>and then encouraged. So this tells you everything about how

0:15:42.104 --> 0:15:45.744
<v Speaker 4>we the public were manipulated in this story.

0:15:46.104 --> 0:15:48.944
<v Speaker 5>In August, there were two things we talked about. The

0:15:49.024 --> 0:15:52.344
<v Speaker 5>first was something that we've referred to as the dig,

0:15:52.784 --> 0:15:55.064
<v Speaker 5>which is what happens when someone is in the process

0:15:55.104 --> 0:15:58.984
<v Speaker 5>of cancelation, and we were saying that it's again back

0:15:59.024 --> 0:16:02.584
<v Speaker 5>to it being disproportionate. Is that people started yelling about

0:16:02.584 --> 0:16:08.184
<v Speaker 5>her plantation wedding, about how Reynolds cheated on scullet Jo

0:16:08.224 --> 0:16:12.424
<v Speaker 5>Hansen with Lively. She's always been rude. Everyone on Gossip

0:16:12.504 --> 0:16:16.264
<v Speaker 5>Girl hated her. There were weird videos of people gifting

0:16:16.304 --> 0:16:18.344
<v Speaker 5>her a bracelet on a red carpet and she would

0:16:18.944 --> 0:16:20.544
<v Speaker 5>not accept it, or something like.

0:16:20.504 --> 0:16:23.344
<v Speaker 3>The one that got the most traction was and I

0:16:23.384 --> 0:16:26.144
<v Speaker 3>remember thinking at the time, this is weird. Without wanting

0:16:26.224 --> 0:16:28.904
<v Speaker 3>to we definitely had our doubts and we spoke about

0:16:28.904 --> 0:16:32.984
<v Speaker 3>this on the show, as did others. That interview with

0:16:33.304 --> 0:16:38.304
<v Speaker 3>a Swedish journalist entertainment journalist called Christie Flaher which came

0:16:38.344 --> 0:16:40.944
<v Speaker 3>out where it showed her interviewing Blake Lively for a

0:16:40.944 --> 0:16:45.184
<v Speaker 3>different movie I think back in twenty fifteen, and it

0:16:45.304 --> 0:16:48.864
<v Speaker 3>showed Blake being a little bit rude, and for some

0:16:49.024 --> 0:16:51.944
<v Speaker 3>reason she posted that with the headline the interview that

0:16:51.944 --> 0:16:55.344
<v Speaker 3>made me want to quit my job. That was in

0:16:55.384 --> 0:16:59.344
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixteen. That interview happened, and yet it came out.

0:16:59.944 --> 0:17:02.664
<v Speaker 3>Now why did it come out? Well, you could say

0:17:02.664 --> 0:17:06.144
<v Speaker 3>that organically that journalist was just trying to ride the

0:17:06.144 --> 0:17:09.424
<v Speaker 3>wave of hate against Blake Lively. But what was revealed

0:17:09.464 --> 0:17:13.264
<v Speaker 3>in this is that this journalist had worked with the

0:17:13.264 --> 0:17:16.944
<v Speaker 3>PR company before because they'd also represented Johnny Depp in

0:17:16.984 --> 0:17:21.024
<v Speaker 3>his trial against Amber Heard. And we know that some

0:17:21.064 --> 0:17:24.704
<v Speaker 3>really dodgy things happened then in terms of how Amber

0:17:24.704 --> 0:17:28.504
<v Speaker 3>Heard was trolled and the volume of internet hate towards her,

0:17:29.184 --> 0:17:31.744
<v Speaker 3>so much of which was seen to be manufactured. So

0:17:32.384 --> 0:17:35.104
<v Speaker 3>again it wasn't organic. And there's a word called astroturfing,

0:17:35.104 --> 0:17:39.064
<v Speaker 3>which I learned, which is basically means you think something

0:17:39.384 --> 0:17:41.824
<v Speaker 3>is organic it looks like natural grass, but when you.

0:17:41.744 --> 0:17:43.824
<v Speaker 1>Look closer you see that it's artificial.

0:17:44.064 --> 0:17:47.104
<v Speaker 3>And what that means is that these things are planted

0:17:47.224 --> 0:17:51.264
<v Speaker 3>and then amplified, either by bots or by these agencies.

0:17:51.264 --> 0:17:51.944
<v Speaker 3>That's what they do.

0:17:52.224 --> 0:17:55.064
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so in terms of being planted, I think that's

0:17:55.104 --> 0:17:59.344
<v Speaker 5>an important point because in the investigation it sort of

0:17:59.384 --> 0:18:02.304
<v Speaker 5>said this isn't bots. I always imagined it was bots.

0:18:02.824 --> 0:18:06.864
<v Speaker 5>But at the time, I was posting on TikTok about

0:18:06.864 --> 0:18:09.624
<v Speaker 5>the Blake Lively thing, and I was noticing that every

0:18:09.664 --> 0:18:13.384
<v Speaker 5>time I posted something that was defensive, it got no reach.

0:18:13.544 --> 0:18:15.704
<v Speaker 5>So I remember talking about this on the show, only

0:18:15.904 --> 0:18:18.544
<v Speaker 5>a few hundred views, and then I posted one thing

0:18:18.584 --> 0:18:22.704
<v Speaker 5>that was cheeky that had something about Blake Lively's cancelation.

0:18:22.824 --> 0:18:25.744
<v Speaker 5>It actually went against it, but all the metadata would

0:18:25.744 --> 0:18:28.344
<v Speaker 5>have suggested that I was about to go her blew up,

0:18:28.984 --> 0:18:33.304
<v Speaker 5>and it seemed that if you were being critical of

0:18:33.344 --> 0:18:38.024
<v Speaker 5>Blake Lively, your content was on steroids. As someone who

0:18:38.384 --> 0:18:40.904
<v Speaker 5>consumes a lot of social media content, it is not

0:18:41.104 --> 0:18:44.744
<v Speaker 5>often that you get a unanimous view on anything. But

0:18:44.864 --> 0:18:49.464
<v Speaker 5>you went onto these media platforms and all of a sudden,

0:18:50.024 --> 0:18:55.224
<v Speaker 5>it was like wall to wall. Everyone hated her. And

0:18:55.304 --> 0:18:58.264
<v Speaker 5>let's be clear, if you saw someone pop up and

0:18:58.304 --> 0:19:02.064
<v Speaker 5>have a go at Blake Lively, that was probably legitimate.

0:19:02.424 --> 0:19:05.784
<v Speaker 5>But where they were getting the information, how their brain

0:19:05.904 --> 0:19:09.904
<v Speaker 5>had been marinating in content kind of contributed to that.

0:19:10.344 --> 0:19:11.344
<v Speaker 1>Well, it creates a lens.

0:19:11.584 --> 0:19:13.904
<v Speaker 3>And I should say, Christy Flower has come out and

0:19:13.944 --> 0:19:16.584
<v Speaker 3>said she has nothing to do with the alleged smear campaign,

0:19:17.064 --> 0:19:20.304
<v Speaker 3>but she was exactly what you were talking about, Jesse.

0:19:20.544 --> 0:19:23.544
<v Speaker 3>She was being opportunistic. So we live in the attention

0:19:23.664 --> 0:19:28.024
<v Speaker 3>economy and if you wanted to go viral, everybody looks

0:19:28.064 --> 0:19:30.904
<v Speaker 3>at the numbers who makes content and in the media,

0:19:31.104 --> 0:19:33.984
<v Speaker 3>so you knew that if you did something that was

0:19:34.104 --> 0:19:37.864
<v Speaker 3>against Blake Lively, it would go off. So it's important

0:19:37.904 --> 0:19:41.704
<v Speaker 3>to understand how something can be both organic and manipulated

0:19:41.784 --> 0:19:43.224
<v Speaker 3>because people will say, but.

0:19:43.224 --> 0:19:45.024
<v Speaker 1>Hang on, Blake Lively.

0:19:45.104 --> 0:19:48.744
<v Speaker 3>They didn't make her try and promote her hair care line,

0:19:48.784 --> 0:19:52.104
<v Speaker 3>they didn't make her reference alcohol, they didn't make her

0:19:52.144 --> 0:19:56.344
<v Speaker 3>wear florals. But the thing is that it's the volume,

0:19:56.744 --> 0:20:00.624
<v Speaker 3>So you can start to believe, oh, everybody hates Blake Lively,

0:20:00.664 --> 0:20:03.984
<v Speaker 3>and when you hear enough of that, it does impact

0:20:04.184 --> 0:20:05.464
<v Speaker 3>on how you view someone.

0:20:05.704 --> 0:20:10.104
<v Speaker 5>And there was also I remember looking at interviews where

0:20:10.464 --> 0:20:14.024
<v Speaker 5>she seemed really insensitive about the subject matter of the film,

0:20:14.424 --> 0:20:17.064
<v Speaker 5>but it was so purposefully cut, and if you watch

0:20:17.104 --> 0:20:19.704
<v Speaker 5>the whole interview, that's not how it seemed. And then

0:20:19.744 --> 0:20:22.424
<v Speaker 5>you were getting Justin Baldoni with these incredible cuts of

0:20:22.784 --> 0:20:26.544
<v Speaker 5>him saying something really eloquent about domestic violence. So it

0:20:26.584 --> 0:20:30.104
<v Speaker 5>did seem that, yeah, I suppose that that is allegedly

0:20:30.144 --> 0:20:30.904
<v Speaker 5>part of the smearing.

0:20:31.584 --> 0:20:34.984
<v Speaker 4>This is where we can bury anyone. Headline comes in

0:20:35.144 --> 0:20:38.904
<v Speaker 4>because in the New York Times investigation, there are literal

0:20:38.944 --> 0:20:44.184
<v Speaker 4>screenshots of text messages between Baldoni's people and the PR

0:20:44.264 --> 0:20:48.424
<v Speaker 4>people saying exactly that that they can bury anybody with

0:20:48.584 --> 0:20:51.304
<v Speaker 4>enough ammunition, and that they needed to do it to

0:20:51.304 --> 0:20:54.424
<v Speaker 4>get Baldoni's story across. We're going to be back in

0:20:54.464 --> 0:20:56.144
<v Speaker 4>a minute, but first a little break.

0:21:02.704 --> 0:21:06.504
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk about the effect of how cancelation

0:21:06.664 --> 0:21:10.824
<v Speaker 3>works and how it can be manipulated, because having experienced

0:21:10.864 --> 0:21:14.064
<v Speaker 3>it a number of times organically, certainly not to my knowledge,

0:21:14.064 --> 0:21:17.904
<v Speaker 3>with a calculated or paid smear campaign by a publicist,

0:21:19.144 --> 0:21:23.344
<v Speaker 3>things gained traction, and then everybody wants to be part

0:21:23.344 --> 0:21:25.904
<v Speaker 3>of a pylon, right, That's why it's called a dogpile

0:21:26.144 --> 0:21:32.024
<v Speaker 3>or a pylon, and there becomes status in reinforcing the

0:21:32.744 --> 0:21:36.944
<v Speaker 3>accepted narrative, which in this case was that Justin Baldoni

0:21:37.024 --> 0:21:39.744
<v Speaker 3>was a hero and cared about domestic violence victims, and

0:21:39.784 --> 0:21:43.624
<v Speaker 3>Blake Lively was an entitled diva who cared about nothing

0:21:43.824 --> 0:21:45.904
<v Speaker 3>other than her hair and looking pretty.

0:21:46.464 --> 0:21:49.784
<v Speaker 4>And because of that that sort of narrative about who

0:21:49.784 --> 0:21:53.024
<v Speaker 4>Blake Lively was, she's a prime candidate for this, right,

0:21:53.544 --> 0:21:57.264
<v Speaker 4>because the thing that's very depressing about this story is

0:21:57.264 --> 0:21:59.584
<v Speaker 4>that we're all being manipulated all the time right on

0:21:59.624 --> 0:22:02.104
<v Speaker 4>social media, and we think we're having our own thoughts

0:22:02.144 --> 0:22:04.744
<v Speaker 4>about things and going, yes, I see, But what this

0:22:04.824 --> 0:22:07.984
<v Speaker 4>shows very clearly is that we're being As Lively said

0:22:08.024 --> 0:22:09.984
<v Speaker 4>in her statement about it, she said she wanted to

0:22:10.024 --> 0:22:12.904
<v Speaker 4>show behind the curtain of how these things start. But

0:22:13.024 --> 0:22:15.544
<v Speaker 4>one of the things that we've got to ask ourselves

0:22:15.664 --> 0:22:19.584
<v Speaker 4>is why are we so invested in thinking awful things

0:22:19.584 --> 0:22:24.064
<v Speaker 4>about women and women like Lively? You know, she in particular,

0:22:24.184 --> 0:22:27.104
<v Speaker 4>I guess she is blonde and beautiful, married to a

0:22:27.224 --> 0:22:29.464
<v Speaker 4>rich man. She is a striver We've talked about on

0:22:29.504 --> 0:22:31.224
<v Speaker 4>this show lots of times. Is the worst thing you

0:22:31.344 --> 0:22:34.984
<v Speaker 4>can be. She has her own businesses, she tries really hard,

0:22:35.064 --> 0:22:38.544
<v Speaker 4>like she promoted the shit out of that movie, and

0:22:38.984 --> 0:22:42.544
<v Speaker 4>it's almost like the world was dying to believe this

0:22:42.624 --> 0:22:44.904
<v Speaker 4>about her, which is one of the things I find

0:22:45.784 --> 0:22:47.224
<v Speaker 4>deeply depressing about it.

0:22:47.264 --> 0:22:50.664
<v Speaker 5>And that's what the crisis pr person behind all of

0:22:50.664 --> 0:22:53.584
<v Speaker 5>this actually said in one of the And the reason

0:22:53.584 --> 0:22:55.424
<v Speaker 5>we have these texts, I should say, is because they

0:22:55.464 --> 0:23:00.424
<v Speaker 5>were subpoened. So it's the genius of Blake Lively in

0:23:00.504 --> 0:23:02.384
<v Speaker 5>all of this is to go, I'm going to get

0:23:02.384 --> 0:23:05.504
<v Speaker 5>all the evidence I need to show what really happened,

0:23:05.864 --> 0:23:09.984
<v Speaker 5>which is that you have Melissa Nathan saying basically, I

0:23:10.024 --> 0:23:13.144
<v Speaker 5>can't believe how quickly people just want to hate a woman.

0:23:13.464 --> 0:23:16.384
<v Speaker 5>I'm seeing all this positive justin Baldoni's stuff, and I

0:23:16.384 --> 0:23:18.664
<v Speaker 5>don't even agree with half of it. So it was

0:23:18.784 --> 0:23:22.824
<v Speaker 5>like they lit the fire and then when it blew up,

0:23:22.904 --> 0:23:26.304
<v Speaker 5>they didn't need to do a thing because people.

0:23:26.904 --> 0:23:28.824
<v Speaker 2>Want to hate a woman.

0:23:28.944 --> 0:23:33.624
<v Speaker 5>And the irony of this entire story is that it's

0:23:33.624 --> 0:23:36.544
<v Speaker 5>an allegory for domestic violence in the context of a

0:23:36.584 --> 0:23:40.744
<v Speaker 5>film about domestic violence, which is that people were so

0:23:41.744 --> 0:23:47.584
<v Speaker 5>ready to jump on a woman who maybe didn't use

0:23:47.624 --> 0:23:53.504
<v Speaker 5>the right words, or was profiting or something. And except

0:23:53.624 --> 0:23:57.504
<v Speaker 5>that this man was a feminist ally. It's almost Shakespearean

0:23:57.704 --> 0:24:00.704
<v Speaker 5>in that in order to defend his image it's a

0:24:00.704 --> 0:24:03.584
<v Speaker 5>feminist ally, he had to bury a female co star.

0:24:04.304 --> 0:24:07.664
<v Speaker 5>And we were so happy to follow him there and

0:24:07.704 --> 0:24:12.664
<v Speaker 5>to go not only follow him there, like we didn't

0:24:12.664 --> 0:24:15.544
<v Speaker 5>look at all the facts, which is that none of

0:24:15.584 --> 0:24:19.704
<v Speaker 5>the cast were on speaking terms with him anymore, Colleen

0:24:19.744 --> 0:24:22.864
<v Speaker 5>who all on her side, yes, And we were so

0:24:22.944 --> 0:24:26.744
<v Speaker 5>happy to follow him there. And I think that there's

0:24:26.784 --> 0:24:31.224
<v Speaker 5>a difference between doing something and expressing the doing of something.

0:24:31.304 --> 0:24:32.584
<v Speaker 2>This speaks to something that.

0:24:32.504 --> 0:24:36.624
<v Speaker 5>Feels very very true, which is that there are people

0:24:36.664 --> 0:24:38.704
<v Speaker 5>who use the right words, who have the right link

0:24:38.704 --> 0:24:43.424
<v Speaker 5>in their Instagram bio. But that is not the same

0:24:43.504 --> 0:24:46.584
<v Speaker 5>as being the thing you're purporting to being, which is

0:24:46.624 --> 0:24:50.984
<v Speaker 5>that he's saying he supports women and that this story

0:24:51.064 --> 0:24:55.904
<v Speaker 5>was really important to him. It's just an incredible, like,

0:24:56.384 --> 0:24:59.504
<v Speaker 5>look at potential if it's true hypocrisy.

0:24:59.744 --> 0:25:02.384
<v Speaker 2>I think this story has many places to go.

0:25:02.624 --> 0:25:07.064
<v Speaker 4>And today one of the pr Wizards involved in this.

0:25:07.304 --> 0:25:10.824
<v Speaker 4>Jennifer Abel has some messages that are allegedly her who's

0:25:10.864 --> 0:25:13.024
<v Speaker 4>saying that those messages that we were just talking about,

0:25:13.064 --> 0:25:16.144
<v Speaker 4>Jesse were cherry picked and that you didn't see others.

0:25:16.184 --> 0:25:17.864
<v Speaker 4>And I'm sure that's true. So there's are many more

0:25:17.904 --> 0:25:20.944
<v Speaker 4>places to go. But your point, Jesse is so spot on,

0:25:21.024 --> 0:25:23.784
<v Speaker 4>because I remember at the time a lot of people

0:25:23.784 --> 0:25:26.104
<v Speaker 4>have a lot of love for Baldoni and he was

0:25:26.144 --> 0:25:28.984
<v Speaker 4>seen to be doing all the right things. But I'll

0:25:29.024 --> 0:25:30.904
<v Speaker 4>just listened to the interview with him that he did

0:25:30.944 --> 0:25:33.944
<v Speaker 4>on How to Fail with Elizabeth Day, and the guy,

0:25:34.424 --> 0:25:37.424
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, I'm just going to say it is insufferable,

0:25:37.984 --> 0:25:41.824
<v Speaker 4>like he is insufferable. He doesn't obviously go to lively

0:25:42.384 --> 0:25:45.584
<v Speaker 4>in that interview, and it happened before the legal letter,

0:25:46.224 --> 0:25:49.264
<v Speaker 4>but he described the filming as devastatingly difficult for a

0:25:49.304 --> 0:25:51.984
<v Speaker 4>number of reasons. He made very clear on the record

0:25:51.984 --> 0:25:53.584
<v Speaker 4>that he thought there should have been a trigger warning,

0:25:53.744 --> 0:25:58.704
<v Speaker 4>like it was very clear. But the whole feeling about it,

0:25:59.184 --> 0:26:02.904
<v Speaker 4>Elizabeth Day barely gets a word in, is that he

0:26:03.064 --> 0:26:07.464
<v Speaker 4>was lecturing about victimhood and we are always saying that

0:26:07.504 --> 0:26:10.264
<v Speaker 4>we want men to talk about domestic violence, and we do.

0:26:10.864 --> 0:26:14.504
<v Speaker 4>But we want men to talk to men about domestic violence.

0:26:15.024 --> 0:26:19.384
<v Speaker 4>We don't want them to lecture women about it. And

0:26:19.464 --> 0:26:21.504
<v Speaker 4>I know people have problems with the movie, and people

0:26:21.504 --> 0:26:24.064
<v Speaker 4>have problems with the source material of the book, but

0:26:24.224 --> 0:26:26.584
<v Speaker 4>this movie was aimed at women. The book was aimed

0:26:26.584 --> 0:26:29.664
<v Speaker 4>at women, right. It's the way that they chose to

0:26:29.704 --> 0:26:32.824
<v Speaker 4>promote it that Baldoni then flipped in order to virtue

0:26:32.864 --> 0:26:35.704
<v Speaker 4>signal because he knew basically that he was going to

0:26:35.744 --> 0:26:38.384
<v Speaker 4>be taken down. What's also interested in all this is

0:26:38.424 --> 0:26:41.824
<v Speaker 4>that Ryan Reynold and Blake Lively and the power that

0:26:41.864 --> 0:26:44.184
<v Speaker 4>they wield in Hollywood is probably always going to come

0:26:44.224 --> 0:26:47.304
<v Speaker 4>for him, right, So he knew that was coming, so

0:26:47.384 --> 0:26:51.704
<v Speaker 4>he wanted to position himself as the perfect allocate ally

0:26:51.784 --> 0:26:56.384
<v Speaker 4>and advocate, and he's there lecturing women about victimhood and violence.

0:26:56.904 --> 0:26:59.984
<v Speaker 4>That's not what we want from the guys. I mean,

0:27:00.024 --> 0:27:02.144
<v Speaker 4>I can't speak for all women, but.

0:27:02.184 --> 0:27:05.024
<v Speaker 3>Can we talk about timing for a second, because it's

0:27:05.064 --> 0:27:07.104
<v Speaker 3>pretty sobering to go online and look at some of

0:27:07.144 --> 0:27:11.664
<v Speaker 3>the reactions to this, where people are just they want

0:27:11.704 --> 0:27:13.784
<v Speaker 3>to twist it and still make it about Blake and

0:27:13.784 --> 0:27:16.984
<v Speaker 3>they're not interested in facts or perspectives.

0:27:17.784 --> 0:27:18.584
<v Speaker 2>Why now?

0:27:19.184 --> 0:27:19.704
<v Speaker 1>Why now?

0:27:19.744 --> 0:27:23.344
<v Speaker 3>It's pre Christmas. Some people have said, well, it's just

0:27:23.384 --> 0:27:27.064
<v Speaker 3>come out on Netflix. It's a calculated move. She wants

0:27:27.104 --> 0:27:30.104
<v Speaker 3>to just try and salvage the damage to her reputation.

0:27:30.584 --> 0:27:34.464
<v Speaker 3>But she didn't say anything back then like this. Everyone

0:27:34.504 --> 0:27:37.224
<v Speaker 3>had forgotten about it. Essentially, she'd come back.

0:27:37.624 --> 0:27:40.984
<v Speaker 5>Why now, it would have been totally lost. If she

0:27:41.064 --> 0:27:43.664
<v Speaker 5>said something back then, she would have sounded And this

0:27:43.784 --> 0:27:47.264
<v Speaker 5>is also such a great example of gas lighting. She

0:27:47.424 --> 0:27:50.344
<v Speaker 5>would have been told she was crazy. If she said

0:27:50.344 --> 0:27:54.344
<v Speaker 5>at the time that there is a manufactured effort to

0:27:54.424 --> 0:27:58.864
<v Speaker 5>bury me, people would have gone, you are grasping, how embarrassing,

0:27:58.984 --> 0:27:59.624
<v Speaker 5>blah blah.

0:27:59.464 --> 0:28:01.824
<v Speaker 3>Blah, and that she was making it all about her

0:28:01.864 --> 0:28:04.864
<v Speaker 3>instead of centering the centering victims.

0:28:04.904 --> 0:28:06.984
<v Speaker 5>It's about to come out on Netflix. I'm not sure

0:28:07.024 --> 0:28:09.064
<v Speaker 5>if that's just in the US or if that's here too.

0:28:09.344 --> 0:28:13.104
<v Speaker 5>And just in the last week I started seeing stories

0:28:13.104 --> 0:28:15.984
<v Speaker 5>about Blake Lively pop up again. I saw a story

0:28:16.104 --> 0:28:19.544
<v Speaker 5>about something Ryan Reynolds had said about how he and

0:28:19.624 --> 0:28:22.064
<v Speaker 5>Blake grew up working class, and then people were going

0:28:22.064 --> 0:28:25.944
<v Speaker 5>into Blake Lively's childhood and going, that's not working class,

0:28:25.944 --> 0:28:32.144
<v Speaker 5>how embarrassing? Yeah, were they anticipating another wave, that's the question.

0:28:32.584 --> 0:28:35.904
<v Speaker 5>And the other reason why I think it's now is

0:28:35.984 --> 0:28:39.264
<v Speaker 5>because of how long this takes. In order to do

0:28:39.304 --> 0:28:44.104
<v Speaker 5>this properly in order to get lawyers do the research subpoena.

0:28:44.304 --> 0:28:50.624
<v Speaker 5>Those text messages prove it, they needed to buide their time.

0:28:50.824 --> 0:28:54.904
<v Speaker 5>And it's important to remember Blake Lively is worth about

0:28:54.904 --> 0:28:59.784
<v Speaker 5>thirty million dollars. She's rich, but she's not like the

0:28:59.904 --> 0:29:02.904
<v Speaker 5>richest person in Hollywood, Ryan Reynolds, is worth more than

0:29:02.944 --> 0:29:05.904
<v Speaker 5>three hundred million, because he hasn't had these business ventures.

0:29:05.584 --> 0:29:08.624
<v Speaker 4>Right and also intensely well connected.

0:29:09.224 --> 0:29:12.544
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so I think it took because you can look

0:29:12.544 --> 0:29:16.184
<v Speaker 5>at this case and go, what does Blake Lively want?

0:29:16.224 --> 0:29:17.704
<v Speaker 2>This isn't going to be about damages.

0:29:17.784 --> 0:29:21.944
<v Speaker 5>This isn't about sending Justin Baldoni to jail, like, nothing

0:29:21.984 --> 0:29:22.264
<v Speaker 5>about that.

0:29:22.384 --> 0:29:23.184
<v Speaker 1>It's not criminal.

0:29:23.304 --> 0:29:26.544
<v Speaker 5>She wants to correct the record, and in order you

0:29:26.624 --> 0:29:28.344
<v Speaker 5>need to have power and you need to have the

0:29:28.384 --> 0:29:31.464
<v Speaker 5>financial means, and she does. And I think that's why

0:29:31.464 --> 0:29:36.544
<v Speaker 5>she's doing it because imagine how many actresses have been

0:29:36.584 --> 0:29:39.344
<v Speaker 5>buried and have never been able to tell their story.

0:29:39.864 --> 0:29:41.984
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's the rule of cancelation, isn't it. You can't

0:29:41.984 --> 0:29:44.824
<v Speaker 3>defend yourself, well it's happening, otherwise it makes it worse.

0:29:45.224 --> 0:29:47.584
<v Speaker 3>But the other thing to note is that there's a

0:29:47.624 --> 0:29:52.824
<v Speaker 3>civil complaint. But then there's also the New York Times investigation.

0:29:53.144 --> 0:29:55.744
<v Speaker 3>The lead journalist on this was the same journalists that

0:29:55.784 --> 0:30:00.424
<v Speaker 3>exposed Harvey Weinstein, Megan Towey. And they don't just publish

0:30:00.584 --> 0:30:03.184
<v Speaker 3>what someone else wants them to publish. They go and

0:30:03.384 --> 0:30:08.024
<v Speaker 3>corroborate everything. They do their own extensive reporting out, making

0:30:08.064 --> 0:30:11.344
<v Speaker 3>sure that all the sources can be confirmed. So in

0:30:11.384 --> 0:30:13.984
<v Speaker 3>many ways, the timing was more about what The New

0:30:14.064 --> 0:30:16.304
<v Speaker 3>York Times was going to do. But the other thing

0:30:16.304 --> 0:30:19.224
<v Speaker 3>to remember, when we're talking about power and money, the

0:30:19.304 --> 0:30:22.704
<v Speaker 3>guy who is the financial backer of Wayfarer, which is

0:30:22.784 --> 0:30:27.104
<v Speaker 3>the studio that Jamie Heath and Justin Baldonia partners in,

0:30:27.864 --> 0:30:31.944
<v Speaker 3>is like a billionaire, so he's also got unlimited funds.

0:30:32.384 --> 0:30:35.104
<v Speaker 3>He has a lot more money than Ryan Randalls and

0:30:35.104 --> 0:30:37.704
<v Speaker 3>Blake Lively put together. So it's not a case of

0:30:38.184 --> 0:30:42.304
<v Speaker 3>Blake Lively punching down the complexity of power. Dynamics on

0:30:42.504 --> 0:30:46.384
<v Speaker 3>both the set and in Hollywood aren't just about who's

0:30:46.384 --> 0:30:47.984
<v Speaker 3>the most famous in the Daily Mail.

0:30:48.384 --> 0:30:51.504
<v Speaker 4>You know what, though, And this is A more pragmatic

0:30:51.584 --> 0:30:53.784
<v Speaker 4>reason too, is they let the movie do its thing.

0:30:53.944 --> 0:30:57.384
<v Speaker 4>That movie was really successful. Yeah, you know, so she

0:30:57.424 --> 0:31:00.824
<v Speaker 4>would have been contractually obliged to promote that movie. Also,

0:31:00.904 --> 0:31:03.784
<v Speaker 4>she clearly wanted to, and she didn't want to promote

0:31:03.784 --> 0:31:06.784
<v Speaker 4>it with him, which is again very unusual. But she

0:31:06.984 --> 0:31:09.824
<v Speaker 4>promoted the shit out of that movie while all this

0:31:09.984 --> 0:31:13.144
<v Speaker 4>was going on. It was very successful, It's had its

0:31:13.224 --> 0:31:16.984
<v Speaker 4>period of box office time, and now you can sit

0:31:17.024 --> 0:31:19.104
<v Speaker 4>there and reflect on that that was all happening in

0:31:19.144 --> 0:31:21.904
<v Speaker 4>real time to her. It does seem extraordinary to me,

0:31:21.984 --> 0:31:25.104
<v Speaker 4>though I know that Baldoni has very powerful backer their

0:31:25.144 --> 0:31:29.864
<v Speaker 4>met of course, but that he ever thought that they

0:31:29.944 --> 0:31:34.784
<v Speaker 4>weren't going to do this Because Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively

0:31:35.504 --> 0:31:37.504
<v Speaker 4>Reynolds is one of the most powerful men in Hollywood.

0:31:37.584 --> 0:31:40.344
<v Speaker 4>Deadpool was the second biggest movie of the year. He

0:31:40.464 --> 0:31:42.024
<v Speaker 4>makes a lot of people a lot of money. They

0:31:42.024 --> 0:31:46.584
<v Speaker 4>are intensely powerful. He would be furious. Imagine sitting in

0:31:46.584 --> 0:31:48.944
<v Speaker 4>that meeting that he sat in with his wife and

0:31:49.024 --> 0:31:52.304
<v Speaker 4>all those people and literally listening to that list being

0:31:52.344 --> 0:31:54.504
<v Speaker 4>read out about them walking in on her when she's

0:31:54.544 --> 0:31:57.824
<v Speaker 4>half naked and breastfeeding in her trailer Revenge is a

0:31:57.904 --> 0:32:01.184
<v Speaker 4>dish best served cold. Right, those guys have gone and

0:32:01.224 --> 0:32:03.624
<v Speaker 4>got their ducks in a row in a very professional,

0:32:04.344 --> 0:32:07.144
<v Speaker 4>very organized manner, and now they're coming for them. And

0:32:07.984 --> 0:32:10.984
<v Speaker 4>fair enough, if indeed everything that's in that legal letter

0:32:11.224 --> 0:32:13.544
<v Speaker 4>is true, absolutely fair enough.

0:32:13.824 --> 0:32:16.064
<v Speaker 3>So what are our takeaways before we wrap up and

0:32:16.184 --> 0:32:17.584
<v Speaker 3>actually go on holidays?

0:32:17.864 --> 0:32:21.184
<v Speaker 5>I think the reason why people are so fascinated by

0:32:21.184 --> 0:32:24.584
<v Speaker 5>this is because it's an exercise in perspective, but also

0:32:25.384 --> 0:32:30.384
<v Speaker 5>we were used as audiences and consumers of media. We

0:32:30.384 --> 0:32:34.464
<v Speaker 5>were played. And the other thing is that I am

0:32:34.504 --> 0:32:40.464
<v Speaker 5>now looking at other examples of cancelation. I'm sorry, but well,

0:32:40.504 --> 0:32:43.824
<v Speaker 5>actually there are some examples of men. But what's confusing

0:32:43.904 --> 0:32:47.784
<v Speaker 5>about them are I don't know who benefited. So it's

0:32:47.864 --> 0:32:50.224
<v Speaker 5>really important when you look at a cancelation like this

0:32:50.784 --> 0:32:53.104
<v Speaker 5>to see who the winners are. But it makes me

0:32:53.224 --> 0:32:58.584
<v Speaker 5>think very differently about Megan Markle. I just wonder when

0:32:58.664 --> 0:33:01.824
<v Speaker 5>you see Walter all and wheneverone walks around and they

0:33:01.824 --> 0:33:03.784
<v Speaker 5>go I just have a sense of something. I have

0:33:03.824 --> 0:33:07.064
<v Speaker 5>a sense that they're not very nice or something.

0:33:07.104 --> 0:33:08.064
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point.

0:33:08.304 --> 0:33:11.384
<v Speaker 5>It just makes me go, how much of this is

0:33:11.424 --> 0:33:15.104
<v Speaker 5>all manufactured? And how difficult is it to prove when

0:33:15.144 --> 0:33:19.744
<v Speaker 5>these social media wizards are so much smarter than us.

0:33:20.104 --> 0:33:22.664
<v Speaker 3>So out loud As, we will be returning to our

0:33:22.824 --> 0:33:25.904
<v Speaker 3>scheduled programming of hot Pods summer, where we are going

0:33:25.944 --> 0:33:28.104
<v Speaker 3>to be giving you all sorts of delicious things to

0:33:28.144 --> 0:33:29.824
<v Speaker 3>listen to over summer.

0:33:30.464 --> 0:33:31.664
<v Speaker 1>If only you could see us.

0:33:31.704 --> 0:33:34.624
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's early in the morning, we are all at home,

0:33:35.304 --> 0:33:38.064
<v Speaker 3>but we really wanted to bring this to you because

0:33:38.744 --> 0:33:41.424
<v Speaker 3>we just thought that it was an important story to cover.

0:33:41.744 --> 0:33:44.424
<v Speaker 5>It was one of those stories that in terms of

0:33:44.424 --> 0:33:46.184
<v Speaker 5>the group chat, it was just going off.

0:33:46.264 --> 0:33:47.624
<v Speaker 2>Look, chances are in two.

0:33:47.544 --> 0:33:49.904
<v Speaker 5>Days there'll be another story that blows up our group

0:33:49.984 --> 0:33:53.504
<v Speaker 5>chat and we're like, let's jump on. But this time

0:33:53.544 --> 0:33:55.504
<v Speaker 5>of year, I think we all tend to fall into

0:33:55.544 --> 0:33:58.944
<v Speaker 5>some rabbit holes, and it appears that we were.

0:33:58.864 --> 0:33:59.504
<v Speaker 2>Victims of that.

0:33:59.984 --> 0:34:02.504
<v Speaker 4>If this conversation has brought anything up for you, help

0:34:02.584 --> 0:34:04.744
<v Speaker 4>is available. We're going to put links to resources that

0:34:04.784 --> 0:34:06.064
<v Speaker 4>can help in the show notes.

0:34:06.224 --> 0:34:08.864
<v Speaker 3>Take care, I'm going outside to touch some grass.

0:34:08.944 --> 0:34:11.584
<v Speaker 1>We love you out Louders. We will be in your

0:34:11.624 --> 0:34:12.264
<v Speaker 1>ears shortly.

0:34:12.784 --> 0:34:22.784
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye bye