WEBVTT - After 6000 Autopsies, This Was The Case That Broke Him

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday, March eighth in twenty twenty one, and police

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>are gathered in a remote section of the Flinders Rangers

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in South Australia. They've been told they'll find the body

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of a twenty one year old woman here. Jasmine Corp

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was last seen leaving her job at Southern Cross Aged

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Care in Adelaide on Friday night. By Sunday, detectives were

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>being told a story by her ex boyfriend. He said

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Jasmine had taken her own life and that he had

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>buried her body more than four hundred kilometers from home.

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So here they are, and they're about to uncover her

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>shallow grave. Among those gathered is Professor Roger Bayard. He's

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the one that's going to determine exactly how Jasmine died.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>What he discovers will give him nightmares he hasn't experienced

0:00:54.200 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in forty years on the job. I'm Jemma Bath and

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to True Crime Conversations, a podcast exploring the

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>world's most notorious crimes by speaking to the people who

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>know the most about them. Professor Roger Bayard is one

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>of Australia's most respected forensic pathologists and has spent more

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>than four decades investigating sudden, suspicious and unexplained deaths. He

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is internationally recognized for his research into forensic pathology, sudden

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>infant death, and unusual causes of death, and has worked

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on some of our country's most confronting homicide cases, like

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Snowtown murders and the horrifying case of Jasmine kr.

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>He also helped identify victims of the Barley bombings in

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two and the Boxing Day tsunami in

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Thailand in two thousand and four. This is a man

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>who has performed more than six thousand autopsies. In twenty

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, he was named a World Leader in forensic science.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty four, he was named Tasmanian Australian of

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the Year. In twenty twenty five he became a Companion

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>of the Order of Australia and in twenty twenty six.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Just recently he retired from an impressive and wide ranging career.

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>As someone that works in and around death, Professor Bayard

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>has seen some horrific things. The way he gets through

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it is focusing on the science, not the horror. Here's

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Roger Roger, thank you for joining me on True crime

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>conversations and congratulations on your recent retirement. Was forensic pathology

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 1>always what you plan to do if you go back

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to young Roger.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I was going to be an archaeologist, but thought, when

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 2>on my teenage years, you don't get much money doing that,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>so maybe I'll do medicine, and no, I do do

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 2>basically emergency medicine, and the qualified in general practice was

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 2>going back to Canada to emergency medicine. And I was

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 2>in Belice and I was snorkeling and it was so

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 2>good I stayed a few extra weeks. And when I

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 2>go back to Canada, no jobs in emergency. So basically

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 2>by default I got into pathology, and then into pediator

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>pathology and then forensic pathology. So it's been a sort

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 2>of a downpill course really for years.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned four decades. You have seen so many iterations

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of your profession. Has it changed in the way you

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>do your job? Given the advances in technologies.

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 2>It has. What we're using more often now is imaging

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>CT examinations, So most forensic facilities have cts, so bodies

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>get CT before an autopsy, which means that you can

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>actually find a course to death, sometimes without even opening

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>the body. So we're doing a lot more CT examinations

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>with external examinations still not looking for any injuries or

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 2>something untoward, and the CT can tell us if there's

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 2>been a rupture at the heart or whether there's been

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a stroke. So that has changed things dramatic. It also

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 2>adds to our standard autopsies as.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, because you have to include it as well.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. So, yes, we've been dragged out of

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>the nineteenth century, sometimes reluctantly.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>But I can imagine being able to use CT and

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>not having to open a body for a family member,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like if I had to imagine my loved one being

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>chopped open to be able to be spared that like,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing.

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>It is a good thing. It's a good thing for families,

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 2>for the pathologists or resources. But I often meet with

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 2>families and you know, the particularly with babies, they want

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to meet the person who they want to ask the

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 2>pathologists questions, but it's not really what it's about. They

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>want to see the person that looked after their baby

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 2>in the time that they last saw the baby to

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the time they saw him again or her, And you know,

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I explain that it's not chopping open it's it's it's

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>a surgical procedure. Nowadays, we open the body cavity is

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 2>really carefully treated with respect, and everybody knows that this

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 2>is a tragedy, and I think that's important for people

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>to hear.

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting to hear say that, because, yeah, me using

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that word chopped, it's such a it's quite a violent word,

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's quite well. It is. It's medical. What you're doing.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Is it almost like you have a process that you

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>go through. You're you're doing the exact same thing kind

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of in every autopsy.

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, there's a standard procedure of opening the three

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>body cavities, examining the organs, taking them out, weighing them

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>and slicing them and looking for disease and injuries, and

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>then taking pieces for looking at under the microscope. But

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 2>the there are modifications. For example, if somebody has maybe

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 2>a back injury, you would you would dissect the act,

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 2>which you would normally do. You may in a strangulation

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>case where you would do a nectar section. So by

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 2>that what you're doing you're taking every layer of the

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>skin and the muscles, and you're looking for bruising and

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 2>injuries and documenting it with photography, so you do modify

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>them according to the case, but there is a standard

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 2>process that should be followed and it is not always followed.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>When you said that respect for the body and the

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>family is a big part of what you do, can

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you expand on that, How do you make sure that

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a body is respected?

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Essentially, pathologists are the last doctors that this person is

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 2>going to see. So there are patients. So when the

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 2>bodies come in, they come with the funeral director, they're

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>in body bags, they're covered with sheets. They're brought into

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the mortuary on the trolley and the dissections perform on

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the trolley. There's not unnecessary moving of the body. The

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 2>body is to this people, and that's that's the important part.

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 2>And if you if you don't understand it, then you

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 2>should not be doing forensics.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>How many autopsies do you think you've done over a

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>forty year career.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I lost count Actually was up to six thousand, I think,

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 2>and then a few years ago I just stopped counting.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But they're the autopsies I've done. But then I've seen

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>tens of thousands of other autopsies as well. Because my

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>colleagues are autopsy around me. So a large number of

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>dead people.

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I can see why you're done, Roger. That's a lot.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I agree. I feel it's funny. The last couple

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 2>of months, I've been thinking back to cases and thinking,

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 2>aback what I've done. I mean, I published over one

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 2>thousand papers and twelve textbooks, and it makes me I

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 2>feel exhausted.

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised. You're a very accomplished man, well driven,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think. Can you remember your first autopsy?

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely? Really, I remember my first autopsy. I remember my

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>first pediatric autopsy. And my first autopsy was in Hobart

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen eight and I was a medical resident in

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the hospital and I was getting interested in pathology, and

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 2>so the pathologist said, well, you know, I'll show you

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>how to do an autopsy. And it was a patient

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I was looking after who had a disseminated cancer and

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 2>he was going to die. And my boss said, you

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 2>better go and tell him he's not going to make it,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 2>and also that I want an autopsy. So I sat

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>down with this old fellow he was an old digger

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 2>because it was a repatriation hospital, and gave him the

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>bad news and mentioned the autopsy. And then he said, well,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>who's going to do the autopsy, and I said, well,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 2>it's actually going to be me. So he just sat

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>back and thought for a bit. Then he just looked

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 2>over and said, you know, son, you're going to be

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>all right. So basically I looked after him in life,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I looked after him in death, and he gave me

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a benediction for my career, which decades later still means

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot to me. In the first Pediatric Case was

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>my first publication, actually as a little girl in Canada,

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Genevieve who died of leukemia and said a very strange

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>finding which we published. But I still use her in

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 2>my textbooks and I still use her to teach, and

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 2>in fact, I've just finished the fourth edition of My

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Sudden Death in the Young Book, and I've dedicated to

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 2>gel and all the other young people who have contributed

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>to it, so her memory continues.

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Did you find the pediatric autopsies harder given it's a

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.239
<v Speaker 1>child or I guess like mechanically as well.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm very good at the sections because obviously much smaller.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 2>And I was always interested in pediatrics. I did flying

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 2>doctor work and did a lot of pediatrics there, and

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I've found pediatric case as harder as I get older,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 2>because when I first started, I thought, I am going

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>to find the cause of death here, you know, I'm

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>going to work it out, and it was very challenging.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 2>And then as I got older, I realized more and

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>more that sometimes you're just not going to find out

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 2>what's happened, and you know the impact of this death

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>on families.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't just do crime, but you have

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of crime and the worst things that

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>humans can do to other people. Is that something you've

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>had to learn to compartmentalize or how do you kind

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of process the things you've seen?

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, just correct you. I don't do crime. I observe

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 2>crime just of course the record, you do compartmentalize and

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 2>when you're doing a case. I mean, I've had some

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>horrific childhood cases, the assaults. One was a little boy

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>who was I think kicked in the stomach and the

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 2>de facto boyfriend who did it actually videoed him on

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 2>his phone while he was dying. And you can't think

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 2>about that while you're doing the case. The case is

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the order. If you start to get distracted, then you

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>don't do a proper job later. Of course, one case

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I remember there was another little boy who been kicked

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 2>in the stomach and he had a paratonitis. So when

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 2>I opened the anominal cavity, there's this whiff of almost

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.719
<v Speaker 2>like sewage came in and I just just stopped me

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 2>in my tracks because I realized what that meant, and

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 2>so I had my back turned to the police. And

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 2>everybody knows that sort of pretending to the second one.

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 2>I just got myself together. Yeah, occasionally at night you're

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 2>you're sitting there in its cases that you don't expect

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to get through to you that.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Might Does it get easier dealing with death or do

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 1>you have an interesting relationship with death?

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I see death as a part of life, and

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually an animist, and I believe that life is

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 2>like a river and we're just an eddy in the river,

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and then when we go, we're still part of the

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 2>life force, but the eddy's gone. It's not as we were.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the mistakes in the West is

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>we trivialize everything, but we're so terrified of death we

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>hide from it. You know, you don't put grandma out

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 2>on the kitchen table and have awake and everybody's standing

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>around telling great stories. What you do is Grandma's putting

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>a body bag whipped away. You may never see her again,

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 2>and you know she's in a coffin and cremated. That's

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>not a good way to say farewell. And I think

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 2>we lose by not will not be able to say

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 2>so well.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right there, because there are so many

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>other cultures that that celebrate life after death much more

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 1>than the Western world.

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I'm a very close friend who is from Samoa

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and she just went back the end of last year

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 2>for the second burial for her mother. And what that

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>means is mum was buried years ago, and the three

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 2>daughters get together and they get the bones out, and

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>they wash the bones and anoint them with oil, wrap

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 2>them up in tapper, have them in the house and

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 2>they have a second ceremony, and so it's very visceral thing,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>but it's it's a way of saying goodbye, you know, properly.

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 2>So other cultures I think do it better.

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Hundred can't. I cannot imagine that happening at a Western

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>funeral or a Western kind of well.

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 2>We're spiritually bankrupt. Actually, that's that's how I see it.

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I tend to agree in terms of how much looking

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>into crime was a part of your job. Can you

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of give us a bit of an overview because

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you worked in so many different areas, did investigating crime

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of take up a majority or how is that

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of it.

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Varies tremendously depending on countries and jurisdictions. In some countries

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the pathologists will just do criminal cases, but here we

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 2>do all sorts of cases. The current as Act of

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 2>South Australia is basically any death is reportable, it's sudden,

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 2>unexpected or doctor can't issue a certificates. So probably sixty

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>percent of our case so just natural death right, And

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>then we have a large number of suicides twenty five percent.

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Then we have vehicle accidents, and you get down to

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 2>actual homicides, it's probably only about two to three percent.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>So although it occupies a lot of our time, because

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, with a standard case of somebody who's just

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>dropped down there with a heart attack, you know very

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 2>easy to quickly find the current artyage. Over with a homicide,

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 2>you may be going for eight or ten hours. Is

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 2>there a lot of injuries? Trying to work out which

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 2>injuries are important? Is it an injury or is it

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 2>not which injuries were lethal, the sequence of injuries, the

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 2>type of injuries, sharp force, blunt force. Then you have

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to put it all together into a report and then

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 2>go to court and be challenged, made to look like

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>an idiot. There's a great quote of Jackson Lambs in

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Slow Horses, and I've put it in my book saying

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that sometimes talking to lawyers in court is like trying

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>to explain Norway to a dog. It's just they asked

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>questions I know you can't answer.

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's one of those It's one of those careers

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that you There aren't many jobs where you get kind

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of criticized to the level that you do when you

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>are standing up in a court room, like having your

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>work dissected that kind of closely and horribly in like

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a cross examination. Like there's not many of us that

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have to go through that.

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>No, And it's interesting the games that were played. I

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 2>was inter state and the defense said, you know, did

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>you bring all the material that you base your opinion

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 2>on with you to court? And I thought, well, the

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 2>prosecutors smart enough to catch this, And I said no,

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't. So you just raised an eyebrow and looked

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>at the jury as if you know this is in competence.

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 2>When the prosecutor came, he said, you didn't bring all

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 2>of the material? Did you? Said no? He said why not?

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I said, because, as you are aware, it fills ten

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 2>boxes and it wouldn't fit on the plane. And so

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 2>in that instance the jury thought, ah, so the other

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>lawyer was actually trying to put one across.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you enjoy working in homicide, especially if it ended

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>up with you having to go to court?

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I wouldn't say I enjoyed. I find an interesting process. Yeah,

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 2>it's quite stressful, be very to measure the blood pressure

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 2>of pathologist in the witness box when they're being hammered.

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it's interesting. This adversarial system, I think, you know,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>is a bit of a problem. Going back to SMOA,

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I was over there doing autopsis for the government and

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>there was a homicide. A young fellow had dropped a

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 2>rock on another kid's head. They were both reasonable young blokes,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 2>but they were both drunk. There they don't have juries.

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 2>They have a council of elders. And the judge said

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 2>to me, why don't you come down and stand beside

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 2>me and explain to the council, And they had a translator,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>and it's interesting the elders speaking saying you what I

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>was saying, but it was also translated. But the two

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>lawyers were not really at each other's throats. So I

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 2>got the feeling that I've already thought, this is just

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 2>a tragedy, and let's, you know, let's find out what

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>happened to see what we can do. But that that

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 2>was a very meaningful court appearance. Other times, you know,

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>you'll get asked the same question five hundred times, or

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 2>you'll get asked a question that's about five minutes long

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 2>with a whole lot of double negatives in it, so

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 2>that you know you don't you're really not quite sure

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.959
<v Speaker 2>what's going on. In that case, you can go to

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the the judge and say, I'm sorry, you're on it,

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 2>but you know, I can't ask the question the way

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 2>it's put to me. It will confuse the jury. And

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I've had judges saying just answer the question, doctor, okay.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>You also get put in scenarios where you your evidence

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>or findings might be put up against another experts. Would

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that happen very often?

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yeah, quite often. And the problem is the more

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 2>technical case, the more difficult it is. For juries to

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of sort it out. So if you have some

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of you know, bespeckled, bald, be it, an old

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 2>guy saying one thing, and you've got similar guys saying

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 2>another thing, often the juries will just negate both of them.

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>So that's too complicated. So what what the court or

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 2>what the other side has done is they've created a

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 2>reasonable doubt. So one of the things that's developed in

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>curture reason is it's called hot tubbing, and it means

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 2>that two witnesses will be in the same box at

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the same time. And that's fascinating because I find that

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>people who have pathologies, who've got quite outlandish theories really

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 2>tone them down when I'm sitting beside them looking at them,

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 2>because my facial expression will be you know what, I'm

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>allowed to do that? And then the lawyer will say,

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, do you have an opinion on that? To

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 2>press a byad, the side that calls me calls me professor.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.479
<v Speaker 2>The side often the other side caused me mister to

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 2>reduce my status. I don't care. My father was called

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 2>mister for eighty years. But what they'll say is, what

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:50.239
<v Speaker 2>do you think of that statement? I said, Well, I'm

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 2>a bit confused because I'm not aware of any literature

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 2>that supports that, and this, this and this, and so

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 2>it has to be then answered at the time, So

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>it speeds things along, and I think it it makes

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>it easy. It's also like pre trial conferences. Let's just

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 2>have a conference with everybody and see what we can

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>agree on and what we can't agree on.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I think you've already kind of answered this, but I'm

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>going to ask you bluntly, what do you think about

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>our current court and justice systems given your involvement in them.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it does a spectacular job. Given how fragmented

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 2>society is, mistakes are made, but I think that generally

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the system is a safe system. I'm not so supportive

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of juries. I prefer judge alone because then you can

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 2>get the reasons why they made the decision. I've got

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 2>judges who are friends who much prefer jury trials. I

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>think it's just it brings out more information. I do

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 2>like the European inquisitorial system rather than our adversarial where

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>you get to talk about things you have the conferences.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 2>It's less aggressive. So I think, yes that given what

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>we've got, it does a pretty good job.

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe just toned down the aggression. Yes, yes, indeed, let's

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>go back to the autopsy room. When you are investigating

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>a crime, would you have the detectives in there with you?

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>How does it work in terms of I know you

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>do report after the fact, but how involved are the

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>detectives and the police very involved.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Some of our cult and safety people want the police

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 2>to stand behind the room with a glass between them

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 2>and me, and I won't have that. I'll go to

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a death scene and talk to the police. You know,

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 2>what's happened, who might it be, how could this have happened?

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>What are questions that we need to do? What are

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>samples should be taken? There are crime scene officers there

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 2>as well who look after that. They're very skilled, but

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 2>we're all talking about what is the possibility? And then

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>at the autopsy, I'll have the crime scene officer and

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I will have one or two detectives sitting in the

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 2>room and we're talking about things. What could this not be?

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>What could it be? We try and do it as

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>quickly as possible so that they can get information. If

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>they have somebody that they suspect, they can then ask

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 2>them questions and I'll have information from me to say, well,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 2>it was a stab wound with a double sided blade,

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 2>not a bullet wound.

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>After the break, Roger talks about his time working on

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the case of Jasmine cor who was buried alive. I

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about some cases so can people can

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>really understand how your work works. I want to start

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>with Jazmine, which was one of the harder kind of

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>cases in your career. She was murdered in twenty twenty

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>one by her ex boyfriend. He at first denied ever

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>being involved in her death, and he just admitted to

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>burying her body, told police where he had buried her.

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk us through your involvement, because that was

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the cases where you went to the scene

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>as they exhumed her body, just meine correctly.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't one of the harder cases. It was the hardest case,

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and after that I really started to think about retirement.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that it was so horrific that something actually

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 2>broke in me and I lost I don't know the

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 2>enthusiasm perhaps, but yeah, I wanted out after that.

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So you went to the crime scene when they exsumed

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>her body. You couldn't tell in that moment what had happened.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Could you well, I'll take you back a step. I

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>was phoned on a Sunday night about her death and

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Taverick Singh, the perpetrator, had suggested they had a suicide

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 2>pact and then she went through with it, but he didn't.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Then he was very it was so complicated but stupid.

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 2>He on the day before he was seen on CC

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>footage of a hardware store getting a shovel in cable ties.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 2>He then lent his car to a friend, and all

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 2>of this is a matter of public records, so I

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 2>can talk about it. He put his phone in the

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>back of the French's car, and when he was abducting Jasmine,

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 2>his friend went south. He then had her in the

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 2>boot with a blindfold and her legs tied for five hours.

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 2>She didn't have any head injuries. She didn't have any

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 2>drugs on board, so she was completely aware of what

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 2>was going on. Then he took her up north and

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 2>as she's lying in the boot, she can hear him

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 2>digging the hole and he dragged her into the hole

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 2>and then just filled the soil around her. When the

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 2>body was taken out, the question was was she dead

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 2>before she went into the ground, And he was just

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 2>hiding the body, and when we got her back to

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 2>the mortuary we did a CT scan. We could see

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 2>material in her airways and at autopsy there was soil

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 2>in her mouth, in her trakar bronchi down into the

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 2>lungs in her esophagus, so she had inhaled soil and

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 2>she died from being buried alive, which is one of

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the I mean, people have nightmares about that sort of thing.

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is that why it horrified you so much? Just

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>imagining the cruelty of her death.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she was a very sweet little Ponderabi woman who

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 2>had come over from India to learn nursing and was

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 2>working in a nursing home. And apparently from everything we hear,

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 2>she was just a lovely person. And he apparently was

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 2>considered a reasonable fellow and until he wasn't. It's interesting

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 2>he finally pleaded guilty. And it's the only trial I've

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 2>ever gone to, this sentencing because I wanted to. I

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 2>wanted to put my eyes on this fellow, and I

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 2>expected something like Charles Manson, but just this average looking nerd.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 2>It brings to the point of, you know, is it

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 2>in all of us to do this? Who knows?

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Did you find attending the sentence helpful for you while

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to process this case, or no.

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 2>They're not really nothing really helped. Talking to my colleagues helped,

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>and that's what we do.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You also did the Barley bombings in two thousand and two,

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>if I'm correct.

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Yes, what.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it like working over overseas in these countries that

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>perhaps don't have the facilities that you're used to.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>It's challenging. They're very hot, they don't have good refrigeration units,

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 2>so the bodies are all decomposed, and it's confronting. I mean,

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the smell's extraordinary. And with the tsunami there were just

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 2>so many children and families. It was so distressing.

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Because it is a completely different experience having one body

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in a like a kind of like an operating room

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>sit situation and then having open air thousands of bodies

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like that. Is that is world's apart in terms of experiences.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's it's terrific. And the mortuary were working in

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 2>was actually there was a temple room and we had

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't have running water, and there was material on the

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>ground out of the body bags and there are probably

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 2>five teams working in this confined space. So yes, it's

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 2>it's completely different, and there's something you know, you're not trained.

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>We read about it until you're actually there, you don't

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 2>realize how how complex is. The Tirees did a spectacular job.

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 2>They really were well organized, but resources were strained in

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 2>those instances.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you looking for causes of death or is it

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>mainly just identification?

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Combination of both. We're looking for anything untoward. And I've

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 2>written a paper called the Hiding in Plane Sight. What

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 2>better place to hide a homicide victim than amongst hundreds

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 2>of other bodies? And I talked about the crime rate

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 2>in London during the Blitz and that went up. How

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 2>easy would it be to just walk along behind somebody

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 2>you want to murder, hit them with a brick, throw

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 2>them into a bomb site and it would be assumed

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 2>that it was part of the bombing. When I was

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 2>in Thailand, one of the mortuary tenders said, come in,

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 2>have a look at this, and there was a coffin

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 2>and he took the lid off and there was a

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>perfectly preserved body of a young woman, and so I

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 2>got the entire authorities there. I don't know what happened,

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 2>but she had been that coffin had been under a

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of other coffins which would actually taken off. Now,

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 2>if we hadn't moved those coffins, she would have then decomposed,

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 2>and you know, you would think, yes, she's one of

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the victims of the drowning.

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>That It's just mind boggling, isn't it that that like

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that that could happen. I guess it's probably happening in

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>every major disaster that we hear about.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I suspect. So, I mean, if you're trying to hide

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 2>a what better place Snowtown?

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>We have to talk about Snowtown because that is one

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of the most notorious kind of murders, serial killings in

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Australian history. Take me back, because it was nineteen ninety

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>nine that those bodies were found, eight bodies in a barrel,

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a few other bodies buried elsewhere. And you were fairly

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>early on in your career, weren't you.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 2>I had just started full time at forensics three weeks before,

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and this was my first week on call and I

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 2>got called by the head of Major Crime about the

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Snowtown bank vault and barrels and really had no idea

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>what was going to happen. But we got the barrels

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 2>down to Adelaide and examine them there. And that was

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 2>not easy because what if I go and drums are

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>very heavy. These were full of fluid. We didn't know

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>whether it was acid or what it was, so we

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 2>had to test it for toxic chemicals. And then we

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 2>had to work out how to actually empty the barrels

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 2>without losing any evidence because as a fluid come out,

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>if there are bullets in there, you miss them. So

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 2>we had to sive all the remains and then pull

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 2>the bodies out, the eight bodies, and we gave them

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>a to f and then did testing. We examined them

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 2>for identifying features like tattoos and the dentists in the DNA.

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Surprising it didn't work and people are stout of it

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 2>that they say, well, you can get DNA out of dinosaurs,

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 2>but the problem with this is a bad environment. It's

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>wet and no oxygen, the DNA breaks down. So the

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 2>identifications were with traditional fingerprints and features like that.

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>How long did that take you? I can imagine that's

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>not you know, a one day thing. That's it sounds

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>like weeks of work.

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>It took a couple of weeks, and then of course

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the legal side of it, and I think the trial

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 2>went for a year. It was very, very time consuming.

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>How did you determine how those people had died when

0:29:57.560 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there were so many things happening in those barrels.

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, I had two colleagues who were working on They

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 2>were working on most of the cases, and there were

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 2>gags in some of the mouths. Sometimes you just couldn't determine.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Body that I examined was skeletonized, so I couldn't tell

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 2>how they died. It was difficult to identify injuries because

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of the puture faction. There were stories about being tortured

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 2>with electricity and sparklers to the genitals. There was one

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 2>case of cannibalism and we did find a piece of

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>flesh that was missing off off a leg. I think,

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 2>so there were some very bizarre things that went on there.

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 2>But in a way, the cause of death wasn't all

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that important, given that you know you've got dismembered bodies

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and barrels that these fellows are you know, obviously handled

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and been actually driving on the countryside. They had them

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>in the back of a trailer for a while.

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.719
<v Speaker 1>In terms of cases you've worked on in your career,

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>do you look back on that one as like, it's

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to say enjoyed. But was that, like I can imagine,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a puzzle trying to work all of that out.

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that or was it just so hard to do

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>something so intricate like that?

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>It was just you take it a step at a time,

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, each case an individual case, and then

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you go from that to the next one. I must

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>admit that that's one of the few times I've had

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 2>nightmares after there. I woke up one on the Saturday,

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 2>just bolt up writing better think three in the morning

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 2>and said to my dog, what have I done? You know,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I've moved from pediatrics into this. It's it was interesting

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and challenging, and I'm glad I don't have to do

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 2>it ever again.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in terms of attending court for Snowtown, that would

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>have been one of those cases where the media attention

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>because they wouldn't be media attention for every case you

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>appeared on, but that one, I can imagine would have

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>been huge. Which was that overwhelming for you having the

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>media as an added element, not really.

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Because you used to delivering evidence, but I remember the

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it was with the committal all I talked

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 2>about was putre faction or autolysis, which is two methods

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 2>of breaking down their bodies, puture factions bacterial and autos

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 2>just breaking down. So that's what I spent most of

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 2>my time on. And when I walked out a little

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 2>about twenty camera crews in front of me, and I'd

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 2>forgotten about them. I burst out laughing, and somebody said,

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, you were the only person in the whole

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 2>history of that trial that came out of the court laughing.

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought, yeah, not a good look.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Why were you laughing because you'd just forgotten.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I was just well, I'd been talking about trivia and

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 2>here's twenty camera crews wanted to get my picture up.

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Next, Roger tells me about how he was involved in

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Sally Clark's conviction being dismissed. I want to move on

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>now to Sally Clark, the UK mother who was convicted

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the murder of her two sons nineteen ninety nine.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>That conviction was dismissed in two thousand and you were

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>asked to review that case for the defense.

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 2>If I'm right, yeah, two thousand and three. I think

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 2>it was the second quarter of appeal. Convicted in ninety nine,

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 2>one Quart of Criminal Appeal upheld the sentence, and then

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I was asked by the defense to look at them

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 2>for the second court.

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>You cited significant and ongoing problems in the investigation of

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the deaths of those two boys. I'm curious, is this

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a case of the pathologists involved not understanding pediatric pathology

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>or what do you think went wrong?

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Partly, I mean, I find it really difficult to understand.

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if I could go through the cases, I mean,

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Christopher died at eleven weeks and at autopsy they said

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 2>there was an injury of the inside of his lip,

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 2>which is significant in their baby, and there were bruises

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 2>on his legs. But they put the cause of death

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 2>as lower respiratory infection, so he had enough respiue infection

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 2>to kill it. And then I think the beginning of

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight Harry died. And with Harry, they were both

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 2>with Sally alone at the time. With Harry, they found

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of things that said this is shaken baby syndrome.

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 2>They found bleeding at the back of the eye, they

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 2>found the laceration of the brain. They found all sorts

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>of things. Now when this was reviewed, Oh, also he

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 2>had two fractured ribs on the right hand side. When

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.959
<v Speaker 2>this was reviewed when Sally had been charged with murder

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 2>with shaken Baby, the retinal hemorrhages, the bleeding in the

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 2>eyes weren't there. That was just congested vessels, and the

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 2>doctors in the hospital when they've been trying to resuscitate him,

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it hadn't seen retinal hemorrhages. So the retinal hemorrhages was wrong.

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 2>The laceration of the brain was a cut cause when

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 2>the mortuaru tenants were removing his brain, and that's not

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 2>a feature of shaking baby anyway. And a lot of

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 2>the other things didn't drive. And so what they did,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 2>rather than actually say, let's take a deep breath and

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 2>review all, they sell it's obviously inflicted suffocation, and the

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 2>pathology reasons for that were pretty dubious. They went back

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and reviewed Christopher because of that, and you remember he

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 2>had died from a severe recipe infection. Well that's gone

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 2>now they say it's also inflicted suffocation. There. The problems

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 2>with Chrystal were that the bruises on the legs weren't

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>noticed by the doctors in the hospital or the police,

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and then people trained to look for this. When you

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 2>have what you think is a bruise, you cut it

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 2>so that you actually see the hemorrhage and the tissues underneath.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise it might be libidity. The post mortem staining this

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 2>wasn't done. The grounds for saying that was inflicted suffocation

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 2>were pretty shunky. You know Harry as well, Again, photographs

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 2>not taken, tissues not sampled, The fractured rib on the

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 2>right hand side, it couldn't be seen on my croscopy.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 2>There was supposed to be a fractured dislocation of rib

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 2>on the right hand side as well, that hadn't been

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 2>photographed properly, so you couldn't review it. The retinal hemorrhages,

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 2>as I said, weren't seen by the doctors in the hospital.

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 2>It was a mess, actually, But she still was convicted.

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 2>And then it transpired that the examining doctor had pathologists

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 2>had withheld information from the court. I don't know why,

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 2>but Harry had microbiology cultures that showed staphlococcasaureus, a very

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 2>nasty bacteria, a pure growth in five different sites. So

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 2>he clearly died of Scepsis what about Christopher? Well, you

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 2>can't tell, because you know there wasn't enough documentation, so

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I called Christopher's death unascertained and Harry's death due to sepsis,

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 2>and Sally was. The conviction was quashed in two thousand

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 2>and three, and then she died of a mixed drug

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 2>and alcohol toxicity several years later. Whether it was deliberate

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 2>or accidental, don't know, but if you look when she

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 2>came out of court, she said, there are no winners.

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 2>And you think of her husband, Stephen, who's lost his

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 2>wife and two boys. What a sad story that is.

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 2>There was the whole issue too with Soroy Meadow, a

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 2>very distinguished pediatrician in the UK, who said there's a

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 2>one in seventy three million chance of this being due

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to SIDS, and that was then looked at and people said.

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 2>There was an editorial I think in the British Medical

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 2>Journal saying convicted by mathematical error because just because one

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 2>case has happened, it doesn't have any bearing on whether

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 2>another case will happen. So he was castigated for that.

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 2>But I also blame the defense. Why didn't they query it,

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.439
<v Speaker 2>Why did they let that through? I mean, nobody thought

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 2>those kids were sins anyway, So it's just a red herring,

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 2>So it was a mess of a case.

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't help but think of Kathleen Folbeck while reading

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>about Sally. You know, another young mother convicted over the

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>murder of four children. Eventually all of that was quashed

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>quite recently. Do you see similarities there? Or I know

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>that Kathleen Folby her children It was all to do

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with genetics and stuff, but originally she was it was

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a sid's death, and then she got convicted with murder.

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And it just makes me think, like, how often is

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this happening that mothers have been convicted of murder when

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there's all these other reasons at play.

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think it occurs very often. The fact

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 2>that it occurs at all is clearly a problem. I

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 2>appeared for the defense with Kathy actually got forty years,

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 2>so it shows you how good my evidence is. But

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 2>I think, stepping aside from the genetic stuff, there were

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 2>reasons that these children could have died anyway. Laura, for example,

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 2>had this full blown marcarditis inflammation of her heart that

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 2>was ignored in favor of inflicted asphyxia. Sarah had a

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 2>very strange shaped back of her palette, and one of

0:38:56.000 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 2>the boys was was epileptic, So I don't think think

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you need to evoke genes. I worry a bit about genetics,

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 2>and I did give a talk to the Medical Legal

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Society in New South Wales and on Kathy, and I

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 2>just said, what I'm here for is for you to

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 2>tell me how you know the kids died from this

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 2>mutation rather than with this mutation. Three have the cardiate mutation, Sarah, Laura,

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 2>and Kathy. Well, Kathy is still alive, so it's not

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 2>immediately lethal. The two boys have this mutation that causes

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 2>lethal epilepsy in mice, not in children. So I don't

0:39:34.120 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 2>understand the genetics, and nobody could really explain it to

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 2>me at this meeting. But as I said, I don't

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 2>think the case ever should have got up because I

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 2>think they were You know, although you have a lot

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of death in the family and people talk about Meadow's law,

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.919
<v Speaker 2>one death is SIDS, two is undetermined, three is homicide.

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 2>That's a denial of natural justice. It's also not Meadows

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 2>law as de Mayo's law. So you text some medical

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 2>examine who came up with that for sir Roy. So

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:08.399
<v Speaker 2>again a number of issues and a very tragic case

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean for babies dead.

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that genetics aside, she should never have gone

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to prison because there was enough reasonable doubt in the evidence.

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's my belief.

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Sudden infant death, We've mentioned it a few times. That

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is an area that you specialized in, isn't it. Why

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>did you decide to specialize in that area.

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, as I said, I'd done a lot of pediatrics.

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I've done flying doctor work, I've done pediatrics in hospital,

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 2>and then when I started pathology, I just realized that

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 2>parents shouldn't shouldn't have to see their children die. There's

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 2>a great quote of Euripides, What greater pain immortals bear

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 2>than this to see their children die before their eyes?

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:50.359
<v Speaker 2>And so I just thought, well, if I can work

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 2>on these cases and find preventative strategies will work out

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 2>what's going on, then that's a good thing to do.

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 2>And that's how I deal with these cases. Otherwise they're

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 2>just so. But looking at accidental deaths, we worked very

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 2>hard in the nineteen nineties and got legislation changed about

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 2>unsafe cots, and so we're not getting the number of

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:13.720
<v Speaker 2>deaths in cots that we used to. You know, kids

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 2>being wedged or hanging from things. So that was that

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 2>was a victory. I've done a lot of work in

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 2>SIDS and I did some work with Harvard University and

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 2>we found that there's a chemical called substance P in

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the back of the brain that controls breathing, controls heart rate,

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 2>it also controls head and neck movement. And so we

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 2>found substance P was decreased in some SIDS babies significantly.

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:40.439
<v Speaker 2>And we've asked for years why don't they just lift

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 2>their heads up when there's face down aras that is,

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 2>they don't because they can't. So I think we're putting

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 2>together pieces of the jigsaw, and that's that's important.

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Before your guidelines, how many children do you think we

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 1>were losing to SIDS?

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's we used to. There were I think fifty

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 2>in the eighties a year in South Australia. Now they're

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.959
<v Speaker 2>about five. But one of the terrible things is the

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 2>sleeping position. You know, we found out that sleeping face

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.720
<v Speaker 2>down is a bad thing. They should sleep on their backs.

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 2>But if you go back historically, particularly in the States

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 2>in the fifties, pediatricians doctor Benjamin Spock were advising parents

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 2>to put their babies to sleep face down, and there

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 2>was a pediatrician, Abramson, who said, look, we can't do this.

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll suffocate and it's been calculated with something like I

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 2>think in the UK and Europe sixty thousand babies died

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 2>because of that medical initiative. Now you don't hear that

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 2>very often. Wow, this medicine doesn't like to admit errors.

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 2>But that was a mistake. Wasn't evidence based. The thought

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 2>was if they're on their backs, they'll they'll aspirate, vomit,

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.479
<v Speaker 2>inhale it and that doesn't happen.

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But it also makes you think like that's more than

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>an error, is it? Could criminal charges have been involved

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>there with that kind of advice.

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it was incredibly well intentioned and it

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 2>made sense, and a lot of medical initiatives are like that,

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 2>but when you examine you think, nah, maybe that's not

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the best thing to do.

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>We recently covered the suspicious death of Australian Jason Rigby

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in Fiji. I don't know if you remember this. You

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>gave some comment for sixty minutes just last year on

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:27.879
<v Speaker 1>that it was ruled a suicide in a very short investigation.

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 1>They are now treating it as homicide. What were your

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 1>thoughts when you heard about that case and that ruling.

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I haven't actually reviewed the evidence since the TV program,

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 2>but I think the stab wounds and the scenario didn't

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 2>make all that much sense, and so my opinion was

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 2>it should have been treated as a suspicious case from

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the word go. And that's what happens. If you have

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 2>a stabbing. The first thing you got to ask yourself

0:43:57.120 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 2>is has this person been stabbed? Have they done it themselves?

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 2>And there are various ways of differentiating, you know, self

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 2>inflicted stab wounds from inflicted stab wounds.

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask in a suicide case, is

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it hard to determine if it was done to them

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>or if they've done it to themselves in any kind

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of form of suicidal death.

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes, I mean one of the Snowtown cases was thought

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 2>to be a suicidal hanging, but he was actually strung

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 2>up by the perpetrators. So that's an example of mist homicide.

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 2>With stabbings, if you stab yourself, often there are multiple

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 2>stab wounds. There's not just one wound, and you have

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 2>what to call hesitation cuts, So you've got one cut,

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a very superficial cut, because it's very difficult to hurt yourself.

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 2>So there may be multiple little inside wounds that aren't significant,

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 2>whether it's say a homicidal cut throat or probably just

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 2>one cut from one side to the other. With suicidal

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 2>little wounds, when people stab themselves in the chest, say

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 2>they're often lying on a bed or a couch, they

0:45:04.600 --> 0:45:07.240
<v Speaker 2>take off their clothes that you don't stab through clothing,

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't go through bone, It just goes through

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 2>soft tissue. And there's just probably one stab wind into

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the heart and the knife will be in sight you.

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 2>So those are the things that help you sort of differentiate.

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Also with a stab wound. If somebody's being stabbed, they

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 2>tend to try and get away. They may fall over,

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 2>there may be blood, force, trawl or an other things.

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>And stabbing yourself to death is not overly common, is it.

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 2>No, not really, It's most of our suicides are carbon monoxide,

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 2>are hanging, or or drugs.

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a bit of a big question, but what

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is the most unusual death you've seen. I know that

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:45.239
<v Speaker 1>that is another area that you've specialized in.

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I suppose a lot of them, actually, But there was

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 2>an oldly woman who was pecked by her rooster, which

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>was out collecting eggs and she had Barica's veins and

0:45:54.680 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 2>she bled to death from that. I published that because

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 2>it was strange, but as to give advice. So if

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:06.879
<v Speaker 2>you have varicas veins and you get a small cut,

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 2>don't walk around, lie down, elevate the leg, put your

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 2>finger over it, and you know, pressure a medical alert

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 2>button or phone somebody. And I got phone costsm all

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 2>over the world, people saying thank you so much of

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 2>that advice. My grandmother's got varicas veins. I worry about it.

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 2>So I've developed an approach to pathology called preventive pathology.

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 2>All my clinical colleagues think that, you know, the pathologist

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 2>knows everything, but he's always too late, which is a

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 2>bit rude. But what this is is taking lessons to

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 2>the mortuary like that one and putting it out there

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:41.399
<v Speaker 2>so that simple, simple things can be considered and people

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 2>can actually prevent them from dying.

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you think would be the proudest achievement from

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>your career?

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 2>My book Sudden Death in the Young it's now and

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 2>it's fourth edition as I just submitted it on the weekend.

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's a it's a summary of all of the

0:46:58.160 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 2>possible causes of sudden unexpected up the age of thirty five,

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 2>and I it's yes, it's it's I really am proud

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of it. It's also proud of getting the AC last year.

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 2>That was a nice sort of recognition of of of

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 2>my career. So those two probably, Yeah, getting the A C.

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a good time to go. Yep, I'm done,

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm out.

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right.

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious do you consume true crime in your in

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 1>your regular day? Do you watch documentaries listen to podcasts

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>or is it too much for you? Having worked.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Crime fiction? Actually, I really like reabs and inspector banks,

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 2>so I to read a lot of that. It's interesting

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to see the angles that authors come up with. And

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean Patricia Cornwall Cake Scarpetta was based

0:47:56.440 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 2>on a friend of mine in New York, so sort

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 2>of connections there, and I call it witless silence. I

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's silent witness. But the doctor there was based

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 2>on another friend, Helen Whitwell in England. So things weave

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 2>through these stories that they're fascinating.

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 1>What about watching these forensic pathologists on screen? I can

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine you would sit there going that wouldn't do that,

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do that, that's not right.

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I think the only television program I enjoy forensically is

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Inspector Rex. He's a even a C grade forensic program

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 2>from Vienna where Inspected Rex the German Shepherd sold all

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:36.399
<v Speaker 2>the crimes. The thing about Inspected Rex is that he's

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 2>not trying to guestimate the time of death like they

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 2>do on Silent Witness. You know, they'll all the time

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:45.279
<v Speaker 2>of death was two minutes past midnight. Yeah, plus and

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 2>minus about six hours. There's a lot of well, I

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 2>have to compress a whole investigation into an hour, so

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:59.919
<v Speaker 2>it's understandable that there are inaccuracies. But yes, I don't

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:02.799
<v Speaker 2>tend to enjoy the portrayal of forensic pathologists on TV.

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 2>A lot of them are these sort of dottery old

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 2>guys with glasses and beards and bald heads that make,

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, a lot of black humor. So it doesn't

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 2>seem real to me.

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you telling me that you can't, as a pathologist

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>tell the exact time of death. It's more of a window.

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, there are so many different I've called timing the

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Achilles Heel of pathology because you know, although there's a

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 2>process that you go through, like you know, the body

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 2>temperature decreases and the body gets stiff. It's different for

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:35.800
<v Speaker 2>different people in different environments. So there's a lot of

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 2>inaccuracies there. Interestingly enough, there's a very complicated German chart

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 2>for measuring temperatures and working out time of death, and

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 2>it was reproduced in Bernard Knight's textbook, and a colleague

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>of mine from South Africa a few years ago pointed

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 2>out that the reproduction actually has thrown out the parameters,

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and so anybody who's using the chart from the textbook

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 2>would get the wrong time of death. You've just got

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:05.839
<v Speaker 2>to be very cautious. I mean, gastric emptying time used

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:07.759
<v Speaker 2>to be. You know, people say, oh, yes, they died

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.279
<v Speaker 2>two hours after this or whatever. All I say is,

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, if there's food in the stomach, they died

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 2>or were murdered sometime after they ate. Because if you're terrified,

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 2>sometimes the gas entering time is really quick. Other times,

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:27.879
<v Speaker 2>if you're injured, it may be very slow. We get

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 2>people who have been in ICU for say four days,

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:33.160
<v Speaker 2>and they've still got food in their stomach from before

0:50:33.200 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 2>the accident. So again there's a lot of variability, and

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's one of the things in modern forensic

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 2>pathology that we've getting much better out of saying I

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know. And I like doing that in court with

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 2>juries because if I say to a question I really

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I can tell the jury thinks, oh, well, okay,

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't think he knows everything. So when he does

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:56.319
<v Speaker 2>say he knows something, then we can probably put more

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:56.800
<v Speaker 2>faith in it.

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Professor, you've retired. Now you're passing the baton to the

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 1>younger forensic pathologists.

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Of the world.

0:51:05.840 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I just throw it into the mortary and left of Australia.

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 1>What is your advice to the profession. What are you

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 1>hoping to see from the profession and what do you

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think makes a good forensic pathologist? What values do you

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>want to see upheld.

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I think compassion and curiosity are the two most important points,

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and a work ethic. I've seen a lot of younger

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 2>pathologists who don't see to be really interested in the job. Clearly,

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 2>working as much as I have is something that most

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 2>people would not want to do. But my boss said

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to me once when I started forensics. He said, if

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 2>they're paying you to do something you enjoyed, then it's

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 2>not work, And as I said, I've treated it like

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 2>a puzzle to work out causes of death and prevention strategies.

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 2>And I really like writing literature and history of my

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 2>best subjects at high school, so I've continued that and

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 2>that to me, every paper I write has to have

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 2>a particular point that I'm making a change in practice

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:17.320
<v Speaker 2>or a new observation, and that that I think is

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 2>what young pathologists must do. I don't think of it

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:21.920
<v Speaker 2>as a job. I think of it as a vocation,

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and I'd like people to treat it like that.

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, Professor Bayad, thank you for everything you've done all

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:32.759
<v Speaker 1>of the I was going to say millions. It feels

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:35.799
<v Speaker 1>like millions of texts and kind of findings you've had

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>over your forty year career. And thank you for joining us.

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Demm, it was a pleasure.

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to Roger for joining us on this episode.

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:48.240
<v Speaker 1>You can find links to Roger's books in our show notes.

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you're following our show on Apple Podcasts and

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Spotify for updates on this story and all the stories

0:52:54.719 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we cover. Thanks so much for listening. I'll be back

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:00.239
<v Speaker 1>next week with another true crime converce Station