WEBVTT - A Very Cranky William & A Very Wicked Woman

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Mama Mia out loud. It's what

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>women actually talking about on Monday, the twenty second of June.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And I am Holly Wayne right, I'm Claire Stevens. Welcome back.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Sorry Amelia, but you were off a bit.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Last week and I think somehow Loud has thought I'd

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>had a baby and I was like, guys, like I

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 2>honestly like I wish, but no, I was just sick

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>and it was boring and I had to listen to

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you guys without fighting back. It was annoying.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Amelia Lessa And here's what's made our agenda for today.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Olivia Wilde is finally talking about that cursed don't worry

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Darling pressed to her and why she inexplicably became one

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 2>of the most hated women in the world.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>The shit skirt is casting around for a new British

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>prime minister to wear it. What you need to know

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>about the mess of UK politics right now and what

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it might say about ours.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 3>And I have a very simple, completely free way to

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 3>start your day better.

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But first, in case you missed it, So it seems

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Keith Urban Nicole Kidman divorce has taken a

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>lovely turn.

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh how nice?

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Who would have thought this? It was about nine months

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>ago that that split came out of the blue, didn't it.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 3>At least I was in the Mumamea offices that day

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>and that was just I think that was the biggest

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 3>day in history.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Everybody lost their minds. Now, they obviously knew it was

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>coming because by the time we heard about it, their

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>settlement was almost done. So as far as we know,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this could have been brewing for a while, but it

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly came out of nowhere for us. But it seems

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that things are amicable now because social media slutes know

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>these things. First of all, it was Nicole Kidman's birthday

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, and Keith Urban actually made a story and

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>put it on his stories and it just had text

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>lower case happy Birthday, Nicole Mary.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Which makes her more relatable because I feel like every

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Australian woman their middle name is either Mary or Marie

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 2>or Louise. Like I like that she's Nicole Mary.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think maybe one of the daughters like showed

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>him how to do it. Yeah, like I'm not doing

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>too much. Wasn't just a lowercase story. It wasn't a

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>very good story, and their design it wasn't there was

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>no design, and then the next day with design kidman

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>posts for father's sakes. It's just been Father's Day on

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the world, and she had a

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>split screen photo of her late dad and then Keith

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with his girls and wished all the good dadsy So

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>things have gone nice?

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Do I like this? That's interesting because I feel like

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 3>it's very fraught about when and how you interact with

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 3>X's on social media or in general, whether you reach

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 3>out to them on their birthday.

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? Do you think would you?

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe it. I don't believe you can be

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>amicable this quickly. I think there's tension, but I think

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>it's very clever that they're pretending to be I think

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 2>that's quite lovely. But it's like, don't pretend that there

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been any.

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Drama, but don't you think that it's possible that all

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the drama happened? Or because apparently, if reports are to

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>be believed, their settlement has been relatively stress free. They've

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>both agreed to not go for alimony, not go for

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>any spousal support anything like that. She walks away with

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>her money, he walks away with his They've got a

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 1>very straightforward custody agreement with the kids, which is joint,

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>but she's primary parent and if reports as to be believed,

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>schorelous here she is dating again. Remember there was all

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the gossip about him. Maybe is she dating Simon Baker?

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>I wish she was because that would be great.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 3>But although I don't know, you don't know about it.

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Apparently she's dating a businessman.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's that's a big Hollywood move these days. Reese

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>has got a businessman on.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The Chairman of the Border MGM, and he's called Paul Salem.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Allegedly he's divorced with four daughters.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 3>And again regardless vibe here.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so maybe things have just maybe Nichole's just

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like cool, let's get back to social media and I,

0:03:58.800 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 3>He's been hanging out at mar Lago, So I feel

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>like they're diverging in many ways at this point.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, Well, Sunday, the daughter she unfollowed her dad

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>on Instagram and April, so I think she might say

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>that this Sunday.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were talking about Father's Day on Sunday.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>She did that Sunday, Yes, sorry, Sunday, you don't.

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Miss the thing, Joe gest stating and checking out Sundays following.

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 2>She followed him again, unfollowed and followed. But I just

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>think you can say, oh you want about the legal process,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 2>That's what I care about.

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 3>I've got another little bit of social media news from celebs,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 3>which is that Anne Halfaway is joining the ranks of

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 3>celebrities who are pregnant well into their forties. She posted

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend in what looked like a kind of

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 3>like Lily Allen coated Brooklyn Brownstone vibe type backdrop. She

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 3>was wearing this very sheet cheesecloth number and it showed off.

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Dare I say she was flaunting a baby bump.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>She is pregnant real estate agent over here with the

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>brown style.

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, it was very yesteryear coded right, this cheesecloth number

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that she was in. And now there's a lot of

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 3>other celebrities who are pregnant into their forties right now.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Natalie Portman is pregnant, she's forty five. Giselle was forty

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 3>four when she had her latest and Cianna Miller, of

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 3>course we've talked about on the show, was forty three.

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>So I was interested to see what the story was

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 3>with Anne Hathaway's other children. I knew vaguely she had children,

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 3>but she is very private about it, so I kind

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 3>of had to dig a little. But it turns out

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 3>her first child was born a full ten years ago.

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 3>That's quite a spread, and then her second and twenty nineteen,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and she's talked a lot about going through infertility and

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 3>conception house, so it's very nice news.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know who her partner is. Same guy

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with all the kids, same guy, same guy. That's very

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>private and he so little.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Fun story. I was in Positano, I'm going to say

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years ago, and I was standing at a bus

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>stop and I.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, Impositano, but you were saying it a bus john

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 3>a lot about the quality of my.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Holidays a few years ago, Yes, And I looked across

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 2>the road and I went, that's Anne Hathaway and she

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 2>was with the same guy that she's still with.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 3>I googled the Italian fraudsters that was a great.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Before, same same guy, because I was like, I don't

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>recognize yeah, and then when I googled him, I was like,

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly who she was with. And I was so excited.

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 2>But this was this was pre kids. Pre everything, but no,

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 2>I have been on holiday with Anne halfway you have.

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Definitely this all buys into my theory that we're living

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>in an age of agelessness, that like the longevity tech

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>bros are all about, you know, not eating food and

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>doing all that stuff to live forever. But the female

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>version of that is extension of fertility. And I don't

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>know if it's now just because I'm old, but now

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm like forties so young, you have so much time.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. One of the most bizarre realities of celebrity culture

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>is that a story can completely take over the zeitgeist

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 2>for weeks or months at a time, and then just

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 2>as quickly as it appeared, it's entirely forgotten. And then

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 2>when it comes up again, we're like, oh, yeah, that

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 2>was bat sheet insane. So with the clarity of hindsight,

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 2>often you can't work out why everyone lost their minds.

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>And this is the case with the scandal of the

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Don't Worry Darling press tour with Olivia Wilds.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 3>This was one of my favorite moments and pop culture ever.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed it. I saw a tweet that was like,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>it's q andon for highly online people. Yeah, and I'm

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 2>like that's what it was for me. Like the closer

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 2>you look, the more you found it.

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 3>I think Q and on is also Q and on

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>for I take a p.

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>That's very true. So very luckily we got Olivia Wilde

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 2>sitting down on Call Her Daddy last week to unpack

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>all the details of the Gossip of the Press. Too

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 2>are with Alex.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Cooper because apparently her new movie is really good.

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, The Invitation and it's called with Sethrob.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe it. Her first movie that she directed was brilliant. Yeah,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the book smart and I've always given her a lit

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I know credit.

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>And can we just acknowledge don't worry, Darling was an

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 2>excellent film. I enjoyed it.

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 3>I didn't watch it.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the prob.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I didn't watch it. The controversy I say too much.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>She's really smart, like on this. In this interview, she

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>talks about how she's always wanted to direct her now

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>she is a proper director. She's followed Greta Gerwick and

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>all the rest of it. And one of the things

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting that she says, though she says it's

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>given her speaking of agelessness, she said she feels like

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>she can relax. It's given her some longevity because otherwise

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you cast out at an early age.

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, she's very talented. So in twenty twenty two, for

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>those who have forgotten the headlines about the Cursed, don't worry,

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Darling pressed who are were everywhere and the drama kicked

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>off in April when Olivia Wilde, who directed the film,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 2>was at CinemaCon and she's on stage talking about the

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>movie and she is served custody that were from via

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 2>her ex Jason sidekis ted Lasso.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's why I will never believe he did it

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on purpose, because he's Ted Lasso.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it really challenged a lot of what we thought

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>about that man. But so she served these papers and

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 2>in that moment she was seen as a bit of

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>a victim. People went, that would be absolutely awful.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It's unquestionably a shitty thing to do in front of

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>all these people, just derail her whole professional moments.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 2>So bad. But I think it really did put a

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>spotlight on people being like, oh, she was with ted

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Lasso and now they're no longer together and they have

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 2>kids together, so people kind of had that in their minds.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Then later in the year don't worry, Darling comes out

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and it was largely overshadowed by a whole lot of

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>other drama. So Olivia Wilde was dating the lead actor,

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Harry Styles, who was ten years her junior and currently

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Florence Pugh, who was the lead actress, was pissed about it,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and this there did actually seem to be legs to

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.599
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Florence Peugh was pitched. She made a

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 2>few statements. She went to Venice Film Festival and didn't

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 2>say anything, didn't give any interferee.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 3>She switched around with an apperl sprits in hand and

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 3>just refused to speak.

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Which is how I prefer to express my exactly exactly.

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 2>So there definitely was some tension. And then of course

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 2>we had uh the spitting incident, which was Harry Styles

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 2>definitely looked like he spat on Chris.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Pine and do you think that he did?

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there is no way that Harry Styles spits, I asked,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at that foot, it is the optical

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>illusion of the century. He said, Remember, Jesse and I

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>did a canceled episode on it, and we said, it's

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>like ghosts.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 2>It's more fun to believe. It's more fun if you

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 2>just believe that Harry Styles did spit on Chris Pine

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and then Harry Styles made joke about It's like, this

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>isn't for you to joke about, this is for us

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to joke You shut up. But now four years later,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Olivia Wilde has spilled everything she's did very quiet.

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But we're a good reason because she was hard.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 3>You know who's not happy that she's choosing now to

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 3>speak up. Yes, she has a movie coming out, but

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 3>also Jason Zadekas has new season of ted Lars and

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 3>all of this is undercutting that every man, good guy

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 3>image that he has worked so hard to present in

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 3>ted Larso wow, I don't think so well.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Olivia Wilde makes some very interesting points about the conversation

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 2>around her relationship with Harry Styles at the time. They

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>went out for for a few years and then broke up.

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 2>But this is what she says about the age gap.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like the happiness made them mad.

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Like I would like go to shows and dance and

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 2>people were like, oh, oh good gee, You're like, dare

0:11:58.559 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 2>you dance?

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 4>I think that it's we police women's morality to such

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 4>a different degree than men that in especially mothers, the

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 4>fact that you were kids, you're fuck oh yeah. So

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 4>I think that there is a expectation, especially as a mother,

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 4>that when you go through that public separation with the

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 4>kids involved, you are supposed to be self sacrificing and

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 4>you need to be sexless.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, preach. Every word of that is true.

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 3>But that was mostly call her daddy speaking.

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, she was kind of putting it more into words

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>because Alex Cooper asked Olivia Wilde why she thought there

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>was so much anger about her relationship with Harry Styles,

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 2>and Olivia Wilde said, it's sort of the parasocial relationship

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>people have with him. But she also was like, I

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know, Like why do you think? And so I

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 2>thought Cooper gave a really interesting analysis of that, Amelia,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Why did we have such a visceral reaction to a

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>relationship with a ten year age girl. I think Harry

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Styles is in his late twenties.

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>He was twenty six, she was thirty six.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think it's.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Just the mother thing. I think age gap relationships post

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky in the late nineties, I

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 3>think we have developed this weird, very prudish morality around

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 3>age gap relationships whether they be between an older man

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 3>and a younger woman, or a younger woman, or an

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 3>older woman and a younger man. And the proof I

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 3>have of this is that there's this new show on

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Disney Plus called Alice and Steve. It is a perfect,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 3>one of those like perfect little capsules of a show

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 3>that only the Brits can do. It's only six episodes,

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 3>and it's six perfect little half hour episodes, and it's

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 3>about Jermaine from Flight of the Concords, who is embarking

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 3>on a relationship with a twenty six year old woman

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 3>who is.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>The daughter of his best friend.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>His friend, right, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll get to that. I think it's important on its

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 3>so but yeah, and it's like sort of like it's

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 3>been built as like a wrong colm, which I hadn't

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>heard that phrase before, but it's very true for this show.

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 3>It's like that kind of awkward, cringey humor that you

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>can't look away from. I just loved it. I ate

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 3>it up over the course of like forty eight hours.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>But then I you know how you watch a show

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 3>and then you want to see what the reviewers think.

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 3>So I saw googling around and the first thing that

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 3>comes up is the Guardians review, and I'm sorry, but

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 3>to me, it encapsulated our inability as a society to

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>talk properly or rationally about this topic. It was a

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 3>review written by Lucy Mangan, who is a great TV reviewer.

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I love her reviews generally, but she kind of just

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 3>spins out about this premise, and she writes that the

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 3>poor man we are led to understand is not a predator.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 3>He's just a bit weak and lonely, and never asks

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the question of whether inexperienced people are ever in command

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 3>of a situation involving experienced people of any kind. So basically,

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 3>as a society, we seem to have decided that inherently,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 3>if you have an age gap, regardless of whether it's

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>a man, again, regardless of which gender is in which

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 3>power position, it can never be a relationship that's anything

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 3>other than wrong or perverted. And I just think that

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 3>that's insane. Twenty six is a full grown adult who

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 3>is perfectly capable of consenting to this relationship. Is it

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a good relationship? No? Are they compatible? Not in the

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 3>slightest But the.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Best friends started dating your daughter? Yes, Well, yeah, that's

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the premise of the show.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 3>But to say that the concept in itself of someone

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 3>being more experienced than someone means that there is an

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 3>inherent and wrong power dynamic. I just think is like

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 3>a very strange new morality emerging.

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I I think we've always been totally fine with age

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>gap relationships when it's men and women. For a long time,

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>older men younger women. That was the norm and every

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>movie you've ever seen when you think about it, right,

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's only recently post Me Too, we've started

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing back on them with any actual veracity.

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Like well, but the fact that Jason Sudeikis was dating

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 2>somebody who was younger.

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And no one even meaned it.

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know that. That's the first I had heard

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>when when Olivia Wilde said it in the Call a

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Daddy interview.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that a lot of the kind of way

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you feel about age gut relationships, Like many things in life,

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's often about your life stage and where you're at,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because I think that I don't think that generally we

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>think that age gat relationships full stop are wrong, But

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you can see the power dynamics so much more clearly

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>from later in your life.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>But I want to keep the conversation around a twenty

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 3>six year old is not apparently capable of deciding that

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 3>she wants to have a fling with this guy as

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 3>much older than her. And the thing is that all

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 3>relationships have power differentials, like no one enters into a

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 3>relationship entirely equal on every footing. For instance, I'm a

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 3>very very bad driver because I learned in my thirties.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm very inexperienced when it comes to driving. I'm married

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 3>to someone who's a great driver, who's been driving like

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 3>a normal person since his teens. That's okay. There's different

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 3>power dynamics and relationships.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I agree, once you're an adult, do what you

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>want to do. But I think that as older women

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in particular often get a very cynical about the men

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in their lives who, strangely their girlfriends are always twenty five.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like no one is suggesting that that twenty five

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>year old doesn't have agency. It's more it says something

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>about you if you're a man in your fifties and

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you only date twenty five year olds. I mean, look

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>at how we all laugh at Leonardo DiCaprio, right, And

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think I do think it's true that Olivia Wilde,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>when you listen to this interview and they go through

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this crazy year, we burnt that woman.

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 2>At the stage the public shame.

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It is one hundred percent true. She was dating our

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite internet son. You know, she was older than him.

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>What a predator. She had young children. She makes a

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>point that not long after the divorce, it was thanks

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and all the custody arrangements were fine, and it was

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving and she was home with the kids and Sedukis

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>was in Costa Rica with his young girlfriend, and she

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>said that was fine. I knew he was there. Everybody

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>but the press had the pictures of him and his

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>young girlfriend on the beach, and they were all like,

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>how lovely for him, isn't that great? I would like

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to see what they would have said about me if

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a national holiday and I was not with

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>my children frolicking on a beach with Harry Styles. I

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>think we know what they would have not.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 3>And I agree with that she was burned at the stage.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm just saying that I think you're right

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 3>that post me too. We're casting that judgment more on

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 3>men than we're used to, and maybe that's a good thing,

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 3>but I'm just observing that that's changed since say the nineties,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 3>when feminists everywhere stuck up for Bill Clinton because they

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 3>said that Monica Lewinsky was perfectly capable of consenting as

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 3>an intern to engaging in sexual acts with the president.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 2>I think what's interesting about the Olivia Wilde story is

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>that now with the benefit of hindsight and kind of

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the sting coming out of whatever, we were so furious

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>about at the time, which feels so ridiculous. Do you

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 2>think it was I think we were angry. We were

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 2>angry that she hired Harry Styles and that she they

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 2>were spending a lot of time together in the trailer, Amelia,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and that.

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Was probably making Florence uncomfortable. Like I get Florence's side

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 3>in this. I think in a workplace dynamic, that's not easy.

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think we were mad about that. We

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>were mad, but we I think we were mad that

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 2>he's just an innocent little boy and this woman who's

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 2>a grown up, divorced woman. Yeah, divorced woman. Remember the

0:19:55.960 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 2>story about about the salad He brought salad dressing Styles

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 2>a salad over to her house. This came from the

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 2>nanny brought a salad over to her house, and Jason

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Sadaikis was so sad about it that he like laid

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 2>in front of the car or something to like stop her.

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a messy split. It was a really really

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>amating and then the salad dressing recipe went viral. It

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>was the one from Harper Nora Refron's one from Hartburn.

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a deep cut. But then I think we

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>made that salad dressing, maybe brought it into a podcast,

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>like the world was obsessed with this. I think it

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>was also that she it didn't follow the split the

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>trope that we like, which is like man leaves woman

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>woman very sad. Yes, this was like whatever happened between them,

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>she did not seem sad. She seemed like she was

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>living a great life. She was releasing a movie, she

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>was dating a hot young man. She was you know,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>at parties, at concerts, dancing, as she says, And we

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>were like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, this is not

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>how this is supposed to go.

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 3>That's true.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 2>And I think we also looked at Jason Sadeikis and

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 2>we were like, how dare you do that? To ted Lers,

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 2>which was.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 3>There was a big parasocial thing about yeah, like Jason

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 3>today because is tedlar so.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and in hindsight that was ridiculous because he's not.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>That's just a character to your point about it's more

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>fun to believe the spit. Yeah, Alex Cooper in that

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Call Her Daddy interview does say did Jason Sedukis serve

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you those papers on stage? On purpose? And Olivia Wilde says,

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I have to believe that he did not. He says

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. He's very upset about it, and I have

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>to believe him, which isn't quite the same as saying

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe him.

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 3>No. I read some interpretation that said she's very clearly

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 3>saying that he knew. Is that how you understood that? Yes?

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>But as she says, I have to believe that he

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't because I'm parenting kids with him, and everyone who's

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>ever been through a messy split nose and you've got

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>kids involved, at some point you just have to get

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>on with it, right. But that is a pretty unforgivable

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>thing to do if he did do it.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that they're wishing each other happy birthday

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 3>on Instagram.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>No. After break, the shit Skirt is looking for a

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>new owner.

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Who doesn't want a free and easy way to improve

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 3>their life. I know I sound like a telecommercial, but

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 3>hear me out this. This is actually well on my mind.

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 3>There's an artist called Tom Sacks, and he has a

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 3>very simple rule that I cannot stop thinking about since

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I learned about it last week. Before you touch your

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 3>phone in the morning, you have to do or make

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>something yourself. He calls it output before input or OBI.

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 3>And weirdly, he's developed an up with Nike around this concept,

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 3>which sort of seems to undercut the whole point. But

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>we're setting that aside. We're just going to focus on

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 3>the idea of putting something out in the world before

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 3>you start taking in the shit skirt and all the

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 3>other terrible news. And apparently this helps you because you

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 3>become more creative, you become more focused. It's especially good

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 3>to do on days and you have a lot of

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 3>stuff going on. And you can also try it in

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 3>the evening before bed, because apparently it really helps you

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 3>to remember your dreams, what.

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Sort of things, what sort of things should I be doing?

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, here are some examples that Tom gave draw sing

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 3>which I wake up seeing if you were sleeping with

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 3>someone next to you potentially would annoy them a one

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 3>minute plank, which I kind of was my favorite because

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 3>it sort of seems the most tangible and least insane

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 3>thing to do. Dancing little macarina or this is my favorite.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Touch clay. Just get out some clay, make a little

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 3>pinch pot. You're good to go. Which one are you

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 3>going to do? Holly dancing?

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>For sure? This morning I got up at five because

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's Monday, I come to the city I got. I

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>had to get up at five to catch my train.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine if I'd have gotten up at five

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>just put some tunes on, just like I had a

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>big party in my bedroom and then just for one minute,

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and the dog would have been like, sorry, just out

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>putting before I put back. So let's give that a

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>go next week.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 3>Are you going to just keep a little bit of

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 3>clay by your bed? Yeah?

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Really get my creativity out first thing. I have seen

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 2>so many versions of this that I guess because we're

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 2>living in an age where we're getting an unprecedented amount

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of input, Like we're just we're constantly reading, watching things,

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 2>just constant stimulus that we should be that there needs

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 2>to be an overall balance as well that it's like

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 2>you should be producing more than you in jest, But

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 2>how about when you're tired or lazy or can't be fucked?

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I nobody wants to see what I do with Clay.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 2>No one wants No one wants me to sing. It's

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>just I'd like, would it make my life better?

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 3>But so would me also journal. That's some other idea. Look,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 3>I should be clear. I think I learned about this

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 3>last Thursday. And have I done it even once? No,

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I haven't, but it's a dream.

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm trying to think if I've done it accidentally.

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 3>No. I feel like people who have cats sometimes can

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 3>do this because as a former cat owner myself and

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.479
<v Speaker 3>I love cats, as I hope out louders. No, I

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 3>know in this day and age, it's kind of stigmatized

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 3>to say you love cats. Anyway, that's another topic.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>She's really good out on a limb.

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 3>A cat often vombits first thing. That's their version of

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 3>output before input. Just throwing that out there as well.

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I often create a cup of tea first thing.

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 3>In the morning.

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's what I did.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there go that works.

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 3>There you go to out louders, maybe you can show

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 3>your output before imput, Yeah, before input, I'd love to

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 3>know what people do.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Actually, that would be really helpful.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 5>Moments like this don't come around often. In fact, in

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 5>more than forty years of reporting politics, I don't remember

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 5>anything remotely like what is happening right now. Right now,

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 5>I can't say to you with any confidence who will

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 5>be the Prime Minister of the UK in a fortnight,

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 5>as that general election is coming very soon.

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 3>You're joking, Not another.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>One, another one, yes, another one, friends, It's pretty likely

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that by the UK morning so hour tonight, the UK

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>will have a new prime minister, or at least a

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>new prime minister in waiting.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Output before yes.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>A minute, that Kirstahamer wakes up on Monday morning, hopefully,

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>well not hopefully, probably his first output will be to

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>sign a resignation letter. Why do we care? Well, for

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>two reasons. Who gets to wear the shitskirt of post

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Brexit Britain is a bit of a running scene on

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>out Loud. Several years ago we did a whole analogy

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 1>about how trying to clean up that mess was like

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody trying to get shit off the skirt and who

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>got it passed around? And that sort of became a

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>phrase for us to use when we know that something bad,

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody's about to get handled something bad. They're about to

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>be putting the shit skirt on.

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Who had it for kind of the longest. I feel

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 2>like Theresa May had.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The reason May was the original shit skirt where Liz

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Trust wore it for a very short amount of time.

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Boris Johnson had it obviously for a while there. It's

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>been passed around quite a lot. In fact, if Keir

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Starmer gets rumbled, is that the word I'm looking for,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>tumbled rolled, whatever we want to say, tray he I

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think he'll be the sixth British Prime minister in ten years,

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>so then mearly as good as Australia were there for

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a while at getting rid of them. The other reason

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>why we care is because what is rattling conventional politics

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in the UK is kind of eerily familiar to some

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of the things that are going on here, and also

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because it is batshit crazy, as anyone who has seen

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the pictures over the weekend of probably the next UK

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Prime minister standing next to a bin and a fox

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>on a stage. Well, no, we'll get to that. I'm

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>going to try and explain as quickly as I can.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>What has happened. The Prime Minister of the UK is

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a man called Kia Starma Serkis Starmer. He used to

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>be a human rights lawyer. He used to be incredibly

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>well respected.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Top human rights lawyer. As Bridget Jones would.

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Say, indeed, he's got very he's actually got quite darcy vibes,

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>except not as handsome, but like as in.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 3>If Colin First was Prime minister, no Onel would be

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 3>rolling handsome.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But he has that sort of buttoned up thing going

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>on that people outside the UK think that men from

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the UK are like that, when in fact they're all

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of drunken shouting at football games. But anyway, we'll

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>get back to that. He's very unpopular. I think he's popular.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>He's popularity at the minute stands on minus fifty seven percent.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow, so that means like more than one hundred percent

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 3>of people are just like nah, exactly.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And the thing about that is two years ago, a

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>bit less than two years ago, he and his Labour

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Party won the general election in a landslide, like a

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>very very decisive landslide, so they held a really significant majority.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Right Anyway, he's very unpopular now because Britain has all

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>kinds of problems and he is generally seen as being

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>ineffectual in dealing with them. Enter the most popular man

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in British politics. He is the mayor of my hometown.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, Andy Burnham Manchester mayor aka King of the

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>North right, right, So he The thing that's interesting about

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>him is he's run as a scrappy insurgeon, but actually

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>he's only ever been a politician. He's one of those.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:40.719
<v Speaker 1>But he has a very personable aspect. Right. So if

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Keir Starmer is buttoned up and polite, Andy Burnham never

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wears a tie, can talk to real human beings in

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the grand character of No, he's not because he's not

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a badly. He's not a badie.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 2>He's what's the Australian equivalent, vibe wise, shit, that's tough

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Bob Catter.

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's a Titian in Australia who can talk to real

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>human beings without appearing really awkward. Yeah, we'll come back

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to that. Yeah. So he's the mayor of Manchester and

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>very very popular labor person and lots of people have

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>said he's who should be challenging Kirs Starmer for the

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>election because people like Andy Burnham, and they don't like Kirstarmer.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But there was a little problem, and that's that Andy Burnham,

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>as the mayor of Manchester isn't an MP. He's not

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a member of parliament. He can't go into parliament, is.

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.479
<v Speaker 3>He like in an American analogy Zora and Mandani the

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 3>mayor of New York like a mayor who everyone loves.

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And he's done great things for Manchester, right, I mean

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>not everybody thinks that, obviously, but he's fixed He's shown

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that he can fix some difficult problems. He's brought back

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the buses into public ownership and they actually work and

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>run on time. He's encouraged development of the city without

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>selling everything off. Like he's seen as a good dude,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>right generally speaking, not by everybody of course. Anyway, problem

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was he isn't a member of parliament, so we can't

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>challenge Kirstamma not so much of a problem. We just

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>tap another politician on the shoulder and say quit so

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that I can run in your seat, therefore entering politics.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Coming back to challenge.

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 3>So they just engineered a biologic They just completely engineered

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 3>a bio Who was it who got the tap on

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 3>the shoulder. Were they just publicly No, he.

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Was fine because I think he knew that the greater

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>good was being.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Served stiff up on it.

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But who knows what will happen after if things fall apart,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>which they probably will anyway. Another key piece to this

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is they had to choose an area of the northwest

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of Manchester. It's in the Greater Manchester. The area they

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>chose that was having a bit of a problem with

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the far right. So this will sound familiar to many.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But the insurgent party in Britain at the minute, and

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>many Poles say the preferred PM is actually the party

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>called Reform, run by Nigel Farage. He was the guy

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>who really wanted Brexit and then when it happened, fucked

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>off to it.

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 3>It's easy to remember because the name Nigel Farage sounds

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 3>like the villain in a nineteen eighties.

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Children's movie, and many people they would think that was apt.

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>But also he's charismatic and controversial, ring any bells. He

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is funded by a particularly controversial billionaire. The Reformer picking

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>up lots of defectors from the traditional Conservative Party ring

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>any bells, and a lot of the candidates who stand

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for Reform wouldn't really withstand a bit of a deep

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>dive on their Twitter accounts, do you know what I'm saying. Yeah,

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>there's often quite a bit of problematic stuff there. So

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Burnham had to prove the mayor of Manchester had to

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>prove that he could stand up to a reform voting

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 1>populace and win, because that's what the government of Britain

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to do. And so Makefield, which is the place

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.479
<v Speaker 1>that he stood in the recent local elections, they voted reform,

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so very much reform leaning place, and Andy decided to

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>go in there and not sort of scrap with all

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the angry, anger making issues that reform were going in on,

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>but play happy warrior and sort of also disassociated himself

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit from the labor parties. It was all vote Andy,

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>believe in Andy, and he smashed it. He won with

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a big majority. The far right was split into two parties,

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:11.479
<v Speaker 1>but even if you added them together, they came nowhere

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>near him. The Conservative Party, so our version of the

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>UK version of Liberals didn't even really poll They got

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like two percent, which shows also what's going on there.

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Who had this seat before reform was on the ascendencied

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 3>labor labor Okay.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's a labor it's traditionally a labor seat, but

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the kind of seats that is falling from

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>traditional parties to the minor parties, which is also something

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that's happening here. Is this the seat where the Reform

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>guy had a tweet that said I'm sorry, I'm sexist. Yes, okay,

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>exact seat. Yeah, the reform guy was campaigning in England

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>shird a lot, which is a whole other issue where

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of English people like I want my flag back please,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but and he it was proved to be a bit problematic,

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but that was generally considered a little bit like some

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of the one nation MPs here like that's just what

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>knock about guys do. So he did get a bit

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. Andy Burnham wipe the floor with him. So

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>now he can re enter politics and with the Bin

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and the Fox on his side, he can march down

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to London and get rid of kir Starmer. So it's

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>basically an engineered from within the party way to topple

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Right. One detail in this which you know, it's interesting

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to look at comparisons with other countries and Australia But

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 3>one contrast I'm seeing here potentially, which is also interesting

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 3>to look at, I think, is that this was a

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 3>labor stronghold that became a reform stronghold. And what we

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 3>are seeing in Australia so far as yes, people who

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 3>have voted for all the for both major parties as

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 3>well as even potentially the Greens and the Teals are

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 3>deffecting to one nation. That's what they're telling polsters. But

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 3>at the moment it does seem like it's more something

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 3>that is being that it's support from the Liberal Party

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 3>that is bleeding to one nation. Do you know why

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 3>in the UK it's more of it across the board.

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Thing my view is they are further down the line

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>from where we are now. Obviously there's loads of differences

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>between these two countries. UK population is much bigger, much

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>more diverse, lots of I mean, there's a lot of difference.

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It's much more urbanized, although well you know, many more cities.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, when reform first came up in Britain,

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they were taking from the right. They were like seen

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>as a Conservative party alternative.

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 3>And this is pre Brexit we're talking right now, No,

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 3>this is post.

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And then what's happened is that vote has begun to

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 1>chip away at everybody. Right, so I think that and

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of course this also I'm not making a super neat comparison,

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.919
<v Speaker 1>but because again the places are so different, but there

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is a firm argument that what is happening in Britain,

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they're just further down the line that we are, you know,

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>traveling towards the polls. Here one nations on the rise,

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 1>particularly outside the metropolitan Area's charismatic leader, well funded by

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a private sector. There's a lot of similarities. And so

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they say that Albow is looking at Burnham and going

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a happy Warrior too, because that's

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously the way to fend this off problem is happy

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Warrior goes down to Westminster today. He says to Sir Kia,

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I want your job please, and Sir Kia so far

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I said no, you're not having it. In fact, he

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>even tried to stop Andy from standing the first time around.

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>He did block him and he fell to the Greens.

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 2>He says, look at the polls, I'm really popular, and

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 2>everyone says, sir, your minus fifty seven percent.

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not a plus fifty seven. So Kirstarmer has been

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>like trying to push Andy Burnham away for ages. But

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>now the King of the Nord's coming down and now

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>all the reporting as we're recording today say that Keir

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Starmer has been convinced it's inevitable.

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Pass Andy played that, like, what does he say? Does

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 3>he say I want to be prime minister?

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>He says it's time for a change.

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 3>He says change.

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>He says it's time for a change. And interestingly, you know,

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>as I said, he's it's sort of personality politics too,

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>which we know from America and many other places, is

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a trend that we can't seem to push back. Although

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we were talking last week about how maybe it's fading

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with that Obama guy that we don't know anything about.

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is very much personality politics. A lot of people

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>who voted for Andy Burnham in this election would not

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have voted voted for another labor candidate. They like him

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's a real challenge for politicians because a lot

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of them, no offense politicians are not that likable.

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Do we think that that the personality politics is what's

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 2>happening with one nation and with reform in the UK,

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 2>because reform similar to one nation, they have a very few.

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 2>There are only very few members of that party. There's

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>like eight us.

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, there are an increasing number at all times because

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>in that particularly on the local level, but on the

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>on the national level at the moment there aren't very many. Yeah,

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>but Poles are pointing towards the sweep. The problem. The

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>issue is for that, with the exception of some of

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the people who have deferred from other parties, the promer

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>conservatives a bit like how here Nats like Barnabie Joyce

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have joined one nation. There's a vast amount of inexperiperience there,

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>which is like a strength and a weakness, because you

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>can be I'm not one of these career politician idiots.

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm an ordinary person and I can talk like ordinary people.

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But then there's also like a but do you understand

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>how things work? And they're like not really.

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 3>And Andy is a career politician, really he is.

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>But he somehow has managed to like shake that off.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 3>That's so interesting.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>So his critics will say he's been he's been part

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>of a government before, he's been around for ages. He

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is one of them. But he has sort of convincingly

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>made a case that no, I'm different, I'm changed I'm

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the insurgent. What will be interesting about the shit skirt?

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Though Andy Burnham famously never wears a suit, he never

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 1>wears a tie. He is a gen X dude, he's

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty six. His campaign ads were full of oasis like

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he likes to be like brick CP pop dude.

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 3>He wear a ways to say like yes you can

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 3>have our music and.

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Albo all the big Manchester bands and he wore so

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>he always wears a T shirt and like a bomber jacket.

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You know how politicians have like a uniform and when

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>down Andrews only ever worn north face. Yeah, and so

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing is it's still in the UK. Now, if

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you're going to go into Westminster, you have to wear

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a shirt, a jacket and a tie. And Andy Burnham

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. So maybe the ships he's going to

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>wear the ship skirt and a shirt and tie to

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just keep reinforcing his man at the people vibe.

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 2>That did get some conservative politicians up in arms. Wearing

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 2>a skirt get them very very up.

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It would be very King of the North, like all

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the way from Scotland kind of a wearing kilt. Anyway,

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what's happening.

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 3>I just say here, just get some clay. I think

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 3>play today Monday morning clay. Then you can handle things.

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it is it is fascinating that this wave

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 2>because the big win for labor in the UK that

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 2>was around about the same time that Australia had a

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 2>labor win and Canada there was there was like a

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 2>wave of it, and it seems like there is this

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of turning point now and it's interesting that it

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 2>is that it mirrors in all different parts of the

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:10.760
<v Speaker 2>world what the mood is. I'll be very, very interested

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 2>to see what happens with this and what our labor

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 2>party learns from it.

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Talking about what Alba might take from this, Claire is

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>that one of the reasons why people have turned on

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Starmer after that big win is that he's seen as

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>being nice but ineffectual and of flip flopping changing his

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>mind on big policies. And again, does that sound a

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit familiar about how people are feeling about Albo.

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 3>After the break, there is chaos at King's Court because

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Harry and Megs are coming to town. Harry and Megs

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 3>are rolling out the suitcases in Montecito because they are

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 3>preparing for a trip to the UK with Archie and

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Lily in Toe and it is happening next month, which

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I hate to tell you all, is coming up remarkably soon.

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 3>It's almost July. Where is chaos at court about how

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:04.919
<v Speaker 3>to deal with this visit? Absolute chaos. On the one hand,

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 3>you've got two camps. On the one hand, you've got

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.919
<v Speaker 3>King Charles and what you might call the Doves. These

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 3>are the people who say, let's just get back to normal.

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Charles wants to give Harry and Meggs a house to

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 3>stay in while they're in the UK. He has offered

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 3>them security. He has offered them, in fact, a security envelope,

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.760
<v Speaker 3>as some of the reporting goes, which sounds really nice.

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 3>And then in the other camp you've got the Hawks.

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 3>This is led by William. They see the trip as pernicious,

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 3>they see it as emotional blackmail. And it must be

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 3>said they are more in touch with public opinion that camp,

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 3>because for the most part of the UK, the only

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 3>people less popular than Kirstarma are Harry and Megs. So

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 3>here is the problem. Charles has offered the residents and

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the security to Harry and Megs, and that is why

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 3>they are bringing the kids. Because previously Harry said he

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 3>would never bring the kids to the UK unless he

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:59.959
<v Speaker 3>was given security, So the security and the residents are happy.

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.320
<v Speaker 3>So in that sense, it seems like Charles and the

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Doves have won. But Charles is clearly still profoundly unsure

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 3>about how he wants to play this visit, because there

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 3>is very mixed reporting on whether he will actually even

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 3>meet with Harry and the family when they're in the UK.

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 3>And the Hawks meanwhile a warning that by offering Harry

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:22.240
<v Speaker 3>and Meghan, the residents and the security, they are setting

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 3>a very dangerous precedent for the rest of Charles's reign. Holly,

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 3>who is going to win out? And do you think

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 3>that Charles could really not meet with Harry and Meghan

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 3>after he's given them a residence for their trip.

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Charles is one hundred percent going to meet

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>with Harry and Meghan, because I think that's what all

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of this is about. I thought this Hawks and Doves

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>thing was really interesting because I reckon in all of

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.439
<v Speaker 1>our families, we'd have hawks and doves. There are people

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>who are like, let bygones be bygones, let's forgive and

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 1>forget and move on. And there are people who are like,

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>never forget.

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.239
<v Speaker 3>And in friendship groups, dare I say it right?

0:42:56.680 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's really relatable in lots of ways.

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that while the king is still the king,

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:07.479
<v Speaker 1>so while Charles is still ultimately the power, his say

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>goes right. So I know William's pissed off, and I

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>know William's getting a lot of influence because everybody knows

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to be king soonish, But right now

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the dad who gets to say, boys, this is

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing. And what we're doing is we're going

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to let them come. We're going to make sure they're safe.

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if they came and something happened. Imagine. So it's

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the sensible choice. He So we let them come. We

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>don't celebrate them. We don't like bring them out on

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the balcony and have you know, parades in the street

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.240
<v Speaker 1>or anything, but we let them come and do their stuff.

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Harry allegedly is coming for an Invictus one year out countdown,

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and we make sure allegedly apart from the you know

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that he wants to come and stick it to

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>his brother and we'll get on with it and you

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have to play now, you don't have to come

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to tea William, but they're coming. I think that's a

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>sensible choice.

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 2>In a way. It's interesting timing because Charles doesn't really

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 2>have that much to lose, like William's gonna take over.

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:13.720
<v Speaker 2>It won't be that long. People in terms of public opinion,

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 2>people quite like William. So he's allowed to have his

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:19.879
<v Speaker 2>line in the sand about Harry, which is quite clever

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 2>again for his own popularity, because it mirrors what the

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 2>British public think.

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 3>But I don't.

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I this makes me a little bit more sympathetic to

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Charles that he even though it is not what people

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 2>in his camp necessarily want, it is not what the

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:41.439
<v Speaker 2>public want. I kind of like it. And the fact

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 2>that he wants to.

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>See his grandkids he does. It's the most relatable thing

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's ever happened. Like he wants to see his grandkids.

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 1>He famously said, it's even in Harry's books, So even

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>in Harry's unsympathetic telling that when Harry and William were

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.879
<v Speaker 1>really fighting hard, he was like, boys, please don't make

0:44:56.960 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>my final years a misery, and they are doing that.

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 3>But the thing is, I really think that there's a

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 3>big schism emerging between William and Charles. And the reason

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I said that is because you said it may not

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:12.360
<v Speaker 3>be that long. But by all accounts Charles's counts, the

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 3>treatment has been successful to the extent that we can

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 3>say that it's been successful. He's looking at potentially another

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 3>fifteen years. There are some longevity genes in this family. Meanwhile,

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 3>William has been briefing constantly along the lines of when

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I am king, which is very offensive to Charles, because

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 3>you know who sat by silently through his mother's historically

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 3>long ragn never briefing of what he would do when

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 3>he was king, was Charles. It's really rude of William

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 3>to be doing this.

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 2>People on William's side, like the Hawks are the ones

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 2>who are speaking to the Daily Mail.

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and they keep staying in trouble. And Charles, meanwhile,

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 3>is like, I've waited my whole life for this. Give

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 3>me my potentially my up to fifteen years of actually

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 3>being king without constantly undermining me in the press.

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's fair enough. I think it's one of

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:02.280
<v Speaker 1>those things where you can kind of see all signs.

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Because William, i think rightfully, is the most hurt by

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>what he sees as Harry's betrayal, and I think what

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>he sees is Harry's betrayal is not so much the

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 1>moving to Montecito as writing the book right up until

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>he did that, that core text of spare that we

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>returned too often.

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 3>We should actually have it behind us.

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We really should. The only two people who knew what

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.479
<v Speaker 1>it was like to be them with those like, those

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>two boys have the most singular unusual childhood, traumatic experiences,

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:36.279
<v Speaker 1>great experiences, privileged tragedy, all that stuff. The two of

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:40.359
<v Speaker 1>them were so bonded, and in Harry's book he kind

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of dismissed all that. He mocked William.

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Well and he attacks Kate, which which by all accounts

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 3>William regarded as quite understandable.

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And he very much. He also kind of makes it

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>out like they were never that tight anyway, him and William, Like.

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 3>He makes fun of his baldness.

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we've all seen he Yeah, he's really mean

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about his brother. And I think that blowing the doors

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 1>off that trust. I don't know how he come back

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 1>from that, even as much as I'm like, oh, yeah,

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the doves forgive and forget, that's a pretty hard thing

0:47:08.239 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to forgive and forget. But can't you just shut up

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.759
<v Speaker 1>let him come with his family and sit in your

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 1>palace while he sits in his palace for a week.

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe got to bou Moral for a bit, just get

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 3>a bit away from it.

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>All, or a nice, nice European beach bit of positana,

0:47:24.640 --> 0:47:29.720
<v Speaker 1>go hang out exactly.

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the cousins want to play like I do. I

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of empathy for Charles, but I have

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 2>seen it said that this is also his weakness as

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:44.240
<v Speaker 2>a leader, because it's what, well, what kind of kept

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Andrew around for so long? Was that Charles Nelson want

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 2>to cut ties with members of his family. And the

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 2>fact that William is a bit more pragmatic and a

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:59.800
<v Speaker 2>bit more able to see when maybe the royal family

0:47:59.880 --> 0:48:06.760
<v Speaker 2>is being manipulated or used. That goes well with the public.

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 3>Ok. Yeah, he's got the longevity of the monarchy itself

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 3>to worry about, William.

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's some pretty funny commentary about Meghan and how

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 2>now that she's lost her Netflix steal and all of that,

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 2>she's kind of come scurrying back. But I do like

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 2>to say that this is not about Meghan. I always

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 2>hate that when these family dramas happen we somehow sent

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:34.239
<v Speaker 2>to the woman as though she is causing it. And

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I think the fact is there is so much complexity

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 2>in this family. And I've also seen rumors that William

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 2>growing up, that the rift between William and Charles has

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 2>always a little bit being there.

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>That is his mother's song.

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that he's like, no, you were cruel to my mum.

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 3>William runs hot, doesn't he? Yeah?

0:48:56.400 --> 0:49:00.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, speaking of there are recent photos where he looks

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:01.040
<v Speaker 2>really hot.

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>He does seem to be going upset. He does seem

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to be going through a bit of a midlife maker.

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.799
<v Speaker 2>I know he looks really hot head a football game,

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but he was like in a suit

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 2>and he appears to have maybe had some regrowth of

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:19.320
<v Speaker 2>his hair, like he looks good, which can't be hurting.

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 1>My hot tip for watching where the next showdown is

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:25.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be is the World Cup. Because they posted

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a little picture of Harry with the kids today for

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Father's Day and little Archie was wearing an England shirt,

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>which is a very like considering Archie lives in the

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:36.800
<v Speaker 1>US and has nearly all his life. Is a very

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:40.320
<v Speaker 1>pointed reference. And the World Cup has been played in America,

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:42.240
<v Speaker 1>as we know different parts of America and different countries

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in America's but if England make it through, there's no

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>way William's not going. He is obsessed with football and

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be a showdown in the stands.

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 3>And we will be buying Oh Wow out louders.

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:00.080
<v Speaker 1>That is all we have time for today, but do

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>not forget that twice a week, every week we have

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:07.399
<v Speaker 1>special episodes of out Loud just for subscribers. And if

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you become a MoMA Mia subscriber, you get access to

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 1>all the stories on the internet from Mamma Mia. You

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>get access to every podcast that we make and our

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 1>exercise app Move, including Move Walk. Right now, we've got

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a special end of financial year offer on with thirty

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 1>percent off your subscription price. We'll put a link in

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the show notes.

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye.

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 2>MoMA Maer acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on

0:50:35.360 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 2>which we've recorded this podcast.