WEBVTT - The Very Famous Australian In Complete Free Fall

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mere acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:23.727
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome to

0:00:23.767 --> 0:00:26.367
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia. Out loud, what women are actually talking about

0:00:26.487 --> 0:00:30.047
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday, the eighteenth of September. I'm Holly Waynwright. Sorry

0:00:30.047 --> 0:00:35.127
<v Speaker 2>I forgot that part. I'm Holly Wayne Right, I'm and.

0:00:35.087 --> 0:00:36.287
<v Speaker 3>I'm jeffew Stevens.

0:00:37.367 --> 0:00:38.367
<v Speaker 1>I got me who I.

0:00:38.447 --> 0:00:41.767
<v Speaker 2>Was for a moment. It's not surprising brain was wondering.

0:00:42.167 --> 0:00:44.647
<v Speaker 2>I'm back in the room and on the show. Today.

0:00:45.087 --> 0:00:48.927
<v Speaker 2>Instagram is finally doing something about teenagers on its app,

0:00:49.007 --> 0:00:52.047
<v Speaker 2>but others think this is just a parental cop out.

0:00:52.527 --> 0:00:56.847
<v Speaker 2>We unpack Also, are you terrified of breaking a streak?

0:00:57.287 --> 0:00:59.367
<v Speaker 2>When does a self improvement have it become an addiction?

0:00:59.487 --> 0:01:03.967
<v Speaker 2>And what are hours? And a very famous Australian man

0:01:04.127 --> 0:01:06.367
<v Speaker 2>is in complete public free fall?

0:01:06.927 --> 0:01:08.327
<v Speaker 1>Is it time to look away?

0:01:08.767 --> 0:01:10.807
<v Speaker 2>But for us Jesse steven.

0:01:10.807 --> 0:01:13.407
<v Speaker 3>In case you missed it, as a close personal friend

0:01:13.567 --> 0:01:16.847
<v Speaker 3>of both Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez, I am at

0:01:17.047 --> 0:01:19.367
<v Speaker 3>my wit tend Matt Damon and I we've been on

0:01:19.407 --> 0:01:19.927
<v Speaker 3>the phone.

0:01:20.087 --> 0:01:20.807
<v Speaker 2>I bet you have.

0:01:21.087 --> 0:01:23.287
<v Speaker 3>We have because where we are in the same boat.

0:01:23.367 --> 0:01:26.207
<v Speaker 2>The benefit support what'sapp groups must be going.

0:01:26.167 --> 0:01:27.647
<v Speaker 1>There's Ben again.

0:01:27.927 --> 0:01:29.767
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's what we call our group.

0:01:29.887 --> 0:01:31.847
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, not Ben again.

0:01:32.527 --> 0:01:35.967
<v Speaker 3>We event and we rage. And this is because on Saturday,

0:01:36.647 --> 0:01:40.087
<v Speaker 3>Ben and Jen were pictured having brunch together with afflex

0:01:40.167 --> 0:01:44.327
<v Speaker 3>two kids and Lopez's twins, and apparently the reports are

0:01:44.327 --> 0:01:47.007
<v Speaker 3>that they were kissing and Affleck couldn't keep his hands

0:01:47.047 --> 0:01:47.647
<v Speaker 3>off Lopez.

0:01:47.807 --> 0:01:51.207
<v Speaker 1>I raise reports denied, Well, there was one report that

0:01:51.327 --> 0:01:53.407
<v Speaker 1>said that, and then the other reports, plus some of

0:01:53.447 --> 0:01:56.727
<v Speaker 1>the photos showed him what looked to be shouting at

0:01:56.727 --> 0:01:58.727
<v Speaker 1>her baldy language was awful.

0:01:58.807 --> 0:02:01.407
<v Speaker 3>I don't ah, but some of the ones I saw

0:02:01.407 --> 0:02:02.727
<v Speaker 3>they were very very close.

0:02:02.887 --> 0:02:04.727
<v Speaker 1>They arrived together in a car. I don't know what's

0:02:04.767 --> 0:02:07.967
<v Speaker 1>going on. I don't know why they would do the

0:02:08.007 --> 0:02:10.247
<v Speaker 1>pat walk and go to I think it was such

0:02:10.247 --> 0:02:13.167
<v Speaker 1>a famous so where they know they are going to be.

0:02:13.207 --> 0:02:15.327
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps it was a pet walk, right, So what are

0:02:15.327 --> 0:02:17.527
<v Speaker 1>they trying to achieve with a pet walk? They don't

0:02:17.567 --> 0:02:20.407
<v Speaker 1>need to be in the media more. I guess if

0:02:20.407 --> 0:02:23.727
<v Speaker 1>they want to send a message, stop writing. It's just

0:02:23.847 --> 0:02:25.327
<v Speaker 1>started a whole new cycle.

0:02:25.527 --> 0:02:27.887
<v Speaker 3>Ye pressure, and she had her engagement ring on her

0:02:27.927 --> 0:02:28.527
<v Speaker 3>pinky finger.

0:02:28.647 --> 0:02:30.047
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they're getting back together?

0:02:30.647 --> 0:02:31.607
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:02:31.967 --> 0:02:35.727
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think that this helped with the rumors

0:02:35.847 --> 0:02:36.807
<v Speaker 3>because's a friend.

0:02:36.847 --> 0:02:41.287
<v Speaker 2>I'm concerned the divorce announcement, and then can't keep our

0:02:41.287 --> 0:02:42.687
<v Speaker 2>hands off each other. Maybe whatever.

0:02:42.727 --> 0:02:46.727
<v Speaker 1>I'm so tired, I know, right, it's like, really, what.

0:02:46.607 --> 0:02:47.287
<v Speaker 3>Do I say to Jen?

0:02:47.687 --> 0:02:49.847
<v Speaker 2>What do I say? You say, No, that man is

0:02:49.887 --> 0:02:51.807
<v Speaker 2>not going to change. That's what you say. He's not

0:02:51.807 --> 0:02:53.407
<v Speaker 2>going to change. You think he's going to change, He's

0:02:53.447 --> 0:02:56.567
<v Speaker 2>not going to change. Just keep moving forward.

0:02:56.687 --> 0:02:58.167
<v Speaker 1>What Matt Damon was trying to tell her.

0:02:58.087 --> 0:03:00.567
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I feel as though their kids are close, and

0:03:01.087 --> 0:03:03.487
<v Speaker 3>what I saw was two people who want what is

0:03:03.487 --> 0:03:05.367
<v Speaker 3>best for their kids. And in the reports it said,

0:03:05.407 --> 0:03:06.847
<v Speaker 3>you know, they want to make sure their kids are

0:03:06.847 --> 0:03:09.047
<v Speaker 3>still hanging out. The big question is, of course, couldn't

0:03:09.047 --> 0:03:10.887
<v Speaker 3>they hang out in the backyard in a private location.

0:03:11.007 --> 0:03:13.527
<v Speaker 1>Well, the kids are not little kids now. The kids

0:03:13.527 --> 0:03:17.607
<v Speaker 1>do hang out together, I think. But also it is

0:03:17.727 --> 0:03:21.527
<v Speaker 1>genuinely really tricky when you've got a blended family and

0:03:21.887 --> 0:03:26.527
<v Speaker 1>the two parents bring children into their relationship. I've seen

0:03:26.567 --> 0:03:28.527
<v Speaker 1>this play out a number of times, and the kids

0:03:28.567 --> 0:03:31.927
<v Speaker 1>become really close to their step siblings and then they

0:03:32.047 --> 0:03:35.327
<v Speaker 1>just part ways, and it's not like when you know

0:03:35.447 --> 0:03:39.407
<v Speaker 1>two parents and their biological children. If the two parents split,

0:03:39.407 --> 0:03:41.967
<v Speaker 1>the biological children will see both and they'll probably the

0:03:42.047 --> 0:03:45.567
<v Speaker 1>kids will stay together and will go between parents. But

0:03:45.727 --> 0:03:48.727
<v Speaker 1>when it's everyone came with their own children, they kind

0:03:48.727 --> 0:03:51.007
<v Speaker 1>of leave with their own children, and then the children

0:03:51.047 --> 0:03:54.527
<v Speaker 1>don't see the other parents and relationship siblings, Yeah, what

0:03:54.647 --> 0:03:58.407
<v Speaker 1>is that relationship with your former stepfather and your former

0:03:58.527 --> 0:04:00.967
<v Speaker 1>step siblings. It's really tricky.

0:04:01.087 --> 0:04:03.247
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm glad you're seeing so much real life

0:04:03.367 --> 0:04:07.727
<v Speaker 2>in the Benefit saga. I'm just more like past the popcorn.

0:04:08.207 --> 0:04:11.007
<v Speaker 4>They're an automatic set of protections for teens that try

0:04:11.047 --> 0:04:13.727
<v Speaker 4>and proactively address the top concerns that we've heard from

0:04:13.727 --> 0:04:17.807
<v Speaker 4>parents about teens online, things like who can contact them,

0:04:18.167 --> 0:04:21.207
<v Speaker 4>what content they see, and how much time they spend

0:04:21.407 --> 0:04:22.167
<v Speaker 4>on their device.

0:04:22.567 --> 0:04:27.007
<v Speaker 1>Instagram's about to change dramatically for teenagers is the breaking news,

0:04:27.047 --> 0:04:30.287
<v Speaker 1>and they are not going to be thrilled. But anyone

0:04:30.327 --> 0:04:33.047
<v Speaker 1>losing sleep over how much sleep teens are losing because

0:04:33.047 --> 0:04:36.207
<v Speaker 1>of incessant Instagram notifications and the fact that social media

0:04:36.287 --> 0:04:40.327
<v Speaker 1>has been proven to cause major harm to kids and teens, well,

0:04:40.367 --> 0:04:42.847
<v Speaker 1>it is a good day for you. You might remember

0:04:42.927 --> 0:04:46.287
<v Speaker 1>last week we spoke about how the government announced that

0:04:46.367 --> 0:04:48.127
<v Speaker 1>they would be looking at the banning of kids from

0:04:48.207 --> 0:04:49.287
<v Speaker 1>using social media.

0:04:49.367 --> 0:04:52.007
<v Speaker 2>We're looking at the range between fourteen and sixteen.

0:04:52.367 --> 0:04:54.767
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the reasons why we're having a trial,

0:04:55.167 --> 0:04:57.207
<v Speaker 1>and what we're looking at is how you deliver it.

0:04:57.287 --> 0:04:59.407
<v Speaker 2>This is a global issue.

0:04:59.447 --> 0:05:02.447
<v Speaker 1>Well since that conversation in the last twenty four hours,

0:05:02.727 --> 0:05:07.607
<v Speaker 1>Instagram has tried to make a preemptive move to avoid

0:05:07.647 --> 0:05:10.407
<v Speaker 1>government regulation. Not just in Australia, but a lot of

0:05:10.407 --> 0:05:12.927
<v Speaker 1>governments are sort of rumbling around the world about this.

0:05:13.607 --> 0:05:16.887
<v Speaker 1>And Instagram, owned of course by Meta, who own Facebook,

0:05:16.927 --> 0:05:20.607
<v Speaker 1>They've announced changes of their own. And the big change

0:05:20.687 --> 0:05:23.767
<v Speaker 1>is that teen accounts are going to be introduced for

0:05:23.887 --> 0:05:27.647
<v Speaker 1>anyone under eighteen. You're not meant to be on Instagram

0:05:27.687 --> 0:05:32.327
<v Speaker 1>anyway under thirteen, So if you're a teenager, starting with Australia,

0:05:32.367 --> 0:05:34.967
<v Speaker 1>the UK, the US and Canada and then rolling out

0:05:35.007 --> 0:05:37.567
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the world, here are the key changes.

0:05:38.167 --> 0:05:40.847
<v Speaker 1>All teen accounts will be set to private as a default.

0:05:41.207 --> 0:05:43.487
<v Speaker 1>It's going to start happening now. So if you teenage,

0:05:43.567 --> 0:05:46.407
<v Speaker 1>or if a teenage already has an account, presuming that

0:05:46.527 --> 0:05:49.327
<v Speaker 1>they entered their correct air state, which they probably didn't.

0:05:49.767 --> 0:05:52.767
<v Speaker 1>It will be set to private. Followers who the user

0:05:52.807 --> 0:05:55.727
<v Speaker 1>has not accepted, cannot see their content are interact with them.

0:05:55.767 --> 0:06:00.047
<v Speaker 1>That's what private means. Teenage users will automatically be placed

0:06:00.087 --> 0:06:03.487
<v Speaker 1>on a more restrictive setting for sensitive content, such as

0:06:04.087 --> 0:06:08.927
<v Speaker 1>material promoting cosmetic procedures and sexually explicit or violent content.

0:06:09.447 --> 0:06:12.447
<v Speaker 1>No thought, maybe that might have been happening before, seems not.

0:06:13.127 --> 0:06:15.967
<v Speaker 1>An anti bullying feature will filter out offensive words or

0:06:15.967 --> 0:06:19.287
<v Speaker 1>phrases in comments and DM requests, which should go swimmingly

0:06:19.487 --> 0:06:22.207
<v Speaker 1>given that the words that teenagers use aren't even understood

0:06:22.687 --> 0:06:27.647
<v Speaker 1>by anyone. They'll also get a notification which they can ignore,

0:06:28.007 --> 0:06:30.247
<v Speaker 1>to tell them to leave the app after sixty minutes.

0:06:30.247 --> 0:06:33.287
<v Speaker 2>You stay very cynical about it. I was sitting there

0:06:33.327 --> 0:06:35.167
<v Speaker 2>going that sounds good. That sounds good.

0:06:35.247 --> 0:06:37.647
<v Speaker 1>Have you met a teenager? The interesting one also is

0:06:37.647 --> 0:06:40.367
<v Speaker 1>that sleep mode will be automatically turned on for all

0:06:40.407 --> 0:06:43.367
<v Speaker 1>teen accounts between ten pm and seven am, which means

0:06:43.367 --> 0:06:47.487
<v Speaker 1>that they'll get no notifications. Now, if you're sixteen or seventeen,

0:06:47.687 --> 0:06:50.447
<v Speaker 1>you can opt out of all of those settings, but

0:06:50.527 --> 0:06:54.047
<v Speaker 1>if you're fifteen or younger you'll need a parent or

0:06:54.047 --> 0:06:57.607
<v Speaker 1>guardian's permission to do so, or your teenager will just

0:06:57.607 --> 0:07:00.647
<v Speaker 1>get your phone and pretend to be you an opt

0:07:00.647 --> 0:07:01.767
<v Speaker 1>out on your behalf.

0:07:02.047 --> 0:07:05.727
<v Speaker 3>I hear your cynicism. Yeah, but haven't we been yelling

0:07:05.727 --> 0:07:07.807
<v Speaker 3>at metas to do something? And now Meta's done something

0:07:07.807 --> 0:07:10.087
<v Speaker 3>and everyone's going while the teenagers can just override it.

0:07:10.287 --> 0:07:12.247
<v Speaker 1>This is very different to the fact that they just

0:07:12.287 --> 0:07:15.367
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be on social media. So this is designed to

0:07:15.407 --> 0:07:19.007
<v Speaker 1>plicate governments and parents and make everyone think, oh, they're

0:07:19.047 --> 0:07:22.647
<v Speaker 1>being responsible, they're doing something. Therefore, it takes all the

0:07:22.647 --> 0:07:25.007
<v Speaker 1>wind out of the sales of a total ban, right,

0:07:25.007 --> 0:07:27.407
<v Speaker 1>which is what governments have been talking about, which we

0:07:27.527 --> 0:07:29.247
<v Speaker 1>know is far better for the kids.

0:07:29.367 --> 0:07:32.007
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but that's going to take so much time an

0:07:32.047 --> 0:07:35.767
<v Speaker 2>actual legal ban in different territories around the world. And

0:07:35.847 --> 0:07:37.727
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting you were saying how Australia is not the

0:07:37.727 --> 0:07:40.767
<v Speaker 2>only one. It's not. But we discussed last week the

0:07:40.847 --> 0:07:43.887
<v Speaker 2>social media restrictions that our government are discussing putting in

0:07:44.247 --> 0:07:46.487
<v Speaker 2>are amongst the harshest in the world, and they're talking

0:07:46.487 --> 0:07:48.727
<v Speaker 2>about them in America like everybody's talking about them.

0:07:48.767 --> 0:07:51.607
<v Speaker 1>So I but that's why this is happening whole No

0:07:51.687 --> 0:07:52.047
<v Speaker 1>I get that.

0:07:52.087 --> 0:07:53.687
<v Speaker 2>I don't want no, no, But my point is it's

0:07:53.687 --> 0:07:55.847
<v Speaker 2>going to take a really long time, so something's better

0:07:55.887 --> 0:07:57.247
<v Speaker 2>than nothing. From my perspective.

0:07:57.447 --> 0:07:59.887
<v Speaker 1>It won't necessarily take a really long time because they

0:07:59.887 --> 0:08:04.887
<v Speaker 1>have bipartisan support for this legislation, so to be lobbied

0:08:04.967 --> 0:08:06.087
<v Speaker 1>about the government, they're.

0:08:05.927 --> 0:08:08.167
<v Speaker 2>Going to be lobbied and lobbied and lobbied by these

0:08:08.207 --> 0:08:10.967
<v Speaker 2>massive like if Australia manages to do it. Nowhere else

0:08:10.967 --> 0:08:13.447
<v Speaker 2>has managed to do it yet, So if Australia manages

0:08:13.447 --> 0:08:16.607
<v Speaker 2>to do it, great, But my perspective is I know

0:08:16.847 --> 0:08:19.647
<v Speaker 2>why they're doing it, and it is cynical. They're trying

0:08:19.687 --> 0:08:23.247
<v Speaker 2>to divert some of this heat. But something is better

0:08:23.287 --> 0:08:23.887
<v Speaker 2>than nothing.

0:08:24.247 --> 0:08:26.607
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's a bit of a defeatist attitude. Frankly.

0:08:26.687 --> 0:08:29.207
<v Speaker 1>So parents are also going to have some new features

0:08:29.247 --> 0:08:32.007
<v Speaker 1>that they can use, like supervision features. None of these

0:08:32.007 --> 0:08:34.687
<v Speaker 1>features parents will understand how to use. And I am one,

0:08:35.007 --> 0:08:36.247
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very but.

0:08:36.287 --> 0:08:38.567
<v Speaker 2>This sounds simpler than the other things a little bit.

0:08:38.647 --> 0:08:41.007
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty complicated. Have you ever tried to get your

0:08:41.087 --> 0:08:43.167
<v Speaker 1>kids phone and try to make it like it's really hard?

0:08:43.247 --> 0:08:45.847
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent yes, But and this is exactly why

0:08:45.927 --> 0:08:47.847
<v Speaker 2>they've done it so that people like me who are

0:08:47.927 --> 0:08:50.007
<v Speaker 2>umming and ring about whether or not my teenagers should

0:08:50.007 --> 0:08:53.447
<v Speaker 2>be on Instagram. But this sounds like a really simple

0:08:53.567 --> 0:08:55.527
<v Speaker 2>way for me to be at because I cannot do

0:08:55.567 --> 0:08:58.167
<v Speaker 2>all that parental control stuff. I know I should, and

0:08:58.287 --> 0:09:00.687
<v Speaker 2>I google and I watch YouTube videos about how to

0:09:00.727 --> 0:09:03.407
<v Speaker 2>do it. I find it really confusing soda most parents.

0:09:03.767 --> 0:09:05.567
<v Speaker 2>If I can just from the get go set them

0:09:05.647 --> 0:09:07.967
<v Speaker 2>up with an account that is all these things are

0:09:07.967 --> 0:09:09.407
<v Speaker 2>built into it, that's a good thing.

0:09:09.447 --> 0:09:12.487
<v Speaker 1>But what are they actually so their account won't be

0:09:12.567 --> 0:09:17.007
<v Speaker 1>public like it sounds like a lot, but it's.

0:09:15.807 --> 0:09:18.487
<v Speaker 2>Ten o'clock to get off or like this, which reminder

0:09:20.047 --> 0:09:21.927
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, you need to kick him off.

0:09:22.007 --> 0:09:24.287
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean you can't look at it. I just won't

0:09:24.327 --> 0:09:27.287
<v Speaker 1>get push notifications. But you know who also isn't happy.

0:09:27.687 --> 0:09:32.807
<v Speaker 1>Evan Spiegel, our friendly billionaire husband of Miranda Kerr. He's

0:09:32.807 --> 0:09:35.087
<v Speaker 1>the boss of Snapchat. And what's interesting about this is

0:09:35.127 --> 0:09:39.407
<v Speaker 1>that Instagram is not the main game for teenagers and

0:09:39.487 --> 0:09:42.047
<v Speaker 1>Facebook doesn't even exist for them. That's something that their

0:09:42.087 --> 0:09:46.327
<v Speaker 1>grandparents use. They are all on Snapchat and TikTok, and

0:09:46.807 --> 0:09:51.127
<v Speaker 1>the bosses of those social platforms do not agree with

0:09:51.207 --> 0:09:54.607
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram approach, and the loudest pushback has come from

0:09:54.967 --> 0:09:58.327
<v Speaker 1>Evan Spiegel. He's the boss of Snapchat and he's the

0:09:58.407 --> 0:10:00.487
<v Speaker 1>father of their three children, who are too young to

0:10:00.527 --> 0:10:04.167
<v Speaker 1>have phones conveniently, and he says, there's a teenager in

0:10:05.087 --> 0:10:06.927
<v Speaker 1>it's the all Under Bloom one. I think, yeah, yeah,

0:10:06.927 --> 0:10:09.847
<v Speaker 1>it's the Orlando Bloom one. He's fourteen. So he says

0:10:10.607 --> 0:10:13.007
<v Speaker 1>he weighed on not about the Instagram band, but he

0:10:13.087 --> 0:10:17.167
<v Speaker 1>weighed into the idea of Australia's planned social media age band,

0:10:17.487 --> 0:10:19.687
<v Speaker 1>and funnily enough, he's not in favor of Funny that.

0:10:19.847 --> 0:10:22.767
<v Speaker 1>He says, parents have already got these tools today. We

0:10:22.887 --> 0:10:25.487
<v Speaker 1>use the iOS level controls and screen time at our

0:10:25.527 --> 0:10:28.527
<v Speaker 1>house to limit what our teen who's fourteen, what he's

0:10:28.567 --> 0:10:31.607
<v Speaker 1>able to use. We have Family Center as well inside

0:10:31.607 --> 0:10:34.807
<v Speaker 1>of Snapchat that allows parents to monitor their teens activity

0:10:34.847 --> 0:10:38.167
<v Speaker 1>on Snapchat and put in place more stringent content controls

0:10:38.207 --> 0:10:40.967
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. He clearly has not spent much

0:10:40.967 --> 0:10:43.767
<v Speaker 1>time with his fourteen year old, and maybe he has

0:10:43.847 --> 0:10:46.047
<v Speaker 1>because he's the boss of Snapchat, so he understands how

0:10:46.087 --> 0:10:49.327
<v Speaker 1>to work it. Yeah. I have never been more puzzled.

0:10:49.527 --> 0:10:51.567
<v Speaker 1>I tried to get on Snapchat many years ago, like

0:10:51.567 --> 0:10:53.127
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people did, because I like to try

0:10:53.167 --> 0:10:56.927
<v Speaker 1>and understand social platforms from the inside, because I'm always

0:10:56.967 --> 0:10:59.287
<v Speaker 1>a believer. If you don't know the game, you can't

0:10:59.287 --> 0:11:02.807
<v Speaker 1>make the rules. It is so confusing. It felt like

0:11:02.927 --> 0:11:05.767
<v Speaker 1>wandering around in the dark. I didn't understand it. And

0:11:05.887 --> 0:11:08.207
<v Speaker 1>this is where kids are doing all their communicating. So

0:11:08.247 --> 0:11:11.327
<v Speaker 1>we might use group techs, WhatsApp groups, they do all

0:11:11.327 --> 0:11:14.367
<v Speaker 1>of it on Snapchat. So Snapchat is the big game,

0:11:14.407 --> 0:11:16.567
<v Speaker 1>and the big insidious thing that Snapchat has that's so

0:11:17.967 --> 0:11:20.967
<v Speaker 1>I think so awful for teens is the snap maps,

0:11:21.247 --> 0:11:23.007
<v Speaker 1>so you can see where all your friends all are

0:11:23.047 --> 0:11:25.767
<v Speaker 1>at all times, and that means that you can see

0:11:25.807 --> 0:11:27.847
<v Speaker 1>when everybody's at a party or when everybody's at some

0:11:27.967 --> 0:11:30.207
<v Speaker 1>house and you haven't been invited.

0:11:30.527 --> 0:11:33.647
<v Speaker 3>Evan says that Snapchat's really good for well being though.

0:11:33.647 --> 0:11:36.367
<v Speaker 2>Yeah so, and he actually says that they're not even

0:11:36.407 --> 0:11:39.287
<v Speaker 2>really a social media platform, so I shouldn't really be

0:11:39.727 --> 0:11:41.247
<v Speaker 2>included in these exactly.

0:11:41.487 --> 0:11:43.447
<v Speaker 1>So puts it on to parents. He said, we've really

0:11:43.447 --> 0:11:45.367
<v Speaker 1>done a lot to empower parents to make the right

0:11:45.487 --> 0:11:49.247
<v Speaker 1>choices for their teenagers. And again, all those tools already

0:11:49.287 --> 0:11:51.887
<v Speaker 1>exist for parents who would rather restrict the use of

0:11:51.927 --> 0:11:54.407
<v Speaker 1>certain naps for their teens, would we I'd rather they

0:11:54.447 --> 0:11:55.087
<v Speaker 1>just be banned.

0:11:55.527 --> 0:11:58.287
<v Speaker 3>So, as you say, of course he's going to say that,

0:11:58.527 --> 0:12:01.007
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at the data. So most Snapchat users

0:12:01.007 --> 0:12:03.447
<v Speaker 3>are between the ages of thirteen and thirty four. One

0:12:03.487 --> 0:12:05.927
<v Speaker 3>in five are between thirteen and seventeen.

0:12:05.967 --> 0:12:07.807
<v Speaker 1>I think the only one that's thirty four is Evans

0:12:07.847 --> 0:12:10.607
<v Speaker 1>is going to say, yeah, one year old is on Snapchat.

0:12:10.647 --> 0:12:13.767
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I know millions are under the age of twelve.

0:12:13.807 --> 0:12:15.767
<v Speaker 3>So of course it is for little little kids. And

0:12:15.807 --> 0:12:18.567
<v Speaker 3>as you say, it's so rich for a tech founded

0:12:18.567 --> 0:12:20.927
<v Speaker 3>to tell us about the parental controls. We work in

0:12:21.047 --> 0:12:24.367
<v Speaker 3>digital media. We're pretty tech savy. I've never heard of

0:12:24.407 --> 0:12:29.087
<v Speaker 3>the iOS level controls, what the family center something something.

0:12:29.207 --> 0:12:33.247
<v Speaker 3>I was like, I have no idea what you're talking about, Like,

0:12:33.607 --> 0:12:35.567
<v Speaker 3>you are so literate in this in a way that

0:12:35.607 --> 0:12:37.887
<v Speaker 3>parents aren't. And on the Instagram thing, I know that

0:12:38.287 --> 0:12:41.327
<v Speaker 3>you were saying they're doing this, you know, to appease governments,

0:12:41.327 --> 0:12:43.887
<v Speaker 3>and there's been this pushback. On the one hand, I'm

0:12:43.887 --> 0:12:45.927
<v Speaker 3>glad that they've done something, and I really I want

0:12:45.927 --> 0:12:49.287
<v Speaker 3>to pay that the cynic in me is going this

0:12:49.367 --> 0:12:53.327
<v Speaker 3>is a move because they're looking at potentially losing millions

0:12:53.367 --> 0:12:54.527
<v Speaker 3>and millions of users.

0:12:54.607 --> 0:12:56.847
<v Speaker 1>And Adam Assiri said that, he said, it's bad for business,

0:12:56.927 --> 0:12:58.007
<v Speaker 1>but we'll struggle through.

0:12:58.167 --> 0:12:59.887
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, no, no, this is good. This is a

0:12:59.927 --> 0:13:03.087
<v Speaker 3>good for business move because the options are because they

0:13:03.167 --> 0:13:05.927
<v Speaker 3>didn't have any of these controls. The Jonathan Heights of

0:13:05.967 --> 0:13:08.167
<v Speaker 3>the world, who's written that very famous book about the

0:13:08.167 --> 0:13:11.207
<v Speaker 3>Anxious Generation, He's spoken a lot about Instagram and mental

0:13:11.247 --> 0:13:15.127
<v Speaker 3>health rates declining with the introduction of Instagram and Snapchat

0:13:15.247 --> 0:13:18.967
<v Speaker 3>and TikTok. The push has been get them off, that's

0:13:18.967 --> 0:13:21.847
<v Speaker 3>the big argument. In fact, parental controls aren't what they're saying.

0:13:21.887 --> 0:13:24.167
<v Speaker 3>They're saying get them off. So they're clearly sitting in

0:13:24.207 --> 0:13:26.447
<v Speaker 3>board meetings going, well, we can't lose them all together.

0:13:26.487 --> 0:13:28.327
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have to make some like this is

0:13:28.367 --> 0:13:32.087
<v Speaker 3>a new product, essentially to tailor it specifically to a

0:13:32.127 --> 0:13:34.687
<v Speaker 3>generation that they can't afford to lose. Like I don't

0:13:34.687 --> 0:13:36.247
<v Speaker 3>think that this is about giving anything.

0:13:36.407 --> 0:13:38.767
<v Speaker 1>The sound you can hear are parents heaving a big

0:13:38.847 --> 0:13:41.927
<v Speaker 1>sigh at the thought of the mental load of having

0:13:41.967 --> 0:13:44.927
<v Speaker 1>to navigate all of this new stuff and what I

0:13:44.967 --> 0:13:47.647
<v Speaker 1>struggle with well, I don't struggle with But my belief

0:13:47.687 --> 0:13:50.887
<v Speaker 1>is that we agree as a society that there are

0:13:50.967 --> 0:13:54.607
<v Speaker 1>certain things that are bad and there are certain things

0:13:54.607 --> 0:13:57.807
<v Speaker 1>that we need to do to protect everyone in our community.

0:13:57.927 --> 0:14:00.087
<v Speaker 1>For example, seat belts. We don't just say, oh, seat

0:14:00.087 --> 0:14:02.447
<v Speaker 1>belts are there, you can use them. We've installed them

0:14:02.447 --> 0:14:04.087
<v Speaker 1>if you want to. But it's up to parents to

0:14:04.127 --> 0:14:06.487
<v Speaker 1>decide whether kids use a seat belt or not. There

0:14:06.527 --> 0:14:09.847
<v Speaker 1>are really strict rules around that. Same with alcohol, with vaping,

0:14:09.847 --> 0:14:13.527
<v Speaker 1>all of these things that we understand. The driving age,

0:14:13.527 --> 0:14:15.687
<v Speaker 1>it's not like parents should be able to decide when

0:14:15.727 --> 0:14:18.567
<v Speaker 1>the kids are able to drive or smoke or drink.

0:14:18.687 --> 0:14:19.487
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you on that.

0:14:19.567 --> 0:14:22.247
<v Speaker 3>But then what Meta is doing. What I appreciate about

0:14:22.247 --> 0:14:24.887
<v Speaker 3>what they're doing is about how automatic it is, like

0:14:25.167 --> 0:14:27.607
<v Speaker 3>is happening overnight. It's not that you need to go

0:14:27.687 --> 0:14:30.207
<v Speaker 3>home tonight. It's not any parent. It doesn't need to

0:14:30.207 --> 0:14:33.367
<v Speaker 3>go and press one hundred buttons. That's going to happen automatically.

0:14:33.567 --> 0:14:36.167
<v Speaker 3>I also think this thing where and it's interesting the

0:14:36.207 --> 0:14:39.567
<v Speaker 3>head of Instagram came out and he was saying he's

0:14:39.567 --> 0:14:41.487
<v Speaker 3>not even going to talk about all the tools they're

0:14:41.487 --> 0:14:45.087
<v Speaker 3>going to use to ensure that teenagers are protected because

0:14:45.087 --> 0:14:47.967
<v Speaker 3>we don't want to give teens an instruction manual. Because

0:14:48.007 --> 0:14:50.047
<v Speaker 3>I find this thing about, well, they're just going to

0:14:50.167 --> 0:14:52.487
<v Speaker 3>use a new VPN. We'll talk about this last week.

0:14:52.527 --> 0:14:53.687
<v Speaker 3>It's like, well they are.

0:14:53.567 --> 0:14:56.927
<v Speaker 2>Now, Well, no, they are, though. Look I'm at the

0:14:57.127 --> 0:15:00.047
<v Speaker 2>absolute coal face of this. Right. My fourteen year old

0:15:00.127 --> 0:15:03.447
<v Speaker 2>daughter uses social media and I have not yet bought

0:15:03.487 --> 0:15:05.767
<v Speaker 2>a phone for my twelve year old son, but he

0:15:06.407 --> 0:15:08.927
<v Speaker 2>will get one in January because he's gone to high school.

0:15:08.927 --> 0:15:12.367
<v Speaker 2>And that, like, it's really interesting. The Jonathan hypebook that

0:15:12.407 --> 0:15:14.407
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned before, when we look back at this time

0:15:14.447 --> 0:15:17.207
<v Speaker 2>of realignment about social media and kids and teens, that

0:15:17.367 --> 0:15:21.127
<v Speaker 2>was an absolute cut through pivotal change. It spoke to

0:15:21.167 --> 0:15:23.967
<v Speaker 2>the right people in the right voices. It was massively influential,

0:15:24.007 --> 0:15:26.487
<v Speaker 2>and it has Remember when we first saw that and

0:15:26.487 --> 0:15:28.367
<v Speaker 2>we talked about it on the show, that big piece

0:15:28.407 --> 0:15:29.967
<v Speaker 2>that was about in New York Times, and I said,

0:15:29.967 --> 0:15:32.527
<v Speaker 2>it's making me feel sick, and we discussed it. That

0:15:32.807 --> 0:15:35.007
<v Speaker 2>is going to be one of the big temp pole

0:15:35.047 --> 0:15:37.927
<v Speaker 2>moments where we all went, Oh, the thing is, as

0:15:37.967 --> 0:15:39.887
<v Speaker 2>I think about, right, I'm going to buy my son

0:15:39.927 --> 0:15:43.087
<v Speaker 2>a phone for high school, and I get a chance

0:15:43.167 --> 0:15:46.127
<v Speaker 2>to do over right what I did with my teenager.

0:15:46.407 --> 0:15:49.487
<v Speaker 2>With all this new information that has come out, particularly

0:15:49.527 --> 0:15:52.007
<v Speaker 2>in the past twelve months, what am I going to

0:15:52.087 --> 0:15:58.567
<v Speaker 2>do differently? Probably nothing, is the God's honest truth, right,

0:15:58.967 --> 0:16:01.407
<v Speaker 2>of course I will. I'm more aware, I've read the things.

0:16:02.007 --> 0:16:04.807
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, the same social pressures are

0:16:04.807 --> 0:16:07.047
<v Speaker 2>going to be there, particularly for a kid who might

0:16:07.047 --> 0:16:08.927
<v Speaker 2>be a little quirky, a little different. I'll have some

0:16:09.007 --> 0:16:12.367
<v Speaker 2>issue around social relationships. The same issues are going to

0:16:12.407 --> 0:16:14.927
<v Speaker 2>be there that everybody else is on it, everybody else

0:16:15.007 --> 0:16:16.727
<v Speaker 2>is doing it. If I'm not on that, I can't

0:16:16.727 --> 0:16:20.527
<v Speaker 2>talk to blah blah blah. So I actually appreciate, even

0:16:20.607 --> 0:16:23.607
<v Speaker 2>though I am smart woman and I can see absolutely

0:16:23.687 --> 0:16:26.127
<v Speaker 2>the cynicism with which these changes are being made. You're

0:16:26.167 --> 0:16:29.167
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent right Mia and Jesse about that. They're

0:16:29.207 --> 0:16:31.847
<v Speaker 2>panicking about what they're about to lose, and so they're

0:16:31.887 --> 0:16:34.607
<v Speaker 2>going how can we mitigate? How can we mitigate? I

0:16:34.687 --> 0:16:38.207
<v Speaker 2>appreciate anything that is going to make it really simple

0:16:38.247 --> 0:16:38.487
<v Speaker 2>for me?

0:16:38.767 --> 0:16:39.967
<v Speaker 1>So which parts do you think?

0:16:40.247 --> 0:16:43.647
<v Speaker 2>So I think of making those changes on Instagram automatic

0:16:43.727 --> 0:16:46.207
<v Speaker 2>and immediate, but is really mean which.

0:16:46.087 --> 0:16:48.847
<v Speaker 1>Changes in particular do you think are going to help.

0:16:48.767 --> 0:16:50.287
<v Speaker 2>The fact that all I have to do is make

0:16:50.327 --> 0:16:52.407
<v Speaker 2>my daughter's account. If I give it to her a

0:16:52.447 --> 0:16:55.847
<v Speaker 2>teen account, and it's automatically private, and it's automatically going

0:16:55.927 --> 0:16:58.687
<v Speaker 2>to have various restrictions on it, on content that's served

0:16:58.687 --> 0:17:02.167
<v Speaker 2>to her. That's good. It's better than not. It's not perfect,

0:17:02.327 --> 0:17:02.967
<v Speaker 2>but it's good.

0:17:03.127 --> 0:17:05.287
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't it be better if she wasn't on it?

0:17:05.327 --> 0:17:07.767
<v Speaker 2>Well, she's not on it, and if I decide to

0:17:07.807 --> 0:17:10.447
<v Speaker 2>do it, it's such a sort of at the moment

0:17:10.567 --> 0:17:13.127
<v Speaker 2>still a very ideological Wouldn't it just be great if

0:17:13.167 --> 0:17:15.087
<v Speaker 2>no kids had phones? Wouldn't it just be great if

0:17:15.087 --> 0:17:17.487
<v Speaker 2>no kids looked at social That's not the world I

0:17:17.567 --> 0:17:20.287
<v Speaker 2>live in. I might live in that if I was

0:17:21.127 --> 0:17:23.647
<v Speaker 2>a very different kind of person with a very different

0:17:23.727 --> 0:17:26.327
<v Speaker 2>kind of life. But actually technology plays quite a big

0:17:26.367 --> 0:17:28.607
<v Speaker 2>part in my life, of my kids' lives, and it's

0:17:28.607 --> 0:17:30.527
<v Speaker 2>going to for the rest of their lives. So but

0:17:30.567 --> 0:17:32.047
<v Speaker 2>what I'm not a fan of the luod eye.

0:17:32.087 --> 0:17:35.407
<v Speaker 1>What we can see, what Instagram have shown us is

0:17:35.407 --> 0:17:38.687
<v Speaker 1>that they can identify all the kids' accounts right everyone

0:17:38.767 --> 0:17:41.607
<v Speaker 1>under eighteen or under sixteen, or under whatever aage, and

0:17:41.647 --> 0:17:45.207
<v Speaker 1>they can apply restrictions so what they could do is say,

0:17:45.887 --> 0:17:49.487
<v Speaker 1>no child under let's just say sixteen needs to be

0:17:49.967 --> 0:17:54.807
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram between ten pm and six a three. So

0:17:54.847 --> 0:17:57.967
<v Speaker 1>you don't just get notifications like do you know what

0:17:58.007 --> 0:18:00.687
<v Speaker 1>I mean? That's why when you actually drill into what

0:18:00.727 --> 0:18:03.767
<v Speaker 1>they're doing and what they could clearly do but aren't doing.

0:18:04.047 --> 0:18:06.527
<v Speaker 2>And I have one hundred percent agree with that, and

0:18:06.567 --> 0:18:08.687
<v Speaker 2>I also I am a fan of the age gating

0:18:08.727 --> 0:18:10.527
<v Speaker 2>of social media apps, I really am, and I hope

0:18:10.567 --> 0:18:13.047
<v Speaker 2>it happens, but it hasn't happened yet, and so we're

0:18:13.087 --> 0:18:15.247
<v Speaker 2>still in the wild West at the moment. Like the

0:18:15.287 --> 0:18:18.807
<v Speaker 2>tweaks are okay, But the place that this gets really

0:18:18.847 --> 0:18:21.647
<v Speaker 2>thorny for parents is what Evan Spiegl's saying, which is like,

0:18:21.687 --> 0:18:24.287
<v Speaker 2>it's your fault. So, for example, with the ten pm

0:18:24.767 --> 0:18:26.567
<v Speaker 2>one rule that I do have in my house and

0:18:26.607 --> 0:18:29.127
<v Speaker 2>it's very strict and we do not breach it is

0:18:29.207 --> 0:18:31.927
<v Speaker 2>no phones in the bedrooms, so after a certain time

0:18:32.047 --> 0:18:35.887
<v Speaker 2>of night, they're not allowed their phones, generally speaking. Enormous

0:18:35.927 --> 0:18:37.927
<v Speaker 2>pushback to that one that Matilda first got a phone

0:18:37.967 --> 0:18:40.007
<v Speaker 2>all that, but now that's just set. That's just the

0:18:40.007 --> 0:18:43.167
<v Speaker 2>way it is. No one argues about it. Anymore. There

0:18:43.207 --> 0:18:44.807
<v Speaker 2>is a point there people will say, well, that's up

0:18:44.847 --> 0:18:46.647
<v Speaker 2>to parents, and that's subjecnt and like some of it is,

0:18:46.687 --> 0:18:48.327
<v Speaker 2>and some of it is easier to do than others.

0:18:48.327 --> 0:18:51.687
<v Speaker 2>So that's that can be easy ish to do, depending

0:18:51.687 --> 0:18:53.527
<v Speaker 2>on whether or not you've got a lock box, which

0:18:53.567 --> 0:18:55.647
<v Speaker 2>we do, whether or not you've got control of the

0:18:55.647 --> 0:18:58.527
<v Speaker 2>Wi Fi and all those things. But what is complicated

0:18:58.567 --> 0:19:00.887
<v Speaker 2>for me, even as Jesse's already said, as someone who's

0:19:00.967 --> 0:19:03.887
<v Speaker 2>very tech savvy, is when I hand my son the phone,

0:19:04.367 --> 0:19:06.287
<v Speaker 2>have I put the right restrictions on it? Are the

0:19:06.287 --> 0:19:09.407
<v Speaker 2>filters right? Everything that he needs to do has to

0:19:09.447 --> 0:19:11.287
<v Speaker 2>go through me, and I have to password to prove it.

0:19:11.287 --> 0:19:14.527
<v Speaker 2>And I have a hard time remembering any of my

0:19:14.607 --> 0:19:17.687
<v Speaker 2>passwords ever, because I'm a woman of a certain age.

0:19:17.687 --> 0:19:19.607
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps I don't know why, but I do like I've

0:19:19.607 --> 0:19:23.167
<v Speaker 2>DoD so make it easy for me until we've solved

0:19:23.167 --> 0:19:23.647
<v Speaker 2>this problem.

0:19:23.687 --> 0:19:26.127
<v Speaker 3>And I know there is a term that's totally overused,

0:19:26.247 --> 0:19:29.607
<v Speaker 3>but I feel, like Evan Spiegel, I think this is gaslighting.

0:19:29.647 --> 0:19:32.487
<v Speaker 3>This is gaslighting parents, and it is guilty parents.

0:19:32.527 --> 0:19:37.127
<v Speaker 1>And he's so privileged because not everybody has staff and

0:19:37.207 --> 0:19:39.807
<v Speaker 1>nannies and people at home and able to supervise their

0:19:39.887 --> 0:19:42.007
<v Speaker 1>kids twenty four seven. Yeh so and.

0:19:42.007 --> 0:19:44.527
<v Speaker 2>Divert them with really like enriching activities.

0:19:44.607 --> 0:19:46.487
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to create an app that will addict

0:19:46.567 --> 0:19:49.527
<v Speaker 3>your children. It is designed to addict you. And he said,

0:19:49.527 --> 0:19:51.807
<v Speaker 3>on the same day as he gave these comments, we're

0:19:51.847 --> 0:19:54.607
<v Speaker 3>on pace for record annual revenue this year. So he's

0:19:54.647 --> 0:19:59.407
<v Speaker 3>celebrating his wins which have been caused by creating absolute addiction.

0:19:59.807 --> 0:20:01.687
<v Speaker 3>And then he's going to sit there and wag the

0:20:01.727 --> 0:20:04.567
<v Speaker 3>finger at parents and say, if your kids are addicted,

0:20:04.607 --> 0:20:18.207
<v Speaker 3>that's your fault. What's the difference between ritual and obsession,

0:20:18.367 --> 0:20:21.047
<v Speaker 3>an enjoyable habit and a compulsion. How do we know

0:20:21.087 --> 0:20:23.687
<v Speaker 3>what serves us or brings us joy and gives our

0:20:23.727 --> 0:20:27.167
<v Speaker 3>life structure? And what might we be a little bit

0:20:27.207 --> 0:20:30.087
<v Speaker 3>too reliant on? You might have heard of the running

0:20:30.127 --> 0:20:30.847
<v Speaker 3>app Strava.

0:20:31.127 --> 0:20:34.567
<v Speaker 2>Have you like everyone that my running friends are very

0:20:34.567 --> 0:20:35.367
<v Speaker 2>into their Strava?

0:20:35.487 --> 0:20:36.807
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't have any running friends.

0:20:38.167 --> 0:20:41.007
<v Speaker 3>Well. A recent article in The Guardian by Chloe Hamilton

0:20:41.087 --> 0:20:44.047
<v Speaker 3>tells a story of a man named Tom Vickery and

0:20:44.167 --> 0:20:47.367
<v Speaker 3>he cannot break his Strava streak. He's on a streak

0:20:47.407 --> 0:20:50.007
<v Speaker 3>and streak is just what we were talking about. Word

0:20:50.007 --> 0:20:52.927
<v Speaker 3>popularized by snapchat. You're on snap streaks, which is when

0:20:52.967 --> 0:20:55.767
<v Speaker 3>you've been messaging each other constantly for a very long

0:20:55.807 --> 0:20:59.807
<v Speaker 3>period of time, and this language, well, yes, exactly right.

0:20:59.887 --> 0:21:04.287
<v Speaker 3>It's the gamification of habits essentially. But this streak language

0:21:04.327 --> 0:21:07.327
<v Speaker 3>has now infiltrated a lot of apps that we use

0:21:07.407 --> 0:21:09.647
<v Speaker 3>because it ensures that you will use it every day.

0:21:10.247 --> 0:21:14.247
<v Speaker 3>So he has to log his run and Hamilton also

0:21:14.287 --> 0:21:17.607
<v Speaker 3>speaks to people who have the same relationship with wordle

0:21:17.727 --> 0:21:21.447
<v Speaker 3>or due lingo. They can't go a day without completing it.

0:21:21.487 --> 0:21:23.527
<v Speaker 3>In fact, do you two remember, I think it was

0:21:23.687 --> 0:21:26.687
<v Speaker 3>just a week ago that we talked about tarot and

0:21:27.007 --> 0:21:32.007
<v Speaker 3>magic and all that. Anyone else checking their bloody coaster? Yes,

0:21:32.167 --> 0:21:34.527
<v Speaker 3>I've checked it every single day since I've downloaded that

0:21:34.607 --> 0:21:35.367
<v Speaker 3>god forsaken out.

0:21:35.447 --> 0:21:36.207
<v Speaker 1>Have you learnt much?

0:21:36.327 --> 0:21:38.007
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's changed how I live my life. And that's

0:21:38.047 --> 0:21:40.727
<v Speaker 3>really it's a real problem because it's not real. According

0:21:40.847 --> 0:21:45.087
<v Speaker 3>to gamification expert Kimba Cooper Martin, this is due to

0:21:45.167 --> 0:21:48.607
<v Speaker 3>something called loss of version. So it's a psychological principle

0:21:49.007 --> 0:21:51.807
<v Speaker 3>that says humans are often more motivated by the fear

0:21:51.887 --> 0:21:55.287
<v Speaker 3>of losing something than the prospect of gaining something new.

0:21:55.807 --> 0:21:58.127
<v Speaker 3>So that means that if you're on a streak, you

0:21:58.207 --> 0:22:02.207
<v Speaker 3>are terrified of breaking it because you're now invested in

0:22:02.247 --> 0:22:05.607
<v Speaker 3>this kind of long game. So is this healthy? I mean,

0:22:05.647 --> 0:22:07.487
<v Speaker 3>if it's a running app, you think this is great,

0:22:07.487 --> 0:22:11.247
<v Speaker 3>it's encouraging exercise. Or is it a kind of addiction

0:22:11.447 --> 0:22:13.687
<v Speaker 3>and his addiction always bad? What do you think?

0:22:13.727 --> 0:22:16.527
<v Speaker 1>The first thing that I thought of was actually when

0:22:17.167 --> 0:22:20.447
<v Speaker 1>people who have become sober talk about how many days

0:22:20.487 --> 0:22:22.887
<v Speaker 1>of sobriety they have or how many years of sobriety

0:22:22.887 --> 0:22:25.207
<v Speaker 1>they have. And I was listening to an interview with

0:22:25.287 --> 0:22:28.807
<v Speaker 1>Demi Moore this week and she was talking about how

0:22:28.927 --> 0:22:31.727
<v Speaker 1>she got sober when she was like twenty two, and

0:22:31.727 --> 0:22:35.567
<v Speaker 1>that was forty years ago. But then she was clear

0:22:35.647 --> 0:22:39.727
<v Speaker 1>to point out that she then I can't know how

0:22:39.807 --> 0:22:42.127
<v Speaker 1>she called it a detour. She called it a detour,

0:22:42.287 --> 0:22:44.287
<v Speaker 1>and that she has twelve years of sobriety. In the

0:22:44.287 --> 0:22:47.167
<v Speaker 1>interviewer was sort of saying, yeah, was it hard to

0:22:47.207 --> 0:22:50.607
<v Speaker 1>start again? Because essentially the clock resets. And the other

0:22:50.807 --> 0:22:53.407
<v Speaker 1>story that I remember is David Sedaris. Remember when everybody

0:22:53.447 --> 0:22:55.487
<v Speaker 1>got Apple watches and it was about ten thousand steps

0:22:55.487 --> 0:22:57.727
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly you could measure you steps. And David Sidaris

0:22:57.767 --> 0:23:01.127
<v Speaker 1>is an amazing writer and comedian, and he became obsessed.

0:23:01.167 --> 0:23:03.367
<v Speaker 1>Every day he went for a walk near his home

0:23:03.407 --> 0:23:06.527
<v Speaker 1>in northern England, I think, and he would pick up

0:23:06.567 --> 0:23:09.607
<v Speaker 1>rubbish and then he started needing to beat his ten

0:23:09.647 --> 0:23:12.047
<v Speaker 1>thousand steps, and then it became I've got to do

0:23:12.087 --> 0:23:14.127
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and twenty. And he kept going until he was

0:23:14.687 --> 0:23:18.447
<v Speaker 1>doing like fifty thousand steps, walking twenty miles a day

0:23:18.887 --> 0:23:21.167
<v Speaker 1>and was like winning awards in the community because we

0:23:21.247 --> 0:23:24.847
<v Speaker 1>picked up so much rubbish and he couldn't stop. His

0:23:24.967 --> 0:23:27.847
<v Speaker 1>watch eventually broke and he was so kind of relieved

0:23:27.887 --> 0:23:29.727
<v Speaker 1>because that was the only way it had to be

0:23:29.767 --> 0:23:31.727
<v Speaker 1>taken out of his hands, because he was so addicted

0:23:32.207 --> 0:23:33.647
<v Speaker 1>to this streak in this routine.

0:23:33.687 --> 0:23:36.567
<v Speaker 2>It's very clever loss of version. It's very clever, and

0:23:36.687 --> 0:23:38.647
<v Speaker 2>so many people use it. In fact, we should use

0:23:38.687 --> 0:23:40.967
<v Speaker 2>it like watch your mommere out loud listening streak Like

0:23:41.007 --> 0:23:42.887
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to break it, do you? It's this

0:23:42.927 --> 0:23:46.687
<v Speaker 2>is it's a brilliant marketing tactic. It's infiltrated my world

0:23:46.807 --> 0:23:48.687
<v Speaker 2>lately because I might be one of the few people

0:23:48.727 --> 0:23:51.607
<v Speaker 2>who started doing wordle in lockdown and kept going. So

0:23:51.847 --> 0:23:53.767
<v Speaker 2>do you still do it? I do Wordle and the

0:23:53.807 --> 0:23:56.287
<v Speaker 2>New York Times every day. I try and do it

0:23:56.327 --> 0:23:58.527
<v Speaker 2>every day. So my routine is, and we're going to

0:23:58.527 --> 0:24:02.607
<v Speaker 2>talk about routines that before I fall asleep, I do Wordle,

0:24:03.247 --> 0:24:06.127
<v Speaker 2>Connections and Strands, which are three New York Times word

0:24:06.167 --> 0:24:07.807
<v Speaker 2>games before I fall asleep.

0:24:07.887 --> 0:24:11.447
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't that activate arouse your brain too much? Maybe?

0:24:11.487 --> 0:24:13.807
<v Speaker 2>But for me, I find it quite a good wine down.

0:24:13.887 --> 0:24:16.887
<v Speaker 2>And I also like to believe that I'm like fending

0:24:16.927 --> 0:24:20.247
<v Speaker 2>off Alzheimer's or something, you know. But they have only

0:24:20.327 --> 0:24:24.047
<v Speaker 2>recently introduced streaks for all those things. So your word

0:24:24.127 --> 0:24:25.687
<v Speaker 2>or streak they've had for a while. So when you

0:24:25.687 --> 0:24:27.847
<v Speaker 2>finish Wordle and you get it, you start to immediately

0:24:27.887 --> 0:24:30.487
<v Speaker 2>pop up, It's got your streak on there, It's got

0:24:30.527 --> 0:24:32.447
<v Speaker 2>you know. Obviously you often get it on three or

0:24:32.447 --> 0:24:34.607
<v Speaker 2>you often get it on four. And then now with

0:24:34.727 --> 0:24:37.087
<v Speaker 2>Connections and Strands being two other word games, and they're

0:24:37.287 --> 0:24:39.567
<v Speaker 2>they're slowly introducing streaks for those two. And I have

0:24:39.767 --> 0:24:45.527
<v Speaker 2>had two very consciously uncouple myself from being attached to

0:24:45.567 --> 0:24:48.567
<v Speaker 2>the streak because what was happening to me is I

0:24:48.647 --> 0:24:51.767
<v Speaker 2>would fall into bed exhausted from doing whatever else, or

0:24:51.927 --> 0:24:53.967
<v Speaker 2>working late or doing whatever I was doing.

0:24:53.807 --> 0:24:54.287
<v Speaker 1>With the kids.

0:24:54.767 --> 0:24:56.127
<v Speaker 2>And then I'd be like, fuck, I've got to do

0:24:56.207 --> 0:24:58.287
<v Speaker 2>wordle because if I don't do word I lose my streak.

0:24:58.287 --> 0:25:02.327
<v Speaker 2>And then I'd remind myself I'm a growner, yeah, and

0:25:02.527 --> 0:25:05.567
<v Speaker 2>I am in charge of my own life, and the

0:25:05.567 --> 0:25:07.727
<v Speaker 2>New York Times app does not own me. And then

0:25:07.727 --> 0:25:10.167
<v Speaker 2>I give myself a stern talking to And does it

0:25:10.287 --> 0:25:12.247
<v Speaker 2>hurt a little bit the next day when it says

0:25:12.447 --> 0:25:15.407
<v Speaker 2>you're on zero? Yes, But do I have to just

0:25:15.487 --> 0:25:17.127
<v Speaker 2>remind myself that I'm a grown up.

0:25:17.327 --> 0:25:17.567
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:25:17.967 --> 0:25:20.167
<v Speaker 3>But we do this even though you know apps have

0:25:20.207 --> 0:25:23.247
<v Speaker 3>done it because they're capitalizing on the psychology of habits,

0:25:23.247 --> 0:25:27.327
<v Speaker 3>which enormous amount of research has gone into lately. We

0:25:27.407 --> 0:25:30.287
<v Speaker 3>all do it within our own lives. We game of

0:25:30.367 --> 0:25:35.087
<v Speaker 3>fire habits all the time. Well, for example, I have

0:25:35.687 --> 0:25:38.367
<v Speaker 3>started going to the gym and have been like, I

0:25:38.407 --> 0:25:40.727
<v Speaker 3>am going to go three times a week. So in

0:25:40.767 --> 0:25:43.047
<v Speaker 3>my head, that's kind of the streak. If I didn't

0:25:43.087 --> 0:25:45.647
<v Speaker 3>go three times in a week, I would definitely feel

0:25:45.807 --> 0:25:47.727
<v Speaker 3>a sense of loss and like I hadn't.

0:25:47.727 --> 0:25:49.487
<v Speaker 2>So if you get to the end of the week

0:25:49.527 --> 0:25:50.927
<v Speaker 2>and you haven't done it. You go, I have to

0:25:50.927 --> 0:25:52.847
<v Speaker 2>go tomorrow because I have to do money exactly. I

0:25:52.887 --> 0:25:54.847
<v Speaker 2>have to do my three It's weird. I'm not a

0:25:54.967 --> 0:25:56.847
<v Speaker 2>numbers person, but I'm a data person, so I have

0:25:56.927 --> 0:25:59.927
<v Speaker 2>to have something I can track. And I've used my

0:26:00.007 --> 0:26:02.487
<v Speaker 2>Apple Watch like I have my Kilo jewels on it

0:26:02.527 --> 0:26:04.327
<v Speaker 2>and I have to hit a certain amount of Killo

0:26:04.367 --> 0:26:06.607
<v Speaker 2>jewels in order to establish that I have done the

0:26:06.687 --> 0:26:10.207
<v Speaker 2>right workout that I have done sort of enough. And

0:26:10.527 --> 0:26:12.727
<v Speaker 2>this goes to James Clear, who I've talked about before,

0:26:12.767 --> 0:26:15.447
<v Speaker 2>who wrote the book Atomic Habits. He says, when you

0:26:15.447 --> 0:26:18.087
<v Speaker 2>want to change your behavior, you can simply ask yourself,

0:26:18.287 --> 0:26:20.287
<v Speaker 2>how can I make it obvious? How can I make

0:26:20.287 --> 0:26:22.967
<v Speaker 2>it attractive? How can I make it easy? And how

0:26:22.967 --> 0:26:25.407
<v Speaker 2>can I make it satisfying? And that's kind of the

0:26:25.687 --> 0:26:26.287
<v Speaker 2>big ask.

0:26:26.647 --> 0:26:29.727
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's it's the four things, because it's like que

0:26:30.607 --> 0:26:35.207
<v Speaker 3>behavior something and reward. You need four things in order.

0:26:35.287 --> 0:26:37.047
<v Speaker 3>So it's like a weird thing. Right, every morning, I

0:26:37.087 --> 0:26:39.167
<v Speaker 3>make my bed. But the way that I now do

0:26:39.207 --> 0:26:40.847
<v Speaker 3>that process is I walk into my room and the

0:26:40.887 --> 0:26:43.247
<v Speaker 3>curtains is still drawn, and I know I can't open

0:26:43.287 --> 0:26:46.047
<v Speaker 3>the curtains till the bed is made. So it's this

0:26:46.167 --> 0:26:47.927
<v Speaker 3>weird thing because then I get to open the curtains

0:26:47.967 --> 0:26:49.607
<v Speaker 3>me like the day has started and the light's in.

0:26:50.047 --> 0:26:52.527
<v Speaker 3>Like it's a really simple cue that I there is

0:26:52.567 --> 0:26:54.127
<v Speaker 3>this tiny little reward at.

0:26:54.087 --> 0:26:56.607
<v Speaker 1>The end of you worked that out from reading that book.

0:26:56.967 --> 0:26:59.687
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there are like all of these things. Another

0:26:59.727 --> 0:27:02.567
<v Speaker 3>weird one that I've gamified in my life is I

0:27:02.607 --> 0:27:05.967
<v Speaker 3>have a pickieater in Luna, and I was feeling a

0:27:06.007 --> 0:27:07.767
<v Speaker 3>lot of stress. Still I am about what she doesn't

0:27:07.767 --> 0:27:09.967
<v Speaker 3>doesn't it. I now have these lists in my phone.

0:27:10.007 --> 0:27:12.327
<v Speaker 3>This is insane, but this is what I've done because

0:27:12.327 --> 0:27:15.287
<v Speaker 3>I've gamified it. Every time I give her a new food,

0:27:15.767 --> 0:27:17.967
<v Speaker 3>I have to write it down because if I write

0:27:18.007 --> 0:27:20.927
<v Speaker 3>it down, then I feel like there has been an achieved,

0:27:21.007 --> 0:27:22.687
<v Speaker 3>like I did do a thing. I tried to do

0:27:22.727 --> 0:27:24.847
<v Speaker 3>a thing, and I need to mark that. And then

0:27:24.847 --> 0:27:26.367
<v Speaker 3>I've got a list of all the things she will

0:27:26.407 --> 0:27:28.407
<v Speaker 3>eat and so I look at it and I go,

0:27:28.487 --> 0:27:30.887
<v Speaker 3>look at your achievement. She does have things that she like.

0:27:30.967 --> 0:27:33.687
<v Speaker 1>You know, the gamifying. They say that kids have to

0:27:34.207 --> 0:27:37.087
<v Speaker 1>be given something. I think it's seven times before they'll

0:27:37.127 --> 0:27:39.127
<v Speaker 1>accept it. So that's also a way to game of

0:27:39.207 --> 0:27:39.967
<v Speaker 1>fy it isn't.

0:27:39.727 --> 0:27:43.767
<v Speaker 3>It exactly, because otherwise it feels very mundane.

0:27:44.127 --> 0:27:46.047
<v Speaker 2>I think you and me are very because you love

0:27:46.047 --> 0:27:49.287
<v Speaker 2>a routine. I think you have worked that out about

0:27:49.287 --> 0:27:52.487
<v Speaker 2>yourself without having to gamify it, right, Like, your routines

0:27:53.207 --> 0:27:56.047
<v Speaker 2>are quite immovable in some ways, so am mine completely

0:27:56.087 --> 0:27:57.927
<v Speaker 2>so mine, But you didn't need to do that to

0:27:57.967 --> 0:28:00.927
<v Speaker 2>do that. But well, how do you feel if your routine, say,

0:28:00.967 --> 0:28:02.727
<v Speaker 2>your morning routine gets disrupted.

0:28:03.207 --> 0:28:07.327
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel like myself and I need my routines

0:28:07.367 --> 0:28:10.967
<v Speaker 1>to be seven days unfortunately, which is a real shame

0:28:11.047 --> 0:28:13.847
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes it's nice to have a day off. But

0:28:13.887 --> 0:28:16.767
<v Speaker 1>the thing about routines is that they lighten your mental

0:28:16.807 --> 0:28:19.167
<v Speaker 1>load because they mean it's less decisions that you have

0:28:19.247 --> 0:28:22.087
<v Speaker 1>to make, less choices that you have to make. That's why,

0:28:22.207 --> 0:28:26.927
<v Speaker 1>for example, the best time to exercise is in the morning,

0:28:27.247 --> 0:28:29.807
<v Speaker 1>and not give yourself a choice and just make it

0:28:29.887 --> 0:28:33.527
<v Speaker 1>part of your morning routine. Because as soon as you say,

0:28:33.767 --> 0:28:35.047
<v Speaker 1>if it's at the end of the day, you've then

0:28:35.087 --> 0:28:37.927
<v Speaker 1>got the whole day to find reasons not to do.

0:28:37.967 --> 0:28:41.687
<v Speaker 3>It, and your willpower starts to fall off a clear.

0:28:41.527 --> 0:28:43.607
<v Speaker 1>And I would always maybe other people are different. Maybe

0:28:43.687 --> 0:28:45.727
<v Speaker 1>doing it at night can be your routine. But for me,

0:28:45.847 --> 0:28:48.647
<v Speaker 1>I would spend the whole day with the mental load

0:28:48.687 --> 0:28:50.807
<v Speaker 1>of should I, should I not, could I not? Will?

0:28:51.087 --> 0:28:54.167
<v Speaker 1>But maybe how will I feel? So to me the

0:28:54.207 --> 0:28:57.287
<v Speaker 1>mental load of choice. What I have for breakfast? Am

0:28:57.327 --> 0:29:00.287
<v Speaker 1>I going to exercise? Should I wash my hair or not?

0:29:01.247 --> 0:29:04.207
<v Speaker 1>I try to remove as many of those choices as

0:29:04.247 --> 0:29:07.487
<v Speaker 1>possible from my day with routine, light steeve jobs and

0:29:07.527 --> 0:29:08.127
<v Speaker 1>the black pole.

0:29:09.247 --> 0:29:11.167
<v Speaker 3>Have any tricks for the shit you don't want to do?

0:29:11.607 --> 0:29:14.647
<v Speaker 3>Like one example that I read was a writer or

0:29:14.727 --> 0:29:17.807
<v Speaker 3>let's say there's emails or salespeople have to make fifteen

0:29:17.847 --> 0:29:19.247
<v Speaker 3>calls and they don't want to make the calls, right

0:29:19.727 --> 0:29:22.527
<v Speaker 3>was you need a visual cue? So they said in

0:29:22.567 --> 0:29:24.527
<v Speaker 3>one jar you have like hairpins, or you have paper

0:29:24.527 --> 0:29:26.407
<v Speaker 3>clips or whatever, and then you move it every time.

0:29:26.447 --> 0:29:29.807
<v Speaker 3>You need a visual sense of progress. For a lot

0:29:29.807 --> 0:29:32.287
<v Speaker 3>of people, that's like something I have to do. What

0:29:32.287 --> 0:29:33.887
<v Speaker 3>do you do if you've got a task that you

0:29:34.007 --> 0:29:36.407
<v Speaker 3>really really don't want to do? How do you trick yourself.

0:29:36.167 --> 0:29:36.527
<v Speaker 2>Into doing it?

0:29:36.607 --> 0:29:36.767
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:29:36.887 --> 0:29:39.567
<v Speaker 1>Don't? I just don't do it? And that's a real problem.

0:29:39.767 --> 0:29:43.367
<v Speaker 1>So one of the sort of the productivity hacks is

0:29:43.487 --> 0:29:45.967
<v Speaker 1>eat the frog first, yea. So they say, if you've

0:29:45.967 --> 0:29:48.127
<v Speaker 1>got thing, something that you really don't want to do,

0:29:48.127 --> 0:29:50.167
<v Speaker 1>do that first. You get it out of the way,

0:29:50.527 --> 0:29:52.847
<v Speaker 1>and then you need to treat everything else you do.

0:29:53.087 --> 0:29:56.647
<v Speaker 1>The reason that that doesn't work for everybody, particularly if

0:29:56.687 --> 0:30:00.007
<v Speaker 1>you have ADHD, is that the thing you don't want

0:30:00.047 --> 0:30:04.247
<v Speaker 1>to do become so insurmountable that it means that not

0:30:04.287 --> 0:30:06.167
<v Speaker 1>only will you not eat the frog, you won't do

0:30:06.207 --> 0:30:08.367
<v Speaker 1>anything else that you've got to do afterwards. And so

0:30:08.447 --> 0:30:10.447
<v Speaker 1>that's how your life can sort of descend into a

0:30:10.447 --> 0:30:13.167
<v Speaker 1>bit of chaos and things can just get postponed, postponed.

0:30:13.847 --> 0:30:16.207
<v Speaker 3>So how about you, Holly, Yeah, Like, how about the

0:30:16.207 --> 0:30:17.047
<v Speaker 3>shit you don't want to do?

0:30:17.287 --> 0:30:19.807
<v Speaker 2>Little treats? Yeah, it's the only way. It's like if

0:30:19.847 --> 0:30:22.647
<v Speaker 2>I do that, I get to blah blah so and

0:30:22.687 --> 0:30:24.647
<v Speaker 2>that might be a different thing on a different day,

0:30:24.727 --> 0:30:26.527
<v Speaker 2>depending on where I am. The treat might be like

0:30:26.567 --> 0:30:28.487
<v Speaker 2>a literal treat, like I get to eat that thing,

0:30:28.607 --> 0:30:31.567
<v Speaker 2>drink that thing, or it might be I'm not allowed

0:30:31.607 --> 0:30:33.167
<v Speaker 2>to go in my garden and do the thing I'm

0:30:33.287 --> 0:30:35.127
<v Speaker 2>do in my garden until I've written that many words

0:30:35.407 --> 0:30:38.167
<v Speaker 2>like there will be that like or whatever it is,

0:30:38.327 --> 0:30:40.527
<v Speaker 2>you know, whatever the task is I have to do, Like,

0:30:40.567 --> 0:30:43.087
<v Speaker 2>I'm not allowed to do that until I've done that.

0:30:43.127 --> 0:30:45.487
<v Speaker 1>I think about how teens is also for me. If

0:30:45.487 --> 0:30:48.687
<v Speaker 1>you do them for long enough, they're not routines anymore.

0:30:48.687 --> 0:30:51.647
<v Speaker 1>They become almost part of your identity. It doesn't even

0:30:51.647 --> 0:30:54.727
<v Speaker 1>occur to me making breakfasts or what the thing I

0:30:54.767 --> 0:30:57.887
<v Speaker 1>make for breakfast. It's literally muscle memory. Like my body

0:30:57.927 --> 0:30:59.607
<v Speaker 1>moves in a way. I notice this when I'm in

0:30:59.647 --> 0:31:01.887
<v Speaker 1>the shower. My body moves in a way in the

0:31:01.887 --> 0:31:04.647
<v Speaker 1>shower that I'm not even aware of. Yeh, but I

0:31:04.727 --> 0:31:06.607
<v Speaker 1>do this. Then my face, then I do this, and

0:31:06.647 --> 0:31:07.807
<v Speaker 1>then I reach and then I do this.

0:31:07.927 --> 0:31:10.047
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's got of common ingrained process. And this is

0:31:10.047 --> 0:31:12.567
<v Speaker 3>what clear says that when you walk into a dark room,

0:31:12.967 --> 0:31:16.327
<v Speaker 3>you switch on the light, and that's not a conscious thought.

0:31:16.407 --> 0:31:17.887
<v Speaker 3>So I think we imagine.

0:31:17.487 --> 0:31:19.127
<v Speaker 1>People cost nothing in mental load.

0:31:19.367 --> 0:31:21.487
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and people go, oh, me a exercise of seven

0:31:21.567 --> 0:31:23.527
<v Speaker 3>days a week. Where does she get the motivation? You

0:31:23.567 --> 0:31:25.927
<v Speaker 3>don't have any motivation when it comes to exercise. No,

0:31:26.087 --> 0:31:27.007
<v Speaker 3>You've actually outside.

0:31:27.127 --> 0:31:28.767
<v Speaker 1>Where do you get the motivation to brush your teeth?

0:31:28.807 --> 0:31:28.847
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:31:28.967 --> 0:31:30.847
<v Speaker 1>You don't even think about that as a choice. It's

0:31:30.927 --> 0:31:31.927
<v Speaker 1>just a thing that you do.

0:31:32.047 --> 0:31:34.567
<v Speaker 2>I'm obsessed with my morning walk. If I don't get

0:31:34.567 --> 0:31:37.287
<v Speaker 2>to do it, I'm really pissed off. I will organize

0:31:37.287 --> 0:31:39.567
<v Speaker 2>my day around that, whether I'm here, whether I'm at home.

0:31:40.007 --> 0:31:41.447
<v Speaker 2>It's like if I don't get to do it, if

0:31:41.447 --> 0:31:43.767
<v Speaker 2>I've got an early meeting or an early interview, or

0:31:43.807 --> 0:31:45.327
<v Speaker 2>I've got to dry it like it, just do you

0:31:45.367 --> 0:31:46.327
<v Speaker 2>actually enjoy the war?

0:31:46.487 --> 0:31:47.047
<v Speaker 1>I love it.

0:31:47.367 --> 0:31:49.007
<v Speaker 2>I love because I don't really.

0:31:48.887 --> 0:31:51.167
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy my exercise in the morning. I don't enjoy it,

0:31:51.207 --> 0:31:53.367
<v Speaker 1>but I enjoy how I feel afterwards, and I enjoy

0:31:53.487 --> 0:31:54.887
<v Speaker 1>having done it, Yeah.

0:31:54.767 --> 0:31:56.607
<v Speaker 2>Which is how I feel about things like running and

0:31:56.607 --> 0:31:59.327
<v Speaker 2>like hard things. But walking isn't hard. Walking is just

0:31:59.407 --> 0:32:02.167
<v Speaker 2>nice and I like being outside and I like, I

0:32:02.167 --> 0:32:03.967
<v Speaker 2>don't know for what I mean. It gives me whatever

0:32:03.967 --> 0:32:06.527
<v Speaker 2>it gives me. But it's interesting to me that if

0:32:06.567 --> 0:32:08.807
<v Speaker 2>I think now about like maybe tomorrow, I might not

0:32:08.807 --> 0:32:10.607
<v Speaker 2>get to go because I've got this thing and that

0:32:10.647 --> 0:32:12.607
<v Speaker 2>thing or I've got to finish that thing, I can

0:32:12.727 --> 0:32:16.687
<v Speaker 2>feel the like, the unhappiness, the anxiety building in my

0:32:16.767 --> 0:32:18.887
<v Speaker 2>chest because I just love it. Right, So it's become

0:32:18.927 --> 0:32:20.807
<v Speaker 2>a routine that I very much embrace.

0:32:20.927 --> 0:32:23.007
<v Speaker 3>My trick has been pairing those things I don't want

0:32:23.047 --> 0:32:23.967
<v Speaker 3>to do with things I.

0:32:23.847 --> 0:32:25.687
<v Speaker 1>Love, like opening the curtains.

0:32:25.767 --> 0:32:29.647
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and there's always tasks, like you know, whether it's

0:32:29.807 --> 0:32:32.087
<v Speaker 3>invoicing or emails you don't want to reply to, or

0:32:32.087 --> 0:32:34.167
<v Speaker 3>there's work I don't want to do. I have to

0:32:34.167 --> 0:32:37.127
<v Speaker 3>do it alongside something I enjoy it, which is usually coffee.

0:32:37.287 --> 0:32:39.247
<v Speaker 3>It's like when you sit down to have the coffee,

0:32:39.447 --> 0:32:42.287
<v Speaker 3>which you love, you've got to do you don't want

0:32:42.287 --> 0:32:42.447
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:32:42.567 --> 0:32:46.527
<v Speaker 1>Tea is my conduit into doing anything.

0:32:46.247 --> 0:32:50.487
<v Speaker 3>Really and saving podcasts for exercise because then I'm looking

0:32:50.527 --> 0:32:52.647
<v Speaker 3>forward to the podcast, and I've convinced myself I'm looking

0:32:52.647 --> 0:32:55.847
<v Speaker 3>forward to the exercise. Out louders, I want to know

0:32:56.327 --> 0:32:58.887
<v Speaker 3>how you keep good habits. What are your little tricks?

0:32:58.887 --> 0:33:01.767
<v Speaker 3>What have you gamified? Do you think it's sometimes a

0:33:01.767 --> 0:33:03.327
<v Speaker 3>little bit toxic? Do you have a bit of a

0:33:03.367 --> 0:33:05.447
<v Speaker 3>streak like Collie does with her world or I know

0:33:05.527 --> 0:33:08.847
<v Speaker 3>lots of people I was traveling recently and that I went, Okay,

0:33:08.887 --> 0:33:10.727
<v Speaker 3>we need to have an intervention. Because there is addiction

0:33:10.887 --> 0:33:11.367
<v Speaker 3>with word.

0:33:11.247 --> 0:33:11.527
<v Speaker 1>Or going on.

0:33:11.607 --> 0:33:13.927
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there definitely is. But also for me and brand

0:33:14.007 --> 0:33:15.887
<v Speaker 2>it's a togetherness thing too, because we send each other

0:33:15.887 --> 0:33:18.807
<v Speaker 2>our stats. If we're not together, there go see it's

0:33:18.847 --> 0:33:23.807
<v Speaker 2>cute saving lives. Just wait for the Montmere out loud streak.

0:33:26.967 --> 0:33:29.527
<v Speaker 1>Do you want daily out loud access? Why wouldn't you?

0:33:29.647 --> 0:33:33.847
<v Speaker 1>We dropped episodes every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for mum

0:33:33.967 --> 0:33:36.527
<v Speaker 1>MEA subscribers. Follow the link in the show notes to

0:33:36.527 --> 0:33:38.967
<v Speaker 1>get us in your ears five days a week, and

0:33:39.007 --> 0:33:41.487
<v Speaker 1>a huge thank you if you're already a subscriber.

0:33:46.927 --> 0:33:50.887
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday, the front page of a Sydney tabloid newspaper, beaming

0:33:50.887 --> 0:33:53.967
<v Speaker 2>out at us from every servo and convenience store shelf,

0:33:54.127 --> 0:33:56.727
<v Speaker 2>was of a famous man who had just suffered a

0:33:56.807 --> 0:34:01.847
<v Speaker 2>drug overdose. Andrew O'Keeffe used to be a mainstream TV hero.

0:34:02.487 --> 0:34:05.647
<v Speaker 2>He hosted game shows, Morning TV and he even received

0:34:05.647 --> 0:34:09.087
<v Speaker 2>an order of Australia Medal in twenty seventeen for his

0:34:09.287 --> 0:34:13.487
<v Speaker 2>TV and charity work. Things began to go pair shaped

0:34:13.527 --> 0:34:16.887
<v Speaker 2>for him in the late twenty teens, in quite a

0:34:16.927 --> 0:34:20.847
<v Speaker 2>familiar pattern for those who've seen the celebrity downfall narrative

0:34:20.967 --> 0:34:27.047
<v Speaker 2>unfold before scuffles with photographers, a divorce, a dui, a

0:34:27.087 --> 0:34:30.607
<v Speaker 2>big dollar contract with his employer Channel seven not renewed,

0:34:31.167 --> 0:34:33.887
<v Speaker 2>and then things ramped up. The man who was once

0:34:33.967 --> 0:34:37.527
<v Speaker 2>the chairman of White Ribbon was arrested in twenty twenty

0:34:37.527 --> 0:34:41.167
<v Speaker 2>one on domestic violence and common assault charges against his partner.

0:34:41.767 --> 0:34:44.687
<v Speaker 2>Those charges were dismissed on mental health grounds. He was

0:34:44.847 --> 0:34:48.527
<v Speaker 2>ordered into an intense mental health program. Then later that

0:34:48.607 --> 0:34:52.447
<v Speaker 2>same year, more assault charges and now drug possession. His

0:34:52.607 --> 0:34:56.847
<v Speaker 2>reliance on methamphetamine ice as many people call it, becomes clear.

0:34:57.527 --> 0:35:01.207
<v Speaker 2>Since then, more assault charges, more DUIs, a five month

0:35:01.287 --> 0:35:06.167
<v Speaker 2>stint and rehab, arrested for breaching, an avo, intimidation, stalking,

0:35:06.847 --> 0:35:11.007
<v Speaker 2>and this week an overdose an ice possession. Back in

0:35:11.047 --> 0:35:13.767
<v Speaker 2>court before a judge who's saying that jail might be

0:35:13.807 --> 0:35:17.487
<v Speaker 2>the only thing to save Andrew O'Keeffe's life. There are

0:35:17.527 --> 0:35:21.567
<v Speaker 2>more paparazzi outside court, more front pages, more news articles,

0:35:21.647 --> 0:35:26.247
<v Speaker 2>more headlines. Why are we talking about Andrew O'Keefe today, Well,

0:35:26.287 --> 0:35:29.327
<v Speaker 2>I've got a question. Should this man's descent into an

0:35:29.407 --> 0:35:33.247
<v Speaker 2>absolute freefall of mental illness and drug addiction and violence

0:35:33.887 --> 0:35:37.727
<v Speaker 2>and desperation be on our front pages at all? Would

0:35:37.807 --> 0:35:40.127
<v Speaker 2>not covering this be giving a free kick to a

0:35:40.127 --> 0:35:44.447
<v Speaker 2>privileged celebrity who's been convicted of assaulting women or is

0:35:44.567 --> 0:35:49.407
<v Speaker 2>continuing to cover this just added cruelty, unhelpful, robinecking and

0:35:49.567 --> 0:35:53.327
<v Speaker 2>exploitation of a fascination with riches to rags stories.

0:35:53.847 --> 0:35:56.647
<v Speaker 3>Jesse, I think it's voyeurism, and I don't think it's

0:35:56.687 --> 0:35:59.727
<v Speaker 3>in the public interest anymore. I keep seeing this on

0:35:59.807 --> 0:36:03.487
<v Speaker 3>the front page of papers and on every homepage. He

0:36:03.567 --> 0:36:07.607
<v Speaker 3>has not worked in media for almost four years, like

0:36:07.807 --> 0:36:12.047
<v Speaker 3>he isn't on television currently. He is clearly very very

0:36:12.127 --> 0:36:16.287
<v Speaker 3>unwell with addiction issues and mental health issues. And there's

0:36:16.287 --> 0:36:19.767
<v Speaker 3>a video that's been circulating that was broadcast on Channel seven.

0:36:19.767 --> 0:36:22.127
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if other networks picked it up, but

0:36:22.287 --> 0:36:26.927
<v Speaker 3>he was being followed by a paparazzi who was snapping

0:36:27.007 --> 0:36:32.447
<v Speaker 3>and filming, who yelled at him Big Weekend Mate in

0:36:32.527 --> 0:36:36.127
<v Speaker 3>reference to him nearly dying over the weekend of a

0:36:36.207 --> 0:36:40.327
<v Speaker 3>drug overdose. He obviously, I mean, I would assume, reacted.

0:36:40.567 --> 0:36:42.967
<v Speaker 3>He didn't want to be followed out of the police station,

0:36:43.047 --> 0:36:46.167
<v Speaker 3>and he was yelling back, and this cameraman was saying,

0:36:46.207 --> 0:36:49.487
<v Speaker 3>you're a degenerate, You're a degenerate, And I thought, when.

0:36:49.287 --> 0:36:51.407
<v Speaker 1>You say a camera man, I don't think it was

0:36:51.527 --> 0:36:54.127
<v Speaker 1>anyone employed by the media necessarily. I think it was

0:36:54.167 --> 0:36:56.487
<v Speaker 1>someone with a phone who then sold the footage.

0:36:56.767 --> 0:37:00.607
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but around were television cameras, so what I could

0:37:00.727 --> 0:37:04.407
<v Speaker 3>see was he is followed everywhere. Yes, he's followed absolutely everywhere,

0:37:04.447 --> 0:37:08.767
<v Speaker 3>which begs the question why do we need to see this?

0:37:09.287 --> 0:37:09.727
<v Speaker 3>Who is it?

0:37:10.007 --> 0:37:10.207
<v Speaker 1>Four?

0:37:11.247 --> 0:37:14.327
<v Speaker 3>Is this a way for us to sort of mock

0:37:14.527 --> 0:37:17.647
<v Speaker 3>or even get some titillation out of addiction? And even

0:37:17.687 --> 0:37:20.887
<v Speaker 3>reading what the judge this is a really really sad story.

0:37:20.927 --> 0:37:24.327
<v Speaker 3>And I don't mean just sad for Andrew o'caife. There

0:37:24.327 --> 0:37:27.447
<v Speaker 3>are serious victims. I feel for his family, like this

0:37:27.567 --> 0:37:33.087
<v Speaker 3>is just horrific. But the judge said they've tried rehabilitation facilities,

0:37:33.407 --> 0:37:37.727
<v Speaker 3>they've tried mental health facilities and nothing is working. For

0:37:37.767 --> 0:37:40.887
<v Speaker 3>a lot of Australian families, is probably quite familiar that

0:37:40.967 --> 0:37:44.927
<v Speaker 3>you just get absolutely stuck. But I don't think we

0:37:44.927 --> 0:37:47.727
<v Speaker 3>should be looking anymore. Is there an argument of public

0:37:47.727 --> 0:37:48.327
<v Speaker 3>interest here?

0:37:48.607 --> 0:37:51.567
<v Speaker 1>I guess the argument could be it's a cautionary tale.

0:37:51.927 --> 0:37:56.327
<v Speaker 1>It's as close to our own Britney Spears or Amanda

0:37:56.367 --> 0:37:59.287
<v Speaker 1>Binds as we've seen. Obviously he doesn't have that kind

0:37:59.327 --> 0:38:03.327
<v Speaker 1>of level of fame. But the line between mental health

0:38:03.367 --> 0:38:08.647
<v Speaker 1>and addiction and crime and self destruction. I mean, there

0:38:08.687 --> 0:38:13.007
<v Speaker 1>is no line. They're all just so blurred. And I think, well,

0:38:13.047 --> 0:38:14.647
<v Speaker 1>the thing about fame is that you can't give it

0:38:14.647 --> 0:38:17.087
<v Speaker 1>back like he will always be. You can't turn it off,

0:38:17.087 --> 0:38:21.007
<v Speaker 1>and you can't retrospectively go because people aren't following, you know,

0:38:21.247 --> 0:38:25.447
<v Speaker 1>Joe Brown around and photographing him every time he gets arrested.

0:38:25.567 --> 0:38:27.087
<v Speaker 1>And as you say, Jesse, this will be a really

0:38:27.127 --> 0:38:30.927
<v Speaker 1>familiar cycle to people who have loved ones who are

0:38:30.927 --> 0:38:35.647
<v Speaker 1>struggling with addiction. The problem is what are you meant

0:38:35.687 --> 0:38:38.287
<v Speaker 1>to do? Like the justice system and the legal system,

0:38:38.447 --> 0:38:41.807
<v Speaker 1>they're made up of people, right, we understand, and the

0:38:41.887 --> 0:38:44.567
<v Speaker 1>judges understand. And he's been shown an extraordinary amount of

0:38:44.607 --> 0:38:48.247
<v Speaker 1>leeway and compassion and given a lot of chances. But

0:38:48.327 --> 0:38:52.207
<v Speaker 1>a crime is a crime. And when you are caught

0:38:52.247 --> 0:38:55.887
<v Speaker 1>with a band substance, when you are driving under the influence,

0:38:55.927 --> 0:38:59.647
<v Speaker 1>when you're endangering people's lives, when you're assaulting people, you

0:38:59.767 --> 0:39:02.247
<v Speaker 1>can't really look away. And the fact that he was

0:39:02.287 --> 0:39:06.447
<v Speaker 1>a white ribbon ambassador or a chair and he was the

0:39:06.447 --> 0:39:09.087
<v Speaker 1>guy on all the game shows and on breakfast television,

0:39:10.047 --> 0:39:13.247
<v Speaker 1>the rubbernecking and the I won't say necessarily public interest

0:39:13.327 --> 0:39:16.127
<v Speaker 1>but the public curiosity because if no one was buying

0:39:16.127 --> 0:39:19.047
<v Speaker 1>the newspapers and clicking on the stories, they would stop

0:39:19.087 --> 0:39:22.407
<v Speaker 1>and he wouldn't be followed anymore. But people do want

0:39:22.447 --> 0:39:25.567
<v Speaker 1>to look. They do because it is so shocking up.

0:39:25.607 --> 0:39:29.047
<v Speaker 1>You know, I met Andrew a few times in various

0:39:29.247 --> 0:39:32.647
<v Speaker 1>media capacities. I always thought he was an intense guy.

0:39:33.607 --> 0:39:36.727
<v Speaker 1>He is quite a prickly guy. But it's shocking that

0:39:36.887 --> 0:39:39.487
<v Speaker 1>someone that you have met that seems like they had

0:39:39.527 --> 0:39:43.567
<v Speaker 1>it all, that had a wife and kids and fame

0:39:43.727 --> 0:39:46.567
<v Speaker 1>and fortune, this could happen to them.

0:39:46.607 --> 0:39:48.487
<v Speaker 3>He's in and out of court like he's And this

0:39:48.567 --> 0:39:50.567
<v Speaker 3>is what I mean is that he is being reprimanded,

0:39:50.607 --> 0:39:50.967
<v Speaker 3>but that.

0:39:50.887 --> 0:39:52.207
<v Speaker 1>In itself becomes the narrative.

0:39:52.727 --> 0:39:55.407
<v Speaker 2>The clear comparison to here was Ben Cousins, right, This

0:39:55.567 --> 0:39:58.967
<v Speaker 2>is exactly what happened to Ben Cousins. Now he's particularly

0:39:58.967 --> 0:40:01.927
<v Speaker 2>famous in Western Australia, the footballer who we've talked about

0:40:01.967 --> 0:40:04.167
<v Speaker 2>on the show before, because his redemption arc is now

0:40:04.207 --> 0:40:07.087
<v Speaker 2>in full swing. It was the same. It was public

0:40:07.127 --> 0:40:11.967
<v Speaker 2>incident after public incident. Do you wi cops chasing photographers, assault,

0:40:12.127 --> 0:40:16.167
<v Speaker 2>stalking like almost exactly the same playbook. Anyone who knows

0:40:16.207 --> 0:40:18.967
<v Speaker 2>anything about serious addiction knows that it will take and

0:40:19.047 --> 0:40:21.727
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Perry's book was very clear on this and obviously

0:40:21.847 --> 0:40:25.647
<v Speaker 2>tragic ending there. It will take many trips to rehabit

0:40:25.767 --> 0:40:29.287
<v Speaker 2>will take many Like it's not we like everything to

0:40:29.327 --> 0:40:33.047
<v Speaker 2>have a neat narrative like problem, you know, treatment fixed.

0:40:33.247 --> 0:40:36.607
<v Speaker 2>It's not generally how it goes with very entrenched addiction

0:40:36.687 --> 0:40:39.927
<v Speaker 2>and mental health. This will go on. And there's an

0:40:40.047 --> 0:40:43.127
<v Speaker 2>element here that you've got to unpick the kind of privilege,

0:40:43.127 --> 0:40:46.047
<v Speaker 2>because there is privilege at play here. As mere reference before,

0:40:46.207 --> 0:40:49.407
<v Speaker 2>particularly in his first domestic violence and assault case, he

0:40:49.447 --> 0:40:51.287
<v Speaker 2>got off on a way that he would not have

0:40:51.327 --> 0:40:53.487
<v Speaker 2>got off if he was Joe Brown. He could afford

0:40:53.527 --> 0:40:55.887
<v Speaker 2>the really good lawyers. He's had a lot of leeway.

0:40:56.407 --> 0:40:59.327
<v Speaker 2>And so there's an argument there that it's kind of like,

0:40:59.487 --> 0:41:04.287
<v Speaker 2>particularly when it comes to violence, often famous and powerful

0:41:04.287 --> 0:41:06.167
<v Speaker 2>and rich men get away with a lot more shit.

0:41:06.367 --> 0:41:09.207
<v Speaker 2>I mean, men in general get away with a lot

0:41:09.407 --> 0:41:11.367
<v Speaker 2>of things when they do things to women that they shouldn't,

0:41:11.407 --> 0:41:13.847
<v Speaker 2>but famous and powerful and rich men more so, more so,

0:41:13.927 --> 0:41:16.927
<v Speaker 2>more so, so, you could argue that that is a

0:41:16.967 --> 0:41:21.367
<v Speaker 2>narrative that plays out here. But arguing against myself about

0:41:21.367 --> 0:41:24.647
<v Speaker 2>that there is also just an element of public shaming

0:41:24.727 --> 0:41:27.767
<v Speaker 2>here that we clearly find irresistible. And me is right,

0:41:27.767 --> 0:41:30.807
<v Speaker 2>they're not necessarily reputable. Cameramember that the people who are

0:41:30.807 --> 0:41:33.087
<v Speaker 2>covering this are yelling at him, You're a disgrace, You're

0:41:33.127 --> 0:41:35.967
<v Speaker 2>a degenerate in order to get a reaction from him.

0:41:36.007 --> 0:41:38.527
<v Speaker 2>It's like, how low do they want him to stoop?

0:41:38.607 --> 0:41:40.607
<v Speaker 2>How low do we need that man to be so

0:41:40.687 --> 0:41:43.047
<v Speaker 2>that we can be like, hat, look at you? And

0:41:43.127 --> 0:41:44.927
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It's interesting about whether we should look

0:41:44.927 --> 0:41:48.367
<v Speaker 2>away because do I think that if and when Andrew

0:41:48.367 --> 0:41:50.687
<v Speaker 2>O'Keeffe manages to get on top of this in some

0:41:50.767 --> 0:41:53.407
<v Speaker 2>way in the way that Ben Cousins apparently has, I

0:41:53.447 --> 0:41:56.127
<v Speaker 2>want him on Dancing with the Stars in three years time? No,

0:41:56.367 --> 0:41:59.767
<v Speaker 2>absolutely not, not with that rap sheet. But do I

0:41:59.847 --> 0:42:03.087
<v Speaker 2>think he deserves to be on the front page every

0:42:03.127 --> 0:42:05.847
<v Speaker 2>time that you know he's in then? Also No, I

0:42:05.887 --> 0:42:08.247
<v Speaker 2>think there's kind of a middle ground there of like,

0:42:08.367 --> 0:42:10.647
<v Speaker 2>is it just time to look away and let this

0:42:10.687 --> 0:42:11.127
<v Speaker 2>shit out?

0:42:11.207 --> 0:42:14.447
<v Speaker 3>We're just compounding the man's distress. And you were saying

0:42:14.447 --> 0:42:15.967
<v Speaker 3>we like things to be black and white, and even

0:42:16.047 --> 0:42:18.727
<v Speaker 3>victim perpetrator, and in the case of the DV incident,

0:42:18.807 --> 0:42:25.127
<v Speaker 3>there is victor pert distress and yeah, but.

0:42:23.087 --> 0:42:26.407
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting these conversations. Sorry to interrupt you about

0:42:26.647 --> 0:42:29.127
<v Speaker 1>when you're saying, we're compounding this, so we should stop.

0:42:29.727 --> 0:42:31.607
<v Speaker 1>What is the role of the media, And I'm not

0:42:31.607 --> 0:42:34.567
<v Speaker 1>saying that in a rhetorical way, like genuinely, what is

0:42:34.607 --> 0:42:37.407
<v Speaker 1>the role of the media, because is it to protect Andrew?

0:42:37.847 --> 0:42:40.527
<v Speaker 3>Is it to harass someone who's mentally ill? Because I

0:42:40.527 --> 0:42:42.567
<v Speaker 3>don't think so. I think if you've got a mental illness,

0:42:42.607 --> 0:42:45.887
<v Speaker 3>so imagine if it was something like dementia and what.

0:42:45.847 --> 0:42:48.087
<v Speaker 1>But is that a mental illness or is he just addicted?

0:42:48.207 --> 0:42:50.647
<v Speaker 2>You know, he has been diagnosed with mental illness, bipolar

0:42:50.687 --> 0:42:51.927
<v Speaker 2>disorder and even addiction.

0:42:52.927 --> 0:42:56.327
<v Speaker 1>Who have bipolar disorder and mental illness don't spit on

0:42:56.807 --> 0:43:00.327
<v Speaker 1>women and assault them and have drugs and drive under

0:43:00.327 --> 0:43:03.487
<v Speaker 1>the influence. So I think that you can't just say, oh, well,

0:43:03.527 --> 0:43:06.567
<v Speaker 1>if you've got the mental health card, therefore all bets

0:43:06.607 --> 0:43:08.807
<v Speaker 1>are off and you're exempt from all scrutiny.

0:43:08.847 --> 0:43:12.007
<v Speaker 2>But it is a relentless and awful disease.

0:43:12.087 --> 0:43:14.887
<v Speaker 3>It just is, right, Yeah, I guess the question is

0:43:14.887 --> 0:43:18.247
<v Speaker 3>if privacy is a human right, like if it's some.

0:43:18.407 --> 0:43:21.167
<v Speaker 2>Court reporting, like you're allowed to report on court. If

0:43:21.287 --> 0:43:23.687
<v Speaker 2>Joe Brown was in that, we need to report on it.

0:43:23.687 --> 0:43:24.807
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be a transparency.

0:43:24.967 --> 0:43:25.207
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:43:25.287 --> 0:43:28.447
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think the redemption arc your ben cousin's

0:43:28.527 --> 0:43:31.527
<v Speaker 3>point is interesting, right, because part of me wonders, is

0:43:31.567 --> 0:43:35.767
<v Speaker 3>the redemption arc possible because we kept him in the

0:43:35.767 --> 0:43:38.927
<v Speaker 3>spotlight because because he never went away exactly, he never

0:43:38.967 --> 0:43:41.407
<v Speaker 3>went away, so he was always famous. So you're going

0:43:41.447 --> 0:43:43.247
<v Speaker 3>to profit off my fame. I'm going to profit off

0:43:43.287 --> 0:43:45.327
<v Speaker 3>my fame. I think at this point, Andrew o' keef

0:43:45.367 --> 0:43:47.047
<v Speaker 3>needs to not be famous, like we've got it.

0:43:47.007 --> 0:43:48.807
<v Speaker 1>His money unbecome famous.

0:43:49.007 --> 0:43:51.087
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think we look back at Britney Spears, right,

0:43:51.287 --> 0:43:53.847
<v Speaker 3>and we look at her and it might be Pollyanna

0:43:53.967 --> 0:43:56.287
<v Speaker 3>or whatever, but we go, hey, maybe you shouldn't have

0:43:56.327 --> 0:43:58.327
<v Speaker 3>been taking photos of someone who would just shave their

0:43:58.367 --> 0:44:01.607
<v Speaker 3>head and was throwing around an umbrella. And having people

0:44:01.647 --> 0:44:04.967
<v Speaker 3>in my family who have struggled with mental illness and

0:44:05.207 --> 0:44:08.007
<v Speaker 3>various things, who have had moments like that, you don't

0:44:08.007 --> 0:44:10.967
<v Speaker 3>broadcast it like there is some privacy and intimacy in

0:44:11.007 --> 0:44:13.767
<v Speaker 3>those moments that you have this instinct to protect.

0:44:14.047 --> 0:44:16.327
<v Speaker 1>But that's because you are their family you're not the

0:44:16.367 --> 0:44:18.527
<v Speaker 1>media who can monetize those pictures.

0:44:18.647 --> 0:44:21.287
<v Speaker 2>Also, in that particular case, there's a very solid argument

0:44:21.327 --> 0:44:23.567
<v Speaker 2>that it was making it worse, that the attention was

0:44:23.607 --> 0:44:24.567
<v Speaker 2>actually making it well.

0:44:24.607 --> 0:44:27.207
<v Speaker 3>And so is this I would say with Andrew O'Keeffe,

0:44:27.487 --> 0:44:29.847
<v Speaker 3>whether it's the addictional the mental illness, it's like, this

0:44:29.967 --> 0:44:33.807
<v Speaker 3>is actually compounding a man's distress and it's not helping

0:44:33.847 --> 0:44:36.647
<v Speaker 3>his victims. I think that it's easy for the media

0:44:36.687 --> 0:44:39.247
<v Speaker 3>to go, oh, we're just reflecting, but to not hold

0:44:39.767 --> 0:44:42.327
<v Speaker 3>the media any kind of ethics in this situation, I

0:44:42.367 --> 0:44:44.647
<v Speaker 3>think is like what do we want here? Because we

0:44:44.687 --> 0:44:47.527
<v Speaker 3>all know where this is heading and what the next

0:44:47.527 --> 0:44:51.727
<v Speaker 3>headline might be, and if that headline comes, it's like, WHOA, Yeah,

0:44:51.727 --> 0:44:53.127
<v Speaker 3>I think the media had something to do with it.

0:44:53.167 --> 0:44:53.967
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they helped.

0:44:55.607 --> 0:44:57.167
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that.

0:44:57.167 --> 0:45:00.327
<v Speaker 2>That's I know exactly what you're saying. Could the media

0:45:00.367 --> 0:45:02.127
<v Speaker 2>be proud of the way they've covered this?

0:45:02.207 --> 0:45:04.607
<v Speaker 1>Y are the media we're talking about?

0:45:06.127 --> 0:45:06.927
<v Speaker 3>You're a degenerate.

0:45:07.047 --> 0:45:08.807
<v Speaker 2>But here's the thing is that I agree, I know

0:45:08.807 --> 0:45:11.207
<v Speaker 2>what you mean, But we do ask ourselves that, Like,

0:45:11.247 --> 0:45:13.407
<v Speaker 2>whenever we're talking about these kind of things, we go like,

0:45:14.167 --> 0:45:16.527
<v Speaker 2>is there an interesting point to discuss here, or are

0:45:16.567 --> 0:45:18.247
<v Speaker 2>we just rober necking? And you know, it's a line

0:45:18.287 --> 0:45:20.887
<v Speaker 2>that we might not always exactly get right, but it's

0:45:20.927 --> 0:45:24.927
<v Speaker 2>definitely an examined thing. Right we make a conscious choice.

0:45:25.167 --> 0:45:27.607
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting because I know what you're saying.

0:45:27.647 --> 0:45:33.087
<v Speaker 2>Could the media, including ourselves, say we treated that with respect? No,

0:45:33.207 --> 0:45:35.527
<v Speaker 2>they couldn't. Yeah, but could you argue that they have

0:45:35.607 --> 0:45:37.367
<v Speaker 2>blood on their hands? I would say in this case,

0:45:37.607 --> 0:45:38.047
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:45:37.847 --> 0:45:39.607
<v Speaker 3>Think it's blood on your hands, but I don't think

0:45:39.607 --> 0:45:41.367
<v Speaker 3>it would be far fetched to say that there are

0:45:41.367 --> 0:45:44.727
<v Speaker 3>people you could look at celebrities who have whether it's

0:45:44.887 --> 0:45:47.727
<v Speaker 3>addiction or mental health issues that if you were to go,

0:45:47.967 --> 0:45:51.007
<v Speaker 3>did the media help or hinder they had a hand

0:45:51.007 --> 0:45:54.127
<v Speaker 3>in it. Yeah. Out Louders, if you enjoy listening to

0:45:54.127 --> 0:45:56.687
<v Speaker 3>this podcast, it would mean so much to us if

0:45:56.687 --> 0:45:58.927
<v Speaker 3>you would be willing to take just a few seconds

0:45:59.167 --> 0:46:00.407
<v Speaker 3>to do these three things.

0:46:00.647 --> 0:46:03.887
<v Speaker 1>First, can you please follow or subscribe to out loud?

0:46:03.927 --> 0:46:07.007
<v Speaker 1>Following the pod helps you And I just thought everyone

0:46:07.047 --> 0:46:09.247
<v Speaker 1>did this, but these animals tell me that's not the case.

0:46:09.887 --> 0:46:13.087
<v Speaker 1>You never miss an episode if you follow us or subscribe,

0:46:13.127 --> 0:46:15.967
<v Speaker 1>and it helps us because you know, miss an episode.

0:46:16.287 --> 0:46:17.927
<v Speaker 2>To do this, all you have to do is you

0:46:17.967 --> 0:46:20.247
<v Speaker 2>go to the out Loud show page on Apple or

0:46:20.247 --> 0:46:22.927
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts, and all you

0:46:22.967 --> 0:46:24.927
<v Speaker 2>have to do is tap the little plus sign or

0:46:24.927 --> 0:46:27.687
<v Speaker 2>click on follow. This is the most important thing you

0:46:27.727 --> 0:46:30.327
<v Speaker 2>can do to support your podcast.

0:46:30.087 --> 0:46:32.047
<v Speaker 3>While you're there. If you'd be willing to give us

0:46:32.047 --> 0:46:34.087
<v Speaker 3>a five star rating, we'd love it too, and share

0:46:34.087 --> 0:46:36.887
<v Speaker 3>an episode with a friend. We would be so grateful.

0:46:37.247 --> 0:46:39.967
<v Speaker 3>We're so grateful to have your ears, and we appreciate

0:46:40.007 --> 0:46:41.607
<v Speaker 3>our outluders so very much.

0:46:41.727 --> 0:46:43.687
<v Speaker 2>A massive thank you to all of you who already

0:46:43.727 --> 0:46:45.607
<v Speaker 2>do that and those who are doing it right now.

0:46:45.687 --> 0:46:47.487
<v Speaker 2>I can hear you, I can see you.

0:46:47.567 --> 0:46:52.087
<v Speaker 1>Three things, follow, five star review, share with a friend.

0:46:52.167 --> 0:46:55.647
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly it. Amazing, well done out that is, thank

0:46:55.687 --> 0:46:59.727
<v Speaker 2>you for listening today. I can hear them doing okay,

0:46:59.767 --> 0:47:02.887
<v Speaker 2>I can feel them doing it good. And thank you

0:47:02.927 --> 0:47:05.847
<v Speaker 2>for listening to today's show. And of course, thank you

0:47:05.887 --> 0:47:08.327
<v Speaker 2>to our fabulous team for putting the show together. We're

0:47:08.327 --> 0:47:10.087
<v Speaker 2>going to be back in your ear tomorrow.

0:47:10.367 --> 0:47:12.007
<v Speaker 3>Yay bye.

0:47:12.127 --> 0:47:14.407
<v Speaker 1>Have you done it yet? Go do it? Do you

0:47:14.447 --> 0:47:15.527
<v Speaker 1>remember what the three things are?

0:47:15.847 --> 0:47:16.007
<v Speaker 2>Go?

0:47:16.087 --> 0:47:16.407
<v Speaker 1>Do it?

0:47:16.527 --> 0:47:19.447
<v Speaker 2>Just press the plus shout out to any Mamma Mia

0:47:19.527 --> 0:47:22.367
<v Speaker 2>subscribers listening. If you love the show and you want

0:47:22.367 --> 0:47:25.367
<v Speaker 2>to support us, subscribing to Mamma Mia is the very

0:47:25.407 --> 0:47:27.447
<v Speaker 2>best way to do it. There's a link in the

0:47:27.487 --> 0:47:28.447
<v Speaker 2>episode description