WEBVTT - Full Bush In A Bikini

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.341
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:16.741
<v Speaker 2>Mama and Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and

0:00:16.822 --> 0:00:18.822
<v Speaker 2>waters that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:19.102 --> 0:00:21.901
<v Speaker 3>I think she's read let them. I reckon she read

0:00:21.902 --> 0:00:24.302
<v Speaker 3>her over the holidays, because I know that Oprah, who

0:00:24.342 --> 0:00:26.381
<v Speaker 3>I believe you know they're in a group. Chap Sure,

0:00:26.662 --> 0:00:30.142
<v Speaker 3>Oprah read it. Oprah loved it. I think she said Michelle,

0:00:30.222 --> 0:00:32.141
<v Speaker 3>not passive aggressively, but just said, I think you'd get

0:00:32.182 --> 0:00:32.702
<v Speaker 3>a lot out of this.

0:00:32.942 --> 0:00:34.302
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let them have their party.

0:00:34.462 --> 0:00:36.581
<v Speaker 3>Yes, let them have their party, but let me not.

0:00:36.582 --> 0:00:42.862
<v Speaker 2>Come hello and welcome to Mom and Mia out loud.

0:00:42.902 --> 0:00:45.262
<v Speaker 2>It's what women are actually talking about. On Monday, the

0:00:45.302 --> 0:00:46.542
<v Speaker 2>twentieth of January.

0:00:46.782 --> 0:00:49.302
<v Speaker 1>I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm Mea Friedman.

0:00:49.102 --> 0:00:51.382
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jesse Stevens, and we are in a new

0:00:51.422 --> 0:00:56.502
<v Speaker 3>studio today. We are making the pivot to video.

0:00:57.262 --> 0:00:57.502
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:00:57.582 --> 0:00:59.662
<v Speaker 3>It makes her sound really up with the times.

0:00:59.662 --> 0:01:01.982
<v Speaker 1>And I just keep shouting, change is exciting.

0:01:02.422 --> 0:01:04.462
<v Speaker 3>She does because you know that Holly and I and

0:01:04.581 --> 0:01:08.021
<v Speaker 3>Nately resist change. We're not sure about it, but we

0:01:08.062 --> 0:01:09.902
<v Speaker 3>are in a new studio. We've got like a fancy

0:01:09.941 --> 0:01:10.782
<v Speaker 3>backdrop and everything.

0:01:10.862 --> 0:01:12.902
<v Speaker 1>This isn't actually going to be our final home. This

0:01:12.941 --> 0:01:15.222
<v Speaker 1>is our temporary studio while we build a new studio

0:01:15.702 --> 0:01:18.302
<v Speaker 1>for ourselves. We're actually borrowing in studio to sort of

0:01:18.342 --> 0:01:21.182
<v Speaker 1>get ready to go into our newstube.

0:01:21.262 --> 0:01:23.741
<v Speaker 2>It's really cool where we are. It's got like hand

0:01:23.742 --> 0:01:27.782
<v Speaker 2>and chairs, it's got like that.

0:01:27.902 --> 0:01:30.581
<v Speaker 3>The office fancy. So I'm going to make a complaint.

0:01:30.582 --> 0:01:34.862
<v Speaker 1>We fit right in anyway, There are some men around two.

0:01:35.222 --> 0:01:37.542
<v Speaker 3>There are also I should note if you follow us

0:01:37.582 --> 0:01:40.022
<v Speaker 3>on Instagram, if you don't, should our videos are going

0:01:40.022 --> 0:01:42.222
<v Speaker 3>to look slightly different. So give us your feedback. We

0:01:42.222 --> 0:01:44.262
<v Speaker 3>don't need to ask for it. They'll give it to us. Oh,

0:01:44.582 --> 0:01:45.581
<v Speaker 3>let us know what they think.

0:01:45.902 --> 0:01:47.342
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, they'll tell us.

0:01:47.862 --> 0:01:50.982
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, It's a massive news week this week, with a

0:01:51.062 --> 0:01:55.182
<v Speaker 2>tentative ceasefire coming into effecting Gaza Trump's inauguration in the

0:01:55.222 --> 0:01:57.702
<v Speaker 2>early hours of tomorrow morning, and as we're about to

0:01:57.782 --> 0:02:01.582
<v Speaker 2>jump into on today's show, many TikTok creators melting down

0:02:01.622 --> 0:02:04.062
<v Speaker 2>about what's going on with their platform in the US.

0:02:04.622 --> 0:02:07.662
<v Speaker 2>So is the TikTok band still in place? Might it

0:02:07.702 --> 0:02:10.822
<v Speaker 2>come here? And why does it matter? Also, I'm not

0:02:10.942 --> 0:02:14.501
<v Speaker 2>the only one having a year of nupe. Michelle Obama

0:02:14.542 --> 0:02:17.102
<v Speaker 2>has rejected her invite to the Trump Party, and we

0:02:17.181 --> 0:02:21.181
<v Speaker 2>think it's big. Letson Energy and Vanity Fair ran a

0:02:21.222 --> 0:02:24.022
<v Speaker 2>full blown cover story about Megan and Harry, along with

0:02:24.102 --> 0:02:27.782
<v Speaker 2>an eight thousand word piece We read it so you

0:02:27.822 --> 0:02:29.422
<v Speaker 2>don't have to let's go.

0:02:31.342 --> 0:02:34.622
<v Speaker 4>We want to hop on here and say goodbye to

0:02:34.702 --> 0:02:36.262
<v Speaker 4>all fourteen million of you guys.

0:02:36.582 --> 0:02:39.262
<v Speaker 5>It's just an app, but it's our whole life.

0:02:39.422 --> 0:02:42.022
<v Speaker 1>No, because anyone else just been crying on this app

0:02:42.022 --> 0:02:47.661
<v Speaker 1>all mate, because it feels like we're losing like community.

0:02:47.942 --> 0:02:49.702
<v Speaker 3>It's just like, why would they take this app from

0:02:49.702 --> 0:02:51.662
<v Speaker 3>the girls? Like if you wanted to take it, take

0:02:51.662 --> 0:02:53.462
<v Speaker 3>it from the boys, not the girls.

0:02:53.542 --> 0:02:54.342
<v Speaker 4>Not the girls.

0:02:54.462 --> 0:02:55.582
<v Speaker 3>I cannot stop crying.

0:02:55.702 --> 0:02:57.582
<v Speaker 2>It's emotional and it's sad.

0:02:58.062 --> 0:03:01.822
<v Speaker 1>I feel so sad. I wonder how you actually would

0:03:01.822 --> 0:03:03.742
<v Speaker 1>go about taking it away from just the boys. I

0:03:03.822 --> 0:03:05.742
<v Speaker 1>quite like that idea. It's a possible solution.

0:03:06.302 --> 0:03:10.062
<v Speaker 3>Late on Saturday, US time, TikTok users in a America

0:03:10.462 --> 0:03:13.422
<v Speaker 3>found their app had stopped working. This was a few

0:03:13.422 --> 0:03:15.982
<v Speaker 3>hours before a federal ban on the app was due

0:03:15.982 --> 0:03:19.902
<v Speaker 3>to take effect. So when they opened TikTok, as some

0:03:19.982 --> 0:03:22.502
<v Speaker 3>of them do every two to three minutes, they were

0:03:22.502 --> 0:03:26.222
<v Speaker 3>presented with the following message, Sorry, TikTok is an available

0:03:26.302 --> 0:03:29.022
<v Speaker 3>right now. A law banning TikTok has been enacted in

0:03:29.062 --> 0:03:33.542
<v Speaker 3>the US. Unfortunately, this means you can't use TikTok for now.

0:03:33.702 --> 0:03:36.702
<v Speaker 3>We are fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he

0:03:36.782 --> 0:03:39.462
<v Speaker 3>will work with us on a solution to reinstate TikTok

0:03:39.742 --> 0:03:43.862
<v Speaker 3>once he takes office. Please stay tuned because you wouldn't

0:03:43.862 --> 0:03:45.982
<v Speaker 3>want TikTok to be full of propaganda.

0:03:45.662 --> 0:03:46.062
<v Speaker 1>Would you.

0:03:46.102 --> 0:03:48.302
<v Speaker 2>No, not at all exactly.

0:03:48.902 --> 0:03:52.422
<v Speaker 3>Let's take forty five steps backwards because for years, lawmakers

0:03:52.422 --> 0:03:55.502
<v Speaker 3>in Congress in the US have been worried about TikTok's

0:03:55.582 --> 0:03:59.502
<v Speaker 3>Chinese ownership. This is for a lot of reasons. TikTok

0:03:59.622 --> 0:04:03.222
<v Speaker 3>is owned by the Chinese company Byteedance, and US officials

0:04:03.262 --> 0:04:06.142
<v Speaker 3>are worried that Chinese laws China is of course run

0:04:06.182 --> 0:04:09.422
<v Speaker 3>by the Chinese Communist Party, could compel them to share

0:04:09.582 --> 0:04:14.022
<v Speaker 3>information about their users sensitive data. They could monitor users,

0:04:14.142 --> 0:04:17.981
<v Speaker 3>They could influence public opinion or elections. It could be

0:04:18.062 --> 0:04:21.502
<v Speaker 3>used to gather intelligence on US citizens. So Jessee is.

0:04:21.541 --> 0:04:25.861
<v Speaker 1>The heart of this that because China is a communist country,

0:04:26.142 --> 0:04:29.821
<v Speaker 1>yep that Bite Downs is essentially controlled by the Chinese government.

0:04:29.981 --> 0:04:31.541
<v Speaker 1>Is that the subtext.

0:04:31.061 --> 0:04:34.101
<v Speaker 3>Correct and that we know that TikTok in terms of

0:04:34.142 --> 0:04:37.862
<v Speaker 3>their settings, they can get details about your location, your

0:04:37.902 --> 0:04:41.901
<v Speaker 3>browsing history. That's one element of it. The other element

0:04:41.941 --> 0:04:44.581
<v Speaker 3>of it is if it is run by the Chinese

0:04:44.621 --> 0:04:49.741
<v Speaker 3>Communist Party, then how about things like propaganda spreading misinformation?

0:04:50.301 --> 0:04:52.861
<v Speaker 3>They have control in that way, which the US has

0:04:52.902 --> 0:04:54.501
<v Speaker 3>been really really apprehensive about.

0:04:54.621 --> 0:04:59.101
<v Speaker 1>And the TikTok algorithm is widely acknowledged as a whole

0:04:59.142 --> 0:05:02.622
<v Speaker 1>other level from every other social media algorithm. So nobody

0:05:02.621 --> 0:05:05.861
<v Speaker 1>knows exactly how that works, and that is proprietary information

0:05:05.981 --> 0:05:07.782
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people would like to get their

0:05:07.782 --> 0:05:08.262
<v Speaker 1>hands on.

0:05:09.582 --> 0:05:13.061
<v Speaker 3>Holders have said youth, mental health, economic concerns. Obviously, this

0:05:13.101 --> 0:05:16.222
<v Speaker 3>isn't a US owned company, so that worries them as well.

0:05:16.262 --> 0:05:19.701
<v Speaker 3>Whereas Twitter, a US owned blocking TikTok, we should also

0:05:19.741 --> 0:05:22.621
<v Speaker 3>say it wasn't going to be unprecedented. India has blocked

0:05:22.662 --> 0:05:25.941
<v Speaker 3>the app, as has Pakistan, and interestingly it has no

0:05:26.022 --> 0:05:29.222
<v Speaker 3>presence in China. You might remember, oh, yeah, they don't

0:05:29.301 --> 0:05:30.701
<v Speaker 3>use it there, they use different app.

0:05:30.702 --> 0:05:32.221
<v Speaker 1>That's worrying.

0:05:32.501 --> 0:05:34.501
<v Speaker 2>It is worry That's a bit like how the Silicon

0:05:34.582 --> 0:05:36.662
<v Speaker 2>Valley tech bros don't let their kids have phones.

0:05:36.861 --> 0:05:38.261
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we're going to put this in the US.

0:05:38.262 --> 0:05:41.062
<v Speaker 3>We're going to spread misinformation, propaganda. We're going to turn

0:05:41.061 --> 0:05:43.501
<v Speaker 3>you all on each other and see what happens.

0:05:43.782 --> 0:05:46.022
<v Speaker 1>So an example of how it could be used I

0:05:46.061 --> 0:05:52.021
<v Speaker 1>was reading is so, for example, one country invades another country. Yeah,

0:05:52.181 --> 0:05:56.381
<v Speaker 1>suddenly your TikTok feed could be full of people in

0:05:56.421 --> 0:06:00.421
<v Speaker 1>the country that was being invaded very happy about the invasion,

0:06:00.541 --> 0:06:03.662
<v Speaker 1>and you could be led to believe, via an algorithm

0:06:04.022 --> 0:06:08.061
<v Speaker 1>and via propaganda, that maybe that invasion was actually very cool.

0:06:08.381 --> 0:06:11.622
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly right. So you might remember all the way

0:06:11.662 --> 0:06:15.782
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty twenty, President Donald Trump signed executive orders

0:06:15.782 --> 0:06:18.741
<v Speaker 3>to ban TikTok. He said it was a national security risk.

0:06:19.301 --> 0:06:22.861
<v Speaker 3>They wanted to force TikTok to sell US operations to

0:06:22.902 --> 0:06:26.222
<v Speaker 3>an American company, So basically have an arm where the

0:06:26.262 --> 0:06:28.462
<v Speaker 3>American side gets to do its own thing, it's got

0:06:28.462 --> 0:06:31.701
<v Speaker 3>some independence. And Byte Dance said absolutely, we will not

0:06:31.741 --> 0:06:35.462
<v Speaker 3>do that. Then in April twenty twenty four, US Congress

0:06:35.501 --> 0:06:38.662
<v Speaker 3>passed a law saying either Byte Dance sells TikTok to

0:06:38.702 --> 0:06:41.662
<v Speaker 3>a non Chinese owner, or we're shutting you down. And

0:06:41.702 --> 0:06:45.381
<v Speaker 3>they chose the latter. So boom, one hundred and seventy

0:06:45.421 --> 0:06:49.342
<v Speaker 3>million Americans who use the app suddenly couldn't until they could.

0:06:49.582 --> 0:06:52.941
<v Speaker 3>Less than twenty four hours later, TikTok was restored. In

0:06:52.981 --> 0:06:57.541
<v Speaker 3>a statement, TikTok said, we thank President Trump for providing

0:06:57.541 --> 0:07:01.062
<v Speaker 3>the necessary clarity and assurance to our service providers. They

0:07:01.101 --> 0:07:05.621
<v Speaker 3>basically said, we don't want to penalize the Americans using it,

0:07:05.821 --> 0:07:09.742
<v Speaker 3>allowing over seven million small businesses to thrive. They and

0:07:09.941 --> 0:07:13.622
<v Speaker 3>for the First Amendment right and against arbitrary censorship.

0:07:14.022 --> 0:07:17.502
<v Speaker 1>Our business is thriving on TikTok. Small businesses I don't.

0:07:17.342 --> 0:07:19.822
<v Speaker 3>Know, some do when some came out. I've seen a

0:07:19.821 --> 0:07:22.662
<v Speaker 3>lot of business owners say that they've they've built their

0:07:22.662 --> 0:07:24.062
<v Speaker 3>businesses off the back of TikTok.

0:07:24.102 --> 0:07:25.662
<v Speaker 1>They did in ads made by TikTok.

0:07:25.982 --> 0:07:29.142
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but think about the economic impact. Think of say

0:07:29.222 --> 0:07:34.182
<v Speaker 2>the tween's skincare craze right, almost entirely fed by TikTok. Right,

0:07:34.262 --> 0:07:37.702
<v Speaker 2>that has entirely changed the beauty industry. So imagine if you.

0:07:37.662 --> 0:07:41.102
<v Speaker 3>Take that out for some small business industry, like a

0:07:41.222 --> 0:07:45.342
<v Speaker 3>cupcake shop on the corner. If you could leverage you know,

0:07:45.462 --> 0:07:48.302
<v Speaker 3>TikTok properly, you can get your message out to a

0:07:48.302 --> 0:07:49.662
<v Speaker 3>lot of people in a very free way.

0:07:49.941 --> 0:07:53.462
<v Speaker 1>It's have you met an algorithm? And are you actually kidding?

0:07:53.902 --> 0:07:56.422
<v Speaker 1>What we know about TikTok is that it's different to

0:07:56.502 --> 0:08:00.302
<v Speaker 1>every other social media app in that followers don't really matter,

0:08:00.782 --> 0:08:04.142
<v Speaker 1>and there's also no real rhyme nor reason to what

0:08:04.342 --> 0:08:06.742
<v Speaker 1>goes viral. So I agree that, as you said, holy

0:08:06.862 --> 0:08:11.261
<v Speaker 1>TikTok globally has a massive cultural in making trends.

0:08:11.381 --> 0:08:14.622
<v Speaker 2>And then that has a commercial impact in selling stuff.

0:08:14.262 --> 0:08:16.742
<v Speaker 1>It can, but you don't have any control over that

0:08:16.782 --> 0:08:18.902
<v Speaker 1>because it's so random. So you can make a video

0:08:18.941 --> 0:08:21.782
<v Speaker 1>that goes absolutely viral, and then you can make a

0:08:21.902 --> 0:08:24.302
<v Speaker 1>hundred other videos that just don't and you don't know

0:08:24.342 --> 0:08:27.901
<v Speaker 1>why because it's about this algorithm. And of course the

0:08:27.941 --> 0:08:30.662
<v Speaker 1>other platforms are going the same way now because everybody's

0:08:30.941 --> 0:08:33.381
<v Speaker 1>trying to be like TikTok, which an idea that it's

0:08:33.422 --> 0:08:36.342
<v Speaker 1>helping small business is just not true.

0:08:36.542 --> 0:08:38.462
<v Speaker 3>I think it is. I would argue with you on that.

0:08:38.502 --> 0:08:40.902
<v Speaker 3>I think especially in like the travel space or whatever.

0:08:41.342 --> 0:08:44.462
<v Speaker 3>You'll notice it. You'll go traveling and everyone is going

0:08:44.462 --> 0:08:46.622
<v Speaker 3>to this cliff top bar. Yeah, why they're going to

0:08:46.622 --> 0:08:48.942
<v Speaker 3>that clifftop bar because they've seen it. That's how travel

0:08:48.982 --> 0:08:50.422
<v Speaker 3>has been things like that.

0:08:50.622 --> 0:08:54.822
<v Speaker 1>It's curated, but it's accidental, Like you can't manufacture that

0:08:54.982 --> 0:08:58.102
<v Speaker 1>unless guess what you pay for advertising on TikTok. You

0:08:58.182 --> 0:09:00.342
<v Speaker 1>can't say, oh, I've got a million followers, I'm going

0:09:00.382 --> 0:09:01.822
<v Speaker 1>to put out this thing and a million people will

0:09:01.862 --> 0:09:03.182
<v Speaker 1>see it. Maybe there are a.

0:09:03.222 --> 0:09:05.342
<v Speaker 3>Lot of businesses in the US which would have a

0:09:05.382 --> 0:09:08.102
<v Speaker 3>TikTok department, and that's what I'm kind of interested about.

0:09:08.502 --> 0:09:11.102
<v Speaker 3>But for context, Trump took a liking to the app

0:09:11.182 --> 0:09:12.942
<v Speaker 3>last year because he used it a lot for his

0:09:13.022 --> 0:09:15.622
<v Speaker 3>presidential campaign. He was kind of good at it, and

0:09:15.902 --> 0:09:19.142
<v Speaker 3>it's unclear whether he actually has the power at this

0:09:19.222 --> 0:09:23.342
<v Speaker 3>point to overrule the TikTok ban. My question is, Maya,

0:09:23.422 --> 0:09:24.702
<v Speaker 3>what do you think happens now?

0:09:24.982 --> 0:09:27.742
<v Speaker 1>We know that over the last or since Trump won

0:09:27.782 --> 0:09:32.182
<v Speaker 1>the election, it's just been a procession of tech billionaires

0:09:32.662 --> 0:09:35.582
<v Speaker 1>and CEOs making their way to Mari Lago, where he's

0:09:35.622 --> 0:09:38.782
<v Speaker 1>been camped out, to kiss the ring and to curry

0:09:38.782 --> 0:09:41.862
<v Speaker 1>favor with him because ironically, yes, he was the one

0:09:41.862 --> 0:09:45.262
<v Speaker 1>that started all of this by saying TikTok should be banned.

0:09:45.022 --> 0:09:46.062
<v Speaker 3>And then he's a savior.

0:09:46.142 --> 0:09:46.582
<v Speaker 1>I can't.

0:09:46.782 --> 0:09:49.822
<v Speaker 3>But of course that the beginning of the story.

0:09:49.462 --> 0:09:51.742
<v Speaker 1>But that is such a great plot point, you know,

0:09:51.902 --> 0:09:55.062
<v Speaker 1>and nobody remembers the beginning of anything. Everybody's just about

0:09:55.062 --> 0:09:56.982
<v Speaker 1>what's happening right now. And also, he used to be

0:09:56.982 --> 0:09:58.982
<v Speaker 1>at war with lots of the tech bros. He said

0:09:59.062 --> 0:10:00.982
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg should be a jail. He was at war with

0:10:01.022 --> 0:10:03.142
<v Speaker 1>lots of them, and now they're all onside. So he's

0:10:03.222 --> 0:10:07.062
<v Speaker 1>very much positioning himself as the hero of free speech

0:10:07.142 --> 0:10:07.902
<v Speaker 1>social media.

0:10:08.342 --> 0:10:12.222
<v Speaker 2>Those guys no reck elation. So it's very on brand

0:10:12.222 --> 0:10:14.022
<v Speaker 2>for him at the moment that he would be the savior.

0:10:14.222 --> 0:10:17.422
<v Speaker 1>So we're about to enter the new phase of this

0:10:17.502 --> 0:10:21.022
<v Speaker 1>reality show and Trump. You know, when it was very

0:10:21.142 --> 0:10:23.982
<v Speaker 1>chaotic last time, and it was all about resistance and

0:10:24.022 --> 0:10:27.582
<v Speaker 1>it was this you know, combative situation between Trump and everybody.

0:10:28.142 --> 0:10:31.862
<v Speaker 1>Now it's completely different this second term, and it's a

0:10:31.902 --> 0:10:34.542
<v Speaker 1>lot more about deference. There's no defiance, it's just deference.

0:10:34.902 --> 0:10:38.422
<v Speaker 1>So what Trump would want is for it to be banned,

0:10:38.622 --> 0:10:41.302
<v Speaker 1>because it's much more interesting if it's banned, and then

0:10:41.382 --> 0:10:44.622
<v Speaker 1>he brings it back versus him stepping in before it's banned,

0:10:44.782 --> 0:10:46.982
<v Speaker 1>do you know what I mean? So everyone's experienced it.

0:10:46.982 --> 0:10:48.702
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot more more interesting, a lot more drama,

0:10:49.102 --> 0:10:50.142
<v Speaker 1>more attention for him.

0:10:50.182 --> 0:10:52.342
<v Speaker 3>The reason it came back, Biden has sort of said,

0:10:52.502 --> 0:10:53.582
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to leave it to Trump.

0:10:53.742 --> 0:10:56.702
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because he's out. He literally has about six more hours.

0:10:56.942 --> 0:10:58.862
<v Speaker 2>And there are all kinds of rumors about the sort

0:10:58.862 --> 0:11:00.942
<v Speaker 2>of coalitions that are being put together that might be

0:11:00.942 --> 0:11:03.182
<v Speaker 2>palatable for the US government to be able to say, look,

0:11:03.262 --> 0:11:06.102
<v Speaker 2>now it's part American owned and all those things, and

0:11:06.142 --> 0:11:07.662
<v Speaker 2>the CEO of TikTok is going to be at the

0:11:07.702 --> 0:11:09.942
<v Speaker 2>inauguration sitting right next to all the other right on

0:11:09.942 --> 0:11:11.742
<v Speaker 2>the stage, So it's going to be.

0:11:11.742 --> 0:11:15.942
<v Speaker 1>Literally just they'll sell some of it to you because

0:11:15.982 --> 0:11:18.182
<v Speaker 1>of that algorithm. So some people are like, oh, he's

0:11:18.222 --> 0:11:19.582
<v Speaker 1>just setting it up so he can sell it to

0:11:19.582 --> 0:11:23.382
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, who is Vice President in waiting. Why that

0:11:23.462 --> 0:11:27.782
<v Speaker 1>won't happen is that this algorithm, this algorithm is so

0:11:28.462 --> 0:11:32.462
<v Speaker 1>some say dodgy, some say incredibly powerful. It's probably both.

0:11:33.182 --> 0:11:36.742
<v Speaker 1>No one wants that ip to get out to competitors,

0:11:36.782 --> 0:11:39.342
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter is a competitor. So even though Elon would

0:11:39.382 --> 0:11:42.502
<v Speaker 1>love it and Trump would probably like Elon to have it,

0:11:42.542 --> 0:11:45.542
<v Speaker 1>Trump's all about the deal. Actually, his favorite thing is

0:11:45.542 --> 0:11:47.942
<v Speaker 1>when people are fighting with each other. So he's now

0:11:47.982 --> 0:11:51.381
<v Speaker 1>got the CEO of TikTok, he's got Mark Zuckerberg, he's

0:11:51.382 --> 0:11:54.502
<v Speaker 1>got Elon, he's got Jeff Bezos. They're all just competing

0:11:54.542 --> 0:11:57.222
<v Speaker 1>with each other, Sam Altman from Open Aie, They're all

0:11:57.262 --> 0:12:00.622
<v Speaker 1>just competing with each other to see who can do

0:12:00.822 --> 0:12:01.702
<v Speaker 1>whatever Trump wants.

0:12:01.902 --> 0:12:04.382
<v Speaker 2>My kids confidently told me that mister Beast is buying it,

0:12:04.822 --> 0:12:08.262
<v Speaker 2>so that actually, and they're like, don't worry, he's going

0:12:08.342 --> 0:12:12.182
<v Speaker 2>to save it. And I'm like, Sam, legit. Anyway, I

0:12:12.222 --> 0:12:14.582
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about the response. Because we started this

0:12:14.662 --> 0:12:17.342
<v Speaker 2>segment by playing all the sound of all the TikTok

0:12:17.542 --> 0:12:21.542
<v Speaker 2>creators crying. Now it's easy to mock that. I can

0:12:21.622 --> 0:12:23.822
<v Speaker 2>understand it. I mean, the thing we were just arguing

0:12:23.862 --> 0:12:25.702
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not people make money from TikTok. Of

0:12:25.702 --> 0:12:28.382
<v Speaker 2>course they do in different ways. You know, if Instagram

0:12:28.462 --> 0:12:31.702
<v Speaker 2>has suddenly disappeared tomorrow, I would take a financial hit,

0:12:31.782 --> 0:12:32.582
<v Speaker 2>like I literally would.

0:12:32.622 --> 0:12:33.902
<v Speaker 1>I mark in my books.

0:12:33.582 --> 0:12:36.302
<v Speaker 2>Through that, we promote our podcasts through that, we make

0:12:36.342 --> 0:12:39.662
<v Speaker 2>content through that. So for some people it's about livelihood,

0:12:39.982 --> 0:12:43.182
<v Speaker 2>but for many, many, many more, it's just about It's

0:12:43.262 --> 0:12:46.302
<v Speaker 2>really interesting in the way we've completely changed our view

0:12:46.342 --> 0:12:49.182
<v Speaker 2>of what media is and how we now see the

0:12:49.182 --> 0:12:51.822
<v Speaker 2>social platforms that we check, as you said, Jesse every

0:12:51.822 --> 0:12:56.022
<v Speaker 2>two or three minutes, not as private companies or media organizations,

0:12:56.382 --> 0:13:00.622
<v Speaker 2>but like air and water, line rights, basic service, basic services,

0:13:00.702 --> 0:13:03.982
<v Speaker 2>human rights, things we can't do without, but our lives

0:13:04.022 --> 0:13:07.422
<v Speaker 2>are there. How could you take that? It's really hard

0:13:07.462 --> 0:13:10.342
<v Speaker 2>not to sound a bit boomery to say this, but

0:13:10.422 --> 0:13:14.062
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of really sad. It's really sad addiction, isn't it.

0:13:14.062 --> 0:13:17.302
<v Speaker 2>It's literal addiction. I think it's really interesting to see that.

0:13:17.422 --> 0:13:20.262
<v Speaker 2>You know, we love it. It's constant distraction, it's our

0:13:20.582 --> 0:13:23.902
<v Speaker 2>particular choice of entertainment and all these things. But it

0:13:23.942 --> 0:13:27.062
<v Speaker 2>isn't air or water, it isn't real human connection, and

0:13:27.102 --> 0:13:30.982
<v Speaker 2>it's really difficult to, i think, for people to get

0:13:30.982 --> 0:13:34.382
<v Speaker 2>their heads around the attachment people have. So you probably

0:13:34.462 --> 0:13:36.262
<v Speaker 2>might have seen a lot of headlines over the weekend

0:13:36.382 --> 0:13:40.862
<v Speaker 2>saying Americans are now logging onto other Chinese owned social

0:13:40.902 --> 0:13:44.742
<v Speaker 2>media platforms, laugh particularly one called red Note, because they

0:13:44.782 --> 0:13:49.822
<v Speaker 2>would rather almost anything than to not have their version

0:13:49.862 --> 0:13:51.502
<v Speaker 2>of TikTok when they open their phone.

0:13:51.822 --> 0:13:54.822
<v Speaker 3>It's one the headline. The headline on the drum was

0:13:54.942 --> 0:13:57.982
<v Speaker 3>TikTok evacuees would rather learn Mandarin for red note than

0:13:58.062 --> 0:14:00.342
<v Speaker 3>use meta, Which is funny because you might have noticed

0:14:00.342 --> 0:14:03.302
<v Speaker 3>in the last week Meta changed how your grid looks.

0:14:03.342 --> 0:14:06.382
<v Speaker 3>Have you noticed this? They've changed it into the TikTok

0:14:07.182 --> 0:14:10.822
<v Speaker 3>dimensions exactly. Look, as you were saying with content creators,

0:14:11.302 --> 0:14:14.862
<v Speaker 3>I understand crying as a content creator. Eighty five percent

0:14:14.902 --> 0:14:18.022
<v Speaker 3>of those content creators are women, and they're making a

0:14:18.062 --> 0:14:20.182
<v Speaker 3>decent living. There's a creative fund.

0:14:20.302 --> 0:14:22.302
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many. No, the creative fund gives

0:14:22.342 --> 0:14:25.462
<v Speaker 1>almost nothing, So I think some people are making money.

0:14:25.542 --> 0:14:28.022
<v Speaker 1>Most people are not making money. So I think what

0:14:28.062 --> 0:14:31.542
<v Speaker 1>they dangle is the prospect of making money. You know, oh,

0:14:31.582 --> 0:14:33.862
<v Speaker 1>you could go viral this video you just post again,

0:14:33.942 --> 0:14:36.062
<v Speaker 1>you could go viral. You could go viral. But even

0:14:36.062 --> 0:14:39.022
<v Speaker 1>the people who go viral can they then monetize that

0:14:39.102 --> 0:14:42.462
<v Speaker 1>virality because it's so random. It's really hard. It is.

0:14:42.542 --> 0:14:45.182
<v Speaker 3>But I think it would be wrong to suggest that

0:14:45.182 --> 0:14:46.902
<v Speaker 3>no one's making money off it like they are. Some

0:14:46.942 --> 0:14:48.702
<v Speaker 3>people have a real, real livelihood.

0:14:48.822 --> 0:14:50.542
<v Speaker 2>Also, it makes them famous and they can speak it

0:14:50.702 --> 0:14:53.222
<v Speaker 2>off to other things. Yeah, I think it's more branding.

0:14:53.302 --> 0:14:55.862
<v Speaker 3>And everyone has said TikTok. I'm like any other social

0:14:55.862 --> 0:14:57.982
<v Speaker 3>media app ever created will make you go faster. It

0:14:58.022 --> 0:15:00.302
<v Speaker 3>will make you go viral faster than anything. In that way,

0:15:00.542 --> 0:15:01.142
<v Speaker 3>it's easier.

0:15:01.302 --> 0:15:03.462
<v Speaker 1>I think it's interesting what you said whole. If someone

0:15:03.502 --> 0:15:08.142
<v Speaker 1>said I'm taking your phone away tomorrow, I would be

0:15:08.142 --> 0:15:10.742
<v Speaker 1>because I'm addicted to it, and also because I assume

0:15:11.182 --> 0:15:13.342
<v Speaker 1>having a phone and having connection to the Internet is

0:15:13.382 --> 0:15:16.902
<v Speaker 1>a human right, Like I get that this idea of

0:15:16.942 --> 0:15:18.622
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean I can't have it?

0:15:18.742 --> 0:15:22.782
<v Speaker 3>And for a generation, this isn't only an entertainment app.

0:15:23.102 --> 0:15:24.902
<v Speaker 3>It's news, it's Google.

0:15:25.102 --> 0:15:27.222
<v Speaker 1>There also be nits. But used to being told no.

0:15:27.342 --> 0:15:29.822
<v Speaker 3>Well yeah, but I'm trying to think of a comparison.

0:15:29.862 --> 0:15:31.622
<v Speaker 3>I mean, think about you in the eighties or whatever,

0:15:31.622 --> 0:15:33.502
<v Speaker 3>if someone tried to take your TV, Like it's a

0:15:33.542 --> 0:15:36.742
<v Speaker 3>similar comparison. But I think that if it is something,

0:15:36.782 --> 0:15:40.662
<v Speaker 3>if it's the way that you search anything, it's like,

0:15:41.102 --> 0:15:43.182
<v Speaker 3>how do I even live now? It's not like any

0:15:43.182 --> 0:15:44.022
<v Speaker 3>other product.

0:15:44.302 --> 0:15:47.062
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting though, because without wanting to go to weeedy,

0:15:47.142 --> 0:15:49.342
<v Speaker 2>what me is saying about the way the algorithm owns

0:15:49.382 --> 0:15:53.462
<v Speaker 2>us all is true. But also this trend and we've

0:15:53.462 --> 0:15:55.222
<v Speaker 2>talked about it all the tech guys who are going

0:15:55.262 --> 0:15:57.982
<v Speaker 2>to be sitting very front and center on that stage tomorrow.

0:15:58.582 --> 0:16:02.182
<v Speaker 2>Is In Zuckerberg's interview with Joe Rogan, he very much

0:16:02.222 --> 0:16:05.262
<v Speaker 2>paints himself and the other tech companies as massive victims

0:16:05.302 --> 0:16:08.542
<v Speaker 2>of government overreach. Right, so he very much says, you know,

0:16:09.022 --> 0:16:11.222
<v Speaker 2>government's all over the world, and I assume when he

0:16:11.262 --> 0:16:14.102
<v Speaker 2>says that, he is also partly referencing Australia and our

0:16:14.262 --> 0:16:17.382
<v Speaker 2>upcoming social media band are trying to limit our business,

0:16:17.542 --> 0:16:19.902
<v Speaker 2>trying to take your information away from you, trying to

0:16:19.902 --> 0:16:23.222
<v Speaker 2>take away your free speech. And so it's very on

0:16:23.502 --> 0:16:26.382
<v Speaker 2>brand at the moment, very popular because they don't want

0:16:26.422 --> 0:16:28.022
<v Speaker 2>to be regulated. Yet they don't want to be regulated,

0:16:28.102 --> 0:16:29.782
<v Speaker 2>they want to make more and more money. But happily

0:16:29.782 --> 0:16:33.462
<v Speaker 2>they've also made their users, including all of us, believe

0:16:33.582 --> 0:16:37.102
<v Speaker 2>that their services are so essential and they're trying to

0:16:37.102 --> 0:16:39.342
<v Speaker 2>be taken away. And so that's why it's so genius

0:16:39.382 --> 0:16:42.382
<v Speaker 2>in a way that when an Americans opened TikTok yesterday

0:16:42.422 --> 0:16:45.462
<v Speaker 2>and saw that it was gone, the President Trump of

0:16:45.502 --> 0:16:49.542
<v Speaker 2>it all in that message was immediately like, but Daddy

0:16:49.542 --> 0:16:51.342
<v Speaker 2>Trump is going to come along and he's going to

0:16:51.382 --> 0:16:54.702
<v Speaker 2>give all you kids back your TikTok, and all those people,

0:16:54.782 --> 0:16:57.582
<v Speaker 2>young people, many of whom probably are not sympathetic to

0:16:57.622 --> 0:17:01.702
<v Speaker 2>President Trump in general, are going to be like, thanks, Dad.

0:17:01.622 --> 0:17:05.941
<v Speaker 3>He saved us. Those companies have so far been stifled

0:17:05.942 --> 0:17:07.022
<v Speaker 3>by government overreach.

0:17:07.101 --> 0:17:08.142
<v Speaker 2>Can you imagine what will happen?

0:17:08.182 --> 0:17:10.742
<v Speaker 3>You imagine what would happen when they're.

0:17:10.502 --> 0:17:14.342
<v Speaker 1>Not After the break, Michelle Obama has taken on Holly's

0:17:14.341 --> 0:17:17.022
<v Speaker 1>word of the Year, and I have an announcement.

0:17:19.381 --> 0:17:23.982
<v Speaker 6>Four bush and a bikini full bush, and a bikini

0:17:24.422 --> 0:17:30.901
<v Speaker 6>full bush and a bikini like full bush in a bikini.

0:17:31.502 --> 0:17:33.462
<v Speaker 1>Friends, it wouldn't be the start of the year without

0:17:33.502 --> 0:17:36.581
<v Speaker 1>important pubic hair news. And today we have some full

0:17:36.621 --> 0:17:38.782
<v Speaker 1>bush in a bikini. As you just heard, is a

0:17:38.782 --> 0:17:41.742
<v Speaker 1>phrase that I'd like to consider for our first out

0:17:41.782 --> 0:17:45.821
<v Speaker 1>loud merch drop because it speaks to a growing full

0:17:45.861 --> 0:17:49.141
<v Speaker 1>bush movement in the pants of gen Z women while

0:17:49.222 --> 0:17:52.621
<v Speaker 1>gen X and boomer women are feeling very excited about

0:17:52.702 --> 0:17:56.702
<v Speaker 1>finally having on trend pubes. Happy days. All right, let's

0:17:56.742 --> 0:18:00.302
<v Speaker 1>unpack these pubes together. The woman you just heard is

0:18:00.341 --> 0:18:02.381
<v Speaker 1>the one we have to thank for this new phrase.

0:18:02.661 --> 0:18:06.262
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Suninda, and she's a regular person on TikTok.

0:18:06.262 --> 0:18:10.381
<v Speaker 1>Funnily enough, who was just scrolling through Etsy and found

0:18:10.422 --> 0:18:12.861
<v Speaker 1>this bikini that she quite liked. And underneath there were

0:18:12.942 --> 0:18:16.422
<v Speaker 1>all these reviews from people who'd bought the bikini, including

0:18:16.702 --> 0:18:19.262
<v Speaker 1>someone who'd bought it and posted a picture of herself,

0:18:19.262 --> 0:18:22.581
<v Speaker 1>and in this picture it was a positive review. Suninda

0:18:22.742 --> 0:18:26.182
<v Speaker 1>noticed that she had a very, very full bush. Now

0:18:26.341 --> 0:18:30.221
<v Speaker 1>nobody can actually locate this photo, because yes, I have tried.

0:18:30.661 --> 0:18:33.581
<v Speaker 1>The sentiment is being widely embraced by the thirteen million

0:18:33.581 --> 0:18:37.382
<v Speaker 1>people who've watched that video about it. Now, this does

0:18:37.422 --> 0:18:39.821
<v Speaker 1>seem to be bad news for laser people who might

0:18:39.861 --> 0:18:43.302
<v Speaker 1>want to consider merkans, because laser is sadly not reversible.

0:18:43.821 --> 0:18:48.302
<v Speaker 1>There has been some really awesome commentary overall, translating to

0:18:48.742 --> 0:18:54.022
<v Speaker 1>you do you. One particular poetic observer noted pubic hair,

0:18:54.182 --> 0:18:57.581
<v Speaker 1>often viewed through a lens of societal uneasy taboo, is

0:18:57.661 --> 0:19:01.742
<v Speaker 1>here reclaimed as a form of personal expression and empowerment,

0:19:02.341 --> 0:19:06.061
<v Speaker 1>and another person brilliantly described it as age one week

0:19:06.141 --> 0:19:11.901
<v Speaker 1>born on TikTok appearance dense and luxuriant. The movement's unofficial

0:19:11.942 --> 0:19:15.901
<v Speaker 1>motto comes from this comment. Every time you keep your

0:19:15.901 --> 0:19:19.621
<v Speaker 1>bush despite societal pressures an angel gains its wings.

0:19:19.901 --> 0:19:23.022
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, have you guys seen this at the beach this summer? No,

0:19:23.182 --> 0:19:24.101
<v Speaker 3>I've seen it in the wild.

0:19:24.262 --> 0:19:26.061
<v Speaker 2>I think I see it anyway, because I hang around

0:19:26.101 --> 0:19:29.702
<v Speaker 2>with normal people. Yeah, exactly, we still have pubic care.

0:19:30.101 --> 0:19:31.142
<v Speaker 3>I've definitely seen.

0:19:30.942 --> 0:19:33.502
<v Speaker 2>A very judgmental comment. Me is glaring at me because

0:19:33.542 --> 0:19:35.542
<v Speaker 2>it sound like I'm saying that people who don't have

0:19:35.581 --> 0:19:37.861
<v Speaker 2>pubic care not normal. No, No, I retract that comment.

0:19:38.022 --> 0:19:39.061
<v Speaker 2>You misread my look.

0:19:39.141 --> 0:19:43.101
<v Speaker 1>It was what situations are you in where you see

0:19:43.262 --> 0:19:45.262
<v Speaker 1>other women's pubic care when.

0:19:45.182 --> 0:19:46.982
<v Speaker 2>Miss the beach and it's coming out of the sides

0:19:47.022 --> 0:19:47.662
<v Speaker 2>of their bikini.

0:19:47.661 --> 0:19:50.542
<v Speaker 1>But so you have seen it in the wild, Okay.

0:19:50.381 --> 0:19:52.141
<v Speaker 3>And when you're saying you don't think it's intentional, I

0:19:52.182 --> 0:19:52.622
<v Speaker 3>don't think.

0:19:52.742 --> 0:19:54.821
<v Speaker 2>I don't think i've seen it in the wild as

0:19:54.861 --> 0:19:57.342
<v Speaker 2>like a cool TikTok trend. I think I've just seen

0:19:57.381 --> 0:19:59.222
<v Speaker 2>it in the wild as the way that women look

0:19:59.262 --> 0:20:00.502
<v Speaker 2>when they go swimming at the beach.

0:20:00.542 --> 0:20:04.861
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I wonder if as a result of the new

0:20:04.982 --> 0:20:06.941
<v Speaker 3>cut of bikinis. When I say new, let's say the

0:20:07.022 --> 0:20:10.901
<v Speaker 3>last two years, yes, is inevitable have gone? I either

0:20:10.982 --> 0:20:14.742
<v Speaker 3>remove with a tweezer every single hair I've ever grown,

0:20:15.101 --> 0:20:17.941
<v Speaker 3>or I just embrace this because the cut at the

0:20:17.982 --> 0:20:21.262
<v Speaker 3>front I quite like a not a boyleg, but like,

0:20:21.502 --> 0:20:23.661
<v Speaker 3>oh yeah, I don't do a G string or whatever.

0:20:23.742 --> 0:20:26.302
<v Speaker 1>I just the high nineties, the high nineties thing.

0:20:26.742 --> 0:20:28.741
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you can get a great bikini like you

0:20:28.782 --> 0:20:32.022
<v Speaker 3>can do your bikini line. You've not even half removed

0:20:32.022 --> 0:20:33.982
<v Speaker 3>what's going to be on show. So I think people

0:20:33.982 --> 0:20:37.061
<v Speaker 3>have just gone it's all too hard. Let the bush fly.

0:20:38.101 --> 0:20:42.902
<v Speaker 2>Tomorrow is the coronation, sorry, inauguration of Donald Trump as

0:20:42.942 --> 0:20:45.821
<v Speaker 2>the returning president of the USA. And look, we're going

0:20:45.901 --> 0:20:48.502
<v Speaker 2>to be pulling Amelia Lester out of the corner. She's

0:20:48.621 --> 0:20:51.861
<v Speaker 2>likely rocking in to attend our debrief when we're going

0:20:51.901 --> 0:20:54.942
<v Speaker 2>to record a little episode about the event just for subscribers.

0:20:55.381 --> 0:20:58.821
<v Speaker 2>But someone who is not accepting her invitation to the party, which,

0:20:58.901 --> 0:21:01.101
<v Speaker 2>unlike the last time Trump took off, is going to

0:21:01.101 --> 0:21:05.581
<v Speaker 2>be a big, well attended affair with huge, very well

0:21:05.581 --> 0:21:09.341
<v Speaker 2>funded victory parties all over town, is Michelle Obama, who

0:21:09.381 --> 0:21:12.942
<v Speaker 2>is we've decided giving big let them energy to her

0:21:13.061 --> 0:21:16.901
<v Speaker 2>year of nup. Her husband is going, Hillary Clinton is going,

0:21:17.141 --> 0:21:20.502
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris and Doug are going. Former presidents Bush and

0:21:20.542 --> 0:21:22.702
<v Speaker 2>Clinton and the current one we think he's called Joe

0:21:22.702 --> 0:21:26.221
<v Speaker 2>Biden will be there, of course with Jill. But Michelle

0:21:26.302 --> 0:21:29.581
<v Speaker 2>has said nup, not doing it, and I think it

0:21:29.702 --> 0:21:32.742
<v Speaker 2>means something. Last time Trump was standing on that White

0:21:32.742 --> 0:21:34.821
<v Speaker 2>House stage in his big coat, it was the Obamas

0:21:34.821 --> 0:21:38.221
<v Speaker 2>who were leaving office, and she said, understandably perhaps that

0:21:38.341 --> 0:21:41.262
<v Speaker 2>she cried her eyes out afterwards. Here's a little bit

0:21:41.341 --> 0:21:42.502
<v Speaker 2>of what she said about it.

0:21:42.661 --> 0:21:46.941
<v Speaker 4>To sit on that stage and watch the opposite of

0:21:46.982 --> 0:21:50.582
<v Speaker 4>what we represented on display. There was no diversity, there

0:21:50.661 --> 0:21:53.861
<v Speaker 4>was no color on that stage. There was no reflection

0:21:54.141 --> 0:21:59.061
<v Speaker 4>of the broader sense of America. I cried for thirty

0:21:59.101 --> 0:22:04.302
<v Speaker 4>minutes straight, uncontrollable sobbing, because that's how much we were

0:22:04.341 --> 0:22:06.782
<v Speaker 4>holding it together for eight years.

0:22:07.182 --> 0:22:10.902
<v Speaker 2>So this time she is protecting her peace and nupping

0:22:10.901 --> 0:22:15.142
<v Speaker 2>it so we believe, is Nancy Pelosi. I wonder if

0:22:15.141 --> 0:22:17.061
<v Speaker 2>this is all part of the lessons being learned from

0:22:17.061 --> 0:22:20.101
<v Speaker 2>the Trump era, like fuck the rules, fuck the niceties,

0:22:20.182 --> 0:22:23.661
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna do what we want to do. Because former

0:22:23.702 --> 0:22:27.821
<v Speaker 2>president's wives have always gone to these things. Michelle Obama, though,

0:22:27.901 --> 0:22:29.941
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most high profile of all of

0:22:29.982 --> 0:22:32.341
<v Speaker 2>those women, and she is not going to go and

0:22:32.381 --> 0:22:35.302
<v Speaker 2>smile and shake hands with the man she's openly criticized

0:22:35.341 --> 0:22:36.941
<v Speaker 2>in the past, unlike a lot of the people who

0:22:36.982 --> 0:22:38.862
<v Speaker 2>are going to be there, who have said awful things

0:22:38.901 --> 0:22:42.101
<v Speaker 2>about Trump before, but now suddenly, as we just discussed,

0:22:42.141 --> 0:22:44.302
<v Speaker 2>are saying, Oh, actually he's fine. Here, I have some money,

0:22:44.422 --> 0:22:45.341
<v Speaker 2>let's have a party.

0:22:45.901 --> 0:22:46.141
<v Speaker 1>Mia.

0:22:46.302 --> 0:22:49.222
<v Speaker 2>Does Michelle's not have a broader significance?

0:22:49.901 --> 0:22:52.222
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was really interesting that she did this

0:22:52.502 --> 0:22:56.502
<v Speaker 1>after last week or the week before not attending Jimmy

0:22:56.542 --> 0:22:57.861
<v Speaker 1>Carter's funeral as well.

0:22:57.982 --> 0:22:59.581
<v Speaker 3>What was the reason for that? Has she said? What

0:22:59.621 --> 0:23:00.261
<v Speaker 3>the reason was?

0:23:00.462 --> 0:23:03.542
<v Speaker 1>She the reason that she gave for not attending Jimmy

0:23:03.581 --> 0:23:06.222
<v Speaker 1>Carter's funeral, He was the oldest living president, and every

0:23:06.222 --> 0:23:08.621
<v Speaker 1>other living president was there. There were some really funny

0:23:08.661 --> 0:23:11.981
<v Speaker 1>memes and videos about that. But she said she had

0:23:12.022 --> 0:23:14.621
<v Speaker 1>a scheduling conflict, and it was later discovered that she

0:23:14.742 --> 0:23:18.141
<v Speaker 1>was on holiday I think in Hawaii or somewhere, and

0:23:18.222 --> 0:23:20.262
<v Speaker 1>so that actually all sparked up a little bit of

0:23:20.302 --> 0:23:23.262
<v Speaker 1>divorce rumors over the weekend. How are the Obama's doing?

0:23:23.302 --> 0:23:25.262
<v Speaker 1>They haven't been seen in public for a while, which

0:23:25.262 --> 0:23:29.542
<v Speaker 1>Obama hosed down by posting a happy birthday photo with

0:23:29.621 --> 0:23:32.502
<v Speaker 1>him and Michelle holding hands over a table, and she commented,

0:23:32.542 --> 0:23:36.382
<v Speaker 1>love you honey anyway her nup. I think, Holly, you've

0:23:36.422 --> 0:23:39.382
<v Speaker 1>nailed it. It's you know, if you've read Becoming, which

0:23:39.422 --> 0:23:44.421
<v Speaker 1>we all have. Michelle's autobiography, she talks so much about

0:23:44.422 --> 0:23:49.182
<v Speaker 1>being the first Black first lady and how she had

0:23:49.222 --> 0:23:53.422
<v Speaker 1>to just be so so diligent about not giving anybody

0:23:53.462 --> 0:23:56.861
<v Speaker 1>anything to weaponize against her and against black women and

0:23:56.901 --> 0:24:01.501
<v Speaker 1>black people by being perfect essentially, And imagine what it

0:24:01.782 --> 0:24:03.901
<v Speaker 1>must have felt like for her to then leave and

0:24:03.942 --> 0:24:07.141
<v Speaker 1>then see basically Milania just came in and took a

0:24:07.182 --> 0:24:11.381
<v Speaker 1>big dump over what that role has traditioned been, including

0:24:11.581 --> 0:24:14.742
<v Speaker 1>my personal highlight of wearing the jacket saying I don't

0:24:14.782 --> 0:24:17.141
<v Speaker 1>care to you when she was going to visit children

0:24:17.141 --> 0:24:20.782
<v Speaker 1>in cages. So I think she's literally just drawn a

0:24:20.821 --> 0:24:24.101
<v Speaker 1>line in the sand. She's having the year of nap,

0:24:24.702 --> 0:24:28.341
<v Speaker 1>just like you whole, and I think that everybody's seen,

0:24:28.901 --> 0:24:32.302
<v Speaker 1>particularly women. You can do everything right, Kamala Harras. You

0:24:32.341 --> 0:24:35.302
<v Speaker 1>can be even Hillary Clinton, you can be qualified, You

0:24:35.341 --> 0:24:37.421
<v Speaker 1>can do all the right things, you can say all

0:24:37.422 --> 0:24:40.181
<v Speaker 1>the right things, and it doesn't seem to matter.

0:24:40.621 --> 0:24:43.382
<v Speaker 3>I think she's read let them. I reckon she read

0:24:43.381 --> 0:24:45.861
<v Speaker 3>her over the holidays, because I know that Oprah, how

0:24:45.901 --> 0:24:48.381
<v Speaker 3>I believe you know they're in a chap. Sure, Oprah

0:24:48.422 --> 0:24:51.542
<v Speaker 3>read it. Oprah loved it. I think she said, Michelle,

0:24:51.661 --> 0:24:53.622
<v Speaker 3>not passive aggressively, but just said, I think you'd get

0:24:53.621 --> 0:24:54.181
<v Speaker 3>a lot out of this.

0:24:54.381 --> 0:24:55.741
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let them have their party.

0:24:55.901 --> 0:24:58.262
<v Speaker 3>Yes, let them have their party, but let me not come.

0:24:58.502 --> 0:25:00.702
<v Speaker 3>And that's what she's decided to do.

0:25:00.821 --> 0:25:03.061
<v Speaker 2>Because I ask you, though, Jessie, because you're very good

0:25:03.061 --> 0:25:06.302
<v Speaker 2>at this, what's the respectful line of nup in that situation?

0:25:06.422 --> 0:25:09.981
<v Speaker 2>Because when you lose, you shake the hand of the winner,

0:25:10.502 --> 0:25:13.221
<v Speaker 2>and you know the progressive side of politics, and made

0:25:13.262 --> 0:25:17.141
<v Speaker 2>a big deal of that after the insurrection in Washington

0:25:17.381 --> 0:25:20.221
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one. So you shake the hand, you

0:25:20.302 --> 0:25:24.061
<v Speaker 2>follow the niceties. Is there like a disrespectful line of nup?

0:25:24.101 --> 0:25:25.782
<v Speaker 2>Because does that also mean you have to go?

0:25:26.182 --> 0:25:28.542
<v Speaker 3>You were right? I was wrong. I reckon she did

0:25:28.542 --> 0:25:32.542
<v Speaker 3>that in twenty sixteen watching the Obamas after Trump said

0:25:32.982 --> 0:25:37.462
<v Speaker 3>that Barack Obama was the head of isis total falsehoods

0:25:37.581 --> 0:25:40.221
<v Speaker 3>about them For them to show up at his inauguration

0:25:40.782 --> 0:25:44.382
<v Speaker 3>and shake his hand and be respectful they did their job.

0:25:44.661 --> 0:25:47.742
<v Speaker 3>She's no longer the first lady. I think your job's finished.

0:25:47.821 --> 0:25:48.702
<v Speaker 3>It's so fine.

0:25:48.782 --> 0:25:52.061
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, whereas your role as a former president, your job's

0:25:52.141 --> 0:25:53.221
<v Speaker 1>kind of neverit different.

0:25:53.341 --> 0:25:55.101
<v Speaker 3>It's different. And she wasn't the president, she was the

0:25:55.101 --> 0:25:55.661
<v Speaker 3>first lady.

0:25:55.542 --> 0:25:57.981
<v Speaker 1>Because Obama sat next to Trump at the funeral. Yeah,

0:25:58.022 --> 0:26:01.542
<v Speaker 1>and they were famously seen. He was sort of like laughing.

0:26:01.581 --> 0:26:03.221
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was making small talk. He'd have to.

0:26:03.502 --> 0:26:05.861
<v Speaker 3>And let's not forget there is one president in all

0:26:05.942 --> 0:26:08.221
<v Speaker 3>of US history who did not show up to an inauguration,

0:26:08.702 --> 0:26:10.661
<v Speaker 3>and it was Donald Trump and Millennia. They did not

0:26:10.702 --> 0:26:13.902
<v Speaker 3>show up to Joe bien As inauguration. So I totally

0:26:14.262 --> 0:26:17.462
<v Speaker 3>respect her move. There's another nut story this week. I'm

0:26:17.462 --> 0:26:20.661
<v Speaker 3>not sure if you've seen it. So Novak Djokovic is

0:26:20.702 --> 0:26:23.861
<v Speaker 3>also embracing his year of nuts. Some would say, you know,

0:26:23.901 --> 0:26:26.381
<v Speaker 3>we're going on to twenty years of nut with Djokovic.

0:26:26.581 --> 0:26:28.701
<v Speaker 2>You're a tennis correspondent.

0:26:28.141 --> 0:26:31.022
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Australian Open, so this is the news today. He

0:26:31.101 --> 0:26:34.302
<v Speaker 3>won his quarter final last night and then he refused

0:26:34.381 --> 0:26:36.821
<v Speaker 3>to speak to the reporter on the court. He just

0:26:36.942 --> 0:26:39.142
<v Speaker 3>kind of said something to the audience and then walked off.

0:26:39.782 --> 0:26:43.542
<v Speaker 3>He was speaking afterwards about why he made that decision.

0:26:43.702 --> 0:26:45.901
<v Speaker 5>The reason why I chose not to do that is

0:26:45.942 --> 0:26:50.061
<v Speaker 5>because a few days ago a famous a sports journalist

0:26:50.061 --> 0:26:53.542
<v Speaker 5>here from Australia who works for a main broadcaster of

0:26:53.581 --> 0:26:57.381
<v Speaker 5>Australia and open at Channel nine, decided to mock a

0:26:57.462 --> 0:27:02.701
<v Speaker 5>Serbian fans and he made insulting and offensive comments towards me.

0:27:03.621 --> 0:27:07.341
<v Speaker 5>So I was hoping he's going to apologize in public,

0:27:07.381 --> 0:27:08.621
<v Speaker 5>which he hasn't done yet.

0:27:09.581 --> 0:27:11.022
<v Speaker 6>I made it into the channel name.

0:27:11.182 --> 0:27:13.701
<v Speaker 3>So what did Jones actually say? Here's a grab of

0:27:13.702 --> 0:27:15.102
<v Speaker 3>what he said the other day back to.

0:27:15.061 --> 0:27:18.661
<v Speaker 7>Melbourne Park where you can see the Novak Djokovic fans

0:27:18.661 --> 0:27:23.061
<v Speaker 7>there in full voice. Yeah, the chances are quite exuretiny Novak,

0:27:23.101 --> 0:27:27.941
<v Speaker 7>he's overrated. Novaksa has the Novack kicking out.

0:27:28.821 --> 0:27:30.141
<v Speaker 6>Oh I'm glad they can't hear me.

0:27:30.341 --> 0:27:32.901
<v Speaker 1>But wasn't he just repeating what the chances were saying.

0:27:34.101 --> 0:27:37.382
<v Speaker 3>They were actually supporters and he mocked the Serbian fans,

0:27:37.942 --> 0:27:41.821
<v Speaker 3>which Novak hated. I reckon it's totally fair enough for

0:27:41.942 --> 0:27:46.221
<v Speaker 3>him to finish playing a match which he won. You know,

0:27:46.302 --> 0:27:47.742
<v Speaker 3>he's been the number one in the world for a

0:27:47.821 --> 0:27:49.342
<v Speaker 3>very long time. I'm not sure if he is right now,

0:27:49.381 --> 0:27:52.022
<v Speaker 3>but he has been to be mocked by a commentator

0:27:52.061 --> 0:27:54.421
<v Speaker 3>like that. It's like, no, I'm not going to come

0:27:54.422 --> 0:27:57.022
<v Speaker 3>out and talk to you. And then this morning Jones

0:27:57.022 --> 0:27:57.941
<v Speaker 3>came out and apologize.

0:27:57.942 --> 0:28:00.221
<v Speaker 1>Remember when Michelle Obama said when they go low, we

0:28:00.302 --> 0:28:01.702
<v Speaker 1>go high about Donald Trump.

0:28:02.341 --> 0:28:05.102
<v Speaker 3>Now it's when we go low we go to Hawaii,

0:28:05.101 --> 0:28:05.702
<v Speaker 3>we don't.

0:28:05.502 --> 0:28:08.661
<v Speaker 2>Go It's interesting because I reckon that fits into the

0:28:08.702 --> 0:28:11.181
<v Speaker 2>screw of the rules. Who because it's like, you have

0:28:11.262 --> 0:28:13.142
<v Speaker 2>to give an interview to this particular journalist.

0:28:13.302 --> 0:28:14.502
<v Speaker 1>This is the official broadcaster.

0:28:14.621 --> 0:28:16.381
<v Speaker 2>You absolutely have to. This is how it works. It's

0:28:16.422 --> 0:28:17.901
<v Speaker 2>always been done like this, so on and so on

0:28:17.942 --> 0:28:20.262
<v Speaker 2>and so on, and there's just a whole lot of people,

0:28:20.422 --> 0:28:22.941
<v Speaker 2>powerful people, it has to be said, who are able

0:28:22.982 --> 0:28:26.061
<v Speaker 2>to do it just going not gonna don't like you,

0:28:26.462 --> 0:28:27.221
<v Speaker 2>that's not okay.

0:28:27.581 --> 0:28:29.782
<v Speaker 1>On that note, I've got a little announcement. For the

0:28:29.782 --> 0:28:33.101
<v Speaker 1>first time in out Loud history, I am changing my

0:28:33.141 --> 0:28:36.941
<v Speaker 1>word of the Year. Oh so I should have known

0:28:37.022 --> 0:28:40.142
<v Speaker 1>there was a problem when because out Loud as we

0:28:40.182 --> 0:28:42.741
<v Speaker 1>record our word of the Year episode just before we

0:28:42.782 --> 0:28:44.542
<v Speaker 1>go off on Christmas break, can we release it on

0:28:44.542 --> 0:28:48.142
<v Speaker 1>news Day? As is tradition but when I was away,

0:28:48.661 --> 0:28:50.822
<v Speaker 1>even before the episode came out, I couldn't remember what

0:28:50.822 --> 0:28:51.382
<v Speaker 1>the word is.

0:28:51.862 --> 0:28:55.502
<v Speaker 3>I actually can't remember right now. It was make okay mate.

0:28:55.502 --> 0:28:57.782
<v Speaker 1>I don't want that word a bit. I refuse to

0:28:57.822 --> 0:29:00.862
<v Speaker 1>have it. My word is going to be let them.

0:29:01.182 --> 0:29:03.902
<v Speaker 1>And I know I'm breaking two rules. Not only am

0:29:03.902 --> 0:29:06.462
<v Speaker 1>I changing my word, but I'm usually the stickler for

0:29:06.542 --> 0:29:08.462
<v Speaker 1>you can't have more than one word. It can all

0:29:08.502 --> 0:29:11.502
<v Speaker 1>be made one word with a hyphen. And I didn't

0:29:11.542 --> 0:29:14.542
<v Speaker 1>know about let them before, and I've just found myself

0:29:14.702 --> 0:29:17.982
<v Speaker 1>using that so much in January when I couldn't remember

0:29:18.022 --> 0:29:20.062
<v Speaker 1>what my other word was. So I'm changing.

0:29:20.102 --> 0:29:23.862
<v Speaker 2>Them them, turn it into one word, let them, leave them,

0:29:23.942 --> 0:29:24.302
<v Speaker 2>let them.

0:29:24.342 --> 0:29:25.862
<v Speaker 3>We should say, if you missed our word of the

0:29:25.902 --> 0:29:28.542
<v Speaker 3>Year episode, we'll have a link in our show notes.

0:29:28.582 --> 0:29:30.822
<v Speaker 3>And apparently there are new rules and you can just

0:29:30.942 --> 0:29:36.461
<v Speaker 3>choose a word now I need. The new season of

0:29:36.502 --> 0:29:39.661
<v Speaker 3>I'm a Celebrity premiered last night, and no one recognized

0:29:39.661 --> 0:29:42.702
<v Speaker 3>each other. That's hyperbolic, but in an article for news

0:29:42.742 --> 0:29:45.342
<v Speaker 3>dot com dot Au, Nick Bond writes it makes for

0:29:45.382 --> 0:29:48.021
<v Speaker 3>an awkward I'm a celeb premiere when even the stars

0:29:48.022 --> 0:29:51.781
<v Speaker 3>don't recognize each other. Samantha, who featured on Married at

0:29:51.782 --> 0:29:54.741
<v Speaker 3>First Sight, asked sam Ti Day, the former captain of

0:29:54.742 --> 0:30:00.382
<v Speaker 3>the Brisbane Broncos, so what's your talent? I really like

0:30:00.462 --> 0:30:02.382
<v Speaker 3>the use of the word in there.

0:30:02.742 --> 0:30:05.142
<v Speaker 2>But before you went in, don't you reckon? You'd bone

0:30:05.222 --> 0:30:08.062
<v Speaker 2>up on like every possible person who might be in there,

0:30:08.102 --> 0:30:09.502
<v Speaker 2>so you could go sah.

0:30:09.782 --> 0:30:11.981
<v Speaker 3>Holly, you could have done that and you still wouldn't

0:30:11.982 --> 0:30:13.742
<v Speaker 3>have come across some of these. I'm going to throw

0:30:13.782 --> 0:30:18.942
<v Speaker 3>some names at you. Zach Towhey, guess, come on, guess.

0:30:19.422 --> 0:30:24.102
<v Speaker 2>Zach Towey. Does he have a you know what?

0:30:24.222 --> 0:30:29.262
<v Speaker 3>He might, but he's an AFL player, Tina proves, Come on.

0:30:29.222 --> 0:30:31.102
<v Speaker 1>Tina influencers.

0:30:31.422 --> 0:30:32.102
<v Speaker 2>I feel bad.

0:30:32.262 --> 0:30:35.741
<v Speaker 3>Love Island contestant probably has more flowers than both of

0:30:35.742 --> 0:30:40.742
<v Speaker 3>you put together on Instagram. I'm sure going Holy yeah right,

0:30:42.262 --> 0:30:47.461
<v Speaker 3>Max Blegda never heard he's so famous. He is a

0:30:47.582 --> 0:30:50.542
<v Speaker 3>UK TikTok creator with you half a million followers or something.

0:30:50.982 --> 0:30:53.902
<v Speaker 3>There's also Nikky Buckley. What do I feel like? You know?

0:30:54.102 --> 0:30:54.662
<v Speaker 1>Sale of the.

0:30:54.622 --> 0:31:00.302
<v Speaker 2>Century Maddie j who he is from Lovely Chat podcaster

0:31:00.502 --> 0:31:00.982
<v Speaker 2>married to.

0:31:02.742 --> 0:31:08.902
<v Speaker 3>Shana Jack No decorator, olympian. Oh you're thinking of I

0:31:08.942 --> 0:31:12.942
<v Speaker 3>know she thinks she's on a TV Who's on the block.

0:31:13.462 --> 0:31:16.421
<v Speaker 2>Blaze, she'd be quite different.

0:31:17.462 --> 0:31:21.941
<v Speaker 3>Shana Jack Swims, Reggie Bird. Do we remember Reggie? She

0:31:22.022 --> 0:31:22.622
<v Speaker 3>won Big Brother?

0:31:23.222 --> 0:31:27.262
<v Speaker 1>Oh Reggie? I remember that Reggie lost her sight, didn't

0:31:27.262 --> 0:31:28.022
<v Speaker 1>she recently?

0:31:28.062 --> 0:31:29.702
<v Speaker 3>She's got a degenerate condition.

0:31:29.902 --> 0:31:32.542
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that'll make it a challenge in the jungle. Maybe

0:31:32.582 --> 0:31:35.021
<v Speaker 1>it'll be easier because she doesn't have to look at

0:31:35.022 --> 0:31:35.622
<v Speaker 1>what she's eating.

0:31:35.622 --> 0:31:38.862
<v Speaker 3>She can just eat you exactly. Right point is there's

0:31:38.862 --> 0:31:42.222
<v Speaker 3>a lot of diversity in the fame element. My pet

0:31:42.262 --> 0:31:44.742
<v Speaker 3>hate is when I see people comment on a news

0:31:44.862 --> 0:31:47.822
<v Speaker 3>article about a famous person with who, because I look

0:31:47.862 --> 0:31:50.222
<v Speaker 3>it up, and also it's a flex you're trying to say,

0:31:50.462 --> 0:31:52.062
<v Speaker 3>like I don't even know who that is.

0:31:52.182 --> 0:31:54.981
<v Speaker 1>I think you're being harsh. I often will be reading

0:31:55.542 --> 0:31:58.622
<v Speaker 1>something or looking at a picture of someone, and in

0:31:58.622 --> 0:32:01.102
<v Speaker 1>my mind will be the sentence, I do not know

0:32:01.142 --> 0:32:01.702
<v Speaker 1>that person.

0:32:02.702 --> 0:32:06.382
<v Speaker 3>That it's not a nice thing to say who.

0:32:06.542 --> 0:32:08.941
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it in a disparaging way. I'm just

0:32:09.102 --> 0:32:12.142
<v Speaker 1>like recognizing the complete fragmentation of fame.

0:32:12.262 --> 0:32:14.502
<v Speaker 3>And that's what this speaks to, is that fame. I

0:32:14.542 --> 0:32:16.822
<v Speaker 3>think it's what makes the show really interesting. The only

0:32:16.902 --> 0:32:20.782
<v Speaker 3>household name in this is Dave Hughes Cusey, but it

0:32:20.902 --> 0:32:25.102
<v Speaker 3>speaks to how fame means something different to every generation.

0:32:25.262 --> 0:32:27.542
<v Speaker 3>I love the idea of a household like your household, Holly.

0:32:27.782 --> 0:32:30.022
<v Speaker 3>I guarantee that your kids know these people.

0:32:30.062 --> 0:32:32.102
<v Speaker 1>I do think jen z Ed's would even know who

0:32:32.182 --> 0:32:32.781
<v Speaker 1>Hughes he was.

0:32:33.422 --> 0:32:33.902
<v Speaker 3>No true.

0:32:33.942 --> 0:32:35.902
<v Speaker 2>I tell Brent all the time that the most embarrassing

0:32:35.942 --> 0:32:37.742
<v Speaker 2>thing he says all the time it's never heard of them.

0:32:37.661 --> 0:32:38.582
<v Speaker 1>Which is what he says.

0:32:39.022 --> 0:32:40.942
<v Speaker 2>It will be said many times during the Hottest one

0:32:40.982 --> 0:32:45.582
<v Speaker 2>hundred countdown. He'll be like Sabrina Carpenter, never heard of them? Like, mate,

0:32:46.062 --> 0:32:47.302
<v Speaker 2>shut up, it's embarrassed.

0:32:47.342 --> 0:32:49.701
<v Speaker 3>I always think, though you turn up in the jungle,

0:32:49.982 --> 0:32:52.981
<v Speaker 3>you don't recognize anyone. How do you ask a question?

0:32:53.262 --> 0:32:54.742
<v Speaker 3>I like the what's your talents?

0:32:54.742 --> 0:32:55.502
<v Speaker 1>Your talent that's great.

0:32:55.502 --> 0:32:58.742
<v Speaker 3>I like that in a moment Harry and Meghan's big

0:32:58.862 --> 0:33:01.661
<v Speaker 3>cover story, we will and by that I mean Holly

0:33:01.661 --> 0:33:04.742
<v Speaker 3>and Maya will tell you everything you need to know about.

0:33:04.462 --> 0:33:06.382
<v Speaker 2>It out loud as.

0:33:06.422 --> 0:33:08.181
<v Speaker 1>If you want to listen to us every day of

0:33:08.222 --> 0:33:10.981
<v Speaker 1>the week, you can get access to exclusive segments on

0:33:11.062 --> 0:33:14.702
<v Speaker 1>Tuesdays and Thursdays by becoming a mum and mea subscriber.

0:33:15.062 --> 0:33:17.221
<v Speaker 1>Follow the link in the show notes to subscribe and

0:33:17.262 --> 0:33:19.622
<v Speaker 1>support us, and a big thank you to all our

0:33:19.661 --> 0:33:28.661
<v Speaker 1>current subscribers. Five years after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's

0:33:28.822 --> 0:33:33.022
<v Speaker 1>Royal exit, Vanity Fair has published an extensive eight thousand

0:33:33.062 --> 0:33:35.582
<v Speaker 1>word cover story, which is a lot of words just

0:33:35.622 --> 0:33:39.582
<v Speaker 1>for ret novella. Yeah, that is actually your regular cover

0:33:39.661 --> 0:33:43.062
<v Speaker 1>story or your regular feature online would probably be about

0:33:43.062 --> 0:33:45.421
<v Speaker 1>two thousand words, maybe three thousand words if it was

0:33:45.502 --> 0:33:48.421
<v Speaker 1>very chunky, And the most interesting part about this story

0:33:48.542 --> 0:33:50.902
<v Speaker 1>is that there were no interviews granted by the actual

0:33:50.942 --> 0:33:55.862
<v Speaker 1>couple themselves, but this story examines their post royal life

0:33:55.902 --> 0:33:59.222
<v Speaker 1>and it was obviously time to coincide with the scheduled

0:33:59.822 --> 0:34:02.622
<v Speaker 1>launch of her new show on Netflix, which was postponed

0:34:02.661 --> 0:34:04.782
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of months because of the bushfires.

0:34:05.502 --> 0:34:06.461
<v Speaker 3>It was written by.

0:34:06.302 --> 0:34:10.062
<v Speaker 1>Contributing editor and Appeal, and it interviewed lots some lots

0:34:10.062 --> 0:34:14.582
<v Speaker 1>of people who've worked with them since they moved to

0:34:14.942 --> 0:34:19.022
<v Speaker 1>America or who know them, and it sort of is

0:34:19.062 --> 0:34:21.942
<v Speaker 1>all about how they've navigated this transition over the.

0:34:22.142 --> 0:34:23.862
<v Speaker 3>Have you actually read eight thousand.

0:34:23.622 --> 0:34:24.702
<v Speaker 1>Well every word?

0:34:24.862 --> 0:34:25.821
<v Speaker 3>Are you kidding about? You?

0:34:25.862 --> 0:34:26.502
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely?

0:34:26.622 --> 0:34:27.502
<v Speaker 3>I need to confess.

0:34:27.661 --> 0:34:29.661
<v Speaker 1>I broke out thumbs clicking on it.

0:34:30.102 --> 0:34:31.861
<v Speaker 3>I looked at it and I went, Jesse, you're going

0:34:31.942 --> 0:34:34.661
<v Speaker 3>to die one day and you don't want to spend Okay, Yeah.

0:34:34.661 --> 0:34:38.821
<v Speaker 2>Twenty five cover line was American Hustlers, which I think is.

0:34:38.982 --> 0:34:40.902
<v Speaker 3>I like to cover. I thought that was interesting, but

0:34:40.942 --> 0:34:43.181
<v Speaker 3>I went, life's too short, so I thought you'd fill

0:34:43.181 --> 0:34:43.382
<v Speaker 3>me in.

0:34:43.542 --> 0:34:45.422
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the cover was a pap shot of the

0:34:45.422 --> 0:34:49.542
<v Speaker 1>two of them in Sunny's on some public event. I'm

0:34:49.542 --> 0:34:51.542
<v Speaker 1>going to give you the five takeaways so you don't

0:34:51.542 --> 0:34:56.542
<v Speaker 1>have to read it first. One was all about workplace drama.

0:34:56.661 --> 0:34:59.301
<v Speaker 1>So there's a source that described Megan's management style as

0:34:59.422 --> 0:35:02.782
<v Speaker 1>mean girls teenager, suggesting that she'd undermine employees by talking

0:35:02.822 --> 0:35:04.981
<v Speaker 1>behind their back and gnawing at their sense of self

0:35:05.582 --> 0:35:09.542
<v Speaker 1>and multiple employees told Vanity Fair that they reportedly took

0:35:09.622 --> 0:35:12.861
<v Speaker 1>extended breaks or underwent therapy after working with her. I

0:35:12.862 --> 0:35:13.982
<v Speaker 1>think everyone should have therapy.

0:35:13.982 --> 0:35:16.901
<v Speaker 3>Anyways, were there multiple sources? Was that one source like how.

0:35:16.942 --> 0:35:18.942
<v Speaker 1>Baucs of sources through the whole thing, but a lot

0:35:18.982 --> 0:35:21.261
<v Speaker 1>of them were almost all of them were anonymous. So

0:35:21.342 --> 0:35:23.261
<v Speaker 1>you have to take all of this with a big

0:35:23.302 --> 0:35:26.262
<v Speaker 1>pinch of salt ok. The second theme of this article

0:35:26.542 --> 0:35:30.382
<v Speaker 1>was about the production chaos around the podcast that they

0:35:30.582 --> 0:35:33.502
<v Speaker 1>or that she recorded with Spotify. They signed you might

0:35:33.502 --> 0:35:36.022
<v Speaker 1>remember one hundred million dollar deal I think, with Spotify

0:35:36.701 --> 0:35:41.622
<v Speaker 1>to produce some podcasts. Megan produced a podcast called Archetypes,

0:35:41.661 --> 0:35:45.741
<v Speaker 1>which we know, and this article talked about people who

0:35:45.822 --> 0:35:48.862
<v Speaker 1>worked at Spotify, saying that she'd agree to provocative ideas

0:35:49.342 --> 0:35:51.902
<v Speaker 1>but then walk them back on the show. So like,

0:35:51.942 --> 0:35:54.862
<v Speaker 1>one episode was meant to be about the word slut

0:35:54.982 --> 0:35:57.942
<v Speaker 1>as being this archetype that women are called, but she

0:35:57.982 --> 0:35:59.741
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to say the word slut. She didn't want

0:35:59.741 --> 0:36:02.221
<v Speaker 1>to say the word bitch, So the bitch episode was

0:36:02.261 --> 0:36:03.021
<v Speaker 1>called the b word.

0:36:03.181 --> 0:36:05.742
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was a bit unfair, too, right, because

0:36:06.462 --> 0:36:08.221
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that must be very hard to

0:36:08.221 --> 0:36:09.982
<v Speaker 2>be Megan and Harry and I know that like the

0:36:10.022 --> 0:36:13.942
<v Speaker 2>world's smallest violin, but you would know that everything you

0:36:13.982 --> 0:36:17.542
<v Speaker 2>said in any setting, any creative brainstorm session, anything with

0:36:17.622 --> 0:36:21.062
<v Speaker 2>any employees, that Vanity Fair and every other media publication

0:36:21.142 --> 0:36:21.942
<v Speaker 2>lord would love to know.

0:36:22.022 --> 0:36:22.181
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:36:22.261 --> 0:36:25.381
<v Speaker 2>So imagine that we're having a brainstorming session about what's

0:36:25.422 --> 0:36:27.261
<v Speaker 2>a new podcast going to be, and I have a

0:36:27.342 --> 0:36:30.142
<v Speaker 2>terrible idea and you have a worse idea, Jesse, because

0:36:30.142 --> 0:36:32.741
<v Speaker 2>that would definitely happen, and Mia just has an embarrassing

0:36:32.781 --> 0:36:33.821
<v Speaker 2>idea because.

0:36:33.902 --> 0:36:34.902
<v Speaker 1>The idea is just lame.

0:36:35.382 --> 0:36:37.902
<v Speaker 2>It's like, this is what that is, you know what

0:36:37.902 --> 0:36:39.981
<v Speaker 2>I mean, It's like they can't do that because they're

0:36:40.022 --> 0:36:42.221
<v Speaker 2>so high risk. Every would like, can you believe that

0:36:42.422 --> 0:36:45.982
<v Speaker 2>Mia Friedman said that thing? You know? And or the

0:36:46.102 --> 0:36:48.981
<v Speaker 2>other thing was I can picture this very clearly too,

0:36:49.261 --> 0:36:52.902
<v Speaker 2>that they would enthusiastically say because Hattery, for example, apparently

0:36:52.902 --> 0:36:56.342
<v Speaker 2>wanted to do one where he interviewed high profile sociopaths,

0:36:56.342 --> 0:36:59.301
<v Speaker 2>including Vladimir Putin, Mark Zuckerberg.

0:36:59.942 --> 0:37:00.982
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like a great.

0:37:01.142 --> 0:37:03.142
<v Speaker 1>This was actually my favorite thing in the whole interview.

0:37:03.181 --> 0:37:05.421
<v Speaker 1>For people who've ever worked on podcasts or who've worked

0:37:05.422 --> 0:37:08.102
<v Speaker 1>in media, trying to learn interviews and particularly trying to

0:37:08.142 --> 0:37:11.142
<v Speaker 1>learn podcast guests in this very out of market is challenging, right,

0:37:11.462 --> 0:37:15.741
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of very hard. So the idea that

0:37:15.822 --> 0:37:19.341
<v Speaker 1>Harry wanted to make this podcast about was about men

0:37:19.382 --> 0:37:22.181
<v Speaker 1>who have traumatic events happened to them in the childhood.

0:37:22.221 --> 0:37:24.661
<v Speaker 1>Like he said, my mother was basically murdered, My life

0:37:24.741 --> 0:37:28.822
<v Speaker 1>was traumatic. Donald Trump Putin, all these other people, perhaps

0:37:28.862 --> 0:37:31.422
<v Speaker 1>they had traumatic events, but what made me grow up

0:37:31.462 --> 0:37:33.382
<v Speaker 1>into a lovely guy and them grow up and to

0:37:33.422 --> 0:37:36.741
<v Speaker 1>be sociopaths. And the quote from a source was like

0:37:36.982 --> 0:37:41.022
<v Speaker 1>this provided somewhat of a booking challenge to the producers.

0:37:41.342 --> 0:37:44.381
<v Speaker 3>Hello, will you be on my podcast called I'm a Sociopath?

0:37:44.582 --> 0:37:45.142
<v Speaker 1>Exactly?

0:37:45.542 --> 0:37:47.822
<v Speaker 2>But also again I have a bit of sympathy because

0:37:47.862 --> 0:37:50.382
<v Speaker 2>you know, you often do have really big, bold ideas

0:37:50.382 --> 0:37:52.102
<v Speaker 2>and then you think them through and you're like, we

0:37:52.221 --> 0:37:53.421
<v Speaker 2>would get annihilated.

0:37:53.502 --> 0:37:55.622
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, but it's also.

0:37:55.542 --> 0:37:58.181
<v Speaker 1>Just not possible, you know what I mean? So I

0:37:58.181 --> 0:38:01.422
<v Speaker 1>think what it all spoke to is the rush. And

0:38:01.462 --> 0:38:04.181
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't Harry and Meghan's fault. The check books were

0:38:04.221 --> 0:38:06.781
<v Speaker 1>out to say, we'll throw all this money at you.

0:38:07.102 --> 0:38:10.502
<v Speaker 1>Netflix did the same, and then it was like, oh,

0:38:10.542 --> 0:38:13.261
<v Speaker 1>what will you actually do? And is anyone interested in

0:38:13.302 --> 0:38:15.741
<v Speaker 1>what you have to say if it's not talking about

0:38:15.741 --> 0:38:20.302
<v Speaker 1>the royal family, which you've ostensibly left. Also the relationship

0:38:20.382 --> 0:38:24.102
<v Speaker 1>dynamic between them. A source described their relationship as intensely passionate.

0:38:24.342 --> 0:38:26.221
<v Speaker 1>They are so hot for each other, the way they

0:38:26.261 --> 0:38:28.821
<v Speaker 1>look at each other. I should probably not be here

0:38:28.942 --> 0:38:30.502
<v Speaker 1>right now. One person said.

0:38:30.542 --> 0:38:32.661
<v Speaker 2>I think that's accurate. Whenever you see them look at

0:38:32.701 --> 0:38:34.102
<v Speaker 2>each other. They look at each other like that.

0:38:34.261 --> 0:38:36.102
<v Speaker 1>But then others said that it was a little bit

0:38:36.261 --> 0:38:40.421
<v Speaker 1>oedipus that Megan was essentially reparenting Harry and that he

0:38:40.502 --> 0:38:42.982
<v Speaker 1>was trying to save her in the way that he

0:38:43.022 --> 0:38:45.902
<v Speaker 1>couldn't save his mother. There was also a very interesting

0:38:46.142 --> 0:38:51.102
<v Speaker 1>anecdote in there about Megan allegedly shopping a potential memoir

0:38:51.701 --> 0:38:56.381
<v Speaker 1>about a divorce. If she were to get divorced, would

0:38:56.462 --> 0:39:00.382
<v Speaker 1>people be interested in a divorce memoir from her? So

0:39:00.422 --> 0:39:03.262
<v Speaker 1>that was interesting, It's weird, and there was no smoking

0:39:03.302 --> 0:39:05.622
<v Speaker 1>guns in this right, so there was nothing that we

0:39:05.701 --> 0:39:09.102
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard before. It was just really confirmation of all

0:39:09.142 --> 0:39:12.861
<v Speaker 1>of those kind of rumors that they're difficult to work with,

0:39:12.902 --> 0:39:14.861
<v Speaker 1>that they think they know best, that they're a bit

0:39:15.022 --> 0:39:17.341
<v Speaker 1>clueless when it comes to making the world.

0:39:17.142 --> 0:39:19.181
<v Speaker 3>Need another profile on Meghan and Harry.

0:39:19.582 --> 0:39:22.022
<v Speaker 2>I ask the same question because one of the things

0:39:22.062 --> 0:39:23.982
<v Speaker 2>that I think is really interesting about this because yes,

0:39:24.022 --> 0:39:26.582
<v Speaker 2>it's basically a lot of mean spirited rumors stitch together

0:39:26.781 --> 0:39:29.022
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of stuff we've heard already. As Mia said,

0:39:30.142 --> 0:39:33.261
<v Speaker 2>So in twenty seventeen, Megan did a proper cover with

0:39:33.342 --> 0:39:36.262
<v Speaker 2>Vanity Fair. Normally a Vanity Fair cover that features celebrity,

0:39:36.302 --> 0:39:39.062
<v Speaker 2>not always but very often is an agreed shoot. An

0:39:39.062 --> 0:39:42.261
<v Speaker 2>Illeblewitch shot it. It cost a bajillion dollars, a long

0:39:42.342 --> 0:39:45.582
<v Speaker 2>form interview. The journalist travels with you, hangs around like

0:39:45.622 --> 0:39:48.702
<v Speaker 2>it's success. It's access to access, and it's deeply sourced

0:39:48.741 --> 0:39:50.341
<v Speaker 2>and it's prestigious.

0:39:50.422 --> 0:39:51.701
<v Speaker 1>And it used to have to be that you'd only

0:39:51.701 --> 0:39:54.022
<v Speaker 1>get a Vanity Fair cover if you gave them something

0:39:54.142 --> 0:39:57.181
<v Speaker 1>a big exclusive, like will you talk about the miscarriage

0:39:57.181 --> 0:39:59.542
<v Speaker 1>no one you had or the divorce like Jennifer Aniston

0:39:59.622 --> 0:40:00.861
<v Speaker 1>famously after Brad So.

0:40:00.822 --> 0:40:02.542
<v Speaker 2>When Meghan did that, it was the first time she'd

0:40:02.582 --> 0:40:05.301
<v Speaker 2>ever spoken publicly about Harry. What is interesting to me

0:40:05.582 --> 0:40:08.181
<v Speaker 2>is that we've gone from that, you know, like her

0:40:08.261 --> 0:40:11.542
<v Speaker 2>giving full access to them, to Vanity Fair running basically

0:40:11.542 --> 0:40:13.622
<v Speaker 2>what in the business we'd call it right around, which

0:40:13.661 --> 0:40:16.181
<v Speaker 2>is they've got a random picture of them, made it

0:40:16.221 --> 0:40:18.181
<v Speaker 2>look really lovely and glossy, slapped it on the cover,

0:40:18.221 --> 0:40:20.582
<v Speaker 2>and then just wrote around everything we've already heard. And

0:40:20.622 --> 0:40:24.942
<v Speaker 2>it's like, I wouldn't blame them for being really pissed

0:40:24.942 --> 0:40:27.902
<v Speaker 2>off about that, because this is an exact example of

0:40:27.902 --> 0:40:30.181
<v Speaker 2>why they hate the media, right even the media who

0:40:30.302 --> 0:40:34.062
<v Speaker 2>are supposedly the most credible, the ones who are on

0:40:34.181 --> 0:40:36.701
<v Speaker 2>their side and inverted commas. Clearly they're not anymore.

0:40:36.781 --> 0:40:39.502
<v Speaker 3>And remember they did give access Megan in particular, did

0:40:39.502 --> 0:40:42.462
<v Speaker 3>give access to the cut, and they wrote the most

0:40:43.102 --> 0:40:45.861
<v Speaker 3>snarky It wasn't actually I thought it.

0:40:46.221 --> 0:40:47.901
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was. I think that was an

0:40:47.902 --> 0:40:51.862
<v Speaker 1>interesting story. But the criticism that's made is that they've

0:40:51.902 --> 0:40:56.142
<v Speaker 1>never really understood that the media is not just pr

0:40:56.822 --> 0:40:58.502
<v Speaker 1>the media is independent.

0:40:58.661 --> 0:41:01.142
<v Speaker 3>And I think they understand that. I think they get

0:41:01.181 --> 0:41:03.381
<v Speaker 3>taught that lesson eighty five times a week.

0:41:03.462 --> 0:41:05.261
<v Speaker 2>But the problem is it's left them with nowhere to

0:41:05.302 --> 0:41:07.542
<v Speaker 2>go to promote their genuine things.

0:41:07.582 --> 0:41:08.381
<v Speaker 1>But that's why she's back.

0:41:08.622 --> 0:41:13.182
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so you would imagine for a major Netflix launch

0:41:13.221 --> 0:41:15.542
<v Speaker 2>show as Megan hasn't. We know, we spoke last week

0:41:15.542 --> 0:41:17.502
<v Speaker 2>about how it's been pushed from January to March because

0:41:17.502 --> 0:41:20.942
<v Speaker 2>of the LA fires. She would be doing traditional media.

0:41:20.982 --> 0:41:23.462
<v Speaker 2>She would be doing a Vanity Fair cover, for example,

0:41:23.502 --> 0:41:25.461
<v Speaker 2>or a People cover, which she still made. People still

0:41:25.462 --> 0:41:26.622
<v Speaker 2>do seem to be on side.

0:41:26.902 --> 0:41:27.062
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:41:27.221 --> 0:41:29.462
<v Speaker 2>She would be doing talk show appearances. She would be

0:41:29.502 --> 0:41:31.341
<v Speaker 2>doing all kinds of things she isn't going to do

0:41:31.382 --> 0:41:34.342
<v Speaker 2>any of that, because she and Harry have very clearly

0:41:34.462 --> 0:41:37.662
<v Speaker 2>drawn the lines of the media haters for very good reason.

0:41:37.982 --> 0:41:40.102
<v Speaker 2>But it kind of puts them in a difficult position then,

0:41:40.181 --> 0:41:42.261
<v Speaker 2>because they're celebrities.

0:41:42.342 --> 0:41:44.102
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if there's a world in which they did

0:41:44.142 --> 0:41:46.542
<v Speaker 3>give Vanity Fair something and then they took it back

0:41:46.582 --> 0:41:48.342
<v Speaker 3>after the LA fires. Is that possible?

0:41:48.542 --> 0:41:51.062
<v Speaker 1>No, because the problem with magazines is that they're on

0:41:51.181 --> 0:41:54.902
<v Speaker 1>very long, laid times. But also when you're a Netflix,

0:41:54.982 --> 0:41:58.542
<v Speaker 1>I mean, your talent is contractually obliged to promote things.

0:41:58.582 --> 0:42:01.901
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because with the Polo documentary that Harry did

0:42:01.982 --> 0:42:05.781
<v Speaker 1>that came out just before Christmas, they didn't seem to

0:42:05.822 --> 0:42:08.022
<v Speaker 1>promote it. They didn't do interviews, they didn't Maybe this

0:42:08.102 --> 0:42:10.301
<v Speaker 1>is written into their contract that they wanted, but it

0:42:10.382 --> 0:42:12.542
<v Speaker 1>starts looking like not a very good deal, which is

0:42:12.542 --> 0:42:14.701
<v Speaker 1>what all the trade press has been saying for a

0:42:14.741 --> 0:42:16.741
<v Speaker 1>really long time that it hasn't been a good deal,

0:42:16.982 --> 0:42:20.742
<v Speaker 1>which is why Spotify didn't renew. She's doing a new podcast, however,

0:42:20.822 --> 0:42:25.741
<v Speaker 1>with another podcast company called Limonata. They want a platform

0:42:25.982 --> 0:42:30.181
<v Speaker 1>and they want fame, but they don't really have a

0:42:30.181 --> 0:42:33.142
<v Speaker 1>lot to say that people are interested in, because what

0:42:33.142 --> 0:42:35.782
<v Speaker 1>people are interested in. Is not Megan talking about feminism.

0:42:35.781 --> 0:42:38.542
<v Speaker 1>It's Megan talking about how hideous it was to be

0:42:38.582 --> 0:42:41.782
<v Speaker 1>inside the royal family, and understandably she doesn't do that anymore.

0:42:41.822 --> 0:42:45.261
<v Speaker 2>I disagree. I would read the absolute shit out of

0:42:45.302 --> 0:42:47.661
<v Speaker 2>a long form Vanity Fair profile where I got to

0:42:47.661 --> 0:42:50.181
<v Speaker 2>see inside Meghan's house, where I got to see, you know,

0:42:50.261 --> 0:42:52.741
<v Speaker 2>like day in the life he stuff. I'm tired of

0:42:52.741 --> 0:42:54.942
<v Speaker 2>all the royal gossip, like I've heard it all, all

0:42:54.982 --> 0:42:58.022
<v Speaker 2>those stories. I mean, Harry wrote an entire book about that,

0:42:58.502 --> 0:43:00.821
<v Speaker 2>very good book that was all about that. So now

0:43:00.982 --> 0:43:02.982
<v Speaker 2>I still think in the same way, I'm interested in

0:43:03.302 --> 0:43:05.382
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of celebrities. I would still want to peak,

0:43:05.422 --> 0:43:10.062
<v Speaker 2>but they understandably do not want to show. To the

0:43:10.142 --> 0:43:11.901
<v Speaker 2>end of our first show in our new home, how

0:43:11.902 --> 0:43:12.661
<v Speaker 2>do we feel it went.

0:43:12.661 --> 0:43:17.341
<v Speaker 1>Friends by, I think it was great. I'll come back

0:43:17.342 --> 0:43:19.462
<v Speaker 1>again tomorrow, which.

0:43:19.302 --> 0:43:21.582
<v Speaker 2>Is lucky because we will. As we mentioned, we back

0:43:21.582 --> 0:43:25.021
<v Speaker 2>again tomorrow to talk about the inauguration. A massive thank

0:43:25.062 --> 0:43:26.862
<v Speaker 2>you to all of you out louders for listening to

0:43:26.942 --> 0:43:29.542
<v Speaker 2>our show today and to our fabulous team for putting

0:43:29.582 --> 0:43:31.861
<v Speaker 2>it together in our new home. We're going to be

0:43:31.862 --> 0:43:32.942
<v Speaker 2>back in your ears tomorrow.

0:43:33.342 --> 0:43:38.062
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye. Shout out to any Mum and MEA subscribers listening.

0:43:38.302 --> 0:43:40.462
<v Speaker 3>If you love the show and you want to support us,

0:43:40.701 --> 0:43:43.502
<v Speaker 3>subscribing to mom and Mia is the very best way

0:43:43.542 --> 0:43:46.102
<v Speaker 3>to do so. There's a link in the episode description.

0:43:47.102 --> 0:43:49.701
<v Speaker 3>Did you see the TikTok trend over the weekend of

0:43:49.822 --> 0:43:53.341
<v Speaker 3>the Americans who knew they were losing TikTok confessing to things.

0:43:53.181 --> 0:43:56.821
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, oh no, because I thought maybe for bush

0:43:56.822 --> 0:43:58.701
<v Speaker 1>and a bikini was part of that. Now I'm just

0:43:58.741 --> 0:44:00.301
<v Speaker 1>going I've got nothing. I'm gone now.

0:44:00.502 --> 0:44:02.982
<v Speaker 3>It was like a sound of trending sound and it

0:44:03.062 --> 0:44:06.102
<v Speaker 3>basically said, let's just say you would never have bought

0:44:06.142 --> 0:44:07.902
<v Speaker 3>any of those skin care products if you knew that.

0:44:07.942 --> 0:44:11.261
<v Speaker 3>I had to filter on someone else saying hundreds of

0:44:11.261 --> 0:44:13.661
<v Speaker 3>thousands of followers about glute exercises, and she's like, I

0:44:13.701 --> 0:44:14.382
<v Speaker 3>have a baby, l.

0:44:14.741 --> 0:44:17.462
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I love like everyone wearing slightly short sighted.

0:44:18.342 --> 0:44:19.102
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm gonna.

0:44:19.142 --> 0:44:19.982
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, damn it.

0:44:21.382 --> 0:44:25.341
<v Speaker 3>And then I actually got here's a squat and it's

0:44:25.422 --> 0:44:27.982
<v Speaker 3>like no, it's no more squats.