WEBVTT - Finally, The Person Missing From The Ruby Franke Story

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.341
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.182
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:18.741
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:22.381 --> 0:00:24.421
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit like sex as well, like sometimes you

0:00:24.502 --> 0:00:26.142
<v Speaker 1>just don't feel like it, like the thought of it.

0:00:26.142 --> 0:00:28.342
<v Speaker 1>You're like, I don't know, I'd hate that. Oh no,

0:00:28.382 --> 0:00:32.461
<v Speaker 1>i'd hate that, you think to yourself. But then you

0:00:32.702 --> 0:00:33.502
<v Speaker 1>have a great time.

0:00:38.302 --> 0:00:40.982
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Mom and Mia out loud. It's

0:00:41.022 --> 0:00:43.822
<v Speaker 2>what women are actually talking about on Monday, the twenty

0:00:43.822 --> 0:00:45.862
<v Speaker 2>fourth of February. I'm Holly way.

0:00:45.862 --> 0:00:48.502
<v Speaker 1>Right, and I am back bitch is I'm meya f.

0:00:50.022 --> 0:00:51.062
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jessees.

0:00:51.542 --> 0:00:54.742
<v Speaker 2>They're being cool if you're not watching Severance. Yeah, it's

0:00:54.782 --> 0:00:55.662
<v Speaker 2>a Severance reference.

0:00:55.742 --> 0:00:58.342
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, correct, my friends exactly because we're at work, so

0:00:58.422 --> 0:01:01.822
<v Speaker 3>we are yes, yef and your Holly is your hollyw W.

0:01:02.062 --> 0:01:03.862
<v Speaker 3>And we've decided that actually talking about how much we

0:01:03.902 --> 0:01:05.942
<v Speaker 3>love Severance is just trying to tell people how smummy this.

0:01:06.062 --> 0:01:08.182
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely a flex and if you do love Severance,

0:01:08.222 --> 0:01:10.902
<v Speaker 2>we may be recording a subscript episode about it very soon.

0:01:11.222 --> 0:01:15.702
<v Speaker 2>But on today's show, the person we're not talking about

0:01:15.822 --> 0:01:19.462
<v Speaker 2>in the story of the parenting influencer who went to jail. Also,

0:01:19.662 --> 0:01:22.422
<v Speaker 2>everyone's lonely, but no one wants to make plans. Why

0:01:22.462 --> 0:01:24.702
<v Speaker 2>we're in the year of the Flake, unless you're mere Friedman,

0:01:24.822 --> 0:01:27.342
<v Speaker 2>who has mastered the pre flake, and I have some

0:01:27.382 --> 0:01:31.102
<v Speaker 2>feedback for you about that. Also why we're all falling

0:01:31.102 --> 0:01:33.702
<v Speaker 2>over ourselves to book into the White Lotus, even though

0:01:33.822 --> 0:01:36.142
<v Speaker 2>the stuff might try and kill us there, But first

0:01:36.302 --> 0:01:36.942
<v Speaker 2>mea Friedman.

0:01:37.422 --> 0:01:39.782
<v Speaker 1>In case you missed it, it's rough out there in

0:01:39.822 --> 0:01:42.462
<v Speaker 1>the news cycle, which is probably why a post about

0:01:42.502 --> 0:01:46.622
<v Speaker 1>whimsy went viral over the weekend. Whimsy is not a

0:01:46.622 --> 0:01:50.142
<v Speaker 1>word that you hear very often, and I couldn't refine

0:01:50.142 --> 0:01:52.302
<v Speaker 1>it myself, so I looked up the definition. It's like

0:01:52.342 --> 0:01:56.582
<v Speaker 1>a playful, fanciful quality, full of odd or unpredictable ideas

0:01:56.582 --> 0:01:59.862
<v Speaker 1>that brings lighthearted humor and makes ordinary things feel a

0:01:59.862 --> 0:02:04.062
<v Speaker 1>bit magical and joyful. So someone asked women in a

0:02:04.142 --> 0:02:07.542
<v Speaker 1>video on TikTok what their whimsical little habits are, and

0:02:07.582 --> 0:02:10.181
<v Speaker 1>the internet responded in a way that felt a little

0:02:10.181 --> 0:02:13.702
<v Speaker 1>bit like a magical hug. Some of the answers included

0:02:13.901 --> 0:02:16.702
<v Speaker 1>when my cat clearly wants something and meows at me,

0:02:16.862 --> 0:02:18.462
<v Speaker 1>I tell her to use your words.

0:02:19.542 --> 0:02:20.542
<v Speaker 3>I often say that's shell.

0:02:21.262 --> 0:02:22.222
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, very cute.

0:02:22.622 --> 0:02:25.501
<v Speaker 1>For my own amusement, I say officers and nod. When

0:02:25.502 --> 0:02:29.022
<v Speaker 1>I see pigeons, I say, may I take your coat

0:02:29.062 --> 0:02:31.982
<v Speaker 1>while peeling garlic. I didn't understand that because I don't

0:02:32.022 --> 0:02:33.062
<v Speaker 1>peel garlic very often.

0:02:33.342 --> 0:02:35.742
<v Speaker 2>The garlic's wearing little coats. Okay, paper coats.

0:02:36.942 --> 0:02:39.982
<v Speaker 1>I call my to do list, my tadar list, and

0:02:40.062 --> 0:02:43.102
<v Speaker 1>do jazz hands as I tick things off. That's cute.

0:02:43.102 --> 0:02:43.782
<v Speaker 2>I like that.

0:02:44.262 --> 0:02:46.382
<v Speaker 1>I kiss my cat on both cheeks, then she kisses

0:02:46.422 --> 0:02:49.502
<v Speaker 1>me on both cheeks. Then I explained she's European to

0:02:49.622 --> 0:02:53.782
<v Speaker 1>no one. So can you think of many examples of whimsy?

0:02:54.142 --> 0:02:56.382
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody does it with their pets, right, Pets

0:02:56.382 --> 0:02:57.942
<v Speaker 2>bring out the wims in you. We all have a

0:02:58.022 --> 0:03:00.542
<v Speaker 2>voice for a dog. I assume I do for a

0:03:00.662 --> 0:03:02.702
<v Speaker 2>very specific voice. But you know what, I was trying

0:03:02.742 --> 0:03:05.262
<v Speaker 2>to do the voice before in the toilet, like I

0:03:05.422 --> 0:03:08.341
<v Speaker 2>was warming up, and I was like, let's do the voice.

0:03:08.502 --> 0:03:09.982
<v Speaker 2>I cannot do it unless she's there.

0:03:10.862 --> 0:03:12.982
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, you can't conjure it.

0:03:14.622 --> 0:03:15.422
<v Speaker 2>Cute little face.

0:03:15.622 --> 0:03:17.382
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I know what you mean. Clara and I have

0:03:17.502 --> 0:03:22.142
<v Speaker 3>exclusively spoken through the girls, babies and I've realized, you know,

0:03:22.181 --> 0:03:24.262
<v Speaker 3>when you look at your your whimsical thing and you go,

0:03:24.822 --> 0:03:27.822
<v Speaker 3>might actually not be that pc because Matilda speaks with

0:03:27.862 --> 0:03:30.302
<v Speaker 3>an accent. I'm not going to say what accent, but

0:03:30.582 --> 0:03:35.222
<v Speaker 3>she actually doesn't speak English English second it's her second language,

0:03:35.222 --> 0:03:37.222
<v Speaker 3>because she doesn't yet, no, she doesn't. She babbles and

0:03:37.222 --> 0:03:39.582
<v Speaker 3>we go, well, yes, that is her language. And so

0:03:39.662 --> 0:03:42.742
<v Speaker 3>we often text from the girls to one another. Clara

0:03:42.782 --> 0:03:44.902
<v Speaker 3>and I haven't had a conversation in nearly two years.

0:03:45.982 --> 0:03:47.582
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing, I imagine.

0:03:47.262 --> 0:03:49.782
<v Speaker 1>The twins life is full of whimsy. Yes, yeah, it

0:03:49.862 --> 0:03:53.262
<v Speaker 1>is sort of magical. Every day little silly things you do.

0:03:53.742 --> 0:03:55.862
<v Speaker 3>And I realized that Lucra and I and you know

0:03:55.902 --> 0:03:57.462
<v Speaker 3>when you tell it out loud and you just sound

0:03:57.502 --> 0:03:59.942
<v Speaker 3>like the lamest person in the world. Luca and I

0:03:59.982 --> 0:04:01.702
<v Speaker 3>have one where every night he gets into bed and

0:04:01.742 --> 0:04:03.782
<v Speaker 3>he says, have you hidden my eye mask? Because he

0:04:03.822 --> 0:04:05.382
<v Speaker 3>wears an eye mask? And what a ridiculous thing. Why

0:04:05.422 --> 0:04:07.422
<v Speaker 3>would I hide his eye mask? And we play this

0:04:07.462 --> 0:04:09.102
<v Speaker 3>whole thing where like I didn't hide your eye mask

0:04:09.142 --> 0:04:10.902
<v Speaker 3>and then you find it anyway.

0:04:10.702 --> 0:04:12.862
<v Speaker 1>That sounds hilarious, hilarious, No, no, no, But.

0:04:13.062 --> 0:04:15.702
<v Speaker 2>Because the people's whimsies are hard. But then I stepped up.

0:04:15.822 --> 0:04:16.541
<v Speaker 1>It gets funnier.

0:04:16.662 --> 0:04:19.541
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because then I started hiding it and it became

0:04:19.582 --> 0:04:22.582
<v Speaker 3>a little game, and I hide it every night and

0:04:22.622 --> 0:04:25.062
<v Speaker 3>then he can't find it, and then we have this

0:04:25.142 --> 0:04:28.301
<v Speaker 3>little playful thing. And it's like people think we're boring

0:04:28.301 --> 0:04:30.262
<v Speaker 3>because we have a baby, but here we are looking.

0:04:30.061 --> 0:04:33.741
<v Speaker 2>For an ear mask. Oh that's quite good, isn't it. Fun?

0:04:34.101 --> 0:04:35.981
<v Speaker 2>Vegetables a lot, I asked, you know what I'm saying

0:04:36.022 --> 0:04:38.782
<v Speaker 2>to them. You're having a hard day. You are on

0:04:38.941 --> 0:04:40.261
<v Speaker 2>your darling. It's gonna be okay.

0:04:40.342 --> 0:04:43.181
<v Speaker 1>I had a thing where I accidentally bought too many

0:04:43.421 --> 0:04:47.421
<v Speaker 1>packs of tiny snack sized sandwich bags, but like the

0:04:47.462 --> 0:04:50.981
<v Speaker 1>snack size, you know, the resealable ones. And my children

0:04:51.022 --> 0:04:53.702
<v Speaker 1>who don't live at home, always come home and like rifle,

0:04:53.782 --> 0:04:55.502
<v Speaker 1>they go shopping in the pantry and in the fridge

0:04:55.501 --> 0:04:56.902
<v Speaker 1>and they're always looking for things, and I'm always trying

0:04:56.902 --> 0:04:59.462
<v Speaker 1>to offload these tiny, little stupid sandwich bags that I've

0:04:59.462 --> 0:05:01.582
<v Speaker 1>got many packets off and then I want them. So

0:05:01.621 --> 0:05:04.342
<v Speaker 1>what I do is that I always hide them like

0:05:04.421 --> 0:05:08.181
<v Speaker 1>in their glove box. All that's fun, handbag, that's quite fun.

0:05:08.421 --> 0:05:10.621
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing that I was thinking that was whimsy.

0:05:11.022 --> 0:05:14.462
<v Speaker 1>Is my jeans today, which none of you have noticed.

0:05:14.501 --> 0:05:16.581
<v Speaker 2>I think you get all your wimsy out of your clothes.

0:05:16.262 --> 0:05:22.981
<v Speaker 1>Actually pretend track suit pants that look like jeanspitch.

0:05:21.861 --> 0:05:23.901
<v Speaker 3>Yes turning up, which can't be good for audio.

0:05:24.142 --> 0:05:25.861
<v Speaker 2>We all document this on the feed.

0:05:26.621 --> 0:05:30.541
<v Speaker 1>Is that whimsy putting on jeans is like a thing

0:05:30.621 --> 0:05:33.501
<v Speaker 1>that's not very whimsical, But I've made them whimsical because

0:05:33.501 --> 0:05:35.422
<v Speaker 1>they're actually secretly tracksuit pack.

0:05:35.462 --> 0:05:37.462
<v Speaker 3>The other whimsical thing we've been doing is I feel

0:05:37.501 --> 0:05:40.182
<v Speaker 3>like every time you know you've got Luna or I've

0:05:40.181 --> 0:05:42.301
<v Speaker 3>got Luna, is we teach her a new phrase that

0:05:42.342 --> 0:05:45.101
<v Speaker 3>she actually doesn't need. So she got home from the

0:05:45.181 --> 0:05:48.622
<v Speaker 3>other day gay rights. Someone had taught the nanny had

0:05:48.621 --> 0:05:50.342
<v Speaker 3>taught Luna gay rights, and we were all just having

0:05:50.381 --> 0:05:51.021
<v Speaker 3>a laugh about it.

0:05:51.142 --> 0:05:53.541
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just a bit silly, very silly. You know

0:05:53.582 --> 0:05:59.381
<v Speaker 2>what's whimsy? The budgies. The budgies are yes you a producer.

0:05:59.501 --> 0:06:02.421
<v Speaker 2>Ruth play the little prank on mea a while ago

0:06:02.541 --> 0:06:04.621
<v Speaker 2>where we were sitting in her office having an important

0:06:04.662 --> 0:06:08.141
<v Speaker 2>meeting about something serious, and then suddenly we noticed that

0:06:08.181 --> 0:06:10.142
<v Speaker 2>they were a little pretend Bude and.

0:06:10.101 --> 0:06:11.742
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was real. I could just see one

0:06:11.782 --> 0:06:14.342
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, is that real? On?

0:06:14.462 --> 0:06:18.421
<v Speaker 2>Like a pop plant hiding in one of MEA's coat hangers?

0:06:18.902 --> 0:06:21.742
<v Speaker 2>And the in joke is that, Mia? What's the en

0:06:21.782 --> 0:06:22.262
<v Speaker 2>joke about it?

0:06:22.462 --> 0:06:24.061
<v Speaker 1>It's something about it. I look at a camera and

0:06:24.101 --> 0:06:24.701
<v Speaker 1>talk to myself.

0:06:26.301 --> 0:06:28.142
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, they're very whimsy.

0:06:29.022 --> 0:06:31.702
<v Speaker 3>You might have heard about Ruby Frank, a woman who

0:06:31.782 --> 0:06:34.741
<v Speaker 3>abused her children in front of millions of people, but

0:06:34.861 --> 0:06:38.181
<v Speaker 3>what do we know about her husband? Let's start at

0:06:38.222 --> 0:06:40.181
<v Speaker 3>the beginning. Do you guys know much about this story?

0:06:40.262 --> 0:06:42.541
<v Speaker 1>I know nothing. It's an all or nothing story. I

0:06:42.621 --> 0:06:46.702
<v Speaker 1>know she's a YouTuber and an influencer and was while

0:06:46.782 --> 0:06:49.262
<v Speaker 1>she was you know, had this big channel, was secretly

0:06:49.301 --> 0:06:51.421
<v Speaker 1>abusing her children, and now she's in jail. That's yeah.

0:06:51.541 --> 0:06:54.022
<v Speaker 3>I had no context for when the story came out.

0:06:54.022 --> 0:06:56.702
<v Speaker 3>I'd never heard of her. So basically, in twenty fifteen,

0:06:56.782 --> 0:06:59.702
<v Speaker 3>Ruby Frank, she was a mother of six living in Utah,

0:06:59.981 --> 0:07:02.941
<v Speaker 3>began a YouTube channel called eight Passengers so six Kids,

0:07:02.941 --> 0:07:05.462
<v Speaker 3>her and her husband Kevin. At its peak, the channel

0:07:05.501 --> 0:07:09.301
<v Speaker 3>had two point five million subscribers, and the content often

0:07:09.381 --> 0:07:12.581
<v Speaker 3>in sight into their home life. Her parenting style was

0:07:12.662 --> 0:07:16.822
<v Speaker 3>always very strict. For example, her two sons were play

0:07:16.862 --> 0:07:19.542
<v Speaker 3>fighting in one video, and she told them if they

0:07:19.622 --> 0:07:21.742
<v Speaker 3>kept doing it, they'd lose the privilege of eating dinner.

0:07:22.102 --> 0:07:24.581
<v Speaker 3>One of her daughters was cutting things in the house

0:07:24.622 --> 0:07:26.382
<v Speaker 3>and she threatened to cut off the head of her doll.

0:07:27.102 --> 0:07:29.902
<v Speaker 3>But things started to become more and more extreme over

0:07:29.902 --> 0:07:30.941
<v Speaker 3>the course of the channel.

0:07:31.022 --> 0:07:35.622
<v Speaker 1>This at the time when those family YouTubers and they

0:07:35.662 --> 0:07:38.662
<v Speaker 1>sort of documented their whole life. It's not so common anymore,

0:07:38.662 --> 0:07:41.062
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, but it was huge in the mid.

0:07:41.262 --> 0:07:44.302
<v Speaker 3>The kind of yeah, yeah, exactly in Utah because of

0:07:44.342 --> 0:07:46.622
<v Speaker 3>the Mormon element, there are these big families.

0:07:46.662 --> 0:07:49.141
<v Speaker 2>It feels like, not to want to make light of

0:07:49.182 --> 0:07:52.742
<v Speaker 2>this story, but that Utah really overrepresents in the influencer space.

0:07:52.902 --> 0:07:55.821
<v Speaker 2>It's like a lot of the traadwives from Utah. Yeah,

0:07:55.862 --> 0:07:58.141
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the big families are from Utah. It

0:07:58.222 --> 0:08:00.462
<v Speaker 2>must have a high headcount of it does.

0:08:00.542 --> 0:08:02.942
<v Speaker 3>And physically it's a very beautiful face.

0:08:04.222 --> 0:08:05.302
<v Speaker 2>A set.

0:08:05.582 --> 0:08:08.542
<v Speaker 3>Things then became more extreme. So her older son, Chad,

0:08:08.742 --> 0:08:11.461
<v Speaker 3>speaking to the said that his mother had taken away

0:08:11.542 --> 0:08:14.422
<v Speaker 3>his bed for seven months after he played a prank

0:08:14.462 --> 0:08:16.901
<v Speaker 3>on his sibling, and since he'd been sleeping on a

0:08:16.941 --> 0:08:20.302
<v Speaker 3>bean bag, and in the video, Ruby Frank was seen laughing.

0:08:20.821 --> 0:08:24.461
<v Speaker 3>This then launched a petition flagging that there were signs

0:08:24.462 --> 0:08:28.381
<v Speaker 3>of abuse and neglect where they called on Child Protective

0:08:28.422 --> 0:08:31.581
<v Speaker 3>Services to investigate. That was from her followers. The channel

0:08:31.622 --> 0:08:33.942
<v Speaker 3>shut down, and then Ruby Frank kind of went off.

0:08:34.022 --> 0:08:36.142
<v Speaker 3>We didn't see so much of her kids anymore, but

0:08:36.222 --> 0:08:39.462
<v Speaker 3>she launched a parenting advice support program alongside this woman

0:08:39.542 --> 0:08:43.542
<v Speaker 3>named Jody Hildebrand. Then in August twenty twenty three, this

0:08:43.622 --> 0:08:47.902
<v Speaker 3>story broke out again because one of Frank's children, reportedly malnourished,

0:08:48.222 --> 0:08:50.702
<v Speaker 3>climbed out of Hildebrand's house and banged on the door

0:08:50.742 --> 0:08:52.822
<v Speaker 3>of a neighbor asking for food and water.

0:08:53.302 --> 0:08:55.622
<v Speaker 4>I just had a twelve year old boy so up

0:08:55.662 --> 0:08:59.502
<v Speaker 4>here at my front door asking for help, and he's

0:08:59.862 --> 0:09:03.662
<v Speaker 4>said he had just came from a neighbor's house. He's emaciated,

0:09:03.822 --> 0:09:05.942
<v Speaker 4>he's got tape around his leg.

0:09:06.302 --> 0:09:10.062
<v Speaker 3>Frank and this Hildebrand woman were arrested and four of

0:09:10.102 --> 0:09:13.022
<v Speaker 3>Frank's children were taken into care. The eldest two were

0:09:13.062 --> 0:09:15.782
<v Speaker 3>out of home by that point. Here's what we know

0:09:15.862 --> 0:09:18.542
<v Speaker 3>about what Frank was doing to her children. She forced

0:09:18.542 --> 0:09:20.862
<v Speaker 3>her twelve year old son to do hours of physical

0:09:20.902 --> 0:09:24.662
<v Speaker 3>tasks off and outside. It resulted in serious sunburn that blistered.

0:09:24.982 --> 0:09:28.062
<v Speaker 3>He was denied food and after attempting to run away,

0:09:28.102 --> 0:09:31.702
<v Speaker 3>his hands and feet were regularly bound. Similar punishments were

0:09:31.742 --> 0:09:35.381
<v Speaker 3>inflicted on her daughter. There are more horrific details that

0:09:35.422 --> 0:09:38.381
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to outline here, but Frank was ultimately

0:09:38.622 --> 0:09:41.702
<v Speaker 3>charged with child abuse and will spend four to sixty

0:09:41.822 --> 0:09:45.702
<v Speaker 3>years behind bars, which I think it will be around thirty.

0:09:46.422 --> 0:09:48.542
<v Speaker 3>This has led to a lot of reflection and potential

0:09:48.622 --> 0:09:51.302
<v Speaker 3>law reform. When we round dad, where is Kevin? I

0:09:51.422 --> 0:09:54.662
<v Speaker 3>have often wondered this because he has evaded a lot

0:09:54.662 --> 0:09:58.342
<v Speaker 3>of scrutiny. They were separated by that point, and he

0:09:58.702 --> 0:10:01.542
<v Speaker 3>had not been living with Ruby Frank for about thirteen

0:10:01.582 --> 0:10:04.102
<v Speaker 3>months before this happened, and it is understood that the

0:10:04.142 --> 0:10:07.422
<v Speaker 3>abuse really stepped up in that time. He hadn't seen

0:10:07.422 --> 0:10:09.702
<v Speaker 3>the children, and he hadn't seen the children, but a

0:10:09.742 --> 0:10:13.782
<v Speaker 3>lot of the strict behaviors and also having the children

0:10:13.822 --> 0:10:14.862
<v Speaker 3>on a YouTube channel.

0:10:15.022 --> 0:10:17.502
<v Speaker 2>The YouTube channel involved him exactly right.

0:10:17.982 --> 0:10:21.782
<v Speaker 3>But over the weekend Kevin Frank spoke about his regrets

0:10:22.262 --> 0:10:24.982
<v Speaker 3>and he said that he is petitioning for a bill

0:10:25.142 --> 0:10:28.182
<v Speaker 3>whereby a child claims a percentage of money made off

0:10:28.222 --> 0:10:31.582
<v Speaker 3>their image, and also can demand as an adult that

0:10:31.622 --> 0:10:33.102
<v Speaker 3>the content made of them be removed.

0:10:33.422 --> 0:10:36.262
<v Speaker 1>You would assume that that was already the case, but

0:10:36.302 --> 0:10:37.662
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's just not in law.

0:10:37.822 --> 0:10:40.502
<v Speaker 2>No, it is in some countries. So this is part

0:10:40.542 --> 0:10:43.542
<v Speaker 2>of the whole reckoning around. You know, this kind of

0:10:43.702 --> 0:10:48.502
<v Speaker 2>influencing that involves children, and there are some countries where

0:10:48.702 --> 0:10:50.822
<v Speaker 2>ten percent of the income has to be put aside

0:10:50.942 --> 0:10:52.742
<v Speaker 2>in some kind of trust for a child, and they

0:10:52.782 --> 0:10:55.022
<v Speaker 2>want to try and pass a similar law in some

0:10:55.062 --> 0:10:57.542
<v Speaker 2>of the states in America, which is why this guy has.

0:10:57.422 --> 0:11:00.502
<v Speaker 3>Come out has come out. But Holly, I wondered when

0:11:00.502 --> 0:11:03.381
<v Speaker 3>I saw this a week conflating two issues here because

0:11:03.382 --> 0:11:06.502
<v Speaker 3>one is the YouTube element. But is this actually a

0:11:06.542 --> 0:11:08.782
<v Speaker 3>story about vologging or is this a story about something

0:11:08.822 --> 0:11:09.502
<v Speaker 3>else entirely.

0:11:10.502 --> 0:11:13.822
<v Speaker 2>I think this story gets misrepresented a lot because I'm

0:11:13.822 --> 0:11:16.782
<v Speaker 2>probably typical of some out louders who aren't massively familiar

0:11:16.782 --> 0:11:19.422
<v Speaker 2>with the Franks in that I've seen these headlines around

0:11:19.462 --> 0:11:23.222
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and it's been very much cautionary tale about

0:11:23.222 --> 0:11:28.382
<v Speaker 2>putting your children online, toxic side of influencing and parent influencers.

0:11:28.982 --> 0:11:31.062
<v Speaker 2>But what we're talking about here some of the abuse

0:11:31.142 --> 0:11:33.822
<v Speaker 2>that you outlined before, the stuff that Ruby Frank actually

0:11:33.822 --> 0:11:37.182
<v Speaker 2>got arrested for and is serving a significant jail term for,

0:11:37.302 --> 0:11:40.662
<v Speaker 2>as she absolutely should. That was not on the internet.

0:11:40.902 --> 0:11:44.142
<v Speaker 2>That is child abuse of the highest order. And it's

0:11:44.182 --> 0:11:46.261
<v Speaker 2>not like she was putting that upon YouTube. There is

0:11:46.302 --> 0:11:49.222
<v Speaker 2>a world of difference between the kind of stuff that

0:11:49.342 --> 0:11:52.102
<v Speaker 2>she was famous for, and I think we should be

0:11:52.142 --> 0:11:54.182
<v Speaker 2>really clear about. One of the reasons why this, I

0:11:54.182 --> 0:11:57.102
<v Speaker 2>think is so shocking in inverted commons to people is

0:11:57.102 --> 0:11:59.982
<v Speaker 2>that Ruby Frank, certainly at the time of her fame,

0:12:00.582 --> 0:12:04.542
<v Speaker 2>she doesn't look like an abusive parent in inverted commerce.

0:12:04.582 --> 0:12:07.582
<v Speaker 2>Obviously I'm not saying that, but that's the world's perceptions.

0:12:07.782 --> 0:12:11.982
<v Speaker 2>She's very well roomed, white lady with the nice bob

0:12:12.022 --> 0:12:14.742
<v Speaker 2>and the beautiful home and all the beautiful children, and

0:12:14.782 --> 0:12:18.582
<v Speaker 2>there's that aspirational element that people buy into. But she

0:12:18.702 --> 0:12:20.902
<v Speaker 2>was known, as you said, Jesse, for being quite strict.

0:12:20.942 --> 0:12:22.622
<v Speaker 2>But there is a world of difference between the kind

0:12:22.662 --> 0:12:24.302
<v Speaker 2>of stuff she was putting up on YouTube, which was

0:12:24.302 --> 0:12:27.822
<v Speaker 2>stuff like my daughter forgot her lunch today, the teacher

0:12:27.862 --> 0:12:29.582
<v Speaker 2>called me, But I'm gonna let her go hungry to

0:12:29.622 --> 0:12:32.182
<v Speaker 2>teach her a lesson let them. Yep, that's a let them.

0:12:32.222 --> 0:12:34.342
<v Speaker 2>And also some people would say that's you know, that's

0:12:34.422 --> 0:12:39.982
<v Speaker 2>good parenting, like resilience, content, etc. There is an ocean

0:12:40.022 --> 0:12:43.022
<v Speaker 2>of difference between that and keeping your child restrained in

0:12:43.062 --> 0:12:44.862
<v Speaker 2>a secret room in your house. And I think that

0:12:44.982 --> 0:12:48.302
<v Speaker 2>in a way, the headlines and the beautiful blonde lady

0:12:48.382 --> 0:12:52.022
<v Speaker 2>and the parent influencers finger wagging is like almost trying

0:12:52.022 --> 0:12:54.102
<v Speaker 2>to convince people that that's what was happening and we

0:12:54.102 --> 0:12:56.382
<v Speaker 2>were all born into it. But they're two different things.

0:12:56.462 --> 0:12:56.862
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:12:56.982 --> 0:12:59.822
<v Speaker 3>Do you think this has much to do with YouTube

0:12:59.862 --> 0:13:02.582
<v Speaker 3>and sharing images of your children online? Because it's almost

0:13:02.582 --> 0:13:05.222
<v Speaker 3>like people are trying to suggest see the type of

0:13:05.222 --> 0:13:07.862
<v Speaker 3>people that profit off their children. I wonder if there's an.

0:13:07.782 --> 0:13:10.502
<v Speaker 1>Element about I wonder if you guys are feeling defensive

0:13:10.742 --> 0:13:15.782
<v Speaker 1>because you've profited off your children in some of your content. No,

0:13:15.862 --> 0:13:18.422
<v Speaker 1>I'm joking, but to me, I didn't read it like that.

0:13:18.542 --> 0:13:23.102
<v Speaker 1>To me, I read it that it was more it's

0:13:23.142 --> 0:13:26.102
<v Speaker 1>all lies, and we suspected that it was all lies.

0:13:26.102 --> 0:13:28.702
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think there's glee, which is it

0:13:28.782 --> 0:13:32.462
<v Speaker 1>all looks so, whether it's ballerin a farm or any

0:13:32.502 --> 0:13:35.262
<v Speaker 1>of the other influencers Narah Smith. It all looks so

0:13:35.342 --> 0:13:40.542
<v Speaker 1>picture perfect, but underneath the surface there's terrible, dark things happening,

0:13:41.302 --> 0:13:43.422
<v Speaker 1>and it's like there's a glee, which is we knew

0:13:43.422 --> 0:13:44.862
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be as good as it looked.

0:13:45.302 --> 0:13:47.782
<v Speaker 3>I think it's also almost a true crime element of

0:13:47.822 --> 0:13:51.702
<v Speaker 3>there were science, so it's the online detective.

0:13:51.502 --> 0:13:53.782
<v Speaker 1>The idea that it was happening under everyone's none.

0:13:53.822 --> 0:13:56.142
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because there were the sort of little things which,

0:13:56.182 --> 0:13:58.982
<v Speaker 3>as you say, taken out of context, don't look you

0:13:59.062 --> 0:14:01.062
<v Speaker 3>kind of go, oh, that's a bit harsh, but it's

0:14:01.142 --> 0:14:04.742
<v Speaker 3>not a crime. But I worry that it will embolden

0:14:04.942 --> 0:14:09.942
<v Speaker 3>the commenters and embolden the kind of online community that

0:14:10.102 --> 0:14:12.982
<v Speaker 3>we all know can be. I remember sharing an image

0:14:12.982 --> 0:14:15.302
<v Speaker 3>of Luna when she was a few months old and

0:14:15.382 --> 0:14:19.022
<v Speaker 3>a comment basically suggesting that it was my fault she

0:14:19.102 --> 0:14:22.422
<v Speaker 3>was so little because I wasn't feeding her properly. And

0:14:22.462 --> 0:14:26.342
<v Speaker 3>this is the thing about like people watching any of

0:14:26.382 --> 0:14:28.862
<v Speaker 3>your parenting, is that they're going to have an opinion

0:14:28.862 --> 0:14:29.302
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:14:29.342 --> 0:14:32.462
<v Speaker 1>But aren't we learning that from this generation of kids

0:14:32.662 --> 0:14:35.062
<v Speaker 1>who were put on the internet by their parents, And

0:14:35.982 --> 0:14:37.942
<v Speaker 1>I should say none of us knew what we were doing.

0:14:38.022 --> 0:14:41.422
<v Speaker 1>It just so happened that my kids escaped that era.

0:14:42.142 --> 0:14:44.182
<v Speaker 1>Had they been born a few years later, or some

0:14:44.262 --> 0:14:46.302
<v Speaker 1>of them a few years earlier, I would have done

0:14:46.502 --> 0:14:49.582
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Because it's like, if you're someone who

0:14:49.622 --> 0:14:53.102
<v Speaker 1>lives online and part of the content that you make

0:14:53.342 --> 0:14:57.142
<v Speaker 1>and monetize is about your life, you can't just pretend

0:14:57.142 --> 0:14:59.422
<v Speaker 1>you don't have children. So I get that, but I

0:14:59.422 --> 0:15:01.702
<v Speaker 1>think that what we're seeing now is that those children

0:15:01.742 --> 0:15:04.302
<v Speaker 1>are old enough to go, hey, you know that thing

0:15:04.662 --> 0:15:05.662
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't good for us.

0:15:05.742 --> 0:15:09.382
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But I reckon that we are unable to see

0:15:09.822 --> 0:15:12.262
<v Speaker 3>as a spectrum. We have become so black and white

0:15:12.302 --> 0:15:14.742
<v Speaker 3>about sharing an image of a child online that it's

0:15:14.782 --> 0:15:17.822
<v Speaker 3>like you share an image and you're traumatizing them for life.

0:15:17.982 --> 0:15:21.262
<v Speaker 3>There is a spectrum where it's like sharing a family photograph,

0:15:21.502 --> 0:15:25.902
<v Speaker 3>child appears in video, making your children work full time

0:15:25.982 --> 0:15:28.902
<v Speaker 3>for your content, and filming them at their worst moments

0:15:28.942 --> 0:15:32.782
<v Speaker 3>when they're crying or tantruming or whatever, like, they are

0:15:33.462 --> 0:15:37.022
<v Speaker 3>totally different things, and we seem to not understand that

0:15:37.102 --> 0:15:38.062
<v Speaker 3>it's yeah, that it's.

0:15:37.942 --> 0:15:40.502
<v Speaker 2>Not the same. Ruby Frank's daughter, who has written a

0:15:40.542 --> 0:15:43.022
<v Speaker 2>memoir and who is also talking in this push to

0:15:43.062 --> 0:15:45.542
<v Speaker 2>get this bill passed in Utah, which her dad is too,

0:15:46.262 --> 0:15:48.782
<v Speaker 2>is very vocal about the fact that she feels very exploited,

0:15:48.902 --> 0:15:50.862
<v Speaker 2>and she said, you know, she was her mum would

0:15:50.902 --> 0:15:53.462
<v Speaker 2>film her bras shopping and put that online. She'd put

0:15:53.502 --> 0:15:56.862
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of very sensitive teenage stuff up there. And

0:15:57.102 --> 0:15:59.262
<v Speaker 2>I think, without questioning me or you're right, that there

0:15:59.342 --> 0:16:02.382
<v Speaker 2>is a generation who've grown up and said hey, But

0:16:02.502 --> 0:16:06.102
<v Speaker 2>as Jesse says, I don't think that's the same as

0:16:06.102 --> 0:16:08.862
<v Speaker 2>somebody who just sometimes puts a bitture of them. Care no,

0:16:09.022 --> 0:16:10.782
<v Speaker 2>but we are. I mean, you're right. But to your

0:16:11.062 --> 0:16:13.302
<v Speaker 2>barber earlier on which is fair enough about you know,

0:16:13.342 --> 0:16:16.582
<v Speaker 2>do you feel defensive? I think I probably do feel defensive.

0:16:16.662 --> 0:16:19.262
<v Speaker 2>Not in any way do I feel like I want

0:16:19.302 --> 0:16:21.582
<v Speaker 2>to defend a person like Ruby Frank who's abusing her

0:16:21.622 --> 0:16:24.382
<v Speaker 2>children in the worst way possible. But I do want

0:16:24.422 --> 0:16:27.102
<v Speaker 2>to be a little bit defensive about the idea that

0:16:27.422 --> 0:16:32.942
<v Speaker 2>ever involving your children in online content is necessarily entirely negative.

0:16:33.022 --> 0:16:34.862
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's true. I think it feeds into

0:16:34.902 --> 0:16:36.822
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons why the wear of the dad's

0:16:36.942 --> 0:16:39.902
<v Speaker 2>question is interesting, which is the people who are consuming

0:16:40.142 --> 0:16:42.462
<v Speaker 2>very often a lot of parenting content on the internet,

0:16:42.542 --> 0:16:45.622
<v Speaker 2>or women they're looking at other women doing it. And

0:16:45.822 --> 0:16:48.902
<v Speaker 2>although it very often starts off with a I feel seen,

0:16:49.062 --> 0:16:52.022
<v Speaker 2>thank god, my house is dirty like your houses. My

0:16:52.142 --> 0:16:54.702
<v Speaker 2>kid won't eat vegetables like your kid won't eat vegetables,

0:16:55.102 --> 0:16:58.462
<v Speaker 2>it also always morphs into a big stream of judgment,

0:16:58.702 --> 0:17:01.062
<v Speaker 2>big stream of like, well, you know that child's top

0:17:01.102 --> 0:17:03.062
<v Speaker 2>does look a bit dirty, and you're not feeding your

0:17:03.102 --> 0:17:06.182
<v Speaker 2>child probably Jesse and whatever. I think that that's very

0:17:06.222 --> 0:17:10.342
<v Speaker 2>toxic for the parent involved, and we know that if

0:17:10.341 --> 0:17:12.381
<v Speaker 2>the child is exposed to that, that's terrible. But I

0:17:12.382 --> 0:17:14.702
<v Speaker 2>don't think that everybody who's doing that on the internet

0:17:14.861 --> 0:17:16.382
<v Speaker 2>isn't considering the outcome.

0:17:16.502 --> 0:17:19.061
<v Speaker 1>No, and of course many of them are. You would

0:17:19.101 --> 0:17:22.181
<v Speaker 1>hope that this is about apple kind of situation. But

0:17:22.262 --> 0:17:24.381
<v Speaker 1>I think what's interesting also is part of this bill

0:17:24.462 --> 0:17:27.021
<v Speaker 1>is that when the children become adults, they can request

0:17:27.022 --> 0:17:29.941
<v Speaker 1>and all that content about them is taken down. And

0:17:30.022 --> 0:17:33.101
<v Speaker 1>what I think that it speaks to is when we

0:17:33.182 --> 0:17:37.341
<v Speaker 1>have children, we feel that their experiences are our experiences,

0:17:37.381 --> 0:17:39.782
<v Speaker 1>and at what point do they become their own experiences?

0:17:39.821 --> 0:17:43.942
<v Speaker 1>Like you exactly, you watch people talk about a child's

0:17:44.101 --> 0:17:48.502
<v Speaker 1>medical condition or their behavior and it's all through the

0:17:48.581 --> 0:17:51.262
<v Speaker 1>lens of how it affects that person as a mother,

0:17:51.302 --> 0:17:54.221
<v Speaker 1>which I completely understand. But I think what we're becoming

0:17:54.262 --> 0:17:57.461
<v Speaker 1>more aware now is that that person didn't necessarily consent

0:17:57.661 --> 0:17:59.581
<v Speaker 1>to that. I don't mean, you know, when they're in

0:17:59.581 --> 0:18:02.022
<v Speaker 1>a their photos on the internet, or they're in a

0:18:02.022 --> 0:18:05.101
<v Speaker 1>little bit of sponsored content. I more mean that kind

0:18:05.182 --> 0:18:08.462
<v Speaker 1>of vlogging turning your life into a reality show.

0:18:08.942 --> 0:18:12.302
<v Speaker 3>It's just interesting to me how this conversation has almost

0:18:12.341 --> 0:18:16.901
<v Speaker 3>totally excluded fathers like as participants in their children's lives.

0:18:16.982 --> 0:18:19.022
<v Speaker 3>And I understand it to a degree because it is

0:18:19.141 --> 0:18:22.542
<v Speaker 3>women who post a lot of this content and women

0:18:22.581 --> 0:18:25.742
<v Speaker 3>follow women like that's totally the point. But I also

0:18:25.861 --> 0:18:28.621
<v Speaker 3>think that we understand women to be in charge of

0:18:28.621 --> 0:18:32.621
<v Speaker 3>parenting decisions, and so I wonder if this were reversed,

0:18:32.861 --> 0:18:35.742
<v Speaker 3>it because of our children's will Exactly like, if a

0:18:35.821 --> 0:18:39.621
<v Speaker 3>child is online, let's assume, unless it's Grimes and Elon Musk,

0:18:39.982 --> 0:18:42.901
<v Speaker 3>let's assume that both parents have consented to that. But

0:18:43.061 --> 0:18:46.262
<v Speaker 3>the judgment is always towards the mother, because it's your

0:18:46.341 --> 0:18:46.942
<v Speaker 3>job to kicks.

0:18:47.182 --> 0:18:49.502
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean, I know what you're saying. I

0:18:49.502 --> 0:18:53.422
<v Speaker 1>think that's slightly disingenuous in that there is in most

0:18:53.462 --> 0:18:56.861
<v Speaker 1>households and most families there's divide and conquers. So the

0:18:56.901 --> 0:18:59.741
<v Speaker 1>Internet and social media and knowing about all of that

0:19:00.141 --> 0:19:04.341
<v Speaker 1>is seen as moreover something that women generally know a

0:19:04.341 --> 0:19:06.942
<v Speaker 1>lot more about. You know, men on social media tend

0:19:06.982 --> 0:19:09.902
<v Speaker 1>to either not be on it or their lurkers men

0:19:10.022 --> 0:19:10.701
<v Speaker 1>rarely post.

0:19:11.101 --> 0:19:11.461
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:19:11.542 --> 0:19:13.101
<v Speaker 3>I think that that's a decision that you make and

0:19:13.101 --> 0:19:14.902
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to the bottom line of the family

0:19:15.101 --> 0:19:17.941
<v Speaker 3>like this man, Look, Kevin, there is no you know,

0:19:18.022 --> 0:19:19.821
<v Speaker 3>there's evidence that he had absolutely nothing to do with

0:19:19.861 --> 0:19:21.061
<v Speaker 3>this Kevin Frank in terms.

0:19:20.901 --> 0:19:23.341
<v Speaker 2>Of the abuse of the abuse. Yeah, but he was

0:19:23.422 --> 0:19:25.341
<v Speaker 2>he was very involved in the vlogging.

0:19:25.581 --> 0:19:28.222
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, And he's come out and obviously said that

0:19:28.262 --> 0:19:31.502
<v Speaker 3>he has regrets. But I just note that at no

0:19:31.621 --> 0:19:34.861
<v Speaker 3>point did everyone kind of go He was also putting

0:19:34.861 --> 0:19:36.942
<v Speaker 3>a camera in front of their face and also endorsing

0:19:36.942 --> 0:19:39.182
<v Speaker 3>the parenting style that they were both practicing.

0:19:39.302 --> 0:19:40.981
<v Speaker 2>And there are a lot of Yeah, and there are

0:19:41.022 --> 0:19:43.061
<v Speaker 2>a lot of dad influences now too. They have a

0:19:43.061 --> 0:19:45.461
<v Speaker 2>lot of female followers. I think this is the modern

0:19:45.782 --> 0:19:48.902
<v Speaker 2>example of the stage parent, right, And there have always

0:19:48.982 --> 0:19:52.542
<v Speaker 2>been extreme versions of stage parenting that have veered towards

0:19:52.982 --> 0:19:56.581
<v Speaker 2>pushing your kid really hard exploitation and pay the bills

0:19:56.581 --> 0:19:59.782
<v Speaker 2>for the family exploitation, working them over time. This is

0:19:59.861 --> 0:20:01.262
<v Speaker 2>like the dark side of that.

0:20:02.502 --> 0:20:05.861
<v Speaker 1>After the break, why everyone is feeling a bit aspirational,

0:20:05.982 --> 0:20:07.302
<v Speaker 1>including Megan Michael.

0:20:14.942 --> 0:20:16.942
<v Speaker 2>It might sound like I'm in his studio in Inner

0:20:16.942 --> 0:20:19.821
<v Speaker 2>Sydney at the moment, but mentally I am replying on

0:20:19.901 --> 0:20:22.061
<v Speaker 2>a taste for sun loungers Mui.

0:20:23.182 --> 0:20:25.341
<v Speaker 3>I haven't started watching White Lotus yet, so is it

0:20:25.462 --> 0:20:26.542
<v Speaker 3>very kind of pictureque?

0:20:26.542 --> 0:20:28.741
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've seen the other two, right, Yeah? So the

0:20:28.782 --> 0:20:31.421
<v Speaker 2>first White Lotus was a set in Hawaii at the

0:20:31.422 --> 0:20:34.421
<v Speaker 2>Four Seasons of Maui. The second one was set at

0:20:34.462 --> 0:20:37.341
<v Speaker 2>another Four Seasons in Sicily in Italy. This one is

0:20:37.381 --> 0:20:40.022
<v Speaker 2>actually filmed at three different resorts in Thailand, one of

0:20:40.022 --> 0:20:43.701
<v Speaker 2>which is the Four Seasons Samui and yes.

0:20:43.901 --> 0:20:46.422
<v Speaker 3>I feel like a holiday to be beautiful.

0:20:46.821 --> 0:20:49.181
<v Speaker 2>Of course, as soon as the first episode of season

0:20:49.182 --> 0:20:52.461
<v Speaker 2>three dropped last week, google search is for where the

0:20:52.502 --> 0:20:53.702
<v Speaker 2>hell is that filmed?

0:20:53.861 --> 0:20:56.462
<v Speaker 1>And can I go there? Skyrocketed, And the truth of

0:20:56.502 --> 0:20:58.661
<v Speaker 1>it is it's second only to why the hell did

0:20:58.702 --> 0:21:02.101
<v Speaker 1>they change the theme music? Which was iconic. But we

0:21:02.141 --> 0:21:02.621
<v Speaker 1>will move on.

0:21:02.742 --> 0:21:04.701
<v Speaker 2>We will move on. We will learn to move on

0:21:04.861 --> 0:21:08.141
<v Speaker 2>and grow and change. The hotels now in the white

0:21:08.182 --> 0:21:11.581
<v Speaker 2>Lotus world actually by into that. You can buy Whiteladus packages,

0:21:11.702 --> 0:21:14.101
<v Speaker 2>you can get deals, you can go online at the

0:21:14.101 --> 0:21:17.061
<v Speaker 2>moment and you can buy a white Loadus fluffy white robe.

0:21:17.381 --> 0:21:21.141
<v Speaker 2>You can buy white Loaders fluffy slippers. There are Instagram

0:21:21.222 --> 0:21:24.022
<v Speaker 2>accounts with all the shoppable links to all the clothes

0:21:24.061 --> 0:21:26.542
<v Speaker 2>the resort war that the women wear on the show,

0:21:27.182 --> 0:21:30.061
<v Speaker 2>and everything in white Loadus land, it seems now is shoppable,

0:21:30.061 --> 0:21:33.502
<v Speaker 2>which is not unusual because a lot of TV has

0:21:33.542 --> 0:21:37.702
<v Speaker 2>gone that way. You can buy a appropriately named skinny

0:21:37.742 --> 0:21:41.022
<v Speaker 2>water bottle from Emily in Paris. You can buy a

0:21:41.101 --> 0:21:44.141
<v Speaker 2>Stranger Things motorbike helmet. You can buy all that stuff, which.

0:21:44.061 --> 0:21:47.022
<v Speaker 3>We were discussing just last week that Netflix is about

0:21:47.061 --> 0:21:47.981
<v Speaker 3>to get in on this.

0:21:48.141 --> 0:21:52.341
<v Speaker 2>Big time with with Love Megan, which widely assumed is

0:21:52.381 --> 0:21:53.782
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to be able to buy a lot

0:21:53.821 --> 0:21:56.022
<v Speaker 2>of the things that are in that show. But I

0:21:56.061 --> 0:21:58.581
<v Speaker 2>have a question specifically about the white load of thing,

0:21:58.621 --> 0:22:01.701
<v Speaker 2>but broadly about aspiration, because if you watched any of

0:22:01.742 --> 0:22:04.622
<v Speaker 2>the white loaduses, particularly the first one, but any of them,

0:22:05.022 --> 0:22:08.182
<v Speaker 2>you'll know that actually, although it's very lovely to look at,

0:22:08.621 --> 0:22:12.462
<v Speaker 2>it is actually a high level social satire about how

0:22:12.581 --> 0:22:16.262
<v Speaker 2>rich people going to fancy resorts around the world are

0:22:16.302 --> 0:22:19.861
<v Speaker 2>actually very problematic. It gives both perspectives to the people

0:22:19.861 --> 0:22:21.542
<v Speaker 2>who work there and the people who stay there. And

0:22:21.621 --> 0:22:25.502
<v Speaker 2>very often the people who work there, I hate truly

0:22:25.581 --> 0:22:28.942
<v Speaker 2>awful people who are staying there. Sometimes there's murder involved.

0:22:29.141 --> 0:22:30.661
<v Speaker 2>And in the first one there was a lot of

0:22:30.702 --> 0:22:34.542
<v Speaker 2>commentary about the impact on Indigenous communities. There's always a

0:22:34.581 --> 0:22:37.981
<v Speaker 2>lot of social commentary in those shows, and I find

0:22:38.022 --> 0:22:42.102
<v Speaker 2>it really interesting that we love all that and then

0:22:42.141 --> 0:22:43.981
<v Speaker 2>we go, yeah, yeah, yeah, but I just want to

0:22:43.982 --> 0:22:45.861
<v Speaker 2>go there. This spar looks amazing. Where can I book?

0:22:45.982 --> 0:22:50.222
<v Speaker 2>It's like our aspiration completely overrides the context.

0:22:50.381 --> 0:22:52.302
<v Speaker 3>We want their holiday, but we don't want to be.

0:22:52.381 --> 0:22:54.862
<v Speaker 2>Them, but we will be them when we're on their holiday.

0:22:54.901 --> 0:22:59.262
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, because we don't see ourselves as the leisure class.

0:22:59.502 --> 0:23:01.821
<v Speaker 3>We do not see ourselves as that, And in fact

0:23:02.341 --> 0:23:05.981
<v Speaker 3>there's this contrast between even like I keep thinking about

0:23:06.022 --> 0:23:08.901
<v Speaker 3>the Kim Kardashian of the world, right keeping up with

0:23:08.942 --> 0:23:11.782
<v Speaker 3>the Kardashian ended. I think last year I can't even tell.

0:23:11.702 --> 0:23:14.421
<v Speaker 2>Them it's on again against It's not called keeping up

0:23:14.422 --> 0:23:16.981
<v Speaker 2>the it's just called the Kardashians on at the.

0:23:16.982 --> 0:23:21.581
<v Speaker 3>Moment, totally fizzled out in terms of interest.

0:23:21.262 --> 0:23:23.461
<v Speaker 1>Cultural in terms of cultural.

0:23:23.182 --> 0:23:26.101
<v Speaker 3>Relevance, it has totally fizzled out because I think there's

0:23:26.141 --> 0:23:29.061
<v Speaker 3>something very on the nose about the Kardashians right now,

0:23:29.222 --> 0:23:34.181
<v Speaker 3>the conspicuous consumption of it, that luxury goods. I don't

0:23:34.302 --> 0:23:37.742
<v Speaker 3>think that that's what we aspire to anymore, and there's

0:23:37.782 --> 0:23:40.542
<v Speaker 3>a real kind of revolt against it.

0:23:40.581 --> 0:23:42.982
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you're right. I wish you were right

0:23:43.022 --> 0:23:44.741
<v Speaker 2>about that, But I think if you look at the

0:23:44.782 --> 0:23:46.742
<v Speaker 2>culture in America at the moment, there is a lot

0:23:46.782 --> 0:23:49.622
<v Speaker 2>of aspiration towards extreme wealth. There's a lot of it.

0:23:49.742 --> 0:23:52.101
<v Speaker 3>I think the ratings of the Kardashians tell us something.

0:23:52.141 --> 0:23:55.901
<v Speaker 3>I think the fact that they are not cool. Like

0:23:55.942 --> 0:23:57.821
<v Speaker 3>if someone told you that they were a massive fan

0:23:57.821 --> 0:23:59.821
<v Speaker 3>of Kim Kardashian, you'd be very confused.

0:23:59.901 --> 0:24:00.101
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:24:00.101 --> 0:24:02.901
<v Speaker 2>But also that show, I think it's just morphed because

0:24:02.982 --> 0:24:05.381
<v Speaker 2>the Kardashians has died for lots of reasons, one of

0:24:05.422 --> 0:24:07.861
<v Speaker 2>which is that you're now expected to watch like with

0:24:07.982 --> 0:24:11.141
<v Speaker 2>baited breath to see Kim Kardashian go to that fashion

0:24:11.182 --> 0:24:13.422
<v Speaker 2>show that you've already seen her go to fifty five

0:24:13.462 --> 0:24:16.021
<v Speaker 2>times on your socials by then. And I think there

0:24:16.101 --> 0:24:18.142
<v Speaker 2>is some truth to the aspirational thing, but I think

0:24:18.182 --> 0:24:21.102
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of just shifted a bit because now it

0:24:21.182 --> 0:24:23.581
<v Speaker 2>is this we want to buy all the things that

0:24:23.621 --> 0:24:26.581
<v Speaker 2>all the famous people have. One of the biggest obviously

0:24:26.782 --> 0:24:28.941
<v Speaker 2>shows on YouTube is about giving away lots of money,

0:24:28.942 --> 0:24:32.022
<v Speaker 2>making people into millionaires. Everybody wants that, Like, I don't

0:24:32.061 --> 0:24:37.061
<v Speaker 2>think the hunger for money status things has gone anywhere.

0:24:37.702 --> 0:24:39.782
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I think that something like the White Lotus

0:24:39.782 --> 0:24:41.502
<v Speaker 2>and how we kind of love to be in on

0:24:41.542 --> 0:24:43.422
<v Speaker 2>the joke of laughing at the rich people, but really

0:24:43.462 --> 0:24:45.742
<v Speaker 2>we just want to be on their holiday kind of

0:24:45.782 --> 0:24:46.821
<v Speaker 2>says that we haven't moved on.

0:24:46.861 --> 0:24:49.021
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't think it's as complicated as that.

0:24:49.101 --> 0:24:51.141
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just like that looks like a really

0:24:51.222 --> 0:24:54.262
<v Speaker 1>nice place to go and have a massage, or to

0:24:54.381 --> 0:24:57.661
<v Speaker 1>go and have a swim, hopefully without any bodies in

0:24:57.702 --> 0:25:01.941
<v Speaker 1>the pool. But that idea of there's no longer a

0:25:01.982 --> 0:25:05.542
<v Speaker 1>barrier between what I see and I want to buy it,

0:25:05.621 --> 0:25:09.502
<v Speaker 1>and that's what influencer culture is right because it's affiliate.

0:25:09.861 --> 0:25:12.542
<v Speaker 1>I can just click on whatever this influencer is wearing,

0:25:12.661 --> 0:25:15.821
<v Speaker 1>what products they're using. This is just an extension of that,

0:25:15.861 --> 0:25:18.341
<v Speaker 1>which is why Netflix is actually a really logical partner

0:25:18.341 --> 0:25:21.542
<v Speaker 1>for Megan Markle in terms of you watch it and

0:25:21.581 --> 0:25:22.982
<v Speaker 1>then you click straight away.

0:25:23.182 --> 0:25:26.302
<v Speaker 3>You say that there's no barrier. But the massive barrier

0:25:26.462 --> 0:25:29.182
<v Speaker 3>that exists in a way that it didn't even ten

0:25:29.262 --> 0:25:31.741
<v Speaker 3>years ago is the cost of living adress, and I

0:25:31.742 --> 0:25:34.982
<v Speaker 3>think that that is kind of the ghost haunting all

0:25:34.982 --> 0:25:35.181
<v Speaker 3>of this.

0:25:35.381 --> 0:25:37.461
<v Speaker 1>But that's the whole point. So that you can't go

0:25:37.742 --> 0:25:40.141
<v Speaker 1>to the White Lotus, you can't go to Thailand, but

0:25:40.182 --> 0:25:42.341
<v Speaker 1>I can buy a little robe, or I can buy

0:25:42.381 --> 0:25:45.621
<v Speaker 1>that little kaftan that she's wearing all the sandals, or

0:25:45.661 --> 0:25:46.382
<v Speaker 1>a scented can.

0:25:46.581 --> 0:25:49.222
<v Speaker 3>So I reckon that the aspiration has morphed, and I

0:25:49.302 --> 0:25:51.981
<v Speaker 3>think it's smaller, Like I do think that there's a

0:25:52.061 --> 0:25:55.101
<v Speaker 3>smaller world, Like I'm thinking about the tradwife because that

0:25:55.502 --> 0:25:59.542
<v Speaker 3>has become very aspirational, but that's cooking your own sourdough,

0:25:59.742 --> 0:26:03.782
<v Speaker 3>Like there's also something that is doable. Of course, they're all.

0:26:03.621 --> 0:26:06.102
<v Speaker 1>Like that's about the aspiration of time, having a lot

0:26:06.101 --> 0:26:09.222
<v Speaker 1>of time, exactly. And there's something called the Lipstick index

0:26:09.262 --> 0:26:11.341
<v Speaker 1>or the Maine index, which is when the cost of

0:26:11.381 --> 0:26:13.942
<v Speaker 1>living is high and people are struggling or there's a recession,

0:26:14.381 --> 0:26:17.022
<v Speaker 1>the sales of small luxury goods will go up. So

0:26:17.101 --> 0:26:20.222
<v Speaker 1>lipsticks used to be magazines, little things that you can buy.

0:26:20.542 --> 0:26:23.661
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's no accident that tmu's slogan is

0:26:23.702 --> 0:26:26.782
<v Speaker 1>shopped like a billionaire without spending much money. And it's

0:26:26.782 --> 0:26:30.662
<v Speaker 1>the same reason why the big designer houses like Chanelle

0:26:30.821 --> 0:26:35.302
<v Speaker 1>or Duck Chaange, Gabana, they have fragrance businesses because ninety

0:26:35.341 --> 0:26:37.581
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of people could never buy anything from Chanel,

0:26:37.621 --> 0:26:40.421
<v Speaker 1>but they can afford a fragrance. So this idea of

0:26:40.422 --> 0:26:42.142
<v Speaker 1>being able to buy a little bit of jam from

0:26:42.141 --> 0:26:44.741
<v Speaker 1>Megan Markle, of being able to buy a white Loatus candle,

0:26:45.222 --> 0:26:47.661
<v Speaker 1>or you know, in succession, it was about the stealth wealth.

0:26:47.901 --> 0:26:50.621
<v Speaker 1>I can buy a little bit of that lifestyle that

0:26:50.621 --> 0:26:51.582
<v Speaker 1>I could never afford.

0:26:51.742 --> 0:26:53.902
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because and I was listening to you talk

0:26:53.901 --> 0:26:56.662
<v Speaker 2>about Megan last week, of course because I was off

0:26:56.702 --> 0:26:58.741
<v Speaker 2>the show, but I was like, oh my god, what

0:26:58.742 --> 0:26:59.262
<v Speaker 2>did you mean?

0:26:59.341 --> 0:27:02.821
<v Speaker 1>Can we just break to ask what you thought about her? Announcement.

0:27:03.022 --> 0:27:06.341
<v Speaker 2>I was very excited about the announcement. I think that

0:27:06.462 --> 0:27:09.981
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the nitpicking about the copyright stuff is

0:27:10.182 --> 0:27:15.222
<v Speaker 2>typical Meghan bashing, but also just astounding that they continue

0:27:15.262 --> 0:27:19.221
<v Speaker 2>to apparently keep kicking such own goals. But on Meghan World,

0:27:19.901 --> 0:27:21.821
<v Speaker 2>you said on that on the show last week, and

0:27:21.861 --> 0:27:24.142
<v Speaker 2>you're very right that the esthetic. I know I say

0:27:24.182 --> 0:27:26.461
<v Speaker 2>it wrong, but I can't help it. Just just go

0:27:26.542 --> 0:27:30.022
<v Speaker 2>with me, just becol people like you that the esthetic

0:27:30.262 --> 0:27:33.262
<v Speaker 2>that Meghan Michael is flogging or it was apparently going

0:27:33.302 --> 0:27:35.902
<v Speaker 2>to be flogging on with Love Meghan and with as

0:27:35.942 --> 0:27:39.621
<v Speaker 2>ever feels a bit dated now. She posted a vision board.

0:27:39.661 --> 0:27:42.262
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of aspiration, she posted a vision board this week,

0:27:42.302 --> 0:27:44.061
<v Speaker 2>and I'm just so happy she's back on Instagram. But

0:27:44.061 --> 0:27:47.102
<v Speaker 2>I may have already say that, I'm sorry, I'll stop talking.

0:27:47.141 --> 0:27:48.542
<v Speaker 1>You'll never get boring.

0:27:48.661 --> 0:27:51.022
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that she posted this week is

0:27:51.101 --> 0:27:54.181
<v Speaker 2>her vision board for we assume for with Love Meghan, right,

0:27:54.702 --> 0:27:57.621
<v Speaker 2>and it's just a whole lot of it is just

0:27:57.661 --> 0:27:59.101
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot of Easter eggs. So there are a

0:27:59.141 --> 0:28:02.022
<v Speaker 2>lot of literal memes or what memes used to be

0:28:02.901 --> 0:28:06.341
<v Speaker 2>from her tig days of like these kind of nafts.

0:28:06.061 --> 0:28:08.141
<v Speaker 3>Like you can't please everyone, You're not a Jarrevan.

0:28:08.302 --> 0:28:10.822
<v Speaker 2>That's all exactly that kind of stuff with a cursive

0:28:10.942 --> 0:28:13.701
<v Speaker 2>font and then a little tig thing she like, it's

0:28:13.742 --> 0:28:16.782
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen. But I think it's back. This is my point,

0:28:16.901 --> 0:28:19.542
<v Speaker 2>right because also on the corner of that vision board,

0:28:19.542 --> 0:28:22.462
<v Speaker 2>because don't think I haven't seen it many times, what

0:28:22.621 --> 0:28:24.341
<v Speaker 2>else is on it? There's a flat lay or what

0:28:24.742 --> 0:28:30.341
<v Speaker 2>else is so a pancake with a face made from

0:28:30.341 --> 0:28:33.382
<v Speaker 2>bacon and bananas. This is very exciting. There are fabrics,

0:28:33.422 --> 0:28:36.581
<v Speaker 2>watches so whimsical that are definitely not from clothes because

0:28:36.621 --> 0:28:38.741
<v Speaker 2>she's not allowed to sell those allowed to sell clothes

0:28:38.822 --> 0:28:42.342
<v Speaker 2>as per copyrights. There's a very cute illustration of her

0:28:42.542 --> 0:28:44.902
<v Speaker 2>and her man friend Harry and English coats. There's a

0:28:44.982 --> 0:28:47.382
<v Speaker 2>flat lay of a lot of what are presumably are

0:28:47.382 --> 0:28:50.022
<v Speaker 2>going to be the recipes from the show. They could

0:28:50.142 --> 0:28:52.982
<v Speaker 2>be from the whole pantry, from the app, the Bell

0:28:53.022 --> 0:28:54.181
<v Speaker 2>Gibson app that we've.

0:28:54.062 --> 0:28:57.462
<v Speaker 1>All just seen, yes again around that time.

0:28:57.582 --> 0:29:01.941
<v Speaker 2>So beautiful, looking, healthy, gorgeous. I mean, there's only so

0:29:02.022 --> 0:29:04.941
<v Speaker 2>many ways to food style, right, but they look very

0:29:05.022 --> 0:29:07.542
<v Speaker 2>much of the time, and I just think it's back.

0:29:07.702 --> 0:29:09.502
<v Speaker 2>I think that level of aspiration, and probably for a

0:29:09.582 --> 0:29:11.142
<v Speaker 2>lot of the reasons that you two were just discussing,

0:29:11.262 --> 0:29:13.862
<v Speaker 2>like a bit of accessible joy, a little bit of

0:29:14.142 --> 0:29:16.342
<v Speaker 2>trying to hold onto a portion of control in an

0:29:16.422 --> 0:29:17.382
<v Speaker 2>uncontrollable world.

0:29:17.742 --> 0:29:19.622
<v Speaker 1>Stewart two point zero that that kind of.

0:29:20.222 --> 0:29:23.421
<v Speaker 2>Domestic aspiration as well, as you know, the white Lotus

0:29:23.502 --> 0:29:26.222
<v Speaker 2>level is kind of back in fashion. Is it whimsy?

0:29:26.462 --> 0:29:28.782
<v Speaker 1>Because you talk about the things that you'll be able

0:29:28.822 --> 0:29:30.701
<v Speaker 1>to buy? I assume you probably won't be able to

0:29:30.702 --> 0:29:33.142
<v Speaker 1>buy the ice cubes with the tiny little flowers.

0:29:32.782 --> 0:29:35.662
<v Speaker 2>But anyone can make that tis isn't it. You can

0:29:35.742 --> 0:29:38.462
<v Speaker 2>go out in your street, steal.

0:29:38.222 --> 0:29:40.622
<v Speaker 1>Some flowers from someone else's guarded.

0:29:40.302 --> 0:29:42.502
<v Speaker 2>Forage and put them in some water, and I will

0:29:42.582 --> 0:29:42.902
<v Speaker 2>be free.

0:29:43.022 --> 0:29:45.622
<v Speaker 3>My neighbor has a sign saying do not steal my hydrangers.

0:29:45.742 --> 0:29:46.421
<v Speaker 3>I've thought about it.

0:29:47.342 --> 0:29:48.782
<v Speaker 2>She's like, I know what you want to do with

0:29:48.822 --> 0:29:50.782
<v Speaker 2>these pedals. I have one more question though, for me,

0:29:50.862 --> 0:29:54.222
<v Speaker 2>a business brain. Back to the white lotus right, there

0:29:54.262 --> 0:29:57.302
<v Speaker 2>would have been a time where an amazing brand like

0:29:57.382 --> 0:30:00.222
<v Speaker 2>The Four Seasons would not want to be associated with

0:30:00.342 --> 0:30:04.582
<v Speaker 2>a show where their staff were depicted taking drugs, sex,

0:30:04.982 --> 0:30:10.102
<v Speaker 2>beating up people, getting murdered, where a fancy brand would

0:30:10.102 --> 0:30:12.941
<v Speaker 2>have been like not near my brand, please. But the

0:30:13.022 --> 0:30:15.862
<v Speaker 2>four seasons, obviously after the success of these shows, are

0:30:15.942 --> 0:30:19.182
<v Speaker 2>leaning in I'm going, fine, we'll go with it. Very

0:30:19.222 --> 0:30:21.022
<v Speaker 2>savvy marketing, but a bit of a shift.

0:30:21.542 --> 0:30:24.142
<v Speaker 1>Not really when you think of that, these are basically

0:30:24.302 --> 0:30:26.822
<v Speaker 1>like infomercials because the whole point of the show is

0:30:26.942 --> 0:30:29.661
<v Speaker 1>to show when we check the plot out, it's just

0:30:30.022 --> 0:30:33.421
<v Speaker 1>an infomercial. Turn off the volume, and it's just looks

0:30:33.782 --> 0:30:36.782
<v Speaker 1>like a fantastic ad for you please find the murder,

0:30:36.902 --> 0:30:39.421
<v Speaker 1>which are absolutely sold out. And I think the other

0:30:39.502 --> 0:30:43.102
<v Speaker 1>thing about why everything's shoppable is that it's really expensive

0:30:43.222 --> 0:30:46.942
<v Speaker 1>to make TV and film and there are so many

0:30:47.062 --> 0:30:50.142
<v Speaker 1>challenges and by doing that, not only is it an

0:30:50.222 --> 0:30:53.782
<v Speaker 1>extra revenue stream for the creators and there's money to

0:30:53.862 --> 0:30:57.542
<v Speaker 1>be made, but then there's also product placement. And apparently

0:30:57.622 --> 0:30:59.142
<v Speaker 1>that I was reading that the White Lotus they were

0:30:59.182 --> 0:31:00.902
<v Speaker 1>talking about season four was going to be in Norway,

0:31:01.062 --> 0:31:03.702
<v Speaker 1>and that's just fallen through because one of the things

0:31:03.742 --> 0:31:07.822
<v Speaker 1>that they demand from the countries is massive tax breaks

0:31:07.902 --> 0:31:10.902
<v Speaker 1>and grants and all of those things, because those are

0:31:10.942 --> 0:31:12.782
<v Speaker 1>expensive shows to make and you need all the help

0:31:12.782 --> 0:31:13.142
<v Speaker 1>that you can.

0:31:13.142 --> 0:31:17.981
<v Speaker 3>Get in case he missed it. Last Thursday, billionaire Clive Palmer,

0:31:18.182 --> 0:31:21.502
<v Speaker 3>former head of the United Australia Party, launched a brand

0:31:21.622 --> 0:31:23.622
<v Speaker 3>new political party. Did you guys say this?

0:31:24.062 --> 0:31:27.661
<v Speaker 2>I did. I saw the hats, shoppable shoppable hats.

0:31:28.142 --> 0:31:30.342
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that Clive Palmer was still a thing.

0:31:30.542 --> 0:31:35.422
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So it is called trump Et of Patriots.

0:31:35.462 --> 0:31:40.302
<v Speaker 1>Trump Trumpet, Trumpety Trumpet the the oh did there? Yes?

0:31:40.422 --> 0:31:41.221
<v Speaker 3>Can you see what he did?

0:31:41.302 --> 0:31:41.941
<v Speaker 1>What a genius?

0:31:42.142 --> 0:31:42.342
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:31:42.862 --> 0:31:46.701
<v Speaker 3>It promises to make Australia.

0:31:46.742 --> 0:31:50.502
<v Speaker 1>Trump again, great gaat again, My goodness.

0:31:50.542 --> 0:31:53.902
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, he wants to drain the swamp of Canberra. What

0:31:54.022 --> 0:31:56.701
<v Speaker 3>was his last party called United Australia. He's had a

0:31:56.742 --> 0:31:57.422
<v Speaker 3>few now.

0:31:57.422 --> 0:31:59.502
<v Speaker 1>It's like, we're not even going to pretend to United Australia.

0:31:59.542 --> 0:32:02.421
<v Speaker 1>Were Actually that's going to lean in to dividing every country.

0:32:02.542 --> 0:32:05.542
<v Speaker 3>What actually happened is that he lost a high court

0:32:05.582 --> 0:32:08.502
<v Speaker 3>bid to reregister United Australia. So I needed a new net. Okay,

0:32:08.622 --> 0:32:11.622
<v Speaker 3>bitlight megants who.

0:32:11.542 --> 0:32:14.501
<v Speaker 1>He's calling it the as I'm quite far.

0:32:15.422 --> 0:32:18.342
<v Speaker 3>He wants to ban transathletes from women's sport. Basically, all

0:32:18.422 --> 0:32:22.702
<v Speaker 3>his ideas are imported from Trump's America. Is this something

0:32:23.182 --> 0:32:25.382
<v Speaker 3>we should be worried about, like, are we about to

0:32:25.502 --> 0:32:27.862
<v Speaker 3>turn into what's happened over there?

0:32:27.902 --> 0:32:29.701
<v Speaker 1>And is this our republican part I don't think so

0:32:29.822 --> 0:32:32.062
<v Speaker 1>everyone keeps saying that, and it's like, Oh, Dutton's going

0:32:32.142 --> 0:32:35.062
<v Speaker 1>to go so Trumpian and he's going to do culture wars.

0:32:35.302 --> 0:32:39.062
<v Speaker 1>He's already said he's not. Now politicians are politicians. But

0:32:39.582 --> 0:32:42.261
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken on the show before after we all freaked

0:32:42.302 --> 0:32:45.462
<v Speaker 1>out when Trump got back in that the reason that

0:32:45.582 --> 0:32:49.661
<v Speaker 1>Australian politics will never become as extreme is because of

0:32:49.742 --> 0:32:53.342
<v Speaker 1>compulsory voting. And this sounds really nerdy, but it's not

0:32:53.582 --> 0:32:56.582
<v Speaker 1>that people don't care as much or that there aren't

0:32:56.582 --> 0:32:59.342
<v Speaker 1>as many people here that will be attracted to extreme things.

0:32:59.462 --> 0:33:02.942
<v Speaker 1>But in countries where voting isn't compulsory, it's like the algorithm.

0:33:03.022 --> 0:33:06.502
<v Speaker 1>It's literally the same thing. The issues and the policies

0:33:06.582 --> 0:33:08.782
<v Speaker 1>and the vibe that gets people out to vote has

0:33:08.862 --> 0:33:09.461
<v Speaker 1>to be extreme.

0:33:09.702 --> 0:33:11.542
<v Speaker 3>It's what I remember Holly saying that it has to

0:33:11.622 --> 0:33:15.221
<v Speaker 3>be presented as existential as this is the last election,

0:33:15.542 --> 0:33:16.502
<v Speaker 3>get off your bum.

0:33:16.462 --> 0:33:20.222
<v Speaker 1>And whereas in Australia, in most countries the vast majority

0:33:20.262 --> 0:33:22.782
<v Speaker 1>of people are in the middle are basically centrist. They're

0:33:22.822 --> 0:33:25.382
<v Speaker 1>not extreme left or extreme right. We also don't have

0:33:25.542 --> 0:33:26.302
<v Speaker 1>everyone vote.

0:33:26.582 --> 0:33:28.862
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we also don't have the far right component. We

0:33:28.942 --> 0:33:31.662
<v Speaker 3>don't have fifty states. I think that that totally changes

0:33:31.862 --> 0:33:35.902
<v Speaker 3>our like we're obsessed with American politics culturally, I think.

0:33:36.382 --> 0:33:39.782
<v Speaker 3>But it is naive to suggest that it is going

0:33:39.902 --> 0:33:42.622
<v Speaker 3>to sort of infiltrate. I think how this.

0:33:42.742 --> 0:33:43.742
<v Speaker 2>Election is run.

0:33:44.702 --> 0:33:46.782
<v Speaker 3>I think that this not so sure. You know, you

0:33:46.902 --> 0:33:49.862
<v Speaker 3>know what it might infiltrate. It doesn't work. I do

0:33:50.022 --> 0:33:52.382
<v Speaker 3>not think it works. And let's remember that Clive Palmer,

0:33:52.382 --> 0:33:55.421
<v Speaker 3>who has already run on make Australia great Again since

0:33:55.542 --> 0:33:58.302
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixteen, are worked for Trump. He spent more than

0:33:58.302 --> 0:34:00.982
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty million dollars to secure one seat

0:34:01.182 --> 0:34:01.702
<v Speaker 3>in parliament.

0:34:01.742 --> 0:34:02.662
<v Speaker 1>He's just not the vibe.

0:34:02.862 --> 0:34:04.342
<v Speaker 3>He's not the vibe.

0:34:04.422 --> 0:34:07.502
<v Speaker 2>The most Trumpian thing about Clive Palmer in many ways

0:34:07.782 --> 0:34:10.262
<v Speaker 2>is his exaggeration of his own success right because he

0:34:10.382 --> 0:34:12.462
<v Speaker 2>is a very rich man. He is a proper billionaire.

0:34:12.542 --> 0:34:16.301
<v Speaker 2>He's not pretending. But he has been trying to win

0:34:16.702 --> 0:34:20.822
<v Speaker 2>serious Australian political influence for a decade and he has failed.

0:34:20.942 --> 0:34:24.622
<v Speaker 2>Clive Palmer, Yeah, Clive Palmer has, and so he would

0:34:24.701 --> 0:34:26.701
<v Speaker 2>have to go much much harder at it than he

0:34:26.902 --> 0:34:30.181
<v Speaker 2>is at the moment with his trumpet whatever, I mean,

0:34:30.261 --> 0:34:35.901
<v Speaker 2>god trumpet of patriots. But I'm a very strong It's

0:34:35.902 --> 0:34:37.661
<v Speaker 2>so funny because when I came here from England, which

0:34:37.701 --> 0:34:39.461
<v Speaker 2>is a very long time ago now, and I thought

0:34:39.502 --> 0:34:43.821
<v Speaker 2>that mandatory voting was unbelievable, Like my head nearly fell off.

0:34:43.862 --> 0:34:45.421
<v Speaker 2>I was like that it was bad. Yeah, I've never

0:34:45.542 --> 0:34:47.301
<v Speaker 2>even heard of it. I've never heard of such a thing.

0:34:47.342 --> 0:34:49.062
<v Speaker 2>There aren't very many places you to have it.

0:34:49.102 --> 0:34:50.861
<v Speaker 1>An American in this horrified and.

0:34:50.902 --> 0:34:53.142
<v Speaker 2>I actually thought it was probably quite bad for politics

0:34:53.181 --> 0:34:56.302
<v Speaker 2>because I used to think, oh, you know, people aren't informed,

0:34:56.342 --> 0:34:57.982
<v Speaker 2>but they have to vote. You know, they don't care,

0:34:58.062 --> 0:35:00.582
<v Speaker 2>but they have to vote. And now thirty years down

0:35:00.622 --> 0:35:02.902
<v Speaker 2>the line, I've been here nearly thirty years, I'm like,

0:35:03.542 --> 0:35:06.661
<v Speaker 2>that's great. The fact that you don't have to exercise

0:35:06.701 --> 0:35:08.942
<v Speaker 2>the edges exactly how you just explained it is brilliant.

0:35:09.542 --> 0:35:12.901
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think there is any argument that there

0:35:13.062 --> 0:35:15.341
<v Speaker 2>is a lot of hate to be made from dividing people.

0:35:15.462 --> 0:35:18.622
<v Speaker 2>And in Australia we do have similar divisions between the

0:35:19.181 --> 0:35:23.462
<v Speaker 2>metro people and the regional people. Country Australia, which is

0:35:23.502 --> 0:35:25.902
<v Speaker 2>the real Australia. Who are the real Australians? And we

0:35:26.062 --> 0:35:30.381
<v Speaker 2>saw it in the campaign for the Indigenous referendum. Voice

0:35:30.422 --> 0:35:34.382
<v Speaker 2>to Parliament working those divisions can be quite successful. So,

0:35:34.502 --> 0:35:36.741
<v Speaker 2>although I agree with you, Jesse, I don't think that

0:35:36.942 --> 0:35:40.781
<v Speaker 2>Palmer's the vibe. I'm not quite so optimistic that we're

0:35:40.862 --> 0:35:42.222
<v Speaker 2>not susceptible to that division.

0:35:42.542 --> 0:35:45.301
<v Speaker 1>The election is set to be announced soon. There's been

0:35:45.382 --> 0:35:47.261
<v Speaker 1>rumors that it's going to be announced any day and

0:35:47.342 --> 0:35:49.181
<v Speaker 1>that maybe the election will be before Easter.

0:35:49.342 --> 0:35:51.582
<v Speaker 2>You know what I'm worried about very selfishly, Well, if

0:35:51.622 --> 0:35:53.302
<v Speaker 2>it's on the day we do one of our shows,

0:35:53.622 --> 0:35:55.821
<v Speaker 2>I mean we will have time to go and vote.

0:35:57.102 --> 0:35:59.221
<v Speaker 2>What if the result comes in while we're on stageh

0:35:59.382 --> 0:36:00.261
<v Speaker 2>that not just be fun?

0:36:00.582 --> 0:36:00.821
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:36:01.302 --> 0:36:03.181
<v Speaker 2>Could we be likely sales out of bell Crab like

0:36:03.261 --> 0:36:05.702
<v Speaker 2>on the stage calling it Yeah, yeah.

0:36:05.582 --> 0:36:07.942
<v Speaker 1>We will bags you be Anthony Green Jesse.

0:36:10.181 --> 0:36:13.742
<v Speaker 3>In a moment. There are seven different types of Flakes,

0:36:14.181 --> 0:36:14.741
<v Speaker 3>which one is.

0:36:14.781 --> 0:36:18.981
<v Speaker 2>Maya one unlimited out loud access. We drop episodes every

0:36:19.062 --> 0:36:23.382
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Mamma Mia subscribers. Follow the

0:36:23.422 --> 0:36:25.022
<v Speaker 2>link at the show notes to get us in your

0:36:25.062 --> 0:36:28.142
<v Speaker 2>ears five days a week, and a huge thank you

0:36:28.342 --> 0:36:30.142
<v Speaker 2>to all our current subscribers.

0:36:36.422 --> 0:36:40.261
<v Speaker 1>Counseling plans is so hot right now. Last week I

0:36:40.422 --> 0:36:42.502
<v Speaker 1>tried to cancel a dinner because it was raining.

0:36:42.902 --> 0:36:43.422
<v Speaker 2>How did that go?

0:36:44.982 --> 0:36:47.542
<v Speaker 1>The person I tried to cancel told me that I

0:36:47.661 --> 0:36:50.462
<v Speaker 1>was pathetic and did you go? I went good and

0:36:50.542 --> 0:36:53.742
<v Speaker 1>I had a great time. Glad I didn't cancel. Everyone's lonely.

0:36:53.862 --> 0:36:55.821
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to actually leaving the house, how

0:36:55.862 --> 0:36:58.142
<v Speaker 1>come nobody can be bothered to follow through on the

0:36:58.261 --> 0:37:01.102
<v Speaker 1>arrangement they made in a flood of social enthusiasm last

0:37:01.142 --> 0:37:05.822
<v Speaker 1>week after their second coffee. Stylus dot com recently posted

0:37:05.862 --> 0:37:10.262
<v Speaker 1>a story by writer Shahed Azadi about the psychology behind

0:37:10.582 --> 0:37:13.342
<v Speaker 1>the seven different types of flake, and I guarantee that

0:37:13.382 --> 0:37:16.062
<v Speaker 1>you will recognize yourself or the flakes in your life

0:37:16.142 --> 0:37:19.821
<v Speaker 1>from the following list. First one, the relationship flake. This

0:37:19.982 --> 0:37:23.302
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of flake that cancels because of reasons

0:37:23.382 --> 0:37:26.582
<v Speaker 1>or plans with their partner. Their partner will always come first.

0:37:26.902 --> 0:37:28.342
<v Speaker 3>I find that flake very annoying.

0:37:28.502 --> 0:37:29.422
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, strange.

0:37:29.582 --> 0:37:31.902
<v Speaker 1>Second type is the work flake. They're always working in.

0:37:31.982 --> 0:37:33.341
<v Speaker 1>Work will always be prioritized.

0:37:33.382 --> 0:37:34.301
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure we've all been that.

0:37:34.982 --> 0:37:38.022
<v Speaker 1>The last minute flake. This is my jam. They have

0:37:38.181 --> 0:37:41.062
<v Speaker 1>something called present bias, so they commit to plans when

0:37:41.102 --> 0:37:44.102
<v Speaker 1>they feel excited and like it's a good idea, but

0:37:44.181 --> 0:37:46.382
<v Speaker 1>then they struggle with those plans when they're faced with

0:37:46.462 --> 0:37:48.781
<v Speaker 1>the immediate cognitive load of following.

0:37:48.502 --> 0:37:50.542
<v Speaker 2>Through on the You know what's great about the last

0:37:50.582 --> 0:37:53.542
<v Speaker 2>minute flake is that sometimes if I'm at a social

0:37:53.582 --> 0:37:56.102
<v Speaker 2>event where me is meant to come, I never think

0:37:56.142 --> 0:37:58.301
<v Speaker 2>she's gonna come. I think she's going to last minute flake,

0:37:58.701 --> 0:38:01.301
<v Speaker 2>and then sometimes she just turns up and it's like

0:38:01.382 --> 0:38:03.982
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful surprise. I remember when we were going to

0:38:04.062 --> 0:38:05.741
<v Speaker 2>something at the Opera House and we were having dinner

0:38:05.781 --> 0:38:08.221
<v Speaker 2>before and I was like, Mia is never coming to

0:38:08.302 --> 0:38:11.701
<v Speaker 2>this restaurant. Too many steps, too many steps, too much,

0:38:12.062 --> 0:38:13.901
<v Speaker 2>she will never find a park, it's not going to happen.

0:38:14.102 --> 0:38:15.301
<v Speaker 2>And then she just materialized.

0:38:15.302 --> 0:38:17.142
<v Speaker 1>It was like a little tree. I have a lot

0:38:17.181 --> 0:38:19.862
<v Speaker 1>of stern words with myself because I'm trying to deflake

0:38:20.022 --> 0:38:23.261
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying to be more present, so I've got

0:38:23.342 --> 0:38:26.301
<v Speaker 1>like a show up thing anyway. Number four this is

0:38:26.302 --> 0:38:29.661
<v Speaker 1>also sometimes me the forgetful flake. This flake relies on

0:38:29.822 --> 0:38:32.142
<v Speaker 1>the other person either forgetting that you've made the plan,

0:38:32.822 --> 0:38:36.022
<v Speaker 1>or hoping that the planned hangout is forgotten so that

0:38:36.542 --> 0:38:39.862
<v Speaker 1>no excuses are necessary. Preemptive flake is someone who's so

0:38:40.062 --> 0:38:43.102
<v Speaker 1>proceeds of bailing a few days out they start complaining

0:38:43.181 --> 0:38:46.502
<v Speaker 1>of feeling tired, run down, or busy at work. That's

0:38:46.582 --> 0:38:49.622
<v Speaker 1>not me, because that's someone with a lot of just

0:38:49.741 --> 0:38:53.381
<v Speaker 1>say no yes. I think this is possibly you two

0:38:53.462 --> 0:38:56.821
<v Speaker 1>definitely number six the people pleasing flake, and this is

0:38:56.862 --> 0:38:58.941
<v Speaker 1>people who say yes to plans to make everyone happy,

0:38:58.982 --> 0:39:00.221
<v Speaker 1>but there's no way they can do it all, so

0:39:00.302 --> 0:39:01.302
<v Speaker 1>they have to flake.

0:39:01.502 --> 0:39:04.901
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I will say yes in the moment. Two

0:39:04.982 --> 0:39:05.901
<v Speaker 3>plans on Monday night.

0:39:06.102 --> 0:39:11.022
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and then I go, hmmm, something to work that.

0:39:11.422 --> 0:39:13.582
<v Speaker 1>So you'll say yes because you don't want to disappoint

0:39:13.622 --> 0:39:16.422
<v Speaker 1>someone in the moment. And sometimes do you always know

0:39:16.542 --> 0:39:17.701
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to cancel before it?

0:39:18.022 --> 0:39:18.701
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you do.

0:39:18.942 --> 0:39:21.181
<v Speaker 3>I know that I've got to and then ultimately you

0:39:21.342 --> 0:39:22.981
<v Speaker 3>just let them down ten times more than you would

0:39:22.982 --> 0:39:23.701
<v Speaker 3>have in the first place.

0:39:23.822 --> 0:39:24.701
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is your fear.

0:39:25.622 --> 0:39:28.261
<v Speaker 1>And the last one, seventh type of flake is the

0:39:28.422 --> 0:39:31.701
<v Speaker 1>upgrade flake. This is a flake you'll see a lot

0:39:32.022 --> 0:39:34.422
<v Speaker 1>around news eve. They say yes to plans with you,

0:39:34.502 --> 0:39:37.062
<v Speaker 1>but they keep an eye out for better options always.

0:39:37.221 --> 0:39:38.862
<v Speaker 2>Ye, Mia, I've got a bone to pick with you.

0:39:38.902 --> 0:39:41.062
<v Speaker 2>A bit of feedback about your flakiness. It's not actually

0:39:41.102 --> 0:39:43.862
<v Speaker 2>about the flakingness. It's about because MEA's she's the opposite

0:39:43.862 --> 0:39:44.862
<v Speaker 2>of the people please a flake.

0:39:44.942 --> 0:39:45.062
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:39:45.142 --> 0:39:50.342
<v Speaker 2>So Mia wrote a newsletter recently, maybe I was feeling sensitive.

0:39:50.422 --> 0:39:52.262
<v Speaker 2>I was like, fuck sake, Maya. When I read.

0:39:54.142 --> 0:39:55.382
<v Speaker 1>Anyone that I had that reaction.

0:39:55.942 --> 0:39:58.261
<v Speaker 2>It was I've got a new way to say no

0:39:58.382 --> 0:40:00.142
<v Speaker 2>to plans, to things I don't want to do. And

0:40:00.302 --> 0:40:02.261
<v Speaker 2>I think the subject line would have been better than that,

0:40:02.261 --> 0:40:04.741
<v Speaker 2>because you're a good writer. But it was basically that

0:40:04.822 --> 0:40:07.741
<v Speaker 2>when someone asks you to do something, you just say,

0:40:07.902 --> 0:40:08.741
<v Speaker 2>oh no, I'd hate that.

0:40:10.142 --> 0:40:11.542
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh know, I'd hate that.

0:40:11.781 --> 0:40:15.661
<v Speaker 2>That is so offensive and so very levels.

0:40:15.982 --> 0:40:18.502
<v Speaker 1>Because can I explain I got a liverit that that's

0:40:18.582 --> 0:40:21.781
<v Speaker 1>highly advanced. That's highly advanced preflaking.

0:40:22.181 --> 0:40:25.542
<v Speaker 2>That is like an aggressive, aggressive flake because no, it

0:40:25.622 --> 0:40:27.342
<v Speaker 2>doesn't just say I don't want to do it. It

0:40:27.462 --> 0:40:30.181
<v Speaker 2>kind of says you must be crazy for wanting to

0:40:30.302 --> 0:40:33.181
<v Speaker 2>do that and for thinking, even for a moment, that

0:40:33.342 --> 0:40:34.102
<v Speaker 2>I want to do that.

0:40:34.462 --> 0:40:36.582
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's very hard because there's a bit of shame

0:40:36.701 --> 0:40:38.821
<v Speaker 1>in that place. Yes in that response, isn't there?

0:40:38.982 --> 0:40:40.741
<v Speaker 2>And then the other part of my worry is like,

0:40:40.781 --> 0:40:43.661
<v Speaker 2>I've got some concern trolling about it for you. What

0:40:43.822 --> 0:40:46.982
<v Speaker 2>if you think you'd hate it but you wouldn't, because

0:40:47.261 --> 0:40:49.901
<v Speaker 2>I worry that sometimes when you were very rigid about

0:40:49.982 --> 0:40:52.142
<v Speaker 2>I don't do those things, like I don't do Monday

0:40:52.221 --> 0:40:54.261
<v Speaker 2>night drinks or I don't do you. She used to

0:40:54.302 --> 0:40:55.622
<v Speaker 2>be I don't do red carpets.

0:40:55.862 --> 0:40:56.221
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:40:56.342 --> 0:40:58.102
<v Speaker 2>Then she went to the logis, yeah, she did a

0:40:58.142 --> 0:41:00.261
<v Speaker 2>red carpet every week, but I hate it still. But

0:41:00.422 --> 0:41:02.502
<v Speaker 2>you went to another one and you were like, actually

0:41:02.582 --> 0:41:05.582
<v Speaker 2>that was fun. So what about breaking out of rigiditity?

0:41:05.982 --> 0:41:08.701
<v Speaker 1>You're right, and sometimes you need to just get over

0:41:08.741 --> 0:41:11.022
<v Speaker 1>yourself and show up. Sometimes you just got to show

0:41:11.102 --> 0:41:14.221
<v Speaker 1>up when it's hurtful to someone else, Like I think

0:41:14.261 --> 0:41:15.382
<v Speaker 1>it's important to show up.

0:41:15.661 --> 0:41:18.582
<v Speaker 3>Twice yesterday I tried to convince people to come to

0:41:18.661 --> 0:41:21.342
<v Speaker 3>an escape room with me. She's different social situations, and

0:41:21.422 --> 0:41:24.982
<v Speaker 3>twice they said along the words of oh, no, i'd

0:41:25.022 --> 0:41:27.582
<v Speaker 3>hate that and starting a movement. Guys, I found myself

0:41:27.741 --> 0:41:32.821
<v Speaker 3>becoming a paid sponsor of escape rooms. And I got

0:41:32.942 --> 0:41:33.782
<v Speaker 3>home and I went.

0:41:33.661 --> 0:41:35.902
<v Speaker 1>Because it's then you take it as a challenge and

0:41:35.982 --> 0:41:37.381
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I'm going to convince.

0:41:37.142 --> 0:41:39.301
<v Speaker 3>You escape rooms are actually really fun.

0:41:39.382 --> 0:41:42.102
<v Speaker 2>Have you found anyone to go to an escape room? Only? Luca?

0:41:42.181 --> 0:41:44.821
<v Speaker 3>And it's just too sad. I am actually reformed for

0:41:44.942 --> 0:41:46.982
<v Speaker 3>like I have managed to reform it.

0:41:47.342 --> 0:41:50.381
<v Speaker 1>You go out a lot. That's true because what changed.

0:41:50.142 --> 0:41:55.661
<v Speaker 3>I was in my I reckon early twenties, so unreliable,

0:41:56.221 --> 0:41:58.542
<v Speaker 3>so like, and that was the I realized that that

0:41:58.622 --> 0:42:01.382
<v Speaker 3>was a reputation I was getting, letting people down with

0:42:01.462 --> 0:42:03.062
<v Speaker 3>something I did all the time because of the people

0:42:03.062 --> 0:42:07.261
<v Speaker 3>pleasing element. I wasn't organized in a diary and I

0:42:07.502 --> 0:42:13.102
<v Speaker 3>saw it seriously people's feelings and someone who needed to

0:42:13.142 --> 0:42:14.941
<v Speaker 3>hang out because something was going on in their lives.

0:42:15.062 --> 0:42:16.982
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't there, and you don't come back from that.

0:42:17.261 --> 0:42:19.221
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit like sex as well, like sometimes you

0:42:19.342 --> 0:42:20.902
<v Speaker 1>just don't feel like it, like the thought of it.

0:42:20.982 --> 0:42:23.142
<v Speaker 1>You're like, I don't know, I'd hate that. Oh no,

0:42:23.181 --> 0:42:27.142
<v Speaker 1>I'd hate that, you think to yourself, But then you

0:42:27.542 --> 0:42:28.301
<v Speaker 1>have a great time.

0:42:28.661 --> 0:42:33.741
<v Speaker 6>I want what I want us to find this many

0:42:33.862 --> 0:42:40.102
<v Speaker 6>ways to answer the question with oh no. This week's

0:42:40.221 --> 0:42:42.382
<v Speaker 6>challenge for everybody.

0:42:41.982 --> 0:42:49.781
<v Speaker 5>Involved with that loud Okay, massive thank you to all

0:42:49.862 --> 0:42:52.741
<v Speaker 5>of the out louders who didn't say oh no, I'd

0:42:52.781 --> 0:42:55.701
<v Speaker 5>hate that when it came to pressing play on today's show,

0:42:56.102 --> 0:42:58.422
<v Speaker 5>and of course to a fabulous scene for putting it together.

0:42:58.462 --> 0:43:01.421
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be back in your ears tomorrow. Goodbye bye.

0:43:02.862 --> 0:43:05.302
<v Speaker 3>Shout out to any Mum and Me are subscribers listening.

0:43:05.622 --> 0:43:07.701
<v Speaker 3>If you love the show and you want to support us,

0:43:08.022 --> 0:43:10.462
<v Speaker 3>subscribing to Mom and Me I is the very best

0:43:10.542 --> 0:43:13.382
<v Speaker 3>way to do so. There's a link in the episode description.