WEBVTT - The Hollywood Star Who Hates Everyone

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to MoMA Mia out loud. It's what

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>women are actually talking about on Wednesday, the eighth of April.

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Holly Waynwright, I'm.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Amelia Leicester and I'm Kles Stevens.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>First time we have gathered since the Long weekend. Yeah, yes, fine,

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 2>it was.

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 3>It was eventful and in terms of the.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>World, in terms of the world and chocolate. Here's what's

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>made our agenda for today. A Hollywood elder has unloaded

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>his unflattering opinions on everyone from Margot Robbie to Johnny

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Depp and we want to know where are where are

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the grumpy old women?

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Plus Donald Trump keeps saying horrifying things, But we might

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 4>have a bit of an antidote for you.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>And the rumor mill is on fire with Taylor and

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Travis's wedding plans. But what's true and more importantly, what

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>do we think is true?

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Some predictions, yes, some random and rogue predictions. But first,

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Savannah Guthrie went back to work this week. She's the

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Australian born American TV host. She hosts The Today Show

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and her mother disappeared in really shocking

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and distressing circumstances several months ago now and now Savannah

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>has finally gone back to work.

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>She said.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>She sat down at the desk and she said, here

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we go, ready or not, Let's do the news. She

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was wearing yellow, which is generally seen to be a

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>symbol of, you know, waiting for missing people.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 2>To come back.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Her co hosts were wearing yellow ribbons, which is the same.

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>There were yellow flowers, and there were people outside the

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>studio who were all holding up signs and wishing her well,

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and she went out at one point of the broadcast

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to greet them.

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And this is a little bit of what happened.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 4>And these signs are so beautiful. You guys have been

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>so beautiful. I received so many letters, so much kindness

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 4>to me and my family, and we feel it, we

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 4>feel your prayers. So thank you so much. Every day

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 4>every day.

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>There have been no leads in that case since that

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>really shocking vision that we reported on at the time

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>of a masked man being caught on the ring camera

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of Savannah Guthrie's mother's door. No leads at all, and

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>so Savannah Guthrie like, after two months, going okay, I'm

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>going back to work. It's incredibly brave because there's so

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>much attention piled on her and you can only imagine

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the conversation she's having constantly. But it made me think

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of how many people when you go through something awful,

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an illness, treatment, loss, grief, like there is

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a point at which you have to go back to work,

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Like you have to go back and you're not going

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a ticker take parade for it, and you're

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.559
<v Speaker 1>going to have to deal with the sort of sympathetic

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>looks from your coworkers, and you're going to have to

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>push on through. And it just made me think, like

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>she kind of it's so brave to what she's doing.

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And some people have said, oh, well, you know, did

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>she have to go back and all those things, but

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it just made me think that's what people do. You

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have to get on with it, right, and we just

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>want to say enormous love to you if you're going

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>through something shitty at the moment. I think Savannah Guthrie

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>shows an extraordinary amount of bravery that actually lots of

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>us have to exhibit every day.

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot going on in the world right now

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>which we will get to, but I think it's important

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.679
<v Speaker 3>that we pause and acknowledge a water tight and high

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 3>stakes news story. There are rumors that Taylor Swift and

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Travis Kelsey's wedding will take place in the middle of

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the year, which is the US summer, specifically on June thirteenth.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Where do these rumors come from?

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we know they're getting married, right, I do know.

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>She told us she posted the picture the English teacher, Yeah,

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the pe teacher or whatever. It was something something, Yeah,

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the school cafeteria.

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 3>We assumed, Yeah, we've assumed it's twenty twenty six. You

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>assume you might have a summer wedding. Rhode Island's lovely

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 3>in June.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>She's got a holiday house. Yeah.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 3>So there have been headlines all over the place in

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 3>the last few days, predictions about bridesmaids and esthetics and

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 3>the wedding dress designer. And you'd hope with all those

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>headlines that there would be some solid information that it's

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 3>based on. I mean, I did so. I did a

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 3>bit of a deep dive.

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 3>An Instagram account called Wedding Chicks that links vendors, planners,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and locations together for people's weddings, posted a carousel a

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 3>few days ago and the first slide reads save the date,

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Taylor and Travis are getting married on June thirteenth. The

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>next slide reads date significance, but it's missing a C,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 3>so it really says date significance, which is how we

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 3>know this is an excellent source. It turns out the

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 3>entire already of the evidence for this claim is thirteen

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 3>is Taylor's lucky number.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, there's a lot of numerologies.

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Kansas City Chiefs are not playing on that day.

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 5>That's I mean, well that is important.

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he does need to be there.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 3>He needs to be there, and probably so do his teammates.

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 3>In fact, they have a mini camp from June nine

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 3>to eleven. How convenient because it will be over by

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 3>the thirteenth. Guys, this is all the evidence.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 4>No, but I also heard that there was a rumor

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 4>that she had had to pay someone who was having

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 4>a wedding at the fancy Rhode Island place that she

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 4>was having the wedding on the same day.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, on that post, there was a comment from a

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 3>wedding planner who said, I'm the wedding planner for the rumored.

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Place where she's getting married, and there.

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Is a bride and it ain't Taylor, and I thought,

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 3>but that's something you'd say if your bride was Taylor.

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>It's true, don't We're going to have to put up this.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 4>If you're a wedding planner for Taylor Swift sweating, you're

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 4>really like just posting red herrings in Instagram comments.

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 3>But then a photographer commented and said that the whole

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 3>area is meant to be shut down for that weekend.

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>About Taylor Swift is she commits to a bit right.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>We all know that she likes to drop red herrings everywhere.

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Easter eggs, as I think we call them these days,

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are like clues and trails to things, and she's got

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>decoys and there are pretend Taylor's and she famously arrives

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at a concert in the back of a bin like

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>she knows how to decoy. So I reckon she is

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>sending us to that location.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, and she can keep a bloody secret. She can

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 3>do something, so.

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Can her friends.

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Yes, what I've heard is that she and Travis have

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 4>really slimmed down the guest list and it's now down

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 4>to only one hundred and fifty Grandma they.

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Originally want to wait, do you think, well, I'm just

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>saying she's famously invited him and said We're not having

0:06:58.760 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>one of those little ones.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm inviting one.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I like, it's like, you know, until you start seeing

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>it all coming in and then like maybe one hundred

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and fifty maybe Graham not.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Who were the bridesmaid discussions? Okay, Selena?

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 3>The rumors about bridesmaids were Selena Gomez, which absolutely, yes, Yes,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Taylor was a bridesmaid for Selena, wasn't she.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 4>I think she was kind of like an unofficial Yeah.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they were wearing matching dresses, but.

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 3>She was featured heavily. The is it Ham Orheim?

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 4>Oh I don't.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Sisters mates?

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 3>And then another prediction from this random wedding website was

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 3>gig had Did And it's like, no, no, no, no, no, no,

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 3>no no no, we need to differentiate between who is

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 3>seriously in Taylor's in a circle and who is just

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 3>a modelg Did is a model who is friends with Taylor,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 3>but no.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>She has famous.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Used the question is Blake going to be a bride?

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I know, I know because I reckon pre all the controversy. Yes,

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 3>but now Taylor's just a little bit too savvy.

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 4>I think went through focus.

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to know.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what we think with all our

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>wisdom about how much we are really going to know

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about this wedding when it happens. Because we've just seen

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>an excellent example of a very high profile couple just

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>sneaking off and getting married. Tom Holland I always getson

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and I love him. I don't know why Tom Holland

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and Zendaya. There doesn't seem to be any doubt about it.

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>They've been married. We don't know when. We don't know where,

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what was worn, we don't know who went,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what kind of pace they had.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 4>We only found out that they were married because law Roach,

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 4>a stylist, happened to drop the news that they were

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 4>married on a red carpet.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 2>And she's wearing a ring and whatever.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 4>And she's been wearing like something old, something new, something borrowed,

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 4>something blues right. Her press to her for the drama.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But she They have illustrated that two very high profile

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>people can pull off a completely secret non like not

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>even paparazzi outside wedding.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 4>But that's Taylor's worst night.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what I want to discuss is she's rich enough

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that. She could get married in a hermetically

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>sealed bubble in space, like she's a billionaire, she'd do

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what she wants?

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Will she do that?

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 4>No, she wants. The whole point of this is that

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 4>we all know she's getting married. She's made that very clear.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Her entire herve to this point is arguably about getting

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 4>married as the end point of the narrative. Wouldn't you

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 4>say yes?

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Since love story it really has been.

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But you could let people know that you're getting married

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on your terms. Like a lot of celebrities, the only

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>way you find out they got married is because they

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>drop the pictures after the event. And then there are

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>other celebrity weddings that you know it's happening because they

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are a helicopter circling the island. They're a paparazzi everywhere,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>all the famous people are arriving.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Like which version of that is Taylor going for?

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 4>And Selena Gomez, for example, did kind of keep her

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 4>a wedding largely under wraps. There were helicopters circling, but

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 4>they didn't get many photos. The photos that we have

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 4>are the ones that Selena wanted us to see.

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she did a fun Taylor will definitely do that, right,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>She's an absolute master.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Think about when Jack Antonoff got married, her longtime firstwhile

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 4>producer got married to Margaret Quali and they got married

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 4>also in New England. But the problem was that Taylor

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 4>just completely ended up dominating the proceedings. Her fans were there,

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 4>they were taking photos of Taylor. It kind of, by

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 4>all accounts ruined things for Margaret on her big day.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, Taylor has to be at her own wedding.

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 4>She does.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 5>She does.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 3>And something that actually got me thinking because on kind

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 3>of on the record a publicist.

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 5>It was probably a publicist.

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 3>Somebody spoke to people in August last year and said

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 3>it would be a private, low key event, right, And

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the more I think about it, the more I'm like,

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 3>absolutely not. And I read this article in New York

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 3>magazine about how having a Vogue cover so good for

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 3>your wedding is more prized every Yes, and the theories

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 3>about why are so compelling. So one quote from a

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 3>luxury event planner says, the new social currency is much

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 3>more about showing that you're a creative person than that

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 3>you're a rich person. I think Taylor wants to create something,

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 3>it'll be your work of art.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it will be full of Easter eggs, and it'll

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be full of little nods to this and that. The

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that was great about that article is so celebrities

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>have a few choices when it comes to how public

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to go. So back in my days of being tabloid

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>magazine lady, we did loads of weddings. We did Carl

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Sanderland's first wedding, we did Nat Bass's wedding, Ricky Lee's wedding.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>We did weddings all the time. And obviously you pay

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>money for that. So you do a deal where you say,

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we want the engagement, we want the wedding. Honeymoon would

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>be great, you know, but that comes with cash. But

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what you get for that cash kind of ruins the

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>wedding in lots of ways. And for a start, you

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have journalists and photographers at your wedding that

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you didn't choose. You have to be approving pictures on

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>your wedding night, you have to agree to do all that.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to do an interview on the day, you

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have to do all that stuff. So that kind of

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>old school selling your wedding is obviously way below Taylor's

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pay grades. She ain't doing that, but the Vogue version

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of selling your wedding is similar, probably though you're paying

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Vogue rather than the other way around. Because in that

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>article Chloe Marle, who's the editor of Vogue, but she's

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>worked there a long time, and she is credited as

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>bringing the weddings back to Vogue as being a big

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>selling points, as they're often their top stories. She said,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we run it like a military operation, and we will

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have those pictures up within hours. So she talked about

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Venus William's wedding. I think that no one knew it

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was happening. It got married on the Friday, The pictures

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>were up by the Sunday, So again somebody in your

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>party has to spend that time photo approvals, back and

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>forth with your publicists. We like that, we like that,

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but to have your wedding in Vogue is massive status

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and loads of celebrities do that and non celebrities too.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that Taylor will do that the Vogue

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>wedding as as the vehicle to get the fans the

0:12:58.240 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>pictures or do you think she'll go directly.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I think she'll go direct but I do think that

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 3>what Vogue has tapped into in terms of wedding content,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 3>and I guess the resurgence of how important it is

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 3>for identity and how it's an extension of personal brand.

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I think Taylor will be tapping into all of that,

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 3>because there was a quote that said, the wedding planning

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 3>process can bring up that little girl in the cafeteria

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 3>who really wants to be seen. This is the ultimate

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 3>version of that. And I think there's a little bit

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 3>of Taylor Swift who's like, I'm marrying the jock and

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I want everybody to see.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 5>But there was also I just had to add this

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 5>tidbit that was in the article.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 3>A woman in the fashion industry apparently tried to get

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 3>her wedding in Vogue and got rejected, and apparently she

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 3>burned bridges with a lot of the friends who participated

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 3>in her wedding, blamed the fiasco on all her guests,

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and then she checked herself into a trauma retreat.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So this guy in there is quite just saying, we

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>don't do lake Como passe. If you get Marion like Coma,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you won't make it into Vogue anymore.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 4>We don't like it.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't exactly we don't like castles in Scotland. We

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>don't like anything that ordinary people have started doing.

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to get it.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 3>They're like, if we've done the Cotswolds six times, I'm

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 3>not going to do it at seventh.

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 5>Gosh.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 3>But no, I think Taylor will come direct fans. I

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 3>think that there will be some great Instagram content, but

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I think she'll keep it a secret until it happens.

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they should live.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You know how, every time there's a royal wedding, the

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>argument for why the nation is paying for this so

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>like obviously Harry and Megs, William and Catherine is like,

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the security and the flowers in London's closed down,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and it is always it's great for national morale and

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's always like things have been tough lately, there's been

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a recession. Whatever, it brings everyone together for a reason

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to be happy. What could be better at this moment

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of global international crisis than for Taylor and Travis to

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>just throw it open live stream?

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Come on in?

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Did you see that? In the gatest round of royal revelations,

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 4>apparently the Queen said that she thought Megan's dress was

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 4>too white. Yes, yes, So what Hugh White will tailor dress.

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I know she'll, she'll bloody get it right. I mean,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 3>she's worn so many designers, and she's worn quite a

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 3>few wedding dresses in her film clips.

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Because she's dressed up as a bride many times. But me,

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Oriel exactly, Taylor Swifts not like me Oriol don't come out.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 4>In a moment. Is there anything hotter than someone doing

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 4>their job really, really well? Australians woke up this morning

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 4>to the news that Donald Trump had said something even

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 4>more upsetting than usual. He said, a whole civilization will

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 4>die tonight, never to be brought back again. His threat

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 4>of mass destruction and more crimes was of course directed

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 4>towards Iran, which two days ago on Easter he'd also

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 4>threatened with total destruction and hell. By the end of

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 4>the day US time, and by the time we're recording this,

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 4>it looks like the immediate crisis has been averted. Trump

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 4>has said that he and Iran's leaders have agreed to

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 4>a ceasefire, and the terms of that are being clarified.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 4>It does look like the Strait of Hormoots, which is

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 4>where all the where twenty percent of the world's oil

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 4>is being held up. It looks like that will be

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 4>opened under Iran's control for at least two weeks. A

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of other details being worked out, and you can

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 4>hear more about that on today's Quickie. But I guess

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted to say that it's really hard to

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 4>know what to say when someone says something like this,

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 4>When someone threatens mass murder and war crimes, and he is,

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 4>rather than your very looney Tunes relative, the most powerful

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 4>person in the world, and I don't have anything profound

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 4>to say about it, except for the fact that it

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 4>really makes you feel upset and scared, and like, if

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 4>this was someone who was in your life saying these things,

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 4>you would probably look into getting them some sort of

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 4>professional help.

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It's sometimes worth remembering. And I know this is, like,

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, not an original thought, but that this is

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>not how leaders used to speak, you know what I mean,

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Like tweeting out capital letters. There were lots of swear

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>words in the last lot over Easter. There are just

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>all these direct threats, and the thing that's tricky about

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it is you kind of get a bit blind to

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 1>it in a way. I woke up to that this

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>morning and I was just but I also thought, well,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I know he's going to back away from it because

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>he always does, like he says outrageous thing. And then

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you pointed out to me that no, he doesn't always,

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and the chaos is the point. But it's this foul

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.719
<v Speaker 1>mouthed diplomacy, whatever you want to call it out, what

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just, it's not. It's so disturbing because it's just

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>reset the way that all of the things work.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 3>And it reminds you that other politicians had very different

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 3>strategies for very good reason in the past, because that

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe a world crisis would happen, or you'd start a walk.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 4>They tend to think through the consequences. They tend to

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 4>use measured language. They'd be careful about threatening entire populations

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 4>with mass murder.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah yeah.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 4>But we don't live in that world anymore.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 3>No, And I think Trump's general vibe at the moment

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 3>has us turning towards competency pawn.

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>What's that so?

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 3>A couple of months ago, an article in The Guardian

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>introduced the term, writing, when it feels as though the

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 3>world is moments away from any number of disasters, there

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 3>is nothing hotter than watching someone do their job really,

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 3>really well. And this particular article referenced the Pit, which

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 3>has a massive invested audience. It has won so many awards.

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Hospital drama that stars the er guy.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Correct, Yes, and I cannot turn away from these doctors

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 3>in Pennsylvania who doing their jobs to a high degree

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 3>of success. And you should just like the way that

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 3>they talk and they know and it's it's science and

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 3>there's they're making decisions based on thought.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 5>It's so hot.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 4>They might not even be the best doctors that ever existed.

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 4>The point is that they approached their job with a

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 4>level of seriousness that feels devoid in real life.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>This is like the outlauder who said in the group

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the other day that they'd started watching the West.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Wing, and I used to. I was an obsessive.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>West Wing fan for a period of time when I

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>was on maternity leave. It was my breastfeeding watch. I

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>know you're supposed to be communing with your baby, but

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I was communing with Jed Bartlett and watching those pretend

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>politicians and pretend you know, back roomors like walk and talks.

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Of these crises.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Everything was quicker, but they were serious people, the best

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and brightest. That used to be a given.

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's probably part of the appeal of Taylor Swift

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 4>as well, because, in addition to writing amazing songs and

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 4>performing them and doing a sold out, record breaking world tour,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 4>that recent documentary that took us behind the scenes of

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 4>the Era's tour was really designed to impress on us

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 4>how much work goes into making it look effortless and

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 4>making the audience have a fun time. And Taylor Swift

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 4>is someone who has given us competency porn.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 5>Really, it really has.

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 3>And Julia Baird wrote an article for the Sidney Morning

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Herald earlier this month and the headline was I'm hooked

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 3>on competency porn.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 5>I wish our leaders were.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Too, And it was basically about watching the frustration of

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 3>watching politicians make some terrible decisions as opposed to when

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 3>you come across in life an efficient nurse or a

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 3>council worker, or a banker or a baker who just

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 3>knows what they're doing, and it just really Oh.

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 5>But the other thing that has.

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Me thinking about competency porn at the moment, and I

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>think that it is a reason why the world has

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 3>tuned into it so hard, is the current Artemis mission,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and they're just casually traveling deeper into space than anyone

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>has ever been before. It's humanity's first journey towards the

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Moon since nineteen seventy two. And I think it really

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 3>is for me in a world where, especially in American politics,

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 3>there has been such a rejection of science, of objective truth,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>You then watch something like that and think, so many

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 3>things have to go right, and so many people have

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 3>to be patient and put their egos aside, and you

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 3>can't be a narcissist, and you can't do anything rogue.

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 2>You just have to be.

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Careful and a team player and a team player. And

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>without all of the science, the rocket does not go

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 3>to the moon.

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 5>It just doesn't.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 3>And I thought that the fact that Trump has been

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 3>distracted by other things might have been good for our spaceship,

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 3>because I reckon he would have come and he would

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 3>have said, let's put a sticker on it, and they

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 3>would have said, yeah, so everything has to be really

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 3>and he would have been like, no, I have some

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 3>rogue ideas of how to.

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's paint it goal.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the reasons he hasn't come is

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>he possibly doesn't really approve of it, right. I think

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's what it's been interesting. I've surprised myself about

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>how much I've loved watching the vision coming out of

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this this space mission, the plant, Like if you've got

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a kid in your life who loves space, and lots

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.959
<v Speaker 1>of kids do. When the pictures of the planets in

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the in our galaxy are so beautiful and it is

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so hypnotic, and seeing the pictures of the Moon out

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of the window and the Earth from the window, I've

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>absolutely loved it. I found it very soothing. If I

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was a completely different person with a different brain and

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like thirty years that would be my I would love

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to be on that spaceship. But it's so hypnotic and gorgeous.

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>But it is costing something like one hundred billion dollars.

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 4>But better spending it on that than.

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's the thing is is this?

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that's really kind of interesting about this

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is obviously this has been planning for a really long time.

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Nine years for this particular ship to go up?

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Is that right? I was wondering why it was happening

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 4>now in Trump's second time.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, so nine years for this particular ship to go up.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you call them ships. I'm just

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>doing that craft, not like a cruise liner. But I

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a bar cocktails with umbrellas in them.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>But you know, nine years for this particular mission, but

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>actually the whole thing has been in train for nearly

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty and it's got these serious missions about like trying

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to maybe make Moon a landing place to go further

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff, and so they're doing lots of science,

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>even though we just like the pretty pitch and the

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>stories about the toilet. But it is costing a lot

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of money. So some people are saying, well, you know,

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that money better spent elsewhere. We've got a lot of

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>issues on Earth climate change, dada da. I understand that,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>but there's something about that or yeah that I don't know,

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>it feels really necessarily.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a good point, Holly. But then again, independent

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 4>analysts have said that by day six of the Iran

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 4>War it was costing eleven billion dollars already.

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've got some audio of the moment that the

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 3>spacecraft actually went further than humanity had ever gone before.

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, from cabin of integrity here as we surpass the

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 6>furthest distance humans have ever traveled from planet Earth. We

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 6>do so in honoring the extraordinary efforts and feats of

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 6>our predecessors in human space exploration, but we most importantly

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 6>choose this moment to challenge this generation in the next

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 6>to make sure this record is not long lived.

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 2>They're just so reasonable.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I would, as I say, I would take that challenge

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>if I was twelve. I just need to sidebar on

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing that trickles down from what you started off

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>by saying, Amelia, which is how unsettling and stressful the

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Trump rhetoric is. I guess yesterday morning, I filled up

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>my car really early. I was coming up to Sydney

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>for work and I had to use the car, and

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I filled my car up really early at this little

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>petrol station near me. There's a woman who manages that station.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>She's always there, she knows all the locals, she's really friendly,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and when I pulled in there at five thirty yesterday

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>morning after the long weekend, she was already visibly upset

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>by the amount of abuse she had copped from people

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>pulling in and filling up and seeing the petrol prices.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And I just think that it's so understandable. As we

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>talked about last week, it's so understandable how stressed and

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>anxious we all are. It's so understandable, how you know,

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>coupled with the human awful, humanitarian cost and then the

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>very literal cost on our back pockets and what's going

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and we don't know what the future is

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and how long. It's really understandable that everybody's so stressed.

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But I just seeing the embodiment of that in this

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.239
<v Speaker 1>woman who's just doing her job, who's getting yelled at

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>by frustrated people every day.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>It just feels like something we've just got to not do.

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you see it in It's a big plot point

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 3>in the pit, the fact that people take out so

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 3>much of their anger towards the health care system, on

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 3>healthcare workers who are so competent for the most part.

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>But of course people are furious about the fact that

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 3>they can't afford healthcare or that they have to wait

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 3>a ridiculously long time because there aren't resources. But it's

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 3>the same thing. It's the channeling of our frustration it

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 3>incompetency at the wrong people.

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 4>That's true. And also maybe we just have to somehow

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 4>channel our energy and attention less towards the people who

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 4>are tapping out true social posts on the toilet, and

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 4>more towards the people who are literally going where no

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 4>humans have gone before.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, look, I suggested that you should go to the

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.719
<v Speaker 7>quickie if you want more on what Trump said today,

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 7>But if you want more on a phenomenon called chicken.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Nick, I need you to stick around for out loud day.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Right here.

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 4>A phrase has been coined for this very familiar phenomenon

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 4>where you're eating some chicken and all of a sudden

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 4>you are utterly repulsed by it. Have either of you

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 4>had this experience? Yes, I think it's a universal non

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 4>vegetarian human experience to have. People are taking to TikTok

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 4>because that's what you do. You have to take to

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 4>TikTok to emmortalize the exact moment that they experienced. Chickennick.

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Some of them have even extended it to egg ick.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Sorry poultry. Not having a good week here.

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>These are two of my main protein sources. Do you

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>know how I'm protein maxing.

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Every now and then you just get a little bit

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 3>of egg and you go, oh, this is egg.

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 5>It really hits you that it's egg.

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, sometimes someone puts chicken and egg together in a

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 4>salad and you just, you know, like some kind of

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 4>channibal or something. Look, the good news is you can

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 4>do something about it. Professor of psychobiological psychology in the UK.

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 4>His name is Lorenzo Stafford, and he's got an action

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 4>plan for you. He says that the ick is a

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 4>disgust response which can be reprogrammed, So don't worry if

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.479
<v Speaker 4>you get the chickenick. Here's what you got to do. First,

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>try preparing a chicken a different way. Lorenzo. That's not

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 4>easy to say if I'm halfway through a sandwich, but okay,

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 4>I'll take that on your advisement. He says, use breast

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 4>instead of sighe for instance.

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, I so agree thighs always.

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Do you think thies are more chickenick? Yeah?

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but they got more pink.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>But foodies will tell you they they always always taste better.

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. The Japanese love their chicken with a bit of pink.

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Chicken SMI is also a thing.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 6>Anyway.

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 4>The second thing Lorenzo says is avoid having to deal

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 4>with rod chicken. I love this tip from Laurenzo. He's

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 4>basically saying, have someone else make you did and then

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 4>you won't get chicken.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 5>How's the chicken getting cooked?

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>If you never coming to my house on a Tuesday night,

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>make the noodle soup.

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 4>He says, you'll be back to enjoying chicken in no time.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 4>But this just got me thinking also about ick in general,

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 4>because this was a plot point in season two if

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Nobody Wants This. You might remember there was an episode

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 4>where Noah, who was Adam Brody, was trying to be

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 4>a little bit too charming and then Kristen Bell's character

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Joanne all of a sudden decided she couldn't stand him.

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 4>It's funny because season two of Nobody Wants This, I

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 4>think gave us all the ick. So that's sort of

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 4>a bit matter, isn't it. The Daily Mail put together

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 4>a list of other things which give people the ick.

0:29:54.440 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 4>According to TikTok, some of these include calling wine veno, which, yeah,

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 4>running after a ping pong ball, which I take offense

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 4>because I'm very good at ping pong, and an awkward

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 4>bowling technique. Yeah.

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 3>To add well, I think in terms of the ick,

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 3>i'd extend that to anyone wearing bowling shoes.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, when you go bowling, it's never it's always.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 4>And just putting your foot into the ball.

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 3>And it's warm and you don't know who's worn it before.

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 3>It just it's just not it. Jesse's husband, I'm sure

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 3>she's brought up on this show, he says, chow.

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 4>And I used to work with someone, a guy who

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 4>used to call everyone a chum, and I'm just excentral.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, on the chicken for a second, is I

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of chicken at home, and you know

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>there is with breast, as discussed the white there is

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a very fine line between like dick and chewy as hell,

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to hit that right on. And you

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>know who knows how to do that? The patrons say

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of this show's recipes, Nagi following I made a naggy

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>chicken recipe the other week. It was like one with

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the crunchy sauce or whatever. And she was like cook

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for exactly three minutes on each side and then resting

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>for two and I was like three minutes on each

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That's very specific, but I decided to do exactly what

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I was told, absolutely perfect juice.

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 4>See, I live in fear of the chicken neck, I'll

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 4>be honest. It kind of dictates my life. Choices, and

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 4>I will never get a chicken salad because you never

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 4>know did they prepare the chicken in.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 3>A way that avoided right because during during pregnancy, I'm

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 3>not meant to For example, cafe downstairs has chicken sandwiches,

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not meant to eat one of those chicken sandwiches

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 3>because the chicken's been sitting out there for ages. Maybe

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 3>something she would listeria. I'm going to be real, guys,

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I've been pretty fast and loose, and then I did

0:31:55.920 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 3>end up in hospital food poising and I know it

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 3>was chicken, and I know where it was from, and

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 3>I knew the moment I bid into it and I

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>kept it.

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, the didn't put you off.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 4>It didn't ask too hungry.

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you either know who Brian Cox is or you don't.

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>The defining factor will be whether or not you are

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a succession person. Probably because he is most famous for

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>being the seventy nine year old Scottish actor who plays

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Logan Roy. Not true Rupert Murdoch at all, certainly not

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Rupert Murdoch at all. He obviously has done loads of

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>other things, but he is that catapulted him from respected

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>character actor to super famous. Always interviewed and asked what

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he thinks about everything actor? Right, And he was all

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>over the internet this past weekend because he did a

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Sunday Times interview in the UK. And to be honest,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>actually when you read the interview, he didn't say all

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>these things in the interview. It's just that the journalist

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was like Brian Cox says what he thinks and went

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and trolled trawled his memoir and every interview and he

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>has said a lot of things and then he added

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to them in the interview, So it wasn't like the

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>interview was all of them. But what did he say?

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I just want you to imagine while I'll tell you

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what he said, these words coming out of the mouth

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of like a female equivalent to him, So like a

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>respected elder actor like say Helen Mirren, Johnny Depp is

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>so overblown, so over range. Edward Norton is a pain

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in the ass. Kevin Spacey's a stupid, stupid man. Ian McKellen,

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that's Gandolf people. His acting is not to my text.

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 3>And did he say that when he was like co starring.

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he doesn't care what he has said oftentimes about

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Strong, who obviously is in succession his very respected actor,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but famously method, and Brian Cox has no time for method.

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>He said, it's fucking annoying and it's American shit.

0:33:58.120 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, that's what he said about that.

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>In the Sunday Times piece, he was asked about Wuthering Heights,

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>which he hasn't seen. He likes the old version with

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Merle Oberon, but he hasn't seen the latest Woman Jacob

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and Margo. He went into a fake Australian accent, he said,

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to do this terribly. Basically, he went

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>into a fake Australian accident, went.

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Keith Cliff, it's me, Kathie.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>How are you doing? Keith? Alright, yeah, I'm all right.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And then he said Margot Robbie is far too beautiful

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>for that role. I mean, I think there should be

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>something more of gipsy about her, but it's wrong of

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:34.399
<v Speaker 1>me to judge. It may have been a brilliant film

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>too late, Brian, it's wrong of.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 5>Me to judge anyway. I all Australian, so what.

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I need to know because like this is just like

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the classic grumpy old man in inverted commas, who's like

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he says himself, I mean, my wife is always saying

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 1>to me, Brian, be careful, be careful, But I think,

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>fuck it, I don't want to be careful anymore.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 2>I'll be eighty this year.

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say what I want. Can we imagine

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a world where a Helen Merren, a Meryl Streep, a

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Dame Judy Dench just unloads on all her female contemporaries

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like this? Can you imagine what would happen?

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 5>Never?

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Like it just would never ever happen. The other thing

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 3>is like those are kind of openly controversial, Like a

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of those are a little bit funny. Like I

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 3>remember seeing what he said about Jeremy Strong and the

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 3>method acting and thinking that's hilarious because that is the

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 3>difference between Americans and Brits, that Brits are like, stop

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 3>being so wanky.

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 5>It's just a job.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 3>That is honestly a funny observation. However, he has in

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 3>that there's a line about Kevin Spacey being an idiot.

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 3>He's defended Kevin Spacey a few times, and like he said,

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.879
<v Speaker 3>he's an old friend of mine, all right, Kevin did

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 3>certain things. He also did a lot of extraordinary work,

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.319
<v Speaker 3>and I find that really petty. I just don't like

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 3>it basically criticizing all the I guess me too stuff

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 3>against someone who seems to have done some pretty disgusting things.

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 3>And I reckon if that you're right, if that was

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 3>a woman, totally different story. I also think if it

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:15.399
<v Speaker 3>was a younger man, Remember when Matt Damon kept being

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 3>slammed for just saying slightly the wrong thing about me too.

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Like we seem to have moral standards for men who

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 3>I guess are middle aged, and as soon as they

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 3>get old, we go no, no, no, you're good. You

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 3>can be a crazy old grandpa.

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that's such an interesting point about the double

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 4>standard holy and like, what would happen if Meryl Streep

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 4>said these things? Because last week Meryl Streep's obviously on

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 4>her press tour right now for Devil Wears prior two,

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 4>for which I've already purchased my ticket, and she was

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 4>in Mexico, and I don't know if you saw this,

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 4>but she went a little bit viral because she and

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Anne Hathaway were being interviewed outside and I guess a

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 4>worker had been tasked with holding an umbrella up to

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 4>deflect the light for them. Meryl stops the interview, turns around,

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 4>pats this man on the shoulder and thanks him for

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 4>his service. That's so different from what we are different.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>And also it made me think because I was like,

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>because we're seeing a lot of merrill and this today

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this morning, I woke up to see the Vogue cover

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>she's done with Anna Winter, right, so heaven they've done

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all this content for Vogue where they're like in a

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>lift together and all this stuff. Obviously promoting Devil West too,

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Anna win Tour. They're both seventy six. Anna Wintour is

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 1>generally considered and discussed all the time as being an

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:38.359
<v Speaker 1>ice Querrel's streep is seventy six. They are both seventy six.

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>In mind, they are, and Anna Wintour is always discussed

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:47.959
<v Speaker 1>as being a ice queen, a queen bitch, all these things.

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Actually go and try and find her saying something horrible

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>about another person.

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 2>And you can't.

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>She's made like declarations about like, you know, if your

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>competition is better than you, just stress better or whatever.

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And obviously the stories a legendary of the way she

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>might treat assistance.

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 2>That's why Devil was prior to exists. But she is not.

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>She is generally considered to be a pretty awful person

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in inverted commas, and yet she is not sitting around saying.

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 4>She's not Carl Lagerfeld, who started around saying all sorts

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 4>of offensive things about fat people and people who we

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 4>didn't like the way they dress.

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Because women know intrinsically that if you are caught bitching

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in inverted commas about another woman, that story has such

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>legs it will follow you forever, like you cannot be

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>seen to criticize other women.

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Devil's advocate, I reckon our Gwinny as she ages,

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 4>is going to lean into speaking her truth and leaning

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 4>into her power, and maybe she'll be a grumpy old woman.

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Well she used to come she would. I would really

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 3>enjoy that era.

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Because she look she's pretty upfront now about For instance,

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 4>when she started joining the press jo for MRDI Supreme,

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 4>she told people that she claimed not to know who

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Timoth they shallam before they started filming.

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wonder if you can say I wonder if the

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>rules are that you can say it about men like

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. I wonder if like as

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>women get they can say, I worked with this guy

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and he was rude to me. I worked with this

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>person and they were dismissive. But I wonder if you

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>could say about a contemporary of your lives, I don't

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 1>think she's very talented well, or one of the many

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>things that Brian said.

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because I always think we did an episode of

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 3>canceled about Catherine Heigel, and I think about it all

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 3>the time.

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:33.240
<v Speaker 2>But she's the only example.

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh, she was so brutally canceled literally for being honest

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 3>for five minutes she said a few honest things, so.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 5>There was a profile.

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 3>And I always find it so interesting that the cancelation

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 3>of Catherine Heigel happened at the exact same time that

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Woody Allen and Harvey Winstein were thriving. But anyway, she

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 3>was asked about the decisions for her character Izzie Stevens

0:39:55.840 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 3>in Gray's Anatomy, and she basically said that a particular

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 3>storyline was a ratings ploy and it shocked people. It

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 3>wasn't predictable, people didn't see it coming. But she said

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 3>business like, it didn't make sense, and business is business.

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I understand it, but I want there to be some

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 3>cooperation between the business end and.

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 4>The creative end.

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 3>So people saw that as her criticizing Shonda Rhymes. Then

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 3>in the same interview, she was asked about her two

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 3>thousand and seven film Knocked Up, directed by jud Aptao,

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.919
<v Speaker 3>and she said it was a little sexist and outrageous

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 3>that she said that. And she said, it paints the

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 3>women as shrews, as humorless and uptight, and it paints

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the men as lovable, goofy, fun loving guys stoned.

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 4>And I don't know, I think you're overstating a because

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 4>I got another example that's going to ruin this argument. Oh,

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 4>you great Martha Stewart. She has said things about other

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 4>women and we love her for it. For instance, she

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 4>actually criticized Gwyneth Paltrow and said that she was basically

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 4>muscling on it in an area that she didn't know

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 4>about when she is trying to become a homemaking expert.

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's not bad.

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But Martha is a grumpy old woman. She sends it,

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and please don't at me. I know that old woman,

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, But like, in the context of this conversation,

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that is not a bad one.

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 2>She says what she thinks allegedly.

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, I don't think that Brian Cox is going to

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 4>be on the cover of Sports illustrated his kiss your

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 4>face anytime soon. So maybe if you are a quote

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 4>unquote grumpy old woman, you also have to be attractive

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 4>enough to cover sports illustrations.

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 3>But with that said, I do think culturally we have

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 3>a soft spot for a certain type of woman who's

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 3>older and who will tell you like it is, don't

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 3>tell it like it is. There's something really comforting about

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 3>that about a woman who will sit you down and

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:47.279
<v Speaker 3>be like that that.

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Does nothing but tell it how it is.

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 2>These days, Yeah, but she doesn't. She doesn't criticize her peers.

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 4>No, she criticizes Donald Trump.

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:55.839
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think Maria Margleis is another one, like who

0:41:58.719 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>is her whole person?

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Like I just say it, And I think that she's

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously an example of that, But I just think, I

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 2>I I not that.

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm encouraging people slagging off their contemporaries. I think it's

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>probably better to have a respectful.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Silence. But it's just an interesting thought experiment.

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 4>I think it's about the level of pettiness too, Like

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Ammartha Stewart, she's Yeah, she's occasionally said somewhat disparaging things

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 4>about people who she doesn't think of as her peers

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 4>or contemporaries. But there's a level of pettiness to where

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Brian Cox has taken it that I think you're right.

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 4>I don't think women are allowed that.

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 2>No, And apparently Jeremy Strong has said to him, please.

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Stop, please stop slagging off my method acting, and he

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>just can't help it.

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I have such a soft spot for Jeremy Strong.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Out loud us, thank you for listening to us.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate you so much.

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Big shout out to a special and massive out louder

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Anathea this week, but we appreciate.

0:42:58.440 --> 0:42:59.240
<v Speaker 2>All of you for listening.

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>We're watching it on Apple oh yes, and watching us

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:02.959
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Video.

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Will be back in your ears on Friday.

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 3>And can I recommend break Some Break some roles do

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 3>a recommendation on a Wednesday. Sign up for the newsletter

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 3>because this week you will find everything about Amelia Lester's

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:19.240
<v Speaker 3>favorite things, from the one thing she says truly changes

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 3>her skin.

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 5>If you're watching this, you will be very curious about that, to.

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 3>The signature books she buys her friends, to the weird

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 3>thing she puts on her pizza. This is where you

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 3>get the download. Yes, and I think I'm up.

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 1>You are we started doing these questionnaires with all the hosts,

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>including the ones who are on the show every day,

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about all their favorite stuff. Questions are so good and

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so if you want to see those first, you've got

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to sign up for our substack.

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Bye.

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Mum May acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 3>which we've recorded this podcast.