WEBVTT - The Belle Gibson Fallout & Armie's 'D*ckhead Defence'

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:15.022
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a Muma Mia podcast. Muma Mia acknowledges

0:00:15.062 --> 0:00:18.062
<v Speaker 1>the traditional owners of land and waters that this podcast

0:00:18.102 --> 0:00:22.222
<v Speaker 1>is recorded on. Are you kidding? It's not about the

0:00:22.222 --> 0:00:24.982
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media. Who cares in twenty twenty five, who's on

0:00:25.021 --> 0:00:28.702
<v Speaker 1>the Today Show or on sixty minutes. It's about TikTok

0:00:28.822 --> 0:00:32.942
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram, and there is an algorithm deciding who gets

0:00:32.982 --> 0:00:35.742
<v Speaker 1>platformed and who goes viral on those.

0:00:35.942 --> 0:00:38.582
<v Speaker 2>And now, by the way, those platforms are taking away

0:00:38.622 --> 0:00:41.222
<v Speaker 2>fact checking and are taking away a lot of the

0:00:41.302 --> 0:00:44.582
<v Speaker 2>layers of authority that they put in place during the

0:00:44.622 --> 0:00:46.742
<v Speaker 2>pandemic to make sure there wasn't misinformation.

0:00:52.822 --> 0:00:55.742
<v Speaker 3>Hello, and welcome to Mummy. Are out loud what women

0:00:55.822 --> 0:00:59.582
<v Speaker 3>are talking about on Monday, the seventeenth of February. I

0:00:59.622 --> 0:01:02.862
<v Speaker 3>am Jesse Stevens, I'm mea Friedman, and we've got Amelia

0:01:03.062 --> 0:01:06.542
<v Speaker 3>Lester filling in for Holly today. Amelia introduced herself in

0:01:06.581 --> 0:01:07.461
<v Speaker 3>ten seconds or less.

0:01:07.462 --> 0:01:10.422
<v Speaker 2>Hello, I'm a friend of Mia Friedman. I'm an editor

0:01:10.422 --> 0:01:13.742
<v Speaker 2>at Foreign Policy Magazine and I'm an Australian American who

0:01:13.782 --> 0:01:14.622
<v Speaker 2>lives in Sydney.

0:01:14.742 --> 0:01:17.502
<v Speaker 3>I think you should have led with the second part.

0:01:17.742 --> 0:01:19.902
<v Speaker 2>I know the most important thing in my life is

0:01:19.902 --> 0:01:21.102
<v Speaker 2>that I'm a friend of the agreement.

0:01:21.742 --> 0:01:26.382
<v Speaker 1>She's also tertiary educated, which means I now feel officially outnumbered.

0:01:25.862 --> 0:01:28.262
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the letterboard. You are last. And on

0:01:28.302 --> 0:01:32.062
<v Speaker 3>the Show Today last week, Louis Theroux interviewed Armie Hammer,

0:01:32.222 --> 0:01:36.182
<v Speaker 3>who launched into an impassioned dickhead defense. What is the

0:01:36.222 --> 0:01:40.022
<v Speaker 3>dickhead defense and did it work? Plus the real life

0:01:40.102 --> 0:01:43.022
<v Speaker 3>characters from Apple Side of Vinegar are coming forward with

0:01:43.142 --> 0:01:47.022
<v Speaker 3>their own accounts. Do they have a point? And could

0:01:47.062 --> 0:01:51.302
<v Speaker 3>the Bell Gibson spectacle happen today? And apparently the whole

0:01:51.342 --> 0:01:54.742
<v Speaker 3>generation thing is a myth, but we are not all convinced.

0:01:55.342 --> 0:01:58.262
<v Speaker 1>But first, in case you missed it, one of Australia's

0:01:58.302 --> 0:02:02.182
<v Speaker 1>most successful business women, Kayla Itsines, who is a fitness

0:02:02.222 --> 0:02:06.422
<v Speaker 1>influencer with an app called Sweat, which she sold for one

0:02:06.462 --> 0:02:09.142
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million dollars and then bought back for

0:02:09.181 --> 0:02:12.342
<v Speaker 1>a lot less. She posted a TikTok video last week

0:02:12.382 --> 0:02:15.982
<v Speaker 1>calling out what she sees as excessive sexualization in the

0:02:15.982 --> 0:02:19.902
<v Speaker 1>fitness industry. Ladies, put your bums away, She essentially said,

0:02:20.181 --> 0:02:23.941
<v Speaker 1>stop filming those videos up your bum because I don't

0:02:23.942 --> 0:02:26.102
<v Speaker 1>want to see that. While I'm having breakfast. That's literally

0:02:26.102 --> 0:02:28.022
<v Speaker 1>what she said. We can't play you a grab of

0:02:28.062 --> 0:02:31.462
<v Speaker 1>it because she has since taken it down after a

0:02:31.502 --> 0:02:34.342
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were very unhappy and called her out

0:02:34.382 --> 0:02:36.621
<v Speaker 1>for being a hypocrite because.

0:02:37.222 --> 0:02:41.462
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't she been selling bikini body literally the name bikini

0:02:41.502 --> 0:02:43.102
<v Speaker 2>body plans for years and.

0:02:43.062 --> 0:02:46.422
<v Speaker 1>Years She has, indeed, and at the end of this video,

0:02:46.502 --> 0:02:48.542
<v Speaker 1>when am I missing well the part where I said

0:02:48.582 --> 0:02:50.342
<v Speaker 1>she was a businesswoman. At the end of this video,

0:02:50.502 --> 0:02:53.822
<v Speaker 1>she did do a shout out to her own glutes

0:02:53.902 --> 0:02:57.462
<v Speaker 1>program and say that it was essentially if people didn't

0:02:57.462 --> 0:03:00.542
<v Speaker 1>want to look up bums but still wanted to have

0:03:01.022 --> 0:03:03.302
<v Speaker 1>amazing glutes. As she said, she said, she's got a

0:03:03.342 --> 0:03:07.341
<v Speaker 1>glutes program and if they followed her program then they

0:03:07.342 --> 0:03:12.822
<v Speaker 1>could just see more modest bottoms and less Still before

0:03:13.502 --> 0:03:16.822
<v Speaker 1>what she was saying, Jesse, I'm not really across Kayla

0:03:16.902 --> 0:03:19.262
<v Speaker 1>It scenes, although I do know that this is the

0:03:19.302 --> 0:03:21.901
<v Speaker 1>reason we launched move because we wanted people to have

0:03:22.181 --> 0:03:25.142
<v Speaker 1>an option of it not being so appearance focused.

0:03:25.302 --> 0:03:28.502
<v Speaker 3>I get served a lot of fitness content on Instagram

0:03:28.542 --> 0:03:31.502
<v Speaker 3>and TikTok, and I have been served Kayla It scenes

0:03:31.782 --> 0:03:34.662
<v Speaker 3>bick anybody for ten years I'm not sure if she

0:03:34.662 --> 0:03:37.942
<v Speaker 3>does it anymore, but I distinctly remember the beginning of

0:03:38.022 --> 0:03:40.662
<v Speaker 3>sort of the fitness industry. The model was his or

0:03:40.662 --> 0:03:43.022
<v Speaker 3>before and after, and I'm talking ten a day before

0:03:43.062 --> 0:03:43.422
<v Speaker 3>and after.

0:03:43.622 --> 0:03:45.622
<v Speaker 1>Wow, you have a lot of body after baby stuff.

0:03:45.742 --> 0:03:48.782
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, women's bodies, and Kayla is known. I would

0:03:48.822 --> 0:03:51.822
<v Speaker 3>say that the appearance of her abdominals is central to

0:03:52.142 --> 0:03:55.182
<v Speaker 3>her marketing. It's really important because you know, it's the

0:03:55.222 --> 0:03:58.502
<v Speaker 3>illusion of fitness or it makes people it's shorthand to go.

0:03:58.542 --> 0:04:01.222
<v Speaker 3>I'm really in the same way that Sam Wood often

0:04:01.262 --> 0:04:04.102
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have a shirt on. I think that fitness is

0:04:04.142 --> 0:04:06.862
<v Speaker 3>seen as something very visual. So when I heard her

0:04:06.902 --> 0:04:10.742
<v Speaker 3>talking about the sexualization, I thought, we're all playing the

0:04:10.782 --> 0:04:13.542
<v Speaker 3>same game here, which is that the algorithm of both

0:04:13.622 --> 0:04:15.902
<v Speaker 3>is we need attention in order to get people to

0:04:16.262 --> 0:04:17.342
<v Speaker 3>buy our products.

0:04:17.421 --> 0:04:20.261
<v Speaker 1>So it's like she's more female gaze, and say the

0:04:20.342 --> 0:04:23.262
<v Speaker 1>Tammy Hembrowse who have a lot of shots of their

0:04:23.262 --> 0:04:26.422
<v Speaker 1>bum filmed in those low angles. She talks a lot

0:04:26.421 --> 0:04:29.541
<v Speaker 1>about low angles, which is just a different vibe. It's

0:04:29.582 --> 0:04:30.661
<v Speaker 1>more perhaps male gazing.

0:04:30.821 --> 0:04:32.462
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't necessarily have a problem with it, and

0:04:32.501 --> 0:04:34.301
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure that it is male gaze because I

0:04:34.301 --> 0:04:36.061
<v Speaker 3>get served a lot of glute content because I have

0:04:36.142 --> 0:04:38.902
<v Speaker 3>issues activating my glutes is a personal issue that I have,

0:04:38.941 --> 0:04:41.142
<v Speaker 3>and I say, TikTok, help me with my glute exercises.

0:04:41.181 --> 0:04:42.942
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because your legs just connect straight to your.

0:04:42.821 --> 0:04:45.941
<v Speaker 3>Bag exactly, And so what I need is to And

0:04:45.981 --> 0:04:48.461
<v Speaker 3>this is my defense of the form fitting because I

0:04:48.501 --> 0:04:50.222
<v Speaker 3>know what leggings she's talking about.

0:04:51.061 --> 0:04:53.581
<v Speaker 1>Was she talking about leggings or was she talking about angles?

0:04:54.061 --> 0:04:58.421
<v Speaker 3>Angles? But she's saying, you can really see the glute being.

0:04:58.621 --> 0:05:00.742
<v Speaker 1>Act But is that maybe sometimes because the glute is

0:05:00.782 --> 0:05:01.382
<v Speaker 1>an implant.

0:05:01.662 --> 0:05:03.421
<v Speaker 3>Well that's a whole other story.

0:05:03.662 --> 0:05:06.701
<v Speaker 2>Aren't you just saying then that abs are female gaze

0:05:06.782 --> 0:05:09.141
<v Speaker 2>coded and glutes are male gaze coded.

0:05:09.262 --> 0:05:12.821
<v Speaker 3>See, I think that the gaze is just everyone's gaze.

0:05:12.981 --> 0:05:14.901
<v Speaker 3>I think that now that we're just looking at the

0:05:14.902 --> 0:05:16.741
<v Speaker 3>same I mean, i'd be interested to see the stats

0:05:16.741 --> 0:05:20.262
<v Speaker 3>about who's following who, But I'm a woman who's looking

0:05:20.301 --> 0:05:23.902
<v Speaker 3>at a lot of glute centered content. And I think

0:05:23.981 --> 0:05:28.022
<v Speaker 3>that the reason we have such form hugging clothing in

0:05:28.181 --> 0:05:30.541
<v Speaker 3>exercise is often because there is a focus on form.

0:05:30.541 --> 0:05:32.782
<v Speaker 3>There's a focus on this is how you correctly do

0:05:32.821 --> 0:05:35.821
<v Speaker 3>the pilates, move the weights for the yoga thing, which

0:05:35.861 --> 0:05:37.582
<v Speaker 3>is what you're being for because you don't want to

0:05:37.582 --> 0:05:40.022
<v Speaker 3>get injured. So you can't have someone dressed as an

0:05:40.022 --> 0:05:43.941
<v Speaker 3>Amish person doing a squat because I don't know how

0:05:43.941 --> 0:05:44.781
<v Speaker 3>your backs arching.

0:05:44.941 --> 0:05:49.101
<v Speaker 1>Among fitness influences, the trend used to be for a

0:05:49.181 --> 0:05:53.421
<v Speaker 1>much slimmer body. Kayla, it seems is very much. She's

0:05:53.541 --> 0:05:56.941
<v Speaker 1>very slim, whereas some of the other fitness influencers that

0:05:57.022 --> 0:06:00.861
<v Speaker 1>do the booty content, well they've just got really big booties. Yeah,

0:06:00.902 --> 0:06:04.741
<v Speaker 1>so there's a more muscular, a more big bottomed. And

0:06:04.981 --> 0:06:07.382
<v Speaker 1>the criticisms that she obviously took to heart because she

0:06:07.421 --> 0:06:10.501
<v Speaker 1>took it down, were that she was hyper critical because

0:06:10.821 --> 0:06:13.741
<v Speaker 1>she flaunted her body, as the Daily Mail would say,

0:06:14.101 --> 0:06:16.981
<v Speaker 1>and why is she criticizing other women for how they

0:06:17.022 --> 0:06:18.381
<v Speaker 1>want to portray their own bodies.

0:06:19.222 --> 0:06:24.021
<v Speaker 3>Last week, documentarian and podcast Louis Thuru released a podcast

0:06:24.061 --> 0:06:27.622
<v Speaker 3>episode with actor Armie Hammer that has since gone viral

0:06:28.262 --> 0:06:32.301
<v Speaker 3>due to the palpable tension that emerged between the two men.

0:06:32.981 --> 0:06:36.582
<v Speaker 3>You might have seen this clip circulating on social media.

0:06:36.662 --> 0:06:39.381
<v Speaker 3>Did you have anything else you wanted to say? I

0:06:39.381 --> 0:06:40.461
<v Speaker 3>should know.

0:06:40.501 --> 0:06:43.021
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't love the way the interview started.

0:06:43.262 --> 0:06:46.941
<v Speaker 4>Just to be perfectly honest, I'm not crazy about drudging

0:06:47.061 --> 0:06:49.422
<v Speaker 4>up all of this stuff because for me, a lot

0:06:49.421 --> 0:06:52.582
<v Speaker 4>of these issues have been resolved, whether it be legally

0:06:53.022 --> 0:06:55.942
<v Speaker 4>or within myself, and I feel like a lot of

0:06:55.981 --> 0:07:00.342
<v Speaker 4>those waters have settled. I think doing things like that

0:07:00.621 --> 0:07:05.101
<v Speaker 4>stirs up the water again unnecessarily. It definitely wasn't my

0:07:05.181 --> 0:07:08.941
<v Speaker 4>favorite beginning. I'm glad we moved past that and got

0:07:08.981 --> 0:07:11.302
<v Speaker 4>to a place where we could have a civil, normal

0:07:11.381 --> 0:07:14.982
<v Speaker 4>conversation like that felt good. But drudging up all that stuff, like,

0:07:15.302 --> 0:07:15.862
<v Speaker 4>I don't love it.

0:07:16.182 --> 0:07:18.302
<v Speaker 3>I hear you and I sense that during the chat.

0:07:18.422 --> 0:07:21.182
<v Speaker 3>I think in the court of public opinion, the jury

0:07:21.222 --> 0:07:22.142
<v Speaker 3>is still out.

0:07:22.342 --> 0:07:25.062
<v Speaker 4>But my thing now is like the court of public opinion. Like,

0:07:26.662 --> 0:07:29.662
<v Speaker 4>pick anything that the court of public opinion has an

0:07:29.702 --> 0:07:32.422
<v Speaker 4>opinion on, and there's a very good chance that they

0:07:32.422 --> 0:07:35.022
<v Speaker 4>will not be fully informed. There's a very good chance

0:07:35.062 --> 0:07:36.782
<v Speaker 4>they don't have the full story, and there's also a

0:07:36.862 --> 0:07:38.222
<v Speaker 4>very good chance that they're probably wrong.

0:07:38.582 --> 0:07:40.941
<v Speaker 3>I sent this around when I saw it first thing

0:07:41.222 --> 0:07:44.261
<v Speaker 3>last week and went, that is the single best podcast

0:07:44.302 --> 0:07:47.302
<v Speaker 3>trailer I have ever seen. Because I saw that when

0:07:47.302 --> 0:07:49.782
<v Speaker 3>I need to listen to it immediately let's take a

0:07:49.782 --> 0:07:52.701
<v Speaker 3>few steps backwards. Because Armie Hammer, who you might know

0:07:52.941 --> 0:07:56.261
<v Speaker 3>as the Winklevoss Twins in the Social network or he

0:07:56.782 --> 0:07:58.982
<v Speaker 3>was the lead in Call Me by Your Name opposite

0:07:59.022 --> 0:08:04.062
<v Speaker 3>Timothy Shallamy, he was accused of sexual emotional and physical assault, rape,

0:08:04.102 --> 0:08:08.062
<v Speaker 3>and cannibalistic fantasies in early twenty twenty one. Text messages

0:08:08.062 --> 0:08:10.422
<v Speaker 3>were published at the time that read I'm one hundred

0:08:10.422 --> 0:08:13.302
<v Speaker 3>percent accnnibal. He expressed a desire to cut off a

0:08:13.302 --> 0:08:16.142
<v Speaker 3>piece of his partner and eat it, and another text

0:08:16.262 --> 0:08:19.742
<v Speaker 3>expressed wanting to hold a partner down and rape her.

0:08:20.302 --> 0:08:22.782
<v Speaker 3>Hamma maintained that these were taken out of context and

0:08:22.862 --> 0:08:26.382
<v Speaker 3>were part of a sexually charged and consensual back and forth.

0:08:26.982 --> 0:08:30.141
<v Speaker 3>The charges against him were eventually dropped in twenty twenty three,

0:08:30.381 --> 0:08:34.982
<v Speaker 3>citing insufficient evidence. Hamma has since spoken about losing every

0:08:35.062 --> 0:08:37.582
<v Speaker 3>job he had, he was dropped by his agent, he

0:08:37.662 --> 0:08:40.942
<v Speaker 3>was shunned by friends, and he's talked about the emotional

0:08:40.942 --> 0:08:44.022
<v Speaker 3>toll that the allegations took on him. And now in

0:08:44.062 --> 0:08:47.702
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five, he is sitting opposite Louis and I'm

0:08:47.702 --> 0:08:49.542
<v Speaker 3>going to give you the headlines from the interview. If

0:08:49.542 --> 0:08:50.342
<v Speaker 3>you haven't listened.

0:08:50.422 --> 0:08:52.582
<v Speaker 1>Amy has a podcast of his own, doesn't he does?

0:08:52.702 --> 0:08:53.582
<v Speaker 1>Mum he does?

0:08:53.862 --> 0:08:56.342
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, released it last year. Remember his mum bought him

0:08:56.342 --> 0:08:56.942
<v Speaker 3>a phaseectomy.

0:08:57.142 --> 0:08:59.902
<v Speaker 1>That was so kind. Do you think he's now just

0:09:00.462 --> 0:09:02.662
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have been talking about he's coming back,

0:09:02.742 --> 0:09:06.182
<v Speaker 1>and there's no such thing as cancelation. I imagine he's

0:09:06.182 --> 0:09:09.062
<v Speaker 1>been on peas Morgan. Do you think he just is like,

0:09:09.582 --> 0:09:11.102
<v Speaker 1>I've just got to talk about it. I'm just going

0:09:11.182 --> 0:09:12.982
<v Speaker 1>to own it. I'm going to lean into it, and

0:09:13.022 --> 0:09:14.902
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to talk about it until it's not interesting

0:09:14.942 --> 0:09:15.742
<v Speaker 1>to people anymore.

0:09:15.982 --> 0:09:16.222
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:09:16.542 --> 0:09:18.742
<v Speaker 3>I think so. I think he probably had two choices.

0:09:18.862 --> 0:09:21.342
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he did retreat for a significant period of time,

0:09:21.902 --> 0:09:23.782
<v Speaker 3>But the biggest thing is in a moment, he's going

0:09:23.822 --> 0:09:26.062
<v Speaker 3>to have movies to promote, so he can't just come out.

0:09:26.102 --> 0:09:28.422
<v Speaker 3>And I think when he promotes the movies, he probably

0:09:28.462 --> 0:09:29.342
<v Speaker 3>wants to promote the movie.

0:09:29.502 --> 0:09:30.262
<v Speaker 1>So he's working again.

0:09:30.342 --> 0:09:31.182
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. Is he getting cars?

0:09:31.342 --> 0:09:31.502
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:09:31.582 --> 0:09:33.062
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he said he's getting offers every day.

0:09:33.182 --> 0:09:34.062
<v Speaker 1>Okay, interesting.

0:09:34.142 --> 0:09:36.862
<v Speaker 3>So these were the headlines from the interview. He admitted

0:09:36.902 --> 0:09:39.062
<v Speaker 3>to having an affair while still married to his wife,

0:09:39.102 --> 0:09:41.622
<v Speaker 3>but said that people in happy marriages don't have affairs.

0:09:42.342 --> 0:09:45.382
<v Speaker 3>He said only one side of the text. Conversations were leaked,

0:09:45.542 --> 0:09:48.062
<v Speaker 3>meaning that they would devoid of context. He talked about

0:09:48.062 --> 0:09:51.662
<v Speaker 3>intergenerational trauma. His grandfather was accused of killing a man

0:09:51.782 --> 0:09:54.902
<v Speaker 3>of sexually abusing his daughter. There's a documentary called The

0:09:54.902 --> 0:09:58.022
<v Speaker 3>House of Hammer about the history of the family. He

0:09:58.102 --> 0:10:00.702
<v Speaker 3>says the scandal was the greatest thing that ever happened

0:10:00.702 --> 0:10:03.062
<v Speaker 3>to him. It forced him to get sober. He didn't

0:10:03.102 --> 0:10:06.742
<v Speaker 3>recognize who he had become, and he denies, ultimately that

0:10:06.822 --> 0:10:10.822
<v Speaker 3>he was guilty of anything that resembled a crime. Ultimately,

0:10:11.102 --> 0:10:14.542
<v Speaker 3>he used what hollywould call the dickhead defense. He was

0:10:14.582 --> 0:10:18.302
<v Speaker 3>a bad person, radicalized by fame and money and pornography

0:10:18.622 --> 0:10:21.502
<v Speaker 3>and access to anything he wanted All the time, he

0:10:21.582 --> 0:10:26.102
<v Speaker 3>treated people badly, women his wife. He says that like Icarus,

0:10:26.142 --> 0:10:28.462
<v Speaker 3>he flew too close to the sun, but he was

0:10:28.502 --> 0:10:32.782
<v Speaker 3>not guilty of abuse. Maya does the dickhead defense work.

0:10:33.302 --> 0:10:35.502
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a really interesting interview to listen to.

0:10:35.742 --> 0:10:39.262
<v Speaker 1>I'm not all the way through it, but I think

0:10:40.142 --> 0:10:45.662
<v Speaker 1>that when you call yourself a dickhead, you show two things. Firstly,

0:10:46.582 --> 0:10:52.462
<v Speaker 1>there's humility in there, and secondly, there's self awareness. And

0:10:52.502 --> 0:10:55.942
<v Speaker 1>I think implicit in that is an apology of sorts,

0:10:56.262 --> 0:10:59.302
<v Speaker 1>because what we know is that no matter what you do,

0:11:00.182 --> 0:11:05.062
<v Speaker 1>however you apologize, will be critiqued and found wanting by

0:11:05.302 --> 0:11:08.782
<v Speaker 1>the apology police. And the other time that I can

0:11:08.822 --> 0:11:11.422
<v Speaker 1>think that this really really worked. Although the two things

0:11:11.462 --> 0:11:14.662
<v Speaker 1>aren't comparable. But Karl Stefanovic a number of years ago

0:11:15.062 --> 0:11:19.262
<v Speaker 1>used an offensive term for a marginalized group of people

0:11:19.342 --> 0:11:21.822
<v Speaker 1>and there was a big backlash about it, and the

0:11:21.862 --> 0:11:25.142
<v Speaker 1>next day on the Today Show he said, I was

0:11:25.142 --> 0:11:27.702
<v Speaker 1>a tool. I really shouldn't have used that word. Now

0:11:27.702 --> 0:11:31.422
<v Speaker 1>I understand, I won't use it again. And by calling

0:11:31.502 --> 0:11:35.502
<v Speaker 1>himself out so strongly, he sort of left no room

0:11:35.662 --> 0:11:38.222
<v Speaker 1>for people to come at him anymore. And it worked.

0:11:38.462 --> 0:11:39.542
<v Speaker 3>Have you ever seen a woman do it?

0:11:39.822 --> 0:11:40.062
<v Speaker 1>Never?

0:11:40.142 --> 0:11:40.302
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:11:40.342 --> 0:11:41.982
<v Speaker 3>God, no, I don't think a woman can use it

0:11:41.982 --> 0:11:44.662
<v Speaker 3>acad defense Amelia, do you think it works well.

0:11:44.702 --> 0:11:47.422
<v Speaker 2>One thing that I thought was so interesting about that grab,

0:11:47.702 --> 0:11:50.582
<v Speaker 2>which I assume was the most interesting part of the interview,

0:11:51.302 --> 0:11:54.622
<v Speaker 2>is that it reminded me of this phenomenon that doctors

0:11:54.662 --> 0:11:56.622
<v Speaker 2>describe as the doorstop question.

0:11:57.142 --> 0:11:57.902
<v Speaker 5>Oh have you heard of that?

0:11:58.742 --> 0:12:01.022
<v Speaker 2>So apparently when you go and see the doctor, they

0:12:01.142 --> 0:12:03.302
<v Speaker 2>know that you're basically going to sort of fluff your

0:12:03.302 --> 0:12:07.182
<v Speaker 2>way through the actual consultation, and then as you stand

0:12:07.262 --> 0:12:10.142
<v Speaker 2>up on the way out, you go just one other thing,

0:12:10.502 --> 0:12:13.222
<v Speaker 2>and then that often turns out to be the thing

0:12:13.262 --> 0:12:15.102
<v Speaker 2>that is wrong with you, or you know, you might

0:12:15.142 --> 0:12:16.982
<v Speaker 2>have a mole that you That's how I almost get

0:12:17.022 --> 0:12:17.702
<v Speaker 2>cancer removed.

0:12:17.822 --> 0:12:20.342
<v Speaker 3>We're standing and walking out of the room going actually while.

0:12:20.222 --> 0:12:24.022
<v Speaker 2>I'm here, doorstop question Mia. In No Filter interviews, would

0:12:24.022 --> 0:12:26.942
<v Speaker 2>you always ask people is there anything else you want

0:12:26.982 --> 0:12:29.381
<v Speaker 2>to say? That kind of like cleaning up question in

0:12:29.462 --> 0:12:29.662
<v Speaker 2>the air?

0:12:29.822 --> 0:12:33.622
<v Speaker 1>Never? I never ever would. Maybe I probably should have.

0:12:34.262 --> 0:12:35.982
<v Speaker 1>That's really I think it's a little.

0:12:35.742 --> 0:12:38.342
<v Speaker 2>Bit of a lifetack in general, because if you're having

0:12:38.342 --> 0:12:41.102
<v Speaker 2>a conversation with someone, it takes time to warm up

0:12:41.142 --> 0:12:44.262
<v Speaker 2>to the actual meat of it. I think, sorry, that

0:12:44.382 --> 0:12:46.022
<v Speaker 2>was bad given the cannibal discussion.

0:12:46.102 --> 0:12:50.262
<v Speaker 3>I think that that's specific to this type of interview

0:12:50.462 --> 0:12:53.582
<v Speaker 3>right because Louis, I think this is season four or

0:12:53.622 --> 0:12:56.062
<v Speaker 3>season five of his podcast, and it has in terms

0:12:56.102 --> 0:12:58.702
<v Speaker 3>of charting, it's not really been working. I listened to

0:12:58.742 --> 0:13:01.222
<v Speaker 3>a few of them and I stopped because I don't

0:13:01.262 --> 0:13:03.342
<v Speaker 3>think Louis Threux is a celebrity interviewer.

0:13:03.422 --> 0:13:03.702
<v Speaker 1>He's not.

0:13:04.422 --> 0:13:05.262
<v Speaker 3>It's not where he's best.

0:13:05.462 --> 0:13:08.262
<v Speaker 1>He's best talking to weird people about weird thing.

0:13:08.382 --> 0:13:12.702
<v Speaker 3>He is a subculture journalist, like that's where he got

0:13:13.102 --> 0:13:18.022
<v Speaker 3>his experience, and he is so skilled at sitting with

0:13:18.062 --> 0:13:22.302
<v Speaker 3>someone and giving them space and playing the idiot.

0:13:22.542 --> 0:13:25.582
<v Speaker 1>And but it's also not just about him. It's celebrities

0:13:25.582 --> 0:13:27.382
<v Speaker 1>have gotten so good at this, and they've all got

0:13:27.422 --> 0:13:30.302
<v Speaker 1>their own podcasts. Yeah, they don't need to give you anything.

0:13:30.342 --> 0:13:34.662
<v Speaker 1>Whereas real people are less guarded, they have less to lose.

0:13:35.302 --> 0:13:37.942
<v Speaker 1>They're also just more interesting. They're not media trained. And

0:13:37.982 --> 0:13:41.102
<v Speaker 1>back to your original question, Jesse, do I think it worked? Yeah?

0:13:41.102 --> 0:13:43.102
<v Speaker 1>I guess it did work because I came away from

0:13:43.102 --> 0:13:46.462
<v Speaker 1>that podcast interview thinking was he a dickhead? Is he

0:13:46.542 --> 0:13:51.182
<v Speaker 1>still a dickhead? Absolutely? Is he a cannibal? And all

0:13:51.222 --> 0:13:53.662
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I actually had believed that he was.

0:13:53.982 --> 0:13:56.462
<v Speaker 3>No, it's interesting you use two terms. The first was

0:13:56.502 --> 0:13:59.702
<v Speaker 3>you said it shows some humility. I do not see

0:13:59.902 --> 0:14:01.942
<v Speaker 3>one ioda of humility in that manner.

0:14:01.982 --> 0:14:03.782
<v Speaker 1>No, I think it for him, I think it shows

0:14:03.822 --> 0:14:07.142
<v Speaker 1>false humility. Ah, that's why. So I think that's why

0:14:07.142 --> 0:14:09.261
<v Speaker 1>it's a defense. I don't think it's always effective, and

0:14:09.382 --> 0:14:12.102
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he came across as having humility at all,

0:14:12.422 --> 0:14:15.182
<v Speaker 1>But I think if it's done right, like with Karl Stefanovic,

0:14:15.502 --> 0:14:17.502
<v Speaker 1>it worked because it did show humility.

0:14:17.542 --> 0:14:19.382
<v Speaker 3>You also said that it was a type of apology,

0:14:19.582 --> 0:14:22.862
<v Speaker 3>which was interesting given you can scrape this entire interview

0:14:22.862 --> 0:14:25.422
<v Speaker 3>and you will not find anything that is a semblance

0:14:25.422 --> 0:14:26.062
<v Speaker 3>of an apology.

0:14:26.142 --> 0:14:26.902
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's angry.

0:14:27.062 --> 0:14:29.582
<v Speaker 2>There's also a semblance of truth in what he said, too,

0:14:29.622 --> 0:14:31.902
<v Speaker 2>which is when he talked about the court of public opinion.

0:14:31.982 --> 0:14:34.142
<v Speaker 2>And it's true that the court of public opinion can

0:14:34.222 --> 0:14:35.782
<v Speaker 2>linger long beyond.

0:14:35.422 --> 0:14:36.582
<v Speaker 5>The actual courts.

0:14:36.902 --> 0:14:39.942
<v Speaker 2>And it brought to mind a case that happened in

0:14:39.982 --> 0:14:42.422
<v Speaker 2>twenty twelve in New York a cannibal cop. Have you

0:14:42.462 --> 0:14:45.502
<v Speaker 2>heard of this, Jesse Nature Crime Explorations. There was an

0:14:45.662 --> 0:14:50.182
<v Speaker 2>NPD officer named Gilberto Valet and he was arrested because

0:14:50.262 --> 0:14:53.502
<v Speaker 2>he had been on online forums talking about roasting women,

0:14:53.582 --> 0:14:56.302
<v Speaker 2>cooking women, eating women. He was stood down from his

0:14:56.382 --> 0:14:59.462
<v Speaker 2>job at the NYPD, but the criminal charges were dropped.

0:14:59.502 --> 0:15:01.862
<v Speaker 2>The judge said, look, you clearly have a diseased mind,

0:15:01.942 --> 0:15:04.302
<v Speaker 2>that was the phrase he used, but you haven't committed

0:15:04.342 --> 0:15:06.942
<v Speaker 2>any crimes. And his lawyers had been arguing that all

0:15:06.942 --> 0:15:09.902
<v Speaker 2>along that he was just exploring these sexual fantasies online.

0:15:10.022 --> 0:15:11.622
<v Speaker 2>It seems to me that there's a bit of a

0:15:11.662 --> 0:15:15.142
<v Speaker 2>parallel here with Army and the idea of minority report,

0:15:15.182 --> 0:15:17.982
<v Speaker 2>that old Tom Cruise movie. If you haven't actually done something,

0:15:18.702 --> 0:15:21.662
<v Speaker 2>and here I'm just talking about the cannibalism charges, how

0:15:21.702 --> 0:15:22.982
<v Speaker 2>do you ever escape it?

0:15:23.342 --> 0:15:28.062
<v Speaker 3>Yes? And the question is, then what's worse is being

0:15:28.262 --> 0:15:30.262
<v Speaker 3>tired with the brush that you're a bad person or

0:15:30.262 --> 0:15:32.982
<v Speaker 3>that you're a dickhead, better or worse, and being tired

0:15:33.022 --> 0:15:35.302
<v Speaker 3>with the brush that you're a criminal. And what I

0:15:35.342 --> 0:15:38.582
<v Speaker 3>found interesting about the dickhead defense was that I thought,

0:15:39.182 --> 0:15:42.222
<v Speaker 3>I think I would rather own having committed a crime

0:15:42.462 --> 0:15:45.502
<v Speaker 3>than being a bad person. But there are many men

0:15:45.542 --> 0:15:47.662
<v Speaker 3>in Hollywood who seem happy to sit there and go

0:15:48.022 --> 0:15:50.262
<v Speaker 3>I'm a piece of shit, I'm a terrible person.

0:15:50.022 --> 0:15:53.982
<v Speaker 1>Because that's their path back to employment and reintegration into society.

0:15:54.142 --> 0:15:57.502
<v Speaker 1>Whereas for a woman to say that she ain't coming back,

0:15:57.582 --> 0:16:00.662
<v Speaker 1>like that's not a path back, I think it's completely calculated.

0:16:00.982 --> 0:16:03.142
<v Speaker 3>It makes it so clear where our line is in

0:16:03.222 --> 0:16:05.822
<v Speaker 3>terms of do you have permission to re enter? Did

0:16:05.862 --> 0:16:07.462
<v Speaker 3>you go to even if you went to prison. You

0:16:07.462 --> 0:16:09.502
<v Speaker 3>did serve your time, and we'll let them back in.

0:16:09.622 --> 0:16:09.902
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:09.942 --> 0:16:12.582
<v Speaker 3>But for women like I just thought about Ellen or whatever.

0:16:12.622 --> 0:16:14.142
<v Speaker 3>I thought, if she stood and she made a few

0:16:14.222 --> 0:16:16.382
<v Speaker 3>jokes and stuff, but if she stood there and went, yeah,

0:16:16.422 --> 0:16:18.942
<v Speaker 3>I was a selfish piece of shit who treated everyone poorly,

0:16:19.462 --> 0:16:23.342
<v Speaker 3>we'd have gone it just doesn't work. But for him,

0:16:23.422 --> 0:16:26.942
<v Speaker 3>even the affair, I thought only affair, and he said, well,

0:16:26.982 --> 0:16:28.982
<v Speaker 3>you know, you don't have an affair if your marriage

0:16:29.022 --> 0:16:31.862
<v Speaker 3>is going well. And I was like, oh, you're even

0:16:31.862 --> 0:16:33.142
<v Speaker 3>blaming her for the affair.

0:16:33.702 --> 0:16:36.022
<v Speaker 1>What I took away from it was that he was

0:16:36.102 --> 0:16:40.422
<v Speaker 1>wanting to clarify. It's like, the word out there is

0:16:40.422 --> 0:16:42.582
<v Speaker 1>that I'm accountable. I'm not. The word out there is

0:16:42.582 --> 0:16:45.062
<v Speaker 1>that all of these things were non consensual. I'm saying

0:16:45.102 --> 0:16:47.902
<v Speaker 1>they are now Again it's him against her, he said,

0:16:47.942 --> 0:16:51.382
<v Speaker 1>she said, But he was still providing that context that

0:16:51.462 --> 0:16:55.062
<v Speaker 1>you hear in people who feel misunderstood, and he says

0:16:55.062 --> 0:16:56.662
<v Speaker 1>that he feels very misunderstood.

0:16:56.822 --> 0:16:59.022
<v Speaker 3>One of the most interesting parts of the interview I

0:16:59.142 --> 0:17:01.702
<v Speaker 3>thought was the question about Woody Allen.

0:17:01.902 --> 0:17:04.102
<v Speaker 1>If Woody Allen offered you a role in his new movie,

0:17:04.142 --> 0:17:04.861
<v Speaker 1>would you take it?

0:17:04.942 --> 0:17:07.621
<v Speaker 4>Would I work with Woody Allen. I mean at this point,

0:17:07.982 --> 0:17:13.022
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that I buy into any of the

0:17:14.341 --> 0:17:17.742
<v Speaker 4>cancel we need to dis and that like I don't know.

0:17:18.141 --> 0:17:20.461
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I know that this is like a trick question,

0:17:20.542 --> 0:17:23.221
<v Speaker 4>and I know there's no right way to answer this question.

0:17:23.341 --> 0:17:26.741
<v Speaker 4>But I think I think it's well no, because like

0:17:26.942 --> 0:17:27.902
<v Speaker 4>if I say.

0:17:28.061 --> 0:17:30.702
<v Speaker 1>No, it is a trick question. I think louis really

0:17:31.022 --> 0:17:33.502
<v Speaker 1>ques brilliant, but it is a trick question. Louis being

0:17:33.542 --> 0:17:34.502
<v Speaker 1>disingenuous there.

0:17:34.581 --> 0:17:37.901
<v Speaker 3>He was basically speaking to how there does appear to

0:17:37.942 --> 0:17:41.061
<v Speaker 3>be a line being drawn down Hollywood, And he goes

0:17:41.101 --> 0:17:43.542
<v Speaker 3>on to ask, oh, also in that movie is Kevin

0:17:43.581 --> 0:17:45.302
<v Speaker 3>Spacey and Harvey Weinstein's producing it?

0:17:45.462 --> 0:17:47.742
<v Speaker 2>This movie is going to happen right the way that's

0:17:47.782 --> 0:17:48.581
<v Speaker 2>coming out next to you.

0:17:48.861 --> 0:17:51.302
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and everyone's going to go and say everyone, And

0:17:51.341 --> 0:17:54.422
<v Speaker 3>what he's saying is, have you been so radicalized by

0:17:54.422 --> 0:17:59.741
<v Speaker 3>your cancelation that you now go everyone's mad. Let's just

0:18:00.141 --> 0:18:02.342
<v Speaker 3>kind of put myself in the camp with the other

0:18:02.422 --> 0:18:04.741
<v Speaker 3>men who have been canceled. And I thought he had

0:18:04.821 --> 0:18:06.781
<v Speaker 3>quite a fair answer to that, which is I'd want

0:18:06.782 --> 0:18:09.262
<v Speaker 3>to sit down with Woody Allen first. I mean, we

0:18:09.341 --> 0:18:11.221
<v Speaker 3>all know that that's not going to reveal everything, but

0:18:11.381 --> 0:18:13.181
<v Speaker 3>that he just knows that a lot of what is

0:18:13.222 --> 0:18:17.222
<v Speaker 3>being said isn't necessarily the truth of someone who he says,

0:18:17.222 --> 0:18:18.022
<v Speaker 3>has experienced that.

0:18:18.341 --> 0:18:20.621
<v Speaker 2>I think we are seeing a big backlash to the

0:18:20.742 --> 0:18:22.982
<v Speaker 2>late Orts cancelation era.

0:18:23.302 --> 0:18:23.502
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:18:23.542 --> 0:18:25.782
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so many of the people, even in Trump's cabinet,

0:18:25.861 --> 0:18:28.142
<v Speaker 2>are people who used to be on the Democratic side

0:18:28.141 --> 0:18:30.581
<v Speaker 2>of politics who got canceled and then said, well, I'm

0:18:30.621 --> 0:18:32.821
<v Speaker 2>seeking revenge. I'm joining Trump's cabinet.

0:18:33.222 --> 0:18:35.742
<v Speaker 3>That's true. I think of the moment, there's a Trump

0:18:35.782 --> 0:18:39.502
<v Speaker 3>theme here. I agree. After the break some updates on

0:18:39.542 --> 0:18:42.502
<v Speaker 3>the Bell Gibson story. One week after the release of

0:18:42.542 --> 0:18:43.502
<v Speaker 3>Apple Side of Vinegar.

0:18:47.502 --> 0:18:49.861
<v Speaker 1>It's been a week since the new series Apple Side

0:18:49.861 --> 0:18:54.422
<v Speaker 1>of Vinegar has been released on Netflix, and it has

0:18:54.702 --> 0:18:58.861
<v Speaker 1>sparked global attention from people discovering this story for the

0:18:58.901 --> 0:19:01.862
<v Speaker 1>first time from around the world. And also there've been

0:19:01.942 --> 0:19:05.101
<v Speaker 1>quite a few developments from people who are associated with

0:19:05.182 --> 0:19:09.502
<v Speaker 1>this story in real life. The family of Jessinskoff, who

0:19:09.542 --> 0:19:12.861
<v Speaker 1>who is the wellness influencer who's portrayed in the show

0:19:12.982 --> 0:19:17.742
<v Speaker 1>as Miller Blake heavily inspired by Jess's story, but her

0:19:17.782 --> 0:19:21.502
<v Speaker 1>family have come out her father in particular, and said

0:19:21.542 --> 0:19:23.782
<v Speaker 1>that it's just not true. There are a lot of

0:19:23.821 --> 0:19:25.061
<v Speaker 1>inaccuracies in the way.

0:19:25.222 --> 0:19:27.422
<v Speaker 3>What does he say are the inaccuracy Yeah.

0:19:27.222 --> 0:19:31.101
<v Speaker 1>So he says that the main inaccuracy is that Jess

0:19:31.101 --> 0:19:34.621
<v Speaker 1>and Bell Gibson were friends. And Talon Parmenter, who is

0:19:34.782 --> 0:19:37.661
<v Speaker 1>Jess's former fiance, has also come out and said that

0:19:37.782 --> 0:19:40.022
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And I think what's really important for people

0:19:40.061 --> 0:19:42.861
<v Speaker 1>to understand because I watched that story happen as it

0:19:42.982 --> 0:19:46.781
<v Speaker 1>happened in real life to Jess. They're not disputing the

0:19:46.821 --> 0:19:50.502
<v Speaker 1>medical side, so nobody knows exactly what her medical history is.

0:19:50.542 --> 0:19:53.421
<v Speaker 1>And that's frankly not so much how business, except for

0:19:53.502 --> 0:19:57.021
<v Speaker 1>what she told us through her Instagram, and she was

0:19:57.542 --> 0:19:59.982
<v Speaker 1>very open and honest about saying that at the end

0:20:00.621 --> 0:20:03.302
<v Speaker 1>she wished that she'd listened to doctors earlier on in

0:20:03.302 --> 0:20:06.101
<v Speaker 1>her journey. The other person who's come out this week

0:20:06.302 --> 0:20:09.901
<v Speaker 1>is Richard Gilliat, who says that he was the one,

0:20:09.942 --> 0:20:12.982
<v Speaker 1>and indeed he was. He's a journalist from The Australian.

0:20:13.061 --> 0:20:16.181
<v Speaker 1>He broke the original story and revealed the moment that

0:20:16.222 --> 0:20:19.502
<v Speaker 1>Bell Gibson's lies began unraveling, and he also said that

0:20:19.581 --> 0:20:22.622
<v Speaker 1>what he thought was most different about the way Bell

0:20:22.742 --> 0:20:25.382
<v Speaker 1>was portrayed versus his experience of her, and he did

0:20:25.422 --> 0:20:28.061
<v Speaker 1>interview her a number of times, is that he said

0:20:28.101 --> 0:20:32.901
<v Speaker 1>she was portrayed as this quite conniving, successful scammer, and

0:20:32.982 --> 0:20:35.861
<v Speaker 1>he said that she was actually terrible. She was terrible

0:20:35.861 --> 0:20:39.141
<v Speaker 1>at covering her tracks. It was a time before people

0:20:39.661 --> 0:20:42.061
<v Speaker 1>would dig online, so she didn't have to be as

0:20:42.061 --> 0:20:43.581
<v Speaker 1>good as she would have had to be today. But

0:20:44.061 --> 0:20:46.901
<v Speaker 1>he said she was actually a really bad liar and

0:20:46.942 --> 0:20:49.101
<v Speaker 1>there were always big holes in her story. It's just

0:20:49.141 --> 0:20:52.101
<v Speaker 1>that nobody really looked into them at the time. The

0:20:52.702 --> 0:20:55.661
<v Speaker 1>Victorian premier Justinto Allan has come out and said that

0:20:55.861 --> 0:21:00.941
<v Speaker 1>consumer Affairs Victoria, who is owed hundreds of thousands of

0:21:00.942 --> 0:21:04.141
<v Speaker 1>dollars from a fine Bell Gibson, was given back in

0:21:04.222 --> 0:21:07.141
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen. It's now over half a million dollars that

0:21:07.222 --> 0:21:09.862
<v Speaker 1>she ownes with penalties. Just Cintra Allen has said that

0:21:09.942 --> 0:21:12.821
<v Speaker 1>they will continue pursuing that debt, and it was also

0:21:12.861 --> 0:21:16.901
<v Speaker 1>recently revealed that Belle has split from her longtime partner

0:21:16.901 --> 0:21:20.381
<v Speaker 1>Clive Rothwell, who is portrayed in the show, and also

0:21:20.462 --> 0:21:23.581
<v Speaker 1>claims that she still can't afford to pay her fines.

0:21:24.341 --> 0:21:28.381
<v Speaker 1>What we were thinking about is could Belle Gibson happen

0:21:28.621 --> 0:21:31.901
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five or was that a moment in

0:21:31.942 --> 0:21:35.782
<v Speaker 1>time and we've all learned our lesson about wellness scammers? Amelia?

0:21:35.821 --> 0:21:36.462
<v Speaker 1>What do you think?

0:21:36.702 --> 0:21:38.661
<v Speaker 2>One thing they thought was really interesting in that Richard

0:21:38.661 --> 0:21:40.981
<v Speaker 2>Gilliad story was that he pointed out this was the

0:21:41.101 --> 0:21:43.622
<v Speaker 2>very beginning of the wellness movement. He said that when

0:21:43.621 --> 0:21:46.902
<v Speaker 2>he started reporting on that he had never written anything

0:21:46.901 --> 0:21:48.142
<v Speaker 2>about wellness before.

0:21:48.262 --> 0:21:51.101
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine, Yeah, well, a man working at a

0:21:51.101 --> 0:21:54.861
<v Speaker 1>broadsheet and mainstream media, right, so at the time.

0:21:54.782 --> 0:21:57.182
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was have a different era, but.

0:21:57.182 --> 0:22:00.182
<v Speaker 1>No one was really willing to call it out at

0:22:00.182 --> 0:22:02.542
<v Speaker 1>the time because, especially when someone came out and said

0:22:02.542 --> 0:22:06.142
<v Speaker 1>they had cancer, you can't ask for someone's medical records.

0:22:06.222 --> 0:22:09.821
<v Speaker 1>It didn't occur to people that lies were being told

0:22:09.982 --> 0:22:12.821
<v Speaker 1>or that they were going to necessarily have tragic ends.

0:22:12.901 --> 0:22:15.822
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was just sort of watching this slow moving car accident.

0:22:15.982 --> 0:22:18.901
<v Speaker 2>It got me thinking more broadly about the trajectory of

0:22:18.942 --> 0:22:21.341
<v Speaker 2>the wellness movement, because if you assume it sort of

0:22:21.422 --> 0:22:25.102
<v Speaker 2>started around twenty ten, let's say, and then it kind

0:22:25.141 --> 0:22:28.902
<v Speaker 2>of reached its climax, if you will, during the pandemic

0:22:29.581 --> 0:22:33.901
<v Speaker 2>when we had this actual public health emergency, and suddenly

0:22:33.982 --> 0:22:37.782
<v Speaker 2>thinking about our fourteen stepskin care routines and the optimal

0:22:37.821 --> 0:22:40.542
<v Speaker 2>way to tone our abs might have seemed irrelevant. But

0:22:40.702 --> 0:22:44.102
<v Speaker 2>if anything, I think it caused more people to embrace

0:22:44.141 --> 0:22:46.262
<v Speaker 2>the idea that their body was the only thing they

0:22:46.302 --> 0:22:48.901
<v Speaker 2>could control in this completely out of control moment.

0:22:48.982 --> 0:22:51.221
<v Speaker 1>Well, that was Pete Evans' time, right when he was

0:22:51.262 --> 0:22:54.581
<v Speaker 1>selling those health lamps and the bone broth, and when

0:22:54.581 --> 0:22:56.302
<v Speaker 1>he sort of imploded. Do you think a lot of

0:22:56.861 --> 0:23:01.861
<v Speaker 1>people who were perhaps interested in alternate medicine became radicalized

0:23:01.942 --> 0:23:03.022
<v Speaker 1>during COVID Yeah.

0:23:03.061 --> 0:23:05.421
<v Speaker 2>I think that what happened was that when the world

0:23:05.462 --> 0:23:08.622
<v Speaker 2>became more out of control, people realized, well, I can

0:23:08.702 --> 0:23:11.581
<v Speaker 2>make sure I e five servings of fruit and vegetables

0:23:11.621 --> 0:23:14.222
<v Speaker 2>every day, and I can make sure that I get

0:23:14.222 --> 0:23:17.182
<v Speaker 2>my body into optimal shape. And that idea of optimization,

0:23:17.302 --> 0:23:19.622
<v Speaker 2>which came to us via Silicon Valley but then sort

0:23:19.621 --> 0:23:22.381
<v Speaker 2>of trickled down into the wellness industry, I think was

0:23:22.422 --> 0:23:24.462
<v Speaker 2>a big part of that. That idea of making sure

0:23:24.502 --> 0:23:27.302
<v Speaker 2>that every part of your life serves a purpose and

0:23:27.341 --> 0:23:29.662
<v Speaker 2>your body is running like a well oiled machine.

0:23:29.702 --> 0:23:31.742
<v Speaker 1>So it almost seems like an absurd question to ask

0:23:31.782 --> 0:23:35.262
<v Speaker 1>you when over the weekend the new health secretary in

0:23:35.302 --> 0:23:39.661
<v Speaker 1>America was sworn in and it's rfk Jr.

0:23:39.942 --> 0:23:40.742
<v Speaker 5>Yes, So, Robert F.

0:23:40.821 --> 0:23:43.502
<v Speaker 2>Kennedy Jr. Is now Donald Trump's new Health and Human

0:23:43.542 --> 0:23:47.381
<v Speaker 2>Services Secretary. It's interesting because in his confirmation hearings, he

0:23:47.462 --> 0:23:49.621
<v Speaker 2>was asked a lot of questions about whether he believes

0:23:49.661 --> 0:23:52.822
<v Speaker 2>in vaccines, and he kept saying that, yeah, he's actually

0:23:52.861 --> 0:23:55.101
<v Speaker 2>fine with them. The way that he would make an

0:23:55.101 --> 0:23:57.302
<v Speaker 2>official distinction is that he thinks that people should make

0:23:57.341 --> 0:24:00.622
<v Speaker 2>their own choices about vaccines. Now, of course that kind

0:24:00.661 --> 0:24:03.861
<v Speaker 2>of undercuts the whole purpose of vaccines, which has herd immunity.

0:24:03.901 --> 0:24:06.662
<v Speaker 2>But Caroline Kennedy, his cousin, came out with a video

0:24:06.942 --> 0:24:10.022
<v Speaker 2>before his hearing where she said he vaccinates his kids.

0:24:10.422 --> 0:24:12.022
<v Speaker 5>It's just that he's decided that.

0:24:12.061 --> 0:24:15.421
<v Speaker 2>It's financially lucrative for him to profit off these families

0:24:15.462 --> 0:24:18.622
<v Speaker 2>with sick children and basically scare manger about the health

0:24:18.621 --> 0:24:22.661
<v Speaker 2>effects of vaccines. Broadly speaking, I think that his appointment

0:24:22.742 --> 0:24:25.942
<v Speaker 2>really shows that the Make America Healthy Again movement has

0:24:26.182 --> 0:24:30.621
<v Speaker 2>fully taken flight. Are you familiar with this basically like Maha, Yeah, MAHA.

0:24:30.661 --> 0:24:35.222
<v Speaker 2>So basically, it really emphasizes integrative and holistic medicine, reducing

0:24:35.302 --> 0:24:38.742
<v Speaker 2>environmental pollution, eating healthy. Look, all of this sounds great, obviously,

0:24:38.782 --> 0:24:41.302
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone at this table would disagree that

0:24:41.341 --> 0:24:43.262
<v Speaker 2>those are worthy goals. But I think there is a

0:24:43.341 --> 0:24:46.261
<v Speaker 2>darker side to it, which says, your health is solely

0:24:46.302 --> 0:24:49.181
<v Speaker 2>your responsibility. The government needs to get out of helping

0:24:49.222 --> 0:24:51.501
<v Speaker 2>you live a healthy life, and if you get an

0:24:51.502 --> 0:24:54.222
<v Speaker 2>illness or a disease, it's kind of on you. And

0:24:54.381 --> 0:24:56.941
<v Speaker 2>one example of that is that at his hearing he

0:24:57.101 --> 0:25:00.221
<v Speaker 2>said that we should study the origins of chronic illness

0:25:00.262 --> 0:25:04.141
<v Speaker 2>over researching infectious diseases. Now, I think that most people,

0:25:04.302 --> 0:25:06.782
<v Speaker 2>certainly most scientists, would probably say we should do both.

0:25:07.182 --> 0:25:10.382
<v Speaker 2>Let's figure out how to fix obesity and make sure

0:25:10.422 --> 0:25:12.462
<v Speaker 2>that we prevent the next airborne pandemic.

0:25:12.861 --> 0:25:15.341
<v Speaker 3>What Apple Side of Vinegar did so well that I

0:25:15.381 --> 0:25:19.142
<v Speaker 3>think actually plays perfectly into this MAHA moment is that

0:25:19.462 --> 0:25:23.662
<v Speaker 3>the wellness movement and the MAHA movement both have a point,

0:25:23.982 --> 0:25:27.742
<v Speaker 3>like they have a real point. And Jess's family coming

0:25:27.742 --> 0:25:30.542
<v Speaker 3>out and saying don't put her alongside Bell Gibson. I

0:25:30.542 --> 0:25:32.981
<v Speaker 3>think that's fair because Jess really had cancer, and that's

0:25:33.022 --> 0:25:35.101
<v Speaker 3>what they're trying to say too, And that is a

0:25:35.141 --> 0:25:38.381
<v Speaker 3>totally different thing the wellness movement. People who talk about

0:25:38.581 --> 0:25:42.621
<v Speaker 3>holistic or alternative remedies aren't lying about their health conditions.

0:25:42.661 --> 0:25:43.422
<v Speaker 3>That's like a.

0:25:43.381 --> 0:25:45.421
<v Speaker 1>Separate thing, but it was some of them are.

0:25:45.901 --> 0:25:49.582
<v Speaker 3>It's a total anomaly like that someone would lie about it.

0:25:49.982 --> 0:25:51.702
<v Speaker 3>I think the question of whether or not it would

0:25:51.702 --> 0:25:53.982
<v Speaker 3>happen today is an interesting one because I keep seeing

0:25:54.022 --> 0:25:57.501
<v Speaker 3>a lot of commentary and criticism about the role that

0:25:57.502 --> 0:25:58.421
<v Speaker 3>the media played in this.

0:25:58.861 --> 0:26:01.222
<v Speaker 1>But hang on, don't we have these We just had

0:26:01.422 --> 0:26:05.742
<v Speaker 1>an Australian influencer parenting influencer arrested a couple of weeks

0:26:05.782 --> 0:26:10.662
<v Speaker 1>ago for faking an illness allegedly allegedly in her child

0:26:11.341 --> 0:26:13.701
<v Speaker 1>and actually allegedly harming her child.

0:26:13.942 --> 0:26:16.421
<v Speaker 3>So in that way, the onus, I think has to

0:26:16.462 --> 0:26:19.861
<v Speaker 3>be on the media in terms of what they platform

0:26:19.861 --> 0:26:22.141
<v Speaker 3>and doing their due diligence. If you've got someone on

0:26:22.182 --> 0:26:25.061
<v Speaker 3>your morning TV show saying that each how do you do.

0:26:25.061 --> 0:26:27.542
<v Speaker 5>That, Jesse? Do you ask them for their medical record? Well,

0:26:27.581 --> 0:26:28.222
<v Speaker 5>this is what I mean.

0:26:28.341 --> 0:26:31.381
<v Speaker 3>If they're sitting there saying you should do a coffee enema,

0:26:31.502 --> 0:26:34.022
<v Speaker 3>it'll cure your cancer, whether or not they have cancer.

0:26:34.061 --> 0:26:36.302
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you should platform them because every scientist

0:26:36.381 --> 0:26:39.621
<v Speaker 3>in the country will tell you that's not true. But

0:26:40.341 --> 0:26:43.061
<v Speaker 3>we cannot. And this is something I don't know it

0:26:43.061 --> 0:26:47.062
<v Speaker 3>comes up in the show, but there is patient doctor confidentiality.

0:26:47.101 --> 0:26:49.862
<v Speaker 3>We cannot access people's health records. If someone comes out

0:26:49.861 --> 0:26:51.941
<v Speaker 3>and says, if Bell Gibson emerges now and says she

0:26:51.982 --> 0:26:55.141
<v Speaker 3>has cancer, we can't prove or disprove that what n

0:26:55.742 --> 0:26:59.141
<v Speaker 3>did this whole case was actually following the money. And

0:26:59.621 --> 0:27:01.422
<v Speaker 3>one of the things I was most surprised to learn

0:27:01.502 --> 0:27:04.181
<v Speaker 3>was about the five year old boy who in real

0:27:04.222 --> 0:27:07.581
<v Speaker 3>life she pledged to give him an enormous amount of

0:27:07.581 --> 0:27:10.222
<v Speaker 3>money for surgery. And that was true, and that was true,

0:27:10.222 --> 0:27:12.341
<v Speaker 3>and she never gave it to him, and he died.

0:27:12.702 --> 0:27:17.101
<v Speaker 1>What Jess's father and former fiance have objected to, again

0:27:17.302 --> 0:27:21.222
<v Speaker 1>is not so much the portrayal of her medical story,

0:27:21.702 --> 0:27:25.061
<v Speaker 1>but it's the idea that she was somehow parallel to

0:27:25.141 --> 0:27:28.181
<v Speaker 1>Bell Gibson, that she cared about Bell Gibson, that she

0:27:28.341 --> 0:27:30.741
<v Speaker 1>wanted to enact revenge on Bell Gibson. At the end

0:27:30.742 --> 0:27:33.181
<v Speaker 1>of her life. None of that happened, and I have

0:27:33.262 --> 0:27:35.622
<v Speaker 1>to say, I wasn't aware of any of that sort

0:27:35.661 --> 0:27:36.582
<v Speaker 1>of connection, which.

0:27:36.422 --> 0:27:40.181
<v Speaker 3>Is why Mila was understood to be an amalgamation of

0:27:40.222 --> 0:27:43.141
<v Speaker 3>a few different people and wasn't given the real life

0:27:43.222 --> 0:27:45.022
<v Speaker 3>name of Jess. And so I think we've got to

0:27:45.061 --> 0:27:46.662
<v Speaker 3>be really careful in talking about it.

0:27:47.262 --> 0:27:49.542
<v Speaker 1>Belle wanted to be like Jess, like that part is

0:27:49.581 --> 0:27:51.902
<v Speaker 1>true clearly because Jess was much more famous.

0:27:52.182 --> 0:27:54.302
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but we have to be careful to not say

0:27:54.302 --> 0:27:56.821
<v Speaker 3>that Mila is Jess because she's not.

0:27:57.141 --> 0:27:59.821
<v Speaker 1>Belle did turn up at Jess's funeral, though, that's true.

0:27:59.982 --> 0:28:02.861
<v Speaker 2>Just back on that question of whether it can happen again, though, Jesse,

0:28:02.982 --> 0:28:05.181
<v Speaker 2>I think you made a really interesting point, which is

0:28:05.222 --> 0:28:10.182
<v Speaker 2>that people are feeling tired, exhausted, run down, stressed, anxious,

0:28:10.262 --> 0:28:15.022
<v Speaker 2>can't sleep. That's been happening ever since we got smartphones, basically, yeah,

0:28:15.061 --> 0:28:16.742
<v Speaker 2>and we're searching for solutions.

0:28:16.782 --> 0:28:22.702
<v Speaker 3>And the conspiracy that institutions, that governments, that pharmaceutical companies,

0:28:23.222 --> 0:28:26.462
<v Speaker 3>you know what we eat, is making us sick. It's

0:28:26.542 --> 0:28:31.581
<v Speaker 3>not totally a conspiracy, the pharmaceutical industry in the US especially,

0:28:31.621 --> 0:28:35.222
<v Speaker 3>it's a for profit medical system. I watched a movie

0:28:35.262 --> 0:28:39.222
<v Speaker 3>recently called Dark Waters with Mark Ruffalo about a company

0:28:39.382 --> 0:28:41.741
<v Speaker 3>that put toxic chemicals in its water supply, and this

0:28:41.862 --> 0:28:45.862
<v Speaker 3>whole town people were getting cancers and autoimmune diseases. The

0:28:45.902 --> 0:28:50.022
<v Speaker 3>erosion of trust in institutions is real and justified.

0:28:50.462 --> 0:28:54.662
<v Speaker 1>In Australia, they've been finding certain chemicals in dams. Back

0:28:54.702 --> 0:28:57.102
<v Speaker 1>to the point of could it happen today? And when

0:28:57.142 --> 0:28:59.461
<v Speaker 1>you said about the mainstream media needs to be careful

0:28:59.462 --> 0:29:02.822
<v Speaker 1>who they platform, are you kidding? It's not about the

0:29:02.862 --> 0:29:05.622
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media. Who cares in twenty twenty five, who's on

0:29:05.661 --> 0:29:09.302
<v Speaker 1>the Today Show or on sixty minutes. It's about TikTok

0:29:09.582 --> 0:29:13.582
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram, and there is an algorithm deciding who gets

0:29:13.622 --> 0:29:16.421
<v Speaker 1>platformed and who goes viral on those.

0:29:16.582 --> 0:29:19.181
<v Speaker 2>And now, by the way, those platforms are taking away

0:29:19.222 --> 0:29:21.822
<v Speaker 2>fact checking and are taking away a lot of the

0:29:21.942 --> 0:29:25.261
<v Speaker 2>layers of authority that they put in place during the

0:29:25.262 --> 0:29:27.382
<v Speaker 2>pandemic to make sure there wasn't misinformation.

0:29:27.822 --> 0:29:32.261
<v Speaker 1>But to their credit, those platforms also have amateus looths.

0:29:32.982 --> 0:29:35.502
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that everything that happened in the

0:29:35.661 --> 0:29:38.102
<v Speaker 1>portrayal of the other thing that the reporter from The

0:29:38.102 --> 0:29:41.022
<v Speaker 1>Australian said is that his wife actually had breast cancer

0:29:41.062 --> 0:29:44.342
<v Speaker 1>and he really resented that being grafted onto the story

0:29:44.342 --> 0:29:46.702
<v Speaker 1>of the two guys from the age who do exist

0:29:46.782 --> 0:29:50.142
<v Speaker 1>as well, but again they were all fictionalized. I think

0:29:50.142 --> 0:29:52.462
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok would do this lou thing, so it's kind

0:29:52.502 --> 0:29:55.862
<v Speaker 1>of like it couldn't happen again, but it already is.

0:29:56.022 --> 0:29:59.022
<v Speaker 2>We're all hungry for the magic bullet, for the solution

0:29:59.222 --> 0:30:02.622
<v Speaker 2>to our general feelings of malise and exhaustion, and I

0:30:02.622 --> 0:30:04.822
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to keep looking for that as long

0:30:04.862 --> 0:30:08.182
<v Speaker 2>as these big institutions are declining in front of our

0:30:08.302 --> 0:30:11.462
<v Speaker 2>very eyes. Are you always thinking about your next meal

0:30:11.542 --> 0:30:13.902
<v Speaker 2>or snack? I am. I think that everyone in the

0:30:13.902 --> 0:30:16.622
<v Speaker 2>world can be divided into two categories. People who are

0:30:16.661 --> 0:30:18.542
<v Speaker 2>thinking about what they're going to eat next, and people

0:30:18.582 --> 0:30:20.421
<v Speaker 2>who think that there should be a pill for food

0:30:20.422 --> 0:30:21.142
<v Speaker 2>and you never have to do.

0:30:21.302 --> 0:30:21.701
<v Speaker 1>That's it.

0:30:21.782 --> 0:30:22.582
<v Speaker 3>I'm in that category.

0:30:22.661 --> 0:30:23.582
<v Speaker 5>What do you mean there is?

0:30:23.622 --> 0:30:25.102
<v Speaker 1>It's called weight loss drugs.

0:30:25.142 --> 0:30:27.941
<v Speaker 3>No, as in like I wish that I could just

0:30:27.982 --> 0:30:29.701
<v Speaker 3>have a cup of sludge a day, but had on

0:30:29.702 --> 0:30:30.382
<v Speaker 3>my nutrients.

0:30:30.422 --> 0:30:32.782
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I fall somewhere in the middle.

0:30:33.022 --> 0:30:34.742
<v Speaker 2>I'm one of those people who looks at the menu

0:30:34.782 --> 0:30:37.181
<v Speaker 2>of a restaurant before I go to decide exactly what

0:30:37.302 --> 0:30:37.982
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to order.

0:30:37.982 --> 0:30:39.782
<v Speaker 3>See, I'm the one who sits there and goes you order.

0:30:39.782 --> 0:30:41.261
<v Speaker 5>I'll just pick anyway.

0:30:41.262 --> 0:30:43.742
<v Speaker 2>There's a word for people like me, and this Japanese

0:30:43.782 --> 0:30:47.902
<v Speaker 2>word is kushi sabishi, which translates to lonely mouth. I

0:30:47.982 --> 0:30:50.542
<v Speaker 2>learned this from Pandora Sex newsletter, and it refers to

0:30:50.582 --> 0:30:53.062
<v Speaker 2>when you want to eat something, not because you are

0:30:53.142 --> 0:30:56.342
<v Speaker 2>hungry or because you require nutritional value, but because your

0:30:56.342 --> 0:30:58.622
<v Speaker 2>mouth needs company. And I love this, Oh.

0:30:58.502 --> 0:31:00.902
<v Speaker 1>I love this. So it's different to eating your feelings.

0:31:01.182 --> 0:31:03.582
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's just because your mouth needs company. And this

0:31:03.702 --> 0:31:09.382
<v Speaker 2>explains okers smokers, Maybe it'd explains smokers. It's an oral fixation. Actually,

0:31:09.422 --> 0:31:11.302
<v Speaker 2>I once had a yoga teacher who said that part

0:31:11.302 --> 0:31:14.142
<v Speaker 2>of the reason why people get addicted to smoking is

0:31:14.142 --> 0:31:16.462
<v Speaker 2>because you're doing yoga breathing and it relaxes you.

0:31:16.622 --> 0:31:19.662
<v Speaker 5>It's so true, we should put a health warning on that.

0:31:20.982 --> 0:31:23.462
<v Speaker 2>A much healthier habit is buying your pretzels in bulks

0:31:23.502 --> 0:31:25.542
<v Speaker 2>from cost Co, which is what I do. Because I

0:31:25.622 --> 0:31:27.822
<v Speaker 2>have lonely mouth. I always need to have a party

0:31:27.822 --> 0:31:29.501
<v Speaker 2>in my mouth. And now I have a word to describe.

0:31:29.542 --> 0:31:30.902
<v Speaker 3>Did you gun No?

0:31:31.062 --> 0:31:33.582
<v Speaker 5>Because I don't like it. Don't doesn't do a bit

0:31:33.582 --> 0:31:34.941
<v Speaker 5>of crunch, a little bit of salt.

0:31:35.182 --> 0:31:37.622
<v Speaker 2>I'm quite particular about my mouth. Do you have a

0:31:37.661 --> 0:31:39.302
<v Speaker 2>favorite snack for your lonely mouth?

0:31:39.422 --> 0:31:43.302
<v Speaker 1>Okay, T T yeah, yeah, my mouth is lonely without

0:31:43.342 --> 0:31:44.221
<v Speaker 1>tea as.

0:31:44.062 --> 0:31:46.981
<v Speaker 3>Someone nothing likes my brain up. I don't really get

0:31:46.982 --> 0:31:52.142
<v Speaker 3>excited about things, but I have begun with the Easter eggs.

0:31:52.822 --> 0:31:54.582
<v Speaker 3>I know it's only February.

0:31:54.382 --> 0:31:56.622
<v Speaker 1>Cross bunds, but it's a particular type of taste of

0:31:56.862 --> 0:31:57.582
<v Speaker 1>East eggs.

0:31:57.342 --> 0:32:00.262
<v Speaker 3>Which there's just the little Cadbury, nothing inside, nothing fancy,

0:32:00.382 --> 0:32:02.542
<v Speaker 3>and you chuck it in the mouth and then you

0:32:02.661 --> 0:32:04.941
<v Speaker 3>just suck it. And I have them every single night,

0:32:05.302 --> 0:32:08.662
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm just well, I've been overdoing it and I've

0:32:08.661 --> 0:32:11.022
<v Speaker 3>been feeling a bit seack. So I'm trying to cut

0:32:11.062 --> 0:32:15.302
<v Speaker 3>down to say five, what would r would? He would

0:32:15.342 --> 0:32:17.542
<v Speaker 3>say anything that happens for you as your own fault,

0:32:17.582 --> 0:32:18.462
<v Speaker 3>and he'd probably be right.

0:32:19.022 --> 0:32:21.902
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next, a generational argument that we have been

0:32:21.942 --> 0:32:24.622
<v Speaker 1>waiting to have all day. Maybe all our lives.

0:32:25.062 --> 0:32:29.062
<v Speaker 3>Want unlimited out loud access. We drop episodes every Tuesday

0:32:29.062 --> 0:32:33.302
<v Speaker 3>and Thursday exclusively from Mum and Maya. Subscribers follow the

0:32:33.342 --> 0:32:35.182
<v Speaker 3>link in the show notes to get us in your

0:32:35.222 --> 0:32:38.062
<v Speaker 3>ears five days a week and a huge thank you

0:32:38.222 --> 0:32:39.702
<v Speaker 3>to all our current subscribers.

0:32:45.622 --> 0:32:50.021
<v Speaker 2>Are generations Real? An ABC podcast called Future Tense has

0:32:50.062 --> 0:32:52.502
<v Speaker 2>come up with a pretty provocative theory on this in

0:32:52.542 --> 0:32:56.302
<v Speaker 2>an episode called The Danger of Generational Labeling. The podcast

0:32:56.342 --> 0:32:59.582
<v Speaker 2>brings in demographers who argue that the naming of generations

0:32:59.742 --> 0:33:02.181
<v Speaker 2>is pseudoscience. Says it's no better than astrology.

0:33:02.262 --> 0:33:04.502
<v Speaker 1>But it's a hang on. Isn't it based on literally

0:33:04.542 --> 0:33:05.342
<v Speaker 1>when you were born?

0:33:05.622 --> 0:33:09.701
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but there's always christ Us true.

0:33:09.862 --> 0:33:13.102
<v Speaker 2>So baby boomers apparently they're allowed to still be a generation.

0:33:13.302 --> 0:33:14.142
<v Speaker 5>They can breathe easy.

0:33:14.222 --> 0:33:17.422
<v Speaker 2>They are based on what the experts call a demographic reality.

0:33:17.822 --> 0:33:22.782
<v Speaker 2>But then you move on to these more pseudoscience cultural generations.

0:33:23.022 --> 0:33:25.902
<v Speaker 2>Generation X, Sorry, Mia, that's not based on an economic

0:33:25.942 --> 0:33:27.181
<v Speaker 2>or demographic reality.

0:33:27.182 --> 0:33:28.102
<v Speaker 1>In my head, it's all.

0:33:28.022 --> 0:33:28.502
<v Speaker 5>In your head.

0:33:28.862 --> 0:33:31.421
<v Speaker 2>Millennials, Jesse and I. It's just a reference to a

0:33:31.462 --> 0:33:34.421
<v Speaker 2>point in time. It doesn't mean anything. Gen Z was

0:33:34.462 --> 0:33:36.822
<v Speaker 2>still arguing on when that group begins and ends, and

0:33:36.862 --> 0:33:39.542
<v Speaker 2>apparently Jen Alpha, no one even knows if that's a

0:33:39.582 --> 0:33:42.302
<v Speaker 2>real thing. And also the name is very unimaginative because

0:33:42.302 --> 0:33:43.662
<v Speaker 2>we're starting at the side of the alphabet.

0:33:43.982 --> 0:33:47.981
<v Speaker 1>Is this because baby boomers were actually a reference to

0:33:48.222 --> 0:33:51.102
<v Speaker 1>a change in population. Right, So there's a certain number

0:33:51.102 --> 0:33:53.062
<v Speaker 1>of babies born every year, but there was a big

0:33:53.102 --> 0:33:56.702
<v Speaker 1>spike after the war, hence the name of the baby boomers.

0:33:56.862 --> 0:34:00.422
<v Speaker 1>What generations have come to me now is like how

0:34:00.422 --> 0:34:03.342
<v Speaker 1>they've been influenced by the culture. Is that what generations are?

0:34:03.742 --> 0:34:07.262
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And so there's all these problems with labeling people

0:34:07.382 --> 0:34:11.221
<v Speaker 2>like that they suppress individuality, they're very static. So like

0:34:11.382 --> 0:34:14.422
<v Speaker 2>a millennial when a millennial was fifteen is probably quite

0:34:14.422 --> 0:34:16.862
<v Speaker 2>different to what a millennial is like now. For instance,

0:34:16.902 --> 0:34:19.782
<v Speaker 2>I now like watching nature documentaries and talking about real estate.

0:34:19.862 --> 0:34:22.382
<v Speaker 2>But when I was fifteen, I was still a millennial.

0:34:22.422 --> 0:34:23.982
<v Speaker 2>I did not enjoy either of those things.

0:34:24.062 --> 0:34:26.582
<v Speaker 1>But isn't that just then what a millennial like? Now

0:34:26.622 --> 0:34:30.062
<v Speaker 1>millennials are all having children, So that's just what millennials

0:34:30.062 --> 0:34:31.781
<v Speaker 1>are doing.

0:34:31.022 --> 0:34:34.342
<v Speaker 3>About a difference between us age rather than generation.

0:34:34.862 --> 0:34:36.502
<v Speaker 5>Yes, So in fact it's brilliant.

0:34:36.542 --> 0:34:40.862
<v Speaker 3>Millennials were seen as this kind of cynical work, obsessed,

0:34:40.942 --> 0:34:43.102
<v Speaker 3>were obsessed generation.

0:34:42.982 --> 0:34:46.741
<v Speaker 2>And halfaway and the devils products exactually a tootemic millennial.

0:34:46.982 --> 0:34:49.022
<v Speaker 5>You're not a writer in reality by ites as yours

0:34:49.342 --> 0:34:49.542
<v Speaker 5>like we.

0:34:49.622 --> 0:34:54.221
<v Speaker 3>Were given this specific personality, and then we grew up

0:34:54.582 --> 0:34:57.062
<v Speaker 3>and faced the housing market, or whether or not we

0:34:57.142 --> 0:34:58.701
<v Speaker 3>were going to have children, all of these things that

0:34:58.862 --> 0:35:03.741
<v Speaker 3>people do in a lifespan, and we responded to those variables.

0:35:03.822 --> 0:35:06.221
<v Speaker 1>But it's different because the generation behind you, which is

0:35:06.302 --> 0:35:09.342
<v Speaker 1>Gen Z, aren't the same as you. They're not obsessed

0:35:09.342 --> 0:35:12.341
<v Speaker 1>with work, they're not the differences between I think that's

0:35:12.462 --> 0:35:14.222
<v Speaker 1>changing too at the same age.

0:35:14.542 --> 0:35:17.862
<v Speaker 2>So back in twenty seventeen, I wrote a big article

0:35:17.942 --> 0:35:21.102
<v Speaker 2>about Gen Z as the most socially progressive generation ever,

0:35:21.221 --> 0:35:23.382
<v Speaker 2>and that was grounded in some social science research that

0:35:23.502 --> 0:35:25.901
<v Speaker 2>was emerging at the time. For instance, they were much

0:35:25.942 --> 0:35:28.582
<v Speaker 2>more accepting of the idea of gender fluidity. They were

0:35:28.661 --> 0:35:31.982
<v Speaker 2>much more into racial justice. They were called sometimes the

0:35:32.022 --> 0:35:34.462
<v Speaker 2>Harry Potter generation, meaning that they wanted to go out

0:35:34.502 --> 0:35:36.942
<v Speaker 2>and avenge the wrongs of the world. But look in

0:35:37.022 --> 0:35:40.381
<v Speaker 2>the recent US election, almost half of young people voted

0:35:40.422 --> 0:35:42.422
<v Speaker 2>for Donald Trump, and that was much higher than it's

0:35:42.462 --> 0:35:45.701
<v Speaker 2>been in previous generations or in previous elections. So the

0:35:45.781 --> 0:35:48.342
<v Speaker 2>idea that we assume that young people are always progressive,

0:35:48.701 --> 0:35:51.342
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's just that young people are always progressive, and

0:35:51.382 --> 0:35:54.301
<v Speaker 2>then as they get older and they face adversity in

0:35:54.382 --> 0:35:55.461
<v Speaker 2>different problems in life.

0:35:55.622 --> 0:35:59.542
<v Speaker 1>They're not progressive because gen z big maga people. Yes,

0:35:59.622 --> 0:36:00.781
<v Speaker 1>I'm being general, but.

0:36:01.342 --> 0:36:03.062
<v Speaker 3>They've grown up a little bit, is the point. And

0:36:03.582 --> 0:36:06.182
<v Speaker 3>what people are saying is that there's datists to suggest

0:36:06.221 --> 0:36:08.022
<v Speaker 3>that as you grow up, you become more risk averse.

0:36:08.342 --> 0:36:11.102
<v Speaker 3>So the idea that you become more conservative as you

0:36:11.181 --> 0:36:13.942
<v Speaker 3>grow older, rather than it being we can look at

0:36:13.982 --> 0:36:16.261
<v Speaker 3>this generation and go, they're going to vote this way.

0:36:16.661 --> 0:36:18.942
<v Speaker 3>How they vote actually can change throughout a lifestyle.

0:36:18.982 --> 0:36:21.181
<v Speaker 1>So then why was the cover story of New York

0:36:21.261 --> 0:36:25.542
<v Speaker 1>magazine all these young, hip gen z maga people.

0:36:25.902 --> 0:36:27.781
<v Speaker 3>Well, the point is, and I think this is what

0:36:27.862 --> 0:36:31.582
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to make that media and marketing has become

0:36:31.661 --> 0:36:35.142
<v Speaker 3>obsessed with generations. Before they even look at the data,

0:36:35.181 --> 0:36:37.502
<v Speaker 3>they've decided what they're going to see, and they're kind

0:36:37.542 --> 0:36:42.502
<v Speaker 3>of projecting these stories onto people that aren't true. So,

0:36:43.382 --> 0:36:47.301
<v Speaker 3>for example, a lot of generations and millennials, gen Z

0:36:47.942 --> 0:36:51.102
<v Speaker 3>is about cultural shifts that happened in the US. Now

0:36:51.221 --> 0:36:53.582
<v Speaker 3>South Korea is using the idea of gen Z. Nothing

0:36:53.582 --> 0:36:57.901
<v Speaker 3>happened in South Korea that was particularly fundamental, So that's

0:36:57.942 --> 0:37:01.662
<v Speaker 3>one problem with it. The second is that it doesn't

0:37:01.781 --> 0:37:05.062
<v Speaker 3>look at variables like class. And that's the big thing

0:37:05.142 --> 0:37:07.062
<v Speaker 3>that we never seem to talk about, is that a

0:37:07.142 --> 0:37:10.821
<v Speaker 3>white middle class millennial is not the same as a

0:37:11.542 --> 0:37:14.622
<v Speaker 3>migrant who lives in a totally different suburb. They don't

0:37:14.701 --> 0:37:16.862
<v Speaker 3>vote the same, they didn't have the same set of

0:37:16.942 --> 0:37:18.461
<v Speaker 3>life experiences to that point.

0:37:18.661 --> 0:37:21.102
<v Speaker 2>Just last week, I can't believe I'm defending boomers, but

0:37:21.181 --> 0:37:23.342
<v Speaker 2>here we are. A report came out and it showed

0:37:23.382 --> 0:37:26.022
<v Speaker 2>that there's a bunch of renting retirees in Australia who

0:37:26.022 --> 0:37:27.982
<v Speaker 2>are living below the poverty line. The actual stat was

0:37:28.022 --> 0:37:30.542
<v Speaker 2>two thirds of renting retirees. You don't think of boomers

0:37:30.622 --> 0:37:33.622
<v Speaker 2>in our discourse, okay, boomer discourse. You don't think of

0:37:33.701 --> 0:37:35.982
<v Speaker 2>them as living below the poverty line, but a lot

0:37:36.022 --> 0:37:36.381
<v Speaker 2>of them are.

0:37:36.622 --> 0:37:41.142
<v Speaker 3>And it's causing a lot of unnecessary tension between generations

0:37:41.181 --> 0:37:44.301
<v Speaker 3>when we might have more things in common than we think,

0:37:44.422 --> 0:37:47.181
<v Speaker 3>and we get this stereotype. So before a gen Z

0:37:47.382 --> 0:37:49.622
<v Speaker 3>walks into the office, you might go, oh, here we go,

0:37:49.781 --> 0:37:52.022
<v Speaker 3>here's another one, and then they do or say something

0:37:52.142 --> 0:37:55.582
<v Speaker 3>and it just sort of reinforces what we already suspect.

0:37:55.741 --> 0:37:59.102
<v Speaker 1>I think it can be a helpful acknowledgment of the

0:37:59.382 --> 0:38:03.542
<v Speaker 1>cultural impact of certain things depending on how old you are.

0:38:03.622 --> 0:38:06.142
<v Speaker 1>That's what it is to me. So for example, I

0:38:06.221 --> 0:38:08.701
<v Speaker 1>looked at this thing about one point zero versus gen

0:38:08.822 --> 0:38:12.901
<v Speaker 1>Z two point zero and the differences with it. One

0:38:12.982 --> 0:38:16.701
<v Speaker 1>point zero graduated high school before COVID and two point

0:38:16.822 --> 0:38:19.221
<v Speaker 1>zero graduated high school after COVID.

0:38:19.302 --> 0:38:23.181
<v Speaker 3>So the demographers in this talking about generations said that

0:38:23.382 --> 0:38:26.341
<v Speaker 3>matters COVID is massive, exactly, And so.

0:38:26.701 --> 0:38:30.661
<v Speaker 1>To say gen Z, like, that's a big impact. And so,

0:38:30.822 --> 0:38:34.421
<v Speaker 1>for example, the relevant cultural events for gen Z who

0:38:34.741 --> 0:38:37.301
<v Speaker 1>graduated high school before COVID were like the Women's March

0:38:37.382 --> 0:38:39.941
<v Speaker 1>and the Climate Strikes Back March and Black Lives Matter

0:38:40.622 --> 0:38:42.701
<v Speaker 1>and all of those things were part of the zeitgeist.

0:38:42.741 --> 0:38:46.142
<v Speaker 1>But for the ones who graduated after COVID, it's more

0:38:46.181 --> 0:38:49.221
<v Speaker 1>about resistance to COVID and masking protocols and more of

0:38:49.302 --> 0:38:52.142
<v Speaker 1>a move towards MAGA and anti cancer.

0:38:52.181 --> 0:38:54.261
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's that's right me and I was

0:38:54.342 --> 0:38:57.262
<v Speaker 2>going back and forth on this topic myself. Another example

0:38:57.382 --> 0:39:00.741
<v Speaker 2>is jen Alpha. They're very young people under the age

0:39:00.781 --> 0:39:03.261
<v Speaker 2>of six or seven. Apparently a lot of them are

0:39:03.302 --> 0:39:07.102
<v Speaker 2>suffering from slow development in gross modor skills and that's

0:39:07.181 --> 0:39:09.462
<v Speaker 2>because when they were meant to be going to playground,

0:39:09.622 --> 0:39:10.701
<v Speaker 2>all the playgrounds were shut.

0:39:10.982 --> 0:39:14.102
<v Speaker 5>Now that's a clear cultural impact. So they were lives.

0:39:14.302 --> 0:39:17.982
<v Speaker 1>You have a whole generation who were in utero and

0:39:18.142 --> 0:39:20.862
<v Speaker 1>then at home. It's kind of like the COVID rescue dogs.

0:39:21.181 --> 0:39:24.382
<v Speaker 1>They're messed up. A generation of dogs that were adopted

0:39:24.542 --> 0:39:27.782
<v Speaker 1>or born during COVID are messed up because they missed

0:39:27.862 --> 0:39:30.422
<v Speaker 1>all of that socialization. So we now see the effects in.

0:39:30.822 --> 0:39:34.262
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, apparently young kids are having problems with toilet training

0:39:34.342 --> 0:39:38.262
<v Speaker 2>because that requires you to involve various gross motor actions

0:39:38.302 --> 0:39:40.821
<v Speaker 2>in your body. They grew up on screens a lot

0:39:40.902 --> 0:39:43.301
<v Speaker 2>more than other kids because their parents were trying to

0:39:43.382 --> 0:39:45.221
<v Speaker 2>work at the same time as the kids were stuck

0:39:45.261 --> 0:39:47.421
<v Speaker 2>at home. All of this meant that there's a sort

0:39:47.462 --> 0:39:51.062
<v Speaker 2>of population wide problem with gross motor skills.

0:39:51.181 --> 0:39:53.582
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, see that seems a lot more significant

0:39:53.741 --> 0:39:56.181
<v Speaker 3>to me than say, looking at millennials and they say

0:39:56.302 --> 0:39:59.342
<v Speaker 3>the GFC was really you've got early and late millennials.

0:39:59.822 --> 0:40:03.301
<v Speaker 3>When you graduated in proximity to the GFC matters a

0:40:03.342 --> 0:40:06.062
<v Speaker 3>lot in terms of what career choices you made. But

0:40:06.142 --> 0:40:08.182
<v Speaker 3>I would also say add class in there.

0:40:08.221 --> 0:40:10.582
<v Speaker 5>Like that's the way the on the GFC, there's a

0:40:10.622 --> 0:40:13.222
<v Speaker 5>thing about micro generations. Have you come across this concept?

0:40:13.302 --> 0:40:16.382
<v Speaker 2>So my husband graduated from university in two thousand and

0:40:16.462 --> 0:40:18.381
<v Speaker 2>eight and I graduated in two thousand and five.

0:40:18.502 --> 0:40:20.542
<v Speaker 3>See I graduated high school in two thousand and fo. Okay,

0:40:20.542 --> 0:40:21.902
<v Speaker 3>so it's a different yeah, you go.

0:40:22.302 --> 0:40:24.861
<v Speaker 2>So the thing is that between him and me, there's

0:40:24.902 --> 0:40:27.821
<v Speaker 2>three years, but there's a world of difference in terms

0:40:27.862 --> 0:40:30.502
<v Speaker 2>of I entered the workforce when everyone was feeling good.

0:40:30.982 --> 0:40:33.301
<v Speaker 2>First job had a caviar and oyster tower at the

0:40:33.382 --> 0:40:36.422
<v Speaker 2>Christmas Priorty. When he entered the workforce, he said, this

0:40:36.622 --> 0:40:38.142
<v Speaker 2>is not so good. I'm going to go and be

0:40:38.181 --> 0:40:40.502
<v Speaker 2>a professional mover for a few years because there's not

0:40:40.622 --> 0:40:41.741
<v Speaker 2>a lot of jobs available.

0:40:41.862 --> 0:40:45.982
<v Speaker 1>That's so interesting. So those big cultural moments do impact

0:40:46.542 --> 0:40:48.582
<v Speaker 1>on a generation, but I think they impact on a

0:40:48.661 --> 0:40:51.462
<v Speaker 1>generation differently depending on how old you are. So for example,

0:40:51.862 --> 0:40:52.342
<v Speaker 1>for Gen.

0:40:52.462 --> 0:40:54.702
<v Speaker 5>X, yeah, what are your generation?

0:40:54.982 --> 0:40:59.382
<v Speaker 1>Well, AIDS was a big thing and becoming sexually active

0:40:59.701 --> 0:41:02.982
<v Speaker 1>at a time when sex was being portrayed. You know,

0:41:03.062 --> 0:41:05.942
<v Speaker 1>the boomers had free love and by the time the

0:41:06.022 --> 0:41:09.422
<v Speaker 1>millennials came along and were having sex, HIV was not

0:41:09.622 --> 0:41:12.741
<v Speaker 1>seen as a death sentence anymore, and you know, it

0:41:12.862 --> 0:41:14.862
<v Speaker 1>was just a different time. But for us it was

0:41:14.982 --> 0:41:17.582
<v Speaker 1>like our COVID essentially connected to sex.

0:41:17.741 --> 0:41:20.461
<v Speaker 3>I also think that technology and the speed at which

0:41:20.502 --> 0:41:24.501
<v Speaker 3>technology is evolving, is churning out generations at a faster pace,

0:41:24.902 --> 0:41:27.301
<v Speaker 3>because I think there's such a distinction between when you

0:41:27.382 --> 0:41:29.381
<v Speaker 3>got your first phone, what apps you use.

0:41:29.582 --> 0:41:31.862
<v Speaker 2>My daughters sat down in front of the television yesterday

0:41:31.942 --> 0:41:34.342
<v Speaker 2>to pick something on Netflix, and she started, now, this

0:41:34.502 --> 0:41:37.942
<v Speaker 2>is a podcast, but she started scrolling my TV and

0:41:38.062 --> 0:41:40.142
<v Speaker 2>she just knew intuitively how to scroll, and I had

0:41:40.221 --> 0:41:42.382
<v Speaker 2>to explain, sorry, we don't have touchscreen TVs.

0:41:42.502 --> 0:41:43.741
<v Speaker 5>But how did she even learn that?

0:41:43.942 --> 0:41:46.062
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm having the same like lunar and a phone.

0:41:46.142 --> 0:41:48.221
<v Speaker 3>She never sees me pick up a ringing phone. So

0:41:48.302 --> 0:41:50.622
<v Speaker 3>I got a ring ring and she's like, what, that's

0:41:50.661 --> 0:41:52.781
<v Speaker 3>all we have time for today. A big thank you

0:41:52.942 --> 0:41:55.102
<v Speaker 3>to all of you the out louders for listening to

0:41:55.181 --> 0:41:57.862
<v Speaker 3>today's show and our fabulous team for putting it together.

0:41:58.302 --> 0:42:01.102
<v Speaker 3>We will be back in your ears tomorrow. Bye.

0:42:02.862 --> 0:42:05.982
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to any Mum and Maya subscribers listening if

0:42:06.062 --> 0:42:08.542
<v Speaker 1>you love the show and want to support us as well.

0:42:08.822 --> 0:42:11.301
<v Speaker 1>Subscribing to Mama Maya is the very best way to

0:42:11.422 --> 0:42:13.782
<v Speaker 1>do so. There is a link in the episode description