WEBVTT - Prince William Has Entered The Chat

0:00:08.234 --> 0:00:14.874
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a mom with mea podcast that's huge.

0:00:15.114 --> 0:00:16.314
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, but it's all me and Andy.

0:00:16.314 --> 0:00:17.553
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about what are you going to do to

0:00:17.634 --> 0:00:17.874
<v Speaker 1>keep it?

0:00:17.914 --> 0:00:19.154
<v Speaker 3>What have you got coming up and tell.

0:00:19.034 --> 0:00:21.834
<v Speaker 1>The people tell you we can't beat you at your game.

0:00:21.874 --> 0:00:24.114
<v Speaker 1>I'll just keep refreshing it till we get back there. Yeah,

0:00:24.554 --> 0:00:25.034
<v Speaker 1>well done.

0:00:25.114 --> 0:00:28.154
<v Speaker 2>Who was that Jesse was so referring to Hamish?

0:00:28.154 --> 0:00:31.714
<v Speaker 4>Blake has finally released a statement conceded.

0:00:31.474 --> 0:00:35.994
<v Speaker 5>Regarding our victory in the podcast Ranker where we did

0:00:36.193 --> 0:00:40.833
<v Speaker 5>beat Hamish Nandy. They are usually number one. We got

0:00:40.913 --> 0:00:44.153
<v Speaker 5>number one. It's of course completely irrelevant that they are

0:00:44.153 --> 0:00:44.833
<v Speaker 5>on holidays, but.

0:00:44.913 --> 0:00:46.473
<v Speaker 2>They haven't really been releasing them.

0:00:46.394 --> 0:00:48.434
<v Speaker 5>No, and that Hamish has probably been laying by a

0:00:48.473 --> 0:00:49.954
<v Speaker 5>pool with a cocktail.

0:00:50.114 --> 0:00:52.114
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what I heard when I heard that?

0:00:52.434 --> 0:00:53.714
<v Speaker 3>I heard a scared man.

0:00:53.874 --> 0:00:56.194
<v Speaker 5>I heard a scared man too. I mean it was

0:00:57.234 --> 0:01:00.194
<v Speaker 5>it was diplomatic. He'd clearly prepared that statement and really

0:01:00.234 --> 0:01:01.634
<v Speaker 5>thought about what he was going to say.

0:01:01.754 --> 0:01:04.194
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's clearly true that he and Andy spoke of

0:01:04.234 --> 0:01:04.714
<v Speaker 2>nothing else.

0:01:04.874 --> 0:01:08.234
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and it's clear that that certainly wasn't the.

0:01:08.154 --> 0:01:10.834
<v Speaker 4>First he'd heard of the fact we beat him in

0:01:10.834 --> 0:01:13.074
<v Speaker 4>the Red gun that maybe he's been a bit distracted.

0:01:13.634 --> 0:01:15.914
<v Speaker 4>I would say he is a dignified loser.

0:01:16.074 --> 0:01:19.874
<v Speaker 2>He's a dignified loser, and you're in our thoughts, Hamish.

0:01:19.474 --> 0:01:22.154
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, better luck next month. Actually, I don't even think

0:01:22.154 --> 0:01:25.034
<v Speaker 5>he's back next month. Better luck in July when you

0:01:25.114 --> 0:01:27.234
<v Speaker 5>decide to come back for five minutes and you smash her.

0:01:27.514 --> 0:01:31.234
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, out Loud as Welcome to Australia's number one podcast.

0:01:31.674 --> 0:01:35.074
<v Speaker 5>We keep saying that until Hamish is our annual needs

0:01:35.074 --> 0:01:35.874
<v Speaker 5>back to work.

0:01:36.114 --> 0:01:38.074
<v Speaker 2>This is Mama Mire out Loud and it's what women

0:01:38.114 --> 0:01:41.314
<v Speaker 2>are actually talking about. On Monday, the twenty third of February.

0:01:41.394 --> 0:01:43.953
<v Speaker 4>I'm Holly Wayne Wright, I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:01:43.514 --> 0:01:46.114
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Amelia Lester and here's.

0:01:45.914 --> 0:01:48.594
<v Speaker 2>What's on our agenda for today. So Prince William was

0:01:48.634 --> 0:01:51.234
<v Speaker 2>just at the bafter's right. Just happened just before we

0:01:51.274 --> 0:01:53.474
<v Speaker 2>got on air, and someone asked him if it's in

0:01:53.554 --> 0:01:58.634
<v Speaker 2>Hamnet and he gave a very understandable response to that.

0:01:58.914 --> 0:02:01.794
<v Speaker 2>That suggests he's had maybe other things on his mind.

0:02:01.834 --> 0:02:04.194
<v Speaker 4>He's not maybe in the mental yeah.

0:02:04.034 --> 0:02:06.954
<v Speaker 2>Like I think perhaps the fact that his uncle may

0:02:06.954 --> 0:02:08.874
<v Speaker 2>have just put him and his dad and everybody else

0:02:08.913 --> 0:02:11.353
<v Speaker 2>out of a job, so we will be discussing the

0:02:11.394 --> 0:02:14.594
<v Speaker 2>ongoing fallout from Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

0:02:14.994 --> 0:02:18.994
<v Speaker 5>Plus, we finally know what replaced the girl boss feminism

0:02:19.114 --> 0:02:22.754
<v Speaker 5>of the twenty tens. It is the burnout feminism of

0:02:22.754 --> 0:02:25.194
<v Speaker 5>the twenty twenties. But we want to know if that

0:02:25.234 --> 0:02:27.634
<v Speaker 5>trend is actually really any better.

0:02:28.354 --> 0:02:30.874
<v Speaker 3>And we all think we know what happened last week

0:02:30.914 --> 0:02:33.954
<v Speaker 3>when Channel nine's Danika Mason went to air drunk from

0:02:33.994 --> 0:02:35.074
<v Speaker 3>the Winter Olympics.

0:02:35.114 --> 0:02:37.754
<v Speaker 1>But the truth is a little bit more complicated.

0:02:38.714 --> 0:02:42.794
<v Speaker 2>But first, so as I say, Prince William, Princess Catherine,

0:02:42.794 --> 0:02:44.793
<v Speaker 2>they're at the Baftis. They used to always go to

0:02:44.834 --> 0:02:46.514
<v Speaker 2>the Baftis, but they haven't been for three years because

0:02:46.514 --> 0:02:49.794
<v Speaker 2>of Catherine's health. Right, so this is a triumphant return

0:02:49.874 --> 0:02:52.154
<v Speaker 2>to the red carpet, as the tablelats would say. She

0:02:52.234 --> 0:02:54.594
<v Speaker 2>was wearing this gorgeous Gucci frog that she's born before

0:02:54.994 --> 0:02:59.194
<v Speaker 2>I know she's recycling it, which is ace. But unlike

0:02:59.234 --> 0:03:01.314
<v Speaker 2>previous years, when they step out of the car and

0:03:01.354 --> 0:03:03.994
<v Speaker 2>onto the red carpet, they just get yelled at from

0:03:04.034 --> 0:03:07.274
<v Speaker 2>all these paps, going is the monarchy in peril? Well

0:03:07.314 --> 0:03:10.034
<v Speaker 2>you miss it all over William if you're don't about

0:03:10.074 --> 0:03:13.034
<v Speaker 2>to resign and he's like, oh fuck. And then one

0:03:13.034 --> 0:03:15.994
<v Speaker 2>of the journos asks him, have you seen Hamnet, which

0:03:16.074 --> 0:03:17.554
<v Speaker 2>is a fair question. They knew it was going to

0:03:17.594 --> 0:03:19.594
<v Speaker 2>win Big English movie, and he.

0:03:19.634 --> 0:03:21.514
<v Speaker 1>Said, A famously sad movie.

0:03:21.594 --> 0:03:23.954
<v Speaker 2>It's very sad emotional movie. I know lots of people

0:03:23.954 --> 0:03:26.994
<v Speaker 2>who share Prince William's sentiment on this. He said, I

0:03:27.074 --> 0:03:29.554
<v Speaker 2>need to be in quite a calm state. He said

0:03:29.634 --> 0:03:31.913
<v Speaker 2>to watch it with um and I am not at

0:03:31.914 --> 0:03:34.914
<v Speaker 2>the moment, so I will save it now. Fair lots

0:03:34.954 --> 0:03:36.994
<v Speaker 2>of people feel that way about Hamnet. Kate was there,

0:03:37.034 --> 0:03:39.874
<v Speaker 2>she was like, I've watched it, she said, cried. She

0:03:39.874 --> 0:03:41.714
<v Speaker 2>had cried, mine is out my eyes when all puffy.

0:03:41.714 --> 0:03:44.714
<v Speaker 2>I'm like me too, you too? Yeah? Anyway, why is

0:03:44.754 --> 0:03:47.234
<v Speaker 2>William not calm? William is not calm because, as you

0:03:47.234 --> 0:03:49.714
<v Speaker 2>would know if you listen to our special emergency episode

0:03:49.754 --> 0:03:53.674
<v Speaker 2>on Friday, his uncle, formerly known as Prince Andrew, was

0:03:53.794 --> 0:03:56.714
<v Speaker 2>arrested in the UK on Thursday, and the fallout for

0:03:56.794 --> 0:03:59.634
<v Speaker 2>that has now led us to a place where people

0:03:59.634 --> 0:04:02.434
<v Speaker 2>are saying, is this the end of the monarchy? Is

0:04:02.554 --> 0:04:04.914
<v Speaker 2>King Charles about to abdicate? Jesse? Have you heard all

0:04:04.914 --> 0:04:06.074
<v Speaker 2>this abdication chat.

0:04:06.394 --> 0:04:06.634
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:04:06.674 --> 0:04:09.554
<v Speaker 5>I listened to an emergency episode of Mummy out loud

0:04:09.594 --> 0:04:11.594
<v Speaker 5>on Friday. I had not seen anything. I had not

0:04:11.634 --> 0:04:15.554
<v Speaker 5>seen pictures, and then I listened to you explain it

0:04:15.594 --> 0:04:17.674
<v Speaker 5>all to me. And I must say that when I

0:04:17.714 --> 0:04:21.914
<v Speaker 5>saw William use the word calm, I thought it was

0:04:22.594 --> 0:04:26.234
<v Speaker 5>very revealing because the keep calm and carry on is

0:04:26.274 --> 0:04:29.394
<v Speaker 5>the royal mantra, and he was basically saying, I am

0:04:29.474 --> 0:04:34.193
<v Speaker 5>not calm right now. I am completely thrown by this.

0:04:34.553 --> 0:04:37.274
<v Speaker 5>I think that they've been very strategic in what they

0:04:37.313 --> 0:04:39.914
<v Speaker 5>have and haven't said, but I can't imagine the family

0:04:40.433 --> 0:04:40.794
<v Speaker 5>fall out.

0:04:41.393 --> 0:04:44.433
<v Speaker 3>If you look at Charles's statement that he released after

0:04:44.474 --> 0:04:48.393
<v Speaker 3>the arrest, it was a real departure from royal protocol,

0:04:48.433 --> 0:04:51.034
<v Speaker 3>which is normally all about W and R and the

0:04:51.113 --> 0:04:55.473
<v Speaker 3>royal WI. And his statement began, I have learned with

0:04:55.553 --> 0:05:00.153
<v Speaker 3>the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. That

0:05:00.234 --> 0:05:02.313
<v Speaker 3>is not how you rever to your brother. No, you

0:05:02.354 --> 0:05:04.914
<v Speaker 3>don't rever to your brother by aseful name. To me,

0:05:04.993 --> 0:05:07.073
<v Speaker 3>it was giving the Mariah Carey.

0:05:07.234 --> 0:05:10.113
<v Speaker 1>I don't know her mean yes, yeah, yeaheah, I don't

0:05:10.234 --> 0:05:11.593
<v Speaker 1>know her vibes.

0:05:11.354 --> 0:05:13.674
<v Speaker 2>But good luck with that, Charles, because so a bit

0:05:13.714 --> 0:05:16.754
<v Speaker 2>of a recap on what's happened since so Andrew Mountbatten

0:05:16.753 --> 0:05:19.474
<v Speaker 2>Windsor was arrested early on Thursday morning and he was

0:05:19.513 --> 0:05:22.354
<v Speaker 2>taken to a police station in Question for around twelve.

0:05:22.034 --> 0:05:24.034
<v Speaker 4>Hours, which means I had a lot of questions.

0:05:24.113 --> 0:05:26.953
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he was not charged and he has not been charged,

0:05:27.234 --> 0:05:29.234
<v Speaker 2>and it's important to note, of course, no charge is

0:05:29.313 --> 0:05:32.713
<v Speaker 2>laid and obviously he's innocent till proven guilty. He was

0:05:32.753 --> 0:05:35.234
<v Speaker 2>not cautioned, he was not bailed, he was just released.

0:05:36.154 --> 0:05:39.834
<v Speaker 2>So there's that. But the arrest itself has been one

0:05:39.834 --> 0:05:42.553
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest stories in the world, but particularly shocking

0:05:42.553 --> 0:05:44.553
<v Speaker 2>for the royal family. Apparently King Charles didn't know it

0:05:44.674 --> 0:05:46.394
<v Speaker 2>was going to happen. Nobody in the family knew it

0:05:46.474 --> 0:05:48.714
<v Speaker 2>was going to happen. Andrew didn't, and that's you can

0:05:48.753 --> 0:05:52.354
<v Speaker 2>see why. Obviously, if Scotland Yard had tipped Charles off

0:05:52.714 --> 0:05:55.034
<v Speaker 2>and then Andrew was suddenly not home when the cops

0:05:55.034 --> 0:05:57.673
<v Speaker 2>came knocking on the door, that would have been problem enough.

0:05:58.113 --> 0:06:00.873
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's waiting now for the other shoe to drop. So

0:06:01.393 --> 0:06:04.153
<v Speaker 2>the ripple effect of this is enormous and where we've

0:06:04.234 --> 0:06:06.953
<v Speaker 2>landed today, which is this sort of is this really

0:06:06.953 --> 0:06:08.433
<v Speaker 2>good to be the end of the monarchy? And everybody

0:06:08.513 --> 0:06:10.994
<v Speaker 2>shouting at Prince William about it because there's a lot

0:06:10.993 --> 0:06:14.113
<v Speaker 2>of reporting out there that this scandal is so big

0:06:14.154 --> 0:06:16.473
<v Speaker 2>and goes so far and so deep into the monarchy

0:06:16.714 --> 0:06:20.873
<v Speaker 2>that Charles may have no choice really but to maybe abdicate.

0:06:21.034 --> 0:06:23.433
<v Speaker 5>Can I ask you about that, because when I've seen

0:06:23.474 --> 0:06:27.553
<v Speaker 5>whispers of that and reports saying that there's maybe a

0:06:27.594 --> 0:06:29.354
<v Speaker 5>push for him to abdicate, or that it might be

0:06:29.354 --> 0:06:32.873
<v Speaker 5>something he chooses to do on his own accord, why like,

0:06:32.953 --> 0:06:34.553
<v Speaker 5>what does this have to do with Charles?

0:06:34.674 --> 0:06:37.594
<v Speaker 2>So the reason is this didn't come from nowhere. This

0:06:37.633 --> 0:06:40.953
<v Speaker 2>has obviously that Andrew business has been an open secret,

0:06:40.993 --> 0:06:43.154
<v Speaker 2>like different levels of it. It's important to note that

0:06:43.193 --> 0:06:46.674
<v Speaker 2>what he was arrested for misconduct in public office, and

0:06:46.714 --> 0:06:49.674
<v Speaker 2>as we've talked about on Friday's emergency meeting, what he

0:06:49.714 --> 0:06:52.553
<v Speaker 2>appears to have been arrested for are the allegations that

0:06:52.594 --> 0:06:55.193
<v Speaker 2>came out in the latest drop of the Epstein files

0:06:55.474 --> 0:06:58.713
<v Speaker 2>that while he was Special Trade Envoy for Great Britain,

0:06:59.154 --> 0:07:03.474
<v Speaker 2>he was emailing Epstein and the allegedly sharing very sensitive

0:07:03.513 --> 0:07:06.553
<v Speaker 2>information that was good for Epstein and his pals things

0:07:06.553 --> 0:07:09.554
<v Speaker 2>that you should share. So that is what he was

0:07:09.594 --> 0:07:13.914
<v Speaker 2>actually arrested for. In twenty twenty two, Andrew reached an

0:07:13.953 --> 0:07:16.554
<v Speaker 2>out of court settlement with Virginia Giffrey in a US

0:07:16.634 --> 0:07:19.754
<v Speaker 2>civil case which involved an undisclosed payout of a very

0:07:19.874 --> 0:07:22.713
<v Speaker 2>large sum of money and no admission of guilt on

0:07:22.754 --> 0:07:25.394
<v Speaker 2>his part. That money is widely believed to have come

0:07:25.434 --> 0:07:28.273
<v Speaker 2>from the Queen, from King Charles, from his family. Basically,

0:07:28.314 --> 0:07:30.914
<v Speaker 2>he didn't have twelve million pounds lying around, so there

0:07:30.953 --> 0:07:33.634
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of lot of speculation that how much

0:07:33.634 --> 0:07:35.754
<v Speaker 2>did everybody know and how much did they enable him.

0:07:36.274 --> 0:07:38.634
<v Speaker 2>There is a journalist and an author called Andrew Lowney

0:07:38.714 --> 0:07:42.194
<v Speaker 2>who wrote the book about Andrew and Fergie last year

0:07:42.234 --> 0:07:44.234
<v Speaker 2>that became almost a bit of a catalyst for all

0:07:44.274 --> 0:07:46.434
<v Speaker 2>of this. And he was interviewed by the Quickie this

0:07:46.514 --> 0:07:48.794
<v Speaker 2>morning and this is what he said about the problem

0:07:48.834 --> 0:07:49.794
<v Speaker 2>that Charles faces.

0:07:50.274 --> 0:07:54.394
<v Speaker 6>I have counterless stories in my book entitled in My Research,

0:07:54.594 --> 0:07:57.074
<v Speaker 6>of people going and complaining to the Palace, to the

0:07:57.154 --> 0:07:59.954
<v Speaker 6>Queen's private secretary and being sent away with a flea

0:07:59.994 --> 0:08:02.994
<v Speaker 6>in the ear. And these are intelligence officials, the heads

0:08:03.034 --> 0:08:05.714
<v Speaker 6>of the Foreign Office, and others. So I do think

0:08:05.754 --> 0:08:07.834
<v Speaker 6>this scandal is getting very close to the crown and

0:08:07.874 --> 0:08:10.953
<v Speaker 6>it may well lead to a second abdication, depends what

0:08:11.074 --> 0:08:14.353
<v Speaker 6>he knew and what he did. I think his position

0:08:14.434 --> 0:08:17.554
<v Speaker 6>is very dangerous. You know, clearly they didn't expect this

0:08:17.634 --> 0:08:21.274
<v Speaker 6>Epstein material to be released. They're kind of paddling furiously

0:08:21.354 --> 0:08:24.554
<v Speaker 6>now to see what they can say. So no, I

0:08:24.554 --> 0:08:26.954
<v Speaker 6>think he's you know, as more and more evidence comes out,

0:08:26.994 --> 0:08:29.914
<v Speaker 6>and I suspect it will implicating other members of the

0:08:29.994 --> 0:08:32.514
<v Speaker 6>royal household. I mean they will say perhaps that King

0:08:32.594 --> 0:08:35.274
<v Speaker 6>Charles didn't see it. It went to private secretaries. The

0:08:35.354 --> 0:08:38.634
<v Speaker 6>Queen dealt with it, but he was in effect co

0:08:38.754 --> 0:08:40.514
<v Speaker 6>ruling with the Queen for the last few years of

0:08:40.554 --> 0:08:43.474
<v Speaker 6>her reign. He's been the king for the last few years.

0:08:43.914 --> 0:08:46.794
<v Speaker 6>This is a problem that goes way back. And Andrew

0:08:46.874 --> 0:08:49.554
<v Speaker 6>was basically an accident waiting to happen. So I think

0:08:49.594 --> 0:08:52.034
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be very difficult to keep his hands clean.

0:08:52.034 --> 0:08:54.674
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the wagons are circling. I think it's looking

0:08:54.754 --> 0:08:55.714
<v Speaker 6>very dangerous for him.

0:08:55.954 --> 0:08:59.754
<v Speaker 3>Wow, the fact that he's saying that Andrew Lowney really

0:08:59.954 --> 0:09:02.994
<v Speaker 3>I was pretty skeptical of this idea that Charles would

0:09:03.074 --> 0:09:06.594
<v Speaker 3>step down, because since when has Charles ever wanted to

0:09:06.634 --> 0:09:09.354
<v Speaker 3>take respond on stability for anything anyone at his family does.

0:09:09.434 --> 0:09:11.994
<v Speaker 1>But that's a very credible source.

0:09:11.834 --> 0:09:14.874
<v Speaker 2>It is, and it's also it's interesting because I don't

0:09:14.874 --> 0:09:18.194
<v Speaker 2>think anyone suggesting this will happen tomorrow, next week, next month,

0:09:18.594 --> 0:09:20.434
<v Speaker 2>But people are now saying that they think that that

0:09:20.794 --> 0:09:23.834
<v Speaker 2>when Andrew was properly cast out by Charles last October,

0:09:23.874 --> 0:09:26.594
<v Speaker 2>when he had his prince title revoked and he was

0:09:26.674 --> 0:09:28.634
<v Speaker 2>kicked out of the family home and all those things,

0:09:29.154 --> 0:09:32.194
<v Speaker 2>Charles didn't know that this exact arrest was coming, but

0:09:32.314 --> 0:09:35.354
<v Speaker 2>they knew that the chickens were coming home to roost,

0:09:35.714 --> 0:09:38.514
<v Speaker 2>and he by doing that level of stepping back, he

0:09:38.634 --> 0:09:40.954
<v Speaker 2>was signaling I'm not going to stand in the way.

0:09:40.994 --> 0:09:42.354
<v Speaker 2>The palace are not going to stand in the way

0:09:42.354 --> 0:09:44.634
<v Speaker 2>anymore of whatever you're going to do. And that was

0:09:44.674 --> 0:09:47.274
<v Speaker 2>one step in this. The problem that the royal family

0:09:47.314 --> 0:09:49.114
<v Speaker 2>have if they want to survive, of course, is that

0:09:49.194 --> 0:09:53.594
<v Speaker 2>there is an enormous public dissatisfaction with obviously Andrew's actions,

0:09:53.874 --> 0:09:56.394
<v Speaker 2>but also the perception that there's just a completely different

0:09:56.434 --> 0:09:58.274
<v Speaker 2>set of rules for royals, which there always has been.

0:09:58.354 --> 0:10:01.314
<v Speaker 2>Let's be honest, But that's becoming increasingly unpopular, and the

0:10:01.354 --> 0:10:04.914
<v Speaker 2>speculation is that William is a clean skin in this.

0:10:05.034 --> 0:10:07.714
<v Speaker 2>No one can suggest that he was complicit. He has

0:10:07.754 --> 0:10:10.314
<v Speaker 2>been very stern. He has said over and over again

0:10:10.354 --> 0:10:12.394
<v Speaker 2>that he wants to modernize and slim land the monarchy.

0:10:12.714 --> 0:10:14.953
<v Speaker 2>So there is speculation that Charles could sort of take

0:10:14.994 --> 0:10:18.074
<v Speaker 2>the fall, as it were, for this and then at

0:10:18.074 --> 0:10:20.794
<v Speaker 2>some point step down, maybe because of his health, maybe

0:10:20.834 --> 0:10:23.034
<v Speaker 2>for other reasons. He's seventy seven and he's not very

0:10:23.034 --> 0:10:26.554
<v Speaker 2>well and allow a different kind of monarchy to come through.

0:10:27.034 --> 0:10:29.554
<v Speaker 3>But that slim down monarchy is going to have a

0:10:29.594 --> 0:10:33.674
<v Speaker 3>direct implication on Harry and Magant very much, because he's

0:10:33.674 --> 0:10:35.594
<v Speaker 3>not going to slim it down in one way and

0:10:35.634 --> 0:10:36.554
<v Speaker 3>not the other way.

0:10:36.554 --> 0:10:39.434
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, if you look at so they call them

0:10:39.474 --> 0:10:43.994
<v Speaker 2>the pushbike royals, right, the royals of Scandinavia, so Norway, Denmark, Sweden.

0:10:43.994 --> 0:10:46.994
<v Speaker 2>They have this model of monarchy where the only royals

0:10:47.034 --> 0:10:50.474
<v Speaker 2>are actually the king for the monarch and their direct heir.

0:10:50.794 --> 0:10:53.074
<v Speaker 2>So that means that the only if they were to

0:10:53.114 --> 0:10:56.154
<v Speaker 2>follow a Nordic model, the only official royals who get

0:10:56.194 --> 0:10:58.674
<v Speaker 2>any kind of public allowance as it were, and are

0:10:58.754 --> 0:11:02.714
<v Speaker 2>working royals would be William, Catherine and their children and

0:11:02.754 --> 0:11:05.674
<v Speaker 2>everyone else. Like, of course they're still posh and you

0:11:05.754 --> 0:11:07.994
<v Speaker 2>still get to go to palaces and be involved in

0:11:08.114 --> 0:11:10.754
<v Speaker 2>weddings and whatever, but they're not working members of the

0:11:10.834 --> 0:11:13.874
<v Speaker 2>royal family on the public purse. And in Britain that

0:11:14.034 --> 0:11:16.354
<v Speaker 2>used to be a sprawling group of royals, it's been

0:11:16.434 --> 0:11:17.834
<v Speaker 2>slowly carved out.

0:11:17.914 --> 0:11:19.634
<v Speaker 3>And it's the key that they don't get a title

0:11:19.714 --> 0:11:22.874
<v Speaker 3>to presumab day which are part of what enabled Andrew

0:11:22.954 --> 0:11:25.514
<v Speaker 3>to sort of work in these worlds was his HR

0:11:25.514 --> 0:11:25.914
<v Speaker 3>eight and.

0:11:25.914 --> 0:11:28.314
<v Speaker 2>Gave him status, and he gave those to his daughters

0:11:28.354 --> 0:11:32.234
<v Speaker 2>and famously the Queen's daughter, and when she had her

0:11:32.354 --> 0:11:34.314
<v Speaker 2>children she said, I don't want the titles she could

0:11:34.354 --> 0:11:37.034
<v Speaker 2>have given her daughter and son prince and princess, she said.

0:11:37.114 --> 0:11:39.954
<v Speaker 2>Nat Andrew is probably a surprise to no one as

0:11:39.994 --> 0:11:42.714
<v Speaker 2>more and more of his character becomes apparent. Who's like, absolutely,

0:11:43.074 --> 0:11:44.234
<v Speaker 2>my girls will be princess.

0:11:44.274 --> 0:11:46.634
<v Speaker 1>He had it on his email signature, as we now know.

0:11:47.434 --> 0:11:50.754
<v Speaker 2>So he wanted that one hundred percent. So that will

0:11:50.754 --> 0:11:51.914
<v Speaker 2>be interesting.

0:11:51.474 --> 0:11:55.034
<v Speaker 5>Because Harry and Meghan have just I'm really surprised at

0:11:55.034 --> 0:11:56.034
<v Speaker 5>the restraint they've shown.

0:11:56.634 --> 0:11:59.234
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised I haven't said anything yet. Really, yeah, I am,

0:11:59.274 --> 0:12:00.874
<v Speaker 4>because this is so.

0:12:01.234 --> 0:12:05.234
<v Speaker 5>Much like I just keep imagining Meghan showing up to

0:12:05.754 --> 0:12:09.074
<v Speaker 5>meet Harry's in laws at the table and being like, wait,

0:12:09.234 --> 0:12:12.394
<v Speaker 5>your uncle, that guy who's just sitting across from me

0:12:12.514 --> 0:12:16.154
<v Speaker 5>was accused of what probably had a lot more insight

0:12:16.274 --> 0:12:18.354
<v Speaker 5>than any of us did. And as you say, it

0:12:18.434 --> 0:12:22.194
<v Speaker 5>was mentioned in Passing and Spare in Harry's book. But

0:12:22.714 --> 0:12:24.434
<v Speaker 5>do you think they will say anything.

0:12:24.994 --> 0:12:28.274
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they'll say anything directly immediately, but I

0:12:28.314 --> 0:12:31.034
<v Speaker 2>think that they would be quite happy sitting in Montecida

0:12:31.114 --> 0:12:33.754
<v Speaker 2>right now. A because they've distanced themselves from an increasingly

0:12:33.794 --> 0:12:37.634
<v Speaker 2>toxic brand. B Because all the reports are that Harry's

0:12:37.634 --> 0:12:39.474
<v Speaker 2>going to go back to the UK in an official

0:12:39.474 --> 0:12:41.994
<v Speaker 2>capacity this northern summer, and Megs might go too, and

0:12:42.034 --> 0:12:45.354
<v Speaker 2>the kids might go too. For the first time. Whether

0:12:45.434 --> 0:12:48.274
<v Speaker 2>or not William really is on the brink of becoming king,

0:12:48.794 --> 0:12:51.074
<v Speaker 2>Harry has a kind of opportunity to set them up

0:12:51.074 --> 0:12:54.914
<v Speaker 2>as sort of almost like more moral superior royals, you know,

0:12:55.394 --> 0:12:58.274
<v Speaker 2>in a different way, and he might lose his title.

0:12:58.674 --> 0:13:00.554
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he clearly wants to really hold onto that

0:13:00.594 --> 0:13:03.434
<v Speaker 2>title too. He's given it to his children if William

0:13:03.474 --> 0:13:05.554
<v Speaker 2>gets his way, but not for a while. There's still

0:13:05.554 --> 0:13:08.274
<v Speaker 2>some time to make hay. I think they'll bide their

0:13:08.314 --> 0:13:09.834
<v Speaker 2>time before they say anything.

0:13:10.074 --> 0:13:11.234
<v Speaker 4>And here's my other question.

0:13:11.714 --> 0:13:13.394
<v Speaker 5>Do we think this is what I think a lot

0:13:13.434 --> 0:13:17.074
<v Speaker 5>of the outrage has been is that Andrew has not

0:13:17.354 --> 0:13:21.634
<v Speaker 5>given official evidence. Do you think that this might.

0:13:22.274 --> 0:13:22.874
<v Speaker 1>Force him to?

0:13:23.074 --> 0:13:26.674
<v Speaker 5>Is there a future in which Andrew has to sit

0:13:26.754 --> 0:13:31.594
<v Speaker 5>on trial and testify and actually reveal the details of

0:13:31.634 --> 0:13:33.154
<v Speaker 5>his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

0:13:33.234 --> 0:13:34.994
<v Speaker 2>Yes, But the thing is is the details of his

0:13:35.074 --> 0:13:38.354
<v Speaker 2>relationship with Jeffrey Epstein are already revealed. You know, he

0:13:38.434 --> 0:13:41.354
<v Speaker 2>and Sarah Ferguson and some of the people mentioned the most. Yeah,

0:13:41.474 --> 0:13:44.194
<v Speaker 2>in those millions and millions of Epstein, Puss and their daughters,

0:13:44.554 --> 0:13:47.234
<v Speaker 2>that relationship was clearly very close. And they've both been

0:13:47.274 --> 0:13:49.394
<v Speaker 2>proved to have been lying when they said, oh, after

0:13:49.434 --> 0:13:52.194
<v Speaker 2>his conviction, we barely had anything to do with him.

0:13:52.394 --> 0:13:54.274
<v Speaker 2>The same year he was released from prison, Fergie and

0:13:54.274 --> 0:13:57.234
<v Speaker 2>the girls were flown on Epstein's purse two Palm Beach

0:13:57.314 --> 0:14:00.514
<v Speaker 2>to have lunch with him, like they were tight. And

0:14:00.554 --> 0:14:03.714
<v Speaker 2>the Brits are quite smug this weekend about the fact

0:14:03.714 --> 0:14:07.994
<v Speaker 2>that well, at least we're doing something about our Epstein villains.

0:14:08.034 --> 0:14:11.594
<v Speaker 2>Important to note that obviously people said why was he

0:14:11.674 --> 0:14:15.554
<v Speaker 2>arrested rather than just asked him for questioning. Usually in

0:14:15.594 --> 0:14:18.354
<v Speaker 2>a high profile case, the first thing would be helping

0:14:18.394 --> 0:14:22.074
<v Speaker 2>us with our inquiries, right, But the fact that he

0:14:22.154 --> 0:14:24.274
<v Speaker 2>was brought in it meant that the police had power

0:14:24.314 --> 0:14:27.394
<v Speaker 2>to then go and search his house and houses, which

0:14:27.434 --> 0:14:30.274
<v Speaker 2>they did. Also, they could hold him whether he spoke

0:14:30.434 --> 0:14:32.234
<v Speaker 2>or not. They could hold him, whereas if they just

0:14:32.274 --> 0:14:34.394
<v Speaker 2>invited him in at his own discretion, he could just

0:14:35.234 --> 0:14:38.874
<v Speaker 2>make excuses and go. And also it may suggest that

0:14:38.954 --> 0:14:41.474
<v Speaker 2>they had tried to help us with our inquiries several

0:14:41.514 --> 0:14:42.114
<v Speaker 2>times in world.

0:14:42.994 --> 0:14:45.114
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think they did it on his birthday?

0:14:45.314 --> 0:14:48.994
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I don't know, because the fact I was listening

0:14:49.034 --> 0:14:51.994
<v Speaker 2>to reporting saying that to arrest him to question about

0:14:51.994 --> 0:14:54.514
<v Speaker 2>the Epstein connection, they would have had to be cooperating

0:14:54.554 --> 0:14:57.554
<v Speaker 2>with the DOJ in America, So that's an international issue.

0:14:57.994 --> 0:15:00.674
<v Speaker 2>They have also come under criticism for maybe treating him

0:15:00.754 --> 0:15:03.674
<v Speaker 2>and other roles with kid gloves for these past few years.

0:15:04.194 --> 0:15:06.914
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Charles and the Queen and her time were pushing

0:15:06.914 --> 0:15:10.314
<v Speaker 2>them back, just in terms of the ripple effect So

0:15:10.514 --> 0:15:13.794
<v Speaker 2>the other big story this weekend that's come out. Everybody's

0:15:13.794 --> 0:15:16.474
<v Speaker 2>been saying, where's Fergie, Where's Sarah Ferguson. She hasn't been

0:15:16.514 --> 0:15:19.714
<v Speaker 2>seen in Britain since September last year. Some reporting from

0:15:19.754 --> 0:15:22.754
<v Speaker 2>Tom Sykes, who's the Royalist, broke that she had been

0:15:22.754 --> 0:15:25.914
<v Speaker 2>in a clinic in Switzerland over January. That she's obviously

0:15:25.954 --> 0:15:28.634
<v Speaker 2>in a fragile state and she's trying to find where

0:15:28.674 --> 0:15:30.794
<v Speaker 2>she can go. She's been sited in the Middle East.

0:15:30.994 --> 0:15:32.914
<v Speaker 2>Her daughters sometimes work in the Middle East.

0:15:32.914 --> 0:15:34.434
<v Speaker 3>By the way, the clinic that she went to in

0:15:34.434 --> 0:15:37.514
<v Speaker 3>Switzerland is apparently the most expensive rehab clinic in the world.

0:15:37.554 --> 0:15:39.274
<v Speaker 3>And the way she got in there is that she

0:15:39.354 --> 0:15:41.914
<v Speaker 3>did a video on their social media talking about us.

0:15:41.954 --> 0:15:42.674
<v Speaker 1>Of course she did.

0:15:43.594 --> 0:15:45.914
<v Speaker 2>So this is the thing, right, is that one of

0:15:45.954 --> 0:15:48.514
<v Speaker 2>the reasons why Sarah and Andrew have always been problems

0:15:48.514 --> 0:15:52.114
<v Speaker 2>for the royal family is because they don't have enough money,

0:15:52.154 --> 0:15:54.234
<v Speaker 2>in their opinion, to live the way they want to live.

0:15:54.274 --> 0:15:56.314
<v Speaker 2>Tina Brown has always been on the record as saying

0:15:56.314 --> 0:15:59.474
<v Speaker 2>that peripheral royals are a big problem because it's like

0:15:59.514 --> 0:16:01.634
<v Speaker 2>they can't really earn enough to live by getting just

0:16:01.674 --> 0:16:03.474
<v Speaker 2>a good job. You know what I mean, live in

0:16:03.514 --> 0:16:06.394
<v Speaker 2>the way that they are accustomed to. So therefore that's

0:16:06.394 --> 0:16:10.114
<v Speaker 2>why you're staying at your problematic billionaires friend's mansion in

0:16:10.354 --> 0:16:13.514
<v Speaker 2>New York, or talking your way into a clinic in Switzerland,

0:16:13.594 --> 0:16:16.074
<v Speaker 2>or getting a Saudi prince to bankroll your trip to

0:16:16.154 --> 0:16:18.874
<v Speaker 2>the UA. So lots of talk about what Fergie is

0:16:18.874 --> 0:16:20.914
<v Speaker 2>going to do. And of course the princess is Beatrice

0:16:20.914 --> 0:16:22.834
<v Speaker 2>and Eugenie. There has been a lot of sympathy for

0:16:22.914 --> 0:16:25.234
<v Speaker 2>them because they were named hundreds of times in the

0:16:25.274 --> 0:16:28.154
<v Speaker 2>Epstein files, and mostly they were really young at the time.

0:16:29.034 --> 0:16:30.634
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people are saying, if they want to

0:16:30.674 --> 0:16:34.394
<v Speaker 2>show that they are of goodwill during this reckoning, that

0:16:34.434 --> 0:16:36.954
<v Speaker 2>they would hand their titles back to because if their

0:16:36.994 --> 0:16:38.874
<v Speaker 2>father isn't a prince, are the princess?

0:16:39.074 --> 0:16:42.474
<v Speaker 3>Any can't get over how we've learned through these emails

0:16:42.674 --> 0:16:46.794
<v Speaker 3>how their parents, which is so irresponsible in intertwining women

0:16:46.794 --> 0:16:50.994
<v Speaker 3>in Epstein's world. For instance, Beatrice's eighteenth birthday a masked

0:16:51.034 --> 0:16:55.354
<v Speaker 3>ball that apparently costs one hundred pounds. Harvey Weinstein, Julie Maxwell,

0:16:55.394 --> 0:16:58.834
<v Speaker 3>and Jeffrey Epstein attended her eighteenth birthday party. Now that's

0:16:58.874 --> 0:17:00.634
<v Speaker 3>not on her that's on her parents.

0:17:00.714 --> 0:17:03.274
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, they probably helped pay for it.

0:17:04.513 --> 0:17:06.113
<v Speaker 4>A fun fact to end on.

0:17:06.394 --> 0:17:09.674
<v Speaker 5>Did you know that fourteen years ago a member of

0:17:09.674 --> 0:17:11.074
<v Speaker 5>the royal family was convicted of.

0:17:10.994 --> 0:17:11.793
<v Speaker 4>A criminal offense.

0:17:12.154 --> 0:17:14.634
<v Speaker 2>Who was that? Jesse was Princess Anne.

0:17:15.194 --> 0:17:19.114
<v Speaker 5>Princess Anne pled guilty after her dog, a three year

0:17:19.154 --> 0:17:23.434
<v Speaker 5>old English bull Terrier called Dotty, bit two children as

0:17:23.434 --> 0:17:25.754
<v Speaker 5>they walked in winds A great part and.

0:17:25.634 --> 0:17:28.434
<v Speaker 4>Shew the book criminal offense.

0:17:28.634 --> 0:17:32.234
<v Speaker 5>Fined five hundred pounds, which we all know was a

0:17:32.234 --> 0:17:34.714
<v Speaker 5>lot of money, a lot that's more than.

0:17:34.674 --> 0:17:38.754
<v Speaker 4>Any fine Andrew's gotten. But you know, Princess Anne did

0:17:38.754 --> 0:17:39.154
<v Speaker 4>her time.

0:17:39.194 --> 0:17:42.553
<v Speaker 2>As they say on dogs. One last thing, Yeah, Sarah

0:17:42.554 --> 0:17:45.914
<v Speaker 2>ferguson Fergie. She famously got the Queen's corgies when the

0:17:45.994 --> 0:17:49.313
<v Speaker 2>Queen did she and she likes to talk about it

0:17:49.354 --> 0:17:51.514
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and she says things like, when the corgies

0:17:51.514 --> 0:17:52.914
<v Speaker 2>come in in the morning and bark at me, I

0:17:52.994 --> 0:17:54.314
<v Speaker 2>like to think it's the Queen.

0:17:54.314 --> 0:17:56.914
<v Speaker 5>Like saying, I definitely put those dogs on like only

0:17:56.954 --> 0:17:58.794
<v Speaker 5>famous to enjoy.

0:17:58.594 --> 0:18:00.994
<v Speaker 1>The now come.

0:18:02.714 --> 0:18:05.874
<v Speaker 2>And apparently it really annoys William and Catherine really.

0:18:05.874 --> 0:18:07.034
<v Speaker 1>That they have the call, that.

0:18:06.994 --> 0:18:09.194
<v Speaker 2>They have the corgies, and that she keeps talking about

0:18:09.234 --> 0:18:12.313
<v Speaker 2>the Corgies because she keeps like insinuating herself closer and

0:18:12.314 --> 0:18:15.074
<v Speaker 2>closer to the Queen. Because Charles is in a difficult situation.

0:18:15.154 --> 0:18:18.234
<v Speaker 2>It's really for him to distance himself completely from Andrew,

0:18:18.234 --> 0:18:20.794
<v Speaker 2>who has to blame his mum. And everybody still loves

0:18:20.794 --> 0:18:23.474
<v Speaker 2>the Queen, even if her the fact that her favorite

0:18:23.514 --> 0:18:27.634
<v Speaker 2>child apparently his nickname from his security detail was the

0:18:27.754 --> 0:18:34.434
<v Speaker 2>C word. It does call a judgment into questions. Okay,

0:18:34.634 --> 0:18:37.034
<v Speaker 2>we'll keep you up to date, friends, keep an eye

0:18:37.034 --> 0:18:38.194
<v Speaker 2>on that teetering crown.

0:18:39.034 --> 0:18:42.314
<v Speaker 5>After the break, a new brand of feminism has replaced

0:18:42.354 --> 0:18:45.634
<v Speaker 5>the girl Boss era, But is it really any better?

0:18:49.634 --> 0:18:51.114
<v Speaker 1>Hey out loud as it's Mia.

0:18:51.634 --> 0:18:54.074
<v Speaker 7>I have got one of my favorite episodes of all

0:18:54.114 --> 0:18:58.474
<v Speaker 7>time coming into your ear holes tomorrow. Amelia and I

0:18:58.514 --> 0:19:02.434
<v Speaker 7>have downloaded all our obsessions about the new show loves

0:19:02.474 --> 0:19:04.314
<v Speaker 7>story about JFK Jr.

0:19:04.634 --> 0:19:05.674
<v Speaker 1>And Carol and Bassett.

0:19:06.514 --> 0:19:08.914
<v Speaker 7>Whether you know who they are or not, you're going

0:19:08.994 --> 0:19:12.674
<v Speaker 7>to love this episode. We certainly loved making it. Our

0:19:12.674 --> 0:19:16.874
<v Speaker 7>subscriber apps drop twice a week Tuesdays and Thursdays, so

0:19:16.994 --> 0:19:19.954
<v Speaker 7>if you're not already a subscriber, follow the link in

0:19:19.994 --> 0:19:22.554
<v Speaker 7>the show notes and you can get out loud and

0:19:22.634 --> 0:19:24.914
<v Speaker 7>me in your ears five days a week.

0:19:26.434 --> 0:19:29.354
<v Speaker 5>There's an article in Bloomberg this week about how burnout

0:19:29.434 --> 0:19:34.714
<v Speaker 5>feminism has come to replace the girl Boss lean in era,

0:19:35.234 --> 0:19:38.874
<v Speaker 5>and author Alice Rob makes a very compelling case. So

0:19:39.394 --> 0:19:43.194
<v Speaker 5>she begins by reminiscing about the twenty tens, when Yahoo

0:19:43.314 --> 0:19:48.474
<v Speaker 5>chief executive officer Marissa Mayer insisted it was totally possible

0:19:48.474 --> 0:19:50.154
<v Speaker 5>to work a one hundred and thirty hour a week

0:19:50.194 --> 0:19:54.114
<v Speaker 5>as long as you timed your bathroom breaks perfectly, and

0:19:54.234 --> 0:19:58.114
<v Speaker 5>media boss Joanna Coles, while walking at her treadmill desk,

0:19:58.434 --> 0:20:02.033
<v Speaker 5>insisted that she was not at all interested in relaxing.

0:20:02.194 --> 0:20:03.914
<v Speaker 5>So that gives you a snapshot of what the twenty

0:20:03.954 --> 0:20:04.793
<v Speaker 5>tens vibe was.

0:20:05.314 --> 0:20:08.634
<v Speaker 2>But this decade, it happened to all the trep It's true,

0:20:08.834 --> 0:20:11.754
<v Speaker 2>I know recently, and she had one. I had a

0:20:11.834 --> 0:20:12.353
<v Speaker 2>friend with one.

0:20:12.714 --> 0:20:14.714
<v Speaker 3>I remember when people used to sit on bow sue balls.

0:20:14.794 --> 0:20:15.754
<v Speaker 3>That one way too.

0:20:16.034 --> 0:20:18.033
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if I had a treadmill desk, it would just

0:20:18.074 --> 0:20:21.474
<v Speaker 2>be a very very heavily about clothes track.

0:20:21.874 --> 0:20:26.554
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but this decade, the twenty twenties, is all about

0:20:26.634 --> 0:20:30.354
<v Speaker 5>the pleasure of giving up, and Rob cites a number

0:20:30.394 --> 0:20:33.434
<v Speaker 5>of books throughout this article that really capture this sentiment.

0:20:34.074 --> 0:20:36.634
<v Speaker 5>She talks about Emma Gannon, who is a writer we've

0:20:36.754 --> 0:20:41.594
<v Speaker 5>spoken about before. She was a very accomplished journalist, podcaster,

0:20:41.794 --> 0:20:45.754
<v Speaker 5>was doing everything, and she basically quit all the commitments

0:20:45.794 --> 0:20:49.314
<v Speaker 5>to take walks and eat banana bread instead. She also

0:20:49.394 --> 0:20:52.354
<v Speaker 5>wrote a very successful book and substack and all of that,

0:20:52.474 --> 0:20:54.834
<v Speaker 5>but basically she was like, this burns me out and

0:20:54.874 --> 0:20:57.114
<v Speaker 5>it makes me not happy, and she started this movement.

0:20:57.874 --> 0:21:01.594
<v Speaker 5>There's even one book called Life After Ambition, which sums

0:21:01.674 --> 0:21:05.194
<v Speaker 5>up a lot about this genre. For some women, having

0:21:05.234 --> 0:21:09.914
<v Speaker 5>babies is the breaking point, and for others it was

0:21:10.234 --> 0:21:13.114
<v Speaker 5>discovering that despite their one hundred and thirty hour work weeks,

0:21:13.154 --> 0:21:14.554
<v Speaker 5>they were still getting paid less.

0:21:14.394 --> 0:21:17.754
<v Speaker 4>Than the men they worked alongside. Amelia.

0:21:17.874 --> 0:21:21.634
<v Speaker 5>There are definitely some parts of burnout feminism to be

0:21:21.954 --> 0:21:25.474
<v Speaker 5>celebrated in terms of us all going this is too much,

0:21:25.474 --> 0:21:29.754
<v Speaker 5>I can't do it. But should we be worried about

0:21:29.754 --> 0:21:32.994
<v Speaker 5>this kind of shaming of female ambition. There's this idea

0:21:33.114 --> 0:21:39.274
<v Speaker 5>that the new trend is that we've all got to

0:21:39.354 --> 0:21:45.474
<v Speaker 5>pretend like work life balance, hobbies, not striving too much

0:21:45.514 --> 0:21:48.514
<v Speaker 5>is what we really want, and I'm not seeing maybe

0:21:48.754 --> 0:21:50.594
<v Speaker 5>men being pressured the same.

0:21:50.394 --> 0:21:51.354
<v Speaker 1>Way use the problem.

0:21:51.434 --> 0:21:54.434
<v Speaker 3>Men aren't leaning out, Men are still just at that

0:21:54.514 --> 0:21:58.594
<v Speaker 3>table leaning in yes, And that tells me that there's

0:21:58.634 --> 0:22:01.033
<v Speaker 3>something awry with this trend.

0:22:01.434 --> 0:22:02.754
<v Speaker 1>If this article actually made me.

0:22:02.754 --> 0:22:06.074
<v Speaker 3>Quite sad, the idea that it says that for all

0:22:06.114 --> 0:22:10.434
<v Speaker 3>of human history women's ambition has been condemned except for

0:22:10.474 --> 0:22:13.314
<v Speaker 3>this brief period between twenty thirteen and twenty twenty.

0:22:13.354 --> 0:22:15.274
<v Speaker 1>That really hit home for me because.

0:22:15.074 --> 0:22:18.074
<v Speaker 5>It's true, and there's so much hatred towards the women

0:22:18.074 --> 0:22:19.194
<v Speaker 5>who led that girl bus.

0:22:19.114 --> 0:22:21.074
<v Speaker 4>Here are like so much vitriol.

0:22:20.634 --> 0:22:24.314
<v Speaker 3>True, And I just think that it's also a little

0:22:24.354 --> 0:22:28.314
<v Speaker 3>disingenuous for all these authors that are cited in here

0:22:28.354 --> 0:22:31.073
<v Speaker 3>to tell us how they're just so lazy now and

0:22:31.114 --> 0:22:32.793
<v Speaker 3>they do nothing to eat banana bread.

0:22:33.034 --> 0:22:35.154
<v Speaker 1>But I'm reading this in books they've written.

0:22:35.194 --> 0:22:37.793
<v Speaker 3>Now. I've never written a book, but I think that

0:22:37.834 --> 0:22:41.034
<v Speaker 3>they're quite time consuming, is what I've heard, and they're

0:22:41.114 --> 0:22:44.074
<v Speaker 3>quite impressive achievements. So do tell me how lazy you

0:22:44.114 --> 0:22:45.674
<v Speaker 3>are when I'm reading it in a book you.

0:22:45.634 --> 0:22:48.513
<v Speaker 5>Wrote, Rebsolutely, nothing burns you out like writing a book.

0:22:49.314 --> 0:22:52.234
<v Speaker 5>I'm not seeing these people disappear. It's like I see

0:22:52.234 --> 0:22:57.354
<v Speaker 5>the reinvention. I mean, it's just rebranding, right, it's rebranding.

0:22:57.434 --> 0:23:01.434
<v Speaker 5>And it's like, is there something unpopular now about going well,

0:23:01.434 --> 0:23:02.394
<v Speaker 5>I want to be the boss?

0:23:02.754 --> 0:23:03.994
<v Speaker 4>Like is that kind of Well?

0:23:04.034 --> 0:23:07.394
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting, isn't it? Because maybe it's just splintering because

0:23:07.394 --> 0:23:09.034
<v Speaker 2>there is still a lot of what you would call

0:23:09.114 --> 0:23:11.154
<v Speaker 2>girl bossing on the internet. Look at Emma Greed. We

0:23:11.154 --> 0:23:13.074
<v Speaker 2>talk about her all the time, right, she's boss lady

0:23:13.074 --> 0:23:15.874
<v Speaker 2>at Skins. Look at all every Kardashian. Look that these

0:23:15.874 --> 0:23:18.354
<v Speaker 2>are not lazy people. These are not that any of

0:23:18.354 --> 0:23:19.714
<v Speaker 2>these women are lazy, but you know what I mean,

0:23:19.754 --> 0:23:23.234
<v Speaker 2>they're not celebrating not working. They are work bitch, right,

0:23:23.954 --> 0:23:27.114
<v Speaker 2>And I think that this is a pushback to that

0:23:28.154 --> 0:23:31.674
<v Speaker 2>because it's an interesting question about the men. Are men

0:23:31.754 --> 0:23:33.794
<v Speaker 2>allowed to burn out? I don't know that they are,

0:23:34.154 --> 0:23:35.754
<v Speaker 2>do you know what I mean? Like, I think that

0:23:35.834 --> 0:23:39.674
<v Speaker 2>the culture we expect men to work, work, work, work, work,

0:23:39.714 --> 0:23:41.834
<v Speaker 2>and if they were to say I'm burnt out and

0:23:41.834 --> 0:23:44.194
<v Speaker 2>I need to stop, we'd probably everyone would probably be

0:23:44.274 --> 0:23:46.714
<v Speaker 2>quite mocking of them. Are we seeing like a splintering

0:23:46.794 --> 0:23:50.754
<v Speaker 2>of different groups because the girl boss world doesn't suit everybody,

0:23:51.194 --> 0:23:54.194
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make them happy, doesn't make them feel fulfilled. Nor

0:23:54.274 --> 0:23:56.634
<v Speaker 2>does the soft life as they call it, suit everybody.

0:23:56.714 --> 0:23:59.074
<v Speaker 2>So are we not just seeing a broader range?

0:23:59.354 --> 0:24:02.954
<v Speaker 5>Because or was the issue though that we were being

0:24:03.074 --> 0:24:07.674
<v Speaker 5>yelled at to lean in while our home lives mark

0:24:08.074 --> 0:24:11.234
<v Speaker 5>in terms of who was looking after our children.

0:24:12.194 --> 0:24:15.914
<v Speaker 2>We were all that's exactly the reaction to that, you know,

0:24:15.954 --> 0:24:17.594
<v Speaker 2>which is the fact that, well, you can girl boss

0:24:17.674 --> 0:24:19.274
<v Speaker 2>or you want, but when you get home, you're still

0:24:19.474 --> 0:24:21.394
<v Speaker 2>mopping the floor and cooking the dinner and try.

0:24:21.554 --> 0:24:23.394
<v Speaker 5>And a man can lean in if the woman is

0:24:23.434 --> 0:24:26.394
<v Speaker 5>still doing the majority of the domestic load, which I

0:24:26.434 --> 0:24:29.314
<v Speaker 5>think was that contributing to the burner.

0:24:29.474 --> 0:24:31.754
<v Speaker 3>Look, I hate to be doing this, but I'm going

0:24:31.834 --> 0:24:33.234
<v Speaker 3>to defend Cheryl Samberg.

0:24:33.434 --> 0:24:34.833
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but I have to.

0:24:35.074 --> 0:24:38.314
<v Speaker 3>I do think that the whole lean In idea got

0:24:38.354 --> 0:24:42.594
<v Speaker 3>completely misunderstood by everyone. The whole idea was that you

0:24:42.674 --> 0:24:45.513
<v Speaker 3>meant to instead of preemptively saying, well, I want to

0:24:45.514 --> 0:24:48.674
<v Speaker 3>have kids, therefore I'm not going to work as hard

0:24:49.034 --> 0:24:51.634
<v Speaker 3>just in preparation for that. She's like, no, just keep

0:24:51.674 --> 0:24:54.434
<v Speaker 3>working hard until the point that you want to have kids,

0:24:54.474 --> 0:24:56.354
<v Speaker 3>and then you can reassess. That was all she was

0:24:56.394 --> 0:24:58.874
<v Speaker 3>saying with lean In she was saying, lean in until

0:24:58.874 --> 0:25:00.514
<v Speaker 3>you can't lean in anymore.

0:25:00.114 --> 0:25:02.834
<v Speaker 2>And you'll be in a good position take break now.

0:25:02.874 --> 0:25:04.234
<v Speaker 1>It is not bad advice.

0:25:04.554 --> 0:25:07.554
<v Speaker 3>And I recently went to speak at my high school,

0:25:07.554 --> 0:25:09.834
<v Speaker 3>as I know you did, Jesse, and I was sent

0:25:09.874 --> 0:25:13.154
<v Speaker 3>a list of sample questions by the high school students

0:25:13.194 --> 0:25:16.554
<v Speaker 3>who invited me, and one of the questions was how

0:25:16.594 --> 0:25:20.154
<v Speaker 3>do you achieve work life balance? And I just thought,

0:25:20.394 --> 0:25:25.114
<v Speaker 3>how insane at seventeen to be worried about that about

0:25:25.234 --> 0:25:28.194
<v Speaker 3>work life balance. I just don't think they need to

0:25:28.234 --> 0:25:31.434
<v Speaker 3>worry about that, And that was Cheryl's point. So I

0:25:31.554 --> 0:25:34.513
<v Speaker 3>kind of worry that by telling us all not to

0:25:34.594 --> 0:25:36.874
<v Speaker 3>work so hard, not to worry so much, there's a

0:25:36.874 --> 0:25:40.154
<v Speaker 3>bit of a nefarious conservative agenda underneath it, because it's

0:25:40.194 --> 0:25:42.954
<v Speaker 3>basically saying like, you don't need money, and the fact

0:25:42.994 --> 0:25:45.714
<v Speaker 3>is women need money. The pay gap is widening again

0:25:45.954 --> 0:25:48.434
<v Speaker 3>for the first time in a while, and it's because

0:25:48.554 --> 0:25:51.474
<v Speaker 3>women are being told that actually their financial future and

0:25:51.514 --> 0:25:52.874
<v Speaker 3>security is not important.

0:25:53.034 --> 0:25:54.273
<v Speaker 1>Okay, who benefits from that?

0:25:54.514 --> 0:25:57.114
<v Speaker 2>But I agree with you entirely. But also, and I

0:25:57.194 --> 0:25:59.793
<v Speaker 2>think I've told this story before, so throw something at

0:25:59.794 --> 0:26:01.793
<v Speaker 2>my head. That's the case. But so I had a

0:26:01.874 --> 0:26:06.274
<v Speaker 2>significant episode of burnout in the mid twenty teens when

0:26:06.314 --> 0:26:08.754
<v Speaker 2>my kids were little, and I remember very clearly being

0:26:08.754 --> 0:26:11.513
<v Speaker 2>at the doctor and like having it was very similar

0:26:11.514 --> 0:26:14.353
<v Speaker 2>to the way that Emma Gannon explains it. And I

0:26:14.394 --> 0:26:15.874
<v Speaker 2>was crying at the doctor and I was trying to

0:26:15.874 --> 0:26:17.754
<v Speaker 2>explain to her what was wrong with me. And this doctor,

0:26:17.794 --> 0:26:20.354
<v Speaker 2>who was much younger than me and very glamorous, she

0:26:20.474 --> 0:26:23.194
<v Speaker 2>said to me, Oh, I see women like you all

0:26:23.234 --> 0:26:25.354
<v Speaker 2>the time. She said, women trying to have it all.

0:26:25.634 --> 0:26:26.594
<v Speaker 2>That's what she said to me.

0:26:26.714 --> 0:26:31.154
<v Speaker 5>And the doctor said, doctor, and I diagnose you with

0:26:31.234 --> 0:26:32.754
<v Speaker 5>trying to have it I.

0:26:32.674 --> 0:26:34.594
<v Speaker 2>Diagnosed you with trying to have it all. And I

0:26:34.634 --> 0:26:37.434
<v Speaker 2>was busy having my burnout meltdown, which apparently was right

0:26:37.474 --> 0:26:39.634
<v Speaker 2>on schedule exactly what it was.

0:26:39.914 --> 0:26:42.994
<v Speaker 3>Well, this doctor is obviously just slacking away. Didn't go

0:26:43.074 --> 0:26:43.594
<v Speaker 3>through medical.

0:26:43.874 --> 0:26:46.914
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I was like trying to have it all, like

0:26:46.994 --> 0:26:48.593
<v Speaker 2>have a job and have a family like those.

0:26:48.754 --> 0:26:51.074
<v Speaker 5>You were also trying to run a marathon, which you

0:26:51.154 --> 0:26:52.313
<v Speaker 5>do talk about often.

0:26:52.474 --> 0:26:56.114
<v Speaker 2>Well I did. That was possibly my mistake. But the

0:26:56.154 --> 0:26:58.714
<v Speaker 2>thing is is I can't bear my view on this

0:26:58.874 --> 0:27:02.514
<v Speaker 2>is that it is true that we absolutely fetishized busyness

0:27:02.514 --> 0:27:04.314
<v Speaker 2>for a while there, and I think we're pulling back

0:27:04.354 --> 0:27:05.914
<v Speaker 2>from that, that whole thing of like how are you

0:27:05.954 --> 0:27:06.314
<v Speaker 2>and busy?

0:27:06.314 --> 0:27:07.034
<v Speaker 1>How I'm going?

0:27:07.234 --> 0:27:11.034
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, And I think that there is a sort

0:27:11.034 --> 0:27:13.554
<v Speaker 2>of for a high achieving woman, but I'm sure it's

0:27:13.594 --> 0:27:16.314
<v Speaker 2>probably true of a hygiene man. I don't know. If

0:27:16.354 --> 0:27:19.513
<v Speaker 2>we're not completely stretched all the time and doing twenty

0:27:19.514 --> 0:27:21.074
<v Speaker 2>five things all the time and we get a moment

0:27:21.114 --> 0:27:23.994
<v Speaker 2>to breathe, we panic, we feel guilty, we feel lazy,

0:27:24.114 --> 0:27:27.273
<v Speaker 2>we feel like we're panicking. I'm supposed to be constantly

0:27:27.274 --> 0:27:31.313
<v Speaker 2>in a state of hustle, of hustle, of stress, of

0:27:31.474 --> 0:27:33.353
<v Speaker 2>too many places to be, too many things to do,

0:27:33.394 --> 0:27:36.554
<v Speaker 2>and if I'm not in that state, I'm doing life wrong.

0:27:36.594 --> 0:27:39.313
<v Speaker 2>I think that's absolutely true that that became fetishized and

0:27:39.354 --> 0:27:41.474
<v Speaker 2>normalized to a point. And so if you do say

0:27:41.554 --> 0:27:43.754
<v Speaker 2>and people like how are you and you're like, I'm fine.

0:27:43.794 --> 0:27:46.434
<v Speaker 2>I spent the weekend, you know, I don't know, watching

0:27:46.474 --> 0:27:49.834
<v Speaker 2>TV in my garden baking a cake, people be like, oh,

0:27:49.874 --> 0:27:53.474
<v Speaker 2>you're supposed to be constantly optimizing. So I think that

0:27:53.554 --> 0:27:58.314
<v Speaker 2>if burnout feminism acknowledge is that everybody's nervous system isn't

0:27:58.314 --> 0:28:01.234
<v Speaker 2>created for that, not everybody's preferences aren't created for that,

0:28:01.234 --> 0:28:04.593
<v Speaker 2>then that's fine. But we are to your point, Emelia,

0:28:04.634 --> 0:28:06.874
<v Speaker 2>about the young women asking you that question, It's like

0:28:06.874 --> 0:28:10.793
<v Speaker 2>we're preloading them with this idea that you can't handle it.

0:28:11.354 --> 0:28:14.234
<v Speaker 2>You cannot handle the life that will come at you

0:28:14.274 --> 0:28:15.194
<v Speaker 2>if you want to work hard?

0:28:15.594 --> 0:28:15.754
<v Speaker 3>Is that?

0:28:16.434 --> 0:28:17.314
<v Speaker 1>Is that true? Though?

0:28:17.594 --> 0:28:18.594
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's true.

0:28:18.714 --> 0:28:19.034
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:28:19.114 --> 0:28:20.474
<v Speaker 2>Men have breakdowns? Just you know?

0:28:21.154 --> 0:28:25.314
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I wonder if the setup, though, was unsustainable. It's

0:28:25.314 --> 0:28:28.313
<v Speaker 5>like the one hundred and thirty hours a week is

0:28:28.314 --> 0:28:33.313
<v Speaker 5>completely unsustainable. And remember when Arianna Huffington discovered sleep and

0:28:33.394 --> 0:28:35.954
<v Speaker 5>she was like, everyone, there's this thing that you should

0:28:35.994 --> 0:28:37.874
<v Speaker 5>do for a few hours every night and it makes

0:28:37.914 --> 0:28:40.674
<v Speaker 5>you feel great. And it was like that was a

0:28:40.714 --> 0:28:44.554
<v Speaker 5>weird time, that was ripe for parody like that, there

0:28:44.594 --> 0:28:46.514
<v Speaker 5>was something kind of ridiculous about that. But then at

0:28:46.554 --> 0:28:50.634
<v Speaker 5>the same time to transition into this burnout feminism.

0:28:50.634 --> 0:28:53.754
<v Speaker 4>And I hate to kind of use this word.

0:28:53.554 --> 0:28:56.434
<v Speaker 5>All the time, but there is such an inherent privilege

0:28:56.434 --> 0:28:59.714
<v Speaker 5>in it, right, because not everyone gets to fall in

0:28:59.754 --> 0:29:02.314
<v Speaker 5>a heap, and not everyone gets to take a year

0:29:02.354 --> 0:29:05.074
<v Speaker 5>off because you're tired. I think about my Nan who

0:29:05.154 --> 0:29:07.394
<v Speaker 5>had she had seven kids. She had a husband who

0:29:07.434 --> 0:29:10.794
<v Speaker 5>was a war veteran and was in a wheelchair, and

0:29:11.154 --> 0:29:13.434
<v Speaker 5>she looked after the kids, and then she went overnight

0:29:13.674 --> 0:29:15.594
<v Speaker 5>and cleaned offices.

0:29:15.794 --> 0:29:17.194
<v Speaker 4>Right, she had to do that.

0:29:17.514 --> 0:29:21.714
<v Speaker 5>If you told that woman that having a hobby and

0:29:21.754 --> 0:29:25.314
<v Speaker 5>getting a good night sleep and work life balance was important,

0:29:25.314 --> 0:29:28.074
<v Speaker 5>she would have spat in your face because that was

0:29:28.114 --> 0:29:29.394
<v Speaker 5>not something that was possible.

0:29:29.434 --> 0:29:32.194
<v Speaker 2>But equally, why are we telling women, and I know

0:29:32.274 --> 0:29:35.594
<v Speaker 2>this is my particular favorite soapbox, that if you have

0:29:35.794 --> 0:29:38.154
<v Speaker 2>a job that fulfills you, you will also do all

0:29:38.154 --> 0:29:39.794
<v Speaker 2>the load at home and you just have to deal

0:29:39.834 --> 0:29:42.394
<v Speaker 2>with it. That isn't actually true. You could actually set

0:29:42.434 --> 0:29:45.194
<v Speaker 2>up a much more equal partnership if you're in whatever

0:29:45.274 --> 0:29:47.874
<v Speaker 2>kind of relationship you're in, if you're in one same

0:29:47.954 --> 0:29:51.314
<v Speaker 2>sex or straight relationship where you're not doing everything, it's

0:29:51.354 --> 0:29:53.634
<v Speaker 2>just like we almost accept that as well. That's the diffault.

0:29:53.714 --> 0:29:56.394
<v Speaker 2>So we're telling girls from the beginning, you'll be set

0:29:56.434 --> 0:29:58.314
<v Speaker 2>up to fail because you'll have to do all the

0:29:58.314 --> 0:30:00.394
<v Speaker 2>work at home, You'll have to do all the work

0:30:00.394 --> 0:30:03.594
<v Speaker 2>at work. You'll burnen yourself out. And I think there

0:30:03.634 --> 0:30:05.874
<v Speaker 2>are other options. I saw a mug I really wanted

0:30:05.874 --> 0:30:07.474
<v Speaker 2>to buy on the Internet the other day that said

0:30:07.794 --> 0:30:09.874
<v Speaker 2>earn your own money, marry someone funny.

0:30:11.154 --> 0:30:12.754
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I like that a lot.

0:30:13.154 --> 0:30:15.954
<v Speaker 3>After the break the Australian reporter who went viral for

0:30:16.074 --> 0:30:18.714
<v Speaker 3>being drunk on air, it turns out there's something we

0:30:18.754 --> 0:30:28.714
<v Speaker 3>all missed in this story. So we all think we

0:30:28.834 --> 0:30:32.074
<v Speaker 3>know what happened last week when Channel nine reporter Danika

0:30:32.074 --> 0:30:35.794
<v Speaker 3>Mason appeared drunk on air in a live cross to

0:30:35.874 --> 0:30:37.074
<v Speaker 3>the Today Show from Milan.

0:30:37.234 --> 0:30:39.314
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the clip. Everyone in the whole world saw

0:30:39.314 --> 0:30:39.714
<v Speaker 1>the clip.

0:30:40.154 --> 0:30:44.274
<v Speaker 3>Even Anthony Albanezi wait in he described himself as pro Danika.

0:30:44.834 --> 0:30:47.634
<v Speaker 3>The general vibe online and around the world seemed to

0:30:47.634 --> 0:30:50.554
<v Speaker 3>be onya. People thought it was funny. She gave a

0:30:50.674 --> 0:30:55.234
<v Speaker 3>very fulsome and gracious apology afterwards. But when I started

0:30:55.234 --> 0:30:58.874
<v Speaker 3>looking into it today, I realized that it's like so

0:30:59.034 --> 0:31:02.274
<v Speaker 3>many Internet stories. You think you know what happened from

0:31:02.354 --> 0:31:03.834
<v Speaker 3>the TikTok that you saw.

0:31:04.034 --> 0:31:07.154
<v Speaker 1>But actually the real story of what happened is so

0:31:07.274 --> 0:31:08.914
<v Speaker 1>much more interesting and it.

0:31:08.874 --> 0:31:13.394
<v Speaker 3>Really sheds light on how internet stories get created.

0:31:13.474 --> 0:31:16.314
<v Speaker 1>Let me explain. Okay, here's what I pitched.

0:31:16.234 --> 0:31:19.834
<v Speaker 3>It happened before she went on air drunk last Wednesday.

0:31:20.474 --> 0:31:23.594
<v Speaker 3>I think that she went out to a pub in Milan,

0:31:23.914 --> 0:31:25.914
<v Speaker 3>or she had a lot of negronies while she was

0:31:25.954 --> 0:31:28.514
<v Speaker 3>having great fun all evening and then all of a sudden,

0:31:28.554 --> 0:31:30.514
<v Speaker 3>remember she had to be on air, was pulled back

0:31:30.514 --> 0:31:32.514
<v Speaker 3>in front of the camera and was drunk. And that's

0:31:32.634 --> 0:31:35.634
<v Speaker 3>very irresponsible, right, because who would do that. Well, what

0:31:35.674 --> 0:31:39.314
<v Speaker 3>I didn't realize is that was her sixth appearance on

0:31:39.514 --> 0:31:40.554
<v Speaker 3>air that evening.

0:31:40.674 --> 0:31:41.914
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were going to say that was her

0:31:41.954 --> 0:31:44.634
<v Speaker 2>sixth LAGRONI oh, it probably was that too.

0:31:44.834 --> 0:31:46.074
<v Speaker 4>That needs a lot of negroments.

0:31:46.114 --> 0:31:47.794
<v Speaker 2>Actually, she had been working.

0:31:48.074 --> 0:31:53.194
<v Speaker 3>She had been working all night in minus six degree temperatures,

0:31:53.594 --> 0:31:56.834
<v Speaker 3>so she had been doing these crosses to morning TV

0:31:56.914 --> 0:32:00.194
<v Speaker 3>in Australia, but it was evening in Milan, and basically

0:32:00.234 --> 0:32:03.074
<v Speaker 3>the first one she's absolutely fine, the second one she's

0:32:03.114 --> 0:32:05.634
<v Speaker 3>absolutely fine. Again, it's very cold out there. She's had

0:32:05.634 --> 0:32:08.834
<v Speaker 3>a very busy day at work. Third appearance starting to

0:32:08.954 --> 0:32:12.794
<v Speaker 3>appear a little looser. Fourth appearance starts to slur her words.

0:32:12.874 --> 0:32:14.034
<v Speaker 1>Oh my fifth.

0:32:13.874 --> 0:32:16.554
<v Speaker 3>Appearance gets worse, and then there's the sixth appearance. And

0:32:16.594 --> 0:32:18.314
<v Speaker 3>by the way, she was going to be on for

0:32:18.394 --> 0:32:21.554
<v Speaker 3>a seventh appearance, it's speculated, but they pulled her from that.

0:32:21.594 --> 0:32:24.194
<v Speaker 2>I think she's been hustling too hard. She needs to

0:32:24.194 --> 0:32:25.034
<v Speaker 2>get into the burn out.

0:32:26.274 --> 0:32:28.834
<v Speaker 3>So let's have a listen to the particular clip which

0:32:28.834 --> 0:32:30.754
<v Speaker 3>went viral, because I'm going to tell you some more

0:32:30.754 --> 0:32:32.554
<v Speaker 3>context about that that's going to change how you think

0:32:32.554 --> 0:32:32.954
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:32:34.074 --> 0:32:37.194
<v Speaker 1>Like the price of coffee over here is actually fine.

0:32:37.714 --> 0:32:40.314
<v Speaker 1>It's more the price of coffee in the US that

0:32:40.394 --> 0:32:42.754
<v Speaker 1>we are going to have to get used to. I'm

0:32:42.754 --> 0:32:44.714
<v Speaker 1>not sure that the IAS.

0:32:44.834 --> 0:32:47.754
<v Speaker 3>I don't watch morning TV, and I came across this

0:32:47.874 --> 0:32:50.754
<v Speaker 3>exact clip and I thought, oh no, why is she

0:32:50.794 --> 0:32:52.634
<v Speaker 3>talking about the price of coffee in the US.

0:32:52.834 --> 0:32:57.074
<v Speaker 1>Why is she talking about iguanas? And the reason is

0:32:57.274 --> 0:32:58.234
<v Speaker 1>very sensible.

0:32:58.394 --> 0:33:02.154
<v Speaker 3>In her previous five or six appearances on The Today Show,

0:33:02.234 --> 0:33:04.914
<v Speaker 3>Karl Stefanovic had been talking to her about the fact

0:33:04.914 --> 0:33:06.794
<v Speaker 3>that she's soon about to go to Vegas for the

0:33:06.794 --> 0:33:10.794
<v Speaker 3>Annil's Games there, so she was referring back to their

0:33:10.834 --> 0:33:14.754
<v Speaker 3>previous five conversations about her upcoming US trip, and then

0:33:14.834 --> 0:33:17.514
<v Speaker 3>the iguana bit, which I think everyone around the world

0:33:17.594 --> 0:33:19.834
<v Speaker 3>just thought was so surreal and off the wall, is

0:33:19.834 --> 0:33:23.954
<v Speaker 3>because literally throwing to her, Carl compares her to an iguana,

0:33:24.074 --> 0:33:26.274
<v Speaker 3>which by the way, makes no sense. He was by

0:33:26.274 --> 0:33:28.994
<v Speaker 3>all accounts sober, but in his throwing to her on air,

0:33:29.074 --> 0:33:31.834
<v Speaker 3>he compares her to an iguana, and she's live in

0:33:31.874 --> 0:33:36.034
<v Speaker 3>really hot She's naturally very confused by the comparison.

0:33:36.594 --> 0:33:39.194
<v Speaker 1>So it was just a reminder that nothing on the

0:33:39.194 --> 0:33:40.594
<v Speaker 1>internet is as it seems.

0:33:40.754 --> 0:33:44.034
<v Speaker 5>No, And I think as well when she made her apology,

0:33:44.034 --> 0:33:46.074
<v Speaker 5>which I thought was incredibly can I.

0:33:46.074 --> 0:33:48.314
<v Speaker 2>Just say just two sets back, did she say in

0:33:48.314 --> 0:33:50.034
<v Speaker 2>her apology that she had been drinking?

0:33:50.074 --> 0:33:52.554
<v Speaker 1>Yes, wasn't drunk.

0:33:52.874 --> 0:33:54.914
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's part of the good will, is

0:33:54.954 --> 0:33:58.794
<v Speaker 5>that she didn't try and make it like about anything else.

0:33:58.834 --> 0:34:00.434
<v Speaker 4>She went, yeah, I had a drink.

0:34:00.194 --> 0:34:03.794
<v Speaker 3>And Carl tried like when he first when this happened,

0:34:03.994 --> 0:34:07.754
<v Speaker 3>his immediate reaction was to say, oh, it's very hold there.

0:34:07.874 --> 0:34:10.634
<v Speaker 3>And when I was reporting from Washington, DC, my mouth

0:34:10.674 --> 0:34:13.194
<v Speaker 3>didn't move properly because it was too cold. Carl, of course,

0:34:13.234 --> 0:34:15.154
<v Speaker 3>has been drunk on their himself, and it was arguably

0:34:15.154 --> 0:34:15.953
<v Speaker 3>the main him.

0:34:16.034 --> 0:34:17.873
<v Speaker 5>If anyone is going to interview you drunk, you want

0:34:17.874 --> 0:34:19.274
<v Speaker 5>it to be Carl because he's going to try and

0:34:19.314 --> 0:34:19.873
<v Speaker 5>cover for you.

0:34:20.034 --> 0:34:21.354
<v Speaker 4>That was Krlay's best.

0:34:21.954 --> 0:34:25.274
<v Speaker 5>But she said altitude, She said I had a drink,

0:34:25.314 --> 0:34:28.674
<v Speaker 5>on nepty's stomach. I mean throw in sleep deprivation if

0:34:28.674 --> 0:34:31.554
<v Speaker 5>she's doing these night crosses. And I can't imagine the

0:34:31.594 --> 0:34:34.314
<v Speaker 5>kind of hours that she's doing. We all know the

0:34:34.354 --> 0:34:36.473
<v Speaker 5>experience of having one or two drinks and it hits

0:34:36.474 --> 0:34:40.314
<v Speaker 5>you harder because of a myriad of factors. But what

0:34:40.394 --> 0:34:43.433
<v Speaker 5>I have found so interesting about this story is that

0:34:43.554 --> 0:34:46.554
<v Speaker 5>it seems to be the one thing that the Internet

0:34:46.594 --> 0:34:49.393
<v Speaker 5>can agree on, which is like, all power to.

0:34:49.594 --> 0:34:52.514
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that nice? And it's nice for it is a

0:34:52.554 --> 0:34:55.834
<v Speaker 2>surprise because I thought the Internet would be outraged. No

0:34:55.874 --> 0:34:58.514
<v Speaker 2>one is out right, lady at work, it's happening, and

0:34:58.634 --> 0:35:00.474
<v Speaker 2>you can't trust the ladies with the alcohol.

0:35:00.554 --> 0:35:03.434
<v Speaker 5>Everyone's like, oh well, we can't get drunk on television anymore.

0:35:04.234 --> 0:35:05.314
<v Speaker 4>I really like it.

0:35:05.554 --> 0:35:07.634
<v Speaker 2>There are probably some whales as who are like, we

0:35:07.674 --> 0:35:10.834
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be celebrating the drunk lady. Because what I wondered

0:35:10.874 --> 0:35:13.274
<v Speaker 2>when I first saw it was I wonder what this

0:35:13.394 --> 0:35:17.114
<v Speaker 2>does to your career ongoing, like as in it's good lolls,

0:35:17.834 --> 0:35:20.514
<v Speaker 2>but will she always be known for this? And I

0:35:20.554 --> 0:35:23.234
<v Speaker 2>bet that she is probably beating herself up about that

0:35:23.314 --> 0:35:25.754
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. But also I didn't know who she

0:35:25.914 --> 0:35:27.674
<v Speaker 2>was before this story came out. And now I'm really

0:35:27.714 --> 0:35:29.954
<v Speaker 2>impressed with her because I know she had seven crosses

0:35:30.874 --> 0:35:31.634
<v Speaker 2>too outpointed.

0:35:31.834 --> 0:35:35.433
<v Speaker 5>People who have been watching religiously have said she's a

0:35:35.474 --> 0:35:37.513
<v Speaker 5>brilliant reporter. So I think a lot of the good

0:35:37.514 --> 0:35:39.993
<v Speaker 5>will has come from the fact she's actually really good

0:35:39.994 --> 0:35:42.393
<v Speaker 5>at her job. She's been great at her job for

0:35:42.434 --> 0:35:47.114
<v Speaker 5>this entire period. She had this one moment that she's gone, oh,

0:35:47.194 --> 0:35:48.473
<v Speaker 5>I'm mortified, I'm actually really.

0:35:48.514 --> 0:35:50.834
<v Speaker 3>Bad and that job is so much more demanding than

0:35:50.874 --> 0:35:54.674
<v Speaker 3>I realized. I mean, seven or eight crosses in one evening,

0:35:54.674 --> 0:35:56.274
<v Speaker 3>when I'm sure she does have to wake up very

0:35:56.314 --> 0:35:58.314
<v Speaker 3>early the next morning to cover that. I just had

0:35:58.394 --> 0:35:59.913
<v Speaker 3>no idea that morning TV was that.

0:35:59.874 --> 0:36:03.594
<v Speaker 5>Brutal Can I ask you a question earlier because I

0:36:03.634 --> 0:36:07.234
<v Speaker 5>wondered if this was a uniquely Australian cultural thing that

0:36:07.394 --> 0:36:10.114
<v Speaker 5>was like we kind of loved when Karl was drunk

0:36:10.154 --> 0:36:10.433
<v Speaker 5>on air.

0:36:10.954 --> 0:36:12.634
<v Speaker 2>We do talk about it a lot, we do talk

0:36:12.674 --> 0:36:13.674
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years ago it.

0:36:13.754 --> 0:36:16.554
<v Speaker 1>Was, but arguably it was his making, right, It's.

0:36:16.474 --> 0:36:19.274
<v Speaker 5>Kind of his making because it was like Alarican Australia's

0:36:19.314 --> 0:36:21.993
<v Speaker 5>the authenticity. It's like seeing your friend have a few

0:36:21.994 --> 0:36:24.913
<v Speaker 5>too many at a party or whatever. How would this

0:36:24.954 --> 0:36:28.074
<v Speaker 5>go down in the States. I'm wondering about the cultural difference.

0:36:28.154 --> 0:36:31.074
<v Speaker 5>If this was a US reporter, do you think that

0:36:31.594 --> 0:36:34.954
<v Speaker 5>viewers would be as accepting and gracious or do you

0:36:34.994 --> 0:36:35.913
<v Speaker 5>think they'd be like I.

0:36:35.834 --> 0:36:38.354
<v Speaker 3>Think the reason why everyone in the world forgave her

0:36:38.514 --> 0:36:42.314
<v Speaker 3>is because it does tap into what people, rightly or wrongly,

0:36:42.394 --> 0:36:44.953
<v Speaker 3>for better or for worse, think of Australians, which is.

0:36:44.914 --> 0:36:46.794
<v Speaker 1>That they travel the world, they have.

0:36:46.794 --> 0:36:50.034
<v Speaker 3>A good time doing it, and they let loose and

0:36:50.074 --> 0:36:52.954
<v Speaker 3>that is a national stereotype that has been exported. So

0:36:53.034 --> 0:36:55.754
<v Speaker 3>when people saw that, they were relieved that Australians were

0:36:55.794 --> 0:36:56.553
<v Speaker 3>exactly as they.

0:36:56.434 --> 0:36:57.194
<v Speaker 1>Imagine them to be.

0:36:58.434 --> 0:36:59.394
<v Speaker 2>And they're not wrong.

0:36:59.794 --> 0:37:00.433
<v Speaker 1>They're not wrong.

0:37:00.514 --> 0:37:02.954
<v Speaker 2>Lemonchella, that's what she would have been drinking, right, Milan,

0:37:03.114 --> 0:37:04.074
<v Speaker 2>that would be surely.

0:37:04.234 --> 0:37:07.433
<v Speaker 5>And we've all had We've done live shows or I've

0:37:07.514 --> 0:37:11.554
<v Speaker 5>done live television where no, no, no, where people have

0:37:11.674 --> 0:37:13.873
<v Speaker 5>been offered a drink before and someone's had a beer

0:37:13.994 --> 0:37:16.274
<v Speaker 5>or a wine or whatever, and I've been like, that

0:37:16.514 --> 0:37:17.234
<v Speaker 5>is dangerous.

0:37:17.354 --> 0:37:19.234
<v Speaker 2>Oh Graham Norton show, they always have wine.

0:37:19.314 --> 0:37:21.194
<v Speaker 5>I'm like, I would not put it on my tongue

0:37:21.234 --> 0:37:23.674
<v Speaker 5>because I just know I would forget.

0:37:23.674 --> 0:37:26.274
<v Speaker 2>I was on antibiotics or something.

0:37:25.954 --> 0:37:28.354
<v Speaker 5>And then it would react and then I do something

0:37:28.354 --> 0:37:29.954
<v Speaker 5>really weird.

0:37:30.914 --> 0:37:33.594
<v Speaker 3>Bar soap is dying, and I, for one, I'm not

0:37:33.594 --> 0:37:35.393
<v Speaker 3>happy about it. First of all, I need to know,

0:37:35.554 --> 0:37:37.913
<v Speaker 3>are you a bar soap or a liquid soap user?

0:37:37.994 --> 0:37:39.593
<v Speaker 4>Jesse, I love me a bar soap.

0:37:39.874 --> 0:37:41.554
<v Speaker 1>Oh good, Okay, I do, Polly.

0:37:42.034 --> 0:37:44.754
<v Speaker 2>I have very strong opinions about the divide bar soap

0:37:44.834 --> 0:37:46.234
<v Speaker 2>for shower, hand soap for sink.

0:37:46.674 --> 0:37:48.593
<v Speaker 1>Oh interesting. I want to hear more about that well.

0:37:48.754 --> 0:37:51.474
<v Speaker 3>Over the coming decade, bar soap is projected to become

0:37:51.714 --> 0:37:53.034
<v Speaker 3>near extinct, which.

0:37:52.874 --> 0:37:54.194
<v Speaker 1>I feel very sad about.

0:37:54.594 --> 0:37:57.714
<v Speaker 3>Body wash has come to dominate the personal hygiene market,

0:37:57.754 --> 0:38:00.714
<v Speaker 3>and this is in part because bar soap uses skew

0:38:00.874 --> 0:38:05.194
<v Speaker 3>Old people over fifty five love some bar soap, whereas

0:38:05.274 --> 0:38:07.114
<v Speaker 3>eighteen to thirty four year olds think.

0:38:06.954 --> 0:38:10.154
<v Speaker 1>That it's dirty and which it's not, which it's not.

0:38:10.634 --> 0:38:13.473
<v Speaker 3>I need to play you a grab that I think

0:38:13.594 --> 0:38:16.234
<v Speaker 3>is to blame for why young people think that soap

0:38:16.314 --> 0:38:18.754
<v Speaker 3>is dirty and awful. And it comes from a show

0:38:18.794 --> 0:38:21.473
<v Speaker 3>called Friends. You may have heard of it. And here

0:38:21.554 --> 0:38:25.714
<v Speaker 3>is Joey spreading lies about bar soap to Chandler.

0:38:26.034 --> 0:38:28.514
<v Speaker 7>Why can't we use the same toothbrush, but we can.

0:38:28.434 --> 0:38:29.914
<v Speaker 3>Use the same soap.

0:38:30.154 --> 0:38:33.274
<v Speaker 8>Because soap is soap, it's self cleaning.

0:38:34.914 --> 0:38:36.993
<v Speaker 5>All right, Well, next time you take a shower, think

0:38:36.994 --> 0:38:39.354
<v Speaker 5>about the last thing I wash, and the first thing

0:38:39.434 --> 0:38:40.034
<v Speaker 5>you wash.

0:38:41.194 --> 0:38:43.834
<v Speaker 1>Soap is soap. Chandler is exactly right.

0:38:43.914 --> 0:38:46.194
<v Speaker 3>Some scientists with too much time on their hands put

0:38:46.234 --> 0:38:49.554
<v Speaker 3>some e coli, some actual e coli, on soap to

0:38:49.594 --> 0:38:52.074
<v Speaker 3>see whether it would get contaminated when people used it

0:38:52.114 --> 0:38:52.553
<v Speaker 3>on their hands.

0:38:52.554 --> 0:38:55.393
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, it didn't. Because soap is soap.

0:38:55.194 --> 0:38:57.114
<v Speaker 4>It is self cleaning. It can't grow.

0:38:57.154 --> 0:38:59.514
<v Speaker 1>It's like vaginas and ovens. It's self cleaning.

0:38:59.674 --> 0:39:02.394
<v Speaker 4>Exactly exactly right. Isn't it funny?

0:39:02.394 --> 0:39:02.554
<v Speaker 6>Though?

0:39:02.594 --> 0:39:06.314
<v Speaker 5>Because I kind of agree with Holly. There in the shower.

0:39:07.514 --> 0:39:08.314
<v Speaker 1>A bar of soap.

0:39:08.594 --> 0:39:12.873
<v Speaker 5>That is, because I have a sense that it's the

0:39:12.914 --> 0:39:14.554
<v Speaker 5>most efficient way to get clean. Yeah.

0:39:14.634 --> 0:39:17.314
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't use the bar of soap on

0:39:17.354 --> 0:39:19.114
<v Speaker 2>my body. I lather it up in my hands to

0:39:19.154 --> 0:39:21.393
<v Speaker 2>get a really good lather going. And it's such an

0:39:21.434 --> 0:39:24.674
<v Speaker 2>elegant des like it literally disappears when it's finished. Yes,

0:39:24.994 --> 0:39:27.074
<v Speaker 2>be better. But when you're washing your hands, which you

0:39:27.114 --> 0:39:30.074
<v Speaker 2>do more often generally speaking, at the sink was I

0:39:30.114 --> 0:39:32.913
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be always reaching and it always goes

0:39:32.914 --> 0:39:34.154
<v Speaker 2>a bit smaggy on the side of.

0:39:34.154 --> 0:39:35.634
<v Speaker 1>The thing it does make.

0:39:35.794 --> 0:39:38.514
<v Speaker 5>But then I was reading that if you have even

0:39:38.554 --> 0:39:42.433
<v Speaker 5>like your fancy soap with your pump, apparently pump way

0:39:42.474 --> 0:39:46.194
<v Speaker 5>dirtier than yourself cleaning soap because you've got your germs.

0:39:45.834 --> 0:39:52.154
<v Speaker 3>On that don't tell all the people with very sop soapsp.

0:39:50.154 --> 0:39:52.194
<v Speaker 2>Bottle with some gamart soap inside.

0:39:53.434 --> 0:39:56.674
<v Speaker 5>But even like environmentally, the idea that we've all gone

0:39:56.794 --> 0:39:59.994
<v Speaker 5>to these kind of plastic tubs.

0:39:59.634 --> 0:40:02.474
<v Speaker 1>Petro chemicals slash, yes.

0:40:02.674 --> 0:40:04.354
<v Speaker 4>We just except now are in the shower.

0:40:04.874 --> 0:40:06.794
<v Speaker 5>This article that we read about it, which for some

0:40:06.874 --> 0:40:08.474
<v Speaker 5>reason and was ten thousand words.

0:40:08.274 --> 0:40:12.873
<v Speaker 2>I was like, this is the longest dissertation on bar

0:40:13.074 --> 0:40:14.154
<v Speaker 2>so It went into.

0:40:13.914 --> 0:40:16.114
<v Speaker 5>The history of bar soap, and I was like, look,

0:40:16.154 --> 0:40:17.194
<v Speaker 5>I just have a feeling about it.

0:40:17.194 --> 0:40:18.794
<v Speaker 1>I don't need the history. It was in sleeate if

0:40:18.834 --> 0:40:19.913
<v Speaker 1>anyone wants to read it.

0:40:19.994 --> 0:40:22.674
<v Speaker 5>But it was saying even at hotels they don't have

0:40:22.754 --> 0:40:23.714
<v Speaker 5>it anymore.

0:40:23.794 --> 0:40:25.554
<v Speaker 4>A lot of places just have it on the wall.

0:40:25.634 --> 0:40:28.714
<v Speaker 3>Now hotels are apparently building in that kind of bolted

0:40:28.794 --> 0:40:29.394
<v Speaker 3>on soap.

0:40:29.434 --> 0:40:30.994
<v Speaker 1>That makes me feel like I'm in a prison.

0:40:31.554 --> 0:40:33.194
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you don't know how it smells to you.

0:40:33.234 --> 0:40:33.634
<v Speaker 1>Pump it?

0:40:33.834 --> 0:40:36.154
<v Speaker 4>No, I like with a I can smell it before

0:40:36.154 --> 0:40:36.473
<v Speaker 4>I run.

0:40:36.554 --> 0:40:39.433
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but here's the obvious, the obvious pushback to soap

0:40:39.434 --> 0:40:41.474
<v Speaker 2>in the shower right now, if you live with someone

0:40:41.474 --> 0:40:44.873
<v Speaker 2>grubby or people who are grubby, it's the hair that

0:40:45.074 --> 0:40:47.553
<v Speaker 2>is the thing that people get upset about. And there

0:40:47.554 --> 0:40:49.634
<v Speaker 2>are people in the world, and I believe that most

0:40:49.634 --> 0:40:52.154
<v Speaker 2>of them possibly called men. I don't want a stereotype

0:40:52.234 --> 0:40:54.594
<v Speaker 2>who might well use the bar on their body, who

0:40:54.634 --> 0:40:57.714
<v Speaker 2>get air or dirt in it, and then it feels icky, right,

0:40:58.114 --> 0:41:00.914
<v Speaker 2>And if you're living with people you're not that intimate

0:41:00.954 --> 0:41:04.873
<v Speaker 2>with to Joey's point, it does feel a bit like

0:41:04.914 --> 0:41:06.634
<v Speaker 2>sharing a toothbrush, even though it isn't.

0:41:07.154 --> 0:41:10.473
<v Speaker 5>That is why the secret is that you need your

0:41:10.474 --> 0:41:12.594
<v Speaker 5>own bar of soap, even though it's not.

0:41:12.594 --> 0:41:13.473
<v Speaker 2>With your name on it.

0:41:13.554 --> 0:41:17.834
<v Speaker 5>Well, we have always used separate soap because I agree

0:41:17.874 --> 0:41:18.194
<v Speaker 5>that the.

0:41:19.674 --> 0:41:21.434
<v Speaker 4>Separate soap like a bar.

0:41:21.674 --> 0:41:24.274
<v Speaker 3>Two separate bar soaps, or are you in a bar

0:41:24.394 --> 0:41:25.834
<v Speaker 3>soap liquid soapole?

0:41:25.914 --> 0:41:28.433
<v Speaker 5>We are in two separate bars. And when we buy it,

0:41:28.434 --> 0:41:30.433
<v Speaker 5>it's like, here's your bar of soap, and this is

0:41:32.634 --> 0:41:36.513
<v Speaker 5>it's not it just isn't covered in hair, so it's

0:41:36.594 --> 0:41:40.034
<v Speaker 5>like mine will sit somewhere different. I know that that's mine,

0:41:40.554 --> 0:41:42.034
<v Speaker 5>but I don't want to pick up like the little

0:41:42.074 --> 0:41:43.993
<v Speaker 5>slither with like just.

0:41:44.114 --> 0:41:45.434
<v Speaker 4>A little round hairs on it.

0:41:46.274 --> 0:41:49.834
<v Speaker 2>That there's that guy like he will open the toothpaste tube.

0:41:51.314 --> 0:41:54.154
<v Speaker 4>Mate, you can afford you.

0:41:55.034 --> 0:41:58.234
<v Speaker 2>I do appreciate the free galley. It never goes astray.

0:41:58.274 --> 0:42:01.394
<v Speaker 8>But things aren't actually that bad, and so I'm often

0:42:01.434 --> 0:42:06.594
<v Speaker 8>going into the bathroom the tastes they got everywhere. The

0:42:06.714 --> 0:42:09.594
<v Speaker 8>kids are like, why does that do that?

0:42:14.234 --> 0:42:16.114
<v Speaker 2>I believe that is all we have time for on

0:42:16.114 --> 0:42:18.634
<v Speaker 2>this Monday's when we are out loud on the number

0:42:18.634 --> 0:42:19.953
<v Speaker 2>one podcast in the nation.

0:42:21.794 --> 0:42:22.274
<v Speaker 1>Do you think.

0:42:22.154 --> 0:42:25.554
<v Speaker 3>Hamish is a sparal liquid so so true?

0:42:25.834 --> 0:42:27.634
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's always in his house, so they've got

0:42:27.634 --> 0:42:28.754
<v Speaker 1>the fancy it's.

0:42:28.954 --> 0:42:30.953
<v Speaker 2>Nice bar soap. It smells great, right.

0:42:31.914 --> 0:42:34.954
<v Speaker 4>I think you can get like designer bars a state.

0:42:35.114 --> 0:42:38.714
<v Speaker 3>Do you know that brand fancy? It's Australian and California.

0:42:38.754 --> 0:42:41.314
<v Speaker 3>It's very fancy. And I went to his estate for

0:42:41.354 --> 0:42:44.513
<v Speaker 3>a story and he started his very fancy brand making

0:42:44.554 --> 0:42:47.834
<v Speaker 3>the most beautiful bar soaps from just herbs he'd gathered

0:42:47.834 --> 0:42:48.354
<v Speaker 3>in the garden.

0:42:48.874 --> 0:42:52.154
<v Speaker 5>That should be Maybe our treat for being number one

0:42:52.194 --> 0:42:56.274
<v Speaker 5>now is that maybe we don't need the home brand generic.

0:42:57.314 --> 0:43:00.554
<v Speaker 5>Maybe we should buy ourselves and really fancy bodies.

0:43:00.834 --> 0:43:03.434
<v Speaker 1>What about like a branded Muma. You're out loud soap?

0:43:03.554 --> 0:43:06.994
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, bring it on, Haron.

0:43:07.274 --> 0:43:11.674
<v Speaker 4>That can be my maternity leave project. Yes, yes, yes,

0:43:11.794 --> 0:43:12.154
<v Speaker 4>I like that.

0:43:12.394 --> 0:43:13.674
<v Speaker 1>You needed a project.

0:43:14.514 --> 0:43:16.114
<v Speaker 2>We can call it don't want to get bored. We

0:43:16.154 --> 0:43:20.634
<v Speaker 2>can call it number one. So anyway, thank you out

0:43:20.674 --> 0:43:22.594
<v Speaker 2>louders for being here with us this Monday, and thank

0:43:22.634 --> 0:43:24.194
<v Speaker 2>you to our amazing team for helping us put the

0:43:24.234 --> 0:43:26.393
<v Speaker 2>show together. As you've heard from me and She and

0:43:26.434 --> 0:43:28.354
<v Speaker 2>Amelia will be back in your ears tomorrow with a

0:43:28.434 --> 0:43:31.474
<v Speaker 2>very special subscriber episode. Jesse and I, we'll see you

0:43:31.474 --> 0:43:32.074
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday.

0:43:32.314 --> 0:43:34.594
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye.

0:43:39.074 --> 0:43:41.994
<v Speaker 5>Mamma Mayer acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on

0:43:42.034 --> 0:43:43.754
<v Speaker 5>which we have recorded this podcast.